Slashdot Mirror


How Do You Store and Reconcile Email Archives?

heyitsjustme wants to know how you deal with old email. "I delete most of what I get but keep the stuff from friends and relations as an archive. Unfortunately I have these email archives from the late 80's through today in the form of macintosh, linux and windows mailboxes including AOL 1.0 mailboxes. What does everyone use to archive email across multiple platforms and non-standard mailbox formats? Is there an easy solution out there? Does anyone archive IM?"

380 comments

  1. Italian school of driving by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No need for rear view mirrors. What is behind you is not important.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Italian school of driving by boybaha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I also have email archives that stretch back to the early-1990s. I pretty much still have every email I've ever sent or received. When upgrading email clients, I often migrate my archives with me, converting them using whatever client's built-in importing and exporting functions I have available. I went from Eudora to Outlook Express to Thunderbird to Mac Mail. I also have programs that "pop" webmail off their sites (gmail, hotmail and yahoo) to consolidate them in whatever current mail client I'm using. I just keep them in neat folders ("Old Eudora Mail," "Old Yahoo Mail")..

    2. Re:Italian school of driving by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So if Barbra MegaStreisand is chasing you from the back while you're driving to go get a few Krispy Kreme doughtnuts, it's not important ? =O

    3. Re:Italian school of driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was funny.

    4. Re:Italian school of driving by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 1
      No need for rear view mirrors. What is behind you is not important.

      Apparently you manage the email over at Microsoft?

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    5. Re:Italian school of driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I archive your email and IMs when they pass through my system. :-)

    6. Re:Italian school of driving by pVoid · · Score: 1

      What do you use to farm mail out of your yahoo account? I'm looking for just that.

    7. Re:Italian school of driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why?

    8. Re:Italian school of driving by chucks86 · · Score: 0

      "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana

      --
      Help a poor college student. Send a couple cents via paypal to chucks86@gmail.com
  2. Here's what I do... by sub7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I archive all my pr0n on DVDs these days. It's really easy and oh wait... fsck!

    --
    rm -rf /bin/laden
    1. Re:Here's what I do... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I archive all my pr0n on DVDs these days. It's really easy and oh wait... fsck!

      One day... someone... somewhere is going to invent some sort of mechanism for removing text you've already typed. It shall be called "back-one-space" and will remove the letter before it.

      If this is impossible, surely they can keep a way of having all our text auto-submitted!

    2. Re:Here's what I do... by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

      You probably don't need to check DVD file systems if you've burned them properly.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    3. Re:Here's what I do... by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many peoples' heads this one will fly over. Bravo!

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    4. Re:Here's what I do... by anjrober · · Score: 1

      I don't get this? What is he suppose to remove? fsck isn't a typo, it's File system check. I'm confused...

  3. Since a month back by Cambrant · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've been going with the Gmail philosophy of storing everything. Until someone gets hold of my password of course. People should generally be more careful with the storage of their online communication. Print what's important and stick it all in a drawer. That's the safe way to do it.

    1. Re:Since a month back by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Print what's important and stick it all in a drawer. That's the safe way to do it.

      Until someone breaks into your house/someone who lives with you goes snooping.

    2. Re:Since a month back by FLEB · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are traps.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    3. Re:Since a month back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue ackbar

  4. rm -fR /var/spool/mail/* by xlyz · · Score: 2, Funny


    and you are done!

  5. Once every computer change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I save backup of my emails and other stuff (including IM).

    Then I trash them when I change my computer. (every 4 years)

  6. Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by heypete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Save it all. With the exception of some mail archives lost to catastrophic disk failures (I keep archives for my own convenience, not for any official purposes, so I don't back them up), I keep all my email.

    Thunderbird is able to import all my old mail archives (from years and years of Eudora) and search it effectively. If I were inclined to export all my archives from my Mac to my Windows machine, I could use Google Desktop Search to really search through it all.

    1. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ye-es, but that also necessitates keeping legacy systems over time, and sometimes that's not practical.

      For instance, I started out using email on an Amiga, then a PC, then a Linux box. Accessing those older PC and Amiga email archives is practically impossible and the situation will only get worse as more and more email info - pretty much all of it - is being sucked into current proprietary email systems.

      On a sidenote, MSN Messenger is actually quite useful in that you can turn on conversation logging and get output in XML format. Nice, futureproof, simple...

    2. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daddy, did you really order gay phone sex twice in October 1998?

    3. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Libraryman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why delete?

      Because if you delete early and often, you've committed no crime. If you wait to delete it until someone (feds, cops, *IAA, UN-black-helicopter troopers, whoever) demands you turn it over to them, you're screwed.

      After all, you break laws too (everybody does, they are written that way). You just haven't been caught yet. (I know this because if you had, you wouldn't have all you email archived!)

    4. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Linuxathome · · Score: 1
      I could use Google Desktop Search to really search through it all.

      Awesome idea. I'm gonna be doing this.
    5. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because if you delete early and often, you've committed no crime. If you wait to delete it until someone (feds, cops, *IAA, UN-black-helicopter troopers, whoever) demands you turn it over to them, you're screwed.

      After all, you break laws too (everybody does, they are written that way). You just haven't been caught yet.


      Instead of deleting all your e-mails "early and often" why not just delete the ones that have illegal activity in them? Or better yet, don't conduct illegal activity via e-mails. Those are a couple of a crazy ideas I know, but it just might save you from deleting all your e-mails.

    6. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first rule of thumb is "always bring your mail with you." If you change clients, or you change OS's, there is always a way, however roundabout or painful, to get mail into a usable form. This may involve installing Outlook, exporting all of your mail to Outlook, and importing it all from outlook, but it is worth it. Worst comes to worst, redirect it all back to yourself.

      If you do this religiously, you will only ever have to worry about your current mail format, and how you're going to upgrade it all to your new mail client. For archiving, you can either put it all in a folder that you never open or search, or under a different account that you never open or search, but at least it is all together.

      It's a lot easier to figure out how to take e-mails across current and last generation systems and current and last generation mail clients than it is to try and bridge a 15 year old machine that ran from 5 1/2" floppies using some nasty proprietary mail format and modern floppyless OS using some nasty proprietary mail format.

    7. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by DGolden · · Score: 1

      Heh. One of the first (and worst) applications I released onto the internet was a program to rip emails to plaintext from an Amiga microdot email file...

      --
      Choice of masters is not freedom.
    8. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This may involve installing Outlook, exporting all of your mail to Outlook, and importing it all from outlook, but it is worth it.

      Outlook + IMAP is the way I do it. You can drag messages between local storage and your mail server.

    9. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

      Of course its better to not have any of your illegal stuff in any kind of writing to begin with. On the other hand, laws are made retroactively, there could be regime change, or other unpleasentness.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
    10. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Your brain doesn't forget because it needs the space

      Your brain forgets because it becomes intolerably complex to sort through all the shit.

      Archiviging becomes about limitations of CPU cycles at some point. yours.

    11. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, laws are made retroactively, there could be regime change, or other unpleasentness.

      For the majority of slashdotters this wouldn't be a problem, as I'm pretty sure American laws can't be retroactive. If I ate a chicken today and e-mailed someone saying I ate a chicken, and tomorrow it became illegal to eat chicken, I can proclaim to the world "I ate a chicken on the 12th of March" and I won't be able to be charged with any crimes.

      However given your choice of words (regime change) I figure your talking about other countries, I can't comment on their legal systems. IANAL

    12. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Fortran+IV · · Score: 1
      ...than it is to try and bridge a 15 year old machine that ran from 5 1/2" floppies...
      <pedantic>Wow, where did you find a 5-1/2" floppy drive? Will it read my old 5-1/4" floppies?</pedantic>

      But you make a very good point, in general: It is much easier to keep everything up to date together than to bring mail in from 15-year-old systems. Of course, if I followed that philosophy with everything, then my answer for the current poll would have been much less interesting.
      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    13. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Wow, where did you find a 5-1/2" floppy drive? Will it read my old 5-1/4" floppies?

      Well, you know, data expands over time...

    14. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." - U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    15. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

      Yes, as long as you are in the USA, and as long as the constitution stays that way.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
    16. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So Steamboat Willie is NOT actually protected by copyright, since at the time it was created copyright protection only lasted fourteen years!! The constitution says so!!

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    17. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could use Google Desktop Search to really search through it all.

      Even better, if you use Google desktop search then google and everyone else can search through it all!

    18. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by krayfx · · Score: 1

      sadly thunderbird isnt capable of importing *.mbox formats. i mean, its pretty much stuck with replacing the mbox or the profile from the previous thunderbird profile. i could not do a straight mbox import - which is really sad - this drove me to check all the various mail clients, and finally settled with opera mail. the operamail had to be setup properly - none of them - hughin & muvin or whatever served my purpose. but opera does give ptions to set it up acc. t what you wish to. it works fabulously now. its able to import ANY kind of mbox - which is what i was looking at squarely. besides, there are tons of shortkeys that are so helpful. the workflow was a bit complicated - like the opera mail doesnt actually have folders - but has a good search facility which indexes you email much like google does, it works well - but not exactly like gmail - which is fair enough for me - thus i moved from thunderbird to operamail - because of lack of mbox import. very disappointed with thunderbird, but, maybe it was meant to be - i like opera mail better, and opera isnt evil.

    19. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, you break laws too (everybody does, they are written that way).

      Not in all countries.

    20. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      European Convention on Human Rights, Article 7:
      No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.
    21. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by legoburner · · Score: 1

      you can in mozilla mail (and I assume thunderbird) but it is quite bastardised... you have to create a new mail account for that mail (eg; 'archive1') and fill in junk user details. Next you need to get your old .mbox and copy it over Inbox in your mail folder. Eg; for me it is: ~/.mozilla/default/lwy03rk7.slt/Mail/somesmtpserve r.com/ You need to overwrite Inbox with your inbox.mbox, and then Sent, Drafts, Trash, etc. with other mbox files. The .msf files in there are mozilla's caching information for displaying your mbox files. I am sure there are some programs out there that will do this for you, but at the end of the day so long as you stay in an open format then that is all that matters.

    22. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by erikdalen · · Score: 1

      If you're scared of getting caught, why not encrypt it all?

      --
      Erik Dalén
    23. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow... you really are american, aren't you? Your regime can change just as much as anyone elses... stop being so arrogant and open your eyes.

    24. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by mikelang · · Score: 1
      You say "Thunderbird can ... search it effectively".

      Q: How do you do it?

      My Thunderbird cannot even do full-text search of my year-old mailbox.
    25. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by dustman · · Score: 1

      Wow... you really are american, aren't you? Your regime can change just as much as anyone elses... stop being so arrogant and open your eyes.

      No, it really can't. Neither can England, France, Canada, Japan, and a bunch of other "developed" countries.

      Countries which are run by dictatorships can. Cuba's can. North Korea's can. etc...

      "Regime change" literally means the government changes, and we have that every 4-8 years.

      But it "really" means/implies the old government is just plain thrown out, and a new one is started, pretty much from scratch. New laws are written up, etc..

      And that's just not going to happen in most countries, no matter how much some of us want it. Change is slow.

      This isn't arrogance, its realism. There is a lot of things about America that I would like to be different. Some of the things (tax laws, IP laws, etc) I would like to be different enough that it's just not going to happen in my lifetime without a "regime change", without "starting over".

      But it's not going to happen.

    26. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by dubidub · · Score: 1

      If you're scared of getting caught, why not encrypt it all?

      Because it would be a crime not to decrypt it if the government demands you to do so.

    27. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be true, but the 5th amendment says it isn't.

    28. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      When I was using Mozilla, I could symlink the files to my mailbox and use Pine to read them. I still can do the same using Evolution. For a year I was forced to use Outlook (Express variety) and after loosing a gig ov mail archives I will not do it, fullstop. I haven't used Mozilla as a mail client again but convinced some others to ditch Outlook and start using Thunderbird. All of those are pretty happy now. I am content with Evolution, so far.

    29. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by INetUser · · Score: 1

      I have to second the Google desktop search idea.

      I've found thing that I've forgotten about using it. The nice thing is that it will not only search your main mailbox folders, it will also search any of archives that you've opened in Outlook as well.

      Yea, well, it is a Microsoft based solution.

      Outlook starts to have a problem when a message store, or .PST file gets to around 1 GB. So I Automatically archive anything over a few months from the main message store to an archive, then manually archive out of that one by quarter into a seperate .PST file named YYYY-Qn. These are then stored on CD-Rs, as well as remaining on the hard disk for indexing and searching. Works well, hardly loose anything.

      However, it seems that MS have botched the File-Archive menu function, as the date compare doesn't seem to be consistent, but oh well, the system works, email is not lost and is reasonably filed, and will continue to work as long as the .PST file format is supported by the MS tools.

    30. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well while regimes can change, I think the relevant powers have got things pretty much heading the way they want, so they aren't going to do much overthrowing in the USA just yet.

      --
    31. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by krayfx · · Score: 1

      actually, the kmail does a great job of importing the mail, unfortunately i need 'windows' for my business needs. couldnt quite manage to move lock stock and barrel to linux, however i intend to so sometime soon, courtesy wine/ sedega/ crossover. or, better still would be to do it without any proprietary sfware - that would be the day ! though that might not be a cakewalk exactly. lemme see.

    32. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by krayfx · · Score: 1

      actually, i did not explain the part of the problem bothering me. while i setup thunderbird - i did not do a clean job - i defined my inbox in another folder of my local disk - not the default one that thunderbird usually uses. also i defined many folders to reside in different locations - as in attachments and stuff. i did this for each of my multiple pop3 accounts personal and business use. which is why i required a mbox import utility. otherwise - i should say thunderbird is a fairly straight forward and neat software. i would still recomend users to thunderbird, since operamail is a bit complicated for the average 'joe' user. this is where thunderbird scores - its has nice spamfilters and stuff. and also - legoburner thanx for the idea - i had tried some of it out, but as i mentioned above - i couldnt not overwrite the "inbox" mbox, since i had split and localised the mail into different folders - being over-enthusiastic about sorting mail. my mistake actually, i shouldve understood the way the software generally works before going abt such customisations. anyways - i am sure the folks at thunderbird arent going to wait for long before providing me a solution!

    33. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally know someone who was jailed for 8 years under a retroactive statute. In the USA.

    34. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by legoburner · · Score: 1

      if you make a new folder under Inbox in mozilla, it will create a new mbox file in your profile for that folder. I have my mail split into Inbox, System and Support for a few of my roles, each of those can be created and then overwritten with one of your split mbox files perhaps? I have done something similiar in the past after corrupting my mozilla install. If you dont mind merging things you could always do cat *.mbox > master.mbox

      (not meaning to sound rude/pushy at all, just offering my experience as I spent quite a bit of time standardising older mboxes into mozilla)

    35. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Unless it is copyright infringement, where they can turn back the clock and re-protect those works for which it already expired.

    36. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes that is true but you can't be held accountable for copys made to the work the day before the new law took effect but after the previous law was no longer in effect. In other I make 50 Copies of no longer copyrighted work today. Tommorow they make a law that puts copyrights back on that book. I hadn't broken any laws at that point. If I try and make another copy at that point I have borken the law but my and my 50 frends are fine with the original 50 copys all day long.

    37. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure American laws can't be retroactive.

      American laws also can't infringe on the freedom of speech, etcetera...that hasn't stopped the American legislature from passing such laws and the American executive branch from jailing people under them.

      Tht fact that the state isn't legally authorized to do a thing, is no guarantee that they won't go and do that thing anyway.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    38. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, you aren't very credible, because

      A. That is illegal
      B. You are an Anonymous Retard^H^H^H^H^H^HCoward.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    39. Re:Disk space is cheap. Why bother deleting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the majority of slashdotters this wouldn't be a problem, as I'm pretty sure American laws can't be retroactive.

