Slashdot Mirror


Driver's Licenses with Digital Watermarks

ForceQuit writes "MIT Technology Review reports that Minnesota will begin issuing a unique driver's license designed to combat counterfeiting. It includes a reflective image (of a loon) that appears to float above and below the card when the license is tilted. It also includes an invisible, digital watermark capable of carrying security data such as date of birth. The information would be readable only through a computerized scanner, which law enforcement officers could carry."

373 comments

  1. Loons by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Funny


    The floating images will be of loons, an enduring symbol of the state.

    I thought that was California?!?!

    1. Re:Loons by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try visiting uptown in Minneapolis. Plenty of loons here too.

    2. Re:Loons by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they meant the type of loons MC Hammer used to wear? A baggy pair of silk trousers watermarked into your driver's license would certainly be distinctive.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:Loons by qw(name) · · Score: 2, Informative


      Actually, I was thinking of the Canadian one dollar coin. Nicknaming the new driver's license the loonie would fit here as well.

    4. Re:Loons by badmammajamma · · Score: 1



      I don't even live there and I'm tired of hearing them.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    5. Re:Loons by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Ignore last post.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    6. Re:Loons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The state symbol is the bird. which has been misfortunately named. Still much better than having the Steve as the state symbol.

    7. Re:Loons by Leeesher · · Score: 1

      No, no... DINKEYTOWN is the new Uptown! Your loon watching experience will be much better there... Get with the times ;)

    8. Re:Loons by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      I went to the U of MN so I spent plenty of time in Dinkytown. And you're right, the loony quotient is quite high in Dinkytown. Hmm... maybe a scientific study is in order!

      On a side note: I actually had my wedding reception at the Loring Pasta Bar. Tasty food!

  2. You're Confused by cflorio · · Score: 3, Funny

    The picture of the Loon is actually your photo!

    1. Re:You're Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      informative?!?! wtf?!?! that's insightful!

    2. Re:You're Confused by REggert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the picture of loon is actually the photo of the moderator that mod'd that as "informative".

      --

      cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

    3. Re:You're Confused by Creedo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they would mark any post in this thread as insightful.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    4. Re:You're Confused by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      informative?!?! wtf?!?! that's insightful!

      Bulls--t!! It is "interesting".

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    5. Re:You're Confused by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Re:You're Confused (Score:1)
      by Creedo (548980) on Friday December 10, @08:26AM (#11052137)
      I wonder if they would mark any post in this thread as insightful.


      Apparently not.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  3. Driver's license security by PhotoJim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds like a good idea. Identity fraud is a serious problem. I work at an insurance office in Saskatchewan (Canada) that does license issuing among other things. We get all sorts of efforts to acquire fake ID, it's rather pathetic. Almost all of the efforts involve trying to drink under age, but these days the reality is that people will try to get fake identities for less savoury purposes. It's hard to criticize this move by Minnesota.

    1. Re:Driver's license security by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Damn, glad they didn't have this when I was a teen...would have really made it difficult to buy beer/booze....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Driver's license security by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I work at an insurance office in Saskatchewan... We get all sorts of efforts to acquire fake ID, it's rather pathetic.

      i live in alberta where we have a snazzy driver's license with an encoded pattern and such.

      about a year ago i lost my license (along with just about every other card i have) so i headed down to one of the privatized "registry shops" to get a new one.

      really, the process was embarassingly easy. when the woman asked me behind the counter for some i.d. i said "it's all been stolen". she shrugged, took my picture, and gave me a brand new license basically on faith alone that i was who i claimed to be.

      now, she did look at the picture they had on file but, really, if you look like like your license photo you're in rough shape. bottom line: any 180 cm tall male with light hair and grey eyes who didn't look too dissimilar to me could have waltzed in there and picked up a license with my name on it, snazzy security stripe not withstanding.

    3. Re:Driver's license security by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try New Jersey...My college roommate did this

      He took his brothers birth certificate and Social Sec Card to a different DMV(Dept. of Motor Vehicles) and said he lost his license. Since pictures weren't kept centrally (only at local offices) they gave him a brand spanking new license with HIS picture but all his brothers info on it. And the original license his brother had was never cancelled. So now two valid licenses existed for the same person with different pictures.

      Granted you needed the docs, but hey some bad guys work in groups...


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re:Driver's license security by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 1

      In Nova Scotia (Canada) there has been an digital drvers licencse registry in place since the photo IDs came into place somewhere around 1993. I left Nova Scotia in 1996 and moved to another province. I returned in 2002 and went to get a new licence for Nova Scotia. I was shocked to see them pull up my picture from 1996 and since my driver ID is unique, I got my old one back.

      A couple of points:

      the reality of what you look like in a picture doesn't change that much.

      future facist/statist/communists states will have little trouble identifing those its doesn't like and create amazing profiles of everyone (including you!!). So make sure you are ready for your future life in a labour camp.

      it still leaves the way for me to create another ID and just put another picture in the system with my new name, address and birthdate.

      IDs in large scale environments, i.e. huge companies, soceity etc do not ensure any protection againt fraud as illustrated by one of the parent posters whos wallet was stolen.

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    5. Re:Driver's license security by JRaven · · Score: 1

      And it's precisely because of this sort of nonsense that many places in Pennsylvania will require multiple IDs from anyone who tries to use a NJ drivers license. Heck, I know someone with a valid NJ drivers license who has repeatedly had the cops called in when he tried to buy alcohol because someone at the counter thought it was a fake.

      JR

    6. Re:Driver's license security by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      She looked at your online photo - that should be good enough. I am in good shape and if you look at my photo - it seems to bear a striking resemblance to me. The process shouldn't be hard, it should just be secure - and with your picture available thats pretty good.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    7. Re:Driver's license security by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I have never understood why some places require 2 IDs. If you can get a convincing looking fake ID, getting a second non-photo and non-birthdate ID would be no problem at all. Have your older brother, or whoever's ID you're using, to apply for a credit card and then cancel it shortly after the card arrives. There's your second ID.

    8. Re:Driver's license security by e2ka · · Score: 1

      While in Saskatchewan your children may be trying to obtain fakes for booze, in Minnesota our old-enough-to-die-in-war young adults sometimes go to Manitoba to have a legal night on the town 3 years early!

      Also, there are other fakes that work just as well for getting booze in Minnesota. A lot of bars accept the temporary "yellow papers", which are pretty easy to obtain and augment... or so I've heard...

    9. Re:Driver's license security by eheldreth · · Score: 1

      I live in West Virginia, and I have been fighting for over a year now just to get an F(motercycle) class endorsment on an existing license because my house is rural enough we don't have a street address.

      --
      The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum. - O'Toole's Corollary
    10. Re:Driver's license security by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      That's easily avoided. Here in Saskatchewan, you have to see the photo driver's license, not the temporary one. No photo, no service unless you're sure the consumer is over 19. There is talk about reducing the drinking age to 18 here, since Alberta and Manitoba are 18 as you said. I'm sure that the denizens of North Dakota and Montana to the south of us would love that...

    11. Re:Driver's license security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not going to mater to your local $merchandise store clerk.

      I could go into a number of local stores, write a check, use an ID with a picture of godzilla in a pink wig (I'm bald and white, and my nose is slightly crooked but I'm not THAT ugly) and there are clerks who would accept it.

      Hyperbole aside, the best DL picture doesn't look like you after a day if you've changed your hair/ gotten a tan /etc. Godzilla in a pink wig is a passable likeness to most clerks when there is a line of people 15 deep.

      Why do I know this? I was one of those clerks. After being chewed out by too many managers for questioning Visa cards with the logos worn off, checks that looked like recovered spitwads, etc, etc, I said "fuck it. It's not my money" and let the store get ripped.

      Your average cashier is told to play nice to the customer, even if he's ripping you off to your face. Or ripping your face off.

    12. Re:Driver's license security by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure, we've had this in Ontario since 1995. The image is digitally printed and stored in a central DB. The birthday and name info is encoded into a magnetic stripe, and we have a hologram of a trillium when the card is tilted.

      What's different about this?

    13. Re:Driver's license security by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      My company wants to combat this by putting chips in your head.

      www.patriot-tags.com

      The civil liberties people complain, but only _before_ the implantation, they're a docile as lambs after it. Sometimes they get in trouble, robbing banks to raise money to invest in us, but the tech support guys are working on that.

      We've just got a $1B contract from the Chinese, and donated the cash to the Republican party, so we have pretty high hopes in the American market too.

      Anyhow, need go, just got that one pesky lone guy trying to screw things up.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:Driver's license security by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I'm pretty sure, we've had this in Ontario since 1995. The image is digitally printed and stored in a central DB. The birthday and name info is encoded into a magnetic stripe, and we have a hologram of a trillium when the card is tilted."

      Actually the birthday is 'encoded' into the license number itself. Look at your driver's license number. The last six digits are actually the YYMMDD of your birthdate.

      And your signature is also digitized. When you sign for your first driver's license, they scan it into the computer. When I got my second one, I didn't have to sign. They just used the scan from the original one and printed it again. They are pixel-identical.

    15. Re:Driver's license security by SQLz · · Score: 1

      I would agree but identity fraud/theft is mostly electronic, you don't need a fake or valid ID or anything really besides some personal data.

      Virginia has had this kind of stuff for like 10 years now. The hologram, the black strip the cops can swipe to see if the Id is legit. It doens't stop people from just getting a friends ID or going to Maryland or DC where fake IDs are easier to come by.

    16. Re:Driver's license security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minnesota just busted a huge counterfeit ring that was selling thousands of fake ids to college students. Also, until recently, Minnesota also allowed anyone to go into the department of health and request a birth certificate for anyone born in the state. All you need is the birth certificate to get a DL in Minnesota. Here is one weird thing, though: if you were born out of wedlock your birth certificate could only be obtained by your biological parents or grandparents.

    17. Re:Driver's license security by pikakilla · · Score: 1

      They will need another government issued state ID. Credit cards and whatnot would not be accepted.

    18. Re:Driver's license security by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what that would be. I'm not taking my passport to the bar; not to mention some people don't even have one. I'm not carrying my birth certificate around. It's a fine line between ensuring proper identity and driving away legitimate customers.

    19. Re:Driver's license security by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "... use an ID with a picture of godzilla in a pink wig (I'm bald and white, and my nose is slightly crooked but I'm not THAT ugly) and there are clerks who would accept it."

      I've found a good thing to do is go out, party your ass off the night before...get totally trashed...get little or no sleep, and generally look like a bad imitation of Keith Richards, then, go get your drivers license pic taken.

      That way, if you get pulled over and you've been partying...the cop will look at this picture on your license...then at you, and figure this is the way you naturally look...and not be suspicious of your 'condition'...

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Driver's license security by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      The birthday encoding into the # helps me remember my drivers license #. But some people who were born in a month before October (i.e., the month # is = 09), the encoding is slightly different.

      Someone born in 790322 may have a license # that ends in 795322 or something like that.

      I haven't figured that one out yet.

    21. Re:Driver's license security by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      I was born before October and mine doesn't look strange.

    22. Re:Driver's license security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a long time I had a Georgia Drivers liceanse in Pennsylvania. Then later I had a Pennsylvania drivers liceanse in New York. You would not believe the shit I had to put up with at bars to get a drink. (It was due to military relocation, you aren't required to change residancy, if anyone is suspicious I was up to something)

      The worst was when I moved down here to Texas still with the Penn license. Not only did I not get a drink they beat me up for being a Yankee. Heh, not really. Actually never been carded here in Texas. Go figure, you look over 12 they will give you a beer no problem.

    23. Re:Driver's license security by legojenn · · Score: 1
      The last six digits are actually the YYMMDD of your birthdate.

      Mot quite. In Ontario, the last six digits of the licence number represent the date of birth for men. For women, the fourth to last is increased by 5. My last six digits are 696111. That being said, I am sure people would be able to figure out my date of birth.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    24. Re:Driver's license security by pikakilla · · Score: 1

      True, but thats what they must accept (military id, prison ID, Student ID(so long as it has a birthdate)(really any government or likewise sponsored institution that gives photo id's with birthdate on it). I dont like turning customers down myself, but turning a customer down is much better than accepting the form of id only to find out that it was some underage kid from corporate who goes around and makes sure people do their job.

  4. Nothing to worry about... by duxwig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So really, there is no need to worry from a teenage perspective. It'll be another 10 years before any kind of tavern has a card-swiper to actually tell that you're not of age. By then, someone will have found some way to replace/confuse the machine and you'll appear of age.

    1. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1

      this might actually be a good from the teenage perspetive. When the digital encoding is cracked, and the use of the scanners is wide spread, most vendors won't even take the time to look at the card. They'll just swipe it and serve you.

    2. Re:Nothing to worry about... by duxwig · · Score: 0

      And its not like most people who serve alcohol under the age of 35 actually CARE if they serve you or not.
      They knew how the game went back in their day.

    3. Re:Nothing to worry about... by rkhalloran · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know one of the local pubs put in a scanner that supposedly can read all of the various mag-stripe licenses. He said saving the cost/headaches of fines for serving to minors more than covers the cost (approx US$2K).

      Don't know how many of the forgers hack up the mag-stripe data as well, but it's probably not a lot.

    4. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posted Anon for obvious reasons.

      As a college student on top of these types of things.
      It is easy and done at nearly every professional place. So if you want to make one yourself, it most likely will not have one, but the professional ones will scan.

      But what most students do is just use IDs that don't have mag-stripes. You always aim for the weakest link...

    5. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He said saving the cost/headaches of fines for serving to minors more than covers the cost (approx US$2K).

      Not to mention the high-quality database he's been able to acquire of information about his patrons. Not just name, sex, height, date of birth, eye-color, home address and DL# -- all highly desirable to someone making forged driver's licenses --- but also the patterns of their comings and goings at his place of business, both individually and group demographics (as in Tuesday night seems to be popular with the yuppies as well as something more devious like Fred and Bob always show up at about the same time together, maybe they are having an affair).

      I refuse to let any non-government agency swipe the mag-stripe on my driver's license If they won't serve me without doing so, I don't do business with them. I have walked out on such establishments in the past, the risk of identity theft is a lot greater than the occasional hassle of such precautions against it.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:Nothing to worry about... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Don't know how many of the forgers hack up the mag-stripe data as well, but it's probably not a lot.

      The hell it isn't. I know a lot of people who re-encode their license mag stripes to get into bars (the bouncers take a quick glance at the photo and swipe the card...they will believe whatever the machine has to say.)

      For this reason, I believe that machine readability is a disaster waiting to happen.

    7. Re:Nothing to worry about... by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 4, Informative
      In Michigan anyway, and I am assuming most states, the mag stripe contains a very limited amount of info. There's your DL number, your DOB, and a couple of SMALL numeric codes that, from what I can tell, correlate to the office where your ID was proccessed at, and the type of license/endorsements you have (regular driver, CDL, School Bus, HazMat, motorcycle, etc).

      I am involved in a project to install new ID systems in the Sec. of State offices here, and I have personally scanned my licence into a text editor and looked at the information on there. It's something like 45 characters or so.

      If you are worried about someone getting all that iformation, it would be much more effective and much easier to have a cheap camera installed at teh point of sale (cashier register, self checkout lane, in the black light of the door bouncer types of bars) and grab medium resolution 5 fps video of everything that goes by. All that info that you are paranoid about giving up through an electronic reader is actually on the front of your license.

    8. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Olinator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Blockpoth the quoster:

      [...] I refuse to let any non-government agency swipe the mag-stripe on my driver's license If they won't serve me without doing so, I don't do business with them.[...]
      There's a simpler way -- introduce the magstrip on your license to Mr. Bulk Magtape Eraser. Then they can swipe away, and when their reader doesn't work, you say "Yeah, that happens to my credit cards, too, sometimes -- I occasionally work around high magnetic fields." Then they have to look at the front of the license anyway. If they don't accept it, it's not like you're out anything -- you weren't going to frequent their establishment anyway, right?
      Ole
    9. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Ickster · · Score: 1

      That's already a problem. Some municipal liquor stores in the Minneapolis suburbs require that you let them swipe your ID as proof of age (they claim they don't store the information; it just enables the register when they swipe the ID) but when I've gone through those, they just swipe it without ever looking at it. The more complex the actual IDs get, the less actual intelligence is applied by the person authenticating.

      --
      --- Usually, those that believe in absolutes are ignorant, fools, or both.
    10. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be just as worried about government agencies acquiring information about me as I would be worried about private organizations doing so.

    11. Re:Nothing to worry about... by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      There have been many news stories about bars USING and sharing the information on cards.

      So, when you get kicked out of a bar, they can prevent you from re-entering at later dates. Also, other bars on the network will also prevent you from entering their establiments as well.
      There are also numerous cases of bars selling the information of who visited them.

      I'm surprised at the newsworthiness of the story, other than it being a mid-west state finally implementing these features. Washington and Florida have had the holgrams, and digital info for quite a number of years, I'm sure other states have too.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    12. Re:Nothing to worry about... by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      disregard me, I should have RTFA before reading the comments

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    13. Re:Nothing to worry about... by AlanKHG · · Score: 1

      Depending on the state, the license number can contain a significant amount of information, including birthdate and a significant portion of the person's name.

      Here's an example.

