Slashdot Mirror


Sinclair And Clones Computer Show

Anonymous Coward writes "The Sinclair ZX Spectrum seems to be alive and well with 'Your Sinclair' magazine being relaunched at WH Smiths newsagents, and according to this, there is a Spectrum and clones computer show in Norwich, England, (the other Sinclair formats and clones include the QL, SAM Coupe, Timex/Sinclair, ZX81, Z88 etc). It looks like it could be fun. I must get my Spectrum out and play some games."

218 comments

  1. ooh does anyone remember this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    When you're LISTing a program on the Speccy and it asks you to scroll go into extended mode and press a key... the screen scrolls up lots of garbage. Bug or easter egg?

    1. Re:ooh does anyone remember this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      does anyone remember this When you're LISTing a program on the Speccy and it asks you to scroll go into extended mode and press a key... the screen scrolls up lots of garbage. Bug or easter egg?

      I remember it every time I read Slashdot and constantly scroll lots of garbage on my screen.

    2. Re:ooh does anyone remember this by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Interesting

      or the all time favorite..

      poke 23659, 0

      or

      poke 23613, 0

      Scary that I can still remember them.

    3. Re:ooh does anyone remember this by network23 · · Score: 1
      Not easter.

      Chuckie.

  2. So... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who thought that T'zer was no hottie? That magazine was years ahead of its time, by the way...

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    1. Re:So... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      True... but she was a she, and in those days there weren't too many of them interested in computers!

  3. obligatory question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    does it run Linux?

    1. Re:obligatory question by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      I *did* write a task-scheduler for the Spectrum once, which could sequence eight different tasks. I incorporated something derived from it into some embedded controller code (running on a Z80) for a company that did, well, embedded stuff. I heard a bit later on, that the company had been bought by a large electronics manufacturer, and the simple scheduler I'd written while off my tits on magic mushrooms one night while I was in 6th year at high school, has since been incorporated into the braking system controllers of a very high-end automobile...

    2. Re:obligatory question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think the question should be:

      Does it run NetBSD?

    3. Re:obligatory question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in 6th year at high school, has since been incorporated into the braking system controllers of a very high-end automobile...

      So what you are saying is you brake for tits, and now a car brakes for high end tits? That is progress! You can't imagine how unsafe to look at tits when you are driving, and how much better it is for the car to make a valued judgement to stop so you can look at high end tits. This is progress!

    4. Re:obligatory question by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      So what you are saying is you brake for tits, and now a car brakes for high end tits? That is progress! You can't imagine how unsafe to look at tits when you are driving, and how much better it is for the car to make a valued judgement to stop so you can look at high end tits. This is progress!


      That's the power of Open Source for you...

  4. What fun! by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I must have a dozen Spectrums of various iterations kicking about here - including 2 of the early blue-key types complete with microdrives and microprinters.

    I even have a couple of 'docking bases' which allowed (IIRC) you to network up to 16 Speccys together in series.

    It just really suprises me that there is enough interest still going in the spectrum to actually warrant a magazine relaunch.

    'Back in the day' I used to own my spectrum primarily for gaming. The magazine to have was 'Crash' (complete with cover-mounted cassette). Now there was a real magazine; it wasn't even glossy ;)

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:What fun! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The docking bases were called "Interface 1" and were one of the most amazing hardware at the time. I also remember having a huge box housing a 3.5'' drive (oh yes!) and a composite monitor port - Opus Discovery I think it was called. The joys of loading a game in 3 seconds :->

      Also, please, Crash was vastly inferior to YS. It was not funny. YS was.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:What fun! by JimStoner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Always preferred Crash myself (not that it matters much after 20+ years). I always dug the cover art by Oliver Frey (I think was his name) - he also did the "the terminal man" comic strip inside. For a reminder... http://www.crashonline.org.uk/

    3. Re:What fun! by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it the 3" disks?

      (Actually 3"x3.5" or something like that).

      Things like the spectrum +3, Amstrad CPC etc used the 3" disk format; I forget the capacity now but it wasn't huge.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    4. Re:What fun! by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      I remember my first speccy (my first computer) - I had to save up my wages from a paper round, and then could only afford the 16K version. I couldn't make much use of the colour, as I only had a b/w tv set with a stick-on green overlay so it looked "professional" - yeah, I know ;-) Man I wrote so much code on that thing, starting with basic, and typing in whatever appeared in the weekly copies of whichever computer mags I could get hold of. Then moved on to assembler - and learning almost zen-like patience as my code would lock up the machine and I'd have to wait for a load back from tape again ;-) Wrote loads of games for people to play at school, and maybe wrote the first computer "demo" - it was a graphic demo that I painstakingly timed to sort of sync up with "Close to the Edge" by Art of noise ;-) The wierd thing was that it would only sync up the first time I booted the speccy, loaded the prog and ran it. If I re-ran it, it would run more slowly...

      Of course now even my mobile phone has 100 times the CPU power and 256 times as much RAM, but I was still glad to have been around when the early affordable home computers were born; when computer courses were all about programming and understanding how the machines worked instead of how to use Word and Excel in the MS sponsored "education" (or rather, training) of today.

    5. Re:What fun! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      No, you are confusing it with the abominable Amstrad made Spectrum +3. The Discovery had 3.5 inch, single sided single density, about 200Kb per disk irc...

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    6. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that URL!

      Ahhhh. Nostalga.

    7. Re:What fun! by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Suprisingly, in all my Speccy ownership, I never came across that format.

      Did they look just like the 'modern' (now legacy) 3.5" disks?

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    8. Re:What fun! by ploppy · · Score: 1

      The Opus Discovery 3.5" disks *were* the modern 3.5" disks. Of course in those days they had just been developed, that's why the disks were single sided, single density, rather than the later double sided double density capacities. The Opus Discovery disk could store 180K formated. Not very much these days but much more than the mircodrive's 85 - 100K and much faster and more reliable.

    9. Re:What fun! by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Once again, I forget the detail.....

      Weren't microdrive disks sequential-only? - The ones I have while being in good asthetic condition, must have stopped functioning many moons ago.

      You've seriously suprised me that the 3.5" standard started so early (I must have led a sheltered life ;) )

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    10. Re:What fun! by ploppy · · Score: 1

      When the Amstrad made Spectrum +3 came out, 3" disks were already an almost 'dead' technology, having been beaten by the superior 3.5" disks. 3.5" disks were "proper" disks with tracks, 3" disks used a single spiral track going from the outside of the disk to the inside. 3" disks had to be explicitly ejected and turned-around to use both sides, where true double sided capable drives were becoming available for 3.5" disks. 3.5" disks, as mentioned, were therefore obviously superior to the 3" disks.

      There was a claim in the Spectrum magazines at the time of the Amstrad Spectrum +3 release that Amstrad had done a deal with a manufacturer/distributor of 3" drives and had got a "job lot" at bargain basement prices. Though I don't know if there was any truth in this story, there was no technical reason to have used 3" disks.

    11. Re:What fun! by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      3 posts about 3" disks on the spectrum +3?

      Anyway, I'm sure the Amstrad PCW 9512 (the one with the daisywheel) had a two sided 3" disk drive, so you didn't have to turn the disk over. They were great machines, only limited in lifespan by the elastic band in the disk drive.

    12. Re:What fun! by ploppy · · Score: 1
      3 posts about 3" disks on the spectrum +3?

      Purely a coincidence AFAIK ... The network here for some reason slowed to a trickle for about 30 minutes. I tried to post the message three times and it timed out everytime.

    13. Re:What fun! by AstroByte · · Score: 1
      Yeah, they were sequential. They had one reel, containing a single continuous loop of tape. The tape was pulled out of the middle of the reel and wound back onto the outside. Supposedly it was made out of "industrial strength" video tape, but it explains why they were so unreliable. The tape must have been under considerable strain. It was also why they were so slow.

      If I remember, it would go round the loop 5 times, and if it still couldn't read it, it would give up, with the dreaded IO error :) You'd sit there listening to the tape going round, counting the passes with your fingers crossed. All the old tricks, like trying it in multiple drives, giving it a shake, or a wiggle when it was in the drive. You only lived with it because it was vastly better than cassette tapes. How many people today would put up with trying 3 or 4 times to load a game, each time with different volume settings?

      When I took my microdrives apart (to clean the rollers, etc.), the head looked suspiciously like a cassette player head, but I don't know if it was.

    14. Re:What fun! by mailtomomo · · Score: 0

      then you could fit a 3'5 drive in it by modifying the floppy cable (the only "signals" missing are mass).

    15. Re:What fun! by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      It seems a shame that my microdrive gear doesn't work anymore but its only too well known that computer gear doesn't have the working longevity of its casings.

      I do think though, that my gear would make a good 'static' museum exhibit ;)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    16. Re:What fun! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Of course now even my mobile phone has 100 times the CPU power and 256 times as much RAM, but I was still glad to have been around when the early affordable home computers were born; when computer courses were all about programming and understanding how the machines worked instead of how to use Word and Excel in the MS sponsored "education" (or rather, training) of today.


      Hmmm... maybe I went to the wrong school, but apart from Logo and a tiny bit of BASIC (maybe not even that), all the computer stuff we learned in school for at least a year was how to use the BBC Micro equivalents of Word and Excel.

      One of my teachers loved me - the other hated me - simply because I spent all of my time in those classes writing programs to do cool things instead of listening to them.