      The doctrine of no ex post facto law only applies if the powers that be are interested in obeying the Constitution. On the other hand, you might one day be considered an "enemy combatant" (or whatever weasel word is being used in the future) for whom absolutely no laws nor ethics apply apparently.

  7. I work for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...so I just delete everything after a major deal falls through.

  8. I'm afraid... by joNDoty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the best way to consolidate various types of emails may be to email them to a common source. Then archive from there.

    1. Re:I'm afraid... by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      That's good for the text itself, but screws with the rest of the data (sender, date sent, etc)

      And assuming you still have an app to read that: I've got some old netscape (2.x, I think) mail folders that I can read with a text editor, but I no longer have a program that will open it - there may be, ut I haven't looked that much really.

    2. Re:I'm afraid... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      If you can read them, and they follow a regular form, then perl, awk, and sed are your best friends. That's pretty much what I did, split the messages up in a perl script and tarred them.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    3. Re:I'm afraid... by fluxindamix · · Score: 1

      yes exactly, I'll do that with gmail, you create a gmail account, create various labeling rules, and then add another rule to forward all emails to your desktop email adresss, so at all times you have your archive on web, and you can delete your desktop client mails anytime you wish,

  9. email archive by Pompatus · · Score: 4, Funny

    I delete most of what I get

    You must work for microsoft

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:email archive by The+Ancients · · Score: 1
      You must work for microsoft

      That's not a very fair comment. There are many fortune 500 companies out there that engage in this type of activity - it's just that Microsoft got caught more than most :p

    2. Re:email archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You must work for microsoft"

      I don't think that's really fair and it's certainly not insightful. We encourage people to delete mail because for legal purposes we have backups that include client-deleted emails and are taken daily. Live mail space for a 15000+ workforce can be a major drain on resources. In any case, daily backups means the chances of having more than one copy of any required email are extremely high.

    3. Re:email archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Of course its a fair comment. As you state many fortune 500 companies engage in record manipulation and Microsoft WAS caught, therefore it is a perfectly legitimate comment.

      Maybe other companies do it but until there is proof then you can't slander them but Microsoft do it, so they're fair game.

    4. Re:email archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used to work for Enron...

    5. Re:email archive by SeventyBang · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, right.

      Old email is what's been used against them in court.

      If you get tired of Gmail's 1G limit, go to HRiders.com: 1T limit with a 500M attachment limit.

      ___________________
      Windows Server 2003 Compute Cluster Edition:

      You can buy a blow-up doll and use her at the intended size. But you can't just keep pumping air into her and expect to get a working, bigger blow-up doll unless she was designed to achieve those proportions.

    6. Re:email archive by SeventyBang · · Score: 1

      No troll! It's true. I do not troll on /.

      Can the morons who modded me explain to me out what I said is trolling?

    7. Re:email archive by sharkey · · Score: 1

      That's an unfair generalization. He could be a GNOME dev, after all.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:email archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ___________________
      Windows Server 2003 Compute Cluster Edition:

      You can buy a blow-up doll and use her at the intended size. But you can't just keep pumping air into her and expect to get a working, bigger blow-up doll unless she was designed to achieve those proportions.

      Yep, that should do it. Metamod fair.
  10. Cyrus Imap... by DaGoodBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...with fetchmail / procmail / cyrdeliver for sorting and storing from other sources. How can 5GB of mail can't be wrong?! I can slice and dice my all my email (including about a gig of spam...) for choice bits of information.

    --
    My God! It's full of Voids!
    1. Re:Cyrus Imap... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Me too, though I add one little twist: a Perl script to archive older emails to subfolders, so my threaded sort of current email doesn't slow things down.

      It's still all available when I want it, but the day-to-day use is faster.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  11. Unix mail format by saccade.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the basic Unix mail format, essentially plain text series of messages. Eudora does fine with it; and most anything else can read/import it. I have email going back to the 80's in this format. The one time I had to convert was when I was working for a company that used "Quickmail" on the Mac. I wound up reverse engineering their format and hacking up a program to convert it to plain text.

    1. Re:Unix mail format by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ditto, in my case the "mbox" format to be precise. I currently use Procmail to automatically CC all incoming messages to a dedicated archive file, one per month, each year in a seperate folder. Outgoing mail is also sent to the same file, although I could easily have an "infile" and an "outfile", break mail apart by topic, or whatever. For more robust long term backup purposes I simply tarball the dozen files within each directory into a file called "mail-yyyy.tar.gz" and backup as normal.

      Since mbox is a pretty standard format many tools have a built in import routine or that there there will be an existing third party tool to handle any conversions at least. Failing that, it's fairly trivial to cobble together a one-off conversion tool using a scripting language, or even to batch remail each message one at a time if your new email client uses some undocumented storage format, or is an online service like GMail.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Unix mail format by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

      I always thought that it might be interesting to have proxy server that would capture incoming and outgoing mail into mbox files. However, I haven't seen anything like this yet.

    3. Re:Unix mail format by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      or even to batch remail each message one at a time if your new email client uses some undocumented storage format, or is an online service like GMail.

      This neat little procmail recipe (I came across it a while back, but I forget exactly where) does exactly what you describe. First, create a file (i use forwarder in this example) with these contents:

      :0
      ! address@example.com

      Then execute this command:

      formail -s procmail ./forwarder < mboxfile

      Viola!

    4. Re:Unix mail format by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec, does this mean Thunderbird doesn't use mbox format? Darn, I have to rethink my policy. I won't suggest anything to anyone if I can't debug/support it.

  12. PDF by DisasterDoctor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I delete almost everything, and only save a few very important or personal emails. For those I do keep, I print to PDF, and archive by date and person/subject. It works exceptionally well for me. It is all electronic, takes very little disk space, and keeps the clutter to a minimum, and eliminates most of the cross platform nightmares.

    1. Re:PDF by Arker · · Score: 1

      Why would you use pdf to print plain text data?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:PDF by chipace · · Score: 1

      amen. If there were atteched photos, they probably will not be saved in their native format. I had to laugh when I saw the dumbass slashdot moderator mod the parent up.

      The same dumbass modded-up the spotlight comment too. Who wants 10,000 email pdfs to sort through? Or one pdf with 10,000 pages?

      Mozilla maintains indexes of the sender and subject lines for lightning fast searches (and then you can go to body text if you can't find it with those fields). You don't even have to use mozilla to search the indexes, you can just grep them if you want.

  13. One Word by Zone-MR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One word: IMAP. If you can read your email using any decent email client, it should support moving it to an IMAP server. If you are using web-based email or some crappy client which can't export emails to a standard/raw format, you'll have to write a script to convert the messages.

  14. It's simple: plain text by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever since I first got acquainted with e-mail on my Apple IIe in the '80s, I've used e-mail programs that offer plain-text storage as at least an option. It's one of the most universal formats in existence, and can be read one way or another on computers both decades old and brand new. I encountered some weird proprietary clients in the '90s that still stored e-mail in this format, because from a corporate perspective, this stuff was still in its infancy, plus HTML hadn't yet mucked everything up. To this day I still store in plain text from Eudora 6.2.

    I burn it to CD-Rs that I know won't get moved around or scratched. They stand a good chance of lasting the rest of my life.

    1. Re:It's simple: plain text by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      "I burn it to CD-Rs that I know won't get moved around or scratched. They stand a good chance of lasting the rest of my life.

      Actually, that's not true. New studies (forgive me I have no link but I did see it on the Screensavers a while back) have shown that if you take normal run of the mill CD-Rs and burn data on them then store them untouched for one year, when you try to read the data, a lot of them will fail. Just something to think about.

      Most companies do make long-term disks (read expensive) for critical data storage. Something about "DVD/CD rot" which consists of inconsistencies in the organic dye on the disks that corrodes over time.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    2. Re:It's simple: plain text by TTK+Ciar · · Score: 1

      I agree, text is the best way. Besides, the RFC-compliant internet standard email format is text. I store all of my mail in standard mbox format, in files whose names take the format:

      [address].[end-date].[n].txt

      For instance: billm@ciar.org.2005-04-12.00.txt

      That file contains all of my email messages received to that account from some earlier date to 2005-04-12, inclusive. Getting the start date is easy (just head the file and grep out Date) so I don't bother encoding that in the filename. Their sizes range from a few hundred KB to about 100MB, depending on how many days' worth of email is in there. The [n] is there to avoid name collision when saving multiple files from the same account on the same day. When I feel the need to compress them, I use bzip2 on entire files. If you're more concerned about portability, then you can use gzip2 --best, which is only mildly worse and runs on all significant platforms (*nix/BSD/Solaris, MacOS9, MacOSX, Windows95 and later).

      -- TTK

    3. Re:It's simple: plain text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Besides, the RFC-compliant internet standard email format is text

      MIME-encoded text, actually. Which can be a pain-in-the-ass to deal with, especially for attachments.

    4. Re:It's simple: plain text by TTK+Ciar · · Score: 1

      MIME-encoded text, actually. Which can be a pain-in-the-ass to deal with, especially for attachments.

      mbox formatting doesn't care about the format of the text inside a text message. MIME is a standard, but it's just text in the end, so it gets stored into mbox-formatted files just fine.

      As for attachments, yes, MIME is the RFC-compliant internet standard for storing attachments. So you should store them that way, and use any of a number of utilities conversant in this standard for extracting them as needed. Two alternatives are to either store them in decoded form (which is fine), or use some proprietary format (which is worse). If you store them in decoded form, then some structure will be necessary for storing them separately so that they can be easily matched with letters. It should be pretty easy to come up with a convenient format. My predisposition would be towards making a directory for each mbox file (perhaps with a .d suffix instead of .txt), with a subdirectory for each letter that contains attachments, and the decoded attachments in the subdirectory. To make them easy to carry around, you could zip or tar them up.

      On the other other hand, you could use a format which is trying to become an internet standard, and is making some headway in that direction -- ARC format, which was made for archiving documents of various formats into a standard format. It's a little harder to manipulate than simple text files, though. Its complexity has discouraged casual home use, though many libraries, universities, and companies are adopting it for their archives.

      -- TTK

    5. Re:It's simple: plain text by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      You realize that mbox format corrupts your messages, right? Lines that start with "From" are often switched to ">From", or other contortions.

      Use maildir format. Of course, I'm not sure what kind of support exists in Windows clients for maildirs, but I would hope that by now they've started using it.

    6. Re:It's simple: plain text by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Informative
      I burn it to CD-Rs that I know won't get moved around or scratched. They stand a good chance of lasting the rest of my life.

      No! Check those backups! I have lost data stored on CD-Rs (luckily I had copies), and many of my discs have started to turn yellow after about 2 years! Also, you can sometimes see these little spots of discolouration on the CDs, which makes me think there's a fungus of some sort that's eating them.

      The lifespan of CD-Rs is unknown at this point. Don't trust them for more than a year without inspection, and make fresh copies after 5 or so years.

      I'd also recommend using some kind of forward error-correction scheme, like par2.

  15. Log everything... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

    I log and keep all my traffic including IRC logs going back to '94.

    My email isn't in quite the mess yours is, (I used Eudora for almost all of my emailing since I first got on the net, and have just imported from one version to another, and now into Thunderbird.)

    I would simply start copying & pasting, or see if you can try importing into excel.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Log everything... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I log and keep all my traffic including IRC logs going back to '94.

      Hey B5_geek, here's a trick to free up a lot of disk space *and* raise the S/N ratio in your logs:

      mv irclog.txt irclog.txt.fat && grep -vi lol irclog.txt.fat > irclog.txt && rm -f irclog.txt.fat

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Log everything... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      What is so evil about lollipops that you want to grep out all the discussion about them?

      *** QQQ is now known as Lol
      <Lol> [insert pivotal discussion content here]

      * Why do I need to escape <Lol> with &lt; when posting in "Plain Old Text" Mode... (What part of "Plain Old Text" doesn't the slashdot comment post form understand?)

    3. Re:Log everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mv irclog.txt irclog.txt.fat && grep -vi lol irclog.txt.fat > irclog.txt && rm -f irclog.txt.fat

      You mean:
      sed -i s/lol// irclog.txt
      You geek wannabee
    4. Re:Log everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're not much of a geek either apparently, since your sed line doesn't do what the original line does...

    5. Re:Log everything... by DaveLatham · · Score: 1

      lol

    6. Re:Log everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a druid

  16. IMAP server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use an IMAP server

  17. Upon Searching.. by yuriismaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    EmailMan has the answers to your problem.

    More utilities than I want to bother with, but hopefully they'll have the converter(s) you need.

    Good Luck!

  18. of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course people archive IM. I archive everything, but in particular conversations with customers (I do contract programming.)

    See if one of the desktop search products, such as Beagle or Google's will index will index your archives. That might be all that you need.

    If not, the first step is to convert everything to a real format. Eudora and Thunderbird can read in some of the non-standard mail formats and convert them to unix mbox.

    1. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for archiving IM, doesn't AOL do that for you?

      Just set aside a couple bucks today, and with compounded interest you'll have no problem buying your old IM conversations on the open market.

    2. Re:of course by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      To index IM, I use HTML. Its supported on every platform I know of, keeps the formatting it tact, and a quick GDS will find whatever I need really (I use GAIM with a "plugin" that I wrote for GDS. Works for me. I accumulate about 10mb of IM convos a month, no not too much really.

      Saving IM convos is a VERY good idea, that and email. Often you will have remembered some little ting that you need later, like a phone number, address, and the only place you have it is in the archives.

  19. Print them to PDF by karmaflux · · Score: 1

    and store the files by correspondant. It's not fancy, but it's foolproof.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:Print them to PDF by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I print everything and give it to my secretary.

      I've no idea what she does with it after that but then who cares what happens to old mail anyway ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  20. local WU imapd by mAIsE · · Score: 0

    setup a local imap server, you can generally setup imap from almost any modern mail client, let the client do the work of conversion.

    then put all of your mail into imap folders, sort by year etc.. Each folder will then be in a large text based file. That you can rsync, tar , etc..

  21. gmail by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    every email I get has a copy forwarded to a google gmail account. I also forward everything to an account on my server as well, but I like the gmail account because I can get at it anywhere.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  22. Your favorite online storage by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Hriders.com gives unlimited free 1 Terabyte email accounts that include 500 Megabyte attachments. We have been asked why we would do such a thing. The answer is simple to help people store large amounts of information in a safe and secure environment. - - - We decided that yes a Terabyte of space may sound rather extreme to some, others will not think so. If you have a free membership with Hriders.com then you will receive a free 1 Terabyte 500 Megabyte attachment email account. You will be able to store over 40 million emails, videos, games, mp3s, or pictures.

    This might be useful, if they don't collapse under /.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Your favorite online storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above post is just a lame attempt to get Slashdotters to view a biker website.

    2. Re:Your favorite online storage by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      for the clueless here is the link to the actual page describing the one terabyte email offer

      http://hriders.com/web_page.cfm?web_pageID=38

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Simple.. by billimad · · Score: 2, Funny

    I give mine to Microsoft for the safe storage and instant retreval they are renoud for. Oh wait..

    1. Re:Simple.. by varmittang · · Score: 1

      yep, I recently lost all my emails in my hotmail account due to something they were doing. Which, I only use that account to get security updates and MS Tech show invitations. So I didn't lose anything important.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  25. Don't change e-mail clients by rueger · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's one of the many reasons why I have stayed with Pegasus Mailfor many years. Because they were created in the same program I know that I can still access my old mail files without problems.

    What I do at year end is move all of that year's messages to a new folder and reset my filters so that the new year's messages go into a new set of folders.

    Periodically I just copy off previous year's messages to CD.

    At least few times I have been able to back a couple of years and find information that I lacked.

  26. Kinda Sorta OT by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Interesting

    but ...

    Along these lines, is there an OSS package that can read the varied formats the Submitter is referring to, tag and drop them in a DB with a nice, friendly, web-enabled (secure) front-end for searching?

    My former employer kept *all* of his email from the last 20 years in tar.gz files. Let's just say it wasn't easy to find an email from er, 15 years ago very easily.