    14. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Phishcast · · Score: 1
      I used to live in Richfield, MN and all the liquor stores in that town required you to present ID so they could swipe it. I saw them ask a man obviously in his 60s for ID so they could swipe it. The cashier claimed that she couldn't open the register without it.

      Right next to the register there was a sign that read, "Card reader only verifies your age. No personal information is collected when swiping your driver's license." Kind of makes you wonder though...

    15. Re:Nothing to worry about... by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      That's really interesting. I knew that in MI the first character is the first letter of your last name, and the first three digits vary based on your last name as well. I never stopped to think wether the rest of the number holds some significance based on name. The link you provided was very fascinating.

      As it turns out, for those of you who don't want to read it, common first/middle or the first couple letters of more uncommon names are encoded in the DL number, and a very rough approximation of the last name. The name encoded from my DL # could be McPatterson, Megabit, or any number of things, none of which are my name. It would be very difficult to figure out my actual name from just the DL number. Getting my DL number from my name and DOB would be easy, of course, but it's the other way around that privacy concerns would come from.

      Either way, I am still not concerned about lettign someone swipe my ID, as the amount of information they collect is still far less than what they could get with a simple freeze frame and some basic image enhancement of a security camera tape as I pulled out my wallet to pay for something.

    16. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this is a good idea (and I like it), it does nothing to send a message to establishments that do this that what they're doing is wrong. I agree with the original poster, non-government agencies should not swipe DLs or other ID.

    17. Re:Nothing to worry about... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Some states (I know Illinois is an example) use an 2D barcode. Think of lots of little black and white 'pixels' arranged in a rectangle on the back of the card. The system is favored over magnetic strips because it's cheaper to make (just part of the printing process) and more resilient as magnets won't harm them.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    18. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Either way, I am still not concerned about lettign someone swipe my ID, as the amount of information they collect is still far less than what they could get with a simple freeze frame and some basic image enhancement of a security camera tape as I pulled out my wallet to pay for something.

      That's ridiculously poor risk assesment on your part

      The information may be the same, or even more with the camera, but the effort required to acquire it is orders of magnitude more expensive. The chances that your local liquor store has an automated system going over all security tapes to pull that information off all video-taped customer transactions is infitisemally small.

      The chance that they have a computer recording all the data from each swipe of a driver's license is probably close to 100% - the official justification being that they need a record of having verified a customer's age in case they get sued or fined for underage sales.

    19. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Some states (I know Illinois is an example) use an 2D barcode.

      And even easier to deface - black felt tip marker anyone?

      Does illinois, or any of the other states, make it illegal to scribble out the barcode?

    20. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with your right to try and stop the theft of your identity, everything the mag strip provides can be seen on the face of your ID. Also, establishments that might ask yuo for your ID are doing so for both your protection as well as there own. I work for Safeway (grocery store) and it is company policy that all credit card transactions we check for valid ID. Also if you write a check for the first time, we would like you to swipe your ID to show who you really are. If you do not want us to swipe it, we can hand enter the ID # into the system.

      Either way it is not done to gather information about our shops for business statistics but rather to make sure whoever is claiming to be you, is in fact you. It is not fail safe, but anything more then that and the customer would likely not shop at our store because it would no longer be convient.

      Also, when many establishments collect information about you through various methods (grocery stores all you club cards now, at least Safeway, Krugers, and Albertson's) it is so that we may see what our customers buy so that we may market the product for the customers better. Customers really do win when we are busy trying to provide better sales then the other guys.

      Cheers
      AC

    21. Re:Nothing to worry about... by plover · · Score: 1
      I don't get the "swipe" thing. Is someone is selling them a box as a kind of 'insurance' deal: "If you use our magic swiper we will pay your underage drinking fines" kind of thing?

      Especially in Minnesota. There are two different drivers licenses issued here: one for under-drinking-age and one for drinking-age. The drinking-age license has the photo on the right hand side, and the underage license has the photo on the left. Takes just a glance at the card and picture to see if it's a kid or an adult.

      Seems incredibly stupid to me, but then again I'm not a fan of "zero tolerance" for any non-violent crime (except for being the perpetrator of "zero tolerance" laws -- for them, I have zero tolerance.)

      --
      John
    22. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No self respecting fake ID maker would make a fake ID without a valid magstrip. I hope the bartender isn't ignoring the ID's and just swiping them because the magstrip is one of the easiest steps. The holograms on the other hand are an absolute pain in the ass.

      These watermarks seem fairly pointless to me seeing as the cops are the only ones who can tell the difference. There aren't very many people with the balls to hand a cop a fake id unless they have a good friend at the DMV.

    23. Re:Nothing to worry about... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I forget how naive and trusting the average bloke is in America. Thanks for reminding me. Let me return the favor by opening your eyes just a little bit to how the world really works.

      Also, establishments that might ask yuo for your ID are doing so for both your protection as well as there own.

      I know that's the company line, what they tell you tell the customers, but you should exercise some critical thinking before just blindly repeating it. Verification of ID for credit card purchases is NEVER for the customer's protection -- they are already protected by federal law which makes them liable for no more than $50 of charges on a stolen card and 99% of the issuing banks waive even that $50. Essentially ZERO risk. The store on the other hand generally has to "eat" the cost of a fraudulent transaction and thus it is in their best interest to reduce risk as much as possible. Thus there is no benefit to the customer to having to provide ID, but there is increased risk of identity theft and who knows what else. In other words, the company line is a flat out, bald-faced lie -- Safeway is trying to shift the risk of fraud onto their customers, they should at least be honest about it.

      I work for Safeway (grocery store) and it is company policy that all credit card transactions we check for valid ID.

      Then Safeway better get ready to lose their merchant account. Such policy is in clear violation of both Visa and Mastercard merchant policies. If Visa and MC get enough complaints, they will eventually cancel the contract. Rather than dig up an online merchant contract - read this soundbite summary. The reasoning behind these contractual clauses is that MC and Visa want their cards to be as easy to use as cash. Cash rarely needs an ID, thus credit cards must also rarely require an ID else they aren't as easy to use. Think of the policy what you will, but that is contract Safeway signed, if they don't like the burden of risk, they are free not to accept credit cards.

      Either way it is not done to gather information about our shops for business statistics but rather to make sure whoever is claiming to be you, is in fact you. Also, when many establishments collect information about you through various methods (grocery stores all you club cards now, at least Safeway, Krugers, and Albertson's).

      More rote recitation of the company line without the application of critical thinking.

      1) Unless you are close to the CIO at Safeway, you have no idea what happens to the data once it is put into the system. No matter what they are doing with it, they would never admit to anything unless caught red handed. Thus such reassurances are meaningless (at least in America, the UK and Europe they have extremely strict data protection laws that would prevent Safeway from lying about it over there).

      2) There are data-mining companies that vendors, grocery stores in particular, can get a subscription to where they feed all the information they gather (DL info, CC#, shopping lists, etc) to the data-mining company which then cross-corelates as much of that information as possible among all the subscribing merchants. So, you may avoid using those "club cards" at the grocery store, but if you pay with a credit card they can associate your purchases with your CC# and if you have an account at another subscriber like say, Blockbuster Video, where they require a credit card and personal details then viola! "they" now can connect your personal details to your purchases. They find out that you just rented Shrek 2, so they send you a coupon (only good at the groecery store) for Shrek Cereal. Or maybe the local pharamcy reports that you just filled a subsrcription for a herpes medicine, so the next week you get a coupon for condoms in the mail. At what point does "marketing" cross the line and become invasion of privacy? Or maybe Corporate stalking would be a more

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  5. Great Move, With a Caveat by Staplerh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't see any possible problems with this move, apart from the immigration part. Sounds like the information encoded in the chip contains no sensitive information, so that's a bonus, and a more secure identification system makes the entire system more reliable. However, from the article:

    There will also be a "status check" notation on the front and back of licenses showing when an immigrant's visa expires, something the state already had begun to put on licenses despite opposition from civil liberties groups.

    This is a bit of a sticky point, IMHO. This isn't really necessary, and will probably achieve nothing but undue stress for immigrants, and prompt deportation if an illegal gets caught at a traffic stop (presuming that these IDs can not be forged). I don't know what Minnesota's illegal immigrant problem is, but this is a disturbing development. It's a drivers license, not a citizenship card. First step in a bad direction?

    --
    "There's no success like failure, and failure's no success at all."
    - Bob Dylan
    1. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by PhotoJim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Immigrants don't have the same rights as citizens. That's true in every country on Earth. While they deserve certain rights, until they gain citizenship and share in the responsibilities and obligations of citizenship, they don't have the right to gain all the benefits and rights of living in that society. I don't think that Western countries have skewed the balance too far.

    2. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      Running the risk of sounding unpopular, I actually like the idea of putting the Visa status on the Driver's License. It's a fair compromise between offering licenses to illegals, and having those licenses turn into defacto proof of citizenship.

      If he's here beyond his expiration date, then he is breaking the law, and not just for running that red light.

    3. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by HawkinsD · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, sir. "Undue" stress? If they're here unlawfully, then they're breaking the law. Yes, it's stressful to be caught breaking the law. Sorry.

      Call me a fascist if you want, but this is a step in a good direction.

      --
      Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
    4. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see is that an officer could determine that the person is an immigrant from looking at the card. I could see police unfairly treating a person differently because of that.

      Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing illegal immigrants deported whether at a traffic stop or even at the local Wal-Mart. I'm really not too concerned about our immigration policy, but I do think if someone is doing something illegally and then get stopped for allegidly doing something else illegally (with just cause of course), they should be charged with both. The policeman's job is to enforce the law. If he can get a tool that will better help him to enforce that law (that doesn't violate any laws itself), I'm all for that.

    5. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the Bill of Rights applys to Ugandans living in Uganda, or for that matter every human on the face of the earth?

    6. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      AMENDMENT XIV Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868. Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
      Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    7. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Preamble:

      We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

      Sorry. Nice idea, but the Constitution applies to the U.S. only.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    8. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by JustOK · · Score: 1

      within its (the US's) jurisdiction

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      you needed to highlight two parts:

      All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

      nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      Thus people here on visas are not guaranteed equal protection of the laws as they are not born or natuarlized in the United States.

    10. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Still, that's only who created the Constitution. Its been awhile since I've read the relevant docs, but its only in terms of who can run/hold office do they mention citizenship.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    11. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Bastian · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know what Minnesota's illegal immigrant problem is

      Mostly it's people from Wiconsin crossing the river in makeshift rafts in search of lower taxes.

    12. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by JustOK · · Score: 1
      and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
      oooooo, immigrants/visa holders AREN'T subject to the jurisdiction of the US while they're there?
      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    13. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I like the idea touted by some Libertarians (with a capital "L"): loosen immigration laws to let people in for all the shitty jobs (digging ditches, crop picking) and so that there's no reason to try to sneak in. Then, anyone that sneaks in can be viewed as an invader and dealt with harshly.

    14. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the information encoded in the chip contains no sensitive information

      It's not a chip. It's a picture that can be uniquely verified. Same as having a unique number on your license.

    15. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Undue stress? It's the immigrant's responsibility to keep track of his legal status, and to leave the country once his license to remain within it has expired. "Illegal immigrants" are called that for a reason.

    16. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      according to the article, "Fake ID cards made it possible for the Sept. 11 terrorists to board commercial flights.". I thought that had already been debunked to death.

    17. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Saltine+Cracker · · Score: 1

      I don't see a problem here. Immigration is a serious issue that needs to be more seriously addressed at the state and federal levels.

      It's well known that the INS is understaffed to handle the problem of managing both legal and illegal immigrants. Look at the problem in California and several other states where the local law enforcement is instructed to ignore resident status when illegals are encountered/arrested/whatever. This is done due to a policitical fight over money. The local law enformcent will not enforce federal immigration law with out getting further financial aid from the INS.

      It's shameful, but the reality is the illegal situation in California could completely overwhelm both the INS and the local law enforcement if they applied full enforcement.

      Kudos to a State who's trying to make a difference in this arena.

    18. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by racermd · · Score: 1

      I don't know what Minnesota's illegal immigrant problem is

      Mostly it's people from Wiconsin crossing the river in makeshift rafts in search of lower taxes.


      Until it's time to license one's car... Apparently WI has a much lower vehicle registration cost than MN.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    19. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I don't care if we weaken or strengthen immigration laws--I just want them to be enforced fairly.

      This is the problem I have with amnesty--it encourages people to immigrate ILLEGALLY! Folks, if you are here, in my country, without permission, I want to know why.

      Personally, the low-wage jobs can go to whomever is willing to do them (believe me, I've had my share of them, too, including mining granite for buildings), regardless of national origin. This will only help to equalize the status of individuals all over the world. EVENTUALLY, the standard of living will rise in those countries that currently export labor, and costs will come in line with more modern countries--as long as things are allowed to work.

      Here's the deal-you go to another country to work, fine, you just have to pay all the taxes everyone else there pays, and contribute to society. The entire concept is that if you come here, you must contribute, or you have no right to use the public services. Want a license? PAY YOUR TAXES!*

      That's about enough of that.

      *Until the fair tax plan is implemented, at which time, everyone will pay taxes on goods, which SHOULD help bring in a number of people who currently skip taxation.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    20. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a "citizenship card".
      (Too bad, too, because that is part of what
      prompted passage of Arizona's "Prop 200" --
      non-citizens participating in local, state, and
      national elections w/o even a driver's license.)

      Minnesota's new driver's license is a move in
      the right direction, although IMHO it should
      include blood type, thumbprint, and DNA sequence.
      If Minnesota is anything like the Metro DC area,
      most of the local police couldn't be bothered
      less about whether an immigrant's visa has
      expired (let alone whether they entered legally
      or not.) They consider good public relations
      with the immigrant community to be much more
      important than enforcing Federal laws -- they
      leave it to DHS/INS to do the investigative
      work as well as taking them into custody.
      More like Clinton's "don't ask - don't tell"
      policy about gays in the military than anything
      remotely resembling enforcement, unless a felony
      has occurred. And the DHS/INS is still largely
      adopted the environmentalist-fisherman policy
      of "catch and release" regarding illegal aliens.
      They don't have the manpower or the detention
      facilities to properly enforce the law.

    21. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you are talking about. The driving license expiry date is already set to when the visa expires. You have to present all of your visa papers before you can get a driving license.

    22. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Not in the definition of the Bill of Rights.

      Historically, the 14 Amendment applies to citizens of the US. It was created when certain states tried to deny black slaves their rights, even though they were born in the US.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    23. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a simple boolean "and", right? Immigrants and visa holders are indeed subject to the jurisdiction of the US while they're here, but they're not born or naturalized in the US, so they're not considered US citizens.

    24. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Xcott+Craver · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You're assuming that the data on the driver's license will be correct---i.e., that it will list the bearer's current visa status.

      Will they get a free replacement whenever their status changes? Will we ever see someone mistakenly arrested because his/her license is out of date?

      If you're here unlawfully, sure you're breaking the law. If you're here lawfully but your driver's license disagrees, is that breaking the law? Does the law require you to properly maintain every thing upon which some bureaucrat decides to plaster your visa status?

      This is the same problem we have with databases of sex offenders. It may sound like a great idea, if you assume the database is accurate. But entries get stale, and suddenly people start tossing bricks through your window and beating up your kids at school.

      Xcott

    25. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by tsg · · Score: 0

      No, sir. "Undue" stress? If they're here unlawfully, then they're breaking the law. Yes, it's stressful to be caught breaking the law. Sorry.

      The huge assumption you are making is that the law is necessarily reasonable. It isn't always. Deporting an otherwise productive member of society simply because he doesn't have the proper paperwork doesn't help anyone.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
    26. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by coachvince · · Score: 0

      At least in New Jersey (USA), there's a lack of "prompt deportation". Having relatives who work in law enforcement, I know they've basically been told to "stop bothering" the INS with information about illegals they run across in traffic stops (even as drivers!).
      Of course, not to sound conservative (I am a /.er, after all), but that does cause some undue stress to those of us who are legal, licensed, insured drivers (since the illegals cannot have a license or insurance), as we never know who will try to book away after being involved in a traffic accident. It also raises our insurance rates, since there are accidents our companies can never sue for.
      I sympathize with illegal immigrants, for wanting to earn more than they do at home. But, if they came in legally, they would be supporting the system that makes this such an appealing place to work! Really, if all immigrants paid FICA, SSI, and the like, I wouldn't be upset about the load that they place on the public welfare system, and other government services.
      By the way, I'm not trying to say that illegals are all a drain on society, and nothing but that. I grew up in an area where kids mowed lawns, delivered papers, and bussed tables for pocket money. Where I live now, none of the local kids would dream of having such a menial job.

      If our society truly "falls" due to illegal immigrants (as some of my conservative colleagues seem to expect), it is our society's fault, not the immigrants, because we have allowed them to stay at our convenience, and we have made them a necessity.

      --
    27. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      This isn't really necessary, and will probably achieve nothing but undue stress for immigrants, and prompt deportation if an illegal gets caught at a traffic stop (presuming that these IDs can not be forged).

      Police already do ID checks of drivers they pull over, and will arrest people on outstanding warrants. Is that a violation of the driver's privacy, or a completely within the realm of law enforcement? If someone is in the country illegally, do we not have justification for deportation?

