Slashdot Mirror


Games That Shoot Back

syousef writes "A shooting game that shoots back, delivering electric shocks through the player's hips when they're shot, is being used for recruitment (Hey shooting people is fun) and training by the U.S. military. There's talk of developing it into a PC game. Here's a quote from the article: 'It has the same power as a stun gun. It knocks you down. You have to continue to work through the pain and keep on fighting, as that is what you need to do - to keep on fighting even when wounded.' I guess in Soviet America, games shoot you. How many law suits would this cause based on unknown heart conditions? I also hope there's some sort of built-in safety in case the thing starts to zap you repeatedly. (Deadly endless loop, anyone?)"

89 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Suicide Booth by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this is brought to the PC games, I hope they also include a suicide feature so that I can finish myself or team mates who are suffering from electric shock.

    "Timmy, forget about the TK rules, kill me please, please!"

    1. Re:Suicide Booth by mwilli · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem I see in this is that if there is a suicide feature, some evil game developer would *accidentally* make the feature so it delivers a fatal electric shock. I know I would if I were that evil developer. Does that make me a bad person?

      Otherwise, this sounds like a game for me!

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
    2. Re:Suicide Booth by izomiac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm... this system + virus = gamer genocide?

    3. Re:Suicide Booth by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hopefully the manufacturer of the device will include some kind of circuit breaker or fuse to stop a lethal shock.

    4. Re:Suicide Booth by VdG · · Score: 3, Funny

      So a shock transmitted through the hips is unlikely to cause heart problems. But there might be other unwanted side-effects.
      Brown trousers should be compulsory.

    5. Re:Suicide Booth by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're trying to get people to apply to be expendable human weapons. Do you REALLY think they care?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    6. Re:Suicide Booth by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes....

      Year one, week one, of any electronics course teaches you of the safety and hazards of electricity.

      The skin surface has a very high resistance. Blood has a very low resistance. Open and/or bleeding cuts in the skin are dangerous near electrical contacts. It takes a lot of current to cause any real damage through skin. That's why you can touch the terminals of a relatively low voltage battery without a problem. But touching the terminals to fresh cuts on both hands can produce a high current flow right through the heart and cause fibrillation.

      Very high voltages can overcome the resistance of unbroken skin and do the same thing. Something I discovered by being careless. I've always practiced putting one hand behind my back while working near live high voltage/current sources. I made the mistake once of resting one hand on a metal radiator in a car while turning the distributor on a running engine to set the timing. A crack in the distributor cap allowed a charge to escape to my hand, through me, and to the radiator. I've had high voltage shocks before, but not like this. I felt funny in the chest, dizzy and weak momentarily, and almost fell over before my heart started pounding like I finished a marathon. I recovered from it rather quickly, but I'm sure I rattled my heart rhythm for a moment because of that.

    7. Re:Suicide Booth by Janitha · · Score: 2, Funny

      It seems unlikly that they would include a features such as that.

      That would be like adding a small switch in your normal firearms to give a option of "shoot back at face"

  2. America's Army from Hell by sumdeus · · Score: 5, Funny

    America's Army Part II -- The Final Recruitment. If you manage to live through this video game you are worthy of a sandy death.

    --
    Peter: I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about.
    1. Re:America's Army from Hell by Rosyna · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. It's a challenge even for Teal'c.

    2. Re:America's Army from Hell by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Our local PD contracts with a company that provides incident simulations. Basicly and officer has to run through a simulation of a likely law enforcement scenario (felony trafic stop on a stolen vehicle.)

      Often times a poor performance on the officers part will lead to a "shootout."

      The officers are outfitted with a miles-laser type system to their service weapon. Also supplied to the officer is light body armor and a shatter resistant face shield. The simulator makes use of human-aimed air guns that fire "soft" plastic pellets at the officers.

      I don't understand how these pellets mark the officers, but officer performance is determined by scoring marksman ship with the laser and marks left on the officer by the airgun. These are not "paintballs" as they are re-used repeatedly. Something similar to airsoft pellets.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    3. Re:America's Army from Hell by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now I know what those newpapers mean when they write something like "The pictures from Abu Ghraib prison have shocked the US army."

      Just beta testing...

  3. Malware by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who will be the first to write malware that actually kills people?

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:Malware by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Who will be the first to write malware that actually kills people?"