    Is there a package that can read the mbox, the other box-formats, plain text, pull from pop, old tar.gz bundles, categorize (sorta), tag and make such things searchable?

    Totally a shot in the dark here, i'm not a mail guy at all ... just wondering as the Submitter did what i like /. Submitters to do: make me think and look for new, better stuff ... or better ways to do old-stuff.

    It is the "drink" that makes me wonder, sorry :)

    1. Re:Kinda Sorta OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a package that can read the mbox, the other box-formats, plain text, pull from pop, old tar.gz bundles, categorize (sorta), tag and make such things searchable?

      Not really, but procmail comes with a tool called formail that can read and convert between several formats. If you output each email into a separate file, it should make the messages easier to work with. You could probably run something htdig or Google desktop search, or use grep to find messages. Of course it would help to have a search tool that understands mail headers, MIME encoding, etc.

    2. Re:Kinda Sorta OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's in mbox format you can use grepmail even if if the mail file is compressed.

    3. Re:Kinda Sorta OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at http://greenstone.org.

    4. Re:Kinda Sorta OT by gunfleet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is there a package that can read the mbox, the other box-formats, plain text, pull from pop, old tar.gz bundles, categorize (sorta), tag and make such things searchable?

      Yes there is, check out

      http://www.greenstone.org/cgi-bin/library

  27. How I archive my mail by gpscc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I only use e-mail clients that store mail in ascii with standard headers. This means no Outlook mail. I still use the Netscape e-mail client to view and organize my mail. Also I have various perl scripts that can access the e-mail archive. I have 22 years of e-mail, archived on my PC. It gets backed up with the nightly backup onto a swapable firewire drive. I swap the backup every morning and have one of the drives with me.

  28. Convert to MBOX format by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Almost every email client around can import and export mbox formats. Getting your email in a format that is going to be readable in 20 years is the first step, otherwise why bother?

    Worse comes to worst mbox is readable as plain text.

    1. Re:Convert to MBOX format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Almost every email client around can import and export mbox formats.

      One would think so, but it seems that even with Mozilla applications, such as Thunderbird, it is extremely difficult to import an mbox file. I know it doesn't work properly because I recently tried this. I am considering to use my Gmail account from now on, but will also investigate if IMAP can come to the rescue as was suggested by an earlier poster.

    2. Re:Convert to MBOX format by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Hmm... That's interesting I thought that Thunderbird used the mbox format.

      If you can set up an IMAP server I know of a trick that does work (as I have used it successfully a number of times. UW IMAP stores its folders in mbox format by default. You can then use your email client to transfer files to your IMAP server and you end up with mbox files.

    3. Re:Convert to MBOX format by snaptography · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is always quite an interesting discussion, especially because MS Entourage can not even import from a MS Outlook database...doesn't seem to make sense. Although I would say that MBOX formats are probably your best bet...unless you want to write your own exporting,parsing,sorting system.

      --
      -- www.kiwicommunications.com --
    4. Re:Convert to MBOX format by Megane · · Score: 1
      This is why I'm using UW IMAP and not Cyrus. Cyrus saves mail in a database. While this is more efficient for accessing mail, having my folders be plain mbox files means I can be sure of simple backup and restore, and simple format conversions. I just make sure to move my old mail to folders every now and then so that my main mailbox is uncluttered and speedy.

      But if I was running a mail server for more than just myself and my mom, you bet I'd be running Cyrus.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Convert to MBOX format by iawia · · Score: 1

      Actually, Cyrus uses a maildir format, and just has a database for the indexing and stuff (which can be regenerated, naturally).

      I used to have UW IMAP, but at some point it just got too slow. Another advantage of Cyrus is that it can deal with multiple concurrent client for one account, so that my mail doesn't slow to a crawl if I forget to close my mail client on another machine.

  29. My Backup System by hhlost · · Score: 1

    Every week I do a backup of everything important on my SuSE box, the entire public dir on my live web server and two testing servers plus the MySQL databases on all four. My email and document files go back to about 1995 and still everything fits on a single CD. (I also burn another copy for off-site b/u.) So, I have multiple copies of everything that's more than a week or two old. As soon as I have more data than will fit on one CD, I'll move to an incremental system... and start to worry about CD rot.

  30. Re:One word by Padrino121 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gmail?

    I don't know about you but I generate about 6GB of email archives per year. Besides that having my email potentially available for searching doesn't sit well with me. I'm not sure where it stands now but there were a lot of potential privacy issues with Gmail.

    No I don't receive hords of email, just a lot of engineering related with source code,research, white papers attached. If you do anything business related it's important to keep all of the original emails received so there is an electronic paper trail.

  31. I wish... by shanen · · Score: 1
    Well, my basic reaction to this topic is that I haven't ever found a really good way to do this, but I wish there was one. Actually, I wish it was part of a more general system to sort and manage personal files, restructuring things and getting rid of the duplicates. This is actually an indirect side effect of the cancerous growth of HDDs. Sort and clean up? Why bother? Just copy the universe to the new machine. Who cares about wasting a few GB?

    Closest thing to a helpful feature I've seen is the importing features of some programs. Unfortunately, that has mostly favored Microsoft. They have the most resources to devote to this, both in terms of making sure the competitors email can be imported into their system, and in terms of making sure that their OWN email can't be exported successfully to the other systems. (The last one is indirect these days, in terms of the file system. Yeah, you can export to one giant flat mess. At least that was the situation the last few times I tried to escape from Microsoft's clutches, but I'm really loathe to abandon my very complicated filing system.)

    Farthest thing and least helpful was a shareware program that would eat the email when the trial period timed out. I don't remember the details except that I'll never voluntarily deal with blackmailers.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  32. MOD BACK UP (ABUSIVE MODERATORS) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post is clearly on topic. It's also a quote from a movie on philosphy. Stupid moderators modded it down.

  33. Archiving IM by stephthegeek · · Score: 1

    I use Trillian, which logs all my IM conversations, and I can't tell you how many times I've looked up a URL from a year ago, or a friend's address, or some other bit of obscure information I might have passed on, but didn't think it was worth saving at the time.

    --
    ~~~
    Drupal themes from TopNotchThemes
  34. emacs by bsdpanix · · Score: 1

    I've been using emacs to read mail for 18 years.
    from rmail to vm to gnus, no conversion problems.

    (what's an AOL mailbox?) :)

  35. Re:One Word by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I second this.
    I started running my own IMAP server on an old machine a year or so ago - and synced all my old mail archives to various folders.

    My mailserver also solves another problem - multiple POP accounts. I have my IMAP server set up so that each one of my POP accounts gets automaticly tagged and sent to it's own folder.

    A third common problem this solves is having multiple machines. Now my desktop's email client is always synced with my laptop's email client. Before I had run into problems when ever I traveled and fetched my email from the road.

    --
    I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
  36. One's things sure by eddeye · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't ask Microsoft.

    --
    Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
  37. AIM Logs by HitByASquirrel · · Score: 0

    I use Adium on OS X for AIM, and I have it automatically set to log everything. Currently both my G5 and Pismo log to boot drives, but I back the logs up on an external hard disk on a regular basis.

    It basically acts like an automatic journal/diary, as I tend to talk about most significant, or even sometimes insignificant events with friends and family.

  38. Hmm that's easy by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    Store everything in mbox format (that is, raw text with headers and all).

    Every email client worth the name understands that, for the good reason that it's the format they receive emails in :-)

    For nonstandard forms of archives (perhaps old AOL clients and whatnot), you're probably left either (1) perl'ing a convert script or, if you can (2) fire up the old client in Win95 in VMWare or something and fwd the mails to yourself (tedious).

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Hmm that's easy by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      this is an old question for me -- how to extract those old aol mail archives. i actually still have the old mail backups from the aol file cabinet, but they are not exactly readable. aol wanted you to use their email and no others, so conversion was not an option.

      question is, convert scripts or no, does anyone have documentation covering the old mailboxes for AOL? damn them, they kept such things "secret". altho easily reverse engineered, people didn't post solutions that could get them sued.

      there used to be shareware that would convert the old binary mail archives to common text formats, but i really haven't seen any lately. aol certainly doesn't give a damn, never did, about making the customer happy.

      any ideas?

    2. Re:Hmm that's easy by Megane · · Score: 1
      question is, convert scripts or no, does anyone have documentation covering the old mailboxes for AOL? damn them, they kept such things "secret". altho easily reverse engineered, people didn't post solutions that could get them sued.

      Have you tried using Google?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Hmm that's easy by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Yep. Also tried asking a polite question on Slashdot.

      Oops. My bad.

    4. Re:Hmm that's easy by Megane · · Score: 1
      Thwack.

      Unless you're using AOL for Windows, in which case I think you can find a bit more documentation/utilities for that format elsewhere, but I've only ever used the Mac version, so I can't help you there.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  39. Mailing lists... by rrosales · · Score: 1

    All of the links in my daily pr0n-in-your-mail messages go bad if I dont check them every day so they're useless after being read :)

  40. My technique by Karpe · · Score: 1

    I delete all mail that has not been directly addessed to me. Usually all mail from mailing lists, unless the message is really interesting or it is a thread I've been participating. I didn't use to do that, but when I changed to this method I deleted the old unimportant messages as well. It brings down the number of messages to a manageable level.

    Messages are not sorted into separate subject folders. They are all in a single mailbox, the mailbox. Every month I back up this mailbox to the name of the previous month. I do the same with my sent mail. Messages are then kept in individually monthed mbox files, independent of the email program I am using. All mail programs to date I've used are able to import messages. I keep in the mail program only the mailboxes of the last few months.

    If I need to find a message, I first search through the month or, if I am not sure, the year that the message was received. I "grep -i" in a directory with all my mboxes. It usually doesn't take too long, just a few minutes in the worst case. After I find the mailbox, I import it in my current mail program (Mail.app now), to forward, save attachments, etc.

    I've tried keeping all these mboxes as a Cyrus imapd spool, but the trouble was larger than the benefit.

    I keep all (personal, things I've been directly involved with) my mail since 1996. It works for me. It is around 300MB compressed with gzip.

  41. mbox or maildir by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    I've been using mbox format since the eighties, and never had a problem with it on any platform. It's pretty much been THE standard for email for as long as email has existed. If I ever were to switch, I'd probably switch to maildir, which has nearly as wide-spread support these days.

    1. Re:mbox or maildir by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Mbox is better for archival as it is only the one file, or a few larger files as opposed to many small files with special names. You can always tar Maildir, but then you might as well put the email in mbox which can be opened directly. There are a number of simple tools that will make a copy Maildir or Imap and store the result as mbox.

    2. Re:mbox or maildir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used both mbox and maildir over the years and after many years I am convinced that maildir is the way to go. It is also "plain text" but is much easier (and faster) to manipulate as each message is in a separate file. With mbox, if some or other mail manipulation program screws up you lose the whole archive, while with maildir you lose at most one message.

    3. Re:mbox or maildir by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Being one large file has disadvantages as well as disadvantages. It's generally a lot easier for a single file to get trashed than for a whole directory. And there's mbox's infamous "From" munging problem. And using, say, grep to find a particular message is a lot easier if the messages are in separate files. All of which is not to say I disagree with you - I still use mbox, and the reasons you list are among my reasons. I'm just saying that it is, I think, largely a matter of taste. How do you weight the tradeoffs? And as for those simple conversion tools - those work both ways.

    4. Re:mbox or maildir by hacker · · Score: 1

      If you like mbox, you should try the original uwash.edu format, mbx, MUCH MUCH faster to load, search, and index. Its not entirely text though, there is a small binary header.

      I still use mbox exclusively with pine, but I use mbx for larger archival mailbox files.

    5. Re:mbox or maildir by Bishop · · Score: 1

      It's generally a lot easier for a single file to get trashed than for a whole directory.

      Agreed. Although in the case of Mbox it is pretty easy to fix a corrupt file.

  42. Archive what? by Mishura · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never keep emails, or archive IMs or any other form of communication. Once a email is read, it is deleted. Same goes for normal old-skool mail, I read it and then trash it. The only exceptions are of letters/email of some importance such as information I need to keep handy, or if it has some kind of sentimental value (letters from deceased relatives for example.)

    Sure, HDD space is cheap; but I tend to equate people who archive every single form of written communication to those who have an Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, in that they hoarde everything in sight: newspapers, snail mail, magazines, boxes, etc..

    Commit to memory and destroy the evidence. Thats my way of handling archives.

    1. Re:Archive what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you throw out your mail as soon as you read it, how are you keeping letters written by deceased relatives? Are they sending you mail after they die?

    2. Re:Archive what? by Lorrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd imagine once your relatives decease they stop sending you mail -- conveniently cutting down on the amount you need to archive. Nice!

    3. Re:Archive what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, HDD space is cheap; but I tend to equate people who archive every single form of written communication to those who have an Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

      Wait a second. You are comparing me to myself?

    4. Re:Archive what? by Mishura · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you throw out your mail as soon as you read it, how are you keeping letters written by deceased relatives? Are they sending you mail after they die?

      Actually, yes. I did recieve a letter from my grandmom a week after she died. Snail mail works very slow indeed.

      Reading the letter was strange. The content wasn't strange, just the feeling you get from recieving information from a dead person. That's all I'll say about it.

      Cue the "I read dead people's email" jokes..

    5. Re:Archive what? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...Once a email is read, it is deleted...

      I have two categories of e-mail: premanent important and temporary. The permanent is about 1%, usually personal stuff, the rest gets deleted along with the spam about once a week. In our litigious nation, *anybody* can get sued for almost anything, especially business related things. The less information you keep, the less ammunition the hungry, often crooked lawyers will have to use against you. The stuff I keep is converted to ordinary text files and backed up along with other backups from the hard drive onto CD's. CD's kept in the dark in a cool place are quite stable storage devices. If you wanto to keep something for your decendants a 100 years from now, laser printing it on acid free paper and storing it in a dry place is the surest way.

      --
      All theory is gray
    6. Re:Archive what? by eyebee · · Score: 1

      I keep some mailing list items, such as how-to things, which I can refer back to, but eventually I clear those out. I have no need for email I received 20 years ago, as I no longer have the software/hardware/equipment it refered to. I guess if I were a collector of something I would then.

      --
      Onwards & Upwards!
    7. Re:Archive what? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Think of it this way; what are you going to do, reply?

      --
      I don't get it.
    8. Re:Archive what? by MasterB(G)ates · · Score: 1

      a bit off topic, but after Bon Scott died in 1980, all of his friends received christmas cards. "Merry fricken christmas mate...I'm on the Highway to Hell for real now!"

      --
      In the Slashdot moderating system, humourless based offenses are considered especially heinous.
    9. Re:Archive what? by michelcultivo · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a lot of people that don't follow the Netiquette Guidelines specifically when responding threads; they don't cut the things that don't need to be included on the response. And this was the big cause of having a lot of space wasted when storing email.

    10. Re:Archive what? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I never keep emails, or archive IMs or any other form of communication. Once a email is read, it is deleted. Same goes for normal old-skool mail, I read it and then trash it. The only exceptions are of letters/email of some importance such as information I need to keep handy, or if it has some kind of sentimental value (letters from deceased relatives for example.)

      Oh, come on. I keep all of my email archived right beside my taped phone conversations and all of my postal mail right beside my gun in a drawer right beside my bed.

      But seriously. I've heard of people keeping copies of their mail from x number of years back and toting it around with them and saving it here and there, but I have never heard of anyone that actually ever looked at it, and none of these people keep their postal mail nor do they tape their phone conversations or other conversations. I guess email is just that much more important than every other form of communication.

      I do keep all of my email for work saved in directories for each year. This has come in handy for a lawsuit that I'm involved with, and for saying to people "but on this date you said XYZ". Its much less than a gig or two for a few years of emails. If I lost it, I wouldn't be that upset.

