Slashdot Mirror


Relic Russian ICBM To the Rescue for Science

helio writes "Japanese space agency, JAXA, has announced that the agency will use DNEPR space launch system to launch OICETS (Optical Inter-Orbit Communications Engineering Test Satellite). Initially OICETS was to be launched with Japan's H-IIA rocket, however the delay in their development and a lack of time in the schedule force JAXA to utilize Russian's DNEPR system. For those who are too young to remember Cold War, DNEPR space launch system used to be Russian's inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBM). As you may guess, the OICETS satellite will be launched from a silo."

149 comments

  1. Check it over reallllly good folks by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Boy are they going to be suprised if the backup systems kick in and the ICBM slams into Washington D.C.

    Seriously however, I can't think of a better use for old Russian ICBMs.

    1. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as the research satellite doesn't contain any nuclear warheads, I think we're probably safe if it impacts, unless it hits someone directly on the head, which one would have to take as some sort of sign from God that maybe today wasn't the best day to get out of bed.

    2. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lets hope that the US doesn't have an automated response system that watches for anything coming out of the silos. It doesn't make for good international relations to launch a couple thousand nukes in response to communications satellite.

    3. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by nizo · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the owners of the satellite probably wouldn't be too pleased. I assume a launch from a russian silo won't trigger any alarms here anywhere?

    4. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking that all week unfortunately.

      Folks, give your family an extra hug tonight.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by bzebarth · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Would you like to play a game?"
      "How about, Global Thermonuclear War?"

      I guess I'm probably dating myself with that one.

    6. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      The only way to win is to not play at all.

    7. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I'm 19 and I loved that movie.

    8. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Rumagent · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I too have difficulty finding a better use for an ancient Russian ICBM than flattening the white house.

      Not that I am bitter or anything...

    9. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be funny. Alarms suddenly go off all over washington, at the pentagon, in NORAD. Some trigger happy general pushes a red button somewhere, missiles are launched, and everyone dies :-)

    10. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny
      Lets hope that the US doesn't have an automated response system that watches for anything coming out of the silos. It doesn't make for good international relations to launch a couple thousand nukes in response to communications satellite.

      Oh, good point, good point. Put that into the "Cost" column in the Cost-Benefit analysis for our Global Satellite Telecommunications Domination plan.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by dustinbarbour · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless of course it nails you while you are in bed. Then it *WAS* quite obviously your day to get out of bed.

    12. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by learn+fast · · Score: 1

      Old Soviet ICBMs as used as boosters for the Soyuz spacecraft that serve the Intn'l Space Station right now.

    13. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by dhakbar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every Slashdot reader would absolutely LOVE to get nailed in bed, for it is but a pipe dream...

    14. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by tandr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously however, I can't think of a better use for old Russian ICBMs.

      Well, I could not think of better use for old American ICBMs either. Or Chinese.

    15. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Allow me to assure you that a launch from any silo, or anywhere in russia, will be carefully scrutinized by any number of people and autonomous systems whose job it is to make sure we don't get nuked without doing something about it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by davesplace1 · · Score: 1

      Yea I'll take satellites over warheads any day :)

    17. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're a slashdotter. You're expected to date yourself.

    18. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      l0lZ d00d U R 1334 pFu|\|EE

    19. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is already happened in the US. ICBM have enough power and accuracy to launch satelites. Why not use those old ICBM since you don't have build a new rockets to launch satelites. If you don't use them they might be used for some other purpose most likely bad.

    20. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      WOPR!

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    21. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Kinda reminds me of watching Star Trek:First Contact, where Zephraim Cochrane used an old ICBM as the booster for the first warp drive ship.

      I for one support using up old obsolete missiles for space exploration. After all, both the US and USSR space programs were developed using missiles, including captured V-2's.

      Personally, I think the probs with the current Russian Federation space programs would lessen if they threw in with the ESA. The Ariane 5 is a nice looking booster on paper, but doesn't have the track record of a Proton or Elektron booster.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    22. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "everyone dies"

      Yeah, that would be funny.

    23. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by NateTech · · Score: 1

      No no no.

      "A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

      --
      +++OK ATH
    24. Re:Check it over reallllly good folks by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Why? If you're looking for that numbnuts from Texas, he's always on vacation at his "ranch".

      They have to keep him away from Washington where real power-brokers and people with a clue about politics live and work. He's an embarassment when he's there.

      Just let him hang out down in Cowpattie, TX as long as he wants. Find him some horsies or something to ride, would ya?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  2. WHAT?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what

    1. Re:WHAT?? by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no kidding

      wtf do all the acronyms mean?

    2. Re:WHAT?? by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1

      Don't you know to use Google?

      The company that makes the missle is located in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, which is situated on the Dnepr river; hence, the name DNEPR.

      --
      No data, no cry
    3. Re:WHAT?? by rxmd · · Score: 1
      The company that makes the missle is located in Dnepropetrovsk, Ukraine, which is situated on the Dnepr river; hence, the name DNEPR.
      w00t! Dnepropetrovsk is where my girlfriend is from. Gotta tell her that she's da bomb... ;)
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    4. Re:WHAT?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so.. russianbrides.com?

