Slashdot Mirror


Following the Chips in Wynn's New Casino

ctwxman writes "As Steve Wynn gets set to open his new Las Vegas casino, something new hits the tables: RFID encoded chips they report that "The fancy new chips look just like regular ones, only they contain radio devices that signal secret serial numbers. Special equipment linked to the casino's computer systems and placed throughout the property will identify legitimate chips and detect fakes" " " Having stayed pretty much everywhere else cool on the strip, I'm sure I'll try the Wynn out soon after it opens, but I think I'll be cashing out my chips before I leave the casino. It makes me nervous knowing I could be unwittingly scanned by others after I leave the floor. Of course, this added inconvenience may save me a fortune in blackjack losses!

264 comments

  1. Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative


    The range over which you can read RFID information in any sort of portable (ie: non-obvious) fashion is limited to a few inches. In fact, tuning the damn things so they'll read at (say: 4 or 5) inches is hard.

    The readers that are designed for doorways can do roughly 2 feet, but they're huge and very very obvious - they're designed for store entrances, where they make you walk through the "gates" to get in/out of the store. You can't miss a 4-foot (max) separated row of columns covering all the exits...

    RFID works by the reader exciting a sympathetic response in the tag (which is itself unpowered, though it rectifies the incoming RF energy to self-power), this response modifies the reader's waveform signal, overlaying an incredibly weak (roughly 1% of the incident waveform) signal on top. It is this weak modification to the reader's signal that has to be extracted and deconstructed into a bitstream.

    Speaking as one whom RFID has tried, it's not an easy task to get any significant distance between tag and reader, and IM(NS :-)HO the likelihood of being randomly snooped on wherever you go is damn small. Almost flying-pig small. Our asset management system aimed for a 6" separation between tag and reader, and we didn't care about being obvious though there were size constraints for the reader (had to fit in a 1U box). Getting repeatable results proved very difficult with the units we had.

    Aside: London Underground introduced an RFID-based system for block-purchase of tickets, promising it would read your "ticket" in your bag/pocket as you passed by. This claim was dropped on introduction, and they now advise you to swipe the reader with your tag as you go by...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by terraformer · · Score: 1
      The range over which you can read RFID information in any sort of portable (ie: non-obvious) fashion is limited to a few inches.
      For now...
      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    2. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'll have readers at the door. All they need is readers built into tables and where they cash chips.

    3. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking as one whom RFID has tried...

      RFID tried you out? How did that go? Did it hurt?

    4. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by OECD · · Score: 1

      The readers that are designed for doorways can do roughly 2 feet, but they're huge and very very obvious - they're designed for store entrances, where they make you walk through the "gates" to get in/out of the store. You can't miss a 4-foot (max) separated row of columns covering all the exits...

      Right, but as they become more and more common, you won't notice them. And I'm sure plenty of businesses would love to know if you're carrying a lot of chips around.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    5. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say the idea of the RFID chip in a Casino chip would be not for tracking due to range limits but would be for when counting to cash out.

      Take your chps move them down a belt through a reader and Boom you have your total. if you used a fake chip and it did not transmit you get no credit for it.

      Faster counting, Less fakes sounds like a good thing to me.

      Corey

    6. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting
      > The readers that are designed for doorways can do roughly 2 feet, but they're huge and very very obvious - they're designed for store entrances, where they make you walk through the "gates" to get in/out of the store. You can't miss a 4-foot (max) separated row of columns covering all the exits...

      Considering the space already available to install cameras, cabling, and God only knows what else above the ceiling, wouldn't it be easy to include large transmitters in the ceiling?

      Better yet, install a semi-large one (a little smaller than your doorway-size variety) in each table. Doesn't matter if you see all 10 tables "light up" when Joe Gambler walks by them, you only need to get 2-3 hits before you can retrace his steps.

      It's sorta like facial recognition in that you can build up a track of where Joe Gambler went during his entire time at the site.

      But it's better -- because you can sort those tracks by dollar amount. What would it be worth to a casino's marketing department to know which path certain groups customers walk after losing all their chips (or after doubling their chips!), and reorganizing their floors (placing bank machines along the most likely route for the losers, and slot machines or other tables along the way to the cashier's cage for the winners) accordingly?

      If you were really clever, you could even have hustlers on the floor. Guy wins $1000 at a $25 Blackjack table? Cute chick comes over and offers him a drink on the way to the cashier's. Asks him how he did. Points out the conveniently-located row of $100 tables that somehow always have to be walked around before he can get to the cashier's.

      As we progress, running a casino will become more and more like playing SimAnt. (Then you can sell an extension the technology to the government to play with the rest of society, and it gets to be a lot more fun, to say nothing of more profitable :)

    7. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by maxpuppy · · Score: 0

      Finally, someone who knows what they are talking about when it comes to RFID.

    8. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by RedX · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. I'm sure a casino would like to know for a few different reasons how many of its chips are leaving the casino. The swipe cards for the slot machines were developed to track a gambler's habits. RFID in the casino currency is another logical area to track.

    9. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      So you're saying you need a purse or bag with a PDA and a small antenna to walk through a crowd in order to pick up who has the most chips to steal. Doesn't sound too hard in the dense vegas crowds...

      Also, don't forget about future enhancements in the antennas, or perhaps a vehicle mounted system. Anything that uses radio waves is in danger of being snooped.

    10. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering the space already available to install cameras, cabling, and God only knows what else above the ceiling, wouldn't it be easy to include large transmitters in the ceiling?

      Sure. As long as you're okay with the ceiling being within four feet of the floor. That's the downside.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    11. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      If you were really clever, you could even have hustlers on the floor. Guy wins $1000 at a $25 Blackjack table? Cute chick comes over and offers him a drink on the way to the cashier's.

      Hey, if RFID results in cute chicks buying me drinks, I'm for installing it in EVERYTHING.

    12. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there would be anything illegal about deactivating the RFID's in the chips with a microwave? And, if the RFID's were burned out...would they not have to pay out the chips to you?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by brian.glanz · · Score: 1

      Not to be unduly snarky in reply to an Informative post, but ... I've read that the "internets" can be used to transmit information collected in one place, to another place. If this absurd idea were true, an RFID scan, via "computers" connected to "internets," could be read anywhere -- for a price.

      Anyone ELSE seeing a HUGE business in reading RFID from location X, and transmitting data to various buyers?

      BG

    14. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by HarvardAce · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What would it be worth to a casino's marketing department to know which path certain groups customers walk after losing all their chips

      If you lost all your chips, how are they going to track you? Then again, I always make it a point to keep a $1 chip as a souvenir, so maybe they could bank on that.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    15. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by dekemoose · · Score: 1, Funny

      ....duhn duhn duh!!!

    16. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by johndeeregator · · Score: 1
      Aside: London Underground introduced an RFID-based system for block-purchase of tickets, promising it would read your "ticket" in your bag/pocket as you passed by. This claim was dropped on introduction, and they now advise you to swipe the reader with your tag as you go by... The DC Metro has been using "SmarTrip" cards for a couple of years now, and everyone just keeps them in their wallet and passes them over the sensor. I'd say that the success rate of this technique is around 90% -- with the 10% of failures due to George Costanza-like wallets.

      Personally, I take great pleasure in always carrying an old-fashioned paper (with magnetic strip) Metro card in my wallet. I never buy/upgrade to the exact amount of my trip, as I have no desire to hold onto the change. As a result, I've had a paper card, usually valued between $0.10 and $0.50, in my wallet for the last five years or so.

      (Aside: Metro decided to save some money by getting rid of parking attendants in its parking lots at the suburban station. Now, to pay for parking, you are required to buy a SmarTrip card. The card costs $25 and come pre-loaded with $20 of value on it. I guess gouging tourists is one way to increase revenues!)

    17. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Eh, it isn't like you can get parking at some of the parking lots after 9 a.m., anyway :)

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    18. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Tufriast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I think is more important about this data, is that the gambling habits of people can be tracked easily. This is probably one of the most powerful marketing, and surveillence tools out there. Knowing how many chips a person likes to carry, and other information is kind of scary. I look at it as an invasion of privacy. There are all sorts of legal matters at stake. In Austin they already are making kids wear RFID dog tags for attendance purposes, now all we need is a casino making sure you have money in your pocket to burn. Watch them deny you a line of credit when they see you blow a mess of chips in less than three minutes, and are able to track where they went.

      --
      Help me, help you. - Jerry McGuire
    19. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      I probably oughtn't respond to this, but since it's possibly a colloquial expression.... It's in the same vein as "I found it trying to ...", or "it was not easy to".

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    20. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by brian.glanz · · Score: 1

      On the fringe of topic here, but yes the connection between behavior, identity, and credit is the most troubling you mention. I can't even see my credit score, despite a recent federal act mandating that I get occasional free credit reports, without buying it. This despite that it is my credit score which is often used to evaluate my credit worthiness.

      RFID exponentially increases the importance of this question. Casinos are one frontier at which the technical issues will find their resolutions; before long though, we are going to need more concerted efforts in Congress and similar places around the world, if consumers are to be protected from what could become corporate omniscience with regard to consuming mentalities of individuals.

      BG

    21. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by djwavelength · · Score: 1

      Watch them deny you a line of credit when they see you blow a mess of chips in less than three minutes, and are able to track where they went.

      Or, maybe in that case, they'd approve you for a higher line of credit?

    22. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RFID tried you out? How did that go? Did it hurt?

      It was in Soviet Russia, of course...

    23. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Saying "RFID" to a Slashdotter is like saying "nuclear" to an environmentalist. Both will react with as much blind fear and lack of rationality.

    24. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently large casinos do all these "benefits" with different but current technology. The only way to win at a casino is not to play. Remember, to them, you are just a number.

    25. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Nothing illegal, though they would also not likely have to pay you full value.

      If the chips fail RFID they they can be assumed counterfit. If you complain that they are legit, then there is a contention. The chips are cut open and then you have the electronics. You get paid.

      A full failure analysis then ensues, it is found that the chips have been tampered with. Since all your chips are the bad ones they send you a bill for the cost value of the chips (likely to be almost a buck a piece). If you don't pay this then either it goes to collections and ruins your credit, or bubba and guido come and visit you.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    26. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      Strange, at uni we use some system which seems pretty much like this...

      cept it works!

      However, you do need the general vercinity of your body to be at about the right height....

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    27. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by novakyu · · Score: 1
      I probably oughtn't respond to this, but since it's possibly a colloquial expression.... It's in the same vein as "I found it trying to ...", or "it was not easy to".

      If you remember that, in the examples you give, "try" is used intransitively (i.e. without a direct object...), or rather, it is use of "trying", an adjective derived from the verb "try" (but no longer functioning as a verb), it's probably "incorrect" (from a point of view of a prescriptive grammarian) to say "whom RFID has tried".

      But of course, that's not to say if enough people use "try" that way, that could be standard usage (although I have a feeling that the specfic sense of "try" in that usage is, if it was every actually in standard usage, actually old and dying out.....).

    28. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, first of all, if you can counterfeit a poker chip then you can counterfeit an RFID tag to go in it as well. If the idea is to give every chip a unique serial number, then you can make them up. Of course, the machine should know what numbers are valid. So, you just create dupes of existing serial numbers. What happens to the poor sucker with a real chip if you cash a duped chip first, the machine accepts it, and then flags his chip as a counterfeit because it already has that serial number logged in?

      But, counterfeiting poker chips is risky. Casinos take it very seriously, and their cashiers are trained to spot fakes just like the dude at the 7-11 is supposedly trained to spot fake $20 bills. They are going to really inspect any large transaction, especially under suspicious circumstances.