  43. Re:One Word by pasamio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMAP isn't really a word, its an anocrym. But I agree, IMAP is the way I use, it helps for the relevant email and on my network I use both Linux and Windows (with a dedicated Linux box). I have Evolution set up to continually check and sort my email into IMAP folders and I generally read them off my linux box. If I need to click on links, I generally open up any Windows email client (from Thunderbird to Outlook) and it'll connect to IMAP and my emails will all appear (nicely sorted too!). If I need webmail, I have squirrelmail (which I use) to access my IMAP system remotely using any web browser and I can get at my hotmail email (from the old days, but my accounts are still active) using freepops or some other Web Email to POP3 gateway. Everything (but gmail, my mailing list archive), is in my IMAP server - I just backup one area.

    --
    I always wondered where this setting was...
  44. Web Mail and Evolution by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1
    I have a question along the same lines. I use Evolution to pull down my local email. But I would like to also be able to read it externally. If I set usermin to use the evolution mboxes, they become unsync'd in evolutions view.

    So how do I use evolution and a browser view without keeping double copies?

    --
    I do security
  45. formail, mairix, and mutt by rsw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Convert everything into mbox format. formail will help you with that.

    Use mairix to search through email.

    mutt is the best mail client ever.

    -rsw

    1. Re:formail, mairix, and mutt by pancake_lover · · Score: 1

      mutt is the best mail client ever.

      All mail clients suck. Mutt just sucks less.

      --
      Homer no function beer well without.
  46. Archiving IM by WillySilly · · Score: 0

    I archive IM convos to blackmail people......I mean...

  47. Spotlight and Tiger by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Combine this with spotlight/tiger in mac os. Spotlight indexes PDF content. print it to pdf and it will be searchable. Assuming you have a Mac that is.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Spotlight and Tiger by aberkvam · · Score: 1

      Store it in any format you like. If it isn't one of the supported file formats that Tiger automatically recognizes, then you (or some kindly programmer-type) can create a plug-in that supports your file format. Assuming you have a Mac...

    2. Re:Spotlight and Tiger by webagogue · · Score: 1

      Or, for those running Windows, you could install the MSN Desktop search with PDF plugin. It will index PDF files as well.

      --

      Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
    3. Re:Spotlight and Tiger by zapp · · Score: 1

      Gasp! someone on slashdot mentioned (and apparently USES) the MSN search...

      I'm disappointed... truly disappointed.

      --
      no comment
    4. Re:Spotlight and Tiger by Pozac · · Score: 1

      You mean like Beagle (linux) or Google Desktop Search (Win)?
      Except you can use these on your PC today without installing a beta OS.

      (I know we consider XP to be beta)

    5. Re:Spotlight and Tiger by asjk · · Score: 1
      Combine this with spotlight/tiger in mac os. Spotlight indexes PDF content. print it to pdf and it will be searchable. Assuming you have a Mac that is.
      Yea, I've done the same. Every year I archive only the necessary messages to PDF as one big file so I can search for the nugget of data I'm looking for. I don't get too anal about it 'cause I don't really have to do searches too often.
  48. Ask Bill by Mustafu · · Score: 1

    This is simple. Just click "Send Error Report" and the wizards at Microsoft will be more than happy to help!

  49. Archiving IM by Unreal+One · · Score: 1

    At work we're forced to use an internal MS Windows Messaging for internal IM. It's not a bad program, but it has no archiving functionality. I've found that Messenger Plus! (http://www.msgplus.net/) is a great compatible add-on that add's message logging and other features to Windows Messenger.

    However BEWARE, Messenger Plus will want to install spyware by default. Be sure to select the, "I don't want to support this company, don't install spyware". hehe Funny but the option is something like that.

  50. Archive IM? by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 1

    Why would you do that? Do you record all your phone conversations? IM is just like that, unless it's important (rarely happens) you'll never get to look at it even if it was archived anyway. We just feel the need to archive every piece of information as geeks as long as it's electronic and hence possible.

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
    1. Re:Archive IM? by praetis · · Score: 1

      I would* archive my phone conversations if it was as easy as AIM logging. When people tell me something on IM, I never have to write it down. I can just search the logs if I ever need it later. I argue there's no reason NOT to. It's also nice to look back and remember past eras of my social life (don't laugh dammit).

    2. Re:Archive IM? by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I log all my IM conversations with Gaim, then rewrite them as text narratives which I sell to pr0n sites. And all those 1u$3r$ on Yahoo who think they're chatting with an 18 year old nymphette will never know the truth!

      Oops, I've said too much.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  51. Easy... by praetis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I archive my mail on /dev/null. Send it there daily.

  52. Or use maildir by suso · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whatever you do, I think its best to keep it in an open and obvious format like mbox or maildir. The nice thing about maildir though, is that since all the messages are seperate, it might be a little easier to write a program to put them into a new format.

    Personally, since 1999, I've been using a combination of maildir and procmail to archive and save my mail. Every message that comes in, goes to a folder called .saved-messages-YYYY-MM and also to my inbox. I simply don't touch the saved-messages folders and when I am done with the message in my inbox, I just delete it. This has worked well for me and makes it much easier to deal with archiving old mail. In the end, having categorized folders and such is just a waste of time. Its kinda like the wm2 (window manager) way of thinking, but for mailboxes.

    1. Re:Or use maildir by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      I actually use maildir for my current mail as well. However, it is far easier to find tools to convert to mbox than to convert to maildir, and once you have your mail in mbox format you can always convert to maildir :).

    2. Re:Or use maildir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maildir is also preferable to mbox format because the single-file-per-directory scheme that mbox uses has scaling limitations - If you use mbox, your IMAP server will have indexing problems when you get too many messages (over 1000, say) in a directory. Maildir is much better for this.

    3. Re:Or use maildir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you use a good imap server

  53. Archivie Instant Messages by MCron · · Score: 1

    I keep logs of all messages sent through DoorManBot, which allows offline messaging on AIM, but I do that through special software only for the system.

    For normal IM logging, I use Middle_Man, an AIM plugin. Other AIM plugins do this too, so take a look around.

    --
    Send offline messages on AIM with DoorManBot
  54. Re:One Word by pHDNgell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One word: IMAP

    Absolutely. I use no fewer than two mail clients on two different machines on any given business day. Every email I've sent since 1995 or something like that, and received since 1998 is available and searchable. Over this time, I've accessed this archive with the following clients:

    * pine (lots of pine)
    * mac mail
    * thunderbird
    * various netscapes/mozillas
    * ML (some random IMAP reader)
    * My phone (my old Sony/Ericcson speaks IMAP)
    * My palm (two different apps)
    * python
    * a java webmail system I wrote
    * three or four other webmail systems
    * mutt ...who knows what else. I've got freedom to try whatever I want at any given moment without losing my current or past mail.

    --
    -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
  55. if an email is important by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    then it gets copied & pasted to a text file and saved, then deleted from the email client...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  56. Archiving tool: ForKeeps by sstern · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have several CDs worth of stuff archived with ForKeeps:

    http://www.fkeeps.com/whofor.htm

    It's a bit of an old program and the interface is clunky, but it works reasonably well once you work through it.

    --
    --Steve
  57. Keep an archive on your current mail client by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    That's what I have been doing in recent years: keep your regular "recent" emails in one profile, and in another all your archive stuff, using the same client and formats.

    When you switch mail clients (you allways do in a few years), make sure you import all current *and* archive email in a new set of profiles. Backup from your current app.

    Still have to figure gmail in the equation, but with pop3 access should be just a matter of importing it in a app and backing it up - but downloading up to a GB over pop3 may be problematic, not sure what provisions are there to resume downloads.

    just an idea ...

    1. Re:Keep an archive on your current mail client by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1
      When you switch mail clients (you allways do in a few years)

      Bah. I've been using VM under Emacs for ten years this May. 5.84 then, and 7.19 now.

      Thanks, Kyle!
  58. Prioritize. Your Ex' Love Letters can be deleted. by Aeron65432 · · Score: 1

    I only forwarded the important/funny stuff to my other email addresses when I switched addresses.

    Now I use Gmail, and everything gets archived. I don't see Gmail/Google collapsing anytime soon, (or me running out of storage space) and so I think in 10 years, if you ask this question, I'd say I just archived it.

  59. Delete it by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That way it won't be subject to a sub poena. You'll regret it one day if you don't. Do you realize how much incriminating stuff you have in there?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Delete it by man_ls · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Generally, most people don't have to fear subpoenas unless they're doing something illegal or nefarious in some way.

      Good point, though.

    2. Re:Delete it by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Forget that, you wouldn't believe what some asshole with the same name as me posted to alt.drugs 20 years ago. Thanks deja/google.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:Delete it by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Illegal...you mean like copyright violations?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:Delete it by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      However, you also might trash the one piece of information that will help you win a five billion dollar case in a few years.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Delete it by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a rather optimistic viewpoint. It's entirely possible for someone to do nothing illegal and still find themselves at the blunt end of a civil suit.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    6. Re:Delete it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, most sane countries have crime expiration laws for the insignificant nonsense part of "crimes". Thus assuming you follow the do-no-harm guidelines you're usually safe if you figure out a way to get younger-than-two-years stuff off the radar; rest can be archived in a decrypted, easy-to-access format :-)

  60. same sort of thing.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what format and where outlook stores e-mails? I need to archive a friends e-mails and she only used outlook and I have no clue where to start with Windows 98 and outlook..

    --
    I like muppets.
  61. Google Desktop Search by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    If you know basic programming (file access and working with a given API), then you can try writing a plugin for Google Desktop Search. This way, you can add all your old files to the GDS database, and automatically archive the new ones.

  62. IMAP it. by ron_lima · · Score: 1

    I keep everything on my IMAP server. When the mailbox is full, I delete everything.

    --
    Ronaldo Faria Lima
    E-mail:ronaldo@ronaldolima.eti.br
    Home page: http://www.ronaldolima.eti.br
  63. American school of driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My car is bigger than yours. Move it or lose it!

    1. Re:American school of driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never driven in India, have you?

    2. Re:American school of driving by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      which is close to the roman attitude. Intersections, roman style: if you've got right of way just step on the gas to scare the old farts out of the way; if not, just stop right in the middle of it as if asking: "are you willing to crash into me, asshole?" Best tools for the job: either a new thick skinned car oozing attitude, or an old beaten up scrap (anyone will think you can't give a damn in case of an accident). If you drive an average, fairly new but not too much, car... you're condemned to irrelevancy.

      e

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    3. Re:American school of driving by hyfe · · Score: 1
      My car is bigger than yours. Move it or lose it!

      In Italy, the one with the most expansive car looses the most :) .. when everybody is a freeking maniac, you just can't count on people chickening out anymore

      I've got a slight feeling the reason they don't have any of those 'last person to brake while racing toward a cliff' is because everybody who tried died after about one try.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  64. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting
    And have all my mail arrive in the NSA's inbox?

    Thanks, but I'll pass.

  65. MHonarc by lunarboy · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a solution to this same problem for a long time. For now, I still have all my email from the last 10 years stored in my MS Entourage database. Scary. What I would like to do is convert them all to HTML and/or plain text so that it's searchable, and won't need a special app to view them. Who knows what formats will still be around in 10, 20, 30+ years? But I suspect HTML and plain text will survive.

    What I don't like about the mbox archiving technique is that you have to import the mbox into an email app to read it. To me, that sounds like a chore because I'd want to keep those messages separate from my current email box, and then there's processing time it takes to import it, etc.

    It seems to me that an ideal situation would be that the file system can search it (i.e. Spotlight in Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger) or use a web browser.

    There is a solution for archiving emails to HTML: MHonarc. I've played with it in the past and it does its job fairly well. What annoys me about the script is how difficult it is to customize the output, especially if you want it to validate and use CSS.

    There's nothing else out there that I could find to my satisfaction. Maybe some resourceful developers want to embark on a new OSS project??? :)

    --
    Roger Wong
    Graphic Designer
    Oakland, CA
  66. The answer to everything... Gmail (& Thunderbi by ryrw · · Score: 1
    I'm an obsessive email archiver and thanks to Gmail, I can do it simply and easily cross platform. With gmail's smtp server, it saves all my outgoing mail no matter if I send it from my mail client on a Mac, Linux box, Windows machine, or someone else's computer through the web interface. Then, using Thunderbird on all three platforms, I can download both the incoming mail and the mail I sent (possibly from another computer). That way, all my computers have all the sent/received mail without any duplicates all the time. And if needed, when away from my computer, I can get to the most recent email archive through the Gmail web interface. Also, thanks to Thunderbird, I have a consistent mail interface between all my computers/platforms.

    Moral of the story: Get a gmail account.

    As for conversion, you can google for programs to convert your mail (or upload it to gmail) from pretty much any format into a Thunderbird compatible format.

    It was also nice to get out of Outlook Express with it's 218 MB limit on folders. It was deleting email at random (presumably for years) without ever even mentioning it to me. Three cheers for Micros#%@!

  67. Dave's top ten by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    10 Your mother told you to stop being such a pack rat.
    9. Disks fill up, no matter how cheap they are. Low cost doesn't excuse gluttony.
    8. Backups take forever.
    7. Restores take an eternity, especially if your not confident.
    6. Mail client gets slower and slower.
    5. Searches take too long.
    4. Mail clients make mistakes, especially on big stores. See #7
    3. Your CYA evidence may be used against you.
    2. A mail store is not a file system and SMTP is not a file transfer protocol.

    And the number one reason to delete your old email...

    1. IT'S ALL A BUNCH OF USELESS CRAP JUST AS IT WAS WHEN YOU FIRST RECEIVED IT!!

    1. Re:Dave's top ten by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. IT'S ALL A BUNCH OF USELESS CRAP JUST AS IT WAS WHEN YOU FIRST RECEIVED IT!!

      Hey! It has nostalgia value. I love being able to reminisce about the old Enlarge Your Penis offers I used to get back in the days when I could still look down and see it - damn programmer's gut.

      Uh... I mean... I hear that's what others use it for.

    2. Re:Dave's top ten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I consolidated all my personal e-mail since 1995 into a Maildir (which I access using IMAP).. It totalled only 60 MB. I don't think that is a whole lot that I need to worry about disk space or searching or my IMAP server not able to handle it. The way I have it organized, my searches don't occur on any of the old mail (unless I want it to). The only point I think you were right about is the evidence used against me (in my case, anyhow). It's kinda entertaining to go back and read some of my old correspondences and see how much of a different person I was back then. It's kinda like looking at old diaries or something.

  68. Re:One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's four words:
    IMAP: Internet Message Access Protocol.
  69. Older versions of Eudora by mabu · · Score: 1

    I use Eudora 5.1 - I have every e-mail since 1995 at my disposal. It works very well. Upgrading doesn't hose mailboxes; you can move the entire subdirectory to a new machine and it works perfectly. I can't say much for the newer versions of Eudora. Version 6.2.1 seems to have some bugs in it, but if you can get earlier releases of this software, it's excellent.

    1. Re:Older versions of Eudora by gordgekko · · Score: 1
      You can find 5.1 here. It has Adware though...

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  70. Philosphy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a quote from a movie on e-mail archives, next time?

  71. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    6GB yearly? Holy shit...

    Do you actually sign up to those free porn places?

  72. How I do it by Matt+Perry · · Score: 5, Informative
    I use a procmail recipe to archive my mail. I put it after filtering mailing lists and before I filter spam:

    OLDMAILDIR = $MAILDIR
    MAILDIR = $ARCHIVE_DIR
    :0 cW: archive.lock
    | /bin/gzip >>mailarchive-`date +%Y%m`.gz
    MAILDIR = $OLDMAILDIR

    I use grepmail to find old emails that I might need. Grepmail lets you use perl regular expressions to find messages and then outputs the entire message where a match was found. You can use grepm to open grepmail matches as a mailbox in mutt. grepine does the same for Pine, which I use.