    5. Re:WHAT?? by rxmd · · Score: 1

      Nope. Institute of Slavonic Studies, Bonn university, Germany. :)

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  3. heh by Renraku · · Score: 2, Funny

    (minutes after launch)

    This just in!

    Rhode Island has been consumed in a fiery explosion!

    Also just in, the word "oops" is heard around the world, supposedly originating from a team of scientists and launch coordinators..

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:heh by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Funny

      HEY NOW! I live in RI =(

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:heh by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Ooh, that suggests a great riff on one of my favorite things....

      ENTIRE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DESTROYED IN ENORMOUS EXPLOSION

      Details at 11!

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:heh by larkost · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be: "Entire State of Rhode Island Destroyed in Moderately Big Explosion"? Maybe "Above Average"....

    4. Re:heh by Kehvarl · · Score: 1

      probably a better headline would be:
      "Entire State of Rhode Island Destroyed in Explosion Visible from Conneticut."

      this of course assumes that the observer is standing just across the border and is watching carefully.

    5. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, pressed launch button from the other silo.

    6. Re:heh by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Such an explosion would be potentially visable from Massachussetts. If the observer had binoculars.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  4. I Dunno... by JossiRossi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seems a bit too much like a James Bond Villian plot.

    "That's right Mr. Bond. The japanese science missile is actually carrying a nuclear payload, and there is no one here to stop me MWHAHAHAH! Now I'm going to put this "stop missile" remote control over here and leave the room secure in the fact that you can't possibly escape your restraints... MWHAHAHAHAH!"

    --
    Just a boy doing unproffesional IT work that's way above his head.
    1. Re:I Dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You watched "You Only Live Twice" last night, didn't you?

  5. Sigh. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it's a relic, then it's not Russian, it's Soviet. If you want to call it current then it could be Russia, but then there would be some irony, as the name DNEPR is the name of the most important river in Ukraine, which is (in case any of you were sleeping while recent news was transpiring), a completely different country (much to Russia's consternation). In fact, if the Russians haven't yet changed the name of the DNEPR system, it only goes to further evidence their thinly veiled ambitions on Ukraine.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 1

      You must not be old enough to have been alive during the cold war or you are not from USA. Us dumb americans know that all those who used to live in CCCP(USSR) are "russians".

      --
      "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
    2. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it was a tough transition for the Russia to go from the largest (area) country in the world when it was the Soviet Union to... the... largest (area) country in the world now as the Russian Federation.

    3. Re:Sigh. by igny · · Score: 1

      I'll bite.

      Change of the name is considered to be bad luck for ships (I am not sure about ICBMs, likely even more so). Besides, it makes me laugh to hear the "formerly known as..." phrases (among the most laughable changes in history are "french fries"->"freedom fries", for example). The name "Dnepr" does not imply that the system was either designed, built or deployed exlusively in Ukraine. There are plenty of Russian systems, ships and such with the names like "Elbrus", "Everest", or even "Kiev" or "Odessa". I would not be surprised if I hear about a Ukrainian ship named "Volga" or "Dunab".

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Sigh. by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      If it's a relic, then it's not Russian, it's Soviet. If you want to call it current then it could be Russia, but then there would be some irony

      Yeah, because the cataclysmic breakup of the largest country on the planet never generates any opportunity for irony....

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Sigh. by a66at · · Score: 1

      I think, it's ukrainian rocket, it was definitely developed and built in Dnepropetrovsk. But Ukranians had little luck in producing rockets since they acquired independency, because they lost their only customer - Soviet Army. It seems, they also have not launch facility for heavy rockets. That's why the launch will be performed by russian agency.

    6. Re:Sigh. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Jesus, how is this flamebait? (Are you threre, god, it's me, drinkypoo) Expecting journalism from slashdot is like expecting security from microsoft or benevolence from the bush administration but it's a reasonable request, if not a reasonable expectation. There IS a difference between "Russian" and "Soviet". Be educated, and moderate with your mind, not your ass.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're really confused pal. This system is based on the Soviet SS-18 ICBM. It was developed jointly by Russia and Ukraine AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union. That's why it is named DNEPR. To emphasize the co-operation between the two...

      As to the Russian influence on Ukraine - it's not going anywhere, at least during our lifetime. After all the two were a single entity on and off for hundreds of years since the establishment of Kievan Russia in 7th century AD.

      -Alex

    8. Re:Sigh. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
      Actually, there are no ukrainian ships named volga or dunab. Anything with clearly russian names has been renamed long ago.

      Remember: it's perfectly normal to find a coffee in moscow or raleigh-durham called "amazon." However, it's quite another thing when you name something that has defense and national import, like, say, your nuclear weapons.