      I'm just glad they let me, otherwise I'd probably have committed suicide through boredom.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    17. Re:What fun! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      I had (still have) the strangest clone of ZX, it was called Byte made by some obscure electronics plant in a country called Moldova in Eastern Europe. The keyboard was made out of rubber that wore off and I had soddered by hand key-by-key a new keyboard taken from some electronic typewritter after I cut a whole in the case of the console to expose the contacts. I remember tuning the tape player for maximum gain, playing IKARI, and my all time favourite Stock Cars. I even made a special keypad to emulate a kempstone joystic just to play Sock Cars. I wrote my first assembler, pascal, C and of course BASIC program on it.

      That console was the biggest gift I had received from my parents. Years later I am a grad student in Comp Sci in U.S. but it all started back home with that ZX clone. Well that is my sappy and nostalgic story.

    18. Re:What fun! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      3" disks were available in a double sided version, the 8512 and 9512 PCW machines came with drives for them. I'm also not sure where you get the "spiral" thing, there were some custom "disk drive" units built during the mid-eighties that were like that, but the 3" disk was a regular, random access, tracks 'n' sectors, disk drive.

      The major issue with 3" disks were that they were more expensive than 3.5" disks. The enclosure, a solid plastic sleeve with various mechanical extras, was rather more complex and expensive than the 3.5"'s enclosure. In theory, the 3" was a more durable design, but the added expense, the fact the .5" didn't really translate into much of a more compact disk, and the fact the .5" arguably did reduce the amount of capacity in the future ("HD" double-sided 3" disks stored 720k, I don't think they ever got more capacity than that) meant they really weren't going to compete with 3.5" disks. 3.5" disks were "good enough", cheaper, and had more potential.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    19. Re:What fun! by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      I'm just glad they let me, otherwise I'd probably have committed suicide through boredom.

      You were blessed with good instructors then.

      Some 20+ years ago, when I was in my first CS class, any forays into "cool things" would be rewarded with a stern "That's NOT the assignment!"

      Yes, I was expelled from the class eventually...

    20. Re:What fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to hear the affect it had on your life.

      A lot of the best games programmers in the world began on that little beast, Clive Sinclair deserved his knighthood.

      There isn't an equivalent to it's ease of programming nowadays, especially at that price!

  5. What I find interesting by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    is why doesn't anyone massively manufacture faster CPUs basing their underlying design on the ZX Spectrum architecture which while being notably simple algorithmically (low count of transistor gates and intergate connections) would be significantly more effective considering the heat and power they would produce as compared to the legacy 386 architecture we use now. That might be something we all wait for: battery powered, silent PCs with no moving parts. Could that be the ironic future of computing: simplicity?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do.

    2. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are a numbers of Z80-compatible processors, still sold by the company that made the original processor: http://www.zilog.com/

    3. Re:What I find interesting by faragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simplicity, at GHz clock rates it is not enough. Let me explain it, on the KHz and MHz era was quite easy to have a "omnipresent" main clock signal, nowdays, at GHz clock rates that it is almost not possible to achieve: you have to do "sync on target" tricks, alas "hyper transport", "net burst", "usb", "1394", "serial ata", and other syncrhonization protocols. The GHz rate clocks are only feasible on small regions of a micro circuit die, as example, on your favourite GHz processor (say Intel's P4 or AMD's Opterons), there are a nightmare of clock arrangements.

      In the other hand, not all "uP in a library" can be scaled up to 500Mhz, i.e., as example, you can not push to 500Mhz a 4Mhz designed Z80, may be just up to 32 or 50Mhz.

      Simpler is good and nice, but the simplest isn't ;-)

    4. Re:What I find interesting by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      I think we'd all rather have a simple but modern architecture with a boat load of registers.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    5. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we'd all rather have a simple but modern architecture with a boat load of registers.

      Intel? Boatload of registers? You have *got* to be kidding! Do you know the architecture of MMIX? Now *that's* a boatload. But Intel? Please!

    6. Re:What I find interesting by Detritus · · Score: 1

      There are some relatively simple things you can do with multiphase clock generators to solve clock distribution problems. You can have each circuit block tied to one of many outputs from the clock generator. You select the phase based on the propagation delay of the clock line and local timing requirements. It's a way to precompensate for propagation delay across the chip. It may not get you to 1 GHz, but it scales better than a single clock.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:What I find interesting by rco3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What I find interesting...is why doesn't anyone massively manufacture faster CPUs basing their underlying design on the ZX Spectrum...

      Oh, I know this one! It's because they're all stupid, right?

      I'm certain that the engineers and scientists at Intel, AMD, VIA, Transmeta, Motorola, IBM, SGI, etc. (many of whom with EARNED Ph.D's) are all sitting around reading Slashdot so that they can harvest your pearls of wisdom, and learn from the master how to build faster microprocessors. If they would just clock a Z80 at 2 GHz, they could run BASIC programs REALLY fast!

      No, wait - that's not it. They're not building the fastest, most efficient architectures they can BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO. Same reason Microsoft won't release the secure version of Windows XP, and Linus won't allow a user-friendly version of Linux. They're deliberately denying YOU your god-given right to run small, efficient code at high speeds so that they can maintain control over your brainwaves... no?

      Oh, yeah. Maybe it's because IT'S NOT THAT SIMPLE, and pretending to have a Ph.D. doesn't actually confer any knowledge or intelligence. Hmm?

      Your post(s) smell of Amsterdam Vallon.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    8. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BECAUSE YOU'rE A FuKKING DUMASS ST00PID!!!!!#@%13

    10. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A desktop computer with a high clock speed and low transistor count on the processor would suffer more from over-heating, not less. More transistors with a lower clock speed may actually dissipate more heat (if you have a lot, lot, lot more transistors but only crank down the clock speed a bit) but the heat would be spread over a bigger die, so the actual die temperature would be lower. Plus the hot area of the package would be bigger (i.e. as big as the die) making it easier to get all that heat out onto a nice big heat sink or cool it with a huge fan.

      Besides, who the hell wants to play manic miner on a 4GHz ZX Spectrum with a 800 MHz FSB?? It was too bloody hard on the 4MHz Speccy. I used to hate that stupid game, it took longer to load off of a tape than it took me to die about 100 times.

    11. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like the 65C816. Or even the 6502.

      If you count 'zero page' as registers (no good reason not to), that's over 256 registers. And so easy to code for.

    12. Re:What I find interesting by mailtomomo · · Score: 0
    13. Re:What I find interesting by Lproven · · Score: 1

      There is.

      The Sprinter, from Peters Plus. OK, it's only 21MHz, but it's a modern Spectrum with ISA slots, a hard disk and so on.

      There's also the C-One, a modern Commodore 64.

      I'm sure there are more besides...

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    14. Re:What I find interesting by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Just what exactly was the 65816 actually USED in?
      I know it was used in the Apple IIGS I think but was that the only thing to use it?

    15. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they have - it's called RISC (e.g. ARM)

    16. Re:What I find interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but that is a physical solution, not a logical one. There is no logical solution to achieve 3GHz with a single logical clock on a modern uP die. Anyway, this is good, physic limits pushed engineers to design new transport protocols at high speeds. I can't imagine how we'll be able to syncronize a 50 or 100GHz data burst in the future... but, that song was on from 20 years ago, when speaking about hundred mega Hertz unbreakable limit was a topic ;-)

  6. Popularity? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This brings up a question that I've been wondering. Sinclair machines were very popular over in Europe, right? Could anyone tell me why they took off over there and not over here?

    Either way, neat show. Wish I could go.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Popularity? by modernbob · · Score: 1

      They did take off here. Timex marketed them. I remember seeing these in such places as Fred Meyer and many other dept stores. I had a few of these as they were cheap and easy to program. quality wasn't all that hot. I remember putting a 16K memory card on the extender and having issues with the thing overheating. This was my first case mod as I cut a big chunk of plastic out and went to norvac and bought a fan for it. Last one of these timex machines I had was used as a door stop some years ago in my office. Oh no, I've shown my age!

    2. Re:Popularity? by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Well I knew they were here, but they were huge in Europe right? I meant if they got so big there, why didn't they get up there with Commodore and Atari here in the states?

      Was it just that they came in too late (Commodore and Atari were already here, while they didn't have much stiff competition in Europe?). Or was it something else?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Popularity? by pesc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sinclair machines were very popular over in Europe, right? Could anyone tell me why they took off over there and not over here?

      The first machine I bought was a Sinclair ZX-80. I bought it because it was very inexpensive. It was the first complete system to sell for under 100 pounds, which was revolutionary cheap for the time.

      The circuitry was amazing. It had 1 KByte of memory which also serverd as video memory! I remember that someone crammed in a chess program into that. The original BASIC interpreter was 4K. (Why are all program so damned big nowadays?)

      To make the system very cheap, it had no dedicated video circuitry! You stored characters in RAM and ended each line with 0x76. (The less text you had on display, the less memory it used.) To display the text on the screen, you set a special bit in hardware and jumped to the RAM character buffer. The CPU would start to fetch instructions from the text buffer, but the hardware would clear all bits fed to the CPU (00=NOP). Instead the RAM output was fed to the BASIC ROM which now served as a character generator. When the end of line was reached, the 0x76 code was fed to the CPU which interprets that code as a HLT (halt) instruction. So no more bits were fed to the display until horizontal sync, which gave the CPU another interrupt. So with a minimum of 74xx logic gates video text could be generated at low cost and extremely low memory requirements. Of course, the screen went blank when executing BASIC code.