    At the end of each year I clean the spam out of my archives using a procmail recipe and spamassassin. This recipe marks messages as deleted in the mailbox. I open these in pine, sort by deleted, and double check them. Once I'm sure they're all spam, I delete them:

    # vim:ft=procmail:

    LINEBUF = 8192
    SHELL = /bin/sh
    MAILDIR = $HOME/mail

    :0 fW: spamclean.lock
    | spamassassin -e --prefs-file=/home/matt/.spamassassin/user_prefs-s pam_clean 2>/dev/null

    # If the message was deemed to be spam, set the status to "deleted" so that
    # we can delete it easily and optionally review it.
    :0 e
    {
    :0 fhw
    * ^^rom[ ]
    | sed -e '1s/^/F/'

    :0 f: formail.lock
    | formail -I 'X-Status: D'
    }

    # Fix the mangled "From" line
    :0 fhwE
    * ^^rom[ ]
    | sed -e '1s/^/F/'

    # Remove the last of the SpamAssassin headers
    :0 f: formail2.lock
    | formail -I 'X-Spam-Checker-Version'

    # File message in temporary mailbox
    :0: sandbox.lock
    z-cleaned_mbox

    The special spamassassin config turns off bayesian filtering and sets the threshold high:

    required_hits 15
    clear_headers
    fold_headers 0
    use_bayes 0
    The rest of the spam I clean out by hand.
    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:How I do it by Matt+Perry · · Score: 3, Informative
      Almost forgot. I archive my sent mail as well. This might be harder for you if you don't use a single email client on a single machine. IMAP can help with that.


      Put this in ~/bin/rotate-sent-mail.sh:

      #!/bin/bash

      # This script takes sent mail in $HOME/mail and moves them into
      # $HOME/.mailarchives/sent. It will also rename the file to have the date of
      # the log file included.

      MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
      ARCDIR=$HOME/.mai larchive/sent
      year=`/bin/date +%Y`
      month=`/bin/date +%-m`

      # updating last months mail
      month=$((month-1))

      # if this is last years mail, set the date correctly
      if [ $month -eq 0 ] ; then
      month='12'
      year=$((year-1))
      fi

      # if the month is less than 10, add the leading zero back
      if [ $month -lt 10 ] ; then
      month=0$month
      fi

      mv $MAILDIR/sent-mail $ARCDIR/sent-mail-$year$month
      touch $MAILDIR/sent-mail && chmod 600 $MAILDIR/sent-mail
      bzip2 -9 $ARCDIR/sent-mail-$year$month
      Now add the following to your crontab:

      0 0 1 * * $HOME/bin/rotate-sent-mail.sh

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:How I do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end of each year I clean the spam out of my archives

      Hmmm. Does that mean you clean the spam out twice, once ad hoc while working through your daily mail in your client, then again the same spam at the end of the year out of the archives? If so, that'd be suboptimal I guess ....

    3. Re:How I do it by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1
      Does that mean you clean the spam out twice, once ad hoc while working through your daily mail in your client, then again the same spam at the end of the year out of the archives?
      Yes, but it works out fine, at least for me. I installed milter-sender on my MTA (sendmail) and that has cut my spam from 200+ messages a day down to about 2100 total in the last 12 months. It's far easier to filter when it's that few. I /dev/null any spam with a score above 11 but I want it in the archives unless a friend sends me something that would score that high and I would have otherwise missed the message. That way I can get it out of my archives. I do have people whitelisted but better safe than sorry. Most of my spam is /dev/nulled by spamassassin. I've probably had less than 300 messages that I have to clean out of my mailboxs in the last year and easily 90% of that ended up in my spam folder rather than my inbox.
      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  73. convert to standard mailbox format by dindi · · Score: 1

    and just store the whole thing on cd/dvd/tape..

    maybe run a nice script to have an index in a db on the sender/title ....

    or standard mailbox, and then make a bootable minilinux with pine (mozilla/whatever) on the same media (use vmware or similar to access it from non unix systems ...

    actually my mailbox is just a growing junk collection, and have to do something with that too ... and hey, i even have stuff from the bbs times with quickmail, or bluemail .... or whatever it was called :)

    or just export the mail addresses and delete the whole thing :)

  74. Manatory ZOË plug by MCRocker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, if you're going to be on this topic, a mention of ZOË is pretty much required.

    ZOË is a sort of an archiving proxy that sits between your mail client and your mail server. It stores and indexes everything, so you can pop open a browser window and do a search on anything you've ever sent or received. Naturally, this was created before gmail.

    With ZOË you don't need to worry about those pesky email folders and waiting for long searches.

    Naturally, spam filtering before ZOË is a good idea.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  75. dbmail / imap / procmail / fetchmail / clamav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still haven't finished setting up my own system yet but I think dbmail is a good way to go
    it allows mail to be stored on a SQL database

  76. monthly mailbox format archives by bloosqr · · Score: 1

    I've kept all my mail for the last 10 years or so using stand unix mailbox files. Pine moves each read and sent folder into individual monthly folders which are very easy to grep through. In fact to use "modern" email programs I setup a cron script to do the same thing that pine used to do as well as move mail more than a year old into an "old" archive subdirectory. In addition I have procmail eat the binaries into an attachments folder. Its simple to setup all the directories for "viewing" via imap though to be honest I still just ssh in and use pine. As far as old "aol", "gmail" account etc email them to a proper account w/ a tag in the subject header or something and let procmail file them away for you in one of your folders.

    -bloo

  77. Practical research applications by Martian_Bob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do data mining research, most recently on the Enron email dataset, and I've actually been having to roll my own multi-mailbox storage, access, and retrieval systems. It's taking way more time than I'd like, at this point I've gotten a database and web-based viewers made up (beware, they're quite slow).

    If anyone has an idea of an open-source application similar to what the submitter is looking for, it would help my research quite a bit. There's practical research applications in this stuff, if someone's interested in making it.

  78. CSV by vnangia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just about every email program that I've used has managed to export to CSV. A few web-based email systems didn't allow such imports and some hunting on the web found some sort of convertor (like YahooPOPS!, etc.) that converted to POP and then I exported them to CSV using Eudora or Outlook, or whatever program I was particularly enamored with.
    Admittedly, sometimes the column names didn't match up ("Sender" v "From"), etc., but for the most part that how I did it. I also made an effort to keep the number of email accounts that I had to a minimum. At this point of time, most everything is stored in the form of .PST files that are archived on CDs and on an external hard drive.
    I also made an effort to keep my email accounts to a minimum, which probably made this entire process significantly easier and when I did close an account (like when I finished work at a company), I exported the emails from there and kept them in .PST in case I needed them for anything later on.
    As far as indexing works - I have them stored in 6 month segments (Jan97-Jun97, Jul97-Dec97, ...), since I can usually remember roughly when I got an email that I was looking for - alternatives include perhaps by name of sender or company.
    I do archive IMs - Trillian worries about it for me. :)
    Hope this helps.

  79. Best archive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best archiving option is to post all your emails to usenet. You bet it's archived there for all eternity!

  80. Insightful? by rolux · · Score: 1

    Spotlight - as any other similar technology - also indexes your *e-mail* in the first place. There is no need to transform your mbox files to pdfs, mp3 metatags, iCal entries, or whatever Spotlight may index as well...

    --
    My next comment will be ready soon, but moderators can beat the rush and mod it up early.
    1. Re:Insightful? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but Mail is not invincible to the "have too many e-mails and the client gets slower ans slower" problem. At least if you have hundreds of PDFs, your machine isn't getting slower.

    2. Re:Insightful? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Mail's speed is a lot better with many emails in Tiger.

    3. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, and iTunes turns raw sewage into fresh daisys. Shut up, fanboy.

    4. Re:Insightful? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope so! I am really looking forward to the active folders too.. it's a real travesty you can only search by one criterion in the current Mail.

    5. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been waiting for you to show up, fanboy. Now bent over.

  81. Maybe this solution... by advid.net · · Score: 1
    I have the same problem, I want to read my mail archives but I no longer have the proper tools/software.

    Since we are not alone facing this problem I suggest we join as a task force to setup a bunch of virtual machine with the proper tools installed to read those archives.

    Some people reading us may have the required software.
    We can get a vwmare trial licence and setup a Linux drive and a Win 3.11 drive (guest drives are host files, philes are easy 2 share and plug somewhere else, got it?).

    I can't tell everything right away here, but we need a common keyword to find each other safely: let say MAIRCHIVEL (0 at google today).

    hum... BTW does anybody remember this mail client running with the scheduler on windows 3.11 ? it would be nice to see it with a brand new name ;-)

    (if you find me too cryptic you may be not enough interested by a solution, perhaps some other nerds here will explain more zan me)

  82. Use your imagination... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll start you off.

    bash
    zcat
    grep
    |
    >

    Now lets see what you can do.

    1. Re:Use your imagination... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

      ...and now i'll answer:

      pop box .. on a server in japan. Minus shell access.

      Your turn.

    2. Re:Use your imagination... by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      #!/usr/bin/python

      import poplib

      # (do stuff here)

  83. archiving IM by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    This is only practicle if you use something like Gaim that automatically saves conversations for multiple IM services. Every few months I'll copy my old IM logs to a backup location, usually when I upgrade the client software in case they change the format of the file or what not.

    It's actually pretty convienient to be able to search through old conversations. It makes a better journal than trying to thoughts out to yourself.

  84. And what's ahead of you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are targets...

  85. My solution by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've found the easiest way to handle EMail when it's in multiple formats like that is to just print everything out and store it in boxes in my garage.

    --
    I am NOT a man!
    I am a free number!
    1. Re:My solution by russellh · · Score: 1

      truly, i agree. one should never discount the survivability of paper. print out those old proprietary format documents before the app/media is inaccessible.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:My solution by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      That's actually more sensible than you might think. A lot of paper records last for a good deal of time. Libraries come to mind.

      --
      I don't get it.
  86. Paper by 0BoDy · · Score: 1

    If it's worth printing out: it's worth saving. If it's not, I don't save it. Paper: one of the cheapest data storage comodities available.

    --
    Can I be a Luddite too?
  87. I only keep... by antdude · · Score: 1

    one year of e-mails. I keep all important e-mails forever until I don't need them.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  88. IMAP and mailbox/maildir by idlake · · Score: 1

    I use IMAP and mailbox/maildir.

    IMAP allows synchronization between many different servers and clients.

    Mailbox and maildir both are open formats. Maildir uses one file per message, which makes management a little easier but some less advanced file systems have trouble with so many files in a directory. Mailbox is a reliable standby. Either way, I keep annual archives.

    I think it's inappropriate to keep permanent records of IM conversations. IM is more like a face-to-face talk and people don't stick a tape recorder into each other's faces when they talk either.

    1. Re:IMAP and mailbox/maildir by mildgift · · Score: 1

      (karma boost) I do the same thing. I always tried to move important mail into an account that could be downloaded into an mbox-using email client. You get the mail into that account by mailing it there, or using IMAP to upload into a folder from the "bad" app, and downloading it with the "good" app. The main clients that I used are Apple Mail, all the Mozilla mailers, PINE, and Eudora (a good one). Stay away from Outlook, OE, some of the odd Mac mail software, AOL, etc. Also, delete aggressively. I keep everything I write, and maybe .25% of the incoming stuff. I keep an archive folder organized by year and quarter. It's like my own little searchable database.

  89. Re:One Word by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Can someone step me through getting an IMAP server running on my network, and moving existing mails to it?

    Assume I have Linux or Windows boxes available (Would prefer Windows, yeah blah blah but other people don't like me 'wasting' hardware on *nix), and I use Outlook for my primary mail client.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  90. IMAP works by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    What I do is have an IMAP server running on a Unix machine, and archive my e-mail into IMAP folders. The server turns those into vanilla Unix mailboxes, so I can deal with the messages as plain text if I want to. Almost every e-mail client out there supports IMAP, so compatibility isn't much of a problem. It also lets me use different clients and different systems to access all my e-mail in one place.

  91. Emailchemy.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

    I use this.. it is fully cross platform too (I'm not affliated at all) and supports the various quirks in different versions of Eudora too.

    Linkey

    1. Re:Emailchemy.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't link to crippleware without linking to a crack.

    2. Re:Emailchemy.. by daviddlewis · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Emailchemy was only the program I found that was able to convert my 2GB Outlook Express archive to other formats. (I happened to move to mail.app on the Mac, but Emailchemy supports many other output formats, including pure mbox.) By comparison, Thunderbird choked in importing this archive.

      I actually used a beta version of Emailchemy that retained the hierarchical structure of my (approximately 3000 folders). This was the biggest sticking point with most tools I looked at.

      Dave

  92. Email archiving and tools by rahard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I archive most of my emails. Up to this point, my email archive is close to 2 GBytes.

    I keep the emails in mailbox format (that is, in plain text as it is stored in most UNIX systems), in several files. The reason I do that is that most email readers (MUA) can read mailbox format. I keep them in several files to make it more manageable.

    The tools that I use to manipulate emails are mostly "from", "procmail", "grep", and "less". There used to be tools from the "elm" era (still remember them?), such as "frm" (which is better than "from"), "reademail" (to read individual email, given the number of email in the archive), "deletemail" (which can delete an individual email in the archive). Too bad, these tools are gone. At one point I slapped a simple Tk interface as a front end to those tools. But it didn't scale well.

    At one point I did experiment to store emails in indiviual files. But the tools to manipulate them are limitted. I used MH.

    The next experiment I did was to take all those email headers and put them in a database. (I used msql, which was popular at that time.) Then, I had a Java applet and perl script to make queries to the database (and actually did an analysis of my reading habit). The actual emails were stored as plain text files. Each email was stored in individual file. Basically, the original email was untouched. I got bored and never continue the project.

    Now ... I am stll searching for the perfect email tools.

  93. IMAP.. by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    I've always found IMAP fantastic (properly configured, thousands of emails searchable instantly, from any email client anywhere in the world (if you use imaps or ssh tunnels), only downside is you need a machine to run it on, though if youve got more than one PC in the house, it's not a bad idea to put a 3rd one in to run a few network services, like email and file sharing.

    I'd recomend for those without a limited budget to get a low-power machine, onboard video, slowest 90nm processor you can find, one hardisc with a backup medium eg cd/dvd rewriter, or two hardiscs for a raid etc, for those on a limited budget, any PC your friends or relatives want to get rid of :)

  94. Gmail Loader by DaViking · · Score: 1

    I've been looking to do the same although my email archive isn't nearly as massive but I would still like to consolidate it all. One option I've been considering is GMail Loader. All it does is forward your mailboxes from a variety of clients to a Gmail account and you can read and search it from there. At this point all the Gmail privacy concern post should begin...

    --
    (This sig intentionally left blank.)
  95. Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by ahbi · · Score: 4, Informative

    I strongly recommend Outport. It does an extremely good job of converting MSFT Outlook attachments into something more readable (mbox I think, it has been a while). MS Outlook usually mangles attachments into some wrapper called TNEF.

    Also, anyone know of a client program that will recursively create folders on an IMAP server (maybe a server issue. In which case, what server?)
    I had gotten over translating my years of Outlook email into something more universally readable, but I have so many nested folders that the inability to have the client recirsively create IMAP folders is an issue. Suggestions?

    1. Re:Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Also, anyone know of a client program that will recursively create folders on an IMAP server (maybe a server issue. In which case, what server?)

      AFAIK, most IMAP servers support only messages OR folders in any particular folder. The only one of which I am aware that supports both messages AND folders in the same folder is Cyrus. It happens to be the one I run, but it takes some work to get it setup properly.

    2. Re:Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by vsync64 · · Score: 1

      Courier IMAPD does as well, and installing it using the FreeBSD port was a breeze.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    3. Re:Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by oops · · Score: 1

      Dovecot will do this natively

    4. Re:Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you are asking, now that I have my outlook mail in mbox format, how do transfer it to the IMAP server including the nested folders? What worked for me a couple of years ago when I moved from Eudora pop3 to IMAP was Mozilla Mail. Mozilla will import your mbox mail/folders as local folders at the same time it will create your IMAP folders. From there it is just a matter of dragging your mail from the local folders to the IMAP folders.

