Slashdot Mirror


Google Launches SMS Search Service

jSpectre writes "Google's been busy introducing a lot of new things this week. The latest, a SMS search service. SMS a message to 46645 (googl) and find local business listings, product prices, dictionary definitions, and more. Go Google!"

60 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. I was wondering how they'd search my SMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it's a search VIA SMS, which makes a lot more sense.

    1. Re:I was wondering how they'd search my SMS by zaxios · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering how they'd search my SMS

      In Soviet Russia, Google searches YOUr, um, SMS. D'oh!

    2. Re:I was wondering how they'd search my SMS by aussie_a · · Score: 2

      I was getting ready to say "alright, everyone's right. Google is after people's personal information and this is clearly an invasion of privacy, they ARE evil" and then I realised the heading was misleading :)

  2. woohoo! by NightDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, now i can search for pictures of naked women ANYWHERE!

    --
    -ND
    1. Re:woohoo! by stateofmind · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know.. ASCII porn doesn't do much for me. :)

    2. Re:woohoo! by El · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but viewing pictures of nekid wimmin on your mobile phone with it's postage stamp screen is liable to make you go blind...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:woohoo! by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      (o)(o) ...Na, it's just not the same.

    4. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      (*)(.) - Janet Jackson

    5. Re:woohoo! by HitByASquirrel · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you're viewing pictures of naked women with a postage-stamp screen i doubt its the action of watching thats making you go blind.

    6. Re:woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in my day we had to print our porn on 30x8 punch cards, and we liked it.

  3. Google aren't 1337 any more... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    The latest, a SMS search service. SMS a message to 46645 (googl) and find local business listings, product prices, dictionary definitions, and more. Go Google!"

    If google were 1337, their sms number would be 600613.

    1. Re:Google aren't 1337 any more... by BenVis · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as I can still use this google will always be 1337.

      --
      "Preceded by itself yields falsehood" preceded by itself yields falsehood.
    2. Re:Google aren't 1337 any more... by Wakkow · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would they want their SMS to be "boobie"? I think you're thinking of a different kind of search engine...

    3. Re:Google aren't 1337 any more... by Aroma+7herapy · · Score: 4, Funny
      which reminds me of the new nation-wide info phone# for the police in the Netherlands.

      It's 0900-8844, thus 0900-TUIG, which translates in 0900-SCUM..

      Coulnd't help thinking that there is at least _one_ cop in holland who has a sense of humour...

  4. Will it be able to understand messages like.. by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 4, Funny

    whr can i g3t sum t13 f00d?

  5. This may be king of mobile service offerings. by Negadin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This (or something like this) may be huge as people become more dependant on their mobile phones.

    No one wants to navigate some funky mobile web page looking for things like numbers, addresses or other things. People want instant information easily.

    SMS is pretty easy to understand - send a message and interpet the results. No clunky (and inconsistant) navigation problems.

    Heck - mobile mfg's (or OS designers) could put a search service into their phone that could utilize google's offerings automatically.

    1. Re:This may be king of mobile service offerings. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe so, but every time I use the SMS messaging on my Verizon phone (Motorola T720) I get the feeling that the user interface was designed by a complete moron. Sending to a number requires tapping each number 4 times since it defaults to alphanumeric mode. Just getting to the right screen requires navigating around multiple menus with the stupid circular arrow button.

      Right
      Down
      Select
      44446666666644445555
      OK

      OK
      Done
      Yes

      Deleting a message is similarly a multi-step operation. And God forbid you should get a message while you're trying to read another one.

      Do all phones suck this bad? My old StarTAC had a fairly simple interface, but it didn't have all the features.

    2. Re:This may be king of mobile service offerings. by ewg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use a nifty Sony Ericsson P800. It has a very usable (for a phone) handwriting recognition system.

      My friends ask why I use mixed case and punctuation in my text messages. The truth is it's just the most natural and easy way to enter them on the P800. You never even use the number keys.

      I sent about two dozen queries to Google SMS today, trying everything out. This is not a chore with such a nice text-entry system.

      --
      org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  6. Slashdotting Google with my cell phone by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure Google will be able to handle it. But I wonder what Verizon & co will think about the sudden spike in SMS activity?

    Probably, they'll be thinking about the 12c they're getting from me for each one -- 10 for the outgoing, 2 for the incoming. Crap. Well, it's better than the $1.50 (or so) every time my wife decides to call 411. Drives me nuts when she does that...

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Slashdotting Google with my cell phone by bunyip · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Probably, they'll be thinking about the 12c they're getting from me for each one -- 10 for the outgoing, 2 for the incoming. Crap. Well, it's better than the $1.50 (or so) every time my wife decides to call 411. Drives me nuts when she does that...

