Ask 'Hitchhiker's Guide' Exec. Producer Robbie Stamp

After nearly three years of waiting, the movie version of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is almost upon us. I've been impressed with the casting, and with the trailers I've seen of the film -- enough that I'm taking the rather unhappy early review posted the other day with a large grain of salt. Now's your chance to ask whatever you'd like of Robbie Stamp, the film's executive producer; we'll pass on to Robbie some of the best questions and publish his answers as soon as he gets them back to us. (As usual, please -- confine yourself to one question per post.)

Comments

One question

[tech-hawger]

How faithful to the spirit of the book will the movie be?

Re:One question

[Yonder Way]

Not very.

Re:One question

[Rei]

I especially liked the part where Fort convinced the Vorons to take Zipnot to Guildford. All they need now is Anna, a robot ninja from the planet England, and they'll have gotten everything right.

Re:One question

[janeil]

The only reason the Guide lives on is the original experience of hearing that intro music, then the dialogue of the radio play. Buy the radio version. Hear the reason you've heard of the Guide.

Douglas Adams was an amazing man, and the popularity of the radio series allowed him to do a lot of very cool things. But he always acknowledged how different the books were from the radio series, much of which was written very quickly. And he usually hinted at the fact that the books were written because there was a definite ready-made market for them, and I say good for him.

Even though I'm an obvious true believer in the original radio series, I still say bring on the movie, different or not. A movie isn't a radio dialogue, or a book either. And why shouldn't his wife benefit as well?

It does irk me a little for the trailers to say "..based on the best selling novel." Again I say there'd be nothing without the original radio series.

My Question: "Why doesn't Zephod's (sp?) second head show all the time?"

Why?

[bonch]

Why'd you take out the jokes?

Do you realize how many people will miss "Beware of the Leopard?" Almost all the dialogue in that skit is gone, so it's not even a joke anymore.

Re:Why?

[Sebastopol]

...furthermore: is it too late to add this famous joke back in?

Re:Why?

[manyoso]

As others have pointed out, the dialogue was originally written to be spoken, which it was in the original radio play, and it worked very, very well, thank you.

If you can't imagine that dialogue in your head being funny when spoken then you are either not a fan, have a shitty sense of humor, or are entirely devoid of imagination. Possibly all of the above.

Re:Why?

[tooth]

Do you realize how many people will miss "Beware of the Leopard?" Almost all the dialogue in that skit is gone, so it's not even a joke anymore.

Why pick on that one (missing) joke? Like DNA had said heaps of times before, the movie isn't the book, and the book isn't the radio play! They're different because they're different mediums. So many of you have canned this film and it's not even released yet... How are you supposed to enjoy it if you go in with that attitude? What about all the jokes from the radio play that were not in the book? Do you complain about them?

HHGG

[Turn-X Alphonse]

Will the full trilogy (5 books) be made or is it being played by ear to see how the first goes?

Re:HHGG

[ReverendLoki]

Addendum to the above question:

If you were to make the remaining books into movies, would you try to fit it all into 3 movies? If so, should heralded as the "The Increasingly Innaccurately Described as Increasingly Innaccurately Named Hitchhiker's Trilogy"?

Re:HHGG

[biglig2]

Yes, but there was one thing consistant across the radio, book, and TV. They were full of DNA's jokes. Our fear of the new movie is that it is full of broken DNA jokes.

What is the answer?

[EnronHaliburton2004]

What is the Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything?

It had to be asked.

Re:What is the answer?

[Poromenos1]

43, with a margin of error of +-1.

Re:What is the answer?

[DrEldarion]

Everyone knows that! We want to know the QUESTION.

Re:What is the answer?

[Tackhead]

> 43, with a margin of error of +-1.

"W-H-A...T" What!

"D-O-Y-O"? Doy-oh, "u-G", Do you Get!

*snip*

"...n,u,s-O-n-E!" Plus or minus one!

"What do you get if you multiply six by eight, for values of eight moderated up or down by +/-1?"

(I always thought there was something fundamentally wrong with Slashdot moderation anyways.)

The only question that really matters: Whether he'd have approved or not, would DNA have laughed while watching your "re-imagination" of his work?

Re:What is the answer?

[jhines0042]

What is this Sig you refer to?

Re:What is the answer?

