Slashdot Mirror


MPAA Under Investigation for Illegal NYPD Payoffs

An anonymous reader writes "The New York Post is reporting that two NYPD officers are being investigated for taking illegal payoffs from the MPAA for busting sellers of pirated DVDs. According to the article, MPAA investigators would tell the cops where pirated movies were being sold, which is perfectly legal, but, after the bust, they'd give them several hundred dollars in gratuities, which is illegal. Naturally, the MPAA denies all of this."

103 of 500 comments (clear)

  1. pirated movies/games.... by npfscayle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm all for free movies, but when people sell them, they should get arrested.
    Save the bandwidth for me. :)

    1. Re:pirated movies/games.... by DenDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why pirate the movies when real life is just as exciting..

      corrupt cops, big industry interests, the justice department gets involved, maybe the feds, why heck where's Jack Bauer?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    2. Re:pirated movies/games.... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah! And when the cops let murderers, armed robbers and rapists run amok beacause busting simple copyright infringers pays a kickback, that's cool too. After all, you get free bandwidth! ;b

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:pirated movies/games.... by SA+Stevens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the Court System that lets murderers, armed robbers, and rapists run amok.

  2. strange by scenestar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a rightious organisation out to protect the lawfull rights of artists they have a rather odd way of practice

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:strange by Hinhule · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems right up their alley to me.

      Anti-Piracy Bureau of Sweden Planted Evidence

      Anti-Piracy Bureau of Sweden has nothing to do with the swedish government, and is funded by the record/movie companies.

      This has also caused a lot of debate in sweden.
      From what I can tell, as long as you are not selling warez/pirated music, it will most likely be perfectly safe to use P2P programs in sweden.

    2. Re:strange by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For a rightious organisation out to protect the lawfull rights of artists they have a rather odd way of practice

      Yeah, but for a greedy organization dedicated to stealing money from their users, that's no surprise to me.

      Unfortunately (for the *AA enemies) I think this is an isolated case, rather than their modus operandi. After all, it's reasonable to expect that one or two cops (or even a P.D.) can be corrupt, isn't it?

  3. Money making by markild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that it loses $3.5 billion in potential worldwide revenue because of movie piracy."

    Surely the can't expect that their raids of arrests will provide them with more sales.

    Where they thinking that as long they're already on the red number side, they could just buy themselves some police forces?

    --
    Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
    Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
    1. Re:Money making by Rs_Conqueror · · Score: 3, Funny
      Surely the can't expect that their raids of arrests will provide them with more sales.

      Apperantly they do, and don't call me shurley...

    2. Re:Money making by laird · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Surely the can't expect that their raids of arrests will provide them with more sales."

      If I understand your claim, I think you're wrong.

      Yes, I think that they do in fact think that when people buy bootleg copies of DVD's that they don't buy legit copies of the DVD's, so shutting down illegal manufacturers (i.e. factories that manufacture DVD's that they don't pay royalties on, and street vendors who burn DVD-R's and don't pay royalties) they reduce the supply of bootlegs and thus increase sales of legit DVD's.

      Is there something there that you disagree with?

    3. Re:Money making by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there something there that you disagree with?

      Reducing the supply of bootlegs doesn't translate into increased sales of legitimiate DVDs. Economics tells us that the higher the price vs the perceived value, the less people who'll buy the product. It could very well be that the price of the bootleg is acceptable to bootleg customers, but that the price of the legal DVD is not.

      Which means that you might get *no* increase in legal DVDs by shutting down bootleg operations. You will, however, acquire power that you didn't have before (by definition).

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  4. What's worse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know who's worse: people paying cops to enforce the law, or cops that won't enforce it unless you pay them extra.

    1. Re:What's worse? by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not every crime is equally important.

      I think I can see the logic of this - most cops probably don't give a damn about who's selling DVDs, especially since the people who do it (at least here) are usually immigrants (sometimes illegal) who have a very poor knowledge of the language and can't get a job.

      Doesn't seem to be much point to me in arresting some guy who managed to get some income that way, when there are much more harmful people out there. I think most cops would be pretty happy with that at least they're not selling drugs or mugging people.

    2. Re:What's worse? by Sparxter · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe because some of the cops already break the law at home, away from work. Personally if I was a cop I wouldn't give 2 hoots about piracy. I'd care more about the person being mugged 2 streets away

      As a cop I can tell you that this is indeed the case. As a small department with a lot of area to cover, piracy is the LAST concern any of us have. To put it in perspective I would rather write someone for J-walking...

    3. Re:What's worse? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >but I can't argue that tipping police with just enough money to help pay that credit card bill

      If this is the case, then there is something wrong with the system. I thought that was what a salary was for.

      Can I pay a guy to be busy with minor offenses so that my major offense will be ignored?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:What's worse? by zotz · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I don't know who's worse: people paying cops to enforce the law, or cops that won't enforce it unless you pay them extra."

      Sure, if it were as simple as that. But could it be that you are buying a change in their priorities? For instance, they really should be dealing with the mugger that has been in Central Park recently, but because of your "tips" they ignore the threat of physical harm to citizens and instead help you enforce your copyrights.

      Another thought just came to me. Haven't I seen something in the news recently about cities refusing to have local police enfore federal laws? So aren't copyright violations, violations of federal laws? Was this the FBI getting "tips" or city cops? Hmmmm. Anyone care to bat this thought around?

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    5. Re:What's worse? by zotz · · Score: 2, Funny

      "To put it in perspective I would rather write someone for J-walking..."