      I believe the discussion locally (I live in Minnesota) involved the fact that those legally in the country could acquire a driver's license valid for four years, which might last longer than their visa. A lot of this is based on perception of vulnerability rather than any actual one. Everyone wants to scramble to prevent another 9/11, but they want to plug every hole they can think of, whether or not it actually helps or makes sense.

    28. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Meh. . .

      I'll gladly pay twice as much to register my vehicle in return for paying half as much in property taxes.

    29. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I have migrated to Minnesota in search of a lower cost of drinking tickets...$130 beats $300+ any day sir.

    30. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      God forbid we deport illegal immigrants - what are they thinking.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    31. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      You are correct that immigrants are subject to the law of the US including its protection - this amendment was not broken. Illegal immigrants are breaking other laws (violating their VISA expiration date). Once they do that - their world of rights starts to shrink by a whole heck of a lot --- then again, this happens to anyone who breaks the law.
      If someone is here on a temp visa, it should be published on their license. If they want to encode it in a strip so nobody but the proper authorities can view this then fine - but at least the police can find out and deport those who are not here legally.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    32. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by habig · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that the data on the driver's license will be correct---i.e., that it will list the bearer's current visa status.

      As I understand it, it will carry the expiration date of their visa, not a "valid or not" bit. So if one needs to renew a visa, one needs to update their license.

    33. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by e2ka · · Score: 1

      If Minnesota is anything like the Metro DC area

      ummmm.... I think there may be some differences :/

      most of the local police couldn't be bothered less about whether an immigrant's visa has expired

      In most Minnesota (small) towns, the local police can be bothered by just about anything. They seem rather bored and some will hassle you for what seems like no reason at all. Note I've found this is not the case in Minneapolis, where your original comparison may actually hold true.

    34. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Justice8096 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the present time we get the best of both worlds - we get the taxes from immigrants, but we don't have to give the same quality of service to them. Social Security is a good example - Immagrants have to pay it, but until they are citizens they have no rights to the benefits. Similarly, an immagrant has to pay property taxes if he or she owns a house, but has no rights to vote until they are a citizen.

    35. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      It's the immigrant's responsibility to keep track of his legal status

      You are right of course, but as a citizen you probably don't have much contact with your country's immigration laws and administration. The latter unfortunately is very overloaded and the former are less than clear.

      To give a concrete example: I have a friend who wanted to become a US citizen - the way this usually works is to apply for a H1B, then apply for a greencard, then get naturalized. A greencard application typically takes between 2 and 10 years. For her it was more like the latter (sorry, I forgot how long it took exactly). At some point her H1B expired. My (and her) understanding of the law would have been that she'd have to leave the country at this point. The INS however told her that she would have to stay, otherwise she'd lose her position in the greencard queue. She would not be allowed to work, however. The INS did not provide her any intermediate status either.

      So put yourself in her position - she just wants to comply with the law, she certainly would have left the country and waited for her greencard (it ended up taking another 6 months, but she had sufficient funds). Now imagine having a driver's license like that. What if the next cop interprets her situation differently than the INS?

    36. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      By the way, I'm not trying to say that illegals are all a drain on society, and nothing but that. I grew up in an area where kids mowed lawns, delivered papers, and bussed tables for pocket money. Where I live now, none of the local kids would dream of having such a menial job.

      Which is a sad statement about the youth of America. These kinds of jobs give kids a perspective about what "real" work is.

      If someone (whether here legally or illegally) is here to get ahead and is willing to work hard to do so - more power to them. Give them amnesty (or whatever) - those are the kinds of people that work to make themselves and their communities better places.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    37. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      This is by design. Politicians are afraid to appear weak on immigration law to prevent voter backlash. At the same time, they are very afraid to crack down on illegal immigration because, once again, they would lose votes. There are enough immigrants who have become citizens and enough descendants of immigrants in this country that the pro-immigration groups now have significant voting power. Politicians cannot ignore the opinions of immigrants, legal and otherwise, due to their supporters' voting power. Immigration law is becoming one of those "third rails" of politics, where no politician wants to touch it with a 10 foot poll.

    38. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      No, sir. "Undue" stress? If they're here unlawfully, then they're breaking the law.
      The bit you quoted a single word from was "nothing but undue stress for immigrants". The word "illegal" didn't appear until later in the sentence. The grandparent's point about feature creep is a perfectly valid one: if the system is at all sensible then it won't issue driving licences which last beyond the entitlement to remain in the country, so it would be unnecessary to have immigration information on the driving licence.
    39. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Delphis · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone who is on the downhill stretch of dealing with the INS (permanent resident with 10yr green card now), I can tell you that yes, it is already illegal if you do keep the INS informed of your current address within about 2 weeks after you move (I think it's 10 days, but I could be wrong). Those laws were pre 9/11 too.

      If it was tied in with drivers license... bleh, okay.. I ALREADY have to carry my green-card with me everywhere I go, so that's no big deal to me. The only thing different is that my green card does not have my address on, my drivers license does. So that would be additional pressure to get the drivers license renewed.

      The only time that MAY be a problem is if you move somewhere temporarily, like I recently did. I called the INS and sent in the form both times, but I only changed my drivers license once we were in our house, i.e. not the temporary apartment. So if it were law that you'd have to change your drivers license both times, that would SUCK since it costs money to do so. Mailing a form and a toll-free cost nothing but time.

      --
      Delphis
    40. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by tsg · · Score: 1

      I thought that had already been debunked to death.

      The corollary to my sig: Never let the facts interfere with what you want to believe.

      --
      People's desire to believe they are right is much stronger than their desire to be right.
    41. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by sapped · · Score: 1

      Too late. Here in TN I am stuck with a "driving certificate" which says in big red letters "This is not an ID". I am here legally, abiding by all rules, yet the assumption seems to be that I must be a terrorist just because I am a foreigner. California had a much better system whereby they simply ensured that your license expired the same day as your visa. I get treated with respect but I will not be able to use the license past my legal limit either. Both sides win.

      However, good luck convincing anybody to treat foreigners with some respect in the current climate.

    42. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      In point of fact however, illegal aliens ARE
      a drain on society. All the border states
      with Mexico have a serious financial drain on
      their Medicare/Medicaid funds -- hospitals
      are required by law & regulation not to turn
      away patients just because they are illegal
      aliens. The state of California alone has
      determined that more than 2 billion USD per
      year is spent on healthcare for illegal aliens.

      Why should the USA accept nearly 2 million
      illegal aliens entering this country each
      year, when the backlog of persons trying to do
      the right thing and enter the USA legally may
      wait for 8 - 10 years or more for their green
      card?

      If they are in this country illegally, then they
      have already flagrantly broken the law. Many
      use forged or illegally obtained documents in
      order to stay in this country. It is a big part
      of the problem with identity theft in this
      country, not just scam artists. Quite a few
      illegal aliens become virtual slaves until their
      "fee" has been paid to their smugglers. Others
      pay their way by smuggling illegal drugs or
      weapons across the borders. IMHO, ID theft and
      similar document fraud should be treated as a
      serious felony, with at least 10 years in
      prison for the first count. Gangs that provide
      fraudulent documentation to illegal aliens should
      be charged the same as terrorists, since they
      are facilitators. Life in prison would be an
      appropriate penalty.

      Until such time as there is a cryptographically
      secure biometric national ID card, the borders
      and seaports are properly secured, and the
      current immigration laws are actually enforced
      uniformly, this country is at risk for yet
      another 9-11-2001. Not so very long ago, a
      Pakistani woman with ties to al Qaeda swam across
      the Mexican border and was heading for NYC. She
      was traveling on a fraudulent South African
      passport and made her way to Mexico. The only
      reason she was caught (at Midlands, TX airport)
      was because her clothing was still wet from the
      swim. If she has opted for taking a bus to
      NYC instead of flying there, she would never
      have been caught.

      If you want to check out a balanced overview
      of the immigration situation in the USA, both
      legal and illegal, a good place to start is at
      "www.cis.org".

    43. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by metamatic · · Score: 1
      This isn't really necessary

      It's worse than that: it's completely unnecessary.

      Every permanent resident alien already has to carry an alien registration card with their photo, thumbprint, a bunch of holograms, and all kinds of other stuff encoded into it. Cops can just ask to see that.

      All that's achieved by having another copy of the info on the driver's license is that there's one more place info needs to be updated, and a bigger chance of it being incorrect.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    44. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      These kinds of jobs give kids a perspective about what "real" work is.

      I have to agree here. After working in a gas station during high school, I realized that I don't want to be working in a job like that for the rest of my life.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    45. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "This is a bit of a sticky point, IMHO. This isn't really necessary, and will probably achieve nothing but undue stress for immigrants, and prompt deportation if an illegal gets caught at a traffic stop (presuming that these IDs can not be forged). I don't know what Minnesota's illegal immigrant problem is, but this is a disturbing development. It's a drivers license, not a citizenship card. First step in a bad direction?"

      Well...I agree with your general points on this, but, just a question...Isn't an illegal alien breaking the law by definition? Should someone in this state NOT be immediately deported?

      I was shocked on the news the other day on showing how often, known illegals are just let go. Why is this?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    46. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Not only that, but I have migrated to Minnesota in search of a lower cost of drinking tickets...$130 beats $300+ any day sir."

      What the devil is a drinking ticket????

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    47. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from Minnesota, and there was some (small) controversy here when this was passed into law. I'm pretty sure it was all part of the 9/11 hoopla, so it wasn't easy to argue too much.
      But, this WILL cause problems for immigrants. Have you ever had to deal with the INS (or whatever they're called now, department of motherland security or something)? Federal beauracracy at it's finest. My wife reported an address change 3 times over several months and when we went to the office, it was still not updated. Hopefully police officers will have some sort of interface with INS data that will reduce the hassles this can cause OR it will be quitely removed someday.

    48. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're here lawfully but your driver's license disagrees, is that breaking the law?

      Yes, (In my state, at least) it is.

      Have incorrect information on a state issued I.D. card is indeed illegal. When you move, you change your address and renew your license. If you get a new Visa, you renew your license. Simple as that.

    49. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but I have migrated to Minnesota in search of a lower cost of drinking tickets...$130 beats $300+ any day sir.

      Stop driving drunk, asshole.

    50. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by justin_speers · · Score: 1

      The "Troll" above makes a good point.

      Rights are something you are born with. They aren't something that can be taken away. They aren't granted by the bill of rights or anything else. Therefore, you don't have to be a citizen to have rights, even if your Government pretends you don't have them.

      If only citizens had the rights outlined in the bill of rights, that would imply that the first ten ammendments AWARDED us those rights. That would make them privileges, not rights, granted to us by the Government. Privileges can be revoked at any time.

      This may be somewhat off-topic, although this discussion is dealing with what have become virtually mandated Identification cards, and that could easily flow into a discussion of individual rights. I just hate to see the poster above modded down like that.

    51. Re:Great Move, With a Caveat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "people here on visas are not guaranteed equal protection"

      It says "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws", not "nor deny to any citizen within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

      It doesn't matter whether or not you're a citizen; you are entitled to equal protection.

  6. Finally, a sensible state by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    None of this encoding my life history on the card, or letting my card broadcast my identification to everyone sitting on the bus with me. This state has it right. If the cop wants my information, he can stop me and ask me for it. The things on the computer readable portion are on the card anyway, so it lets the cop scan me in and let me go on my merry way faster, without the hassle of having my DL number mistyped and coming up as some wanted murderer.

    Maybe I should look into moving.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Finally, a sensible state by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Sensible?

      Are you forgetting that Minnesota is the same state the at elected Jesse Ventura as it's governor?

      As a (now) former Minnesotan who voted in that horrible 1998 election, I too carry the shame of his being elected, even though I voted for one of the other guys (who is now a congressmen).

    2. Re:Finally, a sensible state by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Stop reminding me!

      I was out of the state when this vote happened so I take no responsibility for the foolishness of slightly over a third of our population. What % did Jesse end up getting? 35%? 40%?

    3. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarity! Someone finally bucks the Republicrat and Demopublican trend, and everyone slams the result.

      Because in the end it's really not about getting the best person for the job or a person who can improve everyone's quality of life, it's about getting a person with a label you're comfortable with, even if they haven't lived up to it for years now.

    4. Re:Finally, a sensible state by garcia · · Score: 1

      None of this encoding my life history on the card, or letting my card broadcast my identification to everyone sitting on the bus with me. This state has it right. If the cop wants my information, he can stop me and ask me for it. The things on the computer readable portion are on the card anyway, so it lets the cop scan me in and let me go on my merry way faster, without the hassle of having my DL number mistyped and coming up as some wanted murderer.

      As long as private companies (like liquor stores) cannot ask you to let them scan your license and store it in a database. I don't even want them to have my birthdate stored (I won't even give my zipcode when asked).

      I scratch the hell out of the bar on the back of my license to keep these readers from working.

      Police officers are one thing (as you are normally stopped for actually doing something illegal) but liquor stores compiling purchasers data (remember they can tie CC's to your DL info if they have it scanned within the same minute as the CC transaction).

      No thanks.

    5. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to move here. It is cold and snowy.

    6. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't stay up to date with his policies or practices as govenor, as I was out of state during his term, so I ask you this: what was his policies, what did you agree with / disagree with? The majority of the people I have spoken with seemed to think he did a good job, so I'm curious to find a counter-point.

    7. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Policies? Are you crazy? The OP was just mad he couldn't have a name-brand (tm) candidate.

      And just for the record, I did live there at the time, and it was the only time I can remember (in 25 years of voting) of actually voting *FOR* someone, instead of against yet-another-slime-to-the-core-should-be-a-used-car -salesman politician, thankyouverymuch.

    8. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Thuktun · · Score: 1
      Are you forgetting that Minnesota is the same state the at elected Jesse Ventura as it's governor?

      For those not familiar with Ventura's tenure as governor in Minnesota:
      No, the media jackals are -- what I'm saying there -- really, the book -- I take shots at politics. I take shots at the media. But ultimately, the book is taking a shot at us, the American public, because we are getting what we are asking for. We are not holding politicians accountable. We are not holding the media accountable.
      - Jesse Ventura, Sept 2000, Larry King interview (emphasis added)

      October 2000 - Ventura tells radio listeners he drank gin shots with President Clinton at the White House. White House unamused. Ventura says he was joking.

      January 2001 - Ventura toys with run for president. Las Vegas odds makers give him respectable 20-1 shot. Ventura doesn't run. He now says he fanned flames for fun.

      February 2001 - Reporters rebel at Ventura's plan to make them wear credentials designating them an "Official Jackal." Ventura backs off the plan.

      April 2001 - While lashing out at a columnist critical of his natural resources policies, Ventura says "Until you've hunted man, you haven't hunted yet."

      May 2002 - The legislative session ends on a low note for Ventura, whose plan for fixing a deficit was ignored. Budget bills were passed over his vetoes. He went fishing while legislators balanced the budget, and golfing as they trudged through the last day of session.

      June 2002 - Ventura lashes out at the media over reports that his 22-year-old son, Tyrel, used the governor's mansion as a party pad. A day after the story broke, Ventura announced he wouldn't seek re-election. He said his heart was no longer in the job but also criticized the media for invading his family's privacy.
      - Milestones in Ventura administration

    9. Re:Finally, a sensible state by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      He went fishing while legislators balanced the budget, and golfing as they trudged through the last day of session.

      Tell him to move to Texas and pretend to be conservative. Half the people here would vote for him because he says he's conservative, the other half would vote for him for not meddling in their affairs.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  7. Digital ID by Kunnis · · Score: 0

    It says something in there about a digital ID being readable by law enforcement with a scanner? What kind of ID is this? Is it Radio based or flash based? I really don't want people walking around and aiming a scanner at me, and all the sudden the billboard I'm walking next to says "Hey Joe, I know you're 28, male, and live in the suburbs, and here's the most effective adversting for you!"

    1. Re:Digital ID by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure they meant an RFID chip, but having worked with the police, I know that the scanner they're given will have to be overly simplistic to use, with only one button, and a big yellow happy face to let them know their scan worked successfully.

    2. Re:Digital ID by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I really don't want people walking around and aiming a scanner at me, and all the sudden the billboard I'm walking next to says "Hey Joe, I know you're 28, male, and live in the suburbs, and here's the most effective adversting for you!"

      The digital information does not sound like it will be RFID. TFA says that it is encoded in a digital watermark. To me that sounds more of an image analysis deal. The scanner is likely to be some sort of laser scanner that reads image data from somewhere on the licence. "The Minnesota license also includes an invisible, digital watermark capable of carrying security data such as date of birth."

      I think the licence does sound a lot better than a lot of the ideas that the government comes up with. But my issue with the article is the possible use of inaccurate facts to mislead the general public, or sheeple. In particular the line that reads "Fake ID cards made it possible for the Sept. 11 terrorists to board commercial flights." Didn't some of the terrorists of that attack have valid, official licences. After all, it isn't that hard to get a licence. Well, at least Gov. Tim Pawlenty didn't say it was impossible to counterfeit. Nothing is impossible to do, if you can make it in the first place, someone else can get the equipment and materials and make another one.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    3. Re:Digital ID by drnlm · · Score: 1
      The articles more than a little light on details, but digital watermarking is usually used to refer to an optical technique. Usually the idea is to embed some identifying characteristic in the image without visually impacting on the quality of the image. Digital watermarking is aimed at having some method for identifying the oprigin of the image. They seem to be combining this with stenography and embedding additional information in the image.

