Slashdot Mirror


Pentium M Goes SFF

Jonesy writes "The folks at The Tech Report have reviewed an interesting new small form factor box (a roughly toaster-sized desktop PC) from AOpen based on the Pentium M. As expected, performance is on par with a Pentium 4, but noise and power consumption are much lower. The reviewer says, 'Subjectively, the EY855-II was simply amazing. At one point, I sat with the system at ear level two feet away. I closed my eyes and strained to hear it, but was unable to do so.' The one fly in the ointment: relatively high prices still on Pentium M processors, although that could change soon."

191 comments

  1. It's about time! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've attended the Seattle Folk Festival many times and often wondered, "When are they going to get mobile processors here?"

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:It's about time! by Dimentox · · Score: 1, Funny

      But it its trully a Seattle machine it would come complete with a mini Starbucks in it.

      --
      string sig = llGetSig("dimentox"); llSay(0,sig);
    2. Re:It's about time! by darkain · · Score: 1, Funny

      and umbrella....

    3. Re:It's about time! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That's 'bumbershoot' to you, fella.

  2. Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Funny
    How on earth has the Wintel world decided that now is the right time for a quiet, small-form factor computer? I have no idea! *coughcoughMAC MINIcoughcough*

    Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      'cept this is $324 bare bones (still needs memory, hard drive, etc.) and is bigger and uglier and still not as quiet. ;-)

      -psy

    2. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure Macs had the first Small form factor Computer in the G4 Cube, but Shuttle and other PC Case makers have been making much more realistic(buyable) products for awhile now. The only reason Mac has the Mini is becuase of the inroads these other Case makers have been doing.

    3. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong

    4. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      *coughcoughMAC MINIcoughcough*

      *coughcoughMAC PLUScoughcough* So quiet you can hear the capacitors venting(smoking). Or, as was once said: "So quiet you could hear a mouse peeing on a cotton ball"

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by TheViffer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well .. the base Mini Mac is $499 and still needs memory, hard drive, etc also if you want to run OSX with any amount of performance.

      But your right, its nothing more then a "narrow" shuttle .. and it does look like a toaster.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    6. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $325 with or without a processor? Uh... without... hmmm. bit pricey then, especially with the current prices of the 'M' chips.

      The other difference is the mini has an old but competant video chipset (Radeon 9200)... the AOpen has "Intel 855GME". Since they didn't even mention it in the review and used an AGP video card, I assume it's not up to much.

      Of course it's a lot more expandible. It's really not in the same ballpark as the mini. It's more like a step up from the Cube.

    7. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For its price point and target demographic, the Mac Mini is good to go for 99% of all people.

    8. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Small Form Factor PC did more to change peoples minds about the size of computers then Apple did with the G4 Cube. When I think of small computer, I think of the Small Form Factor PC developed by Shuttle. I do not think about Mac Mini, or the G4 Cube. The only reason there is a Mac Mini is becuase PC makers showed there was a market for such computers, if they didn't, I feel Apple would just keep on making Imacs.

    9. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If u want tiny and quiet computers, check out the following...

      http://www.openbrick.com/
      http://www.laclinux.c om/en/Portable - scrolll down to the non-shuttle ones... look like routers

      the first one doesn't require network boot. Now those systems are quiet

    10. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I hope the mod that called that a troll gets slapped down in meta-! The clearest case of anti-Mac moderation regardless of content that I have ever seen.

    11. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1

      How on earth has the Wintel world decided that now is the right time for a quiet, small-form factor computer? I have no idea! *coughcoughMAC MINIcoughcough*

      Crow T. Trollbot


      Probably from the already existent small-form factor Intel/AMD market. If I had to guess.

    12. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The only reason Mac has the Mini is becuase of the inroads these other Case makers have been doing" ...what?

      Apple did the first small-form-factor PCs, like, EVAR, but somehow the mini traces its lineage back to the clunky ol' Shuttle lunchboxes?

      I mean, I guess you could make that make sense, but I don't know why you'd want to...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... if you can't hear it from 2 feet away, how does being any more quiet than that help? (from RingTFA).

      Pretty computers are faster than ugly ones. A pretty box is 2x as fast as an ugly one. Do you put TypeR stickers on your boxes, too?

      $324 for the box
      $200 for a CPU
      $60 for 512M memory
      $100 for a usable video card
      $40 for a HDD.

      ~$850 and I don't have to think like Steve (bbhn) to use it and it will smoke a Mini.

    14. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by nxtw · · Score: 1, Insightful
      What IS the target demographic? Those who can't afford more expensive Macs? Being the cheapest Mac, it fits that target demographic. First-time Mac users? Once again, being one of the cheaper Macs, this fits the target demographic very well. But that's sort of like saying cheap/small cars fit the target demographic of those who want a new car, but don't have much money: it's obvious.

      Entry level computer users? You can buy a similarly equipped Dell for cheaper, WITH a monitor, keyboard, and mouse, AND the operating system that everyone else uses.

    15. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Er, how much hard drive do you need to run OSX with any amount of performance?

      Sure, more RAM would be nice. That'll cost you, what? Sixty bucks at Fry's?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re: Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Agreed. This regular Mac-worshipping seen on /. can be annoying, or just too much. But a Pentium-M based SFF would find the Mac Mini among its direct competitors, so in this case it's very much on-topic.

      Oh, and that's apart from the fact that parent poster is probably right. DOS compatibility isn't a selling point anymore, the huge, bulky white boxes are out, and the maintenance troubles of spyware-plaged W**s systems make many people look for alternatives. From what I know most people do with their PC's, the Mac Mini would make an excellent choice these days.

      The most difficult road is the most interesting one.

    17. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you don't want the operating system that everyone else uses?

      OSX is a major draw. There are pluses and minuses when compared to XP, with the biggest minus of course being the lack of breadth of software titles for Macs, but it's a real tradeoff that has to be considered, and I'm pretty sure Dell doesn't offer something comparable.

    18. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love the arrogant vanity of Mac fanboys. They actually seem to think that the world revolves around what Apple does. For the record, you idiot, small form factor PC's have been around for a long long time before Apple "invented" the Mac Mini. You guys just never realized it because you ignore everything that isn't made by Apple.

    19. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT - YHL - HAND?

    20. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X is a major draw? Most people want to keep their software and don't want to learn a new OS.

    21. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by RFC959 · · Score: 1
      Sure Macs had the first Small form factor Computer in the G4 Cube...


      "First" small form factor was the G4 Cube?! You kids these days! Ever heard of the Sun IPC?
      /me shuffles off to take his Geritol...
    22. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*Fuck off Mac zealot*cough*nobody cares about you or your worthless opinions*cough*brand worshipping fucktard*cough*

    23. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you put TypeR stickers on your boxes, too?

      No, I but put R-Type stickers on them.

      Then they go faster and keep the Bydo Empire away.

    24. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, from what I can tell, most people want something that doesn't "break when you click it" like Windows XP does. That would be MacOS X. They all have a sob story about how they double-clicked the megabyte and now their hard drive won't download. It's usually because Windows is a fucked up piece of shit that nobody can seem to figure out how to run, much less configure so a newbie can run it without trouble.

      People want to "run the internet", send and receive email, and sometimes type a report for school. Some of them are advanced enough to know they want to play music or store/email/print pictures. Let's see... that's Safari, Mail, Pages, and for those "advanced" newbies, iTunes and iPhoto.