      I hear ya. I'm so sick of malware that burns up motherboards.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Malware by brsmith4 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better:

      /* fake, pseudo-asm */
      #define _shock(mag) __asm__ volitile \
      ("movl %0,%%sri \ /* imaginary register for shock intensity */
      mov $1,%%sre \ /* imaginary register for shock enable */
      movl %%srs,%eax \ /* imaginary register for shock status */
      movl %eax,%1" \
      :"=r" (i) \
      :"r" (k) \
      :"eax") \ /* return status from register */

      #define _unshock() __asm__ volitile \
      ("movw $0,%%sri")

      int main(void){
      long magnitude;
      int status;

      /* lets increase the dosage every time we shock */

      for (magnitude = 10; magnitude != 0; magnitude *= 2){
      if (!(status = shock(magnitude))) return EXIT_FAILURE;
      sleep(1);
      if ((status = unshock())) return EXIT_FAILURE;
      }

      return EXIT_SUCCESS; /* we never get here */
      }

      It might not work, but at least the idea is sadistic enough...

    3. Re:Malware by glimmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will take a while, but it'll overflow.

      thats ok, you'll be dead by that time

    4. Re:Malware by msim · · Score: 5, Funny

      sweet merciful crap, you guys think too much.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  4. Uh oh by dg41 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone forgot to turn the safety protocols back on.

    1. Re:Uh oh by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      CleverNickname's going to be pissed. He'll have to bypass the holodeck conduits and reverse the polarity by using the main deflector dish or something.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. What next? by SteelV · · Score: 4, Funny

    An MMORPG that knocks you out by electric shock and steals your clothes and jewelry, etc. when you die in-game? Realism isn't always a *good* thing. I would prefer not to be shocked while playing Counter-Strike, please.

    Next.

  6. Hey, by CompotatoJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's all fun and games until someone does a headshot and 1000V runs through your entire body!

  7. You know who'll benefit from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The adult industry... in some sick and perverted way.

  8. Predicted in fiction by meckardt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This was written about in Piers Anthony's "Kilobyte" 20 years ago.

    1. Re:Predicted in fiction by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And 22 years ago a two-player video game appeared in the James Bond movie Never Say Never Again (1983) which would shock the losing player through dual metal joysticks. If the player let go they would lose, and the voltage increased as the other player took over their virtual territory (global conquest type game).

      Speaking of getting shocked by current flowing from one hand to the other (conveniently placing current flow dangerously close to the heart), anybody see the recent episode of Myth Busters where the assistants rig a fake Ark of the Covenant with an electric fence transformer and had the host grab a hold of the two terminals with his hands? I'm surprised someone didn't get fired (or sued) over that one.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Predicted in fiction by porp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I saw that episode of Mythbusters. Why should someone be sued or fired? People touch those cattle, electric fences accidentally everyday. Shit, I've been shocked by one, and I wasn't looking to sue my grandfather. Sure it hurts, but it just scares the shit out of you more than anything.

      porp

    3. Re:Predicted in fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "builders" where trying to prove that you could make a battery out of a pot, metal core, and acid because a similar device was dug up in china or somewhere like that. It is obvious that it is possible because that is what a battery is; so, they altered the myth to what these ancient batteries might have been used for.
      One thing they came up with was electrified acupuncture since it is something used today. Another thing was too see if it had enough current to electro-plate with. Surprisingly it worked well but there is no way the pepole of that time had the scientific knowledge to realize they could do that.
      The last thing they came up with was for religious reasons. If you hooked a battery up to an alter or something and then someone touched it the alter would give a shock that due to there lack of scientific knowledge would seem to have come from God or a god. The shock they got from daisy chaining there pot batteries was not impressive so they hooked up an electric fence transformer. They then convinced Adam to touch there arch of the convent even though he had a suspicion they hooked up a more powerful source.
      In the end he was not happy and really pissed which they showed on camera. Even though it was not close to a lethal current, I am surprised someone didn't get fired.

  9. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 3, Funny
    ^---Sorry couldn't resist...

    Try harder next time
    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  10. Ouch by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    Worst.
    Playstation.
    Accessory.
    Ever.

    Call me when they have a peripheral to go with Hentai games.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  11. Shocking! by Guyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is an incredibly electrifying development. The gaming community must be arcing with excitement! I, for one, simply cannot wait to be plugged into such action and adventure. Not to mention all of the amped up individuals bolting to recruiting stations to try their hand. This kind of technology blows away all of the current games by far. Let's hope that development is met with little resistance and that the capacitance of the developers' creativity is immeasurable.

    (Yes, I know, it's horrible. The line to shoot me starts over there. *point*)

  12. Natural Evolution by purduephotog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pain is one of the greatest behavior modifiers there is.

    The whole point of a FPS trainer is to educate reality out of an individual. When you fire a pistol, sometimes your body will jerk the hand in anticipation of the shot. Dryfiring a few hundred times is enough to condition the pull back out, but it will eventually creep back.

    I'm remember reading that 3/4 of the soldiers in WWI and WWII didn't aim at anything. They were conditioned to shoot at little bullseyes, not people. Notice how the military trains on human shaped targets now? Human-aim-fire-response.

    This is all good, believe it or not.

    Getting shot in a game there is no pain and risky behaviours can continue to flourish. Getting hit with a live round is most likely to inflict pain. Therefore, make the game as realistic as possible without killing your candidate :)

    Will I play this? Nope. I already take Americas Army seriously and do my darndest not to die. But then again I'm not one of those people that beg the S-24 in order to get a pistol, either ;)

    1. Re:Natural Evolution by elhondo · · Score: 2

      Do you happen to have a cite for the bullseye line? I was in the military from 88 - 93, and we did a fair bit of shooting at bullseyes. Except for 500 yard shooting, it was mostly bullseyes. It's somewhat doubtful to me that most World War I soldiers and Marines were incapable of shooting at live targets due to never shooting at people. If anything, I would expect green troops to have poor fire discipline due to the novelty of trench warfare, but that's about it. I also don't recall any historical narratives citing any soldiers on a large scale not aiming at anything.

    2. Re:Natural Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He was talking about the Nazi soldiers. Of course, the Americans could kill 3 enemies with a single spit while somersaulting out of a burning building with a broken leg and a pretty French girl on the shoulder... It's all documented quite well in WWII Hollywood movies.

    3. Re:Natural Evolution by Nine+Mirrors+Turning · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you happen to have a cite for the bullseye line?

      Read 'On Combat' by Grossman (Of 'On Killing' fame) and Christensen. (Amazon).

      I also don't recall any historical narratives citing any soldiers on a large scale not aiming at anything.

      This is actually a well-established fact. S.L.A Marshalls study after WW2 found that only 15-20% of the individual riflemen actually fired their weapons at the enemy. Pretty controversial at its time.
      For more on this, read 'On Killing' by Grossman. All your questions will be answered.

      --
      (Elegance is not an option)
  13. This would be great for fencing. by VidEdit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My geeky $.02:

    Maybe a shock belt could be used to improve the increasingly unrealistic sport of Olympic fencing.

    While fencing is not a video game, it lacks a certain realism in the sense that there is not a significant enough penalty for getting hit. In epee' fencers learn to do many very silly attacks that put their face in danger so that they can attempt a toe shot.

    By attaching a shock belt to the electronic scoring equipment that is already used, fencers would learn to use the kind of caution that they might in a real duel.

    Of course that doesn't solve the problem of sacrifice that is encouraged by making all of the target area worth the same number of points, or the unrealistic use of the coupe--where a fencer often whips his foil into a "J" shape to touch his opponent on the back. But the shock belt may be a step in the right direction along with some other changes.

    --
    1. Re:This would be great for fencing. by endersdouble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a fellow fencer, you are an *idiot*. To start with, fencing is getting unpopular enough as it is, you want to start shocking people? More importantly, it wouldn't make it better sport. Short of the simple roman circus value, it wouldn't make any difference w/r/t "realism". the flick may be an extremely unrealistic move, but in many cases, it is simply the best move to hit someone. Unless we actually change the rules in foil/sabre to get rid of right-of-way, it will remain so. Do you want to get rid of right-of-way? And to any confused non fencers, just read the first line and skip the rest.

    2. Re:This would be great for fencing. by tyman · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...but don't they already have electric fences?

  14. Been done by DavidLeblond · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mattel created a device that would shock gamers a long time ago for the NES. They called it the Power Glove.

  15. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In some countries this will land you in jail. When I was in the UK I was shocked to discover that two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home are not legally permitted to beat the shit out of each other. "Brawling" is an offense of the crown and you can be put away for it. Of course, it's an unenforcable law when you're in private, but in public it's common for two people who have agreed to fight to be sent to prison for it. How insane is that? Here in Australia if you ask someone to "step outside" the law will usually not get involved.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  16. Re:The Kevorkian game by bleckywelcky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, if you want to die just take up some very extreme sports. If you're 65 and in constant pain, just climb Mt Everest. Or go for a 100 mile trek through the mountains with a 5 day food supply. You never hear of a BASE jumper living his days out in the old folk's home...

  17. Re:Beyond the simulation of 'fighting while wounde by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not electricity, but my buddy learned to not forget his nut cup after getting shot in the balls with a few paintballs. Learned real quick.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  18. Re:The Kevorkian game by -kertrats- · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...increase their market share...

    I'm not sure you quite understand how euthanasia works...

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  19. Different operating systems... by Bifurcati · · Score: 2, Funny
    Windows: Works really well, provided you're just getting shot in the chest. As soon as you try to do something more complicated like getting shot in the head or foot, the "Blue screen of death" takes on a whole new meaning...

    Linux: No batteries for the shock are needed, as the frustration of trying to get the hardware to interface with linux everytime you're shot is far more painful.

    SCO: The software comes with a variety of legal services built in so you can sue about that "unknown" heart condition.

    Mac: Never has it been so easy to administer high voltage electric shocks to your hips.

    1. Re:Different operating systems... by CoolGopher · · Score: 2, Funny
      OpenBSD: Even though the driver has been loaded and the config files updated, no shocks are delivered since doing so would be insecure.

      NetBSD: Once the driver is loaded, the config files updated, and the right incantations are spoken, it has never been easier to deliver high voltage electric shocks over the network.

      FreeBSD: After loading the driver and updating the config files you are left with the options of running with or without the Giant lock. With it, all shocks are Giant and hurt accordingly; Without it the system occassionaly dead-locks...

  20. imagine the (mis)applications... by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

    DRM. You can download anything you want for free, provided the RIAA gets to shock you on a per megabyte basis - negative conditioning.

    Educational games. Kids are hooked up to the computer and the computer quizzes them, zapping them every time they make a mistake.

    Extreme games - apply the electrodes to areas of the body much more sensitive than they would otherwise be attached to.

    Exercise games - electrodes attached such that they automatically stimulate and tone the muscles while you work/play.

    I could go on, but i'll spare you.

  21. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    You want giant tentacle penises to erupt from your PS2 and rape you?

    I guess even sex-crazed demonic octopi need love.

  22. uh oh ... by ssand · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would hate to be hit by someone using the rocket launcher.

  23. Re:yay! by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Informative

    yes, in context,


    ""You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil," Mattis said. "You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them.""


    It's so easy to take things out of context but it also says something about the point you are trying to make.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  24. More material for Jackass The Movie 2 by ylikone · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much you want to bet we will have tons of stupid teen guys attaching this thing to their nads?

    --
    Meh.
  25. They had this already. by nxtr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but Microsoft recalled those XBox power cables.

  26. unsettling by potpie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it a bit sickening that the military is producing games to attract people to join. Aren't games supposed to be fun? Are they hoping for gamers to think "hmm- this game is fun, I think I'll join the army so I can HAVE FUN KILLING PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE." ?

    Does anybody else find that unsettling?

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:unsettling by darkfire5252 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but, in _my_ military, as much as I may dislike how the CinC chooses to deploy it, I want that sort of attitude. Granted, I don't want every gamer to think that way, but if the alternative is recruting people who are going to give up and run when they take a non-lethal bullet, bring on the realism. The whole point of an army is you train killers, not good people.

      I, for one, welcome our new electronic overlords.

    2. Re:unsettling by Afty0r · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I find it a bit sickening that the military is producing games to attract people to join ... Are they hoping for gamers to think "hmm- this game is fun, I think I'll join the army so I can HAVE FUN KILLING PEOPLE IN REAL LIFE." ?... Does anybody else find that unsettling?
      The military also pays salarys to people - are they hoping people will think "Hmm, I need some money and I can't get a job, I think I'll join the military and KILL PEOPLE FOR MONEY"?

      Well, actually, yes they are - that's why they recruit most actively in poor areas, for the same reasons that terrorist-financiers recruit most (but not all) of their suicide bombers from youngsters with no jobs and impoverished families.

      There are groups of people ideologically at odds with one another on our planet, fighting for power and control of a variety of things - there is no way to win, and the only way to avoid losing is to not play their game.
  27. Heart Conditions? No problem! by Blind_Io_42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heart conditions are not a problem, just go to Start > Settings > Control Pannel > Game Hardware > Shock Feedback Options and enable the Difibulator option.
    In the event of cadiac arrest the computer will automatically re-start your heart, call the paramedics, reserve a room at the hospital, notify your family, and cancel your dinner reservations. That is unless the game locks up.

    Lag would also be a pain if it happens right when you die.

    --
    No one of consequence
  28. Sexual apps for TENS units are old news by xtal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get with the programme.. not mainstream, but certainly not new.

    http://www.electrosexstore.com

    http://www.peselectro.com

    --
    ..don't panic
  29. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm in NSW actually. But generally if you're not causing a disturbance you'll get no trouble from the police. "What's going on here?" "Just settling a little dispute officer." "Well do it in the alley, not in the street." is a far cry from "Right, you two, into the paddy wagon, you're off to a holding cell and you'll see the judge in the morning."

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  30. watt a terrible post by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should be charged with battery and kept in a cell.

    That's it for me, I'm going ohm now.

  31. This is better. by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 5, Funny

    while(1)
    {
    shockuser();
    }

    No chance of overflow with this loop.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  32. Battlestar Linux, by Microsoft... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Funny
    In other news, Microsoft has just bought out id Software, and is developing a new game, codenamed Battlestar Linux. The game is said to be a combination 1st- and 3rd-person shooter based on ideas from Doom, Quake, Grand Theft Auto, and the classic Kings Quest series.

    "We've developed some innovative new ideas for this game," stated Mark Davidson, project manager for the Battlestar Linux effort. "Our game will be set in an environment of post-World War 3 New York, with the city engulfed in violence from scattered rebel groups, gangs, warlords, and other nice characters. What sets this game apart from other games is a new USB we are producing that will make the gameplay feel more real. Attachments that go to a skullcap, waistband, wrist- and ankle-straps, will provide an electric shock whenever the player is 'shot' by an electrical weapon such as the raygun or cellblaster. Gas burners installed in these straps will engulf the player in real flames if the player is shot with a flamethrower. Explosives placed in a pack, worn on the player's back, will blow the player up if the player is hit with a grenade or rocket. Finally, a system of shotguns, strategically placed around the room in a surround-sound fashion, will shoot real bullets at the player when the player is hit by bullets in the game. Our effort is intended to give new meaning to the term 'virtual reality.'"

    People familiar with the matter suggest the game will only be available for Linux, a first for operating system vendor Microsoft, which usually makes applications available only for the Wintel platform and for the Mac.

  33. A little reverse engineering... by shadowmatter · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and we have "Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing Electro-Shock Edition."

    Wonderful. Never will your child reach typing 60 w.p.m. faster. Or with fewer fingers.

    - shadowmatter

  34. Re:Changes to Existing Games by rokzy · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Can you say, "Wheel of Misfortune"?

    no I can't, every time I tried to say it I got interupted, because the 1990s called, and they wanted their phrase back.

  35. If I may just chip in... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've gone too far-radically too far - with the appaling punnage. They are so bad, it hertz...

  36. Lag.. by spawnofbill · · Score: 3, Funny

    Player:"hey, I got shot, where's the sho*zzzt*"

  37. Re:The Kevorkian game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh I should expect he does. You see, the advantage of suicide software is that the users never survive to complain about the bugs. Ergo, no code maintenance neccesary!

  38. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by GrahamCox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    two consenting adults in the privacy of their own home are not legally permitted to beat the shit out of each other

    Consenting? I think the law operates as it does because in fact consenting to being beaten up is really pretty unlikely, and the vast majority of situations where this might occur are cases of domestic violence, which surely no sane person would prefer the law turned a blind eye to. If you and a mate want a fight, go ahead - but make sure you don't create a disturbance, damage property or get any third parties involved. Usually by the time you've arranged all this you can be fairly sure the law will leave you to it - but by then presumably cool heads will have prevailed and realised the whole matter can't be settled by a fight. Fights are the last refuge of the idiot, and because society at large believes that, the law upholds that view.

  39. Re:Ouch by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the FAQ:

    Can I communicate with partners who use different computers than I do?

    Presently FuckU-FuckMe only works with Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows NT. Macintosh and Linux versions are currently being developed.


    Why a linux version? Would anyone be able to use it? ...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  40. Just how painful is the Taser? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This was some 20 years ago, but a colleague (we are not cops, just EEs) brought a Taser to a presentation -- his point that the Taser didn't really "stun" -- it just plain hurt. He thought the cops would find it wouldn't work, but would be mighty handy with "suspects in custody" if you know what I mean. He was warning us the Taser would be become the modern version of "rubber hoses."

    Well anyway, the idea that you could have a weapon with two settings, stun and kill, gee, where did the cops get the idea that this would come in handy? Turns out that it is hard to stun someone without killing them. The old detective movie cliche of stunning someone by hitting them over the head? An MD writing in TV guide told readers that "if you hit someone over the head, most likely you just hurt them and make them mad. If you hit them harder to knock them out, chances are you kill someone from a hematoma."

    I have seen films where they Taser a volunteer, and they start convulsing or they just faint and tip over and hit the mat in the gym they are doing this with a thud. I have seen a recent episode of "Cops" where they Tasered a whole bunch of different people, and it didn't seem to do anything. I suppose the electric shock causes intense, sudden pain, and that can cause someone to collapse, just like being shot with a bullet, only there is no tissue damage so the person doesn't bleed to death, but does it really work? I suppose a bullet doesn't always "work" in that a person can be fatally wounded but not always drop dead right away.

    Anyway, I was the only person at the meeting willing to try the Taser (it was a model with two electrodes sticking out, and it didn't have the darts for remote action). I was going to zap my forearm and I was quickly advised "better try it on your leg. So I hold the Taser up to my leg and press the trigger. I was pretty embarrassed because I yelled out "Jesus Christ!" I was more startled than anything else, and it hurt real bad, but not the kind of hurt of someone drilling into your teeth -- more like the worst kind of muscle cramp -- it really hurt but I felt like my leg muscles were seizing up.

    So what does a Taser do? Does it really knock a person out like on Star Trek, or does it merely cause a person to take the Lord's name in vain? Have they made the Taser more powerful in the last 20 years? More maybe because my finger was on the trigger, I let go when it first started to hurt, and a person has to deliver multiple jolts to get someone to collapse.

  41. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man, that's really really stupid. "Fighting never solved anything" is the most absurd statement of all time. There's this thing called testosterone that us "idiots" have which tell us that causing someone else harm will earn their respect. Arranging a fight with someone else who feels the same takes about as long as it takes to say:

    "You tryin' to start something?"
    "You wanna go?"
    "Would you care to step outside?"

    Now maybe your society at large thinks that is unacceptable behaviour, but the vast majority of males on earth think it is the most natural thing in the world. Almost every fight finishes with two men who now understand that they are powerful and deserving of respect, and subsequently treat each other such.

    As for domestic violence, that's hardly the matter in question and is obviously not a case of prearranged agreemented combat.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  42. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Police Powers Act clearly states that if you are assaulted you are free to assault the person back, in which case neither party can be charged with assault.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  43. Camping (good point) by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll bet everyone will be camping all the time.

    You mean "hiding behind something bulletproof", just like most soldiers do in a REAL WAR unless the enemy is chasing them or their officers are ordering them to move? A real firefight between a dozen soldiers can take hours, since getting anyone to "rush" is both stupid and nearly impossible.

    That's why "elite units" are elite, because they will actually voluntarily put themselves in harm's way rather than only trying to stay alive. Consequently, they can make short work of conscripts and half-trained farm boys.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  44. obedience to Authority by justthisdude · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I am suprised that no-one has made the connection with Stanley Milgram's "Obedience to Authority".

    http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm/

    Remember for each person getting shot in an on-line game, there is someone willingly doing the shooting. One additional purpose of this could be to desensitize the players to inflicting harm on others, or finding people who never minded much in the first place. For those that do especially well, there is always prison guard duty...

    --
    "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
  45. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by stor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fights are the last refuge of the idiot

    From my experience fighting is the first refuge of the idiot.

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  46. but what if it crashes? by compro01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i remember reading a story in a magazine about the first public demo of a force-feedback joystick. the game that was being played (doom) crashed and the joystick went beserk. if i remember rightly, the joy using the thing ended up with some broken fingers. moderen joysticks have a much less forcefull implimentations of this, but it askes this, what if the game crashes?

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  47. Better for message boards or chatrooms by GopherDylan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are a lot of stupid people out there that I'd love to shock via the Internet.

  48. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I give you permission to hit me how is it assault? It's just such an absurd term. We're not talking about someone punching you without reason. We're talking about two consenting adults agreeing to the terms of a challenge to rectify a grievance. Whether those two adults choose to flip a coin, play rock-paper-scissors, thumb wrestle, arm wrestle or have a fist fight is no concern of the law. The problem with the UK is that you are ruled. You're subject to the whim of the crown. Since the first parliament was convened in Australia we've introduced laws that have freed us from that rule. Thankfully the crown has never intervened (like they did in the US) and we've never needed to have a revolution. Unfortunately the concept of "victim of crime" has been lost. Even in the US people are convicted of crimes to which there is no victim. I wish we could return to the days when police actually responded to greivances instead of "patrolling" the streets. If there is no victim, there is no greivance and therefore, there is no crime.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  49. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the law operates as it does because in fact consenting to being beaten up is really pretty unlikely

    Have you never heard of boxing?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  50. But, it could be like Paint ball by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Paint balls hurt when they hit you. They can leave a pretty sizable welt if they hit you on a hard spot like the wrist.

    So, you REALLY try not to get hit. It's exciting!

    If there were a concequence to being shot in an FPS besides a two minute wait until the next round, it would make you think twice about rushing or doing something stupid, and develop more tactics. There would probably be more camping (not necessarily a bad thing if the level is designed well) and it would force you to overcome those camps with better tactics.

    Of course, I wouldn't want it to be as painful as a damned stun gun.

    But, in the end it wouldn't work because you have no way to be sure there's a device attached to every person playing the game over the internet. This only works if there's full participation (you know, like SPF.)

    In a LAN game it could be a blast though.

    If something like this came to the mass market, I'd expect it to be some weak vibrating belt thing, not an electric jolt.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  51. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

    See, that's exactly the kind of behaviour that would earn you an invitation to step outside if we were in the same room. You insult me freely on Slashdot demonstrating that you have no respect for me, because you feel no threat to your person. If we were in the same room you would not be so bold. Perhaps you consider my reasoning here to be uncivilised. To that I say: it is your actions which are uncivilised. Feel free to disagree with me. Feel free to tell me so. That is showing me respect. But calling me an idiot is clearly an act of disrespect and should be met with the offer of boxed ears.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  52. Re:Save yourself a couple hundred bucks... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There's this thing called testosterone that us "idiots" have which tell us that causing someone else harm will earn their respect.

    No, violent idiots like you may earn my fear, but never respect.

  53. It's an attempt by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To put a real fighting spirit into our PlayStation Generation. And it has a good point. If you get hurt, you can't just cry and take your ball and go home. That can get you and your squad killed. Getting hurt and wounded... that doesn't mean the fight is over. That just means the fight is on! That you have to fight harder, and smarter. Training like this is a good thing. - Former Instructor at the Infantry Training Center at Ft. Benning Georgia.

    --
    MadOgre.com
  54. Loss of voluntary muscle control by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well as you noticed, it does make you cramp up. If you were standing, it was probably difficult to stay that way. Had you been walking or running, the sudden jolt would almost certainly make you lose your balance, which makes it quite difficult to attack someone. That is the point -- not to stun someone, but to forcibly remove their conscious control over major skeletal muscles. This only needs to take place for a few seconds in most circumstances, allowing time to surround the tas-ee and (once the juice is off) pin him down. This isn't to say that the pain doesn't play a role in it, it's quite useful as an intimidation tactic. But the real point is to stop what someone is doing without the high risk of fatal injury that comes from firearms (even with beanbags and the like).

    Another aspect is that there is no scatter, there is no projectile penetration, and there is no risk of shooting the neighbor or wife through the wall accidentally. If firing into a crowded space, or even into a fistfight, you wanna make sure you hit just your target (but if you miss and hit someone else, you don't have to zap them).

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  55. who decides the pain threshold ? by krayfx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) who decides how much pain is enough for most people ?
    2) how conclusive is the study of pain for different persons, its all in the mind anyways, or the way one is brought up for pain perception.
    3) cant someone be killed over a massive multiplayer network game? (people have hacked sims massively and some disease is also supposed to be spereading, so what stops people from hacking these?)
    4) skynet can start from here ;) - first kill the gamers
    5) what abt shock addiction, new kind of pleasure for gamer junkies.
    6) whats the legal age for gamers to experience such shocks!
    7) what about disabled persons.
    8) will the game creators include a fineprint that they arent responsible for any damages such as heart attacks, paralysis... and other possibilities mentioned in the forum.

    ... random thoughts.

  56. That was the case for me by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As in, the big worry was heart fibrillation. I held on to a computer monitor as it was plugged in (the case was off), and recieved a couple tens of thousands of volts . . . burnt my thumb really had where I was holding it. I swore quite a bit, punched a locker (this was at school during a spare), walked down to the office . . . and then passed out, probably psychosomatic more than anythig else (though all that shaking does take it out of you).

    I woke up a minute later on the office floor (oddly enough, I didn't "pass out" in a classical sense, I just had all my senses slowly fade until I was essentially unconscious simply because I had no awareness of any stimuli---very disconcerting, to say the least). After that I was taken in an ambulance to the hospital, though I was quite fine. I spent quite awhile tring to explain to a doctor how this had happened, he was baffled as to how I had burnt myself so badly off of wall current. "No, no, monitors have capacitors and..." but he wasn't getting it. It was a wasted couple of hours, but at least I got to join the very exclusive club of "people that had left our school in an ambulance", and I got a pretty unique story out of it.

    It did mean that we never got that computer into the locker, though. Oh well, it probably just would've electrocuted the entire bank of lockers. On second thought, damn, that would've been interesting . . .

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  57. Gives new meaning to BSOD by carlmenezes · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh yeah...and in the near future on Windows update :

    ***user plays game, gets addicted to it and goes to anonymous website to download a new map*** ..some time later...

    "Windows had downloaded a security patch that will prevent a third party from gaining access to your computer and shocking you repeatedly. Click OK to update Windows."

    ***user clicks OK***

    The following dialog pops up on screen:

    "SUCKA! W1nD0z3 1s 4 n00bZ! I 0wn yoo n0w! Choose your hairstyle : Popcorn or Spikes"

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  58. Yeah great idea by Kaorimoch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thats the last thing I want. Work all day slaving for your boss and then you come home for a break, to relax and then your computer shocks you. This must be the real circle of life, constant pain.

    Better make sure Immersion doesn't have a patent on this one Sony.

  59. Misinformed about electricity by Fringex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Being shocked through the hips cannot cause heart problems of any sort. Electricity has to path through your heart in order to mess up the natural rythem of the heart. More importantly stun guns operate on a super high voltage with extremely low current. It isn't voltage that can cause fibrilation but current. The number of electrons passing through a single point in one second. So over all tissue damage will be minimal, it is the force of these limited amounts of electrons that causes the red marks commonly found on stun gun victims. The tissue damage commonly resulted from electrical shock is due to the bodies resistance. The best example is to compare the body to a light bulb. With enough current, it heats up causing tissue damage. You literally cook. That is why defibrilation units cause skin to smoke and hair to burn because the amount of electricity forced through the heart is the same as is required to light a 60 watt bulb. Make no mistake, no heart problems can result due to this means of training.

  60. Even Earlier in "The Avengers" by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Informative

    The James Bond movie simply copied the same set-up from an earlier episode of the TV show The Avengers called "Dead Man's Treasure" where Emma Peel drove a race car simulator hooked up to deliver an electric shock to the driver when a mistake was made. Similarly shocking was another episode called "The Danger Makers" from the previous year where she had to walk along a see-saw holding looped wands around electrified tracks like you sometimes see on a smaller scale at carnival games.

  61. Your favorite language sucks :) by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's hardly a fair statement... Think too much? C'mon, it's written in C...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  62. Camers Everywhere by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The REAl problem with this will be that every player will suddenly see the inherent happyness of Camping, and nobody but those with this feature hacked to stay off will ever take a step into challenged territory.

    The REAL advantage is that maybe people will finally learn that getting shot hurts like crapass.

    *lol*

    Yeah, right.. like gamers could learn.

  63. Playstation? by Dasch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many playstation games have built-in support of dual shock (the controller shakes when you're shot, blown apart, etc. etc.), maybe that signal could be used to trigger the stun gun instead?

    Oh wait, dual shock is patented...

    Nevermind.