      As someone who handles poker chips very often (I play poker at card rooms very frequently), I deal with experienced chip handlers a lot. Casino chips are stored in racks of 100 chips, divided into 5 equal stacks. The color of the chip, along with the color and pattern of the chips' edge spots, make it very easy to spot a foreign chip in a rack with a single glance. Really experienced dealers, cashiers, and poker players can glance at a stack of chips and tell how many are there. It's not hard to do; considering people can tell by the sound of a riffle how many cards are in a deck, I expect that skill is one anyone can develop.

      Casino chip counterfeiting is not trivial. The chips are ceramic, formed under immense heat and pressure. More recent techniques involve polymers designed to closely approximate that real chip look-and-feel in a much less destructible object. There are many techniques to preventing chip counterfeiting, much like with national currencies. You have to get the weight exactly right, chips surfaces are textured, the printing process is not trivial, they make a particular sound when two of them collide, etc.. Casinos use holograms on their high-denomination chips, or unusual surface treatments (Lucky Chances, for example, has some kind of thin, strong plastic coating on their >= $20 chips that is just slick enough to prevent doing most fancy chip tricks with them).

      Making a good casino-quality chip is an expensive, involved process! Embedding an RFID tag is just another step in creating a successful counterfeit.

      Ahh, well, the only counterfeit I care much about is when that goddamn deuce drops on the river, counterfeiting my low and making me wonder once again why I like Omaha 8-or-better so much.

    29. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by GoodNicsTken · · Score: 1

      Simon,

      Thanks for the post. I guess there really is no need for alarm since the readers have to be so large. In fact we should embrace RFID in every aspect of our lives.

      After all, if there's one thing every /.'er knows, it's that technology never gets faster, smaller, and more powerful.

    30. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by scowling · · Score: 1

      You are begining to try my patience. You have been tried and found wanting.

      It's a perfectly common use of the word and used transitively. In Oxford Concise, it is the fourth verb definition listed (of ten definitions).

      His use of the word was by no means unclear or incorrect.

      - Jim, professional editor

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    31. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by FEEBLE*BMX · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it Space Cowboy. Some people just don't have the imagination to add anything interesting to the discussion. They resort to picking apart the spelling or grammar instead of understanding and commenting on the content of the post.

      I can only compare this to standing in an art gallery discussing the various interpretations of a painting on the wall and having someone walk up and interrupt the conversation by saying "that painting is hung crookedly".

    32. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
      If you were really clever, you could even have hustlers on the floor. Guy wins $1000 at a $25 Blackjack table? Cute chick comes over and offers him a drink on the way to the cashier's. Asks him how he did. Points out the conveniently-located row of $100 tables that somehow always have to be walked around before he can get to the cashier's.

      Such hustlers are usually called "shills" in Casino parlance, and have been around since the dawn of the modern casino. In Nevada - and probably most other areas where gaming is regulated - the dealer has to tell you if there are any shills working that might be affecting your play. All you have to do is ask.

    33. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you can answer this for me then. The phrase "as one whom RFID has tried" -- shouldn't there be a preposition before "whom"? Generally, I think "to whom" or "of whom". Used on its own, wouldn't one use the plain old "who" instead? "... as one who has tried RFID"?

    34. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by scowling · · Score: 1

      No preposition is necessary; whom is being used appropriately in the objective case; RFID is the subject.

      The funny thing is that one rarely has to use the word "whom" except after a preposition -- in other objective cases, "who" is appropriate informally. Our style guide at work advises staff that we won't correct it otherwise.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    35. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "whom" is used whenever it is to be the object of the clause. For example, "The man whom I insulted punched me." There's no easy way to work in a preposition before "whom", yet whom is the correct usage.

    36. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You bought the wrong stuff. In good conditions you can read an RFID tag very far away, with off the shelf equipment. The more tags you are carrying, the more likely that you'll get a signal off one of them. The results don't have to be repeatable if you get enough readers and someone is carrying around enough tags. Any time a reader gets multiple hits at one time from a directional antenna, it can associate those tags until they diverge, and a hit on either one can be considered a hit on the same target.

      While it's not an issue with these chips, they're going to start putting RFID tags in the soles of shoes "for inventory management" so all that needs to be done is put readers in sidewalks and bingo, you can be tracked anywhere you go if they're on every street corner. It would take a long time to get all those installed, on a timeline of at least years if not decades, but I for one do plan to live that long.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      First off, your wrong. Language is meant to convey ideas concisely and efficiently (which a painting is not), so it helps if we all follow the same rules.

      Secondly, if a painting is hung crookedly, it should be fixed dammit!

    38. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So RFID is the subject doing the trying?

    39. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      His wrong what?

    40. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by mingot · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure. I'm sure a casino would like to know for a few different reasons how many of its chips are leaving the casino.

      They should be able to get pretty darned close using simple math.

    41. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Apparently, card counting in Blackjack can provide a mathematical edge to the player rather than the casino.

    42. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      But you still can't always win, a group of MIT students a while back proved it was definatly possible when they took frequent trips to casinos, but apparently even they have frequent weekends where they lost badly. But they had large cash reserves, and doing it often enough and they won more often than they lost. But the point is you can't always win, even at blackjack, while counting cards.

    43. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you f'ing kidding?

      I only get partial value cuz your tech broke. I paid $500 for this chip and you're giving me $500 back.

      Thankfully, there are powers above bubba and guido.

      Assuming you're transaction isn't suspicious ;)

    44. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course they had times where they lost badly It's called gambling for a reason. However, the point is they won more often than they lost. They were able to tip the odds out of the casino's favour into theirs.

    45. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      The important part to the casinos is this is rare. It happens much they'll pull the blackjack tables.

    46. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by intangible · · Score: 1

      I live in Vegas.

      All the casinos have "player's cards" that you use in any machine you want to gamble on, and some places have slots on the blackjack and other tables for you to use your card in. They are already tracking all those (just like the supermarket); what's to stop them from using RFID tags in these as well and place readers all over the casino? Maybe they already do.

    47. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by novakyu · · Score: 1
      You are begining to try my patience. You have been tried and found wanting.

      Ah, there you go---I think your examples explain it all. "You are beginning to try my patience." So the correct use would be, "one whose patience RFID has tried..." As you can see, when something is very, er, bothersome, it tries someone's patience, not the person himself. Also, in your usage, "you have been tried and found wanting," well, it's in the sense of trial, test of worthiness (or a simple court trial)---and I doubt that the RFID tags were trying Space cowboy to see if he is worthy of using RFID tags for inventory.

      Well, I guess the definition that my, er, Merriam-Webster's lists, "to subject to something (as undue strain or excessive hardship or provocation) that tests the powers of endurance," might possibly be used with a person as the D.O., as opposed to an object (i.e. any non-person), but IMHO, I think that particular usage in Space cowboy's writing in uncommon and possibly not idiomatic. If any of my writers (that is, if I were an editor---or when I was an editor) wrote a sentence like that, well, I'd probably ask him to revise it... as it might bring unnecessary attention to that particular sentence, drawing the reader's attention away from the story (it's for this very reason I don't write "he or she"---it's aesthetically displeasing).

    48. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      His wrong what?

      His wrong point of view. It's in the same vein as the neighborhood kids saying, "my bad", when someone messes up (misses a perfect shot), except that in this case, he's saying "your wrong"---typical American reaction, blaming someone else for what could very easily be everyone's fault. :)

    49. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by novakyu · · Score: 1
      The funny thing is that one rarely has to use the word "whom" except after a preposition -- in other objective cases, "who" is appropriate informally. Our style guide at work advises staff that we won't correct it otherwise.

      Yeah---this is a typical case of modern languages losing their once-glorious case system. Our ancestors once spoke their language with precision, clearly marking direct object (accusative (though this term "accusative" is a, well, bad translation---by Romans, of a Greek word) case) separte from indirect object (dative case). But, now, we've debased ourselves to the point of not being able to tell the subject of a sentence from the object, unless we have a context or a pronoun (which fortunately kept the nominative-accusative difference so far). Pretty soon (er, a millenium or so), we will be losing what we have left of the case system, too!

      PS. The day I learned that all Romance languages lost their case system---gosh, less than two millenia ago, they had 6 separate cases (well, 5, if you don't really consider "vocative" a case)!---was the day when the sky came crumbling down on me. Well, at least while I'm studying German, I will have this comfort that at least one widely-spoken modern Indo-European language kept its dative, if in a horribly crippled form.

    50. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by tezzer · · Score: 1

      Sources please? I'm looking for a hand-held reader that will pick up an RFID tag 12-20 feet away, and the tags that can be picked up thus. Are you talking out of your ass, or can you point me in a profitable direction?

      --
      (Celui que tient la peur de devinir nuage)
    51. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1


      Ok, I'm replying to this late, but frankly I think you've misunderstood what I was trying to say. There is a physical limit on the information that can be resolved. It's rooted in the fundamental equations of electromagnetic field theory, and there's no way you can somehow be "better" by being smarter.

      You can be better by increading your resolving power, by increasing your cross-sectional area of juxtaposition or by increasing your bandwidth potential. None of these are subject to technical innovation, in the same way as gravity is not subject to technical innovation.

      Quad Erat to br demonstrated.

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    52. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by N+Monkey · · Score: 1
      The range over which you can read RFID information in any sort of portable (ie: non-obvious) fashion is limited to a few inches.

      For now...

      Given what the previous-1 poster wrote, I guess you should be concerned if something like Parkes or Jodrell Bank is pointed at you, but I think you might notice one of those appearing in the street.

      The alternative would appear to beam more energy at the RFID device which possibly is of more concern, given that they are probably operate in the microwave spectrum. Still there must be a limit - either the person or the RFID must cook eventually.
    53. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soveit Russia... blah, blah, blah

    54. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      No they just reserve the right to ban players who win too much too often. There really arn't enough people in the world good enough that it will ever become a problem as the casinos take in much much more than they lose to a few players, why else do you think they have maximum bets. An individual winning every hand at maximum bet still wouldn't cause the place to loose money that day, as there are enough people loosing tons of money at the same time.

    55. Re:Be calm, relax, things aren't that bad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's not particularly hand-held, so no, I can't point you in any direction that will help you. If the information helps you in any way, the links I saw to the equipment were here on slashdot. Somewhere :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. i for one welcome our new RFID overlords. by de1orean · · Score: 3, Funny

    ehhh, it hardly matters. the house always gets its chips back eventually....

    1. Re:i for one welcome our new RFID overlords. by TheCarp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except the ones that you take home as souvenirs.

      Course they get quite expensive if you want to collect a whole set :)

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  3. Hack the chips. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Go to a casino, bring some foil. Put the chips in your pocket and put one in the foil.

    Smuggle it out of the casino and then see what makes it tick when you get it home.

    1. Re:Hack the chips. by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      They probably won't care if you take your chips home. No need to hide it. They just want to stop people from cashing in fakes.

    2. Re:Hack the chips. by ryanjensen · · Score: 1

      In fact, they'd prefer you take your chips home. That $5000 chip won't cost them $5000 to replace, but it (should have) cost you $5000 to take home.

    3. Re:Hack the chips. by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to smuggle it. In fact, casinos probably like it when people don't cash out their chips before leaving. If you lost the chip, they wouldn't have to pay you the cash equivalent.

      Frankly, I'm not that curious. The smallest chips are $5 pieces (they use silver dollars for lesser amounts), and if I've got a fiver I'm not gonna cash out, that sucker's going on the nearest blackjack table.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    4. Re:Hack the chips. by Ohm2k · · Score: 1

      Accually there are clay $1 chips if that casno has a poker room. Noone wants to play 3/6 with silver. Some places even have clay chips in $0.25 and $0.50 for 7 card stud games. But these chips tend to be of a lesser quality and lighter weight.

      --
      People find it strange that I don't know how to juggle or tap dance.
    5. Re:Hack the chips. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "They just want to stop people from cashing in fakes."

      This will also kill card counting....they can see you're bet swings...and know you're betting based on an advantages...especially if they track your betting with all the cards dealt....RFID's in the cards too?