    9. Re:Sigh. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
      You're probably right on point A, which is the origin of the DNEPR system. I have no expertise in this and bow to your knowledge. At the very least, then the slashdot writer was ignorant (what a surprised).

      however, you are totally full of shit on point 2. First of all, there was never anything called "Kievan Russia" - there was something called "Kievan Rus", where Rus != Russia. I'm sure you know this already but were hoping that the readers of slashdot would not. The resulting monologue about how russia is not ukraine i'm sure you've heard a thousand times, but what's the point of repeating it to you, as by using a term like "Kievan Russia" you have already clearly indicated what your actual intention is.

      By the way, mr "it's not going anywhere, at least during our lifetime." Catch that election the other day? Good luck with BaikalFinanceGroup, Moskal!

    10. Re:Sigh. by Kesha · · Score: 1

      > Good luck with BaikalFinanceGroup, Moskal!

      They have BaikalFinanceGroup well in hand, they don't need luck - BaikalFinanceGroup has already sold the shares to a state owned oil company, but thank you for the sentiment.

      Here is some useless trivia for you:

      Moskal is a derogatory term used by some Ukrainians to call Russians. Another one is kotsap. In turn the Russians call Ukrainians khokhly - (due to the characteristic haircut that some Ukrainian men had in the past).

      Nice talking to you, jerk.
      Paul.

    11. Re:Sigh. by igny · · Score: 1

      How about Tunguska or Shilka? Or S-200 Angara used in Ukrainian excersises?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    12. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're splitting hairs here! What's the difference "Kievan Russia" or "Kievan Rus"? A simple Google search would show that those are used interchangeably. We'll see what happens after the elections... But I still doubt that Ukraine would be any more independent from Russia than Texas is from the US.

      -Alex

    13. Re:Sigh. by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
      Splitting hairs? Are you kidding me? And you're using 'google' as an authoritative source? Don't be stupid.

      Here's the short version of the answer:
      1. Ukraine has never been part of Russia, full stop. Ukraine has been at times part of the RUSSIAN EMPIRE, just as India has been part of the British Empire. Your ignorance of this fact doesn't make it any less true.
      2. The term "Kievan Russia" is flat our wrong. By historical accident, the sounds of the words "Rus" (which is usually translated by scholars as "Ruthenia") and "Ros" of "Russia" are similar. However, the etymology is COMPLETELY different. Why then do people call it "Kievan Russia"? Two reasons - one, general ignorance. Two, Russia (or, as the Soviet Union, Czarist state, etc) has over the years involved in a SYSTEMATIC CAMPAIGN against Ukrainian nationalism. This compaign included: a. purposely confusing and conflating the terms kievan-rus and "Russia" to try to artificially create some common history bullshit story. b. systematically clamping down on ukrainian language and culture. consider how many of the top schools during communism were russian language only. At times under the Czars and Communists, Ukrainian was effectively outlawed and systematically marginalized as a 'peasant language.' This was deliberare. c. moving in Russian speakers into Ukraine while deporting / murdering nationalists.

      even if you don't believe me on point a) (and if you do some further research on this matter, you will doubtlessly run into many dead ends which are the result of bad scholarship seeded by agenda'd individuals from the past), points b) and c) are obvious and fairly undenyable historical facts.

      By the way, mr Dec 30 poster - the elections ARE over. Yanukovich's appeals are over, and Ukrainians have loudly and clearly said three words to Russia: STEP OFF, BITCH.

      Incidentally, I am not Ukrainian, though I do employ a large number of Ukrainain citizens (who happen to be Russians, but Ukrainian citizens and proud of it, nevertheless).

    14. Re:Sigh. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      They drink so fucking much that I doubt they noticed.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  6. The ICBM contains...... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    The ICBM contains a beowulf-cluster of sharks with friggen lazer beams mounted on their heads. It be be piloted by giant alien ant overlords (which I welcome) led by Bruce Willis. There, does that cover it all?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The ICBM contains...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought all "non-active" silos had been de-commissioned and could no longer be used for any type of launch..... ?

    2. Re:The ICBM contains...... by mogrify · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, forgetting some running Slashdot gags is for old people.

      --
      perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    3. Re:The ICBM contains...... by jrod2027 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, DNEPR launches you!

    4. Re:The ICBM contains...... by melted · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's led by Natalie Portman, you, insensitive clod.

    5. Re:The ICBM contains...... by souilicrepus · · Score: 1

      But is it digitally signed?

      d

    6. Re:The ICBM contains...... by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      Well, mostly, but does it run Linux?

    7. Re:The ICBM contains...... by bwcarty · · Score: 1

      You forgot that in Soviet Russia the ICBM contains you, and that in Korea, only old people use ICBMs. Also, you can't leave out 1. Obtain ICBM 2. ??? 3. Profit! Feel free to throw in liberal doses of anti-MPAA, RIAA, Microsoft, and SCO commentary. That should get most of it.

