Slashdot Mirror


Writing Fiction Using SubEthaEdit

Phil Shapiro writes "The recent blizzard on the East Coast makes for some great collaborative creativity opportunities of various sorts, including group fiction writing using SubEthaEdit. Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools? We didn't either." Man, the best fiction I've ever produced is some of the project plans created using SubEtha.

185 comments

  1. An honor? by Lifereaper0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "national teaching award from Radio Shack" What an honor to win such a thing. What's next? Best movie award from /. ?

    1. Re:An honor? by odioalsoco · · Score: 0

      I think the next great thing will be the best microsoft programs by linux.org

    2. Re:An honor? by Lifereaper0 · · Score: 1

      And the award goes to Windows 95 for best operating system!

    3. Re:An honor? by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

      Worst part about it is they ask you for your address and phone number before they'll give you the award! ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    4. Re:An honor? by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      ...and a little paper slip that you have to mail to the head office to get a 40% rebate on your limo to the award ceremony.

    5. Re:An honor? by Zab+UvWxy · · Score: 1

      Sort of reminds me of the first year that there was a Heavy Metal category at the Grammys.... Favoured to win was Metallica for "...And Justice For All"; award went to Jethro Tull.

      --
      "I don't get it." -- ObviousGuy
    6. Re:An honor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in Nebraska.

    7. Re:An honor? by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      daeley writes:
      "Worst part about it is they ask you for your address and phone number before they'll give you the award! ;)"

      Radio Shack has long since done away with the phone-and-address crap. I know this because I'm typing this message at a Radio Shack POS terminal right now.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    8. Re:An honor? by Presidential · · Score: 1

      So you got access to a POS terminal? Can you check to see if a bug was fixed? Go to the ICST entry screen. To get there, use option 5. Stock, then 2. Transfers. Now enter a store number in the destination field. It doesn't have to be anything special; we're going to erase it soon. In the Shipped By field, enter whatever you like. Now in the comment field, type in a relevant comment with a ; separating two sentences. Tell me if the terminal locks up after you hit in this area.

      Sorry, totally off topic. But, I really want to know if they fixed that bug. Last time I called POS support, they said it was a 'feature.'

      To 'unlock' the terminal, just alt-f4 the ACRWIN process and restart it, either from the hotkey or the start bar.

      Oh, and they haven't done away with the phone and address crap entirely. Any returns require that info. So do things like service vendors (cellular, pcs, satellite, etc) and in-store payments (Sprint, Dish Nutwork, etc). Usually those customers expect to fork up their infos.

      Also don't forget transactions with gift cards or checks...

      Tell me also how many entries of "Radio Shack" you have in your instore customer database.

      --
      Whenever Mrs. Fitch breaks wind, we beat the dog.
  2. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently only MacOS users are allowed to write it. I can't get it to run on my computer.

    1. Re:Sorry by KingDaveRa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its a shame there's not a windows/*nix version, or a similar thing using AIM or MSN Messenger. Do similar tools exist and I've never seen them maybe? I'd like to do some online collaborations.

    2. Re:Sorry by Teppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Collaborative text editors were a hot research topic about 8-10 years ago, and it turns out to be quite hard to get them right.

      The only mostly-finished one I could find that runs on Windows (and Linux!) is MoonEdit. Anyone want to put a server up and try it?

    3. Re:Sorry by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its a shame there's not a windows/*nix version, or a similar thing using AIM or MSN Messenger. Do similar tools exist and I've never seen them maybe? I'd like to do some online collaborations.

      Well, there's NetMeeting, which comes with Win2K and XP (and as an install on earlier versions). Text, audio/video conf, whiteboard, app sharing. Not the greatest but it's already installed and it's free.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    4. Re:Sorry by sockonafish · · Score: 0

      Even more reason to buy a mini!

    5. Re:Sorry by xtracto · · Score: 0

      Interesting link, the movie is kind of funny, while watching it I realized you can only edit text files, but I started to think that mixing MoonEdit with LaTex could yield to something interesting!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem to have forgotton your freecrapnow.com link.

    7. Re:Sorry by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Actually I was thinking this concept could be extended to be code context sensitive so that it could be used for group coding.

      Even as it is, it could be used in that way though.

      (Thinking to self...)

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    8. Re:Sorry by xtracto · · Score: 0

      That sounds cool also, what about an extension for emacs that allows it to do this thing?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    9. Re:Sorry by Woy · · Score: 1
      That sounds cool also, what about an extension for emacs that allows it to do this thing?

      So that emacs can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools on its own?

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    10. Re:Sorry by idolcrash · · Score: 1

      A wiki can be set up for this, but then one would have to at least password it so only authorized persons can edit.

    11. Re:Sorry by Jahz · · Score: 1

      A wiki can be set up for this, but then one would have to at least password it so only authorized persons can edit

      I'm going to guess that you have not used SubEtha. It lets multiple people collaborate on a document at the same time. For example, when I am typing on line 10, I can see one of my collaborators typing 5 lines up, and another one highlighting and deleting the paragraph below. Its all realtime. Each person has their own color.

      And yes, you can password protect your document so that the public cannot collaborate. This is far more efficiant than a Wiki for many collaborative purposes.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
    12. Re:Sorry by idolcrash · · Score: 1

      Ah, seems interesting, but since they are looking for a working Windows solution, Wiki seems to be a decent workaround, at least temporarily.

    13. Re:Sorry by WickedClean · · Score: 1

      A friend and I sometimes co-author short stories and we pass a document back and forth and just type the new stuff in red. Something like this would be cool for us, though. Word sucks.

      --
      ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
    14. Re:Sorry by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

      MoonEdit looks pretty cool. I'm gunna give it a spin with a few friends and see how it behaves. Thanks for that one.

  3. For those who don't know... by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...this is SubEthaEdit. It's a rendezvous and network-aware text editor designed for collaborative coding that seems to be finding more use. Meanwhile, it's also just a damn nice text editor for general use, and is free (yes, I know that TextWrangler is also free now).

    --
    I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    1. Re:For those who don't know... by wickedj · · Score: 1

      This seems really interesting but I have no Mac to run it on. Is there something similar available in the Win32 or Linux flavors?

    2. Re:For those who don't know... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile, it's also just a damn nice text editor for general use, and is free

      You do have to pay for a commercial use licence - only saying this because I'm one of those people who has registered!

      It's a great text editor just by itself, but since nobody I work with has a Mac it's a little annoying that my copy stays offline. Still, it was well worth the registration fee anyway, and supporting other programmers financially gives one that warm-and-fuzzy feeling you only get with registering non-nagging shareware. ;-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:For those who don't know... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      it is a GREAT Programming editor... is supports tons of languages out of the box and you can get more Modes from the website plus write your own and submit them.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:For those who don't know... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I would like to add that I wish that codemonkeys would port this tool to Linux or start a project of adding support for their software to talk to there software like this because it would d be nice to use it to actually do collaboration over the net.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:For those who don't know... by Space+Coyote · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I would like to add that I wish that codemonkeys would port this tool to Linux or start a project of adding support for their software to talk to there software like this because it would d be nice to use it to actually do collaboration over the net.

      SubEthaEdit is a Cocoa application, which means porting it for Windows / Linux would require nearly a total re-write depending on how much of it is written in Objective-C. And from my experience with writing Cocoa apps vs. Win / Linux apps, you can get a very feature-rich, polished application up and running much more quickly with Cocoa, thanks to its use of frameworks. So a port to another OS might just seem like too much work for the team they have.

      But I would definitely love for more programmers to start using ZeroConf (rendezvous' generic name) on other platforms. It's just a damn neat protocol.

      --
      ___
      Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    6. Re:For those who don't know... by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

      YES! Finally. Now we just need a game that is available for Mac and not the PC and the Earth polars will swap. Or something.

    7. Re:For those who don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " you can get a very feature-rich, polished application up and running much more quickly with Cocoa"

      That is quite an understatement.

      And what is scary is that really isn't even taking into account the fairly new Bindings and the soon to be released Core Data.

    8. Re:For those who don't know... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      This seems really interesting but I have no Mac to run it on.

      Why not?

    9. Re:For those who don't know... by larkost · · Score: 1

      There have been a long list of great Mac games that never made their way to Windows, but they are never blockbusters, so they never enter the conversation. Some examples would be:

      Ferazel's Wand
      Ares
      Airburst
      MAFFia (an incredibly addictive and disturbed game where you shoot sheep)
      (thats just off the top of my head)

      Not to mention the games that came out for Mac first: Myst, the Dark Castle series, the Marathon series, the Escape Velocity series, etc.

      Mac gaming may not have the blockbusters, but it is not the wasteland that it is made out to be.

    10. Re:For those who don't know... by rtm1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      SubEthaEdit is a Cocoa application, which means porting it for Windows / Linux would require nearly a total re-write depending on how much of it is written in Objective-C

      Because it has to be said, there is always GNUstep when you need to port a Cocoa app to Windows or *nix. I have read mixed reviews, but if you stick to the core Openstep API then you should be okay porting your Cocoa app to GNUstep. As far as Obj-C goes, gcc does compile it, so it isn't the language that's the stumbling block.

      All of that said, the codingmonkeys have commented in the past that their use of Apple only frameworks (rendezvous, addressbook, etc), would make a port to gnustep really difficult, and that they make pretty heavy use of the newer Apple Cocoa extensions (CoreFoundation) that aren't in Openstep or GNUstep. So doing a Windows / *nix port is hard, but not because of Obj-C or Cocoa in general, but because SubEtha uses several of the newer OS X APIs that aren't in Openstep. At least that is my understanding of it.

      --
      "Belief means not wanting to know what is true." [Nietzche, The Anti-Christ, 1889]
    11. Re:For those who don't know... by chickens · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been looking for a few months now for a cross-platform alternative to SubEthaEdit. There exists a plugin for jEdit, but that's implemented on top of IRC and is a bit of work to set up

      Just recently discovered MoonEdit which is a little more like what I need. The collaboration works very well, but it's a bit light on other features..

      A port of SubEthaEdit would be so nice...*dreams*

    12. Re:For those who don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. It sucks how Myst was a Mac blockbuster, but 99% of the users didn't even know it was on Mac first.

      Stupid Windows lusers.

    13. Re:For those who don't know... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I have been looking at doing this for the past few weeks now. (I've been helping with adding rendezvous support to other linux apps).
      My first step is to get a way to send generic packet information over kopete. I'm still not sure how to do that yet. :)

    14. Re:For those who don't know... by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Alright fine then, how about opening the protocol that SubEthaEdit uses? Let someone else write the application that can talk the talk. I use my iBook regularly, but for long coding/writing sessions, it's much nicer to use my Linux desktop machine.

      There are ZeroConf daemons for Linux now (mDNSresponder) but they don't help with the individual application communication protocol.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    15. Re:For those who don't know... by ThousandStars · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, too, that Cocoa has hooks for Rendezvous, which probably makes an app like SubEthaEditor much easier to create.

    16. Re:For those who don't know... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Last time I played with ZeroConf, I found out that the current version doesn't work through a NAT router -- i.e. the router in like 80% of broadband-enabled homes. Uh. No thanks. When it *works* with the most common network configuration for homes, give me a call.

    17. Re:For those who don't know... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1
      From the SubEthaEdit FAQ:

      I don't see any shared documents. What's wrong?

      Please check if you have enabled a firewall. If so, please allow SubEthaEdit to use ports 6942 to 6951. In case you are using Mac OS X's Click 'New' to the right of the list of predefined ports, choose 'Other' from the pop-up menu and enter "6942-6951" for the port number and "SubEthaEdit" for the description.

      I'm behind a router. How can I work with others over the internet, that also sit behind a router?

      One user has to enable port forwarding on his router. Port 6942 to 6951 should be forwared from the router to the computer. After that the other user should be able to establish a connection to him, which will be used to share documents in both directions. If you need to find out your dynamic IP, for example browse to http://whatismyip.com
      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    18. Re:For those who don't know... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few other comments...