      Thus, if the article is using convential terminology, this is will require an optical scanner, and probaly one that scans the card at quite a high resolution. In this case, there should be minimal risk of remote information leakage. The dangers of any watermarking scheme is that there is a limit to how robust you can make it against changes to the image. If poorly implemented, this scheme could quite easily fail if the license is dirty or damaged.

      It is of course, completely possible that they're using a technology like RFID and simply using the phrase digital watermark to confuse the issue, but let us wait for more evidence before making that assumption.

  8. subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The information would be readable only through a computerized scanner, which law enforcement officers could carry.


    Why, are the scanners really that heavy?
  9. Re:What to think. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

    Sure, I love it when the guy at the bar scans my license even though I'm 26. That way, when anyone needs some ammunition they can easily show I'm a raging alcoholic.

  10. Can it be produced? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If so, it can be reproduced. The only issue is if the cost is too high to make it worthwhile to copy.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Can it be produced? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      "The only issue is if the cost is too high to make it worthwhile to copy."

      Herein lies the problem. These things are still going to be copied by folks (like terrorists) who find it worth the money to fake an ID. Johnny Underagecollegekid's fake ID isn't going to pass police inspection, so this is completely useless in that case (our downtown police radio the info in to the station to verify that the ID is real anyways). his scenario is similar most other lesser reason for getting fake ids. The people this ID is targeted at will be the ones with the resources to fake the info. On top of that, will the IDs that these unsavory folks fake be less scrutinized by law enforcement. After all, the card scaned properly and nobody can fake this ID.

    2. Re:Can it be produced? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      The people this ID is targeted at will be the ones with the resources to fake the info.

      Perhaps some groups yes but not all. Let's not forget the other face of terrorism; small groups of kooks like Tim McVeigh. Would McVeigh have the resources for this?

      Once again slashdotters are naysayers to a technology because it's not a catch-all. Sorry folks, if there was a catch-all solution to the problems of terrorism, illegal imigration, identity theft or forgery you let me know; we'll make a mint off it.

      By making a system more complex you increase the chances of someone making a mistake somewhere along the line. This is what law enforcement needs. Not only that but terrorists know this too. That's why the 9/11 hijackers were given instructions that stressed not violating any laws. A simple traffic violation could have brought them on to the radar of law enforcement. It's certainly happened before.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Can it be produced? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      It's possible to make physical objects extremely difficult to reproduce by using custom-built and carefully monitored equipment and materials in their construction; look at what goes into manufacturing paper money.

    4. Re:Can it be produced? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      It's ok if a system is not a catch-all, but if it's not then don't tout it as one. My primary point (at the bottom of the post) is that I fear these new IDs being scrutinized less because they are so hard to duplicate.

    5. Re:Can it be produced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Minnesota and also attend a univesity, thus I can tell you that counterfit DL's are a huge problem. I remember when we were freshman we had a friend who worked in the office that printed student ID's and we simply sent him photoshop images of doctored up DLs and we would print em off. Lucrative business for a while, until some kid at the U of M had his dorm room stormed by the police and all of his card printers et. al. were confiscated. So it has been a huge problem here.

    6. Re:Can it be produced? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      Wait... where's the sarcastic tag?

      My office has a color copier. The only things keeping me from slapping a dollar bill on there and hitting the green button are:
      1) A little sign that says "don't copy money"
      2) The fact I don't have a dollar on me.

      When a machine found in most of the offices in America can create a passable forgery it isn't difficult to reproduce.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    7. Re:Can it be produced? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some groups yes but not all. Let's not forget the other face of terrorism; small groups of kooks like Tim McVeigh. Would McVeigh have the resources for this?

      I assume that as long as he passed his driving test the cost wouldn't be exorbitant. Did Timorthy McVeigh have a valid driving licence? Would absence of one have made much difference? If not then it's not much of an example.

      Once again slashdotters are naysayers to a technology because it's not a catch-all. Sorry folks, if there was a catch-all solution to the problems of terrorism, illegal imigration, identity theft or forgery you let me know; we'll make a mint off it.

      Something that sounded like it might actually be some sort of hindrance would be a plus. This just sounds irrelevant. Terrorists are people. They mostly get their identity documents by applying for them to the government, just like the rest of us. Maybe the proportion who rely on fake documents is enough to justify the expense and messing about, then again maybe not. I'd like to hear some real statistics on past incidents. At the moment this just sounds like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

      By making a system more complex you increase the chances of someone making a mistake somewhere along the line.

      True. Parallel parking in particular can be a bitch until you get the hang of it.

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    8. Re:Can it be produced? by Jeremy+Singer · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of proprietary stuff in there, and unless you know what you are looking for, it is hard to know what you are trying to duplicate. The fuzz, on the other hand, will be trained and equipped. Your average teenager is not going to be able to copy this.

    9. Re:Can it be produced? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Did Timorthy McVeigh have a valid driving licence? Would absence of one have made much difference? If not then it's not much of an example.

      Once again, you're only thinking of what has been done. The face of terrorism is going to change and change again. Perhaps McVeigh didn't have to. What if McVeigh was a wanted man and needed to aquire some materials that required a drivers license? Or wanted to take a flight? Or got pulled over on a broken tail light? It's about what COULD happen, not what has happened. So it's a fine example.

      Maybe the proportion who rely on fake documents is enough to justify the expense and messing about, then again maybe not.

      And you're willing to make that choice for others? Frankly getting around the country at this point in time can not be easy to do without an ID. Sure, someone may pass with no real questioning but if your point is valid than why not cut the expenses all together and just let people claim they are who they are since any document can be forged with the right people and equipment. Frankly, that's what your arguement sounds like... "since this isn't an exact solution than it solves nothing". Insulin isn't an exact solution to diabetics but it's better than death.

      True. Parallel parking in particular can be a bitch until you get the hang of it.

      But it's pretty damn hard to get it right if you don't have a car. And it's worse if "the man" is waiting to bust you for getting it wrong once you do get the car.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    10. Re:Can it be produced? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      It's ok if a system is not a catch-all, but if it's not then don't tout it as one

      Who did?

      My primary point (at the bottom of the post) is that I fear these new IDs being scrutinized less because they are so hard to duplicate.

      Perhaps. Those who would check IDs for whatever reason need to be held to a higher standard in this case. There really is no way to avoid/discount the human factor. If there was we may not even need this technology.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    11. Re:Can it be produced? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      These things are still going to be copied by folks (like terrorists) who find it worth the money to fake an ID.

      So, underage terrorists are going to fake my id to get into bars? Why not just get real IDs? If an illegal farm worker can do it, surely a well funded arab can.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Can it be produced? by Ralph+Yarro · · Score: 1

      Once again, you're only thinking of what has been done. The face of terrorism is going to change and change again.

      Yes, let's not worry about facts at all, they're only what's happened in the past.

      And you're willing to make that choice for others?

      Am I willing to play my part in the process and insist on my pooint of view in all this? Too damn right I am. I don't see you hesitating to make choices for others. Who do you think you are you anyway?

      --

      The real Ralph Yarro posts as Anonymous Coward. Anyone else is an impostor.
    13. Re:Can it be produced? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Maybe driving licenses are overrated as ID. I'm sure there are millions of non-licensed, safe drivers that are never caught by authorities because they don't commit traffic violations.

      OTOH, I'm pretty sure that 95% of vehicular homicides, accidents and chaos-causing road behaviour is caused by "licensed" individuals.

    14. Re:Can it be produced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "huge problem" is not fake ID's.. It's the reason behind fake ID's. You deny a person something (booze, smokes, etc) and damn right they're going to try to subvert the system to get it.

      21 is too old for drinking and smoking anyways. Look at Europe. They take a much more relaxed attitude towards it, and it's not near the problem it is in the West. Once something isn't taboo, it's not as big a draw as it was before.

    15. Re:Can it be produced? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's not worry about facts at all, they're only what's happened in the past.

      No, identity theft isn't one of the largest growing segments of crime... no.

      Who do you think you are you anyway?

      I'm a concerned citizen that can see past all the nonsense and see that identification is a major part of life in the these times.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  11. Digital watermark, eh? by Euphorea · · Score: 1

    "It also includes an invisible, digital watermark capable of carrying security data such as date of birth."
    Read: Embedded RFID...
    We all knew it was coming, but will there be any privacy concerns from it? Strangely they didn't really go into any details in the article about the "digital watermark" other than the fact that it would require a "computerized scanner" to read it. I wonder if/when they will release further details of just what they are planning on doing to their citizenry.

    1. Re:Digital watermark, eh? by shawng · · Score: 0

      Actually a digital watermark is an encoding of the bits within the image of the drivers license itself. It is basically a modification of the image in a certain way that is virtually invisible to the naked eye yet detectable by a scanner. This is quite different than RFID.

    2. Re:Digital watermark, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Read: Embedded RFID..."

      Who said anything about RF ID? A digital watermark is embedded in the frequency of the two dimensional signal itself... an image. There is no chip. There is no electricity/radio frequency involved at all. The scanner is just used to convert the image to a digital format. The digital image is then converted to the frequency domain for extraction of the payload using a special algorithm.

    3. Re:Digital watermark, eh? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      "It also includes an invisible, digital watermark capable of carrying security data such as date of birth."

      2D barcode written in lemon juice.

    4. Re:Digital watermark, eh? by dead+sun · · Score: 1

      MN's page about the new license says it uses a Digimarc technology for the watermark. A quick scan of Digimarc's page shows plenty of optical image data hiding and nothing about RFID. I think they mean digital watermark in the traditional sense, which makes it a security feature and not a potential problem, since if you can read the hidden data you can read what's on the card's face anyway.

      --
      If not now, when?
    5. Re:Digital watermark, eh? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you've won the first place in the Slashdot knee-jerking competition.

  12. good thing this wasn't a few years back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    otherwise my fake ID would never have worked. This is a sad day for underagers everywhere.... the beginning of the end.

  13. overkill by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2, Funny

    All this to keep terrorists from attacking us. And by 'keep terrorists from attacking us', I mean 'keep underage kids from buying beer'.

    1. Re:overkill by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      Certainly the number of "lost" (read: hologram cut out to be placed on fake license) licenses will skyrocket once this goes into effect.

    2. Re:overkill by SlashHoe · · Score: 1

      I imagine that is the purpose of the "unique ID". When the ID is lost, a new one is created. If the old ID shows up again. They know it is bogus. Just guessing though I didn't RTFA.

    3. Re:overkill by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      keep underage kids from buying beer
      This goes beyond keeping kids from buying beer.
      In Fl and in Va our DL's have quasi holograms on them, that might help prevent underage liquor purchases but not by much. My first year in college the guys in the room next to mine were still pumping out fake ID's so students could get in to clubs and buy alcohol etc. So obviously the countermeasures are in some cases only as good as the person checking the ID's, unless it's easy to reproduce. Face it if a minor want to buy alcohol there are plenty of avenues to get it besides a fake ID. Have a friend buy it for you, or go to a place that doesn't acre. In Tallahassee we had allot of these and the students knew which ones to go to.
      From TFA the information would be readable only through a computerized scanner, which law enforcement officers could carry.
      This watermark is not intended to stop underage drinking because club owners and liquor stores won't have the scanners.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All this to keep terrorists from attacking us.
      The sad part is that most of the 9/11 hijackers had valid drivers' licenses. Valid. Legal. Issued by the state. With their real names on them.

      This isn't going to stop a damned thing.
  14. Jersey by Attar81 · · Score: 1

    What does it matter if you can just get an ID from another state? For instance, drivers licenes from Jersey are just a laminated piece of paper with a "hologram" (which was just shiny marking).

    1. Re:Jersey by Smirks · · Score: 1

      Not anymore. NJ has just started giving out digital drivers licenses which is reported to be the most secure DL in the country. It has the feature listed in the above story, plus many more.

      See: http://www.state.nj.us/mvc/press/archives/newddl.h tm

    2. Re:Jersey by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Correction: We're switching to digitized driving licenses now. However, you have to go through a crazy-ass verification process (several proofs of ID that add up to at least 6 "ID points") to get one...and EVERYONE must have a photo license now.

      In the past, you could just have a little card with your name, address and driver's license #...no photo required. Meanwhile, our photo licenses were a composite photograph of the license application form and your photograph. It was encased in a hard plastic card with a golden "swoosh" watermark in it.

    3. Re:Jersey by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      For instance, drivers licenes from Jersey are just a laminated piece of paper with a "hologram" (which was just shiny marking).

      And because everyone knows that, very little fraud (true financial or severe fraud) is committed with the (old) Jersey license. The built in fraud protection was the fact that everyone knew that it could be copied on a bubble jet printer (and gave it a trust that corresponded to that knowledge.)

      It actually was quite beautiful.

  15. As opposed... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

    to all the other states that DONT issue a "unique" drivers license?

  16. How is this different from the magnetic strip by ats-tech · · Score: 1

    Michigan has been doing this for some time.

    1. Re:How is this different from the magnetic strip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and so has colorado........

      I guess the east coast needs to get with the program........

    2. Re:How is this different from the magnetic strip by donbrock · · Score: 0

      Maryland has had that for a couple of years.

    3. Re:How is this different from the magnetic strip by halligas · · Score: 1

      The current Minnesota drivers license has a magnetic strip. Apparently that wasn't good enough.

    4. Re:How is this different from the magnetic strip by Creepy · · Score: 1

      yeah - the problem is, the point of the magnetic strip was to get external sources such as bars to swipe it to verify the information rather than just judging by the picture. In this sense, the initiative was a royal flop (I think because the state wanted ridiculous usage fees). I think my card was swiped once the entire time I had a mag strip on it, and that was at club bundle (my name - group of clubs that share a cover) that got shut down for too many underage drinkers. It's also easy to demagnatize, which leaves the check up to a visual one again.

  17. Pictures! by adler187 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just happened across this the other day. Filling out an accident claim I saw this page on the MN Dept. of Public Safety site which has a picture of the new liscense. My first impression was not terribly positive. To me it looks pretty ugly, but whatever.

    1. Re:Pictures! by racermd · · Score: 1

      The license iteself isn't too bad. It's the picture of "Gayle Elizabeth Sample" that looks fugly.

      Another interesting point flying under the proverbial radar here is the new numbering system. It's no longer based on one's name, and will be re-assigned to you if you leave the state and return.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    2. Re:Pictures! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's just because Ms. Sample looks like she's coked up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Pictures! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Interesting too is that Gayle Elizabeth Sample was born in 1958 and is under 18 (birthdate is in red), but not under 21 (no red border around image). And Miss Sample seems to have been issued this new version of the license a month early, too.

      More direct links to page and to image, the latter because they've sized the image down slightly in the markup.

      I wonder if they're basing the license number on your SSN and if it is a reversible encoding.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Pictures! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it is at least tied to your SSN given that they say your ID number doesn't change even if you name changes or if you leave the state and return. SSN would be the obvious way to achieve that. I hope they're smart enough to have a number that can't be correlated with your SSN except by a database lookup (which nobody other than the DMV and law enforcement have access to), but I've learnt never to underestimate peoples stupidity when it comes to security.

    5. Re:Pictures! by adler187 · · Score: 1

      Well I guess it didn't link to the right page, darn ASP. Anyways, here is the correct URL

  18. Not that much different than other states by moorcito · · Score: 2, Informative

    How is this news?

    Missouri has been issuing drivers licenses with a digital water mark of the state capitol for a number of years.

    1. Re:Not that much different than other states by moorcito · · Score: 1

      Oops, my bad. I RTFA and realize that in this case the watermark was not only a watermark, but a superwatermark at that.

      Personally, I thought this was the definition of a watermark: watermark is a design embossed into a piece of paper during its production and used for identification of the paper and papermaker. The watermark can be seen when the paper is held up to light.

      So if it's invisible what the heck are we supposed to call it?

      Either way, Missouri still has had this "The licenses have a security feature in which a reflective image appears to float above and below the card when the license is tilted," for years.

    2. Re:Not that much different than other states by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      In the literal sense yes, but the term digital watermark is often applied to all kinds of techniques for hiding values in, say, images or text. Its really steganography, but your average reporter and non-techie reader would probably choke on that word :)

  19. I like this new move for my state by RavynWork · · Score: 1

    I'm from the state of Minnesota, and while my license doesn't expire until 07, I'm going to fork over the $8 to get my new one. For those of you putting on the tinfoil hats, I think that these licenses are not going to be the start of some Big Brother scheme. Sure, they'll have some of your info digitally imprinted on it, but who cares? It wont be abused.

    And as for the Civil Liberties union and all of their "concerns"; Sorry. If your special immigrant is here and can't seem to renew their passport on time as the law states, then they're here illegally, and they'll face the consequence. I want an officer of the law to know this, instead of simply letting them go to have some other officer have to track the person down at a later date.

    All in all, I think this is a definite move in the right direction, and a pretty cool one at that.

    1. Re:I like this new move for my state by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      Sure, they'll have some of your info digitally imprinted on it, but who cares? It wont be abused.

      Please turn in your account immediately, you are no longer welcome in this area.

    2. Re:I like this new move for my state by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      If your special immigrant is here and can't seem to renew their passport on time as the law states, then they're here illegally, and they'll face the consequence.

      The only problem being that you could evade detection by simply having a driver's license indicating when your visa expires. If you ask me, its just adding another fraud loophole to the system.