      It was an amazing machine and I have many fond memories playing with it. The schematics was included so you could do some hardware hacking as well.

      --

      )9TSS
    4. Re:Popularity? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

      Probably a combination of money (you only wanted a speccie if you were terminally broke) and the fact that "Uncle" Clive (Sir Clive Sinclair) was kind of famous in the UK. But, my first home computer was a VIC-20 (eventually when they were sort of dying I bought a QL, mainly because the guy sitting next to me did the UCSD p-system port for it :-;). Oh, and I had a pre-production 512K RAM
      card (somehow I forgot to return it when I left
      said company above (accidentally honest !)).
      (To those who know, adding the Sinclair RAM card
      made the machine 2x faster because it preferentially used the lower wait state memory you'd just added. For some benchmarks, the QL was about half of a Sage II (an 8MHz 68000 "super" micro)) with the added card. Without (bare 128K) it benchmarked like an ACT Apricot (Victor 9000ish to you US folk).

      But, Heck, be aware folks that travelling to my (parents) home city of Norwich is *not* fun. Has anyone fixed up the east rail lines yet so it doesn't take godzillion hours...

      (The M11/A11 is a well known death trap, although
      we used to have endless fun in the old days playing spot the Lotuses (in days gone by based at Hethel aerodrome) being road tested...

      If you go there (Norwich) be sure to check out the neat norman castle keep which is the museum, stranger's hall, and the cathedral (spire roughly the same height as a Saturn V rocket). If there's
      an organ recital *go*. You won't regret it.

      Cheers from (sunnier) Athens Greece.

    5. Re:Popularity? by spectecjr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because we have a culture

      Only if yeast infections count.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    6. Re:Popularity? by BenjyD · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Has anyone fixed up the east rail lines yet so it doesn't take godzillion hours...

      Two hours from Liverpool street, approximately forever from anywhere else.

    7. Re:Popularity? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here are some adverts from that era

      Applications for games and applications.

      It's amazing they managed to get a flight simulator (if a bit blocky) running.

      The $149 computer

      The $99.95 computer

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Popularity? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I don't think they where all that popular in Europe. In the UK yes but not in the rest of Europe. Part of it probably have to do with the fact that it where "English". They where cool machines but frankly the Vic-20 was better than then ZX-81s, the C-64 and Atari 800s where better than the Speccy, and the Amiga, and ST where better than the QL. Later the Microsoft/Intel monster killed the all the interesting home computers. Intel/Microsoft created the Kudzu of computers.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:Popularity? by Zangief · · Score: 1

      The circuitry was amazing. It had 1 KByte of memory which also serverd as video memory! I remember that someone crammed in a chess program into that. The original BASIC interpreter was 4K. (Why are all program so damned big nowadays?)

      Sheesh...They have to fit all those bugs and security vulnerabilities somewhere!!!

    10. Re:Popularity? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Why are all program so damned big nowadays?

      Because they do a damned sight more, that's why. I had a Spectrum - one of the original rubber-keyed 16KB models. Sure it was great, but I'll stick with my 2.4GHz PC and 1/2gig of RAM, thanks, at least until I can upgrade.

    11. Re:Popularity? by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I own a couple of C-64s, a 48K Spectrum, a TS-2068, a PC-8300, a 130XE Atari, and QL (yes, I lived on both sides of the Atlantic). I have also programmed on a ZX-81, a VIC-20 and an Atari 800XL. My all time favorite is the Spectrum. Somehow it was just a lot more satisfying of a machine than any of the others (the 800XL would be second). Maybe it was the time, maybe it was the associated culture, I don't know but I still love my Spectrum while I don't think much about the other machines.

      You are absolutely right about the kudzu of computers. I am not a fan of Apple (I think the marketing emphasizes pretentiousness and, for me, the systems don't justify the extra expense) but I greatly appreciate their doing something different. In the Good Old Days (tm) there was another layer of beauty in each machine to appreciate. We were much closer to the metal and each machine really had its own personality.

    12. Re:Popularity? by Lproven · · Score: 1

      Because in much of Europe people had - and have - much less disposable income than in the USA. Apple made the first personal computer for under $1000 and it was a huge hit - there. Too expensive here. So "Sinkers" made the first personal computer for under £100 - and became a millionaire.

      They didn't sell so well in the USA because they were too cheap. Why buy a limited $200 Timex-Sinclair computer when you could have a much better $400 Atari or Commodore? In the UK, the £200-£300 machines were too expensive for most kids...

      It's all about money.

      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    13. Re:Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A11 a deathtrap? You're not wrong. I got run over by a bus there in 1994. Very nearly killed me and now I've got more steel bits than Steve Austin...

    14. Re:Popularity? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Here are some adverts from that era

      *sniff* Ahhh... ye olde Sinclair ZX81 (aka the Timex Sinclair 1000)... my first computer.

      My Dad secretly added on a real keyboard for it (or somehow getting one with a proper keyboard), taught himself how to program, and then pretending not to know how to program he just sat back and let me go at it.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    15. Re:Popularity? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I should have probably not said better. But in graphics and IO I feel the Atari and C-64 where better machines. Now as to fun programing that is a very presonal thing. Most people on hear probably do not get it since most of them think Perl is da bomb :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    16. Re:Popularity? by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      There used to be small mail-order companies who adapted standard keyboards for the ZX81. They used to advertise in the small columns of Personal Computer World. If I remember correctly, the keyboard was black, and fitted over/around the ZX81 (not unlike the Dell keyboards 20 years later!) with the exact ZX81 keyboard lettering on the keyboard.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    17. Re:Popularity? by arose · · Score: 1

      And in Soviet Russia the BK-0010 programms you!

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:Popularity? by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

      Maybe it has something to do with advertising dollars. Over in Europe, there are fewer broadcast outlets, and therefore you have to buy fewer ad slots to get the word out. Back in the US, you'd need to buy tremendous quantities of ads (or some really expensive national ads like the Superbowl or Macy's Thanksgiving Parade) to reach a comparable number of people.

      I can just see someone like Pat Sajak saying "And today's show is brought to you by Sinclair, makers of... uh... what? A Spectrum? What's that? We're having some technical difficulties."

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    19. Re:Popularity? by Inda · · Score: 1

      I remember that someone crammed in a chess program into that.

      I remember waiting 20 minutes for the CPU to take its turn on the highest level... 20 minutes to work out that the opening move was P-K4! It brings a smile to my face just thinking about it.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    20. Re:Popularity? by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      Probably because America was playing with Apple then.

      No, really. IIRC when ZX80/ZX81/ZX Spectrum were storming Europe, Apple and Apple II were doing fine in the US. So the Apple machines were never heard of here, while Sinclair machines were almost unknown in the US.

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    21. Re:Popularity? by joper90 · · Score: 1

      i say bollocks to that..

      ok.. why is my mouse driver now bigger that windows 3.1?

      yes it included some stupid pointer gfx and stuff.. but the driver is still much bigger that the spectrums memory.

    22. Re:Popularity? by joper90 · · Score: 1

      thats true.. and i would love to see the code of how they programmed chess into 48 including all the gfx... they were masters..

      Or.. how they programmed Jet Set Willy with like 100 different rooms.. It didn't exactly stream them like gta does ;)

    23. Re:Popularity? by RabidStoat · · Score: 1

      ah Jet Set Willy. What a classic, every time I hear the music these days I start twitching uncontrollably. Anyone remember the huge competition that PCW (I think) ran to win everything that was available for the Spectrum, it had something to do with finding hidden places in Ant Attack - that weird isometric rescue game.

    24. Re:Popularity? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I'm only theorising here, but a big part of the reason for the Speccy's popularity in the UK was because it was cheap compared with the C64. Most people couldn't justify spending all that money on a computer in the days when they were little more than interesting curiosities. In the same way that your first car's usually an old rustbucket, your first computer was a Spectrum. And everybody develops an irrational love for their first car, right?

      Technically it was utter turd by comparison, with its attribute clash and non-existent sound chip meaning you had to interrupt the CPU to produce beepy noises whilst the C64 had the fantastic SID, but we Brits love a plucky underdog, and this inferiority made the humble Speccy a very endearing machine in a funny sort of way, and "Uncle" Clive Sinclair a legend in the eyes of a generation of a certain age. Amstrad, on the other hand, were despised by an awful lot of people for what they did to Sinclair. To this day I've never bought anything the cheapskate bastards have made, in fact.

      Anyway, in America your computer-buying public probably had a bit more money and could afford to splash out on a C64. Plus you don't really do the underdog thing like us, do you?

    25. Re:Popularity? by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      Can't help you with 1K chess but here is a commented disassembly of Jet Set Willy:

      linkee

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    26. Re:Popularity? by gidds · · Score: 1
      Yes, I think cost was a big factor.

      Lots of people got Speccies coz they were cheap. People who were serious about computing got* a Real Computer, like a Beeb!

      [fx: rush of nostalgia...]

      (* Or, as in my case, our dads got :-)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    27. Re:Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it had anything to do with the fact that it was English, just see how popular the ZX81 was in Europe. You can simply blame that on poor marketing I presume.
      As for the C-64, the poorness of its Basic was a big deterrent for me not and getting a Spectrum instead. That machine had a spirit too, due mainly to its huge fan base. I miss the fun all those UK magazines for the Spectrum, that was the time.

