Slashdot Mirror


66.3 Million Domain Names Registered

IO ERROR writes "VeriSign announced that 5.1 million new domains were registered in the third quarter of 2004, and that there are now 66.3 million active domain names, both the highest numbers ever. It also said that the percentage of domains registered to live Web sites has increased and country code top-level domains are becoming more widely accepted."

179 comments

  1. Content? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how many have actual content or don't redirect to another site. There are so many names out that that are bought up by corporations that all point to the same ste and so many others that try to capitalize on user stupidity and are just mispellings of popular cites.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    1. Re:Content? by foobsr · · Score: 5, Funny

      mispellings of popular cites

      No.

      Presumably more likely.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    2. Re:Content? by rossi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've setup a few domains for people who just want to use the name for email only and dont want any website content.

      --
      I want to meet the guy who invented beer and see whats he's up to now.
    3. Re:Content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep you +5, Insightful for you, you fucking Kraut!

    4. Re:Content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well. if you want sites with content, thousands of them are fake fake banks and security companies used by 419 fraudsters. All full of really cheesy corporate graphics (usually lifted off legitimate sites)

    5. Re:Content? by Eisvogel · · Score: 1

      Mark Alert for 2004-12-01 [23 changes]

      New 18
      On-Hold 5

      new
      freedishnetwork.net
      hypotheken-rechner.com
      hypotheken-rechner.info
      hypothekenrechner.info
      johne-karosseriebau.com
      kushner-rendon.com
      laughnewyork.com
      nordic-schneeschuh-park.com
      nordicschneeschuhpark.com
      p-kushner.com
      paulkirchner.com
      planetroughnecks.com
      prakashnet.com
      s-kushner.com
      schneider-electrik.com
      schneiderastroskop.com
      worldtechnetwork.org
      khne.info

      on-hold
      ahnetwork.com
      click2richness.com
      dump-dishnetwork.info
      hahne-link.com
      teltechnetworks.info

      Tell me how many of those provide any real content. On some days the god-for-nothing ratio is even worse.

    6. Re:Content? by opqdonut · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So you think domains exist only for web content? The web is a relative newcomer on the internet, and AFAIK full of crap. There's no point in adding to the crap if you have nothing to say. A domain with no web suits me fine, i prefer ssh, mail, irc and usenet :)

      --
      yes > /dev/dsp
    7. Re:Content? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I agree, that is mostly what I use my domain for. Another thing to consider is that webhosting has gotten loads cheaper in the last 6 months. The company I host with offers 10G/200G xfer and all the features for 3.95 a month.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:Content? by pretzelsofwar · · Score: 1

      humm, it might be interesting to have a list...

      --
      redvsblue.com
      ::BANG!::
      Sarge: Did you just shoot yourself in the foot?
      Simmons: Yeah I do that sometimes now..
  2. Squatting by Nurgled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet most of this year's domains have been registered by the automated scripts which watch for domain expiry and jump in and register the domain from underneath the owner.

    I've seen this happen in no more than a day. It's very annoying, and means people have to move their sites elsewhere and deal with the old site now being at best a page full of adverts and at worst a redirect to some weird porn.

    1. Re:Squatting by noselasd · · Score: 1

      My bet is pr0n sites. They seem to hog every goddamn combination of obscene words.

    2. Re:Squatting by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but you see, that's the beauty of it; these cocksuckers probably don't watch their own websites. Have a world of wierd porn linking to a website that says "sorry, this scamming bastard has been shut down".

    3. Re:Squatting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know... Every registar I've had let me renew my addresses way before they'd expire and even have a "saftey period" right after they expire before anyone can re-register it. Of course maybe I've just got good registars, but seriously if you aren't really watching your domains and renewing them then perhaps you don't really want to keep them.

      I've got a hunch more than a few of those domains just happened to be "sold" to those scripts. It's more logical.

    4. Re:Squatting by CrackerJack9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, this could cause some problems for those evil scripts...

      What is the Domain Redemption Period?

      The redemption period is a Domain Registry period of up to 30 days that occurs when a domain name is deleted after having expired unrenewed. Instead of just getting deleted and returning to the pool of domain names available for registration, the existing registry keeps a hold on the domain name in a what is technically called as REDEMPTION PERIOD.

      *IMPORTANT PART*
      During this 30-day redemption period, the original domain registrant (owner of the domain) is allowed to retrieve the domain name from deletion by contacting their Registrar. [Google search]

      I actually own a name that expired in September--having forgotten to renew it even I am having trouble transfering it back to myself (through a different registrar)...so them must be some incredible magical scripts....

    5. Re:Squatting by Nos. · · Score: 1

      As many have noted, most registrars will notify you repeatedly when a domain is about to expire. I use domainsatcost.ca and just have mine setup to auto renew on my credit card. I don't even think about my domains expiring, just notice about a $15 charge on my credit card every now and then for a domain renewal.

    6. Re:Squatting by neoform · · Score: 1

      you're tell me..

      i had djneoform.com stolen from me and the new owner wanted to sell it back to me for $400USD, i told him to fuck off. i don't know why it's even legal, they aren't even doing anything with the domain, it doesn't even point to a server.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    7. Re:Squatting by Feyr · · Score: 1

      i got mine from www.dynonames.com registered for 10 years, for about 80$

    8. Re:Squatting by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      Also, I thought that "safety period" was a requirement. I think you have 60 or 90 days after expiration to renew.

    9. Re:Squatting by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      How did they steal it? Did you let it expire, or did they force you at gunpoint to transfer it to them?

    10. Re:Squatting by neoform · · Score: 1

      much like my current situation due to stupid rules, you cannot transfer a domain 60 days prior to it expiring, so unless i want to pay my current registrar's fees to re-register it, then have it transfered, my only option is to let it expire then immediately register it again. unfortunetly (for me) those that snatched it up do this all the time and register 'just-expired-domains' in hopes of catching people like me.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    11. Re:Squatting by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      Thats kind of sneaky - I wonder why the 60 day rule? A transfer shouldn't take very long at all - a matter of hours, a couple of days at most?