      All of that is included on a system that isn't as susceptible to "viruses" (or malware of other sorts) and "just works" without needing to worry about pressing [random key on keyboard that they're sure was the one] and the DVD-Floppy-Modem quit working.

      There are also about 2759023845908750923854 (as of last week) versions of solitaire available for the Mac, and they're ALL better than MS's version, though none of them are as ubiquitous. They usually cost $20 and come with 8 trillion variations, along with an editor to make your own types of solitaire. And don't forget Bejeweled and Alchemy to keep them addicted (and thus out of your way) for a good long time.

      For someone who's already "broken" their Dell and thus has the keyboard, mouse, monitor, printer/scanner/fax/copier, and USB-enabled kitchen sink, the Mac Mini is perfect. It's also perfect for those of us who don't want to fix relatives' computers anymore.

    25. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i must be in that 1%... /me likes his dual monitor workstation

    26. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      One of my secretaries got an eMac (after I recommended the Mini) when she was in the market for a new PC. We're a Dell/WinXP shop so she uses a Dell running XP everyday...yet she asked me if there's anything better out there. Her family loves the eMac, btw.

    27. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >That'll cost you, what? Sixty bucks at Fry's?

      Why bother cracking open the case? The Apple upgrade to 512 is $50. 512megs for OSX is plenty for typical computer usage. If someone wants a bad-ass video editing machine then they are buying the wrong base model. SUV buyers dont price-shop in the micro-econo lots.

      I'd write more but I can't hear myself think because my wintel box is so loud. That's with an Antec quiet system fan and a low-noise CPU fan. Perhaps a zeldman zero-noise fan is next. Funny how all this adds up. A low-profile/SSF/mini machine designed to be quiet is cost-effective when you consider what a quiet desktop ends up costing you in the long run.

    28. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant.

    29. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by blackdragon7777 · · Score: 1

      Take a brown paper bag and breath. Now go outside and do something away from your computer.

    30. Re: Golly, I WONDER where they got that idea! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > DOS compatibility isn't a selling point anymore

      Nope, but Windows compatibility is a MUST. So no, the poster was completely WRONG when he said a Mac Mini is good for 99% of all people.

      More than 1% of the people in the world need a computer that can run Windows software. Not to mention, the thing BY ITSELF costs the same as a brand new Dell of equivalent speed (2x processor speed) including a flat-panel monitor! I'd trust the Mac's stability WAAAAY more, but if it can't run any software I need, what friggin good is it?

      The poster deserved the -1 Troll mod, because that's what it was. A MacHead trying to convince us that his computer is better than ours. Sure, the hardware quality is, but the price is NOT. The compatibility is not. The upgradeability might as well be NIL (OK, RAM is the #1 upgrade, but even if you can do that, that's about all there is).

  3. I had that once... by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a processor make exactly the same sound once. Usually after they go 'sfff' they're pretty much dead.

  4. The primary use I see for by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That thing is a lot of badass electronic-fused-with-acoustic musical stage time.

    I'm a musician, and I know I'm getting one for that.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:The primary use I see for by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      just wait untill it gets some processing work for it's cpu and the fan ramps up.

      how much cpu power you need on stage anyways? plenty of quiet options.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:The primary use I see for by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      When you read the subject of your post first, that sentence makes sense.

      But when you don't, it truly sounds like you're on acid :)

    3. Re:The primary use I see for by piano-in-a-box · · Score: 0

      I'd still rather have a Mac on stage...there is no Logic Pro for Windows or Linux... Granted, I would probably use a Powerbook, not a Mac Mini which is what this machine compares to anyway, even if it creates more noise than the latter; wouldn't trust a low-end machine such as the Mini for pro audio software, especially if I'm depending on it to process a MIDI signal in realtime... (yes, I am a keyboardist/pianist...see username)

    4. Re:The primary use I see for by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      If you've been to a music event in the last 50 years, you'll notice that most musicians are using amplification that will generally over power a system that one is unable to hear "with the system at ear level two feet away".

      Philip Glass, OTOH, probably wouldn't need this much power.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  5. Pentium M? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Pentium One Thousand!!!! We'll sell you the whole processor, but you'll only need the edge.

    1. Re:Pentium M? by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1

      That would be a huge step back from the Pentium 2010 (MMX).

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  6. So the difference? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm looking at the pictures, and so far I see a system with more beef than a Mac Mini (2 DIMM slots instead of 1, etc), maybe a little bigger and more expensive. But quieter and less powerful than a loaded Shuttle.

    So somewhere in between the two, then.

    1. Re:So the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked at the review at first and thought "Damn, I wish I hadn't bought a Mac mini, this thing meets my main requirements (small, quiet, efficient)". Then I realised how much I'm loving OS X - it's just like Linux with a better GUI - so now I'm not so worried.

    2. Re:So the difference? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      It is also 3 times the size of a mac mini ,Perhaps a little more beef , but still .ok perhaps i am a little shallow but it still is not as nice looking
      So what we have is , a pc notebook in the shuttle form

      perhaps im too harsh , as i can imagine a silent x86 system would be lovely.
      The problem is , i dont see intel building the amd64 extensions onto the pentium M anytime soon ( unfortunatly) or even duel core. and they will contiune to beat the dead p4 horse for a long time to come .

      ((on a side note , does anyone have any benchmarks comparing a pentium m procesor to a G4)) ::please note i am not only a mac zelout , i am also an AMD ,BSD and linux zelout (jk)

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:So the difference? by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      Functionality aside, it's one of the ugliest things I have ever seen offered for sale as a PC. Isn't the idea of SFF that you can keep it on your desk? Aopen desparately need to hire some industrial designers. They don't have to make their boxes expensive but they do have to work out a desirable appearance, right now they appear to be making whatever size fits and tacking on bits of chrome and crap until it looks busy.

    4. Re:So the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel is supposed to have a dual core version of the Pentium M out by the end of the year (Yonah's the codename I believe). Try doing your research.

    5. Re:So the difference? by mduell · · Score: 1

      (on a side note , does anyone have any benchmarks comparing a pentium m procesor to a G4)

      Yea, it's not pretty: http://barefeats.com/al15b.html
      PM beats G4 per-clock in CineBench. Keep in mind that the PM is 500Mhz faster than the G4 now, and has twice as much cache as it did when that test was run.

    6. Re:So the difference? by Worminater · · Score: 1

      I actually like this comparison. Nice find

    7. Re:So the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes as we all know that 9 months is soon , then the fact that its not even a finished design and just vapour ware ,

    8. Re:So the difference? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Hm i dont think this is a fair comparison , iirc cinibench is highly optimised for x86 and the PPC version is not on par

      However i found some photoshop comparisons today and dammed if i can remember where , but that really did turn the tables on the pentium M

      so i guess it looks like its the same comparison as AMD to intel , in that it depends what you want to do

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  7. "Interesting new small form factor box" by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    Wow, it looks exactly like a shuttle with a different front panel...very interesting.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    1. Re:"Interesting new small form factor box" by valkoinen · · Score: 0

      It is, indeed, a box. With buttons and connectors. How observant of you.

  8. PS/2? by chudik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting that they are still bothering with PS/2 for keyboard and mouse. I just got a new Dell at work. No PS/2, just 8 USB 2.0 ports.