      My question is how or with what, do people recommend backing up IMAP mail. Server do fail occassionaly.
      MC

    5. Re:Outport & recursive IMAP folder creation by jrumney · · Score: 1
      AFAIK, most IMAP servers support only messages OR folders in any particular folder. The only one of which I am aware that supports both messages AND folders in the same folder is Cyrus.

      Exchange, despite all its faults, supports this too.

  96. AOL does.. by destiney · · Score: 1

    Does anyone archive IM?

    AOL does, don't you read /. ?

  97. IM Logs by electronerdz · · Score: 1

    I keep all of my IM logs. Gaim logging has been on ever since I started using it. Unfortunately, the changed formats at one time, and I think I lost some. It currently dates back to late 2003. I have all my email since 2002 in Evolution, I only delete the spam and mailing lists... well some lists. Back in the days of Windows, I had an unfortunate battle with format, and format won. Then I saw a penguin in the far distance, and I knew my destiny.

    --
    Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
  98. not flame bait by trifster · · Score: 1

    Outlook pst file. about 4GB's now. Converted to outlook 2003 so PST's can grow larger than 2GB. Save every email.

  99. Best Archive Format by null+etc. · · Score: 1
    I use the Enron archive format for backing up my records. It's easy, but time consuming:

    1. Print out emails.
    2. Shred them.

    Man, it's so nice not being burdened by the embarrasing history of all the emails I sent. Besides, that was a long time ago, way before Score: 5, Funny.
  100. with a script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    #!/bin/sh

    tar cvzf mail-$DATE.tar.gz ~/Mail ; gpg -e $self mail-$DATE.tar.gz && cp mail-$DATE.tar.gz ~/archive/.

  101. Re:One Word by Barryke · · Score: 1

    So IMAP sounds interesting, but how can i cheaply install it on my already present Windows server?

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  102. Re:One Word by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    Ummm...

    urpmi imapd (or apt-get imapd, or whatever)
    man imapd

    Or you might want to actually say what system you want to install to, in what context, what mail clients you use, or you could go read the mail HOWTO (if using Unix/Linux), or use Google, or the Microsoft knowledge base (or whatever it's called) or whichever of a hundred ressources which might be suited to your problem instead of asking a very vague question on a non technical forum.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  103. archiving emails... by unknown_host · · Score: 0

    /dev/null of course.

  104. Re:One Word by Vario · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have a look at bincimap. It works well, installs easily and seems to be quite secure.
    See http://www.bincimap.org/ for more details.

    It runs on my small linux server without problems and I can access my emails securely over ssl from anywhere. The only limit is the hd size, so even a couple of GB should be no problem.

  105. Re:One Word by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    Sure. From my experience the best IMAP server for Windows is MailEnable. Unfortunatly for IMAP support you'll need the Pro version which isn't free, but you can try it for 60 days, and my windows installations rarely last that long ;)

    On the client side, it's easy - just add your server to Outlook as an IMAP server, and that's it. You'll probably find that IMAP support in Outlook sucks (it's a lot better in Outlook Express), but it's still OK.

  106. I'll tell you what doesn't work by rs79 · · Score: 1

    Amiga floppies. All my email from 1986 to 1990 fit on 3 Amiga floppies downloaded from a Xenix system. They are of course unreadable... although, it jsut occured to me I have a 10 meg Amiga scsi A1000 drive in the barn that has it all. Hmmm...

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
    1. Re:I'll tell you what doesn't work by FLEB · · Score: 1

      in the barn that has it all. Hmmm...

      I want your barn.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  107. Important ones.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I save the important one which are about 10 percent of them. The rest of it gets deleted with impunity. Anything over 5 years old that i still need I still keep a hold of, but the oldest message in my mailbox is 3 years old. You will find out if you actually go through your box, about 90 percent of them you don't really need.

    --

    Gorkman

  108. Always Import to the New Software by elvisripley · · Score: 1

    I have an archive going back to 98 when i got my first computer and I have always moved to the newest technology and imported my mail at that time, so even though I have used Outlook Express, Entourage, Netscape, and now Apple's Mail I keep all my mail in the .mbox format inside Mail, I get rid of my old archives and just backup my current mailbox format. I also started saving all my IM sessions. I use Mac OS X and the new Spotlight search feature is what influenced me to start saving those. Being able to search through loads of emails and IM sessions seems like a nice thing to have and storage is cheap, I don't mind saving many many pages of what is mostly text. It didn't seem like it would even make an impact of any kind. Hundreds of typical chats are only about 1 MB.

  109. save all ingoing and outgoing in YYYY-MM files... by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and let mutt sort out.

    I had multiple folders, sorted by people/project. I got in a complete mess and finally snapped when I spent half an hour looking for a simple message.

    Use procmail to write all incoming messages to 'all-mail-YYYY-MM' and use Mutt hooks to write out to the same directory.

    At the end of the year, cat them together and make 'all-mail-YYYY'. Accessing and reading this mailbox can be done with 'mutt -R -f all-mail-YYYY' as this opens read-only. Use 'l' to do 'limit' searches and use ~t, ~f, and ~b in AND combinations to limit on To: From: and body of messages. It's lovely only having to look in one place!

    Procmail:
    INCOMING=all-mail-`date +%Y-%m`
    # now I want to keep a copy of EVERYTHING in a dated directory :0 c:
    $INCOMING

    Muttrc:
    set record="+all-mail-`date +%Y-%m`"

    Works for me!

    Dr Fish

  110. This might work by JediSB · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Mailbag Assistant might do the trick.

  111. Reconcile? by smchris · · Score: 1


    I just collect stuff, I don't have any motivation to reconcile it!

    Seriously, it's convenient that Evolution saves in the same format as Mutt. A prudent number of folders to file by and I'm thinking annually I dump to CD. Searching? Grep, of course.

  112. Mozilla to Thunderbird by amembleton · · Score: 1

    I used to use Mozilla, which successfully imported my Eudora mail. However, I now use Thunderbird but have not been successfull in automatically importing Mozilla mail into Thunderbird. I have manually transfered a few emails but not managed to do any kind of automatic import.

  113. OE to mbox to html by Gax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My father was concerned about the longevity of his e-mail a few years ago, so I created a small batch file that converts his Outlook Express mail archive into mbox on a monthly basis. Last month he asked if I could convert them "into a web site" so he can get an idea of a thread history without parsing a huge file. When I get a moment I'm planning to write a script that outputs each message to a new file in html tags and use the message subject and date to create a rudimentary index.html.

    I'm surprised no one has tried this before. It's a good low-tech solution for people who require information in a hurry and is more immediate than a flat file.

    1. Re:OE to mbox to html by Gax · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised no one has tried this before. It's a good low-tech solution for people who require information in a hurry and is more immediate than a flat file.

      I hate to reply to myself, but I wanted to correct a few things that occured to me after posting. I'm aware of other alternatives (such as maildir, Mailbag Assistant) that are mentioned elsewhere in this thread, but they are needlessly complex or require you to install software. I'm aiming for a similar approach to an ARexx script for YAM on the Amiga. This actually works better than the approach I'm taking, as it (IIRC) also exports the attachment and creates a a href link in the relevant message.

      If anyone is wondering how a simple batch file can convert OE mail archives into mbox, it can't. The script simply checks the date and calls other software to do the conversion.

    2. Re:OE to mbox to html by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Er, someone has tried this before. Take a look at MHonArc.

  114. zoe is google for personal e-mail by theMAGE · · Score: 1

    ZOE: http://zoe.nu/ is a nice mail archiver/indexer/server. It has a nice web user interface, it is written in java and it is easy to install.

    If it only handled IMAP...

  115. Re:One Word by astrashe · · Score: 2, Informative

    IMAP is the answer. I don't use IMAP on a regular basis, but it did let me export mail from outlook over to Evolution on linux.

    I used the UW IMAP server, which is a little easier to set up than the Cygnus one.

    The UW IMAPd keeps its folders in mbox format, so it's a great tool for converting oddly formatted mail.

    Moving email is pretty easy -- it's harder to move calendar entries, address books, notes, and the other sorts of data that ends up in a program like outlook. I think the easiest way to do it would be to sync to a palm device, on windows, and then do it again under linux, although I haven't actually tried that.

  116. Mailbag Assistant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mailbag Assistant from fookes software will take care of all your concerns. Great piece of software. Sorry, Windows only.

  117. Print it out. Why bother archiving? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    Print out all the emails. Photocopy all the printouts. Laminate the originals. Lease fire/water proof storage space & store it there. Keep the copies under your bed.

    If you have saved them since the 80's, I am sure
    they warrant such special care.

    1. Re:Print it out. Why bother archiving? by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 1

      Pah! If that lasted 500 years you'd be lucky. Even with archive quality stock you'd be pushing 1-2,000 years unless you could ensure consistant storage standards. What you need is something really durable. What do you think Stonehenge is?

    2. Re:Print it out. Why bother archiving? by lanswitch · · Score: 1

      Merlin's mailarchive???

    3. Re:Print it out. Why bother archiving? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Interesting you mention this: There are literally hundreds of stones all around northern Europe/Asia which clearly is covered with some sort of writing. On the other hand, no one knows how to read it.

      One crazypot was claiming that he could read one in Finland in old Turkish (which is streching the truth a little bit but hey!), he was claiming that these stones were erected by Hun/Turk tribe leaders around the world, noting down what they've done etc.

      On the other hand, there are stuff already like these mail archives and at least this one was encrypted finally in 1893.

  118. What does everybody by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    use to archive email across multiple platforms and non-standard mailbox formats?

    A printer?

    --
    What?
  119. Re:One Word by canuck57 · · Score: 1
    One word: IMAP....

    Good choice, mine too. I copy everything into IMAP, just works and works.

    On the UNIX host, I periodically burn them to CD/DVD.

    The best part is if you delete something from the spinning plater and you need it all you have to do is copy it back in from the CD.

  120. Re:One Word by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Just like you install any other piece of software, with a Windows based IMAP Server install package.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  121. What I do by doodleboy · · Score: 1

    I have personal email going back 10 years or so. I'm also on a couple of high volume email lists and get ~500 emails/day.

    I keep everything in mbox format. I archive high volume mboxes with archivemail, so everything older than 90 days gets gzipped. Procmail sorts all my mail, spammassassin strips out the garbage, etc.

    I use mutt as my email client. It's as powerful as any other program I've used, and because it's text mode I can ssh into my home machine and check my mail from anywhere.

    I suppose this is somewhat of a stoneage type setup, but I've been using it for years and I've never seen a reason to upgrade.

  122. Post it on /. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Funny
    Just post all your email on Slashdot. Since no one reads the articles anyway, no one will notice when they aren't on topic, and there's always the possibility that your email from Mom will actually be on topic. Furthermore, it will be easy to search using Google, and the Wayback Machine will automatically archive everything for you.

    As a bonus, you can tell which emails are worth reading by how they get moderated. All your work related emails will probably be modded Troll, except for your performance review, which will be modded +5 Funny. Email from your illicit lovers will be modded Insightful, since that type of thing is new to most of us. Email from your family will be conveniently modded down so you will not have to deal with it. Your friends won't need to send you any email at all, since they are probably already on Slashdot, and therefore, know enough to post in your threads.

    Problem solved. Ah, Slashdot... Is there anything it can't do?

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  123. Only an SQL database could handle the data by aclidiere · · Score: 1


    Maybe this hasn't been mentioned because there is no email client supporting an SQL database already. I think that Thunderbird should show the way and offer the possibility to store emails as an SQL database.

    That searches give instantaneous results would make a part of my job way easier. It seems to me that many email programs fail at that. There is Spotlight from Apple, but it's a feature of the OS. I like the way iTunes lets me navigate through MP3/AAC files. The whole interface of iTunes is built around the idea that you're going to look for a tune. Much more often than search a tune, what I find important is to quickly find what my friends and co-workers told me, and what I told them.

    There are many big limitations in email programs, but they often are subtle in that they leave the responsability to the user. For example, Thunderbird with the default options puts the cursor at the end of the text when replying to an email. So I often receive an email response starting with a whole page of the very message I wrote! Only at the end do I read: "Agreed. John." Some might say it's the fault of whoever wrote the response; I think the email program is flawed.
    Another example is the discouraging difficulty of create filtering rules. I don't know many people who have filters programmed. I think that 1% of email users is a realistic figure.

    A good email program should make it easy to write good emails, not just tons of emails. All email programs are archaic. As, I said, they make searches a hassle.

    A possible explanation for the very little sophistication of email programs is that typically, people that design software (1) are not the best communicators, (2) are not very good at improving their own tools.

    For those interesting in the design of Social Software, Joel Spolsky wrote an interesting article on his blog. Recommended reading.

  124. The Old Fashioned Way by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    I print it out, seal it in an envelope and mail it to myself. Then, in 20 years, I can pretend to get new mail and open it as a suprise!

  125. Re:One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to rain on the parade and all, but I wouldn't like to have all the e-mail I've received for the last 10 years available on an online server. While it sounds like a decent enough transition strategy for modern clients (I don't know about AOL 1.0, though), I would strongly recommend still backing things up manually, and taking stuff off the IMAP server periodically. 'course, I just download all my e-mail to my machine and archive it in various folders. Haven't had to switch e-mail clients in like ever, so.

  126. Wrong Question by ellem · · Score: 1

    Why would you? Old email can only be used against you. Trash everything and burn your hard drives every few years.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  127. Use Trillian for IM by adachan · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in backing up message history look no further than Trillian (www.trillian.cc). The history of every IM is backed up in very easy to access and searchable (through the program) txt files.

  128. Re:One Word by FLEB · · Score: 1

    Way to go. Now it's five words.

    Jerk.

    --
    Information wants to be free.
    Entertainment wants to be paid.
    You just want to be cheap.
  129. I've been using mh since the mid-80s... by doom · · Score: 1
    The way that I do this? Well, I've been using mh in some form or another since the mid-80s (currently emacs MH-E is my front end). So all of my mail is in the form of lots of little files with numeric names (and I run reiserfs because it's good at dealing with lots of small files).

    There are some mildly irritating things about this message format, e.g. if I've got a back up version of ~/Mail/BOZOTECH, I can't just restore it to the directory, because the numeric file names are arbitrary and reused often (e.g. an old version of "~/Mail/BOZOTECH/1666" would get backed up on top of a new one).

    But then, as is often pointed out, with MH format, small errors will only destory individual messages instead of big stashes in a single mbox...

    And this format is simple enough that file system tools like find/grep work very well with it. You can write your own custom tools by sticking together mh commands in shell scripts (I still refile mail that way rather than using procmail... I like being able to clean-up a folder full of mail after it's arrived, rather than having to do it all when the mail is coming in).

    One of these days I'm going to experiment with indexing it all with swish-e, maybe play with slyphweed claws as a front-end, see if there's a way I can switch to maildir format, and so on...

    I realize that this answer is completely unhelpful, but then the given question was a little silly ("how do *you* do this?").

  130. SME/E-Smith will do it. by webweave · · Score: 1

    Take an old machine too slow to run M$ warez on and install SME/E-Smith on it. http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=13 This is a free linux server distro designed for small groups, it has a full mail server with pop and imap support. It builds the entire system and applications from one CD. It has a wonderful "backup to desktop" feature and runs for years without a reboot.

    One of the reasons SME runs nicely on old hardware is that it does nor run a GUI but is administered throug its own web server.

  131. Why does this not inspire confidence? by windowpain · · Score: 1

    I went to mutt.org.

    First thing on the page:

    Latest News

    Note: The mutt-users list recently suffered catastrophic failure. Please resubscribe.

    Hmmmmm.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  132. Use mbox format by whitis · · Score: 1

    I have kept virtually all the email I have ever received in the last 25 years. They are almost all stored in unix mbox format. I also keep logs of all IM conversations in gaim or gabber formats.