    12. Re:Squatting by jrumney · · Score: 1
      As well as squatters, there's spammers and phishers who have to keep opening new domains to replace the ones that get closed down.

      How many variations on c1t1bank.com are there in that list of new domains I wonder?

    13. Re:Squatting by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No all registars do that, you have a safety period of about a month. There's still a big rush to grab the domain after this period. Especially since search engines are now giving higher weight to websites that have been around for a while. I guarantee if you have PR 6 or higher and you let your domain expire, there will be every damn search engine spammer and their mom trying to get your domain.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    14. Re:Squatting by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In my observation, the worst squatters are unscrupulous domain registrars (not just the 3rd-party brokers). Which is why I believe registrars should not be allowed to own any domains other than those they need for their business, or for personal sites, and those should be adequately documented as such.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. Don't believe by AlexTheBeast · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am so jaded.

    The first thing I thought about when I saw this... what is VeriSign trying to pull now.

    /godaddy believer now

    1. Re:Don't believe by BoldAC · · Score: 1

      I don't know why...

      They only do great things!

    2. Re:Don't believe by ultrasonik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One note about Go Daddy. I checked the availability of a domain name on Go Daddy. It was available. Then a couple months later I went to register it and it had been bought by a squatter. This has happened to me not once, but twice. Is Go Daddy selling their whois lookups to squatters?

    3. Re:Don't believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding! I'm sure their stock holders would agree.

    4. Re:Don't believe by hendridm · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Then a couple months later I went to register it and it had been bought by a squatter.

      Yeah, I went to a used car lot once and the same thing happened. I saw this car that was a sweet ride for a good price. When I came back a couple months later to buy it, it was gone. I think the dealer probably put out extra flyers on it since it was now obvious it was popular, and could thus charge more. Bastard.

    5. Re:Don't believe by BoldAC · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful

      Because A happened after B doesn't mean that B caused A.

    6. Re:Don't believe by Patik · · Score: 1

      It's pretty ridiculous to draw that conclusion from this scenario. Two people must've been looking at the same domain. Why did you wait two months and give them the opportunity to take it?

    7. Re:Don't believe by mikrorechner · · Score: 1
      ...what is VeriSign trying to pull now.
      You know, I also thought there is something fishy when I read this:
      Another key trend identified by the study was the further establishment of the .net domain's role in the health and functioning of the Internet overall. While the domain accounts for only eight percent of domain names worldwide, it includes 58 percent of hosts and 30 percent of name servers.
      ICANN is accepting proposals for the .net registry since end of November. Verisign will bid, and maybe they want say that it would be better to keep the current registrar by stressing the importance of the .net tld for "the health and functioning of the Internet overall".

      On the other hand, one of the other bidders will be DENIC, the registrar for the .de ccTLD - the second biggest TLD (over 8 million entries) after .com (over 30 million entries). They should be capable of managing the ~5 million .net domains.
      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    8. Re:Don't believe by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      wow, twice. i thought about getting 'www.getfoxfire.com' because people are dyslexic, but it was registered a few days before i checked. i believe, according to your definition, that someone stole my thoughts before i thought them and decided to buy the domain before I did. thanks sir.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    9. Re:Don't believe by e2ka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a theory like that too. I was interested in getting a site that was my own (uncommon) last name. I ran several whois searches over a few weeks while I thought about it. Then when I finally decided to buy it, it was gone.

      It is now a redirect to seeq.com, and my family name is shamed :(

    10. Re:Don't believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the domain he wanted to register was called ajdpqbrzqw.com. I don't see how this could have been guessed and registered by someone else.

    11. Re:Don't believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe the domain he wanted to register was called ajdpqbrzqw.com. I don't see how this could have been guessed and registered by someone else.

      Agreed, and in that situation, I would tend to think they sold it to squatters. However, the parent made this accusation, and not a very good one (several months?), without suggesting what type of domain it was.

    12. Re:Don't believe by shreyasonline · · Score: 1

      You must use the WhoIs service from http://www.internic.net instead of using any stupid Go Daddy WhoIs service.

  4. call for the silliest one ! by selderrr · · Score: 1, Funny

    Add below the most silly domain name you've encountered so far ! this one is a nice start

    1. Re:call for the silliest one ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:call for the silliest one ! by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not particularly silly (especially if you're a Welsh speaker), but certainly long: http://www.llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwyl l-llantysiliogogogoch.com/

      Oh alright, it is silly.

      Apparently even the place-name was made-up - in the 19th Century, to attract tourists on the new-fangled railways.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    3. Re:call for the silliest one ! by Cylix · · Score: 1

      There are so many odd ones out there.

      You can whois /odd combination/* and find some goofy ones.

      ASDFASDFASDFASDFAWDFSADFASDFSDF.NET

      Whois is fun!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:call for the silliest one ! by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Well, my fave has always been johnkerryisadouchebagbutimvotingforhimanyway.com

    5. Re:call for the silliest one ! by lxs · · Score: 1

      Naoto Hattori's site is either silly or annoying depending on your mood:

      http://www.wwwcomcom.com/

      Nice art though.

    6. Re:call for the silliest one ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found this one to be quite funny :)
      http://www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz.nl/

    7. Re:call for the silliest one ! by erotic_pie · · Score: 0

      one of my favortes is http://www.31337.com/

      Another good one is http://www.josh.com/

      and who can forget maddox http://thebestpageintheuniverse.com/

    8. Re:call for the silliest one ! by jonasj · · Score: 1
      How about this then:

      http://slashdot.org/

      :-)

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
  5. New sites by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    VeriSign announced that 5.1 million new domains were registered in the third quarter of 2004

    The representative then added "Approximately 58% of these are phishing sites."