[AviLazar]

"Sorry, please phrase your answer as a Question."

This is Double Jeapardy

Re:What is the answer?

[jspoon]

what does 54 have to do with anything? I think you meant "What is six times seven?"

Nope, obviously he was simply using base thirteen instead of base ten.

Re:What is the answer?

[Nothing Special]

Yes, but nobody would write a joke in Base 13. It just isn't funny.

Re:What is the answer?

[brianiac]

Of note: in base 13, 6 × 9 = 42

Re:What is the answer?

[dubl-u]

Yes, but nobody would write a joke in Base 13. It just isn't funny.

But you shouldn't take that to mean that only jokes in base 10 are funny.

You know why programmers confuse Halloween and Christmas? Because OCT 31 = DEC 25.

And no, you're wrong, that really is funny.

Why attempt the impossible?

[mattkime]

Considering that there is zero chance that real Hitchhiker fans will be satisfied with the movie ... why do you even bother trying?

Which character was the hardest to Cast?

[jhines0042]

Which of the characters in the movie was the most difficult to find an actor for and why?

Question

[smorpheus]

In Making the Film, what was the most difficult cut that had to be made? What scene from the book do you wish could have made it into the movie?

The books

[rkrabath]

Can you appreciate Brittish Humor?

MJ Simpson?

[Anonymous Coward]

So is the movie really as bad as MJ Simpson says? You can tell me, I won't tell anyone else if you agree with him.

Universal appeal to book readers/non book-readers?

[JeTmAn81]

Was there an effort made to appeal equally to both fans of the original books and those who have not read the books, or was it slanted towards one group over the other?

HHG2G Question

[unique alias]

Was investing in a franchise with such a purist fan base ever a concern for you, and what audience do you see this film appealing to most in light of such concerns?

Great Timing!

[Relic of the Future]

How about doing another interview after we've seen the movie?

Re:Great Timing!

[GoodbyeBlueSky1]

Why? Everybody here is clearly already an expert on the movie which they have never seen and yet are so sure it will suck.

The movie could turn out brilliant and the trolls here will still complain about the towel reference from page 140 that, unforgivably, is not in the movie.

Re:Great Timing!

[matts-reign]

There was no reference to towels on page 140. Page 140 was when slartibartfast introduced them to Magrathea's "factory floor". Perhaps you have a diffent version of the book than me.

Wide audience

[Tlosk]

In making the film, was it ever a consideration to create a film that will appeal to people who have never read the books or heard the radio broadcasts? In making adaptations from literary works, especially ones with rich, stand alone universes, much time is spent on exposition of material that is well known to anyone who has read the works. While needed for people unfamiliar with the milieu, exposition rarely makes for riveting entertainment. But then again, so many people have read the books or heard the broadcasts, who actually makes the decision? It it just left up to the screen adaptor?

Book to Film

[MisanthropicProgram]

I understand from film makers that I know that it's very difficult to bring a book to film. Many things that work in a novel just don't work on film.
I'm curious as to what decisions you made regarding editing, changing, or even adding things to the plot to bring the story to film?

Marvin's look?

[Pengunea]

What was the driving inspiration behind the look for the movie version of Marvin? Fans are all aware of the "brain the size of a planet" lament, but what's with that giant round head? A new play on words? For laffs? Because all the other MP3 players seem to be going with that look nowadays?

Re:Marvin's look?

[Turn-X Alphonse]

Douglas Adams said he wanted Marvin to look round and sleek, not like his TV series counter part. Today "sleek and cool" is an iPod with legs.

Re:Marvin's look?

[pavon]

I wondered about that too. The large head creates the impression of a cute child, and well, Marvin is neither cute nor childish. I don't think the TV series Marvin wasn't any better though. I always imagined that Marvin would appear as thought the designers wanted him to appear sleek, but utterly failed, and instead came across as cheap looking. I definately did not see him as very tall, as he was in the TV series, but not child looking either, more stout around 5".

I do know I have the habit of overlooking or forgetting details about character descriptions when reading books, so my ideas might not match some factual details (which I would check before making anything like a film). And I am also aware that Marvin's personality was GPP prototype and somewhat of a failure by the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, so there really isn't any logical reason that his appearance should match his personality. But neither of the Marvin designs seen thus far are at all satisfying to me.

Re:Marvin's look?

