Slashdot Mirror


GUI Pioneer Jef Raskin Has Passed Away

Viridian writes "Jef Raskin, GUI pioneer, interface expert, Apple employee #31, and the man most credited with the creation of the Apple Macintosh, died of cancer on Saturday February 26, 2005. It was Raskin who named it after his favorite fruit, the McIntosh apple, although he said that he changed the spelling to "Macintosh" to avoid potential copyright conflicts with McIntosh, the audio equipment manufacturer."

74 of 353 comments (clear)

  1. I sure hope... by ThomasFlip · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bill Gates pays his respects

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
  2. Nothing on the Apple Site by SallyMac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Steve is usually a touchy feely type guy, i'm surprised that there's not anything on the Apple site about it, however small.

    --
    cleverly disguised as a responsible adult ||
    1. Re:Nothing on the Apple Site by eggboard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, he and Steve have been mad at each other since 1982. But we'll see. There will be plenty of accolades for a man who changed the face of personal computing from the inside. (Steve Jobs changed it from the outside.)

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
    2. Re:Nothing on the Apple Site by caferace · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither does Raskins website either. Maybe you should drop him an email?

  3. Humane Interface by rjordan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, oft criticized on here, I still hope his humane interface project keeps going...

    --
    "When no-one around you understands start your own revolution and cut out the middle man"
    1. Re:Humane Interface by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really bad timing, considering Raskin just got $2m funding to work on the Humane Interface. People can be so inconsiderate some times...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Humane Interface by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Jef Raskin's Humane Interface was eye-opening and invigorating for me even though I disagreed with some big bits. Now perhaps we'll see some developers open up to his thoughts when they previously rejected him because of traditional industry cliques, ip concerns, herd-like marketing, or just plain laziness.

      It's a sad, sad day; especially to lose another great mind to cancer. I just hope Jef's ideas may be taken even more seriously now that he's sloughed off this mortal coil.

  4. Put quite simply... by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Bugger.

    There are few enough decent UI designers out there who understand what is actually important over what "looks real pretty". Here was a man who was more interested in it working for people, than it looking good on a poster.

    The original Mac interface is a design classic, where design is about function, not about style.

    So next time you design an interface or a web page remember the creator of the Mac. What you create will be WORSE than the Mac.. BECAUSE of all the colours and "clever" bits you used.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Put quite simply... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of Raskin's ideas were very text-centric and wouldn't be entirely applicable to people developing applications for processing graphics, for example, but I still feel that The Humane Interface should be required reading for anyone intending to develop software, even on an amateur basis.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Put quite simply... by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 5, Informative

      The blurb was incorrect. Jef did not design the Mac user interface. He had basically nothing to do with the Mac, in fact. He started the project with his idea for a computer that should be easy to use, but he left the Mac project in 1981, years before the team produced an actual computer.

    3. Re:Put quite simply... by iocat · · Score: 4, Informative
      Jef had a good idea, and he was a nice guy. Definitely although the Mac is remembered now more for its revolutionary UI, Jef had the "computer for the rest of us, PC as appliance" idea, which Jobs morphed quite a bit both before and after seeing what Xerox was up to -- Jef actually wanted Macintosh to use a tape drive, IIRC, to keep costs down.

      It's not taking anything away from Jef to set the record straight about who did what, he was a pioneer and we'll definitely miss him. I hope the humane interface project can survive without him.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  5. my condolence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    All my sympathy to his family and friends.

  6. Thanks by Ed+Almos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Farewell sir, and thanks.

    Ed Almos
    Budapest, Hungary

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
    1. Re:Thanks by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, it's not very often that Edward James Almos posts here.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  7. Progammer at Work... by neutronica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He was one of my VERY few programming heros.

  8. What a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Controversial in his views, at least he had some mindshare and was pushing the envelope in innovation with his interface experiments. Rather than incrementally changing what has become the de facto UI over tha past 20 years, he was willing to step out of the box, get some metrics and push a vision for "easy to use" software and interfaces.