      You could automate the whole thing...trick would be to make some 'stupid' but not totally advantage losing moves on occasion to throw off the machines watching you....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Hack the chips. by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      Well, you're not supposed to be counting anyway! Cheater! (j/k of course)

      Seriously though, an experienced dealer can tell when you're counting, most likely better than any computer algorithm. That is unless you're really really good at covering it up, in which case you're also probably not winning a whole lot.

    7. Re:Hack the chips. by bnenning · · Score: 1

      This will also kill card counting....they can see you're bet swings

      They can easily notice that anyway. That's why the MIT guys used a team system; one person makes small bets, and when the count becomes favorable he signals a teammate who joins the table and makes big bets. Neither of them has to vary their bet sizes. (Of course, the casinos can counter with facial recognition, and the arms race goes on).

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  4. I wonder... by g2racer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If the RFID technology is similar to the car key RFID technology that was recently cracked...

    1. Re:I wonder... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Do you think casinos are that simplistic?

      If the chips didn't read properly, all it would warrant is a closer look by some higher up staff, and you can be sure that if there was nothing fishy going on, the casino would happily pay you and likely comp you for the inconvenience.

    2. Re:I wonder... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I suppose if enough stink was made, the casino could x-ray the chips. Big letters inside "LUXOR", next to the now-defunct RFID chip, would identify the chips as theirs and valid.

      I doubt the RFID functionality is the last word in valid/not valid chips.

      Good question to ask when you get some chips, though.

    3. Re:I wonder... by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      I hope your not serious....
      What would really happen is they would go hmmmm this chip doesn't seem to be working. Please step aside while we check to see if it's fake or just broken.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    4. Re:I wonder... by Razzak · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that won't be the *only* way to identify the chips, it will just make it lots easier.

      "Hey, this batch of 500 chips have incorrect RFID tags, we should check them out".

    5. Re:I wonder... by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      Plus, in many jursidictions, hacking the casino's technology will bring down whole legal shitstorm on you. If you want to fiddle with RFID chips, stick to Wal-Mart's.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    6. Re:I wonder... by Loether · · Score: 1

      Chips are the casinos property. We just get to use them while visiting. I was in Vegas over X-mas break and they had signs when leaving the casino that said it was illeagle to take chips out of the casino. So if you were really tring to defraud them they could allways fall back on that. I know they don't enforce this because several casinos accept their competitors chips. But they had the signs up probably so when they rotate new chips in they don't have to honor old chips.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    7. Re:I wonder... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >they had signs when leaving the casino that said it was illeagle to take chips out of the casino. So if you were really tring to defraud them they could allways fall back on that. I know they don't enforce this because several casinos accept their competitors chips.

      Correct. It's a legal strategem, designed to give them the authority to deny you the right to cash in large numbers of possibly counterfeit chips that you didn't buy at the casino immediately before approaching the cage.

      And yes, if you disable one of Wynn's RFID-equipped chips, it won't show up as a valid ID anymore and will be rejected as counterfeit.

      Which is the entire point of the system.

      Whether you then say "I didn't know that it was counterfeit" and accept their indifferent shrug, or go "neener-neener I was just testing you noobs!" and get your face beat in, is entirely up to you.

    8. Re:I wonder... by qengho · · Score: 2, Funny


      "If you want to fiddle with RFID chips, stick to Wal-Mart's."

      But that doesn't give you the opportunity to schmooze with a big guy named Vito:

      Vito: Mr. Bellagio, he don't like that you're takin the chips out of da casino.

      You: Fuck off, man, I have rights!

      Vito: <crunch>

      You: < splat>

      Vito: Thanks for your co-operation.

  5. Darn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now my fake chips that broadcast incorrect serials won't work. Wait, my chips don't broadcast anything, so how does this affect me?

    Seriously, this seems like a better way to keep track of chip movement (superimposing a map of chip movement on a casino mapto see where people go first, what patterns they follow around the floor, etc), big spenders, etc, than preventing fake chips.

    1. Re:Darn it by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      read the first post on the range of these things.

    2. Re:Darn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was assuming all the gaming areas where people have chips would be covered with sensors. Then, if each chip has a unique ID, it is just a matter of tracking it from cage to place to place to place to dealer stack / slot vault / cage.

  6. Is it illegal . . . by JJ · · Score: 2

    to take a chip you legally bought out the door?

    I see this as a way to protect against theft, as in bringing illegal duplicate chips in the door.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    1. Re:Is it illegal . . . by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Forget leaving with worthless chips, just take your own scanner in and locate all the people carrying high value chips.

      Easy money for a stalker.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Is it illegal . . . by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the couple of casinos I worked at, they wanted you to take the chips home with you - it's close to 100% profit. And the silvers and clays are made by companies with almost as much rigor as the US Mints, so someone would have to go to a lot of trouble to bring in fake chips.

    3. Re:Is it illegal . . . by Feyr · · Score: 1

      while it's probably possible to see who has the most chip. i seriously doubt you can see who has the high-value chips.

      most likely the chips themselves just broadcast a serial number, that are matched in a central database.

      just clearing that up, as lots of people seem to be misunderstanding that part

    4. Re:Is it illegal . . . by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the RFID system is that it stores enough of a key to contain details like Manufacturer, Product, Revision and Batch in one large 64bit number with enough change left over for its own serial code.

      Just like the encoding of your engine VIN number except with much greater detail.

      part of the audit trail these devices goes through is MUCH more efficient if a costly database lookup for every single item is not required at every single instance.

      Imagine the hoppers counting chips. These can be made VERY efficient when combined with rfid.
      However, if the details are stored on a backend central database an additional network lookup is required for each individual chip just to find its type, I know computers have scaled quite a bit at the moment, but it just doesn't make sense to even consider that.

      Of course, sometimes the detailed specific product details and history are required and this is when it can be linked to the backend database, but other than that, its not required.

      RFID in a store will work in a similar manner, the full product type is held in the barcode, and a lookup based upon its type reveals the store price of that item, but the fact remains its a tin of beans, and a $100 chip is a $100 chip.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Is it illegal . . . by simishag · · Score: 1

      I live in Las Vegas. It is perfectly legal in Nevada to take chips with you outside the casino. Chips are not legal tender and are not, to my knowledge, accepted by any reputable businesses in town, although some places near certain big name casinos might take them instead of cash (but I doubt it). Usually they aren't even accepted at stores, gift shops or bars inside the casino/hotel. They are strictly for gaming.

      With no or very few exceptions (I'm not aware of any), one casino won't accept another's chips, so the only place you can exchange chips for cash is at the cashier's cage in the casino where you actually bought the chips. Besides the obvious concern of fake chips, casinos must remain independent of each other. Allowing chip exchanges between casinos would have the net effect of commingling funds, which is a big no-no.

      RFID chips are a data mining tool, not a security device. People come to Vegas to have a good time, not get frisked at every exit for a stray $5 chip. The casinos will never check people for chips on the way out; customers wouldn't stand for it. Chips are free casino advertising right in your pocket, and it's not like people won't bring them back eventually.

    6. Re:Is it illegal . . . by simishag · · Score: 1

      Hoppers don't count chips. They count real and casino coins and sort them by size, weight, and/or electrical characteristics. It's been possible to sort chips optically (by color) for a long time, and it's probably much faster than with RF. Every RFID reader I've seen has a certain minimum amount of time required to analyze the device, and taking even 1 second per chip in a hopper is waaaay too long.

      Moreover, the usage pattern of chips that I've seen avoids automatic sorting, and as in many jobs that handle money, manual counts are the rule rather than the exception.

      At the table, the dealer keeps the chips sorted in a little tray. When there's no dealer, the tray is locked up with a little piece of paper showing the chip count. Every time I've seen it, this chip count is done by hand, signed by the dealer and countersigned by the pit boss. When you take your chips to the cashier's cage, they count and sort them by hand, give you your cash, and then place the chips into sorted trays, ready to be taken back to a table. There aren't really any areas where massive automated counting of clay chips is required. Casino coins are a different story, but those are different sizes and can be counted like regular coins.

      These new chips probably won't use RFID to identify themselves, although that's certainly possible. It's much more about learning what the customer does with the chips, and how they move through the casino.

    7. Re:Is it illegal . . . by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a long time gambler and part time chip collector...

      Most casinos *will* take chips from other casinos if (a) they're part of the same chain, or (b) they're a reputable A-list casino not in debt.

      Luxor will take Circus Circus chips because they're both Circus Circus owned casinos.

      Binions will take a Station chip because the Station casinos are financially stable.

      Those chips are dropped in the box as cash and replaced with chips from THAT establishment.

      Elsewhere in this thread they mentioned take-home chips were nearly 100% proffit for the casino. Not so on $1 denominations and roulette and other "marker" chips. The cost of high-grade casino chips from someone like Paulson or Chipco (look at your chips, the ones with top-hats and canes, those are Paulsons -- the slick ones are Chipco) run about $1 each (!) in lots under a thousand, and probably don't drop much under $.50 for quantities in the 10's of thousands. Sure, they're still proffit, but try running out of Binions downtown with a rack of $1's from the Poker Room. Expect to be "asked" to cash out your chips before you leave. [$1 Binions WSOP chips went for >$1 on eBay for most of last year.]

    8. Re:Is it illegal . . . by simishag · · Score: 1

      interesting. To be honest, I've never tried to change chips at a different casino from where I bought them. The situation just never presented itself (I'm pretty good about cashing out every time) and I figured they were serious about the sign that said "we don't take other casino chips." But I guess cash is cash and surely there are "arrangements" between the big names to exchange each other's chips.

      You are also quite right about the roulette and poker chips. They don't even let me leave the table with the roulette chips :)

    9. Re:Is it illegal . . . by sirinek · · Score: 1

      There are signs stating that it is illegal to use or accept chips as payment for anything other than gambling (ie you cant take your chips to the casino restaurant and spend them there)

  7. Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by funny-jack · · Score: 5, Informative

    from the rejected submission bin:

    funny-jack says: A small school in the San Francisco area has come up with the latest "innovative" use for RFID: tracking student attendance.

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 1

      Oh god no! What will happen to our schools now that attendence is being tracked!?!?!?!

      Wait a sec... I seem to recall attendence being tracked in the past via roll-call in homeroom.

      So, hm, this is just a case of technology streamlining an extisting task, correct?

    2. Re:Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 1

      Just FYI on the rejected part. It would have counted as a dupe.

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    3. Re:Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Incorrect, not only will it make the teachers lax, it will do exactly the opposite of what it is intended to do...if you track me by a signal vs actually seeing me, I can just throw that badge in my buddies backpack and then skip the class, the teacher will read that I'm there still and you have accomplished nothing.

    4. Re:Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      That's not terribly innovative, /. ran a story several weeks ago (possibly months, I really have no concept of time beyond a couple days) about a school in Texas doing the same thing.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    5. Re:Chips ain't the only thing being tracked... by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Umm....check your pair of Nike first before you hide the RFID tag under the tinfoil hat.

  8. Good uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFID has become kind of a catch-22. Many critics of the technology warn that it could become the next way for Big Brother to watch over the unsuspecting public. It also has potential to do great good, as in what has just been listed in this article. RFID is also used to track lost dogs, cats, and other pets. It can also be a use for ID theft, though

  9. What happens when the RFID chip dies? by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I'm sorry sir, your $100 chip appears to be counterfeit."
    "WHAT? I just got it from the blackjack table over there!"
    "Remain calm. Casino security will be with you shortly."

    In other words.... PWN3D!

    1. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what will be interesting is to see how they work this new feature into their procedures.

      As it is now, I could easily (assuming I could have good counterfits made that were not distinguishable from normal chips in some simple manner) bring fake chips into a casino and use them... the hard part is getting good fakes and putting them into your stacks without arising suspicion.

      Remember there are cameras and various forms of security all over the place.