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:New sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the rebels Sir.............they're here....

    2. Re:New sites by Oswald · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Click here for details (sucker).

  6. Yoo-hoo!! by ceeam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What a milestone. Or not? Is it any wonder that now there are more registered names than before? Would you expect inverse? Let's post this kind of stuff every month!

    And then - I'm sure they are counting only 2nd level names, right? And country-specific names are not included, are they? informatics.uni.edu and economics.uni.edu are counted as one? the-company.com and thecompany.com are counted as two?

    Finally - what constitutes a "live" web-site? "Under construction" counts? And why a web-site? Is there a rules that every resolved domain name should have a web-server at port 80?

    1. Re:Yoo-hoo!! by shufler · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Subdomains beyond the second level aren't usually bought from a registrar, and more importantly, aren't registered. Just add it into your DNS zone, and away you go.

    2. Re:Yoo-hoo!! by Plutor · · Score: 1

      Third-level domain names don't have to be registered, and more importantly, VeriSign has no idea (and it would be impossible to find out) how many "deep" domain names exist. At the company I work for, we have at least a dozen strictly-internal subdomains: dmz, dqs, corp, stress, etc., and thousands (maybe tens of thousands) of node names registered in DNS. If each of these internal FQDNs were counted separately, I guarantee you the number would be much higher.

      Unless BIND was phoning-home, there would be no way for anyone to figure out how many of them we had configured. And even then, it'd have to get around our firewalls.

  7. My domain by guttergod · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somebody told you you were one in a million?? I laugh at you lack of uniqueness. I have one domain name... This means I am one in 66.3 million.... Go figure... :)

    --

    Apple built a platform for their ideas, Google built one for everyone's.

    1. Re:My domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      HA! I have three domains, so that makes me...uh...oh....HA! I have three domains!

    2. Re:My domain by Mordack · · Score: 1

      Somebody told me I was one in a million. With a world population of over 6 billion that means there are over 6000 people just like me! So I kicked his ass! I want to be unique!

      --
      I don't need no stinkin' sig!
    3. Re:My domain by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Somebody told me I was one in a million. With a world population of over 6 billion that means there are over 6000 people just like me! So I kicked his ass! I want to be unique!

      There comes a time in every man's life when he must hunt down and kill all 5999 of his doppelgangers.

    4. Re:My domain by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you are a completly unique and special individual. Just like everybody else...

  8. Acceptance of country code TLDs by iwan-nl · · Score: 5, Insightful
    country code top-level domains are becoming more widely accepted

    I don't know about the rest of the world, but here in the Netherlands our country-code TLD (.nl) is far more accepted than .com or .net. People have more trust in it because this TLD can only be registered by "legit" companies.

    --
    I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    1. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It's similar in germany, at least as far as the acceptance of ccTLD (.de) domains are concerned. I'd guess that at least 99.9% of all domain names that you see mentioned in advertising, commercials etc. are under .de, and it's probably even more than that.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by shufler · · Score: 1

      There is stigma here in Canada against our TLD (.ca) for some reason. Americans hate it ("Pffft. Dot-c-a's suck!"), and Canadians seem to want the usual .com, .net, and .org TLDs.

      That said, country-code TLDs usually cost more for some protectionist reason. You should see the agreement you need to agree to to get a .ca. All sorts of crazy shit which boils down to "Just be glad you don't need a trademark to get a .ca TLD anymore." They removed that insane requirement back when the cira took over.

    3. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      4 years ago yes...

      A few years ago, they began allowing the crazy private tld ".123.nl" and such. This wasn't much of a success (hey, the person who owned '123.nl' could even do that), so they decided to allow it alll..

      Right now, it's pretty easy for a company to claim a domain name that is 'truely' theirs over here, which is a big advantage. However, you are able to register it without any proof of being a legit company. Your information is outdated.. :P

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    4. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All sorts of crazy shit which boils down to "Just be glad you don't need a trademark to get a .ca TLD anymore." They removed that insane requirement back when the cira took over


      I don't know, I think .ca was a lot more valuable when the requirements were in place. I think you also needed to have offices in at least 2 seperate provinces as well - otherwise you'd get *.XX.ca (where XX is your province abbreviation).

      Now anyone can have one (and I have a few), and there's no trust involved. I for one preferred knowing that _______.ca has at least met some criteria before I even visit.
    5. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see the agreement you need to agree to to get a .ca.

      This one? It's 11009 words, and is the reason I didn't register a .CA domain. After reading about 10000 words you'll see that it's pointless, because they can change the terms whenever they feel like it. They should have just wrote "you agree we can do whatever we want after giving you 30 days notice", which is basically the same thing in 14 words.

    6. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by iwan-nl · · Score: 1

      I don't say only legit companies can register .nl domains. That's why I put legit between quotation marks. Although it's easy to register some .nl domain as a "less legit company", .nl domains are still *seen* as more trustworthy.

      --
      I'm trying to improve my English. Please correct me on any spelling/grammar errors in this post.
    7. Re:Acceptance of country code TLDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your website slashdotisfullofca.ca ?

  9. Country Codes by kjeldor · · Score: 5, Funny

    "and country code top-level domains are becoming more widely accepted"

    I'm sure this acceptance has arisen mainly from everyone's favorite Christmas Island website and it's hypnotizing void.

    1. Re:Country Codes by rylin · · Score: 1, Funny

      Indeed, though I feel there's a huge gaping hole where once my favorite site was.

    2. Re:Country Codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure do love those Christmas Island websites

  10. Obligatory Simpsons quote by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    IMHO the greatest internet-related quote ever, and one that I will post at any remotely relevant opportunity (forgive my bad memory for inaccuracies)

    Karl: "Hey Homer! You got the #1 non-adult-oriented website!"
    Lenny: "...which makes it 10 trillionth overall!"

