Slashdot Mirror


Lucas To Redo Star Wars In 3-D

Warlock7 writes "You might have thought that it was going to all be over on May 19 with the release of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Well, not so fast. It seems that George Lucas is planning to re-re-release the Star Wars films in a new 3-D format. There are also several other directors that are interested in this new technology and they are trying to get theaters to install new technology to allow the showing of their films in the new 3-D format [req free reg]."

100 of 593 comments (clear)

  1. Please Say It Ain't So by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

    What does Lucas do anyway, just wake up every now and then and think "in what new ways can I rape the fond memories of a younger generation"?

    This guy's gone totally batshit insane. I think the best thing anyone could do for the franchise at this point is put the man in a damned straighjacket and throw him off the brooklyn bridge with a lead weight in a backpack on his back.

    I can respect that some people may have liked the first two pieces (even if it wasn't my cup of tea, so to speak), and this third one might be okay, but this is a little ridiculous.

    PLEASE GEORGE JUST STOP. It was a great idea the first time through with episodes 4-6, and I understand that you had to round it out with the first three parts of the series, but you're just hurting us now. Please.... please stop hurting us.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Funny

      What does Lucas do anyway, just wake up every now and then and think "in what new ways can I rape the fond memories of a younger generation"?

      ... and then he said 3D animation was Jesus Juice and that Jesus would've liked 3D animation if it had've existed and then I went to sleep on his bed and....

    2. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 3, Funny

      Please stop hurting America!

    3. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by pens · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an idea... DONT WATCH IT. Nobody's forcing you to watch his latest movie.

    4. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by phyruxus · · Score: 5, Funny
      Every time George Lucas re-releases a Star Wars movie, god kills a domo-kun.

      PLEASE, Think Of The Domo-Kuns!

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    5. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by xxavierg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "in what new ways can I rape the fond memories of a younger generation"

      wow, when a person redoes a film of his, and you call that "rape", either you had a very bad childhood or you are very, very weak minded. or maybe you do not understand the definition of rape. i do not think redoing a movie in a way you do not like constitutes rape.

      "Please.... please stop hurting us"

      if you do not watch the new releases, it won't affect you. if you stay on the meds, you will be differentiate betweem reality and fiction.

    6. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah like when they cleaned up and enhanced the OT for the DVD release. Boy I sure hate the way those movies look fresh and vibrant and actually don't look dated almost 30 years later! Damn you Lucas! Perhaps after you see how beautifully ROTS ties everything together, you'll stop complaining and realize George owns. BTW, when was the last time you completely changed the entire movie industry forever? Just curious.

    7. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by Saxerman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If nothing else, you would think that the number of fan films and stories being created would be a testament to the fertile playground available to create new works in. Why would you want to continue to rehash the same 30 year old story rather than expanding on it?

      Unfortunately it's not the content holders that are the problem, it's the consumers that continue to buy it.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    8. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But George Lucas has been CONVICTED OF HAVING A MONOPOLY on Star Wars! As a convicted monopolist I'm actually forced to watch his movies. Stormtroopers with ray-guns to my head take me to the theaters, force me to pay for my tickets and watch these movies. Dear God, please make him stop!!!

    9. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sorry sir, there's a pedantic dick running around out here and it seems to have gotten itself lodged in my ear somehow. Could you please speak u... oh wait... you're the...

      Never mind.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    10. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by agraupe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did he have to do the first three parts? I think it would have been done better in pure book format, since he completely trashed the first part with horrible SFX. The third one looks good, based on the trailer. Like the games, though, I think it is just a plot to make horrid amounts of money. Will it stop? Probably not, after this he can make movies out of the books (and he's probably thinking of Shadows of the Empire too, since that gives a clearer picture of what happens during Eps 5 and 6).

    11. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would be content for him to remake the teddy-bear fest that was Return of the Jedi. Imagine that after the Wookies are enslaved in Episode 3, what a triumph it would be for them, not the Ewoks, to be a big part of the Empire's downfall. Not to mention the dialog just plain SUCKS!!! Please Uncle George, retell that story.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    12. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "derivative works" are never a bad thing. Preventing access to the originals is. The problem is when artists abuse their creative monopoly to renig on their social contract and prevent access to the originals.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    13. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Dude. The OT was a cheesey sci-fi series with
      > shitty effects. Now, I love cheesey sci-fi series,
      > but how did star wars change the movie industry
      > forever? What, it made sci-fi more acceptable?

      Were you even ALIVE in the 70's have you ever even seen anything else besides StarWars and or it's decendants? ILM was a VAST improvement over the tech of that era. Those effects even stand up well today.

      HELL, the same techniques are being used today that were pioneered for the OT. HELL, the same effects house is being used today for a great deal of the effects done today.

      ILM, Pixar, EditDroid, SoundDroid, Renderman.

      The next time you see a film start out with some silly desk lamps you can think Uncle George for pioneering the tech.