    28. Re:Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in Soviet Russia the BK-0010 programms you!

      And in the US illiteracy shows YOU up.

    29. Re:Popularity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to reply to this. I entered that competition and even took a day of school to do so. You had to call in at a certain time and tell them what object could be found outside the maze after you completed the highest level (an ammo box). The prize was 1,000 GBP of computer stuff (looked bloody great in the promo photo).

      Cheers,

      Matthew

      (ex-pat in US)

  7. Video Playback off an HD... via a spectrum by kilf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Video of the hardware panel at NotCon '04, showing a demonstration of the current speccy DemoScene, and playback of a music video off an HD.

    http://quernstone.com/notcon04/
    http://quernsto ne.com/notcon04/NotCon-Hardware-hig h.mov

  8. Marketing by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Poor Marketing

    This is what prevented them from being a really big player here.

    It's also what killed the atari comptuer products..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  9. Last time I checked... by Osrin · · Score: 1

    My 16k Speccy still worked... it came down from the Attic about 3 months ago, I was amazed.

    I don't have a cassette player that I can plug in to load any games though. :(

    JET SET WILLY LIVES FOREVER.

    POKE 35899, 0

    1. Re:Last time I checked... by payndz · · Score: 1

      Jet Set Willy won't live forever if you only have a 16K Spectrum!

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:Last time I checked... by Osrin · · Score: 1

      You can work that out from the address that is being POKED.

    3. Re:Last time I checked... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      My 16k Speccy still worked... it came down from the Attic about 3 months ago, I was amazed. .. and you and it didn't get Attaked at all?

      I'm impressed.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:Last time I checked... by germanbirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      POKE 35899,0 is the poke I also still most remember. Even 20 years later, wake me up in the middle of the night and ask me "How do you get infinite lives in Jet Set Willy" and I could tell you :-)

      The neatest one liner:
      FOR n=1 TO 80:CIRCLE n,n,n: NEXT n

      The DevPac Assember was also cool.

      Anyone remember the teach-it yourself programming course, where one issue came out every week called INPUT? I still have them.

      My speccy setup:

      Spectrum 48K (sometime along the line: upgraded to a Plus, then replaced with a 128K version)
      Interface 1
      Timex thermal printer
      AMX Mouse
      Microdrive
      Epson FX80 with serial port.

      I wrote most of my school assignments with Tasword 2, if I ever needed any artwork done, I fired up Artstudio...

      Artsudio - it used a Lenslock.... I hated those damn things.. This was a piece of plastic with you put on the screen, pressed buttons until the box was as big as the piece of plastic, and then looking through the lenses, you could see two characters which you couldn't see without it.
      3 wrong entries and you had to load the app from cassette again... 5 minutes wasted.

      Jet Set Willy, Tasword 2, Artstudio, Elite, Attic Attack, Sabre Wolf.

      I never really read Crash, because I was more into writing my own software rather than playing games, but but I never missed an issue of "Your Sinclair" - they had a cool style of writing and I also never missed "ZX Computing monthly" which focussed mainly on writing your own programs.

    5. Re:Last time I checked... by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Run a lead from the audio out on your PC to the speccy MIC port, use Taper on the PC to load and play TZX or TAP files down the wire. Files from tzxvault and/or world of spectrum (use google for that)

      For the record, I've got a cupboard full of speccy gear, including a naked zx80, four zx81s, boxes of cassettes, and speccys from 16kb to +3. Nostalgia...

      And 3 years ago I finally picked up issue 1 of Crash magazine, to add to my original collection of issues 2-50. I've been looking for that mag since 1985, so it was nice to get it.

      I don't wonder that ZX stuff is coming back - the gameboy handhelds remind me of nothing as much as shrunken speccies, especially the games. There are something like a million 35-40 year olds who wasted half their lives on Dun Darach, Elite, Shadowfire and so on.

    6. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poke 23610,28 :>

    7. Re:Last time I checked... by Osrin · · Score: 1

      (c) 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd, 0:1

    8. Re:Last time I checked... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Gameboy Advance is more like a portable NES or SNES than a spectrum :)

      Heck, I wouldnt be surprised if there is a ZX Spectrum EMULATOR for the GBA...

    9. Re:Last time I checked... by daveashcroft · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was referring to the gameboy, not the gameboy advance. ;-)

    10. Re:Last time I checked... by joper90 · · Score: 1

      Ahh.. the thermal printer..

      I remeber the joy when i discoveded you could make the black buy burning it with a match.. (it made green flames)

      queue lots of fire and a bucket of water.. and not happy parents :(

    11. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. Perhaps some new games will come out for it? by muntumbomoklik · · Score: 0

    Maybe ID will release Doom3 for the Spectrum? What about Halflife 2? And here's hoping for UT2K4..... Sp3ctrUm PwnS j00r 4MD!!!

  11. TK85 by stm2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Argentina there were some authorized clones made by a local motor company (Czwerny). Here are some pictures: czwerny (these are not mine).
    Also in Brazil, I got this model imported from Brazil:
    TK85.
    I also have some CZ1000 and CZ1500 (were called TS in US).

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  12. Great learning machine by jon514 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I got a Spectrum when they first appeared (aged about 13). I found it was a great machine to learn about computing - you had a Sinclair Basic interpreter as the main interface & Z80 assembler underneath. I spent many happy hours coding & hacking games on it. It & its predecessor, the ZX81, were what got me hooked on IT & software development. One of the great things was full manual it came with & fairly straightforward books you could buy detailing the full ROM disassembly!

    I wonder whether those at that age now find it as easy to learn as much about the basics of computing? How hard is it to understand the fundamentals of how the machine really works, when most teenagers probably have a PC & Windows OS to play with?

    1. Re:Great learning machine by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I mean, a lot of people who have graduated with good degrees in Comp Sci don't actually understand what is going on internally. Arguably, it's not that important. But, just as knowing how the mechanical bits of your car works can make you a better driver, knowing how the internals of the CPU (not just a rough idea of what's inside, but actually understanding what's going on) can make you a better programmer. Even in high-level languages.

    2. Re:Great learning machine by clandestine_nova · · Score: 1

      I would love to have something like that to learn about the basics of computing, mostly because I got my start with high-level software. Like a sibling post said, the knowledge isn't necessary, but it could definitely be useful.

      I started getting into computers when I was around 13 as well - however that was only two years ago. My knowledge is limited to mostly high-level languages and the like.

      --
      Discworld.
    3. Re:Great learning machine by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since there is a java based emulator of it, (it even runs on a Sharp Zaurus) you could freely distribute the emulator and point people at the right resources for programing the Z80/1.

      It's the same concept as has been used at a lot of universities in teaching Assembly. Since a lot of professors teaching when I went to school cut their teeth on the PDP-11, guess what platform we coded in Assembly for. Did anyone have a PDP-11 to run that code on? Nope. It was nearly all run on a vax-vms system.

      A lot of instructors today probably cut their teeth on the Apple II, or early AT/XT computers. I doubt that they will actively promote working with ZX80 instructions, or basic, but who knows.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:Great learning machine by master_p · · Score: 1

      I too learned computing with ZX Spectrum. I asked my father to get me an Atari video game system, because I'd seen MsPacMan at the arcades and I was amazed by it. But he decided to get me a computer instead, for educational purposes; that's why now I am a software engineer.

      Nowadays young people can't dissect their PC as easily as we did with the Spectrum, because todays computers are much more complex. Furthermore, the commercial nature of the PC prohibits many companies from fully disclosing the internals of their hardware.

      I wish there was a place in the market for a home computer, ala ZX Spectrum/C64/Amstrad/Atari ST/Amiga: an all-in-one unit, with built in keyboard, floppy and dvd ROM drives, joystick ports, and standard video and sound hardware. It would not have a sophisticated catch-all gui, but something rather along the lines of Amiga's Workbench. It's graphics hardware need not be extremely sophisticated; something along the lines of the Gamecube. It would be totally open, software and hardware-wise.

      I guess I can only dream, because economies of scale prohibit for custom designs to be equally cheap to mass-produced products.

    5. Re:Great learning machine by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Remember those SAT analogy games? I have one for you:

      Spectrum:Wheelbarrow,Athlon XP:_____?

      I think I'd have to fill in the blank with "car" if I was looking at it in terms of complexity.

      It's a lot easier to understand a wheelbarrow than it is a car, isn't it?

      This is actually why I was such a big fan of my TI-85 calc in high school. Everything about the hardware was easy to find out and manipulate via assembly instructions, and the operating system is single-tasking, so you can take total control of the hardware without needing to understand semaphores or the other things that most people can't easily learn on their own without help.

      Other than Calcs, the only option for such learning is Lego Mindstorms, I think.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  13. Why Buy a Z80? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just create on in a FPGA..

    Hell, you can re-create an *entire* spectrum in a single FPGA, and a couple of support chips..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Why Buy a Z80? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Why Buy a Z80?

      Because you can just buy one for a few bucks.

      KFG

  14. Did any one else... by eLoco · · Score: 1

    ... see the name Sinclair and think:

    "Great, what did those bastards do now?"

    --
    sig != null
    1. Re:Did any one else... by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I was trying to process "Sinclair" and "Clones" in the same headline.... I was about to cry.

    2. Re:Did any one else... by fatphil · · Score: 1

      There's still a Sinclair on one of the science parks in the north of Cambridge. It's just past the Milton Road Park & Ride terminus. I believe Sir Clive no longer has anything to do with it.