    3. Re:I like this new move for my state by cat_jesus · · Score: 1
      Sure, they'll have some of your info digitally imprinted on it, but who cares? It wont be abused.
      Oh well if you say so, I guess it won't.

      WTF?
  20. Wait a minute by duxwig · · Score: 0

    Ok, I live in Wisconsin. I could have sworn we have this kind of protection in our Drivers License anyway? We have digital scanning ids, and we have watermarks on our card plus UV light identification. Maybe I'm just mistaken....

  21. uh.. what? by XO · · Score: 1

    Umm.. hello... virtually every ID is like this now and has been for years.

    Now, apparently the slashdot people have gotten so bad that not only do they hardly ever leave their parents basements, when they do they don't even have identification on them, considering the last time i saw a state ID or DL that did not have such security measures was probably in the early 90's.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  22. The summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Summary of posts:

    - This is shocking! Now criminals can see I'm male, and determine my age. Just by looking at me (with a IR scanner device)!

    - Yeah, it's fine now, but it's a slippery slope, soon they'll shove these cards in your BRAIN! I told you 1984 was right!

    - This is great, those filthy criminals should be shot, anything that keeps us safe is good, and I don't care what the costs are.

    - I don't have anything to hide what do I care! Only bad people have bad things happens to them.

    - Americans are stupid, and you voted Bush. Americans are stupid!

    - And, lots of contrived shitty jokes.

    Enjoy.

  23. I think the biggest question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will be whether or not the new licenses will take 6-8 weeks to process, the way a prior MN license did. In one of the prior iterations, they stamped a bunch of the data (name, address, etc) into the plastic (much like a credit card). These licenses took some 6 weeks to get, making it hard to get bank accounts and the like set up when you first move into the state. (Indeed, I had a bank that wouldn't accept permit me to open an account with an out-of-state DL)

  24. Loon? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain to us non-Americans what a "loon" is? The only association I have with that word is "lunatic," which I'm guessing is not what's actually on the drivers' license.

    1. Re:Loon? by Almond+Paste · · Score: 0

      Your hunch is accurate, but a loon is also a type of bird.

    2. Re:Loon? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 0

      Type of waterfowl, sorta like a duck but different.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Loon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a type of bird.

    4. Re:Loon? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      A loon is a water-loving fowl like ducks.

    5. Re:Loon? by ats-tech · · Score: 1

      http://images.google.com/images?q=loon&hl=en&btnG= Google+Search

    6. Re:Loon? by moorcito · · Score: 0

      Type of waterfowl, sorta like a duck but different.

      That's the funniest thing I've read on slashdot in a long time.

      What's an orange?

      Type of fruit, sorta like an apple but different.

    7. Re:Loon? by Almond+Paste · · Score: 0

      I agree, but your parody is arguably even funnier.

    8. Re:Loon? by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
      Can someone explain to us non-Americans what a "loon" is?

      It's the official official state bird.

    9. Re:Loon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well I got the rest of those wrong [state.mn.us]

    10. Re:Loon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only association I have with that word is "lunatic," which I'm guessing is not what's actually on the drivers' license.

      That's what's on my driver's license.

    11. Re:Loon? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      As I believe someone already mentioned, a loon is a resident of California. There are also several derivative words, e.g. loony.

    12. Re:Loon? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      They have a very distict call that echos over the north woods. The sound carries incredibly far because a Loon in an enormous bird - near goose size, and emits its call on the water allowing it to bounce of the surface to the shore. There are other other calls that it has, very eerie stuff when you are a kid out by the lake at dusk, very cool when you are an adult.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    13. Re:Loon? by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      Its the state bird of minnesota. Sorta like a goose.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  25. Loons... by Anaplexian · · Score: 0
    It includes a reflective image (of a loon)...

    define:loon
    1. a worthless lazy fellow
    2. large somewhat primitive fish-eating diving bird of the northern hemisphere having webbed feet placed far back; related to the grebes
    3. addle-head: a person with confused ideas; incapable of serious thought


    I wonder why an entire state in the US wants a lazy, worthless person incapable on serious thought for identification purposes!
    1. Re:Loons... by halligas · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least we don't have a loon on our Money, at least not Yet.

  26. Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    Someone walks past me with a hand-held scanner and gets my date of birth, and they have one of the more important keys for ID theft. Who's to say they wouldn't eventually ask to put my SSN number on there too?

    Thanks, but no thanks - that is totally unnecessary for someone to identify me. I don't need my wallet telling people private info w/o my permission...

    1. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      Its not RFID, so if the scanner can't see the card, it can't read it.

    2. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      So get a wallet that has an inner layer of material that blocks radio frequencies. Then only when you take your license out of your wallet would it be able to be scanned.

    3. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by servognome · · Score: 1

      Who's to say they wouldn't eventually ask to put my SSN number on there too?
      Unfortunately, many people have chosen their license number to be their SSN.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by rogueuk · · Score: 1

      Where do you get to choose your license number? What possible benefit could you get for choosing your own?

    5. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone can SEE your DL, and with this "new" method, you do have to be looking at it, then they ALREADY can steal your info! Just by looking at it, or maybe by taking a snap with a camera phone! I mean come on, you can try harder than that to come up with a Chicken Little scenario!

    6. Re:Privacy/ID Theft Issues? by servognome · · Score: 1

      In AZ at least several years ago you were allowed to choose your SSN number as your license number. That way if there were any forms you had to fill out that asked for your license number you had it memorized. Of course back then (90's) identity theft wasn't really common.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  27. Mine is already unique by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    It's got this pattern of staple holes all over the corner.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Mine is already unique by Secrity · · Score: 1

      From being stapled to copies of traffic tickets, and you got your license back when you went to traffic court? Georgia does this.

    2. Re:Mine is already unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does Illinois, and it's the most fucking annoying thing I've ever had happen.

  28. Not foolproof by Qender · · Score: 1

    So uh, What will prevent terrorists from just stealing drivers licenses from people who look like them?

    1. Re:Not foolproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shortage of people who aren't terrorists who look like them?? Oh sorry, not terribly PC.

  29. When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by human+bean · · Score: 1

    Method One: Dress nice, get a decent looking date, go to a place that isn't some sort of meat rack with a million screaming "teenangers" trying to crash their way in, lay a fifty on the table, and order. Rarely fails.

    Method two: Go to a bar without a license. The company is probably better. Well, at least more interesting.

    Is there an underager out there that doesn't know this?

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

    1. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by doon · · Score: 1

      And try and remember not to mention you are going to the prom..

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    2. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      Fifty bucks is a lot to pay for a few beers.

    3. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Method three: Shouldertap. You can usually get a bum to buy you whatever if you buy him a little vodka, too.
      Method four: Steal it. Most supermarkets leave beer on the loading dock for quite a while. If you're a kid getting around on chevrolegs you can find out when this is by walking past the store on your way to wherever. Same goes for bicycle-riding, but it's actually easier to run away carrying a 12-pack than to get on a bicycle without dropping it, most times.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Better still, move to a country which isn't so anally retentive to have 21 as a drinking age. 18 is a much better age. After all, if you're considered old enough to die for your country you are old enough to drink beer.

    5. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      I wish this were the case, but the rate of deaths due to teenage drunk driving or just being stupid did go down significantly since the age was raised. Perhaps we Americans are just a little too stupid with that stuff or we aren't introduced to it early enough.

    6. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      So make sure you go to a bar that gives change.

    7. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

      The rates due to drunk driving in general went down significantly since the age was raised, because raising the age went along with a general campaign against drunk driving. Fewer people of all ages drive drunk today. Drinkers of any age are much more likely today than twenty years ago to employ a designated driver, take a cab home, drink at home rather than at a bar, or whatever other strategy ensures that they won't be on the road while intoxicated.

      The 21 drinking age is, and always has been, about marginalizing a politically impotent group of people as a supposed solution to a problem.

      In fact, my ex recto guess is that the 21 drinking age has created its own set of problems. Why is it that we never used to hear about college frosh drinking themselves to death 20 years ago? Because when you're allowed access to something forbidden--be it drugs, or high-calorie desserts, or booze--the tendency is to consume it to excess because you never know when you're going to get it again. You also don't have the opportunity anymore for older folks to teach younger ones to drink responsibly.

      (Oh, and lest you think I'm some whiny undergraduate, I'm nearly 40. I came of age right when all these changes were going on.)

    8. Re:When did DLs ever affect teenage drinking? by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      Yes, alcohol is treated as forbidden and a terrible thing....until your 21 in our society. Yah I have always thought that by limiting people for such a long time from alcohol that we don't know how to handle it when we get our hands on it. Looking at some european countries where the kids are allowed to drink at a young age, we notice that they become experienced with it and know how to handle it when they get older.

      There are only a handful of politicians that want the drinking age changed. I say in our falling economy we lower it and put some extra bucks into stuff. But we have a policy of stubborness and I doubt it will be changed.

  30. I can hear the nanny-state types in St Paul now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, shure, Sven, I know. But it's for your own protection, anyway, don'tcha know. We have to keep the next Moussaoui outta here somehow...

  31. Minnesota, the New Province by phaln · · Score: 1

    When did Minnesota become Canada's newest province?

    Buncha loons. /obscure reference

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
    1. Re:Minnesota, the New Province by rodentia · · Score: 1

      When the rest of the untied states of a merka put the retard back in the White House.

      And we took Isle Royale with us, sorry Michigan.

      --
      illegitimii non ingravare
  32. encryption? by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't go into to much technical detail, but I wonder if the digital watermark has any level on encryption at all. I could imagine a clever hacker working around the digital watermark -- unless is has a formidable amount of encryption.

    Even better would be a system where each piece of information was encrypted with a different key.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  33. From Minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Minnesota and here are a few factoids:

    The DL's also have had common mag strips for a while. I haven't heard if they are going to retain them.

    The state also puts other certificate information on them such as firearm training, boat safety training and snowmobile safety training.

    The Common Loon is the state bird.

    Nightclubs have the right to refuse anyone for any reason. This includes valid paper ID's from other states.

    A friend who lives in Central America was visiting Minnesota and we tried to get into a club. He had his foreign DL, his passport and Minnesota paperwork for duplicate Minnesota DL and was refused entry! To me, a passport trumps everything but, hey, bouncers aren't particularly known to be rocket scientists.

  34. Digital Driver's licenses and Credit cards... by Saltine+Cracker · · Score: 1

    I hope in the future of ID management that credit card transactions at retail stores and/or via the Internet become more of a two factor transaction, first requiring the card and then requiring a swipe of the driver's license or state id.

    As a one time victim of id theft and credit card fraud, I hope that the technology being used to help law enforcement ID people when necessary could be used in the private sector to help secure our financial identities.

    It would be difficult for someone who's stolen your credit card to make a purchase if they also had to produce your driver's license. Granted most people keep both of those items in their wallets/purses, but I still think it would be a deterrant.

  35. Last time I checked by Thunderstruck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In most states there is no penalty for forgetting your driver's license at home, or for travelling without it if you're not driving. (The latter would raise all sorts of right to travel issues. The former results in a warning to produce the license within 10 days.)

    So from a privacy perspective, am I not better off just leaving my license at home wrapped up in my tinfoil hat?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:Last time I checked by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      IANAL - but I believe you are quite incorrect. Most states have laws requiring you to carry your driver's license when you are driving and these laws can assess a fine. If the cop lets you off he is doing you a favor.

      In many states, all adults are required to carry proof of identity at all times when they are in public. This is more important than you think, and it is just as much for your safety as it is to protect the public interest. Joggers who have suffered heart attacks have been "John Does" for significant periods of time because they did not have their IDs on them.

      If a cop asks you for identity, you better be able to prove it. If you can't they will take you to jail and make someone come down and identify you!

    2. Re:Last time I checked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cough up some statues, or stop spreading bullshit.

    3. Re:Last time I checked by jaredbpd · · Score: 1

      True Story: I worked for a suburban police department in a town that happened to contain a large mall at the intersection of 3 highways. Shoplifting was and still is a huge problem at this mall, and anyone caught by store security or mall security who could not produce a form of ID for the responding police officer (Driver's License or other acceptible form of ID) were immediately arrested.

    4. Re:Last time I checked by Thunderstruck · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're mistaken on this. In fact there was a recent Supreme Court of the United States case which considered the issue of whether a police officer could even demand your name, much less a state-issued identification. It was narrowly held that a name could be demanded if state law provided such. Anything more, it suggests, is probably unconstitutional.

      The case was Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada.

      This post is not intended as legal advice and should not be relied on as such.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    5. Re:Last time I checked by Omniscientist · · Score: 1
      It is very true that you need your ID on you at all times, if you do not have an ID, a cop can hold you up to 72 hours. (about?) But the thing to remember is, that this will never really happen, unless the cop is really really really being a prick and you're doing something that's pissing him off but not quite illegal.

      Its nothing to worry about really unless the cop is racist or trying to bust you for something and needs a cause.

    6. Re:Last time I checked by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Mall security demanding ID? Must be some big guys, because it sounds like they're trawling for an ass-whooping.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    7. Re:Last time I checked by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      This is only if they have a legitimate reason to require ID, like suspicion of a crime. If the person can produce the ID sooner, like by getting it from their house, there is no reason to hold them for 72 hours. If a cop locks somebody up for this amount of time and then releases them with no charges filed, and they cannot show they had probable cause to detain the person, they are begging for a lawsuit. Most police departments would pay out a settlement rather than trying to fight a false arrest suit.

    8. Re:Last time I checked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was stopped in Texas for speeding and didn't have my driver's license on me. I got a warning for speeding (55 in a 40) and a ticket for the DL. The officer told me to appear at the court with my DL within 72 hours and the DL ticket would be dismissed. I did and it was. They just photocopied the DL and stapled it to the ticket.

    9. Re:Last time I checked by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      I am sure that there are rules that a cop has to follow when he asks for ID. I don't think you always have to be a suspect in something for him to ask you to produce an ID. I've been asked for ID when I was a passenger in a car that was stopped for a minor traffic violation. To be fair, the driver was arguing with the cop and I suspect the cop was a bit agitated by that.

      I've also had to produce identification because I was a witness to a traffic accident. I had no part in it other than seeing it happen.

      I am quite sure it is not a "good thing" if the cop asks you for ID and you can not produce it. If you were close to the line before, that alone could put you over the line in the cop's eye.

      It is almost always best to cooperate with the cops and get them off your back. In Minneapolis (where I live) I have absolutly no doubt that if a cop asks me for ID and I can not produce it, my chances of going to jail just got a whole lot better. That is the bad side of the cops here, they take no BS. But the good side, is they usually only tangle with people who need tangling with.

    10. Re:Last time I checked by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing "had to" and "was asked to." Police can ask you for your ID, they can ask you if you mind letting them search your car, heck they can even ask you if you are carrying drugs.

      They cannot generally require any of this without reasonable suspicion, or in the case of a search probable cause.

      Then again maybe constitutional protections have been abandoned in your state. Around here the fist thing we do when we get pulled over is get out of our car and go talk to the police officer.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    11. Re:Last time I checked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats usually the last thing you want ot do when you get pulled over. The cops usually don't like to be approached when they pull you over.

    12. Re:Last time I checked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Around here the fist thing we do when we get pulled over is get out of our car and go talk to the police officer.
      Around here, that's a good way to find yourself on the receiving end of a can of pepper spray. I wish I lived where you do.
    13. Re:Last time I checked by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      For your own safety, if you get pulled over DO NOT GET OUT OF THE CAR. If you aren't hit by a car, you may be shot by the officer! Exiting the car is considered an agressive move and a threat by the cop.

      If stopped, place your hands where they can be seen by the cop (on top of the sterring wheel is fine, out the window is okay, above your head silly but fine.

      If a cop asks you for an ID you are asking for trouble if you do not cooperate. Even if it is only "asks" and not "demands." They are in charge, and they have a gun. Most states have laws that require adults to have identification on them at all times (at least I think most states do, I am not a lawyer and am only sure of Minnesota where I live).

      Cops who encounter people who think they are lay-lawyers" who assert their "rights" tend to be pretty by-the-book with these people and will take absolutly no BS from them. They hope that this will teach them a lesson (and it is probably a lessone they need to learn).

  36. terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by harpoon · · Score: 1

    >Fake ID cards made it possible for the Sept. 11 terrorists to board commercial flights.

    I am 99% sure that NONE of the 9/11 terrorists used fake IDs and that all of them boarded under their real name, despite the fact that some of them were on terrorist watch lists.

    Can anyone confirm/research this? (I'm too lazy)

    1. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I am 99% sure that NONE of the 9/11 terrorists used fake IDs and that all of them boarded under their real name, despite the fact that some of them were on terrorist watch lists.

      While probably true this doesn't make the point that future terrorists could try forging IDs moot.

      Terrorists are a bit smarter than your Hollywood writers. These attacks will not become cookie cutter. If it was as simple as that we'd have many more attacks today. Terrorists know that they're being watched for in a time when we take the threat more seriously. They know that members may not be able to move as freely under their real names as they did the first time.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      To the best of my recollection, some of them used genuine Virginia driver's licenses, which were obtained fraudulently. The database didn't have a field for boxcutter knives, or for a note warning airlines to keep the cockpit door locked.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard this too. Unfortunate, but true. Can you imagine, however, if they were denied their licenses? The ACLU would freak. The media would call Bush a racist. Jesse Jackson would run down and give a speach....

      http://fromthemorning.blogspot.com

    4. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2
      Between the 19 hijackers, they had 63 'valid' licenses from various states. One would presume that at least 44 of those were 'fake'.