    8. Re:The ICBM contains...... by rxmd · · Score: 1

      The dog is on fire to remind you.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    9. Re:The ICBM contains...... by Cigarra · · Score: 2, Funny

      Netcraft confirms: Russian ICBMs are dead.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    10. Re:The ICBM contains...... by Taladar · · Score: 1

      You forgot the "Mac/Linux/... is the solution to all your problems" posts.

    11. Re:The ICBM contains...... by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

      ohh... if you are gonna reprimand him at least get more than 1 error fixed... no hot-grits... or evil goatse... and a severe lack of petrification!

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    12. Re:The ICBM contains...... by mr_stark · · Score: 1

      There, does that cover it all?

      Apart from the naked, petrified Natalie Portman on the nose-cone shoving hot grits down your pants while shouting:

      1 Conduct Cold War
      2 Build ICBMs
      3 ???
      4 Profit

      Now your covered.

      --
      I can't think of anything witty right now
  7. Wait until... by agw · · Score: 0

    they launch the first warp-one capable space ship from a silo.

    1. Re:Wait until... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Funny
      "they launch the first warp-one capable space ship from a silo"

      They obviously used a farm silo for this one. Check out the exclusive photo.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    2. Re:Wait until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanna find a missile silo to live in - for the cheap.

  8. Silo Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought all "non-active" silos had been de-commissioned and could no longer be used for any type of launch..... ?

  9. This article definatly lacks definate articles by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Japanese space agency, JAXA, has announced that the agency will use the DNEPR space launch system to launch the OICETS (Optical Inter-Orbit Communications Engineering Test Satellite). Initially the OICETS was to be launched with Japan's H-IIA rocket, however the delay in their development and a lack of time in the schedule force JAXA to utilize the Russian's DNEPR system. For those who are too young to remember the Cold War, the DNEPR space launch system used to be the Russian's inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBM). As you may guess, the OICETS satellite will be launched from a silo."

    You know, Engrish can be cute, or it can be a pain to read.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:This article definatly lacks definate articles by daniil · · Score: 1
      For those who are too young to remember the Cold War, the DNEPR space launch system used to be the Russian's inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBM).

      *Wondering who that Russian might have been*

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    2. Re:This article definatly lacks definate articles by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      *Wondering who that Russian might have been*

      Yeah, it would have made more sense to just delete an "n" than to add a "the", but I was on a roll...

      It probably was Boris though ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:This article definatly lacks definate articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, "definately" is definately spelled "definitely", Mr. English Teacher.

    4. Re:This article definatly lacks definate articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid fuck.

  10. Dnepr systems for space since 2000 by gelfling · · Score: 1

    http://www.russianspaceweb.com/dnepr.html

    Developed originally for the R36M ICBM/FO program scheduled for decommissioning 2007, the Dnepr is now looked at for commercial uses. Mixed bag of success. Economic problems persist.

    A bigger problem will be where Russia phases out Baikonur in favor of their own launch site at Svobodny 18, which isn't built for Dnepr.

  11. Russians, military funding, and the private sector by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In addition to the Japanese project, a Russian nuclear sub crew will get some live-fire training while launching the (privately-funded) Planetary Society's Cosmos 1 solar sail project in March of 2005.

    There are also companies that partner with Russian airbases to take wealthy Westerners up in basically anything with wings. Having a Yankee in the back seat pays for the gas and maintenance, and helps the pilot get some flight hours.

    Hey, if you're short on hard currency to pay your troops, why not take some Western cash and make someone happy (whether it be through launching a space probe or giving 'em the ride of a lifetime) while your troops are getting their training.

  12. If it *does* head for DC... by mogrify · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... I think we can be reasonably certain that our brand-new, fully-functioning ballistic missile defense system will not intercept it...

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:If it *does* head for DC... by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      But our Patriot system sure will get it, if they're deployed. :)

    2. Re:If it *does* head for DC... by daniil · · Score: 1

      ...Washington DC was saved by a mound of patriotic Americans who sacrificed their lives to block the stray ICBM from hitting the White House...

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:If it *does* head for DC... by Taladar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Don't you mean "Washington DC was saved by patriotic Americans who guided the ICBM to the White House"?

    4. Re:If it *does* head for DC... by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 1

      wait... is that a bad thing or a good thing? :}

      I mean of any place to hit on the earth the people there would be the least missed. Well... maybe a certain place in Utah also...

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    5. Re:If it *does* head for DC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, that would mean they guided it to City Hall.

  13. Serious Comment: Japan & Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I, for one, am glad that Tokyo chose to cooperate with Russia on the next satellite launch. The other 3 options are the USA, France, and China.

    Apparently, the latest Japanese assessment that China is a hostile foreign power has pervaded the government of Japan, and Tokyo will not be cooperating with Beijing for the intermediate future.

    For those who are not aware, the Japanese government recently issued a defense whitepaper identifying Beijing as a hostile military threat. Unlike the Taiwanese, the Japanese do not wish to hand critical space/aeronautical technologies over to the butchers in Beijing.

  14. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well weren't Soviets mostly Russian and Russians mostly Soviets during the cold war? (Albeit Russians not living in the Soviet and non-Russians living in the USSR's domain like Latvians and other republics?)

