Slashdot Mirror


Irish Movie Theatres Go Digital

Draoi writes "ElectricNews is reporting that Irish movie theatres are to be the first in the world to switch from old 35mm media to a completely digital format. New movies are to be delivered via satellite which, I'm sure, will bring up security issues of its own."

195 comments

  1. dupey dupe by nmoog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks dupey...
    What is this some kind of irish joke?

    1. Re:dupey dupe by nmoog · · Score: 4, Funny

      As the smoke clears, several dead slashdotters lay motionless on the floor...

      "Well partner," mutters the handsome, yet dangerous looking nmoog "looks like I wins this here dupe-quick-draw."

    2. Re:dupey dupe by kubrick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Obviously I need to spend more of my hard-earned money on a faster internet connection. Well, any excuse will do, I guess...

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:dupey dupe by Shigernafy · · Score: 1

      At least its not the same editor.. then we'd really have a problem.

      Its not like we can expect the editors of the site to actually know what goes on here.. right?

    4. Re:dupey dupe by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      All this dupe talk makes me wonder if they'll have digital projectors in second run cinemas.

      If those projectors are too expensive for non-chain outfits, you could have a serious divide between the digital haves and the analog have-nots.

    5. Re:dupey dupe by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      you know, I'm starting to think that this has to be some sort of troll conspiracy. People must have started noticing that the editors don't read the site, and INTENTIONALLY submit duplicate articles. It's unreal how often we see the same article again on here.

    6. Re:dupey dupe by lousyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, no, it's okay. It's when we start seeing Slashdot article announcing older Slashdot articles that we're really in trouble.

      --
      If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    7. Re:dupey dupe by gessel · · Score: 1

      Well, given the quality or lack thereof of current digital projectors (I saw THX1138 on the newest equipment at Telluride, it failed during the movie and was harsh and sort of unpleasant compared to the clean 35mm prints being shown) second run theaters might become more popular with the people who actually care about picture quality.

      One of the things I am willing to pay for is exceptional image quality, the lushness and shadow detail of film. If it's just a digital projector, some DMD/DLP POS really no better than the office unit I borrowed for the weekend, then why bother? I'm really not that interested in the clever audience commentary.

      If it were me, I'd fight the home theater battle and the rapidly improving equipment on that front with 70mm film and Imax installations. That's worth going out for. Give me Cinerama (3 synchronized projectors in ultra wide screen wrap around) or I'll stay home.

      Digital projection democratizes the equipment, ultimately, quantizing the quality differences between home equipment and professional out of existence. Bits are bits, but analog leaves infinite room for tweaking to at least give users the warm, fuzzy belief in quality differences, even if they're largely illusory.

      For the next couple of years, real film projection will have real quality advantages over digital projection for live action film. Ultimately it will go the way of the "advantage" of LPs over CDs... But when it does, what value will the $10pp theater have over the barcolounger?

    8. Re:dupey dupe by Satertek · · Score: 1

      Is it so hard to ignore duplicate articles? I'm sure that there are many people like myself that missed that article and tire of reading your irrelevant complaints.

      Ignore it and move along. That is all.

  2. Dupe... by beh · · Score: 1, Informative

    We had that story three days ago: here...

    1. Re:Dupe... by eatmywake · · Score: 0

      dupe. dupe. I call your post a dupe! ;)

    2. Re:Dupe... by stuffisgood · · Score: 1

      The amount of dupes on this site is incredible. Not only did I read this story about a day before the original /. post on BoingBoing, now I get to read it again on /. Slow news day huh?

    3. Re:Dupe... by nanodude · · Score: 1

      The writers were a little duped when they wrote this.

  3. Dupe by thesatch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dupe.

    1. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      at least it gives us something to bitch about

      i for one welcome something other than myself to be depressed over

  4. Yes by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 0, Redundant
  5. Slashdot dupes set to go digital by kubrick · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
    1. Re:Slashdot dupes set to go digital by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Considering the number of dupes over the past few weeks , i would say "harder than it seems".

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Slashdot dupes set to go digital by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Weeks? Are you sure you don't mean years?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    3. Re:Slashdot dupes set to go digital by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Well over the last three weeks or so i have noticed a far greater number of dupes than average. Maybe its the weather

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  6. That's not news by davmoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    What would really be news is if Slashdot authors started reading their own website to see what their co-authors are posting.

    In addition, what would really be news is if Slashdot authors started reading their own website to see what their co-authors are posting.

    But then also, what would really be news is if Slashdot authors started reading their own website to see what their co-authors are posting.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:That's not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't you think it would be great if Slashdot authors started reading their own website to see what their co-authors are posting?

    2. Re:That's not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're just following the rule: release early, release often.

    3. Re:That's not news by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Oh man, you really made me laugh !
      lol
      But, seriously it would be news if Slashdot authors started reading their own website to see what their co-authors are posting

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:That's not news by anno1602 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 'Insightful' moderation of parent really made it for me.

    5. Re:That's not news by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      What's really funny is that a friend of mine who knows one of the editors told me that they make about 15/hr for working at OSTG on ./.

      I can attest that if I only made that much to sit on a website and 'accept/deny' storys and get paid $15/hr for it, I sure as hell wouldn't make many mistakes ;-)

      Rate this flamebait if you must, I'm just stating how I think it's odd how you could have the easiest job in the world, get paid so much for it, and stilln make so many stakes WITHOUT getting fired for it to boot!

    6. Re:That's not news by meatspray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have mixed feelings on this. That's about 40k/yr.

      That's a damn nice chunk of change for say a tech savvy college student, But really not all that much to attract a technical professional which seems to be the standards base to which editors are held.

      I guess location matters as well. I'm in the Baltimore cooridor where the 'average' tech salary is closer to 60k. Some places in California 40k would be near povery wouldn't it? If they were smart they'd only employ mid west college students.

    7. Re:That's not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the real story is CSS2 support lacking in IE7.
      All this stuff is about theatres that I don't understand.

    8. Re:That's not news by nacturation · · Score: 1

      That's about 40k/yr.

      That's $40K/year assuming it's full-time which I think it a bit of a stretch. Perhaps I don't know the full scope of what editors do -- maybe a lot of it is invisible background work to keep the cogs turning -- but it doesn't seem like this site would take a dozen editors working full-time to maintain.

      I would imagine OSTG handles things like negotiating ad contracts, accepting paid story submissions, etc. so that editors don't have to deal with those details.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  7. FPNAD by michaelhood · · Score: 4, Funny

    First Post Not About Dupe!

    Seriously guys, there's been 6 in a row. You're duping comments now.

    1. Re:FPNAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On the bright side though Dupe jokes are now replacing "beowulf cluster " and "does it run..." jokes.

    2. Re:FPNAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side though Dupe jokes are now replacing "beowulf cluster " and "does it run..." jokes.

    3. Re:FPNAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side though Dupe jokes are now replacing "beowulf cluster " and "does it run..." jokes.

    4. Re:FPNAD by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      FPNAD? Yeah, I think my NADs got FP once, too.

    5. Re:FPNAD by madprof · · Score: 1

      Oh there's always one, isn't there?