    Not just some crank with wild ideas, he was able to get some of his visions into practice and leverage that developmental capital into newer and more refined methods and idioms.

    We've lost a visionary folks, and that's just a shame. His loss hurts us all.

    1. Re:What a shame by crunch_crumble · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Rather than incrementally changing what has become the de facto UI over tha past 20 years, he was willing to step out of the box, get some metrics and push a vision for "easy to use" software and interfaces.

      I absolutely agree. The current direction of (mainstream) user-interface design is incredibly dull. In Raskin's book The Humane Interface, some of his ideas throw up more questions than answers, but he at least articulates a genuinely different model of interaction from the current WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus and Pointers) mode of operation shared by Mac, Windows and Linux.

      He once remarked that there was little difference between Mac and Windows. I know that's likely to raise the ire of Mac users, but I think he was right. Any interface on the Mac can be duplicated on the PC (and vice-versa), and this includes the number of steps taken to complete a task. No, this won't necessarily make the PC more pleasant to use - the point is that both platforms share the same methods of interaction with minor (although important) differences.

      Consider Java: how could such a language promise cross-platform capability if these two operating systems were really so different in their behaviour and methods of interaction? Or iTunes? How could Apple write iTunes for Windows which pretty much mimics the same functionality as the Mac version if Windows didn't share the same fundamentals as the Mac?

      You can argue about the aesthetics of the interface, the general simplicity of operation the Mac has over similar tasks in Windows (and hence the general "user experience"), but none of this changes the fact that both systems share a common UI foundation. No-one seems to be challenging this existing framework - looking beyond it (gimmicky 3-D interfaces haven't impressed me) and that's why the direction of interface design feels so stagnant.

  9. Re:not an apple fan by alfrin · · Score: 4, Informative

    They had a good enough reason for that... Why Apple Uses One Buttoned Mice

  10. What will happen with his work? by trs9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know we have discussed his more recent work on ZUI and whatnot here before and some people are a big fan of it and others are not. But I wonder what will happen with the project, or if it will be continued by others he was working with. He seems to be the one who really spear-headed the effort. Does anyone know? It would be a shame if he couldn't finish his project as he conceived it and it got dropped because there was no one to take it over. Condolences to anyone who knew him well.

    1. Re:What will happen with his work? by cold+wolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      His son, Aza Raskin, will take over I assume. If you look at raskincenter.org (after the memorium thing) you'll see he's been a very active member. I'm sure the rest of the Archy team will continue, despite this horrific loss. I really admired this guy and his ideas. He might have been a little nuts sometimes, but most Renaissance men are (yes, he was a true Renaissance man).

  11. Origins of the name. by thenetbox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sad news indeed. :(

    Heres some more information I found about the naming of macintosh apples.

    "The Macintosh project began at Apple as one code-named Annie, and spearheaded not by Steve Jobs (he actually lobbied against the Mac project at one point) but by Jeff Raskin, a former computer professor and Apple employee number 31. Raskin is generally credited with quickly changing the codename from Annie to Macintosh, an obvious tie to the Apple brand. Macintosh was spelled differently than the apple variety, however, in an unsuccessful attempt to avoid trademark disputes. Apple itself, lore has it, was named by Steve Jobs for either his love of the Beatles (and their Apple Records label), his interest in health foods, or because of his fond experiences working in the apple orchards of Oregon during a brief stint at college there. Or for none of those reasons. Except for the short-lived Pippin operating system, Apple the company thankfully avoided any other product references to varieties of apple, the fruit."

    (taken from creativepro)

    1. Re:Origins of the name. by waffffffle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is not entirely correct. The Newton name is obviously apple related, although not a type of fruit, of course.

      Raskin is one of my personal heros as well. He will be missed.