      Very interesting. Could Google have partnered with the phone company to get their slice of your 12 cents? Anybody know of other companies that moght have already offered services like this?

      Alan.

    2. Re:Slashdotting Google with my cell phone by tool462 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have signed up with a website that provides SMS messages with traffic updates. Since I have a long commute, it's handy to get notification that a major accident has occurred on my route home, so I can work around it. However, my (former) wireless provider--the always wonderful AT&T Wireless--decided that these SMS messages were spam, assumably because of the volume. They now block the IP address that the website is sending the messages from, despite the company's repeated attempts to correct the situation and many customer complaints. We'll see how they respond to this new spike in usage.

    3. Re:Slashdotting Google with my cell phone by eae · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SMS:es are sent using signaling, rather than over a dedicated communications channel, like voice and data.
      Thus there is very little overhead and theres no real limit of the number of messages that can be sent simultaneously (like there is for voice/data channels), and thats also why there's a 160 char limit.

  7. A natural progression by saddino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Google is clearly aiming to be the information center for the connected/wired world, which makes perfect sense: after realizing that Google's value is its sheer amount of content, any service that brings people to that content is going to be pursued.

    I bet, eBay and Amazon, with similar giant demographic and e-commerce content won't be too far behind (e.g. the "price check" feature is tailor made for Amazon).

    1. Re:A natural progression by Fortress · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Google is clearly aiming to be the information center for the connected/wired world

      How long until we all complain about Google's monopoly of the Internet?

      I like Google, but it's now a publicly held company, meaning it's responsibilities are now to the shareholders. I fear that Google will be taken over by suits who want to use all of Google's information and influence for insidious purposes. It may be only a matter of time before the corporate culture changes from "Do no evil" to "Do what's profitable and hide it if it's evil."

  8. Ubiquitous Google by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google seems to be entering just about every area.

    Maybe their idea is to make sure that they are well established in several areas in a way that they are indispensable - the best search engine, good e-mail service, business tools and what not.

    That way, even if Google did risk crashing down, or if something did happen, people would like not that happening. That, and the benign image they portray, may work to their favour.

    I'm talking through my hat, ofcourse.

  9. Google branching off the internet? by Lifix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, google is branching out of the internet and into phones... well this certainly seems like a great idea. No one wants to spend the time to load up a web browser and web pages. This would make it alot easier to get google on phones, and this introduces google onto phones that can't get on the web, but can get sms's.

    --
    In nature, there are neither rewards or punishments, there are only consequences.
  10. More sms goodness by Greg@RageNet · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been playing around with SMS services for a while, since it's a great way to get information out to folks without them carrying any extra devices (everyone has cellphones now). I created a tool to send traffic reports via SMS for Californians, KnowTraffic and it'll even give you stock quotes if you send a message 'quote TICKER'. SMS is pretty powerful stuff that hasn't really been exploited much in the US yet.

    -- Greg

    --
    Slashdot, would a spell-checker for posting be too much to ask? It's not rocket science!
  11. Free? by Gaima · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With Google becoming a "proper business" now I'm actually quite amazed they're not charging for this. I would.
    I know it doesn't cost them much, you pay for the outgoing and incoming messages after all, but would you miss the cost of one extra message per search? Ignoring special deals, and inter-network rates, that's about 12p in the UK.
    Could probably even generate a higher per search revenue stream than the ads.
    Seems like a natural, and non-evil, way to make some money to me...

    1. Re:Free? by seizer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not sure how the charging structure works in the USA, but most GSM networks in the world charge a fixed termination fee for an SMS message entering their network (all UK networks have agreed on 3p, which is why you can't get a better rate (or if you can, it'll be a loss leader).

      With high traffic numbers, you can usually arrange a profit sharing deal with the provider of your services, so if Google's smart (and they are) they'll figure out a way to take a cut of the revenue. That's how the UK's "free" ISPs took off - Freeserve and the like simply said "we will generate X million minutes of phone calls a month, who'll give us a cut".

    2. Re:Free? by Blue+Mushroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the reasons google is the internet search god is precisely because they offer so much truely useful functionality for free to the user. If they charged for this, yes, they would make money off of it. Will it ever become a killer cellphone app if they do charge for it? No, I don't believe so. The true value of providing this service is to drive the word google that much deeper into the minds of the users. Providing so many awesome services to people for free also builds customer loyalty, something they will desperately need when microsoft really starts playing dirty (well, more like extra super more than usual dirty) to steal google's market share.

