Slashdot Mirror


Robbers Scared by GTA

HellSpam writes "Some robbers tried to burglarize a poor old lady and her 3 grandsons. Her grandsons happened to be playing Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas, and the sounds of the police from the game scared them away! From the article: "The police in the game were saying, 'Stop, we have you surrounded. This is the police.' The burglar, unknowingly, thought this was the actual police and panicked ... being apprehended by PlayStation." Now, no more saying games are bad for you..."

66 of 472 comments (clear)

  1. and then ... by klang · · Score: 4, Funny

    the grandsons beat the shit out of the poor burglar..

    1. Re:and then ... by vranash · · Score: 5, Funny

      With a large, pink, double dildo ;-p

    2. Re:and then ... by Viceice · · Score: 4, Funny

      reminds me of a story i read in the local paper.

      These 2 burglars planed on robbing the home of a lawyer while he was out, as they had staked out the place and figured that his wife would be home alone during the day time.

      So one afternoon, after making sure the lawyer had left, they put their plan into action. Unbeknown to them, the lawyer's son and his buddies from his hockey team were in, fresh from a game.

      So these 2 guys walked in with a knife each, to find 6 fuming mad built up guys with hockey sticks + 1 old lady.

      One got away, one was handed over to to the cops after being beaten to a pulp while being "aprehended".

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    3. Re:and then ... by JimmehAH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why is this troll?

      There's a large, double-ended dildo in the showers of the Police Departments in GTA:SA. It's quite a powerful weapon for melee. Almost as satisfying as beating a tramp to death with a bunch of flowers. In the game of course.

    4. Re:and then ... by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read that as "hockey sticks +1", and my first thought is that they were pretty low level players...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  2. This happened to me once by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 5, Funny

    A man ran in, pointed a gun at me, saw that I was playing Daikatana and ran off screaming.

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:This happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      A man ran in, pointed a gun at me, saw that I was playing Duke Nukem for Ever and vanished in a puff of logic.

  3. What I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish the 3 kids then all picked up baseball bats and laid into the thief

    before taking off with his car and finding hookers.

  4. Urm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    What is the point of the word "burglarize"? "Burgle" means exactly the same thing.

    1. Re:Urm... by TwistedSquare · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apparently, it's the difference between British and American English.

    2. Re:Urm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the US we like our words to have phonetic relationships to meaning. Sound and meter very important and we like our words to be cool. It is not that we don't have "cute" words, but robbery (notice hard 'B' and "ery" sound) is cool and the word used to describe it shouldn't sound like a teddy bear picnic on lollipop lake. Burgle sounds like being tickled or at worst half vomiting in your throat, but it does not sound cool. Queer eye for the straight guy meets 'theft' and you get burgle.

      On the other side of the coin, this is one reason British humor is so funny.

    3. Re:Urm... by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Funny

      In my opiniation, "burglarize" is a perfectionally validative wordification. How else would reportization of the securitial/policial forceship appearize to be importantive enoughly to be respectative by the massmediaship and influentate the societyness?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:Urm... by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because "Hamburglarizer" was too hard for McDonalds to say.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    5. Re:Urm... by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Burglarize" is a perfectly cromulent word.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  5. Home Alone? by Peden · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds abit too much like something from the film "Home Alone" doesn't it?

  6. Crappy journalism as usual by t_allardyce · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was back in March according to the article so GTA:SA wasnt out yet! (must have been a previous one) The story is in the news because they just got sentenced to around 5 years each - kind of like a darwin award they're gonna get the piss taken out of them in jail.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  7. Yeah Right! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure that he didn't die laughing at you?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  8. Re:It wasn't GTA:San Andreas by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article: "Back in March, Sandy Wilson was taking care of her three grandsons when a group of men attempted to burglarize her home, pointing a gun at the kids.".

    So back in March, it couldn't have been GTA:SA

  9. Bad luck for the burglar by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that he was in the US.In our small country , England , the Govt would charge the old lady , for scaring the burglar.