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I personally like this quote:

      "Girls are like internet domain names, the ones I like are already taken."
      "Well, you can still get one from a strange country!"

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by Zathras26 · · Score: 1

      It's not related to domains, but this is my favorite "Simpsons" Internet exchange, from when Homer is trying to do his own dot-com startup:

      Homer: Welcome to the Internet, friend! How may I help you?

      Comic Book Guy: I am interested in upgrading my 28.8 kilobit dialup connection to a 1.4 megabit T-1 line. Will you be able to provide an IP router that's compatible with my token ring ethernet LAN configuration?

      Homer (pauses and blinks several times): ...Can I have some money now?

    3. Re:Obligatory Simpsons quote by Alsee · · Score: 1
      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  11. .com rules, sadly by bgeek · · Score: 0

    i'm sure most people will still go for a .com before everything else.

    1. Re:.com rules, sadly by Savant-Ben · · Score: 0

      Not here in the UK, I think most people prefer a .co.uk to a .com

    2. Re:.com rules, sadly by bgeek · · Score: 0

      are you sure? most of the people i know in the UK will go for a .com before a .co.uk. unless, of course they're a) not willing to spend the money (yes, that does happen) or b) the domain has already been taken. think about it - whats the domain your avg luddite will enter into a browser? a country specific or a .com?

  12. Best registrars? by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

    Is there an alternative to GoDaddy that is just as cheap but doesn't force you to go through all those annoying ads on the way to the checkout counter?



    Eric
    1. Re:Best registrars? by gtoomey · · Score: 4, Interesting
      $5.99 at 1and1.com They also offer free DNS and allow you to point 5 additional domains to their DNS servers for free.

      .info are FREE there at the moment. Good control panel too.

    2. Re:Best registrars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The customer service at 1&1 is horrible. I would advice to pay a couple of bucks more for a quality registrar.

    3. Re:Best registrars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YAY! Let's register MORE!!! but no kidding, 1and1 is good stuff. But if you have your own DNS server, it can be a bit tricky...and between me and slashdot...I don't think they like it when you point 'their' domain to another DNS server {shrug}

    4. Re:Best registrars? by Archbishop · · Score: 1

      Don't know about price in comparison to GoDaddy, but Joker is provided good service to me, with no ads.

    5. Re:Best registrars? by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Know any cheap ones for .ca?

    6. Re:Best registrars? by mopslik · · Score: 1

      I've seen NetNation advertised a fair bit. They'll issue .ca domains for $15CAD. Haven't tried them yet, though.

    7. Re:Best registrars? by neoform · · Score: 1

      http://www.ev1servers.net

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    8. Re:Best registrars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RegisterFly.com is about $1 more, but includes free rotating e-mail obfuscation offers WHOIS protection for only $0.99-$2.50/year (depending on the sale), whereas GoDaddy charges $9/year. In the end, RegisterFly is cheaper and results in next to zero WHOIS spam.

    9. Re:Best registrars? by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've used LowCostDomains.ca for a few. They charge $17.45 (Canadian kilopennies) for .ca domains, haven't had any problems pointing them to the DNS my web host (KGB Internet Solutions, also Canadian and great for Java hosting, though the name may former residents of the Soviet Union a pause) maintains.

      Eric
      Check your HTTP headers here
    10. Re:Best registrars? by savers · · Score: 1

      Netfirms is selling .com .net .org domains for $4.95/yr. http://www.netfirms.com/offer/

    11. Re:Best registrars? by elrusoloco · · Score: 1

      Just as a heads up - they still ask for a credit card number when you register the free .info domain....not sure why. I just tried.

    12. Re:Best registrars? by _Laban_ · · Score: 1

      try joker.com. Good prices. No ads. No nonsense. All domains "domain locked" per default.

  13. And in other news... by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Funny

    The number of domain names used for hosting adult content, was reported to have hit the 50 million mark.

  14. maybe... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's because the old domains never die. These god awful search sites and other squatters just buy them all up. I use to own the domain name jeremylogan.com (my name), since I let it die two different domain squatters have bought it up as soon as it was available. I'm really beginning to think we ought to have to justify our domain names in some fashion.

    If you need a little help being convinced just check out http://manpage.com/ and tell me THAT URL couldn't be put to some real use.

    1. Re:maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. In the perfect world, the domain name would expire, so that someone who had an idea could register and make it useful out of it.

      But, unfortunately, domain names are big business. See sedo and similar. Attractive domain names (2-3 characters and single words with .com) still go for $1000+ each.

      People buy expired domain names that are listed in search engines, so they can attract traffic.

    2. Re:maybe... by Coppit · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that Verisign sells domain searches. I searched for coppit.com there, and a week later a squatter had it. It's not like I was going to pay the extortion, so I had to wait a year before I could get it myself.

    3. Re:maybe... by Random_Goblin · · Score: 1

      . I searched for coppit.com there, and a week later a squatter had it.

      perhaps they had this plan for selling holes in the ground to put police in, that didn't work out for some reason?

    4. Re:maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need a little help being convinced just check out http://manpage.com/ and tell me THAT URL couldn't be put to some real use.

      Umm... we're talking UNIX documentation, right? Or something else?

  15. I won't believe it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until Netcraft confirms it.

  16. Are they counting the expired ones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have 10 domain names and last year I sort of realized I had no need for all of them and only kept 3 and left the rest expired. I have a hunch many people are doing the same after all those years of domain hoarding glut.

    Seriously... Do we all really need www.iaml33tyouarenot.org with several varients of it with dashes inbetween in all country codes?

  17. hmmm by bairy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Lets round the figure down to probably 65million active domains.
    Google - Searching 8,058,044,651 web pages

    8bn/65m is 123 and a bit. So that means that all the websites average out at 123 (cached) pages. When you think the BBC boasts half a million pages, and sites such as zdnet, cnet etc have hundreds of thousands, just think how many sites only have 1 page. What a waste of domain!