      This type of license identification and verification might be one way of plugging that loophole.

    5. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Between the 19 hijackers, they had 63 'valid' licenses from various states. One would presume that at least 44 of those were 'fake'.

      Fake=counterfeit. All of those licenses were state issued so none of them were either counterfeit or fake.

      They may have been fraudulent (obtained through deceit, bad documentation, bribery etc) but they were not counterfeited so the word "fake" cannot apply.

      This type of license could only make the problem worse (as told in my signature below.) As long as people trust the document more, those wishing to commit fraud will want the better license more desperately, since it would be more powerful. It's an endless circle of better licenses=better fraud=need for better licenses.)

    6. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by quarkscat · · Score: 2

      Damn right, they didn't!

      The 9-11-2001 terrorists that needed to have
      driver's licenses got real ones from the
      Commonwealth of Virginia. At that time, VA
      didn't even require proof of residence in the
      state. This has subsequently changed in VA.

      However, ID fraud is still prevalent in the
      Metro DC area. There have been employees of
      the Social Security Administration (in Baltimore)
      who were finally arrested for selling SSNs.
      Employees of DMVs in both Virginia and Washington
      DC have been arrested for selling legitimate
      drivers licenses to persons without proper
      identification (just cold hard cash). And the
      FBI and DHS/INS recently raided a home in NoVA
      where more than 1,900 sets of forged IDs (BCs,
      drivers licenses, and other documents had been
      created for illegal aliens from Indonesia. This
      illegal enterprise had been on-going for more
      than 3 years, and generated more than 2-1/2
      million USD in revenue for the perpetrators.

      I, for one, would welcome a national ID card
      that used photo, blood type, fingerprint(s),
      and DNA sequence. I don't much care for the
      notion of an embedded RFID that broadcast this
      data, but using adequate encryption that requires
      an official scanner to read (like Minnesota) does
      sound pretty reasonable.

    7. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Yes, they were 'valid' (as I said). Fraudulent, yes, because you're only supposed to have one license at a time.

      These type of licenses do not completely fix the problem, but they may be one part of a full solution.

      Or should we just go back to a types piece of paper, since it doens't fully, all by itself, fix the problem?

    8. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Or should we just go back to a types piece of paper, since it doens't fully, all by itself, fix the problem?

      If the terrorists had shown up on that day with non-photo Vermont licenses, do you think that 9/11 would have happened the way it did?

      (This answer is a little disingenuous, but think about it nevertheless. The solution is found in my signature line and has to do with eroding trust in the document, not by boosting it.)

    9. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by rking · · Score: 1

      This type of license identification and verification might be one way of plugging that loophole.

      Is this based on the theory that the loon picture will come to life and follow the licensee around, shouting to everyone that he already has a license and mustn't be given another one? Or is there some even more subtle detail that I'm missing?

    10. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      As part of on overall system of cross-state checks, a toughening of the actual license might help.

    11. Re:terrorists DID NOT use fake IDs by hughk · · Score: 1
      I, for one, would welcome a national ID card that used photo... and DNA sequence
      That would be rather a large ID card o contain a complete human DNA sequence. I believe it is around 3 billion base pairs or so.

      What you mean is a set of DNA markers, which generaly are far from unique.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  37. Uhh -- this won't combat Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite the article repeating oft-quoted lies -- the September 11th terrorists did not have fake drivers' licenses. They had valid, state issued licenses that were incorrectly issued. In one case, the terrorists bribed a state employee.

    In reality, this gives money to 3M (anyone tracking those campaign donations?), makes it harder for underage drinkers to doctor their ID, and gives the State further excuse to track the citizens.

  38. Re:What to think. by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yes, because it's all stored in the SUPER DUPER EVIL GOVERNMENT TRACKING DATABASE!

    You know what those barcode scanners do? They simply read the unencrypted data that is stored in the magnetic strip. They're not connected to any network or anything else.

  39. Right to stay here is not included by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You are afforded basic human rights by the constitution while in our country. We don't have to let you stay in our country. If anything this move is better for immigrants than some of the other proposed solutions, because they have to be caught breaking another law, as opposed to simply having their ID broadcasting with an RF chip. Sure, our immigration laws can be silly, but part of that is due to the fact there is no one litmus test to tell who's a productive member of society and who isn't. In my mind, we should actively be seeking out illegals who are working in this country not to deport them, but to grant them visas and begin collecting taxes from them. I know, it's simplistic given the wages many of them earn, but I have a hard time divorcing the right to live in the USA with the responsibility to pay taxes. I guess I believe in "pay to play".

    1. Re:Right to stay here is not included by metamatic · · Score: 1
      I have a hard time divorcing the right to live in the USA with the responsibility to pay taxes. I guess I believe in "pay to play".

      I have a hard time divorcing the requirement to pay taxes from the right to vote how those taxes are spent. I believe in "No taxation without representation", a principle that the USA abandoned many years ago.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Right to stay here is not included by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

      In my mind, we should actively be seeking out illegals who are working in this country not to deport them, but to grant them visas and begin collecting taxes from them.
      We are already collecting taxes from them. They are also paying into Social Security.
      We should grant them visas so they can live in peace, not fear.

      --
      ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
    3. Re:Right to stay here is not included by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      We tried that in 1986. It was a spectacular failure, as the number of people trying to get in jumped dramatically once the program was announced, even though immigrants had to prove that they'd been here for a certain amount of time (I think it was four years) before they could be considered for the family program. I partially agree with the grandparent -- we should be seeking out illegals, but it should be to deport them. There are between 8 million and 12 million illegal immigrants in the US, and more than three million of them are in California alone. Note that California's population is about 33 million or so, meaning that one in ten California residents are here illegally.

      In the first half of June, a small group of a dozen border patrol agents managed to round up 400 illegal immigrants in a relatively small area of Southern California. Even though they were stopped by direct order of DHS Undersecretary for Immigration Asa Hutchinson, this had a chilling effect on the local illegal immigrant population -- many of them fled the area. If they'd been able to keep up that pace for a year, they could have rounded up nearly 10,000 illegals for deportation. Imagine what a dedicated branch of, say, a thousand agents combined with a tripling of the agents on the border and in the ports could do. Low-end unemployment and construction unemployment would virtually disappear in a few years, to be replaced by people who are less of a burden on the system as it is.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Right to stay here is not included by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      A large percentage of the illegals people are getting worked up about are getting paid in cash almost unlivable salaries. This is part of the problem.

  40. More info on the cards by crumley · · Score: 1

    Here's some more direct info on the card from Minnesota DVS.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  41. MOD parent UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 Insightful!

  42. Lic. was not originally intended to be a ID by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think that this is indicative of a problem throughout the United States that has snuck up on the government.

    Driver's Licenses were intended to be exactly that, a license or permit that demonstrates that one is legally permitted to drive. They happened to have a photo of the person on them . . . how this became an official government identification card was something of an accident. Private groups started using the driver's license as ID to cash checks becuase it provided some level of photo identification . . . but there was no common standard for confirming identity when applying for a license. Some states were very slack about this (For example, in Virginia until recently, one only needed a form from a lawyer asserting one's identity with no official documents whatsoever.)

    It's good to see that states are recognizing that the driver's license is a de facto identification card in the US and they are taking counterfeiting seriously.

    1. Re:Lic. was not originally intended to be a ID by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      They happened to have a photo of the person on them

      Actually, they did not. They didn't start getting photos until the late 1960s, most state not until the mid to late 1970s, the last states in the early 1980s and most of Canada not until the mid 1990s. (The exceptions are Colorado and California, which apparently had B+W photos since the late 50s. Everyone else went with color from the get go.)

      The description information (height weight eye color) that is still found on the license is how police could tell that the license applied to the person presenting it. It is still found on the license today as an anachronism (no one has bothered to remove it.)

      The interesting question is why licenses got photos. The research I've done has indicated that law enforcement (at the time) had little interest in the photos. One clear thing is that black and white photos are better for identification (to this day actor's headshots are mostly found in black and white because the facial features pop up better on black and white.)

      Yet for some reason, most states legal codes require the pictures to be in color.

      My hypothesis is that the photo licenses became popular right about the same time that Polaroid introduced instant color photo technology, and they needed a place to put that expensive but profitable product. (Indeed, its ID making group was always its most profitable.)

      If my suspicions are right, it leads to the lesson that just about anything to do with driver's licenses is vendor driven. Statements like "impossible to counterfeit" as said in the article have been said since the early 1980s and its the same BS now as it always has been. Politicians are being sold biometrics really hard right now.

      Remember that that driver's license fraud cycles are profitable (photo drivers license...then photo ID fraud...then better photo licenses, then better fraud...rinse later and repeat.) At some level, I think the companies realize it by now....

    2. Re:Lic. was not originally intended to be a ID by gordguide · · Score: 1

      " ... and most of Canada not until the mid 1990s ..."

      Not sure where you get your information, but Photo Drivers Licenses were the norm in Canada in the 1980's and in some provinces were mandatory issue in the 1970's.

      Saskatchewan did not have a photo driver's license requirement until 2001.

      Every other province did, with Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia (which represent 75% of the population of Canada) having that requirement for 30 years or more.

      I'm not positive on when, exactly other provinces not cited above made photo drivers licenses mandatory, but certainly before the 90's; it was well known that SK was the only holdout at the beginning of that decade.

      As of June 01 2003 all Canadian Provincial Photo Licenses were revoked and replaced by the current (mandatory) version, which is a Canadian National Photo Drivers ID; issued by each province, it follows a specific form and contains identical information encoded in both a barcode and a magnetic stripe.

      It also has a number of other security features including holograms, fleurescent inks, magnetic ink fonts, both magnetic bar and optical barcode scannable, etc.

      For an idea of what a US Peace Officer can obtain in a routine check or traffic stop on a Canadian Resident with or without a driver's license see http://www.in.gov/isp/idacs/documentation/midx6g02 .html (State of Indiana).

      US residents in Canada will find that Canadian Police can access similar information (ie whatever a US officer can get) from Interpol/FBI quickly from the car or on patrol due to a formal information sharing agreement signed about 15 years ago and informally available for at least 10 years before that (they signed a formal agreement when the two governments figured out what they were doing was technically illegal prior to that point).

      And for an example of an enterprising private firm that takes data off your driver's license when you shop or have a drink, see SWIPE http://www.we-swipe.us/plain.html#about/

      I couldn't get the other links to work from the SWIPE site on this post (wrong referrer, perhaps?), but interesting info can be found at the SWIPE site, including an interactive map of each State and Province's current encryption methods and information on the SWIPE bar, that scans data from your drivers license when you order a refreshing beverage, ostensibly to "confirm" your drinking age.

      If you don't care, you don't have to read the rest about the SK license and photo ID.

      Although SK did not use a photo on the annual paper driver's license, Government Issue Provincial Photo ID was available for a fee ($10) from the provincial department regulating liquor laws as early as 1976 and was legal photo ID and proof of age in Canada; by the early 90's an optional Photo Drivers license was available as well as an non-drivers Photo ID card from a Motor License issuer.

      This is similar to the "Identification Cards" for non-drivers issued in Minnesota (and other States) during the mid-to-late 80's and possibly earlier, which closely resemble the MN Photo Driver's License.

      The current SK license is two parts; a 5-year photo ID and an annual paper license. It is not a valid drivers license without both parts present and current. This is similar to a Pilot's License, at least in Canada (the license is not valid without a current Medical Certificate accompanying it).

      SK uses this system because the Driver's License is both an operator's permit and an annual insurance certificate, providing additional insurance beyond plate insurance for the holder involved in a motor vehicle accident in the US, Canada or Mexico (the insured does not have to be the driver; it covers the holder as passenger in a bus or as a pedestrian, for example).

    3. Re:Lic. was not originally intended to be a ID by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      This was actually just from memory and conversations. When I did research on Ontario it indicated to me that the photo licensing requirement was put in place in 1995, as part of the motor vehicle code. This seems to fit in generally with Canadians and their knowledge of photo licenses, but I'm always open to learn more. Quebec and New Brunswick still do not require mandatory photo licenses (at least, from the last time I did research.) Interestingly, the Quebec photo license, while being digital in form, is the only jurisdiction in north america in which the digital photo image is not retained.

      I've known about SK and its interesting non-photo history (as well as its issuance via SGI.) The SK assembly discussion about the topic is kinna interesting.

  43. re: widespread use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the licenses from Maryland and Texas, it becomes apparent they've been doing this for some time. In fact, pretty much all the states use the same magnetic strip you find in credit cards. Texas keeps track of your hunting / fishing / whatever licenses that way as well (though for some odd reason they have a separate physical license also issued).

    Going to a "digital watermark" does strike me as odd given that and I expect the people suggesting this is going to RFID tech are probably right.

    No Big Brother aspect to it now, but given the trends in Europe which appear to be heading towards more and more surveillance, I expect it will lead to that in future.

  44. It's only a piece of paper by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    All this hullaballoo (sp?) about encoding information in driver's licenses, etc., misses the point. The purpose of an identification card is to give the person/machine examining it assurance (to the required level of certainty) that the person presenting it is who he says he is. However far you want to go in determining that, it doesn't do a thing to enhance national or provincial security, nor does it do anything to tell the state trooper who just pulled you over that you have a sawed-off shotgun under your seat or a USB disk drive in your pocket.

    Holography and RFID make the document harder to counterfeit. Some biometric information, like the color of the person's eyes, height, weight, etc., is useful in establishing that the bearer is the person belonging to the ID.

    Nonetheless, none of this is worth a whit if the ID is issued fraudulently. Here in Virginia, we had a problem with DMV clerks issuing driver's licenses to anyone for the price of a bribe, as well as notaries public who would vouch for anyone for a fee. The licenses themselves were machine-readable, with some kind of special seal on them that would be difficult to counterfeit, and included the information I mentioned above. A policeman could be reasonably sure the driver is the person in the photo. But, at bottom, because the controls on the license issuing process were bad, and the identification accepted by DMV was so weak, it was possible for anyone to get a real Virginia license or ID card that would be acceptable as genuine anywhere.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  45. Re:What to think. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

    did tha gubbment tell ya that ? Or are you just talking out your ass AGAIN ?

  46. Re:Debunked by danknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ah, but if you repeat it enough, then it becomes truth

    --
    wanted: one clever sig,apply within
  47. similar stuff but with number plates in india by adeydas · · Score: 1

    here in india, the government is implementing a system where the number of plates of cars will have engine's chasis number written with laser tips and invisible to the naked eye so that it becomes easy to detect stolen cars...

    1. Re:similar stuff but with number plates in india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do they get the numbers? Does a DMV representative actually go out and get dirty? Horrors! Or do they just trust the applicant to provide the number? Hmmm, no chance for fraud there!

      What if the engine is removed, and a rebuilt engine is installed, and the pooched engine is then rebuilt and put into a different vehicle? You could have either two plates with the same number, and only one correct; or, both plates with incorrect numbers.

      How does this detect a stolen car? It might help *identify* a stolen car -- but only if the engine serial number isn't fucked with, and only if the plate is still on the stolen vehicle!

      Finally: this won't change a thing about stealing cars. I mean, really. Thieves have been getting around serial numbers forever.

  48. Re:What to think. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    I've just strangely looked at the hardware. There's no connection to anything but power. Hell, I've been to bars that have their bouncers with handheld versions of these things.

    But I'm sure they actually sync with the master government DB every night!

  49. Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the first time I actually have something to contribute. As an attorney in Minneapolis who works with mostly undocumented immigrants (illegal immigrants) I think i should add a couple of details to this.

    1) Minneapolis has an ordinace preventing police from asking about a persons immigration status, unless that status is a part of another crime. (so this means at a traffic stop they can _not_ ask you about your status) There are two reasons behind this law. One reason the city passed this law is to encourage immigrants to feel safe and comfortable with city police, to report crimes, call for help, not leave the scene ect. However the primary reason for the law is that federal law gives sole jurisdiction over immigration matters to federal law enforcement. That means that even without the Minneapolis ordinace the local police can't enforce immigration law. Just like the Immigration officers can't arrest you for speeding or running a red light.

    In Minnesota you can not get a license if you are an undocumented (illegal) immigrant. And an estimated 60,000 undocumented immigrants live here. Right now they either have no IDs or occasionly an ID from their home country - and these are often difficult to validate or even read if not in english.

    A few of the main reasons people push to give undocumented immigrants license are 1) becuase that way they will have ID and police/banks/hospitals/ect will know who they are 2) they will have to pass the drivers test if they want to get an ID and that will encourage many (not all) to learn the traffic rules 3) once they get a drivers license they will be able to get car insurance 4) terrorists have enough resources and money to get IDs other places, so this law has little impact on well organized terrorists.

    1. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by liquidmpls · · Score: 1

      I just want to add that putting a visa experation date on the driver's license only impacts people who have valid visas, and does nothing to address the illegal immigrants. But it was stated above that illegal immigrants cant get driver's licenses in Minnesota already.

    2. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 2

      They are not 'undocumented' immigrants. They are fucking ILLEGAL immigrants. They are here ILLEGALLY, ergo they are ILLEGAL immigrants and should be put out of the country for any infraction that brings them to the attention of authorities.