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  15. obligatory answer by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No.

    1. Re:obligatory answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong some versions do run linux http://www.q40.de/

  16. Dear old N orwich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I studied Computing in Norwich (hello City College!) and there's something rather sadly appropriate about Norwich being the venue for a show about, well how shall we put this, "dated" computers.

    Alan Partridge (Aha!) had his radio show in Norwich. And loved the place. 'Nuff said.

    1. Re:Dear old N orwich by Chembryl · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Let us hope that this is the one and only time that the sad town of Norwich is ever mentioned on such a prestigious a website as slashdot.

      --
      - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
    2. Re:Dear old N orwich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the most stunning women I have ever met came from Norwich...

      And no way in hell did she ever intend to go back there.

    3. Re:Dear old N orwich by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      Well I like the place too. Studied my MSc in computing at the UEA and kind of stayed. And I live less than half a mile from the venue :-)

      They also forget to mention on the website that there's a great pub called the Trafford Arms just down the road that serves some of the best real ale available and also does great food.

      BTW, there are also direct trains from Liverpool, Birmingham, Manchester, Nottingham and Cambridge, as well as London. You can also fly to the airport from quite a few other regional aiports or Amsterdam if travelling from abroad. It's not that hard getting here.

      Bob

    4. Re:Dear old N orwich by spectrokid · · Score: 1

      aaah, UEA, the memories.... It had 20% foreign students when I was there. The delicious smell of chicken & rice when my Nepalese neighbour was coocking breakfast... And after X-mas, all students returned with their local booze. I have NEVER been so sick as after combining swedish vodka, Gammel Dansk, austrian schnaps, belgian beer and Murphys. Do they still have that DISGUSTING hamburger van showing up after disco-night? I remember only the British could actually eat that without instant food poisoning.

      --

      10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    5. Re:Dear old N orwich by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      The "Rat Burger" van? Yes, it's still there. Can't say I've ever dared myself, and I am British...

      Bob

  17. Don't forget about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...The hidden "debug/test" mode.

  18. Norwich? by ollie_ob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Norwich?

    Arrrharrrrr!!!

    </Partridge>

    --
    #define ROSE any_other_name
    1. Re:Norwich? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Norwich? They're probably gathered round the ZX81 gaping, pointing and threatening to burn the "man with the magic black box of lights".

    2. Re:Norwich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to live in Norwich, and I wrote my first computer game on a ZX spectrum when I was 8 years old. So back off!

  19. I feel your pain. by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    I feel for you with the zen-like patience while 10k of code loads from an audio cassette.

    Unfortunatley, I just can't resist giving you nightmares tonight;

    BWAAAAAAAARRRRRRRR BIP! BWAAAAAAARRRRRR BEEEEBEBEEEEEBEEEBEEE BIP!

    Do you remember those hypnotic lines around the restriced area of the screen too?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:I feel your pain. by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      ... oooh, I remember the pain of trying to get some games to load and then, just when it gets to the end, it either says "Tape loading error", or for the newer, fancy, _Turbo Loaders_, it would just reset.

    2. Re:I feel your pain. by fatphil · · Score: 1

      RANDOMISE USR 1234

      I think 1331 was similar, but with different colours.

      It's been 15 years though...

      FP.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  20. WTF?!? A new issue of Your Sinclair? by spectecjr · · Score: 1, Funny

    A new issue of YS?

    And nobody even emailed me?

    Gah! I've been robbed!

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  21. Silent PC by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, you can get that today with an ARM based unit..

    Extreme low power, and they run really cool... Just check out your PDA if you doubt that...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Silent PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why PDA? There are ARM-based desktop boxes out there. New ones, too :-)

  22. I found my old ZX80 a little while back by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    I was pleased to find it still functioned. But there were two disappointments. (1) It's turned yellow. That plastic needs care if you want to to stay looking white. (2) It doesn't smell the same. I miss hat heady aroma of fresh new electronics. Now it smells of absolutely nothing.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I found my old ZX80 a little while back by grolschie · · Score: 1

      I was given an old ZX81 with 16k expansion pack a few years back. Some of the spongy keys don't work to good anymore. Is there any way to resurrect the keys on these things?

  23. How to spot a _true_ zx fanboy... by tinla · · Score: 1


    I keep telling people that you're not a real spectrum nut unless you've got your pride and joy hanging on the office wall, with the original manuals and a signed photo of sir clive himself.

    The chap at the gallery claimed they don't get many computers in to be framed. I find that hard to understand...

    --
    0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
    1. Re:How to spot a _true_ zx fanboy... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      The original manuals were great.... I *really* like the the cover design.

      However, I note that your manual uses white-ring bindings. The original mail-order speccy used black ring bindings!

      ;P

    2. Re:How to spot a _true_ zx fanboy... by Tet · · Score: 1
      However, I note that your manual uses white-ring bindings. The original mail-order speccy used black ring bindings!

      What, you mean like this? Oh, sometimes I'm just so l33t! :-)

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    3. Re:How to spot a _true_ zx fanboy... by Noodlenose · · Score: 1
      I bow my head to you, oh Overlord!

      This must truly the best piece of geek art I've ever seen.

    4. Re:How to spot a _true_ zx fanboy... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Damn you're good! ;)

  24. And my old teacher said I was wasting my life.... by TAZ6416 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In my last year at School I got caught reading Crash magazine and Sinclair User in English class a few times and my teacher said I was throwing my life away by not paying attention to O'Level English. But now, I have a job supporting over 800 Windows XP Desktops, all because of that little rubber keyed bugger. Oh hang on.. supporting XP is hell, bollocks he was right, I'm wasting my life ;) Jonathan

  25. SAM Coupe by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    They sold 12,000 Sam Coupes? I had no idea it was so many.

    I remember I got one of the early models with the dodgy ROM and the shop I bought it from tried to charge me £25 to replace it until we complained.

    They were great machines - still played speccy 48K games, 3.5" disk drives, 256Kb RAM. The SAM BASIC was great: it had an EDIT command, for writing self-modifying BASIC programs. I wonder where I put the thing...

    1. Re:SAM Coupe by carou · · Score: 1

      If you can't find it, try this instead.

    2. Re:SAM Coupe by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I'd just found it - thanks. I'm now horrified to find that years of C++, Prolog and Java have seemingly completely overwritten my knowledge of SAM Basic. Apart from ZAP and BOOM.

    3. Re:SAM Coupe by jpgrosen · · Score: 1

      12000... and a cool 24 of them sold in Denmark, and I got one !! :-)

  26. flame war to end all flame wars by hine_uk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well it looks like its settled 8-) The speccy is Definitley BETTER than the C64 and here is the proof! We won the war only about 15 years too late Now if you will excuse me time to sit back and hopefully toast some marshmallows on the heat

    1. Re:flame war to end all flame wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm terribly sorry, but C=64 got a brand new Zzap 64 - full sized - released recently. Guess the Speccy is just the poor cousin again. Late for the party and all ;)

    2. Re:flame war to end all flame wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hihi

      Actually, I've got a 64 with 64HDD which runs quite nicely

      the main gem is a +3 with +3e ROMs enabling you to use (half of (!)) a standard IDE disk with it :>

      http://www.fusionchat.net/pics/machines/Spectrum -P lus3e.jpg

      Excuse the mess, but that one has:

      Rom switcher (Sinclair 128/+3e) so the games that didn't like Amstrad "fixing" the NMI service routine can be played (and snapshotted to/ loaded from disk with the multiface)

      Internal +D, switchable out with an ugly switch on the back of the machine that you can't see and has since been replaced (red button on top of machine is +D snapshot button)

      3.5" B: drive, formattable to up to 880K, so stick THAT in your Amiga and smoke it :>

      That pic is fairly old mind, the multiface in particular is built into the machine now, although I still don't have a slimline 2.5" IDE disk I can put under the 3" floppy -.-

      Nor have I got round to putting the disk swapper in yet, although that just needs moving from the old board I toasted trying to replace with a PC PSU the amstrad PSU I overloaded with additional drives (-12v where +12v should have gone, oops?)

      hideki.adam @ gmail.com if anyone is interested in playing with these machines, you can actually have an amplified internal speaker that sounds nice (AY and ULA sound) without adding /anything/ but a speaker and two wires thanks to some of the built in +2a tape stuff :>

  27. Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by payndz · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Forget even the Z80 and 6502/10 computers of the Eighties - 68x00 chips must be going for pennies by now. (Hell, the 6502 is still being made!)

    Why isn't there a 'starter' computer system around any more? I went from self-taught Sinclair and C64 BASIC to minor levels of assembler on both systems before life shifted me away from computers for a while, until I came back to C++ on a Mac more than a decade later - and I think learning assembler properly would have made C++ a snap!

    But the way systems are now, there doesn't seem to be anything to get people into programming easily. Anyone could piss about in BASIC for a couple of hours and get things moving about the screen that actually respond to their inputs, but in C++ on a GUI-based machine?

    For that matter, why isn't there a BASIC interpreter built into modern machines? I mean, jeez, how fast would *that* run? 64-bits at 4Gh compared to 8-bits at 1Mh? For a program I could write myself in an afternoon for a particular job, I'd quite happily sacrifice GUI elements and go back to 'Enter value here_' options.