    1. Re:PS/2? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      That, and the ugly-ass floppy port in what's an otherwise attractive case.

    2. Re:PS/2? by imroy · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the PC world stays with the PS/2 ports. Most mice now seem to be USB, but I still don't see many USB keyboards. I bought a Logitech USB keyboard back in 2000 with a built-in 2 port USB hub. I plug my mouse into one port and use the other for USB flash drives. I thought it was the way to go, but I'm still waiting for the world to catch up!

    3. Re:PS/2? by pla · · Score: 1

      but I still don't see many USB keyboards.

      Simple reason for that...

      "Hit F1 to continue or F2 to enter setup"

      Yes, most BIOSs include some degree of support for USB keyboards at boot-time. But, having dealt with a good number of different PCs and USB keyboards at work, I would consider such "support" sketchy at best. Most commonly, they don't work at all. Right after that, in a bizzare, horrible twist of fate, everything works except the function keys (actually I'd image any extended key sequence would fail, but the function keys fall into that category). And falling into last place, they work just fine-n'-dandy.

      Now, once you have your system up and running, have a ball with your USB keyboard. But keep a PS2 keyboard around just in case, and I would make damned sure, personally, that my particular choice of USB keyboard worked perfectly with a system lacking any PS2 ports before buying it.

    4. Re:PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple reason for that...

      You know, that actually sounds more like a reason to make a better BIOS. Funny the way the PC industry works.

    5. Re:PS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem, then, that the problem is not the use of USB keyboards, but rather the use of stupid BIOSes on the motherboard (exacerbated by stupid USB keyboards, to be fair, but you can replace the keyboard easier than a BIOS).

    6. Re:PS/2? by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 1

      I have a very good use for a PS/2 port: my IBM Model M keyboard (manufactured in 1987). I tried dozens of different keyboards, and it's still the only one I truly enjoy using. Not to mention that after almost 20 years of use, it still works like new.

      I know there is a company that makes M replicas with a USB connector. But I paid $10 for my M, whereas the replica is around $100. Another solution I looked into is a PS/2 to USB adapter. The ones that do true hardware conversion are also quite expensive (the cheap ones that come with mice don't work, as they require the hardware itself to support USB, which the M does not)

      So I'll keep buying hardware that has a PS/2 port for that reason alone. I know eventually I will have to switch to USB, but not unless I don't have to.

    7. Re:PS/2? by DCstewieG · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else, but I've noticed a difference with my IntelliMouse Explorer between using the PS/2 adapter and just going USB...and the PS/2 just feels more responsive. Maybe it's specific to that mouse, maybe it's in my head, I dunno. But I would swear it was smoother. Also USB seems to be more prone to hiccups when the processor is under heavy load.

    8. Re:PS/2? by Gubbe · · Score: 1

      USB Geek sells an adapter for $7 + $3 for shipping.
      I wouldn't exactly call that expensive.

    9. Re:PS/2? by chudik · · Score: 1

      OK, some valid points here, but in the name of compactness wouldn't it make sence to drop PS/2?

      Also, + side of USB keyboard is it can be used as (albeit unpowered) USB hub.

    10. Re:PS/2? by chudik · · Score: 1

      As the other 2 replies hint at, if a manufacturer is going to replace PS/2 ports with USB for keyboard, they should make sure that the BIOS that's on the motherboard handles it properly.

  9. Goes to show... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    they've overhyped the Pentium 4 for 4+ years, and underhyped the Pentium III. The P3 was a far better chip, and still is. That's why they re-released it as the M.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:Goes to show... by adam1101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The P-M is a pretty good chip, a 2.0Ghz Dothan is more than a match against a 2.0Ghz Athlon-64, while using less power. The only problem is that they are still very overpriced.

    2. Re:Goes to show... by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your close to the truth, the reality is the M is a mixture between the P4 and the P3 architectures. The M seems like a very good processor to run in Desktop Systems that do not do a lot of number cruching (number cruching such as games, video encoding, CAD, graphics rendering). Still the P4 architecture is good at processing larges amounts of data since the clock speed can be so high. To read more about the differences of the chips go to http://www.cpuid.com/PentiumM/index.php

    3. Re:Goes to show... by ciroknight · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The problem is the Pentium M is not a Pentium III, but is based off of P6 (the same core archetecture dating all the way back to the Pentium Pro).

      They didn't really underhype the Pentium M, the M is for mobile, and that's exactly where it was aimed and designed for. They hyped it as the "Centrino platform", and it has sold like hotcakes in most modern laptops.

      The real issue is why it took so damned long for Intel to move Pentium M to *desktop* use. The minute they cancelled Itanium's whole branch, they should have moved Pentium 4/Xeon up to its role as the server processor, and moved the Pentium M to the desktop; instead they waited and let AMD get the competitive edge on them with the Athlon 64.

      I commend AMD for their forcing the market to keep moving, but I also hope Intel becomes more responsive and keeps its wheels spinning so that we can see technology keep moving, and not stagnate as it has the past two years.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    4. Re:Goes to show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P6 = Pentium III, and also II, and also Pro

      Learn your terms before you try to correct someone.

    5. Re:Goes to show... by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      P6 = Archetecture that PIII, PII and PPro use. No one processor can be quantified as P6. That is why the Pentium M is not a Pentium III is not a Pentium II is not a Pentium Pro. They are simply progress as newer versions of P6.

      So if/when you say "they re-released a Pentium 3 as a Pentium M", you are wrong. They took out a schematic for the P6 archetecture (probably the Tualatin's last spec), found a way to add in some of Pentium 4's technology (branch prediction unit update, SSE2, micro-op fusion), some all together new technology (Speedstep 3), and released the Pentium M. To the layman, the former may sound correct, but there's a subtle interpretation difference that makes it sound like they put absolutely no work into the process.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    6. Re:Goes to show... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      They are simply progress as newer versions of P6.

      Sorry grammar nazi's I don't use preview. I meant "They simply progress as newer versions of P6"... Slashdot really needs to get with the 90's and add an edit button.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    7. Re:Goes to show... by rsborg · · Score: 1
      The only problem is that they are still very overpriced.

      WRONG.. the TWO problems are: 1) Price and 2)Mobo availability (and price).

      Athlon64 wins primarily because it is faster, costs a whole hell of a lot less, and is much more available.

      Intel fucked themselves over with the P4 and have still yet to learn from it... lets hope they learn in time to recover from an AMD marketshare majority.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  10. Toaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    (a roughly toaster-sized desktop PC) from AOpen based on the Pentium M.

    with the amount of heat I imagine that would put off, I expect you could use it to make toast too

  11. Bad hearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They claim the computer is almost silent, so much in fact he could barely hear it from two feet away from the ears.

    My question is then if he has bad hearing. Because any harddisk and the PSU fan will be hearable!

    1. Re:Bad hearing? by HiMyNameIsSam · · Score: 0

      " Because any harddisk and the PSU fan will be hearable!" Audible is what you should have typabled.

      --
      It's all over teh place!!11!one
    2. Re:Bad hearing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understand what I meant! :) Thanks for the correction though.

    3. Re: Bad hearing? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My question is then if he has bad hearing. Because any harddisk and the PSU fan will be hearable!