      What George started and set free has flourished quite well actually.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by Babbster · · Score: 5, Funny
      More accurate translation: All you people who have ridiculous over-fucking-reactions to a damned movie need to find something better to care about.

      PS- Han shot first.

    15. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by mph · · Score: 4, Insightful
      man, people put WAY to much into relevance into a space movie...
      Yeah, they'd be better off taking slashdot comments way too seriously.
    16. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 5, Funny

      PS- Han shot first.

      There's rumors that after Episode III is released and they do a 6-DVD extra-final director's cut. Neither Greedo nor Han shoots. Instead they settle their differences peacefully and just agree to disagree.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    17. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by quetzlcoatl · · Score: 2, Funny
      I agree. His impact on the movie industry is undeniable.

      You ARE talking about Howard the Duck, right?

      --
      remember, tuesday is soylent green day.
    18. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how did star wars change the movie industry forever?

      Well, for starters, yes it did make sci-fi more acceptable. (Or rather, acceptable again.) The then-current media scene (TV and movies) was an SF wasteland, all the good (and even mediocre) shows and movies died with the death of the Apollo program.

      Lucas also introduced some pretty amazing (for the time) technologies: motion-control cameras, for example. Previous levels of shot composition were done with relatively fixed, flat shots. Take a look at "2001" again and see how flat everything looks. There's no parallax shift as things move relative to each other, and the composite shots are pretty simple.

      For the time, the effects were anything but "shitty", they were bleeding edge state of the art. (Well, except perhaps the detonation of Dantooine, that was lame.)

      Editing (in terms of number of different scenes, cuts, etc) was also brought to a new level -- remember, back then it was still done with reels of film, a viewer, and a razor blade, none of this "digitize the whole thing and feed it into an Avid (or equiv) non-linear editing suite". (As I recall, it was Lucas' wife who did much of the editing.)

      There are also indirect effects -- Lucas invested the money he made off the first "Star Wars" in, among other things, THX sound technologies and Industrial Light and Magic (ILM) FX studios. The latter made some significant contributions to the field computer graphics.

      Yes, "Star Wars" (before it was ever called "A New Hope") changed the movie industry forever.

      --
      -- Alastair
    19. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by Scroatzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How has he prevented access to the originals? Do you own the original Star Wars? Quit bitching. If not, get on eBay and buy it.

      Other than that, just because you and aparently millions of others have deified Star Wars doesn't give you diddly squat as far as any kind of right or privelege to decide whether or not George Lucas is doing the right thing.

      "Renig on their social contract"?? What contract is that? Lucas is a dude who created a beloved work, and who wants to "finish" it in the way that he as an artist envisioned it. That "vision" is his alone. You and all of these other nay-saying fans can bitch all you want, but because you're not the ones with the vision, you *really* have no entitlement to decide anything at all about these films.

      I can't take it anymore. Stop whining. Stop blowing these issues out of proportion. George Lucas doesn't owe anybody anything. He's already payed you by making a series of great epic films.

    20. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      George Lucas is a real figure, gods are superstitious characters.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    21. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Informative

      Under George's direction, ILM and Dykstra did infact invent the motion control camera. If you're not aware of this then you have no real background in this area and no real basis to tell anyone anything.

      ILM was the first dedicated motion picture effects house. ILM invented or improved on technology as needed.

      Now 2001 represents the absolute pinnacle of pre-SW effects. What George and ILM did was to set the minimum standard to that level (and higher) and enable everyone else to achieve it.

      Motion control allowed an effects shot to be seamlessly composited and only limited by the tech of analog film compositing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by rjelks · · Score: 2, Funny

      ......this is not the flamewar that you're looking for.

    23. Re:Please Say It Ain't So by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please stop hurting America!

      Why does he hate freedom?

  2. Star Wars Forever? by lecithin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "You might have thought that it was going to all be over on May 15 with the release of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith."

    I don't know anybody that is foolish enough to believe that this was over. As long as there is an interest and the opportunity to make some money, it isn't going to be over. Many folks thought that Star Wars would end in the 70s. It is still around decades later and still making a profit. You don't get rid of a profitable interest.

    If the entertainment factor is there, I'll go see more. Will the market of 'Star Wars Enthusiasts' allow more movies to be made? Will we see different plots in the future? Will we see more 'enhanced' versions? I'd think probably. They may suck, but I would bet that we are not done with 'Star Wars' for quite a while. I hope that what comes out is good.

    When are we going to get sick of it?

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Star Wars Forever? by Rightcoast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no way it will be over on May 15th, not when the movie gets released on the 19th nationwide.