    Kind of makes me wonder if you could take the gameplay refinements we take for granted today and apply them to an old machine. I'd love to see a (top-down, obviously) C64 version of Crazy Taxi! Or going the other way, how about a totally real-time version of The Sentinel powered by a G5 or 4Ghz Pentium?

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Kind of makes me wonder if you could take the gameplay refinements we take for granted today and apply them to an old machine. I'd love to see a (top-down, obviously) C64 version of Crazy Taxi! Or going the other way, how about a totally real-time version of The Sentinel powered by a G5 or 4Ghz Pentium?

      There was a Playstation and PC version of The Sentinel (called Sentinel Returns), with music by John Carpenter.

      A good friend of mine (Chris White) worked on one of the ports.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by wmorrow · · Score: 1
      Why isn't there a 'starter' computer system around any more?

      Microcontrollers:

      for example. All you Forth fanatics can come out of the woodwork now:)
    3. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by geg81 · · Score: 1
      Why isn't there a 'starter' computer system around any more?

      There are lots of them, depending on what you mean by "starter":
      • MiniITX machine for under $200
      • PIC-based microcontroller for $20
      • PIC-based microcontroller with Ethernet for $55
      • Palm with Quartus Prolog and Keyboard
      • PC Forth on FreeDOS running on MiniITX or another modern PC
      • Any old SPARC or Mac (boot PROM contains Forth interpreter)


    4. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by drfreak · · Score: 1

      Windows still has QBasic. It's good enough for simple file and text i/o. For both Windows and Linux, wxBASIC looks pretty neat.

    5. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by flabbergast · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geez, I wish cars were like they were 80 years ago. I mean, nobody understands how their car works anymore! I'd give anything to prime the cylinders in my car, and crank the engine over by hand! I mean, real men know exactly what their cars do, and don't leave it up to computers and such things! I mean, today's cars with their fancy keys and electric starters and brakes that actually work abstract the essence of the car away from the driver! The driver should know how their car works and why!

      Bollux to all you people who keep saying "Man, I miss the old days!" I sure as heck don't miss the old DOS days of trying to get around the 640K limit or IRQ nightmares. Now, I plug and play. Or with the C64 and its terrific graphics! Yah 320x240 screen with pixels so large that people don't have discernible faces.

    6. Re:Why no 'simple' computers like this today? by Werrismys · · Score: 1

      Sentinel had a sequel, running realtime with 3D acceleration (on peesea, win32). Music by John Carpenter.

      --
      'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  28. OOh by cuteseal · · Score: 1

    Ooooh... I'll get out my Apple IIe and we could have a LAN party!

    1. Re:OOh by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 1

      Hell, My old trash-80 Mico Color Computer still works! Kin I join the lan party? (I'll even spring for the beer!) };-)

      --
      The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  29. And the new YS can be found... by posternutbaguk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bundled with this month's RetroGamer magazine, for those of you in the U.K.

    More information and a review can be found at http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/ys94_review.htm/

    1. Re:And the new YS can be found... by SiW · · Score: 1

      I found RetroGamer in a bookstore at the mall. In the middle of nowhere, Iowa, USA. So chances are pretty good that you can find it if you're anywhere near civilization.

  30. If you liked... by jd · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...Bill Gates' 640K remark, you'll just love Sinclair's thoughts on 32-bit systems. Yes, Sir Clive Sinclair was convinced that nobody needed more than 8 bits. :) The QL used an 68008 processor, which was largely a 68010 that could only shuffle 8 bits into out out of the processor at any one time.


    Sinclair was notorious for over-hyping his products, advertising them long before they ever came to market, and aimed much more for numbers than for quality. (If he hadn't built that stupid C5, Sinclair might well today have the kind of grip Microsoft has. Clive had been inventing and marketing products from radios to metal detectors for several decades before the ZX80, so he was very well established. In the early days of home computing, he very probably had more cash on hand than Bill Gates and Paul Allen. If the QL had been true 32-bit, and he'd not gone bust over building an electric car from washing machine motors, there is every reason to believe that the industry today would be bowing to him.)


    Legend has it that one reason his computers were so cheap was that he'd buy defective parts. His argument, apparently, was that home users were never going to put industrial-sized loads onto their computers, so there was no point in buying chips up to that grade. Consumer electronics barely existed, back then, so the cheapest alternative was to buy stuff that had failed QC. The stuff would likely still work well enough for home use, you just didn't want to use those machines to control nuclear reactors.


    (Maybe that explains what happened at Chernobyl...)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:If you liked... by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > The QL used an 68008 processor, which was largely a 68010 that could only shuffle 8 bits into out out of the processor at any one time

      Just like the 8088 used in the original IBM PC, which (if I may quote) could only "only shuffle 8 bits into out out of the processor at any one time".

      I suspect you'll find the reason that Sinclair chose the 68008 for the QL was largely the same reason Motorola offered it - cost. It's FAR cheaper to design and manufacture boards with 8-bit buses than with 16- or 32- bit ones.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    2. Re:If you liked... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Didn't Linus T. cut his teeth on the QL ?

    3. Re:If you liked... by AstroByte · · Score: 1
      The 68000 wasn't truly 32-bit until the 68020 was introduced. The programmers model may have been 32-bit internally (i.e. registers) but the 68000 (and 68010) had a 16-bit data bus, meaning all loads and stores were done in two lots.

      As you said, the 68008 had an 8-bit bus, meaning all loads and stores took 4 operations! Strangely enough, it was actually introduced after the 68000, to try and encourage its adoption at a time when 8-bit systems, and their cheap boards ruled.

      Incidently, the 16/32 bit split of the 68000 was supposedly where the ST came from in the Atari ST range (e.g. 520ST). That or Sam Tramiel (son of the CEO of Atari Jack Tramiel)...

    4. Re:If you liked... by carou · · Score: 2, Informative

      Legend has it that one reason his computers were so cheap was that he'd buy defective parts.

      More than legend...

      Pictures...

      The memory chips in the secondary bank of the 48k ZX Spectrum were all faulty 64kbit chips of which either the top or bottom half had failed testing (so they were "cheap as chips" when he bought them - haha.) They were put into the Spectrum, wired up so it only accessed whichever 32kbit actually worked properly, and the defective half was just ignored.

    5. Re:If you liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bill Gates' 640K remark"

      Was not made by him

      "Legend has it that one reason his computers were so cheap was that he'd buy defective parts. His argument, apparently, was that home users were never going to put industrial-sized loads onto their computers,"

      Nonsense. He bought half defective RAM chips. The RAM chips had two "rectangles" of memory cells, say left and right. If only one half was broke, you still could use the other half.

      So the 48K Spectrum used 64 x 1 Kbit, with one working section for its upper 32 KByte.

      If you replaced those 8 chips with 100% good 64 x 1 Kbit chips, you could use the "highest" address bit to toggle 2 banks of 32 K.

      Of course I used that trick a lot when writing assembly, I loaded the assembler in one bank, switched, testen my program, and if it crashed the computer, I had the assembler back. Saved a lot of tape juggling.

      John Bokma

    6. Re:If you liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Was not made by him

      Yes it fucking well was. Microsoft apparently controls enough of the world's information sources to revise official history to edit it out, but I was alive and adult at the time and he fucking well said it, damnit!

    7. Re:If you liked... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Microsoft apparently controls enough of the world's information sources to revise official history to edit it out, but I was alive and adult at the time and he fucking well said it, damnit!


      If that's the case, then where and when did he say it?

      Surely you can remember that too. You see there's this thing... it's called verification.

      Peoples' memories are flawed things. They change over time. New memories can be implanted, that kind of thing.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    8. Re:If you liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those chips are marked 4164B-10.
      Does that mean they're 10 nanosecond?

    9. Re:If you liked... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      I don't think that the problem with the QL was the 8 bit bus, at the time nobody was doing true 32 bit, even the IBM PC was 16. The real problems were the crappy graphics - only 4 fixed colours in hi res, the choice of the microdrive as the storage medium and the fact that it was over a year late.

      The root of the problems was that Sinclair went overboard on cheap, with the QL people wanted a $3000 computer for $800, he decided to go for $600 and in the process just made everything a bit too cheap. A real keyboard and a real disk drive would not have added much to the cost. A decent graphics architecture ditto.

      The machine only had 128K which would not have been a problem if memory expansion had ever come available, it never did. The single chip integration wafer flopped.

      Not long after ATARI came out with the 520ST which was everything the QL was not. I paid the same for my ATARI, monitor and disk drive as the QL had cost me and not much later.

      The thing about the car was not the financial hit, it was a separate company. It was the credibility loss he suffered, the shoemobile was just plain silly.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    10. Re:If you liked... by Bryan+K.+Feir · · Score: 1

      They apparently did the same thing with the Tandy Color Computer for a while, during the early days of the 32K upgrade. Or at least so the rumour went.

      Not for very long, though; soon enough 64K chips were cheap enough that nobody bothered selling the half-bad ones.

    11. Re:If you liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he bit into one. That plastic was tough, and tasted nasty too.

    12. Re:If you liked... by julesh · · Score: 1

      The memory chips in the secondary bank of the 48k ZX Spectrum were all faulty 64kbit chips of which either the top or bottom half had failed testing (so they were "cheap as chips" when he bought them - haha.) They were put into the Spectrum, wired up so it only accessed whichever 32kbit actually worked properly, and the defective half was just ignored.

      This may have been true on some models, but with later models you get a simple mod kit that allowed you to switch which half you were using under software control. This worked fine for most people who tried it, so most of them by that stage must have been fine.