      "You're a cop and you can't spell jaywalking ?"

      Dud3, y0u 3v3r 7h1nk h3 m4y b3 4 |337 c0p?

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    6. Re:What's worse? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think selling illegal copies of other people's works is bad, and I'm not for distributing illegal copies of other people's works for free, but I wonder about jurisdiction here. Is it really the job of state and city cops to enforce federal law? Or are there city and state laws against this?

    7. Re:What's worse? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If this is the case, then there is something wrong with the system. I thought that was what a salary was for.

      There is something wrong with the system when cops for example feel it necessary to accept tips or moonlight as security with their uniform in order to make ends meet. I'm very offended by the practice but i'm not going to get angry with the cop because of it.

      Can I pay a guy to be busy with minor offenses so that my major offense will be ignored?

      Indeed you can... doesn't make it right but i'm sure you could. Look at speeding ticket quotas. A system punishes police for not writing a specified amount of infractions esp in times where a city needs extra money. Talk to police along major interstates and see what they have to say about the subject.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    8. Re:What's worse? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No surprise there. Police agencies intentionally reject applicants with high intelligence. Don't believe me? Check this out, or this, or this. A cop who can't spell his own name would not surprise me.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    9. Re:What's worse? by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how's about you focus your energy on fixing the system instead of promoting breaking it more.

      --
      No Comment.
  5. Full Text if /.'ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    April 21, 2005 -- Two NYPD veterans are being investigated by Internal Affairs for allegedly accepting payoffs from the motion-picture industry to arrest vendors of pirated DVDs, law-enforcement sources told The Post.

    One officer, a sergeant on the force since 1992, has been transferred from the Staten Island Task Force to the 122nd Precinct pending the internal investigation.

    The other, a cop for five years, still works on the task force.

    As members of the unit, the officers, ages 36 and 32, would arrest the sellers of illegal DVDs and confiscate their stock.

    Often they would act on tips from investigators with the Motion Picture Association of America, many of whom are former cops, sources said.

    There is nothing improper about that practice. But on at least four occasions in Brooklyn, Manhattan and Staten Island, the task force officers arrested the vendors, confiscated the illegal movies and then allegedly received gratuities of several hundred dollars from the MPAA itself or its investigators, the source said.

    The MPAA strongly denied that the payoffs came from the trade organization.

    "We don't give cash to police officers," said Bill Shannon, an MPAA anti-piracy official.

    "We work with law-enforcement organizations by providing information and logistical support, and the police make the arrests."

    No department charges have been filed against the NYPD officers, and neither is on modified duty.

    The Staten Island Task Force last made headlines in 2003, when one of its members, Officer Bryan Conroy, allegedly shot and killed Ousmane Zongo, an unarmed African immigrant, inside a Manhattan storage warehouse.

    Conroy and other officers were at the warehouse to bust DVD pirates.

    Zongo, who spoke little English, was an innocent bystander. Conroy's trial earlier this year ended in a hung jury. He will be retried this summer.

    The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that it loses $3.5 billion in potential worldwide revenue because of movie piracy.

    Hollywood has stepped up its effort to bust video and DVD pirates.

    An MPAA tip, for example, led to the recent prosecution of Randy Guthrie, the black sheep of a blueblood New York family, who was recently sentenced to 21/2 years in a Chinese jail for selling nearly $1 million in pirated movies over the Internet.

  6. Re:Umm. by Omniscientist · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No. Law enforcement is a public service. What they do is to be expected, not rewarded. Tipping will lead to favoritism which must be avoided.

    Telemarketer called you; you're on the do not call list?
    click here

  7. Re:Umm. by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So where do you draw the line between tipping an officer for doing you a "favor" and bribing him to do you a "favor"?

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  8. Campaign funds by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Funny

    The MPAA giving to someones campaign funds is perfectly legal, lets say a Police Chief, who then in turn is tough on copyright crimes.

    Yup, business as usual.

  9. Which it be? by n0dalus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FTA: Two NYPD veterans are being investigated by Internal Affairs...
    From title: MPAA Under Investigation for Illegal NYPD Payoffs

    So, who's under investigation here?

    1. Re:Which it be? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2 cops and the MPAA I would imagine. ;-)

  10. Life is easy... by William+Robinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Uh.. No Officer.. I just read it on slashdot that you accept cash.

    1. Re:Life is easy... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damned! If only they'd accept paypal too!

  11. I am not surprised by andydread · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The MPAA and the RIAA will stop at nothing to protect their monopolies. These 2 corrupt officers are just a tip of the giant iceberg of people that recieve huge sums from the MPAA and RIAA. Some others - Several politicians, Virus writers. Yes they employ these people to create nastyware to disrupt p2p networks. and many many more people are bribed by these organizations. The MPAA and the RIAA are among the most corrupt organizations in America. And the blatantly lie about their the root cause of their losses almost every year. It is about time they are investigated but I fear they may buy out the investigation.

  12. Re:Why not? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny
    "You say they lose $x billion per year to the underground industry is ludacris"

    No, no; a lot of other bands are being copied too, not just Ludacris.

  13. Re:Umm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then you get a situation where whoever pays the cops the most gets the most justice.

    We already have a problem with police going after more high profile crimes involving a lot of money, rather than going after less high profile crimes which involve less money but more harm to the individual.

    For example, if a little old lady is scammed out of $10,000 by a guy who says he will fix her leaking roof, that causes her a lot of harm.

    In contrast, if someone distributes music online and costs the music industry $100,000, which is highly unlikely, the police will go after those guys with more vigor, even though the music industry won't feel the sting of that guy's actions much if at all.