    On a serious note , this is a very big issue.Unlike the US , where the rights of home owners using force against burglars are quite clear , in the UK this is a grey area.Home owners can use reasonable force only and that is decided by the courts.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
    1. Re:Bad luck for the burglar by AlphaPB · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unlike the US , where the rights of home owners using force against burglars are quite clear , in the UK this is a grey area.Home owners can use reasonable force only and that is decided by the courts.

      The U.S. is a nation composed of 50 states, each with its own laws governing self-defense in the home. There are states with the so-called "castle laws" which allow the use of deadly force inside the home, but even these states might have a "retreat requirement" which requires that the homeowner retreat to a place of safety if but only if it is possible to do so in a safe manner.

      In the US, the justifiability of a self-defense incident is still very much decided by a court. The mere availability of deadly weapons in this nation does not mean that gun-owning Americans can use them at will.

    2. Re:Bad luck for the burglar by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The right of self-defenc(s)e (just being PC) is being eroded in most countries as an artifact of an encroaching police state. I've been saying this for decades: if citizens have no legal right to defend themselves, the government will next conclude that they have no need of anything that would help them defend themselves. Like guns. Is the government (any government) really so concerned that we might accidentally pop a burglar? Do they really care if we accidentally shoot ourselves in the {insert body part here}? Do they really care how many shooting victems show up on the 5 o'clock news? Sure, individual lawmakers may be, but government as a whole has other ideas.

      The unrelenting anti-gun bias is just a smokescreen, whose sole intent is to convince us to allow yet another part of the Constitution to effectively die. What they are afraid of is an armed, independent population that would cheerfully shoot any government official that oversteps his bounds. And why would they care about that? My guess: they're planning on overstepping their bounds.

      Oh I know, tinfoil hat stuff ... but I'll say this. After four+ years of George Bush at lot of folks that used to dismiss such views as paranoid are giving them a second look. A lot of anti-gun types make such a big deal about how the "right to bear arms" really isn't a right to bear arms, etc. etc., continually trying to reinterpret the Founders' intentions. But their intention was pellucidly clear: the right was given to us as a deterrent (and last-ditch defense) against an abusive government. It can happen here, folks, and a lot of people that fought so hard to eliminate guns from our society may one day wish they had one. A gun, that is.

      Let me add, just to eliminate any confusion, that I'm not a member of the NRA nor have I ever owned any firearm more powerful than a BB gun. But I want the right to acquire one if I feel sufficiently threatened (by anyone or anything.) That's what the Founding Fathers wanted, and so far as I'm aware there's been no Constitutional Amendment that says otherwise. The recent history of the United States, in particular, has been one of steadily increasing government power, going hand-in-hand with this simpleminded idea that if we could just ban all guns, life would be so much better. Unfortunately, that goes against the history of such things, and really places more trust in our government that it currently deserves.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Bad luck for the burglar by Danse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How does not being able to kill somebody for taking your television consitute not being able to legally defend yourself?

      Maybe on your planet nobody ever does any harm to the occupants of the home they break into, but that's not what it's like here on earth. Between burglars who would rather kill you than get caught, angry ex-spouses/lovers, and the average rapist, there are plenty of situations in which you would want to have an effective means of self-defense. Non-lethal weapons just don't cut it. They are not as reliable or effective as guns, and they don't have the simple ability to scare the hell out of someone so that you don't have to actually use them. Guns do that.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  10. Re:It wasn't GTA:San Andreas by utopianfiat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, you beat me to the chase.
    I recall the line was in both of the previous games, so really it could have been GTA3 or vice city.
    *or* if you wanted to take the newspaper literally, it might have actually been GTA for playstation.

    --
    +5, Truth
  11. The word is 'burgle', you illiterate moron! by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Informative

    The verb is 'burgle', and one who burgles is a burglar.

    You don't call a burglar a 'burglarizer', do you?

    Cripes!

    1. Re:The word is 'burgle', you illiterate moron! by dustman · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary& va=burglarize&x=0&y=0

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=burglariz e

      Looks like burlgarize is OK to me. In fact, for a couple of the dictionaries, the definition of "burgle" is just: "see burglarize".

