Slashdot Mirror


AMD Chip Fraud Delays Release of New Chipset

rocketman768 writes "According to internetnews.com a workshop in Taipei has been re-labeling nearly a million AMD Athlon XPs. It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC."

243 comments

  1. Alchemy chipset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about authenticity.. and AMD's worried?? :-P

  2. AMD by bharatk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess noone noticed their chips were manafactured by "Advanced Moocro Devices".

    1. Re:AMD by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I guess noone noticed their chips were manafactured by "Advanced Moocro Devices".

      So how is the remarked-CPU problemm getting in the way of...

      their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC.

      I mean, seriously. Turning a Gateway/e-machines into an FX-53/3400+, that's what I call Alchemy!

    2. Re:AMD by mollusk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, I know a genuine 'Panaphonics' when I see one.

      --
      The Revolution. Now available as a convienent six tape series from PBS.
    3. Re:AMD by nolife · · Score: 1, Funny

      Panaphonics? What a scam. That must be cheap knockoff of the Pansunic brand that I see the guys selling in the streets.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    4. Re:AMD by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I think the author is a bit of a fraud himself for sensationalizing this. He calls them "counterfeit" and "fake" but that's not really what they are.

      Reading between the lines, it sounds like these guys just bought a bunch of AMD chips, marked higher clock speeds on them, and then resold them.

      Yeah it's a million chips but this is not big-time counterfeiting. It's not like they ripped off the design files and built it in their own fab, which would take TREMENDOUS resources, and is a project of such a scale that it would be impossible to do in secret.

    5. Re:AMD by isaac338 · · Score: 1

      Personally I tend to stick to Sorny...

    6. Re:AMD by nolife · · Score: 1

      I noticed that as well. The other issue is this statement:

      one man had been arrested after investigators found the warehouse illegally re-labeling as many as one million chips as AMD Athlon XP microprocessors.

      So they found one million of them in the warehouse or they have reason to believe that 1 million have passed through there or what? I have no idea how many cpus AMD sells but they do sell them directly to businesses in large quantities but this place would seem very suspicious to have bought 1 million of the things. No one thought that was a little odd? Again, maybe I am way off and the practice of selling 1 million chips to a no name company that does not even appear to actually sell PC's seems a little odd. Maybe that quantity is normal.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    7. Re:AMD by dosius · · Score: 1

      I like Magnetbox myself. XD

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    8. Re:AMD by chargen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When the SO and I went to Cuba a few years ago, the alarm clock was branded "Panashiba"! No, for real!

      -chargen

    9. Re:AMD by caino59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      uh...yea...but it's still ILLEGAL.

      a million chips? say there's a 10 dollar difference between one chip model and the next speed up. That's quite a bit of pcket change.

    10. Re:AMD by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Only Coby for me.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:AMD by FRiC · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article refers to xbitlabs which refers to Sin Chew Daily, which isn't even a Taiwanese newspaper. I searched Taiwanese sites and the most recent AMD related bust only found 60,000 pcs of remarked chips, not a million as reported.

    12. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess nobody noticed 'no one' is two seperate words.

    13. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess noone noticed" Learn how to spell! There is no such word in any dictionary as "noone" no one is NOT A COMPOUND WORD! http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=no%20one

    14. Re:AMD by plover · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're not thinking like a big-time ripoff artist (which is not a bad thing!)

      They could have structured their purchases using legitimate motherboard companies as intermediaries, or they could have set up their own front company to hide the purchase. Just because you've never heard of Panashiba doesn't mean AMD's sales rep won't sell to them.

      Possibly they used a Chinese or Russian firm as a cutout. Both of those countries are large enough that a million chips not hitting the market might go unnoticed. The order could also have come through a corrupt government official from a smaller country, such as Cuba, under the pretext of a military or governmental order.

      They could even have hijacked a freighter or cargo containers carrying product. Computer chips long ago replaced lipstick as the highest dollar value per truck for hijacking. They have a tremendous resale value.

      We may never know, but it sure would be interesting to find out.

      --
      John
    15. Re:AMD by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      It's still fraud. They are not what they advertise them to be, hence "fake".

      Maybe it doesn't fit the exact definition of "counterfeit", but that doesn't make it any less wrong.

    16. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can obviously write English. It's time for you to learn that no-one is hyphenated. Unless you're referring to noon in Olde English, there's no such word as 'noone'. It just makes you look stupid.

      Lesson learned?

      ok. good.

    17. Re:AMD by Mudcathi · · Score: 1
      Yeah it's a million chips but this is not big-time counterfeiting.

      Whoa, you sound like that dude in the Austin Powers movie! So how many chips would it take to impress you... say, one hundred BILLION fake chips?! (said while gnawing on the tip of my curled pinky)

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    18. Re:AMD by KuNgFo0 · · Score: 1

      I'm a Sorny kind of guy.

    19. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Lesson learned?

      Probably not. I've noticed that the same people repeatedly make the same mistakes, no matter how many times they are corrected. This is especially true with people who apostrophize the word "its" incorrectly.

      P. S. Yes, I know that "apostrophize" is not a real word.

    20. Re:AMD by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 1
      --
      while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    21. Re:AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I got really excited about the time machines, until I clicked on them and found out they were clocks.

    22. Re:AMD by Bigman · · Score: 1

      At this moment I am proaudly wearing my "Cucci" wristwatch. A friend picked it up abroad somewhere a few years back, and gave it to me when I admired it having found it lying about in his den.
      I like it a lot, amazing how many people are fooled, especially since designer-wear is *so* not me!
      I always get a laugh when people ask me if it's genuine, and I say "Yeah, it's a genuine Cucchi!"

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    23. Re:AMD by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Totally unrelated, but I just happen to be trying to sell 940,000 of the new 5GHz AMD chips -- can any fellow slashdotters hook me up with a buyer?

    24. Re:AMD by chargen · · Score: 1

      You know I never even thought that it might still be a functional company. I thought it must have been a made up name the Cuban government slapped on illegally imported U.S. alarm clocks.

      Wait, they'd all come from communist China anyway...!

      -chargen

    25. Re:AMD by xpyr · · Score: 1

      Hey, I know a genuine 'Panaphonics' when I see one.

      ...and look, there's magnetbox and sorny.

  3. what's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    they're just doing the overclocking for you! saves the customer time, really.

  4. Yea by kaiser423 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's something they have to be pretty agressive about. They're starting to get a really good name among the PHB's and average joe's. So, they have to really fight to keep their reputation growing. Their new reputation is almost to the point where it's a selling point. They just need to keep it there, and then they have a cash cow.

    1. Re:Yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you even know how a cash cow works?
      Their main product (only product?) is processors, how the hell is that a cash cow? They have to fight for market share just about every year, so no, this is not a cash cow for them, it's the company's good name at stake really.

    2. Re:Yea by kaiser423 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the past, people never got fired for buying IBM. Same goes for Microsoft and Intel and Oracle. That simple attitude is a cash cow. They could count on a decent chunk of money every quarter that they didn't really have to work for. That's a cash cow -- money rolling in just because you're there.

      I can see it starting to happen with AMD in certain arenas. It might not be some huge cash cow like MS Office is to Microsoft, but there's a growing segment out there who thinks that AMD gives you the most bang for the buck. Once that attitude filters into corporate hierarchy, they get to sit back and reap the benefits. Hopefully they'll continue to innovate once this happens.

    3. Re:Yea by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny
      Do you even know how a cash cow works?

      Shove quarters in its butt and it sprays money from its tits?
      There may be moo to it, but that's what I herd.

    4. Re:Yea by Slack3r78 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if AMD has a cash cow, it's their flash memory business. It's what kept the company's head above water during the lean years where the microprocessor division was doing nothing but losing money.

    5. Re:Yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Their main product (only product?) is processors, how the hell is that a cash cow?

      Silly coward, AMD is big in chipsets, signal processing, and embedded low-power CPUs (no not MOBILE I mean x86 embedded... there is still a market even for 386's ya know).