      --

      "Humanity lives and dies by its capabilities of communication, or lack thereof."

  12. Google won't be another Netscape by ShatteredDream · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google learned from Netscape's mistakes and instead of going to the government crying about MSN is constantly working on beating Microsoft to new markets in aways that tie the new markets back to Google's old original base. Knowing how competitive Google is, one would think that Microsoft, which talked about buying them out or competing directly against them, would just accept Google's existance and work with them to save money. At the rate Google is going, it'll probably be the one battle that Microsoft can't win.

  13. So much for 411. by d3ity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like 411 just got outdated. Now I can get a phone number and address for anyone via SMS. And a text message costs what? less than 5 cents? vs a 2 dollar call to information?

  14. Yeah, but it's nothing that new really... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People have been googling from WAP phones for years now.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Yeah, but it's nothing that new really... by igrp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yup, I ditched my cell phone provider's WAP homepage in favor of Google's a year and a half ago (I still have a bunch of portal subcategories bookmarked though).

      I don't really use WAP all that much since I usually have a WiFi-enabled PDA with me and a networked computer within 100 yards (and that's the outside figure). But it's a pretty useful service when you're on the road and don't have luxury of IEEE 802.11 coverage.

      Google's interface works really well on cell phones. They even have a system called "Google Numbers" (IIRC) which is basically a T9 type of system (you don't hit the #2 key twice to get a "b" character -- you just input numbers and let Google figure out what you mean). The interface is pretty slick and it works well even on a small, low-resolution cell phone screen.

      The problem is, most other websites just don't. I realize there's really not a whole lot Google can do about it though. That's why these days, I usually don't even bother using WAP for anything except checking sports scores and headlines. It's just easier to use my cell phone and PDA (the only thing I use Bluetooth for these days -- and it rocks).

  15. Are they evil yet ? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
    *eyes on watch*

    "I think it's time for Google to go evil in 3...2...1..."

  16. Re:Outside USA by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative
    Try http://www.google.com/, or if you've only got an older phone: wap.google.com.

    SMS is so 1990s for the rest of the world, I guess that's why this in North America only, where its still a gee-whiz thing. I've been using google from my phone for at least 4 years now. A few kB of GPRS is far cheaper than a couple of SMS messages too.

  17. Re:Not knowing what to say, I sent it 'pizza' by ornil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing that's missing is the ability to find where you are. So you actually have to tell it your address. However, the phone company obviously knows where you are, and I personally wouldn't mind if it communicated this information to Google upon my request.

    For those concerned about privacy, I'd simply make it opt-in, i.e. phone company messages you the first time you do this, and asks to reply if you want to enable Google/some other guy (identified by their phone number) to see this information.
    The phone company then always attaches your address when you message this number.

  18. Doesn't SMS cost money for in/out? by brendanoconnor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do not use my cellphone for much of anything except receiving calls and calling out. Does sending and receiving an sms cost money? If so that could add up. I mean, when I search google, sometimes I do not pick the right wording, and I get bad results, whilst other times I pick the right wording. A bad series of wording could cost me several out goings, and maybe since data has to be transmitted back, some incomings as well.

    Correct me if I am wrong but this sounds like a good way nickel and dime the SMS users. Although they did send it. Oh well.

    Brendan

    1. Re:Doesn't SMS cost money for in/out? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 2, Informative
      Right now I buy 300 msgs a month for $2.99. T-Mobile now has a deal of $9.99 a month for unlimited texts

      At $3 for each 300 msgs (I'm assuming this isn't only for the first 300), you could buy 900 for $9. So does the fact that you are instead spending $10 for unlimited messages really mean that you're going to use more than 900 a month?! That's 30 a day. There are people who really use that much?
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  19. Froogle price checks the killer app by ewg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Froogle price checks are the killer app here.

    Standing in the middle of a retail store, you can gauge pricing versus online retailers.

    Somewhere, Alan Greenspan is smiling.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  20. Google SMS privacy policy by SlyDe · · Score: 4, Informative
    (Ok, I know, shameless karma whoring....)
    http://www.google.com/sms/privacy.html

    Information that we collect and how we use it

    When you send a message to Google SMS, we log an encrypted version of the incoming phone number, the wireless carrier associated with the number, and the date and time of the transaction. We use this data to analyze the message traffic in order to operate, develop and improve our services. Google will never rent or sell your phone number to any third party, nor will we use your phone number to initiate a call or SMS message to you without your permission. Your wireless carrier and other service providers also collect data about your SMS usage, and their practices are governed by their own privacy policies.