      So lets say I do make it to the table with stacks of fairly good counterfit chips. Lets say they are exact minus the RFID tag. OK, so my normal course of action is to go to the poker table, but I could go anywhere.

      My goal here is not to make money, but to break even. I can't risk taking fake chips to the cashier, because thats where its very likely to get caught and if they have and RFID, they will definitly be looking for missing chips.
      (ie they will want to wave my rack of 500 chips over the detector and get exactly 500 valid unique rfid signatures right?)

      So I need to exchange all or at least most (if I have 1 or 2 fakes in a set of 500 chips, its going to be easy to claim I won them at a table and they wont care, but if I have a large number, rest assured they will have some questions for me)

      Preferably I want these chips going into other people's stacks rather than the dealers. So my best strategy is to fake $5 chips, because they don't use $5 chips in the rake usually, and never use one in a situation where the dealer will use it to make change... this isn't too hard.

      Now play a few rounds of poker and you see I have a problem. How do I keep fakes and reals seprate? If my method of getting them to the table is sound (notice I am ignoring this aspect, and with good reason, will get to that) then its easy to start out with a mix of fakes and reals that I can identify and nobody else can by sight.

      Each time I win a pot, I get my chips back, plus other peoples, and note, between rounds of betting, the dealer splashes the pot. so I can't easily keep my fakes seprate.

      ALl in all the whole thing will work for a little while, but will quickly break down.

      Best I can come up with is leave with $500 in real chips, just play to break even, then toss the chips in a backpack and leave. people do this all the time, leave withthe chips to come back later....

      Then come back with them racked in the backpack, but with ALL my chips in the backpack (so security doesn't become supiscous if they see me take $500 in chips out of my backpack when the door mounted detectors only registered $100)

      Then I play and try to keep the chips seprate.... leave again with all the chips... separate on my own time, and come back with the real chips only.

      But by this time they have realised that I am the only person at my table that never cashed in, and everyone else had bogus chips...

      Thats what the casinos have, defense in depth. Sure you can pull off a little scam here and there, but by the time it amounts to much, they have put 2 and 2 together.

      All they have to do is set the bar high enough that you can't scam enough to make it worth risking. Which is why this will eliminate any worries about fake chips.

      The real scams are collusion on the poker table and card counting on black jack... and marking cards etc. (tho I think card counting is bullshit, its not the players fault that he can remember things and do math... its the houses fault for using dealer shoes rather than shuffling every time)

      Frankly if you want to make money at the casino do what my roomates and I do... become good at poker. You will make money any time you play against people that take bigger risks than you do over time. It is not hard to become disciplined enough to play better than 90% of the poker players out there.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "its the houses fault for using dealer shoes rather than shuffling every time"

      Shuffling every time would decrease the house edge compared to using a shoe with a cut-card.

    3. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on that?

    4. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by Taliesan999 · · Score: 1

      Actually the house edge depends on the number of decks of cards, not them being shuffled more often. Larger numbers of decks increases the number of smaller cards (as well as larger ones), meaning that combinations like 2 3 2 3 4 2 5 to make 21 are more likely. This is advantageous to dealer, since the dealer has to hit on a soft 17 or below.

      Shuffling more often reduces the card counters advantage, because it reduces the penetration (number of cards dealt before the shoe is reshuffled) into the shoe (i.e. the amount of information the card counter has to determine the likely mix of cards to be dealt next).

      BTW, penetration is the reason on low value tables in some casinos (Crown and Star City here in Australia), "continuous reshufflers" have been introduced. These let the dealer put cards that have been used from the shoe back to be reshuffled in every 3 hands or so, meaning there is not enough penetration for any card counting strategy to be effective.

    5. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by Dzifa · · Score: 1

      If this is true, why are casinos switching to autoshufflers? Is the advantage versus a single deck?

    6. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      The ratio of small cards remains the same, however. There are 4 two's in a 52 card deck, 1:13. 24 in a 6 deck shoe. 1:13. Same thing. Well, not that simple, but with more then a couple of decks, and only using 2/3 of the shoe, it is all but consistant throughout the entire shoe.

      The only built in edge is that the dealer plays last. Or, more specifficly, double busts are not pushes.

      The advantage of a large shoe is twofold to the casino: it makes card counting less effective, and the (slight) overhead of doing any kind of shuffle is reduced (that is, it takes 6n+something to shuffle a 6 deck shoe, n+something for a single deck). Another one, I suppose, that the supervisors can keep track of more tables... They keep track of how long players play, but that is based not on the wall clock, but on the number of decks they play. Sup's do something when a player sits, gets up, and when a shuffle happens. Less shuffles, less to do, more tables can be covered.

      As for autoshufflers, the reason is speed, pure and simple. Less time shuffling, more time playing, more wins for the house.

    7. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by Taliesan999 · · Score: 1

      I realise the ratio is the same from 1 to n decks, but the number of smaller cards means there is more chance of a clump of small cards (which is good for the dealer). It doesn't make a great deal of difference the difference in the house edge is small (something like .3%) from 1 to 6 decks (see the rec.blackjack FAQ for some figures), but it does make a difference. It does also make it harder to count cards because the variations in makeup of the deck through play even out more, the more decks you add.

      For the continuous shufflers (the ones in which the cards are shuffled back into the shoe while the shoe is being played), there is definately an advantage of faster play, but the main reason the casinos use them I assume is it makes it impossible to count cards, because the deck penetration is never more than something like 1/10th of the deck, which is highly unlikely to leave the count in favour of the player by even a small margin (here's an interesting article on one of the machines).

    8. Re:What happens when the RFID chip dies? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      hardly relevant. calculating odds in your head based on what cards you have seen and know whats in and out of the deck thusly is IMO just good bet making.

      Its like poker, You look at what you have, how many hands could beat you (would he need just the right card in his hand or both right cards, does suit matter?), how many "outs" do you have? Thats all card counting really is.

      I have no problem with the house having a legitimate edge on games that one woul dplay against it. I don't play those games (well I may play a hand or two of black jack or toss a coin in a slot... but only to kill time while I wait for a seat at a poker table - but I don't just go play them). However, I think a "legitimate edge" is one thats built into the enforcable rules of the game...

      If you are just watching the game and making calls based on what cards you see... if the house needs to outlaw smart play to keep its edge, then I think they need to come up with a new scheme.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  10. Only now? by jdray · · Score: 1

    The blurb seems to indicate that this is a first. If so, I'm really surprised. Many times I've seen dealers pass chips (usually $100 or more) over a scanner that lights up. I assumed that it was checking that the chip was valid, and I guessed that they were using RFID. That's how I would have done it anyway, and I figure that they're AT LEAST as smart as me.

    Looking over the rooms on the web site, I'm surprised at the room rates. The small rooms are expensive (start at $349 per night) and the big rooms are relatively cheap (a 1950 sq. ft. suite for $850 per night). Big suites in other casinos are usually a couple thousand a night (I get this by window shopping, believe me).

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
    1. Re:Only now? by Radi-0-head · · Score: 1

      The "scanner that lights up" is simply a UV light. Most casino chips have some form of logo or identifying mark that can be seen under UV. Try this with your credit cards also! The California drivers license also has an image of a bear that is visible only under UV.

    2. Re:Only now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look, just because YOU can think of it does not automatically make you as smart as if THEY thought of it too. Why? Because they are thinking about it, PLUS all the other technical casino stuff they have to think of in relation to using this technology.....things that you have no idea of THINKING about because you aren't a casino security person.....do not equate being as smart as someone because you can think of the same thing because you have no idea what ELSE they are thinking of or have thought of, or what reasons they may have for NOT using something.

  11. Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to me it could be spoofed, but I Am Not An Expert. What if you have a small radio transmitter in your pocket to swamp the table's RFID transmitter? Maybe read the RFID at one table, and play it back later to spoof some other table?

    Plus it would give the security personnel a false sense of security, and maybe more traditional ways of cheating would be easier.

    I wonder if this is not just a publicity ploy, just make some noise to get more people in who would not otherwise come in.

  12. multiple uses by orange_6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aside from helping to stop counterfeitting, these RF chips could also be used to further what casinos already do: track players. If you know what players have what chips you can figure out what bets they place at table games easier.

    They already do this with slots (where you put a card in with credits) to keep track of comps and the like. If this were implemented into the chips, it would be easier to keep tabs on mid-low range players and who is a good repeat player for issuing comps.

    Just an expansion of many casinos approach to customer relations :)

    1. Re:multiple uses by suffe · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you get this sort of info simply from how many chips people buy and cash in? I doubt there are that many people out there that walk arround the casino for an extended time while winning and losing in equal ammounts. Even so, perhaps those persons are not the one to comp anyways.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    2. Re:multiple uses by orange_6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you wouldn't know what games they won/lost on, which helps the casino determine which players are good at which games and can comp appropriately. Using this you could pinpoint what games and what players are making the casino money without counting every chip manually (which used to be the case).

  13. Trendsetters? by Tjoppen · · Score: 1

    And this year's hottest school trend is(you guessed it):
    Tinfoil hats!

  14. Interesting-looking place by andyring · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That new hotel/casino is a very slick-looking building. I saw it for the first time two days ago when I was in Vegas on business. It's also right across the street from the Las Vegas Apple Store in the Fashion Show mall.

    1. Re:Interesting-looking place by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      Off Topic, but is it bad that when I looked at that picture of the building the first thing I thought was "Man, that's some nice modelling, I can't pick out any of the polys," even knowing that it was an actual photograph?

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

  15. Tracking gamblers by redelm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    RFIDs in the chips will make tracking the gamblers very easy: Record the RFIDs as issued, as bet and as paid out. Yes, it will require (gasp!) computers, but the casinos have money.

    They will be able to track individual gabling habits, and from that, system usage.

  16. Not terribly new by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Back in the mid 1990s (1995-1997) when I was working for Casino Software Corporation of America, one of our major competitors already had this kind of system up and operating. Though I think thiers was ACTIVE RFID instead of Passive (was passive available that early?) they had readers in their blackjack table and even a scanner in the shoe to know what cards were where and who to pay out to. I always thought their system was a security hole- if you could grab the image off of the pit boss's system you would know the cards of everybody at all the blackjack tables. But their system sure did prevent the common "double payout" scam that was running around at the time (where the con man went to the table of a dealer he was paying under the table- and knew that he could get the bets paid incorrectly).

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Not terribly new by chuckfee · · Score: 1

      I believe that system was the Mikohn SafeJack. Apparently the problem was that the chips with integral RFID's were more expensive than their par value. A $1 chip actually cost several dollars.

      An interesting idea but perhaps just too far ahead of its time.

    2. Re:Not terribly new by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't remember the name of the company until you said it- and yes, that was it. As I remember, yes, you accurately described the problem at the time.

      Today, of course, RFID prices have fallen immensely- embedding one in a clay chip would only raise the price of the chip $.15, and be far less than $1 per chip to produce in total.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  17. Bah, that's nothing by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's nothing. Call me when they RFID the cards. I've got a hankerin for some poker.

  18. Another reason... by johndeeregator · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another reason for RFID chips is that they can be used to automatically detect bet amounts, and thus can be used to better determine appropriate player comps. For example, with blackjack, simply place a RFID sensor under the box where the player places his bet, and with the appropriate software, the floorman can instantly see how much the player has been betting (and, perhaps, winning and losing, although that's a little more tricky).

    Also makes cashing out in the poker room quite a bit quicker.

    1. Re:Another reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great there goes my card counting plan ...

  19. Not Entirely New by richlb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Foxwoods Casino in Conn. has been using these in a limited way for a year or two.

  20. I wonder... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I took some chips out of the casino, rendered the RFID tags useless with a magnet (or whatever it takes), then went back and requested payment, would they refuse to pay?