      -
      http://www.rightcoaster.com

    2. Re:Star Wars Forever? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I remember Apple once had the slogan "Apple // Forever". This was just before they came out with the 'GS' model, and only a couple years later, they ceased production of that model entirely and concentrated exclusively on the Mac, and I remember asking an Apple rep at the time what happened to their "Apple // Forever" slogan. He offered me the explanation that the Mac's were still computers made by Apple, and that the Mac _did_ have a "2" in its name (being called a Mac II). I never bought that excuse personally... I had only recently bought a GS (upgrading from my //e) and was quite frankly feeling a bit betrayed.

      The Apple // was the first computer I had ever done any serious programming in, and I positively _loved_ computer programming. However, I eventually came to realize that my feelings of being betrayed weren't about Apple, but they were entirely about my own feelings. This was my first computer, and like a first born child, it can be the hardest to eventually let go of.

      And so eventually I moved on... and today I can still use many of the old programs I had then via an Apple ][ emulator, whenever I wax nostalgic, but that doesn't mean I want to write prorams for the emulator in Applesoft Basic or 6502 assembler again.

      The moral of this anecdote?

      Nothing is forever... people who hold onto the past must at some point either let it go and move on or be left behind. Lucas needs to learn this.

  3. Is it Safe? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    I remember this crushing migraines those blue/red 3D glasses left me with. However this works, I hope they've really tested it. It's all good clean fun, until you realize it screws up your eyes like the Opti-Grab and people sue Lucas, Cameron and the theaters for all they've got.

    "Who is Redo and where is Start?"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Is it Safe? by Jaguar777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember this crushing migraines those blue/red 3D glasses left me with. However this works, I hope they've really tested it. It's all good clean fun, until you realize it screws up your eyes like the Opti-Grab and people sue Lucas, Cameron and the theaters for all they've got.

      Here is a Peter Jackson quote from TFA. :)

      "Forget the old days of wearing the red and blue glasses and the eyestrain. All of that is behind us now. These new active glasses that you're wearing and seeing 3-D with are a breakthrough in technology."

      --
      Maybe you should educate the morons of tomorrow so they'll stop believing the leaders of tomorrow. - Dogbert
    2. Re:Is it Safe? by andrew_0812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to wonder though. How good could this be, taking flat 2D film and trying to turn it 3d. To have effective 3D, wouldn't it have to be filmed with 3D cameras to begin with? Seems like he has a lot of work ahead of him.

  4. Maybe this time... by rekenner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Solo won't shoot at all.
    He'll have a badly redubbed over diplomatic way out of it...

    Naaah. This'll be a good thing, if Lucas doesn't mess with his own work again.

    1. Re:Maybe this time... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, this time the audience shoots first;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Maybe this time... by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe he'll just be a very gassy Han Solo..

      G: Uth laynuma. Chespo kutata kreesta krenko, nyakoska!

      H: Yeah, I bet you have... *frrrrrrrrt*

      G:

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:Maybe this time... by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is Lucas we're talking about here. He grasps at new ways to rape this classic film like a drowning man for a glass of water. Thus I predict the new 3D enhanced scene will play out thusly:

      GREEDO: You can tell that to Jabba. He may only take your ship.

      HAN: Over my dead body.

      GREEDO: That's the idea. I've been looking forward to killing you for a long time.

      HAN: Yes, I'll bet you have.

      Greedo fires his laser, and the scene switches to Bullet Time (tm). The camera twirls with nausia-inducing speed around the laser blast as it slowly, inexorably, approaches Solo's head. Solo bursts vertically out of his seat to execute a Trinity-style crane kick, sending Greedo sailing backwards of his chair while dodging the laser blast. In mid-air, Solo draws his blaster, drains its power cell into Greedo's twirling body before he hits the ground. Return to Real Time (tm).

      HAN: Sorry about the mess.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    4. Re:Maybe this time... by Genrou · · Score: 2, Funny

      Greedo shoots himself in disgust.

  5. Just what we didn't need... by ShadeEagle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yay.

    Jar-Jar in even MORE 3d.

  6. 3D Jar-Jar by bitswapper · · Score: 2, Funny



    3d Jar-Jar...

    Thanks. Now I'm going to have nightmares. The bad kind.

    1. Re:3D Jar-Jar by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just you wait. In Revenge of the Sith, it turns out that Jar-Jar turns to the dark side and kills Palaptine and takes his place. Click-click, edit, click, and will always have been his long nose sticking out of the emperor's cowl.

      "Your fwiends can not helwp you now!"

      Dream well young bitswapper!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. oh my god. by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    yippie. fuckin. kai. aye. what is really the point? if he must muddle in the SW universe, why not expand it? why the remake? is hollywood that empty of ideas?

  8. Penny Arcade by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    This DVD set will be called "Star Wars: The Expensive Edition".