    I think it's a matter of perception really. In reality the names and governments have changed but not the people. Heck... They still have the same song they used in Stalin's time with the lyrics rewrote (once after Stalin died they wanted to remove his name from the song and next after the creation of the Russian federation to remove the mention of Soviet and Communism).

    Or perhaps it was a Ukrainian scientist and factory that put the missile together? I'd wager money that it was a Russian that authorized everything with the production of the missile.

    Either way... The Soviet government was Russian dominated and promoted Russian culture. Name me one non-Russian premiere! Err... Besides Stalin... (he was Georgian), but in general most Soviet government officials were Russian. Even the Russians of the Soviet era prided a bit of their Tsarist heritage such as Peter the Great (just don't mention the greatness of Tsar Nicholas II in public).

    It's like saying that after California and Texas declared independence and we changed our government to Parliamentary monarchy that the people left on the East coast are not Americans because their government changed. Then again... If someone can define "American" I'll give them a cardboard cookie.

  15. About time by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is nice to finally see some old war technology used for beneficial purposes. While this is not the first time it has been done - it is always nice to hear. Especially when a group takes an obvious military weapon only device and transforms it into something useful (i.e. the military uses decomissioned tanks to make barrier reefs).

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:About time by jacen_sunstrider · · Score: 1

      Oh, this is so old news, Zephran Cockran did it years ago.

      Oh, you say that'll happen in the future? But if I already saw it happen...then it's in the past...but warp technology isn't here yet...

      Damned temporal mechanics!

    2. Re:About time by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Many WWII bombers ended there days putting out forest fires. But yes this is a very good example of "swords into plowshears".

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  16. Punishment Missile by frankmu · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think this is really a cover for the Super Milk Chan Punishment Missile

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  17. Russians.... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

    Russians are wikked.

    I don't know whether to be afraid of, or be confident in Russia that they don't leave...ya know...weapons-grade nuculer :) -anything- laying around old military installations that are converted for commericial endeavors. (or military grade anything else, for that matter)

    Svoboda dlya vsekh.
    Inject.

  18. Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by starbird · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been a number of rockets that were originally designed as ICBMs and then used for commercial and other purposes, it's not that uncommon. The original Redstone rockets used for Mercury came right from the USAF. Instead of being loaded with a nuclear payload they recieved a capsule. Same with Gemini and its Titan rockets.

    Sealaunch uses Zenit for the first stage in their launcher. They wre originally designed as a quick launch ICBM by the Soviets. The launch facility was a truck and the whole system was designed to fit inside of a rail tunnel, to stay out of sight from american spy satellites.

    1. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually the Redstone was not an ICBM it was a SRBM it only had a range of a few hundred miles but that is just details. Mercury did use an ICBM the Atlas for the orbital missions. The Delta was based on the Thor IRBM as well. The current rockets called Atlas and Delta share little but a name with earlier versions. It is a good sign that no ICBM had been used as a weapon but many have been used to launch space craft :)

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by Forbman · · Score: 1

      And... Redstone was developed by the US Army. USAF developed Atlas as an IRBM. The current Atlas is very similar looking to the original Atlas, even if it uses more modern engines, and LH/LOX instead of LOH/Alcohol propellant. Titan was the only liquid fueled ICBM for the US. It was also the one that was fitted with the largest US nuclear warheads. As such, a few still were kept around until the 80's.

      I thought one of the Russian launch outfits was using a few SS-18's as a launch platform...

      Now the ultimate irony will be when NASA starts using a few MX Peacekeeper rockets as launchers...

    3. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by dmitriy · · Score: 1

      Sealaunch uses Zenit for the first stage in their launcher. They wre originally designed as a quick launch ICBM by the Soviets.

      Zenit is definitely not an ICBM; it was designed as more powerful replacement for Soyuz. Zenit first stage was also used as Energia strap-on.

      Back in the 60s, Ukrainian manufacturer of Zenit stared rocket production with UR-100, which is the rail-transportable container-stored quick-launch encapsulated storable liquid propellant missile, the world's biggest production run ICBM.

    4. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      "USAF developed Atlas as an IRBM."
      Actually no the Atlas was an ICBM not an IRBM the Air Force IRBM was the Thor that ended up being made into the Delta. The Air Force also got the Jupiter IRBM after it was taken away from the Army.