    --


    Get paid to search..It's geniune and
    1. Re:hmmm by troon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's worse than that - many single-page sites will have multiple domains pointing to them...

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    2. Re:hmmm by Fingerbob · · Score: 1

      A domain is more than just a website. I have one page hanging off my domain, which normally says "go somewhere else". the main reason for me owning the domain is for mail redirection.

    3. Re:hmmm by asrgomes · · Score: 1

      Not at all.

      Most pages are not indexed. There are far more than 8G pages in the Internet... thats for sure :)

      --A.

      --
      --ASRG
    4. Re:hmmm by mwood · · Score: 1

      Exactly -- there are 65533 other TCP ports that may also need domain resolution. Internet !== WWW.

  18. CC TLD's by DarkDust · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, the second biggest TLD in numbers of registered domains is the .de domain for some time now (I don't know for how long... one year, two years ?). And both .uk and .nl aren't small fish either.

    The DENIC (the registry for the german .de TLD) has an interesting graph showing the number of domains in the ten biggest TLDs (in english).

    1. Re:CC TLD's by DarkDust · · Score: 1

      The DENIC (the registry...

      Uhm... *blush*... the link should obviously point to www.denic.de and not to www.denice.de :-)

    2. Re:CC TLD's by CrackerJack9 · · Score: 1

      That's gotta be the 'take-all-defaults- Excel &copy graphing wizard...

    3. Re:CC TLD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The .uk zone has LOADS of registered names:

      • co
      • org
      • sch
      • gov
      • net
      • me
      • nic
      • ltd
      • plc
      • nhs
      • police
      • mod

      Probably the biggest domain there is! (Seriously, though: I bet .de and .nl have lots of naming problems since their entire country is competing for one, flat namespace.)

  19. Registered... but not in use... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The dirtiest trick in the book concerning domain names is how some companies use the "Is this domain still available"-forms to register that domainname you asked for, right after you enquired about it.

    I myself have been dumb enough to first enquire about a few (nosoup4u.com/nosoup4u.net) ; only to find out the hard way it had been registered only a couple days later.

    If the site(s) would at least be used, it wouldn't be too disturbing to me... but since it's only registered, to be bought over by the highest bidder...

    I also know it's very hard to regulate this ; and even harder to 'check' if someone is really 'using' a site ; As , after all, someone could be using it (without my knowledge) purely to use it for, eg. FTP transfers, and not a website.

    Still, it gives me a sour taste in my mouth.

    1. Re:Registered... but not in use... by stoutstreet · · Score: 1

      Not getting in to the whole 'this could be a coincidence' deal...but why wait to register a domain you think is worthwhile? It's only $8 or so.

    2. Re:Registered... but not in use... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      It's something I did years ago... When I was a complete and utter newbie ; Not realising the same (trying to discover if a domainname is taken) could have been accomplished by simply typing it in a browser :/

      Coincidence ? Yes, maybe ; I have heard of more people who encountered the same problem though.

    3. Re:Registered... but not in use... by rthille · · Score: 1

      I'd do a test and see if they do that with a completely random domain: 'dfnl2398723.com', and if so, I'd write a script which hit their site for 10-20 random domains per day, maybe thru some of the web-anonimizer services to give different IPs. At just $5/domain, you'd cost them $50-$100 per day for their assholishness :-)

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    4. Re:Registered... but not in use... by standsolid · · Score: 1

      Did the same thing happen with your Slashdot User ID? //88standsolid88//

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    5. Re:Registered... but not in use... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      But what if the "check it out" site is in fact an unscrupulous registrar? in that case registering the domain costs them nothing. (Someone speak up if it does actually cost them something.)

      MOST of the squatted domains I've encountered are owned by either registrars, 3rd party brokers, or by hosting companies who *also* broker domains. Which is why I think such outfits should not be allowed to own any domain except those they can demonstrate a need for in their business.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  20. Re:Squatting - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not what "squatting" is. If a domain has fully expired, the original owner doesn't "own" it anymore.

    Note that for it to be taken by someone else, that means it was deleted from the registry which takes a full 45 days minimum! Anyone who doesn't notice their domain is down for 45 days, never really cared about it in the first place - remember they could have gotten it back in those 45 days.

  21. I wonder how many... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

    include pictures of some ladies cat or some family's newborn baby. http://fromthemorning.blogspot.com/

  22. Re:Squatting - NOT by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    While that's true (for the gtld registries) I still don't like the idea that thousands of otherwise-available domains are pointing at random advertising sites that nobody cares about.

    Regardless of whether or not this "should" be done, the fact is that these scripts can register domains much more rapidly than any human can directly -- they just go for anything which has just expired. This would at least partially account for a spike in domain registrations, much as scripts for registering common typos do.

    My point was mainly that it's due to the rise of automated registration scripts that registration has spiked.

    (Side note: I'd define "squatting" as sitting on any domain providing a "service" that no-one really wanted, preventing a more relevant service from taking that name. Early on this was done on trademarks, and now it's done on expired domains. Either way, the result is lots of domains that can't be used because they are attached to rubbish. If you don't like that, then never mind. The term used doesn't really matter.)

  23. One per company by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't it policy back in the dark ages (I seem to remember it from '88-'90 or so) that you could get one (and only one) domain name per company. headache.com and constipation.com wouldn't both go to Johnson & Johnson or some other drug company; you'd have just johnson-and-johnson.com.

    Is this a false memory? I also seem to recall that microsoft.com had just launched its MSN service to go head-to-head with Prodigy, CompuServe, and AOL. And to get the domain name msn.com, didn't they create a small business just down the street from the main campus, something like Micro Solutions Networking (MSN)? I swear I could remember doing a whois on it in like '92 or so and seeing the highly suspicious street address.

  24. .eu by smacktits · · Score: 3, Interesting

    country code top-level domains are becoming more widely accepted.

