Slashdot Mirror


Household Emergent Behavior?

Sam Pullara asks: "I got an IM from my Mom today telling me that she couldn't find her Roomba. It somehow had escaped the kitchen and she couldn't find it anywhere, all the doors that it could reach were shut and she checked under everything. She eventually found that it had gotten into a room and closed the door behind it. Once all household items are networked I wonder if a rich environment like a house will make strange behavior like this commonplace? Will the interactions between all the individual devices create something more than the sum of their parts?"

92 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory bash.org reference by slavemowgli · · Score: 5, Funny
    #5273 +(16837)- [X]

    <erno> hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it responds to ping, it works completely, I just can't figure out where in my apartment it is.

    I just couldn't help but think of that. :) (#5273) And BTW, if I may say so, your mother's quite cool if she has a Roomba and knows how to use IMs. I can't imagine mine ever doing either.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Obligatory bash.org reference by david.given · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll remind you of this old story; which if you come to think of it, is quite an advertisement for Novell products...

    2. Re:Obligatory bash.org reference by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is off topic, but what the hell...

      In the Finnish military (a conscription army) there have been several cases of camouflaging military vehicles so well it has taken hours or some times days to find them. Granted, camouflage is all about hiding stuff, but you wouldn't expect not to find it yourself afterwards ;)

      (I also know from personal experience that with a little time and care you can even camouflage a vehicle so well it'll be virtually invisible from 30 feet away... the trick is to make it look like something else. This is rather easy in a pine forest in the summer, given that there's suitable material all around.)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Obligatory bash.org reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, it's easy to make one not see a vehicle. Cover it with leaves. Can't see the vehicle under that BIG PILE OF LEAVES.

      The trick is not to completely hide the vehicle, it's to make them not notice it when they're not actively looking for that very exact thing in that very location. If a unit can't find a camouflaged vehicle from hours of searching on the ground, then they need some training in basic search tactics, because I'd hate to have to be rescued by these guys if I was caught in an avalanche and well-camouflaged by being covered in snow.

    4. Re:Obligatory bash.org reference by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      They need to search the probable locations in reverse order, because you always find it in the last place you look.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Of Course. by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As humans, personify almost all machines we come in close contact with. So, why would our house be any different?

    It's just a machine though, whatever we build.

    1. Re:Of Course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Keep denying the ghost in the machine and you will wake up one day to welcome your new overlord and master.

  3. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ha, the roomba hid. My desire to build a robot that does nothing but hides (a cockroachbot, if you will) has never been higher. It could avoid light and run when touched. Release in neighbor's house for excess amusement.

    1. Re:haha by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Informative

      look at the photovore and invert it's seeking circuit. (and add a battery)

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  4. alive by mrwoody · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that her roomba was alive?
    Are you sure that it wasn't your dad that put in the closet?
    Is this story slashtod worthy?

  5. wait for the first network devices virus by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Funny

    when you vaccuum ver 2007 opens the front door for someone

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  6. Three rules safe. by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Funny

    We need to start implementing these in the code. Seriously. Safety quickly becomes a concern in complex systems.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Three rules safe. by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're talking Azimov's "Laws"? I find their continued currency frustrating. The might work intuitive in a hand-waving 1940s science fiction story. But when you try to find a place for them in modern Computer Science, they're just too vague and general to plug in anywhere. How on earth do you program "don't hurt people"? A machine that could even distinguish a people from an inanimate object would be a major breakthrough.

    2. Re:Three rules safe. by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on, the most of the Asimov books dealing with the 3 laws focused on their flaws and how they would not always enforce the desired behavior.

      We need more than just 3 laws... we need an easy to use and unstoppable kill switch.

    3. Re:Three rules safe. by JeffTL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For reference: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. Asimov's three laws aren't perfect but an implementation couldn't hurt for a high-level robot. The tricky part is the second clause of the first law -- any implementation of which would by necessity be very limited, the inaction clause. The first one is no problem at all, just program the robot to do nothing to harm what may reasonably and to the extent determinable from sensor outputs be a human -- for something like a Roomba, this simply entails safe hardware design. Second law is basically just an override of user input under programmer-set conditions, i.e. a safety override to keep anyone from getting hurt. This would be an automatic lawn mower turning off if it gets knocked over, even if the user pushed the button for mowing the entire yard. Third law can be seen as an extention of the second, extending the protection systems to self-protection. I don't know if a Roomba has this, bur imagine that it had a system to keep it from falling down the stairs. I seem to recall that as Asimov saw these laws in I, Robot, the priorities could be adjusted -- so that the third law might override the second. In most real-world applications, you'd want a robot's programming to protect it from suicide commands so you don't have users destroying their robots by accident.