    2. Re:Origins of the name. by johansalk · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not correct. Apple, and its bitten rainbow apple logo of old were tribute to Alan Turing whose personal problems that mostly stemmed out of being gay drove him to commit suicide by biting a cyanide-laced apple in 1954.

  12. Though I'm not really a Mac user... by ripbruger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have started reading his webpage and about The Humane Interface, and I have to say that this guy really knew what computers were for. For getting work done, to use as a tool for your tasks at hand. I think a lot more programmers could learn from him.

    --
    I can't spell ripburger
  13. GUI King by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

    With the greatest respect to the guy :)

    --Confirmation Dialog--
    Jef Raskin, are you sure you want to logout?

    [Yes] [No]

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:GUI King by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Wow, someone hasn't read his Raskin properly. I think you mean:

      --Confirmation Dialog--
      Jef Raskin, are you sure you want to log out?

      [Log Out] [Remain Logged In]

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:GUI King by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      [Undo]! [Undo]!

  14. I bow my head by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He truly was one of my heroes, though I only realised it the last few years. Respect to him, condolances to them he left behind.
    *steps back and bows again*

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  15. Re:Respects.. by wankledot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've seen a few comments like this, but the reality is that Jef and Steve weren't exactly close. Iirc Jef was fired shortly before the Mac shipped. He's always been very quick to point out his connection to the first Mac (for obvious reasons) but I've never heard of anyone at Apple talking about him as a pioneer or a VIP. If Woz died, I'm sure there would be something from Apple PR about it, but this guy was no Woz.

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
  16. That sucks by eno2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was looking forward to The Humane Environment (THE). It looked rather promising. I'm sure it will continue development, but without the man who actually had a good grasp on UI technology and THE behind it, the development is likely to go the wrong way. Imagine what would have happened if Stallman's Emacs was given over to Bill Gates to manage. We'd have wound up with a really hard to use word processor the also does calendaring, web browsing, e-mail composition, and a whole host of other things + Clippy. Oh wait... Beyond this, it must really suck for his family since he is of far more signifigance to them than he will ever be even to people who think he was a UI genius (myself inluded).

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:That sucks by cookiepus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We'd have wound up with a really hard to use word processor the also does calendaring, web browsing, e-mail composition, and a whole host of other things + Clippy.

      Emacs does all those things too, sans (perhaps) Cllippy.

      On the other hand, at least they'd be integrated in some sane fashion, rather than sucking as they do currently.

    2. Re:That sucks by William+Tanksley · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Raskin Center has been carrying on his work ... hopefully they'll continue it, especially with the funding they've been given. Oh, the name of THE has been changed, and it's scope has been expanded.

      -Billy

  17. Thanks Jeff by mac+os+ken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found your insights to be spectacular. I used to work in a Software Etcetera and make fun of Macintosh computers all the time. Of course then I was a hardened Windows user pushing software. I'm glad I finally came around and bought a Macintosh. The interface simplicity, and how much of it Windows derived, really sold me and now I own three.
    ...and of course the stories about you at http://www.folklore.org are an inspirational read.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  18. An Apple falls from the tree by CA_Jim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goodbye.

  19. from the :( dept, indeed by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

    So long, and thanks for all the clicks, Jef. May you find the perfect interface you have dreamt of for so long in the hereafter.

    For ever in debt.

    1. Re:from the :( dept, indeed by ewhac · · Score: 2, Funny
      May you find the perfect interface you have dreamt of for so long in the hereafter.

      Are you kidding? Raskin would have no compunction whatsoever against lecturing God him/herself. He's probably out there right now talking God's ear off, saying, "This whole arrangement you have here -- angels, archangels, cherubim, seraphim... Strict heirarchical systems tend to break down when they get too large. When new things don't fit, they either get placed randomly or in a giant 'misc' pile, and people can't find things anymore. And I noticed your giant 'misc' pile as I was walking in, so..."