  14. Re:Umm. by ispepalocacoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree completely... and I also can't understand why we tip the servers at restaurants... I mean, if they don't do a good job shouldn't they just be fired?

    --
    I Love Alberta Beef
  15. Loosing revenue? by Darvin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The Motion Picture Association of America estimates that it loses $3.5 billion in potential worldwide revenue because of movie piracy."

    Perhaps the reason the MPAA and RIAA is loosing 3.5 billion is because spending the money on bent officials?

  16. Obviously they paid you to say that. by TCaM · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shill!

  17. Re:Umm. by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So where do you draw the line between tipping an officer for doing you a "favor" and bribing him to do you a "favor"?

    You don't.

  18. Irregular verb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So where do you draw the line between tipping an officer for doing you a "favor" and bribing him to do you a "favor"?

    I tip
    You bribe
    The MPAA induces massive police corruption

  19. They may be bad, but.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The MPAA and the RIAA will stop at nothing to protect their monopolies"

    They may be bad, but they do not have monopolies. By definition, they can't be with all the freely available, legal non-pirated non-MPAA/RIAA films and music out there.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:They may be bad, but.... by Tassach · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Cartel" or "Trust" is a more accurate description of the MPAA and RIAA.

      There's a reason there's a law called the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

      A true Republican president would be fighting against the trusts, unlike the corporate whore who occupies the White House.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:They may be bad, but.... by menace3society · · Score: 2, Informative

      "There should be less government in business and more business in government." -- Warren G. Harding, a Republican

  20. This wouldn't surprise me.. by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Living in New York is an expensive lifestyle. But on the other hand, New York cops really seem to enjoy themselves when it comes to corruption. Take for example last year's Republican convention. New York Cops did their best to round up thousands of people, stick them in an asbestos contaminated concentration camp and then charge them with crimes they never committed.

    The Banno Story - Corrupt nyc cops lie, the DA encourages and participates in the lies.. get caught red handed
    Police Perjurers
    another story related to the new york DA editing/manipulating video tapes

    Google the story, hundreds of cases have been dropped because the Police were inventing stories that never happened and then having the DA charge innocent people with full knowledge.

    1. Re:This wouldn't surprise me.. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the DNC had been held in Austin Texas the same thing would have happened.

      I take it you are not from Texas. In Austin everyone loves the Democratic party. It is everywhere else in Texas that does not. Austin is known as "The Hippie Capital of Texas" by many conservatives in the state.

      I merely posted this to point that out, not to dispute any other point you make.

    2. Re:This wouldn't surprise me.. by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 3, Informative

      " So the police make a bunch of arrests among large crowds of people then drop the charges later.

      I really don't have a problem with that.
      "

      No, what happened was, police were making arrests & making up phony charges that the accused parties had never committed, and then the DA tried to prosecute those crimes by manipulating video evidence. Had they presented the entire video evidence uncut, their case against the accused parties would have collapsed. Luckily, third parties filming the same events from the sidelines jumped in and showed exactly what happened (Peaceful demonstrators being rounded up for no bloody reason. Some of them weren't even demonstrators, just locals walking home.)

      Willful and deliberate treachory on the part of the cops and da.

    3. Re:This wouldn't surprise me.. by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're a fool. Its not the beat cops that came up with that tactic. It was City Hall, federal gov't, and the Police Commissioner. The cops were just following their marching orders. Processing time was not the cops fault. It was an obvious plan to keep protesters away from the convention. Illegal, of course, but apparently the attention of City Hall.

      The perjurers obviously need to be punished, but its the inevitable result when you're arresting a city block, rather than people "disturbing the peace", i.e. the protesters.

      If you really want to stop those tactics, you have to send a message to City Hall, not the beat cop. I like Bloomberg's general management of the city, but I'm still voting against him come November.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    4. Re:This wouldn't surprise me.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Arbitrary arrest and imprisonment goes against the constitution, so far as I'm aware. I believe that there's something in the constitution about a right of "the people" to "peaceably assemble" and about "freedom of speech".

      Now, I've been on mass protests. Except I was fortunate to do so in a free country, Britain. I marched with several hundred thousand people about a topic I must admit I've changed my mind on since in the early nineties. And been with several thousand people protesting on another issue at roughly the same period.

      Unlike America, I wasn't arrested or under threat of arrest and the authorities cooperated with the protest and its organizers. In Britain, the right to protest is not considered something to be stamped upon. Riots are rare because the tactics designed to provoke them are rarely if ever used by British law enforcement. You don't, for example, as is common in the US, herd protesters into a closed area, surround them, and then order them to disperse or be arrested.

      In most free countries, the right to protest isn't dismissed as easily as you do:

      So the police make a bunch of arrests among large crowds of people then drop the charges later.

      I really don't have a problem with that. It is a widely practiced tactic in highly charged crowds. If the DNC had been held in Austin Texas the same thing would have happened.

      We don't consider extreme limitations on the right to protest compatable with freedom. Indeed, the day law enforcement appears to be deliberately doing what it can to stir up trouble, the day it clearly starts making arbitrary arrests, et al, is probably the day the government doing this work finds itself likely to be thrown out. We don't do that kind of thing. We don't tolerate it. And we find it bizarre the country whose countrymen usually pride themselves on the degree of Freedom they have consider their right to start a business and then fire employees for what they do in their spare time as more important than the right to protest.