    2. Re:The word is 'burgle', you illiterate moron! by jabuzz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just a case of Americans deciding that everything is "ized" because it sounds trendy. It is what my Grandma would refer to as "Estuary English". You won't find such abuses of the English language in the OED.

    3. Re:The word is 'burgle', you illiterate moron! by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, whilst some changes in American English were in fact deliberate (and mostly due to Webster and his peers), quite a lot of the differences are simply due to changes to the language that happened in the UK not being propogated to the USA.

      I would guess that this is one of the latter cases - as it appears that burglarize is an old word that has been obsoleted by burgle in the UK (and Australia and New Zealand).

      Quite a lot of how Americans speak is not an "abuse" of English - it's just a result of the separation in a time when the fastest way to communicate between the two countries was a few weeks on a boat.

      I suggest you do some reading on the topic - I'd recommend "The Adventure of English" by Melvyn Bragg, and "Mother Tongue" by Bill Bryson.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    4. Re:The word is 'burgle', you illiterate moron! by bloggins02 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh yes. The infamous "Proof by dictionary links." A much underused technique IMO.

  12. Re:Since when... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Especially as seeing she's a poor old lady.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  13. Updated "Hannah and the Whistling Teakettle"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Am I the only one that remembers this from elementary school?(From Amazon.com)
    Hannah's grandmother, a loving granny, but a hard case when it comes to accepting gifts, learns the pleasures and benefits of receiving in this story of expectations. Hannah is on a visit to her grandfolks and their soda fountain in the Bronx. She has brought along a whistling teapot as a present for her grandmother, who routinely returns most gifts as frivolous. That appears to be the fate of this one as well when grandma gives it the curse: "It's not a necessity." When Grandma's attention is distracted by a customer out front, Hannah takes the opportunity to put the kettle on the old stove and demonstrate that her grandma no longer need let her tea water boil silently away. Two strange men enter the shop and while one tries to distract Grandma, the other jimmies the pay phone. Next thing you know all chaos breaks loose as a high-pitched whistle cuts the air. Thinking its a police whistle, the robbers skedaddle. Grandma figures she'll keep the kettle after all: " `That little bird on the kettle maybe saved our life!' Hannah's grandmother had said. And life, she said, was a necessity." Palmisciano's (A Spaldeen Story) artwork is filled with little details that fix the time period as a gentler one: Grandmas sagging socks, Grandpas two-toned shoes, and the old-fashioned shop with its 20 cent sundaes. A charming story from a more innocent time.
  14. Re:Burglarize!!! by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, stop making words up, it's worse than boswollox

    Of course burglarize is a word. Before you criticize someone's grammar maybe you should read a dictionary.

  15. Re:"Burglarize" by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somewhere in America:

    Operator: "Hello, this is 911, how may I help you?"
    Citizen: "HELP! I've been bloody burgled by two tall guys with fags and they are making off!"
    Operator: "Is this some kind of a sick joke? Call when you have an emergency. "

  16. Along the same lines.... by niew · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A friend of mine was kicked back on his couch in his boxers watching a movie (home theater type setup)...

    There was a knock at the door, he opened it a crack to answer it (he was in his boxers). The door was forced open and he was pinned to the floor by a bunch of heavily armed cops!

    It seems a neighboor had heard somebody yell "Everybody get down!" followed by some gun shots, put 1 and 1 together and came up with 3...

  17. Re:Remember kids... by WillerZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thanks, I'm here all week.

    God help us all

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
  18. Re:Burglarize!!! by Cumstien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a perfectly cromulent word.

  19. This could help in other dangerous situations by aiabx · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm looking for a video game that randomly says "Thank you for ordering the Anniversary Special Bouquet. It will be ready for pickup shortly".
    -aiabx

    --
    Just this guy, you know?
  20. Home Alone by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm gonna give you to the count of ten to get your ugly, yella, no-good keister off my property before I pump yer guts full of lead. One... two... TEN!" *ACKACKACKACKACKACK* *pizza guy runs away all scared*

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  21. Re:And your source is? by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, this totally happened! This guy at work, he has a cousin who goes to school with one of the kids in the story. And he swears it really happened this way!

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  22. Simple answer. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dont own only one gun. Or one knife.