      Also the new Atlas V is very different than the original Atlas. For one the Atlas used what is called 1 1/2 staging. It used three rocket engines feeding from one set of tanks. It then dropped the two booster engines. The tank was also very unusual in that it was a "balloon" style tank made of super thin stainless steel it was pressurized to give it strength. Then new Atlas uses a single Russian engine and a conventional structure. So if the structure is different and the engines are different what is the same?
      BTW for reference take a look at this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_ICBM
      And from the Wikipedia listing "The newest version of Atlas, the Atlas V, is an Atlas in name alone as it contains little Atlas technology. It no longer uses balloon tanks nor 1.5 staging, but incorporates a rigid framework for its first stage booster much like the Titan family of vehicles. Ironically, given Atlas's origin as a military weapon, the Atlas III and Atlas V use Russian-designed engines." Hey I did not even write that entry :) Oh and the Atlas always used RP/LOX and never used alcohol.
      "Titan was the only liquid fueled ICBM for the US." No the Titan I, Titan II, and Atlas where all ICBMs so it was three. The Titan I and Titan II where in the same family but very different machines. They used different fuels and the Titan II used storeables while the Titan I had to be fuel right before launch. The Titan I had a very short life span.
      "Now the ultimate irony will be when NASA starts using a few MX Peacekeeper rockets as launchers..."
      Already happening.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let's hope they keep a few around for their original purpose.

    6. Re:Sealaunch, Redstone, Titan and others by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Nope they are all going. The Start agreement makes the MX useless. Under start all land based missiles must be single warhead missiles. No more mirvs. Helps to prevent counter force first strikes. Right now most of the US's warheads are at sea on the Trident system.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  19. Funny bit from the second link by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

    From the second linked website: You will fly from the top-secret Zhukovsky Air Base, located just an hour from Moscow.

    It isn't top secret if everyone knows where the damn thing is!

  20. I love that tag line by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the great link to the Incredible Adventures folks. You gotta love a company that thinks so highly of their services that one of the web pages says "Don't leave the money to your kids! Wouldn't you rather take a space flight?"

    Cool. Way cool.

  21. Re:In Soviet Russia by iamacat · · Score: 1, Funny

    True enough.

    The question is, does it have a warp drive and are the vulcans watching?

  22. India Too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You do realize that India also can launch Geostationary satellites. The GSLV project of ISRO (Indian version of NASA) can launch such payloads into sky.

  23. Re:This article definitely lacks definite articles by supersho · · Score: 1

    "The Japanese space agency JAXA has announced that the agency will use the DNEPR space launch system to launch OICETS (Optical Inter-Orbit Communications Engineering Test Satellite). Initially OICETS was to be launched with Japan's H-IIA rocket, however the delay in its development and a lack of time in the schedule forced JAXA to utilize Russia's DNEPR system. For those who are too young to remember the Cold War, the DNEPR space launch system used to be Russia's inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM). As you might guess, OICETS will be launched from a silo."

    Unless there's a lone Russian mad scientist behind all of this, "the Russian's" is clearly wrong, as is "Russian's."

  24. Minor FYI on "DNEPR" by milomilo · · Score: 1
    Didn't notice immediately what this acronym was -- but for the more geographically and/or geo-politically aware (read: not us Americans) among us -- the Dnieper river is the third largest in Europe(*), and largest in the Ukraine. It's known as the "holy river" due to its incredibly important role in the historic and economic development of (what's now) Eastern Europe.

    (What with all the "I got first post!" crap responses -- I hope nobody minds the occasional reminder that our world is a leetle beet beeger than the route to the nearest Appleby's/Best Buy/Wal-Mart Megaplex.... ;-)

    (*) Extra points for anyone who guessed the Volga and the Danube -- nice try if you thought Rhone or Seine -- remember that Europe goes a little farther EAST than the Eiffel Tower and Stonehenge, mes amis... ;-)

    1. Re:Minor FYI on "DNEPR" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Psst, it's "Ukraine", not "the Ukraine". It's a country.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Minor FYI on "DNEPR" by samekt · · Score: 1

      So are the United States, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic, to name a few. What's your point?

    3. Re:Minor FYI on "DNEPR" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My point is that Ukraine is not called the Ukraine, but Ukraine. Also your first two examples (and the third) refer to collections of semi-independent governing bodies so they aren't at all the same thing; Netherlands is plural, so it's different as well. Any more inapplicable "examples" you want to share?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Minor FYI on "DNEPR" by samekt · · Score: 2, Informative

      the Gambia, the Niger, the Sudan, the Yemen, and the Ukraine

  25. I hope it works! by sciop101 · · Score: 0
    Hope it works!

    URL:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?x ml=/news/2004/02/18/wrus18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/0 2/18/ixworld.html/>

    I wonder what their backup plan is? SS-18 or sub launch?

    --
    The only thing new in this world is the history that you don't know.[Harry Truman]
  26. Re:Serious Comment: Japan & Russia by BranMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I'm sure it's kind of mutual. Chinese have a LOONG memory, and it's only been ~60 years since the occupation of China by the Japanese was ended. The Japanese conduct in China won them great emnity - I'm sure China considers Japan a Hostile Power even after all this time.

  27. Soviet vs. Russian by mi · · Score: 1

    This ICBM was of Soviet, not of Russian making. Dnepr is the main river in Ukraine, actually.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  28. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1
    Well weren't Soviets mostly Russian and Russians mostly Soviets during the cold war? (Albeit Russians not living in the Soviet and non-Russians living in the USSR's domain like Latvians and other republics?)