    No email application that uses non-standard formats has been allowed to touch my email for about the last 20 years. Before that, I saved mail in plain text format, writing utilities to convert proprietary formats (such as novel and corvus) as needed. Online mail systems such as compuserve or MCI mail were downloaded in some flavor of ASCII. Mail much older than ten years ago is disorganized and on floppies. I think I lost some mail about 10 years ago when a backup across the net failed. Mail since then is saved in subdirectories of my mail folder. When I upgrade computers, the old mail tree is brought over as is or relegated to a subdirectory.

    mbox and maildirs have been the defacto standard for the last three decades and virtually all decent mail software uses some variation of those. The mbox file format has been used on unix systems since 1975 and was adopted on other operating systems as those gained internet access. Both formats are basically the mail message in industry standard RFC-822 format. In mbox, the messages are concatenated separated by ">From" lines and (since 1995) any line starting with "From", ">From", ">>>From" is changed to ">>From" has a ">" prepended so you can accurately revert to the original. In maildir, each message is stored in a separate numbered file in a subdirectory. There are some variations on mbox. One is to add a bunch of nulls before the ">from" line. Another is to add a Content-length: header. Some programs add a dummy message at the begining of the mailbox to store application specific data. Programs may add their own proprietary indexes in separate files. Many programs use standard mbox format including: PC-NFS, unix mail, elm, pine, pc-pine, netscape, mozilla, thunderbird, pegasus, Mac OS X mail, and many others. The primary problems with mbox format are that it is slow to delete a message in the middle of a large file and that some programs have not handled lines beginning with ">From" properly. Each folder is stored in a separate mbox file or maildir. Mime digests are somewhat similar to mbox format. However, they have an extra RFC-822 header at the begining and use a separator line defined in the file header which normally starts with some number of dashes instead of ">From" lines.

    If you have any programs that use non-standard formats, the most sensible thing is to ditch them and if you are prevented from doing that by a pointy-haired boss then install a gateway or find or write a conversion utility.

    There are tools out there such as imap-utils that can save pop3 or imap mail to mbox format (many mail clients can also do this), convert maildirs to mbox format, etc. There are tools availible to convert proprietary formats such as microsoft outbreak, outbreak express, and eudora into mbox files.

    Web mail services can be problematic. Choose one that gives you adequate disk space (so you don't need to delete before backing up) and allows you to retreive your mailboxes via IMAP or allows mailbox downloads in a sensible format.

  133. one month by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I keep my email for a month.......after that I dump it. I usually receive 600+ a month (no spam) and send 200, so one months worth is all I keep.

  134. Simple: there are drugs for OCD. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The late 80's? Hell you might as well print it out, scan it and save the pictures to DVD. Or, just get medicated to relieve yourself of these obsessions.

  135. my thoughts on the subject by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 1
    I've thought about this a lot. I don't have a good solution (mainly because I haven't had the time to write any of my own software), but here is the state of my thought process.

    Requirements:
    1. an email store that I can easily add messages to, and that will handle duplicates gracefully. Like you, I have lots of different archives floating around, mostly from all the different email programs I've used over the years. I want to be able to throw all these into the mail store, and adding the same mailbox twice shouldn't screw things up (message-id can be used as a unique identifier).
    2. an easy and seamless way for new mail to go into the archive. Once I create this archive, I want all my mail to go into it, without having to think about it.
    3. I need to be able to reply to recently received email, using whatever client I want. This is somewhat at odds with the previous requirement, because once your mail is moved from your mail reader's world into the archive, it might not be easily accessible from your mail reader any more (depending on your approach).
    4. Fast, indexed searching, from any web-accessible computer. If I'm at a friends house, and want to see a picture or something that I know I have in my email archive, I want to be able to pop into a web browser and instantly have my answer.
    5. Fast, convenient, thread-capable browsing.
    The most promising solution I've come across so far is OSS project Lurker. It's an archival program primarily designed for mailing lists, but also works pretty well for personal email. You add messages to its data store in mbox format from the command-line, and it indexes them and gives you very fast browse/search on the web. The software scales extremely well, and its web interface is quite snappy.

    So what are its shortcomings? I don't believe it handles duplicates. I can't reply to email in its data store, because it's all web-based (there might be a way to create a link that will open up your mail reader and set all the appropriate headers for replying, but this didn't exist last I checked). There's no way to delete a message from the archive once it's there. There's no IMAP interface, and you can't open its mbox in a mailreader because it depends on knowing file offsets for each message. And there isn't a really seamless way to put messages into it from your mail client, though one good suggestion I heard was to have a special mailbox that a cron would pull messages from.

    Why not just IMAP? A couple of problems with that. Again, it doesn't handle duplicates. I haven't found a web client that will provide fast search of an IMAP mailbox (by caching and indexing headers). And I've never really found a web mail client that I like much.

    Currently I do use IMAP, but it's just a little less than optimal. I keep hoping something better will come along (or that one day, writing email archiving software will be the most exciting thing I can imagine doing :)
  136. What about the future generations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people said that they simply delete email that they no longer need. But what about your children/grand children/great-grand children etc? They won't have any letters from the past to read and see what thier parents were like.

  137. IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just something I came across:

    Procmail stuff - lots of links http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/

    Anyway - I once came across a recipe to use Cyrus to copy every incoming email into folders indexed under

    -date received
    -FROM: domain
    -size?
    -other things?

    Because Cyrus (it's strange dealing with software I share a name with :) has a database format, copies are cheap and, presumably, the same message can exist in a number of places under INBOX without adding any extra storage requirements. I guess procmail or sieve coud do this.

    Anybody know where this page went (or has come up with a recipe for something similar)? I think it's a wonderful idea.

    You could look under "1995, April" or under "from mit.edu" and find the message you're looking for. Zoe I guess would do just as well but I thought this was a neat idea when I saw it a few years ago?

    Is anybody using Sieve out there?

    Here's a page I found on Cyrus IMAP on FreeBSD.

    1. Re:IMAP by akorvemaker · · Score: 1
      Is anybody using Sieve out there?

      FastMail.FM uses Sieve. They're a great free (for basic service) IMAP/webmail provider.

  138. I run my own personal IMAP server by EMR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a machine that runs a dedicated IMAP server with one account on it (mine) which has my 2GB+ of e-mail since 1996. (minus the spam of course). That way I can easily switch between different clients and not have to worry about converting my e-mail all the time.

  139. Ink by PCheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have to print it with something. Ink: one of the most expensive ways to put stuff on paper. Heck, they say it costs seven times more than champagne per drop! That, plus the costs of cartridges and printer maintenance and, and... oh the horror! ;)

    Me? I obsessively reinstall my operating system and reimport old mailboxes into my mail client, so I have a dozen copies of 5-year old email, ten copies of 4-year old email, 8 copies of 3-year old email, etc. No need for backups... plus when I search my computer for old email, I get a dozen copies of what I'm looking for!

  140. Re:One word by sinclair44 · · Score: 1
    ... electronic paper trail ...


    And that just made my list of top 100 favorite oxymorons.
    --
    Omnes stulti sunt.
  141. Experiment by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    I've been considering an experiment: create a new domain name, and email address, and retaining every email sent and received during a ten year period. Mainly, the point would be to track usage and spam reception across a ten year period.

    Of course, this will use some disk space but email compresses pretty well. The only thing I can't decide is if mbox or maildir would be a better choice.

  142. Re:One Word by mrmez · · Score: 1
    I'm not certain, but I don't think AOL 1 supports IMAP.

    Just kidding - I am certain AOL 1 doesn't support IMAP. I feel safe saying AOL 2, 3 etc also don't support IMAP. Since the original poster specifically mentions getting mail from AOL 1 mailboxes, I think there's a step missing in the IMAP solution. Remember, AOL (any version) is not a decent email client. I suppose that if it's possible to take mail from an AOL mailbox back up to the server then perhaps a POP client could DL it and then upload it back to IMAP...

  143. Converting Email by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    It would be helpful if the original poster had mentioned what platform he is using right now.

    In any case, there is a Java shareware program called Emailchemy that might help you considerably with converting email formats, although it doesn't seem to do anything with AOL mailboxes. Check it out here

  144. PDFs more durable than mail, perhaps by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One assumes, perhaps wrongly, that pdfs are a more durable format than mail. This of course is what the entire "ask slashdot" question was about. How do you deal with past mail in different mail programs. If you keep it in pdf format then it probably will be readable regardless of the mail program that generated it. However then the problem is wading through 10,000 old e-mail pdfs. Spotlight solves this. Now that spotlight exists one assumes no operating systme in the future will ever be without something like spotlight.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:PDFs more durable than mail, perhaps by Mugros · · Score: 1

      > One assumes, perhaps wrongly, that pdfs are a more durable format than mail.

      Yes, this assumption is wrong, IMHO

      > How do you deal with past mail in different mail programs. If you keep it in pdf format then it probably will be readable regardless of the mail program that generated it.

      probably, indeed. What is wrong with mail as raw ascii? Every mail program, present and future, should be able to import raw messages.
      If the mail program isn't able to save messages as pure text then i won't use it.
      And i think, you will always be able to read text files as long there are computers.

  145. Boswell Was Made For This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you have a Mac, save it all as plain text files and just throw it into Boswell. It doesn't just archive it, it cross references it for you.

    Can take care of all of the text in your life.

    Check out www.boswell.com.

  146. Does anyone archive IM? by AsYouKnow+Bob · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean, besides the NSA?

  147. getting rid attachments by Arkaein · · Score: 1

    I've used Mozilla for mail for the past several years, and I've had no problem trasnferring my POP folders to a new machine. I don't get all that much mail either, so the storage space wouldn't even be an issue, except...

    Attachments that I no longer care about take up I'm sure the majority of the storage. I'd like to be able to delete the attachments while keeping the messages. Does anyone know of any tools that can go through mail in POP3 format and allow selective deleting of attachments. Ideally I'd like it to be a separate tool from an actual email program, but if there's an email program that can do this (and runs on Linux) I might consider setting it up on my existing folders just to allow deleting of attachments on occasion, while uisng Mozilla to actually download, send and read email.

  148. What non-standard mailbox formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What does everyone use to archive email across multiple platforms and non-standard mailbox formats? Is there an easy solution out there?

    I been using Netscape and Mozilla for email for 10 years. I don't have the problem you ask about because I stick to a standard format.

    Does anyone archive IM?

    Only when it's really, really good cybersex.

  149. Hmmm, this reminds me... by mikefoley · · Score: 1

    ...I should boot up my VAX and pull off the years of DEC email (sans spam TYVM) I have stored on there.

    --
    What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
  150. Offlineimap, of course by LibrePensador · · Score: 2, Informative

    You open all your email with an email client and move all the disparate inboxes into a big IMAP store on your own computer or one provided by a joint like Fastmail.fm or Runbox.com

    Then, you keep a local backup on any computer that you move to with offlineimap, a wonderful utility that doubles as a multi-inbox syncronizer and backup utility. I have been using it for the past two years and can attest to its reliability.

    Enjoy
    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  151. Archiving IM ... by rocketfairy · · Score: 2, Informative
    ... is easy. gaim can do it automatically, plaintext or html, by recipient, and searching is easy. Opening up a nice big html file in a browser, complete with every conversation you've ever had with someone on AIM, can be quite handy.

    I actually have two backups of my mail:
    • raw mbox. procmail copies everything to a folder (on my mailsever) which fetchmail (on my box) grabs once in a while, usable with most civilized mail programs (want to copy everything to an imap server? Use t-bird or some crap) and searchable with mutt, or for that matter a text editor; and
    • gmail. Yes, you have an extra invite or 50 ... just procmail or otherwise autosend a copy of everything to a gmail account as backup. Gmail might not last forever (hence the mbox, and some cdr/tape), but while it does, it makes for handy searching. Not as nice as mutt though :)
  152. I lost my old email archives. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Mostly they were in Outlook PST formats. I backed them up to CDR disks. Then after reformatting my system, Outlook said they were not valid PST files. I think I did this from 1997 to 2005. I am slowing trying to move to Thunderbird so I can avoid this problem. Only Thunderbird does not sync like Outlook does to various devices and services. Also the Thunderbird Calendar is weak, and while Sunbird claims to interface with Thunderbird, I cannot see how it is supposed to do that as it does not interface for me.

    Prior to 1997, I used old versions of Eudora and Netscape, which I stored on Zip Disks, which now suffered from Bit-Rot and lost the data and they are unrecoverable.

    I do not think I did anything wrong, but if I did, they would have to get the mail off of old servers if it is still there, as my copies have all gone up in smoke.

    All I saved to text files, where some software registrations that I paid for. There are some software registrations that I paid for and did not back up that way. :(

    Anyway Microsoft Outlook PST files are not the best way to save or archive email into. I even tried recovery programs, and all they were able to recover was the trash directory which was empty, and nothing else. Fbog!

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  153. Separate Text from Attachments by ckuperst · · Score: 1

    Once every year I spend a day or two separating attachments, and filing them into my virtual filing cabinet by topic and date, And then I export the entire email into one big text file. That way it is easily searchable and is easily imported into any email program later on.

    I started doing this in 1996 starting with Pine (does anyone still use Pine?) at the University of Washington. All my text is still less than a CD. And my contact database has grown to more than 1,000 names.

    Anal, aren't I? But it works, and I can find anything in my history. Just waiting for Spotlight :)

  154. IM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone archive IM?

    Yes. I would tell you who they are, but then I would have to kill you. Ok, ok, I might just drop your priority instead. Consider yourself warned...

  155. IMAP all the way by paulsomm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've about 15G of emails now dating back to the early 90s, all stored in a locally-installed Cyrus IMAP server (maildir format, technically). Never used AOL's mail or free webmails so that was never a concern of mine.

  156. I keep nothing by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    I archive nothing.
    I did in the beginning, but then later I realized I never ever needed to find anything older than a year.

    You want to keep a particular email - forward it to your Gmail (or other) account. If Gmail (or whatever) goes bust one day, so what. It's unlikely you'll actually need any of that crap.

    1. Re:I keep nothing by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      1 Gig is not enough. My mail-archive directory in my laptop is well over 2GB. I'm using Gmail for some time now and it's over 20% full and I've been using it for only persinal communication. 1 Gig won't last long (an other 6 months, maybe).

  157. Re:One word by m101 · · Score: 1

    6gb? You should investigate compressing your inbound/outbound attachments. I'd imagine you could reduce their size substantially. If you were using Outlook (unlikely as it would choke at 2gb) I would suggest http://www.pstcompactor.com/ . Disclaimer: its my product. And I concur with your Gmail privacy concerns.

  158. Re:One Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMAP isn't really a word, its an anocrym.

    acronym - n. A word formed from the initial letters of a name, such as WAC for Women's Army Corps, or by combining initial letters or parts of a series of words, such as radar for radio detecting and ranging.

  159. Filemaker Pro works, with some nice plugins by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
    It's a professional database, and with some plugins http://www.versiontracker.com/php/search.php?mode= basic&action=search&str=filemaker+mail&plt%5B%5D=m acosx&jumptoCat=0 is able to handle email as well. I suggest testing it a bit: the price might me a bit steep for a bit email-backup-management.

    Personally I just insert newer HD's every few years and keep the old ones, including OS and stuff.Need old email? Plug in old HD, reboot: viola! My own timemachine. Including cluttered desktop, silly backgroundschemes and once o so funny error-sounds ('I can't let you do that, Dave' anyone?)

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  160. Google by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    All my messages are belong to Gmail.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  161. Re:One word by dwayrynen · · Score: 1

    Outlook 2003 removes the 2gb barrier on pst files. :-)

    Now if I could just get Apache 1.xx to write to log files larger than 2GB I'll be in heaven.

    Darin

  162. ex post facto Law by Morosoph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why the House of Lords was resistent to the prosecution of Nazi war criminals for so long, incidentally.

  163. Does anyone archive IM? by Dossy · · Score: 1

    Does anyone archive IM?