    13. Re:If you liked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This strikes me as a typical apple product. It is not innovative in any sense except in the styling. It is 50% more expensive than models with similar capabilities. The 'superiority of the UI is mainly a function of whether you are an existing apple user... As it is I suspect it will not be a success because Apple are only really marketing it to their existing user base."

  31. ZX81 + ZX/Spectrum Owner by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

    Still have the ZX81, sold the speccy to buy a BBC Model B, sold the beeb to buy a PC. Then started working on mainframes, System/36, System/38 and AS/400, RS/6000 etc etc etc. That Clive Sinclair fellow has a lot to answer for!

    Currently I have a P4 thingy and an old AS/400.

    Also, I'm building some 8bit single board machines. Z80, 6502, 8086, 6800. Good fun, though running them at 1mhz doesn;t really get anything done.

    1. Re:ZX81 + ZX/Spectrum Owner by natd · · Score: 1
      ...and that is exactly what eBay is for :)

      I have the ZX81, the speccy 48k (2 actually), the BBC B, Master and compact all taking up space in my tiny appartment. Oh - and the C64s, the C16, the CPC646, ST, A1200, A500, A1000, Mac classic & TRS-80.

      And my only 'original' vintage machine - the Vic-20 which was my 7th birthday present and first computer.

      I'm getting the speccy out today - it's much nicer than an emulator for a bit of Dizzy!

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
  32. Sam Coupé, with an é by carou · · Score: 2, Informative

    the other Sinclair formats and clones include the QL, SAM Coupe, Timex/Sinclair, ZX81, Z88 etc

    Just to be pedantic, the Sam Coupé wasn't manufactured by Sinclair, nor was it exactly a clone as it had many capabilities in excess of what the Spectrum could do. Some links:

    The Sam Coupé Scrapbook - all-round comprehensive information

    Shameless plugging of my own site - mostly software rather than hardware information

    SimCoupe - a free and legal Sam emulator for Windows, Linux, MacOS X etc.

    To anyone not involved in the scene, it probably seems very odd to be holding a show for such old computers. But I spent very nearly ten years using that old 8-bit computer, which means it lasted longer than any other computer I've bought since at many times the price, and in that time I've met a lot of people who also used it, and who have had much influence on me in various ways. Most obviously, my interest - and now my job - in programming can be traced back to the days I spent trying to squeeze every drop of performance out of the Z80 that I could possibly get (and back then, every t-state counted!)

    Obviously it's interesting to go to these shows and see what new things people can still do with the old technology. But even more than that, I'm hoping just to have another friendly chat with a few of the people I've known for about the last decade and a half.

  33. I loved 'Your Sinclair'... by Denyer · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...still have a pile of decaying copies somewhere. Crap games corner, loads of software on the cover tapes, Linda Barker being the girl everyone wanted as their best mate, Julian Gollop's "Chaos"...

    Some of the magazine's original content is archived here: The Your Sinclair Rock'n'Roll Years. Go easy on the server, people.

    More info about Chaos (one of the most addictive eight-player games ever) here: The battle of the wizards.

    It's almost as if the last fifteen years never happened.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  34. Two hours? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Seems improved then. I always hated that run from
    LS to Norwich (thorpe station), because the other
    bit (from Bristol Temple Meads to London) was a wizzy 125MPH (about 1.5 hours). Back in my student
    days (in Bristol, SW England), I always favoured the
    sedate Bus approach (Bristol->London (victoria)->Norwich). But someone clearly had a sense of humour in the numbering schemes for busses, because the "747" (cackles hysterically)
    used to run between the end points of Norwich and Bristol (and visited most of the (un)known universe in between). Still, it had the great taste to visit *both* cambridge and oxford, so
    if you were broke (most students always are) and
    not in a hurry was sort of fun...

    (should point out that the 747 wasn't the fast
    via london bus, but the one most of us poor dumb
    idiots ending up using because it was a wee bit
    cheaper)..

    Go kiss the singing postman for me (big grin)

  35. Just use any old mp3 player:-) by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Should work just fine, and plenty of games would fit on a CD.

  36. You don't need a cassette player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use the sound card on your PC, it works a lot better! And you can save your programs as a file on your hard drive.

    This got me thinking I should dig out that ol' ZX81 for a bit of nostalga :)

  37. Re:Popularity -- Timex dun it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The story we heard in Britain was that Sinclair expected Timex to make a US version of the Spectrum, with just enough changes to produce NTSC instead of PAL, but Timex decided to re-design it. They changed the keyboard, added a ROM cartridge etc. By the time they had finished:

    a) the Spectrum was getting old

    b) the machine they came up with would not run a lot of Spectrum software

    Since the main selling point of the Spectrum was the software you could run on it, that killed off the US version.

    Allegedly.

  38. Obligitory Python (Monty) quote by Verminator · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You have won tonight's star prize, the entire Norwich city council!"

    --
    "The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
  39. I was in love once.. by deadgoon42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..a Sinclair ZX-81. People said, "No, Holly, she's not for you." She's cheap, she's stupid, and she wouldn't load - well, not for me, anyway.

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
    1. Re:I was in love once.. by bahgheera · · Score: 1

      Dang. You beat me to it you smeghead.

  40. I still miss Z80 assembly by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best, most logical assembly language I've seen was in my Spectrum. Quite frankly I think Zilog deserves a lot more respect than it gets these days. Anyone who's programmed Z80 assembly will puke from just seeing the ugly x86 flavor.

    1. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      The best, most logical assembly language I've seen was in my Spectrum. Quite frankly I think Zilog deserves a lot more respect than it gets these days. Anyone who's programmed Z80 assembly will puke from just seeing the ugly x86 flavor.

      In all fairness though, Zilog's instruction set was invented after the 8080 set, by a gang of people who used to work at Intel. So really, the Zilog guys had the benefit of hindsight.

      Though given that it's all just mnemonics, and the instructions behind it all are pretty much identical, I've never understood why Intel just didn't switch it over and use the easier-to-understand versions.

      On the plus side for Zilog, they never had the abortion that was segment registers.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by melted · · Score: 1

      They also had integer multiplication (and IIRC, division, too) which 8080 did not have.

    3. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      They also had integer multiplication (and IIRC, division, too) which 8080 did not have.

      Not on the Z80 they didn't; the Z280 may have had it, as may the Z8000, but the Z80 certainly didn't have it.

      Multiplication you had to unroll yourself using a barrel shift routine. Or use a sum-of-squares trick with a table lookup.

      Division was effectively a long division routine. And it didn't run very fast at all (and not many people would do it in their code anyway; it was one of those avoid-at-all-costs things).

      I've still got the Division algorithm I found somewhere on paper, just in case I ever have a need for it (yes, I know...)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by melted · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I've looked up in Google. I must have confused it with some other processor. Nevertheless, Z80 was one heck of a processor for its time.

    5. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by master_p · · Score: 1

      But 8086 was modelled after Z80! that's why the accumulator register (EAX) instructions' implementations are different than the same instructions for the other registers.

      I think the best design of the times was the 68000. ARM is also another good design, with every instruction being conditionally executed using shift bits (ARM code is much more condensed that the relevant code of other CPUs).

    6. Re:I still miss Z80 assembly by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      I've still got the Division algorithm I found somewhere on paper, just in case I ever have a need for it (yes, I know...)

      I went for a job interview last week, which included a written test. Curiously, one of the questions was for a C implementation of an integer long division routine. I'd keep a hold of that piece of paper, if I were you!

  41. Jet Set Willy... by skarth · · Score: 1

    Ah, the joys of Jet Set Willy...

    And I still have my manual for Elite lying around somewhere ... what a great game.

  42. How about the MK14 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one mentioned the MK14. A single board kit before the ZX-nn's. some pics here: http://www.pkshiu.com/review/mk14.html/

  43. Memories.... by Zerbey · · Score: 1

    YS is back? Brilliant! It was total crap when it was originally in print, but in a skillo funky way that we all loved.

    My first real computer was as ZX Spectrum, I spent hours writing programs in BASIC, even learned some Z80 assembler as well. Last I check, it still works fine as well. One of these days I'll get it shipped over to me and figure out a way to run it on these funny NTSC sets they use here. I suspect Radio Shack has something to convert the signal.

    1. Re:Memories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hihi

      Don't count on it, but you should be able to get at least a black and white picture by taking composite off the edge connector I believe (althouhg you may need to twiddle your vertical hold some to get it to stay in one place, and possibly the height)

  44. The differance between this and modern CPUs by cide1 · · Score: 1

    Well, modern cpus are clocked so much faster for two reasons. 1, the transistors are smaller, and therefore faster. 2, modern cpus do less per instruction per clock, due to instructions moving through the cpu's pipeline. While a sinclair might execute an entire instruction in a single clock, a modern Pentium will break that instruction into close to 30 clock cycles, doing a very small portion of the instruction in each pipeline stage. The downside to this, is that when a jump or branch occurs, which is very common, the pipeline must be cleared. Modern chips use branch prediction to try and use which way a branch went the last time it was evaluated, to predict which way it will go in the future. This does add tranistors, which increases power consumption, due to smaller transistor, I thikn the change is negligible. In addition, modern cpus provice floating point capabilities, larger word width, and things like dma controllers, page frame pointers and cache built into hardware. The sinclair probably only had a stack pointer.