      (Disclaimer: I do not actually know Mr. Raskin's professed faith.)

      Offered in the spirit of good humor,
      Schwab

  20. Sorry Jef by theolein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope you'll be more satisfied up there than you were down here. So long and thanks.

  21. Hrm by ashpool7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    So much for this?

    Bizarre UI. Would have been interesting if it had been cultivated.

  22. SF.NET by dedazo · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is Raskin's SF project page. He used to host a complete web site on the SF-provided home page (here) with quite a lot of articles and essays, but it's gone now. You can still see parts of it in the Way bak machine.

    He'll be missed.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:SF.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe the site you are referring to has been moved to http://www.jefraskin.com

  23. Re:McIntosh apples are bland and tasteless by dickens · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you get your McIntoshs at the market they probably are bland and tasteless. I can drive 20 minutes from here in pretty much any direction and pick my own, in season. Nothing like 'em fresh!

    We usually wait for Macouns a week or two later, though.

    All the "eastern" types are better than any of the "delicious" types, when fresh. If I want to buy eating apples in the winter, I go for a Braeburn, usually from New Zealand. Expensive, but they're huge. One is usually too much.

  24. Dibs on his stapler! by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yes! The Stapler!

  25. Jef Raskin Memorial TBA and details by Dave+Burstein · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Linda Blum, his wife, comes this note: Dear Friends, Jef died this evening, surrounded by friends and family, with some favorite music playing. While I am overcome by a profound sense of sadness and am not looking forward the days, weeks and years ahead without him, I am also relieved that he did not suffer for a long time and that he is at peace and no longer in pain. There will be a memorial service, time and date to be determined. ----------- My first thoughts: We lost one of the great ones today, a good and generous man. Jef Raskin died of cancer this evening, after being sick for several months. A wonderful spirit and renaissance man, who inspired me and many others. He created the Macintosh project at Apple in 1979, naming it after his personal favorite fruit He left Apple to form Information Appliances, where he designed the Canon Cat with an innovative interface. He continued refining human interface design, publishing his ideas in The Humane Interface (Addison Wesley, 2000.) The Humane Interface ideas are being implemented in the Raskin Center project Archy, where is son, Aza, is a programmer. His artwork was displayed at New York's Museum of Modern Art. He conducted the San Francisco Chamber Opera Society and wrote the score for a movie, "Smog Patterns," shown on PBS. He has a patent for a "Construction Technique for an Airplane Wing," and was a noted model airplane designer, an accomplished archer, and an occasional race car driver. Website is http://jef.raskincenter.org/home/index.html .There is also a collection of photographs and history at http://www.digibarn.com/friends/jef-raskin/index.h tml Jennie Bourne and I are in the midst of making a movie about him http://www.jefthemovie.com .

  26. More on on Raskins' ideas... by myrdred · · Score: 4, Informative

    Slashdot previously covered his project, and there is some interesting discussion about some of his ideas in this article.

  27. Re:Respects.. by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also, it's a Sunday. Does anyone think PR departments are considered particularly active about now?

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  28. Re:Correct me if i'm wrong ... by mcdesign · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are wrong. Apple didn't steal anything. They licensed part of the GUI idea from Xerox and added many of their own ideas in the creation of the Mac OS.

    See: http://www.mackido.com/Interface/ui_history.html

  29. Huh by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only mention I can find on the entire Apple site (using their "advanced search") is something about "DB2 HyperCard Demo Disks" referring to the "Raskin-Bobbins Hypercard Stack". You'd think that someone of Raskin's stature and relevance to Apple's success would at least have an honorable mention somewhere.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Huh by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've found it pretty rare that something at the Apple site gets updated on the weekend unless it's very carefully pre-planned (which this was not).

      But considering that:

      • Raskin attacked the Mac in an October 2004 interview in The Guardian.
      • He wasn't a current employee
      • Corporate death notices sting corporations stock prices
      • There's further suspected but unpublicized animosity between Apple and Raskin
      My guess is that it probably won't be mentioned on Apple's website on Monday, but it will be all over many mac community websites by then.
  30. I invented Burrell!! by doodleboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are a lot of great stories on Andy Hertzfeld's folklore.org site about the early days of the Mac, including many of the inevitable personality conflicts that arise when you have a lot of folks working under a deadline to get a huge project shipped. A fascinating site - I read it end to end when I came across it.

    My sense is that while Jef had the original vision for the Mac it was Burrell Smith who did much of the actual implementation. If the Mac must have a father, Burrell might be the better choice.

    Here's the funniest take on the whole thing.

  31. Re:Respects.. by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jef Raskin had practically nothing to do with the Macintosh. He had the initial vision of an easy-to-use computer appliance, but he left the Mac project in 1981, a full three years before the Macintosh shipped. Apart from the core vision, which started with Jef but rapidly diverged from what he had in mind, there's essentially no Raskin in the Mac.

  32. Re:We could use more Raskins by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Informative

    Good lord, your post made my brain hurt.

    First: Jef Raskin did not design the Mac UI. He wasn't even involved with he. Rather, he was the vision guy behind the Macintosh. He came up with the idea of an easy-to-use computer and convinced Apple's board to pursue it. When Steve Jobs took over the Macintosh project, Jef left. That was 1981, years before there was anything even like the Macintosh UI.

    Second: The Mac UI was essentially identical to the Lisa UI. The key difference was that on the Mac the pixels were square. The user experience -- overlapping windows, the mouse, the menu bar --was exactly the same.

  33. Re:Correct me if i'm wrong ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, you're partly wrong. Apple, Microsoft and Xerox all borrowed ideas from somewhere else (that isn't necessarily bad, you know ... it's what makes progress possible.) The real crime is trying to lock up good ideas forever. But in any event, I would say the real GUI pioneer was a man named Doug Englebart, whose remarkable demonstration in 1968 at the Fall Joint Computer Conference in San Francisco really laid the groundwork for what we all think of as a modern computer. Behind that demo was six years of hard work by Englebart and seventeen others at the Standford Research Institute. It took a couple decades for those ideas to take off, but take off they did.

    Just FYI, streaming video of the Englebart demo is available HERE if you can handle RealMedia.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  34. Some of his early Mac work by dirkstoop · · Score: 3, Informative

    The following documents provide a nice insight in the man's work at Apple on the Mac project:
    http://library.stanford.edu/mac/primary/docs/bom/i ndex.html/

    especially the article on Design Considerations (M4.1) makes a nice read:

    "If the computer must be opened for any reason other than repair (for which our prospective user must be assumed incompetent) even at the dealer's, then it does not meet our requirements. Seeing the guts is taboo. Things in sockets is taboo (unless to make servicing cheaper without imposing too large an initial cost). Billions of keys on the keyboard is taboo. Computerese is taboo. Large manuals, or many of them (large manuals are a sure sign of bad design) is taboo. Self- instructional programs are NOT taboo.

    There must not be a plethora of configurations. It is better to offer a variety of case colors than to have variable amounts of memory. It is better to manufacture versions in Early American, Contemporary, and Louis XIV than to have any external wires beyond a power cord.

    And you get ten points if you can eliminate the power cord."

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  35. plenty at www.folklore.org by goon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jef Raskins work at Apple, with the Mac is well documented at www.folklore.org. The site created by Andy Hertzfeld has now been made into a book called Revolution in The Valley - a collection of esoteric stories that chronical the birth and development the Mac.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  36. Dear Raskin Family, by eomnimedia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We UI developers of various industries owe Jef their deepest gratitude. We also owe you, his family, our gratitude as well. Thank you for letting him work the long hours, for helping him endure what seemed like fruitless (no pun intended) meetings that probably frustrated him from time-to-time, and for listening to him rant aloud about his interface musings as he bored you for hours (don't the great ones often do that?).