    "Officer, he broke in, and had just picked up my other gun and i was forced to shoot him!!"

    Same goes for knives. THe only problem is, sadly, you can no longer just beat the crap/wound someone breaking into your house, you have to kill them to make sure you dont get sued or arrested.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Simple answer. by austad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A cop friend once told me that if someone breaks into your house, it's technically illegal to shoot and kill them. However, he said that you bet your ass he would shoot and kill anyone that broke into his house. He also told me that if it ever happens, to make damn sure you shoot to kill, because if the person lives, you'll end up in court getting sued or going to prison.

      As far as I'm concerned, if someone comes into my house and forcefully comes through my locked bedroom door, they do not have good intentions. They will either be shot or chopped up with a razor sharp samurai sword.

      Oddly enough, there have been a couple of incidents lately in my city where burglars have been breaking into occupied houses around 5am, tying up the occupants at gunpoint, and then stealing all of their crap.

      Get yourself an alarm system, it's a good deterrent, and has the bonus of alerting you and waking you up if someone does decide to break in. With a properly installed alarm system, you can be reasonably sure that the bumps in the night are nothing. I've was robbed once at a house I was renting, they took a bunch of stuff. And, one of my roomies was home at the time, watching TV in the basement. A second time, we had an alarm system. Someone worked the back door open and it set off the alarm, they ran away. They are lucky they ran away too because they would have only been seconds away from being shot.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    2. Re:Simple answer. by EllF · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unless you're properly trained in how to wield a katana, I doubt you'll be doing a lot of cutting with it. The act of drawing a live blade can be dangerous to someone who doesn't know what they're doing; merely swinging one around like a baseball bat is just apt to sever your own arm.

      I'd reccomend using a wakizashi, anyways. They're substantially shorter, and far more suited to indoor use. The katana is the Japanese version of the longsword, and like its European counterpart, it wasn't meant to be used in close indoor combat as much as on the open battlefield.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    3. Re:Simple answer. by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 2, Funny

      don't worry

      i'm sure he's read snowcrash, whih is probably why he bought it in the first place

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  23. Re:"Burglarize" by dsanfte · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using old english suffixes on your verbs doesn't make you one whit smarter when you have zero english comprehension skills.

    The grandparent was referring to the fact that the Brit would have dialed 999 and not reached emergency services at all.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  24. Old ladies by geoffeg · · Score: 2, Funny

    >Some robbers tried to burglarize a poor old lady and her 3

    Why are old ladies always poor? Do non-poor ladies never get robbed (they should, they have more money).

  25. In Other News... by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 4, Funny

    The burglars who ran away are suing the owners of the home, the children, and Sony for causing them excessive job stress.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  26. Re:"Burglarize" by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Your (and the post you were referring to) both assume that someone from UKia wouldn't know that the emergency number in USia is 911, something that everyone except perhaps some loner living in a cave in the himalayas knows (thanks to US TV/movies).

    /Mikael

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  27. RTFA! by jfaulken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I usually wouldn't do this, but since:

    1) The article is only 4 paragraphs long, and
    2) At the time of my reply, this moron has been modded to +3 Insightful,


    Galveston County Asst DA Michael Elliott explained, "The police in the game were staying, 'Stop, we have you surrounded. This is the police.' The burglar, unknowingly, thought this was the actual police and panicked ... being apprehended by Playstation."


    and also


    Police arrested the four men. Samuel Woodrow received a five-year prison sentence this week. Ronnie Farris is serving four years. Lucas Griffin got probation. And Zachary Brandenburg's trial is in January.


    It's one thing for a -1 post to say things like "wah, wah, wah, what are you talking about, this is stupid, i bet it's a hoax" but when people are burning real modpoints, it's just a travesty. Travesty I tell ya.

  28. Come on people! by Fulkkari · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most likely the burglar didn't get scared of the sound from GTA because it sounded like cops. When he heard the sound he probably just figured out someone was at home and decided to escape. Burglars want to do their business alone... not when the house is packed with people.

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
    1. Re:Come on people! by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story says they came in and pointed guns, and that there were four of them. They weren't sneaking into anywhere, it was a home invasion.

