Slashdot Mirror


RFC On New Internet Routing Protocol

PoesRaven writes "An A. Farrel has put out a Request For Comments paper on a new routing protocol with profound implications for the internet, the usability of the TCP/IP protocol, and the security of the net's youngest users. From the RFC: "It has often been the case that morality has not been given proper consideration in the design and specification of protocols produced within the Routing Area. This has led to a decline in the moral values within the Internet and attempts to retrofit a suitable moral code to implemented and deployed protocols has been shown to be sub-optimal." Interesting, but seems to raise some serious privacy questions.

148 comments

  1. Hey! I read the article! by halivar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just kidding. April Fool's!

    1. Re:Hey! I read the article! by mirko · · Score: 1

      I didn't either but it kinda reminds me of this 3-time reoccurring "Evil bit" story from last year...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:Hey! I read the article! by mpe · · Score: 1

      Just kidding. April Fool's!

      Thing is that April Fool's Day traditionally ends at noon. This was posted at 13:38.

    3. Re:Hey! I read the article! by Dilbert_ · · Score: 1

      I did read it, but via a link from another site a few hours ago. I recommend skipping ahead a bit: the first part contains a lot of 'boring' boilerplate, it gets funnier after that.

      --
      superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
    4. Re:Hey! I read the article! by ergo98 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It was posted at 8:38am Slashdot time (i.e. where most of the Slashdot crew lives).

    5. Re:Hey! I read the article! by waterbear · · Score: 1

      Well I did actually look at the article. Funny/sad is what I'd call it ... but a rather obvious April fool joke for all that.

      The item that really made me laugh today was the one about the Gentoo experimental release built on the Microsoft NT Kernel, the only thing is, I think _they_ have me for an April fool, because they made it look so plausible except for the lack of released code .... :)

    6. Re:Hey! I read the article! by koreaman · · Score: 0

      Since when does April Fool's Day end at noon?
      BTW it's not even 7 AM here...

    7. Re:Hey! I read the article! by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 2, Funny
      Since when does April Fool's Day end at noon?

      April Fools, fool!</Mr.T Voice>

    8. Re:Hey! I read the article! by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      Its always been that way AFAIK. Not that anyone cares. And what with the internet I guess the only time you can hope to stop getting april fools jokes is several days later...

    9. Re:Hey! I read the article! by leerpm · · Score: 1

      I know this particular RFC is meant as a joke. But if this man succeeds in gaining more control over the internet, I would not be surprised to see something along these lines in the future.

    10. Re:Hey! I read the article! by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      The scary part is that in this day and age it's believable that someone would seriously propose this, at least from what I read in the summary.

    11. Re:Hey! I read the article! by lgw · · Score: 1
      Even the boilerplate is good IMO:
      1.1. Conventions Used in This Document

      The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
      "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
      document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

      The key words "SHALT", "SHALT NOT", "SMITE", and "PILLAR OF SALT" in
      this document are to be interpreted as expected.
      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Hey! I read the article! by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      My favorite line:

      "Such a thought is, of course, unthinkable"

    13. Re:Hey! I read the article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice joke... here's another either really funny, or really scary one...

    14. Re:Hey! I read the article! by computational+super · · Score: 1

      Evil bit?

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  2. April fools by jimbo3123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The april fools stories are just getting worse and worse.

    --
    There should be a moderation category "Dumbest Comment EVER"
    1. Re:April fools by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      oh, this is just the start of it. CmdrTaco hasnt yet begun with the duplicate, triplicate, and quadruplicate posting. Just remember the best thing to do is to keep those memories repressed when the day ends. That includes the evil bit fiasco of 2003.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:April fools by Proaxiom · · Score: 4, Informative
      Can't blame the editors for this one. It's one of the annual April Fools RFC, like RFC 1149 - A Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams on Avian Carriers, RFC 2324 Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol, and RFC 2795 - The Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite.

      Slashdot would be remiss if they didn't put up the link.

      I suspect RFC 4042 will make a cameo on the Slashdot homepage today as well.

    3. Re:April fools by lilo_booter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The april fools stories are just getting worse and worse.

