Slashdot Mirror


Pfizer and Microsoft go after Viagra Spammers

Weird_Hock writes "This story from Reuters tells about the joint effort from Pfizer and Microsoft to go after illegal sellers of Viagra. Pfizer is going after the sellers and Microsoft after the spammers. Looks like they're targeting both sides of the money chain."

205 comments

  1. No Case by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    Spammers are selling V|agra you silly!

    Microsoft should double-dip and file a parallel lawsuits against spammers who sell Full Version WinXP PRO for $35.

    1. Re:No Case by Jpunkroman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly, but i don't know what it would be good for since I don't have a pen1s. (I realize that this post could be taken entirely the wrong way)

    2. Re:No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, they're not even selling V|AGR4 any more. V!4GR@ is so old hat.

      C!4Li$ is the new hotness!

    3. Re:No Case by charleste · · Score: 1

      I'm more worried about the Cialis spammers... and those people who *think* I need my anatomy enhanced...

    4. Re:No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, your post was taken the right way, but since there's no "-5, Extremely unfunny" moderation, the next best option was "0, Offtopic".

    5. Re:No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, your post was taken the right way, but since there's no "-5, Extremely unfunny" moderation, the next best option was "0, Offtopic".

      No, them I'm pretty sure you took the post the wrong way... NOBODY has a pen1s since they don't exist. You can argue it's an obvious mispelling of the phrase "pen once" but I'll never agree with you that it's offensive in any way, shape, or form.

    6. Re:No Case by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 0
      Spammers are selling V|agra you silly!

      Why by V|agra when you can enlarge your penis with C1@l1s?

    7. Re:No Case by SCVirus · · Score: 1

      No silly spammers are selling M$ WinXP PRO for 35$!

    8. Re:No Case by fmobus · · Score: 1

      I have a pen1, your insensitive clod!

    9. Re:No Case by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      Still no case. They're selling W1nd0w$ XP Pr0f3ss10n4l.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
    10. Re:No Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, but i don't know what it would be good for since I don't have a pen1s. (I realize that this post could be taken entirely the wrong way)

      I took v|aGRa entirely the wrong way once.... I thought it was meant to be a suppository.

      (I'm sure there's also a joke in there about someone taking your pen1s entirely the wrong way, but I can't figure it out).

  2. Why not go after the users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what the RIAA does?

    1. Re:Why not go after the users? by ThomasFlip · · Score: 5, Funny

      Middle aged men who need pills to induce raging hard ons have enough problems as it is.

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
  3. oh no! by drunken+dash · · Score: 1

    but then where will i get my illicit viagra that i so desparately need, apparently??

    --
    Enjoy an e-piphany
    1. Re:oh no! by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


      but then where will i get my illicit viagra that i so desparately need

      Make sure you also buy Absorbine Jr. for when your arm gets sore.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a horizontal movement of Pfizer and a slight downward movement of Microsoft. What does that suggest about the markets expectation of future distribution of vi4gra?

      Past performance does not guarantee future results. (applies to the stocks and viagra)

    3. Re:oh no! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Crumble an asperine in it and watch the magic!
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Oh no! by DJPsychoChild · · Score: 1

      Maybe Microsoft needs to start taking Viagra? I mean, if they can't keep it up like they were... Isn't horizontal movement what Pfizer was shooting for? Then again, should a company like Pfizer really be working with a company named microSOFT (Give it a second, it will come to you.....)

      --
      CODITO, ERGO SUM: I Code, therefore I am.
  4. How will I... by pintpusher · · Score: 0, Redundant

    get my

    v1A.gR..aaaaa!!!!

    Oh... come on, someone had to do it!

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
    1. Re:How will I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... come on, someone had to do it!

      No, sorry... You can go get yourself a life now.

    2. Re:How will I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant?

      What the hell?

      At least mod correctly poeple!

      He's parodying(sp?) the Ricloa commercial.

  5. Stop taking the fun out of life! by themaddone · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they go after my music... then they go after my drugs...

    But they'll never get my... my... ohmigod, what do I have left??

    1. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P0rn

    2. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by flint · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your rifle. Cause without Viagra your gun is useless.

      "This is my rifle, this is my gun, this is for killing, this is for fun."

    3. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by lrwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      You still have sex! I guess if you are going with the sex, drugs, and rock and roll theme.

      --
      KNEEL BEFORE ZOD!!
    4. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by panaceaa · · Score: 3, Funny

      by lrwx (800141) * on Thursday February 10, @05:01PM (#11635451)
      You still have sex! I guess if you are going with the sex, drugs, and rock and roll theme.


      Howdy partner! Let me be the first to welcome you to Slashdot! Have a nice day!

    5. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [pendantic]
      "This is my rifle, this is my gun; this is for fighting, this is for fun."
      [/pendantic]

      That movie kicked ass.

    6. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/killing/fight

    7. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by flint · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Stop taking the fun out of life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have sex!

      Not without Viagra, "that suff makes your jimmy thick!"

  6. There's a joke here by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2, Funny

    {{{groan}}} How long until the first viagra/virus joke gets included? I mean really, Microsoft and Pfizer? It's like shooting fish in a con - I mean barrel...

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:There's a joke here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lets not go about this half cocked. Microsoft and Pfizer will need to get a firm grip on the situation, and stroking big egos won't make the solution come any sooner.

    2. Re:There's a joke here by SCVirus · · Score: 1

      In a related story Bill Gates has announced that microsoft is pulling out of the deal due to failure to 'come' (up with solutions).

  7. Analysts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..are predicting a long, hard battle.

    1. Re:Analysts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...with stiff penalties.

    2. Re:Analysts.. by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is a daily show episode in the making ;)

      --
      "That's Nietzsche. He killed my father." -- Jesus, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    3. Re:Analysts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't for get "sustained".

    4. Re:Analysts.. by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope that when Pfizer and Microsoft win, we can see footage of their CEOs dancing in the streets to the tune of Queen's "We Are The Champions".

    5. Re:Analysts.. by AetherBurner · · Score: 2, Funny

      From staid, upright lawyers...

    6. Re:Analysts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Future headlines:

      With the help of Pfizer, Microsoft hardens its stance against spammers.

      Microsoft and Pfizer join forces -- can the release of "Longhorn" far off?

    7. Re:Analysts.. by PW2 · · Score: 1

      Is that what they call Poland now?

  8. what normal people do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a perscription and buy from a licensed pharmacy?

    1. Re:what normal people do? by fembots · · Score: 1

      Normal people in Slashdot? You mean there are sharks in lakes?