  21. Re:These guys do it too... by Coming+soon! · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...the press piece.

  22. Google's doing all kinds of stuff by fawlty154 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google labs http://labs.google.com/ shows all kinds of interesting stuff Google is cooking up.

  23. Like many Google technologies by bubba451 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Like many Google technologies, they'll probably put it out there to see if it sticks before thinking about making money from it. That's pretty much what's happened with Google News, Orkut, Gmail, etc.

    And even if they never charge for it, they're reinforcing the notion of Google as the search king, which keeps people coming to google.com.

  24. I got some really weird responses by digid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sent the message "define hello" and got the following response in two seperate messages:

    "(1of2)Glossary * Hello: Help me please Here Holy man Hot Hotel
    How are you? How much is it? Ahlan Aounni affak Hna Shaikh Skhoun Hamy Funak Labass Alek"

    "(2of2)Bshhall Yisswa hada"

    No Joke

  25. Re:But the burning question for /.ers remains... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it's a burning question ... ... well, whomever you last laid wasn't telling you the truth when he/she said "but it's all cleared up now!"

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  26. Re:Not knowing what to say, I sent it 'pizza' by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the UK some phone companies already do this as part of their basic service.

    You go to the WAP screen, select 'food','pizza' and you get a list of all the pizza places nearby.

    I've used it for taxis, ATMs, etc. it's really handy.

  27. The end of the pub quiz as we know it? by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or will they just become fastest googler contests?

  28. Wow. Works well by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Informative
    I have unlimited text messages - so I sent a few. Worked EXACTLY as I would expect.

    Woah. I'll be using this one...

    -Ben

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  29. Macros for cell phones? by rafikki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What do you think the odds are of some cell phones makers starting to introduce a simplified interface for this? That might be a possibility for Google to make some money, partnering with makers to slap the Goole trademark on their phones. Normally someone might have to pay to put their label or trademark on someone else's product, but with Google's name-brand recognition...

  30. Flight information by DarthBart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can't wait till they get real time flight information into it. Nothing like being able to SMS "COA123" and get the flight's location and ETA based on what's coming in from the FAA data feeds.

  31. FAQ by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the FAQ


    Does Google SMS work everywhere? Can I find pizza restaurants in Palermo?


    Right now, Google SMS only works in the U.S. We're working hard to make it available when and wherever you're on the go. In the meantime, how about a little slice of heaven in Little Italy? (try 'pizza 10013')

  32. Re:Not knowing what to say, I sent it 'pizza' by mibus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Without triangulation of the signal (which is alot more manual in real life than TV makes it out to be), you can only get a result from knowing what base you're connected to, which is so inaccurate it's hardly a privacy issue.

    (In most residential areas around where I live, you'd get like 5km accuracy... but I've seen it be about 40km away*!).

    * It was a clear sunny day, the phone managed to get line-of-sight 50km across water to another base which just barely managed to be stronger than one on the other side of the hill we were on).

  33. Does *not* work on Verizon by Dr.+Mortimer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I noticed that I got no result replies on my Verizon phone when I searched for "pizza 60603". I called Verizon and spoke with a lead SMS/data tech to ask why it didn't work. They said that they do not support this and that they would not unless they entered into some sort of formal contract with Google. My big question is: what does it take for Verizon to actually give something useful to its users for no extra charge?!

  34. Pizza in Canada! by Equis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I typed in "pizza 48201" to find the Domino's around the corner here in Detroit. It gave me three results in WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CANADA.

    I wonder if they deliver...

  35. SMS Alerts by manmanic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems like an obvious crossover to me... Google could combine this kind of SMS service with the search alerting concept to provide regular alerts of information that would be useful on a cellphone - price reductions, new shops opening - and I'm sure later on there will be traffic, weather, etc...

  36. Re:Outside US... by apesaga · · Score: 2, Informative

    SMS shortcodes are only valid on certain networks - the ones you pay for usually. For example, here in the UK it costs around £150 per month per network for a dedicated shortcode. If you were only interested in targeting customers on one particular network you would only pay for a shortcode on that network. So, outside the US this is unlikely to work as Google won't have activated their code on any networks other than those in the US. It's not like you can +44 (or whatever) a shortcode to access it internationally.

  37. Re:Outside USA by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unfortunately not. 1MB of GPRS is $3 a month

    So how much are 6500 SMS messages going to cost you?

  38. Re:Not knowing what to say, I sent it 'pizza' by Khazunga · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can triangulate automatically, based on signal strength of the various bases you're connected to. Vodafone here does that as a GPRS service of vehicle fleets. The accuracy is at least enough to identify the street you're in, so its definitely better than 5km.

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  39. Question by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2

    Does anyone already do this? It sounds like a winning little service.