[Scrameustache]

Douglas Adams said he wanted Marvin to look round and sleek, not like his TV series counter part. Today "sleek and cool" is an iPod with legs.

Makes perfect sense. "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with" ought to look like he's... made of plastic and... fun... to be with.

I never liked his look in the TV show, early 80's BBC cheeze fest aside. He sounds depressed, but he's supposed to look... appealing. It's a product that is well marketted, but badly made. Remember the commerical in the show? That other robot on the beach didn't look like something anyone would want to buy.

I like that change: It's a cosmetic upgrade that is actually closer to the spirit of the character.

If..

[Turn-X Alphonse]

If more films are made how will the refrences to God (The babelfish entry) and God's message to his creation be handled? In the current politically correct world will these be dropped or edited to refrence something different?

Re:If..

[TsukasaZero]

If more films are made how will the refrences to God (The babelfish entry) and God's message to his creation be handled? In the current politically correct world will these be dropped or edited to refrence something different? It's simple.

They don't put them in there, like you said. The babel fish scene was cut (http://planetmagrathea.com/notinthefilm.html

Re:If..

[jedinite]

Mostly asked and answered on a recent interview by *sigh* DarthBastard...

DarthBastard: We are hearing from some of the reviews of the film that some of the references to God (such as the second half of the babelfish description) are not in the movie. This is a shame but, given the current political climate in America, is perfectly understandible (though I'm glad the more subtle dig at organised religion - Humma and his sermon - is going to be there). What are your thoughts on this and will we see some of these references on the DVD?

Robbie Stamp: Good first question - there has been *no* pressure of any kind whatsoever to take out any of the " God" references. That Guid entry was cut because the pacing at that stage wasnt working. We had too many entries coming on top of each other too quickly. But there is still plenty of Douglas' atheism in the film and the whole Humma plot is right on the nose when it comes to organised religion. And yes look out for the DVD.

Um.

[devphil]

Douglas Adams wrote multiple versions of the screenplay, including the one used in the movie. The "new" characters, such as the one played by John Malkovich (sp?), were added by Adams specifically for the movie.

If Adams wrote it, grilling the producer about it seems pointless.

Also, fans of the Guide universe(s) will already know that the books, the TV series, the radio series, and all the other media versions have all been contradictory. Douglas Adams himself lost track of how many variant plotlines there were. Having read the interviews and seen the trailers, I'd say they're as close to following "the spirit" of the books as they can be.

Re:Um.

[91degrees]

If Adams wrote it, grilling the producer about it seems pointless.

He didn't write all of it. Look at the writing credits. Douglas Adams and Karey Kirkpatrick. According to the Writers Guild, to get a credit, he had to have written a reasonable proportion of the script himself.

Re:Um.

[Scrameustache]

Douglas Adams wrote multiple versions of the screenplay, including the one used in the movie.

No!
Adams had finally written what he considered the final draft, then he died, and the studio rewrote the script. Most probably to undo all the compromises they had to grant the living Adams.

Here, read how the CEO of the studio spins it:

It was well over a year after his passing that Douglas' widow, Jane Adams, encouraged us to move forward with the film as Douglas undoubtedly would have wanted. Karey Kirkpatrick, who had written the hugely successful "Chicken Run", was hired to complete the work Douglas had started on a film adaption of the book.

Hey...

[Poromenos1]

Maybe they got the Vogon captain to rewrite the script?

Process question:

[DCTooTall]

How hard was it dealing with studio exec's who neither read nor understood Douglas Adam's work, while attempting to transition the original stories to film?

What do you feel is the single compromise made in the name of satisfying studio demands that the fans of the originals will be least likely to accept?

Panic

[provolt]

While making the movie, did you ever start to panic and then see copy of the guide and realize, "Oh yeah DON'T PANIC"?

Where is your towel?

[slash_dot_dash_dot_s]

Where is your towel?

What took so long?

[joshdick]

Douglas Adams has likened getting a movie made in Hollywood to "trying to grill a steak by having a succession of people coming into the room and breathing on it."

Given the considerable success of his books and their large following, why wasn't a film adaptation released earlier? What hurdles had to be overcome?

Why

[afstanton]

do the ads look like a terribly unfunny movie?

Mattresses

[publicenemy23]

On a scale of 1-23, how challenging was the task of casting mattresses for the part of Zem the Mattress? I mean, I've never even seen a talking mattress, I've only read about them in books. Do they have a seperate guild in Los Angeles, or do you have to go abroad to find talent? Enquiring minds want to know.

Oh eBay ....

[EnronHaliburton2004]

I like how eBay tries to sell me '42' items when I search google for 42:

Huge selection, great deals on 42 items.

Stylistic conflict between filmmakers & Disney

[LoadStar]

It seemed that a lot of the reason that Hammer and Tongs was chosen to do this film was their unique style, and in a lot of ways, it works with Douglas Adams' creative vision. However, it's being distributed by Touchstone Pictures, a division of the Walt Disney Corporation, and the quirky nature of Hammer and Tongs doesn't seem like it'd mesh with the culture at Disney. Additionally, I'd imagine the "suits" would have a lot of problems with a faithful treatment of Adams' work.

My question: how was the working relationship between the filmmakers and Disney (Touchstone)? Were there elements of the movie that were cut by Disney because they "just didn't get it," or were they pretty supportive of the decisions made by the filmmakers?

On casting

[Nothing Special]

Why the decision to go with an almost totally American leading cast)? Other big book to movie adaptations (Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings) did outstanding with a fully british, and very mixed (respectively) cast. Was this by design to win over American audiences, or studio pressure, or just because they were the best auditioned actors these right roles? and also, were they the 1st choice for the roles. NOTE: I love Sam Rockwell, Mos Def and Zooey Deschanel, so these are not to be taken critically.

Re:On casting

[babbage]

Why the decision to go with an almost totally American leading cast)? Other big book to movie adaptations (Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings) did outstanding with a fully british, and very mixed (respectively) cast. Was this by design to win over American audiences, or studio pressure, or just because they were the best auditioned actors these right roles? and also, were they the 1st choice for the roles.

In an interview on The Connection on WBUR radio this week, Danny Boyle -- indie director of "Trainspotting" and other movies -- commented on this very point.

Basically, according to Boyle, there's a checklist of British-isms that are believed to cut into the marketability of a film when it is screened in the USA. The bigger the movie, &/or the more likely the producers intend to bring the movie to the American market, the more closely they need to adhere to this checklist. Every checked-box on the list is a compromise for the director -- a little movie like Boyle's Millions can get away with mostly ignoring it, but a high profile movie like Hitchhiker "has to" pay more attention to the list.

For better or worse, this checklist comes up all the time. Jokes based on references to "zebra crossings" and "Ford Prefect" will be lost on the vast majority of Americans, for example. (And it's not just the Hitchhikers movie: the green smiling mascot familiar to American readers of the books never showed up in the British editions [at least at first, not sure about later ones]; with the Harry Potter books and movies, some of the names & dialog were changed so that they'd be less alien to American kids.)

If the director has a lot of clout, or doesn't care about the American mass market, then they can get away with this, but with something as prominent as Hitchhiker, they'll feel like they "had" to Americanize it, whether or not fans of the original versions of the story agree with sanding down all the quirky bits that made the stories so fun to them in the past.

"Burn Hollywood, burn."

Re:On casting

[sbszine]

Why the decision to go with an almost totally American leading cast)?

Judging by some of the past US adaptations of British books, my guess would be parochialism, hubris, and a basic contempt for the material. (No disrespect to the US actors who I'm sure did their best, however miscast).

What would Douglas think...

[danhorn]

As an enormous Hitchhikers fan and Douglas Adams friend, I'm curious how you feel he would view the movie in it's final rendition. Since it's not about the accuracy to the books but about the intent, spirit and truth to Douglas' vision bracketed by the financial and operational limitations of a movie in todays economy would Douglas smile and have another drink or just get drunk? He worked for many years to get this on film and now that it is ready for release, as a friend and knowing him as long as you did, how do you think he'd feel you did?

"Us vs Them", a LotR Redux

[TodPunk]

What does the "movie-first" experience have to offer that the "book-first" does not? Or is this movie really just for the geeks that are already in love with the tale, and my wife will just think it's another of my quirks?

Goals for the Film

[grungebox]

Did the studio execs want a flashy blockbuster like Men In Black, or were they projecting for a lower box office total with the production (and thus not as willing to pony up big effects dollars)?

Re:Goals for the Film

[bugnuts]

I'd extend that question:

Was the goal to create a splashy movie that appealed to the general masses that have not read the books, or was the goal to create a movie that appealed to (or at least appeased) DNA fans, with in-jokes and plots only understandable with a-priori knowledge?
Where do you want the final edit to fall on this axis, between those two endpoints?

Examples of many LotR and Dune attempts come to mind. The first Dune movie was doomed, for it made no sense without having read the book.

How much was added/changed after DNA'a death ?

[ygor]

Consider: Every "incarnation" of tHHGttG has had variations such that no two are alike. Not including this one, Douglas Adams had a direct hand from start to finish of each version, so one cannot make remarks about accuracy or authenticity.

While DNA started this one, he was taken from us before its completion.

SO, my question is : Which "divergences" in this version were done (by/under the guidance of) Douglas Adams and which (if any) were done by other folks after his passing.

FWIW, I plan to ignore the critics and go see this film with a child-at-Christmas expectation. It should be great Eye Candy if nothing else.

Question

[pgpckt]

Could you please respond to the review located at http://planetmagrathea.com/shortreview.html , in particular rebutting the parts that suggest the movie is poor in quality, is a travisty, or is otherwise unworthy of the name HHGTTG?

How to choose a source...

[jd]

There are many, many versions of "Hitch Hiker's Guide" out there. There's the radio series, the books, the TV series, the computer game, the tea towl(!) and even a vinyl record version.

In the end, how did you choose, from this range of sources, what sort of Hitch Hiker's Guide you actually wanted to make?

The essence

[rfernand79]

To me, the essence of the Hitchhiker's Guide lies in the unpredictable turn of events that Douglas sets up to the reader. From a little girl with the answer to Vogon poetry, leaping to dolphins and mice. How do you retain these elements in such a straightforward media as the movies? How did you manage to "guide" the viewer without loosing the "in this page, for something completely different, we will talk about dolphins"?

Avoid Repitition

[Relic of the Future]

Please read this most-recent interview with Robbie before posting any (more) questions that have already been answered.

How did Martin Freeman become Arthur Dent?

[timothy]

This is true: two years ago I was watching "The Office" at a co-worker's house (I'd never watched a whole episode before), and realized that Martin Freeman struck me -- out of the blue -- as exactly the way I would have expected a real-life Arthur Dent to look, gesture and sound, right down to the mooning for dawn, and the look of frustrated annoyance that he occasionally beams at (or rather just past) Gareth.

At the time (having no head for celebrity news), I didn't realize he'd been cast already as Arthur, and figured some other, well-meaning but inferior actor had been cast in that role. "It's too bad that they're already shooting 'Hitchhikers,'" I said, "because that guy *is* Arthur! Anyone else will pale in comparison to the flesh-and-blood Arthur who is playing Tim in this bizarre English-type sit-com!" My better-informed co-worker let me in on the good news, and my casting prowess was confirmed (to me, anyhow).

However, I'm curious how he came to the attention of the film's makers -- or was it vice versa? Was it because of his role in The Office, or was it his idea, or what? Was he already an Adams fan, or was this just happenstance?

timothy

Who takes the glory or the fall?

[El_Smack]

Does any one person have final creative say on a movie? Can the editors take a film and chop it up as they see fit thereby changing, for better or worse, the movie? Can the Executive Producer tell the director to change a character the EP doesn't like?

United States audiences

[shadowlight1]

How well do you think this movie will go over with Hitchhiker newbies and United States audiences as compared to a "native" British audience? On a similar vein, did you go out of your way to make it accessible or concentrate on autenticity?

Motivation

[Viking Coder]

Peter Jackson reportedly said that he got the inspiration to work on Lord of the Rings when he finally realized that no one else was going to do it. What motivated you to get involved with Hitchhiker's? And secondly, what project would you love to see someone do?

... the TV show and the Movie ...

[ninjagin]

I was a big fan of the early 80s BBC TV show and enjoyed the characters in it. When I think of Ford Prefect and Arthur Dent I think of the those guys. As you were making the film, how much of an influence was the television production on the film, particularly with regard to the casting and portrayal of the characters but also with regard to production design?