    Speaking of country code TLDs, anyone know for sure when .eu will become available? I've been waiting for that for a year now.

    1. Re:.eu by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      The European Union is not a country, it shouldn't have a TLD.

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:.eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and neither is .com or .org a country. ban them i say!

      in fact, is .int a country (eu.int, nato.int)?

      so why not .eu?? feeling eurosceptical today, are we?

    3. Re:.eu by smacktits · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The EU is a large association of countries and is quite justified in having a TLD. I would have no problems with allotting TLDs to South America, North America, Asia, Australasia or other regions.

      I can't say the same for .info, .biz, .tv and all the other crappy ones out there.

    4. Re:.eu by TechSam · · Score: 1

      .tv is Tuvalu's TLD. Perhaps you meant .name.

    5. Re:.eu by smacktits · · Score: 0

      Sorry, yes I did.

    6. Re:.eu by DrCash · · Score: 0
      You forgot Poland!

      .pl!


    7. Re:.eu by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Speaking of country code TLDs, anyone know for sure when .eu will become available?"

      The EU isn't a country, it doesn't have a country code, and it won't be recognised by ICANN. All of the territory of the EU overlaps other countries, therefore it will not become a country code. ICANN is keeping the .eu domain reserved for this purpose, but doesn't plan to create a country-specific domain for a non-country.

      Disclaimer: everything I know I learned from wikipedia! ;-)

      At the moment, EU sites are using *.eu.int

      Codes to look for are ISO_3166-1 and rfc1394

  25. running out of good names? by voteforkerry78 · · Score: 0

    .coms are running out. .nets too. that leaves... .biz!

  26. Gaining/Losing registrars by Saeger · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just thought that it would be interesting to note that NetworkSolutions and Register.com are in the Top10 losing registrars. Seems many people have been wising up to overpaying for inferior service and are transfering their domains.

    The fastest growing registrar happens to be GoDaddy.com, where I moved all my domains to several years ago.

    You have to keep watching that bang/buck ratio in registrars, webhosting - in all things. You stay with one provider of anything too long and chances are you'll end up paying higher static prices for the convenience of not looking around at the competition once in a while...

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Gaining/Losing registrars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A client of mine is paying $90/month for crappy win2000 IIS hosting on a slow overcrowded shared server that is also open to exploits. I explained to him that you could get a dedicated server for that price but he wants to stay where he is because he thinks somethign will break. oy vey. people positively abhor change.

    2. Re:Gaining/Losing registrars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know why everyone loves GoDaddy so much. They charge an extra $9/year for WHOIS protection, which really adds up if you have a lot of domains. Meanwhile, sites RegisterFLY offers WHOIS protection for $0.99-$2.50/year (depending on the sale) and NameCheap is offering it for free right now. Both are eNom resellers. And RegisterFLY offers an alternating spam-filtered e-mail address with every domain at no extra charge, which rocks.

      The one time I registered a domain with GoDaddy, it seemed very difficult to add/modify DNS records. Why? If I didn't want DNS, I'd go with one of those $6.49 registrars.

    3. Re:Gaining/Losing registrars by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Gosh, I've never really worried about whois protection. That's what good spam filtering is for. I suppose I'm less worried about my "private" information, since my domains are held by the company I run, generally in the name of the corporation - and those records are public in my state. *shrug* I'm just not quite that paranoid.

      I'll admit that godaddy is uber-annoying now with all those frakin' adds, but really its just a couple of extra clicks. Plus, it seems that the owner is a decent guy. Same goes for my hosting service. It may not be the best, but its reliable, and when I've had questions in the past, I've gotten answers from good people, including the owner.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Gaining/Losing registrars by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I also use GoDaddy -- their prices have been creeping back up lately and are now in the middle of the pack (they were the cheapest around when I first registered a domain), but so far they seem honest, and I've been *very* impressed with their real-human support. So long as nothing changes for the worse, I don't feel much urge to look for a new registrar. Yeah, I could save about $30/yr now, if I moved my domains elsewhere, but trust and service are worth something.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  27. Blame the Registrant by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    I mean, in this day and age you have to be a complete baffoon to let your domain expire. My registrart ( GoDaddy.com ) sends me notices about it needing renewal 1 month, 1 week,3 days, and 1 day before expiry. I imagine other registrars are simmilar - after all, they want you to renew with them.

    How can you not notice all these??? If you let the date slip by after all these, then you don't care baout the domain very much, or are a moron. Or both.

    1. Re:Blame the Registrant by Frobnicator · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How can you not notice all these??? If you let the date slip by after all these, then you don't care baout the domain very much, or are a moron. Or both.
      Or you changed email addresses, or you registered with fake data (in spite of the requirement that you don't), or you created a temporary mail account on something like hotmail to register the domain on, or your spam filter deletes it, or the person getting the email has been fired from the company, or ....
      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  28. Domain names and cyber squats by famouswhendead · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yep it does p*** me off with all the squatters around one typo and popup hell if you're on the wrong comp with wrong browser. But even I've owned my share of unnecessary domain names just in case ;) no real money made though (hundreds of euros not thousand anyways). Hell the more domains the better even though it feels a bit like a redlight district sometimes stuck inside some techno IT ghetto

  29. most of them are mine! by hostylocal · · Score: 0

    i have a really bad habit of buying domain names while drunk. there's nothing like 6 pints of beer to make me think 'i wonder if that is registered...' all they seem to do is generate spam for me! :(

  30. Temporary Pages by echocharlie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think those figures are misleading. What about those registrars that automatically generate a home page for you? Are those included in the tally? And what about squatters that just put up a generic search page? There's too many variables for those numbers to be very useful.

  31. One domain per household by Mos_Hos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the increasing number of people switching to broadband, and the availability of personal servers like The Net-Box, obtaining and using a domain for one's home is not only easy and affordable but also reasonable. I believe that a big share of the domain registrations is for home/personal use and that the numbers will continue to increase.