    I think it's a matter of perception really. In reality the names and governments have changed but not the people.

    There's a lot of ignorance on slashdot, but what you wrote above is ignorant by slashdot ignorance standards.

    Your post is so clueless, I don't know where to begin, but for one, Khruschev was a Ukrainian.

  29. DNEPR-1 by dmitriy · · Score: 2, Informative

    DNEPR-1 is a civilian name for a rocket named (by NATO) Satan.

    Some people think it is way sexier than Delta-4 Heavy.

    Here's more stuff about this relic Russian (actually, Ukrainian) ICBM

  30. ICBM re-use by Migraineman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both the US and the former-Soviets have programs to dispose of ICBMs through commercial-use conversions. The US turns Peacekeeper ICBMs into Taurus launch vehicles. Stanford University launched a bunch of picosats on the first Minotaur - a hybrid of the Minuteman ICBM and Pegasus upper stages. The DNEPR has launched a couple of small satellites already, and has a number of Cubesats on-deck. You can coordinate getting a Cubesat on a DNEPR launch through OSSS or TransOrbital.

  31. Re:Serious Comment: Japan & Russia by justins · · Score: 1
    Apparently, the latest Japanese assessment that China is a hostile foreign power has pervaded the government of Japan, and Tokyo will not be cooperating with Beijing for the intermediate future.

    And by "latest" you mean "last thousand years," right?
    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  32. Re:Serious Comment: Japan & Russia by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Like any good (or even mediocre) super-power, China is only hostiel when they don't get when they want.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  33. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by samekt · · Score: 1

    Your post is so clueless, I don't know where to begin, but for one, Khruschev was a Ukrainian.

    Tell him that Stalin was not Russian and watch his head explode.

  34. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by samekt · · Score: 1

    Ah, it seems he knew it. Never mind, tell it to someone else.

  35. What makes you think that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the buildup of the US Missile Defense Shield technology (Almost total failures in all tests BTW), Russia has stated its intentions of re-investing in its nuclear capabilities, to insure they don't get left behind. They are investing a fair chunk of money into extending the lifespan of missiles that were supposed to be decommissioned by now.

    They've sent rockets into space for the space station, but those are newer. They haven't launched any of the old ICBM's in some number of years. A few weeks ago, they launched 2 as a test. (Those tests were also total failures)

    I'm sure they are absolutely delighted to continue testing these missile systems under the guise of international cooperation.

  36. Re:Serious Comment: Japan & Russia by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    I, for one, am glad that Tokyo chose to cooperate with Russia on the next satellite launch

    The Russians have a history of technological development so that things get to be "good enough". On the other hand is the MiG 29.

    It ain't often been pretty (their history and engineering), but it tends to get the job done. In an emergency, you want reliable, tank-like, brute force, not blinky things that go PING!

  37. Chinese Memory = Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Most people who are alive today never experienced World War II. So, most of us, including the barbaric Chinese, cannot remember any events from that war. We cannot remember what we did not experience.

    When the Chinese talk about "remembering World War II" and using that memory to condemn Japan, the Chinese are talking about bigotry. In China, teaching bigotry to children and passing bigotry from one generation to the next is popular and encouraged.

    We in the West believe that teaching bigotry is wrong. Western culture is very different from Chinese culture.

    By the way, Tokyo has pledged $30 million in relief aid to Southern Asia to assist the victims of the tsunami. Beijing pledged almost nothing. Washington pledged $35 million. Australia pledged $7 million. As always, Chinese culture is very different from Western culture.

    I personally favor treating the Chinese in the same way that they treat non-Chinese. We Westerns should use our "memory" of the Korean War, in which millions of Chinese killed Americans defending freedom in South Korea, to condemn the Chinese and to deport the Chinese immigrants without American citizenship back to the Chinese motherland.

    1. Re:Chinese Memory = Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool. Military planning is by its nature based on past conflicts. Dragging cultural division, to an extent justifiable, into this is clouding the issue. Memory of the Japanese occupation, to give you greater context, as sheltered as you are to have dismissed the apprehension universality from past conflict and brushing it under the shallow and useless cover of supposed "western culture" with implied superiority by promoting treatment by gross generalizations, consider the complete treatment of the Jews from diaspora until the foundation of Israel and their turn to encouraging militarism and bigotry to increase population for itself to reach that point. Clear now?

  38. And it's launching from Kazakhstan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you want to be *really* pedantic about it.

    All the Kosmotras launches take place at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Star City, Kazakhstan.

    One of my clients runs a consulting firm who was trying to help Kosmotras improve their income, one aspect of which was getting tourism income for launches (sort of the closing part of a tour of former soviet sites)... I was hired to do the US site (the Russian one obviously is lacking in tourism aesthetics), but the whole deal fell through after 9/11 and hasn't been picked up lately.