      I don't think you are a troll you are just challanged. ;-)

    6. Re:Yea by mejesster · · Score: 1

      A cash cow is something that nets you a lot of profit WITH MINIMAL EFFORT. AMD invests a lot into PR, R&D, marketing, etc to get where it is and to continue to push into the market. It has nowhere near 50% of total processor sales, pulling it equal to Intel. It can't sit back and rest on its laurels.

      --
      MacroHard - Boning you in a big way! (TM)
    7. Re:Yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. I always thought cash cow was synonymous with M$ Windows.

  5. Re:Is this by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Erm...

    When a chip is labelled, it is usually a cheaper slower chip remarked as a faster chip.

    Now, when this chip is sold and fails/fizzles/burns up, its AMD's reputation on the line.

    This has no parallels with copyrights and the like. AMD is doing what it must to protect its name and its profits (doh!)

  6. I need some magic glasses too by Magickcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC."

    Funny, I didn't read that or infer that from the article. Perhaps you have special glasses that let you read invisible ink?

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

    1. Re:I need some magic glasses too by rlsnyder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I second that thought. Does the submittor really think AMD takes their engineers and sends them out in the field to do legal and investigative work?

      I *think* AMD has more than one department.

      Is editorializing necessary on every darn news story?

    2. Re:I need some magic glasses too by irokitt · · Score: 0

      The glasses, they do nothing!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Every simpsons "fan" seems to get this wrong. get it right! It's

      "My Eyes! The goggles DO NOTHING ARGh..."

      There is no "they".

    4. Re:I need some magic glasses too by SpecBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Slashdot editors have been paid by AMDs marketing department to insert these non sequiturs as part of an experimental advertising technique. Personally, I'd never heard of AMD's Alchemy chipset until I read about what a terrible job they were doing marketing it.

      Future /. posting: "Several critical IE vulnerabilities were announced this week. With the tech media focused on this, it's going to be impossible for the folks at Mozilla to get the word out about the latest Firefox release."

    5. Re:I need some magic glasses too by pcmanjon · · Score: 1
      "Funny, I didn't read that or infer that from the article. Perhaps you have special glasses that let you read invisible ink?"

      No, it's just in between the tags.

      View>Source
      look for the part with
      <!--- secret comments!!!!! --->
    6. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Ed+Thomson · · Score: 5, Funny

      AMD have a "jack of all trades" type workforce. Instead of everyone working on different projects and getting lots of things done slowly, they all work on the same thing at the same time to get a few things accomplished really fast.

      So yes the whole company stopped working on releasing the new chipset and are now all working on the investigating the re-labeling.

    7. Re:I need some magic glasses too by starman97 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait till next week when they have to repaint the Fab building, and the parking lot need re-striping too..

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    8. Re:I need some magic glasses too by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1
      Just this one time, everyone has discounted the accuracy of the quote for better flow. That said,

      Ze Goggles! They do nothing!

    9. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Chris+Burke · · Score: 0

      FYI: The parent post was completely made up nonsense.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:I need some magic glasses too by brentl · · Score: 1

      RTFA, Alchemy is a chip for protable media device manufacturers. Why would they market it to the consumer?

    11. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I work at AMD in CPG (desktop / server processors) and I've never been asked to look at products from PCPD (communications / embedded, like Alchemy). Nor has anyone else I work with, to my knowledge. And if I had to switch architectures every few days, or fly to Taiwan to investigate stolen chips, I'd probably bail. Especially since white, monolingual 'merkin engineers are well suited to getting to the bottom of Taiwanese crimes.

    12. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

      "Is editorializing necessary on every darn news story?"

      Yes it is, but then again, I write for The Inquirer. :)

      -Charlie

    13. Re:I need some magic glasses too by nilbog · · Score: 0

      It's a pretty funny post, but there ARE companies that work like that ..ahem..Microsoft...ahem. "Let's put our Longhorn team on the SP2 project", and who knows whose doing most of their programming, because it sure aint programmers!

      --
      or else!
    14. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Is editorializing necessary on every darn news story?

      Unfortunately it is or the article will get ignored by the folks who approve submissions.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    15. Re:I need some magic glasses too by incom · · Score: 1
      "The Slashdot editors have been paid by AMDs marketing department to insert these non sequiturs as part of an experimental advertising technique. Personally, I'd never heard of AMD's Alchemy chipset until I read about what a terrible job they were doing marketing it."

      Future /. posting: "Several critical IE vulnerabilities were announced this week. With the tech media focused on this, it's going to be impossible for the folks at Mozilla to get the word out about the latest Firefox release."


      Yes, because NPO's(mozilla foundation) are notorious for bribing the media for ethically questionable marketting purposes?
      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    16. Re:I need some magic glasses too by baywulf · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of the Alchemy chips because they are used in embedded applications. They are not marketed to the consumer but rather to companies and firmware/hardware engineers.

    17. Re:I need some magic glasses too by FHMyles · · Score: 1

      It was hidden between the "o" and the "r" in the FNORD!

    18. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pray tell, how many Freescale (nee Motorola) CPUs have you bought? How are the prices at CompUSA?

    19. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD have a "jack of all trades" type workforce. Instead of everyone working on different projects and getting lots of things done slowly, they all work on the same thing at the same time to get a few things accomplished really fast.

      Hm, next time I compile a kernel, I'll put on SMP support...

    20. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      merkin engineers

      Perhaps I should apply for a job at AMD, it sounds much more interesting than I would have expected.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=merkin

    21. Re:I need some magic glasses too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alchemy CPUs aren't aimed at you and me - they're aimed at OEMs. I don't know why the submitter called them "chipsets"... they're a line of SOC CPUs.

  7. Is this-What's in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "This has no parallels with copyrights and the like. "

    Trademark.

    1. Re:Is this-What's in a name? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You could consider it a trademark offense (and it is), but the bigger issue would be false advertising/breach of contract.

    2. Re:Is this-What's in a name? by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1

      Fraud

  8. Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset

    Yes, I'm sure they've taken their fab plant workers and assigned them to detective jobs instead.

    1. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I believe them. Every time my phb asks me about something, it is something that happened a while ago. That means I have to go into forensic mode to find supporting information. This costs me whole days that I could be using much more productively.

      AMD is suffering from the kind of thing that is very distracting to their most important employees. Their reputation is on the line. If it means delaying a new chipset; so be it.

    2. Re:Excuse me? by bigtrouble77 · · Score: 1

      I assumed the submitter meant that AMD was going to engineer their chipsets to reject remarked cpus somehow- which would require resources from their engineering dept. Remember, these aren't desktop cpus so accomplishing that may be possible.

  9. Bad for overclockers by grahamsz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now AMD will be forced to investigate new ways of preventing chips being overclocked to stop this from happening again.

    1. Re:Bad for overclockers by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doubtful. With the cost of fabs, it would probably be less expensive just to raid and shut down the illegal "producers" than to try and work out elaborate protection schemes.

      Remember - implementing half-assed software hacks to "protect" content on a CD is relatively cheap compared to the cost of imlpementing something similar to prevent overclocking in a complex computer chip.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:Bad for overclockers by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

      Unoverclockable chips cannot guarantee that these counterfeiters will not label X processors as Y processors and sell them in small shops all over the world.

    3. Re:Bad for overclockers by confusion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I sure hope not. Not that I've *ever* had any luck overclocking an AMD chip with any bit of stability.
      It seems that there should be a way to report what the chip actually is (much like SPD eprom with RAM), so that you cannot hide what the chip actually is, but you're still able to overclock it. As many others have pointed out, though, it's non-trivial to implement changes, but I'm betting they'll implement something in future versions of their chips.

      Jerry
      http://www.syslog.org/

    4. Re:Bad for overclockers by Squareball · · Score: 1

      Yep, and get away with it.