      Not that I'm saying all Americans are like you. I know plenty that aren't, right and left. But I'm surprised that, generally, you don't get the kind of backlash against Fidel Castro clones in local government in the US as you do in other western democracies. Maybe, because you, as citizens against a government, haven't had to fight for basic democratic freedoms for the last 250 years, many of you have forgotten how important they are.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:This wouldn't surprise me.. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      no.

      What really needs to be done is lawsuits filed against the police for false arrest.

      Saying 'You can always vote the fascists in charge out' is idiotic. Police shouldn't break the law even if ordered to. The fascists, meanwhile, control the media, and thus you can't vote them out.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  21. Re:Umm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they don't think the job is worth the pay then they need to look for a job that does.

  22. how ironic by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the MPAA breaking the law to enforce the law. oh the irony.

    People have been saying for years that the MPAA need to try harder to stop piracy before the movies get leaked. Closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Maybe it's time they started listening.

  23. At last by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The wolf reveals it's true colours. Now do the same to the RIAA and throw all their court cases out untill further investigate (which will lead to price fixing and various other crimes being "discovered"). And since it's been proven that this companies buy people off it'll be impossible to buy off the judge/jury because people wille xpect it and if it seems fishy it'll be looked into.

    Good game gentleman. You lose this round and hopefully won't come back.

    --
    I like muppets.
  24. Why is it that.... by sugapablo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why is it that this makes me want to do a little happy dance? :)

    I bet the MPAA thought that while their actions might have been *technically* illegal, they certainly weren't hurting anybody.

    Sound familiar?

    1. Re:Why is it that.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
      " bet the MPAA thought that while their actions might have been *technically* illegal, they certainly weren't hurting anybody. Sound familiar?"

      The next step is to call them thieves.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  25. Bad cops bad cops by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    Bad cops, bad cops

    New York's finest paid by MPAA
    Bust down your door and take your movie away!
    In de car or on de horse,
    They'll take your DVD's with excessive force.

    Bad cops, bad cops.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  26. Re:Umm. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "You would leave the upholding of the law to those who found nothing more available to them than the low pay offerred by the police department?"

    No, I would leave it to those who are in it for public service, rather than those who are in it to get rich. Besides, the pay is quite adequate.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. Hypocrites by Kaorimoch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think we should run an ad in every movie theatre for MPAA members and affiliates to remind them that "Paying off cops is a crime". We could even show the cops who were paid off in the ad to remind them what happens if you bribe law enforcement officials as part of the cops settlement arrangement.

    They want us to obey the law but forget to do it themselves. Great example guys.

  28. Re:Umm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the police force finds it can't recruit the right people with the pay structure as it is then that's a sign that pay needs to be increased. That's got nothing to do with allowing them to accept bribes.

  29. Laws enforced only if officers tipped. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Informative
    "What is the problem with underpaid law enforcers from accepting tips?"

    Aside from the fact that they are not underpaid, there is this problem. If you have a "tip" system, pretty soon they only enforce laws to benefit those who tip them. Want that burglary investigated? Tip them, or they will "ignore it due to more pressing matters".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. Re:Umm. by smutt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have clearly never worked in the service sector. When I worked in the state of Virginia as a waiter I earned roughly half of minimum wage. The rest was expected to be made up with tips. The federal guvment assumes you will get 8-9% of each check in tips and the IRS taxes you for it. So if you don't tip your server still has to pay the IRS taxes on that tip they didn't receive.
    Please tip. If you can't afford to tip then go eat at McDonalds.

    --
    The Information Revolution will be fought on the command line.
  31. Poor people can't tip the police. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Then you accept that the officers are underpaid"

    Nope. Read the parent.

    "If the pay for enforcement of the law can be overcome by the acceptance of "tips", then the base salary is too low to prevent the officers from breaking their oaths."

    You make no sense here. The corruption and "we only work if you give us extra money" situation would apply even if the pay was $200,000 a year. The MPAA has big money going here. How many hundreds of thousands do you want to pay each officer a year to remove any possibility of an MPAA bribe affacting their actions?

    "In addition, if someone is willing to pay extra to have extra police protection,"

    That reminds me of an obvious thing I overlooked. The poor already are ignored too much when they are victims. As they would not be able to pay the tips, this problem would get much much worse.

    "then how is the police officer who assents to investigating "tipped" crimes at fault for spending more time looking into those crimes than into "untipped" crimes?"

    Ever hear of "to protect and to serve"? There is NOT an asterisk there that says in fine print "only protecting those who pay us extra under the table".

    I thought that enforcing the law only to protect those who bribe you was universally considered to be a problem. You seem to think it is a great reform.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  32. Re: you missed the "why" by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are two ways to improve the bottom line for a firm:
    Increase Sales
    Reduce Cost

    The MPAA considers piracy to be a "cost" that they wish to control, to assist their bottom line.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  33. Hardly surprising... by dysjunct · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The music industry has been involved in payola for years and years, despite it being illegal. Why should they see this as anything different? They'll just come up with yet another excuse as to why this isn't payola. Is it a private gift from one individual to another, which -- totally coincidentally -- happens to be from an RIAA member to a NYPD officer? You can't prove anything! What, you want to outlaw gifts?

    (In Soviet Russia, gifts outlaw YOU!)

  34. Tipping by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The tip is supposed to be paid for services above and beyond the most basic acceptable service. If a waiter doesn't provide acceptable service, it is the customer's responsibility to not only NOT TIP, but also to inform the manager of the bad service.

    What is wrong in the above statement is that not tipping is only acceptable in the case of bad service. This is totally wrong, and contrary to the whole concept of tipping.