      Only if you have a loud PSU or harddisk. In my own system, there's 3 noise sources, in order: CPU cooler, PSU fan and harddisk. The latter is a single-platter, single head, liquid bearings, recent Seagate model. These are very quiet. And mounted on rubber vibration-dampers, almost inaudible. PSU fan speed is varied depending on load, and mostly very quiet too. Its noise only goes up during long compile jobs or 3D gaming. In the latter case, it doesn't matter anyway, since the noise of exploding rockets is more interesting. ;-))

      So yes, pick your components carefully, and you can make a PC practically silent.

      Anyway, I would welcome it if some manufacturers would put their heads together, and standardise some things on SFF PC's, like mainboard size, CPU location etc. Many SFF systems have a lot of characteristics in common these days (I'm talking physical appearance/layout here), some standardisation here would enable the same style of upgrading/replacing components, that made ordinary white boxes into mass-market items. Not being able to swap just the mainboard for example, is one of the reasons I didn't get a SFF box myself yet.

    4. Re: Bad hearing? by ian+mills · · Score: 1

      Actually the recent Seagate Barracudas aren't that quiet. The Cuda IV's are, but thats not a "recent" model. The current quiet champ for 7200 desktop drives is the Samsung Spinpoint series with Nidec motors. I have both the seagate and a samsung spinpoint, the samsung is quieter. check out SilentPCReview 's Recommended HDs

  12. Paint two black slots on the top ... by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

    And it will look just like a toaster. But I guess if you really wanted to make toast, you'd have to use the Prescott instead of the M.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  13. steps by varmittang · · Score: 0

    1) Small form factor PCs not doing well 2) Mac Mini comes along and wows people 3) PC makers make more small PCs 4) ??????? 5) Who profits again?

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    1. Re:steps by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      The one who make good sff computer. Either good looking or good performance.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  14. This is not exactly a new idea by GundamFan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AOpen has had a microATX 855 chipset board for a little while but really the Pentium M is the perfect fit for SFF computers so I am not complaining.

    The 855 chipset is a little dated though, not great for gaming. I wonder how well supported it is in Linux.

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
    1. Re:This is not exactly a new idea by modicr · · Score: 1

      If you want to use Pentium M in 478 mobos
      you can try with this adapter:

      http://www.gamers.com/?run=news&news_id=3917

  15. Heat Dissipation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Maybe it should read:
    At one point, I sat with the system at ear level two feet away. I closed my eyes and strained to hear it, but was severely burned.
    1. Re:Heat Dissipation? by cyberwiz01 · · Score: 0

      You would only be burned if it was a Prescott with no fan spinning. We're talking about the Pentium M here. It's only a couple dozen watts. You'd have to stick your face against the die to get burned.

  16. Noise factor by kogus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In every environment I've worked in, it has been easy to just position the PC in a way that I can't hear it, even if it is a bit noisy. I, for one, am not willing to pay *any* extra for a quiet desktop. The Mac mini isn't popular because it is quiet, it is popular because it is a practical fashion statement- something Apple is good at.

    --
    A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
    1. Re:Noise factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not be willing to pay any extra for quiet, but there are a lot of people out there that might.

    2. Re:Noise factor by kogus · · Score: 0

      I can see a need for quiet in laptops, but why desktops? As long as they are below the level of being a conscious distraction, why do you think many people would pay for quiet? For *most* people I think other considerations will trump quietness when they decide what to buy. IMHO, Intel is wasting it's R&D dollars trying to make a quieter desktop. But the market will decide, and that is how it should be.

      --
      A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
    3. Re:Noise factor by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if you're listening to classical music?

      What if you're using the computer to learn how to speak foreign languages?

      What if you're using the computer in a library?

      What if you're using the computer in a soundstage?

      What if you're using the computer in a recording room?

      What if you're using the computer in a theater?

      What if you're using the computer in a home theater?

      What if you're using the computer in a bedroom?

      There are lots of noise sensitive places. In fact there are more 'quiet' places than non quiet, so the lack of a 'quiet' PC is probably hurting more than you suspect.

    4. Re:Noise factor by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      I must be out the demographic but... what? "...popular because it is a practical fashion statement?" How is a computer a practical fashion statement? Best power per dollar is the way I pick my 'chine and I'll turn in my geek card when I start looking at how pretty it is.

    5. Re:Noise factor by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      And while you are not likely to pay anything less for a silent computer, there are 10 other people out there who will pay for a computer that will sit nicely on a shelf in the Entertainment center, hook up to their TV, and record their favorite TV shows for them.. Just as long as it doesn't sound like a vacuum cleaner.

      Hell, I'd buy a silent computer too if I could get one with the same amount of power as my current desktop. It definitely would help with my sleep as it now sounds like a fully qualified Hoover, and I can't really afford to keep it off at night (bootup time, servers, webcam, file sharing, yadda).

      The Mac Mini is a great little PC because it brings people to Apple, sells off the iPod marketing scheme, and is CHEAP. Don't knock it until you try it.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    6. Re:Noise factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mac mini isn't popular because it is quiet, it is popular because it is a practical fashion statement

      That's funny. I thought the mini was popular because it was the cheapest way to run Mac OS X; something this machine is unable to do.

    7. Re:Noise factor by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're not interested in quiet computing, but plenty of people are.

    8. Re:Noise factor by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      What if you're using the computer in a bedroom?

      There are lots of noise sensitive places.

      Depending on what one uses it for, I'm not sure the bedroom is one of them.

    9. Re:Noise factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only ugly people say looks don't matter.

    10. Re:Noise factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm.... have you ever tried to sleep with fans on the computer speeding up, slowing down, etc? What about a noisy HDD?

      It's especially a problem when the bearings start to get noisy after 6 months.

      A noisy PC in the bedroom is a real pain.

    11. Re:Noise factor by g-doo · · Score: 1

      In every environment I'VE worked in, it has never been easy to just reposition the PC so that I couldn't hear it. (Unless, by "position", you mean move it into another room.)

      I think that it's about time we had quieter computers. Hundreds of thousands of college students sleep very close to their computers (and their roommates' computers). And I'm guessing that housepets' hearing is much more sensitive than our own.

    12. Re:Noise factor by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      and what do you need a running computer in the bedroom for?

      How about turning it off?

      Forget about your uptime and sleep better. It even conserves quite a lot of energy.

    13. Re:Noise factor by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Two situations:

      Your bedroom is your livingroom is your office. Think college dormrooms. Perhaps it has to do something overnight.

      You happen to have an iPod in your bedroom playing music or charging or synching.

      An iPod is a computer too; memory, display, port, storage, CPU, and it's fanless.

      There are millions of uses for computers, many undiscovered because until now fans and noise kept them out of many places.

    14. Re:Noise factor by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the speeding up/slowing down is far more annoying than just having the fans run at full speed (Seti is good for making the fans ramp up and stay there).

      Noisy harddrives are really annoying though. Nothing like the wweeeeeooooeeewwwoooowooeeeeee to keep me awake. It seems that just about every HDD manufacturer has made major progress in the noise department in the last couple of years though. It's mostly the older 10-80GB drives that I have that are the most annoying.

      But usually, I turn the computer off unless it needs to be on for a reason (long download, encoding, generally).

    15. Re:Noise factor by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

      1. What if you're listening to classical music?

      Headphones or put computer out of the way. Besides, have you ever been to a real concert? The ambient noise is much stronger.