      Actually, if you read the article, you might find this one quite funny... has some great quotes in it, like:

      The key words "SHALT", "SHALT NOT", "SMITE", and "PILLAR OF SALT" in this document are to be interpreted as expected.

      and:

      If the Morality Considerations section is present, it MUST contain at least the following subsections. The content of these subsections is surely self-evident to any right-thinking person. Further guidance can be obtained from your moral guardian, your household gods, or from any member of the IMM (Internet Moral Majority).

      Oh well, mebbe I'm easily amused...

    4. Re:April fools by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      I suspect RFC 4042 will make a cameo on the Slashdot homepage today as well.

      I very much doubt it. The chances of any Slashdotter appreciating the humour in that one is practically nil. Mainly because the amount of humour is also practically nil.

      They spend a whole paper talking about a new Unicode format they've come up with that gives a more efficient representation on architectures with 9bit bytes (yes, they exist - see the PDP11).

      And I guess that's the whole joke 'cos there sure as fuck ain't anything else funny in it. Some people have far too much time on their hands (says someone who just spent 15 minutes criticising someone elses April fools day joke on Slashdot).

    5. Re:April fools by Proaxiom · · Score: 1

      On his homepage, the author claims RFC 4042 was implemented on a TOPS-20, which IIRC is something like 30 years old. The guy appears to be into machines with 36-bit words. I can respect that. He probably wrote the RFC because he actually wanted a 9-bit encoding, and then gave it to the IETF so everyone could scratch their heads at his strange hobby.

    6. Re:April fools by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      You are wrong.

      They are getting better, but getting more narrow and more slanted towards a specific profession. For example the referred RFC is really funny only if you know some network engineering. If you do, you will end up in cramps on the floor from hysterical laughter. It is even better then RFC on IP over Avian Carriers with QoS and draft on Electicity over MPLS.

      After all it is an IETF document - it is supposed to be funny to the IETF audience.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:April fools by trafficEng · · Score: 1

      and another one: MPLampS
      RFC 3251 - Electricity over IP

    8. Re:April fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Some people have far too much time on their hands

      Well, it is an RFC by M Cripsin, like in Mark Crispin.

      You know, Mark Crispin, like in IMAP.

      Jezus, like if knuth was makeing a joke in TAOC, andd you would tag him with a ''have too much time on its hands'

    9. Re:April fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue the 'only on /. can reading the article be considered interesting' comments...

  3. Three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In three words:

    Tools, not policy.

  4. I'm going to have to call it... by whitelabrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Horse S**t! Isn't the lack of morality what makes the internet so nice?

    1. Re:I'm going to have to call it... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the internet obviously needs more moral. However, contrary to current believe the problem is not that the people are so bad, but that there are simply no free implementations of moral around. All existing versions of moral come with quite stringent licensing conditions, and are usually controlled by big companies like the churches. As usual, any modification of the moral code by the user is disallowed. This is usually implemented directly into the moral (everything which contradicts the original version of the moral is considered immoral), making the moral vendors the first implementors of DRM schemes. So what is needed is an open source version of moral, where everyone is allowed not only to share their version of moral, but also to freely modify your own version.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:I'm going to have to call it... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Parent should be:
      +5 Funny
      +5 Unintentionally Insightful

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:I'm going to have to call it... by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 1

      yep lack of morality = porn porn porn

    4. Re:I'm going to have to call it... by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

      Parent is probably the only serious post on slashdot today...

  5. Evil bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be no use for this once the evil bit is implemented.

  6. i can only take so much... by dhbiker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    this is a fool too far, nothing to see here - come back tomorrow when you can actually trust the `news`

    1. Re:i can only take so much... by uberjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      you trust the news here

      that's like trusting everything you hear from FOX news

      P.S the popes dead...

      --
      Dick Laurent is dead.
  7. Yes, but.... by gowen · · Score: 3, Funny

    A. Farrel has put out a Request For Comments paper I still think he'll regret leaving Wigan Warriors to try his hand at Rugby Union with Saracens...

    Oh, hell, no-one's going to get this joke.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Yes, but.... by leonscape · · Score: 1

      You'll be surprised.

      Saints Fan myself, though.

      --


      If a first you don't succeed, your a programmer...
    2. Re:Yes, but.... by gowen · · Score: 1
      Saints Fan myself, though.
      Me too, FWIW.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a happy Welshman here...

    4. Re:Yes, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm that too... (The "Owen" in my username is a dead giveaway)...