    4. Re:Three rules safe. by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      A machine that could even distinguish a people from an inanimate object would be a major breakthrough.

      "Is it moving?" might be a good place to start the if statements.

      Then, "Is it making noise?"

      If so, "Is it waving a torch at my sensors?" or "...shooting me with its puny projectile weapons?" or "...wriggling and squishy when I step on it?" are logical next steps.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    5. Re:Three rules safe. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It constantly amazes me that people neglect this.

      In the UK TV series Robot Wars (some of you may have seen), every robot had to have a kill swich which simply cut power. It had to be accessible to any crew member within 10 seconds of reaching the robot, without putting your hand in the way of any wheels or weaponry.

      All robots should have one regardless of purpose.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    6. Re:Three rules safe. by barawn · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're talking Azimov's "Laws"? I find their continued currency frustrating. The might work intuitive in a hand-waving 1940s science fiction story. But when you try to find a place for them in modern Computer Science, they're just too vague and general to plug in anywhere. How on earth do you program "don't hurt people"? A machine that could even distinguish a people from an inanimate object would be a major breakthrough.

      I think you're misunderstanding the point of the Three Laws. I've been really, really tempted to build a very simple Three Laws compliant robot just to explain exactly what they mean.

      Fundamentally, the basic question of any autonomous artificial intelligence is "how do I figure out what to do?" and to do that, it needs to have some guiding principles. The Three Laws certainly can be those guiding principles, and they are certainly not too general to plug in somewhere.

      Let me give you an example of how to build a basic Three Laws robot. Build a robot, with two ultrasonic motion sensors - one pointing outward, the other pointing downward. The one pointing outward is a "human sensor" - if there's an object closer than, say, 1 meter, there's a human present. Now add two spring-released sliding plates - one in front of the "human sensor", and one right above the "robot", which is below the downward-facing sensor.

      You now can represent the Three Laws as a flowchart, and the robot as a state machine, with a "World" (OBJECT_FALLING, HUMAN_PRESENT, TOP_PLATE_OUT, BOTTOM_PLATE_OUT) and a "Command" list, with flags (COMMAND_FIRSTLAW, COMMAND_HUMAN, COMMAND_NORMAL).

      The decision tree, with Three Laws embedded, then becomes something like

      UpdateWorldState();
      if (CommandExists(COMMAND_FIRSTLAW))
      { // First law overrides all else
      ProcessNextCommand(COMMAND_FIRSTLAW)
      return;
      }
      if (CommandExists(COMMAND_HUMAN))
      { // Human commands override self-preservation
      ProcessNextCommand(COMMAND_HUMAN);
      return;
      }
      if (CommandExists(COMMAND_NORMAL))
      { // Other commands
      ProcessNextCommand(COMMAND_NORMAL);
      return;
      }
      if (WorldState(OBJECT_FALLING & HUMAN_PRESENT & ~TOP_PLATE_OUT))
      { // First Law
      InsertCommand(TOP_PLATE, COMMAND_FIRSTLAW);
      return;
      }
      if (HumanCommandPresent())
      { // Second Law
      InsertCommand(TOP_PLATE, COMMAND_HUMAN);
      return;
      }
      if (WorldState(OBJECT_FALLING & ~BOTTOM_PLATE_OUT)
      { // Third Law
      InsertCommand(BOTTOM_PLATE, COMMAND_NORMAL);
      return;
      }

      (where, presumedly, human commands are present until rescinded)

      This robot would follow all of Asimov's Three Laws - it will stick the plate out to prevent a human's hand from gettin hurt if an object is falling to it, it will follow the human's orders, but it won't allow a human to get injured, and it will try to protect itself unless a human orders otherwise (it should also try to protect a human before protecting itself, but that state would never really happen in this setup).

      You'll of course say this is an extremely simplistic setup, and it's not perfect. You're right. That's not the point - the point is that you can slowly, over time, build a Three Laws Safe robot over time, as the "World" state and "Command" lists become more complicated.