  9. Why Stop? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    PLEASE GEORGE JUST STOP

    Four words: Jar-Jar in 3D

    "Oh the humanity!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Why Stop? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 5, Funny

      Four more: Slave Leia in 3D.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Why Stop? by IdleTime · · Score: 4, Funny
      Four words: Jar-Jar in 3D
      I like Jar-Jar.... Is that a problem on /.?
      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:Why Stop? by xSauronx · · Score: 4, Funny
      no

      thats just a problem ;)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    4. Re:Why Stop? by MutantHamster · · Score: 5, Funny
      now, if only they'd also show outtakes in #d as well (rumour has it, that thing had a hard time staying on) *grin*

      Yes! You may finally find out what a breast looks like!

      --
      My Greatest Heist - Muisc partly inspired by the unbeatable Qwantz
    5. Re:Why Stop? by doomsayerxero · · Score: 3, Funny

      We should get Lucas to head up Debian. He does too many release, Debian does too few.

      --
      Don't screw up, don't throw up.
    6. Re:Why Stop? by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yours must not be quite low enough...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    7. Re:Why Stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      ... show outtakes in #d as well ...

      Don't you just hate it when you have to use a keyboard that doesn't have a capital '3'? ;)

  10. This might actually be interesting. by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Purely from a technological, eye-candy standpoint I'd like to see this.

    Of course, what other "brilliant re-edits" will we be subjected to for the re-re-re-release?

    --
    Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
  11. 9 Episodes... by argent · · Score: 4, Funny

    You might have thought that it was going to all be over on May 15 with the release of Episode III: Revenge of the Sith.

    Lucas originally promised 9 episodes.

    his fans are going to make sure he delivers, even if it involves necromancy.

    1. Re:9 Episodes... by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also known as "Nature Trail to Hell - In 3D"

    2. Re:9 Episodes... by RapmasterT · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Those of us old enough to actually remember will tell you Lucas originally promised both Jack and Shit.

      The whole "Episode IV" thing didn't even come about until the theatrical re-release of Star Wars about 18 months after the initial one.

      Lucas likes to pretend he's had this grand vision all along from day one, but the plot inconsistancies and herky-jerky flow of the story looks more like incoherent post-facto ramblings than it does "planned".

    3. Re:9 Episodes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mension Lucas didn't write the screenplays for Episodes 5 and 6, which are, by any reasonable standard, the crown jewels of the franchise.

      Look up the original scripts for "Star Wars", it's pretty god-awful stuff. You can see some of the "ideas" there leaked into the later movies, but Star Wars was Fox's last ditch effort. Their shareholders were unloading ownership, because Star Wars was going to be the studio's last hurrah before they folded.

      But it wasn't.
      Lucas is not a visionary, not a brilliant writer or storyteller. He made some interesting but amateurish films in the 70's, and then struck gold once by pilfering the work of other directors and various uncreditted sci-fi authors, and piecing together an action-adventure movie. "Space opera" indeed.

      The man is so incredibly uncreative, we don't have the proverbial walls closing in on the hero, we have REAL WALLS closing in the hero. We don't have Pitfall Harry swinging over the alligator pit on a rope while he's saving the girl, that ACTUALLY happens in the film. The only thing that DOESN'T happen is that Leia isn't tied up and placed on a set of train tracks by a moustached villain.

      Lucas's ideas are so pedestrian, so cliched, so utterly devoid of originality or creativity. The GOOD GUYS WEAR WHITE (Luke), and the BAD GUYS WEAR BLACK (Vader). (Yeah I know, the stormtroopers break the rule, but I'll bet you dollars to donuts that they're only white so Vader stood out on film).

      The fact that, other than Star Wars, every creative act he's been involved in has been an unmitigated piece of crap sort of supports this.

      I love Star Wars too and I didn't even really HATE the two new films but George Lucas is not some genius storyteller.

      The only thing I really respect about the man is that he refuses to get involved in the Hollywood labor unions, because he doesn't like having to put a bunch of credits and credentials BEFORE his movie.

    4. Re:9 Episodes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The only thing that DOESN'T happen is that Leia isn't tied up and placed on a set of train tracks by a moustached villain."

      Thanks for the idea, I'll go put this into Revenge of the Sith right now!

      -George

    5. Re:9 Episodes... by xgamer04 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that, other than Star Wars, every creative act he's been involved in has been an unmitigated piece of crap sort of supports this.

      You mean like Indiana Jones? Oh wait...

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    6. Re:9 Episodes... by c_monster · · Score: 2, Informative

      The fact that, other than Star Wars, every creative act he's been involved in has been an unmitigated piece of crap sort of supports this.

      ...except Raiders of the Lost Ark. That was another case of Lucas hitting the mark by retelling an old adventure story.