    2. Re:what normal people do? by cunniff · · Score: 1
  9. Oh no! by enoraM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now I have to settle for my increase in girth, length and volume, since they will also go for v1agra and v!agra

    Anyhow - if the big dogs are moving now - after the can-spam-act, it's interesting what kind of stable equilibruum the next generation spam will be. It won't go away - It'll just reach the next stage.

    On the bottom of the first page are the stock qoutes von Pfizer and Microsoft. There is a horizontal movement of Pfizer and a slight downward movement of Microsoft. What does that suggest about the markets expectation of future distribution of vi4gra?

  10. As always by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft want to be the biggest dicks around...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:As always by zoloto · · Score: 1

      Well they always wanted to get a head in everything as well.

    2. Re:As always by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Well, when the CEO's name begins with BALL, it saids it all.

    3. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this means Microsoft isn't a big softie afterall.

    4. Re:As always by FarHat · · Score: 1

      With a name like Micro and soft, they look like they need some viagra themselves.

      --
      At the intersection of computation and biology.
    5. Re:As always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1990's have called, they want their joke back...

  11. Great! by 06metzp · · Score: 0

    Now what about the watches? If only we could get Rolex to go after these newly-ubiquitous (in my experience) spammers, I'd be a happy happy guy.

    --
    This sig left blank for page turns.
  12. And the next thing you know... by drwhite · · Score: 1

    There is the B0n3r vIRus exploiting a windows buffer over flow!

  13. Hold on a minute.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft? Doing something I support? Good lord...

  14. How about castration??? by vudufixit · · Score: 3, Funny

    To reduce aggregate demand for the stuff?

    1. Re:How about castration??? by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Shh, you'll give the RIAA ideas ;)

    2. Re:How about castration??? by Vombatus · · Score: 1

      You have to catch the spammers before you can castrate them

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
  15. Just maybe... by gammygator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they'll come up with a product that keeps my servers up.

    --

    No Nyarlathotep, No Chaos
    Know Nyarlathotep, Know Chaos
    1. Re:Just maybe... by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      nice one. That one's up there with the best.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    2. Re:Just maybe... by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe Microsoft will merge (in the hideous horror-movie way) with the viagra sellers...

      "If your computer is up for more than 4 hours, contact your technician immediately."

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  16. let the jokes begin! by Maskirovka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time for the scumbags to bend over and feel the wrath!

    Someone is gonna be in a world of hurt.

    MS and pfizer are going to spread some love around.

    There will be swelling in some lawyers'...pockets.

    No carrots for the spammers. Just some bloated, throbbing, heavy-handed...sticks.

    1. Re:let the jokes begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the jokes come from someone with a sense of humor!

      You bombed dude.

  17. hmm by GotSanity · · Score: 4, Funny

    is it just me or does it seem like microsoft and pfizer are going to be mutualy beneficial out of this one. pfizer's profits get to go back up and microsoft gets a ton of viagra. That should make the programmers happy. :)

    1. Re:hmm by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being both micro and soft, they could really use it too.

    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy?!? With all this ink and noone to write to, why should I be happy?

    3. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viagra won't do the programmers any good until they have a reason to use it, and a saturday night alone watching porno isn't one of them.

    4. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the hell would programmers need viagra for??

  18. First draft of the press release: by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Funny
    Pfizer and Microsoft announced today that they had stiffened their resolve to go after sellers of counterfeit Viagra(r). They realized such spams were peaking, and they knew they had to harden the course for such counterfeiters.

    "These guys think they can keep profits rising endlessly," complained a Pfizer spokesperson. "They are really beginning to poke us in the eye with their nonsense. We are a big company, and Viagra has helped up grow considerably. We won't let these crooks cut our profits off prematurely."

    (Memo to editorial staff: Does the above sound right? Something seems a bit odd.)

    1. Re:First draft of the press release: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You forgot to work in mention of Microsoft's new product, code name "Longhorn".

    2. Re:First draft of the press release: by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1
      You forgot to work in mention of Microsoft's new product, code name "Longhorn".

      ROFL! That was truly hilarious!

    3. Re:First draft of the press release: by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but the "micro-soft" part of the name might put people off.

  19. Re:Oh, I don't mind. by Grip3n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What the hell? Are you just jumping on the "Oh look at me, I use Firefox and Linux" bandwagon, when realistically you're probably not? This has absolutely nothing to do with any operating system or browser on your system, rather spam, which is something that occurs at the server level.

    If you actually were smart enough to go through the steps of installing Gentoo, I would assume you are smart enough to know that spam isn't platform dependent.

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  20. New Market! by shadowcode · · Score: 1

    Looks like Microsoft is looking to take over the market.

  21. If there's one thing big criminals don't like... by Red+Rocket · · Score: 4, Insightful


    ...it's small-time criminals moochin' in on their racket.

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  22. Strange Behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm dubious that this is just good corporate citizenship, especially in light of the fact that Bill Gates owns a significant interest in Viagra's primary competitor, Cialis.

  23. I forward all WinXP spams to MS by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I forward all spams I get that offer Microsoft software on to MS.

    I figure that I'll let MS spend their money on going after the spammers - after all, the enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy, and is useful to me.

    I get a nice auto-ack from MS with a tracking number for each report. What does that mean? That I get a nice auto-ack from MS with a tracking number - I have no way of knowing for sure that they do anything with the reports.

    But hey, it if nukes a spammer and/or costs MS money, then it's worth it.

    1. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by pe1chl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I forward them the lottery scams that refer to domains registered on their "MSN Personal domains" service.
      They do not seem to care.

      Interestingly enough, the names shifted from (variations on) cashchangeukltd.org, which is just the name of a fraudulent organization, to (variations on) ms-wordpromo.com, which could be seen as a trademark violation by their triggerhappy lawyers. You know, those that went after names like mikerowesoft.com because it was too much like a trademark they registered.

      But despite several reports, nothing seems to happen. They just go on facilitating fraud, and even do so under their own trademarked names.

      I start to believe that there is nothing more than a tracking number generator behind those reporting addresses, and the big Microsoft company is not interested in abuse of its trademarks.

    2. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I feel very sad for you that you consider MS 'Your enemy'. I don't like them either, but I don't attribute them that much power. They aren't an enemy; they are a company out to make money. By calling them the enemy you ascribe malice to them that is unwarranted. You also give them power over you by the same act.

    3. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by myov · · Score: 1

      Depends what it is. I once got spammed by yellovvpages.com (vv, not a w). Forwarded to yellowpages.com, and they asked for additional info.