  32. the-center-of-the-internet.com by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    the-center-of-the-internet.com (about 1996)

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  33. Probably all spam URLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be willing to bet that most of them are URLs for spamvertised websites. Oh SURBL how I love thee.

  34. 66.3 million domain names..of which TLDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they claiming 66.3 million .com/org/net domains are registered or ALL Top Level domains ?

    This is relevant.

  35. Domains and SoundEx by TexasCowboy23 · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered why we *have* these TLDs and country domains. I know that in the early days they helped parse traffic and what not, but nowadays, with so much crap out there on the web, why not just have domain names? i.e. 'cartoonnetwork' rather than 'cartoonnetwork.com'? That way, a business (like Dell and IBM) could just register 'Dell' and 'IBM' ... Make the domain name the TLD. Seems easy enough to me. (I know there's probably a reason we have TLDs, but I'm just being hypothetical.) =)

    At that ... Here's an idea: why don't the Registrars perform an extended SoundEx() on domain names in their database? If I wanted to register cartooonnetwork.com, the Registrar simply shouldn't let me. Or if I wanted to register delll.com or ibmm.com. Or even Barrbie.com ... ('The domain name you requested too closely resembles an active domain.') I know that for the Registrars, they don't care, as long as they get money. But it costs companies and users who then have to spend more money defending a copyright or trademark, etc. If I *really* wanted the domain, it should then send a notice to the existing domain and request permission. But it would certainly cut down on porn sites. I'm getting tired of mistyping google.com and getting slapped with spyware, porn, and miscellaneous crap that I don't want to see. (Well, the porn is okay, but when I *ask* for it. *grin*)

    *shrug* If only if the world was written according to me. =)

    --
    Seth Anderson BTW, I'm not 23 anymore -- I am TexasCowboy26 now. =)
    1. Re:Domains and SoundEx by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      The most obvious reason is that adding a heirarchy reduces the chances of collision. An international non-profit called Foo, a multinational company called Foo and a little firm in Germany can all have the name 'foo' in their respective zones. (foo.org, foo.com, foo.de)

      The reason we have the naming problems we do is because there isn't enough heirarchy, combined with the social problem that people have got used to everything being in .com and have trouble remembering any other domain. If little, local companies in the UK had been prevented from getting .com and .net domains from the start then people would be much more accustomed to seeing org.uk, co.uk, com, org, net, net.uk, de, it, se and so on and they'd be better conditioned to remember which TLD belongs to each entity they are committing to memory.

      I don't much like the idea of constraining the flat namespace any further by writing off any names which are similar to other names. What happens if I get wind of a new and upcoming company falled Foobarwibblenoo and register fobarwibblenoo.com? They'll then be unable to register their trademark as a domain name without going through me.

  36. SiteFinder by Durzel · · Score: 1

    Of course, if Verisign had its own way it would reinstate SiteFinder meaning that technically there would be an infinite number of domain names registered.

  37. cdrecord by Hornsby · · Score: 1

    If only someone would tell the guy that writes cdrecord that he could get his own domain name.

    http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/glone/employ ee s/joerg.schilling/private/cdrecord.html

    --
    A musician without the RIAA, is like a fish without a bicycle.
  38. Unfortunately, by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we now expect that of that 66 million, 90% are probably like this and not as they should be.

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  39. how many? by Lardmonster · · Score: 1

    66.3 million domain names registered... ... and half of those by Russian spammers.

    --
    The more advanced the technology, the more open it is to primitive attack
    1. Re:how many? by Parsec · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... I was gonna say something like that: 60 million of those are probably spamvertised sites.

  40. Stupid Useless Advertising Sites by spikestabber · · Score: 1

    They own millions of good domains that people cant use because they are being squatted on. ICANN should put their foot down and do something about it. Now there are no names left hardly to take since they are all claimed by these stupid sites that get visits by people mis-spelling a URL or a site they used to visit.
    Examples:
    A funny Nintendo related site I used to love: http://www.nintendoclassics.com/
    The company that made Tuxracer: http://www.sunspirestudios.com/
    Shit like this just pisses me off.

    1. Re:Stupid Useless Advertising Sites by spikestabber · · Score: 1

      Actually I made a mistake...
      http://www.classicnintendo.com/

  41. fixed link by Eisvogel · · Score: 1
    1. Re:fixed link by Spoing · · Score: 1

      Links weren't broken. The .org one redirects to a link farm.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    2. Re:fixed link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Links weren't broken. The .org one redirects to a link farm.

      In deed, but the linkfarm.com has no DNS-A record ;)

  42. How many domains does one need anyway? by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    Heirachy affords a lot of flexibility in naming.

    What's so sacred about 'one dot' names anyway?
    People seem to have no trouble remembering bama.edebris.com so why should I mess with trying to register and having to pay for thisbethebamayoubelookingfor.com?

    1. Re:How many domains does one need anyway? by xamomike · · Score: 1

      obviously you aren't using the Internet for commercial purposes, because there is a huge difference.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
  43. WTF? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    And if you did any of the above, and you failed to remember to renew the domain, then it's your own damn fault. It sure as hell isn't the registrars.

  44. Do the math by 54M5UNG · · Score: 2, Funny

    SO,

    FACT: With 86,400 seconds in one day, and 365.25 days in one year, there are 31,557,600 seconds in one year.

    Under the supposition that a program were written that would allow one second to auto-load a URL into a browser, an average of 5 seconds to resolve and load a page on a standard ADSL connection, and one second to view the loaded page before repeating the process (7 seconds total), ~66,300,000 web pages could be viewed in 464,100,000 seconds.

    Dividing these seconds by the seconds in one year indicates that it would take roughly 14.7 years to perform a check on every website.

    Of course, this assumes that I Don't have to take roughly 31.3 seconds to close all the pop-up windows that the google toolbar missed, and that I have all the URLs.