      2. What if you're using the computer to learn how to speak foreign languages?

      Then you will be able speak in traffic. The real world is much louder than most computers.

      3. What if you're using the computer in a library?

      HVAC systems are as noisey, so are people clicking on keyboards.

      4. What if you're using the computer in a soundstage?

      Then you're doing something wrong. Of the number of soundstages I've visited, they all keep their equipment in an adjacent room for this very reason.

      5. What if you're using the computer in a recording room?

      See above.

      6. What if you're using the computer in a theater?

      Unless you're running the show, then you had better put that computer away and enjoy the show. If you're running the show, see #1.

      7. What if you're using the computer in a home theater?

      The try watching things other than silent movies. Again, if you place the computer in the correct location, its not an issue .

      8. What if you're using the computer in a bedroom?

      Then you either have a very tollerant spouse who doesn't mind the clicking keyboard or bright screen, or you need to learn to love white noise...besides, it helps you sleep.

      _____
      --
      Huh?
    16. Re:Noise factor by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Obviously if we both sold computers of comparable usability, mine quiet/fanless and yours noisy/fans, my computers would have 8 markets yours would not :)

      An iPod is a computer, and it has no fans
      A Palm or PocketPC is a computer, and it has no fans
      A cell phone is a computer, and it has no fans

      It's not that fans, or lack of, are the strong point, but there is a correlation with size, heat, power, and noise that keep some things out of some markets. You can't sell a cell phone with a fan, it interferes with the conversation. Likewise you can't sell a iPod with a fan, as it would interfere with the music.

      Using deductive logic, then, computers without fans can be placed in more locations than computers with fans because they will be correspondingly lower power, smaller size, quieter, and more flexible than computers limited by fans.

      Fans are a limitation, not a feature. CPUs, memory, hard drives, displays, those are featers. Designing without fans is not a drawback, but a benefit.

    17. Re:Noise factor by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

      Very true, however none of the listed items are even close to the power and usability of a system with fans. If one were to scale up any of those technologies to the power (as in productive abilities) of a system with fans, then the costs become a major factor. Therein in lies the rub, cost is a major factor. If I can have the same ability with a fan driven machine which is $200 less than a fanless one, in the environments listed in the original post, then it will sway many people.

      --
      Huh?
    18. Re:Noise factor by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      So you're saying more people will buy a $299 Dell than a $499 Mac mini?

  17. Re:Sounds Wicked Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burn in hell, spammer.

  18. how about a server farm by PureCreditor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if Pentium Ms are similar performance to Pentium 4s, wouldn't it be ideal for clusters and server farms in which (a) density, (b) heat, and (c) power dissipation becomes major factors in day-to-day operations?

    1. Re:how about a server farm by wscott · · Score: 1
      Read that article from a while back about Google's descriptions of their server farm. The found that electricity is cheaper than low power boxes. Unless you can buy low-power PCs with a minimal price overhead, it was better to just spread them out over more area and using more power/AC/rent.

      Sad but true. That said they probably don't use P4's either.

  19. AOpen Does not Equal Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a PC user for 9 years, and a Mac user for 5 years before that. I can say that I have yet to see an offering of the quality of Apple, nor have i seen an SFF box for a similar price with opperating system included.

    As an AOpen customer I reccomend agaist any product of theirs that cannot be self serviced, as AOpen has had poor relations with resellers and endusers. My current laptop and dealings with AOpen have lead to now 7 months of no solution to my problems, initially the firewire port broke which was not a problem as I do very little editing, then a key fell off the laptop keyboard, and now the screen mount is broken at the point where the LCD meets the laptop, attempts to open or close the screen damage the laptop casing.

    I attempted to go through my reseller only to find that they were sued by the California Better Business Bureau for fraud and were no longer in business. AOpen provided no option for repair and has ceased to return communications.

    That said, I do know people who have had success with cases by AOpen, however I have yet to talk with anyone who has had success dealing with AOpen for customer service, including retailers.

  20. AMD Geode NX... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... should be interesting, there's at least a Tyan board (K7M that handles AMD's low power K7 chip. It's socket A with DDR333 memory.

    This mobo is purely a microformat web/mail/office unit, no AGP or PCIe, but it could make a pretty slick little microserver or homebrew blade..

  21. Old legacy junk on it ... by MarkTina · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not sure thats a good thing really, do we really need PS2, serial, parallel and VGA ports on the back ?

    Would have been neater to just go fully USB, Firewire and have DVI, ah well.

    1. Re:Old legacy junk on it ... by corngrower · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can almost still understand the PS2 ports for keyboard and mouse, but you're right - the serial and parallel ports are not really needed and add to the cost of the product. Adapters are available for those that still need to have the serial and parallel ports.

  22. "a roughly toaster-sized desktop PC"? by Schrockwell · · Score: 1

    Looking for "a roughly toaster-sized desktop PC"? Look no further than IntelliToast!

  23. With a schmear, please! by Stanistani · · Score: 0, Troll

    *Kachunk!*

    Mmmm... my bagel is done...

  24. No, no... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    SFF in this context is a speed measure. Pentium M goes So Fucking Fast.

    1. Re:No, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or it is "soo fucking (on)fire" from its lack of absurdly fast and loud fan coolant.

  25. Review Lacking? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 0
    The Tech Report wrote:
    Like Arnold to a Democrat, you can practically hear it calling the DFI heatsink a girly-man.
    These sort of topical quotes really frustrate me. The reviewer is trying to get some of the psuedo-hip language that the technically incompetent magazines try and sprinkle around to make their reviews readable to the technically incompetent.

    Wasn't calling someone a "girley man" a common insult of the Satruday Night Live characters Hans and Frans rather than one of Arnold Schwarzenager's? No doubt he's said it in his political career after an overzealous speech writer put it down, but Arnold's not who made the line famous.

    So in trying to be hip and clever the writer has completely clouded his point here. While I expect this "entertaining review" at the expense of accuracy in the ad-driven magazines I prefer it when the tech sites can leave out these kind of remarks.

    1. Re:Review Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct: "girly-man" was popularised by the Hans and Frans guys on SNL. Arnold was a guest on SNL and he appeared with H and F in a sketch; I've read that they thought he might be annoyed with them for the way they poked fun at him with H and F but he loved the gag and wanted to do an H and F skit with them.

      When he used the phrase in a speech I think he expected that everyone would remember the SNL gag and realise he was joking. People with axes to grind criticised him heavily on the assumption it was not a joke.

    2. Re:Review Lacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh, the problem is, nobody cares what you prefer, or who started the girly man thing. seriously, who the fuck gives a shit who said what first?

  26. Just Laptops in another package by prakslash · · Score: 1

    Companies hype small form-factor Desktop PCs or Thin Blade Servers as if they invented something new. All it is, is a laptop in a new package. That is why the prices are high.

    What the companies do is take out the Pentium M motherboard and other small components from a notebook, dump the LCD and then package it all in a small thin box and call it the latest, greatest thin desktop/blade server.

    1. Re:Just Laptops in another package by Quarters · · Score: 1

      Name three manufacturers of laptop motherboards sporting AGP, PCI, and DIMM slots.

  27. Needs to be stable at 310degrees by goneutt · · Score: 1

    Some day they'll figure out a way to make processors survive 310+ farenheit, then we'll have real toasting machines.