      I could have reported the spam, but I figure they have lawyers who would want to "introduce" themselves :-)

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    4. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not what pe1chl said. He said that they are the enemy of his enemy (spammers). That doesn't make MS his friend however.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Parse it again, Sam:

      The enemy (Microsoft) of my enemy (spammers)...

    6. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected :) This 'enemy of my enemy's enemy' crap got me confused! I'm just used to knee jerk MS bashing around here. It's fashionable ;)

    7. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I feel very sad for you that you consider MS 'Your enemy'. I don't like them either, but I don't attribute them that much power. They aren't an enemy; they are a company out to make money. By calling them the enemy you ascribe malice to them that is unwarranted. You also give them power over you by the same act.
      • Exactly what would it take for you to consider their actions with malice? Perhaps an upheld conviction of abusing their OS monopoly to move into other areas and take out other companies illegally? How about their secret agreements with OEMs in the past that required one copy of Windows sold per CPU, whether the OS left the building on the PC or not? I could go on listing more, but at this point in time it's pointless to just say it's business as usual and without malice. The courts have found MS to have broken anti-trust law, and it was upheld on appeal. Companies don't go around breaking laws, then pulling the type of defense strategies MS did without malice. They do that when they did it intentionally.
      • But frankly your argument's silly anyway. I consider MS my enemy. I consider the RIAA and MPAA member companies my enemy. I consider most of the BSA companies my enemy, and I consider the OPEC members to be enemies. Why? Their goal, even if they aren't breaking laws, is to make money at all costs. If that cost is my freedoms (RIAA/MPAA and the congresscritters they own), my quality of life, or what else, so be it, they don't care as long as they make money. They're in business to make money from me even if I fully wish to not pay them a damned cent. I don't willingly, but my tax dollars keep going to them (at the least to pay the damn congresscritters they've bought who represent the companies first and the real people last). I consider that enemy worthy, and worth fighting.

        Power over me? They already have power over you, me and all of us. Hell just look at the litany of bills presented, along with the ones that made it into law. You can't tell me things like the DMCA haven't already given them enormous power over each and every one of us. Companies keep proving they're willing to abuse it any way they see fit. Want to stifle research into security flaws? Already been done, will happen again. Want to try and make sure no one can sell generic parts for your equipment? Already being done, look at the printer manufacturers.

        Sorry, but I don't have to do a damned thing for them to have power over me. They already do, and that's another part of why I consider them my enemies. If you don/t, well congrats on enjoying all those laws and restrictions they've placed on you. I'll be fighting them tooth and nail for the existing ones and future ones while you enjoy having your rights and freedoms removed. Personally I want mine back.

    8. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been forwarding all spam to my Senator for years, and he's still got a small dick and high interest rate loans.

    9. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      In case not everyone knows these, here is an example:

      FROM: THE DESK OF THE E-MAIL PROMOTIONS MANAGER,
      INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT
      MICROSOFT WORD LOTTERY, UK
      3B Olympic Way, Sefton Business Park,
      Aintree, Liverpool, L30 1RD.
      E-mail:admin@ms-wordpromos.com
      REF NO: MSW-L/200-334841
      BATCH: 2005MJL-01
      ELECTRONIC MAIL AWARD WINNING NOTIFICATION
      We are pleased to inform you of the announcement today of winners of
      the MICROSOFT WORD E-MAIL MEGA JACKPOT LOTTERY PROGRAMS held on 3rd
      FEBRUARY 2005. Your company or your personal e-mail address is attached
      to
      winning number 01-03FEB-2005-02 MSW, with serial number S/N-00179 drew
      the lucky numbers 887-13-865-37-10-83, and consequently won in the
      first lottery category.
      You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay out of GBP
      1,000,000.00 POUNDS in cash credited to file REF NO: MSW-L/200-334841
      This is
      from total prize money of GBP 7,000,000.00 POUNDS, shared among the
      Twenty (5) international winners in this category.
      All participants were selected through our Microsoft computer ballot
      system drawn form 21,000 names, 3,000 names from each continent, as
      part
      of International "E-MAIL" Promotions Program, which is conducted once
      in every four years for our prominent MS WORD users all over the world,
      and for the continues use of E-mail. We are sorry to let you know that
      our site is still under construction,as we are updating our site and
      our windows 2005.
      Your fund has been deposited in an escrow account with our affiliate
      bank here in UK, and insured with your REF NO: MSW-L/200-334841 and
      your
      E-mail address, Please note that, you are to contact us via email as we
      are promoting the use of E-mail,You have the right to call the bank, as
      we will provide you with the necessary details on how to claim your
      prize. You are to keep your ref. number and batch number from the
      public,
      until you have been processed and your money remitted to your personal
      account.
      We hope with your prize,you will be happy to promote the use of E-mail
      and the use of MS WORD. To claim your winning prize, you must first
      contact the claims department by email for processing and remittance of
      your prize money to you. Your assigned claims officer contact email is:
      Name: Jack Harold
      E-mail Address: claimsofficer@mswordpromotions.com
      He is to help you in claiming your due prize. Remember, all prize money
      must be claimed not later than the 10th of FEBRUARY 2005. All funds not
      claimed on or before the fixed date will be penalized accordingly.
      NOTE: In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications, please
      remember to quote your reference and batch numbers in all
      correspondences with your claims officer.

      Sincerely,
      Mrs. Monica Lopez
      For MS WORD LOTTO UK.
      Any winner below the age of 18 years is automatically disqualified
      NOTE: Do not reply this mail. You are to contact your claims officer
      immediately.
      SPONSORS:
      CHIEF SPONSOR;MICROSOFT CO-OPERATIONS UK, MICROSOFT CO-OPERATIONS
      ASIA
      MICROSOFT CO-OPERATIONS USA,
      ALPHA PRIVATE BANK UK, ALPHA EXPRESS DELIVERIES UK.

      You would think it has plenty of trademark infringements, and associates the Microsoft name with an obvious scam. I expected them to shut down these domains quickly, but no.

    10. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is the enemy of my friend: free software. The enemy of my friend is my enemy. (The whole "enemy of my enemy is my friend" thing, on the other hand, is a load of bullcrap.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by mrbuttboy · · Score: 1

      you did notice your posting on slashdot,right??

      Look at it this way, if there wasn't MS for us to hate we would have to create them. or something like that... :)

      --
      What do you say to the man that has nothing? Cast it away!!
    12. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Please explain what laws/restrictions they've put upon me. I don't like the crap that spews out of Holywood, so I don't care if I can download movies or not. I don't like pop music, so I don't care if I can download songs or not. I use various OS'es (Windows, *nix, OS X), so I'm hardly a prisoner of any monopoly.