    I can potentially imagine the big stink that would arise if RFID tags stopped working in valid chips for some reason. Suppose you were playing blackjack and won a ton of money, went straight to the cashier, and they refused to pay because the RFID tags weren't responding. I can imagine lawsuits would spring up pretty darned quickly.

  21. Hmmm, what if... by IInventedTheInternet · · Score: 0

    What if someone put a small but mighty magnet on top of someones stack of chips?

  22. I don't get it... by gUmbi · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure I'll try the Wynn out soon after it opens, but I think I'll be cashing out my chips before I leave the casino.

    I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to leave the property with the chips but even if you could, they won't be accepted at other casinos (especially since Wynn is not part of the major casino chains - unless you plan on playing in Wynn's property in Macau).

    If you're concerned about going back to your room with chips because of theft - well, I think it's more suspicious redeeming them for cash in plain view.

    The RFID features are meant to a) reduce theft, fraud and counterfeiting and b) reduce the time required to balance a table.

    1. Re:I don't get it... by GonerDoug · · Score: 1

      Why the hell would the casino care if you came in and bought little pieces of plastic for $5, $25, $50, etc. and walked off with them? Sounds like an excellent way to turn a profit to me...

    2. Re:I don't get it... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to leave the property with the chips ...

      I doubt that the casinos mind if you don't cash in chips. In fact, feel free to take as many $100 chip home with you as you want! How do you think these got out?

      I don't know how much casinos pay for chips, but I'm sure it's much less than the face value printed on them (even the fancy RFID ones).

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    3. Re:I don't get it... by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much casinos pay for chips, but I'm sure it's much less than the face value printed on them.

      That's not true for the lowest denomination of chip. Real casino chips are made of a type of clay that is not cheap to produce. If you want the feel of real chips when playing poker with your buddies, buy a big load of $1 chips from a casino and take them home, it actually costs less than buying the real ones for yourself!

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    4. Re:I don't get it... by hipster_doofus · · Score: 1

      Well, I can tell you from experience that the chips themselves (at least the ones without RFID) cost under $1/each when purchased from the manufacturer. In fact, the major chip manufacturers market their brands of chips to the casinos as being great for collectable revenue (people walking out with them). Even someone who takes a $1 chip home with them is giving free money to the casino. Not a bad deal, huh?

      --
      Five Dolla Moddy-Moddy? ;->
    5. Re:I don't get it... by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Little peices of clay actually, but no, I doubt they care. While they still have to account for the chips they can just leave the money in their investment accounts to earn a bit of interest on the side.

    6. Re:I don't get it... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to leave the property with the chips but even if you could, they won't be accepted at other casinos

      Last time I was there, the downtown casinos tolerated some amount of cross contamination of chips. People tend to bounce around between the casinos there because they are so closely spaced, so you could toss a Horseshoe chip down in the Golden Nugget without the dealer blinking. I always wondered why they didn't go to a common chip design.

    7. Re:I don't get it... by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

      They don't care. In fact, they're happy when you do this. In fact, many, probably most, US casinos issue special "commemorative" chips that are designed to be interesting as keepsakes. It costs less than a dollar to make a casino quality chip in bulk. At $5 each, they'll be happy to sell you as many as you'd like.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by random735 · · Score: 1

      Because i could win $10,000 dollars at one casino, then take it to another casino to cash out. The second casino is out $10k.

    9. Re:I don't get it... by ngc5194 · · Score: 1
      This isn't quite true. If I were to go to Chipco or B&G (two big casino-quality chip manufacturers) and order, say, 500 chips with a given design, yes, it would cost me more than $1 per chip.

      Las Vegas casinos, though, don't buy them in 500 chip lots, they buy them in batches of tens of thousands. This allows the chip company to do a good job ammortizing the mold set-up. This means the price to a casino goes way down.

      As I recall, a typical (non-RFID) $5 chip would cost a typical Las Vegas casino on the order of $0.45 each. Chips get slightly more expensive as their denomination goes up ('cuz they tend to add more counterfit protection to more valuable chips), but at $1 and above, I guarantee you the casino makes money with each chip that walks out the door.

      Some casinos use very small denomination chips (although I can't think of any that have chips with a face value of less than $0.25 in play). Some of these cost casinos close to their face value, even if these "walk" the casinos don't lose money.

    10. Re:I don't get it... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      No, you could walk up to a table with the chips and bet them, not cash them out at the cashier. Also, $10K probably wasn't tolerated, but a guy walking up with a short stack of $5 chips was no problem. I think they did an exchange once a week or month.

    11. Re:I don't get it... by slusich · · Score: 1

      Most casinos will redeem chips from another casino in the same area. High denom chips are considered suspicious, but the normal denoms are used without an issue. Every so often, the casinos will exchange the "foreign" chips back to the casino they originated from.

    12. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I'm pretty sure that you're not supposed to leave the property with the chips but even if you could, they won't be accepted at other casinos"

      At least in Las Vegas, this is false. You may have trouble with large denominations, but small amounts are generally accepted. However, you should go to a cashier to exchange Casino A chips for cash/Casino B chips (as opposed to just plopping it down on Casino B's table).

      A.C.

    13. Re:I don't get it... by SoulMaster · · Score: 2

      Living in Vegas, this is how it actually works...

      You are allowed and usually encouraged to take chips with you when you leave a casino... In fact, most casinos (especailly the Palms) have limited edition chips of all denomitaions that you are encouraged to collect. The casino's can then issue "Removal From Circulation" notices, that render the chips worthles... Perfect profit system.

      On the other part of your statement,

      "they won't be accepted at other casinos (especially since Wynn is not part of the major casino chains)"

      Yes they will... The Main Cage at all Vegas-strip casinos will cash in chips from the other strip-casinos, related or not. Ex, you can take a chip from the MGM grand, to the Rio and exchange it no problem. The theory behind this is that they do not want chip contamination at the tables, but they would like you playing at thier property, not the competitions. Most casinos will have a limit on the $ of chips you can cash in, and if there is any question of authenticity, they will call the cage supervisor on duty over, who is trained in counterfeit chip / cash identification. Infact, they have the couterfiet chip sheet posted right at the cage (sometimes, in plain view of the player, mostly not).

      Also, for those who are posting that they can't track thier chips, they can. They don't for players who have a few hundred, but get like $5000 or so in chips and watch them hawk you. You can't even cash them in at the cage until the cage calls an verifies with security.

      Take it easy,

      -S

    14. Re:I don't get it... by selfabuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      unless the second casino just sends someone over to the first casino to cash the chips out.

    15. Re:I don't get it... by random735 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but the parent poster implied that the chips would be standardized, so how would you tell where they originated?

    16. Re:I don't get it... by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the informed response. I've only been to Vegas a couple times but I don't recall any casinos that used regular chips for denominations less than $1, they always used metal ones (many use metal chips for $1 as well). Can you recall which casinos do that?

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  23. They are tracking the chip... not you... by feepness · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't care about you, they care about where all the $500/%1000 chips are.

    They will see when it is put into a rack, taken out of a rack, and can match that up to the cameras if a particular dealer or shift is consistently low on their "take".

    Casinos are far more worried about their EMPLOYEES stealing (or conspiring with accomplices) than their regular customers. You're giving your money away anyways, what do they care how you do it?

    1. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by orange_6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do care about their customers because if the customers are ignored or feel like they won't win...ever...then they won't come back. It's basic business, keep the customers happy. And what better way to do that than to keep track of what they do on and off the casino floor.

    2. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by flint · · Score: 1

      Millions have lost their butt at the blackjack table, but the casinos only increase their edge adding yet more decks and decreasing penetration as time goes by. You get comped whether you win or lose, as long as you average a certain amount of play. What kind of actions do you think they will take to make players happier?

      And, how do they tie these chips to personally identifiable information? They already have some tracking ability but RFID in chips won't improve it. How will they track you off the floor? The scanners have limited range.

      I still think the motivation for this is about preventing fraud and theft from within.

    3. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by orange_6 · · Score: 1

      You get comped if you are seen as a viable repeat customer who will bring business to the casino over time. If you're joe schmo off the street, you're not getting any. If you can track how joe plays and what games, you can then figure the average wins, what the theoretical wins (alternate plays), and so forth...thus you can turn joe from a nobody into a potential future visitor, just by knowing what chips passed through his hands and when.

      Identifiable info is key, if you want comps give us your digit...just like slots. It would be entirely opt-in at this level, if you don't want the casino to know what you do then don't get a card. If you get a card you allow the casino to track the chips you use (and obtain though games if the equipment allows such).

      Yeah, it makes sense in my head....

    4. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do care about their customers because if the customers are ignored or feel like they won't win...ever...then they won't come back. It's basic business, keep the customers happy.

      It's like they said in a special I saw... "If someone loses big, they'll tell a couple of their friends when they ask what happened, if somoene wins big, they'll tell everyone they see"

      Free advertising on the happy customers.

    5. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by flint · · Score: 1

      Umm, that might be a good theory for the future of RFID, but that's not how comps work right now playing blackjack in Vegas in my experience.

      I get comped for averaging a $100 bet over the course of an hour, even if it is the first visit. If you hand them an ID and tell them to rate you that's enough for them to consider you a "viable repeat." If I drop to $25 per bet it takes four hours. Winning or losing, first visit or no, I can always get comps in this manner.

      The size and manner of comps may vary based on the factors you've cited, I don't know for certain. But I know I have received a lot of comped meals and rooms just by averaging a certain size bet.

    6. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by orange_6 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, by having a computer figure the comps, it alleviates paying someone to watch all the tables keeping track of bets and therefore comps.

    7. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I get comped for averaging a $100 bet over the course of an hour, even if it is the first visit.

      Holy cow. I don't even make $100 an hour at my job. How much are these comps worth, that you're willing to spend so much to get them?

    8. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by flint · · Score: 1

      Well I didn't say I was spending money to get them, although many people do. And I'm not an internet millionaire (I had options at several companies, only one of which made even a cent). But, I've saved up a couple grand for vacation before and figured I could spend it on airfare and hotel for a few days in Hawaii, or drive to Vegas and see if I could rub it together and make it multiply ;)

      Heck, I've stayed at total dives. First person who replies with the correct location of the Ogden House gets a prize! Ah forget the prize, the net makes it too easy. Lately I stay at the cheapest place that has high speed connectivity in case I get paged to fix something. But if I win big or lose big I often end up with a free room at a nice strip hotel.

      The reason I know about $100 bets is that occasionally I'll run up a few hundred bucks winnings playing $5/hand, move up to $25/hand, and if it's running good I'll press it up. But I'm not a Big Baller. Winning like that at 21 is definitely the exception, not the rule. Last trip (CES convention in January) I made $2500 my first night playing a $5 table at the Orleans. I started at $5 a hand but was up to $100-200 a hand before I lost a few hands in a row. Sometimes it just runs good. I gave $1000 back over the next two days but still paid for dinners at Morton's, limos everywhere, etc with some left over. But I had my comps before I gave that back, so I didn't really spend it to get the comps. They are just a bonus.

      The funny thing is that I only played 21 because my brother wanted company. You should only play against the casino for entertainment. Their advantage is too large. My game is Hold'em. Comps aren't that great for hold'em as the house is only getting you for the rake (the percentage they take out of every pot). I like my odds against other tourists better than the odds the house gives me.

    9. Re:They are tracking the chip... not you... by flint · · Score: 1

      But whom do I give my digit to if you alleviated them of their jobs? ;)

      The RFID info will one day be used this way but right now it's about preventing dealers from paying their friends incorrectly.

  24. GTA San Andreas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, we'd have saved a lot of time on the Woozie Vegas mission strand if he'd implemented those RFIDs on his chips.

    (Possible Spoilers if you haven't gotten past San Fierro)

    No driving around with a guy tied to the front of the car, no raiding the chip factory, no real fight against the mafia. No parachuting onto another plane, no trip back to Mark's Bistro.

    OTOH, no hideout at the 4 Dragons Casino either. (No big loss, really, but it's good for doing save-cheats when gambling)

  25. Detection range much longer by redelm · · Score: 2, Informative
    RFID tags used for tollways (in Houston & elsewhere) can read a tag going 60+mph (100km/h) from a distance of 12+ft (2.5m). Reliably! The reader is a flat panel about one foot (30cm) square.

    Perhaps these tags are mroe than a single chip, and have a small loop antenna. But so could casino chips. I'd expect multiple readers (up to one per gaming point, plus each seat & a series for the dealer) to be built-into gaming tables eventually.

    1. Re:Detection range much longer by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you *sure* that's not an active tag ? ie: is the tag powered in any way, and how big is it ?

      After giving up on the manufacturer-supplied readers, we built a reader starting with the reference designs available, and it's all down to the power emitted, the angle-adjusted cross-sectional area of both tag and reader antennae, and the frequency of the carrier wave. I would have thought it would be physically impossible to achieve what you say using only passive RFID. Pretty easy with active RFID though...

      We were using ~13MHz carrier waves, which were the most reliable we could get. There were also ~125 KHz systems. Perhaps there's a higher band now that your auto system uses...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    2. Re:Detection range much longer by kenh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The RFID tags used on cars are much larger than any chip I've ever seen in a casino - and there are good reasons they are as big as they are - they need to absorb enough energy to send the signal back to the detector/antenna 10-15 feet away...

      Also, casinos already know where the players are, they don't need to track them based on chip movement...

      I think the real application will be the action at the table (a computer could watch the volume of betting and act as a virtual pit boss, signalling when the action is getting heavy/slacking off) and in the cashier (count and verify chips quickly). I also wonder if they will also use sensors in the doorways to try and keep their chips in their casino, and know when someone comes in with chips from another casino...

      Ken

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:Detection range much longer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This the problem.

      Your experience with 125kHz and 13MHz systems are using inductive coupling, and thus, must be within the electromagnetic nearfield for reader interrogation. These are legacy systems such as security badge readers, and yes, they're limited to short ranges (say 6 inches).

      New systems (such as epc) are currently 902-928MHZ, and (real soon now) 2400MHz band. These devices can interrogate transponders in the electromagnetic far field, and can easily read passive transponders up to 10 meters with 0dBm (1 watt radiated power).

      Toll collection systems run in the 450MHz band and are -20dBm (100 milliwatt radiated power). The transponders are actively powered (they have small batteries inside of them that) and have to be replaced after several years.

    4. Re:Detection range much longer by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      RFID tags used for tollways (in Houston & elsewhere) can read a tag going 60+mph (100km/h) from a distance of 12+ft (2.5m)

      Those sound very similar to the FastTrak system used on bridges in the SF Bay Area. I bet your system beeps an acknowledgement whenever you go through the toll area, which means it's powered.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    5. Re:Detection range much longer by MobileDude · · Score: 1

      Actually, the main difference is toll tags are ACTIVE, not PASSIVE RFID.

      Simply stated, active uses a battery to boost signal while passive 'recycles' the signal from the antenna to charge and transmit back.

      --
      10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
    6. Re:Detection range much longer by HEbGb · · Score: 3, Informative

      EZPASS and Fastlane tags are powered transmitters - there's a lithium battery inside them. This is a complelety different beast from the RFID tags in the casino chips (and other small passive devices).

    7. Re:Detection range much longer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Everything is powered somehow. There's no reason that a sufficiently large tag couldn't pick up enough power via RF to beep a piezo. Granted, the FastTraks are internally powered, but that doesn't mean every similar device must be.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Detection range much longer by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      There's no reason that a sufficiently large tag couldn't pick up enough power via RF to beep a piezo.

      I guess I was under the impression that you couldn't do this via RF, unless you have a Tesla Coil or something.

      I've got wireless power in my Soniccare toothbrush charging station, but do you have any links where power can be transmitted 15 feet via RF? It'd be cool to read about...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:Detection range much longer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can build a radio and run it off background noise using a long wire, a diode, and a capacitor. A transmitted signal is necessarily stronger than that. QED :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Detection range much longer by whovian · · Score: 1

      New systems (such as epc) are currently 902-928MHZ, and (real soon now) 2400MHz band.

      Ugh, another device operating at 2.4 GHz!?? Any idea about interference with wireless phones or routers?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  26. RFID reader by musikit · · Score: 1

    does anyone know where to get an affordable hand held RFID reader? it would be nice to know weather certain places/things are RFID enabled.

    also is there anything someone could carry with them to make RFID reading useless? like a Credit card type card that will make it so the reader can't read these casino chips or your RFID drivers license?

  27. Stating the obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Of course, this added inconvenience may save me a fortune in blackjack losses!

    So would not gambling in the first place.

  28. Large value chips are verified now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The electronic verification of casino chips is not a new implementation. The Paris Las Vegas and Bally's Casino do it now for $100 (and presumably larger) chips.

    I found this out first hand a few weeks after Paris opened. After a reasonably successful turn at the tables I cashed in several $100 chips and was "tapped on the shoulder" by security a few hours later for a trip to the back room. One of the chips, which I received from the dealer, was a fake with a Bally's logo (both have the same parent company). The scanners in the casino cage identified the fake but not until after I was paid.

  29. I can see only bad things by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Honey, how did you do at the black jack tables?"
    "Lost everything."
    "Was that before or after you gave that floozy a $100 chip?"
    "Damn you RFID!"

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  30. Interesting how they mention counterfitting 1st by hal2814 · · Score: 1

    "However, financial losses due to counterfeit chips are usually minor, and few perpetrators get away with it, Copher [NGC's Chief of Enforcement] said." I really don't think counterfitting is their primary concern. Why don't they just come out and say that they want to track card-counters and people to give comps to?

  31. Lies! by Reignking · · Score: 1

    I think it is a lie! They are just saying that they'll RFID their chips for two reasons. The first is to increase security by scaring people, and the second is to get free publicity. So, they get two windfalls (security, publicity) for nothing! Profit!

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  32. RFID in the cash box and cashier's office by borkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it may be difficult to track chips on the table, the techonology would be very useful in the cashier's office. For one thing, you could incorporate an RFID reader in your chip counter - that would prevent someone from cashing in counterfeit chips. Also, while it's alright for players to walk out of the casino with chips, it's not okay for employees to walk out of the cash office with chips. While they already have cameras galore in there, RFID would give them another way to make sure cashier office staff didn't walk out with a spare chip or two - unless their underwear from Wal-Mart sets off the scanner.

  33. Obligatory Cowboy Bebop reference by dark_requiem · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sweet, it's like that Cowboy Bebop episode where they put an encryption key to a master decryption program in a poker chip!

    1. Re:Obligatory Cowboy Bebop reference by Dusty · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Bebop Edisode 3, Honky Tonk Woman

      Offtopic, my arse.

    2. Re:Obligatory Cowboy Bebop reference by dark_requiem · · Score: 1

      Thank you! (now THIS is offtopic!)

  34. Sweet! by Dolohov · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now when I want to decide who in a casino to beat up and rob, I just have to buy a detector, figure out which poor bastard has the most money, and follow him! No more muss or fuss with guessing wrong and going to the trouble of mugging some jerk who's poor.

  35. Better uses by eyeball · · Score: 1

    There are much better uses for identifiable chips than preventing fraud. This makes it much easier to track player habits down to every dollar they bet. Think of a poker game. On a player-by-player basis, you can now track every doller bet during every moment of the game. This would presumably make comensation systems more accurate (rewarding someone for being a riskier gambler rather than dead weight at a table). With a little mathematics and CPU time it would be trivial to watch for collusion between players in Blackjack and Poker.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
    1. Re:Better uses by Tassach · · Score: 1
      This makes it much easier to track player habits down to every dollar they bet.
      Don't fret it too much. Don't want to be tracked? Remember these two magic words: Money Plays.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  36. why parent offtopic?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    silly ass mods.

    1. Re:why parent offtopic?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there is no "-1, Dumbass" moderation option.

    2. Re:why parent offtopic?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaned-up in meta-mod

  37. I did a similar tracking experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Only I was tracking the chips in a chocolate chip cookie. I found out they all ended up in the same place and they all ended up the same color.

  38. Re:Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    I suspect if a casino had the slightest idea you may be trying to circumvent *any* system they have in place you will find yourself thrown out on your ass.

    Jamming every table you sit down at is not a way to stay inconspicuous

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  39. Walking out .... by p0rnking · · Score: 1

    "... but I think I'll be cashing out my chips before I leave the casino ..."

    Using RFID tags in Casinos was mentioned a while back, and one of the reasons why they wanted to use RFID tags, was to make sure people don't leave with the chips.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/09/ 18 28225&tid=158&tid=98&tid=17

    1. Re:Walking out .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...one of the reasons why they wanted to use RFID tags, was to make sure people don't leave with the chips."

      I don't buy that.

      The casinos don't care if people walk out with their chips. After all, you paid for those chips -- much more than they're worth. They only have value in the casino. Anywhere else they're just clay garbage that you paid the casino money for. They're more than happy to sell you that useless crap.

      They're primarily concerned with thefts and scams, and to a lesser extent mistakes, perpetrated by their own employees. This is, essentially, an accounting measure.

  40. Why wouldn't you anyway by Rombuu · · Score: 1

    but I think I'll be cashing out my chips before I leave the casino.

    Why wouldn't you be doing this anyway? You can't play one casino's chips at another casino.

    --

    DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
    1. Re:Why wouldn't you anyway by BernardKing · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is quite common for gamblers to take their chips with them to another casino. As a courtesy, most major Vegas casinos will accept chips from other nearby casinos and exchange them for their own chips. They do this as a convenience to gamblers who often have lots of chips on them. If you won't accept your competitor's chips, you may lose an opportunity for a gambler to do some spur of the moment betting. Occasionally, if a casino is experiencing financial problems, other casinos will refuse to accept their chips for exchange. They don't want to get stiffed if the other place goes out of business.

  41. EZ-Pass by bsd4me · · Score: 1

    I believe they are all active devices. I recall a recent news story where all of the original EZ-Passes in the NE USA were failing because the batteries in them were dying.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  42. Re:Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by rodgerd · · Score: 1

    I think you'll find if you wander around a casino with a radio transmitter secxurity will want a quick chat.

  43. You're worries about this in VEGAS? by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's like closing the barndoor after the barn's burned down!

    Membership cards linked to multiple casinos, every square inch of every building under surveliance, and data mineing the likes of which the G'uvment can't compete with. Cashless video games that print out your winnings on a barcoded slip of paper...

    If this has you concerned, RFID in your chips is the _least_ of your problems.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:You're worries about this in VEGAS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...every square inch of every building under surveliance..."

      I read an article recently about the incredible amount of surveillance in Vegas. It included a quote from a guy who works for a company that sells surveillance equipment, in which he explained that his company had just filled an order for something like 65 surveillance cameras..... for a church.

  44. Re:Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to me it could be spoofed, but I Am Not An Expert. What if you have a small radio transmitter in your pocket to swamp the table's RFID transmitter? Maybe read the RFID at one table, and play it back later to spoof some other table?

    Doing this in a place with more cameras than patrons, heavy security, a network of private detectives (Griffin Investigations), and the most sophisticated facial recognition packages around makes this a fools game at best.

    If you value your kneecaps, don't pull this in a casino.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  45. dont get a players card, dont get tracked by dealdetectives · · Score: 0

    if you dont sign up for a players card how can they track you? it's impossible.... not everyone has one of these, which you would swipe when you sit down and buy chips. when you swipe the card all the chips given to you could be tracked at that time since to have a players card you have to give the casino your personal info in order to get comps. if you dont have a card then they have no idea who those chips went to. this is a way players could get around the rfid tracking but wouldnt get any comps. useful for those card counters ;)

    since i like my players card but not the rfid tracking i think i'll start carrying around my chips in tin foil in my pocket

  46. Re:Hello, Vegas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    always bet on black.

    hugs and kisses,
    Wesley Snipes

  47. Toll Road Readers in Canada by renehollan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There's a toll road around Toronto, Ontario, that uses RFID readers in much the same way.

    However, it also reads license plates directly if you don't have an RFID tag. One receives a bill in the mail (with a surcharge for not being "in" the system) at the end of the month.

    Dunno about out of province drivers. I guess Canadian ones are tracked down and fined or jailed. (Americans probably just get a fist shaken at them, as they cross the border back into the U.S., thinking to themselves "nyeah, nyeah, nheah, nyeaaah, nyeah!).

    Canuks complain about the cost of maintaining the bridge to Buffalo from the Canadian side. Yanks have the smarts to put a toll on their side of the bridge. Why did I have to be born north of the 49th and surrounded by pinko idiots? Sigh. (Insightful, no! Troll! But wait, insightful... Aw, screw it, I'll take Troll for -5 karma, Alex.).

    --
    You could've hired me.
  48. How to annoy many, many people by drxray · · Score: 1

    1: EMP casino
    2: ?
    3: Profit

    Actually, I have no idea if you could generate a pulse that would destroy all the RFID chips without messing up the rest of the electronics. But I still suspect an implausible Hollywood heist movie using this plot device is being planned as I type.

    --
    Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  49. one minor niggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't the domestic doc called canis lupus familiaris nowadays?

    1. Re:one minor niggle by Seehund · · Score: 1

      No I'm not, you insensitive clod!

      /physician, currently at home

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    2. Re:one minor niggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! You can't call them Niggles anymore! The PC term is Black Wiggles.

  50. A much more insidious attack.... by Leadhyena · · Score: 1
    is one where a counterfeiter will steal chips. The idea is that our black hat will pass up victims walking from table to table with chips and have an RFID scanner in their pocket taking down IDs. Then he will take counterfeits with programmable RFID chips in them, program those chips with the ID they just scanned, and then cash out. Then when the victim tries to play his hijacked chip, the computer flags him (because that chip is already cashed out!) instead of the counterfeiter, who now has the victims's money in hand...

    Deending on RFID for counterfeit identification is a recipe for disaster because of this sceneraio. This leads more credence to the idea that this tech is simply to measure action at the tables. It could also be used to speed up the counting of chips, which would speed up and increase the accuracy of transactions at the cashier. Either of these reasons are more compelling than the counterfeiting issue, but don't generate as good of a PR image as the targeting of counterfeiters.

  51. Can anyone else say... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    Oceans 13!!!!!!!

  52. Parallel Off Topic: Jobs by jo42 · · Score: 1

    Unemployed geeks: Check out the Wynn Jobs link. You should find something in there...

  53. Does this scam still work? by serutan · · Score: 1

    In his classic Steal This Book (a fascinating read, now online for free) 60s activist Abbie Hoffman described the following way to get a free trip to Vegas. Many casinos (at least back then) offered free round trip airfare and a room for a weekend, even meals in some cases, but you had to buy like $500 in chips. These were specially marked chips that could not be cashed in, so you had to gamble them away. The trick he suggested was for whoever goes with you to buy an equal number of standard chips upon arrival, so you have $1000 between you, half marked and half not. Then you both sit at a roulette table and bet against each other; one person bets on black, the other bets on red, identical amounts. So you break even on every bet except when 00 comes up. The person with the marked chips bets only those chips. All payoffs are made in standard chips. When the marked chips have all been lost, the two of you should still have a total of approximately $1000 in standard chips. At that point you cash in and enjoy the rest of your weekend.

    1. Re:Does this scam still work? by nsayer · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're almost right.

      1. You don't need a friend. In roulette, you bet against the house - each player plays independently.

      2. It's not a free weekend, but it is cheap.

      3. You take your $500. Bet $13 each on 0 and 00. Bet $237 each on red and black (or odd and even, or any other 2:1 action). If 0 or 00 comes up, you get $468. If either red or black comes up, you get $474. Thus, your weekend costs you either $26 or $32. Of course, if you feel lucky, you can omit the 0 and 00 bets and simply bet $250 on red and black. The house then has a 5% chance of busting you completely, but you have a 94% chance of having a free weekend. Either way, you get paid in live chips, and can cash them in immediately.

      4. In addition to the straight monetary costs, the hotel gets to make whatever interest it can having had hold of your money (usually) for a (sometimes lengthy) period of time in advance. And, of course, you run the relatively small risk of getting mugged with your $500 (or less) between the casino and your bank.

      5. I haven't been to Nevada (I play poker, so I don't have to leave California) in a long time, but I recall hearing about such offers at least as late as the '80s, so it's possible it still goes on.

    2. Re:Does this scam still work? by nsayer · · Score: 1
      I'll tell another story... This one is 2nd hand, and dates from the 50s. I believe the casinos have gotten a lot smarter since then, so I doubt this would work any more.

      The story goes that a friend of my father invites him and his wife (my mom) to Vegas for the weekend. They get there and start living it up. The friend says not to worry, he'll pay for it all. They see a couple shows, have fabulous meals.... All the while, the friend is periodically going to the cashier's window and cashing checks.

      Comes Monday morning and it's time to check out. Dad listens in and hears the conversation between the friend and the hotel cashier, "Thanks for staying with us. We're sorry you had such bad luck at the tables. To make it up to you, we've comp'ed your party's stay."

      The punch line is that the friend took one of his suitcases straight to the bank the minute they got off the plane. He was cashing the checks, and his wife would cash out the chips and take the money up to the room. Whether he was actually kiting the checks (and thus really did need to get the money back to the bank in a hurry on Monday), I don't know (but probably not - they were pretty well off).

    3. Re:Does this scam still work? by (void*) · · Score: 1

      Informative? If you bet $237 on red and black, if it comes up red, you lose $237 and win $237. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE. You might as well have NOT BET AT ALL. The same if comes up black.

    4. Re:Does this scam still work? by ngc5194 · · Score: 1
      These sorts of junkets fell out of favor in about the '80s or so. However, the casinos were well aware that this sort of thing could be done, and typically the junket conditions allowed the casinos to recind their offer if you tried to do something like this. Short answer: Rarely it was this easy.

      In actuality, using the second set of regular chips is unnecessary for two reasons: 1) You could just bet the irredeamable chips on both bets yourself. 2) You could always just bet one side of the bet. Sure, your variance goes up, but your long run expectation doesn't change.

      Note also that you could have done this with lower out-of-pocket expenses by playing craps betting the pass/don't pass rather than an American roulette wheel.

    5. Re:Does this scam still work? by jdludlow · · Score: 1

      Informative? If you bet $237 on red and black, if it comes up red, you lose $237 and win $237. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE. You might as well have NOT BET AT ALL. The same if comes up black.

      That's the point. He wants to convert $500 of non-cashable chips into $500 of cashable chips. He's trying to break even.

    6. Re:Does this scam still work? by (void*) · · Score: 1

      Here's how to read it: The grandfather post said that. The parent post tried to convey that you could WIN at roulette in the manner. A crucial distinction of PHRASING that should not be ignored.

  54. Kill Command? by Malluck · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they've thought of this, but doesn't the RFID standard require that every tag can be rendered inoperative with a simple kill command?

    All it would take is one script kiddy running through a casino with a chip-killer to ruin everyone's day.

    1. Re:Kill Command? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, they obviously aren't using off the shelf rfid tags since they're embedded inside of the chips!

      i'd like to think they're using custom silicon at the very least, if not a custom interrogation protocol as well.

  55. I don't think this is the whole story by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I worked as a cashier in a casino (that bills itself as the most popular riverboat casino in the world if anyone wants to figure out which one) for at total of 2 and 1/2 years and while I remember several instances of counterfeit money, I don't remember EVER seeing counterfeit chips. I have seen chips from other casinos, but not forged ones.

    While I didn't work in Vegas, I am highly sceptical this happens. If they said it was to prevent employee theft, I would have an easier time beleiving it (although to be effective it would require every exit being covered, which would seemingly be cost prohibitive).

    For counterfeiting chips to be effective, you would have to have a lot of chips, and prefereably a lot of high denomination chips. At least in the casino i worked in, surveillance knows who has the chips already so if someone they have never seen before walks in with even an ammount as small as $5000 in chips, there is a good chance they are going to know. Cashing in anything over $10,000 gets reported to the government anyway (again, unless Vegas is different, but I think that is part of RICO laws), so I don't see counterfeiting chips being effective when you can fake money ans spend it everywhere.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    1. Re:I don't think this is the whole story by SoulMaster · · Score: 1

      Nope, we report all transactions that are over $10,000 too. And all Slot Jackpots that are > than $1999 go on a W2G. And all table game wins that are > than 300 times your original bet go on a W2G as well.

      That's all Federal law.

      People here TRY to counterfeit chips, but it never works. I think it just takes too long to realize any profit... you're right on, and slightly off, do do it you need to make a mess of lower denom chips (like 25s and 100s) and have a slew of people run them in in lots of say $400. Just isn't worth the risk / reward.

      They try to counterfeit cash too, but that is why our Secret Service branch is bigger than anyone elses in in the country!

      -S

  56. Addendum from the original poster by ctwxman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    CmdTaco has added comments to the parent post after mine. However, there is no clear distinction where my words end and his begin. Since they might be interpreted to be from me, and they don't represent my sentiments, please note: everything written beginning with the words, "Having stayed," does not belong to me. In email conversation, CmdTaco has said he didn't feel there would be any confusion since my words are italicized. In this case, I respectfully disagree. I would appreciate this post being modded up.

    1. Re:Addendum from the original poster by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think anyone who's read Slashdot for any period of time knows that the post is in italics and anything else is by the editor who posted the story... This sort of writing happens ALL the time, no-one gets confused... at least I thought they didn't.

    2. Re:Addendum from the original poster by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      I had no trouble telling them apart... yours was about the article and in italics. Tacos was the off topic stuff about making sure to cash out his chips... because you know most people don't, because they like to have chips instead of cash ;)

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    3. Re:Addendum from the original poster by ctwxman · · Score: 1

      I am a very long time reader and hadn't realized that. Believe me, it would please me if I was the only one confused by this. I hope I was wrong in my reason for posting this addendum.

  57. beacon for pickpockets? by Cyryathorn · · Score: 1

    I can imagine high-tech pickpockets/muggers wandering through the casino, seeing whose pockets light up their hand-held RFID reader, and then following them out to the parking lot or what-have-you.

  58. I wonder... by ircubic · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it will take until people will be able to make devices to scan people going out with chips, duplicate those chips' RFIDs, make fake chips with legit RFIDs(possibly through a system where you carry around ready made chips you just load with a new RFID), and cash in other people's winnings?
    Now, I have no experience with this RFID technology... but if that system is entirely dependant on the RFID chips, and no other form of identification... chip duplication might become a problem(which could get the legit owners of the chips accused for making fake chips)...
    Again, if it is even possible(which, I suspect, it will become some day... as with most technology)

  59. Prada has an RFID device inside every... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "proof of authenticity" card found inside every Prada product you buy at the Prada store. And if you are one of the lucky ones to have bought something there before with an RFID card, next time you walk in to the store, the greeter (after glancing at his/hers palm device and reading your quick profile) will greet you by name and sometimes go the extra step and inform you in a metrosexual kind of tone of what they have in stock and might interest you in buying.

    In NYC we call this top notch Customer Service.

  60. Exactly by tgd · · Score: 1

    Better comps would be a big plus... unless you're a high roller, the pit boss rarely pays enough attention to accurate track your betting, especially if you bet in an inconsistent manner at something like craps.

  61. Re:Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

    I suppose you could... but I think the dealer might notice that your homemade radio transmitter doesn't look like one of their chips and would be hesitant to take the bet.