      Look at most current apps and games, they don't require nearly the amount of cpu processing power that is available in new machines. If you have an AMD 1300+ and upgrade to what you think is a 2600+ (but is really a 2200+) would you really notice? Some might but most wouldn't.

    5. Re:Bad for overclockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I buy a chip marked 2600 or 2200, I expect 2600 or 2200 MHz, not some fucking stupid performance rating like Cyrix used back in the day.

    6. Re:Bad for overclockers by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does the MHz really matter that much?

      It's not the amount, it's what you do with 'em.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:Bad for overclockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why the hell do you care what MHz it is? MHz is as arbitrary, if not more so, than the damned "performance rating" you're so against. You say that you "expect" a 2600 or 2200 MHz machine, when it clearly doesn't mention MHz in the number. It's a number, any expectations and preconceived notions you have about 4 random digits followed by a plus sign are your own business, but you really should look in to getting over your anger about those 4 numbers not being the same 4 numbers you seem to so desire.

      It's not difficult, at all, for anyone who cares to look up the MHz ratings of the processors. Should the Motorola 68030 be 68.03 KHz? MHz? GHz? Oh wait, it's a processor type, that doesn't work.. Ok, to you're saying that three processors lined up, 1.25 GHz G4, 1.25 GHz Athlon, and a 1.25 GHz P3 are all sitting there, and somehow knowing how many times some stupid crystal in the computer causes a psuedo-square wave to fluctuate is all you need to know to know which is better?

      MHz means nothing, except in the same stepping of the same processor.

    8. Re:Bad for overclockers by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      True,

      But it's a lot easier to catch someone who sells you a 2.2GHz chip that actually only runs at 1.8.

      It's harder to prove that they sold you a chip that runs hotter and fails more often that it should.

    9. Re:Bad for overclockers by qubezz · · Score: 2, Funny

      But it's a lot easier to catch someone who sells you a 2.2GHz chip that actually only runs at 1.8

      Unless you do as PCChips did with some cheap motherboard processor combos we ordered, the BIOS boots up and says AMD 1200+ CPU as well as the big sticker on the chipset, but removing the 'warranty void if removed' sticker on the CPU heatsink and inspecting shows 850MHz Duron just like CPU-Z does. From the same people that brought us the 'fake cache' chips. I guess fraud is OK in China.

    10. Re:Bad for overclockers by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, with the cost of fabs? What causes you to imagine that AMD would need to build a new fab to introduce nre anti-overclocking features? They might need to tape out some new chips - which they can do in the same fabs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Bad for overclockers by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Doubtful. With the cost of fabs, it would probably be less expensive just to raid and shut down the illegal "producers" than to try and work out elaborate protection schemes."

      Cost of fabs? What? The cost of a new mask maybe, but fabs have nothing to do with this.

      "Remember - implementing half-assed software hacks to "protect" content on a CD is relatively cheap compared to the cost of imlpementing something similar to prevent overclocking in a complex computer chip."

      Once again, what? Software hacks? What planet are you from again? That said, AMD has implemented clock locking features on the the nes 90nm parts, I think the D4 step has them, and the E0 will pretty much be assured of having it. If you want OCable chips, buy an FX.

      As for workarounds, yeah, that has been SO effective with Intel's new strategy. Just get out ye olde soldering iron and bridge those nm-wide fuses they blow to kill the functionality. You go grrl.

      -Charlie

    12. Re:Bad for overclockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect rant. The grand parent plainly is speaking on identification marks, significant in that different operational characteristics are certified based on testing processors and marking them based on the results of those quality control tests-the processors, all processors, are priced differently based on the marking given. There was no mention of comparison to any other model microprocessors, or even actual comparison given that 1300+ designation does not exist. Your rant is a troll and nothing else.

    13. Re:Bad for overclockers by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstand, unless the post was written wrong.

      From grandparent post: "When I buy a chip marked 2600 or 2200, I expect 2600 or 2200 MHz, not some fucking stupid performance rating like Cyrix used back in the day."

      The "+" rating is much like the PR system, but was more accurate in general in relation to the Intel than Cyrix was.

      It seemed to be an odd diatribe anyway.

    14. Re:Bad for overclockers by bob65 · · Score: 1
      When I buy a chip marked 2600 or 2200, I expect 2600 or 2200 MHz, not some fucking stupid performance rating like Cyrix used back in the day.

      Why? When you buy a BMW 325, do you expect it to have 325 horsepower, not some fucking stupid model number like other car manufacturers use? Can you reliably say that a BMW with 300hp performs equally to a Ford Expedition with 300hp? Can hp be used to encapsulate the entire performance of a car? (Hint - no, it's just one of the many characteristics of a car that contributes to its performance).

      So what exactly is wrong with AMD using a simple numbering scheme (which happens to correlate to performance somewhat) to label their processors? Why are you so interested in a specific characteristic of the processor, that cannot be reliably used to compare the processor's performance to that of another manufacturer's? And finally, why do you expect an AMD 2600+ or 2200+ to run at 2600 Mhz or 2200 Mhz, respectively? Has anyone ever indicated as such?

    15. Re:Bad for overclockers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From your signature as of 2005-01-03:

      Fat people are just too lazy to exercise


      FUCK YOU! Many of us do exercise, and are probably healthier than you.


      p2p is piracy


      Go back to sucking Jack Valenti's cock and licking Hillary Rosen's pussy


      $ is not a letter


      So? Do you object to saying Micro$oft because you like unethical business practices, own stock in then, or both? You will lose.


      I support partial birth abortion


      I wish your mom had aborted YOU!

    16. Re:Bad for overclockers by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      I would expect that BMW to be a 3-Series and have a 2.5 liter engine. Similarly, I would expect a Lexus SC470 to be the SC model and have a 4.7 liter engine. That's because these model names/numbers indicate a characteristic of the car itself.

      AMD's numbers came from marketing, and are the same reason why most people would expect a VX7000 to be better than the VX6000, and probably both better than a GL5000. Doesn't matter if the GL5000 got its model number from something significant or if it's just random, and I think that's the problem here. Intel's numbers have a very direct significance to the product itself, while AMD's are marketing (officially benchmarking it against the old Athlon T-bird line).

      Besides, AMD isn't being unreasonable, with most benchmarks showing AMD's model number to be approximately equal to a P4 with as many MHz. This, I believe, is why it's not perceived as such a big issue.

    17. Re:Bad for overclockers by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
      Are the remarked chips really overclocked? Most consumers couldn't tell the difference and I can't see why the forgers would even care. Just mark it up and make the sale. Eventually someone will figure it out and trace backward in the supply chain but by then the operation will have shut down and moved on.

      CPUs (all brands AFAIK) have been multiplier-locked for a long time already, and clock-rate enforcement isn't really practical, so overclockers don't have anything to worry about.

    18. Re:Bad for overclockers by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      It's not simply marketing though, Athlon ratings are multipliers against the performance of a Duron (I believe it's a Duron, but that's a minor detail) clocked at 1GHz. So a 2200 should be about 2.2x faster than a 1GHz Duron. Also, the speed rating on any chip is fluff now that newer processor core design techniques have pretty much changed the entire way a processor works since the old 486 days. Only way to really tell anymore is benchmarking. Just like hitting the quarter in your car to see how it compares.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  10. cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't the BIOS detect this and display it right when a system boots up, you would think even a not-so-clever user would start to notice that the numbers on the package and the numbers on the screen don't match up

    A simple cat /proc/cpuinfo on a GNU/Linux system for experienced users should expose the farce too, correct me if I'm wrong.

    1. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...you would think even a not-so-clever user would start to notice...
      I would doubt it. To most people the bios output is just a bunch of text, as long as there is text and it doesn't stop, the system is working. Most people don't look at what it says.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by rpozz · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're spot on:

      For example:

      model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
      cpu MHz : 3015.616

      I assume it would be exactly the same with an AMD.

    3. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Depends on the system and the user. Lots of modern systems show you a pretty graphic instead of useful POST information these days.

      Also, I doubt that most normal users have any clue what speed their CPU is, much less how to interpret the information provided in the BIOS.