      So, tell me again how they have power over me?

    13. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by oconnorcjo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They aren't an enemy; they are a company out to make money. By calling them the enemy you ascribe malice to them that is unwarranted.

      I think they do Maliciosly attack any technology that threatens thier OS monopoly. They try to keep Web standards to "IE only" thus forcing Web Surfers to have Windows. They try to make MS Office the defacto standard in bussiness thus forcing most bussiness machines to have Windows. They are trying to make windows audio/vidio formats the future "standard" with WMP thus forcing people to stay with Windows.

      They push these propritary standards by providing them with thier OS (with exception of Office) and not providing them with any other OS (except perhaps Apple).

      As a person who likes and uses Linux and would like to be able to interact with the rest of the world as easily as Windows users do, I find myself directly opposed to the strategies of MS. They are my enemy because they are trying to destroy my choice of computer experience down to just thier stuff.

      I can not use IE/WMP or MS Office when I am using a Linux desktop so I use alternatives to those products (even when I am using a windows OS).

      I suggest FireFox to as many people as I can to not only help give the user a better web experience, but to give MYSELF a better experience by hopefully forcing Web Developers to adjust thier IE Only compatibility standards.

      I occasionally suggest OpenOffice to users but have a difficult time justifying it. MS really does have a solid product in MS Office.

      I tell people to try to stay away from WMP and am quite happy that ITunes is doing well and that mp3 is still the defacto standard.

      You may not find MS to be your enemy but I will fight them to keep/get my freedom to have a Microsoft free desktop (without having to sacrifice compatibility).

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    14. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      ...after all, the enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy...

      Rule 29.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    15. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by karnal · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      With so many enemies, I'd hate to be your friend.

      --
      Karnal
    16. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by SwervingVector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll come out of lurking to just comment on this one... I don't like pop music, so I don't care if I can download songs or not. I use various OS'es (Windows, *nix, OS X), so I'm hardly a prisoner of any monopoly. So you don't like pop music, what's stoping you downloading what you do like? You use various OS'es, do you enjoy not being able to edit images in Photoshop on *nix? Not getting the latest games (if at all) on OS X? Do you enjoy trying to configure a WinModem to run on *nix? Ah well, it's your choice. Personally, I'd prefer that the general populace wasn't so accepting of the Spyware, Malware and Crapware that Windows staggers under the weight of. Then maybe MS would be forced into coding a hardened OS off the shelf. I can accept that there will always be a need for updates (duh) but the sheer magnitude of the flaws found in Windows XP cannot be tolerated. You are liable to reply with the stock standard call of "Windows has so many discovered flaws because of it's monopoly of the OS market" so I will take the liberty of dispelling this myth right now. Lets take the path of MacOS as an example; OS 9, despite it's market share, had roughly 50% of the crapware released on the internet, OS X has 0%. When you do the math, taking into account the amount of people using OS X compared to Windows, there should be about 3000ish viruses out for OS X. By the way, before you come back and try to tell me that there already have been viruses released for OS X, I'll define a virus for you: Self-propagating, not proof of concept and not something that requires you to enter your password to delete your homefolder (the virus this point deals with happens to be proven not a virus by the first point)...

    17. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm just used to knee jerk MS bashing around here. It's fashionable ;)

      Don't confuse criticism with bashing. This is after all a tech forum and MS has worked very hard to earn a bad reputation among the technology savvy. That's the down side of brand recognition.

      These people don't hate Microsoft because it's Microsoft, they hate it because the reputation it has made for its shoddy products, overcharged prices, agressive and predatory marketing, and occasionally illegal business practices.

    18. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      No, most of them hate them because that's what the rest of the crowd is doing. Like I said, it's fashionable.

    19. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With so many enemies, I'd hate to be your friend.

      What? Doesn't the fact that he has so many 'enemies' make being his friend a stronger thing than it would be otherwise?

    20. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get a nice auto-ack from MS

      If you forward your spam to MS and you get an auto-ack back from MS for all the spam you forward to them, are you indirectly spamming yourself?

    21. Re:I forward all WinXP spams to MS by mutterc · · Score: 1
      I personally consider all "companies out to make money" my enemy. I know economics is not a zero-sum game, but it is also not an infinite-sum game. The drive for ever-increasing profit growth rate means that eventually every corporation will start squeezing its customers to increase profits.

      They own more and more of the government every year. When all entertainment is pay-per-view, all software (and most hardware) need a subscription to work, when for-profit companies own agriculture (via genetically-modified seeds), when crossing a corporation means getting sued into oblivion (because it's impossible to have the means to defend yourself even from frivolous lawsuits), when companies can buy their stuff from other cheaper places, but you cannot (backed by technology and bought legislation), what will your life be like? How will the "free market" save us?

  24. Now if they would only attack WaMu phishers by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    We get average of at least one Washington Mutual phishing email per day and have absolutely no affiliation with the company. Its definitely the most popular phishing target (more popular than paypal or ebay in our little back water of the IP space). I don't know if WaMu is especially phish-easy, but they seem to be a strong target.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Now if they would only attack WaMu phishers by CyberDave · · Score: 1

      Based solely on my individual accounts, of which there are several that get spammed hard, I'd say the phishers have simply moved on from Bank of America to Washington Mutual.

    2. Re:Now if they would only attack WaMu phishers by Christianfreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you have anything to do at all the administration of your mail server then I would suggest looking into greylisting. Has helped tremendously with the volume of spam I receive to the server I admin because it forces spammers to use a single point to send spam from (a point which you can identify).

      Also ClamAV can be used to scan incoming email on the server side and has definitions for many phishing attacks as well as worms and viruses.

    3. Re:Now if they would only attack WaMu phishers by kbnielsen · · Score: 1

      I agree... Greylisting IS extremely effective and efficient compared to conventional anti spam methods... Where I work, we have seen a dramatic drop in the spam that gets through (see http://www.daimi.au.dk/~glad/spam.html).

      The greylisting was put to use in the start of Q2 2004.

      But please don't use greylisting, because if enough people are using this technique, the spammers will defeat it :)

    4. Re:Now if they would only attack WaMu phishers by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      I don't know if WaMu is especially phish-easy, but they seem to be a strong target.
      • I think they don't care or at least react on them as quickly as other banks is why. I forward all phishing attacks to the companies involved so they can at least do damage control, and of them WaMu has no auto response, and when I do get a response it's 3-4 days later, well past the point of time where they could have done anything. (And it's a canned thank you for letting us know response, not even a "yes this was not from us, if you clicked on the link and entered information let us know ASAP" response I get from most banks.)
      • Personally the lesson I've learned is to be damned glad WaMu's not my bank. YMMV of course, but they don't seem to take these phishing attacks very seriously unlike other banks do.