  29. This is news? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The story is a funny little urban anecdote, but that's it. Burglers get scared off by a lot of things - and they usually don't rob houses while there are people in them so any sign of life can often scare them off.

    If this is news then I'm now waiting for a sensationalist story about a startled burgler or even a policeman on a routine call hearing the audio of some game character making a threat or seeing a high resolution gun pointed at him on a big screen and returning fire, hitting a kid.

  30. Re:"Burglarize" by topham · · Score: 4, Informative

    911 was chosen as it is 9 pulses followed by 2 (seperate) pulses.

    000 would be 30 pulses (with a break between sets of 10).

    911 was originally implemented when the majority, if not everyone, still had pulse dial.

    It was a combination which was thought to prevent misdials.

  31. The article doesn't say GTA:SA by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to the Article, the game was "Grand Theft Auto". That's it... no suffix.

    So I'm trying to figure out... where did the person who posted this story get the idea that it was definitely from the San Andreas edition of GTA?

    I haven't played any of the GYA games... is the sound effect being referred to by this story only in the SA version of GTA or something?

    Certainly if it _was_ GTA:SA, then the story's a fake because I understand it wasn't available back in March.

  32. And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aliens were trying to abduct my grandmother, but I was playing Halo and they heard me operating the Scorpion, so they ran away.

  33. Yeah the opposite was so much better by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Where a landowner could just kill a dirty peasant coming on their land or have them flogged to within an inch of their lives.

    People always complain about the extreme of laws but never seem to have the intelligence to ask why these laws are there.

    The laws in question deal with two things. So called self-defence and playing your own judge.

    There was time when property owners (the upper class/royalty) had plenty of rights. Steal or even just be on the land of the local landlord and you could be killed by his guards. Punishments was whatever the local lord saw fit to deal out.

    This has changed. Now it is up to the police and court system to punish crimes.

    Do criminals have rights? Well the problem is who defines who is a criminal? Is a peasant catching a deer to feed his family a criminal? Well yes and off with their head.

    Nowadays we prefer the courtsystem to decide guilt and punishment. Sometimes this results in "unjust" decisions but what every intelligent person has to ask themselve is what would the alternative result in. Would you allow force to protect a car from being broken into?

    My car is parked on parking lot and you standing next to it causes the alarm to go off. Luckily I got my gun and under your jobbo rule I blow him away. Oops turned out you just bumped my car with your elbow while opening your own. Oh well. At least your family has the right to shoot people who trespass on your grave eh?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah the opposite was so much better by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If someone steps on your property and refuses to leave, you have the right by natural law to use whatever force is necessary to remove them.

      "Your honor, under the state penal code my actions were illegal, but that law doesn't apply to ME; I only follow natural law."

      Ain't gonna work.

      Though the situation mentioned sounds very fishy, no state requires you to retreat when you're in your home. I have a feeling that the facts are a lot different than how they were presented.

  34. NOT Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas by itallushrt · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you actually RTFA you will see that this happened last March. Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas was not even out yet. Had to be either the orginal GTA or GTA: Vice City.

  35. Along those lines by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What worries me is that if an ammendment can be legslated away "for the public good" what about the others? There are plenty of other ammendments that are troublesome, and the government has made attempts in the past and now to curtail.

    If they legslate away the second, then that's great prescident for them to say "We need to get rid of the sixth ammendment. Look at all the drug dealers and evil doers that get off on technicalities because of their scumbag lawyers. The defandant doesn't need a lawyer, they just twist the truth. Our Great and Noble prosecutors are only concerned with the truth, so that's all that is needed. Don't worry, this won't be abused, it just helps make you safe."

    I mean you can argue that basically any ammendment should be done away with to make us safer. In a perfect world, that'd be the case. If the government were composed of perfectly noble beings, than none of these rights would be necessary, because all they do is et in the way of the conviction of the guilty.

    However, that's NOT the case. Governments are corrupt, all of them, to some degree because HUMANS are corrupt. There are next to no examples of perfectly noble human beings. So things like the Bill of Rights exist to control that, and to protect people by ensuring the government can't do whatever it wants.