    4. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by deathazre · · Score: 1

      nope. the CPU model isn't hard-coded into the chip. a 2500+ running on a 200 bus will show up as a 3200+.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    5. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately, it is not so.

      Would be nice if AMD did hard-code the info, but they don't. it's figured out on boot, based on the CPU's clock speed.

      AC to avoid karma whoring, since I already posted this.

    6. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by lachlan76 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because AMD makes each chip the same, and just modifies the multiplier to change the speed, the chip just detects what speed it is running at and makes the text show up as the right one.

    7. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by shlashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So is there any way to tell, as a user?

      --
      Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page.
    8. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Informative

      probably not... most of the Socket A models have a 2-d barcode etched onto the top of the die itself but it would be pretty time consuming to try and decode manually.

    9. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Which is wrong. The CPU string + model can be used to figure out the appropriate clock rate.

      My model 12 Athlon64 3200+ with a bit of googling [with site:amd.com] turns out is a NewCastle 2.2Ghz

      if my cpu was running at 2.6Ghz or something [which I don't know how they would do easily...] I would immediately know it was tampered with. The same goes for the XP series.

      So unless the people found a way to change the returned CPUID information you can easily figure it out.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    10. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure about cpuid but the bios adfaik creates the rating based on the mhz not independently of it.

    11. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by lachlan76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may be able to see traces of work being done on the top of the CPU, in the L3 and L4 bridges.

      They are laser-cut at the amd factory to set the multiplier, and to be modified, the bridges which were cut would need to be filled in, and a conductive material painted on top.

      This it how it's done, only in this case it is the L1 bridges that are joined, so that any multiplier can be set on the motherboard. You could do it with the L3 and L4 bridges to change to a set multiplier, which is probably what they do.

      The bridges which were already joined but needed to be disconnected would be cut/drilled, I imagine that they wouldn't be using a laser like AMD do.

    12. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /proc/cpuinfo on my system shows the speed the CPU was sold as. My BIOS, however, says the speed it's actually running at, as do most Windows programs which report such details.

    13. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      it's possible that the cpu makes the model string on the fly...

      but from what I recall [and I'm not downing my bros box to test] the internal strings don't change.

      Even still, cpuid in windows will get you the FSB/CPU speeds which if you know thing-one about your processor [which I assume most geeks do] they'll know the correct speeds.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    14. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Except the bios gets this information from the chip.
      and the chip has been tampered with, to make it tell the bios it's a faster chip than originally sold as... and no the chip won't burn up... well unless they took the slowest chips, and remarked them as the fastest... normally what you'd get is a few chips that worked fine, and a bunch of chips that are being under voltaged, which would result in a lower stability rate, more crashing etc.
      Remeber the only physical difference between a 2100+ and a 2600+ is a handful of leads on the top of the cpu, that were cut by a laser. Oh and generally the 'fastest' cpus come from the 'sweet spot' of the silicon, where the quality of the silicon is purest...
      So I imagine that on a volume of a million they probabbly had a sophisticated process going on to rebridge cut leads...

    15. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by canadiangoose · · Score: 5, Informative
      My chip is an Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton) overclocked to 2.2GHz on a 200MHz bus, and this is what shows up on my system:
      Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=302 apic_tack=1 devfs=mount
      Initializing CPU#0
      PID hash table entries: 2048 (order 11: 16384 bytes)
      Detected 2204.860 MHz processor.
      ......
      ......
      Calibrating delay loop... 4358.14 BogoMIPS
      ......
      ......
      CPU: After generic identify, caps: 0383fbff c1c3fbff 00000000 00000000
      CPU: After vendor identify, caps: 0383fbff c1c3fbff 00000000 00000000
      CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line)
      CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line)
      CPU: After all inits, caps: 0383fbff c1c3fbff 00000000 00000020
      Intel machine check architecture supported.
      Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
      CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ stepping 00
      --
      Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    16. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Whoops, I geuss that cancels the ability to electronically ID a fraudulent chip. I don't know what Intel does, if they have some sort of write-once area of the chip to identify what the chip originally sold as.

    17. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by OzRoy · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      But once you discover the deception the guy who sold it to you has packed up and pissed off with your money never to be seen again.

    18. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by screwdriver · · Score: 1
      Even still, cpuid in windows will get you the FSB/CPU speeds which if you know thing-one about your processor [which I assume most geeks do] they'll know the correct speeds.

      I own an AMD Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton) processor. If I run it at stock speed, wcpuid reports the name string as "AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+". If I up the FSB to where it is now (208MHz), it reports it as a 3200+. There is no indication that I've found anywhere (BIOS screen or wcpuid) that indicates that this isn't actually a 3200+ processor other than the fact that the FSB has been increased. If I tampered with the bridges on my CPU to increase the clock multiplier or the default FSB, I could make this chip indistinguishable from an authentic 3200+ chip -- at least from a software perspective.

      However, I could always look at the serial number on the processor to find out what the speed is supposed to be or look for physical evidence of tampering. I bet the people who are selling these chips are probably selling them in pre-built systems, to oems (who don't necessarily check the serial #'s on every chip), or to Joe Sixpack's who probably couldn't tell the difference to begin with. People who are "in the know" probably wouldn't buy from these guys anyway.

    19. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      interesting - wcpuid groks p4s correctly - my 2.4ghz is running at 2990ish mhz, but the name string shows 2.4 ghz.

      ostiguy

    20. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by deathazre · · Score: 1

      nowhere on the Athlon XP series is the model coded into the chip. The system figures out what it supposedly is by the clock speed at boot. The only place the actual model is found is that little black label on the top of the thing, and that's easy to cover up.

      It's not that *cpuid gets the info wrong-- it's that the info isn't there to get. Probably takes a small bit of the manufacturing cost out, but has the nasty side effect of opening them up to this sort of stuff.

      --
      Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
    21. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by iabervon · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't actually be too surprising if the "model" were actually determined in testing rather than in production. Around the 486 at least, Intel was selling theoretically identical chips as different speeds depending on how fast they stayed reliable. Of course, once you've gotten to this stage, there's relatively little you can do to make the info permanent.

    22. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by moonbender · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain, but I guess some software such as CPU-Z for Windows could still determine the original rating of the CPU. Or at least aid someone trying to find out. I'm not sure if the raw family and model ids help, but at the very least the cache sizes are both hard (impossible?) to fake and give you a general idea of the kind of CPU you are dealing with.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    23. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an overclocked barton 2500+ (unlocked), fsb of 200mhz, multi of 11.5

      cpuz in XP pro shows it as 2300mhz, says nothing about 2500+ or the original 1.8ghz clock. Even using dump registers I can't seem to find any indication that it can figure out the rating.

    24. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what gets me. Have burned into the CPU the rating of the chip. It then says what the factory set speed of the CPU is when interogated. Rather than lock down the CPU so you cannot deliberately overclock your own CPU, you get a scting that tells you what the CPU you bought is. If that doesn't match what is listed on the purchase order, you've been sold a OC'd chip.

      Everyone wins.

      However, the CPU manufacturers saw this as a justification for the removal of the home OC brigade so that they can sell their CPU's at their highest price point.

      Gaaah.

    25. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by turgid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would doubt it. To most people the bios output is just a bunch of text, as long as there is text and it doesn't stop, the system is working. Most people don't look at what it says.

      Some people think that lots of text scrolling past at boot time is the mark of a shoddy or "old-fashioned" system. I put Linux on an old PC for my neighbour a couple of weeks ago. He was most distressed by all the messages scrolling past before X and kdm started up.

      I also later made the mistake of using a command-line to do something quicky. "This is going back to the old DOS days," he said despondantly.

    26. Re:cat /proc/cpuinfo by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I have been using computers since 1982 (when I was 8 years old). I have built a couple of PCs from parts, and upgraded components a number of times - RAM, motherboard, processor, PSU, graphics card, you name it. I work as a programmer, and have 5.5 years industry experience, and was playing with x86 assembler in the late 80s.

      I never read the BIOS output either. As you say, as long as it's there and isn't different enough to last time that I notice, I don't look at what it says. I see RAM size, processor speed, detected drives and then a whole screenful of stuff I completely ignore.

  11. Re:Is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gosh, before I can even hit reply and you get flamebait. Gotta love the consensus reality here...

    Anyway, could you explain how fraud and piracy are even remotely related, except for, you know, making a complete non-point?

  12. read you blind f00! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:read you blind f00! by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I'm very confused by the specs that I read on the AMD site. It says that these chips have a 14 bit address bus. Doesn't that mean that they only support 16K bytes? Does that even make any sense?

      Or does the memory interface require two cycles to transmit the address, giving a 28 bit address bus, for a total of 256 MB?

    2. Re:read you blind f00! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SDRAM multiplex the row/column address lines - Then they counter it with bursting multiple cycles of memory to average out the extra address cycle as well as intrinsic memory latency.

      The main hint is that these numbers are listed along with the "SDRAM memory controller", so its a low-level spec... Nothing to do with the processor proper.

    3. Re:read you blind f00! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes this would be correct for a SDRAM interface - it's row/column addressed so you do get a very large address space from just 14 bits.

  13. Alchemy by kinema · · Score: 5, Interesting
    their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC
    AMD's Alchemy line isn't a mainboard chipset it is their brand of 32 bit embedded MIPS SoC (system on a chip) devices. The Au1200 is the newest in the family targeted for use in digital media players like PVRs. What makes the Au1200 perfect for media players is it's hardware video codecs that support MPEG1, 2, 4 (including DivX) and WMV9.
    1. Re:Alchemy by swb · · Score: 1

      Hey, this might get me buying a new PC again. I've been wondering why we can't seem to get decent hardware transcoding boards, at any price. Going from DV to MPEG2 or any other standard is often a tedious hours long process with quality, or maybe 1.5x real-time with horrible quality loss.

      Part of the reason this surprises me so much is that DVD recorders are often sub $300 these days, and each one has a hardware MPEG encoder and decoder in it. Why not slap one on a PC for at least "free" (no CPU) 1x encode?

    2. Re:Alchemy by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      Could it be possible as a pci card or something? I'd love one of those, if its not too expensive

    3. Re:Alchemy by swb · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of capture boards that will do hardware-assisted MPEG encoding without host CPU and "accelerate" (to a blazing 1x real time speed!) encoding from DV to MPEG (in the right applications).

      But they're expensive (nearly $1K), especially for the fact that they only deliver 1x real time. I'd also guess that they're old designs and wouldn't have real great driver/application compatibility. Kind of for purpose-built workstations only.

      Apparently the newest cards from NVidia have the ability to run transcode algorithms on their video cards, but that's a "Who writes the code and includes support?" problem, and will it be something that exists in the next rev of Nvidia silicon?

      I'm also told that it's a harder problem to solve "in hardware" and that simple solutions (like DV to a single MPEG-2 format) are kind of limited, and the fact that AMD's new solution is essentially a specialized computer on a chip reinforces this.

      Personally I'd still settle for something that did DV->MPEG2 for DVD at 4x real time. That'd rock, even if it did spend much of that time converting random formats to DV to take advantage of the MPEG2 acceleration.

    4. Re:Alchemy by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You can grab a canopus DV Storm II for 600$ without any special software beyond Edius (video track/effect editor) and a few apps. (Well DivX Pro is included).

      Anyhow, they have a rather nice utility for converting files and it does indeed use the hardware mpeg encoder.

      I haven't checked the speed to see how fast it really is beyond real time, but its not bad for essentially a freebie.

      The main advantage to using the DV Storm II is real time effects, transitions and previews while using an NLE (ie, premiere). Though it is also rather handy for capturing/encoding as well.

      Most people won't have a need for one of these cards, but they are quite nice.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  14. Re:Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it's a good thing I decided to post that as AC.

    Hardly meant as a troll, I've been afraid of what I thought had happened when overclocking *my* 2600/333 t'bred.

  15. Somebody please read the f___ing article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Submitter? Editor? Anyone read this? It said "shadowed" and "put a damper on." There is no assertion anywhere that the fraud caused a chipset delay.

    1. Re:Somebody please read the f___ing article by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I submitted this story earlier, only to see it rejected. Go figure.

      Just who mods the /. gods?

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  16. Wild Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC."

    Can I make a wild guess, rocketman768, from the flow of your logic that you are also a press spokesman for the Democratic Party?

    1. Re:Wild Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      No, he is a WMD expert from the Bush administration.

    2. Re:Wild Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but that read like a painfully lame attempt at a whitty response to the parents original post.

    3. Re:Wild Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but STFU.

      No, seriously. SHUT THE FUCK UP!

  17. The question is... by ral315 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How did AMD not notice this before a million chips were relabeled?

    1. Re:The question is... by rackhamh · · Score: 0

      Let's say I were doing something illegal, where I had to report my activities to somebody else.

      When they come around, do you think I'm going to show them that I'm breaking the law? Of course not. I'm going to show them some legitimate materials, and keep the illegal stuff well out of sight.

      That's what I'd do, anyway.

    2. Re:The question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have very well not noticed it until it was posted to Slashdot, once again proving that bloggers are the people of the year.

  18. Re:Is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i agree, i think a caining is in order to the perpetrator, then a nice long jail sentenence and a mark on this guys record that prevents him from obtaining a job of such responsability...

  19. Author didn't understand story, made up headline by Somegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The news has put a damper on the release of Alchemy, the company's new processor.".

    The author evidently thought this quote meant that AMD was slowing down the release of the processor, instead of realizing that it just means that it dulled some of AMD's excitement over the new product release. The story even states that AMD is already selling "large quantities" of the chipset. Sounds like they are releasing it just fine, no delays.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  20. How is this anything New? by CygnusXII · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This just shows that AMD has reached a point Intel was at 5 or 6 years ago. I worked for a hardware reseller, that got burned by a lot of hotwired, Pentium II's. It was so bad that we were raided by the FEDs'. That freaked me out. Try coming to work one day, walk into the Shop and Agent Smith, flips a Badge and ask you to step into the Boss's Office, for an Interview.

    --
    My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    1. Re:How is this anything New? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least he didn't try to make a copy of himself onto you...

    2. Re:How is this anything New? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think you know when to use apostrophes, commas or capitalisation.

    3. Re:How is this anything New? by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      (OT) That's an ability sadly lacking among most writers on the Internet(or is it internet?). The funniest incorrect use I have ever seen was in an online strategy guide: "Then, You can Beat, your Friends!" or something like that, then "By the way, dont 1a1k 1ik3 1|-|15 |\|0b0dy u|\|d3r51ad5 y00." I felt like emailing the author pointing not to "Talk, Like This, Because nobody, Understands You."

  21. who's the blind f00? by Somegeek · · Score: 1

    The person was talking about the hypothetical link to release delays, not about the existence of the chipset.

    --
    And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  22. How is this anything New?-Job Interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Try coming to work one day, walk into the Shop and Agent Smith, flips a Badge and ask you to step into the Boss's Office, for an Interview."

    And now "CygnusXII" works for the Feds.

    1. Re:How is this anything New?-Job Interview. by CygnusXII · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it was very weird.I pulled into the parking lot, and cars where everywhere. I had been trying to tell my employers we were in for a shit storm, for a month. We (all the RMA Techs) kept tally sheets, specifically for RMA Complaints concerning those CPU's. We had taken one of them apart, to see what was going on under the hood, and they were Hotwired. Here's a quote from an Online Story, that we were involved in.
      "Even armed with knowledge of the re-marking problem, Brock again went shopping online for a CPU upgrade for another system. Thinking he was protected by the "clock locking" technology in the new generation of Pentium IIs, Brock ordered a PII-400 from Micro Source. "When I first got it, the [CPU's] case didn't fit properly, and I thought it didn't look right," says Brock. His research pointed him to Intel's CPUID utility (see " ID, Please" ) and another tool from a German computer magazine, both of which indicated that his chip might be overclocked. He e-mailed Intel for confirmation, but no one there could tell him for sure. After finding evidence of tampering inside the CPU's case, Brock realized he had another re-marked CPU. Fortunately, he was able to return it and get a refund. Micro Source President Eugene Braverman says, "We did have one or two instances where consumers ended up with CPUs we were suspicious about. Now we only buy from Intel-authorized dealers." http://tinyurl.com/6uqe5/ [PCWorld.com] When the Feds' came they confiscated so much stuff, it was amazing. We had a lot of Customers Machines, that were built to order, they all were... Just Gone,we never saw them again, forged CPUs' or Not.

      --
      My cat's picked up a Hammer. HEY! Put down that Hammer. Put Down that Hamm...THUNK!
    2. Re:How is this anything New?-Job Interview. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than likely those machines are now serving kiddy porn on a P2P network in a sting operation.

  23. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider what you're implying...
    You are claiming that your God is unable to protect even an infant.

  24. Seriously.... by tuxter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The reason AMD are so well renowned amongst geeks is _because_ they are over clockable, are they willing to risk this? It's one of their selling points surely.

    1. Re:Seriously.... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are absolutely willing to risk the enthusiast market if it helps them in the mainstream desktop, business, and server markets.

    2. Re:Seriously.... by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Um, risk what exactly? Do you think these overclocking happy geeks are gonna stay happy when their brand new chip won't overclock because some lame ass asian company relabeled the chip? It could be said AMD is doing this for the enthusiasts. However, that is probably not true. It just happens to be in the enthusiasts favor. As I understand it changing a 2500+ from 333Mhz fsb to 400Mhz is pretty easy and almost always successful, but what if that shiney new 2500+ I bought as actually a relabeled 2100+, or worse?

      Or... wait a sec... you didn't actually think AMD was going after them because they were selling overclocked chips, did you? I mean... you did notice that they were relabeling the chips and not telling anyone they were overclocked.. Ya, surely you did...

    3. Re:Seriously.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The reason AMD is so well reknowned, is that they offer the best performance/cost.

  25. Bolex by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine bought a "Bolex" on the street in New York. We placed bets on how long it would last. Surprisingly, it went strong for several months until it was accidentally left in a pocket. The washing machine tore the plastic faceplate out and revealed the cardboard interior. . .

    That was a dang good watch, while it worked.

  26. Mismarked chips? by bob+beta · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean the numbers on those chips don't designate their clock speed?!?

  27. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The head was inside the uterus, how did the scissors get through the back of the head? I see a lie!

  28. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If the mother's life is in danger than I support it as well, althrough a c-section might be more ethical if the fetus is viable (althrough cost might make this impossible on a large scale).

  29. Re:Is this by winkydink · · Score: 1

    You're thinking Singapore, not Taiwan.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  30. I thought my Sempron... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    was just a re-labeled Athlon! (CPU-Z even reads it as one)

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:I thought my Sempron... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      It is, just with less cache (although my athlon-xp has only got 256kb cache anyway, my gf's athlon-xp has 512kb).

    2. Re:I thought my Sempron... by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A Sempron is an Athlon 64/Opteron with the 64-bit goodness disabled, so you get most of the performance benefits of the new architecture, except the 64-bitness and extra registers, on a package that fits into a Socket A, AFAIK. Some Semprons fit in Socket 754, perhaps to appeal to the silly people out there who are either scared of proper 64-bit processors (because intel hasn't done it properly yet) or who go around saying, "you don't need 64 bits for anything."

    3. Re:I thought my Sempron... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're wrong. The Sempron 3100 is Socket 754, and is indeed a neutered A64, but lower-numbered Semprons are based on the old Athlon (since AMD will soon retire the name "Athlon" for non-64 bit processors).

      I threw the parent comment out as a (very) lame attenpt at humor.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  31. Re:Is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that case give him a sex change and force him to become a massage tranny.

  32. Re:your sig by bungalow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The head was inside the uterus, how did the scissors get through the back of the head? I see a lie!

    The doctor kept the baby's head just inside the uterus.Want to see the diagram?

  33. Re:your sig by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the rest of the sig? YHBT, HTH, HAND. Proof that a low /. UID does not denote intelligence.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. Already done by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    The new 90nm chips are clock locked.

    -Charlie

    1. Re:Already done by MightyPez · · Score: 1

      They are multiplier locked. And even then it's only for multipliers above the stock. You can still raise the FSB to speeds above what the chip was designed for.

      For example, my shiny new Athlon 64 Winchester (90nm, socket 939) is currently running at 2330mhz (233mhz x 10) from it's stock 2000mhz (200mhz x 10). I can also run it at 2375mhz (250mhz x 9.5).

  35. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now AMD will be spending more time investigating misinformation by Slashdot than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset.

    Where will it end? Won't somebody think of the engineers?

    1. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      timothy, is that you?

  36. Re:RTFA sh_t for brains. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Indeed, RTFA. It said the low life was taking factory REJECTS (as in ones targeted for destruction) not merely remarking slower "good" parts as faster "more expensive" parts.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  37. Its the latest thing. Soon evryne will be doing it by Pizaz · · Score: 5, Funny

    AMD has even filed a patent for it. They are calling it Enterprise Level Preemptive Multitasking.

  38. Remarking been going on in Taiwan for many years by poopie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Taiwan has been remarking CPUs for at least 10 years. I remember back in the days of the 486 chips with multipliers... most of the chips available were remarked chips, and all anyone cared about was: (1) "can I actually run it at that frequency?" and (2) how much?

    Has anything changed?

  39. Relabling is counterfeiting by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Relabling is counterfeiting, just like pasting the corners from $10 bills on a $1. It doesn't really matter that you are starting from legitimately produced materials.

  40. Since INTEL is more expensive by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping somehow there was like a new cpu manufacturer who made a socket A compatible chip :(

    We need some indie CPU manufacturers.

  41. protection not elaborate, overclocking endangered by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    You completely misrepresent things. The countermeasures are not elaborate or half assed. Intel has already been down this road. Fixed clock multipliers, having BIOS vendors display the embedded brand string that includes the performance index, etc. Overclocking on AMD is endangered by large scale counterfeiting.

  42. Rated speed readily available inside modern CPUs by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    If you have an AMD 1300+ and upgrade to what you think is a 2600+ (but is really a 2200+) would you really notice?

    Sure. Intel and AMD embed brand strings in the CPU that indicate speed or performance rating. When the machine starts up and BIOS displays this string it would say 2200+ rather than 2600+.

  43. Re:your sig by name773 · · Score: 1

    I think he was saying that God shouldn't have to protect the infants... they should be treated as people.

  44. Re:your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support requiring at least one partial birth abortion for every female that gets pregnant.

    I also support raising children using the following method: every time they eat, beat them in the head. Lightly, of course, when they are newborns, but harder as they get older.

    I feel this is equal to teaching children that sex is wrong, since it seems the American (and maybe some other places, too) way is to make sure that kids realize that sex is a dirty, terrible thing you can only do with someone you love.

    It is my hope, nay, my dream, that someday human children will equate an activity necessary for survival with horrifying, sharp pain.

  45. Au1200 media accelerator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just downloaded the Au1200 databook and had a look at the media accelerator chapter. The Media Acceleration Engine (MAE) is a hardware accelerator that provides IDCT and Motion Compensation similar to that of the ATI Rage 128 / Radeon series. There is full documentation on the internal operation of the MAE together with listings of all the registers. This means that it won't be long before it'll be supported under Linux.

    Contrast this with ATI who refuse to release documentation on the IDCT unit. And even worse - Broadcom who make competing CPUs won't release ANY databook unless under NDA.

  46. AMD Alchemy was announced yesterday anyway by freitasm · · Score: 2, Informative

    AMD has announced the Alchemy Au1200 for Personal Media Players on 3 JAN, including price and date for availability... This CPU provides a DVD-quality display that can be scaled directly to larger screens. The Au1200 processor is designed to support industry-standard media formats, including MPEG2, MPEG4, WMV9, H.263 and DivX.

  47. I agree with this post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you weren't posting anonymously, I'd add you to my friends list.

  48. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because in Korea 2005 is for old people.

  49. Spotting a fake? by Renraku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there some kind of guide comparing mislabeled AMD processors to the real deal?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  50. -1 Stupid by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Funny
    It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset...

    Oh yeah! Clearly AMD's engineers are tied up doing this investigation...

    </sarcasm>

  51. Who's modding this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as offtopic or flamebait?

    It is most certainly ON-topic, and nobody is flaming.

  52. Nice headline by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 3, Funny

    rocketman768 writes "According to internetnews.com a workshop in Taipei has been re-labeling nearly a million AMD Athlon XPs. It seems AMD is spending more time investigating this than on releasing their new Alchemy chipset which boasts direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC."

    Yes rocketman768, AMD has one guy that designs chipsets and manages their legal department. While his skills are incredible, he has not been managing his time well lately. This has resulted in the Alchemy being delayed. I will forward your message to HR and let them know about your concerns.

    Your headline is a display of intellectualism that can only be rivaled by an autistic sea monkey. For that, the Internet thanks you.

    1. Re:Nice headline by rocketman768 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I love the internet, such friendly people.

    2. Re:Nice headline by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      The Internet loves you, too.

    3. Re:Nice headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the internet, such friendly people.

      LOL @ stupid noob!!!

  53. Re:Author didn't understand story, made up headlin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get 'em!

  54. Here's some more info from DigiTimes by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Informative

    DigiTimes reports that "Over a million re-marked AMD CPUs have allegedly been shipped to Germany and China, the Chinese-language Liberty Times reported Saturday, ..."
    DigiTimes ~ Taiwan police seize 60,000 suspect AMD CPUs

    http://slashdot.org/~2TecTom/journal/94553

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  55. this was discussed by AMD @ QuakeCon by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting



    During the HardOCP presentation, a pretty significant guy from AMD discussed this matter. He said AMD is not against hobbyists overclocking their chips. He said they're upset over an 'asian company' buffing off their labelling, overclocking the chips, and relabelling the chips. I had just bought an Athlon XP 3200 "OEM" chip and was curious if it might be one of the bootlegged CPUs. I talked to an engineer at their booth and showed him the chip. AMD, like several other QuakeCon sponsors, had real-deal engineers on hand to address technical queries. Not just booth babes handing out shirts. The guy I talked to said he had never seen a 3200 made with a green PCB. He also gave me the contact info for an FBI agent who is investigating this phenomena. Later on, I asked a friend of mine who works at AMD about the green-vs-gold PCB issue. His co-workers were likewise skeptical of a 3200 mounted on a green PCB. So now I'm going to contact that FBI agent and see what he thinks.

    1. Re:this was discussed by AMD @ QuakeCon by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      So now I'm going to contact that FBI agent and see what he thinks.

      Just as long as you're willing to lose your new chip.

      "Sorry. Need that for evidence."

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:this was discussed by AMD @ QuakeCon by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



      I was kinda worried about that, too. That's why I didn't really pursue this until now. I think I'll contact him, offer him the chip and copies of my receipt, etc. I'll then contact the retailer from whom I bought the chip and ask them for a replacement and provide them copy of the FBI paperwork regarding the investigation, etc. It would be in their best interest to send me a replacement, I would think.

    3. Re:this was discussed by AMD @ QuakeCon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seth,
      I'm wondering if you might be able to talk about your experince as I am monitoring the story. So far I've not heard back from AMD.

      Michael Singer
      415-466-0414

    4. Re:this was discussed by AMD @ QuakeCon by burbs · · Score: 1

      Looks like he's Michael Singer, managing editor of Internetnews.com

  56. perhaps they're modding the new chip by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    My first thought was that this submitter was trying to increase chances for story acceptance by sensationalizing the counterfitting story with the Alchemy chip delay... But, I will entertain the notion that the engineers might be having to redesign alchemy to make overclocking more difficult to thwart these folks in Taiwan.

    When I was at QuakeCon this year, an AMD rep speaking during the [H]ardOCP presentation said they didn't care if hobbyists overclocked their chips. They were bothered by these jokers doing it and reselling the chips as faster clocked chips.

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Re: cash cows by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 3, Funny
    Do you even know how a cash cow works?
    It's a stockyard where cattle are kept while awaiting various kinds of inhumane treatment (e.g., branding, slaughter, etc.) at the hands of their depraved owners or their employees.
    The stockyard allows the vicious Cattle Processing Unit (CPU) to access the cattle more efficiently than having to fetch each cow individually from the open range when it's needed to be the subject of one vile torture or another.

    Oh, wait, that's not a "cash cow"; that's a "cow cache".
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  59. I wasn't sure how to moderate that so I think I'll just comment on it. Is this really an AMD Engineer without a sense of hummor? He seems a bit slow as well. Maybe he just needs a bigger heatsink strapped to his head. Or perhaps his clock rating was relabled by the very same Taiwanese shop! Those bastads! Purposefully, overrating engineer's heads so that they wouldn't figure our they were also relabeling their chips! The brilliance!

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Re:Is this by YouMakeMeSoANGRY · · Score: 1

    And you are thinking of Thailand... Or possibly your mum.

  62. Athlon XP 2200+ by elynnia · · Score: 3, Informative

    This article brings to mind an incident I had with an Athlon I'd bought last year for my computer... I bought a 2200+ from a shop in Sydney, Australia, but when I started up the computer the BIOS recognised it as a 1800+, although it displayed it as a 2200+ when I took the computer back to the shop and the shop guy did 'Load Optimised Defaults' in the BIOS. Has anyone else here had similar experiences? ~Aly~

    1. Re:Athlon XP 2200+ by robnauta · · Score: 1
      Yes, when I bought a 1700+ a few years ago. I assume that it's a 133 MHz bus chip since it's a 2200+. The motherboard has a 100/133 jumper, factory default is 100 to avoid blowing up a Duron/Thunderbird with a 100 MHz bus.

      So it runs at 75% of its intended speed until you move that jumper to the 133 position. Then it'll run at its normal clock rate and report as a 2200+.

  63. how to find out, and who do we shout at? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just bought a 400fsb AthlonXP 3200+ (arrived today). It's on green pcb, instead of the expected brown. I suspect it may be one of these knock-offs, but is there any concrete way of telling? model numbers etc. all seem to indicate it is the real deal.

    If it does turn out to be a dodgy cpu, can I legitimately complain to the company I bought it from? After all they have technically sold me a 3200 athlon...

  64. Re:RTFA sh_t for brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you please read the same FA, that I did. here
    The practice, as "re-marking," involves resellers and/or distributors who may purchase less expensive processors that are rated at lower clock frequencies and then re-mark them at higher clock frequencies for resale.

  65. Updated DigiTimes article by 2TecTom · · Score: 1

    Based on tips provided by Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Taiwan, the police Friday raided an electronics company located in Tainan, southern Taiwan, and seized a total of 60,000 suspect AMD CPUs, according to the police and sources at AMD Taiwan.

    The suspect AMD CPUs, including K7 and K8 models, were defective CPUs that would normally have been destroyed. However, market sources said that the CPUs might have been stolen from one of AMD's three packaging and testing plants in Asia and shipped to Taiwan for re-marking. The possible source of the defective chips could be one of AMD's packaging and testing plants in Singapore or Malaysia, or in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province (China), said the sources.

    Over a million re-marked AMD CPUs have allegedly been shipped to Germany and China, the Chinese-language Liberty Times reported Saturday, adding that the value of the seized CPUs would be about NT$300 million (about US$9.46 million).

    Sources at AMD Taiwan confirmed that the 60,000 seized in Taiwan are defective CPUs rejected by the company, however, the company has officially refused to comment on the seized products in Taiwan or the alleged one million shipped to Germany and China, stating that the company will release an official statement when the police investigation has concluded.

    The company from which the suspect product was seized is called Hao Hwa Technology (transliterated from Chinese).
    Taiwan police seize 60,000 suspect AMD CPUs
    Charles Chou and outside sources, Taipei; Steve Shen, DigiTimes.com [Monday 3 January 2005]

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  66. This is hardly a new thing at AMD by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For instance, News.com posted this in an article way back in May of 2003: "The move comes amid the discovery of a remarked chip market earlier this year. In February, AMD embarked of a series of raids in the Philippines."
    AMD combats chip fraud in Asia

    --
    Words to men, as air to birds.
  67. cash cow by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Don't you know that on /. it's no longer politically correct to mock or deride Microsoft?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  68. New slasdot meme? by detrino · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Well, rocketman768 says they can't do X because they are doing Y."

  69. Re: cash cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now THAT's good!

  70. AMD CPUID ? by justins · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are these utilities of any use?
    http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/Technica lResou rces/0,,30_182_871_2364,00.html

    I guess a serial number you could actually call and check with AMD about would cause the privacy worriers to shit themselves, but it would be useful in this case.

    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    1. Re:AMD CPUID ? by b1scuit · · Score: 1
      I don't see how. It's not like your name and address and such are registered with AMD. Unless you don't want ANYONE to know you bought a bad chip, including AMD. And really, if someone has access to the serial number on your CPU, you have other, more serious problems to worry about...

      Sounds like a great idea, actually. Call 800 number, enter serial number, if good, you're told so, hang up. If bad, you talk to an AMD person who helps you... do whatever you do. Call the FBI? The retailer? I don't know, but it'd make me feel better about buying AMD's stuff (if I wasn't a fan already, that is) if I had a tool to determine if it was a legit chip or not, and a human being to tell me where to go/who to call. It'd be good PR, IMHO.

    2. Re:AMD CPUID ? by dbacher · · Score: 1

      If you are running Windows, Crystal CPUID will tell you what the real processor is, if they only changed the label. If they physically changed the part itself, it won't do any good.

      --
      If your code is acting bloated, and is running rather slow, it's likely and predicted that some loops you will unroll.
    3. Re:AMD CPUID ? by justins · · Score: 1
      If you are running Windows, Crystal CPUID will tell you what the real processor is, if they only changed the label. If they physically changed the part itself, it won't do any good.

      That's too bad. The common change now, to get from a 2500+ to a 3200+, involves changing a couple of bridges on the top of the package (as well as the label, I guess). If there were a unique serial number ID in the chip, I don't think they could change THAT. (although perhaps you could change the microcode in the BIOS if you were selling an entire OEM system...)
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  71. Re:Rated speed readily available inside modern CPU by arkanes · · Score: 1

    On at least half the machines I regularly use, the monitor takes long enough to warm up that you can't see the POST, or it's only visible for a small faction of the time. You could very easily do this and probably get away with it for quite some time, if you didn't stay in any one spot for too long. But of course it's a lot better of a strategy if you can rebrand them more completely.

  72. Re:RTFA sh_t for brains. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AMD stated those stolen chips were due for destruction... Well they would do wouldn't they.. So the receivers of the stolen goods will not want them.
    I was of the opine that scrap chips had a paint blob or broken on site, not set as a transportable item.

  73. why can't they spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the word should be solution in the title (when you click the link)

  74. Re:your sig by bungalow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sex that is procreative and fully giving between husband and wife is a wonderful, beautiful thing. No child should be taught that sex is a dirty, terrible thing; the child should learn, however, that it is appropriate only to a husband and wife.

    I feel this is equal to teaching children that sex is wrong, since it seems the American (and maybe some other places, too) way is to make sure that kids realize that sex is a dirty, terrible thing you can only do with someone you love.

    Is this the American way? Seems to me that "Heather has two Mommies" and "Queer eye for the straight girl/guy" and "who wants to marry a millionaire" and the "Sunday night sex show", not to mention most spam, seems to indicate differently.

    It is not right, however, to reduce *any* activity (sex included) to a way to pass the time regardless of the consequences that might follow.

    Dare you read Humanae Vitae?
    http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclic als/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae_e n.html

  75. Re:Alchemy (BEEN THERE, DONE THAT) by danigiri · · Score: 1
    "direct transfer of video from digital video recorders to portable players without the need to transcode through a PC"

    Cool, what Firewire has been designed to do for, like, years?

    From the IEEE1394 horse's mouth: " What does peer-to-peer mean? 1394 is a peer-to-peer interface. This allows dubbing from one camcorder to another without the need for a computer. It also allows multiple computers to share a given peripheral without any special support in the peripheral or the computers. It's another important reason why 1394 is the digital interface of choice and why its acceptance is growing.

    Yeah, there is the issue of HW playback at the portable player level (which is not new at all, either), but PC-less "direct transfer" as the submitter remarks is something Firewire has been designed to do from its inception years ago. In comparison, USB is limited to PC-controlled operation and I don't think 2.0 has changed that.

  76. Re:RTFA sh_t for brains. by Bohemoth2 · · Score: 1

    Someone should beat the bitch with a basball bat!

  77. Yeah, import/export with Cuba is easy... by nnappe · · Score: 1

    >smaller country, such as Cuba, under the pretext of a military or governmental order.
    Cuba has an embargo. Probably it is easier to rob the chips than to buy them as a cuban official, specially as a military order.
    And do you think nobody would notice an order of 1 million chips in a small country?
    Corruption is not just a matter of small countries. And governments in general are better controlled than private companies.

    1. Re:Yeah, import/export with Cuba is easy... by plover · · Score: 1

      Neither China nor Taiwan has Cuba under an embargo. That's an American thing only.

      --
      John
  78. Re:Rated speed readily available inside modern CPU by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    But of course it's a lot better of a strategy if you can rebrand them more completely

    Just to be clear the string is burned into the electronics of the CPU, see the CPUID instructions. You can't really change that. You would have to have a BIOS that is participating in the fraud. However Windows and various utilities also display this CPUID string so a complete fraud would be very difficult.

  79. Re:Rated speed readily available inside modern CPU by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    and how many people would actually notice?

    You only need one to alert the system integrator that unknowingly bought the counterfeit chips.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. ATTENTION BUNGALOW by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    YHBT.
    YHL.

    And, for christ's fucking sake, stop posting in this thread. If you keep this up much longer you're going to be posting at -1 entirely because you got trolled by a signature on Slashdot.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  82. Re:Remarking been going on in Taiwan for many year by BobPaul · · Score: 1


    Has anything changed?


    Yeah. People who buy AMD expect to be able to overclock them (at least I do.) If I bought a 2500+ expecting a barton 2500+ and it turned out to be an overclocked t-bred, I'd be pissed. I already own an overclocked t-bred, and there's no way that's going to compete with a 3200+ like that 2500+ Barton will.

  83. You're right, I was very silly. by turgid · · Score: 1
    I got all muddled up. here is a Socket A Sempron.

    Of course the Socket A one must be based on the Athlon XP core. It would be very difficult to modify a Socket 754 processor (with built-in memory controller) to work in Socket A (where it's in the northbridge), not to mention the fact that the Athlon XP uses the EV6 bus, descended from the DEC Alpha, whereas the Opteron-derived processors have Hypertransport (a descendent of the technology in the Sun E10k) and all sorts of other fancy stuff.

    Silly me :-)

  84. Re:Rated speed readily available inside modern CPU by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Just to be clear the integrators and builders are the same outfit and they would probably not make such an assumption. They would fear mistakes where higher end CPUs were erroneously sold as lower end CPUs. A lower end CPU seeming to be where a higher end CPU should be would set off warning bells. These guys operate on razor thin margins and have to be very careful with their inventory.