  39. Sort of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, DNEPR was achieved in this manner.

    The USSR created the SS-18 (NATO code-name "SATAN") ICBMs with nuclear warheads, to counter a perceived threat from NATO (arms race, ahoy)
    Eventually, Glasnost
    Oops... gotta lose the nukes.
    Let's hire Thiokol (yes, they are rocket scientists)
    Thiokol helps in the disassembly, suggests keeping the ICBMs that are in good shape and repurposing them to launch satellites.
    Kosmotras corp is formed by some former sov military and government officials

    Kosmotras is a private company. Nothing to do with cooperation between russia and ukraine, except that the corp had people from each. At least, it's as private as any russian corporation is

  40. WOPR by mekkab · · Score: 1

    That was a WOPR of a quote!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  41. you missed one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear they let in edit your posts in slashdot.jp...

  42. Duped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have been; the photo is a fake. You can see the the polygon/texture edges on the planet.

    1. Re:Duped by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "You can see the the polygon/texture edges on the planet."

      shhh.... don't tell anyone. That's a real feature of the Earth these days. A byproduct of top-secret Halliburton terraforming experiments. Although why someone would want to terraform the Earth is quite beyond me, I tell ya.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  43. In which case... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ... the ultra-secret American defense shield will power up it's systems and strike back at the sight of the ICBM launch that was monitored. If only they'd publish a launch-schedule, so I know when to hit the bombshelters.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  44. Re:In Soviet Russia by IceRa · · Score: 1

    The Picture of Cockran's Phoenix starting out of a Silo was the first thing that came to my mind too...

    --
    Sig? Where I go, I don't need ... sigs.
  45. I work in Cheyenne Mountain... by weedenbc · · Score: 1

    And I can tell you that aside from some of the information delivery, none of our threat detection system is automated. There are many humans in the loop and you can bet that when this happens we will know about it beforehand that it should be a space launch and not a missile threat.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
  46. but think........ by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    What a good way to disguise a 1st launch strike.

    "Hey George it's your ole made Vlad 'ere, just letting you know we'll be releasing one of our ole ICBMs from a silo, but don't worry George it's only a Jap Satelite", strike one Waco obliterated.

    Better yet the Russians should try 'n get the contract for the Euro GPS network, that way they could disgise a fair dinkum 1st strike launch, by having a good excuse to send up a couple of dozen ICBMs at once, 'Hey George the Euros were getting impatiant about everyone still using your GPS setup so long, so they want us to launch all their satallites ASAP, so don't panic about the couple of dozen ole ICBMs going sky bound next week'

    It's a pity the US's preperations for invading Iraq wasn't used a method to take down the dysfunctional nutjob Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia without warning. Even better the US should've serripticiously armed & backed a Baathist invasion of Saudi Arabia by Syria & Iraq (once daddy Assad died they became good mates again). Then the world would'be been graced by the Baathists purging every Wahhabi Salafist from the penisula the same way Saud ethnically cleansed all christians, Jews & Sufis from the Hijaz some 80 odd years ago (when he also ethnically claensed all the mainstream Sunnis there too who refused to accept Wahhabi tenents)

  47. The relics, should still work fine by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    Russian military technology is known to be very reliable. They might not have always had the latest technical and computer gizmos but they always had reliable equipment. The DNEPR was built during the golden era of Soviet Military. I don't know about this country but back in Soviet Union the profession of a rocket engineer or even any kind of engineer involved in military technology was highly prestigious. They funneled so much money into defence and they went to great lengths to instill this pride of the "Great Soviet" military in young boys that all you wanted to do is be drafted (even though it was mandatory for every young adult male ) and couldn't wait to go fly those planes or go to college to learn to build them. I am not sure

  48. Re:The relics, should still work fine [continued] by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    Sorry pressed submit too early
    I was just wanted to conlude that it seem because the profession of an engineer involved in military techonolgy was so prestigious they had a lot of really good people working on building those rockets. I just don't think in US an aerospace engineer has the same status as they would have in ex-Soviet Union. I don't think they got paid nearly as much as the western designers and engineers, they were motivated by recognition and interest mostly.

  49. have you read the user manual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manual available in English a zipped PDF.

  50. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by igny · · Score: 1

    Khruschev was Russian.

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  51. It was renamed by a66at · · Score: 1

    Modification of SS-18 used for military was renamed. It's "Voevoda" (not the same as "Satan") now.

  52. Re: Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes I make mistakes. Don't we all?
    I odn't.
  53. Re: Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the one hand, you have the article submitter take a few extra seconds to type in the acronym/abbreviation expansions. On the other, you have thousands or tens of thousands of readers typing multiple acronyms/abbreviations into Google. Which do you think is more efficient in terms of time and bandwidth?

  54. Re:Erm... I think that is all semantics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the lyrics rewrote

    "rewritten".

  55. Cryosat Eurokot by neal_nelson · · Score: 1

    The ESA Cryosat satellite is also being launched by a Russian ICBM but with a German extra stage on top, called Eurokot.

  56. Hi Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Oh, look everyone: It's Richard Gere, the "phrusa.org" troll!

    mod him to oblivion.

  57. Metamod notification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's any consolation, I just metamodded that Flamebait as Unfair.