    5. Re:Yes, but.... by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      League == BEST APRIL FOOLS JOKE EVER.

      Shame so many people were too dense to get it. ;)

    6. Re:Yes, but.... by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I'm from Canada and I get it. Go Rhinos!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  8. Hilarious by bendelo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I should send Adrian an e-mail congratulating him for fooling me for at least 5 minutes!

  9. April Fools? by SenFo · · Score: 1

    I'm being careful with anything I read today. I don't know whether to believe it or not. I haven't read the white paper yet. Maybe that would shed some light ;-).

    1. Re:April Fools? by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      I'll be Captain Obvious here and ask, "Shouldn't we be careful with everything we read?"
      And I'm not specifically talking watching out for deception, but also technical errors, typos and general laziness. Like that cookie recipe that called for 2 cups of flour and a tablespoon of salt. Blech!

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    2. Re:April Fools? by philbowman · · Score: 1

      Could be worse - I once got a recipe from Holland which required 300g of self rising flowers.

      --
      Phil
    3. Re:April Fools? by SenFo · · Score: 1

      True, true. It's funny how lazy many of us (myself included, at times) have become. We see that somebody has taken the time to write up some form of technical document (or whatever) and just assume that it's correct. Take K&R 2nd Edition, for instance. There are a ton of mistakes; some of which could potentially lead to bad programming techniques (e.g. casting the return value of maloc(), which isn't necessary).

      On a side note, I did read the posted link and it's definitely very clear that it was a joke ;-) (as if nobody else posted that already!).

  10. This time i will eat my PDA by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ok this one looked resonible till i got to this part
    "It is well accepted by popular opinion and other reliable metrics
    that moral values are declining and that degeneracy is increasing.
    Young people are particularly at risk from the rising depravity in
    society and much of the blame can be squarely placed at the door of
    the Internet. If you do not feel safe on the streets at night, what
    do you think it is like on the Information Superhighway?"
    Then it all came apart , This is a better april fools though

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  11. RTFRFC by OpenYourEyes · · Score: 5, Informative

    You should read more carefully. The RFC does not specify a new protocol, it specifies a new section in RFC documentation, much like the "security implication" sections that started appearing a few years back.

    If you're going to try and be funny - at least be correct. That said, your rush to condemn it certainly puts your moral standing in question - eh?

  12. April Fools by freak4u · · Score: 3, Funny

    So at first I'm getting all pissed off, then I realized the date. Damn hippies. :)

  13. This would be a lot more amusing... by jpiggot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it wasn't so likely to be something the Republican party would like to implement. The conservative movement in the country would like nothing more than a nice, moral, information controlled internet.

    1. Re:This would be a lot more amusing... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1
      Well, which is it? The Republican Party or the conservative movement?

      ...


      Oh, wait, you think those are the SAME THING?! Either I woke up in 1982 again (hate when that happens...) or you just haven't been paying attention...

    2. Re:This would be a lot more amusing... by jpiggot · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry. What I meant to say was "the republican party, and the ultra-conservative facist regime that seeks to impose an almost puritan morality upon a much larger majority, while consistantly breaking laws that don't suit their purposes and unsurping the very principles and integrity this country was founded on for their own bullshit agenda and personal accumulation of wealth"

      But you know, that all doesn't fit in the spellchecker. Thanks for picking up on that !

    3. Re:This would be a lot more amusing... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      You realize, of course, that it's the snot-nosed punk-ignorance of statements like yours that are causing the Left's decline in America, don't you?

      And WTF is "unsurping?" I can't figure out if it's a typo or you're actually more clever than your High School too-cool-for-the-room rant lets on...

    4. Re:This would be a lot more amusing... by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      You mean another one? (after TV)

      Isn't that exactly why cable is necessary?

      Over the air TV in the states is as titilating as church. Not to mention (but I will) choked full of advertising.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  14. Last year's evil bit was funnier. by hrieke · · Score: 2, Informative

    No really. All 12 times that story was posted.
    Oh well.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Last year's evil bit was funnier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't last year. It was the year before. Time flies, eh?

    2. Re:Last year's evil bit was funnier. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it was funny the first time. But you know something? It's not as far fetched as we might think. You all have probably seen those toy guns with the end of the barrel painted orange so the cops know that it is a toy and don't shoot you. Kind of like an "active orange evil bit".

  15. Honesty in reporting by gowen · · Score: 1
    As a member of the "Honesty In Reporting" committee, I recommend the following emendation to slashdot's boiler plate text
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early ... but let's face it, it's going to be another appallingly lame April Fool, so frankly, I wouldn't bother.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Honesty in reporting by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early ... but let's face it, it's going to be another appallingly lame April Fool, so frankly, I wouldn't bother.

      Also, seeing it early just means you'll get bored of it sooner because you're going to see it duped at least 3 times over the next 24 hours.

      I can't help thinking that the people who have bought Slashdot subscriptions are the same type of people who buy penis pills from spammers.

      Although the analogy breaks down somewhat when you consider that the pill merchants probably have at least some kind of QA process. They wouldn't want to send out the same order more than once for instance.

    2. Re:Honesty in reporting by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Emendation or amendment? Either way, it should really read: The next Slashdot story will be the same as the last one.

  16. Spoof RFCs by stevey · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hada great idea for TCP/IP over chocolate - inspired by pidgeon transmission.

    Every time I sit down to write it up I get so full of laughter it's never completed. Shame.

    Some choice bits include:

    • Faster transmission of packets in Summer months.
    • Different coloured chocolates for different data-types.
    • Native support for different levels of encapsulation - runny cores, wrapped in a touch layer of privacy protecting armour (ie chocolate).

    Maybe next year ..

    1. Re:Spoof RFCs by m50d · · Score: 1

      On the pidgeon subject though, I can't help thinking there's room for optimisation. OCRing the packets is too unreliabile and inefficient. I think there should be some form of specialised SD-card-like thing - bubble memory maybe? - that can carry exactly one packet, and is the right size to be carried by a pidgeon.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Spoof RFCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, with the recent tests of IP over power lines, people have begun to realize that any utility which has a connection to every home could be developed into an ISP. It's not just about phone and cable anymore. So what you might want to do is present your "chocolate" idea to your local water district board. Most of them are in the planning stages of an "IP over sewage system" rollout, and some of your ideas might fit in well with their plans.

    3. Re:Spoof RFCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late, Microsoft have already applied for the patent.

  17. More april fools? by smoothwallsamuel · · Score: 1

    They only just made it, it's 23:43 here :D

    Just means that april 2 has most of the april fools jokes for me

    Samuel

  18. This is fantastic. by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

    First G. W. Bush is legislating morality from his bully pulpit in the White House, and now some creep wants to implement morality into our very IP stack? When I want to download images from alt.sex.bugger.with.sailors, I don't want my packets dropping due to someone else's "morality" being implemented on my ISP's router.

    --
    --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
  19. First I thought.. by malkavian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    April Fool..
    Then I thought..
    "Don't give 'em ideas!"

  20. april 1 by sPaKr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As april fools rfc jokes go this is toward the bottom of the heap. Further it is no where close to Parrot which went from joke scary truth (shudder).

  21. YA April fools post. by orasio · · Score: 1

    Hey! you people!!
    This was a nice candidate for an april fools joke.
    The fuun of it is not in calling it when you see it. It's just the other way around, waiting or even baiting for those who fall for the joke, so you can get a good laugh.

    Getting a first post that says "April Fools, hehehehe" takes away most of the fun. After that, you know you will be seeing very few poor guys who fell for the joke.

  22. In soviet russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the New Internet Protocol Roots the RFC...

    Shit,... no,... that wasn't meant to happen...

    April Fool

    That really was worse than the joke I wanted to make about the Pope going Terri on us.

    1. Re:In soviet russia... by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      Well to me the latest pictures conclusively prove that the Pope is in fact Davros (of Dr Who fame)

      I can hear it now "Excommunicate... Excommunicate..."

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  23. I can't believe the IETF accepted this... by Tsar · · Score: 1
    1. Re:I can't believe the IETF accepted this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That one was actually kind of fun. Maybe it was just too obvious.

  24. April Fools Day is Great isn't it? by Urgo · · Score: 3, Informative

    For a full list of sites that pulled April Fools Day Pranks this year check out this list here Here is a sampling: dotget.net - Microsoft to put P2P software .GET into next version of Windows
    kylewenda.com - the government records your phone calls... scary
    rfc-editor.org - RFC for "Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts"
    waferbaby.com - amusing php error
    planet.gentoo.org - Various things, CFLAGS, etc
    fark.com - Many Jokes (keep reloading): BOOBIES!, Logged in as admin, North-Central Kentucky Bunghole-Discharge, page from 1999, BEER
    2600.com - Formal Attire required for 2600 meetings today
    forumsector.com - Changed the name to Nascar Sector
    wikipedia.org - Britannica taking over Wikimedia
    google.com - Google releases Google Gulp
    kellyosbourne.org - Sanctuary records group shut us down
    nukefreezone.net - Making fun of atrios.blogspot.com
    weebl.jolt.co.uk - Replaced with Cats-By-Mail
    telecom.co.nz - Click 2 Brick
    ytmnd.com - (NSFW) hacked by teens for christ
    wingus.ampedhost.com - Site converted into Mingus' Gently-Used Furniture store. Oh dear. Why won't he be kind?
    homestarrunner.com - Now a pay service.
    whirlpool.net.au - Australia's biggest Luddite to head Australia's largest telco
    thinkgeek.com - Fake product listings.
    theregister.co.uk - Bush twins to join Air Force tech unit in Iraq
    creativebits.org - Site purchased by Microsoft
    ocremix.org - Now partnered with EA (or something like that). Called EA ReMix.
    spacedaily.com - Bush Cancels Space Shuttle Program
    planet.gnome.org - Switched sites with planet.kde.org
    planet.kde.org - Switched sites with planet.gnome.org
    ietf.org - RFC: Efficient Transformation Formats of Unicode
    beejaysworld.de - Gentoo dropping livecds for x86
    nature.com - Apollo bacteria spur lunar erosion
    antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov - Water On Mars

    --
    Belive in Technology and AMAZE yourself. -- RIP ZDTV/TechTV
    1. Re:April Fools Day is Great isn't it? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Everything2 has apparently been taken over by Google as well.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    2. Re:April Fools Day is Great isn't it? by jpiggot · · Score: 1

      StupidChildren.com replaced their homepage with the one from N.A.M.B.L.A (the national man boy love association) - sick !!

  25. Reuse... by Ciderx · · Score: 1

    Can't they just reuse the Evil Bit that never came to be after being announced almost exactly a year to the day?

    1. Re:Reuse... by dresseduptoday · · Score: 1

      That one is a stroke of genious. Just imagine how simple making a perfect firewall would be. Want to block spam and intrusions attempts? Deny all packets with evil-bit == 1.

  26. Fool who? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

    For anyone doubting whether this is a joke or not, you only have to read as far as "The key words "SHALT", "SHALT NOT", "SMITE", and "PILLAR OF SALT" in this document are to be interpreted as expected.".

    This is definitely after noon though - bad luck to the submitter...

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
    1. Re:Fool who? by PoesRaven · · Score: 1

      Bad luck on the editors you mean.

      I submitted it last night.

    2. Re:Fool who? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      Well fair enough, I guess :)

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
  27. Re:This time i will eat my PDA by akadruid · · Score: 1

    Then you got to the bit that says

    "...Promiscuous modes of operation are an abomination, exceeded only by
    multicast..."

    and thought maybe there was some truth in it?

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  28. What happened to the evil bit ? by SuneSpeg · · Score: 1

    Its exactly 2 years since that rfc for setting an evil bit in packets appeared, but nothing happened since then ?
    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html

  29. In other news ... by Scorpius-nl · · Score: 2, Funny
  30. Oh well... by starmang · · Score: 1, Informative

    Pretty bad April fools jokes this year, but still nice to see them (:

    --
    Never touch an Irish man's Guinness!@#
  31. Re:This time i will eat my PDA by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    ;) i didnt actualy read it properly , i just skimmed over hee as i had a fairly large idea it was an april fools already from the summary .. how i passed a gem like that is beyond me though lol

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  32. How long is this going to go on? by gpmac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's two in a row. At least the first one was somewhat funny....

  33. I'd like to remind everyone... by r00t_ur_b0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that this is April Fool's Day, not Stupid Joke Day. So please don't submit an article unless it is a really well-thought-out and clever hoax. Thanks.

    1. Re:I'd like to remind everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to remind everyone that this is slashdot, not the BBC. So we can't accept any submissions that are well-thought-out and/or clever. Thanks.

  34. Didn't even read past headline by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    and I guess april fools, not must RTFA in case it is something!

    The problem is, I think everything is april fools! damn!

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  35. Morality is a subjective matter by Ashtead · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would think that any blocking actions caused by morality would be routed around. And presumably, the evil bit would be crucial to determine the quality of morals.

    As for blockin pr0n, who cares. It would really be useful if this could block spam!

    Still, problem is, who gets to sit and determine what is immoral and what isn't? And for that matter, whose morals are we talking about here, is it the FCC, the WWE, the people behind goatse, the Republican Right, or maybe some Islamic Council for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice? And who will pay them? Again, remember the system's ability to block any obstacles including taxation; the ARPAnet people back in the day thought in terms of nuclear bombs not nuclear family value enforcements...

    Then again, considering the date of issue of this RFC, it is all in the +1 Funny realm anyway, which as we know, is karma neutral.

    I rest my case.

    --
    SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    1. Re:Morality is a subjective matter by m50d · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest whoever owns the router. Route stuff according to your morals. Band together with people you agree with. That way you get more of what you want and less of what you don't.

      --
      I am trolling
  36. Made me laugh by slim · · Score: 1
    Come on, it's funny. Under "mandatory subsections":


    - Care and concern for avian carriers. A duck may be somebody's mother. /blockquote
  37. new RFC terminology by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    The key words "SHALT", "SHALT NOT", "SMITE", and "PILLAR OF SALT" in this document are to be interpreted as expected.

    Now prowl the comments for people saying 'why didn't they just use xyz protocol?' without realising ;-)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  38. There are 10 kinds of people. by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those who think this is a real story.
    Those who realize it's an April fool's joke without having to be told.
    Those who think that was binary.

    --

    Question everything

    1. Re:There are 10 kinds of people. by AVee · · Score: 1

      Heh, you are so on topic, if this whould have been about the other rfc posted today...

    2. Re:There are 10 kinds of people. by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

      So how may kinds of people think it's gray code?

  39. Hah funny. by geeveees · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, not really:

    Likelihood of misuse by large, multi-national corporations. Such a thought is, of course, unthinkable.

    Availability of oversight facilities. There are those who would corrupt our morals motivated as they are by a hatred of the freedom of Internet access with which we are graced. We place a significant burden of responsibility on those who guard our community from these evil-doers and it is only fitting that we give them as much support as is possible. Therefore, all encryption and obfuscation techniques MUST be excluded - individuals who have nothing to hide need to fear the oversight of those whose morals are beyond doubt.

    Care and concern for avian carriers. A duck may be somebody's mother.

    The real joke is ofcourse that I actually RTFA

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  40. Slashdot useless for the day. by borgheron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Might as well forget about visiting/posting or reading slashdot. It's April 1st. :/

    Oh.. wait... I should follow my own advice. :)

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  41. As much as I know it's April 1 . . . . . by failure-man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This does read like something the US congress would be interested in doing.

    1. Re:As much as I know it's April 1 . . . . . by delymyth · · Score: 1

      Not only the US congress, believe me :(

      --
      -- Personal Blog: http://www.delymyth.net/ (italian)
  42. Disturbing by Illserve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Have I finally lost touch with the computing industry or is this just not funny?

    Even though this kind of joke has been done to death, I had hoped for a smile to at least cross my lips.

    1. Re:Disturbing by gowen · · Score: 1
      Have I finally lost touch with the computing industry or is this just not funny? Even though this kind of joke has been done to death, I had hoped for a smile to at least cross my lips.
      It suffers from what many of these do. It's a single joke (and a nice enough one at that, with a salting of satire) spread much too thinly over a moderately lengthy document, without being consistently funny or inventive.

      Must try harder.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  43. Lame by lutzomania · · Score: 1

    Man, the April Fools posts are so obvious this year.

  44. Now wait... by brammo · · Score: 1

    I just can't wait to see M$ implement it in Longhorn... ;-)

    --
    Tha-tha-tha-tha-that's all folks!
  45. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is the GWB bit and it is already set.

  46. So did Clippy by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  47. Dead horses by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    RFC 1149 was unexpected, well thought out and original. These attributes are key elements in a good joke. RFC 1149 was damn funny.

    All these others that have followed, including todays jewel, are cheap knockoff copies. They aren't original. They aren't unexpected. It could even be argued that they aren't well thought out. In other words they just are not funny.

    Even if the first couple of knockoffs were funny, like any joke that is told too much, the become not funny over time. These are beyond not funny. RFC 1149 is still funny but all of these subsequent attempts are just lame. People should really know when to stop flogging a dead horse.

    1. Re:Dead horses by Proaxiom · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While I agree that RFC 1149 was the classic April Fools RFC, it was not the first. The previous year, 1989, had RFC 1097 - TELNET SUBLIMINAL-MESSAGE Option. There were a couple earlier ones as well, such as the RFC 748 - TELNET RANDOMLY-LOSE Option in 1978.

      RFC 748 was written by the same guy who wrote RFC 4042, issued today.

      I also agree that the recent April Fools RFCs aren't all that funny. The Evil Bit last year was pretty lame.

    2. Re:Dead horses by Illserve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the contrary, some jokes get funnier and funnier with retelling.

      The problem is that converting one-off jokes into running gags is more art than science, and clearly something these poor guys have absolutely no grasp of.

      This RFC was just pitiful, all the more so because of the obvious time investment.

    3. Re:Dead horses by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Even if the first couple of knockoffs were funny, like any joke that is told too much, the become not funny over time. These are beyond not funny. RFC 1149 is still funny but all of these subsequent attempts are just lame. People should really know when to stop flogging a dead horse.

      But that's precisely the problem they're trying to address! If every system were RFC-4041 compliant, cessation of sadomasonecrobestiality wouldn't be such a problem now, would it?

    4. Re:Dead horses by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The evil bit was cool because people implemented it. I particularly loved the diagram of the bit :-)

  48. Not to be a fuddy-duddy, but by Stiletto · · Score: 1


    Can we NOT have a repeat of last year, where you couldn't find any serious articles on 1 Apr? Sure, some of the fake news is funny, and maybe one or two are actually clever, but most of them (especially last year, ARGGHHH) are awful, stupid, and uncreative. Let's put the really good joke stories up and intermix them with some real stories!

    As an aside, I hope I don't get put on a "You have been temporarily forbidden from posting" holiday for speaking out against the editors (do any of you guys know the editors actually do this now?) but I think it had to be said.

    1. Re:Not to be a fuddy-duddy, but by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I hope I don't get put on a "You have been temporarily forbidden from posting" holiday for speaking out against the editors (do any of you guys know the editors actually do this now?) but I think it had to be said.

      I doubt it. The incredible lameness and lack of integrity of the Slashdot editors is now so obviously apparent to any onlookers, that persuing this policy nowadays would result in a Slashdot readership of approximately 1. And that would hurt the Ad revenue.

  49. Yeah, yeah April fools and all, BUT by starseeker · · Score: 0

    how many of the conservative right would like to see a serious version of this made both the de facto standard and the written law in the US?

    We may be laughing at this one right up until a serious version of it hits Congress.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  50. MOD PARENT DOWN by r.jimenezz · · Score: 1

    This guy seems to be karmawhoring by pasting this post on every single (lame) April's Fool post today...

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I saw this post on other stories as well.

      See:

      <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=144460&c id=12109759">This</a> and
      <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=144539&c id=12109711">this</a> and
      <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=144459&c id=12109881">Finally</a>,
      <a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=144552&c id=12110425">This</a>

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot to turn on HTML This and this and Finally, This

  51. IETF announces IP over Burrito Carriers by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Can you believe the slashdot overloards rejected this as a story! http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lohsen-i p-burrito-00.txt

  52. RFC 1149 was actually implemented by Ulric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By Norwegians, no less.

  53. Obviously a Joke by burbankmarc · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a joke because TCP/IP is a ROUTED protocol, not a ROUTING protocol. Now if they said "BGP 5 new ROUTING protocol" I may have fell for it.

  54. TCP and IP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TCP and IP are separate protocols.

    Furthermore "TCP/IP protocol" is "Transmission control protocol over internet protocol protocol"
    Could you BE any more redundant?

  55. SEVERAL days later? by arete · · Score: 1

    Unless you're on a strange planet with multiple suns or a very odd rotation, it can't be more than 1 complete day from the end of your local day. And that's only if you live just barely on the West side of the International Date Line.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:SEVERAL days later? by bosshoff · · Score: 0

      What about email that gets hung up during transmission? Huh? HOW ABOUT THAT SMARTY PANTS!!!

    2. Re:SEVERAL days later? by sepluv · · Score: 1

      ...or the April Fools jokes we are talking about are /. stories...

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    3. Re:SEVERAL days later? by arete · · Score: 1

      Possibly get another email provider? I know that's allowed in the RFC, but it shouldn't commonly happen.

      Gmail is free, and as of today it gives you Infinity+1 MB of storage space, so there's no reason not to switch. gmail.google.com]

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    4. Re:SEVERAL days later? by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      Well arete.

      Its the 3rd now (at least where I am) and I've still got to pay special attention to the date on an article. The point of my post was that on the internet, no one takes their dumb april fools jokes down immediately, and if you're not careful you may get fooled several days later because you read some april fools joke you didn't see on the 1st.

      I thought it was obvious...

    5. Re:SEVERAL days later? by arete · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Apparently I spend too much time online; this option didn't occur to me.

      : )

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  56. Finally... a real story amid the jokes by syntap · · Score: 1

    I think Al Gore invented morality too.

  57. Technical RFCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I much preferred the more technical ones like:

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1097.html

  58. Re:This time i will eat my PDA by SenFo · · Score: 1

    Hehe, you really read that? I saw the date at the top of the white paper and knew what it was.

  59. Ha Ha!! by p0z3r · · Score: 1

    We must allow for other moral frameworks and fully respect other people's right to subscribe to other belief systems. Such people are, however, wrong and doomed to spend eternity in a dark corner with only dial-up access.

    Now did big dubya write this himself?

  60. Re:This time i will eat my PDA by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    Yeah , the funny thing is ive been waiting for slashdot to post a real artical then wait for us to all start saying "Aprils fool" then them going "hahahaha aprils fool indeed , this is a real story"

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  61. Fnally by bitswapper · · Score: 2, Funny


    "3.2.2. Jumbo Packets
    It is no longer appropriate to refer to "jumbo packets". Please use the term "capacitorially challenged".


    Also known as "Fat Bastard" packets.

  62. Sounds Communist to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, first of all morals are defined by the culture and people of a specific time and place and not by governments, corporations, or Internet protocols in a free and civilized world. Morals are dictated by fascist governments bent on subjugating a people to a common idealistic goal for their own self-glorification and rule of a real or pseudo aristocracy.

    Second, any and all attempts to impose ideological (i.e., moral) boundaries on technological innovations or implementations should be vehemently opposed by any sane, educated, rational individual.

    Is it just me or is our world becoming more and more Orwellian by the day?

  63. Ha ... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    ... ha. (* single clap *)

    To the author: don't quit your day job for a glamorous career in comedy just yet.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  64. Mod Article -1 Redundant by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    This is the same April fool's crap Slashdot posts every year. Maybe not the same protocol, but there's always a new RFC for some protocol on April 1st. Boredom.

  65. Old RFC? by Anm · · Score: 1

    Is this new morality routing framework require or supercede the TCP/IP header evil bit?

    Anm

  66. Another RFC Today.... by sepluv · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's also UTF-9 and UTF-18: Efficient Transformation Formats of Unicode.

    It may be a joke, but I for one welcome our new nonet-using PDP10 overlords. (It would be better with nonets of balanced trits, but hey...)

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
  67. The pope by JoaoPinheiro · · Score: 1

    These April Fools jokes are getting old. Maybe the whole Pope thing was just another one of these jokes and by tomorrow we'll have a video of the Pope on TV saying "Haha! Prank! Fooled ya!!"

  68. April Fools half-day by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Since children started playing April Fools jokes in school.

    The first place I had heard of this was sometime in grade school. Teachers started telling us that April Fools Day really ended at noon, so we weren't allowed to prank in the afternoon. Really, it's just a way to prevent the waste of an entire day.

    Much like in the town I grew up in - Hallowe'en "officially" ended at 8pm. They even blew the town whistle to let everyone know. It was an easy way to keep kids from roaming the streets all night long.

    Personally, I wish we could make Xmas end at noon. Not being superstitious, it sure would be nice to get some shopping in during an obligatory day off (and yes, I do realize the irony in that statement :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.