  25. Microsoft going after spammers???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XXXX is going after spammers!!!
    Long live XXXX !!!

    Microsoft is going afer XXXX!!!
    XXXX must be innocent !!!

    I'm really confused. Could someone explain this to me?

    1. Re:Microsoft going after spammers???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here?

  26. Wrong Target by Eskimore_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I worked on an ISP's helpdesk and I can tell you that the number 1 spam complaint I got was those adverts for having a bigger penis.

    Why can't someone go after those spammers. At least viagra actually works.

    1. Re:Wrong Target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the big penis emails aren't cutting into a giant corporation's profits.

  27. Both sides of the chain. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't one of the sides be the buyers?

  28. Re:Oh, I don't mind. by brilinux · · Score: 1

    If you are using Gentoo, then you should be getting all the ingredients and making the Viagra yourself.

    (This is a joke - I have used Gentoo as well, thought mostly Debian and the BSDs, but I have nothing against it).

  29. bwa-ha-ha! by ed.han · · Score: 1

    this means that for their due diligence, they actually have to look at the spam, doesn't it? yikes!

    ed

  30. Vested interest? by HardsetHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose since no-one yet has made this crack...

    I wonder if Microsoft has an ulterior motive in this whole crackdown.

    Thank you. I'm here all week.

    1. Re:Vested interest? by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      The Micro part just adds to the irony.

    2. Re:Vested interest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wonder if Microsoft has an ulterior motive in this whole crackdown."

      Microsoft has more than one issue in that department.

      Who's gonna be the third partner for Microsoft? Who would be the best to enlarge them?

    3. Re:Vested interest? by auburnate · · Score: 1

      While you are at it, you might bold-type the Micro part as well. Oh wait, that's a different drug.

    4. Re:Vested interest? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      As Viagras biggest consumer, Bill's tired of being both Micro and Soft 8^)

  31. It's just a front: by Morning+$tar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pfizer is actually working on Longhorn with hopes of keeping it up longer and giving it that spine-tingling performance

  32. mmmmpffff by Goeland86 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really don't think it's going to change much. Let them try. Most of the spammers are outside the US. Pfizer might be a little more lucky. It sounds kinda useful, but in the end it probably won't change much to the 500+ spam messages I get a day.

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
    1. Re:mmmmpffff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure things will change - pretty soon you will get 1000 spams a day instead of the measly 500...

  33. Both sides of the money chain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well what about the buyers?

  34. Always wondered why Rolex and Pfizer stayed quiet by TeeJS · · Score: 1

    While 80% of the spam I get is for knockoffs of their products. I also always wondered why these spammers are so hard to "find", I mean how hard it for an investigator to buy one, and follow the credit card trail? (Of course the credit card companies would have to be responsible and stop making money on transactions for illegal goods and services like spam and offshore casinos)

  35. I knew Bill was getting old... by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I first read that I saw. "Microsoft goes after viagra"

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    1. Re:I knew Bill was getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you read it now, what do you see?

  36. Trademark dilution? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I remember the first time I started seeing Viagra (and other prescription drug) spam. It was long enough ago that I figured the pharma companies would want to crack down on it.

    Up until that point, I'd been getting spams for "pharmaceutical" (read: "quackery) products, like the usual "herbal penis pills", "natural apricot pits cancer cure!", "b00st your immune system", "legal pot substitute", and so on.

    If I'd never heard of Viagra before, I'd have lumped it in along with phen-phen, ephedra, and laetrile as the quack medicines I'd historically been getting spams for: that is, substances of questionable efficacy, safety, and/or legality.

    Quickly now, (off the top of your head, without googling and without being a pharmacist), which of the following - Effexor, Paxil, Viagra, Cialis, Phenteramine, Valium, Xanax, Soma, Lipitor, Zyban, Zantrex, Xenical, Meridia and Fioricet - are "real" medicines (that is, which have been approved by FDA for the treatment of medical conditions), and which are fake/quack/banned?

    If you get even one false-positive (that is, a "real" drug that a reasonable person dismiss es as "quacky" due to its prevalence in spam), I'd say the manufacturer of that drug has a prima facie case for trademark dilution against every spammer who spammed for it.

    1. Re:Trademark dilution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prima facie

      How long have you been waiting to use that phrase?

      Clutch

    2. Re:Trademark dilution? by kaustik · · Score: 1

      "legal pot substitute", and so on.

      I have to throw a comment in on this. I don't use any drugs, but a good deal of my friends like to smoke pot. We were driving in a car one day and one of the geniuses pulled out a bag of something from the Internet marketed as "legal marijuanna." I assumed it was a lame joke, so I let them con me into taking a nice big hit....
      That's just about when everything turned into cartoons. Seriously. Everything was a cartoon. I kept hearing this laughing noise coming from off in the distance, but couldn't figure out what it was. 45 seconds later when the hallucinations wore off, I realized it was me laughing.
      No joke here. I've done my share of stuff when I was younger so I know a trip when I see one. Anyway, the stuff is called Salvia Divinorum. Different people sell it online at different concentrates. The stuff I tried was the most expensive blend the site had, apparently.
      Have fun.

    3. Re:Trademark dilution? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      Effexor, Paxil, Viagra, Cialis, Phenteramine, Valium, Xanax, Soma, Lipitor, Zyban, Zantrex, Xenical, Meridia and Fioricet

      Emphesis mine

      And if you're interested in buying some Soma, can I also interest you in some Prozium?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:Trademark dilution? by Sir+Isaac+Lime · · Score: 1

      A lot of people in the Entheogenic community are upset at vendors selling Salvia as "legal marijuana", and they're quite justified in that anger. Salvia doesn't resemble marijuana in the slightest, and it's dangerous to suggest it does.

    5. Re:Trademark dilution? by Large+Bogon+Collider · · Score: 1

      Zantrex is the fake ("herbal"). Phenteramine isn't available anymore. I'm not a pharmacist, just a doc :)

    6. Re:Trademark dilution? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Lipitor is a real medicine which should be banned. It causes memory loss, though the makers deny it. The makers of Statin drugs bribed the FDA head with speaking engagements and he lowered the 'safe' levels of cholesterol to get more people on the drug.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    7. Re:Trademark dilution? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Zantrex is the fake ("herbal"). Phenteramine isn't available anymore. I'm not a pharmacist, just a doc :)

      Congrats -- I first thought of the trademark infringement issue when I flubbed it on "Soma". Heh, a painkiller named Soma. "Yeah, right."