    Tipping is intended as a means of a waiter/tress to earn income above and beyond what they normally earn (which is typically below minimum wage). However to earn that, it is expected, from the customer's perspective, that the waiter must perform services above and beyond what is acceptable as "normal", not what is accepted as "bad service".

    I hate bad tippers. I think they are cheapskates and are ripping off good waiters. However, I have to reproach any waiter who thinks that it is my responsibility to pay him extra just for providing "adequate" service. If I wanted expected service, I would have gone to McDonalds.

  35. Criminal activity is normal for the RIAA by bani · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not the first time the RIAA has been involved in criminal activity.

    Law enforcement goes wild and imprisons students for sharing a few thousand dollars worth of mp3s. It's about time we start imprisoning music industry CEOs who steal $143 million from the public.

    1. Re:Criminal activity is normal for the RIAA by beelsebob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realize that the MPAA and the RIAA are different?

    2. Re:Criminal activity is normal for the RIAA by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The MPAA and RIAA are different the way the Mafia and the Yakuza are different.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Criminal activity is normal for the RIAA by sik0fewl · · Score: 2, Funny

      The MPAA are Italian and the RIAA are Japanese?

      Did I take this too literally?

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  36. Don't treat the symptom, treat the cause by kc01 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I still say the MPAA (and RIAA) would do a LONG way towards reducing or even eliminating piracy if they sold the products for a fair price in the first place.

    The huge profits that are made on movies and music are way out of line. True, there are many execs, producers, direcetors, actors and musicians who don't get wildly rich, but there are loads who do. Rich beyond all comprehension. Why? These people are simply doing a job, one that has tremndous volume. If they cut prices in half or even lower, they'd still make a spectacular living, and they'd sell a lot more. It might even keep their total revenue the same. But I for one would be a lot happier buying a DVD for $5. I suspect many would, and wouldn't resort to buying cheesy bootlegs.

    I do wish they'd lose that "penny-wise, pound-foolish" attitude.

  37. From the article by Nebu · · Score: 3, Funny

    An MPAA tip, for example, led to the recent prosecution of Randy Guthrie, the black sheep of a blueblood New York family, who was recently sentenced to 21/2 years in a Chinese jail for selling nearly $1 million in pirated movies over the Internet.

    Why don't they just say 10.5 years?

  38. come on by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're SUPPOSED to tip police officers, it's only common courtesy.

  39. How much to have someone arrested? by bcmm · · Score: 4, Funny

    How much does this great service cost? I can think of people I would like to have arrested...

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  40. Re:Bribing them to obey oath they swore to... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "You seem to live in a fantasy world where all police are true to their oaths and are not tempted by external monies."

    See other post, about the problem of not enough penalty for giving into this temptation.

    "If you believe that police are working in their jobs because of some "duty" or obligation to the common good, then I have to believe that you are the one who is misguided"

    Do you actually know anyone in law enforcement? Personally? Have you ever talked to any? Most of the police/etc I talk to are working their jobs for this reason and take their "duty" seriously. Or perhaps all the police you know really are heartless mercenaries with no sense of civic duty, and don't care about their oaths? If this is the case, no wonder you hate the police.

    "But hey. I'm the one getting modded down, so fire away with whatever "arguments" you've got from that fantasy world of yours."

    It is like you have never read the messages. After I post several about the real problems of police corruption, you say I am in a fantasy world where "all police are true to their oaths and are not tempted by external monies." You have me confused with someone else.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  41. Bugger me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Paying Cops to bust people!

    Next thing you know they start paying politicians to change laws.

    Oh shit, nevermind...

  42. Re:Get off your high-horses by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Informative

    We know they are guilty. It's fucking obviously so why "wait". Theres no smoke without fire and you can look at any major company you want and there is always smoke.

    MS, Apple, MPAA, RIAA and hundreds of others now having to compete with the internet. The internet is seen as "the wild west", the general people don't care and us geeks are in the minority with no money. So they do whatever they wish with the money they have and if they get caught who really cares but their lawyers who just wants the cash?

    --
    I like muppets.
  43. Re:Why is this so terrible by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few DVDs is different to being polite. If someone comes tot he house to repair something I'll always offer them a cup of tea and a biscuit. Same for the cops when they came here a few months ago (not relating to myself). These guys have a hard job and being polite to them isn't going to make you a favourite at all. Where as giving them free swag will.

    Tea/coffe/snack/whatever = fine
    Goods/services/favours = no

    I suggest you check the difference between being polite and a bribe. Unless you're a little kid theres a big differencr.

    --
    I like muppets.
  44. Re:Umm. by Triskele · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm a Brit and we generally don't tip. It used to be considered insulting in many sectors - "I work for a living I don't need charity" or "Am I a serf?". In fact I will tip if service and the meal is particularly good.

    Though when I'm in the US I do try to remember that the waiters really are serfs and if I don't tip they'll starve. What a lovely system you guys have...

    --

    --
    USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

  45. I think DVD prices are not too high... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "probably getting the price of each dvd/ vcd/ "whatever form" down will be a realistic start"

    Maybe it is just me, but I think DVD prices are decently low right now (for the most part). I was just at a store yesterday and saw a huge selection of recent discs, new, for $7.50 each. Sure, the new ones are espensive when they first come out, but the prices often drift down.

    I aay "for the most part" because I'd like to get those Babylon 5 sets sometime, and they are still very expensive.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:I think DVD prices are not too high... by digidave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah well thost Babylon 5 sets cost just pennies to manufacture. The shows were already produced, so no production costs went into making them for the DVD. A few special features cost very little: a cameraman might cost $20/hour and the interviewees are probably not paid at all, or maybe a couple hundred bucks. There is more profit to be made on TV show sets because production costs are nearly zero and costs are still high.