      SubEthaEdit is a winner of the Apple Design Award for 2003 (at the time, the product was known as "Hydra".)

      This is the kind of surprising use of a new technology that I just love to see. Apple put out Rendezvous, expecting apps along the lines of chat programs. Not "multi-user text editor".

      With Bluetooth, we were expecting people to come up with apps similar to Sync Services, to keep your phone and address book in sync. We sure weren't expecting Jonas Salling to figure out how to use a bluetooth phone as a remote control and proximitiy sensor (see Salling Clicker... Very Clever Indeed.)

      There are a lot of new things coming up in Tiger, and I just can't wait to see what kinds of apps people think up for CoreVideo, CoreData, Etc.

      Another thing worth mentioning: The Coding Monkeys are three college kids, who wrote this app while carrying a full course load. Yeah, they're great coders, but they're also getting a lot of leverage from Cocoa.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:For those who don't know... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I tried that. It might work over the Internet, but it doesn't work on the LAN in my house. I'm not talking about working with people over the Internet, I'm talking about working with people sitting at the computer 10 feet from mine.

    20. Re:For those who don't know... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Sorry it didn't work for you. I am by no means any sort of expert on zeroconf, but you've made me very curious. You say you're behind a NAT router. Are the other people in your house on the other side? Sorry if this sounds like a weird or dumb question. How many subnets do you have?

      Like I said, I seriously doubt I can help due to my lack of knowledge, but your topology sounds weird. And by weird, I mean different than mine. =)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    21. Re:For those who don't know... by 00lmz · · Score: 1

      So it's like multiplayer notepad then?

    22. Re:For those who don't know... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      umm... then you have another router behind your router connected to your internet modem.

      if you have a wireless router, make sure that it is not set to be a NAT if it is connected to the router to the modem. in the case of airport... make sure you have it set to be an access point.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  4. Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, the best fiction I've ever produced is some of the project plans created using SubEtha.

    The greatest lasagne recipe I ever wrote was crafted in MS Word 6.0.

    OK, OK, Courier 12 point, if you must know.

  5. Writing fiction by misrepresenting science by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Funny

    An excellent example can be found here.

    The formula is as follows.
    1.) Write article based entirely on misrepresented sensational claims about the end of the world.
    2.) Get slashdotted
    3.) Sell more ads for website based on high traffic volumes (use only averages when representing numbers to ad buying customers.)
    4.) Profit!

    1. Re:Writing fiction by misrepresenting science by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      Homer: DOH!!!

      The article you're looking for is here.

      Unless you'd like to work on a fictionalized article about the end of the world using SubEthaEdit with me. In that case I have no qualms about getting /.ed or obtaining profit. :-)

    2. Re:Writing fiction by misrepresenting science by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, I could have used SubEthaEdit to have someone help me write this post, as I am now hitting myself over the head with a cluestick with after re-reading the parent.

  6. Mac OSX only... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    *NIX and MS-Windows users can forget about it...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Mac OSX only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully we already have dozens of apps like this one... We welcome MAC to the 21 century

    2. Re:Mac OSX only... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 4, Interesting

      like?

      and BTW.. SubEtha has been around for years.. prior to the name change 3 years ago they were known as HydraEdit.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Mac OSX only... by game+kid · · Score: 1

      I was about to say "you can always use eMule or something similar (heck, even eMail) to send the writing between users" but then I saw SubEthaEdit's site.

      At the risk of being sued, I must say, That's hot®.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    4. Re:Mac OSX only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.. Mac only? Why bother telling us at all. :P

      They had me slightly excited when I saw "Unix command line," but the second I saw the website I knew it was a bunch of Mac freaks.. :P

      Real-time editing of the same file.. Sure! Sounds great! Too bad I only know 1 Mac developer. :P

    5. Re:Mac OSX only... by TylerL82 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just "Hydra". I still rename each update of SubEthaEdit (HYDRA!!!) after I download it.

    6. Re:Mac OSX only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the only Macs I have are an LC630 (68040) and a PowerMac 9600/200MP and neither will run OSX :(

    7. Re:Mac OSX only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MoonEdit is similar, for Windows and Unix only, not Mac.

  7. TextWrangler--too little, too late by bodrell · · Score: 1

    I was stuck using a half-functional BBEdit Lite that BareBones software refused to update at all. Including major, major bug fixes. SubEthaEdit is the text editor I needed all along, and I may even throw them a few bucks in the future, just because their program is free for noncommercial use.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I want to know is when a vi-style interface would be put into SubEthaEdit. (I know the FAQ says vi/etc. can't do this, but I don't see what's wrong with putting a vi-interface on SubEthaEdit then). I'd register SubEthaEdit once implemented!

      Surely I can't be the only one with source code littered with ":q" and other stuck vi-isms until we realize the editor doesn't support them...

    2. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Trillan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I asked the coding monkeys for a minor fix back with 1.0, and it's still broken. And rather than opening the source like they said they were considering, SubEthaEdit now costs $35 for commercial use, whereas TextWrangler is just plain free.

      Don't get me wrong; I am looking for an alernative, too. But SubEthaEdit isn't it.

    3. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Moofie · · Score: 1

      vi? On a Mac?

      I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth. The aesthetic concerns are...concerning.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's Free for non-commerical use

    5. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by tlhIngan · · Score: 1
      vi? On a Mac?



      I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth. The aesthetic concerns are...concerning.



      Well, there's vim already installed as part of the BSD subsystem on OS X, and there's gVim available from the official site that's native OS X (not X11).

      So the program's there. Now we just need the Rendezvous support for it. Or add vi to SubEthaEdit.

    6. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Moofie · · Score: 1

      *shudder*

      I'm one of those guys that just starts twitching when people talk about vi. I hate it so much...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by jcr · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is when a vi-style interface would be put into SubEthaEdit.

      I'm guessing... Never?

      I'd register SubEthaEdit once implemented!

      If there were about two thousand more people who wanted VI behavior in SubEthaEdit, it might be worth looking into.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but that's what I said.

      Free for some uses should not be confused with free. That means every time I do something new with a tool, I need to consider if it I am now delving into commercial use. If you look at their definition for non commercial use, you'll find it quite narrow. I would venture to say that there are none where it's main feature -- multiple editing -- are usable.

      Personally, I think a tool that doesn't have SubWordNavigation in two years isn't worth the space on my hard disc, let alone the $35 they want if I should ever open shipping, non open source code with it.

    9. Re:TextWrangler--too little, too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly would want it in order to consider using the program.

  8. Reminder: choose good collaborators... by game+kid · · Score: 0

    ...or you'll end up with such compounds like "Once upon a time there was T3H H0TT PR1NC3S5!!!11!!1~!1onetwothree who lived in a faraway land..."

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  9. This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 3, Informative
    The real problem with collaborative fiction is finding collaborators who aren't idiots, and then getting good work out of it. The "article" linked was stilted and the humor was inane.

    Sure, there are projects suited to live collaboration. Screenplays, songs, even blog fiction (self plug). But prose narrative is one of the least likely. Name one good novel that was written by committee.

    1. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by jws · · Score: 1

      Naked Came the Stranger

      (look it up)

    2. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Rick.C · · Score: 4, Funny
      Name one good novel that was written by committee.

      The Bible. Council of Nicea, 300 AD.

      It's been on the best-seller list for centuries. I filed my copy under "Historical Fiction."
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    3. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by tb3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, but I have to disagree with you there.
      The plot rambles, the protagonist is completely unlikable, the writing style is dull and repetitive, and it really bogs down in the final chapters.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    4. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Henriok · · Score: 1

      Name one good novel that was written by committee.

      The Bible?
      Quite a best seller last I heard.

      --

      - Henrik

      - when the Shadows descend -
    5. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Bible. Council of Nicea, 300 AD.

      Same objection as the article link: the prose is stilted, the humor is inane.

    6. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by operagost · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And you are ignorant. But I still read your post. However, it is obvious that you haven't read the Bible.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good editor would probably solve that. Novels are usually very personal works of art- I wouldn't want to work with someone who dismisses the few who want to try it as "idiots." I suspect you may be one of the idiots who ruined "Invisible James."

    8. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, believing every land mammal on Earth fit on a boat built by an old man is pretty damn funny.

    9. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by noslayer33 · · Score: 1
      Try any of George R. R. Martin's Wildcards series.

      Of course, since I have tried a few similar projects, I will agree with your first point.

    10. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A good editor would probably solve that. Novels are usually very personal works of art- I wouldn't want to work with someone who dismisses the few who want to try it as "idiots."

      Don't get me wrong, if someone does manage to get good prose fiction out of collaboration I'll applaud. My point was only that it's hard, and finding the right software to do it with is not the hard part. I'd personally find it more convenient comfortable to e-mail drafts back and forth rather than having two people edit the exact same text at the exact same time. One needs to give other people's ideas time to develop a shape before one takes a chisel to them.

      I suspect you may be one of the idiots who ruined "Invisible James."

      If I understood this, I might be able to respond to it. Are you talking about my Web site? What's ruined about it?

    11. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by cei · · Score: 1

      Or Medea: Harlan's World by Jack Williamson, Larry Niven, Frederik Pohl, Hal Clement, Thomas M. Disch, Frank Herbert, Poul Anderson, Kate Wilhelm, Theodore Sturgeon and Robert Silverberg. Edited by Harlan Ellison. The authors did a panel discussion to work out the specifics of the world then generated short stories to populate it. OK, the individual stories aren't collaborative (neither are Wild Cards, for that matter) but the world buidling was.

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    12. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      The plot rambles, the protagonist is completely unlikable, the writing style is dull and repetitive, and it really bogs down in the final chapters.

      True, but the first part has tons of sex and violence, so it's not all bad.

    13. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by iJames · · Score: 1
      Try any of George R. R. Martin's Wildcards series.

      I have, and they're fun books. But shared world isn't really the same as collaboration. Collaborative features like SubEtha offers wouldn't even add value in a case like that.

    14. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't written by committee, it was compiled by committee from the works of many authors writing at different times over thousands of years. There's a big difference.

    15. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ignorent! if you read the bible, you would know thas why some manamals din't survive, because they wasn't touched by the hand of god and thas why the ark could be built by one single man. Plus, it is a scitific fact that the arch was found and god bless hot grits down my pants!

    16. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Dark+Demon · · Score: 1

      Old school Thieves World?

    17. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Sorry, but I have to disagree with you there.
      The plot rambles, the protagonist is completely unlikable, the writing style is dull and repetitive, and it really bogs down in the final chapters.


      Yes. To much pontification and bloviating, not enough action, and that whole sad ending turned deus-ex-machina through resurrection. Ridiculous.

      The prequel is much better, since it has the classic elements of sex and violence.

    18. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by jdbo · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? The last sections are totally trippy, especially the sword coming outta the protagnists's son's mouth. Freaky!

      Of course, the part where the dragon sweeps the stars from the sky TOTALLY reminded me of "The Hobbit", but I guess ya gotta crib from the best...

    19. Re:This only solves the technical problem. by mibus · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think they copied too much from The Matrix...

  10. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

    you know what is also tasty? Open office with 11.5pt helvetica. hmmmm....that makes for some delicious food. And if i were you i would stay away from anything notepad font size 14 -- i think they are too salty or something.

  11. Slashdot... by zepmaid · · Score: 1, Funny

    best fiction ever!!!

  12. Reminds me of some forum fun we had when bored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Each new post describing a choice. How geeky...

    You come up to the entrance to a crumbling dungeon, where the fabled ruby of souls resides. Rummaging around in your pockets, you fish out your trusty dagger. Well...dagger..ish. Ok, it's a butter knife. hopefully you can find something better. Looking up at the cavernesque mouth of the dungeon, a chill runs down your spine, and a small spider crawls up your leg. Ick! you quickly swat it, then ponder the situation at hand. a set of vines snakes all over the sides of the tower that overlooks the dungeon courtyard. you could probably get a good view from there. then again, it looks reaaaaaly high up, and you've been known to get dizzy on a stepladder. maybe it's best to just not know what's ahead...

    Will you:
    A: try to climb up to the tower?
    B: press on into the dungeon?
    C: Go home and have tea?

    B: press on into the dungeon.

    Being scared of heights, you choose to press on into the dank dungeon, smelling the foul nastiness that is this thing. You find a copper sword on the ground, bending it as you smash it dirt wall of the dungeon. "Eh, my knife is better than this piece of pooh." You open a nearby door, and watch a dog eating some gecko thing on the floor. You hear a message echoing throughout the dungeon: "Dog has killed a gecko." Upon approaching the dog, you notice some writing on the ground.

    "I$ #ou c$n r!@ t#i@ &u% m$*t be sm@r$."

    Do you:
    A: north [enter]
    B: write with knife [enter]
    C: /me ill-it-errr-it [enter]

    A: Enter the area

    You suddenly realize that you are in the middle of a NetHack game, and that the little dog is at least 5 times stronger than you. Frantically searching your pockets, you find something squishy. Aha! tripe, your favorite midnight snack. with a mighty heave, you lob the ball of smelly meat at the dog, which greedily devours it, then looks at you lovingly. Aww, how sweet, you made a friend. Now that you have a chance to search the room, which reveals a well-hidden, and very sturdy looking door.

    Will you:
    A: Open the door carefully?
    B: Kick the door down?
    C: Kick the dog?

    C: Kick the dog

    With a mighty hoof you poot the dog in the side of it's belly. For a moment it does nothing, before letting out a strange welp noise, then making a bolt for the door. It smashes it down, whining as it goes. You look on through the now defunct doorway to see a band of Half-Clay Superorc beyond, flattened by your pooch's charge. In the distance you can hear the mutt whining, surely far into the dungeon and out of audible reach. Walking into the corridor, you notice three exits. Which will you take?

    A: North
    B: South
    C: Dennis

    etc...

    1. Re:Reminds me of some forum fun we had when bored by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      This deserves a blessed +5 funny moderation! Unfortunately I don't currently have a potion of moderation, so I just write this post in the dust on the slashdot ground with my uncursed +0 keyboard. I just hope that by doing so I don't trigger an offtopic trap ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  13. The word "fiction" by Kerhop · · Score: 1

    The word "fiction" was used only five times in that article summary... in contrast to another word that was used some 21 times recently.

  14. Web-based variants? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there good (read: don't require staff training and major new paradigm acceptance) collaborative document editing tools for teams working on the web?

    I like the aparent user/access management features (invites, etc.) in SubEtha, as well as the ability to visually tie changes to who made them.

    Cheers,

    1. Re:Web-based variants? by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      Yes, try the software behind story5000.org, dubbed the collabotron. I hear tell there is going to be a free software version released within a few weeks. You can see examples:

      A simple collaboration
      A reconfigured area

      The software has enough hooks to be rebuilt into anything - I am working on an ABC-tune converter at abc.story5000.org right now both as a convenience to me and mine (the fiddle community) and as a favor to the programmer to help suss out bugs.

  15. patch/merge/cvs? by IceFox · · Score: 1

    As an open source developer I colaberate with many other developers on text files using ... cvs. The nicest part being that I have full revision and can back out and we all don't have to be awake at the same time. And when we are all awake together we have been known to use irc for that instant communication. Anyway, nice to see a tool try to put all these ideas into one. -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  16. WTF? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny
    Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools?


    My internal English parser barfed on this sentence. WTF is the parent talking about???
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:WTF? by BaseLineNL · · Score: 1

      Internal English parser? Do you also have external ones?

    2. Re:WTF? by frankie · · Score: 0

      Imagine the movie Adaptation set in a San Francisco bath house instead of a New York apartment. That's collaborative metafiction. Then imagine the same thing happening on the internet. That's collaborative metafiction on SubEthaEdit.

      Any questions?

    3. Re:WTF? by game+kid · · Score: 1
      My internal English parser barfed on this sentence.

      So has mine, and certainly everyone's. I like the collaborative fiction idea...but did they use it for each sentence in the post?

      WTF is the parent talking about???

      WTF indeed. Seriously, SubEthaEdit's the kind of stuff that would make me buy OS X actually.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    4. Re:WTF? by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 0

      Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools?

      Translated: Did you know, that you can make up a /. story about collaborative fiction writing using a web browser?

    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My internal English parser barfed on this sentence. WTF is the parent talking about???
      My own internal English parser failed to parse the sentence which your internal English parse failed to parse. Perhaps we need a self-referential internal English parsing tool that is equipped to deal with internally self-referentially parsing English collaborating barfing bdfkdlxxxxxx...
      Segmentation Fault
    6. Re:WTF? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, there are two possible interpretations:

      1. He asks if you did know that it is possible to write fiction about the subject of using collaborative fiction writing tools to write collaborative fiction.

      2. He asks if you did know that it is possible to use collaborative fiction writing tools to write fiction about the subject of collaborative fiction writing.

      No surprise that your internal English parser reported an ambiguity error.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously the article submitter is talking about a collaboratively-written ficticious story concerning people who write collaborative fiction. Sort of a meta-collaborative-fiction-story, if you will. Collaborative collaborative collaborative. Are you tired of the word collaborative yet? I know I collaborative am. I'm getting collaborative tired of typing collaborative the word collaborative collaborative.

    8. Re:WTF? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I just recognized that there's also a third interpretation:

      3. He asks if you have used colaborative fiction writing tools in order to know that it is possible to write fiction about the subject of collaborative fiction writing.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:WTF? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      If you use the phrase "internal English parser", there's good good chance yours needs to be worked on ;-)

    10. Re:WTF? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the sentence "I want to put hyphens between Fish and And and And and Chips on my Fish-And-Chips sign" have been clearer if quotation marks had been used between Fish and and and and and And and And and and and and and And and And and and and and and Chips as well as after Chips?

      p

    11. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a question. Why do people like you think that "metaizing" things is somehow intellectual or good? It's tiring.

    12. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know you can write fiction about collaborative fiction writing using collaborative fiction writing tools?



      My internal English parser barfed on this sentence. WTF is the parent talking about???


      Tools tools tools write write write.
      Capice?
    13. Re:WTF? by albamuth · · Score: 1
      Can you read LISP?

      (? (Did_you_know (you_can (write (fiction (about (collaborative fiction)) using (tools (collaborative (fiction writing)))))))

      Wow, I haven't used that syntax since 1993...

      --
      [pink beam of light]
    14. Re:WTF? by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Mine worked fine. You should try upgrading (downgrading?) to Slashdot English 0.0.1-alpha-pre.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  17. alternatives by FuzzieNorn · · Score: 1

    moonedit is what I've been using instead of subethaedit when I've wanted to do collaborative editing with those poor souls who have Macs. It's closed-source, Windows/Linux x86 only, is a terrible editor, the UI is horrible and it's generally a pain to use in comparison to subetha which Just Works, but it's a lot better than nothing.

    I assume another possible alternative is to try using the crazy emacs mode where it can connect to multiple displays.

    1. Re:alternatives by FuzzieNorn · · Score: 1

      Those poor souls who don't have Macs, even.

      Googling for the emacs stuff produces lots of links to the emacs documentation for it, such as this, if anyone is interested.

    2. Re:alternatives by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      I clicked on that link. Saw a source comment with 'Ken S.' on it.

      Sure enough, Ken Silverman (of Duke3D/Build fame) wrote it.

    3. Re:alternatives by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's closed-source, Windows/Linux x86 only, is a terrible editor, the UI is horrible and it's generally a pain to use in comparison to subetha which Just Works, but it's a lot better than nothing.

      That doesn't add up to me. If it doesn't run on a Mac, is a bad program with a bad user interface and is a pain to use ...how is it better than nothing? If the tool gets in the way, aren't you better off ditching the tool?

    4. Re:alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how is it better than nothing? If the tool gets in the way, aren't you better off ditching the tool?
      Closing your eyes and sticking your fingers in your ears doesn't make work go away. You often need to use something, even if it isn't perfect.
    5. Re:alternatives by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      But if the tool is actually a hinderance, isn't it better to abandon it? I'm not saying that you should avoid doing the task. I'm saying that it sounds like your choice of tools is ...well, kinda dumb. At least from the description given.

    6. Re:alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't say it was a hinderance--he said it wasn't very good. I would most like to have a shovel to dig a hole. If given only a spoon, I would prefer it over my own fingernails.

    7. Re:alternatives by danila · · Score: 1

      He just exaggerated or you misunderstood. Moonedit is indeed closed source, Windows/Linux/BSD x86 only, that part is true. It's not a terrible editor - it has everything Notepad, which is generally enough. The UI is not horrible, it's just not standard Windows UI (so it's as good/bad as any non-native app). As for being a pain to use, I don't think so. There might be many deficiencies that annoy people (it doesn't seem to have Cyrillic support, which sux), but if you can use Notepad comfortably, you can collaboratively write using MoonEdit.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    8. Re:alternatives by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      emacs: is there anything it can't do?

    9. Re:alternatives by purple_cobra · · Score: 1

      If the tool gets in the way, aren't you better off ditching the tool?
      Ballmer had better shape-up then, eh?

  18. the best fiction i have ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    is from this website

  19. what about wiki? by dns_server · · Score: 2, Insightful

    isn't wiki designed for this collaberation? unlike sub ertha edit, it is not fixed to an operating system, just a web browser, allowing everyone to participate.

    1. Re:what about wiki? by revscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      While Wiki is designed for collaboration, it doesn't allow simulatenous changes that are immediately visible to all collaborators. If you and I were working on a document in SubEthaEdit you would see any changes I make as I make them, and I yours.

      All that and syntax highlighting, too. It's basically the difference between a text editor you run yourself vs. typing a message into Slashdot.

    2. Re:what about wiki? by waveclaw · · Score: 1

      If you and I were working on a document in SubEthaEdit you would see any changes I make as I make them, and I yours.

      So, are you saying that basically it's multiplayer notepad?

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  20. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by Xpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lightweights! Real men use vi with LaTeX to write their lasagna recipes. Donald Knuth would be so proud.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  21. IT JUST WORKS™ by jdwest · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a whim, I installed SubEthaEdit for a recent collaborative project for use on a P'book and a friend's iBook. Both of us were editing (wirelessly) the same document within five minutes -- w/o reading a line from TFM . Nothing scientific to back it up, but we agreed that it saved us a good amount of total project time (and it completely changed our workflow on all projects from that time forward).

    --

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  22. Doh, clipped off the 2nd half of post by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

    I somehow selected and deleted this:

    Everything I can set up with the site is done through a web page admin panel; I don't have ssh or ftp access to the server at all. Without going into programming there's a ton of tweaking that can be done, but there are hooks into events in the system to do things at different points, which is how I'm able to grab the post-comments hook and use it to process the ABC tunes into grahpics instead of just going in as a regular comment.

  23. Does anyone know of a similar art program? by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

    It's hard to find a well designed collaborative chat program.

    OpenCanvas was completely changed in later versions. The early betas that can network are riddled with bugs, particularly in multiple monitor support. The later versions don't network.

    Paintchat is built around a message board concept, which isn't my cup of tea for the same reason I prefer an IM program to a Java chat applet badly translated from Japanese.

    Unfortunately, the IM program drawing functions are primitive at best. MSN's whiteboard is pathetic and Yahoo's shared drawing is fun, but has a tiny canvas and a limited UI.

    Finally, googling for programs involves wading through the enormous amounts of information on OpenCanvas, Paintchat, and "collaborative art education initiatives" at elementary schools. I've been looking for months, and it seems like word of mouth is the way to go.

    So.... any suggestions?

  24. overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF?

  25. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok this made me laugh!

    POTD :')

  26. Re: Sorry - *nix version by groupthink · · Score: 1

    Um, there is a *nix version, its for OS X. How soon we forget OS X is a flavor of BSD.

  27. Lexicon Game . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    But, then, there's always the Lexicon Game or Sample Lexicon Game

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  28. Linux version by Tom · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Damn, no Linux version... :)

    Seriously: Anyone know something similar that's cross-platform? Short of a Wiki, I have no idea.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Linux version by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's time to get a Mac. They're fun! (Most of) your linux software will work on it. :-)

    2. Re:Linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !yob cam fo kcuf

  29. It's a moot point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mac users don't want their writing tainted by non-Mac users. And I agree.

  30. Free Alternative? by existenzmaximum · · Score: 1

    Hi, is there any project trying to bring an alternative to SubEthaEdit on non-mac computers? To be more precise: I am looking for a similar thing I can use on Linux and Windows.. Any Ideas?

  31. There is a macosx version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no _any_ *nix version. And macosx is mach, with bsd compatibility, IIRC.

    Yeah, i know, i am feeding the troll (as AC anyway).

    1. Re:There is a macosx version by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      No, you're feeding a pedant, which is entirely different - because OS X *is* UNIX in every sense, while Linux still is (officially) not.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  32. Re:what about wiki? Not live, concurrent editing by DaRat · · Score: 1

    SubEthaEdit allows *everyone* to edit the same file at the same time. So, the editing is live and concurrent: while I'm making my changes, I see you making your changes. Wiki allows everyone to edit the same file, but you can't see what everyone else is typing at the same time.

  33. closest windows answer... by x40sw0n · · Score: 1
    this http://sastools.com/b2/post/79394249/ seems to be the closest answer to a windows version. also notes that it is based on top of IRC protocols (suprise suprise), and is supposed to work on 'nix as well. some kind of java mumbo-jumbo...

    -x40sw0n

  34. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by igny · · Score: 1

    The greatest lasagne recipe I ever wrote was crafted in MS Word 6.0.

    Did you mean conjured?

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  35. The recent blizzard... by GroeFaZ · · Score: 0

    Whats the point of that, Blizzard coming to the East Coast? Why's that an opportunity to stay at home? Because they're setting up new WoW servers?

    [a minute later]

    Oh wait, you mean that kind of blizzard.

    [another 2 minutes later]

    Wait, I get it. We're talking snow, right? That falls from the - how ya call it - "sky", so hard that you can't go outside.

    Right.

    "Outside". *wink*

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  36. Re:Reminds me of the SRAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the Self-Referential Aptitude Test. The answer to this question is (A) A, (B) B, (C) C, (D) D, (E) none of the above.

  37. Schizo-dot by operagost · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    This article:
    The recent blizzard on the East Coast
    The article beneath it:
    The global warming danger threshold for the world is clearly marked for the first time in an international report to be published tomorrow - and the bad news is, the world has nearly reached it already.
    Sure is toasty here is Philly! Maybe my plumbing will unfreeze by April!

    *waits for environmentalist fanboy ad-homs*

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Schizo-dot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *waits for environmentalist fanboy ad-homs*

      Meaning your purposefully trolling? But just in case you're not...

      An average global temperature increase does not literally mean "it should get hotter." The average yearly temperature in Philadelphia is 54.3F, yet I don't see you "waiting for meterologist fanboys" to explain to you why it today it mysteriously is 34 degrees colder than the average.

      Global warming is a fact. Whether or not it is due to human involvement is what is in discussion. The effects of global warming are also in discussion, but more extreme temperatures, both hotter and colder is one postulate.

      Duh.

    2. Re:Schizo-dot by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The thing about global warming is it doesn't result in temperatures being uniformly warmer all year round. If that was all that happened, it might not be such a bad thing.

      No, the problem of global warming is it results in climate disruption, i.e. the weather being a lot more freakish and extreme.

      Then again, you probably know that and are just trying desperately to remain in denial.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  38. Nice writing... by amokk · · Score: 1

    Man, the best fiction I've ever produced is(sic) some of the project plans created using SubEtha

    With grammar like that, it would definitely be a privledge and an honour NOT to read your works.

    --
    I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    1. Re:Nice writing... by Andrevan · · Score: 1

      With spelling like that, it'll be a privledge to not read yours, either.

      --
      "All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss." - Douglas Adams
  39. Re:Encouraging fiction by misrepresenting posts by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    And linking to the article is so effective in discouraging such behavior! I'm sure the Independent has been thoroughly chastized now that they know you dissapprove of their tactics. I shall be sure to post many such criticisms with links to the site also. That will show them!

  40. Interactive Fiction with SubEthaEdit by Feneric · · Score: 1

    SubEthaEdit sports quite a few different editing modes, including for the Inform language for writing interactive fiction.

    Collaborative Interactive Fiction, anyone?

  41. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by BaldGhoti · · Score: 1

    It looks like you're trying to write a recipe. Would you like to:

    * Add garlic?
    * Add salt?
    * Order a wine from gourmet.microsoft.com?

    --
    [insert witty sig here]
  42. Any Windows Options Available... by JMPrice · · Score: 1

    ...for applications like these? Thanks.

  43. Re:Writing OFF -- TOPIC disinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell when the disinformation agents really want to attack someone who is telling the truth -- they start finding creative ways to insert jokes about both the message and the messenger in places where it's completely off-topic. (And they'll often smear the truth-teller by attributing the motive to greed.)

    This is freaking me out. They really want to barry the Global Warming message.

    Global Warming must be even more serious than I had feared.

  44. patch/merge/cvs?-Croquet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the goal of the OpenCroquet project. As usual Alan Kay is ahead of the game.

  45. FOSS pablodraw by free2 · · Score: 1

    the closest free/opensource software i could find with google is pablodraw (for doing ascii art)
    pablodraw

    1. Re:FOSS pablodraw by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

      Pablodraw is hardly in the same league as a text editor. And imho it's not all that great for askee either.

      Lowtolerance
      -=Long live AcidDraw=-

  46. Category: by jafac · · Score: 1

    From the well-known (on the Internet) "too much time on their hands" category. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  47. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by StuWho · · Score: 1

    01010100011010000110010100100000011000100110010101 110011011101000010000001001100 01100001011100110110000101100111011011100110010100 100000011100100110010101100011 01101001011100000110100101100101011100110010000001 100011011000010110111000100000 01101111011011100110110001111001001000000110001001 100101001000000111011101110010 01101001011101000111010001100101011011100010000001 101001011011100010000001100010 0110100101101110011000010111001001111001

    --
    "If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments." Earl Wilson
  48. We've been doing it for years at my school by bigBlackSabbath · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We started using Subethaedit years ago, starting when it it was originally called Hydra. I work in a high school, and we have carts full of iBooks which we bring to classes. I started using Hydra when it first came out, and suggested to the teacher of our Creative Writing class that it may be useful in his class. We've been using it ever since.

    We started using it to work on playwriitng. One child does one person's dialog, another takes another character's dialog, while another will do descriptions, and another will edit and correct.

    What makes it work is rendezvous. The kids don't need to know ip addresses or hostnames - only usernames. We can setup several groups at once without making it into a major project.

    Aside from the obvious benefits, it creates a transparent opportunity for the kids learn about group dynamics and working together in a way not many classroom activities do. Because the program works so simply, the kids focus on the work without thinking about the process of making it work together. There are other ways of accomplishing this, but nothing that's anywhere as simple as Subethaedit. I'm glad to see people are starting to see the usefulness of this approach. I'm amazed it's taken so long.

    1. Re:We've been doing it for years at my school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      set up!
      set up!
      set up!

  49. I auto-generated them by fbform · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but I generate my lasagna recipes from sauce files. The output is something like this:

    Layer6 Shredded mozzarella + shredded parmesan
    Pasta6
    Layer5 Tomato-mushroom sauce + sliced parmesan
    Pasta5
    Layer4 Peanut-coconut sauce
    Pasta4
    Layer3 Spinach + shredded parmesan
    Pasta3
    Layer2 Peanut-coconut sauce
    Pasta2
    Layer1 Tomato-mushroom sauce + sliced parmesan
    Pasta1
    Layer0 Cooking spray

    The individual sauce recipes are stored in other text files with filename format sau.000, sau.001 etc, with an index file listing what number is what sauce (ordered both by number and by name of sauce). The lasagna recipes were combinatorially generated from the available sauces and bzipped. I currently don't use more than four sauces in my lasagna, and the total number of sauces I have is also fairly low. I may expand both in future if I need to, and re-generate the lasagna recipes.

    In general, this is a pretty clean method to use when you have a wide choice of ingredients all undergoing the same process. Pasta sauces are suitable, as are pancake batters, bread doughs and omelette fillings.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  50. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    Real real men use emacs + AUCTeX along with LaTeX:-)

    I'm not actually joking--I've written a very nice cookbook attractively typeset with LaTeX. It's a wonderful tool. While far from perfect, it is still better than anything else out there, and has an excellent community built up around itself.

  51. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cooking is all about presentation.. and if you cared at all, you would have used Helvetica 11!

  52. MoonEdit by misuba · · Score: 1

    I recently found a cross-platform (Win, Mac and Linux) editor called MoonEdit which seems to do SEE's live-collaboration thing okay, although I don't think it uses Zeroconf to do so. I wouldn't recommend it as a code editor, as it has a number of interface conventions that... well... let's just say that the thing feels aptly named. But for joint note-taking or the kind of fiction described here, I bet it'd work fine.

    --

    If you don't pretend to be anyone, are you?

  53. All my ideas taken... by beermonster1984 · · Score: 1

    Well I went to the trouble of registering wiction.org and wiction.com for a new collaborative fiction website. But then I realized wow I'm not the first! Anyways I'm sure this hapans with anybody.

    Offtopic slightly: Could someone tell me the best tools for this type of job? What about a standard wiki (twiki)? I've never tried to set one up and I'm actually looking for a partner to help with the coding portion of the site in exchange for free hosting etc.


    beermonster1984@gmail.com

  54. Revision-controlling editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for the first editor with integrated revision control.

    How often do you find yourself writing something (a letter or a story, i.e. prose, not code) and you come up with alternate phrasings? It's not immediately clear which wording is preferable, and you'd like to keep track of both possibilities, without keeping them both displayed simultaneously.

    For example, instead of having my email draft say:
    "Look, moron/asshole, that's not your prerogative."
    It would say:
    "Look, moron, that's not your prerogative."
    Then, when you click on moron, a little drop-down window would appear with potential alternatives.

    Until this feature is available, the old, tried-and-tested tools will still be superior: Pen and paper.

  55. Real-time revert wars? by Hal+XP · · Score: 1

    If you and I were working on a document in SubEthaEdit you could revert any changes I make as I make them, and I yours.

    --
    I'm a sci-fi vegan: I don't want the aliens to think we have as much right to live as the fried chickens we eat.
  56. Re:Ummmm, Okay. I'm Following Along, I Think... by jthayden · · Score: 1

    Man I love lasagna, send me the receipe.

    Show me your's and I'll show you mine.

  57. Wal-Mart Offers $498 Linux Notebook by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Wal-Mart Offers $498 Linux Notebook by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 1

      There are three problems with that idea.

      One: It's Wal-Mart.

      Two: It's Linux.

      Three: It's $498. Considering items one and two, that's highway fucking robbery.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart Offers $498 Linux Notebook by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      There are three problems with that idea.

      One: It's another proprietary crap-pile from Apple.

      Two: You're forced to pay for MacOS X, when you'd rather just put your own Linux distro in for Free.

      Three: It's $499. Considering items one and two, that's highway fucking robbery for vendor lock-in.

      = 9J =

  58. TextMate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mac editor to watch though is this one.

    It's not free, but it's cheap; and it has great features I haven't seen in other Mac editors before.

  59. FOSS nte is the ancestor ! by free2 · · Score: 1

    I finally found that the free/open nte is clearly the ancestor of those programs !
    It's in Debian sarge/sid too.

  60. TextMate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am looking for an alernative

    Me to, until I found textmate. Though it's not free.