      Then I found out it was a real medication. In Ford's name, what was that marketing department thinking? (I'm slowly learning never to underestimate the stupidity of marketroids.)

      I wonder how many patients do a double-take or pop out a Huxley reference when first prescribed it. (Heh, I'm slowly learning never to underestimate the prevalence of stupidity in the general public either.)

    8. Re:Trademark dilution? by Large+Bogon+Collider · · Score: 1

      Soma is not too inappropriate of a name. This med can be addicting even though it is supposed to be a muscle relaxant. I rarely prescribe it for that reason.

  37. Next up... by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Rolex?

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
    1. Re:Next up... by jdhawke · · Score: 1

      hear hear, I am getting between 10 and 20 rolex ads a day.

  38. Shouldn't the headline really read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article title should really be:

    "Pfizer and Microsoft go after Viagra Spammers Hard"

    1. Re:Shouldn't the headline really read: by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Pfizer and Microsoft rise to the challenge."

      "Pfizer and Microsoft erect barriers to Viagra spam."

      "Pfizer and Microsoft have the balls to go after Viagra spammers."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Shouldn't the headline really read: by SirModem · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or...
      Pfizer and Microsoft rise to the challenge with barriers erect showing they have the balls to go down on these Viagra spammers.

    3. Re:Shouldn't the headline really read: by karnal · · Score: 1

      Now this deserves mod points....

      --
      Karnal
  39. Spam in general by mszeto · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since I had moderator points, I wanted to read all the crap that gets posted and see if there was anything that needed to be modded up. I was very dissapointed to hardly see *anything* relevant to the topic other than lame jokes.

    I think that this will be good for users. Both companies have something to gain by there being less spam, and thus it will help both companies bottom lines to get rid of it.

    What I hope they *don't* do (since both companies are large) is throw money at the problem and hope it gets fixed.

    I think this is a good day for the internet in general!

    1. Re:Spam in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon spoilsport, chill out ... I thought a few of them were really funny !

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. That's ironic... by triffidsting · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because of Microsoft, I can't get my box to come up, and because of Pfizer, I can't get... oh, nevermind.

    --
    Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    1. Re:That's ironic... by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Quite. Since when was a Microsoft operating system famed for long a uptime?

  42. Stupid claim by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw somewhere that Pfizer said that part of the reason they're doing this is that people think that it's Pfizer sending out the spam...

    Huh?

    I think that not only is that bullshit, that they're actually doing it to try to prevent reimportation (as well as the stopping of non-Pfizer sildenafil citrate).

    1. Re:Stupid claim by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      I saw somewhere that Pfizer said that part of the reason they're doing this is that people think that it's Pfizer sending out the spam...

      Huh?

      I think that not only is that bullshit, that they're actually doing it to try to prevent reimportation (as well as the stopping of non-Pfizer sildenafil citrate).

      • It's probably true. Think about the kind of person who'd bother to read spam, much less buy from it. They're definitely stupid enough to think it's actually Pfizer sending them. They're also the ones who fall for each Phishing attack that comes their way. Hell they're probably well on their way to Nigeria to take part in that great deal to make millions illegally as well.
  43. We have discussed this before by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know we have discussed this before, but shouldn't someone go after Microsoft for a very insecure OS that happens to be a petri-dish for spamzombies everywhere? Isn't it negligent behaviour? It would be a lot easier for law enforcement if you could really say where a message originated instead of discovering that the spammer address is from an old lady who never updated her machine since her grandson installed it.

    When taking over IT on a small advertising agency with lots of Macs at the creative dept and lots of Windows PCs on the rest of the office I had the firewall to deny and log all attempts to connect with SMTP servers outside. Guess what side of the net was infested?

    It appears to me that most of _my_ problems with spam are due to spambots sending mail from ADSL or cable-modems (It's common to have companies whose IP addresses fall in blacklisted ranges and that have to send some or all of their e-mail over ISP servers - raising a lot of security/privacy issues)

  44. With "LongHorn" coming out.... by jamesdood · · Score: 2, Funny

    This should be no suprise. After all the name
    "Short-limp horn" is not nearly as compelling!

    --
    *narf!*
  45. Oh no! by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

    I hope this doesn't take away from my spamusement fun!

  46. Wow, neat by screwballicus · · Score: 1

    Slashdot: Microsoft and a large, powerful prescription drug manufacturer have teamed up to fight their mutual enemies.
    Readers: Well...good for them.

    Quick, someone take a picture of the page before a dominant theory emerges on why this is in fact a malevolent scheme on the part of Microsoft and Pfizer to take away our freedoms.

  47. But which company... by Dr_Ish · · Score: 1

    Will be the first to produce the Blue Pill of death? [Sorry, couldn't resist]

  48. Sir Pun-a-lot by mattspammail · · Score: 1

    Man, they're coming hard against these guys!

    Will they face stiff fines?

    They've been soft on spammers for too long.

    Viagra supporters, rise up! You don't have to take any more of this! (until you can't rise up at all anymore... then take some, then rise back up)

    Pardon the already-posted ones. I'm posting before reading previous posts.

    --
    Now accepting PayPal donations!
  49. But what about... by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    That's great, but who is going to go after the Levitra couches?

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  50. And in other news.... by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Microsoft announce that they are partnering with Pfizer to produce their own generic brand name of Viagra.

    Critics point out that the first version of any product from Microsoft never stays up for long, and that users should wait for the second release, unless they are willing to accept permanent loss of data assets.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  51. And in other news... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    It has been reported that market demand for
    Pfizer's "Viagra" AD prescription has sagged.
    Pfizer stock price plummets 05 percent.
    Analysts conjecture that demand has stiffened
    for the two competing AD prescription brands.
    Stay tuned for more news...

  52. BSOED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blue screen of erectile dysfunction.

  53. Merger by http101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    In today's MarketWatch, software giant, Microsoft and Pfizer have formed a business alliance to combat spammers and illegal manufacture of Pfizer products. The new company name will be, "Macrohard".

    --
    -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  54. I wonder ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...what kind of defense the spammers are erecting?

    1. Re:I wonder ... by whovian · · Score: 1

      ...what kind of defense the spammers are erecting?

      Perhaps they will opt for retrograde evacuation.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  55. Yeh yeh by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Those were the two words Bill Gates did not want to hear on his honeymoon ...

  56. The run-up by mtec · · Score: 1

    Deep in the Gates compound...

    "Honey! Come to bed, It's Wednesday and you know what that means!"

    Bill: "Be right there dear - just trying out these - uh - vitamins I bought on-line"

    20 minutes later

    "Doh!"

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  57. iop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this case, Slashdot Group-Think only allows us to hope that they both destory each other.

  58. A killer combination... by kbnielsen · · Score: 2, Funny

    MicroSoft + Viagra + Penis Enlargement Pills == HugeHard

    That doesn't sound good :)

  59. Why isn't the DEA going after them? by swb · · Score: 1

    Surely selling prescription drugs in any kind of a shady manner (phony perscriptions, no prescriptions, not the drug advertised, etc) across state lines is a serious Federal offense, at least as serious as this drug crime is and should warrant its own Federal task force, RICO prosecutions, and the like.

    I wonder why we haven't seen this and it takes MS/Pfizer joining forces to make an issue out of it. Does this make any sense?

    1. Re:Why isn't the DEA going after them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would imagine these website owners are just using referral systems from offshore pharmacies so the only real law they would be breaking is if their spam does not conform to the can-spam rules (they never handle any drugs themselves).

      The FDA passed a law years ago (I don't know what it was called) that allows you to import a 3 month supply of any prescription drug from another country for personal use (more than that and they might arrest you thinking you are reselling). If the country you are ordering from doesn't do the prescription thing than you can order whatever you want at HUGE savings to boot.

      This is just going to be one of the first steps in cracking down on people like me that can't afford a doctor AND insurance who just buy prescription drugs online at 75% savings. It's all about the drug companies profit margins baby, to hell with the sick and diseased.

    2. Re:Why isn't the DEA going after them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you buy from? I've been looking for a site thats reputable for a while. Not painkillers and narcotics, stuff that actually will help me, like allergy medicine.

  60. At least they're not assholes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want us to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit!

  61. my personal favorite spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    impress your girl with a huge cumshot.

    Because lots of spoo makes everyone happy

    1. Re:my personal favorite spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      impressed != happy

  62. sig... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baldurs Gate II?
    Minsc's hamster right?

    1. Re:sig... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Minsc's hamster right?

      Yes, However, that wasn't a hamster - It was a noble lemming - Much like myself.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  63. Doesn't pfizer get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Have they ever checked their inboxes? It is full of ads for cheap copies of XP i would guess. Or not?

    And they expect Microsoft to help them when MS can't do a decent job on the piracy of its own stuff?

  64. It's a good thing... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    I have to say, this is probably the smartest thing M$ has done (ethically speaking).

    Now, my only question is ... Why?

    I don't see any gain in it for M$. It will get them good publicity in terms of positive responce but ... well maybe that is it... I have to say if they are succesful my hat is off to them.

    ~G

  65. irrelevant posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, your contribution to this discussion hasn't exactly been enlightening either... There just isn't anything interesting to say about this unless you happen to be personally involved - the whole article is an opportunity for jokes. If you want serious stuff, look under "developers" or "bsd".

    1. Re:irrelevant posts by msblack · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has been taken over by the kiddies. I think the best way to overcome this is by reducing the number of moderator points handed out and select additional appointed moderators. I've set my preferences to -1 the score of anything marked funny because it's usually overrated.

      Much of what gets up-modded is often juvenile rantings or people restating the obvious, not thought-provoking discussion or insight. Perhaps my posting is obvious too but I don't see much of anyone who notices or cares.

      How about granting moderator points to those who post articles which were up-modded by Slashdot appointed moderators (not those granted moderator points). In other words, if the appointed moderators think you have something relative to say, you are more likely to be a good judge of others.

      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
  66. Re: And in other views. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to some that no commerce is bad commerce.
    Bad commerce is better commerce.
    Profitable commerce is best. Pfizer. Microsoft.
    The old one-two twenty-three skidoo.
    Spam sandwiches.

  67. Everyone else against spam too: Earthlink & th by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Informative

    In related news, simultaneously Earthlink (in an anti-spam coalition with Microsoft) also announced filing numerous lawsuits to hopefully litigate some major spam operations into oblivion.
    Winning these cases (and most importantly, many more) against the spammers would be much easier, of course, if the U.S. finally adopted an opt-in requirement as well, stating that there is no way you CAN SPAM, like in the EU where under a new agreement on anti-spam enforcement, one single complaint will now even suffice to send the authorities round to eradicate any remaining spammers' hideouts in 13 Member States at once.

  68. Must ... control ... base ... instinscts by morcego · · Score: 1

    No. Must not say it ... No ... No

    GO MICROSOFT GO!

    Gahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! I said it !

    Please excuse me while I go shoot myself on the head.

    --
    morcego
  69. They're ALL crap if they're sold over the Internet by BattyMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Particularly without a prescr|pti0n.

    V1@gr4, C|al1$, 0xycOnt1n and the rest of those (the real ones) are PRESCRIPTION drugs - "Controlled Substances" - the distribution of which (without proper licensing & documentation) is a Big Federal Felony(tm). Anyone "selling" any of those things on the Internet is selling - at best - fakes, and is more likely a simple fraud.

    Even if they're doing it from offshore, selling the REAL stuff (particularly narcotics like Oxyc0d0ne) is a big enough crime (in the US) to obtain action from Interpol resulting in extradition of the offenders. These are scams, every bit as much as Muhammed Al-Quedah, who wants to cut you in on the $22e6 which he skimmed out of Sadam's treasury, and now needs your (confidential) help to get it out of the Netherlands.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  70. MS you are not the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ just f*ck off. You are not the police. You are not the law. You are just a big fat bloated company with a 10th rate product and a lot of money.

    Sure spam sucks, but M$ acting cop is just pure evil.

    Rewards for virus writers, now going after spammers....stop

    You are not the police, or the FBI. Just go away and start putting more energy into your 10th rate OS which allows machines to be zombified and compromised by spammers and script kiddies.

  71. This might be the answer. by igorthefiend · · Score: 1

    In a huge number of spams for products that people might actually theoretically *want*, there's actual crime involved, be it trademarks, copyright violation, passing fake goods off as the real thing - things like that. Sure, it won't stop the annoying mortgage spam, but if we can get rid of drug spam, counterfeit watch and software spam, then that's a heck of a good start. Looking at previous Slashdot Through The Keyhole escapades regarding the homes of spam kings, these guys have assets, which means they companies potentially have something to gain, and these big companies like Pfizer, Rolex, Microsoft et al have their army of caged lawyers... and basically infinite resources to sit on these people in the case of MS... If the theory that there's only a small number of spam kingpins out there, this will either severely limit the type of spam they can send out, or remove the profit motivation.