    I'm sure you realize how much Jef's work has affected, no, changed, our lives. Everyone in the modern world has been touched by Jef's work. Probably more so than most great artists of any genre. Not everyone likes the Beatles, but almost everyone has used a computer interface at work or at home that has been influenced by Mr. Raskin. The users, of course, don't think of Jef every time they click a dialog box, but society is different at every level because of his work. Computers are accessible and usable to almost everyone because not everyone understands what a "command line" is.

    Our prayers, thoughts, and thanks for Jef Raskin and his family on this sad day. Godspeed Jef.

    Sincerest thanks,
    Users and User Interface Developers Everywhere

  37. Re:Respects.. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Iirc Jef was fired shortly before the Mac shipped.

    Actually, after Jobs got ousted from the Lisa project, he commandeered the Macintosh project from Raskin (then a project to make a very cheap $500 computer). Shortly after taking the reigns, Jef and Steve had a number of "conflicts" and Steve eventually pushed Jef out on a leave of absence.

    He truly was a pioneer though. From his very early influence on the project to his comprehensive manual on what a GUI should be.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  38. Re:simple by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Informative
    Perhaps because Jef Raskin *didnt* develop the Mac's GUI?

    Raskin's vision was for an easy to use, CHEAP, computer for the everyman. It was actually quite different from what the Mac actually became. About the only credit he deserves in that regard is for the name (did you know the marketeers tried to change it to "Bicycle" ?!?) and for starting the project. The rest is pretty much to the credit of Jobs and the Mac team.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  39. Contribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Words like "aggrandizing" and "arrogant" seem ill suited to a man quick to answer his email, even from unknowns like me. Anyone who doubts Raskin's contribution should pick up a copy of "The Humane Interface" and read it, and try to find anything to compare it with. After Doug Englebart, I don't know anyone who made a similar contribution to usability.

  40. Trademark vs copyright by Cee · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was Raskin who named it after his favorite fruit, the McIntosh apple, although he said that he changed the spelling to "Macintosh" to avoid potential copyright conflicts with McIntosh, the audio equipment manufacturer.

    Once again.. for the millionth time: it's not about copyright when you are dealing with brand names (like M[a]cIntosh), it's a trademark issue.

  41. Usability vs learnability by gilgongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Raskin, whether you liked him or not, forced you to think about the issue of usability in the light of learnability, which are too often very separate things. It is possible for an interface to be hard to learn, yet very usable once you understand how it works, and god knows the opposite is also true. This is obviously not a very commercial idea, and possibly why he never got on with Steve Jobs.

    Raskin knew that usability isnt just what looks good in the showroom, but what endures and helps the user once the eye candy has worn off. Very few have been prepared or able to make that leap.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  42. He's not *really* dead... by mtec · · Score: 4, Funny

    until someone empties the Trash.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  43. Raskin fits the Apple mold... by writermike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see a lot of comments here regarding whether Raskin was really the cornerstone of the Macintosh. I don't think any of US can really answer that, but it seems to me that Mr. Raskin fits Apple's definition:

    Here's to the crazy ones.
    The misfits.
    The rebels.
    The troublemakers.
    The round pegs in the square holes.

    The ones who see things differently.

    They're not fond of rules.

    And they have no respect for the status quo.

    You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.

    About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.

    Because they change things.

    They invent. They imagine. They heal.

    They explore. They create. They inspire.

    They push the human race forward.

    Maybe they have to be crazy.

    How else can you stare at an empty canvas and see a work of art? Or sit in silence and hear a song that's never been written?

    Or gaze at a red planet and see a laboratory on wheels?

    We make tools for these kinds of people.

    While some see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.

    Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  44. Re:wasn't it XEROX? by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sigh. It's very easy to find out the truth about this, yet still the myth persists. Xerox developed some of the GUI concepts (bitmapped display, windows, mouse input, buttons), but Apple were INVITED to view their work in return for investment in the company. What they saw inspired the Lisa and later Mac interface, but Apple added: overlapping moveable windows, pull down menus, the menu bar, mouse dragging, icons, self-refreshing windows, the entire direct manipulation interface for the file system (Finder), resources, drag and drop, and numerous other details that we take for granted today. None of these came from Xerox. Apple employed a number of engineers that started out at Xerox, and it's certain they brought their knowledge with them and extended it at Apple. Is that theft? If they didn't sign a contract forbidding use of intellectual property after leaving the company, then no. (And who ever had that in their contract in those days?). Apple overlooked one thing however, and that's the SmallTalk language - if they had brought object-oriented programming to the Mac along with the GUI concepts right from the start then perhaps Apple's place in history might have been even greater....

  45. another voice by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dont know what hapens after we die , but if your out there somewhere then i hope this gets to you

    Mr Raskin
    The first computer i ever used was a zx spectrum , the first computer that ever made me feel pasionate about computing was a mac.
    I myself am severly dyslexic and dysphraxic and during my younger years had great difficulty in schooling, had it not been for the mac in our school i feel i would still be marked slow , the interface allowed me to put my thoughts down so other people could understand , it allowed me to excell and fill in a void which would have crippled my education.
    I owe you and your team alot as do many others who were in my situation.
    so tonight i shall open a 12 year old speyside single malt and drink a glass to honour your memory.
    Thank you for all you have done for the world

    Gregg Taylor Kincaid

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  46. I INVENTED BURRELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    my favorite jef raskin story:

    http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macin tosh&story=I_Invented_Burrell.txt&sortOrder=Sort%2 0by%20Date&detail=medium&search=jef%20raskin

    Whatever idea that you came up with, Jef Raskin had a tendency to claim that he invented it at some earlier point. That trait was the basis of Burrell's impersonation of Jef.

    Jef had a slight stammer, which Burrell nailed perfectly. Burrell began by folding his fingers together like Jef and then exclaiming in a soft, Jef-like voice, "Why, why, why, I invented the Macintosh!"

    Then Burrell would shift to his radio announcer voice, playing the part of an imaginary interviewer. "No, I thought that Burrell invented the Macintosh", the interviewer would object.

    He'd shift back to his Jef voice for the punch line.

    "Why, why, why, I invented Burrell!"

  47. Not total bullshit -- Alan Turing and the apple by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is probably BS that the decision to name Apple Computers had anything to do with this, but the story about Turing is likely true, at least that is what is reported here, among other places.

  48. Jobs reached out personally by Dave+Burstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I look forward to Apple's website reflecting Raskin's role more fully, perhaps reflecting some of the excellent material at Digibarn, including Jef's original review of the project in 1981. But the slowness of a Sunday response on the website should not be taken as evidence of lack of respect. After hearing that Jef also had pancreatic cancer, Steve Jobs reached out directly to him privately. The battles of twenty years ago do not need to still be re-fought; far more interesting is to support the Archy project, which Jef in his last days was trying to get to an alpha release. It would be a fitting tribute for Apple to step in with support, and incorporating some of Jef's recent work would make the Mac a much more efficient machine for many kinds of work. Time to coome together, and support and extend Jef's work as a tribute. db

  49. Re:Speaking Ill of the Dead by localman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course I'm not seriously making that argument -- it would be stupid. But that was Jef's argument taken to it's logical conclusion. What is wrong with CTRL-S? Is SHIFT-S bad too because it requires two keys? Maybe switching between upper and lower case should be a menu item? Yes, it's ridiculous. That's my point.

    He would cite case study after case study of how people would take longer to recall and use a keyboard shortcut than to find the menu item. But he obviously wasn't studying people who knew their way around the program! I don't want computers designed only for newbies! Give them their menu items and give me my shortcuts. I know what I'm doing.