    (My God, I have too much time on my hands.)

    Well, my next post will be in 2019, I suppose. ;)

    1. Re:Do the math by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 1

      Have fun. ;)

    2. Re:Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FACT: With 86,400 seconds in one day, and 365.25 days in one year, there are 31,557,600 seconds in one year. WRONG! http://www.google.com/search?&q=seconds+in+a+y ear Get your "FACTS" straight.

    3. Re:Do the math by 54M5UNG · · Score: 1

      Why do we need to argue over a paltry 7,000 seconds? CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG!?

      That's equivalent to the amount of time I wasted watching Jersey Girl.

  45. False assumption by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    I think that is the problem. People do have trouble remembering which site each domain is in. Here in the UK, people get mixed up with .co.uk and .com all the time, which has meant that most UK companies have invested in .com domains to catch the confused. Supermarket chain Iceland even briefly rebranded their company to be called iceland.co.uk even on the realspace shops and bags to try to drive the idea home. I'm sure many people have made the mistake of going to the site about Iceland that lives at Iceland.com at least once. Competitor Tesco just registered both because their name isn't a country. :)

    I'm sure that even in the US, most people's exposure to domain names is via advertising, and most organisations advertising are companies. Therefore the most common domain they see is .com, and they just come to assume that everything ends in .com without really knowing what that abbreviation means.

  46. IRC by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On our network more often I see them for irc kiddies than anything else (vainity domains). They will take the free or low cost offer of a registrar and then let it expire since by the time its time to pay, they are bored with it.

    like .tv, they might get watching.tv and make their irc domain

    was.screwing.your.wife.while.you.were.watching.t v

    and other silly shit like that.

  47. domain eminence by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Remember when the original ICANN handed VeriSign the domain registration monopoly, at $50:year? That would be $30B:year now! We're so much better off now that registration is decentralized, and it costs $3B:year industry! For serving DNS!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  48. It really shouldn't be this high by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
    A great example is having a domain name for every movie released. Dumb. Just put the damned thing in your already-registered space, movie studios!

    Repeat after me.

    DNS is *NOT* a search engine!

    1. Re:It really shouldn't be this high by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post. The other problem, of course, is single companies insisting on registering every trademark they own as a domain name. Also a dumb practice. .Net and .com for the same company, maybe, but I don't like that either.

    2. Re:It really shouldn't be this high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That also extends to telephone numbers. Quite a few numbers were wasted when pagers first became popular. Why should each pager have its own telephone number when the company selling the service could have ONE number and each pager could have that number plus a PIN? It's better now, but some still do it the old way.

  49. Banning 'Domain Parked' websites by xamomike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ICANN *should* do something, but I'm afraid they won't. What would be interesting, is get the popular popup blockers to also block domains that don't have any real information, such as Domain Parked websites, domains for sale messages, etc and get rid of all the damn traffic they grab by parking the domains. Or go back to making domains $150 a registration, instead of 6 bucks (maybe opening up registration to everyone was a _bad_ move). I would certainly think twice about registering 100 domains at $150 each, but 6 bucks?

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world; those who can read binary, and those who can't.
  50. Meaningless stats, really... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I recently worked for a company that was turning into nothing but spammers - they were registering 50~100 new domains *per WEEK* to use for bulk email.

    Just because there are X domains registered doesn't mean that they're actually being used for anything useful.

  51. Free Domain List? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a place to see the currently registered domains? I found a place that would sell me the list for $50 but for what I'm interested in that's excessive. Just .com would be good for me. thx

  52. So many ways to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This tells me that there are 66.29 million ways to say: get PrOn here

  53. 66.3 Million Domain Names by simon+hughes · · Score: 1

    Could somebody get me a list?

    1. Re:66.3 Million Domain Names by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Here's a sample.

      Listing registered domain names...
      >gorgeous-babes.com
      >gorgeous-babes.org
      >pretty-gorgeous-babes.com
      >pretty-gorgeous-bab es.org
      >pretty-sexy-gorgeous-babes.com
      >pretty-s exy-gorgeous-babes.org
      >pretty-damn-sexy-gorgeous -babes.com
      >pretty-damn-sexy-gorgeous-babes.org
      >pretty-damn-sexy-gorgeous-babes-that-will-suck.co m
      >pretty-damn-sexy-gorgeous-babes-that-will-suck .or g
      Error: Out of Memory.

  54. Step 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1. Invent new Catchphrase
    Step 2. Register Domain Name [Catchphrase].com
    Step 3. Shamelessly plug your catchphrase to the universe
    Step 4. Profit!!!

  55. Re:Squatting - NOT by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    Note that for it to be taken by someone else, that means it was deleted from the registry which takes a full 45 days minimum! Anyone who doesn't notice their domain is down for 45 days, never really cared about it in the first place - remember they could have gotten it back in those 45 days.

    This hasn't always been the case. In 2001 or 2002, my domain expired while I was on a 2 week military TDY and my stupid registrar did not automatically rebill my credit card. When I got home, my domain belonged to the vile netster and it has been so ever since.

  56. New slashdot poll by Reziac · · Score: 1

    How many domains do you own?

    -- 1
    -- 2-5
    -- 6-10
    -- 11-25
    -- 26-100
    -- I'm a registrar, you insensitive clod!!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  57. Re:And in other news...Spammer Domains by bareshiyth · · Score: 1

    Ah, there you go. I wondered when someone would get to THAT (btw, put "adult content" in quotes, huh? Ain't all that "adult" and has about as many kids looking as adults!). If you are a blogger, you probably get comment spam every day, up to 300 or 400 sometimes, all reflecting new domains trying to get around spam blacklisting and cleansing by bloggers, etc.

    I figure, the money spent (course, its a lot less that it was but a year or two ago) on all those domain registrations shows how much profit is in the "adult content" and drugs-online, and online gambling business!