Thanks,

The Spirit of Douglas Adams

[narcolepticjim]

With Douglas Adams gone, one of the difficulties you most certainly faced was balancing your ideas for the film with loyalty to his work.

Without Adams to serve as a reality check and oracle for all things Hitchhiker, how did you divine what he would have enjoyed, recommended, etc., without forfeiting or neglecting your own ideas?

Two questons

[calibanDNS]

1. If Douglas Adams were still alive, what do you believe would be his thoughts and opinion of the final version of the movie?

2. Do you believe the movie would be noticeably different if Adams had survived and had more of a hand in its making? If so, in what ways?

Zaphod's Head

[pete-classic]

Is Zaphod's other head in his chest because of midichlorians, you bastard?

-Peter

Re:Zaphod's Head

[selectspec]

Is Zaphod's other head in his chest because of midichlorians, you bastard?

A better way to phrase this question:

Once you decided to rape Duglass Adam's by shitting on his original text with countless corruptions, perversions, and flat out misrepresentations such as the hiding of Zaphod's head in the chest, did you feel that a special circle in hell would be reserved for your eternal torment or that your punishment would take the form of some extreme bowel torture here on Earth?

Still a comedy?

[ThePolkapunk]

I have been confused by the TV spot for this film. It pushes itself as a Sci-Fi exploration, possibly action film with absolutely no comedy. Is this merely the TV advertising campaign, or is the film not a comedy?

Still Douglass' film?

[ThePolkapunk]

There's a rumor going around that there were a great number of things about the movie that were in contention between the studio and Douglass Adams, and that after his death all of these points were decided by the studio in their favor. Is there any truth to this? A lot of fans are concerned that this film will not be faithful to Douglass Adams' vision for the movie.

Extended Edition DVD?

[tsalem]

How much filmed material will not make it into the movie, and is making an extended edition a possibility?

Adams' contribution

[Ibn al-Hazardous]

Having read "Salmon of doubt", I gather Douglas Adams very much wanted to be involved in this project, (I found his list of phone numbers rather funny :), but then he died. :(

What I wonder is how much he got the chance to be involved, and what (if any) of his contributions to the movie script that were cut (and that you miss)? Were there new stuff, or was it a question of selecting from the preexisting versions?

(I realize answering this question might require the protection of an asbestos suit, but you are welcome to borrow mine.)

My Question.

[h4rm0ny]

This movie was in deadlock for a long time until Douglas Adams died. In a reasonably short time span after this, things began moving.

My question is what things did Douglas Adams block that have now gone ahead?

Re:My Question.

[h4rm0ny]

First off, what the Hell does Lord of the Rings have to do with whether this will be a good film or not?

More to the point though, how do you know the film will be close to the book. Even if it were close to the book, it doesn't mean it'll be a good film. Two people can tell a joke and one will make it funny and the other drag it out.

But since DNA didn't even keep true to his original work, how can you criticize?

I haven't criticised, I'm interested in what it was that Douglas Adams was fighting them on. After all, he has produced very funny books and radio plays on this idea. I respect the gift for humour and intelligence he had. If he had fights with the studio over which direction the film would take, then I'd like to know what they were. Whether or not the film varied the plot yet again, the author knew what was funny and what wasn't.

Dialogue cuts

[BaldGhoti]

The infamous Planet Magrathea pre-release review is saying that a lot of Adams's original dialogue was chopped to bits, leaving out classic lines and asphyxiating his jokes. Is this true? If so, why was the dialogue--the one aspect of H2G2 that has been a constant--changed so drastically?

The Ultimate Question to Life, The Universe...

[ZeLonewolf]

If you'd read the books carefully, you would know that it is impossible to know both the Ultimate Question and the Ultimate Answer for any given universe. Thus, since the Ultimate Answer is known (42), the Ultimate Question can never be known.

Trailers

[SiO2]

All of the trailers I have seen on televison recently make the movie seem like an action flick. In keeping with the spirit of the book, I think this clearly isn't the case. However, the trailer I saw before Sin City last night, actually made the movie seem like more of a comedy. Is this just a case of marketing to different demographics? For instance, the audience for Sin City is most likely into comics, sci fi, etc. and will already know what the book and movie are about. However, the average schlub watching televsion will have no idea, so the trailer tries to draw them with lots of explosions. Is this indeed the case?