      --
      Read the full text my book Perl for the Web
    7. Re:9 Episodes... by m_balla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So if the screenplays suck, and the ideas are pedestrian, and Lucas is definitely NOT a genius... then why does everyone watch the films? It isn't because people are really dumb. Lucas has made it clear many times that he's trying to retell old stories and mythologies in a new way. It isn't that he can't think up other ways to save the girl or have his hero walled in... these stagings are INTENTIONALLY literal. The characters are represented in "black and white" because they are meant to be manifestations of mythological motifs that have existed in stories for thousands of years. The wize sage/wizard, the princess in distress, the hero's call to duty, the preverbial 'leap of faith' - all of these are designed to be instantly identifiable characters and actions. The power of the Star Wars stories comes from the way the archetypal characters interact with each other and ultimately how this effects a hero in realizing his destiny. Dialog is meant to advance the plot - nothing more - because like a greek play or comic book, the power of the story is conveyed through action, NOT dialogue. And you know what? People relate to this, just as our ancestors did. Lucas was a 'visionary' because he was smart enough to translate these mythic motifs to a modern media in an entertaining and yet unseen fashion. He set the stage for most fantasy and adventure films to follow (if you think the Lord of the Rings gets made into movies without Star Wars coming first, you're kidding yourself. Peter Jackson says as much.) The bottom line: Star Wars is great BECAUSE of the universality of the characters, not in spite of this. And if the dialog is a little wooden... well, who really cares?

  12. 3D JarJar???? by Lord_Frederick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't a 2D JarJar torture enough?

  13. For the love of God, just stop by ajs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If anyone at Lucasfilm reads this, please, please convey my hopes that we can put Star Wars (the original three movies) away and, if we MUST perpetuate the franchise, do so by releasing new films by up-and-coming directors and writers who have interesting stories to tell.

    I know that's a tad radical for Hollywood, but then Lucasfilm WAS a tad radical once....

    1. Re:For the love of God, just stop by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you care if he releases another movie. It's his money, what's your problem? Does he put handcuffs on you and force you to sit there with your eye-lids taped to your forehead watching the movie?

      Let the guy do whatever he wants to do.

  14. I wonder if the technology exists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could he possibly add a third dimension to the characters as well?

  15. Nooooo! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its like a million voices all cried out in agony, and were suddenly silenced. Surely this is some cruel early April fools day joke? How much more craptacular can he make those movies? And how many ways can he find to ruin them again and again?

    1. Re:Nooooo! by Justin205 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How much more craptacular can he make those movies? And how many ways can he find to ruin them again and again?

      You just had to phrase that like a challenge, didn't you?

      I really would have preferred to never know..

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  16. just like with the blu-ray vs. Hd-dvd wars...... by Moonlapse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    its the pr0nography industry that'll have the final say........ and let's hope they go for it!

    --
    - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
  17. forget SW by justforaday · · Score: 3, Funny

    Forget Star Wars, I'm more excited about "The Adventures of Shark Boy & Lava Girl in 3-D." I mean, c'mon, with a title like that you know it's gotta be good!

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  18. 3D by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone have any information on how these 3d films are different from past attempts at 3d? Do you still wear glasses? If not, how would this look any different than a normal film?

    Due to the fact that I can only see out of one eye, I'm usually let down by such presentations of 3d. They all depend on the viewer wearing a set of glasses and being able to see out of 2 eyes. I wonder if this new 3d technology can actually do anything for people like me?

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
    1. Re:3D by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anyone have any information on how these 3d films are different from past attempts at 3d? Do you still wear glasses?

      Most likely, you'd still wear glasses, yes. Let's remember the two aspects to 3-D photography: 1) getting 3-D information in the first place (usually with multiple cameras), and 2) delivering that data to the eyes (usually by somehow targeting each eye with a different image).

      There are a few other ways to do 2, mostly relying on odd tricks like image "jiggling" (which works, sort of, but isn't that great). Generally, 3-D relies on parallax comparisons made possible by each eye seeing a slightly different image. In order to do that, we need some way to target each eye with a unique image. Some "autostereoscopic" methods use wire or lenticular screens (you see that sometimes in 3-D movie posters). Most systems use glasses. Originally they used red/blue glasses, but that didn't scale well with color films. Then the industry moved on to polarized filters, but that required the viewer hold his head pretty close to straight (if you tilted your head too far to one side, the images would blur and then swap). Polarizing lenses with circular polarization helped minimize some of that. Current "state of the art" uses high-speed LCD shutters in glasses synchronized to the film projector or TV, which shows the right image first (with the left eye blocked by a shutter), then the left image (swapping the shutter to the right eye).

      There's also "one lens" systems that rely on an odd optical trick I can't even begin to explain (been a while since college physics), but it has the effect of making objects in motion *in one direction* appear closer to the viewer, while objects at rest or moving the opposite direction appear farther away. This has been used in "3-D Roller Coaster!" videos hawked in mail-order catalogs, and I think was even used to promote a Rose Bowl parade some years back.

      Anyway, that's all just the delivery problem. The tougher side is the content problem. Lucas only filmed his movies with a single lens, so there's no parallax information that can be used to provide 3-D images. If the films were *completely* computer generated (like, say, The Incredibles), then it'd just be a matter of rendering it once, then telling the computer "shift the camera left 3 inches" and render again. (has pixar actually done this? it'd be cool. :) )

      So with only one image to choose from, how do you "create" depth information? One way that I've seen in the past is to use motion and/or focus artifacts to "guess" at 3-D location in the frame. That is, if something moves in front of another thing, then it's reasonable to assume it should be shown forward in the frame. Or if something's slightly off focus (foreground or background), then you can also assume it's in a different depth plane, and shift it accordingly. I actually saw "Lost In Space" processed with something like this technology, and while it was interesting, it basically sucked.

      Why? For one thing, no matter how smart, the extrapolated depth cues are always just guesses. Unless you work the film manually, scene-by-scene (and even frame-by-frame), there will be problems with consistency with the derived depth information. Also, with a two-camera system, each "eye" not only sees slightly different images, but they see images with slightly different *content*. That is, it's not enough to simply shift an X-wing left or right, but one eye needs to see a little something more where the X-Wing was moved out of. Automated processes (in the past) couldn't do this.

      Now it's possible that with advances in technology, it's finally possible to consistently guess at object depths, and to fabricate reasonable hidden information. As I said, it's not worked well in the past, but in the past, it's been attempted by hucksters and snake-oil salesmen and sold to gullible third-tier theme park movie houses (I saw the aforementioned Lost in Space about two miles from Walt Disney World,

  19. finally! by darthpenguin · · Score: 4, Funny
  20. Horse, meet whip... by cliveholloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    Horse, meet whip. Horse? Are you OK Horse?

    Medic!

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  21. Oh, the horror! by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 2, Funny


    From the article, Jackson screened remastered portions from the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy that featured a looming Gollum and battle dust that virtually fell onto the audience.

    I do hope that Lucas doesn't adopt that particular idea of Peter Jackson's.

    Jar Jar is bad enough when projected on a screen. I'd hate to think about how I'd feel if he were "out and about" in the audience, so to speak.

    Please, Jar Jar, stay where you are. Don't come any closer.

  22. I know! by marika · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why doesn't he try to do something new instead of working on milking us for the 43 different version of the star wars serie, he could try to milk us for other versions of new series. I am truely a genius!

    --
    This is totally insecure, but very convenient.
  23. I For One ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am not willing to pay a higher ticket price at the theater because Lucas wants the opportunity to re-re-re-release the Start Wars series in 3D this time.

    Cinema owners will pass this on to the consumer, and that'll suck.

    And, quite frankly, Lucas is starting to seem more and more irrelevant with his one-trick pony.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  24. WHEN WILL IT END??? OH GOD, WHEN WILL IT END??? by DurendalMac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jesus H. Christ on a grilled cheese sandwich, give it up, George! You've raped Star Wars repeatedly in the ass with a razor-coated cock sheath while beating it over the head with a broken bottle and biting it in the neck! It's dead, you fucking necrophiliac! You've killed it, and yet you STILL want more? Burn in hell, Lucas.

  25. DVD by klugerama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So if they are all gung-ho about this new technology, how do they expect it to match sales long-term? 3-D has been tried before, several times, and is only appealing for a little while, until the novelty wears off and people realize it's a fucking gimmick.

    Besides, as far as I can tell, this new technology can't translate to DVD/any-other-form-of-consumer-owned-media, so do they really expect to make that much on theater sales alone? Lucas, of *anybody* in Hollywood, should be advocating a technology that will be easily transferrable into homes for years to come, not limited solely to theaters.

  26. Re:southpark by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Funny

    anyone else remember the southpark bit about this?

    Are you refering to the the sanctimonious episode? Oh, wait, that includes all of them.

  27. Cool---Chewie vs R2 chess match by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    So we'll be able to see the holographic "chess" match as it was intended...finally....of course too many releases of Star Wars are prone to make original fans want to pull Lucas' arms from his sockets.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  28. Hollywood Logic by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    When you've got a 1D story, make a 3D picture!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  29. Awesome! by geeveees · · Score: 5, Funny

    In this version, Alderaan shoots first!

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  30. Titanic in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's no way this would get accepted as a submission so I'm posting it here:

    From the imdb.com:

    George Lucas has described his final Star Wars movie, Episode III -- The Revenge of the Sith, as "Titanic in space." Speaking to the ShoWest convention in Las Vegas, Lucas said that the new film was "not like the old Star Wars ... This one's a little bit more emotional." Later, Lucas was asked by the Associated Press whether fans would accept a film so different from the old Star Wars. "I feel that I've made the movie the best I can and it turned out the way I wanted it to be, so I'm happy," Lucas replied. "I never try to anticipate what the world's going to think or even worry about whether they're going to like it or not. That's not my job, to make people like my movies. They either like them or they don't. That's completely out of my hands."
  31. Here's another idea by serutan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hire a production crew who grew up during the original Star Wars era. Get a director like Peter Jackson, who has shown that he understands how to use great effects, tell a story on a grand scale, stay faithful to the original spirit and respect the fans. Have this production company make episodes 7,8 and 9 that were planned long ago. Now that might kick ass.

    1. Re:Here's another idea by The-Bus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great. Long teary-eyed close up shots between Luke's effeminate grandson and his trusty butch friend.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:Here's another idea by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Meet the Feebles is a bit overrated, although Bad Taste is cheeky enough to be funny. I actually enjoy his LoTR flicks but if someone starts making fun of Frodo and Samwise I can't help but laugh.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  32. It's a BUSINESS by hanshotfirst · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Do we love or hate capitalism here this week - I can never tell?

    Lucas was a creative guy with an idea that worked. It became a business. I think Lucas is a far better business man than he is a creative man. Judge this by the success of the franchise and merchandising compared to the quality of the written dialog.

    Without a moral judgement on purity of art, etc... Lucas is simply doing what any shrewd business owner does... Market the franchise. Find ways to resell an old product in new packaging, and keep the money flowing in.

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  33. Finally, Lucas can reissue Star Wars! by ALeavitt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:
    "It's really a beautiful system, and one of the reasons I'm promoting it today is I'm extremely anxious to reissue that old group of films I did so long ago in a galaxy far away," Lucas said.

    Well, you know, it has been almost eight years since the original trilogy was rereleased in theaters, and six months since the DVDs came out. Of course Lucas is anxious to reissue the movies - the public has pretty much forgotten about them in this fast-paced world. Lucas needs to bring the movies back to the forefront of the public consciousness, because they haven't been there in months.
    Seriously, though, does Lucas think he's kidding anybody anymore? It's so obvious that his vision isn't artistic, it's financial. He sees a way to keep making a mint with a minimum of effort, and every new film-oriented technology allows him to release Star Wars according to his "original vision," which was somehow compromised in every previous release.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  34. Weird Al reference by ArmedLemming · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hmm strange I don't see any posts linking the story title to the department...

    Nature Trail to Hell was the last (and best IMO) track on Weird Al's "In 3D" album!

    "Coming this Christmas to a theatre near you......."

    --
    Two fish swim into a wall, one turns to the other and says, "Dam".
  35. "Acrive Glasses" by Patermater · · Score: 2, Informative

    "...These new active glasses that you're wearing and seeing 3-D with are a breakthrough in technology." "Active glasses" or shutter based glasses are not new. They shutter each eye so the right or left eye will see one side while the other eye's view is blacked out. It happens quickly enough and does create 3D but it DOES cause bad headaches after about 20-30 minutes of use. These have been available for some time now on computers. I even had a pair when I had an Amiga computer. Last time I saw 3D that didn't give me a headache was using Polaroid lenses in the frames. No flickering, no headaches and very clear 3D in full color.

  36. That'll show you youngsters! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny
    mmmmmm.... Behold the glory of the gold bikini in stupendous Lucasvision!!!!

    It's like they're following me...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  37. Stop whining by chuckmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You lack discipline! No not really, but I'm tired of any post that falls under the star wars category on here resulting in a million comments that can basically be summed up as follows: "Jar-Jar is stupid! Not more Jar-Jar!" "Lucas just wants more money" etc etc etc Alls I'm sayin is you guys need to learn to deal with the fact that George Lucas has a good time making these movies: they're like a hobby. Of course, a very-well paying hobby, but I think he genuinely enjoys making them. If you watch ay behind-the-scenes stuff its very apparent that he's putting alot of work in to them. Personally, I've liked all the movies and I don't find Jar-Jar overly annoying. He's just a different version of Treepio. Sure the dialogue is crappy here and there (rewatch the originals with the mindset of "oh these are ghey" and i'm sure you can find cheesy dialogue and whatnot), but he's just building more lore into the SW universe, which is always fun.

  38. 3D to 2D to 3D by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So we'll be able to see the holographic "chess" match as it was intended...finally....of course too many releases of Star Wars are prone to make original fans want to pull Lucas' arms from his sockets.

    Ok, that'll probably require some re-rendering which I'm sure they have stuff away someplace, but without two camera angles I'm curious how you're supposed to see perspective. Maybe they do it with some re-shading, frame-by-frame, like the colorizing process.

    The thing is, the boogerhead could just re-run all the films, as they are, during the summer and they'd pack theaters anyway.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:3D to 2D to 3D by Marvelicious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and of course he'll replace all the guns with walkey talkeys...

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    2. Re:3D to 2D to 3D by KevinKnSC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is there some way I could just give George Lucas my credit card number, and then he could periodically charge me $60 and mail me some discs? That seems like it would be a lot simpler than the current arrangement.

  39. Get ready for the return of Sensoround by DumbSwede · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Over 14 screens to get to the http://www.mercurynews.com article

    Talk about aggressive marketing overkill. MercuryNews is EVIL! I had to click through 12 advertising screens after finishing registering. This has to be some kind of record for the Internet (or at least a reputable news site).

    That said, I will probably go and see the 3D re-releases (which has nothing to do with MercuryNews of course). Quit whining about Lucas raping your childhood. Just don't go. I didn't like Jar-Jar either. Get over it. Because it's based in space, many techie types feel they own the franchise more that Lucas and the public he is hawking it to. Last time I looked there are about 100 Star Wars novels available in bookstores. It's rapidly catching up with the Star Trek novels. To stop the movies, you would have to stop the books, which show how rabid people are for the saga to go on -- whether it meets your high standards for entertainment fair or not.

    Maybe the 3-D will be good, maybe not. I have wondered why Disney/Pixar haven't re-released their films in 3-D. Some have been presented in IMAX (though not 3D IMAX as far as I know). Here you know the 3D re-rendering will be spot on. Technically it would have to me 2-orders of magnitude easier than converting 2D photographs. Disney will be Making a Toy Story 3 (alone), I'll be very surprised if it isn't Toy Story 3D.

    That said, my viewing experience at home on HDTV is often better than what you see at the Cineplex (especially stuff shot directly in digital, rather than converted from film). I would gladly pay full ticket price to watch my stuff at home while in recent release if I could get it. The point is Cinemas will increasingly have to compete with a viewing experience in the home that rivals that of the theater. Just going wider (Cinamscope) like they did in '50s (and wider yet in the late '60s with Cinerama) wont cut it. People will increasingly start to wait for Movies to come out in Blu-Ray or HD-DVD if the industry doesn't do something to augment the viewing experience. Start looking for things like Sensoround to make a comeback, introduced for the 1974 disaster flick "Earthquake." Also expect several variations of motion simulation, some quite cheap like tilting chairs, and other that require individual pods with 6 degrees of freedom and everything in-between.

  40. New Sharp 3D Laptop ships with ability to play 3D by djc998 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you ever get the chance to check out the new Sharp 3D Laptop it has the ability to convert 2D movies on the fly to 3D. it is very cool. I was able to watch Finding Nemo in 3D and it was really awesome. I hear the same company is making a plugin for TV.

    --
    Check out:http://www.521media.com
  41. Prediction for 2006 by Odd+John · · Score: 2, Funny

    In 2006 Lucas will release episodes 4 to 6 in Smell-o-vision.

    You can smell the oily robots.

    You can smell Luke's sweaty shirt.

    You can smell the ozone as light sabers split the air.

    You can smell it when Lord Vader's battle cruiser dumps the garbage! (ignore that it was in a vacuum)

    And best of all! You can smell Princess Leia's hot, sweaty, brass bikini!

  42. For the web-deficient by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

    Domo-kun is a children's TV show character. The joke doesn't have anything to do with "fanboy," but rather with this well-known mangling of this image (safe for work).

    --
    For more information, click here.
    1. Re:For the web-deficient by Random832 · · Score: 2, Funny

      you're sure it's not this one? this is the one that comes to mind: http://www.timtate.org/images/think_of_the_domokun .jpg

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  43. The patent, in case anyone is interested... by richardtallent · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PT O1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm &r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,686,926.WKU.&OS=PN/6,686,926&RS =PN/6,686,926

    The main patent is #6,686,926 (linked above, this incorporates an earlier patent). Another related patent they have is #6,515,659.

    In short: someone manually draws lines around each object and scoots it over for the right eye, background-cloning the gap. Their software assists in adjusting the object placements from one frame to the next, saving what would otherwise be a monumental task. Their "shift" algorithm is capable of assigning a bump-map-like distortion so the objects have a natural curve rather than being sprite cut-outs.

    Side-note: to get a similar effect (for a few minutes at least), watch a movie with a pair of cheap sunglasses with one glass removed.

  44. You are not making any sense by Augusto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Lucas's ideas are so pedestrian, so cliched, so utterly devoid of originality or creativity. The GOOD GUYS WEAR WHITE (Luke), and the BAD GUYS WEAR BLACK (Vader). (Yeah I know, the stormtroopers break the rule, but I'll bet you dollars to donuts that they're only white so Vader stood out on film).

    You just contradict yourself and try to get out of it, but even you know you're not making any sense. Yes, the Stormtroopers were white so why are you making this stupid comment? And what's wrong with Vader having a black outfit.

    Hey Luke wears black on ROTJ, and General Grievious is all white in Revenge of the Sith. What the hell are you talking about???

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  45. You know.. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lucas should ask Pixar to make the next Star Wars film..?

    Personally speaking I think it would be interesting to see what Pixar would do with something dark and semi-serious.

  46. Re:Titanic-like episode iii = winner! by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Funny

    "does this mean Jar Jar dies quickly, yet abhorrently painfully???"

    Sadly, no.

    Instead, there is a scene of Obi-wan painting a picture of jar jar while he poses nude

    And yes he does die, but it's a slow death while holding hands with obiwan

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]