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  62. Interesting to see if it will work by ash5g · · Score: 1

    It's been tried a few times before in the RFID industry, but it's never been able to work. The reason that casino's want to track the chips is mainly to stop people stealing, hiding or moving chips while they're on the playing tables. No-one could ever guarantee all the chips would read though, so the system never took off. If they've found a way to do it, they would be able to sell the technology in a lot more places than casinos

  63. Try some math lessons by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    gambling is a stupidity tax. Man it is depressing walking past a bank of zombies punishing themselves. Skinner's pigeons got nothing on the blue haired ladies.

    Even if you are playing poker, the house is still a parasite. The rake is unbelievable. Maybe the rake buys you a clean game, but I kind of doubt it. The ethics of mobsters and corporations are no better than that of home game weasels. The only thing saving you is that the overhead of a fix is probably not worth the trouble. Still more do I doubt that a clean game with the rake is worth it: it puts the players in the position of fighting in a burning house.

    Hmm...burning the House, not a bad idea. The indoor air quality probably wouldn't suffer. Vegas is the right place for resuming above ground nuclear testing. We could probably rent space to Iran and N. Korea.

    1. Re:Try some math lessons by m50d · · Score: 1

      IIRC this may be Heinlein, but anyway I read it somewhere: what you pay the house is the price of your night out. View it as an evening's entertainment. If you're betting red/black on roulette you only lose 1/37 of what you bet, at minimum bet it probably adds up to less than what you'd spend going to the cinema or a restaurant. As long as you don't get addicted, or bet money you don't have, you're fine.

      --
      I am trolling
  64. how middle-class of you, taco... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Having stayed pretty much everywhere else cool on the strip

    The coolest Vegas places aren't on the strip. The middle class stays on the strip.

  65. It's all about the comps! by kara70 · · Score: 1
    RFID in betting chips is about more accurately tracking how much a bettor bets, in order to more accurately dole out comps -- freebies from the casino.

    Casinos rate players on how much action they give a casino. The pit supervisor walks around to the various tables and looks, with his eyes, at how much money the big players are betting, to calculate how much the player is earning for free paybacks from the casino.

    Clever betters routinely bump up their bets when they see "the boss" coming around to inspect their betting. By throwing out the bigger chips while you're being watched, you'll qualify for more comps than actually warranted.

    RFID chips will tell the computers exactly how much money you're betting -- no more human interaction required! No gaming the system for more than you should actually get!

    The really terrible thing is that they will soon (if they don't already) put the RFID chips on playing cards themselves. The computer-dealer on each blackjack table could instantly reshuffle the monster six-deck shoe when the cards in the shoe lean too much in favor of the players!

  66. *shrug* by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't have an issue with this since the chips are the property of the casino.

    It's the same thing if they decided to put RFID tags in the towels.

    The only thing I would be interested in, is full disclosure. Even if it's something I have to ask the manager about, the the manager would tell me, "Yes, the chips contain RFID tags, we use them when you cash in the chips to make sure they're legit."

    What surprises me is that hotels haven't put RFID tags in their towels and charged you when you steal them!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:*shrug* by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >What surprises me is that hotels haven't put RFID tags in their towels and charged you when you steal them!

      Because they already stole from you when they charged you $139 a night to get them dirty.

  67. Tinfoil Hat by HexDoll · · Score: 1
    It makes me nervous knowing I could be unwittingly scanned by others after I leave the floor.

    Easy, keep them under your tinfoil hat.

  68. A new precedent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What's to stop them from RFIDing the cards next? It would sure make things easier for the dealer. I bet you won't read about that on in the news.

    1. Re:A new precedent? by scootr1 · · Score: 1

      Why would the dealer care? I'd be afraid to play at any house where the dleaer had an option of hitting or not.

      Now, if somebody else could get hold of that data...

  69. Former MIKOHN employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I worked for Progressive Gaming International, the company that was formerly known as Mikohn. The system that they use for rfid's is total crap. It could on a good day count a stack of 20 chips. But the unwilling nature of the management team to update older than you would believe equipment caused massive problems. The data network that it employs for passing information is pathetic. Even worse is the horrible installation of the tables in a casino. The people employed to install the systems make rats nests out of the cables and wires then shove it all into the base of the table. It's the old out of sight out of mind BS. The nail in the coffin is that the original programmers and hardware designers are not even there anymore and were not replaced. This cause quite a problem one time I remember when they had to contract one of the guys back to fix bugs that had been in the system since day one. The only name I will say anything about is mentioned in the article. Tim Richards was at one time a great guy that wanted to make mikohn a great company with great products. But he just like the rest of the management have listened to the wrong people for far too long. The mistakes he has made are huge and it is why the 16 million in table game revenue (public knowledge by the way) has been steadily dropping for years.

    Something else related to the MIKOHN tables and chips that is really funny. At one time they fired most of the staff that made and tested the tables. Then they hired the former Coe's secretary to lead the table group. Then hired a former human resources flunky to train the casino workers on the tables. Mind you neither of which had any experience relating in any way to this field at all. THEN they wondered why the profits were tanking.........

    I'm not a disgruntled former employee, but I thought I would share some facts and funny things about the tables and the management.

    That's it for my rant.........

  70. It never worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That has the same expected payout as dumping the entire $500 on black and letting it sit there until it's gone. You're going to lose 2/34 of each bet you make. You can reduce the variance by dividing the money up into smaller chunks and letting each chunk sit until it's gone, but the expected payout remains the same.

    Your best bet would be to find a game with better odds and do the same thing (only bet the marked chips). You could also minimize the number of times each chip is bet (since you lose 6% or so each bet) but the difference will not be very large for most games at $500.

    Michael

  71. What if they RFID'ed the cards by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    Then that would be cool because we can carry around scanners that would help us read the cards without having to count it :)

  72. Casion episode? by SaV · · Score: 1

    Wow, looks like someones been watching a whole lot of Cowboy Bebop!

  73. Missing pulse detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right - That fake detector is right next to the missing pulse detector on every EEs wish list...

  74. Banned? by Horizon_99 · · Score: 1

    ifilm is showing a banned superbowl commercial for the Wynn casino. The commercial is just him standing on top of his casino saying it's the first time he's put his name on one. Seems pretty harmless, anyone know why it was banned?

    1. Re:Banned? by sulli · · Score: 1

      I think the NFL bans all gambling ads.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:Banned? by Dzifa · · Score: 1

      This wasn't banned, it just only played in Las Vegas.

  75. Re:Could it be spoofed? Is this just PR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WARNING: Parent post contains obfuscated goatsecx! Mod down!

  76. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  77. Dunno - other things are intrinsically fun by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

    I don't see the point of the activity. Maybe I just identify too closely with the long run. I don't expect to sit in a favorable cluster of events.

    watching the wheel go around and seeing what happens - that's what turntables are for.

    I don't think I'm risk-averse - if the odds were even, I'd probably throw down some dough. If they were in my favor, I'd play pretty seriously. I recognize that the house edge is pretty thin for some games, and you need to average over thousands of outcomes to realize the edge. I wouldn't put it all on red even if I got the 0 && 00.

    1. Re:Dunno - other things are intrinsically fun by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      No real opinion on your stance on gambling, but just pointing out the irony in your handle being so tied to "Jimmy the Greek", the famous gambler.

  78. In America... by rhizome · · Score: 1

    >They will be able to track individual gabling habits, and from that, system usage.

    First you track the individual gambling habits, then you get the system usage, then you get the power, THEN you get the women.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  79. why would you want to? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    I think I'll be cashing out my chips before I leave the casino. It makes me nervous knowing I could be unwittingly scanned by others after I leave the floor.

    What a novel idea, cashing out your chips BEFORE leaving! I even heard they sometimes exchange money for them or something.

  80. RFID Tags in Casino Chips by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1

    The Indian casino here in Minnesota has been using RFID tags in their players chips for quite a while. You place your bet in the circle at the blackjack table and the dealer hits a button on the table just before he starts dealing.

    That button sends a radio pulse up through the bet circle and the casino records exactly how much was bet for each player each hand. If someone trys something sly like placing a $25 or $100 chip under their $5 bet after they have a winning hand, the Casino can detect the cheat immediately.

    The primary reason they do this is for the Comp system. Back in the early 90's I was doing work for the Tropicanna Hotel Casino in Las Vegas. Back then the Casino Administrator, Doug Gomes estimated that they were losing $20 million a year from the loose comp system due to employees stating that their {insert friend/relative here} was a high-roller and played a lot at the {insert any table game here}, and then have the hotel buy the airplane ticket with the promise of big play that never happened.

    Tracking play at the slots is automatic with your players card. At the tables, they have to see how much you bought in with, figure your average bet amount, and the length of time you're playing. Its a very imprecise system but it was the best they had, and it was ripe for abuse.

    What this means is that if you really did lose thousands of dollars at the craps table, you're more likely to get that free room or meal.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:RFID Tags in Casino Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this. I played a lot at the Las Vegas Tropicana in the 90s and always wondered why they never seemed to send me as many comp offers in the mail as did other clubs. Eliminating inside-job comp scams is good for players. But, on the other hand, it has traditionally been easy to bet big when the pit boss is looking (and filling out your rating card) and lowering your bets at other times (read "Comp City"). You won't be able to do -that- anymore.

  81. Winning and Losing by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    It would be easy for Blackjack. When it's the dealer's "turn", they activate a button by foot to record the player's chips on the table then record again after payout.

    Remember, these are "numbered" chips so you know exactly which chips the dealer has and which chips are on the table. You might not know if the player has chips in their pockets :)

  82. it will be in all the major casinos in 2-3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I've done some development work on RFID-chip bet recognition for table games -- it's pretty neat stuff.

    The word around the office is that many of the major local (Las Vegas) casinos will probably be upgrading within the next 2 or 3 years as they see RFID-chip technology maturing.

    RFID chips have the promise to deliver very detailed, real-time reports about game performance, player profiles, and security alerts. The cost of re-racking is pretty small compared to the potential windfall of information the casino back-office can get. Within a couple of years, it will become a point of competition between the majors -- "the other guys have it, so we better get it too".

  83. Inside job... by shpoffo · · Score: 1

    As always, the biggest threat comes through unintentional, or intentional compromise of the system. If these chips are all numbered that mens that when you walk through the door, the casino knows if you have a chip that is not in their database. (guards with guns) So the clear break point is the system that stores the IDs, or the guy that runs it. Since the system will probably be closed circuit, that's out without movie-tactics. Bribe the guy who runs the system to add a few IDs.... that's another loop. Then you and your good friends can go collect money when you like.

    The only other option is to read people's chips when they leave the casino (if chips can leave the casino?) Then you dupe a bunch of chips from distributed readers you have snuck in public places and collect money.

    if the chips can't leave the casino then it probably has to be an inside job, barring some clever hack(?).

    Are RFID tags Tempest standard 'compliant'? Isn't there some movie-technology possibility to have surrepitously small readers? Anyone technically know why a door-sized antenna and decoder cannot operate in a person-sized unit?

    .
    -shpoffo

  84. The next ting you know by Snaller · · Score: 1

    They'll put them on the cards as well!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  85. darn you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i submitted this story a week ago. darn you.

  86. Card Counting by gaintner · · Score: 1

    It seems to me one of the most obvious and simple uses would be to detect card counting at blackjack tables. At the moment they do this by watching how you change your bets. Dealers and pit bosses are trained to notice if your bets keep conveniently changing between 10, 20, and 40, for instance. With these new chips you could have a computer do it for you, and do a far better job. As it is you have to place the chips you are betting in a little circle on the table. All they have to do is put a reader under those circles and they can have a computer automatically track bets and look for suspicious patterns.

  87. wynn is a loser by demon411 · · Score: 1

    this casino sounds retarded. i'm def going to short wynn stock as soon as the casino opens.