    Admittedly, if they're inconsistent, like on Windows, the utility goes down. But even there if you spend much of your time in one or two applications (most people do) it's still better once you learn them.

    On the Mac, where the shortcuts are pretty damn consistent (every program I use follows the same conventions) it is a dream.

    Of course you want menu items too -- but I couldn't bear listening to him claim that I'd be better off reaching for the mouse and hunting for a close button or selecting File -> New a thousand times a day rather than including it in my 80WPM typing routine.

    Cheers.

  50. Re:Respects.. by firewood · · Score: 2, Informative
    Jef Raskin had practically nothing to do with the Macintosh.

    Burrell Smith started as an electronic technician at Apple, not as a design engineer. Though brilliant in his own way, it's an open historical question whether his design talent would have been noticed by Apple's then management without Jef's initial championing. Jef also introduced one of his previous grad students, Bill Atkinson, to a job opportunity at Apple, Atkinson being a key engineer (one of the ones who went on that first technical visit to Xerox PARC) without whom probably neither the Lisa or the Mac would have come into existance.

  51. Re:No longer applies by aristotle-dude · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What the hell are you talking about? Have you never worked in tech support?

    Me: Please right click on the desktop.
    User: What's a right click?
    Me: Press down the right button on the mouse. A Menu should appear.

    How does twenty years change the fact that a two button mouse button is harder to use than a one button mouse for a total computer illiterate?

    Here's a couple tips for you:
    1. If you are involved in computer UI design, do some web design for a while. Then tell us that right click menus are necessary.

    2. Calling users "idiots" because they cannot figure out an unintuitive interface is anti-social and it will not make you popular with the ladies.

    Gawd bloody f'ing geeks. Grow up, move out of your parent's basement and develop some empathy for the "normals" for crying out loud.

    I happen to use a two button+scroll with my powerbook at my desktop but I get by just fine with one button on the trackpad because the UI is designed to work with one button. There is always a main menu item for each context menu item.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  52. Re: usual Mac revisionism at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bullshit.

    It was Raskin who pushed for the use of bitmapped displays (even Wozniak, let alone Jobs, had a hard time being convinced to depart from character generators). He proposed them as early as 1969 (sixty-nine) in his PhD dissertation. That's even before PARC got created. Jobs was probably still wetting his bed in 1969.

    It was Raskin who had to convince Jobs to visit PARC.

    It was Raskin who simplified PARC's cumbersome three-button mouse interface to the point that only one button was required. And he was actually still not quite happy with the mouse as an input device.

    What were you saying?

  53. His name's inside the box by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2, Informative
    You'd think that someone of Raskin's stature and relevance to Apple's success would at least have an honorable mention somewhere

    When the 128k mac shipped, the signatures of the people who created it were molded on the inside of the case. Here's the collection; Jef's name in the bottom-left corner.

    That's probably the best mention Apple gave Raskin - his name's inside every 128k and 512k mac.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  54. I remember Jef by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In October 1979 as I was being shown Bandley III for the first time, I had the striking memory of seeing the writer Steve Clark's office embrasured with a passel of fold-together cardboard widgets which I was told Jef had designed, just for fun.

    After Apple went public he bought a Bentley(!), which for Cupertino-Palo Alto was still a novelty among the technouveau riche.

    For me Jef was the spiritual prototype for John Percival Hackworth, the Victorian nanotech engineer.

    Rest in peace and see you in version 2.0, Jef.

  55. Jef Raskin memorial site by digigardener · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdotters, I have been working with the Raskins for several years to document Jef's life and work for the DigiBarn Computer Museum. I have turned Jef's page at the museum site into a memorial page for him. See what Jef was all about (more than just GUIs) at:
    Jef Raskin: A Life of Design and the rest of the DigiBarn is of relevance to this topic at:
    DigiBarn Computer Museum
    Thanks!
    Bruce Damer, Curator