    3. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

      Some people believe no one is illegal.

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    4. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Not true. Many people come to the US with valid visa's and then decide to stick around long after their Visa's expire. So, once, they were legal now they are not.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    5. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      "However the primary reason for the law is that federal law gives sole jurisdiction over immigration matters to federal law enforcement. That means that even without the Minneapolis ordinace the local police can't enforce immigration law. Just like the Immigration officers can't arrest you for speeding or running a red light."

      So, why aren't the policemen, who find and illegal alien (a lawbreaker) not immediately turning them over to the Fed's for deportation? This is lunacy. A law, a serious law is being broken, and they should be immediately deported.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still others have enough respect for the foreign country and society that they're immigrating to to register with that country, and at least somewhat try to act in accordance with that society's conventions. (Getting car insurance, for instance.)

      I wouldn't move to Belgium or Spain illegally, and expect them to treat me nicely if/when I get caught.

      "No borders" dreamers are on crack.

    7. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are the kind of scum that give mankind a bad name.

    8. Re:Legal info from a Minnesota Attorney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft, it's not a serious law at all. It's a joke of a law designed to calm the anger of xenophobic, backwater half-wits who can't fathom the idea of other cultures living among them and "stealing" their jobs.

      The reason was given in the post as well, if you read it carefully:

      1. The government KNOWS that there is a large number of illegal immigrants.
      2. Since they can't boot everyone out at once, they have to deal with it and how it affects other matters of society.
      3. Which comes to the point mentioned in the grandparent post. Say an illegal immigrant finds someone (a LEGAL and therefore 'more important' citizen) lying in the gutter, shot in the stomach. Think they're going to call the cops if it gets them kicked out of the country? Hell, no. See why now?

  50. Alberta by Redfrost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Alberta (Canada) came out with a new driver's licence a few years ago. It was quite a step forward from the traditional print-it-off-on-paper-then-laminate-it licence. Check it out:

    http://www3.gov.ab.ca/gs/driverslicence/
    "An original. Just like you." Glad my taxes went towards picking that. Probably had a committee set up and daily meetings for 3 months to come up with it.

    Security features used on the card:
    http://www3.gov.ab.ca/gs/driverslicence/sec urity.h tml

    Picture of the card:
    http://www3.gov.ab.ca/gs/driverslicence/fea tures_f lash.html

  51. Re:What to think. by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    Are there any bars in your area where they don't store the fact that you've entered a bar every Friday night in a database? I'm from the Midwest, where I'll grant we're a little backwards, but haven't encountered this. And if that becomes the only way to get a drink out, I guess I'll have to drink at home, because it ain't happenin'.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  52. Why not include fingerprint data as well? by Saltine+Cracker · · Score: 1

    Or some other biometric unique identifier.

    With the advent of more/cheaper biometric technology, would it not be worthwhile to actually stick the unique electronic data of your thumb print in the card and equip Police, credit card readers etc, with thumb scanners?

    Personally I don't have an issue with being able to prove who I am when I need to. I imagine the crowd here will mostly think this is a bad idea.

  53. Re:I live in MN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is nothing new. We have had the loon (state bird) on them many years ago. Now, we have the word "Minnesota" instead, same kind of thing. The loon looks better and will be harder to fake than a word (ever see a loon?)

    For a long time there as been a 2D barcode

    I think the state bird should have been the moskeeto; that is the thing people remember and see a lot of in MN.

  54. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES it can. I live in MN. WE've had this for years, so now its going back to being a loon instead of the word "minnesota". The 2D barcode was always on there anyway.

    Minor revisions are no big deal. The "Minnesota" was harder to see and easier to fake. A loon will be much harder. Basically, if you've ever trashed an old MN card, Its just a plastic card with a protective film over it---the film has the 'watermark' on it.

    I've seen the "Minnesota" ones come out ok on some clear sticker run thru an ink jet. Its easy to spot but people at a bar carding you will not look that close when they just notice the "watermark" at a glance. The loon will help a little...but not a lot.

    The all barcodes are VISUAL and can be copied. Faking them is another matter... Which is why your age is on them... You'd have to know how to make 2D barcodes with a fake age...
    I do not know if it was ever encrypted---probably not, since we've had them for so many years. Perhaps now they will.... but probably in something weak.

  55. Eric, is that you? by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

    Why should I be tarred with the epithet loon merely because I am from Minnesota?
    (halibut owners need not apply)

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
  56. Yeeeeaaaaarrrrgh by cosmonaut_clayboy · · Score: 1

    "It includes a reflective image (of a loon) that appears to float above and below the card when the license is tilted."

    They're putting reflective images of Howard Dean on all Minnesota drivers' licenses?

  57. GA and IL by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Yes, I've had it done in both states.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  58. Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by tail.man · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2004/ 101204nationalid.htm

    US adopts National ID: Homeland Security Now In charge of Regulations for all US States Drivers Licenses and Birth Certificates

    Jonathan Wheeler | December 10 2004

    In a chilling act more reminiscent of the now defunct Soviet Union or the Nazi regime of Adolph Hitler, the United States Congress passed legislation yesterday that requires the States to surrender their regulatory rights over driver?s licenses and birth certificates to The Department of Homeland Security.

    The massive US Intelligence Reform Bill weighed in at over 3,000 pages and though unread by individual Members of either the House or Senate nevertheless passed all of the legislative hurdles needed in order to become law.

    President Bush lobbied hard for these provisions, only objecting when Senator Sensenbrenner attempted to require these same provisions for illegal aliens but which the President opposed. This provision was dropped from the final bill.

    Beginning in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security will issue new uniformity regulations to the States requiring that all Drivers Licenses and Birth Certificates meet minimal Federal Standards with regard to US citizen information, including biometric security provisions.

    Added to currently existing Federal Laws and Supreme Court rulings American citizens when born will be issued a Social Security Number that will be included on their Birth Certificates, along with DNA biometric markers. All birth certificates will also be registered in a Federal Government database maintained by the Department of Homeland Security. No child will be allowed enrollment to schools or be entitled to either State of Federal Government benefits programs without first presenting a certified Homeland Security registered Birth Certificate.

    Drivers Licenses will also contain DNA biometric markers and include the holders Social Security Number and be required for receiving and applying for all State and Federal benefits programs. Previous Supreme Court rulings have also upheld State and Federal Law Enforcement authorities right to request Identification from any American citizen, for any reason and at any time as not being violations of their, the citizens, constitutionally protected rights.

    Major Banks and credit card companies have applauded the adoption of a National ID system as being important to counter fraud and increasing instances of identity theft. National ID cards with biometric markers will eliminate them from having to issue Credit and Debit cards, which for the first time in US history have surpassed the usage of checks and cash. Utilizing The Department of Homeland Securities centralized federal database, Banks and credit card companies will only require the presentation of a citizens Driver?s License to make purchases as all of the persons financial information, including credit and cash balances, will already be known in ?real time?. (The combining of Homeland Security and Banking databases on citizen?s balances and purchases, along with their past and present purchasing information, has been allowed under previous Federal Laws including the Patriot Act.)

    Also included in this bill is a law to require The Department of Homeland Security to establish a separate ID system for citizens to use prior to boarding airplanes, and which is eerily reminiscent of the Soviet and Nazi regimes dreaded Internal Passport.

    Never before in our history have the words of Benjamin Franklin been so correct when he stated: "people willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both".

    Today, December 9, 2004 will be one of those moments in time that future historians will look back on and pin point as being the day that the United States of American, and as it was founded by its forefathers, ceased to exist.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/globalwarmingisascam
  59. Picture of the new license by Seltsam · · Score: 2, Informative
  60. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bla bla, tinfoil hat, bla bla, black helicopters, bla bla New World Order, bla bla Illuminati, bla bla bla.

  61. In other gov't cost-efficiency news... by Jonboy+X · · Score: 3, Funny

    The US Federal Reserve has just announced a new space-age digital holographic RFID watermarking scheme to prevent currency counterfeiting. The technology will be used exclusively on US $1 bills (the most frequently counterfeited), and cost approximately $35 per bill to implement.

    --

    "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
  62. Re:What to think. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if bar owners who bought these scanners realize they've been sold a bunch of snake oil. All they do is read the 3D barcode or mag stripe on the license. Forging this information would be the easiest aspect of making a fake ID. You can get free software that creates these codes. That, combined with a little analysis of valid licenses would be enough to figure out the encoding system and make your own. The scanners could only detect a very poorly made fake ID, which a trained bouncer or bartender should be able to spot anyway. But I guess these things make the bar owners feel better, not to mention if a minor were caught in the bar it would help the owner if they can show that they made every reasonable effort to keep minors out.

  63. Re:What to think. by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

    You may want to investigate this brand-new technology called "Wireless".

  64. Date of Birth by jvalal · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am wrong but isn't the date of birth already on the license? Why is that "secret" security data that would get embedded in the LOOON...? j

    1. Re:Date of Birth by vidarh · · Score: 1

      It's not "secret". It's there to make it harder to tamper with the license by doing stuff like replacing the picture - you'd now also need to be able to place the right watermark on it.

    2. Re:Date of Birth by jvalal · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, but they refer to this as security data. I view security data as something complex or defined by the user like a username and pwd not general information.

    3. Re:Date of Birth by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Then you need to reevaluet your view. In this case it provides security by being information that is tied to the identity and not the general design of the card, embedded in the image by a process that is hard to duplicate.

      The fact that the information is "general" and "known" is entirely irrelevant. It could have been anything, as long as that "anything" is printed in a readable way elsewhere on the card or otherwise is available to whoever is checking the card, but there is no point in creating a "password" or similar and then have to print that on the card as well when the date of birth is already on there.

      It is "security data" ONLY by virtue of being used as a digital watermark in a way that makes it harder to replace images, since you'd need to have an image with the right watermark in order to avoid detection.

    4. Re:Date of Birth by jvalal · · Score: 1

      I don't NEED to reevaluate anything. Its america and I can HAVE any view I want. END OF THREAD>

    5. Re:Date of Birth by vidarh · · Score: 1

      So let me rephrase: Either you reevaluate your view so that it is actually in line with reality and makes sense, or you can go on being a pigheaded moron who insist on holding on to views that make no sense just because you don't feel like facing the facts.

  65. Seems like overkill by jimfrost · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have long wondered about all these technologically marvelous anti-counterfeiting driver's licenses. Is driver's license counterfeiting really common enough -- or serious enough -- to make these technologies economically worthwhile?

    Sure, 20 years ago I <cough> knew some people who might have made fake Pennsylvania driver's licenses in order to purchase liquor. Back in those days the license was nothing but a Polaroid, very easy to clone. But when the states started going to those funny reflective laminations then cloning became a losing proposition (not that it was particularly hard to duplicate those, either, but it was even harder to make them look bad enough to be real).

    Even when it was really easy to fake a license it was more or less a toss-up as to whether to make the license itself or the supporting documentation. For more than a decade now the easiest way to get a fake license (so I hear) is to print up the supporting docs and go get a real one. Way easier. They give out driver's licenses like candy on Halloween, after all.

    This kind of fraud is certainly commonplace around colleges, but I find it hard to get worked up over some kids getting hold of alcohol. (It's pathetic that our drinking age is 21 yet the driver's license age is 16 -- that is a recipe for disaster. If anything, the two should be switched.) In a traffic stop the police call it in, in which case the computer wouldn't know about a false ID and it'd be obvious what's going on -- no matter if the ID is a fancy thing or just a slip of paper. Heck, they don't even need the physical driver's license anymore in most places.

    So I figure the theory here is that it's for preventing identity theft (eg cashing checks in someone else's name -- although the reliance on driver's licenses, obtained via privilege rather than right, for that process is a rant in and of itself) and that doesn't seem like it's worth a lot of ID technology investment either.

    I suspect that many pour misguided souls think that harder-to-fake driver's licenses would stop something like 9/11, in which case I would point out that the 9/11 hijackers had fraudulently obtained real driver's licenses, just like the college kids do. They were legitimate so far as the system knew.

    Until they get around to fixing the lack of any real identity check during the process of applying for a license, not an easy or inexpensive thing to do, all these technologies are worthless.

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
    1. Re:Seems like overkill by deacon · · Score: 1
      Of course it's overkill. The point of it is to spend tax money, the justification is "think of the children!"

      Follow the trail of $ to the subcontractor, and then see where their political contributions went.. maybe you will find some correlation? ;)

      And as you say, the drinking age should be much lower than the driving age. Like many pre-teens, I developed a dislike for liquor from the liquor cabinets of adults when they were out.

      By the time I got a drivers license, I had no need or desire to experiment with getting fall down drunk and puking my guts out.

      Alcohol was no longer a "forbidden treat" that your peers would temp you to try: It was just something that made you feel good for that short time before you felt very, very bad.

      The laws that prohibit drinking of kids too young to drive have directly contributed to the deaths of those same teens when they start driving.

      How the HELL are teens supposed to handle drinking when they have never been given a chance to do so in a safe environment?

      Bah.

    2. Re:Seems like overkill by casuist99 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. New licenses and license features won't prevent any of the problems (security or ID verification) which are supposed to be fixed.

      By far, the most common way that my underage friends get into the bars with us, is they use SOMEONE ELSE'S DRIVER'S LICENSE. It's not fake, and the bearer has a passing resemblence to the picture on the card. This will in no way prevent this sort of circumvention.

      It's the analog-hole of security, so to speak. If you want to make sure the card bearer is the person to whom the license was issued, it's going to take a better biometric than a simple facial picture. Add all the watermarks you want - using someone else's real card is still a problem.

  66. Fight the Power....12.5 cm at a time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like that cop reading your new RFID license to print a ticket out? Microwave the license when you get it, baby!

  67. No, no, no... by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

    It says 'loon' not intelligent former presidential candidate.

    Obviously they are making a veiled reference to Pres Bush (or Terry McAuliffe).

    --
  68. Not News by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

    PA licenses have had reflective holograms over their licenses since at least 1997 when I got mine.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Not News by goobenet · · Score: 1

      MN Has had holograms on their DL's for many years, but they're just that, pretty pictures. Based on what i've heard from various sources, the hologram is actually a data watermark. The scanner can read the info embedded into the hologram. They've also had mag strips for years too, but how easy is it to scratch that up and cause problems for people? I don't think there's RFID in there, but if there is, just fold it in half... I guess the common sense bunny hasn't visited many people today.

  69. As someone who makes fake IDs for a living. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you this is going to be great for my biz, all of my old customers will need new docs.

  70. Nice plan, but.... by boola-boola · · Score: 1
    "Fake ID cards made it possible for the Sept. 11 terrorists to board commercial flights."

    Um, no. Many of them had real, VALID IDs.

  71. Not fascist, just ignorant by alienmole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Immigrant Americans (i.e. every American citizen alive today, whose family immigrated here sometime within the last couple hundred years or so) have continued to live up to the reputation which they created early on with the native Americans: "white man speak with forked tongue".

    On the one hand, tens of millions of illegal aliens are welcomed into menial jobs throughout the country: from farm labor to maid work to nannies. Ordinary people employ them, as well as companies. You even get illegals doing not so menial work, like tech contracting. Illegal aliens collectively form an essential part of the economy.

    On the other hand, the INS (or whatever it's called nowadays) is the most dysfunctional federal agency of them all, and it's not just the agency's fault - it's a function of the national schizophrenia in which cheap labor is desperately needed, but the fiction needs to be maintained that not anyone who wants to can come here to work. Quotas for immigrants aren't even close to realistic in terms of what the economy needs - you could eliminate all the legal immigration and the economy would continue to function just fine, the legal immigration is really just there for show at this point. You couldn't do the same with the illegal immigration.

    So, you ignorant anti-immigration types out there (and you are anti-immigration, if all you support is the current legal immigration system which is just for show, and a poor show at that), just keep on with your little fantasies about the way life works in the imaginary U.S. of A. that you live in, while the rest of us live in the real world which you don't understand. The difference is between the two is that the real world isn't going to go away, whereas your fantasies will become harder and harder to sustain as long as you continue to refuse to acknowledge your national addiction to cheap labor supplied by illegal aliens.

  72. Just Asking Slashdot... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    security data such as date of birth

    Apparently my personal secure date of birth has been stolen. I am almost certain it was reused by someone else. How can I obtain another one instead?

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:Just Asking Slashdot... by ProfFalcon · · Score: 1

      We're from the government. We're here to help.

      Your new date of birth is February 30th, 1972. We're certain no one else has the same identifying date of birth.

      Thank you and have a nice day.

      --
      Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
  73. US econmy would collapse without my people's labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an illegal alien.

  74. US depends on Illegal alien labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your economy will collapse with out us.

  75. There goes my great bar trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    From the MN DVS web site: "Unlike the current system, the number is not based on your name. As a result, in most cases you will receive a number that does not begin with the first letter of your last name."

    Well, there goes my great bar trick of being able to guess the first 4 characters of your drivers license (The first 4 characters are the result of a soundex function). Good times. Won a lot of drinks that way.

    BTW, from the same page on that site....the hologram is "visible only under ultraviolet flight." What the hell is an ultraviolet FLIGHT?

    1. Re:There goes my great bar trick by Arturus_Magi · · Score: 1

      I used to have access to a method to predict the entire ID number. I knew my Florida state driver's license number five months before I got my learner's permit.