      So, tell me again why DVDs cost as much as they do? Ah yes, what the market will bare. Looks like a significant portion of the market has decided that prices are too high.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:I think DVD prices are not too high... by acroyear · · Score: 3, Interesting

      actually, interviews for actors for dvd-special-features cost a lot more than a couple hundred bucks. heck, just getting the rights to use interview footage from other sources like a movie's "red carpet premiere" can cost in the thousands. (consider how the documentary market is getting stagnated because the news people who hold the rights of post-viet-nam footage are charging too much to the point that non-profit companies like PBS's CPB can't afford it).

      the only exception are those for whom their contract involved a percentage of the gross, like the producers, directors, and lead actors. they get paid a substantially higher portion of the dvd sales than the regular actors do.

      for this reason, some dvd releases of classic movies don't get the "special edition" treatment up front (ala Mary Poppins, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, and Chariots of Fire) -- the sales of the first release measure the interest. the profits are then used to pay the actors and other people (critics such as Leonard Maltin in the Disney films) to film the new interview footage.

      its akin to getting a public speaking engagement. those generally run in the thousands, plus transportation and hotel fees, even for small actors like the various Imperial generals/admirals at Star Wars cons. Agents of actors NEVER let them do anything for free, because it reduces their value in the next film's negotiations.

      however, its extremely rare for TV show actors to get a percentage of the gross unless its the fifth season and beyond of a HUGE hit like seinfeld or friends. just as the actors normally don't get a piece of syndication sales, they also rarely get a piece of dvd sales.

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    3. Re:I think DVD prices are not too high... by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Agents of actors NEVER let them do anything for free, because it reduces their value in the next film's negotiations." actually i think the Screen Actors Guild prevents them from getting paid nothing. actors get paid 50 bucks or so for even a Leno appearance. i'm not saying that they make the same amount for a DVD interview, but if they do than that amount of money is so little that you could consider it free if it is divided over the volume of sales.

    4. Re:I think DVD prices are not too high... by Viceice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That because you live in the USA. in the rest of the world, especially in the developing world, the price of movies are grossly over prices.

      I live in a country where if you look at purchasing power parity, our courrency is nearly 60% undervalued against the USD. So stuff here ought to cost only about 40% of what they cost in the US (in other words 60% cheaper).

      Yet, the price of a non bootleg DVD movie here is about US$50 and it stays that way. So that makes it 700% more expensive then your US$7 instead of 60% cheaper which is the fair price.

      Anyway, thats moot, my point is that the MP/RI-AA's arguement is flawed. A people with very low disposeable incomes are either going to buy a bootleg or not going to buy it at all. So there is no loss there because nobody would have bought the original if piracy didn't exist anyway.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    5. Re:I think DVD prices are not too high... by nacturation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah well thost Babylon 5 sets cost just pennies to manufacture. The shows were already produced, so no production costs went into making them for the DVD. A few special features cost very little: a cameraman might cost $20/hour and the interviewees are probably not paid at all, or maybe a couple hundred bucks. There is more profit to be made on TV show sets because production costs are nearly zero and costs are still high.

      So, tell me again why DVDs cost as much as they do? Ah yes, what the market will bare. Looks like a significant portion of the market has decided that prices are too high.


      Ignoring your ignorance about what things in the real world cost, if it's too expensive then just don't buy the shit.

      Every non-commodity item is sold at a price-point of what the market will bear. Do you think your salary should be based upon the minimum it costs you to pay rent, buy a few articles of clothing, and pay for some food? Maybe you're happy with subsisting through life, but most people want to get paid what the going market rate is. If the market will bear a $100K a year salary, I doubt you'll find people saying "Well, I can really get by on only $30K, so I'll cut my employer a deal."

      Let some other store buy DVDs and you can rent it on the cheap. Or get some friends together and split the cost. Next you'll be whining about how cologne and perfume is just a chemical solution in an alcohol base and that it shouldn't cost more than $2 for a bottle of that new Calvin Klein "Pretension" cologne.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  46. Re:I apologize. I misunderstood your argument by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "I thought that you meant that we should hire the best police officers possible."

    Absolutely. But, while paying them more can get better officers, that is not the most of it. Corruption and bribery scandals happen at the top of the law enforcement pay scale (between $100,000 and $200,000 for big cities). Surely these are not poverty wages, yet these big chiefs/leaders/etc still take bribes.

    "I intended to argue for a better "carrot" but you were intent on arguing for a better "stick"."

    When you swear an oath, you swear an oath. No "carrot" should be necessary, or the oath is worthless.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  47. This is about the MPAA not the RIAA by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't get the two mixed up.

    The RIAA is a criminal cartel that buys their own cops
    The MPAA is a criminal cartel that buys their own laws

    (oh and if any lawyers representing either of those organisations are reading this, please sue me for sying that, I'd just love the chance see the expression on your faces when a judge agrees with me)

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  48. Wrong by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "well, they are fully responsible for the piracy themselves!"

    No they're not. Candy costs about 55 cents a bar now, when it used to be about 33 cents when I was a kid. Does this mean if I were to shoplift a candy bar, it's the store's fault? Or the candy manufacturer?

    While I'm certainly not defending the MPAA's actions or saying that things are hunky dory, their shitty actions are not a reasonable justification to steal.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:Wrong by Chuq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While I'm certainly not defending the MPAA's actions or saying that things are hunky dory, their shitty actions are not a reasonable justification to steal.

