Slashdot Mirror


Rodriguez uses Linux to Edge out ILM

An anonymous reader writes "A Linux device helped legendary independent filmmaker Robert Rodriguez (El Mariachi, Desperado, Spy Kids, Once Upon a Time in Mexico, and others) win the race with ILM (Industrial Light and Magic) to create the first movie ever to use a digital format supporting full-bandwidth RGB. Rodriguez's Sin City, which opens April 1, was shot in Dual Link, or "4:4:4" format, and transferred between tapes and hard drives using SpectSoft's Linux-based RaveHD DDR (digital disk recorder)."

192 comments

  1. Wonder if... by stefanmi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would bet that a lot of the digital effects used in this film were rendered and perhaps even designed with Linux. If they were done with Windows they would have used a blue screen.

    1. Re:Wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This was the first interesting Linux-article in like 2 years.

    2. Re:Wonder if... by Seumas · · Score: 0, Troll

      Robert Rodriguez has come a long way since his days of stand-up comedy and his roles as the spanish immigrant in Cheech and Chong.

    3. Re:Wonder if... by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, it depends on which company you are talking about. I know someone who worked on small parts of the film in IRIX.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    4. Re:Wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux fatty. It's time to move out of your mom's basement and learn how real humor is done.

    5. Re:Wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on Sin City at Cafe FX. Sorry no linux all XP on BOXX dual opteron systems. There is no Linux version of Eyeon's Digital Fusion.

    6. Re:Wonder if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did work on the film and at cafe FX and the parts we had (over 400 shots) where all done XP on BOXX dual opterons. Some of the editing was done with discreet which is irix but that amounts to the smallest amout of the work.

    7. Re:Wonder if... by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      Now that's comedy. :-) (Who is "General Protection"....and why is it his fault?)

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  2. Huh? by gumpish · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    was shot in Dual Link, or "4:4:4" format

    Uhm... what?

    1. Re:Huh? by alarch · · Score: 5, Informative

      have you read the article?

      "But what about "4:4:4 Y'CbCr"?!

      Y'CbCr, also known as YUV, is the color space used by film editing equipment. Y represents luminance, while Cb and Cr are color difference signals.

      Consumer DV (digital video) cameras typically use a 4:1:1 Y'CbCr format, in which luminance is sampled for each pixel, while Cb and Cr are sampled at every fourth pixel. SD (standard definition) cameras use a 4:2:2 format. HD cameras can use 4:2:2, or a 4:2:0 format based on "spatial" samples of 2x2-pixel squares. Dual Link, however, uses a 4:4:4 technique."

      --
      Deliriant isti Americani.
    2. Re:Huh? by jovlinger · · Score: 2, Informative

      JPG uses the YCrCb color space as well, by default at 4:2:2, which is also the resolution you get out of a bayer pattern in a digicam.

      (or was it 4:2:0 you get out of a camera?)

    3. Re:Huh? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      Y'CbCr, also known as YUV, is the color space used by film editing equipment.

      YUV is not used by film-editing equipment. Film is strictly an RGB thing. Video gear uses the YUV color space.

  3. Windows.. by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linux was vital to this project. As we all know, if it were Windows-based, the RGB mode would be 0:0:4, more commonly known to the industry as "blue screen".

    1. Re:Windows.. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Linux was vital to this project. As we all know, if it were Windows-based, the RGB mode would be 0:0:4, more commonly known to the industry as "blue screen"."

      Gee, a second incarnation of the same tired BSOD joke. Let's all start slappin our knees!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Windows.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a mindless transfer device it could have been made an any number of platforms, in fact there has been one on windows 2000 for 4 years at least. You must be a bunch of "jack balls" to think that this is a race.

  4. Frank Miller by AAeyers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rodriguez's Sin City,

    Actually, its Frank Miller's Sin City. IMHO the writer is more important than the director.

    --
    "For Great Justice."
    1. Re:Frank Miller by Wakkow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also true considering he is co-directing it as well.

    2. Re:Frank Miller by ccharles · · Score: 1

      True, but the story is about using Linux in the film, which is credited to Rodriguez. I think saying "Rodriguez's Sin City" in this context is perfectly fine.

    3. Re:Frank Miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO the writer is more important than the director

      Sssshhhh...Don't tell George Lucas

      Oh, wait...

    4. Re:Frank Miller by mz001b · · Score: 4, Funny

      actually, I think the correct title is GNU/Sin City.

    5. Re:Frank Miller by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quentin Tarantino is listed as "special guest director" whatever that means.

      If the guy who wrote the comic books also wrote the screenplay AND is co-directing, then anyone whining about canon should be put to sleep.

      --
      -mkb
    6. Re:Frank Miller by jest3r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Although Rodriguez is technically the director, he quit the Directors Guild so that 'Sin City' creator Frank Miller could be credited as director (The Directors Guild only allows for 1 director per movie).

      As a result of leaving the Guild (or being forced out) Rodriguez lost his contract with Paramount to direct the big budget John Carter of Mars (Princess of Mars). Thats got ot hurt.

      Lucas had a dispute with the Guild back in the day and dropped out as well .... This months Wired has a good article on the subject.

    7. Re:Frank Miller by Wakkow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's what IMDB says about Tarantino and Sin City:

      "Robert Rodriguez scored Kill Bill: Vol. 2 (2004) for $1. Quentin Tarantino said he would repay him by directing a segment of this movie for $1. Tarantino, a vocal proponent of film-over-digital, has said that he was curious to get hands-on experience with the HD cameras which Rodriguez lauds. When asked about his experience, Tarantino merely replied, "Mission Accomplished.""

    8. Re:Frank Miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      He's listed as co-director simply because Rodriguez is using many of the same shots as the original comic, and therefore thought he should get equal credit for the look of the movie.

      RR was kicked out of the Director's Guild for this, since he wouldn't remove Miller's name at their request.

    9. Re:Frank Miller by sgant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Though it must be said that Rodriguez resigned from the Directors Guild because he felt that Frank Miller should be given co-director credit.

      Rodriguez is a fanatic of Frank Millers work and he would certainly be the first to jump up and correct someone if they said "Rodriguez's Sin City".

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    10. Re:Frank Miller by malducin · · Score: 1

      Still that article does have a few errors. It fails to mention that Lucas rejoined the Guild so he could direct Episode 1. Also The Letterman Digital Arts Center is not being built atop a garage. They built it where a the old Presidio military hospital was and is quite big.

    11. Re:Frank Miller by djimi · · Score: 1

      It is built on top of a garage. 1600 car garage. Brand new. Lucas always hides the cars on his properties.

      --
      Vox et praetera nihil
    12. Re:Frank Miller by malducin · · Score: 1

      Yes I know they built an underground garage (I took pictures of it). I just think the article worded it very bad, almost seems like they implied they built it atop an existing old structure (like strip mall). Which isn't the case since they demolished everything (the hospital) and started digging and building.

      It's not exactly true he hides all the cars. Current ILM in San Rafael the cars are around the buildins, though many on the acksides of the buildings, but many all around. Basically there is no underground parking facility there, which sometimes makes parking a bit difficult.

    13. Re:Frank Miller by malducin · · Score: 2, Informative

      (The Directors Guild only allows for 1 director per movie).

      Are you sure about that? So what do they do in movies that are anthologies, say like the Twilight Zone movie or the upcoming Eros? There are also many movies that have two directors, like He Said, She Said or movies by the Farrelly brothers? No I think it's because the DGA may demand that directors be members of a Guild but I couldbe wrong.

    14. Re:Frank Miller by jest3r · · Score: 1

      Quoted from Variety Magazine:

      Days before beginning production on the Dimension drama "Sin City," Rodriguez resigned his DGA membership so that he could co-direct with Frank Miller, a film neophyte who created, wrote and illustrated the three-book graphic novel series on which the movie is based.

      DGA rules dictate that there be only one director assigned to direct a motion picture at any given time, although the guild occasionally grants a waiver to that policy. On Thursday, a DGA spokesman said, "The guild regrets Mr. Rodriguez's resignation, however, we stand firmly behind the principle of one director-one film."

    15. Re:Frank Miller by malducin · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that was most enlightening. Didn't know the DGA was that backward thinking in that regard.

    16. Re:Frank Miller by teraph · · Score: 1

      "Backward thinking?" Not really. The one director rule may, on rare occasions, cause problems, but it is an important protection for directors.

      Here is an article on why the DGA is so intent on the one director rule.

      This isn't to say that the DGA (or any guild) is perfect in their rules. Organizations like the DGA are designed to protect the majority of their members, and that sometimes hurts specific individuals who have a different vision, or who have unique situations. This isn't the first time Rodriguez has quit the guild to make a movie, nor is he the only director to do so. But the directors who do are usually the one's who don't need the guild to protect them. People like Rodriguez, Lucas and Tarentino have more than enough clout to get a movie made and distributed while being outside the guild.

      Should the DGA re-examine the rules that are inspiring a couple major directors to leave? Maybe. Should the needs of a couple of directors (even if they are powerful ones) be enough to change rules that appear to working very well for everyone else? I doubt Rodriguez thinks so. He is quoted saying "It was easier for me to quietly resign before shooting because otherwise I'd be forced to make compromises I was unwilling to make or set a precedent that might hurt the guild later on."

      Even in quitting he says that one of his goals was to protect the guild he was leaving.

    17. Re:Frank Miller by RobFrontier · · Score: 1

      In this case the co-Director (Rodriguez) is more important, since it wouldn't be getting made at all with out him involved. Give all the credit to Miller for his writing. But, give Rodriguez all the props for having the balls to stand up and get it made without compromise

    18. Re:Frank Miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do hate the silly rules of DGA but without this one all movies from hollywood would have 10 (asisting) directors and the real director would be in the end of the list of the more famous bystanders. There evidently seams to be no such rule about movie producers.

  5. Damn, I've just gone 16:9... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and they've come out with a fucking 3D format! Things get obsolete so fast. How does it look? 4:4:4 seems a little boxy (Or should I say cubey?) for panoramas, but I guess the third dimension really makes you forget that.

  6. RGB-B&W by STrinity · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, that explains how vibrant the reds, greens, and blues look in black and white!

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    1. Re:RGB-B&W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the movie was in black and white, your post would be funny. But its not: Watch the trailer.

    2. Re:RGB-B&W by NightHwk1 · · Score: 1

      Even if it were in black and white, a lot can be done with the color channels, especially if the film has visual effects (which this one has many of..)

      Most obviously, color keying.

      But also, having three color channels effectively gives you three different black and white versions of the same image.

    3. Re:RGB-B&W by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually you are just seeing the Red channel. He's releasing it in three parts, part two will be the Blue channel and part three will be the Yellow channel. He wanted to be the first person in history to release the separations separately. There's talk of a full color version for the DVD. Tarentino is pissed off because he didn't think of it first.

    4. Re:RGB-B&W by uhlume · · Score: 1

      ...Yellow channel? Which part of 'RGB' do you not understand?

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    5. Re:RGB-B&W by Ricardo+Lima · · Score: 1

      The green one as he mentioned red and blue. :-P

      --
      Ricardo da Silva Lima
  7. From TFA by jm92956n · · Score: 5, Informative
    Consumer DV (digital video) cameras typically use a 4:1:1 Y'CbCr format, in which luminance is sampled for each pixel, while Cb and Cr are sampled at every fourth pixel. SD (standard definition) cameras use a 4:2:2 format. HD cameras can use 4:2:2, or a 4:2:0 format based on "spatial" samples of 2x2-pixel squares. Dual Link, however, uses a 4:4:4 technique.

    "It's really the same as 1:1:1," explains Howard. "It just means 'take RGB, break it up, send part of it down one wire, and part down the other wire.'"

    The compromises in traditional Y'CbCr formats were designed to minimize perceptual loss, keying on the human eye's varying sensitivity to luminescence at various color frequencies. We are most sensitive to brightness in green light, less so in reds, and least with blue. This explains why studios often shoot against a "greenscreen" -- Y'CbCr has most information about green, so it's the easiest color for a software program to identify and replace.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    1. Re:From TFA by jpatters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congratulations, you have mastered copy and paste! You win!

      --
      "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
    2. Re:From TFA by NightHwk1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is true for video, but most studios use film for greenscreening work. The resolution is going to be much higher, and the colors will not have any compression artifacts (which is why filters like this, or this are used. 4:4:4 stores more color information, minimizing those artifacts.

      Also, the color of the screen really doesn't have to be green. Depending on the subject in front of the screen, it can be blue, red, or even black.

  8. In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hear George Lucas uses Outlook Express. Or rather, he has his assistant use it, and read the messages to him. He doesn't even know how to check his email.

    1. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Lucas has gone OTT batshit insane?

    2. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
      ... and you don't know how to direct a movie.


      Your point?

    3. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I hear George Lucas uses Outlook Express. Or rather, he has his assistant use it, and read the messages to him. He doesn't even know how to check his email."

      I'm not all that fond of Lucas's movie making abilities either, but what does that have to do with email? The dude is from an older generation than us. If you're going to prove he's bad at making movies, point at the last two he's made instead of turning computer use into an IQ test.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither does Lucas.

    5. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Lucas?

    6. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty common among CEOs to have an assistant handle their e-mails. It's not due to lack of knowledge, but rather that a CEO's time is very costly and shouldn't be spent filtering their inbox.

    7. Re:In contrast with shitty movie makers... by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      All things considered, he still has 5 movies so far (just counting SW stuff) that were on the big screen (and one on the way), which is probably 5 more than you or GGP post have, despite your opinion of them (or him).

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

  9. Nice review at sarah. word. by anandpur · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had unreasonably high hopes for "Sin City" ever since I watched that fabulous trailer. But it's not like graphic novels-turned-movies have impeccable track records on the big screen, so imagine my concern going into this.

    For lack of a more eloquent explanation, "Sin City" freaking rules.

    Remember the first time you saw "Pulp Fiction"? You were unnerved and at times downright repelled, but you admitted that it was the freshest, most original thing to be put into a theater since... ever, and you couldn't wait to talk about how amazing it was with everyone you knew? "Sin City" is kind of like that.

    http://sarahlane.typepad.com/sarahword/2005/03/cel luloid_lane_.html

    1. Is "Sin City" a family movie?
    - Heavens no. It's incredibly graphic and gruesome. I know YOU'RE into that, but don't bring the kids.

    6. Does the all-star cast detract from the story at all?
    - Refreshingly, no. No one character is the main star, it's more like a bunch of supporting roles. Great supporting roles. These actors are stoked.

    8. Are we talking CG animation or live action?
    - Almost all the live action was done with green screens and props, then the magic was painted in later. It's amazing.

    10. I was pleased to see lots of hot chicks in the trailer. Can I expect more of that?
    - You sure can, my friend! But they'll also chop your head off. Literally.

    1. Re:Nice review at sarah. word. by hahiss · · Score: 1

      Pulp Fiction was *NOT* the ``freshest, most original thing put in theaters . . . ever". It was, like most of Tarrantino's stuff, a tedious pastiche.

      --
      "Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." - H.L. Mencken
    2. Re:Nice review at sarah. word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that statement wasn't directed towards slobbery, pretentious art fags.

    3. Re:Nice review at sarah. word. by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I found this trivia from IMDB quite refreshing:

      # After a poor Hollywood experience in the early-'90s, Frank Miller refused to relinquish the movie rights to any of his comic works, "Sin City" in particular. Robert Rodriguez, a longtime fan of the comic, filmed his own "audition" for the director's spot in secret. The footage, shot in early 2004, featured Josh Hartnett and Marley Shelton acting out the "Sin City" short-story "The Customer is Always Right". He presented the finished footage to Miller with the proclamation: "If you like this, this will be the opening to the movie. If not, you'll have your own short film to show your friends." Miller approved of the footage and the film was underway. Rodriguez also screened the footage for each of the actors he wanted to cast in the film - all of whom are reported to have been instantly amazed.

      # Rodriguez, who credits Miller's visual style in the comic as relevant as his own in the film, insisted that Miller receive a "co-director" credit with him. The Directors' Guild of America would not allow it. As a result, Rodriguez resigned from the DGA, saying "It was easier for me to quietly resign before shooting because otherwise I'd be forced to make compromises I was unwilling to make or set a precedent that might hurt the guild later on." Unfortunately, by resigning from the DGA, Rodriguez was also forced to relinquish his director's seat on the film John Carter of Mars (2006) (at the time "A Princess of Mars" after the book on which it was based) for Paramount. Rodriguez had already signed-on and been announced as director of that film when the DGA situation took place, planning to begin filming soon after wrapping this film.

  10. max payne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the website remindes me of the game max payne .. how is it connected?

    1. Re:max payne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not. dumbass.

    2. Re:max payne? by ramunas · · Score: 1, Interesting

      well the first time I saw the trailer I thought hell It's Max Payne in a movie version :) I bet all the max payne fans will flood this one :)

      --
      ./R My blog
    3. Re:max payne? by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

      Come on, all Max Payne fans should have had their appetites sated by Payback with Mel Gibson.
      The voiceover sound and attitude of the whole film is totally Max Payne :)

      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  11. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by natron+2.0 · · Score: 0

    I agree. With software such as Maya and RaveHD on the market anyone with a creative mind and some tech savviness can creat just like ILM. For instance, just look at all the great indie films you can find freely on the web, there is amazing stuff going on without the need for an old powerhouse like ILM.

  12. Excellent, but... by IvanD · · Score: 0

    Is the movie es "good" as the previous work of Rodriguez? I'm cheap... but movies are too expensive these days, and last movies are... uhm... not completely master pieces.

  13. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    yes, because ILM was much more than just a render farm. Teams of talented artists, model makers and engineers have kept them relevent.

  14. Slightly Offtopic by darkitecture · · Score: 5, Informative


    Incidentally, another distinction earned by Rodriguez during the making of Sin City, is that he joined George Lucas and others who have been kicked out of the Director's Guild. Rodriguez's offense, Howard says, was working with a co-director -- Sin City comic book creator Frank Miller -- who doesn't belong to the Guild.

    I know it's slightly offtopic, but Robert Rodriguez wasn't kicked out of the DGA. He quit because they wouldn't allow him to credit Frank Miller as a co-director.

    Kudos to him, I say.

  15. Seem a bit odd... by Nimloth · · Score: 1, Insightful
    That the first movie filmed using a full-bandwidth RGB system is mostly black and white (with bits of yellow and red once in a while)...

    Seems they could've chosen a more impressive set to show off their technology :/

  16. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by the_weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whatever. Maya + RaveHD does not make you a visual effects facility capable of turning out 300 shots in a post production schedule of 7 months.

    Just like having a copy of the GIMP doesn't make you into one of the leading creative ad agencies in the world. It takes a mix of talent, skill, experience and tools to be the top of your field.

    --
    - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
  17. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Jeez, can't a person speak his mind, even if he has bad grammer and not be persecuted...

  18. But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    In practical terms, Howard says the greater color depth afforded by the Dual Link format gives filmmakers more freedom during "chroma-keying" -- the stage at which solid-color filmstudio backdrops are replaced with imagery. "With Sin City, the entire movie was shot on greenscreen. Robert Rodriguez did some work initially in single-link HD, and he had a heck of a time keying that footage."

    With all due respect to the writer of the article, in practical terms, I'm not sure what this means to the viewer of the film . . . Does this mean that the colors/details look better, or that there are less losses in color/detail during the application of digital effects, or is this fairly immaterial to the end viewer and will the end product look pretty much the same as 4:2:2 work?

    And to extend the question beyond the big screen, will this make a difference in the DVD transfer of this film, or will any benefit be negated by losses during DVD transfer?

    1. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by jfengel · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't mean you get better color, but it does mean you get a better movie. The guys who digitally drop the characters into the backgrounds have more freedom to create what they want, since they can more easily make distinctions between foreground and background based on color.

      Which means that they spend less time chroma-keying (picking out the background colors) and more time making movies. As with any big project, the finished product is filled with flaws that only the actual creator can put his finger on, but the overall sense of polish makes a big difference to the feeling you get when you watch the movie.

      You get the same effect writing software: all those little hacks you had to do to get it out the door aren't immediately visible to the user, but they'll piss you off every time you look at them.

      The changes aren't even necessarily subtle: they may have to substantially alter a shot if they can't get the background to drop out properly. You wouldn't notice without being in the editing booth, but you'll probably like the movie that much more for getting more of the director's vision onto the screen.

      I'm a director [for the stage] myself, and though it's very different from film, we're constantly asking "how much can I get away with?" rather than "what can I create?" You tell yourself that the audience won't notice that you couldn't find the right prop, or that you didn't have time to get rid of the dim spot in the lights, but it pisses you the hell off and looks unprofessional even if the audience couldn't elucidate the difference.

      It would be interesting to have a director go into detail on a commentary track to say, "Well, we would have done X, Y, and Z, but we couldn't because the technology was too limited." The closest you get is the re-released Star Wars movies. Well, maybe it's not such a good idea after all.

    2. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all due respect to the writer of the article, in practical terms, I'm not sure what this means to the viewer of the film . . .

      Not much, it just means a less cost to create the same end result. Some details of the end result may not have been fiscally possible otherwise, but only the film freaks would really notice them.

      For the most part, it just means more profit for the MPAA-members distributing the film and Rodriguez himself.

      However, I have to admire Rodriguez for his "guerilla" approach to film-making, he's an indie director that, for the most part, still runs his productions as if they were independent productions (i.e. very frugally, pushing the edges of best-bang-for-the-buck), just with larger budgets. In that sense, what he does as somewhat of a trailblazer trickles down, enabling future indie productions to reach higher levels of technical quality for the same budget.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Does this mean that the colors/details look better, or that there are less losses in color/detail during the application of digital effects, or is this fairly immaterial to the end viewer and will the end product look pretty much the same as 4:2:2 work?

      It doesn't mean ANYTHING to the viewer... Just like breaking the world speed record doesn't mean anything to the average car buyer.

      It's a milestone. It means a few things to the makers of the film, but nothing groundbreaking. They mention color-keying, so with 4:4:4, you can have multiple "blue-screens" of multiple colors, which would be quite useful.

      will this make a difference in the DVD transfer of this film

      Would a jet car, breaking the land-speed record, make your Ford Taurus go any faster? No.

      DVDs have always been, and will always be 4:2:2. HDTV is 4:2:2. It's not possible for you to view 4:4:4 video at home, and will be at least a decade before that might change. I say might, because there's good reason video is 4:2:2. It's unlikely you would be able to see any difference between a 4:2:2 video, and a 4:4:4 video.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      However, I have to admire Rodriguez for his "guerilla" approach to film-making, he's an indie director that, for the most part, still runs his productions as if they were independent productions (i.e. very frugally, pushing the edges of best-bang-for-the-buck), just with larger budgets.

      Yes. I seriously recommend watching the making-of documentary on the Once Upon A Time In Mexico DVD. It is absolutely awesome how he was able to produce a theatrical film essentially in his garage. There are also a large number of clever hacks that he used to create action scenes that would have been prohibitively expensive to shoot in the traditional way.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I worked on Sin City and let me tell you what. There is no such thing as easy green screening when the actors are wet and reflect all the f'ing green.

    6. Re:But what does this mean to the movie viewer? by uhlume · · Score: 1

      Heh. I'd give you either a +1 Funny or a +1 Insightful for that, had I the mod points.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
  19. Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our Red Green and Blue, Sin City overlords.

  20. Re:look at me by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Funny

    While I love data structures and the theory of data storage on modern machines, please, NULL TERMINATION is not something that is hard. Please, Null Terminate your strings. For Great Justice.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

  21. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Stides · · Score: 1

    No, this shit has to stop.

  22. Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe how much I look forward to see Sin City. It's going to be a classic. I'm as hyped and pumped about it as Robert Hamburger is pumped about ninjas.

    1. Re:Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The films with the gun toting guitarist are totally pointless, it's like a 6 year olds are allowed to write and direct movies these days. I don't mean any disrespect to 6 year olds who are generally more creative, just that this guy makes absolute garbage films.

    2. Re:Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what films you're talking about... but I've seen the Sin City trailers and read about it as much as I can, and it does look good. I suppose you're talking about some other movie?

    3. Re:Sin City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is referring to El Mariachi/Desperado/Once Upon a Time in Mexico.

  23. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get out much ?
    didn't think so, ever wonder why ?

  24. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with the rise of even schools having massive renderfarms

    Why do you equate computing horsepower with talent? Do I go to a film and then marvel at the amount of CPU time it took to create?

  25. The big race... by papastout · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think of all those endeavours ILM has going on...They're about to move to the SF Presidio into a giant new facility where the game company and the film company are going to be rooming in together; Episode III is about to be released (oooh, maybe a PG13 Star Wars flick!) and all those digital film techniques (i.e.: Camera GUI) they have invented. It's a wonder that ILM is no match for a guy that just wants to make a good movie about human depravity.
    I wonder how George will take the news? I predict he'll spend a few million (bah! billion) bucks on some cluster racks to console his staff for the loss.

    1. Re:The big race... by malducin · · Score: 1

      That depends on release dates, not the actual facility per se and happens all the time. When subsurface scattering was shown at SIGGRAPH 2001, VFX and animation houses started working on it. PDI came with an improvement a year later and incorporated it, using it on Shrek 2 which didn't come out till 2004. ILM's Christophe Hery worked on the implementation (mentioned it at SIGGRAPH 2002) but they couldn't apply it on Ep. 2. Some ILM guys left (Joe Letteri and Ken McGaugh) and joined Weta Digital. In the end the first showcase of the techniques was ILM's Dobby in Harry Potter 2, a full month ahead of Gollum. Now did PJ made a tantrum and bought a new renderfarm to console the Weta guys? Of course it's a ridiculous assesment.

      By the way, Hery, Letteri and McGaugh received an Academy SciTech award for their contributions. Second what does a VFX house have to do with the concept of a film of a director?

    2. Re:The big race... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget it was George Lucas who introduced Rodriguez to shooting films in digital - somehow I don't think it would bother him to see another film maker embracing the digital cinema technologies that he's been promoting for so long.

  26. Rotten tomatoes reviews by Reignking · · Score: 0, Informative

    If you are worried about this movie being good, check out the reviews collected at Rotten Tomatoes; all 9 have been positive so far (for a 100% rating).

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  27. This article is misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trying to read that article made me feel like I had ADD again. All of its skipping around on various topics wasn't neccesary. The stupid part of the article is its arrogant attack on ILM when the article later admits ILM has been using this same technology for some time. The only thing is Sin City came out a couple months before Episode 3. Kudos to both studios and I'm not trying to say the Sin City technology isn't an accomplishment, but I wish the author of the article would have focused on their achievements instead of comparing them with ILM.

  28. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Panaflex · · Score: 1

    Heh, sometimes I do. For instance in the movie Contact I was blown away by the amount of CPU it took.

    Pan

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  29. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post (in context) is too funny for people to miss!

  30. Re:Are ILM [relevant] today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think you're a bit misguided...

    today i can create on a home PC in hours what ILM would have taken years

    Technically, yes, but you need a lot of really skilled writers and animators to create the movie in the first place. Merely having the capability to render photorealistic 3D images does not by itself make a good movie -- look at the difference between Final Fantasy: The Sprits Within and any Pixar production to see that.

    with the rise of even schools having massive renderfarms (like the g5 one)

    Again, I think you're mistaken. I assume you're referring to the Terascale cluster at Virginia Tech, but it's not a "renderfarm", it's a supercomputer cluster designated for scientific research. Check out their web page here, they have details about what kind of jobs they'll accept.

  31. Does Rodriguez even know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe credit is due RaveHD, and as long as it didn't crash or hang, then a little credit is due the OS. Maybe this is the beginning of the OS becoming transparent, and apps now matter?

    Unless the man is a penguin fanboy that is.

  32. Again, Dangerous Visions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ILM has an advantage in designing *new* machines, building on their own past achievements, as well as the newcomers', like anyone else. But the most important geniuses at ILM were those designing and using their machines. Organizational culture, rooted in its executives' vision, distinguishes winners from losers. Jumps in tech are opportunities to be exploited, not guarantees of success, for the big innovators as well as the later exploiters.

    A more relevant factor in ILM's relevance is budget. ILM has big budgets, to attract talent and explore more opportunities, more of which they can afford to lose before hitting a winner. But their budget is so high that they can only be hired by big budget projects. Which are run by people who fear any risk, and which tend to make effects budgets "show their value" by featuring the effects, rather than using effects solely to support the rest of the picture (characters, story, etc). So we get ILM working big, bombastic, boring projects. Meanwhile, cheaper (Linux, etc) effects houses can spring up, try stuff, experiment with both effects and other risky, unproven parts of the picture. Again, the bottleneck is brains: if ILM supports the vision of a visionary film, it has an advantage. If ILM's execs apply it to the deadend of mere "special effects extravaganzas", it will be as relevant as fireworks exhibitions.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by Bootle · · Score: 0
      I agree and disagree with you.

      I think most CG effects people get shortchanged. When they are really doing there job, you won't ever know it. I think ILM does do amazing work, the reason it's so amazing is that so much of the work is never noticed by the audience. For example, in Minority Report there was a scene of tom "the midget" cruise being chased down a rain-soaked alley by cops with jet packs. That alley was built in a studio. In the original footage you can see all the lights and electrical rigging, etc in the reflections in the puddles. ILM went in and removed all of that. That's a lot of work that they get no credit for. Plus, who knows how much time/money they spend making cruise look more than 4 feet tall.

      Obviously, this argument holds for WETA and most other world-class effects houses. So I make no statement about the strengths of WETA vs. ILM.

      What I hate is when they DON'T do the effects that need to be done. AvP (the abortion) features antarctica as a setting. Do you see the breath of anyone? No, because they filmed on some studio in england or something!!! It's easy to add CG vapor clouds but they didn't do it. The reason is that they suck. In that case, the LACK of cg is what ruined the setting (the movie was already ruined well before that point).

      Interesting trivia: In minority report, whenever tom cruise is in the room with the fancy computer, the floor gently slopes up towards the center of the room, where he is standing, while other actors stand off to the side where the floor is lower. When the midget is on the run and others are using the computer, the floor is completely flat! Most cruise movies feature these kinds of tricks, it's probably in his contract to make him look tall. It's a fun game to find them whenever he rolls out a film.

    2. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by malducin · · Score: 1
      ILM has an advantage in designing *new* machines

      If you mean new computers, no they don't design them anymore since about the 90s. They used to when there was not much in the way of graphics workstations, like the Pixar Image Computer in the 80s. They do sometimes do a little bit of designing but usually with a vendor.

      But their budget is so high that they can only be hired by big budget projects.

      You be surprised hoy many small projects ILM works on, and sometimes just in a handfull of shots.

      Small dramatic films like the upcoming Eros and Jarhead or films like Punch Drunk Love, 11'09''01 September 11, Gangs of New York, Celebrity, Magnolia and Pollock, low budget comedies liie Are We There Yet? and Stuck on You. There are even higher budget films where they have worked on a very limited basis, like just 1 shot for the Bourne Identity (split into 2 shots on editing).

      Meanwhile, cheaper (Linux, etc) effects houses can spring up,

      Small houses have other constraints and many are actually PC/Windows based. Besides ILM uses Linux both in the renderfarm and as workstations.

      Again, the bottleneck is brains: if ILM supports the vision of a visionary film, it has an advantage. If ILM's execs apply it to the deadend of mere "special effects extravaganzas", it will be as relevant as fireworks exhibitions.

      VFX houses are like contractors, they have to do what is requested on them. ILM nor anyone else is responsible for the scripts. And since it's a very competitive business they have to work on whatever they can get. Blame the studios that approve those films, not the ILM management who have nothing to do about it.

    3. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Your stories are interesting. How did they make Criuse look tall(ish) in _Officer and a Gentleman_? Is that why they cast Deborah (the Fairy) Winger opposite him?

      I think we just agree. Not doing those important CG effects was a bad decision by the movie director, not second-guessed by the movie producer, possibly made by the director of photography, and possibly a mistake by the CG staff that no one noticed - though they should have. ILM (like their 1st-tier peers) doesn't make those kinds of mistakes, because their execs have vision, hiring the best teams on the planet. They have an advantage over the kind of low-budget Linux-based teams we're discussing in this thread, because of their total competence, not because of the programming innovations. In other words, it's the mechanics, not their tools, which give the advantage. The tools just get everyone onto the same shop - where cheap tools can win in the hands of the better mechanics.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by Bootle · · Score: 0
      I thought Richard Gere was in An Officer and a Gentleman... I also don't think tom cruise had the clout to demand "height adjustments" until at or around the time of Top Gun.

      Apparently he is too short to qualify as a navy pilot and that he sat on phone books for all his cockpit scenes in top gun. I think that might be an exaggeration, though.

    5. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      By "machines" I mean their whole tech apparatus: the computers (now COTS), the networks, the apps - everything but the people and their workflow.

      I'd blame the ILM execs if they committed the company to a bizmodel where they can do only expensive VFX which the studios prioritize, to "get their money's worth", and upstage the rest of the movie. As you point out, ILM is diverse enough to also compete with the small shops. But if ILM could only be asked to do extravaganzas, then I'd blame their execs for doing only extravaganzas. Which I expect to become a stagnant sector, as small shops can afford to do the nonextravagant FX that merely support a movie.

      The question I addressed was "is ILM relevant now that Linux helps small shops do what ILM did in the past with big budgets?" I say "yes", because their leadership comes from exploiting tech to do a job, which is management (including hiring talented workers). You point out that ILM is even better, more flexible, in using their tech, than I described. So the hypothetical scenario I referenced is not coming true, and ILM continues to lead - as I'd expect. They didn't just get the tech from aliens; they made it because their founders had insight, vision, and tenacity to perpetuate that corporate culture for decades.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by malducin · · Score: 1

      By "machines" I mean their whole tech apparatus

      OK, just wanted to clarify lest someone else get confused.

      But if ILM could only be asked to do extravaganzas, then I'd blame their execs for doing only extravaganzas.

      That's they thing, they have never been asked to do only extravaganzas, neither by film studios or their own management. Although big budget VFX is their bread and butter (and in the very beginning that was the only place to get work, but Out of Africa and Mishima changed that). But for most projects they have to submit bids. Some of the other cases is when there is a relationship between the director and studio, say Spielberg and Muren, of Robert Zemeckis with Ken Ralston at Imageworks.

      I say "yes",

      Yeah I guess we agree, just wanted to exapnd on a few of your points.

    7. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're right. I'm always confusing those two - maybe because they're each cast for the same identical charming smile, rather than their midget talent.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Again, Dangerous Visions by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Actually, the jet pack chase scene was NOT filmed on a soundstage. It was an actual location. However, they needed to attach rigging to the buildings to support the lights and the flying rigs. So, when it became clear that rigging was visible in the puddles, ILM removed it in post, since they were already going to be doing a number of VFX in that sequence (flames coming from the jet packs, wire removals, etc.).

      As an aside, the production had to get some sort of special permit for all the rigging they built, since evidently it extended a good ways above the buildings, and was the tallest construction in that area. Read American Cinematographer's issue on Minority Report's cinematography for more details.

  33. if it was all linux, why use samba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so it says the images were made available via samba. Sounds like the rest of the process is windows?

    1. Re:if it was all linux, why use samba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not with SMB client, NFS works on linux just fine until you need concurrent access (that is: file locking sucks).

  34. DDR by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't know I could get DDR for linux. Is there a USB Dance Pad I can get? Oh, wait, this must be some othe kind of DDR.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:DDR by goten · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can get a decent clone. http://www.stepmania.com/stepmania/

    2. Re:DDR by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Yes, in this case it would be a Digital Disk Recorder (as opposed to Video Tape Recorder).

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  35. *sigh* by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just want to point out that during my tenure at a certain Linux company, the name of which rhymes with "VA Linux".... OK it was VA Linux, back in the heady days of year 2000 I was telling certain key members of upper management there that if VA is going to sell high proced Linux boxen then they ought to consider building and selling boxen specifically for FILM PRODUCTION. I repeated myself more than once. I was told by certain key players in upper management who no longer work there that "We're not interested in going after niche markets."

    VA no longer sells heavy Linux boxes but obviously someone is, and they're selling them to Hollywood.

    *sigh*

    1. Re:*sigh* by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they ignored you because you used non-words like "boxen." The whole "no niche markets" thing was just their way of being polite.

    2. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, c'mon Kurt, you're making it all up. All you used to do before we canned your ass is look at porn all day, even using our server to host your profile for adultfriendfinder. Damn swingers.

    3. Re:*sigh* by bernz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      hey kurt. long time no whatever....


      anyhow, yes. There were companies who competed with VA after I left (angstrom microsystems), that i helped start (angstrom microsystems) that i eventually left (angstrom microsystem). They made rackmounts (and still do i think) specifically for rendering and we put them all over the place (rhythm and hues, pixar, dreamworks).


      but it is a niche market and competitive as hell.

    4. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah its a company call BOXX technology.

    5. Re:*sigh* by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it is an extremely competitive niche market, but you're right about there being some serious money in it (otherwise it wouldn't be so competitive).

      The particular Linux boxen mentioned here aren't a render farm, but rather a video server (think of it as a very expensive Tivo).

      This particular box has a list price of $25k, and seems to be a strong competitor for other digital video tape recorder replacements, such as the Grass Valley M-Series (which IIRC starts at about $30k), and various other offerings from Sony, Leich, Pinnacle, etc. This is actually the bottom end of this market, which tops out with the Grass Valley Profile, at $75k+, depending on features.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  36. Trailer direct links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trailer 1 (large, 14.5MB) and trailer 2 (large. 20MB)

  37. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    First off, it's "80's", not "80s".

    AP says otherwise.

    Secondly, the first sentence in your fourth paragraph is wrong; it's a run-on sentence.

    Commas can be used to join a series of independent clauses. It's not something you see very often, but it's not wrong.

    I suppose your post would've been much funnier if you weren't being so hypocritical.

    I wonder if you know what "hypocritical" means?

  38. Movies quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now if all those effects could turn his movies into something viewable that would be great. Besides El mariachi, his crap stinks... and bad... i mean i couln't even make myself watch once upon a time in mexico...

  39. Re:Are ILM [relevant] today ? by bman08 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "cluster", "renderfarm"; whatever it is, I'm sure they let students render film projects on it... I mean if nobody's signed up to check their hotmail account or type a book report.

  40. Sigh. by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know you guys have to frame everything in terms of "LINUX WINS!" but you know what? It's not a race. Nobody was sitting around a table going, "I wanna be the first to make a feature with 4:4:4 dual-link RGB!" In fact, just the opposite: Everybody was sitting around going, "Let somebody else try 4:4:4 HD video. I don't want to take a chance on it with millions of dollars of somebody else's money."

    Besides that, this whole thing is completely wrong. We've been using 4:4:4 for years in film production with a device called a "datacine." Go out and shoot 35mm film, which by the way has more color sensitivity than any video camera on the market, then run it through a device that scans each frame at high bit depth and high resolution in (you guessed it) 4:4:4 RGB.

    Seriously, these machines have been around for more than a decade. RGB production is nothing new. You guys are making it sound like it's revolutionary, or worse, like it COULDN'T BE DONE WITHOUT LINUX. Inferno has done 4:4:4 since the mid-90s, and that runs on SGI gear.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

      I won't be the first time that a story has appeared here that made a false claim. Do you think the stories are researched first and verified?

      --
      http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  41. Wikipedia to the rescue! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    See: chroma subsampling. It's even got diagrams. Though it could use a bit of cleanup.

    Wikipedia to the rescue again!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  42. Green Screen by sideshow · · Score: 1

    Yeah yeah yeah, Windows sux0rs and all, but nowadays the screen is lime green and is common known to the industry as "green screen".

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Green Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm blue is still pretty common for non people shots.

  43. What? No. You're wrong. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    It's not possible for you to view 4:4:4 video at home, and will be at least a decade before that might change.

    What? No. You're wrong. Many formats use color subsampling, true, but many still formats don't. JPEG defaults to 4:2:2 subsampling in all of the implementations I've seen, but I think it supports 4:4:4. And lossless formats, like PNG or TGA or (shudder) TIFF, clearly support full color inclusion.

    A thought experiment: render some CGI scene, or do time-lapse photography with a still digital camera in RAW mode, and turn it into an uncompressed AVI. Hey, you're watching 4:4:4 video!

    Now, 4:4:4 video production may be a ways off. But it's certainly possible to view the resulting video, though I don't know how many popular codecs support it.

    And there is a difference, at least when you're picking out stills and doing CMYK separations on them. Look how blocky and crapulent the yellow channel looks when you separate out an MPEG still or a JPEG image, and how sharp the black channel looks. A significant part of that is subsampling at work.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:What? No. You're wrong. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "It's unlikely you would be able to see any difference between a 4:2:2 video, and a 4:4:4 video."

      And there is a difference, at least when you're picking out stills and doing CMYK separations on them. Look how blocky and crapulent the yellow channel looks when you separate out an MPEG still or a JPEG image, and how sharp the black channel looks.


      The real question is "Is size a consideration?". If it is not, do an uncompressed 4:4:4 AVI. I believe it will take around 100GB/hr in SDTV, and something like 600GB/hr in full HDTV. Don't quote me on those, but something like that. You can do lossless compression, but it will still be *huge* videos.

      Now, if we assume that it is, the real question is, are the bits better put to use compressing the vid, or improving the color depth? Personally, I'd rather take two separate 4:2:2 pixels than two 4:4:4 pixels mixed up to save space (a gross oversimplification, but you get the idea).

      Depending on what we want, it might be more effective to increase resolution, decrease compression or increase the frame rate than it is to improve the color clarity.

      Resolution: SDTV is enough if you are more than 10x the screen size away. HDTV is enoug hif you are more than 3x the screen size away. In front of my PC, or if I could get a video wall, I'd be maybe 1x away. You'd need a super-HDTV that is to HDTV that which HDTV is to SDTV.

      Compression: Difficult to say. Trained eyes can spot artifacts (blocking, shearing etc.) in almost any vid. Lossless vids would mean much bigger vids.

      Framerate: We can easily move to 60p. That should put us near the "flicker rate" of the eye at 72Hz, perhaps even 90p for perfection.

      So yes... the colors aren't perfect. But nothing else is either.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:What? No. You're wrong. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Now, 4:4:4 video production may be a ways off. But it's certainly possible to view the resulting video, though I don't know how many popular codecs support it.

      You simply misunderstood my point. Sure, there are formats that support 4:4:4, but consumer equipment doesn't support 4:4:4, and surely won't for many years.

      On a PC, you can do anything, but you aren't going to be able to go out and by a 4:4:4 version of a movie any time soon.

      DVDs are limited to 4:2:2. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray are going to be limited to 4:2:2 as well. HDTVs are limited to 4:2:2, and HDTVs surely aren't going to be replaced by units capable of displaying 4:4:4 in the next several years.

      Incidentally, film would be considered a 4:4:4 standard as well, but you aren't going to be able to go buy the film reels of movies for home viewing either.

      And there is a difference, at least when you're picking out stills and doing CMYK separations on them.

      When you are watching a video, you aren't watching the yellow channel alone, so this issues is irrelivant. As I've said, it's very unlikely anyone would be able to see the difference. Sure, it will help the producers, editors, etc., but won't make any difference for home viewers.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  44. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by nunchux · · Score: 0, Troll

    Jeez, can't a person speak his mind, even if he has bad grammer and not be persecuted... It's "Jesus", or "Gee Whiz", not Jeez. Jeez isn't a word.

  45. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First off, it's "80's", not "80s".

    No it's not you dumbass.

  46. Damn right. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I remember jms mentioning that he's an awful speller and can't do math. (Some usenet post un the Lurker's Guide.) Normally, I'd read that as "my brain is useless", but I already was so impressed by the man's work that I realized---if the man can write and direct a story like that, who cares if he can multiply in his head?

    I was a twit. But I think I've become less of a twit now. Thank you, jms!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  47. DDR by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

    We all know that DDR still stands for Deutsche Demokratische Republik.

  48. filesystems by noahm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's interesting that the article mentions the use of the JFS filesystem:

    During ingestion, the RaveHD wrote sequential DPX files for each shot to a standard Linux JFS filesystem on a fiber-channel disk array, Howard says. When all required shots had been ingested, the entire JFS filesystem was made available via Samba and gigabit Ethernet to the studio's production workers.

    JFS isn't one of the high profile filesystems on Linux; People usually talk about Reiser, EXT3, or XFS. I wonder what lead the developers to choose JFS.

    noah

    1. Re:filesystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We went w/ JFS as we found it to be fairly transparent from the raw disk I/O. Previously, we were using XFS - but JFS beat it out w/ these datarates.

      Jason

    2. Re:filesystems by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      On the SpectSoft page for the RaveHD, they say they are using XFS. Maybe they just pick a filesystem at random for every unit ...

  49. Ironic by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

    Kind of ironic that the first movie to use accurate color capturing digital camera is going to be basically all in black and white, with most things done in CG anyway.

  50. Re:look at me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for great justice!

    alfdjasl;'dfjasldfjas;lfdjas;kldjfnjqwoperqwoeyuqo [vu90a-eg78uqo[eeru8q23o34riuyq3ortibn3q9w etrpnq33w0etryu8hj3qqwo[hjq34[tihjq344t[oiq33yuo'p ij2q4h[9po2uj4rt[oq32884yh4t[oq2448yth9q3o4htij[qo ij9pqww8ujo'qwehurt[0qo2ih33r98nri9[q3y8hrj[0oq398 4yrtuh[0oq34g48r913n45r9pq3ner-9123jn4[9 qe8hntr[9-q348tja[woegnqp[o344rjnq-9320[n5841q-93[ 084htjroqi[345yhq3oi4uhrnq3i4rhbq3i4onrq3[h5rq923o irjn5oq344ihjoq;3i44jto234i5jtoi23j5o;q234ih[0oi23 hjo[w34ih5923oi4hrqo354uq3askljdfalsjdfoa0weur0o[q 3wuroWIJJEROAWIJOAWIUFF09QUWER0O[QWUERO[IJOIjojoIJ OJAOIJAOIJAOIJOIjaonsfoweiafn9ae8rfguqeo[rtiu89rtq e9ropifhq9ertp8hq3;o4hrtqe;oewrtihqe[09rt8yuqaerth jaeo[rirgntaow[ernoa[[wethra9weuyrowerh90q2fnq3p9f qeefqe[erfhq3weq\werq23\erhjeowrtiuo3[04tuaeorihjo ernttoeithroenifoaeinrfo aewhroiaueboaihf;aejkfl;aewjfaoeewiuqaweiojjaojfga opifjapofijheawoprhjaowefijaofijapoeifhujqaeipuubn iopaertyqa9 we8tu9o3wuhroip23q48y47o3qhfueru vnpiouaerhbvoe8hrgoaehbrgoaebrhf eb[ofidjoiajdfoqenwirpoiqihewfo;aidhfopawiher;koqu wegrkl;qWJBERIBAIUZHXCVL;ZXKNCVOLZXCVLZHXLVKNMZCV/ ,.NZXCV,.MNZXCV.,MZNXCV.,ZNMXCV.,ZMMNCVJHV;LSHJKDF ;ISJDOAUF AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGCTTTTTCCTASD;FJKASDL;KJASELEKJ NASLEDFJKASLDFNKASLKDFNASOIDIFJAWWOEIFJASLDFJL;Kja ;ldfjas;lkdfkjaskdn qawoeifhqaweoruiyhpqeiohjgro[qiwehbo[aibnvo[awufow eiahefoqweihrg9o[ pqwe8uyrt0-[ 9387540[oipqejert[0o3hj4toiqewjt[oqerihutopq[3hjir qo[3weiitnqe[owrthjqep[ortyu8q[oerhjoerrirgje;aokn epqorijhgqeop[wturuq30[9turo[qeiirgjh[oeruihteoigh jrw[4890eut0o[q[eihg iopqiunef[90eqh8f-aewf8apfouiaher9-w8ugv op[sfd8uvoae8ufao;eifhjo;eqirnfq9epbn

  51. Oh dear god so relieved. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Oh, thank you. I've been worrying that, despite the trailers and the awesome cast and pretty much the best team you could ask for working on it, this would be terrible on the level of "LXG". Anyone remember that? What fabulous source material. What an awful movie made from it.

    Alan Moore must be kicking himself after that one, saying "Never again, you American fuckers!". No, wait, he's probably rolling in a large pile of money, and more power to him for it. If it means he's fed and clothed and able to write more comics, it doesn't matter how many movies butcher his work.

    I suppose they'll fuck up "V for Vendetta" (ten to one gets you they show V's face) or "Watchmen" next. And yet, hope springs eternal from this. Perhaps they can get Johnny Depp to play Wallace in "Hell and Back" if this does well. Perhaps.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Oh dear god so relieved. by black+mariah · · Score: 1
      Alan Moore must be kicking himself after that one, saying "Never again, you American fuckers!".
      Moore has said on more than one occasion that he really doesn't give a shit what anyone does with his works. He typically ends up giving away all the proceeds from the films anyway.
      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
  52. Don't forget to mention the effects were done at.. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...The Orphanage who are a...dare I say it...Windows house.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  53. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "with the rise of even schools having massive renderfarms (like the g5 one) and companies like Pixar creating fun films, are ILM even worth a column in todays market ?"

    That's sort of like saying a progammer can get twice as much done if he has twice as fast of computer. Think about it.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  54. Ignore the movie watch the extras.... by Nik+Picker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For Spy Kids three that is !

    There is a extra on the dvd for the film where RR ( heavens forbid i even attempt to spell his name ! ) explains how to create some impressive visual and audio affects for your own home movies ( the family friendly ones people ! ) . He gives a very clear and engaging discussion with example film of how to include visual affects , editing and audio additions to make the films more interesting. Id say he understands how open source benefits every on e since he is so willing to share his expertise and experiences.

    As for Sin City ... well as others have commented few Graphic Novels progress well to film but that does not preclude the opportunity that it can occur !

    --
    And thats why Firecrackers and kittens don't mix.
    1. Re:Ignore the movie watch the extras.... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I read some things about how much he made Spy Kids for, and it sounded like small beans.

      Apparantly, he does a heck of a lot of the production work himself, and he's a proper "guerilla filmmaker". He does stuff, it seems, as cheap as he can.

  55. Title's a little misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Rodriguez uses Linux to Edge out ILM"

    Should probably read:

    "Rodriguez beats ILM to use RaveHD DDR on a commercial film release"

    If you read the article, you'll see that ILM are using the same kit, so edging out has nothing to do with it - he's just completed the first film that uses one. That said, ILM did used to be first with everything new and shiny in film, so maybe it is a bit of a shock.

    Anyhows Sin City looks mainly black and white, so what's with the 4:4:4 format?

  56. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by cloak42 · · Score: 1

    His post was hypocritical because he was criticizing for things that he was, himself, at fault for.

    And I would argue that using commas to join independent clauses IS incorrect, as this is exactly what colons and semicolons are for.

    I stand corrected on the 80's/80s thing; I had improperly remembered the AP style guide as saying that they do require apostrophes.

  57. Re:Are ILM [relevant] today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again, read the damn web page if you want to know what projects they actually allow. From their allocation request form:

    System X is operated under allocation and cost-recovery policies set by the university. The Allocation Committee is authorized to award a portion of time on System X, at no charge, to projects of sufficient scientific merit and potential impact. However, this "free" time is limited and has already been paid for by various university stakeholders. Priority for the remaining time on the system will be given to projects that are able to pay, e.g., from sponsored research projects. If a sponsored research project or other university fund will be billed for the proposed System X allocation, please indicate the relevant information in your research description and whether or not you are requesting additional hours beyond your current available funding, i.e., you have X amount of funding but are requesting an additional Y hours.
  58. float, float, float RGB by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are animation systems (including Softimage 3D) which support three floats per pixel. This allows huge dynamic range, so you can have full sunlight and shadow in the same frame. The dynamic range is then flattened, logarithmically (like film) for output.

    Graphics cards will probably start doing this soon. It's a way out of the "shades of black" problem in games.

    1. Re:float, float, float RGB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphic cards have supported floating point color since the DirectX 9 era. In fact, that was supposed to be one of the major selling points of the Radeon 9700/GeForce FX generation, besides all the fancy shader work, and one of the key new features in the Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 engines.

  59. Offtopic, sue me. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I for one will welcome my new penguin overlords when Lightwave is ported to linux. Then maybe we'll see 'First independent American-made anime, created entirely under linux.' on the front page here ;P

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  60. Color Space by mhollis · · Score: 1

    I do have a problem with the article in that it assumes that the color space between RGB and Y'CbCr formats are the same. I regularly use an editor that can work in both color spaces but if I work on a scene using tools based on RGB color space, I need to apply an effect over the rest of that shot (or scene) that limits the Y'CbCr to RGB color space.

    The difference is subtle but noticeable, especially in film (or "digital film").

    Additionally, the tools Rodriguez will use to edit his footage will run on Microsoft Windows or on Apple's OS X. Storage is great, folks but editors don't use Linux (yet).

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:Color Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... smoke for Linux from discreet?

    2. Re:Color Space by mhollis · · Score: 1

      Um ... available for standard definition (television) only.

      I think it's admirable that AutoDesk is supporting Linux at all but I would hesitate to edit a film on standard definition if I could not up-rez to high definition on the same tool. AutoDesk would have you do a standard definition (perhaps letterboxed) "rough-cut" and then buy an SGI for full resolution. SGIs run Irix, which is a great operating system but hardly a derivation of Linux.

      I do not usually reply to "anonymous" people here on Slashdot but I don't want anyone who might be reading this in the industry I work in to be fooled.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  61. AJA drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad the source code for AJA kona2 drivers had not been published on the web...

  62. Marv should be the star by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    What you quoted mentions that no one character is the star, but the first sin city Marv was the central character and it was a great story. I was a comic nut back then and collected all the dark horse presents issues to get the complete sin city story and enjoyed every page of it, and later repurchased it in the reprinted graphic novel. Whereas the followup sin city stories didn't grab me nearly as much as the first.

    So even though the trailer looks amazing and I am really excited to see it, I'm kinda disappointed that it is going to encompass the first 3 sin city books. Esp with the great ending of the first sin city, I'm curious as to how they will blend that in with the other stories.

    And your comment of how pulp was the freshest original thing since ever, well I had that same feeling but it was for reservoir dogs. Even though I did enjoy pulp immensely, it's reservoir dogs that blew me away and I'm glad I caught that in the theatre and I remember at that time going on about the movie to anyone who'd listen.

    Funny how the explosion with tarintino with pulp happened in america, whereas the same media frenzy already occurred for tarintino with reservoir dogs in the UK.

    Btw, I'm not from UK, I'm from Canada.

    1. Re:Marv should be the star by andresin · · Score: 1

      Mixing the first books in one moovie makes sence for me. I'm not sure about the third one, buy "Sin City" and "A Dame To Kill For" are simultaneous.
      Do you remember when Marv and (I can't remembre the name of the guy in "A Dame...")meet each other several time in "A Dame..."?

  63. works in progress by westlake · · Score: 1
    yes, because ILM was much more than just a render farm. Teams of talented artists, model makers and engineers have kept them relevent

    This looks to be a good survey of visual F/X oriented films currently in production or pre-production: Upcoming Effects Films
    "Jarhead" is based on a sniper's experience in the Gulf War, and a change of pace for ILM.

  64. this is stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasnt Episode 3 filmed/shot about 2 years ago?
    Sin City wasnt shot that long ago, because it had a shorter post-production schedule. Episode 3's post-production schedule was like 18 months.

    So.. Lucasfilm/ILM completed their 4:4:4 shoot first (using similar dual-link hardware) before Rodriguez even got started.

    Robert Rodriguez thinks he's such hot shit, but I really could not give a fuck. I get pretty tired of all of these crappy indie directors and kids with a cracked copy of maya thinking they're the next george lucas. Hardware/Number of CPUs in the Renderfarm is the last concern on the minds of people in large studios. You hope you have enough, but otherwise it's all about coming up with interesting visuals. That takes alot of skilled artists and programmers.

    The fact that most of us use linux doesnt matter at all! Maya is LESS stable on linux, Linux has many user-friendliness issues, but we use it because it's a cheap relatively stable unix on powerful commodity hardware.

    Robert Rodriguez didnt beat anyone to anything.
    And the movie is in F'in B&W anyway! Agh.

  65. I like a person that by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    feels so secure about themselves that they don't hesitate to share(see link in TFA) their "secrets" for fear that somebody might "steal" their job. It says a whole lot. Oh, and that Director's guild...nice bunch, eh?

    Y'CbCr, also known as YUV, is the color space used by film editing equipment. Y represents luminance, while Cb and Cr are color difference signals.

    Wouldn't be more accurate to say that Y is luminance w/ green, and that Cb and Cr are "chroma blue" and "chroma red"? Or is that just stupid? And I thought the real holy grail was 6:6:6:6 Think we'll ever see that?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:I like a person that by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. See the following for a good treatment of YUV
      http://softpixel.com/~cwright/programming/col orspa ce/yuv/

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:I like a person that by MrTwixter · · Score: 1

      Hi Y is luminance, Cr is the red minus luminance, Cb is blue minus luminance. Without going into a lot of unnecessary and confusing detail, YUV, and YIQ are roughly the same thing as YCrCb and the n1:n2:n3 nomenclature refers to the horizontal sample rate of the digital encoding system where n1 is the Y channel, n2 is the U channel and n3 is the V channel, assuming YUV is being sampled and all three of the n's are referenced as multpules of the subcarrier frequency. So, 4:2:2 means that Y is sampled at four times the subcarrier frequency, and both U and V are sampled at twice the subcarrier frequency. Now it happens that 4 times the subcarrier equals one sample for every horizontal output pixel, while 2 times subcarrier means one sample for every two pixels output. So, in that case, the luminance is sampled at each pixel and the color difference channels are sampled at every other horizontal pixel. The sample resolution, or color depth, whatever you want to call it is exactly the same in 4:2:2 and 4:4:4. The difference is spacial sampling, not bit depth. As for whether or not we will ever see 6:6:6:6 (that last number is the sample rate for the alpha channel), I would have to say that there is currently no need real need for subpixel sampling so we are probably not going to see it anytime soon. Oh, and one last thing. 4:4:4 is YUV or YIQ or YCrCb, but it is definitely not RGB! RGB is a different color space and changing sample rates is not the same thing as color space conversion.

  66. Re:look at me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... I did a search for this on Google and couldn't find anything. WTF are you saying?

    Translated this reads:

    qawoeifhqaweoruiyhpqeiohjgro[qiwehbo[aibnvo[awuf ow eiahefoqweihrg9o[ pqwe8uyrt0-[ 9387540[oipqejert[0o3hj4toiqewjt[oqerihutopq[3hjir qo[3weiitnqe[owrthjqep[ortyu8q[oerhjoerrirgje;aokn epqorijhgqeop[wturuq30[9turo[qeiirgjh[oeruihteoigh jrw[4890eut0o[q[eihg iopqiunef[90eqh8f-aewf8apfouiaher9-w8ugv op[sfd8uvoae8ufao;eifhjo;eqirnfq9epbn

    Chuck

  67. Explain... by bayankaran · · Score: 2, Funny

    "legendary independent filmmaker"

    He is a filmmaker - but how is he legendary and how is he independent?

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Explain... by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Legendary for squeezing the most out of a tight budget (El Mariachi
      probably cost less than the Columbia Lady intro animation ;).
      Independent for doing the editing by himself.

    2. Re:Explain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independent also for running his own film studio: Troublemaker Studios, and often securing his own funding for projects rather than caving to Hollywood studios.

    3. Re:Explain... by bayankaran · · Score: 1

      His first film was a true independent film. The subsequent ones had no independent nature whatsover.

      Doing your own editing does not make you independent.

      IMHO the best example of a true US independent filmmaker is Jim Jarmusch.

      And the whole "independent label" is a misnomer.

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
  68. Totally OT, but what the hey... by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

    F*ck the DG. F*ck them right up their bureacratic asses. INDIE 4 EVER!!!

    --

    I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

  69. Not the first use by shikari666 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While the subject is interesting, the claim about "first movie ever to use a digital format supporting full-bandwidth RGB" isn't quite correct.

    The Viper Filmstream camera has been used on at least two features prior to this and also uses Dual Link output to a RAID.

    http://www.thomson.net/EN/Home/Press/PressReleases /CorporatePress/PREN040209.htm

    Just setting the facts straight.

  70. Re:Are ILM [relevant] today ? by bman08 · · Score: 1

    yeah, i was kidding, thanks for the update.

  71. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in a persistent vegetative state, you insensitive clod! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrr! !!!! eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!

  72. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took me 20 seconds to type that with no checking whatsoever. But for the OP, I have the image of a fat kid with his face all scrunched up, breathing hard, sticking his tongue out and typing with one finger.

  73. ILM *NOT* edged out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the article says:
    * ILM does have these DDR's,
    * RR's DDR's benefitted from ILM's experience with them (i.e., ILM had them first, it would seem), and
    * Episode III was shot 4:4:4 before RR shot 4:4:4.

    The only way that Rodriguez "edges out" ILM is that his movie comes out before Episode III.

  74. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by aichpvee · · Score: 1

    Brave words for an AC who probably makes minimum wage flipping burgers. If it's so easy to do that shit, why is it that we haven't seen Anonymous Coward Studios taking over the industry? I mean, if you can do the same shit as ILM does in a couple of hours (where those slow bastards take MONTHS) you've got to be the hottest shit since toasted subs.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  75. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither is "grammer". And that dirty, granola-eating hippy "jesus" can go get bent.

  76. Somebody Forgot.. by MikokiksU · · Score: 0

    to post the torrent link.. so where is it?

    --
    Fear is the path to the dark side.
    Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate.
    Hate, leads to suffering.
  77. It's still YUV though. by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    Both CRTs and flat screen technology use RGB at their core. Light recording equipment (cameras) typically also use RGB. So the signal is still being converted from RGB to YUV and back again.

    YUV/Y Cr Cb is a hack. Originally defined as Y Crb it was a way of fitting colour on to a signal and retain compatibility with monochrome equiment. Because of the available bandwidth on the signal the colour differences had to have a lower resolution which was fine because there are less colour receptors in the eyes than brightness receptors.

    A phase difference between the two colour signals allows the two signals to be differentiated. Unfortunately atmospheric disturbance make them drift which is why NTSC got the reception it has about colour. PAL solved it by alternating the phase between colour lines and hence a systematic difference is cancelled out.

    S-Video and eventually 'component' video reduce bandwidth issues and eliminate cross-talk between the luminance and chrominance signals by have them on separate lines. But they are still the YUV hack.

  78. Re:Don't forget to mention the effects were done a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    umm they where done at 3 houses. The orphanage, Hybrid, and Cafe FX. Each had 1/3 of the movie

  79. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to add to that. He could do video res on his home computer. Thats about 1/8 the size that a movie uses. A movie frame(plate) is anywhere from 8 to 18 MB PER FRAME.

  80. Comicon by eddy · · Score: 1

    >The footage, shot in early 2004, featured Josh Hartnett and Marley Shelton acting out the "Sin City" short-story "The Customer is Always Right"

    It is said that you can actually watch three minutes of that footage here:

    This are NOT the Sin City trailer from Apple and various other pages, its a trailer that got shown at Comiccon last year, and got pulled from all webpages VERY fast after. Its 3 min of "The Customer is always Right", the short movie Rodriguez made to convince Miller to let him make the movie, and then 3 min more of various clips.

    Enjoy.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  81. ILM would have used Linux for this... by sharkey · · Score: 1

    but it kept core-dumping the renderer when ever Jar-Jar showed up.

    Linux: The OS with taste.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  82. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Score:-1, Troll)

    I'll use that as notice never to post while logged in during the weekends. What a bunch of buffoons! Go away! Would ya? You're harshin' my high, man!

  83. ...and for Once Upon a Time ... by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    He gives cooking tips in the extras on Once Upon a Time in Mexico. (and a bit more about making movies and such).

    He had a really good tip -- learn to cook your favorite food. Get really good at cooking it, then learn to cook your next favorite, etc.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  84. Re:Are ILM relavent today ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's sort of like saying a progammer can get twice as much done if he has twice as fast of computer. Think about it.

    Which was exactly the situation back in the 60s/70s, writitng your programs on punchcards, then waiting ~2-3 weeks to get access to a computer, only to find out you had a syntax error.

  85. Re:Don't forget to mention the effects were done a by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Cafe are a Windows house. I don't know anything about Hybrid however.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  86. To who? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    To who does Alan Moore give away his mad American cheese? I can believe the first part, but I have a hard time believing that anyone would give away the proceeds from having their beloved artworks molested in such a fashion.

    I think the thing that bugs me about stories with real potential ("I, Robot", for instance) being butchered is that they preclude the making of a better film from the same source material for at least a decade. Supposedly there's a Harlan Ellison script for it floating around out there, but we'll never see it because some turd in a suit got the bright idea to graft a thin sheen of Asimov onto a previously unrelated script.

    And that, really, is why I'm so pleased to hear good things about Sin City. Because if it turns out terribly, we're going to get the same old "comics are crap---just look at that 'LXG' movie!" argument, and what can one say to that?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  87. Which wasn't really a competition since... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ILM also uses *nix for all of their capturing... it was a win win for *nix. I'm still not sure exactly why most slashdotters would be interested in most of the digital cinema developments. But hey it had the word linux in it so it must be relevant to their needs.

  88. Great... by chochos · · Score: 1

    now Linux will be associated with crappy movies like desperado and from dusk till dawn...

  89. Re:look at me by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    for even greater justice!
    or great justice! alfdjasl;'dfjasldfjas;lfdjas;kldjfnjqwoperqwoeyuqo [vu90a-eg78uqo[eeru8q23o34riuyq3ortibn3q9w etrpnq33w0etryu8hj3qqwo[hjq34[tihjq344t[oiq33yuo'p ij2q4h[9po2uj4rt[oq32884yh4t[oq2448yth9q3o4htij[qo ij9pqww8ujo'qwehurt[0qo2ih33r98nri9[q3y8hrj[0oq398 4yrtuh[0oq34g48r913n45r9pq3ner-9123jn4[9 qe8hntr[9-q348tja[woegnqp[o344rjnq-9320[n5841q-93[ 084htjroqi[345yhq3oi4uhrnq3i4rhbq3i4onrq3[h5rq923o irjn5oq344ihjoq;3i44jto234i5jtoi23j5o;q234ih[0oi23 hjo[w34ih5923oi4hrqo354uq3askljdfalsjdfoa0weur0o[q 3wuroWIJJEROAWIJOAWIUFF09QUWER0O[QWUERO[IJOIjojoIJ OJAOIJAOIJAOIJOIjaonsfoweiafn9ae8rfguqeo[rtiu89rtq e9ropifhq9ertp8hq3;o4hrtqe;oewrtihqe[09rt8yuqaerth jaeo[rirgntaow[ernoa[[wethra9weuyrowerh90q2fnq3p9f qeefqe[erfhq3weq\werq23\erhjeowrtiuo3[04tuaeorihjo ernttoeithroenifoaeinrfo aewhroiaueboaihf;aejkfl;aewjfaoeewiuqaweiojjaojfga opifjapofijheawoprhjaowefijaofijapoeifhujqaeipuubn iopaertyqa9 we8tu9o3wuhroip23q48y47o3qhfueru vnpiouaerhbvoe8hrgoaehbrgoaebrhf eb[ofidjoiajdfoqenwirpoiqihewfo;aidhfopawiher;koqu wegrkl;qWJBERIBAIUZHXCVL;ZXKNCVOLZXCVLZHXLVKNMZCV/ ,.NZXCV,.MNZXCV.,MZNXCV.,ZNMXCV.,ZMMNCVJHV;LSHJKDF ;ISJDOAUF AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGCTTTTTCCTASD;FJKASDL;KJASELEKJ NASLEDFJKASLDFNKASLKDFNASOIDIFJAWWOEIFJASLDFJL;Kja ;ldfjas;lkdfkjaskdn qawoeifhqaweoruiyhpqeiohjgro[qiwehbo[aibnvo[awufow eiahefoqweihrg9o[ pqwe8uyrt0-[ 9387540[oipqejert[0o3hj4toiqewjt[oqerihutopq[3hjir qo[3weiitnqe[owrthjqep[ortyu8q[oerhjoerrirgje;aokn epqorijhgqeop[wturuq30[9turo[qeiirgjh[oeruihteoigh jrw[4890eut0o[q[eihg iopqiunef[90eqh8f-aewf8apfouiaher9-w8ugv op[sfd8uvoae8ufao;eifhjo;eqirnfq9epbn or great justice! alfdjasl;'dfjasldfjas;lfdjas;kldjfnjqwoperqwoeyuqo [vu90a-eg78uqo[eeru8q23o34riuyq3ortibn3q9w etrpnq33w0etryu8hj3qqwo[hjq34[tihjq344t[oiq33yuo'p ij2q4h[9po2uj4rt[oq32884yh4t[oq2448yth9q3o4htij[qo ij9pqww8ujo'qwehurt[0qo2ih33r98nri9[q3y8hrj[0oq398 4yrtuh[0oq34g48r913n45r9pq3ner-9123jn4[9 qe8hntr[9-q348tja[woegnqp[o344rjnq-9320[n5841q-93[ 084htjroqi[345yhq3oi4uhrnq3i4rhbq3i4onrq3[h5rq923o irjn5oq344ihjoq;3i44jto234i5jtoi23j5o;q234ih[0oi23 hjo[w34ih5923oi4hrqo354uq3askljdfalsjdfoa0weur0o[q 3wuroWIJJEROAWIJOAWIUFF09QUWER0O[QWUERO[IJOIjojoIJ OJAOIJAOIJAOIJOIjaonsfoweiafn9ae8rfguqeo[rtiu89rtq e9ropifhq9ertp8hq3;o4hrtqe;oewrtihqe[09rt8yuqaerth jaeo[rirgntaow[ernoa[[wethra9weuyrowerh90q2fnq3p9f qeefqe[erfhq3weq\werq23\erhjeowrtiuo3[04tuaeorihjo ernttoeithroenifoaeinrfo aewhroiaueboaihf;aejkfl;aewjfaoeewiuqaweiojjaojfga opifjapofijheawoprhjaowefijaofijapoeifhujqaeipuubn iopaertyqa9 we8tu9o3wuhroip23q48y47o3qhfueru vnpiouaerhbvoe8hrgoaehbrgoaebrhf eb[ofidjoiajdfoqenwirpoiqihewfo;aidhfopawiher;koqu wegrkl;qWJBERIBAIUZHXCVL;ZXKNCVOLZXCVLZHXLVKNMZCV/ ,.NZXCV,.MNZXCV.,MZNXCV.,ZNMXCV.,ZMMNCVJHV;LSHJKDF ;ISJDOAUF AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGCTTTTTCCTASD;FJKASDL;KJASELEKJ NASLEDFJKASLDFNKASLKDFNASOIDIFJAWWOEIFJASLDFJL;Kja ;ldfjas;lkdfkjaskdn qawoeifhqaweoruiyhpqeiohjgro[qiwehbo[aibnvo[awufow eiahefoqweihrg9o[ pqwe8uyrt0-[ 9387540[oipqejert[0o3hj4toiqewjt[oqerihutopq[3hjir qo[3weiitnqe[owrthjqep[ortyu8q[oerhjoerrirgje;aokn

  90. Re:look at me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must speak Schiavoese!