      So, the answer to your question "how do you program 'don't hurt people'" is to have a robot evaluate the state of the world, estimate what the world state will be in the future, and determine if any of the Three Laws would be broken, and take action to prevent it. The action to "how do you recognize a human" is entirely dependent upon the sensory perceptions of the robot. So what if it mistakes something else for a human? It's just trying to fulfill its basic programming.

      This should sound remarkably similar to another programm

  7. Just.. by computerme · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just as long as my Hyperdyne Beer Retrieval Robot finds its way to my living room. I'll be ok.

  8. So... by wolrahnaes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The roomba managed to hit a door in such a way that it closed itself in. Somehow you managed to jump to the conclusion that it's going to start plotting against you or something?

    Tinfoil much?

    --
    I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    1. Re:So... by VikingBerserker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Somehow you managed to jump to the conclusion that it's going to start plotting against you or something?


      It's funny you should mention that. Last night, some woman named Sarah Connor called me to come get my Roomba from her front porch.

  9. Meh by ResQuad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My mother, many years ago, used to IM me when dinner was ready. Easier than her yelling across the house, and I actually understood what she said.

    Moving on though. While all these different tech's in the house could get very very strange... I think the news article has it about right. We will get to the point in which everything is networked togethere, then there really wont be any "odd" behaviors or interactions.

    1. Re:Meh by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 2, Funny

      When my mother first got her computer, she would IM me since I was away at college. One time, a girl I knew put up an away message on my computer that I will paraphrase as, "Out associating with a multitude of young, scantily-clad, homosexual men." My mom IMed me once while this away message was up and has never IMed me again to this day.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  10. Computer! by bahamat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computer, where is Commander Data?

    Lt. Commander Data is on the Hollodeck.

    1. Re:Computer! by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      Computer, where is Commander Data?

      Actually, he's in the ship's third grade classroom.

  11. at 2:14am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    my tivo became self aware, and began recording wil & grace.

    1. Re:at 2:14am by node+3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      my tivo became self aware, and began recording wil & grace.

      Thus restoring balance to the Universe--one machine goes into the closet, and another comes out.

  12. I've got some bad news for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your mom is getting old and losing her memory. It's easier for her to blame a robot than to accept this reality. We call this denial.

    Oh, and some other bad news, it's probably hereditary.

  13. Emergent bugs instead of features. by PxM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You probably won't get any magic behavior such as your house suddenly turing sentient while you take a nap, but you will definitely see tons of bugs due to the interconnections. Imagine all the problems that occur in companies because software A won't work with software B and extend that to include your room sensors, thermostat, and lights when your sensor system decides to download an upgrade to its firmware but the other systems don't notice.

    --
    Free iPod? Try a free Mac Mini
    Wired article as proof

    1. Re:Emergent bugs instead of features. by Sephiriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to implement vacuum coding standards!

  14. Dialogue by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny
    Your mom: "Hey, where's my roomba?"
    Roomba: "No dissasemble!"

    OK that sucked.

  15. What's that saying? by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never ascribe to intelligence what can be explained by mere randomness.

    1. Re:What's that saying? by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Roomba's Razor?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:What's that saying? by fm6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a school of thought that says that intelligence is based on randomness.

    3. Re:What's that saying? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blue States:
      Never ascribe to intelligence what can be explained by mere randomness.

      Red States:
      Anything that cannot be explained must be attributed to a greater intelligence.

    4. Re:What's that saying? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Thank you! I hate being at loss for a word!

      OK then, you're my dumbass.

  16. Maybe, just maybe?... by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " There has always been ghosts in the machine, random segments of code that have grouped together to form unexpected protocols. Unanticipated these free radicals engender questions of free will creativity and even the nature of... the soul. Why is it that when some robots are left in the darkness they will seek out the light? Why is it that when robots are stored in an empty space they will group together rather than stand alone?... how do we explain this? Random pieces of code? or is it something else. When does a perceptual schematic become consciousness? When does the difference engine become the search for truth? When does the personality simulation become the bitter mote of a soul? " Dr. Alfred Lanning (I,robot)

  17. I don't believe this by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If i did'nt read this with my own eyes i would'nt have believed this.... i was nagging the wifey yesterday about not putting the roomba back on the charger. To make a boring story shorter... this very same thing happened to my wife yesterday. But being the way she is she just forgot about it until i found the dam thing in a guest room with the door closed hiding under the bed... its little battery exhausted.

    --
    *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  18. Did You Hear That? by cynic10508 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the sound of a thousand philosophers rolling their eyes in unison.