  36. Similiar Experience with IRC Wave Files by z4ce · · Score: 2, Funny

    About 7 years back our house was nearly broken into. At the time I was an IRC junkie (running my own network and all). We used to play this wav file that had a guy screaming WAKEUP!!! and we would play it frequently late at night to get each others attention.

    For some reason all the thief did was open the window. For some reason he didn't go any further. Our best guess is when he was breaking in he heard a wave file yelling WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!! :)

    Ian

    1. Re:Similiar Experience with IRC Wave Files by orpx · · Score: 2, Funny

      lol, so you assume.

      its funny, cause this one time i left my window open, but forgot about it, and came back and saw my window was open. nothing was stolen, atleast that i know of, but looking under my bed, the dust bunnies looked alittle out of place. Confirming my actual thought of dust bunnies scaring away the possible criminals from the window i forgot i left open. It was a thrilling experience, now I keep dust bunnies everywhere and make sure to clean NOWHERE.... or maybe it was the state of digust my room was in? that made the possible criminal think that this place wasnt worth ripping off... or maybe it was some passing cars, or neighbors fumbling around in the back..i dunno, but im sure its the dust bunnies! fear the seemingly void balls of collaboration.

  37. Re:And your source is? by vsprintf · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is no way they could find that out unless the criminal had an IQ of 70 and then he's lucky to get out of the house with pants on.

    Most criminals are not Lex Luthor. Why do you think there are so many dumb-criminal stories? They really are stupid for the most part. I had one thief (or thieves) fail to steal my Mustang because they jimmied the door and pulled the ignition lock cylinder but then couldn't start the engine. The thing was the key switch had broken and it was so expensive to replace that I had rerouted the wiring to two easily visible/traced switches for ignition and starter. They aren't real bright.

  38. Re:"Burglarize" by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surely somebody who burgles is a burglator.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  39. Re:In Neoconservative America... by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US government has already overstepped their constitutional bounds, and all our guns didn't stop it.

    If the American people cared, the US government never would have overstepped its constitutional bounds, and we wouldn't have needed to use guns in order to stop it. And if the American people don't care, all the guns in the world won't make a difference.

    The Founding Fathers wrote a good constitution, and a great bill of rights. They ensured that we'd be able to speak out and vote to control the government, and that the rights of minorities would be protected as well. There's only one thing they couldn't do. They couldn't insure that we Americans actually care. If we don't care, none of our rights and none of our restrictions on government will make a difference.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  40. Dubya? by roesti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good to see George W. Bush partaking in the Internets.

  41. But before that, they time warped to the future... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...to get GTA:San Andres since it was not available back in March when this attack happened. I would guess it was more likely GTA3 or GTA:Vice City.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  42. Re:Text-book example of making the news by Mortlath · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I know this has already been mentioned, but the robbers were holding the children at gunpoint. So the robbers weren't spooked by the presence of people in the house.

    I suppose they might have been spooked by the thought of more people in the house. But it seems unlikely. On the other hand, the whole incident was very unlikely to happen.

  43. Where could this be? by RobinH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where on earth would you live that someone wanting to steal your DVD player and the $50 worth of cash in your dresser would actually bother to bring a gun with them? If they come in and realize you're home, they just going to leave. Plus, try it in my house and you're going to get a jaw full of rottweiller teeth in your leg.

    I just find it odd that even though property crime rates are about even in both Canada and the U.S., you see the following difference in homicide rates:

    Homicide (per 100,000)
    Canada: 1.9
    U.S.: 5.6

    That's even though Canadians are more urban, less pro-life, less fire-and-brimstone religious, just as multi-cultural, and own almost as many guns (about 70% of the U.S. rate of ownership - though it's admittedly hard to find exact rates).

    Does anybody have ANY idea why the homicide rate is so much higher in the U.S. than other industrialized nations? I mean a real intelligent idea? Canadians and Americans just aren't that different, so why the huge difference in this one area? If someone could figure it out, the U.S. could stand to stop 10,000 homicides per year. If each life is 1 million dollars (per insurance rates), thats 10 billion in savings every year!

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain