Slashdot Mirror


Homemade Mecha Walks in Japan

EtherAlchemist writes "Sakakibara Kikai has pictures and even a movie of their Land Walker robot (Babelfish translation here) which appears to work. Powered by a 250cc gas engine and armed with several guns (including 2 that fire Nerf-like balls) it stands at a little over 3 meters. What makes this one interesting is that it is actually armed and it is piloted instead of being an exo-skeleton. Makes me wonder if the creators of shows like Robotech or comics/RPGs like Battletech have any kind of licensening rights on appearance. I'd like to see a Warhammer..."

75 of 349 comments (clear)

  1. Of Course by jcuffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Japan would be the first country to build a walking robot that shoots stuff.

    1. Re:Of Course by michael376071 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our..... We know if any country is going to take over the world with biped robots, its going to be the japanese

    2. Re:Of Course by SparksMcGee · · Score: 5, Funny
      I feel I speak for all frustrated nerds who have so often wished for a robotic engine of death of our very own when I say "Ha ha ha! Fools! I'll destroy them all!"

      /with ackowledgments to Gary Larson

    3. Re:Of Course by Forthan+Red · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some people will do anything to win the con's costume contest.

    4. Re:Of Course by kai.chan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Starting from plastic models of their favorite mecha, the Japanese have a genuine interest in robotics. The anime and game industries are big factors in Japan's advances in Robotics. Because of mainstream interest in mecha, especially Gundam, University clubs and hobbyist start huge projects on trying to replicate the cool mecha seen in anime.

      Contrast to Robot Wars with wedges slamming each other (which I find to be quite monotonous and repetitive after the first few times), I believe that the path the Japanese are taking -- bipedal robots which are more versatile -- will benefit mankind in terms of usefulness and application. Heck, even the Japanese version of Robot Wars is much more entertaining to watch, with the robots going through various attack patterns. Check it out here

    5. Re:Of Course by McFadden · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You're right. There's even a prime-time family show over here (completely unrelated to anything techie) that has a robot-walker battle segment in it where amateur hobbyists duel it out with robots that would put the "wedges" to shame. Mom, Dad and the kids all turn up to control or cheer on the beast that they've been furiously developing in their garage. Their robots even do funky kung-fu style moves (albeit slowly!), or have 'gloat' manouevers so that they can do a little dance after they've knocked the other guy off the arena.

      A few years ago when the dotcom crash blew apart our industry I nervously accepted a position in Japan and headed out here not really knowing what to expect. I can honestly say its the best decision I ever made. I've never regretted it for a single day. I'd recommend it to anyone.

    6. Re:Of Course by jon3k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Saving fellow men, your friends in fact ... makes you an idiot?

      Thank god we have all these "idiots" willing to risk their lives to protect you, huh?

  2. Terminator by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Help!! the terminators are here

    1. Re:Terminator by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Help!! the terminators are here"

      Okay, that's it. If anybody asks me if I've seen John Connor, I'm pointing in your direction.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. What the heck? by FireballX301 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It has one autocannon and a single gatling cannon. Where are the Extended range lasers? Or the Crossbow missiles?

    I'm actually quite impressed though, but I'd like to see a shot of it actually walking around and such.

    1. Re:What the heck? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the pics on the site and the crappy quality video they gave us, I'm of the opinion this is a hoax. I'm willing to bet it's just a really good rendering job... maybe if I had a higher res video I could be more sure though.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:What the heck? by G-funk · · Score: 2

      If it's CG, why's it so crap? It looks stupid, and shuffles so slow it's rediculous. I've seen tiny $20 plastic toys that do a better imitation of walking.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:What the heck? by Jay+Tarbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ithought that at first, but the way the guns wobbled around, as well as the way it kind of sways side to side makes me think it's real.

    4. Re:What the heck? by menace690 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the video looks pretty real. I'd actually be even more impressed if this was a render as everything looks absolutely real. Making a robot takes some money and effort, but isn't out of the relm of possibility. Making a render with the lighting effects etc is even out of the question hollywood tech. (Well maybe not quite, but you get my point)

      --
      A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward. -- FDR
  4. I want one by randallpowell · · Score: 2, Funny
    It'll make city driving easier once I can crush SUVs and shoot slow drivers with Nerf balls. Imagine that thing crushing SUVs and orange balls bouncing off cars.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    1. Re:I want one by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 3, Funny

      With its top speed, you would be better of walking using your own two legs...

      (all you amputees can bite me)

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  5. Bot vs Bot by Airconditioning · · Score: 4, Funny

    Still waiting paitently for the day they're armed with real weapons and used in arena style fights to the death.

    Clearly they'd never be used against real people.

  6. I dunno 'bout you by Huxley_Dunsany · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...but I'm waiting for the battle-royale between this and the RoboShark!

    Seriously, it's awesome to see two amazing robotic inventions like these - maybe Asimov's vision of a robot-filled future isn't so far off...

    Huxley

    PS I just can't wait till RoboSharks and Rooba's start mating... Land Shark!

  7. Right... by DietCoke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    /sarcasm alarm triggered

    Just like the UAVs were just going to take pictures, right?

  8. Pretty cool .. by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... Except that it's more of a shuffler than a walker. Still, some cool hacking went into this thing.

    In case of a late-night Slashdotting, I've got a copy of the movie stashed temporarily: robo movie

    1. Re:Pretty cool .. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "In case of a late-night Slashdotting, I've got a copy of the movie stashed temporarily: robo movie"

      I triple-dog-dare-you to point a gun at it!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Pretty cool .. by Niet3sche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *gak*

      It moves along on wheels under the feet - think roller-skates. Also, think of how a large, mainly top-heavy (I'll bet the legs' only function is as ballast) thing scooting along ... on roller-skates. It is unstable. :(

      Neat, but ... well, if you're going to build something like this, why not at least have it walk or do something more useful with the legs than provide ballast? Also, a gyro might help with this thing's drunken swagger.

      It's not that it's terrible ... but I think it doesn't even perform up to the same bar that has been set by exoskeleton systems.

  9. Sweet by Mr.Zong · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can pit the robot sharks against the robot suited humans in circle of sweet death.
    Laser eyes, baby, laser eyes.

    I love technology.

  10. Walking? by Forthan+Red · · Score: 2, Funny

    That a pretty lose definition of "walking". Reminds me of Tim Conway's little-old-man character's shuffle.

  11. And the Pilot? by CharAznable · · Score: 5, Funny

    Any word on which 15 year old socially inept angst-ridden teenage son of one of the creators will be chosen to pilot it?

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:And the Pilot? by Slimcea · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd say this is closer to the Gundam/Mechwarrior series rather than Evangelions (since the Eva series is pretty much organic in nature).

      Of course, if this will lead to hot mysterious blue-haired girls with red eyes, then I'm all the more for it :)

  12. I wouldn't say "Walked" by Rightcoast · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wouldn't exactly say this thing walked. It rolled really.

    Although this machine is really cool, It is kind of pointless to put guns on it (implying a military purpose) when enemy fighters could escape the contraption by simply fleeing over say, a parking block or curb.

    1. Re:I wouldn't say "Walked" by toddhunter · · Score: 4, Funny

      They same could be said of the daleks, but they did alright for a while

    2. Re:I wouldn't say "Walked" by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

      The daleks made up for their lack of walking with a plucky 'can-do' attitude...

      Exterminate!!! Exterminate!!!

  13. Re:Bad ass. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Completely useless with the pseudo-walking, but still, if I had money, I'd buy 12." ... it'll be the best prom EVER!!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. Homemade mecha in Oregon by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Funny
    That's most excellent, but with some craft supplies, you too can have a homemade mecha walking in your house too. tee hee

    Here's the costume I made to carry my son for Halloween:
    http://hallert.net/mech/mechcostume.htm

    Here's a video of it in motion:
    http://hallert.net/mech/WalkingTheMech.wmv

    1. Re:Homemade mecha in Oregon by MrScience · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looks like the engine had a core breach! [502 Denied]

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  15. Just because... by DuranDuran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Makes me wonder if the creators of shows like Robotech or comics/RPGs like Battletech have any kind of licensening rights on appearance.

    This may sound like a troll, but I don't mean it that way:

    Just because in this day and age people can sue other people for just about any reason, doesn't mean that everything needs to be turned into a legal issue.

    If I was a member of this mecha's development team and I read this, I'd seriously be wondering whether inclusion on slashdot was really such a good thing after all.

    --
    "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Just because... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The peple that advocate sueing everybody for everything is the lawyers

      Really? Lawyers advocating legal measures? That's as strange as geeks advocating technical measures, HR/"people people" advocating discussion and negogiation, etc.

      People tend to advocate courses of action that

      a) they are familiar and comfortable with
      b) will make them money

      But don't forget, behind almost every sleazy, greedy lawyer is a sleazy, greedy client...

    2. Re:Just because... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fiction has no license defense really. Just about everything we use today was predicted in sci-fi 40 or so years ago. If it was possible to sue, it would have happened. Its one thing to talk about an idea and another to create a working version.

  16. One word by hydopower · · Score: 3, Funny

    Awesome. The Honda robot, those exoskeletons from a couple months ago(for instance the "old people" walker, as if that's the real purpose), this, and the robot that does Tai Chi suggest to me these things: 1) The Japanese are rapidly advancing in bizarre robot technology, in both manned and unmanned forms 2) They may already be armed with strange weapons 3) They're definately already being trained in the martial arts We had better be prepared.

    1. Re:One word by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say "old people" walker like it's a bad thing. My brother-in-law has MD and an exoskeleton that would give him back his independence (imagine going through puberty and having to have your mother help you go to the bathroom) would be worth its weight in gold.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  17. Mirror of the Video by ClamChwdrMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mirror of the vid for everyone: http://www.csupomona.edu/~iwsnyder/robo_s.wmv The video is awesome. I love the nice touches, like the controls for the guns, and the self-lowering windshield.

  18. Oh Babelfish... by Raynach · · Score: 2, Funny
    From the translated article:

    The left side shot cancer/gun type (6 departure)

    So this mech is equipped with a asbestos gun. Great.

    --
    - A
    1. Re:Oh Babelfish... by eganloo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close ... the Japanese word for "cancer" is "gan"--which is pronounced the same way as the Japanese word for "gun" ("gan").

  19. Has anyone else noticed....? by Bifurcati · · Score: 3, Funny
    Has anyone else noticed that this is the third robot post in the last 36 hours?!!!

    Now might be a good time to get out the old Playstation and start practising against the apparently immeninent take over bid...

  20. Watch out for that breeze! by MrScience · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the video, it is a bit unsturdy, I hope the guy piloting it doesn't get sea/car/motion/robot sickness easily.
    Looks like it uses wheels in the feet to move around (interesting that it can pivot without having to reposition the feet). That design decision reduces the types of terrain available to traversing, though.

    Reminds me a lot of the Mini Cooper "robot". I'd be suprised if the Land Walker were fake, though... it's just too imperfect. :)

    I love the progress of science. I want a real Steel Battalion vertical tank! (awesome game, btw)

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    1. Re:Watch out for that breeze! by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      well.. just using a car would get you over more terrains than this fake-walker.

      a car and an uzi = much more useful for settling disputes :)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  21. Reason why it shuffles and doesn't walk by taneem · · Score: 5, Informative

    It takes too much power to drive actuators to raise the feet off the ground. A lot more energy efficient to use the wheels. Of course, it's a lot more complicated to build a walking mech too, and what they've built thus far is remarkable already. Still, they take a hit in terms of agility - this mecha ain't going nowhere fast. Now it needs a jetpack...

  22. Sakakibara Kikai by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oddly enough, this translates to "Sarah Conner Finder"

  23. For Great Justice! by Kaorimoch · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear it comes with a large speaker, which announces every 10 seconds "All your bases are belong to us."