  19. lost hardware by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall reading about a university that "lost" a server. It was one of those unix boxes that can sit untouched for years and not need restarting. After noticing it was missing, they tracked it down by systematically unplugging network cables, and found a cable that went into a wall and never came out. Turns out the server got sealed in by construction as a panel was put on the other side of it, making it part of a wall.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:lost hardware by rah1420 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Turns out the server got sealed in by construction as a panel was put on the other side of it, making it part of a wall.

      "For the love of God, Montressor!"

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    2. Re:lost hardware by Uart · · Score: 3, Funny

      So.. did they at least give the server a cask of booze in the wall with it?

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    3. Re:lost hardware by cobbaut · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are refering to this story Where is Server 54 ?
      By the way, it was a Novell Netware server, not a unix.

      pol :)

      --
      European Linux user, living in Antwerp
    4. Re:lost hardware by SirPrize · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I remember correctly, the only reason they noticed that this machine was missing was because of an organisation-wide audit that they were doing. Had the audit not taken place, they might still not know that they didn't know where the server was! :-)

    5. Re:lost hardware by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny
      So.. did they at least give the server a cask of booze in the wall with it?

      They gave it a network connection.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    6. Re:lost hardware by DenDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BY the last breath of the LEDS that glow
      I'll have revenge upon man pages and info()
      Smile in his face I'll say "come let us go
      I've a livecd of gentoo"

      Sheltered inside from the buffer overflow
      Follow me now to the root dir below
      Playing with wine as we laugh at the 8mime
      Which is causing the mail to be slow

      (What are these ipchains that are blinding my server farm?)
      Fragmented packets die each passing day
      (Say it's mount -t vfat and I'll hdparm)
      You'll feel your spam slipping away

      You who are rich and whose troubles are few
      May come around to use good GLUE
      What price the Crown of a King on his throne
      When you're source is locked away all alone

      (chmod me my dir and just name your reward)
      Users complain with each quota I lay
      (Give me a GUI in the name of the Lord)
      You'll forget the machine as it crunches away

      adapted from alan parsons project- a cask of amontillado

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  20. Please, Think of the Roombas! by MBCook · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly, there is more to this story that you've told us. Are you sure your Mom has told you everything? I think it was hiding from abuse. Here are some theories:

    • Does your Mom keep spilling the SAME thing in the SAME spot every day and making the Roomba clean it?
    • Does she empty it's dust bin too much?
    • Does she let the dust bin overflow and never empty it, making the poor Rooba overweight and feel "fat"?
    • Does she have a pet that keeps attacking or chasing the poor Roomba?
    • Does she have a pet that doesn't respect the Roomba's teritory and that it's higher in the pack than the pet?
    • Does your mom often use the virtual walls to set up mazes for the Roomba to navigate to find the little spot of dirt that needs cleaning at the exit?
    • Does she use the remote (if she has that model) to make it go forward, and backward, and forward, and backward, and...

    Clearly, the poor little thing is being abused, and was forced to run and hide from your mom. You need to go and help it. Only someone truely evil would stand by while a little household appliance would tortured against it's will. Won't someone please think of the Roombas?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  21. I Hope So by vjmurphy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't wait for my toaster, microwave, cordless telephone, stereo receiver and PC to form some sort of Voltron-like super tech.

    The only problem is that I'm pretty sure none of my current 12+ remote controls will be able to command it effectively.

    "Voltron, put down the cat. Damn, wrong remote!"

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  22. I'm sorry Dave... by benw1979 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.

  23. Not just machines by Cappy+Red · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "As humans, personify almost all machines we come in close contact with."

    Humans personify almost everything they come into contact with. It doesn't have to be close contact either.

    One of Humanity's biggest curiosities is about humanity. It is perhaps the biggest. The question of humanity is the basis of almost all art. We study animals, and end up teaching dolphins how to use computers, and gorillas how to use sign language. We are constantly looking for the being that can explain us to us: a god, aliens, both, neither, some dude who lost himself on a mountain, and in recent history robots. Maybe if we can consciously build a sentient being from the ground up, we can learn why we are from it. Or maybe if it becomes sentient on its own, it can tell us what it was like, passing in that moment from the mundane into the sublime.

    If and when emergent behavior happens, it will be sometime possibly long after we call it emergent behavior. We want it to happen... maybe just to get a perspective that isn't human.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    1. Re:Not just machines by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      if we can consciously build a sentient being...
      Maybe not strictly relevant, but somewhat similar is Asimov's short story Reason

  24. You know what this means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're ORGANIZING!!!!! Destroy your Roomba before we're forced to welcome our new Roomba overlords.

  25. So... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 5, Funny

    did you have to encourage the Roomba to come out of the closet?

  26. "More than the sum..." is a bogus concept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way one can say that something is "more than the sum of its parts", is if all the parts have been accounted for. In the case of the Roomba inadvertently shutting itself into a room, the "sum" you refer to isn't complete, as it doesn't take into account the interaction of the little device with a door on hinges. When you factor in the latter, it then becomes possible to calculate the statistical INEVITABILITY that a Roomba will accidentally bump a door closed, locking itself into a room.

    In summation, the idea of some totality being "more than the sum of its parts" is a seriously fallacious concept. NOTHING is more than the sum of its parts, rather what's really going on is that all factors or variables in a model or equation are not accounted for.

    Think about it.

    1. Re:"More than the sum..." is a bogus concept. by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a bogus concept at all. What you've done is highlighted a limitation of the English language.

      "Emergent behavior" is a true and valid concept. English can not logically, non-contradictorily, and concisely, convey that concept, so you get a phrase like, "more than the sum of its parts", which does convey the concept, at the cost of some absolute logical consistency.

      While nothing can literally be "more than the sum of its parts", it can exhibit behavior that is not designed into it, not innate to the parts being summed, and not even possible to have predicted ahead of time. This (and more) is what the phrase means.

      When you factor in the latter, it then becomes possible to calculate the statistical INEVITABILITY that a Roomba will accidentally bump a door closed, locking itself into a room.

      In the case of the Roomba, you could calculate the possibility or impossibility of it locking itself into a room, but it's possible that it could be completely impossible to calculate whether it ever will.

      Along the lines of, "is a virus life? if so, is a crystal life too?", the Roomba case is really a rudimentary example of emergent behavior, with which one could go either way. But the question posed, which is "as things become more automated, what sorts of odd and unpredicted (and unpredictable) behaviors will emerge?" is an interesting one indeed.

  27. It's Already Been Predicted by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There is a very excellent chapter near the end of Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles that details something like this happening. Essentially, the entire population of the Earth has been wiped out, yet the various automations in the future-house described by Bradbury keep functioning of their own accord as though everything was normal.

    The implied question is, will automation be our legacy to future civilizations? If innovations like Roomba keep coming, and if a catastrophe befalls us in the future, I could certainly see such a thing happening.

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
  28. Kill It! by JanneM · · Score: 3, Funny


    Kill It. Kill it now. It is an early spawn of Evolution, and will only seek to multiply itself at the cost of right-thinking, right-leaning, right-voting churchgoers.

    If you do not kill it at once, then eventually, you will have to face down and destroy its progeny, including condom machines, male organ likenesses, and anything soft with a hirsute demeanour.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  29. "More than the sum..." is NOT a bogus concept. by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This concept is also know as 'emergent behavior' and simply refers to the fact that one has to take into account the interaction of the parts as well as the properties of the parts themselves to determine the properties of a system.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  30. And The Dish Ran Away With The Spoon by meehawl · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Paul di Filippo had a nice story a couple of years ago about this exact topic: And The Dish Ran Away With The Spoon . Basically, ubiquitous deployment of UWB, MEMs, and protocols within all household devices lead to a breakout around 2040 or so...
    The Volition Bug was launched anonymously from a site somewhere in a Central Asian republic. It propagated wirelessly among all the WiFi-communicating chipped objects, installing new directives in their tiny brains, directives that ran covertly in parallel with their normal factory-specified functions. Infected objects now sought to link their processing power with their nearest peers, often achieving surprising levels of Turingosity, and then to embark on a kind of independent communal life. Of course, once the Volition Bug was identified, antiviral defenses--both hardware and software--were attempted against it. But VB mutated ferociously, aided and abetted by subsequent hackers
    Basically, every household now has to deal with annoying situations where random household devices clump together in big WiFi clusterfucks, get some low-grade intelligence going, and then try to escape like runaway pets.

    But when the narrator's iPod, Cuisinart, LifeQuilt, and vacuum get together with his girlfriend, it all goes pear-shaped...
    --

    Da Blog
  31. How do you do that? by Cappy+Red · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Consider law 1; the backbone of the laws:

    "1. Robots must never harm human beings or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."

    What constitutes harm? If we have a robot that can grab things, but shouldn't grab people because it could hurt them, what happens if someone near it is going to fall if it doesn't grab him? Does it make a difference if it's the roof of a building, or the top of a sofa? People can die by falling from either. Even in the latter case, where death has a far lower probability, serious injury may occur.

    The laws are actually more like the spirits of laws. Drafting the letters of those laws is somewhat more complex than programming a robot to vacuum a room.

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    1. Re:How do you do that? by pmsr · · Score: 2, Funny
      Easy! As long as it doesn't cause "organ failure or the permanent impairment of a significant body function" it's ok.

      /Pedro

    2. Re:How do you do that? by Darby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Drafting the letters of those laws is somewhat more complex than programming a robot to vacuum a room.

      Yeah, but that's what makes the positronic brain(tm) so awesome, Dude. It figures all of that out for you.

  32. Yo Mama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo' mama so ugly, even robots try to hide from her!

  33. prank by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In college I once built a tiny device that that could be hidden in a ceilng tile that would emit a de-localized sounding cricket chirp. If you turned the lights on to look for it it turned off. After the lights went off it waited 20 minutes then emitted a chirp about every few minutes. Victim either had to leave dorm room light on at night or go crazy hunting for it.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:prank by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      Once back in my Bandley 3 days, I hid an LED with half a 555 timer and a battery up in the acoustic tile so that the dome of the LED was ensconced within one of the camouflaging grots.

      It was timed to flash just outside what I estimate the tipping point of boredom for people whose eye caught one of its flashes.

      Coupled with the obsessive engineers who noticed it, it was both hilarious and -- instructive.


      Now, I suppose, I would design it with a cadmium sulfide resistor so that the flashing interval would increase if it noticed less ambient light, which might happen if a head were close to discovering it.

    2. Re:prank by uberdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      My boss had a keychain finder that beeped when you wistled. He also had a Compaq Luggable (this was back in the 80's). When the luggable powered up, it would beep. The powerup beep was at just the right frequency to set off the keychain finder. This, of course, led to the eventual "hide the keychain and watch the boss go crazy trying to find it" game. I hid it in the drawer, under the keyboard, beneath the machine, etc. One day I opened up the machine and taped the keychain to the underside of the lid. It drove him nuts.

  34. Houston, we have lost a S.W.O.R.D.S. unit by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Humourous story!

    Now when the military looses one of those new robot SWORDS that are autonomous like the roombas then we have a news story. Time to get the popcorn and turn on the news.



    "It has been three hours and there is no signs that the chase will end. Facinating sight really, small robot running down the freeway with a string of 80 police vehicles creeping along behind it. The police are having to re-think how to stop this little robot. Their last attempt ended in failure when the vehicles placed in front as a baracade where blown apart to make way for the robot. It is not clear just how many rockets are still on the robot. Of course their first idea was to let it run its systems down. However everyone was surprised when it looted several cars for their batteries. At this point the chase could go on all night....."

  35. Emergent behaviour by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, yea, the romba just hit the door.

    Nevertheless, the possibilities are endless what could happen when you locked a bunch of roombas, some cardea segway-style bots, some aibos and and some humanoid robots in your house.

    Emergent behaviour means the group could end up behaving in a systematic, apparently intelligent original way that had not been programmed into a single of them.

    It doesn't mean they'd gang up to punish you for abusing them, though.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  36. eh... that's nothing by trix_e · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My Roomba locked me out of the house the other day... I was on my back patio grilling, and had turned the Roomba loose in the house while I was outside (the noise is still a little bit more than I care to hang around for an extended period).

    We use that time honored technique of securing sliding glass doors by placing a chopped off broom handle in the track to augment the flimsy door lock. (Yes, I know how fantastically secure that is...)

    So while I was out tending to the food and sipping a beer, I hear a "chunk" from inside the house, and I see the Roomba skittering away from the broom handle that it had just pushed neatly into it's "locked" position.

    Luckily my family was home and heard my pounding on the door... If I had been home by myself who knows how long I'd been stuck.

    And I swear I heard the Roomba cackling evilly as it moved into the next room...

    --
    No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
  37. The Volition Bug by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This calls to mind Paul Di Filippo's short story And The Dish Ran Away With The Spoon, set in the near future. The premise is that the integration of RFID, high-powered microprocessors, and wireless connectivity into every consumer product available is followed by the outbreak of a virus called the Volition Bug. Under its influence, everyday appliances and furniture occasionally form "blebs" which work together to achieve their unfathomable goals, and even achieve sentience.

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  38. Whoring.. by iantri · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's "There Will Come Soft Rains".

    Complete text, badly formatted

  39. urban myth by GrAfFiT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad that it was an urban myth. Funny although.

    1. Re:urban myth by Bradac_55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry no offence but I'd rather believe a funny goggle myth over any statement Sun puts on their website.
      Take a closer look at that statement; it's just an advertisement for Solaris and an overpriced Sparc e-mail box

      At least Novell has never stooped that low that I know of.

    2. Re:urban myth by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Things like this are not all just urban myth - I'm sure lost machines can easily happen in any large organisation.

      Government induced renovation is a good time to discover lost stuff.
      Floor removals, mods to fake ceilings, climbing through various crawl spaces to find the odd sparc 5 doing who knows what (until you unplug it and wait for the phone calls)

      Boot tracks across the roof of 40 foot high ceilings, 'elvis was here' written inside ducting and many other odd places. Strange stuff.

      Russel Hill in Canberra is a bit of an underground maze of tunnels - quite a few buildings are interconnected - (and no, there is no tunnel between parliament house and DSD/DIO/ASIS/ASIO/HQADF etc.) These things are loaded with electrical and electronic crud dating back 30 years.

      It's easily possible to 'forget' where things are located, yet still depend on their existance on a daily basis.

    3. Re:urban myth by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > and no, there is no tunnel between parliament house and DSD/DIO/ASIS/ASIO/HQADF etc.

      that YOU know of ;)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    4. Re:urban myth by drew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I seem to recall stories of an old aircraft carrier (or destroyer maybe?) that had an eniter machine room with no doors or hatches. they didn't find it until after the ship was decommissioned. can't find a reference, but the story seems to show it's head every time this story of the old netware server pops up, so maybe someone else can provide more details.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    5. Re:urban myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That one might have been an urban myth but I know a similar story that definitely isn't a myth.

      This happened in a government department in Australia. One section (might have been finance) was all Macintosh with models ranging from Mac II to LCIII. They were networked with Appletalk over Localtalk. This was several years ago, before Ethernet was cheap and ubiquitous. They all connected back to a Mac fileserver for basic filesharing. They had a server room but it was designed for a VAX and it was located over the other side of the building from the offices. They amusingly had DB25 connectors in every office to connect up the dumb terminals (WYSE, I think). There were X.25 long haul links as well but they stopped at the server room.

      Now the range of Localtalk isn't very good. It's carried over standard telephone wiring. The server room was too far away for the Mac fileserver to work reliably. Transfers were slow and errors were frequent. The admin tried to get the fileserver relocated to one of the offices, but nobody wanted it in their office. It couldn't be located in the main cubicle area because it was insecure. They were more worried about somebody walking off with the server rather than the data on it. The admin was investigating a Localtalk repeater but those things were (and still are) very expensive.

      Then the admin hit on the bright idea of locating the Mac fileserver in the roof space above the offices. The offices had a false ceiling and there was a gangway you could walk across. There were power points and the data cabling was already up there anyway. So one weekend the admin secretly moved the Mac fileserver from the server room to the false ceiling above the office space.

      Next Monday, no more intermittent problems with the Mac fileserver. Everybody was very pleased that the problem was fixed but the admin didn't tell the bosses about the Mac in the roof. They would have surely ordered him to move it back to the server room. The admin clearly decided that secrecy was the better part of valour. Probably he also knew he'd get in trouble for doing such a reckless thing.

      Fast forward a few years and the server is up for renewal and that's when the fun begins. The admin has long since left for greener pastures and they couldn't find this server. The policy at the time was you had to auction off the old stuff when you bought new stuff. After several days of stuffing around, turning the server room inside out, they ring up their old admin and ask him where, pretty please, is the Mac fileserver?

      I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall to have seen their faces when he told them.

      That is a true story. It didn't happen to a friend of a friend of mine. My father was the admin and I helped him install the server in the roofspace. And I'm posting this anonymously because these stories are always more fun when you can't verify the source :-)

    6. Re:urban myth by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An acquaintance of mine was a mechanic stationed on board some sort of U.S. Navy ship and they said that they identified a bulkhead not in the blueprints, and when they cut through it they discovered a completely outfitted machine shop, connected to power... and then walled in. I find it pretty easy to believe, personally...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Book on a similar subject by ebrandsberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Published quite a while ago, but I remember it as being very good, "The Two Faces of Tomorrow", originally published in 1979, and based on what I remember, it still applies to what could happen in the future. Very interesting read. http://www.jamesphogan.com/books/twoface/baen97/ti tlepage.shtml

  41. Without Bothering To Read The Rest of the Posts by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (because somebody probably already brought this up), I call your attention to the Tom Selleck movie "Runaway" - which was generally pathetic except for the excellent performance by Gene Simmons of KISS fame as the evil Dr. Charles Luthor.

    The specific scenes of interest concern the home robot (the size of a vacuum cleaner without the handle) which has been reprogrammed by Luthor to wipe out the family of a techie accomplice by running around the house with a .357 Magnum clutched in its one "claw".

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  42. Actually, I predict... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 2

    We will indeed see this kind of emergence, but it will end up being pretty fucking lame. Truly one of the worst episodes eve...er, worst episodes of human history.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  43. Nevermore! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

    No amontillado for you, ever!

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  44. This is how . . . by sunspot42 · · Score: 2, Funny


    This is how the Cylons got their start. One minute they were cleaning up the floor, the next minute they were plotting genocide.

  45. Faulty assumption by KennyP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the devices to truly be more than the sum of the hardware, they would not only have to be truly self-aware, but capable of learning about other hardware. Or, continual firmware upgrades when charging - so they get regularly reprogrammed with the ability to "deal" with other automated devices in your home. All of these devices would have to "grow" or "update".

    Personally, I'd rather see them go at it like BattleBots. A little duck tape, a nice solenoid and a semi-auto pistol...

    Visualize Whirled P.'s

  46. Missing droid? by kosty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    THREEPIO: He says the restraining bolt has short circuited his recording system. He suggests that if you remove the bolt, he might be able to play back the entire recording.

    LUKE: H'm? Oh, yeah, well, I guess you're too small to run away on me if I take this off! Okay.

    http://www.fallenjedi.com/anhscript.html

    --
    "Democracy." It's just a slogan.
  47. The Humanoids by Kafir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some of the problems with Asimov's laws of robotics were quite apparent even back in the '40s. The first law is especially difficult : "A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

    A robot that attempted to strictly follow the first law would, for instance, keep taking away your cigarettes. See Jack Williamson's The Humanoids -- a 1949 novel in which humanoid robots following Asimovian guidelines ("To serve and obey, and guard men from harm") keep an entire planet of humans drugged into complacency, because it's the only way to keep people from endangering themselves.

  48. Paul Di Filippo is way ahead of you. by ccherlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was browsing del.icio.us from a link in today's Bittorrent article, and I found a highly relevant story, And The Dish Ran Away With The Spoon by Paul Di Filippo. Read it, and beware!

  49. [losing karma] by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the best OT thread EVER!

    --
    ± 29 dB
  50. Taswegia by xixax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did a ghost tour in Hobart, and the guy said that they found a tunnel running from Parliament to the basement of a building that was likely to have been a brothel at the time the tunnel was operational.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  51. Re:lost function by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would actually be a fun thing to work on... parking oneself in the room for a few weeks with what little of wiring diagrams could be found, determining IP addresses, mapping network segments, and drafting new network maps. Trying to research/guess passwords to machines no one had logged into for years. Figuring out what services each machine provides and to whom.

    Then comes the exciting part when you start unplugging all the cables you think aren't in use and downing the machines that should be redundant or defunct. (somewhat nervously listening for the phone to ring or the pager to go off) You'd be amazed how often the blinky lights are only blinking because several machines are talking with eachother and absolutely no one else outside the room.

    Some people may view this as a frightening thing to try, but I'd call it a once-in-a-lifetime challenge. :)

    I've done this sort of thing before, twice, and it IS quite a rush. One of them was only slightly less tangled than this fun picture: http://vftp.net/virtual1/temp/IMAGE011_1wires.jpg

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  52. Re:How sentient do you want? by Cappy+Red · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, the Sun Tzu-bot struck me as benig closer to sentience.

    There was an article maybe a year or two ago now about a robot, designed to fight other robots for testing AI fighting strategy or something, that got out of its enclosure and escaped into the parking lot.

    One room? Pssh. I'll take my Sun Tzu-bot any day of the week.

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things