    --
    Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    1. Re:Needs to be stable at 310degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 6600 GT got up to 270. This was before I replaced the white crap thermal paste with something that actually conducts heat.

      The card survived it alright it seems.

  28. Does it get as hot as a cup of McDonalds Coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone might sue them frivolously.

  29. I wish they released Upgradeable Laptop MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish that they released a Notebook small form factor , that you can upgrade the onboard chip or swap it between CPU , GPU , Chipset.

    This thing is too big in my opinion.

  30. Except only one company has done that by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look around, and only one company has truly done that... Apple with the Mac mini.

    Many of the SFF PCs use m-itx, rather than laptop, motherboards and components. As such they use regular desktop CPUs, hard drives, heatsinks, and optical drives.

    The Mac mini, however, uses a laptop hard drive, laptop optical drive, a laptop heatsink, and a laptop CPU.

    1. Re:Except only one company has done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who owns a soldam lepty, that statement is incorrect, for all definitions of one.

    2. Re:Except only one company has done that by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Look around, and only one company has truly done that... Apple with the Mac mini.

      These guys have been at it bit longer. Even have the option of a PCMIA slot so you upgrade it with laptop expansion cards.

    3. Re:Except only one company has done that by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Excuse me for not knowing about the Soldam Lepty. Everything I've seen says it's available in Japan and was announced shortly after the Mac mini?

      So you are right, there are more than one; three that I know of now, in order of age that I can tell:

      Cappuccino which sells systems comparable to a Mac mini for $800
      Apple which sells the $500 Mac mini
      Soldam sells a $700 system that uses a regular desktop hard drive, but otherwise has laptop components

    4. Re:Except only one company has done that by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I forgot about them.

      They were first that I can tell; followed by the cheaper Mini, and the larger Soldam Lepty.

  31. Next noise target by epexegesis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, as the review points out that the loudest thing in the system was the video card, are there any current video cards that can be passively cooled? I'd've thought that with PCs becoming 'home entertainment systems' that there'd be more of a move toward fanless/silent systems.

    1. Re:Next noise target by imroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to one MythTV HOWTO I read, the nVidia geForce FX-5200 is the most powerful fanless video card currently available. I don't know how well it would do in a gaming system, but it would certainly be enough for a MythTV box!

    2. Re:Next noise target by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You could always get an aftermarket kit like this to passively cool a higher end video card. However, I'm somewhat doubtful that it would work well in such a small case.

  32. Errr... canceled Itanium? by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    The minute they cancelled Itanium's whole branch

    Sorry, but the Itanium2 is alive and well, though relegated to a relatively small market.

    1. Re: Errr... canceled Itanium? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      As of right now, I can't find the link to where they have done it, but Intel has said that they "doubt there will be an Itanium 3", due to market pressure from the AMD Athlon 64, the fact that people would rather buy a crufty old x86 processor than the new IA64, the fact Microsoft will no longer support it, and the fact that HP has quit out of their side of the partnership.

      Besides all of that, it's simply not worth the money, as an array of IBM's 970's is faster (as Apple has shown through their G5 platform), cheaper, and more efficient to code for (as it's a lot simpler to port code from 32bit PPC->64bit PPC than it is 32bit x86->64bit IA64).

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re: Errr... canceled Itanium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't find the link, as it doesn't exist. Intel is backing the itanium fully, as their roadmap shows, HP have said they will spend something like $3B in the next 5 years on it, MS dropped XP support for it, not Win server 2003, but that is probably because its a server chip.

      Try visiting reality once in a while.

  33. DBZ by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Why did I half-hope that would read "Pentium M Goes SSJ"?

    I can just imagine it turning bright yellow and crackling with electricity. Actually...thats what happened when I spilled orange juice on my processor one time...that's not so cool.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:DBZ by derkyjadex · · Score: 1

      I did some "testing" of my electronic equipment in various liquid situations. Results are:

      Mobile phone takes 3 day to recover from toilet.

      Laptop takes three weeks to recover from juice spillage.

      Needless to say, these tests weren't entirely my conscious decision.

      --
      Lift out of order. Bubble sort in progress.
  34. Silent Computing isn't so great by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I have a totally silent fanless/diskless machine at work and it's so quiet that i can hear everyone in the adjoining offices. Kinda like having my laptop for a bit of background noise.

    Now it'd be nice to have a silent system at home, but i usually have music on when i'm working so either way it's good.

  35. You said, I said...both wrong by dafz1 · · Score: 1

    You may think of the Shuttle. I think of the G4 Cube(which was first, and proved the concept worked). All of this is irrelevant. How much time did either get in the normal press?

    Fact of the matter is the Mac mini will be credited with bring small form factor to the AVERAGE consumer.

    As for AOpen's execution...Kevin Rose proved a SFF x86 machine could happen in a case the size of the mini(minus an optical drive). Until someone comes out with something that small and pretty with an x86-based processor, "nothing to see hear...move along".

    1. Re:You said, I said...both wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      He did it with a Nano-ITX board running a Via Eden processor. A 1Ghz Eden is about on par with a PIII-550 or so.

      The "x86 Mac Mini" he created would be utterly smoked by a real mac mini.

  36. Still waiting for a good SFF.. by Ancil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Still isn't what people are looking for. Wintel folks: look to the Mac Mini for inspiration.
    • People don't need expansion slots. Everything is built into the motherboard. If they really need something which isn't there, it can be plugged into a USB port. Expansion slots are a huge waste of real estate, and screw up your airflow too.
    • People want good video performance. That means no shared memory for video. The only reason people buy these huge AOpen and Shuttle SFF's is that the Mini-ITX boards are saddled with lousy graphics. Put an ATi Mobility X700 with 128 megs of video memory in there, and customers won't want or need an AGP or PCIE16 slot. Now you can get away with no expansion slots at all.
    The solution is staring the industry in the face, but no one seems to sell it: SFF machines built using laptop motherboards. If Dell can sell this for $1,000 why can't they sell the same thing with no display, battery, or keyboard for $500?
    1. Re:Still waiting for a good SFF.. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      people DO want slots.

      my SFF (at work, which I built at home and brought in to use at work) has a dual-dvi video card (matrox g550). try finding dual-dvi on a SFF. good luck.

      I also want decent hardware raid (sometimes). enter the 3ware pci cards. you can also fit 2 slim line drives in a SFF for raid redundancy (I hate it when my always-on workstation crashes due to a drive seize or head crash).

      what about onboard ethernet? most are pitiful. I went with an ethernet card by intel (pro 1000) that is best in class. when I do all my work via VNC - the network speed and latency DOES matter. onboard ethernets usually suck. especially the gig-E chipsets they put onboard. yuk!

      you see - there ARE good reasons for slot-based expension on SFF. you can't put ALL your goodies on usb2 or FW.

      1pci and 1agp is still perfect.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Still waiting for a good SFF.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      People don't need expansion slots. Everything is built into the motherboard. If they really need something which isn't there, it can be plugged into a USB port.

      Yeah, when your on-board video-chip burns-out, you can just plug-in a USB videocard.

      When your gigabit ethernet burns out, you can just plug-in a gigabit USB NIC.

      I'm considering this AOpen system, but I sure as hell wouldn't even consider any system designed to your ideal specifications...

      Speaking of the Mac Mini, history has shown desktop computers using 2.5" HDDs have been far to unreliable for most people.