I guess I fall into both categories, so I will be there for the humor and the explosions. ; )

SiO2

That OTHER Series...

[ReverendLoki]

So, when can we expect the movie version of "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency" to come out?

Will there be any Ewoks or Jar-Jars?

[WillAffleckUW]

or will there be any gratuitous scenes of violence involving the above?

Any Surprises?

[Myrmi]

Are there any scenes that have counterparts in other versions that you originally thought "There is no way that we're going to be able to do that" that you feel have turned out particularly well?

I disagree..

[zippthorne]

Assuming that it's not there (I haven't seen the film that's not out yet), the additional dialogue about the leopard did enhance the humor (though in a typical wordy brittish way), but is unnecessary for the overall gag: namely that the notice was on "public display" in a very unpublic place. The leopard bit just dresses it up a bit by pointing out how rediculously un-public the public display was.

The cheapest resource in a book is its words: you can have as many of them as you want really, no matter how long it takes to read.

By contrast, the most valuable resource in a film is, arguably, the time. If you want to fit the film into one sitting, you need take advantage of films strengths: it is a visual medium.. drop some dialogue and tell the rest of the joke with the visual portion. Which no doubt will be stunning if the trailer is typical of the film.

Re:I disagree..

[Golias]

but is unnecessary for the overall gag: namely that the notice was on "public display" in a very unpublic place.

No, the joke is 100% that it's a comedy of excess.

There's nothing funny about a "public display" document being inconvenient to get at. That's what most of us call "everyday life."

However, a "public display" document in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet in the back of a disused lavatory with a sign on the door which says "beware of the leopard" is fucking hilarious.

Taking it out would be like re-editing the last reel of The Blues Brothers so they would only be chased for five miles by two or three cop cars. The scene would be shorter, cheaper, still contain everything "needed" to tell the story, but it would not funny.

Re:I disagree..

[Anonymous Coward]

That's quite right, it would be like Dr. Evil asking for sharks. Just sharks.

The ovious question.

[Veemon]

How do you respond to allegations that you have taken the jokes out of the movie to make room for the plot, which was then removed to make room for flashy special effects?

Dont forget to bring a towel

[Grendol]

1) How did you arrive at your interpretation of Zaphod Beeblebrox's appearance? I have specific interest in the presenation of the second head.

2) With the six books in the series on Arthur Dent, Ford Prefect, and Zaphod Beeblebrox, how did you choose to keep some material and not show other material? Did you do this with the the thought of a sequel in mind?

3) In the Introduction: Guide to the guide: Some unhelpful hints from the author, will the movie update the contact info on "How to leave the planet" with current contact info to NASA, The Whitehouse, The Kremlin, and the Pope, with the addition of Virgin Galactic at www.virgingalactic.com ?

4)So Long, And Thanks For All The Fish

Generic question here, but I'm curious:

[Headcase88]

Most movies force the producers into some sort of comprimise due to budget/time/movie length restrictions. If these restrictions were lifted so that you could add one more thing to this movie, what would it be?

Re: What is the asnwer?

[Thumpnugget]

Are you kidding me? People around here seem to love writing jokes in all your base.

Have your towel handy

[Johnny Fusion]

Have you already planned a response to the Death Threats, or were you going to leave the planning to the last minute?

Any addition to a beloved fandom will always be hated by the "true fans" and H2G2 will be the same.

Director's Cut

[njfuzzy]

I am curious whether there is a plan for an extended or "director's cut" of this movie.

We have heard a lot about scenes being in and out of various cuts, suggesting that many of the things long-time fans will miss in this movie may have been filmed.

So, my join questions: Are there plans in place to have an extended cut? and Are there any particular scenes that come to mind that you believe should be added back in?

Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency

[Frobisher]

I'd much rather see a Dirk Gently movie. The only real screen time the character ever got was in an old South Bank Show that I have on tape somewhere. I think it would make a really great movie.

How about some casting suggestions?

• Richard MacDuff:
• Dirk Gently:
• Professor Chronotis:
• Michael Wenton-Weakes:
• Gordon Way:
• Susan Way:
• The Electric Monk:

a grain of salt?

[htmlboy]

i'm skeptical of everything i read online, but if the unhappy review is right and the moviemakers don't know that the restarant is at the temporal end of the universe, then i have no faith in them to get the rest right. as far as i'm concerned, mj simpson's review has saved me $8.

1 Question

[thed00d]

I have one question for you... It's a 42 part question:

No, seriously though, here is my question:

Did you get to work with Douglas Adams before his untimely death? If so, what was it like?

Character Motivations

[Bequita]

Why did you feel it necessary to change the character motivations? Part of what made the books and radio programs funny was that the characters AREN'T actually interested in the Question to the Answer of the Meaning of Life the Universe and Everything/Saving the Universe from the homicidal planet Krikkit/God's Last Message to Creation/etc. Instead, all they want is a good cup of tea/wealth and fame/a drink and a peer group/ad infinitum... The utter inanity of the characters was part of the funny.

The plot of HHGTTG has always been fluid, but the characters were the same throughout all the plot variations. I think the new PLOT of the movie could have worked just as well as any of the other HH plots, except that the characters are significantly different in attitude, behavior, and motivation.

Are there any good SF Book to Movie translations?

[huckamania]

That's science fiction books, not comic or fantasy books which both have some decent attempts. Where do you think HG2TG will stack up? I can think of lots and lots of bad SFB2Ms:

Starship Troopers, I-Robot, The Postman, etc, not bad translations so much as bad movies with the wrong title, that changes the entire story and adds new, boring ones. Starship Troopers took out the armor and added sex and unrequited love. I-Robot I will confess I never eyed. The Postman took a sympathetic do-gooder who put his own life in danger and turned him into a post-apocalyptic con man who gets a bunch of innocent people killed.

The original Planet of the Apes, Blade Runner, Total Recall, Running Man are all decent films but again, the source material was pretty much just a starting point, it just went in a better direction.

I look forward to seeing this movie, however I also looked forward to some of the movies I mentioned previously. Good luck, for all our sakes.

Social sattire versus plain humor

[c0d3h4x0r]

In my opinion, what made Douglas Adams' H2G2 books special was their combination of light-hearted wacky humor with a quite serious undercurrent of bitter socio-philosophical commentary.

The movie trailers look as if they capture the light-hearted wacky humor, but my big concern is that the movie will fail to capture and blend in Adams' commentary on society. And as others have pointed out, with Disney involved somehow in the making or distribution of the movie, I doubt the suits would have let much bitter or deep underlying social commentary into the film.

Do you think you actually correctly identified, related to, and captured in film format the social commentary aspect of Adams' writing?

Adams had a George Carlin-esque approach that was key: he pointed out the asinine flaws in mainstream human thinking and behavior, which are things we all notice but few dare to explicitly point out or belittle. To lose that would be a an artistic shame.

Target Audience

[khujifig]

What sort of auience were you aiming at? Fans, non-fans, British, American, et cetera?

Towels?

[Anonymous Coward]

Is there any mention of towels at ALL in the movie (aside from there not being a Guide entry spoken for them), or will I look like an even bigger dork bringing one with me to the theater?

"Hey, why does that guy bring a towel with him to the movies?"
"Um, I don't know, but let's sit far, far away in case he has to use it for... something."

Re:Towels?

[koogydelbbog]

Apparently there are quite a few. The list of missing scenes makes reference to the Guide entry for the towels as being missing but it's only the Guide entry that's cut, not all the other references to towels.

There were promotional towels draped over the backs of the chairs for the recent Leicester Square premier.

cultural/linguistic problem

[readin]

I have friends, including my current SO, who are not from English-speaking countries but speak English pretty well. Not one of them has been able to enjoy my favorite comedic literature due to the cultural and/or lingustic barriers. In making the film have you taken any special steps to make the material accessible to international audiences? Is it even possible to do so without ruining the material?

Why is the flim so different from other versions?

[jonwil]

Whilst I havent yet been able to hear the radio plays, I have seen the TV series (well the VHS version on 2 tapes anyway) and read all 5 books.

I understand that the movie is not a movie of the book, just another conflicting version of the whole story. But, why are things that are consistant between the book and TV show (and probobly the radio plays too I suspect) different in the movie?
Why does the production design/costumes/etc differ so much from what the books (and I assume the radio plays) describe and also what is shown on the TV series? (e.g. zaphod's extra head and arm not being as prominent as the book and TV series depict, the heart of gold not being shaped like a sneaker as described in the book and shown in the TV series and so on)