      I didn't realise DVDs being taken off store shelves was such a huge problem in the US.

      (Hint: If you meant "copyright infringement", say it. Don't say "steal", as that means something else.)

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:Wrong by JayBlalock · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just to take the contrary position: Say you were to put your money into a bank, and it turned out the bank's preferred method of security is to leave the money in piles out on the floor. Obviously, it gets stolen. While in the strictest sense, it's a case of one person committing one crime, only a fool would say the bank was not partially at fault, since their policies made the theft so attractive.

      An extreme case to be sure, but I wanted to illustrate the point. A business has to take reasonable safeguards for their product *AND* make sure they have a viable business model. When the entire world is clamoring for lower prices on music\movies, with the customers being fully aware that these products can be obtained far more cheaply (or for free), then the media conglomerates are inviting piracy by refusing to respond to the market.

      And that's what it all boils down to. The world is moving towards digital distribution, and the media companies are doing everything in their power to try to stop that from happening. They are refusing to update their business model for a new generation. This SHOULD be death for a company. Instead, they have grown so large that they simply attempt to outlaw the new technology that threatens their 1950s mentality.

      Now, personally I think pirates who *profit* off their wares are scum that deserve to be locked up. BUT, that does not mean that the media companies are in any way blameless. The world is changing; they refuse to - and this is the result.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    3. Re:Wrong by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong analogy, no one 'shoplifts' anything by making a copy of a movie. Copying is not the same as theft, no matter how much people here like to bang their shoe on the table and pontificate otherwise. The original media remains untouched. Think more along the lines of selling home-made Mars bars.

    4. Re:Wrong by scsirob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming there's about 20 years difference between 'now' and 'when you were a kid', then today's 50 cents is less money than the 33 cents back then. It's called inflation.

      If today's bar was raised to $14.99, then I would indeed call it the store's fault for trying to make unfair amounts of profit. Which just happens to be what the MPAA does...

      The MPAA has to step into reality by understanding that their super-profitable distribution system (CD, DVD) no longer fits today's reality. They should try to adjust instead of fighting the inevitable.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
  49. NOTICE: The MPAA did NOT deny it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Notice what the man from the MPAA said:

    -->
    "We don't give cash to police officers," said Bill Shannon, an MPAA anti-piracy official.
    --

    Isn't that an odd way of putting a "denial"?

    So Billy, what kind of gratuities do you actually use if not cash?

  50. The Antipiratbyrån "misshap" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently have the Swedish "Antipiratbyrån" (read Antipirate-Bureau) has been doing some not-so-legal stuff when they not long ago raided the swedish ISP Bahnhof.

    Bahnhof states that hey planted evidence through a informer inside the ISP. They payed for the servers which then was filled with warez, mp3s and such.

    Then they come and raided the stuff and now they're under investigation by the swedish government computer agency (which might lead to police investigation, i hope!).

    FYI, the "Antipiratbyrån" is a non-government agency which are funded by Sony and other recordcompanies and the like.

  51. Re:Waiters in the US by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Insightful


    But most countries are socialist-leaning, so I'm not surprised you think so lowly of people who actually have to "sing for their supper".

    How is it that so many people in the US see everything in an axis of Capitalism-Socialism?

    The situation is as follows: Restaurant owners make money from the work of waiting staff. However, the waiting staff are paid on the whim of the customer (with less than minimum wage from owner contribution). The restaurant owner is essentially getting a free ride from the waiting staff. The waiter or waitress has no security and never mind the fact that many of the factors that contribute to "good service" are outside of the waiting staff's hands. If the restaurant owner understaffs, serves bad food or hassles the waitress so that maybe she doesn't feel like smiling or flirting with a customer, then it's not his problem because he's not the one that will be short-changed.

    There's a lot to be said for a system in which everyone knows how much they're getting paid and how much they're expected to pay.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  52. Re:Why is this so terrible by zotz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The MPAA gave these guys a couple free DVDs, it is not like these gifts were large sums of money."

    No, no, you are using the wrong equation. You need to use tyhe one where each work is worth $150,000.00:

    http://www.bitlaw.com/source/17usc/504.html

    all the best,

    drew

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  53. Do you see the irony here? by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " Now now we all want to think the MPAA are guilty but as TFA says its an allegation thats being investigated."

    Isn't this similar to the record and movie companies who want to get info from ISP's about alleged copyright infringement without going to a court of law?

    The media companies have *seen* people stealing, so they assume people guilty and want to just fine them directly without doing that long, involved courtroom stuff.

    Am I the only one who sees the irony here?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  54. What kind of cop are you? by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only cop I would ever expect to surf Slashdot is Robocop.

    Cheers, officer. Just having a funny.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:What kind of cop are you? by Sparxter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only cop I would ever expect to surf Slashdot is Robocop.

      That is funny. I am something of an enigma. (Actually I've been told I look like that shape-shifting cop robot in T2...) It's amusing that at my workplace the brass alternates between blaming me for the computers breaking and asking me to fix them. My co-workers, however, just love the free computer help and advice.

      Rest assured that my ultimate goal is to work in hunting down child porn as I hate the MPAA and couldn't care less about they're childish crusades.

  55. Re:note to mods by Psykechan · · Score: 2, Informative

    The quote is from The Shield (warning: link has heavy use of flash) which is (sadly) one of the best shows on television right now.

    While Vic Mackey is the main character, the quote was actually said by Claudette Wyms; a black detective who is justifying the excessiveness of Vic to the police captain.