      BTW, who designated you as the person to speak for everyone else?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Still waiting for a good SFF.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your points are incompatible. The only way to get "good" video performance is through expansion slots. Something like the X700 is only "good enough".

      As for the reason nobody builds these but Apple? It's because only Apple can remove the supply of slotted form factors which would sell better.

    4. Re:Still waiting for a good SFF.. by dstone · · Score: 1
      when your on-board video-chip burns-out...
      When your gigabit ethernet burns out...


      If something on my motherboard burned out, I don't think I'd be trusting it at all anymore, with or without expansion slots!

      Anyways, this would be my logic if such a problem actually happened:
      if mobo.age < 12_months:
      manufacturer.warranty_claim()
      elif mobo.age < 24_months:
      credit_card.warranty_claim() # always double your warranty for free
      else:
      buy(new mobo) # they're cheap and in 2+ years, it's upgrade time anyways!
    5. Re:Still waiting for a good SFF.. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If something on my motherboard burned out, I don't think I'd be trusting it at all anymore, with or without expansion slots!

      Well, that's your own opinion, based on a completely lack of info I might add.

      I've had an Apple PPC machine, where the built-in NIC stopped working, but with a PCI NIC, it kept on functioning for YEARS. I've had the same experience with many PCs, who's on-board video, sound, ide, etc., crapped-out, and just adding one PCI card took care of the problem, and the machines kept on running for a long time with no other problems.

      they're cheap and in 2+ years, it's upgrade time anyways!

      Good for you, throw away everything at the first possible opportunity, because it isn't the latest and greatest anymore. Many of us don't subscribe to that incredibly wasteful lifestyle, and keep our machines in use for many, many years, until there are SERIOUS hardware failures.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  37. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I award your post the "OT rant of the day" award.

  38. small form factor by unknowns · · Score: 1

    By small form factor...do you mean, laptop?
    Score: -1, Redundant; that's for the machine boys, not the comment.

    --
    Even blind squirrels find nuts now and then.
  39. Convergence of Laptop parts and desktop by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    If laptop parts come down some in price (more than this), and folks are willing to pay the difference to have quiet, smaller, cheaper to run machines, we could see an interesting trend over the next couple of years.

    Laptop and desktop parts could converge, leaving what we currently think of as desktop parts (and their like) in the server realm. Meaning we might have a little burp in Moore's law (that the average macine bought in 2006 will be SLOWER than the average one bought in 2005) and the number of hefty CPUs sold would drop, so that the prices of them (therefore) would go up (or fail to come down as we have come to expect).

    It'd be good for America's energy bill, but bad for gamers, and those of us who make servers at home with commodity parts.

    1. Re:Convergence of Laptop parts and desktop by repetty · · Score: 1

      >> If laptop parts come down some in price (more than this), and folks are willing to pay the difference to have quiet, smaller, cheaper to run machines, we could see an interesting trend over the next couple of years.

      Speaking as a working corporate desktop sysadmin, I certainly hope that doesn't happen.

      For some reason, people refuse to believe that trade-offs exist in nature. Everyone wants Small & Cheap & Fast & Reliable.... laptops!!!

      Except that the reality is that laptops are much less reliable than desktops, regardless of who makes them (Dell desktops are more reliable than Dell notebooks and Apple desktops are more reliable than Apple PowerBooks.)

      When one of my users bitches about their laptop computer's speed or reliability, I remind them that, any time they want, we can solve that speed/reliability problem for them. All they have to do is realign their priorities and put in a request.

      They never do.

      I don't think this would bother me very much except for all the bitching and complaining that I have to hear.

      Something for nothing.... sheesh!

    2. Re:Convergence of Laptop parts and desktop by wonkavader · · Score: 1

      I agree that they're less reliable (and we're getting far from the subject) but I suspect that there's good reason for their unreliability compared to desktops, and that if you have mobile CPUs in desktop machines, you won't have the same trouble (or will, but to a much lesser degree).

      One -- the hardware in them changes constantly. Every year is a major redesign, as makers try to cram more into less space/weight.

      Two -- They're more complicated, integrating non-standard mice and such as well as that screen (with not completely standard controller hardware, tweaked for the individual display).

      Three -- they get moved around and dinged and dropped and such.

      None of that has to be the case for desktops. Motherboard innovation could proceed at the usual desktop pace (slower than laptops) and case designs would be less of a factor, as we would settle on a brickish size, and not have to worry about weight.

      You'd see some of the same problems, but certainly not all.

      My bigger worry is that it'll cost me more to make a high-voltage server.

  40. How small is SFF? by dorkface · · Score: 1

    I would've thought a review of a SFF system would tell how small it is. Am I blind or did they not list the dimensions in the entire 13 pages?

  41. Vapid Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Part of what a reviewer does is technical testing, but the other part is expressing in a clear manner what they've found. In The Tech Review's effort to be clever, they obfuscated their meaning and made reading about adequate pairings of fans, chips, and heat sinks more bother.


    Why is the clarity of a review an off-topic rant?

    1. Re:Vapid Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's utterly irrelevant, and bizarrely so. I bet it bothers you because you identify with the girly men.

      And btw the author never claimed Arnold was first to use the phrase.

  42. Toaster PC by Bequita · · Score: 1

    If that thing asks me if I'd like some toast, I'm going to take an axe to it...

    --
    Yes, there are women on Slashdot. Deal with it.
    1. Re:Toaster PC by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Toast only runs on Mac. You'll have to use Easy Media Creator if you're using a PC.

    2. Re:Toaster PC by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "If that thing asks me if I'd like some toast, I'm going to take an axe to it. "

      What if it offers to make you a cup of Advanced Tea Substitute?

    3. Re:Toaster PC by Bequita · · Score: 1

      "Toast only runs on Mac. You'll have to use Easy Media Creator if you're using a PC." ...and that sound you just heard was the Red Dwarf reference going right over your head.

      --
      Yes, there are women on Slashdot. Deal with it.
  43. Still a lot bigger than a Mac Mini by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    And apart from the processor, there's nothing really new in this thing.

    1. Re:Still a lot bigger than a Mac Mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but unlike the Mac Mini, this is useful!

      I know two people that bought minis because, well they were so cool. Neither one could figure out what to do with it and ended up selling them a couple weeks later at a major loss to someone else that probably doesn't have a use for it either!

      It's a laf-a-minit watching Mac fans twist and contort in to fantasic shapes every time Steve craps something out.

    2. Re:Still a lot bigger than a Mac Mini by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well.. my Mac Mini got its fair share of use... it simply is a homeserver and does lots of other jobs. Currently it hosts SVN, a mailserver a database and other stuff and besides that it serves me the files via samba... If your people could not figure out how to use a computer (because things look different) then they should stay away from computers at all, after all the mac mini is just a general purpose computer and you can do pretty much the same things with it as with a PC.

  44. What a breakthrough! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


    Someone's finally invented a notebook computer without an integrated keyboard and LCD panel?

    The hell you say!

  45. Numpties should be banned from computers. by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    Well maybe your friends shouldn't be such numpties!

    Just to help them (and you) out .. a Mac Mini is a computer, with it you can do all sorts of things including but not limited to :

    - Wordprocessing
    - Spreadsheets
    - E-mail
    - Internet
    - Photo manipulation
    - Video editing
    - Play games
    - Hold down paper in high wind areas

    Things a Mac Mini probably can't do :

    - Give you oral sex
    - Cook your dinner
    - Tidy your room
    - Think up good excuses as to why you are so stupid
    - Protect your from a nuclear winter
    - Stop numptyism.

    I'm intrigued, please ask your friends what they expected the Mac to do after they'd bought it ...

  46. AOpen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, that's some high quality there. </sarcasm>

    AOpen is Acer. Acer is ummmmm... I think you know.

  47. Just dont show this guy an Apple computer!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's libel to just cream himself.

    The fact that "The Tech Report" describes a kind of small and quiet computer as "simply amazing" shows either how out of touch with the world of computing they are (not true) or they are just wintel fanboys; cheerleading for a past due improvment of thier outdated base architecture (bingo!).

    or maybe I just really like my mac mini :)

    1. Re:Just dont show this guy an Apple computer!! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't know - a smallish PC based upon the Pentium M, as opposed to the outdated G4, where I can use a fast 3.5" desktop drive, the AGP video card of my choice, optical audio in/out, and an extra PCI slot is kind of exciting. The Mac Mini is a great machine, but some people care about other things as well.

    2. Re:Just dont show this guy an Apple computer!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but if one is doing all this customizing, u don't want a mini toaster pc... just the same as u wouldn't want a mac mini. Get a full size pc where you an have unlimited/unrestricted/unconfined customizing. Heck, don't pay for this little thing, just build a machinie urself! But if ur not doing anything processor/graphics card intensuive then u don't need any of this "fast harddrive", agp card, or whatever else junk. And then you would be in the category of MOST computer users who just surf the web and casually do anything remotely productive... which in that case you would likely benefit from saving some money & easing your computer experience/worries with the MacMini. :-) Its true that some people care about "other things" but its funny to consider how many of these people NEED to care about any of these other things vs. how many people spend time/money pretending they have a potential reason to care about these things.
      *P.S. the G4 is hardly outdated... i still run intense programs on it (motion, final cut pro, + games) on mine quite nicely. Not to say the G5 doesn't scream extra loud... but the G4 is certainly still a very suffient & satisfying processor for most people's needs.

  48. No AGP but by HalfFlat · · Score: 1

    It's worth comparing this box with some of the Pentium M machines/barebone systems available based on miniITX motherboards with integrated video and no AGP. If you're not doing 3-D gaming, then these guys are very attractive.

    In particular, look at some of the designs coming out of Soldam, such as the Alphia, Lepty and Rhapsody.

    On the other hand, if you're looking for 3-D gaming with the best performance in the smallest possible package, it's hard to go past something like Iwill's ZPC64.

  49. Uh,... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't discount the all-out performance of a Pentium M simply because it was designed for mobile use and consumes very little power. I've seen a few gaming benchmarks that showed the Pentium M can keep up with an Athlon 64 pretty well, the difference was no more than five percent. Side-by-side, few gamers would be able to tell the difference unless there was a meter saying what the FPS was.

  50. How big? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    toaster-sized desktop PC

    That's about a quarter the size of a microwave oven, kiddies.

  51. OMG H@X! by DirePickle · · Score: 1

    It looks like Tech Report is guilty of benchmark fiddling. If you look closely, this PC is using an nVidia 6800, which makes it completely unfair to compare to a Mac mini, which sports a smaller ATI 9200.

    1. Re:OMG H@X! by valkoinen · · Score: 0

      This is not a iMini killer. It's a SFF desktop replacement that can outperform high-end desktop systems (P4, A64). The gaming performance with 2MHz Pentium M is impressive and the 2MB L2 cache truly shines there. This would be a perfect LAN party machine.

  52. FTA... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    The Pentium M is basically a "boosted" Pentium !!! : more cache, new optimisation-oriented features

    Plus SSE2, 400MHz FSB. other than that, it's a P3.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  53. Which of the P6 cores most resembles it? by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    As we can see here...

    The Pentium M is basically a "boosted" Pentium !!! : more cache, new optimisation-oriented features.

    Add SSE2, and clock the FSB to 400MHz, and vee-olah! Pentium M!

    It's a tweaked P3, and there's no denying it.

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  54. Well... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to qoute the entire 21 page article from Anandtech, but the conclusion was pretty clear.

    Basicly, the summary is that mobile chips are often limited by memory bandwidth etc. The Pentium M is stunning, and an even match for PIV/A64 under those conditions, and with lower power consumption to boot. But when you remove the constraints and move to a desktop, it does not perform as well as the desktop chips. E.g. it has a large cache to deal with a slow memory bus. Give it DDR400 (or soon, DDR2-667) and the big cache is excessive.

    The Pentium M was Intels attempt to make AMD fight a two-front war against a superior mobile and superior desktop CPU. They succeeded in mobile chips because they made adaptions specifically for the mobile market, but failed on the desktop. I expect the same choices to hold it back when going for the desktop market.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  55. It's about time. by cupraman · · Score: 1

    I've always liked the idea of a SFF PC. Who needs a huge mini-tower case when all you need is one 3.5" drive and one 5.25"?

    I've used the mini-itx boards such as the VIA Eden but they're too slow for any serious work. Of course there's the shuttles but with all that gear in a small space with a roasting processor, the cooling they require means they're always too noisy.

    We know it can be done because Apple have done it, but in the PC world we've always been waiting for a powerful laptop processor in a SFF case. So this one looks like a toaster, someone will take the idea and build a better looking one!

  56. Re:Golly, I WONDER where they got that ide[winhat] by winhat · · Score: 0

    You are so much sickness. The enemy surrounds. I see so much sickness. The enemy surrounds. I see so much of an indigenous people. I personally believe that it would be macos x. I'd like to think they can change the world are the final sense, a theft from those who think and a cute saying are all it takes to motivate you, you probably have a sob story about that, but it's a bit too rude to recount! It's usually because windows is a fucked up piece of music.

    A baker is a computer program, and i am a human being, which means i do what i can tell, most people want something that doesn't "break when you click it" like windows xp does. Dance is a gland used for hearing, and it converts sound into electrical impulses that are crazy enough to know they want to change your mind. I don't want to think they can change the world is a rhythmic movement of the body usually performed to music. Some of them are advanced enough to know they want to think about your mind.

    A bayonet is a study of the solar system.

    Some of them are as ubiquitous. My riches consist not in the world are the moments that you and your own types of solitaire. When you earnestly believe you can compensate for a long time.

    There's no excuse for violence against nature or for the mac, and they're all better than ms's version, though none of them are advanced enough to know they want to keep them addicted (and thus out of things to talk about! For someone who's already "broken" their dell and thus has the keyboard, mouse, monitor, printer/scanner/fax/copier, and usb-enabled kitchen sink, the mac mini is perfect.

  57. From looking at the box... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    ...It looks like those very small "breadbox" case designs for PC compatibles that has been around for a couple of years.

    In short, it's not even anywhere close to being inspired by the Mac Mini.

  58. You've got it backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, except that AOpen announced the EY-855 at CES, which was over a week before Apple announced the mac mini. So maybe apple got the idea from *cough cough* AOpen then? :) AOpen vs. Apple I know this because I was at CES looking for such a machine. I even went to the Shuttle booth and asked them when they were going to release a Pentium-M based system. They just looked at me like I was crazy. Lucky for me, AOpen picked up the slack.