  72. Re:They're ALL crap if they're sold over the Inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep wondering if some people would actually be dumb enough to buy from them (or if there is that much demand for v1@gr4).

    You're getting something unreliable (possibly fakes, or something that could be harmful), and risking big legal troubles.

    And even if they sold the real thing, I doubt one would really save anything considering insurance pays for most of it - not enough savings to risk your health and the troubles anyways.

    I'm a narcotics user (it's prescribed for chronic pain, so don't bother with bad jokes), and it costs me nothing. (Even v1@gr4 would cost me nothing if I accepted, and they're offering non-stop)

    A bit like "enlarge your ..." spam, I mean - how much "small" guys are there who need/want that?

  73. Re:Always wondered why Rolex and Pfizer stayed qui by SCVirus · · Score: 1

    The spammer will never cashout there spam-gotten cash before laundering it (at least the smart ones).

  74. Better colours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. Re:They're ALL crap if they're sold over the Inter by thogard · · Score: 1

    What needs to happen is they need to use existing laws to bust a few of these guys for "offering drugs to children within 100 yards of a school" and send them to jail for 100 years or whatever the law allows. The rules are on the books and they broke the law. Now make an example of them.

  76. A lesson in Slashbot logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ (remember to use 'M$' - that is funny, but 'Open Sores' will get you modded troll) doesnt include virus scanner - M$ has no regard for security
    M$ includes virus scanner - M$ is using its monopoly to enter another market

    M$ includes extra apps with its OS - it is called bloat.
    M$ doesnt include extra apps - oh look, you dont get anything with Windoze.

    M$ Office has every feature you could want in an office app - it is bloat
    OOo is slower than Office even when running Office under Wine on Linux and only includes half the features - OOo is the best office suite in the world. But Sun is the enemy of open source, even though they gave us OOo.

    IE has an exploit - Windoze is insecure!
    Mozilla has an exploit - Linux is only a kernel, Mozilla is not part of Linux. But this is the year of Linux on the desktop because when it suits us suddenly Mozilla, OOo etc are part of Linux (even though you can use OOo and Mozilla on Windoze too). You see Linux is only a kernel when its convenient.

    FreeBSD is more secure and stable than Linux but FreeBSD sux0r5 because it doesnt have the same driver support as Linux. But Linux r0x0r5 even though it doesnt have the same driver support as Windoze.

    Im sure you see the pattern here.

  77. Im sure they're in f0r 4 |_[]nG T|m3!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    micro5[]ft and phizer will have a g00d t|me trying to stop this as it will probably be |-|ard to find the j4ck0|=|=s that mail all this stuff.

  78. Viagra Spammers Should Take This Seriously by danFL-NERaves · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has always been committed to finding a way to keep it up longer (their operating systems, that is).

    Dan

  79. Side Effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if your spam does not return to Microsoft condition within 6 hours, get medical attention immediately.

  80. OEM viagra by Vivski · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this partnership between Microsoft and Pfizer mean I'll be able to get OEM Pfizer Viagra bundled with my WinXP Pro?

    1. Re:OEM viagra by http101 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it doesn't seem logical... have you seen the pricetag on a copy of Windows Professional (any flavor), its us that's getting the shaft!

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  81. Won't help by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    The majority of my spam today is for Cialis instead. Anti-Viagra would've helped a couple of years ago....

    1. Re:Won't help by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The majority of my spam today is for Cialis instead. Anti-Viagra would've helped a couple of years ago....

      Yep... as far as I know, they don't sell Cialis in the UK, but I heard about it and figured out what it was entirely from spam I received.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  82. Simple by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft's traditional embrace and extent methodology in practice.

    1) Threaten spammers
    2) Buy out or eliminate
    3) Pick up the spamming technology and patents
    4) Bundle with windows
    5) CTRL-ALT-DEL to log on and would you like some V1@gR@ with that?

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  83. i don't know about you.. by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    ..but all i get are offers for 3ff3x0r, p4x|l, v14gr4, C14l1s, ph3nt3r4m1n3, v4l1um, x4n4x, 50m4, l1p170r, zyb4n, z4n7r3x, x3n1c4l, m3r1d14 and f10r1c37

    atb

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  84. I don't see any spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use SpamAssassin with DCC and Vipul's Razor. Sheer bliss - haven't seen a spam in many months. This story is a kind of a reality check.

  85. Is Microsoft friend or enemy? by Vitus+Wagner · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Lets consider this problem:


    What good they did to me?

    • They create very big market for powerful 32-bit PC. If anybody still use 8-bit CP/M machines, I doubd that I could afford dual PIV with 1Gb RAM at home to run real OS on it. It seems good. But I suspect that i could be just as happy with some 300Mhz UltraSparc.
    • They create potential market for software I write. But really I make my living from market where computers was used long before PC era.

    What bad they did for me:
    • They are ultimate cause of spam, adware and other crap which fills my internet channels now. They give millions of uneducated users access f\to internet by selling internet-enabled OS and telling that no education is required to use it.
    • They pushed their complex and closed document formats as standard de-facto. Yeh, I got some pride from community for writing catdoc, but I'd rather live in the world where I don't need to write such strange thing just to read price-lists downloaded from Internet.
    • They are hugely responsible for degradation of computer science education. They created so big demand for second-class coders, that no one teaches good programmers nowadays. It is quite hard to us to find new employees. And this is in Russia. I think in US it is much worse.
    • They also create demand for IE-only internet sites, and encourage uneducated webmasters to do this silly designs, which render blinking pages almost unreadble.
  86. Obligatory lame Leno joke about Viagra by Laconian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously, I can't separate that whiny lameass comedian from the word Viagra anymore.

    JAY: Hey Kevin.. just read the newspaper..
    KEVIN: What, Jay.. chortle, gahahaha..
    JAY: and get this--true story!!--a train was derailed today--i'm not making this up here!
    KEVIN: *laughs*
    JAY: Apparently, Hillary Clinton Lewinsky Viagra William Hung Bush's Pretzel!!!
    KEVIN: *laughs hysterically and strums a few nonsensical bass notes*

  87. Can't Get Your System Up???? (NT) by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1

    but then where will i get my illicit viagra that i so desparately need, apparently??
    (Insert Windows uptime joke here)

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.