    6. Re:FPNAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time it's duped and we post about dupes... does that make it redundant?

    7. Re:FPNAD by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Three, in this case.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  8. Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The screen cursors are made up of pink hearts, yellow moons, orange stars, green clovers, blue diamonds, purple horseshoes and red balloons.

  9. The reason: St. Patrick's Day and....... by codecracker007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...too mush leftover whishkey...*hic*

    --
    7-8-9-10-0
  10. Thankfully by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thankfully our repeats are already totally digital.

    Anyhow, here's something I wanted to bring up in the other thread but as too lazy to do. It says that the new projectors download digital copies of the films from the movie industry. That's all well and good, but my favorite cinemas here in Dublin, the awesome IFI in Temple Bar and the huge megaplex UGC are both my favorites because they show independant and foreign films. In the case of the IFI, that's all they show, alongside older films that you won't see in the cinema anywhere else.

    So what I'm wondering is how would something like Battle of Algiers or OldBoy be shown in Ireland if it's all digital? I actually don't think the IFI is part of this whole all-digital scheme and I'm glad they're not, mainstream cinema holds only the smallest interest for me, and I can't help but see this digital system as anything other than the big studios further consolidating their culture monopoly...

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:Thankfully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, you're offtopic! This thread is reserved for complaining about dupes!

    2. Re:Thankfully by tuxmaster · · Score: 0

      Simple it would not see the smart thing to do is have one or 2 showrooms all digital or have digital and 35mm. I personaly think looking at It from a buisness perspective is a smart move. Cost wize the 35mm fils are easaly scratched and expencive. However I would not do it via satalite that can have some technical issues of its own.
      Not to mention the security issues. First of all Somone can just interupt the signal now true they would have to have a decoder and a bunch of other stuff so it accul might be rather secure but shure would have a bunch of attempts.
      Me personaly I would go all digital but have a few showrooms that have 35mm. For the delivery of the midea I would use dvd's.

      --
      ~tuxmaster
    3. Re:Thankfully by farnz · · Score: 1
      DVDs aren't big enough; where media is delivered physically for digital cinema, the current preferred format is RAID arrays (a film is several hundred GB).

      All digital isn't a problem for smaller distributors; just telecine the film, then deliver discs rather than film. It's still cheaper (although not as much as delivery by satellite).

      Cracking the satellite signal is going to be interesting to academia; it'll use strong encryption (think PGP), and the interceptor lacks the key.

    4. Re:Thankfully by delta_avi_delta · · Score: 1

      Good lord how I miss the UGC on Parnell St...

      Anyway, I'm sure that, while the larger screens will have digital projectors for the blockbuster releases etc, they'll maintain quite a few reel projectors in the smaller theatres for the arty stuff.

      With any luck this could be a feature in the future, prompting cinemas with reels to run "classic movie" weekends thanks to the competitive advantage of being able to play reels...

    5. Re:Thankfully by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Could one not have a RAID array of DVDs? It's a read-only system, after all.

      Surprisingly, in the movie/TV world we've come up with a way to use magnetic tape to store and transport AV data, sometimes we call this "videotape".

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Thankfully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IFI already uses DVDs in at least the larger theatre, and for at least some films. I can remember recently sitting for five minutes while the 'projectionist' was flicking through a DVD menu (visible up on the screen) to fix a sound problem.

      Oh, and to the 'whiskey' remark poster - f*** you.

    7. Re:Thankfully by farnz · · Score: 1

      The problem is capacity; DVDs give you a max of 17GB/disc, implying 10 or more DVDs per movie. High-capacity tape formats (HD-D5 or similar) is certainly a possible distribution method, just not commonly used, as RAID arrays have the capability to be plugged into the system and run immediately, whereas a tape needs to be copied onto the system.

    8. Re:Thankfully by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      A pack of 10 DVDs is a pretty compact, lightweight and economical setup. Being sensible and assuming 4.5GB single layer discs that can be read at 16x (about 160Mb/s) you could have 24 drives as a read only RAID with the data protected for both good read bandwidth and redundancy. 24 x 4.5GB gives 108GB - assuming a 180min maximum run time you'd get 0.6GB/minute or 80Mb/sec which is enough for VERY high quality 1920x1080p at 24fps, or excellent quality at even larger picture sizes.

      Sounds a lot better than shipping disk packs, and is probably cheaper than a highband internet connection for their distribution VPN or even a satellite delivery set-up.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Thankfully by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it'll be unlikely that such independent showing theatres would go ALL digital in the sense that they would throw away their film stuff.

      actually, I would view the articles about this as so that they're installed as an extra device to the theatre - ie. not replacing the film stuff 100%.

      however.. digital 'film' has some bonuses, cheapness to reproduce for one: having an every theatre launch is no longer going to be so expensive.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Thankfully by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      In Quebec, digital-satellite cinema is being sold as a way of dramatically lowering distribution costs (no more weighty 35-mm prints), thus increasing the diversity of what can be shown in movie theatres.

      It remains to be seen if exhibitors in remote areas will actually increase the diversity of their offerings; ultimately, it's up to audiences. I don't think the tech inherently favors the big studios...unless they directly control it.

  11. I'm not one to complain usually by youngerpants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But this is getting silly

    1) Check for DUPES
    2) If you link to a site, please include the coral link (this can be done programatically!)
    3) If you link to a file, add a torrent (this is for the submitters, not the editors)
    4) I have heard that joke before; lets see if anyone has something interesting to say

    Karma be dammed, but this dupe really pissed me off

    1. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This is getting stupid. Then again, I block all the ads and I sure as hell don't subscribe, so what do I care.

    2. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would do all those things if I'd knew there's a big chance of my sotry getting posted. Instead I write a lengthy (hopefully well written) article and think hard how to summarize the whole story into a news article, just so 20 out of 21 stories get rejected. And then the same story is posted after some hours (or days) written like crap with pure FUD in the news article.

      I'm not trolling as I don't have anything to do with this site, but I try to post a story if I see one that I think would be interesting for a discussion by the Slashdot community. But I'm pissed how editors pick out stories, when I write about the same thing as someone else and he gets accepted although it was written like shit compared to mine.

      I admit, this doesn't happen all the time, but too many times already.

      Some time ago, I stoped carying and I just copy/paste the news item from some other site and add links. And *shock* sometimes it gets approved.

      The other funny thing is how you sumbit a story and it's rejected and you submit _the same text_ after it has been rejected and it's approved.

      Slashdot quality is going downhill.

    3. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      You contribute by commenting. How many people would read slashdot if people couldn't discuss the articles? How much ad and subscription revenue would slashdot get in that case?

    4. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, although you haven't seen my other comments... well, you probably have, and I doubt you found them to be positive contributions.

    5. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I agree with you 100%. I haven't had a lot of stories submitted, but of them only 1 has ever been accepted.

      Face it, Slashdot really started to blow in this department a loooooong time ago. It's plain as day the editors really don't give much of a fuck about 'journalism' when they can't even be arsed to check the running log of stories posted. And Timothy is the fucking worst of the lot. Taco at least has the excuse that he founded the thing, but in a way it's worse for him and his reputation when he fucks up.

      Timbo? God knows. I think he even takes a perverse pleasure in irritating his little audience of us peons here by reposting. He still gets paid, he generates headlines of his own, and the advertisers get more eyeballs. Who's really being foolish, him or us?

    6. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Pastis · · Score: 1

      Check for dupes: this can also be done programatically.

      When I post an issue in Bugzilla.mozilla.org, the system gives me a list of potential duplicates.

      How can't that be done for slashdot?

      What about using google?

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Irish+cinema+digi ta l+site%3Aslashdot.org

      It's that simple! (OK maybe that would not work for too recently published articles)

      Actually when you think of it, the hard part of an editor is to correctly select an article. Once you've selected one, spending 30 seconds more to review a potential list of duplicate won't decrease quality.

      If I was responsible for the site I would monitor more my editor's work. If they can't do their job correctly.

      Or let people mark articles as DUPEs. And let me browse slashdot with dupes off by default.

    7. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 1

      You're very naive. The goal of a profit producing website is to get people to come and click things. Posting dupes causes just that. People come, then post comments about the dupe, as opposed to discussion about the story. It's basically free content.

      Think of it this way. The editors can take more time and trim out dupes, replacing them with more interesting new content. Or, they can just take less time, accidentally post the occasional dupe, and produce at least the same amount of site traffic.

      In other words, why should they bother? Less work, free content, and some people see stories they may have otherwise missed.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    8. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      When I post an issue in Bugzilla.mozilla.org, the system gives me a list of potential duplicates. How can't that be done for slashdot? What about using google?

      Slashdot does have a search:
      e.g. http://slashdot.org/search.pl?query=irish finds it.

      Amazing that they've created the elaborate moderation system, throttling, "lameness filters", all to reduce the amount of crap comments; but they don't apply any of the same thought to their own articles, not even spellcheck.

    9. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The search feature here is horrible - it doesn't support basic search techniques like phrases! A year or two ago, there was a story about a Linux store that sold Linux-related things. Try searching for "linux store" and you'll get every story with "linux" or "store." Good luck searching through the hundreds of stories.

    10. Re:I'm not one to complain usually by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Check for DUPES

      What makes you think they haven't simply decided to do a dupe?
      Lots of people loaded a bunch of ads the last time. Maybe they'll do it again!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  12. Just tell us... by Handpaper · · Score: 4, Funny
    which satellite.
    We'll take it from there.

    1. Re:Just tell us... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      heh heh
      that's pretty funny

      kinda reminds me of all the times that i've caught a torrent or nabbed a tv show off IRC only to have my friend tell me that the show airs tomorrow. I'll usually scratch my head and reply "but i watched it yesterday"

      I'm glad for the dupe, I missed this one the first time around.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  13. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Editors, what the FUCK are you being paid to do, exactly?

    Run around modding all these "it's a dupe!" posts down.

  14. Re:You know... by boa13 · · Score: 1

    its not like /. goes through hundreds of articles a day

    No, but it goes through several hundred submissions. To quote CmdrTaco: "We get 500 story submissions on a busy day... and we post 15-20."

  15. industry push by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. everything's a copy of a copy of a copy by qwerbus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i've heard this at least twice. i think at slashdot even. and i don't read other comments. ever.

    --
    the toothpaste is frozen
  17. First? by ozamosi · · Score: 0, Informative

    I know that they does this in sweden already. Maybe not all movies on all theatres though, but the-as-close-to-monopoly-as-possible-company, SF, does it quite a bit.

  18. Same Old Story by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

    It's the classic lack of communication between the no-snakes-and-no-film department and the and-they-don't-need-to-ship-their-single-malts department.

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  19. I am really tired of this by zbuffered · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, about 60% of /. stories are 2-day-old posts on either Gizmodo, Engadget, Lifehacker, or Hack-A-Day. I doubt /. editors even realize this, because they obviously don't get "out" very much.

    But seriously. The dupes are out of control. It takes 10 minutes a day, max, to scan the headlines OF THE SITE YOUR JOB IT IS TO EDIT. Timothy obviously does not read this site. So WTF? Could we possibly get an editor that takes his job seriously?

    --
    Synergy is your friend
    1. Re:I am really tired of this by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Its not only that they post so many dupes, they also ignore decent stories. As recent story is that some science museums with Imax theaters are rejecting any films that mention evolution or the big bang because some people screening the films have called them "blasphemous." Science museums. Worrying about being blasphemous. And slashsot rejects that story. Probably to save room for more dupes.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:I am really tired of this by sporty · · Score: 1

      But isn't paying for a slashdot account supposed to give you the ability to do the jobs of the editors and stop dupes before they get up on the site?

      Oh wait, that was just a money making ploy to drum up cash w/o doing the work of reading their email. Sorry Mr. Malda, but you aren't running a good site anymore. Someday a new site that has quality will come by and squash slashdot.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:I am really tired of this by diogenes57 · · Score: 1

      Your joking, right? Or isn't ironic that this poster is complaining both about dupes and a story the editors missed when in fact the story he mentions actually appeared.

    4. Re:I am really tired of this by XSpud · · Score: 1

      The story I think you're referring to was posted a few days ago - Imax Theaters Demur On Controversial Science Films

    5. Re:I am really tired of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh! That one is scheduled for tomorrow's lineup of dupes!

    6. Re:I am really tired of this by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Maybe the editors would prefer readers that don't take the site so seriously.

    7. Re:I am really tired of this by hankwang · · Score: 1
      First of all, about 60% of /. stories are 2-day-old posts on either Gizmodo, Engadget, Lifehacker, or Hack-A-Day. I doubt /. editors even realize this, because they obviously don't get "out" very much.

      Well, if you're only interested in the latest gadgets on the market, then maybe slashdot is not the right place for you.

      I don't care that much about the freshness of the news, especially not about gadgets. What I do care about is that the stories provoke interesting discussions. There is a reason that people don't RTFAs: the articles themselves often contain very little information anyway.

      Postings on slashdot tend to be intelligent and well-written. Browse at +3 if you don't believe me. Some people here complain that the /. crowd can't spell because they write loose instead of lose somewhere in a long post. Get some perspective! Here someone with an IQ of 145 tells someone with an IQ of 125 that he's stupid. Compare it to any phpBB forum on the net.

    8. Re:I am really tired of this by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Be quiet. I'm trying to get hired.

      --
      This space available.
  20. don't bet on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Re:You know... by XeroPurpose · · Score: 1

    Yes, and 12-13 are different even!

  22. Wonderful by KennyMillar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh great. Here comes an era of pixelated movies, snatchy sound and 'soory this movie cannot be shwona t this time due to a technical problem'.

    1. Re:Wonderful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh.

      How is that any worse than an era of handling marks, cigarette burns and bad matchups between reel #1 and #2?

  23. Sorry, my fault by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was away on vacation three days ago and didn't read slashdot. I'm sorry, this was all my fault. The kind folks at Slashdot knew that this would be the kind of story I'd be interested in, so they decided to post it again for my benefit. I'm deeply sorry.

    I'm also sorry for Windows ME. That was my fault too.

    And the DMCA, that was all me.

    Oh, don't forget the war in Iraq. I pretty much caused that.

    And when I told that guy 14 years ago that it would be a keen idea to advertise his product by sending emails to everyone, regardless of they were interested, that was probably a bad idea too. I know it was a really bad idea to convince porn website opperators to say they were free, when they really weren't.

    In all seriousness, I'm glad to see a country going all digital. I was initially against digital in the theaters, until I saw a screening of Starwars Part One in Burbank back in '99.

    A few of the colors weren't right, and I noticed a few glitches, but generally I was impressed with it, and thought to myself "You know, this is going to be good when all film goes this way".

    Oddly enough, almost 6 years later we still don't have digital projectors in the vast majority of America's theaters, and we have to look to Ireland for adopting the more innovative technology.

    IRELAND!!!??? Now, I'm half Irish, but I'm pretty sure my ancestors fled Ireland because it was a smelly filthy drunken impoverished third world cesspool. How do they manage to get digital theaters while us Americans are still stuck with brand new mega-plexes popping up every time it rains still using the old analog 35mm projection?

    I should not that I'm writing this post completely under the influence of Irish beer, so you'll understand if I'm a little flippant and surly.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Sorry, my fault by starmang · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ireland is not a third world country. In fact Ireland is one of the wealthiest in Europe. And if you RTFA you would see why Ireland has been chosen for this project.

      --
      Never touch an Irish man's Guinness!@#
    2. Re:Sorry, my fault by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 1
      IRELAND!!!??? Now, I'm half Irish, but I'm pretty sure my ancestors fled Ireland because it was a smelly filthy drunken impoverished third world cesspool.

      That was probably the 18th or 19th century. It's now the 21st century. Please keep up.

      On the other hand, it's possibly your dad emigrated from Limerick last week, in which case, you're right, my apologies.

      P.

    3. Re:Sorry, my fault by starmang · · Score: 1

      Can you show me proof of Ireland being "at the forefront of this effort to push software patents through against the wishes of the elected members". By saying Ireland I'm assuming you are talking about the entire country. If that's true then I'm pretty sure you are wrong. Every person I've talked to about software patents sees the danger with them and do not want them in Europe - and I've talked to over 1000 people in my locality. That's 80% of the population of the town I live in - and I'm pretty sure the other 20% don't know what a software patent is. If you mean the Irish Government, please link me to a government backed effort to push software patents through.

      --
      Never touch an Irish man's Guinness!@#
    4. Re:Sorry, my fault by eatmywake · · Score: 0

      This is true.

    5. Re:Sorry, my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree with this viewpoint. It strikes me as strange that some Americans claim "half-Irishness" (or "half-Polishness" etc. depending on ancestry) when maybe one pair of ancestors were actually from Ireland. Especially strange when those people moved to the US a few centuries ago.

      I was born in England. Both my parents are English. All 4 of my grandparents are/were English.

      One of my great-grandfathers was Swedish (he was born in the 19th century), so technically that means 1 of 8 great-grandparents was Swedish.

      Does this mean I can claim being 1/8th Swedish? or is there a more complicated mathematical formula for working out my Swedishness?

      BTW I like meatballs, is this a coincidence??!

    6. Re:Sorry, my fault by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Good point, except for the fact that digital projection looks like ass.

      --
      This space available.
    7. Re:Sorry, my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey! I resent that! I live in Limerick and it's a ... ok, it's a shith*le, which is why I'm moving this week.

    8. Re:Sorry, my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smelly filthy drunken impoverished third world cesspool

      Level of GDP ( billion) - 144.9
      Level of GNP ( billion) - 120.2
      population of the Republic of Ireland about 4M

      Fastest growing economy in europe,
      one of the richest countries in europe,
      most highly skilled workforce in europe,
      and the vast majority of american multinationals have there european center of operations based in ireland

      free healthcare
      free schooling
      free college education

      impoverished? i dont think so

      USA - economys on its tits
      no free healthcare
      no free college education

      so whos's living in the 3 world?

    9. Re:Sorry, my fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, indeed...digital is not all that. Film looks different than digital projection. To open ANOTHER can of worms, this is not unlike tube amps verus digital amps in the audio realm. While I love my Denon mega-tainment amplifier, it sounds...dry. Tubes sound "warm".

      As for digital projection, it's not a bad thing, per se, just different. I like the look of a "handmade" film like "North By Northwest" far better than digital Star Wars. BTW, I saw the original film 3 days after opened in LA in 1977. Because I was one of the last people to get a ticket, I had to sit in the front row with my neck cranked back for 2 hours. I still remember being blown away at the film. (yes, George...I said FILM!) Having seen all 19 versions since, I can say that I am not impressed with the "fixing". It was fine as was. I have the first three as released on tape...I'll keep them until they disintegrate. :o)

  24. News: by xtracto · · Score: 1

    from the no-snakes-and-no-film-and-they-don't-need-to-ship- their-single-malts:

    Breaking news! Irish Cinemas goes all Digital!

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  25. In other news by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot going all dupe. New news will be delivered to you not only once! but twice! And if your lucky, maybe even 3 times on the front page!

  26. Re:About dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But but.. this IS a dupe.

  27. To be sure to be sure! by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny
    What is this some kind of irish joke?
    No, this is.
  28. Good Job! by Celt · · Score: 1

    Ohhhh so its classed as a NEW news story because its from enn.ie this time and not the BBC.
    Great job everyone!

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  29. almere by IndiepoprockJesse · · Score: 1

    I thought we already had a Digital Cinema here in Almere, Holland?! Jesse//

  30. An Irish Digital Theatergoer's Blessing: by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "May your popcorn be buttered and your pixels interlaced!"

    God, that sounded dumb.

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  31. MODS on crack?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting?! That comment is funny as hell, not interesting!

    Stupid slashdot moderators...

  32. Re:About dupes by aventius · · Score: 1

    Do you realize the irony of your complaint. Your complaining about people complaining. I simply love it.

    --
    [insert lame joke here]
  33. Lets just blame.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft, afterall - they must have something to do with it... right?

    Right guys?

    (silence)

  34. Re:About dupes by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I complain about others who complain. Difference is that the dup-whiners complain all the time. Take my message as constructive criticism: instead of posting 50th message saying "this is a dupe!", why not let it be? What are you guys hoping to accomplish by posting 50 messages saying "this is a dupe!". Do you think I didn't notice the first 49 similar messages? Instead of wasting your time (and mine, if I'm trying to find some relevant comments in the midst of "another dupe!"-messages) whining about the dupe, simply ignore it. You are not required to read all articles on /. you know. Simply ignore the dupes, and your life will be much easier.

    But no! Some people get their panties in a bunch and start their crusade of whining. It's like they are mortally offended every time /. posts a dupe.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  35. This site is practically worthless now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be about the exciting geek stories but those seem to have dissapeared only to be replaced with dupes of mainstream news. As for the "comments" they've sucked since easily 1999. All you people do when you click this site is make those retarded editors richer for not doing much of anything, including read their own site. I for one am all set with this crap. I'll go read kuro5hin or some other discussion sites that I'm slow to post for fear they will just turn into this.

  36. Busted by the Spelling Police! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    personally
    wise
    easily
    expensive
    satellite
    so meone
    actually
    sure
    personally
    media

    That was such a misspelling tour-de-force that I can only assume that you're either a) educationally sub-normal b) American or c) a dyslexic who's too stupid to install a spellchecking service.

    Which is it?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  37. subjects are for burrito worshipping muppets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn this story makes me want to wretch.
    Unless anyone can find me come medicine...?
    Purple monkey dishwasher is in my kitchen, dancing.
    Everybody dance now too.

    1. Re:subjects are for burrito worshipping muppets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>unless anyone can find me come medicine...?

      <creepy oldguy in alley>
      i have that right here in this hose, go on and have a drink little boy
      </creepy old guy in alley>

  38. Re:About dupes by Baramin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People probably think that each time a dupe is posted, it takes the spot of a fresh and interesting news they'd enjoy reading and commenting.

    Most whiners need to realize that if dupes were perfectly filtered by the editors, it wouldn't more more news.

    bottom line : a dupe doesn't take a "new news" spot.

    --
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    MyBlog
  39. Yet another digital movie theater by Mad+Hamster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I believe the Imperial cinema in Copenhagen started showing digital movies in the fall of 2004. The first movie shown this way was 'I, Robot'. Disclaimer: No plug here, just posting for the record.

    --
    Yandelvayasna grldenwi stravenka
  40. sounds like a new delivery method for media to me. by shrewd · · Score: 0

    well it does....

  41. World's first Digital Screen Network?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did everyone miss this announcement:

    http://www.artsalliancemedia.com/news.html

  42. same technology as Satellite TVs? by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i wonder if it's using the same technology as Satellite TVs where theaters each get a card and which decodes the satellite transmission. Since it's only a receiver, there's no way to detect who else might be using the same card to receive it. guess it's time to get some connections with Irish theaters and start learning Irish.

    1. Re:same technology as Satellite TVs? by cianduffy · · Score: 1

      Eh?

      Speak Irish?

      Born and raised in Ireland, lived here all my life. Can't speak a word of Irish...

      We don't actually speak it, its just a sham for the american tourists and the Gaelthact Grant man.

    2. Re:same technology as Satellite TVs? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Damn it Cian, now you've let the cat out of the bag. Or "puiscin amach an mala"?

    3. Re:same technology as Satellite TVs? by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      We don't actually speak it, its just a sham for the american tourists and the Gaelthact Grant man.

      I am not Irish, I am an American - but I find the Irish language to be a beautiful sounding one. I am certain there are still a few people left in Ireland who do use it on a fairly regular basis, but I would imagine that it is a dying language, which for some reason saddens me...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    4. Re:same technology as Satellite TVs? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised -- it's experiencing something of a revival. There are pockets of native speakers who use it daily, mostly along the west coast and southwest. But in English-speaking areas, lots of Gaelscoilanna (Gaelic Schools) are starting up where all instruction is in Irish. My nephews both went to these and are fluent and speak beautiful, soft Munster Irish. It shames me that I can't converse with them... when I try they just look at me like I'm an idiot, my command of the language is that bad.

  43. Listen to the subscribers ... by Spooker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, this probably isn't the correct forum for this but I subscribe to Slashdot and have been a faithful follower for too many years ... when I see a pre-release dupe I send an email to the on-call editor, sometimes it works to get the story banished before the rest of the world sees it (and the ridicule starts) ... sent an email about this story but it seems that it wasn't effective ... power to the peer review!

  44. Any non-white nation it would of been racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had you used any darkskinned people nation rather than a white one you could have immediately been called out for being a downright racist.

    Change "ireland" with "[insert newly created this week african nation here]" and see what happens.

    1. Re:Any non-white nation it would of been racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sure about that. Check out some Slashdot stories about China or India, and you'll be shocked at some of the racist nonsense that's posted. I'm not talking about the trolls either; this is stuff that gets modded up.

  45. Dupe By /. & Pepa by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, yeah - I wanna Dupe, baby

    [Oooo, how you doin', nerd?
    No, not you
    You, the Klingon-Speaking one, (ha-ha) yeah
    What's your name? Timothy?
    Damn, that sounds sexy]

    Here I go, here I go, here I go again (again?)
    Girls, what's my weakness? (Linux!)
    Ok then, chillin', chillin', mindin' my business (MSword)
    Yo, /., I looked around, and I couldn't believe this
    I swear, I stared, my *nix my witness
    The brother had it goin' on with somethin' kinda...uh
    Wicked, wicked (w00t) - had to kick it
    I'm not shy so I asked for the 1010101
    Original News? No, that don't interest me
    See what I want is to be paid to be actin' arrogantly.
    Felt it in my blue chips so I dipped back to my bag of tricks (old articles)
    Then I flipped for a tip, make me wanna do tricks for CmdrTaco
    Lick him like a lollipop should be licked
    Came to my senses and I chilled for a bit
    Don't know how you do the voodoo that you do
    So well it's a spell, hell, makes me wanna dupe dupe dupe

    Dupe shoop ba-doop
    Dupe ba-doop
    Dupe ba-doop ba-doop ba-doop
    Dupe ba-doop
    Dupe ba-doop
    Dupe ba-doop ba-doop ba-doop

  46. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's quite sad that the editors here don't even read their own site.

  47. Ha, ha, ha, ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    The only nerds in this world that don't read Slashdot are.... the Slashdot editors themselves!

    Ha, ha, ha, ha.

  48. "First"? Oh please. by perlionex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just because a company called "Digital Cinema Limited" had its first customer doesn't mean that customer is now the "first country in the world to have completely digital cinema."

    Previous comments above have noted that digital cinemas have existed in other countries since 2004. A local cinema in Singapore reported that they were converting to digital cinemas as early as 2003. I highly doubt they're the only ones, too.

    1. Re:"First"? Oh please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, Ireland is the first country in the world to go with completely digital projection. There is a difference between a few cinemas upgrading, and ALL of them being upgraded.

  49. Evil Simpson's leprechaun by vigour · · Score: 1

    "Kiss me oim Oirish, taar tee taar taar, tee tee tee tee"
    Leprechaun Watch Webcam

  50. Fix the dupe problem in software? by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    I think that it is about time that we start trying to warn people of duplicate postings in software.

    Something Awful forums warn you if a specific URL, or similar URL was posted. It then shows you a link to the thread(s) that have the URLs in question posted. After that, if you decide to post, we still have the editors to try to weed out the rest. This solution won't help when someone links to the same issue/story reported by a different company (much harder with syndication also).

    The script/program would select keywords from the text, and then give a percentage that matched each article that matched. It would only be matching against articles that were X days/weeks old. I'm sure lots of other people have opinions on this as well.

    Would anyone be interested in "Ask Slashdot: How do deal with the dupes problem?".

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  51. Re:Bah by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny
    Editors, what the FUCK are you being paid to do, exactly?

    I'd be more inclined, in this instance, to ask them what the feck they're doing.

  52. So that makes going to the cinema in Ireland... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...pointless.

    Current resolutions for digital cinema are not as good as good HD TV. You should never underestimate the resolution of 35mm film.

    1. Re:So that makes going to the cinema in Ireland... by builderbob_nz · · Score: 1

      Current resolutions for digital cinema are not as good as good HD TV

      I've chatted to a couple of my customers about this (one an experienced projectionist and the other an electrician who maintains projection systems) and both agree that the digital cinemas have much more potential than the classic 35mm systems... however... until the people responsible for distributing the films learn to do so properly (when dealing with digital) then 35mm will always seem better.

      Essentially when you are wanting to project an image onto a screen that is 6m tall, then compression is your enemy not for friend.

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    2. Re:So that makes going to the cinema in Ireland... by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Even 16mm film has a better resolution than HD TV. HDTV, 1080 horizontal lines interlaced. 16mm, 2000 horizontal lines. 35mm, 4000+ horizontal lines.

      Unless they are projecting the film scanned at 4K resolution in cineon format, which is 10 MB PER FRAME, it will never be as good looking.

      Digital projectors do however, have some nice advantages. Film sometimes jitters in the gate of the projector, and it's noticable in most theatres. It's unavoidable. A digital projectior has no film, no gate, and therefore the image should be prefectly stable on the screen.

  53. Rubbing everyone's nose in it... by zecg · · Score: 1

    They are really rubbing everyone's nose in it, changing all their cinemas to digital twice in two weeks.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
  54. Don't laugh by ari_j · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't make fun of the dupes, the practice of linking directly to sites running on 286s instead of to caches of those sites, the poor writing quality, the bad sense of humor, or any other problems with Slashdot. After all, some people pay to see this shit before the rest of get it.

    Considering the allegations that Slashdot is frequently getting scooped by Fark, I can understand their desire to pay for the Slashdot version rather than wait entire minutes from the time it gets posted on Fark until the time they can read the Slashdot version, which has been filtered by idiots for your reading agony. The dupes just help to ensure that every subscriber gets an adequate chance to get a first-post comment on every story.

  55. Streaming video off tape by tepples · · Score: 1

    as RAID arrays have the capability to be plugged into the system and run immediately, whereas a tape needs to be copied onto the system.

    Really? I've been streaming video off tape since 1985 when I first used a VHS VCR.

    1. Re:Streaming video off tape by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

      >Really? I've been streaming video off tape
      >since 1985 when I first used a VHS VCR.

      ya, love that digital VHS.

      but, on to a real question: when they had no compression, they used to use 12 inch disks for movies. why not use 1 12-inch disk with compression and get the whole movie on one ?

  56. How do you... by tepples · · Score: 1

    plan on breaking the 256-bit crypto with the keys delivered under separate cover?

  57. Or... by Sanity · · Score: 2, Informative

    Instead of adding a torrent, just prepend "http://dijjer.org/get/" to the URL of the large file and hey-presto, it is now being distributed through Dijjer.

  58. Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. Fork?
    Kick in the ass?

    1. Re:Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, fork!
      slashdot2.org is available...
      Someone go for it, I'll support you.

  59. First in the world ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already have digital theatres over here in Belgium :)

    http://www.kinepolis.bi/index.cfm?PageID=2044

  60. Obligatory Father Ted quote by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1

    Mrs. Doyle - It was a bit much for me, Father. Feck this, and feck that.
    Ted - Yes, Mrs. Doyle.
    Mrs. Doyle - Ya big bastard. Oh, dreadful language. You big hairy arse, you big fecker. Fierce stuff. And of course, the 'F' word, Father. The bad 'F' word, worse than feck. You know the one I mean.
    Ted - Yes I do, Mrs. Doyle.
    Mrs. Doyle - F you. F your f'in wife. Oh, I don't know why they have to use language like that. I'll stick this f'in pitch fork up your hole, oh that was another one. Oh yeah.
    Ted - I see what you mean, Mrs. Doyle.
    Mrs. Doyle - Bastard this and bastard that. You can't move for the bastards in her novels. It's wall to wall bastards.
    Ted - Is it Mrs. Doyle! Anyway.
    Mrs. Doyle - You bastard, you fecker, you bollox. Get your bollox out of my face.
    Ted - Yes, you just go and prepare for the nuns.
    Mrs. Doyle - Ride me sideways was another one.

    1. Re:Obligatory Father Ted quote by ettlz · · Score: 1

      An extract from yet another script that didn't make Ballykissangel:

      Ted. Just play the f---ing note.
      Dougal. The first one?
      Ted. No! Not the f---ing first one! The f---ing first one's already f---ing down! Just play the f---ing note you were f---ing playing earlier! I've been playing the f---ing first one! We have the f---ing first one!
      Dougal. So I'll just...
      Ted. Just play the f---ing note you were f---ing playing there! The f---ing thing you were just f---ing doing! Play the f---ing note!
    2. Re:Obligatory Father Ted quote by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1

      I nearly pissed myself laughing when I saw that scene in Ireland (working for Netscape, pre-AOL days [sob]) - which wasn't bleeped out. When I saw the same episode in the UK, it was all bleepy :(

    3. Re:Obligatory Father Ted quote by ettlz · · Score: 1

      That's odd. In the official Matthews and Lyneham (my spelling might be wrong here) book of the Father Ted scripts, it starts by describing the scene, and then states that "the --- denote censorous bleeps". This lead me to believing that the bleeps were deliberate and meant to be part of the comedy.

      In fact, it would seem buggering around with swear-words is rather frequent in Father Ted: "Fupp off, you fuppin' baxterd!"

  61. 149 digital screens in my city by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I just counted them in the morning paper. Thats about 2/3rd the total. We've pretty much already done what the Irish are proposing.

  62. Quality of the digital image vs FILM ? by rootkill.za · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone that can comment on the quality of the image on the screen. I have started to see digital projectors in South Africa as well. At the moment they only use them for ads, and then switch to film for the movie. My issues with the digital projectots is that the image brilliance (or light intensity) is far poorer then that of the film projectors. You can also notice the pixels which is far worse then artifacts on film. If this is the trend then I'll stop supporting cinemas. I only go for the quality image. Most of the time they mess up the sound system. If the image quality goes its no better then DVD with a home projector.

    1. Re:Quality of the digital image vs FILM ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen Ocean's 12 on a digital screen in Chicago. It sucked. The image was fairly pixellated, the loss in resolution compared to conventional was very noticeable. I will definitely avoid digital projection if I can in the future.

      On the other hand, if the encoding technology is not expensive, digital distribution may actually help low-budget and foreign movies get distributed, for much the same reason that such movies are more easily distributed on DVD than as a roll of 35mm film.

  63. Dupe detection by hankwang · · Score: 1
    When I post an issue in Bugzilla.mozilla.org, the system gives me a list of potential duplicates. How can't that be done for slashdot?

    Maybe the problem is in the time lag between acceptance of a story submission and the actual publication. I don't know the details of the editorial process, but I imagine that several different editors go through 300 submissions every day. These submissions are then given a priority (publish today or during the next week) and pipelined. If the dupe is sitting in the pipeline before the original has made the frontpage, it is technically not yet a dupe. You could imagine a good dupechecker that also checks the pipeline, but it's a bit more work than "just search for old stories."

    By the way, as a subscriber I can see the stories half an hour before they go live, with an invitation to report it as a dupe. It happens every now and then that the story is a dupe and disappears without the non-subscribers ever seeing it. The system of course doesn't work if the on-duty editor is having a lunch break or something.

    1. Re:Dupe detection by Pastis · · Score: 1

      The publication should maybe not be automated for the last step of the submission. One should be there to confirm that the story is not a dupe.

      But I guess that if they don't fix it, that means they don't care.

      As to be a subscriber, I would not pay to help them do their job. I'd rather pay for a small, clean and nice summary even if it's a day or two later. Like a step further after alterslash.

  64. Lets boycott digital cinemas by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Digital, at least in its current form is a step backwards. Digital images are not as near as nice as 35mm film.

    I stopped going to my local cinema when they 'upgraded' to digital as the pixellation/resolution is so bad it ruins the big screen experience.

    1. Re:Lets boycott digital cinemas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Give that man a +5!

      Most people aren't smart enough to figure-out that the resolution you need for a screen that large isn't possible to do with today's technology.

      That isn't mentioning the bigger problem. The digital lossy (aka lousy) compression. Color gradients look horrible with digital movies. Also, anything that is in motion loses almost all of its detail. Slow camera sweeps where the entire background moves do not work well at all. Think of the helicoper shots in LoTR that look so horrible on DVD but look great in the movie theater and on VHS.

      I got to see the fourth Star Wars movie (TPM?) at Skywalker Ranch on a digital projector. The video was 10 Mbps VBR, and still looked terrible. The Lucas Arts employees acted offended when people started complaining about the major problems with the quality. They seemed to think it was perfect. Well, the rest of the crowd had not drank that kool-aid.

  65. In other words by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    More BANG for your BUCK.

    Subscribers rejoice , /. delivers more news for your money then any other news site.The others (Times, Guardian et al)take a quid and give you one tiny story ONCE, those misers.

    OTOH , /. gives you seconds and thirds , with NA(Nifty Acronyms) and unenlighting comments by uninformed uncouth /.ers.

    How lucky can you get?

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  66. Irish jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Get a clue pinheads. First of all Ireland is typically THE place to test new technology in Europe. Why? Highly educated, prosperous, multicultural (you will find a lot of americans working there), open to new technology.

    It is small enough to push and test new technology through countrywide. You want to see where technology is headed - go to the smaller countries and take a look.
    Every major American corporation has figured this out a long time ago and that is why they all have plants and offices in Ireland. Everyone from Apple to Zenith is there.

    If Americans persist in the attitude that they are world leaders in everything it won't be long before weapons production, wars and neo conservatism is the only export left to bolster a rapdily fading, once great nation.

    To the guy who made the third world comment - Where do you think this country is headed? Oil prices aren't rising the Dollar is falling like a rock. We are in bed with nations who would rather see us dead and are sucking us dry financially (see trade agreements with China and Saudi). We bolster rotten regimes and talk about spreading democracy.
    We are held hostage by the worlds banks but the Asians are slowly selling american debt off their books. If America wasn't the biggest consumer market in the world WE would be the third world nation and nobody would lend us a dime based on our fiscal irresponsibility.

    I hate to break it to you guys but the world is leaving America in the dust when it comes to consumer technology. It is only a matter of time when hardcore technology is all developed elsewhere as well.

    3G networks years ago, HDTV years ago etc etc etc
    We are the backwards inward looking nation. In short - Rednecks.

    1. Re:Irish jokes by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      yeah but the war troubles me.

  67. Slashdot at Nasdaq by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    Don't you known that Slashdot bought some Quotes from Irish Movie Theatres?!?

  68. new slashdot tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the cutting edge of technology duped from the trailing edge of news.

    can we STOP calling those that actually work at slashdot editors please? if they were editors they'd have reporters that are dispatched to cover stories, not repeat what other sites are posting.

    we can call them regurgitators, because all they seem to post is the same vile time after time.

  69. Re:About dupes by aventius · · Score: 1

    You miss my point.... I just love the irony.

    --
    [insert lame joke here]
  70. Chances for independent filmmakers by tempfile · · Score: 1

    I wonder whether this technology will benefit independent moviemakers. On one hand, it is far cheaper to make a copy of a digital movie than 35mm film, and simpler to distribute, so that independent movie theatres can get hold of copies more easily. On the other hand, I fear that the satellite distribution system might be controlled by the media giants who aren't interested in small moviemakers using their system, charging high fees.

    What do you think?

    1. Re:Chances for independent filmmakers by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      You could always do an end run around the satellite system by distributing indie films on hard drives, and it would probably still be cheaper than making a print... plus, the hard drives would be reusable. In other words yes, I think we're about to see a golden age of independent filmmaking.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  71. Dupe by Physician · · Score: 1

    Would it really kill the editors of /. to publically apologize on the website each time they post a dupe? An explanation as to how the dupe slipped by would also be appropriate to include with each apology.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
  72. FPNAD by Archades · · Score: 1

    First Post Not About Dupe! Seriously guys, there's been 6 in a row. You're duping comments now. -- oh wait u said that already i guess i should have read the previous comment :-)

  73. I am really tired of this by glrotate · · Score: 1

    First of all, about 60% of /. stories are 2-day-old posts on either Gizmodo, Engadget, Lifehacker, or Hack-A-Day. I doubt /. editors even realize this, because they obviously don't get "out" very much.

    But seriously. The dupes are out of control. It takes 10 minutes a day, max, to scan the headlines OF THE SITE YOUR JOB IT IS TO EDIT. Timothy obviously does not read this site. So WTF? Could we possibly get an editor that takes his job seriously?

  74. The cause of dupes explained by Jodka · · Score: 1

    "It takes 10 minutes a day, max, to scan the headlines OF THE SITE YOUR JOB IT IS TO EDIT. Timothy obviously does not read this site. So WTF? Could we possibly get an editor that takes his job seriously?"

    Here is why slashdot editors post dupes and how to fix it.

    Slashdot editors pick topics to post on the site from a vast pool of submissions. When recalling if a submissin has appeared on ./, they face the difficult task of distinquishing between submissions which they have previously read but which have not been posted, and submissions which they have previously read and which have not been posted.

    When a slashdot reader detects dupes, he performs the easy task of recalling whether he has seen the same submission before.

    So when identifying dupes, readers and editors perform diferent tasks. For readers, the taks of identifying duplicates is easy. For editors, the taks of identifying duplicates is difficult.

    The solution would be for ./ to employ a class of editors who did not have access to story submissions, who only edited to detect duplicates.

    IMHO abuse about how stupid/lazy/drunken the slashdot editors is unfair and misdirected. They have a workflow problem.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:The cause of dupes explained by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      IMHO abuse about how stupid/lazy/drunken the slashdot editors is unfair and misdirected. They have a workflow problem.

      Well what else are we suppose to post about in duped threads?

      I appreciate your explanation and you're probably 100% correct. The issue is that /. is stagnant. If what you say is correct, the solution is to change the way /. works. It'd be easy. Will they do it? No. Because the site remains popular, they make zero changes. They don't update the HTML or implement CSS, they don't implement a system for correcting dupes, they don't improve the site at all.

      To be honest, I don't particularly like reading posts about stupid/lazy/drunken /. editors and so I was a hypocrite posting one myself, but I almost feel that it's a form of civil disobedience aimed at encouraging the owners to change /. for the better. It's either that or stop visiting, but +5 posts abusing /. editors in duped threads should get the point across a little more directly than dwindling readership.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    2. Re:The cause of dupes explained by Jodka · · Score: 1

      "To be honest, I don't particularly like reading posts about stupid/lazy/drunken /. editors and so I was a hypocrite posting one myself, but I almost feel that it's a form of civil disobedience aimed at encouraging the owners to change /. for the better. It's either that or stop visiting, but +5 posts abusing /. editors in duped threads should get the point across a little more directly than dwindling readership."

      Point taken. I should not have implied that crticism is unwarranted. It would have been better had I written that criticism was "inaccurate" instead of "unfair".
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    3. Re:The cause of dupes explained by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      ERM wtf no? ALl the Editor has to do is use that HANDY DANDY search box at the bottom of the page with a few main keywords from the story and scan the recent results. HOW FUCKING HARD IS THAT!?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  75. Re:About dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the hope is that if enough people shout WE WANT YOU TO STOP POSTING DUPES then maybe, eventually, the Slashdot staff will actually start posting useful stuff.

    It's to the point where I'll never subscribe to Slashdot, because it's not worth the $5 to me. I enjoy certain parts of Slashdot (namely, the games section), but I'm sick and tired of the crap that the editors keep on doing.

    Here's the deal: Fix the website. Bring it into the 21st century and out of 1998. Stop posting dupes. Start posting things that aren't obvious ads or FUD. Then I'll consider subscribing.

    Until then... it's just not worth my money. And I like the community here enough that I wish it were worth my money. And that's why it pisses me off whenever SLASHDOT DOES SOMETHING THAT PROVES IT ISN'T WORTH SUBSCRIBING TO.

  76. fix the SlashCode by juan2074 · · Score: 1

    When is the SlashCode getting updated with new mechanisms to detect duplicates?

  77. Re: The Burbank screening by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
    A few of the colors weren't right, and I noticed a few glitches...

    I believe I saw that very same screening (not the same day of course) and I'm curious to hear more about the colors you felt weren't right and what the glitches were. I thought the quality was astounding. The technical quality that is.

    The tonal range was incredible, titles and credits did not jump around and of course there were no scratches or dust marks. After seeing it I felt sure that theaters would be digitally projecting everything within a few years.

    Very funny post, by the way.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  78. Question for all Slashdotters: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be clear from the proliferation of "dupes" that the Slashdot editors don't often read Slashdot. So my question is: Why do you?

  79. Security? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    New movies are to be delivered via satellite which, I'm sure, will bring up security issues of its own.
    Not unless you consider improved security an issue. The need to distribute film canisters has always been a big security hole. In the pre-DVD era, that was where most pirate prints came from -- projectionists "borrowing" the official print between shows. A satellite feed can be encrypted so that not even projectionists can access it between shows. Perhaps somebody will find a hole in the encryption -- but after the DVD CSS fiasco, I imagine distributors will be very careful.
  80. Re:About dupes by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    Nope, I get your point quite well, thankyouverymuch.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  81. sick to death of it by quixos · · Score: 1

    i check my slashdot live bookmark frequently and have not seen anything on this subject. thousands of people including myself are seeing this for the first time. we might even comment on this news if it weren't hopeless to expect that any reasonable person with a life would trouble to wade thru all this self-aggrandizing bullshit.

  82. And it is not even first in the world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bollywood has embraced digital projection long time back. Check out this story at BBC Bollywood enters digital age where they were going to convert 400 theaters by April 2004. Maybe it is a first to convert theaters in the whole country to digital format but I doubt it will be. There will always be one independent exhibitor out there who would like to stay with his older technology.

  83. Which projection technology ? by acaspis · · Score: 1
    So the theatres have finally decided that current digital projection technology is good enough ?

    This faq suggests the projectors are DLP 2K.

    "DLP" (Digital Light Processing) is the Texas Instruments tech based on Digital Micromirror Devices (DMD).

    A DMD is an array of small (10um), digitally controled mirrors etched in a chip-like package. Greyscale is produced by switching each mirror on and off thousands of times per second (yes, mechanical parts wear differently at that scale).

    In single-DMD projectors, colors are created by spinning a wheel with coloured RGB sectors in the light path. Early consumer DLP projectors were plagued with the so-called "rainbow effect": the wheel was too slow (two RGB cycles per frame), allowing some people to notice the alternating R,G,B components.

    Professional DLP projectors have one DMD per color channel in order to avoid the rainbow effect. But some users still feel that "something is wrong with the light" even when looking at static images. This is hard to explain since the greyscale scanning is much, much faster (kHz range) than persistence of vision. So it will be interesting to see whether an unusal percentage of moviegoers feel sick or get seizures at digital theatres.

    "2K" means the resolution is 2048 lines, i.e. not so much better than HDTV. Eventually the industry will move to 4K, which some say is required to match the resolution of film. Will 2K movies be priced 50% (or 75%) lower than 4K ones ?

    Bottom line: Expect lots of flamewars a la CD-versus-vynil in the near future.

  84. Better things to read by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    But they have to spend all their time reading the statements from banner ad companies that run all those microsoft ads. How could they have time to make keep the community's interests in mind? ;)

  85. Good news. by NanotechLobster · · Score: 1

    Lets hope the security issues stay unresolved for a while. =)

  86. Why bother downloading from slow satellites by Begemot · · Score: 1

    Just get it straight and fast from Emule.

  87. Let's get pissed! by Look+KG486 · · Score: 0

    Dupe, dee, dupe, dupe.

    --

    "Play is the only way the highest intelligence of humankind can unfold." -- Joseph Chilton Pearce

  88. Not the first one... by SonarNerd · · Score: 1

    In Finland we have a 461 seat movie theater with digital projector (TI DLP technology). Movie is transferred in digital format. First movie shown using that projector was Star Wars Episode II in 2002.

    I'm not sure about the current status of it, but at least I watched the abovementioned movie there.

  89. Re:Bad acoustics... by hmniq · · Score: 0

    haha funny how out of all the complaints about the editors, *mine* gets modded offtopic :)

  90. Glad I'm not a paying member ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More evidence from which to be glad I'm not a paying member of /. ...

  91. Kinepolis already offers Digital Cinema by steff_stuff · · Score: 1

    So, I guess the Irish are a bit off-beat in their newscast. Go to this site for more info on Digital Cinema http://www.kinepolis.be/index.cfm?PageID=2044