    I do, but that's because I use Trillian which makes logging a breeze, and Trillian's Activity History feature makes these archived logs actually useful, being able to "bookmark" points in the conversation as well as search the logs in several useful ways.

  164. MH format rocks by andyr · · Score: 1
    I have all my mail for the last 10 years.

    I have never changed the basic underlying format - MH - Rand Mail Handler, one file per mail, in a directory, numbered.

    I used to use mh, then nmh, then xmh. Nowadays I use mutt. Evolution will handle mh format, but it is slow.

    --
    Andy Rabagliati
  165. beagle, lucene or swishe for the rest by goon · · Score: 1

    beagle , lucene or swishe for *nix, MS-Land etc.

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  166. Use mbox format by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    I keep my mail in Unix mbox format. This is the format used natively by pine and many other Unix mail programs, but more importantly it's text-based and common enough that it'll never be indecipherable in the future.

    Non-Unix mail programs often have the ability to export messages in a text format that is a bit like mbox but non-standard. I have written outlook_text_to_mbox to decode the text and CSV files written by MS Outlook.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  167. tried MailNavigator? by ipinkus · · Score: 1

    Faced with the same problem, I found that a nagware program: MailNavigator (www.mailnavigator.com) was finally able to help me consolidate my mailboxes into one common format. That's all I'd recommend that one particulary tool for however. Apparently it does all sorts of other stuff, but from what I've seen, it doesn't do it well. Once your mailboxes are in one giant mailbox of some standard format, it becomes much easier to convert/grep using more readily available open-source tools.

  168. Fetchmail, IMap, Raid, Maildir & Swish++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is how my mail infrastructure works:
    I have set op my own Imap server (bincimap) and use the combination of fetchmail + procmail to get all mail from my various pop accounts to that Imap server.

    Now the Imap server is configured to use the Maildir format and the dir is located on an mirroring raid device (just in case of an hd crash).

    Now for offsite backups I just create a tar.gz of the Maildir directory. If dirs get to big I can rotate them. Using thunderbird I can move mail from any imported format to the Imap server.

    And If thunderbirds search function doesn't satisfy me (or I want to script something with it) Swish++ does an excellent job indexing and searching the mail :)

  169. ML and deja-vu by Macka · · Score: 1


    * ML (some random IMAP reader)

    Gracious, I've not thought about that mail reader for many many years. It must be 10-15 years old easy. As I remember it was written by a guy who eventually stopped developing when he joined Netscape in their early days. Don't remember his name.

    It was a GUI app based on Motif, and was the first MUA I ever saw that implemented the concept of "Virtual Mail Folders". I was completely blown away by it at the time.

    And now, here I sit on my Mac all these years later and I'm waiting for Apple to give me that functionality back again with Smart Mail Folders in Tiger. Hmm ... deja-vu.

  170. Re:One Word by pasamio · · Score: 1

    thanks for that, i was wondering why it looked wrong when i wrote it

    --
    I always wondered where this setting was...
  171. Poor Man's DMS by Post · · Score: 1

    I have a small script that exports all my mail from Outlook (minus attachments) to a FileMaker database. This DB holds nearly all my written communication (outgoing E-mail, faxes, letters, incoming E-Mail) plus notes about important meetings and phone calls (I could scan imcoming letters and faxes, too, but I am too lazy to bother with OCR) from the last eight years and weighs around 100 MB. I can live with that.

    This way, my Outlook PST file stays small (just a week's worth of mail plus contact and calendar data), so I can easily sync it with my phone.

    When I open the FileMaker DB (trusty old 3.0, BTW), it prompts me to enter a name and then displays all communication with a person/organization, chronologically sorted. As a bonus, this is linked to my address DB, so I can easily call up additional data. This has saved me several times when an almost-forgotten ex-client called.

    I guess there are more professional CRM products for this kind of stuff, but I feel better with a homebrew solution. And should I ever want to move to a different format, FileMaker can export CSV and TAB. Good enough for me.

  172. .mbox for work mails by giaguara · · Score: 1

    Most of the emails I need to store are decided mail by mail. I keep 20-50 folders on my macs, and store most ork related mails in .mbox format every now and then.
    Very rarely I have an urge to store any personal emails.
    I have saved a few IMs, however my bf has saved practically all IMs for a long time, for work purposes. That includeds a very interesting amount of old IMs with me and him, .. I really rarely find reading old personal emails or IMs interesting. But it must be something "wrong" with me, since I don't keep any personal photos anywhere eitehr.

    1. Re:.mbox for work mails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep 20-50 folders on my macs, and store most ork related mails in .mbox format every now and then.

      Wonder what kind of communication you are into with Orks?!

  173. Check out Mailbag Assistant and Aid4Mail (Win32) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're serious about archiving or migrating your email, take a look at Mailbag Assistant and Aid4Mail for Windows. Mailbag Assistant makes it easy to read email from many different formats. It can search and display your email archives from CD-ROMs and any other location accessible to Windows Explorer. Aid4Mail supports even more mail clients and can archive your messages into highly compressed ZIP files. It can also help you migrate your email to another mail client or a database. Aid4Mail is very accurate; it can correctly migrate status information and is capable of rebuilding Eudora mailbox files and MS Outlook message folders into standard mbox files.

    Mailbag Assistant 3.8:
    http://www.fookes.com/mailbag/

    Aid4Mail 1.0:
    http://www.aid4mail.com/

    --
    Eric Fookes
    http://www.fookes.com/

  174. Bloomba anybody? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love Bloomba verymuch, but now they are acquired by Yahoo and they don't want to continue their e-mail client. !$#$@!

    Now I need to go back to my previous e-mail client.. MS Outlook. (ok, ok.. I know..)

    Anybody know how to export Bloomba e-mail?

    Thanks!

  175. 1000 Megs by bleaknik · · Score: 1

    Gmail. Duh. Forward your email to gmail.

    Need an invite?
    Need 50?...

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  176. One Question... by shic · · Score: 1

    I assume this experience has lead you to evaluate the various options for your IMAP server software. What do you use?

    1. Re:One Question... by Kevin+DeGraaf · · Score: 1

      I assume this experience has lead you to evaluate the various options for your IMAP server software. What do you use?

      I'm not the OP, but I used Courier for years, and then I switched to BINC ("BINC is not Courier").

      There's also the old, hairy UW-IMAP package.

      --
      We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked.
    2. Re:One Question... by shic · · Score: 1

      I was aware of Courier - and I wasn't impressed by what I read about UW-IMAP... I think I'll give BINC a try... it sounds "just the ticket!"

      Thanks!

  177. Re:One Word by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    On my systems I'm using:
    * fetchmail
    * procmail
    * courier-imapd with Maildir
    * any email client.
    This goes the more efficient solution to read and sore mail.

  178. Re:One Word by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    I hate to be redundant but I can't stress how useful this has been for me.

    I've been running courier-imap using maildir for ages now, and typically use kmail and squirrelmail as clients, but I can use anything I want at any time and not get out of sync.

    Per a suggestion in this thread I just switched to dovecot in about 15-20 minutes, and that seems to work just fine after a little tweaking of my imap root settings.

    Cyrus seems to be a good option, but I'm hesitant to try it since documentation and howtos seem to be lacking. One thing I like about my choices so far is that my mail just stays in maildir format, and I could read that with grep and less if I had to.

    Anybody have any luck with a single-user scale instllation of cyrus? Can it handle a maildir where the mail delivery agent and procmail just stick mail in folders? If the various indexes get messed up can you just blow them away without losing anything?

  179. +1 Bincimap by 87C751 · · Score: 1
    I've been using Binc for a little over a year. I, too, went to a single IMAP store to get around the sync problems of multiple clients. It's great. I use Thunderbird locally and at work (over an SSH tunnel), but I have Squirrelmail up for web-only situations. Mutt and/or Pine for the SSH-console-only situations.

    One of these days, I'll get around to importing all the old MMDF mailboxes from my Waffle install of yore.

    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  180. Re:Or use maildir BeOS Style by agmsmith · · Score: 1

    I do something similar to the maildir approach, converting e-mail (from mbox files from long ago and from collected Usenet messages too!) to individual text files. Each text file contains the raw message text, encoded attachments and all, so nothing is lost.

    However, I'm using BeOS's BFS to store these files so they are a more quickly searchable than plain text files (subject, from, to, dates are all indexed by the OS). Plus I file them away in directories by category. I also wrote a conversion utility [MailboxFileToBeMail] for mbox and Usenet messages that automatically attaches attribute tags to the message files, and even does international character set conversion on the subject and other key text.

    - Alex

  181. use IMAP by zenst · · Score: 1

    Most email solutions have some form of IMAP connector so run a local IMAP server on a box. COnnect to that via you email client and drag your email into the imap folders. I had an old outlook PST file and few old OE relics that I migrated onto a more flexible UNIX solution just by connecting Outlook (imported OE into outlook easily enough) to IMAP and draggging the emails into the IMAP folder.

    Basicly there should be least some form of migration/upgrade available to most formats that least allows you a way to get it onto IMAP. Worst case you may have to script something but I'd guess that would be some real perverse format and would very very old, but there again by definition it wouldn;t be that complicated (ie pre attachm,ent days type affairs). Also if your realy stuck you could always use a macro program to copy and paste them all out :).

  182. Re:IMAP all the way - agree 100% by cheros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BTW, it's also the only way to reconcile an enforced corporate suffering of /barf/ Outlook and more sane programs like Evolution (slooow) and kmail (not quite as pretty) or pine (good for SSH on slow dialups ;-).

    With an IMAP backend you can try it all without tying yourself into one format - that's Open Standards for you!

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  183. Alternative. by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Keep all of it ESPECIALLY the spam.

    The more spam the better.

    When they ask for your emails, give them ALL the emails, including the PENIS ENLARGEMENT ones, the nigerian scams etc.

    Even more fun if you use unreliable mail software so that you lose the metadata from time to time, or it gets corrupted.
    --

    Alternatively, delete everything, but the spam :).

    --
  184. Ohh, this ones easy... by HeliumHigh · · Score: 0

    http://gmail.google.com/gmail I remember back in the day.. we had to write down each 1 and each 0 with a chisel into stone, and then lug the tablet up all 22 flights of stairs to the filing cabnet! And we liked it too!

  185. Yahoo Mail by chronicon · · Score: 1
    Try YahooPOPs:

    http://freshmeat.net/projects/yahoopops/

    There are other similar projects listed on Freshmeat & SourceForge that fill the same role. YahooPOPs happens to be the one I use.

  186. Constitution, copyright extensions, and Bono by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." - U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9.

    So Steamboat Willie is NOT actually protected by copyright, since at the time it was created copyright protection only lasted fourteen years!! The constitution says so!!

    I wonder if that has been tried before, ie arguing in court that copryright extensions such as the Disney Bono Act. Because copyrights are supposed to encourage creativity, Thomas Jefferson using actuary tables said copyrights should only last at most 28 years. Tbe way things are now, though most writers will have one, one big seller can mean the person never has to write again. This is the opposite of encouraging creativity. Not only does it not encourage more productions but it also locks out others who could take an original work and create another body of work from it as Michael Cunningham did with Virginia Woolf's "Mrs. Dalloway" in writing his "The Hours".

    Ooh, speaking of Bono, what does everyone thing of Bono heading the World Bank? While I can't say he'd be the best choice he's at the top.

    Falcon
    1. Re:Constitution, copyright extensions, and Bono by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      You seem a little confused;

      The copyright extension passed in October 1998 was named in for the late Sony Bono (Salvatore Phillip Bono) who died after skiing into a tree eariler the same year.

      Bono, lead singer of U2, has long been a proponent of the world bank 'writing off' the debt burden of assorted third-world countries. From what little I know of the world bank this seems wildly incompatable with their established goals and methods.

      There's little chance that Sony Bono will ever head the world bank, because he's dead.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    2. Re:Constitution, copyright extensions, and Bono by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      You seem a little confused;

      The copyright extension passed in October 1998 was named in for the late Sony Bono (Salvatore Phillip Bono) who died after skiing into a tree eariler the same year.

      You may be right, I don't recall ever hearing of Salvatore Phillip Bono nor do I know much about U2's Bono, who first name I thought was Sony. I don't really know much at all about U2, I don't listen to their music. Musically the last couple of years I mostly listen to Jazz, mostly George Benson, Norah Jones, and Neko Case. Stray Cats too. I also like Nat King Cole and Johnny Mathis. And of course Santana.

      Bono, lead singer of U2, has long been a proponent of the world bank 'writing off' the debt burden of assorted third-world countries. From what little I know of the world bank this seems wildly incompatable with their established goals and methods.

      The one thing I did know about U2's Bono was his push to get the World Bank to forgive Third World debt as well as his push for more assistance to combat AIDS in Africa.

      Falcon
  187. not true... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    The 5th Ammendment says that you cannot be forced to testify against yourself. However, you can be forced to turn over other evidence that is very damning to your case.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  188. IMAP isn't a word? by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    >>> IMAP isn't really a word, its an anocrym.

    >> acronym - n. A word formed from the initial letters of a name

    > thanks for that, i was wondering why it looked wrong when i wrote it

    Maybe it was not only the spelling which made it look wrong. The excerpt from the dictionary actually says that an acronym is a word.

  189. Backup mail archives along with a Linux Live CD... by PCMeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the advent and subsequent improvements of LiveCD distros, it should be relatively painless for the average /.'er to:

    * Create a multi-session CD/DVD with your favorite Linux LiveCD distro
    (or roll your own and create an ISO for future use)

    and

    * Backup email files to said CD/DVD
    (I suggest a set of re-writable media of good quality to play it safe.)

    Further suggestions:
    1. It would be advisable to split your archives (ie. Mail2004, etc.), especially if you plan to retain a sizeable amount of mail.
    2. Convert archives from older mail clients before creating backup, or use a newer mail client that can read the old files with ease.

    Good luck!

  190. Re:One Word by Barryke · · Score: 1

    that was a serious question, your reaction doesn't help :|

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  191. Re:Encrypt it twice, then rename to something dull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, create a mountable r/w image with the best encryption supported by your OS. FIll this with your email archives. umount it, then encrypt the image file with a standalone tool, such as gpg. Then rename the file to something absolutely inane yet credible, possibly with a bogus filename extension.

    Keep a copy on your HD, with a CD or DVD backup.

    Don't forget to use encrypted swap, or your strong passwords might be easily recoverable.

    If like many people you have financial information in your mail boxes, be prepared! Your house could be broken into tomorrow, your computers stolen and your HD's hocked on eBay to someone who buys carloads of surplus drives for the purpose of identity theft. Encryption protects you from this and other dangers.

  192. I archive everything by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

    I have a 10GB partition saved for archiving all my data, between AOL Instant Message conversations (courtesy of DeadAIM -- JDennis.net), and I also log what webpages I go on because i tend to forget easily.

    As for e-mail, I keep all of it. I have over 10,000 e-mail messages in my archived folders (encrypted of course). I just need to figure out how to back it up and burn it to a CD using Mozilla Thunderbird.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  193. Did you really DID it ? by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

    So far, it's very simple. But it needs a lot of paper. Really. I began to do like that in a time where I didn't had so good backup solutions... I stopped after around 500 pages. That's not 'that' handy. It's expensive, and very big. Sure, it's then much more stable than any other electronics storage ; but then you lose all the rapid search capabilities that make the email so convenient...

  194. Like Knuth... by Jules+Labrie · · Score: 1

    Avoid the email, it's just a loss of time. (for the argumentation, take a look at this page )

  195. Centralized CVS by webhat · · Score: 1
    Hi,


    all my mail and news archives (messages I wanted saved for posterity) are stored in mbox format in my cvs. It does mean I have to resolve some conflict from time to time, due to the way diff matches changes, but that's only really on high volume lists like lkml and beowulf, or identical mails which might have come in in a different order on different machines.


    Just like my homedir.

    --
    'I am become Shiva, destroyer of worlds'