  76. It's not a normal hologram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As to all the posts about how this is old news and other states have holograms:
    If you actually read the article it says that the loon floating above and below the card is not a hologram it's a new technology designed by 3M which has *only* been used on Australian passports. That's why this is news.

  77. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by ReTay · · Score: 1

    "Bla bla, tinfoil hat, bla bla, black helicopters, bla bla New World Order, bla bla Illuminati, bla bla bla."

    Bla Bla I trust my government. bla bla bla My government always looks out for me. bla bla bla I am a good citizen officer of course you can search my house. bla bla bla The government is you friend, trust the government.
    Sheep......

    bah willing slave.

  78. You lie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sure, they'll have some of your info digitally imprinted on it, but who cares? It wont be abused."

    I'll call BS on this poster. He's a hypocrite. Allow me to demonstrate.

    Please publish your Drivers License info here on Slashdot. Include all the info which the RFID broadcasts.

    Heh. That won't be the last we hear from this idiot RavenWork, but at least he won't be able to dispute that he's a misinformed idiot and a hypocrite. LOL

  79. Making Fake ID's, a novel way by COredneck · · Score: 1

    About 13 years ago (~1991), there were a couple of Butler students who made fake ID's out of their dorm room. What they used was a large Illinois DL background with a hole to put your head through for the picture. One of the underage kids got caught with the fake DL at a bar and ended up ratting on the Butler students. The police raided the dorm room and then notified the Illinois Secretary of State (who administers motor vehicle functions) even though the crime has occured in Indiana. The IL SOS sent one of their police cars to Indiana to pickup those involved and took them back to IL to be prosecuted. The students were charged with felonies. They also faced charges in Indiana as well.

  80. Cue Cat Rebirth?!! by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

    "The information would be readable only through a computerized scanner, which law enforcement officers could carry."

  81. National ID Card VS. Drivers License by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think there is a big demand for counterfeiting driver's licenses for things other than driving a car and buying alcohol under age.
    I think what we are really talking about here is a national ID card.

  82. what kind of watermark algorithm? by jameszhou2000 · · Score: 1

    I am wondering what kind of watermark algorithm is implmented there? Is it a fragile watermark or robust watermark?

  83. Identity theft by maximilln · · Score: 1

    I have a great idea that is 1) cheaper than hi-tech ID cards, 2) more effective than hi-tech ID cards, 3) more palatable for anyone concerned with personal rights:

    QUIT AMASSING DATABASES ON CITIZENS AND CUSTOMERS.

    Identity thieves can't steal it if it's not being artificially created.

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
  84. Re:What to think. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    ok, you're right! All these places have devices with GPRS connections to the super huge government tracking DB that tracks everyone who has their licenses scanned.

    Yawn... this is getting stupid.

  85. Big Brother the Grocery Clerk by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shit just what we need another device to track us in the complete absence of either a coherent process that controls how they are handed out in the first place AND any sort of legislative brakes on the data that is embedded on it or what data its usage gathers.

  86. Read it again... by kperson · · Score: 1

    "Interesting too is that Gayle Elizabeth Sample was born in 1958 and is under 18 (birthdate is in red)"

    If under 18, "the date of the 18th birthday" will appear in red. Red birthdate means nothing.

    1. Re:Read it again... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It does not say, "the date of the 18th birthday", it says, "the date of 18the birthday", which could mean anything.

      Someone here is dyslexic and it's me not.

      One PDF says "18th birthday indicator identifies minors". So it could equally mean that she will cease to be a minor in the future year of 1958 and was actually born in 1940. So she's a minor of age 64, able to buy alcohol but not cigarettes.

      They need to either make it clearer or otherwise better proofread the site!

      Also something I haven't seen mentioned (but I haven't checked recently): "Some images visible only under ultraviolet light."

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  87. Re:What to think. by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

    But I guess these things make the bar owners feel better, not to mention if a minor were caught in the bar it would help the owner if they can show that they made every reasonable effort to keep minors out.

    exactly, for the owner of any establishment that serves alcohol this is manna from heaven. Get sued for serving alcohol to a minor and you not only get to join the company that made the reader a co-tortfeasor in order to spread the cost, you get to turn around and sue the company for anything you do lose for detrimental reliance on their product. However, as a lowly 1L I could be wrong. 2L's and 3L's feel free to critique.

    In addition, once this is hooked to a database the next step is to feed in what people order. You now have a legal record of who drank what, how much, and when. I know, I know, people will switch drinks, etc. However, bar owners will have strong incentive to keep their records as accurate as possible. I know, I know, no one is going to drink where their drinking habits are recorded, ect. I disagree, the "industry" will spin it to make it sound "cute & fuzzy" while throwing in a points system to reward customers. Besides, most bar slugs don't care.

    I believe I have solved for n in the n:???, n+1:profit! slashdot wealth paradigm. n: hook to database.

    --
    between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  88. Whoop-tee friggin DO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give 'em some re-tooled VISA credit card readers, then they can swipe the card's mag strip. You know, those mag strips that have been around FOR A QUARTER OF A CENTURY!?!?! OOhhh..digital watermarks! Wonder how much some a-hole MIT grad ripped off the minnesota DOT to bullshit that job through.

  89. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

    You're a few years off. See New Deal for when "the United States of American, and as it was founded by its forefathers, ceased to exist."

    --
    I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  90. Link to security features of Alberta license by dstyle5 · · Score: 1
    Check it out here.

    I got mine a few months ago when I moved. The temporary license they give you while you wait for you new one to be mailed to you is ridiculous. It's just a piece of paper with your name on it, so you can't even go for a pint if you get ID'd because the piece of paper is not good enough.

    Why don't they just send your new license to the registry and then you can go exchange your old one for the new one when it arrives?

    1. Re:Link to security features of Alberta license by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The temporary license they give you while you wait for you new one to be mailed to you is ridiculous."

      Why do they mail your license to you? I've never been to a place to get a driver's license renewed or replaced where they don't just take your picture there...wait a few minutes, and hand your your new license there when it is developed. Takes about 10-15 min, and your on your way with license in hand....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Link to security features of Alberta license by dstyle5 · · Score: 1
      "don't just take your picture there...wait a few minutes, and hand your your new license there when it is developed."

      They used to do it that way, but the new "secure" licenses are created in a central facility, in Ontario I think. I guess the thought is that it will prevent an person who works at a registry from making a fake one themselves.

  91. freedom and slavery are not limited by borders by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    the people that established the US (while their concept of "people" was limited) believed that the rights we enjoy devolve to all - only we decided to implement them. If those rights don't exist for all, then they may eventually not exist for us (if they aren't inherent to being human but dependent on gov't, the gov't can take those freedoms away at will, which is why we are here in the first place). While I don't agree with Iraq (and don't trust W), the concept invoked by W of helping others to obtain freedom is not a bad idea, and may be the best defense of our own freedoms.

    Illegal immigrants do pay taxes (sales tax, for starters) but can't use the benefits that money pays for - thus they may be a net gain, not a net loss. If you were looking for people who stay here but contribute nothing, there are many with no other justification other than place of birth for whom the right to stay here is included. While they generate many of the same difficulties as illegal immigrants, they consume lots of services, which makes such people almost certainly a net loss in terms of revenue. Some corporations act similarly, offshoring their headquarters to avoid tax here while reaping the benefits of a workforce, an infrastructure, and a financial system for which they did not pay. If you want "pay to play", then illegal immigration may not be the best place to start.

    I think the problem with illegal immigration is that people who don't have any of the duties to maintain the society and the political system but who enjoy its freedoms may not recognize what those freedoms cost; of course, that could be said to be true of many of those with US citizenship as well...

    1. Re:freedom and slavery are not limited by borders by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      They use most of the benefits an average citizen uses. Hospitals, roads, police, fire, sewers and utilities. Often they are provided schools as well. They are protected by our military (of course, the same could be said for most of the world).

      Read what I said more carefully, those that are working and do pay taxes should be allowed to stay and take advantage of the services offered to citizens.

      However, we need to make sure their wages are being properly reported to the IRS on both thier part, and on the part unscrupulous people who knowingly hire them and pay them unlivable wages.

  92. Help me see if it has a RFID. by Laoping · · Score: 1

    Well, I live in Minnesota, and before we cursed with the current governor this was a really nice place to live. Anyway, January 2 I have to go get a new license (Mine is about to expire, so I have no choice). So I would like to find out if it does have a RFID. Anyone know how I could check, or want to help me find out. Until I know for sure, I think I am going to wrap my license in tin foil.

  93. picture of a loon? by Wolfger · · Score: 1
    It includes a reflective image (of a loon)
    Now really, was that called for? Don't judge people based on where they live. ;-)
    1. Re:picture of a loon? by dpete4552 · · Score: 1

      It sucks that you think where I'm from is wack
      But as long as that's enough to keep your ass from coming back
      And with a smile and a hint of sarcasm, he said
      "I beg your pardon but this is my secret garden"
      -- Atmosphere

      --
      http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  94. Privacy vs. Security by dbc001 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about this recently, although in the context of using social security numbers for account numbers for things like bank accounts, schools, etc.

    My question is this: Are the benefits gained greater than the losses? I haven't been able to think of a benefit that is so great that it justifies being treated like a criminal. So I guess we need to ask what is gained by having computer-scannable driver's licenses. I don't think that the average person gains anything. It's the police that gain from something like this.

    Are counterfeit driver's licenses a life-threatening problem? Are they such a problem that any cop needs to be able to verify all my vital stats at the flip of a switch? If this is all just to fight terrorism than I'm just not buying it.

  95. See digimarc.com for more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stock ticker dmrce.

    Oh yeah, the e on the end means they are on the verge of getting delisted from Nasdaq. Seems they are having a difficult time with their quarterly earnings reports.

  96. All have RFID already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All drivers licenses I've ever seen, even the old paper ones, have had RFID.

    You just hit them with RF in the 700 to 400 nm range and they broadcast your ID.

    I'll be marketing a special line of wallets next year that are specially designed to block those wavelengths. You can preorder them now for $250.

  97. Counterfeiting not the problem. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    The biggest loophole in the system is not the counterfeiting of driver's licenses. Remember that someone, namely underpaid state motor vehicle registry employees need to make the legitimate driver's licenses. I'm sure that finding a few corrupt (or blackmailable) employees wouldn't be excessively difficult. For that matter, if the licenses are made "on the spot" like in NJ, breaking into a motor vehicle office and stealing some driver's license templates might not be too difficult. I suspect that the holograms and UV printing are the same for every license - the digital watermark and other things might be printable with a high-quality laser printer.

    -b.

  98. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Added to currently existing Federal Laws and Supreme Court rulings American citizens when born will be issued a Social Security Number that will be included on their Birth Certificates..."

    This is new to me...I didn't get my SS# till we did it in a business/typing class in about 8th or 9th grade...

    What about people who have religious reasons NOT to have a SS#.."the mark" argument, I'd thought that you could refuse to have your child get an SS#...and that they never did have to unless they chose to. One of those you can stay out, but, once in...always in the system.

    I had heard from friends who had kids that the hospitals tried to pressure them to register their babies with SS...but, didn't know it was required by law...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  99. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by tail.man · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yes, folks can refuse to register their babies but if they want them to be able to.. buy, sell, travel, work and excercise all those other "privileges" our loving Gov. grants us they will have to get the number (and the ID) eventually.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/globalwarmingisascam
  100. This is moot now by Beautyon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...Beginning in 2005, the Department of Homeland Security will issue new uniformity regulations to the States requiring that all Drivers Licenses and Birth Certificates meet minimal Federal Standards with regard to US citizen information, including biometric security provisions...

    Because the federal government now controls the universal standard for Drivers Licences.

    Its clear that the house should never pass a bill with more than 10 pages; these provisions were buried in a 3000 page bill, which no legislator read before voting.

    Each congressman should be forced to read every page of the bills that they sign into law, and they should be made to sign each page indicating that they hare read the page.

    Then again, no one in america cares about any of this, and for certain, at least 59,054,087 people will think that its a good idea.

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  101. Go for it. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Assuming you don't have one of those goofy copiers with built-in anti-counterfeiting support, how many people are going to accept payment with money that feels like copier paper instead of like the hard-to-duplicate, hard-to-find kind of paper they use in currency?

    1. Re:Go for it. by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      Anti-counterfeiting isn't built into any copier yet, and the paper used in currency is simply a high cotton content. Any very expensive paper can duplicate it. And if you put it with a bunch of real money you can pass it off relatively easily.

      And have you felt the new money yet? It feels like copy paper.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  102. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Yes, folks can refuse to register their babies but if they want them to be able to.. buy, sell, travel, work and excercise all those other "privileges" our loving Gov. grants us they will have to get the number (and the ID) eventually."

    Well, I thought the kids (not registered as described above) could just get a special tax id, much like and EIN...and thus, pay taxes..be legal..but, not have to pay or be involved with the SS system....??

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  103. This is very likely a waste of time and money by runcible · · Score: 1

    Not knocking the technology involved, which I'm sure is very spiffy and all, but this is dumb.
    Anyone who really wants a fake ID will still be able to get one by buying it from an unscrupulous state employee.
    Only now of course, since the ID being purchased will be one considered "nearly impossible to counterfeit" the item in question will be above suspicion.
    The only thing this really does is weaken an already weak system.

    --
    remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
    1. Re:This is very likely a waste of time and money by runcible · · Score: 1

      I should point out that the ideas behind my statements did not originate with me, but rather with articles like by Bruce Schneier.

      --
      remember the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi: If enough peasants die horribly, someone will probably notice
  104. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    (1) IMPROVEMENT OF APPLICATION PROCESS.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commis- sioner of Social Security shall undertake to make improvements to the enumeration at birth program for the issuance of social security account numbers to newborns. Such improvements shall be designed to prevent--

    This is part of what I read from the Act itself. It seems to say it wants to improve enumeration of SS at birth programs...but, doen't say it is by a law a requirement that you are enumerated at birth.

    IANAL...but, does seem that way as stated..but, there may be another law on this. Is new to me tho....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  105. DL Standards already in the works by schwit1 · · Score: 1
    The AAMVA: American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators(AAMVA) has submitted its recommendations on uniform drivers licensing and licenses. Lots of good stuff and common sense for consistency of design, processes and procedures. Some items are of concern, especially the 'requirement' that the SSN be used as a person's personal identifier. The AAMVA does say that biometrics is not ready for prime time. More recommendations need to be requirements when it comes to sharing data outside of law enforcement. They do recommend not giving undocumented aliens a drivers license. This would seem to be a no brainer after 9/11. Wouldn't it also be abetting a crime?

  106. no, not really.... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    Roads, they use. Also, sewers and utilities (although only implicitly through whatever housing they have - and they pay for them, also implicitly). The military protects them - since they occupy US territory. Police - not unless they commit a crime - if you're here illegally, you're unlikely to call the police to report a robbery, because they'll ask for lots of info you don't have or which will get you sent home. Same with fire. Hospitals are the major item that illegal immigrants will use (and the major cost), and they're the main cost for legal residents as well.

    If lack of contribution to society is the determinant of who should stay and who should go, there are a lot of others who need to leave based on economic contributions in addition to or even before illegal immigrants.

  107. Re:Loons? Patriot II passed, try DNA by tail.man · · Score: 0

    You may be correct.

    I think we agree more than disagree.

    My point is that regardles of the legal details the end result is that if you don't have the number and the card you are a non person. If the legal details are not in place now, wait for patriot III.

    Next comes the chip...
    NSF report on merging humans and technology. The hive mind is mentioned. (PDF)

    They want to chip us all. These things can do more than identify you. The new models can track you and RECEIVE transmissions. Don't take the chip.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/globalwarmingisascam
  108. MN License Fakes by College Kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was some college kid that was printing out fake licenses and selling them. Well they were pretty good fakes and the police finally tracked the guy down. The impounded his computer and found the complete list of all the people he had made licenses for. The tv news teams put out the word that the police were waiting for the people to turn themselves in and turn over their fake licenses. I woundered if all the people turned themselves in and if they even got extra people turn themselves in. I can't find the link to the article. Sorry.

  109. UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realy don't want the San Francisco Pigs to get these. They are incompetant as is. What I DO want is not to be maid to feel like a criminal when I go to take my tests, better tests, HELL better cars TO take the driving and written test. The last time I took a driving test the DMV here in NorCal gave me a POS Jallopy.

  110. For the next state by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    Put some boobies on your drivers' licenses!

  111. Any stories about security technology failing by RFIDJAck · · Score: 1

    There is a guy in my office who is convinced that the security built into a new product will never be broken. I'm a cynic and believe that there will never be a technology that can not be broken. Any stories or arguments about security technology not living up to its promise would be appreciated.

  112. Ummm....no... by dissillus · · Score: 1

    A digital fingerprint? If you mean a barcode i can see that, but I dont understand how a digital "fingerprint" could be applied unless the actual physical "stuff" of the license is altered at printing. I know here in New Jersey, our new Licenses were rumored to have microchips in them, however, I'm pretty sure that idea was kyboshed by the speculation of "what happens if someone put their license in a microwave?". Besides that, the thickness of our licenses are WAY to think for any kind of flashrom device that I know if. The thickness of the license is approximately 1-2mm, and the largest SMT IC I know of is much thicker than that. It's just not possible!