  24. Re:But... by mjjohansen · · Score: 2, Funny

    - but then it would have to be an official Apple product. Not enough semi-transparent white plastic for that.

  25. Re:But... by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Funny
    And if it runs OS X, "everything just works."

    ...but it's made of bright green plastic and you only have one button. And it's the self-destruct button.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  26. Looks Like by willmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    their server is as badass as the machine - except its a bit faster. -- only in japan can some random guy host a 5 meg movie and be slashdotted without the server crashing and burning

  27. Waddling Overlords by MrFlannel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new ... oh, nevermind, it can't even walk right.

    --
    Clones are people two.
  28. Do the Shuffle by MDMurphy · · Score: 5, Informative

    While it has legs, it's really a stretch to call this walking.
    Now this is a walker: http://www.plustech.fi/Walking1.html
    Video: http://www.plustech.fi/WalkingVideo.html

    Yes, it has more than 2 legs, but at least they come off the ground and wouldn't be stopped dead in it's tracks by a speed bump.

    The walker reference probably came from it's gait, it looks like an old man in slippers while pushing a walker in front of him.

    1. Re:Do the Shuffle by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      That has the advantage of 6 legs.

      The problem is that we do not have any mechanical systems that can move rapid enough and accurate enough to mimic biped standing walking and running, espically in a 12 ton mecha form. as soon as someone invents that then your desire would come true in the form of forestry and construction equipment. They would KILL for a machine with the agility of a biped and the speed of a wheeled vehicle.

      the human legs are insanely accurate and fast devices, performing tons of micro adjustments every second. Look at a master of karate, he/she can kick so fast it looks like a blur yet stop their foot 1 inch from your face. computer technology is fast enough to handle that processing but there is no high strength mechanical actuation systems that can.

      and honestly mechanical systems are still very much primitive with only small advances because there has been no need for high speed, high strength, high acuracy yet.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  29. it's the ED-209! by vena · · Score: 2, Funny

    its only weakness... stairs.

  30. "Warhammer"? by Futaba-chan · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'd like to see a Warhammer..."

    You mean a Destroid Tomahawk, yes? The original mecha that FASA ripped off to make the Warhammer? There's a reason why no one has seen a Warhammer in a while....

    Um, besides the fact that mecha don't actually exist.

    Um, except that they do now, apparently.

    Um.

    1. Re:"Warhammer"? by EvilFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      FASA didn't rip off those designs. They licensed them.

      Unfortunately the company they licensed them was a licensee themselves, and it turned out they didn't have the right to offer a sublicense to begin with. Oops.

      Anyway, FASA might have actually had a chance in court, but they didn't have the finances to fight Harmony Gold (a much larger company).

  31. Re:Another Mirror by nmb3000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hey super, it's up.

    Here's a direct link to the movie.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  32. not homemade, but... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Toyota i-Foot may not be armed and isn't homemade, but it really walks and can apparently walk up stairs. On this page there is a link to a video of it moving at the bottom.

    More info can be found here.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  33. Analog system by Lomithrandel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like it's completely analog, no digital gyro or actuators. No radar... No night vision... No talking computer... this is nothing like a mech, more like an upright motor vehicle, aka a freaking car. I don't consider something a mech unless it has at least a few of these things. Not to mention the fact that I can walk faster than this thing, it has literally no use whatsoever, not even a leap in design... just a pet project by an amateur engineer. I would be impressed if this thing didn't use wheels and an unneccesarily fiction-based design to get around.

  34. Metal Gear! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

    It really makes my snake solid.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:Metal Gear! by Havenwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm kinda wondering what kinda use this thing has... it's not really walking - looks like it has wheels under the feet. Just slides one leg forward and slams the breaks on them wheels, and then move the other leg forward.

      About as useful as a car with tires that doesnt really roll.

  35. Re:Yes, think R2D2 crossed with Tanya Harding by jwdb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In what sense? I just watched the movie and, although it's clear that the feet are sliding and probably have wheels under them, do you really think there are any motors attached to them? Unless he's really trying to trick everyone, it's more likely there are only brakes - lock one foot, the other has to slide.

    Of course it is possible that the legs are not actually driven and are only made to look like they're the source of motive power, but that would be quite sad...

    Jw

  36. Robotech vehicles by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that Robotech is mentioned, I have to say I find the Veritech fighter the coolest looking fighter aircraft ever. The best moment was when a Veritech transformed was trying to land. It's motion sequence reminded my of an eagle landing!

    The Veritech looks almost like an F-15. Would it be useful for a military force to have these transformable aircraft? could it be done?

    1. Re:Robotech vehicles by cybpunks3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mecha started with "Giant Robots" which were really Japan's way of doing Sci-fi while tying back to its Samurai roots.

      When you actually look objectively at what a "Mech" would require, engineeringwise, and how it would pose risks to the human pilot, you realize how it will never become a reality, no matter how much R&D is spent.

      When you watch an anime battle with Mecha you see a lot of instances of these things doing hairpin turns and falling to the ground and bouncing around in a jarring fashion. Even today jet pilots can not pull certain maneuvers without blacking out from the G-forces. The kinds of things you see in anime would kill a human pilot instantly without some kind of magical inertial dampener technology. You'd be lucky if you walked away with just a case of whiplash.

      Secondly, we just don't have materials strong enough to build one of these. The joints especially are problematic. There is a real limit to how big these can be without being ultra fragile. If one of these were to fall over, not only would you need help to pick it up, but you'd probably also have to repair it.

      Third, power supply. All those motors need energy. How long do you think it will run off an internal battery or some noisy gas engine?

      I think it's great to try, but just because it LOOKS like something out of anime doesn't mean it's going to be anything close to as functional, and like I said, even if you could magically produce something that could perform like anime, without those intertial dampenders you REALLY wouldn't want to play around with it.

    2. Re:Robotech vehicles by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good analysis, but let me add just one point...

      Military vehicle designers have a name for big round blobs sitting on top of stilts. They call it 'a target'. There is a reason that both the Abram's tank and the Hummer are wide flat vehicles. You get the carrying capacity, and if a shell explodes nearby there is less chance of flipping the vehicle. The typical 'mech' design would be easily toppled and rendered useless with a simple hand tossed grenade, and that big round blob provide lots of area to absorb the blast.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    3. Re:Robotech vehicles by jmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a reason that both the Abram's tank and the Hummer are wide flat vehicles.

      And just to add to that, all the robots in Robot Wars "evolved" into those wide, flat wedges for pretty much the same reason.

      Wide, flat wedges may be boring, but they make a hell of a better fighting vehicle than a tall biped presenting a nice tall target, with very little stability. Mechs look awesome, but from a military point of view, you'd have to admit they're pretty rediculous.

    4. Re:Robotech vehicles by master_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you are saying is true for the classical type of battle, i.e. an open battlefield with mostly flat terrain. But this is hardly the case for today, where the air force plays the most significant role, and armies are called to fight in very diverse areas.

      On the other hand, it would be much easier for a robot like this to play hide-and-seek in mountainous areas, then instantly take off with a quick jump in the air and transform to an aircraft. It would also be possible to hide it inside mountain curves. Imagine a fleet of Veritechs suddently taking off an island that has no landing strips! what a big surprise would it be for the enemy! the advantage of Veritechs should be enormous in this situation.

      Another good use for this kind of vehicles is rescue operations. These type of robots could reach where no helicopter could go, get the people and then easily fight its way back to the base.

  37. Cool but bad idea by Albinoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do we really want autonomous vehicles honing their destructive skills?

  38. Not Likely by wirefarm · · Score: 2, Informative

    People sue a *lot* less here in Japan than they do in the US.
    Corporations may a bit more, but it's just not a litigious society.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  39. Robot-filled future by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    maybe Asimov's vision of a robot-filled future isn't so far off...

    Huxley


    Sounds like a brave new world.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  40. It's a modern miracle! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    How paralyzed soldiers can mame, kill and destroy again. I can't write more -- I'm moved to tears and cannot see the keyboard.

  41. Re:But... by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Funny

    The iDeathRobot

  42. Mechs - BAH! by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll take a hovertank (a la Hammer's Slammers) over a mech any day. Much more practical. A lower profile means it's harder to hit. It can get knocked around and it won't topple over. No knees that can be taken out with a single shot.

    While all of you mech fanatics are rolling around on the ground like a octegenarian with a busted hip, I'll be safe and sound in my tank, busy putting you out of your misery.

  43. Human translation of page by Bemmu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The robot adults longed for in their childhood, "some day, I want to control a robot of my own". "LAND WALKER" makes this dream a reality. We decided to use a four-pedal controlling system assisted by a computer. This leaves the hands free to operate the guns, even while moving. Even though the robot is large, it can be controlled with ease! Currently there is only one robot, but maybe in the near future mecha duel fights will become possible...

    Height: 3.4 meters (11.15 feet)
    Weight: 1000 kg (2204 pounds)
    Passengers: 1 (0.5 Americans)
    Engine: 250cc
    Movement: shuffle (feet not lifted from ground)
    Speed: 1.5km / h (1 mile / h)
    Equipment: 2 air guns (softball), cockpit monitor
    Right side: chaingun-type
    Left side: shotgun-type

  44. Sadly, unlikely to ever happen by DG · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disclaimer: I'm a retired real-life Armoured officer - and incidently, a former hard-core Battletech (board game!) player.

    Sadly, there's a few reasons why we're unlikely to ever see 'mechs striding the landscape:

    1) Vulnerability. Modern anti-armour weapons, especially guns, are insanely powerful. The 120mm gun in the M1A2, when equipped with the latest APFSDS ammo, has a muzzle velocity of over 1800 m/s, and a penatrative capacity of 960mm of Rolled Homogeneous armour - yes, nearly a full metre of solid steel. 1 cubic metre of steel weighs roughly 17,000 lbs

    Tanks get away from this by using armour that has greater protection capacity at thinner thicknesses, and heavily armouring only the portions of the tank likely to see fire - the turret, and the front of the tank. Tank commanders are heavily trained to use terrain and situational awareness to keep the armour pointed at the enemy. The punishments for getting caught "tracks up to the world" or "broadsides" were severe (although not as severe as what the enemy could dish out)

    Ideally, the only part of the tank visible to the enemy at any given point in time is the gun muzzle and the front of the turret.

    Effectively, the armour on the turret is worth about 800-900mm of RHA, and the glacis is between 500-600mm. The sides, top, and rear are much, much less - and the way that you generate those high effective thicknesses is through the use of super-dense materials like depleted uranium - lighter than the equivelent resistive thickness of steel, but still not exactly light.

    Your Atlas, even if the front arcs are more heavily armoured than the rear, stands so much taller than a tank that concealment and the use of terrain will be much tougher, if not impossible. That means that the forward arcs will have to be *at least* as well armoured as the turret of an M1, and it has a MUCH larger surface area to cover. That's going to weigh a LOT more than 100 tons.

    2) Mobility: Given the massive weight of the chassis (dictated by the armour it needs to carry) and the high ground pressure (dictated by the bipedal form factor) this thing is going to tear up terrain like nobodies' business. Tanks, with low ground pressure and (typically) rubber-padded tracks, still rip the shit out of roadways and open country. Your Atlas is going to be far, far worse. It will be difficult to move any number of them from place to place without transforming the roadway into an untraversable morass, and bridges will be right out of the question.

    Even assuming ideal conditions, mobility is still going to suffer. In a world dominated by line-of-sight projectile weapons, the proper place for a biped is on his stomach - or squatting. Soldiers walk and run, yes - but only for short distances. A quick burst of speed to the next position of cover, and then dive on your face.

    I doubt your Atlas will dive more than once.

    There are other reasons... but the basic problem is one of scale. Bipeds do not scale well past a certain size.

    DG

    --
    Want to learn about race cars? Read my Book