    It is true that a modern sinclair with smaller transistors would use less power, but so much has been done in this field in the last 25 years, that a modern design could do so much better. Look at something like a motorola hc12 for a modern version of a cpu similar to the sinclais. Even this has a 2 stage pipeline if I recall correctly.

    Furthermore, the ISA of old chips is quite limited.

    Industry doesnt change designs unless valid. x86 is a great example of this. It is a pretty much messed up design, some instructions are 17 words long, but it can be made to work. Industry moved away from the sinclair because a better solution was found.

    --
    -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
  45. Re: Not YET. by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    Need I say more? And no, you don't need CPU with built-in MMU.

    BTW. How's that Doom clone on the Speccy doing?

  46. Good old Speccy! by Uksi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fond memories indeed!

    I grew up on this computer. Back in Russia, Spectrum clone kits were very popular. They were cheap, the electronics were "close enough", such that intricate timing-based video tricks didn't quite work, but everything else worked.

    I never used the real thing for more than a few minutes. Instead, I used a Russian clone called "Hobbit" (just googled this). My dad was involved in selling them, and so I got one. Apparently only 50000 were made. The great thing about this clone was the PC-style extended keyboard, which obviated the need for some of the trickiest key combos.

    Paired to a small monochrome screen, I used to write (at the tender age of 11) programs and games for it. One game that I wrote was very simple: there was a line through the screen, a person in the middle, and a car running left to right. The sole control was the spacebar: pressing it at the right time would make the person jump long enough for the car to pass under. Despite that, I remember adults playing the game for 5-10 minutes, far longer than I expected.

    Now, I was not one of the l33t assembly coders: instead, I stuck to good old onboard BASIC. One of the niftiest features it had (as far as I was concerned at the time) was the ability to define custom (USR) characters. You could define tens of 8x8 pixel chars, and then print them as normal letters. I used to sit down with a graph paper notebook, separate it into 8x8 cells, draw objects and then shade pixels. I wrote small animations, typically involving cars, little people (Lode Runner, anyone?), helicopters, parachutes, robots, and stuff exploding. The exploding was accomplished by XOR'ing X, O and other characters over the site of explosion.

    Of course, there was the BEEP command. The computer's manual (or some Spectrum-related book) came with a listing to play the funeral march. Much fun was had by shortening the durations of the notes in that march, making it sound upbeat. I tried writing some of my BEEP statement music, but I recall the results were pleasing only to me and not the family :)

    Back in Soviet Russia... oh wait, this was post-Soviet Russia, the black market was rampant and much tape copying was had. Name any game and you could pick it up for less than $1. Childhood memories include sitting in front of the TV, having cleaned the tape head with alcohol (of the rubbing kind, not vodka), hoping that the 5-minute load of this game will succeed.

    The particular version of the Hobbit that I had also included a version of the LOGO interpreter. Since all the books about logo that I had were in Russian, and the interpreter was in English, I pretty much failed to invoke all but the basic drawing commands (DRAW was translated fine by the dictionary, but most other keywords weren't).

    I probably didn't play quite the same games that most Spectrum users did. Some of the ones that I remember include "Lode Runner" (amazing), "Chuckie Egg", "Iron " (yeah!), "Commando", "Knight Lore", "Target Renegade" (boy was this one a pain in the ass to load), "Lotus Esprit Turbo", "Nebulus" (good stuff!), "Saboteur" (how many hours spent on that baby), "Chequered Flag", "Chase HQ" (oh yeah!), "Deathchase" (teh winn!11!!), "Wec Le Mans", "Crazy Cars 1" and "Crazy Cars 2" (nice!), and more that I am too tired of listing. I was not cool enough at the time to play "Elite" (required too much concentration :) ), although I did have it. "Elite" was regarded as "the game to play", from what I remember. Strangely enough, I don't think I've ever played "Jet Set Willie".

    Unfortunately, one sad day, the Hobbit blew a fuse. My dad decided to try inserting a wire for the fuse, since we couldn't find an appropriate replacement fuse. That's when I learned the meanings of "fuses don't blow for no reason" and "magic smoke."

    Recently, I bought a ZX Spectrum from UK off eBay, but the working condition wasn't clear. I still haven't tried it.

  47. TS1000 and ZX81 memories by scottgfx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember being 10 or 11 years old in the early `80's and seeing an ad for the ZX81 in the back of a Popular Science mag. I really wanted one of those things as I had not yet used a computer or owned one. A few years later, after I had been using an Atari 800, bought a Timex-Sinclair 1000 from a kid at school who didn't want it. Even after using the Atari, I thought the TS-1000 was cool. Now, over 20 years later, I'm talking to a 18 year old kid at work. He has a TS-1000 from a yard sale and doesn't know a thing about it. Even more sad, he's not even tried to use it. There is a whole generation or more that only knows Windows and have no idea what is underneath. Yeah, the kid is a geek and knows HTML, but is afraid of the stuff underneath. How sad!

    --
    It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  48. Insiders view of Norwich by fallscrape · · Score: 1

    'tis a wonderful place, full of pubs (over 300) as well as the two cathedrals. There's supposed to be one pub for every day of the week and one church a week for repentance. There aren't any computer shops worth visiting in Norwich. OSB (one step beyond) is just off Bedford street next to Jarrolds. They *do* own a spectrum though. But they did have to pick the week I'm off to china!

    --
    http://www.neobard.info - wacky world of me
  49. Old /. Story by bzarhandz · · Score: 1

    There was a link a few months ago to the first part in a nostalgic series on programming early home pc games, written by a British fellow. It was a great read, and I wanted to see more, but I've since lost it. Anyone know where I might find it again?

    --
    I made a post on the Internet!
    1. Re:Old /. Story by ader · · Score: 1

      Jeff Minter's history of Llamasoft at Way Of The Rodent? Quick search of their site suggests it's up to part five.

      Ade_
      /

      --
      Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
    2. Re:Old /. Story by bzarhandz · · Score: 1

      PERFECT! That's exactly the story I couldn't turn up. Thanks for your time, Ade_.

      --
      I made a post on the Internet!
  50. Pah by oojah · · Score: 1

    All you wannabies :)

    I play on my parents' +2 every time I visit them. My dad plays on it every day, give or take.

    The only reason it is around is for a nice little puzzle game called Peking.

    Uptime would be about 10 years if they didn't turn it off when they go on holiday.

    Having read some of the other comments, I fear I may be in danger of losing an afternoon to playing Chaos. Ah well.

    Cheers,

    Roger

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
  51. Play some games? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    I must get my Spectrum out and play some games.

    Yeah.. every once a while I feel nostalgic, so I'll find a C64 or Nintendo emulator and fire up some classics. That's fun for all of 5 minutes, until I realize that old games really suck.

  52. Hardware by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its not the software that really made the old machines great, it was the hardware.

    No emulator can ever replace the 'realness' of having the real machine on your desk.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. Linus used speccy by sad_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    What some people might not know is that Linus was a Sinclair user as well. Before he got a PC he had a QL, which had a 32bit architecture with a multitasking OS and was a pretty nifty machine for the time.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:Linus used speccy by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      What some people might not know is that Linus was a Sinclair user as well. Before he got a PC he had a QL, which had a 32bit architecture with a multitasking OS and was a pretty nifty machine for the time.


      Alan Cox also used to write for the Sinclair Spectrum + SAM Coupe fanzine "Format". Last thing I saw from him in there was a small assembly language program for the Sinclair Spectrum +3.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  54. That was my first computer by kbahey · · Score: 1
    I got it back in 1984. Learned BASIC on it, and played Jumping Jack and Blue Thunder. Soon realized it is limited without a random storage device. The microdrive (actually an endless tape device) was way too expensive at the time.

    I loaned it to a friend, who busted it I think.

    1. Re:That was my first computer by s-meister · · Score: 1
      I didn't get where I am today without several years of Speccie use. Initially the 48K bathmat-keyed case, then eventually the motherboard went into a full travel keyboard doofus, along with Interface 1 and a pair of Microdrives. I had a Brother thermal printing typewriter with an RS232 interface, rather than the dreaded Sinclair sparky printer.

      I think I still have a C90 cassette with a pile of games on it somewhere...I can't imagine how so many games got onto a single cassette...

      I also had a speech synthesiser doofus. I fiddled with Basic but I couldn't be bothered with Assembler.

      I wouldn't be surprised if most Sinclair users have migrated to Linux. Where else can you have so much intellectual stimulation these days?

  55. Faulty Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes I can confirm this is true - I work for the electronics distributor that supplied the faulty (I think they were Texas Instruments) memory chips - my boss was the man that did the dirty deal!

  56. When will my Timex/Sinclair be worth $1M.... by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1
    ...so I can put it on Ebay? Hell, I even have the memory upgrade module(64k???), but the damn thing is only worth pennies! Oh well, there should be a poll asking what system people first learned to program on. I think a lot of people learned to program on a Sinclair in the 80's long before their families ever bought their first PC.

    On a side note, could anyone ever get the Monopoly game in the back of the Timex Sinclair manual to work? I must've tried 4-5 times, but no luck.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  57. Chaos clone for Windows by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

    A Windows-based clone of Chaos called Chaos-Funk can be downloaded here.

  58. To get you in the mood, here is a FLASH animation. by cjellibebi · · Score: 1
    Here is a fun Flash animation designed to bring back nostalgia to the ZX Spectrum generation

    http://www2.b3ta.com/heyhey16k/