    I would actually say that this is on-topic simply for the fact that FX is, of course, FOX which is a member of the MPAA and "The Shield" is about cops going above the law.

  56. Re:Waiters in the US by rollingcalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I believe that waiting tables in the US is the closest you will come to pure capitalism anywhere. You tip based on their performance. If they suck, you pay them nothing, but if they provide excellent service, you pay them well. I've been known to give 200% tips for excellent service."

    That is much closer to socialism. They do something for you then hope and pray you'll pay them out of the goodness of your heart.

    I hate tipping because a customer's idea of a good tip isn't necessarily the same as the waiter/waitress's idea. I'll give what I think is a good tip, and by the expression on their face I can see they weren't pleased with it. I've even had a waitress actually call me cheap after getting a tip for more than 20%. I stormed out of the place in anger so I wouldn't do something that would get me arrested. But on further thought I should have called the manager to get the damn bitch fired.

    With real capitalism, you either know the price up front or you negotiate it before making the purchase. Thus the transaction only takes place if the dollar amount is mutually acceptable. If the wait staff up-front declared a dollar amount or percentage that they'd be willing to serve me for, I can decline if it's too high, and if I accept their terms they can't complain about not receiving a high enough tip.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  57. MPAA Statement by kernel_dan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTFA: "We don't give cash to police officers,"

    We'll give out cars, credit cards, movie screener tickets, anything but cash!

    --

    Illegal? Samir, This is America.
  58. I wanna see them dangling from a rope! by Cryofan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it that I am the only one who seems to understand that we need to go back to harsh punishments for powerful people (e.g., politicians, CEO's, etc) who are obviously crooked. We need to try, convict and sentence all this powerful and corrupt people. Sentence them to death by hanging.
    That is the only way to swing the pendulum back, to correct the culture.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  59. Re:Umm. by getling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is flamebait and I should not respond but I still will...

    No, you shouldn't perpetuate a system you believe is wrong. However, that also does not mean you penalize someone trying to make a living under that unjust system! If you see something wrong, do something that has a snowball's chance of CHANGING the situation. Don't be a cheapskate and then claim that you are "fighting against unjust laws;" your waiter, who often works very hard for your money (which you may not even see half of - it's a waiter's job to make it all seem effortless), won't be very impressed with your supposed moral fiber.

    --
    "Life is tough but we're tougher. You only get what you give, so give all that you've got." --Tony LaRussa
  60. It's true! The bastards nailed me! by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Granted, the title I was hawking didn't help...

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  61. You are way off topic, you know... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "While I'm certainly not defending the MPAA's actions or saying that things are hunky dory, their shitty actions are not a reasonable justification to steal."

    Who ever mentioned stealing? The subject concerned illegal copies. I defy you go find a story about the MPAA cracking down on DVD theft. You might find some, but they are kind of rare.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  62. Tsk tsk by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Never mind that he's as much a thug as the bastard he replaced."

    The difference is, that while he robs and brutalizes and takes away rights and consolidates dictatorial powers, he says "he is doing it to help the poor". That is enough for some who only look at words not deeds.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  63. Anyone one really surprised? by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are basically no "checks and balances" for Police departments in the US, unlike almost every other government function. They steal, lie, sell illegal drugs and kill for personal gain and pleasure while making +$70K per year in salary and "duty play" to sleep in their cruisers. Orwell said it best:
    For once Benjamin consented to break his rule, and he read out to her what was written on the wall. There was nothing there now except a single Commandment. It ran:
    ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL
    BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS
    [...]
    Twelve voices were shouting in anger, and they were all alike. No question, now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    Police are the pigs of our society. They rule unjustly, refuse to allow anyone outside of the law enforcement community to review their actions and most people are too afraid to speak up against their injustices for fear of reprisals.

    Esteban Carpio and Abner Louima got to see police revenge in action. No trial, just beaten within an inch of their lives. With Abner Louima the NYC Police department repeatedly raped his by jambing a toilet plunger in his anus while yelling "Take this, nigger". And these are the ones that lived.

    I'm sorry, but the police are a cancer on society. And before anyone says I don't understand I was once a LEO assigned to the US Marshall's Office for three years (among other duties). Most cops are nothing more than stupid animals that couldn't think for themselves if they're life depended on it. While there are many exceptions including some excellent police officers, it is clearly not the norm.

    Remember this: next time you get pulled over remember who has their hand on a service issued firearm and who is unarmed. Does it make you feel a little scared? If there's a disagreement are they going to believe you or the cop?

    Check out the moive "The Thin Blue Line" (1988). It's about how the police framed Randall Dale Adams for the murder of a police officer. He's was weeks from execution before the truth can out and freed.

    Many cops carry "throwaway pieces", handguns and knifes that can't be traced back to them so if they kill someone they have an excuse. Back in the '80s I spent some time riding with the Washington DC PD and reported to an officer shooting a suspect. The officer claimed the suspect (now quite dead) had a knife. An Inspector came out, didn't see a knife and said he'd back in five minutes. When he returned there were now four knifes under the body. It seems a few "people" grabbed their throwaway knifes and kicked it under the body without checking to see if someone else had already done it. The Inspecter saw the knifes and closed the case as a justifed shooting. Maybe it would've been different if the kid (16 years old) wasn't black and didn't live in public housing.

    Welcome to Amerika.

    Abner Louima: NYC officer arrested in alleged sexual attack on suspect
    Esteban Carpio: No bail for suspect in detective's shooting

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST