Slashdot Mirror


USB Flash Drive Round-up

Adam writes "Ars has published a massive USB 2.0 Hi-speed Flash drive roundup, with 10 USB 2.0 flash drives that they've tested on three OSes. They rate the drives by performance, durability, and features/accessories (including the crappy software that no one uses). Definitely a good read for anyone who has recently sat on their USB thumbdrive!"

348 comments

  1. iPod shuffle ... by Draoi · · Score: 1, Informative
    ... is conspicuously missing. Why? It's an excellent and reasonably fast 512MB/1GB storage device which also happens to double as an mp3 player.

    Just wondering ...

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:iPod shuffle ... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      I use the iRiver with the Korean UMS firmware upgrade you insensitive clod!

      And I'm not an old person in Korea.

    2. Re:iPod shuffle ... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They excluded all mp3 players from the review.

      If they added mp3 players, the review would have grown from 12 devices to 30.

      However, if I had a choice between a 512MB Flash Drive for $60, and a 512MB Flash Drive/mp3 player for $99, I would definately consider the latter.

    3. Re:iPod shuffle ... by calibanDNS · · Score: 4, Informative

      1GB iPod Shuffle: $149
      The prices of the reviewed drives (according to the comparison matrix at the end of the article) are $77, $120, $116, $138, $86, $127, $108, $80, and $80 for each of the 1GB models. Not only is EVERY drive reviewed cheaper than a 1GB iPod Shuffle, but 4 of the 1GB drives are cheaper than the 512MB iPod Shuffle. Don't get me wrong, I love my iPod Shuffle, but it is NOT cheaper than these drives.

    4. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can such a blatant piece of disinformation be modded up? The 1GB Shuffle costs $149. Here are all the reviewed drives. Which one is over $149 in the 1GB model?

    5. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering ...

      Because there are approximately 1000001 similar products out there which are both storage devices and mp3 players, and that's too many to review.

      Just out of curiousity, why do you say that the iPod shuffle is "conspicuously missing" but conspicuously failed to mention similar products by Creative Labs, iRiver, Rio, and so on? Why not review SanDisk's mp3 players as well as their memory sticks? We're not astroturfing, are we?

    6. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How can such a blatant piece of disinformation be modded up?

      Simple, lots of Apple fans are moderators. :)

      I mean really, there are other combination mp3 player/memory stick devices out there as well. SanDisk has a nice line, for example, and they're cheaper than the iPod shuffle. Why not mention them? Because the moderators like Apple.

    7. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To quote the user reviews for that SanDisk player: ""What the photo doesn't show is the poor quality sound (annoying static) when listening to MP3s... The FM radio seemed to work fine.""

      No thanks; For $5 more I can get the better iShuffle.

    8. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, on certain weeks at Best Buy or Circuit City you can grab a gig of memory in any form for $60, after rebates of course. So that backs you up even more; $100 for 512 is way too expensive (I've seen it for $40), even after the mp3 feature. I've always wondered why someone doesn't make a cheap $20-$30 mp3 player that allows you to plug in your own flash media, like a Compact Flash or Secure Digital card. Oh yeah, they want to make money, not save us money...

    9. Re:iPod shuffle ... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "... is conspicuously missing. Why? It's an excellent and reasonably fast 512MB/1GB storage device which also happens to double as an mp3 player."

      Does the iPod shuffle need to have a battery to act as a drive?

      Does using the iPod shuffle as a drive interfere with music storage on it?

      (I'm just fishing for answers here, I don't know.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Since it charges over the USB port, I imagine it would do fine without the battery to be used as a USB drive. I've done such on very low, although not neseccarily(sic) dead batteries in the past with mine.

      It does "interfere" with storage in that space used for files is space you can't use for music when it's being used for files (obviously), but iTunes has a slider for this. I personally set aside 16 of my 512MB, since it's enough for some selected code, .docs, and a handful of images.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    11. Re:iPod shuffle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In any case the performance of MP3 players used purely as drives is more likely than not to be abysmal. They don't need to have exceptional read/write speeds to store and read a few megs of music at a time. I can testify that my 512mb iAudio G3 is measurably slower than my 256mb Cruzer Micro - especially at writing small files. And you don't want to put small files on the iAudio, at least, because it bloats the bootup times to as much as 30 seconds to have a few thousand tiny files(in my case they were SIDS so that I could play a different kind of music when sitting at a lab computer).

  2. bootable by qewl · · Score: 5, Informative

    Still, the most important feature is that it's bootable. (And some still aren't) I love having Feather Linux on a keychain. The Cruzer Mini has done me well.

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    1. Re:bootable by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      The Damn Small Linux folks are into the bootable usb stick thing, real big. I have not tried it yet, as none of my motherboards can look to the usb port(s) for a bootable item.

      I do use a 256 MB stick for a persistant home directory, and I find that sometimes it will not fire up, and other times it will. The Dell usb sticks always work, however, they are good. I often put several linux OS's restoration or home directory on one stick, each one knows what file to get. Also, I put mouse cursors from KDE-Look.org on the stick, and right now I am running Opera 8 that is stored on the stick. If you use a persistant home directory, rather than a simple restoration of personal settings, that is harder on the memory stick, as it is being written to constantly, just like a hard drive. These are neat little devices, but finding one that always fires up can be a problem.
      If you have one with a little light, then you know you have it working today.

  3. Maybe...one more time by ToddBox · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh good lord...another dupe.

    1. Re:Maybe...one more time by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/ 13/1741210&tid=198&tid=137 Sure looks like a dupe to me.

    2. Re:Maybe...one more time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Just how many fucking dupes does Zonk have to post before he finally loses his job???

      --
      Mod me down...you know you want to.

  4. Most people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Previously, most people had no idea what a Flash drive was, but now you can be sure to find most people with even a basic Flash drive in their pocket or purse.

    Uh, no. Whoever wrote this must make a living pickpocketing or mugging geeks only.

    1. Re:Most people? by vitamine73 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do not believe the vast majority of undergraduate biology students to whom I teach are be geeks. Most of them carry these things in their pocket or backpack! Previously, the only people I knew that had one where geeks!

      If you use multiple computers to do your day's work, this is certainly an affordable and practical solution.. and people in this situation are doing it!

    2. Re:Most people? by aslate · · Score: 3, Informative

      We've been selling USB drives at school as part of a Young Enterprise company. We're taking orders from teachers that know nothing about computers, students in the lower years that don't know much, the school secretaries, my mum has one. These things are pretty much replacing the floppy as a means of easy, cheap and compatable removable storage.

    3. Re:Most people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've been selling USB drives at school as part of a Young Enterprise company. We're taking orders from teachers that know nothing about computers, students in the lower years that don't know much, the school secretaries, my mum has one.

      Do these people carry them around everywhere in their pockets and purses? Sorry, but even if they do most people do not.

      These things are pretty much replacing the floppy as a means of easy, cheap and compatable removable storage.

      Yes, and whilst I'm sure your school secretary and mum carried floppies around in their pockets everywhere they went, most people didn't.

    4. Re:Most people? by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      The college I attend dropped support for floppies at the beginning of the year (some machines have floppy drives still but if they break they won't be replaced, and new machines probably won't have them), and as a result everyone carries USB flash drives (all machines have USB ports on the front of the case).

      Mugging or pickpocketing people for usb flash drives would be stupid - they cost what, about £12 for 128MB now? I'm in Britain so if you want mug/pickpocket people it would be for mobile phones (I don't know anybody who doesn't have one) rather than cheap USB keys.

    5. Re:Most people? by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      The commenters point was that it is probably not true that most people have a flash drive these days, and I have to agree with that. A sampling of only undergrad bio students isn't a very good sampling of the US population as a whole (which is what I'd be lead to believe by the statement in the article). If you think that over 50% of US citizens have a flash drive, you're badly mistaken. I'm constantly in meetings of 20 or more people (with many geeks present) and when someone asks to borrow a flash drive to exchange files, I'd guess that only about 4 or 5 people in the meeting tend to have one (20 - 25%).

    6. Re:Most people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just look for the trademark white headphones of the Ipod.

    7. Re:Most people? by vitamine73 · · Score: 1

      A sampling of only undergrad bio students isn't a very good sampling of the US population as a whole

      Altought you have a valid point, this is funny because I live (and teach) in Canada.

    8. Re:Most people? by rikkus-x · · Score: 1

      I saw adverts last year saying that from a certain date, it would be possible to just tell someone (your provider?) that your phone was stolen, and they could make it useless. Presumably all networks refuse to allow it access.

      Is this why I haven't heard of anyone being mugged for their mobile in the last year or so, or did the media just get bored of mentioning it when it happened?

      Rik

    9. Re:Most people? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're referring to the IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identifier) number. This is sent to the carrier network along with every "hello", and is unique to the device (Although it is possible to reflash new IMEI numbers to some phones). In theory any phone can be pulled from all networks across the world once it is reported stolen, which is why phone companies tell you to keep the box and write down the IMEI number.

      For the curious, dialling *#06# on most phones will show you the IMEI of the handset.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    10. Re:Most people? by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Informative

      These things are pretty much replacing the floppy as a means of easy, cheap and compatable removable storage.

      Great, but that doesn't have any bearing on the statement that "most" people have them. How many people carried around floppies? If everyone with a floppy or CD on them right now was counted with all the people with flash drives, it still wouldn't be half the US.

      Now, if someone were to say that half of all people with USB-capable computers had external USB storage, then that would be believable, even if it wasn't true yet. But half of all people? That just absurd.

    11. Re:Most people? by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

      No, just so entrenched in the tech world that they've lost touch with reality. The average person still has no idea what a jump drive is.

    12. Re:Most people? by VivianC · · Score: 1

      My wife's accounting firm is giving out flash drives to all the staff as well as custom printing some of them for customer promotions.

      Most of the staff will need directions on what to do with them, so they don't meet any (computer) geek criteria.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    13. Re:Most people? by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      well, I have no idea what a jump drive is! If yopu're talking about the devices in tfa, then yeah, but I ain't never heard 'em called jump drives! Do they jump around or what?!

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    14. Re:Most people? by aslate · · Score: 1

      Maybe not over half the US population, but there's a very large number of computer-users that use USB flash drives as a method of data storage. They aren't just "geek only" devices.

    15. Re:Most people? by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      In some countries they even use the IMEI numbers to track the thieves.

      Anyway, this only stops casual and ignorant thieves since it's rather trivial to change the IMEI number on many phones.

    16. Re:Most people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking idiot. If you had really read the fucking article you would see that in the first few paragraphs they refer to USB drives as jump drives. RTFA!

    17. Re:Most people? by coopex · · Score: 0

      Nono, you don't live in Canada, we changed the name to America Jr. Oh, that reminds me, uh yeah, we're getting rid of your universal health care. Been meaning to tell you guys aboot that.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    18. Re:Most people? by rwwff · · Score: 1
      The average person still has no idea what a jump drive is. I think most of the younger generation knows what jump drives are and what they are good for. I don't think most people in general do. Especially outside of any of the high-tech cultural hubs. I still get quizical looks and questions from people when I use my PDA to record check register entries into pocket quicken. And I can't remember seeing any other guy with a jumpdrive dangling from his keychain.

      I think our perceptions of reality and normalcy might be a bit on the wishful-thinking side of things...

    19. Re:Most people? by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      How many people carried around floppies?

      You've no idea of the admiring glances I get in public when I wear my chic Red Hat 6.0 boot/root floppy disks on a string around my neck.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  5. Well done, Slashdot! by Ianoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Article originally posted 10 days ago on Ars. You're really keeping up with the news, eh Zonk?

    1. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article originally posted 10 days ago on Ars.

      It doesn't count as a dupe until it's been posted on Slashdot before.

      In addition, these days many serious dupe spotters regard a second posting as too easy and only count articles once they've been posted three or more times.

    2. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by Construct+X · · Score: 1

      Well, just think of the people that might of missed it the first time. heh

    3. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      It might take 10 days to make its first appearance on slash, but you can be sure it will be back tomorrow.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Article originally posted 10 days ago on Ars. You're really keeping up with the news, eh Zonk?
      I'm sure it'll be much faster the second time around.
    5. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Article originally posted 10 days ago on Ars. You're really keeping up with the news, eh Zonk?

      The editors job isn't to find articles to post, it's to post good articles that have been submitted and not to post dupes--something Zonk does do a poor job of.

      Slashdot works because we, the readers, also read other news outlets and post things to slashdot. Check on the left where it says "Submit a story."

    6. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by M1000 · · Score: 1

      And posted 10 days ago too on slashdot...
      http://hardware.slashdot.org/article. pl?sid=05/04/ 13/1741210&tid=198&tid=137

    7. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Slashdot works because we, the readers, also read other news outlets and post things to slashdot.

      Ahhh... the glory of "journalism" in the internet age.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    8. Re:Well done, Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh... the glory of "journalism" in the internet age.

      That's why it's an agragated news service and not an online newspaper...

  6. out of style faster than the floppy by dattaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the new flash readers as stock on most new computers, these may be unpopular by next year.

    1. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Bastian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With the new flash readers as stock on most new computers, these may be unpopular by next year.

      Only among that miniscule segment of the population that only has to deal with computers made in the past year, year and a half and are only made by manufacturers that include a certain feature set.

      But seeing as how a USB key is a heck of a lot cheaper than buying a new computer or a flash drive for all my friends, I think I'll stick with that.

    2. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      With the new flash readers as stock on most new computers, these may be unpopular by next year.

      Is there one flash standard that ALL computers will take, or will there be diversity? Flash, Secure Disk, XD card, or Sony Memorystick?? If there is diversity, it does not really give people confidence that 1 floppy can be taken anywhere and read.

      Sony has been putting their Memory Stick readers on all their laptops. It is on my laptop. But I never use it because it is the only Sony I own.

      We need an industry standard, one main device for writing and reading data. That is the floppy drive, it just needs to take a couple leaps in memory. 1.44 megs will not cut it, not even close. If the computer industry would have kept this technology up to date, maybe had it double in 1994, double again in 1996, again in 1998, again in 2001, again in 2003, we would have a floppy that is 46 megs. More than enough for almost everyone. Instead we had one huge jump to jazz drives and zip drives that did not become universal. We need 1 standard.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by wfberg · · Score: 1

      With the new flash readers as stock on most new computers, these may be unpopular by next year.

      Yes, because unlike USB Mass Storage, which can be accessed out-of-the-box by any computer with a fairly recent OS and a USB port, my CompactFlash will work beautifully on my friend's PC that has a xD-MMC/SD-MemoryStick1/2 reader! Also, his MemoryStick works great in my MMC/SD-xD-CF combo.. NOT.

      Meanwhile, my frickin' car radio has got a USB port to play MP3s. It also has an MMC/SD slot (but no xD, MemoryStick 1/2, CF, etc. etc.)

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    4. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Most notebooks have USB jacks, but ones with flash readers are pretty rare.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      What model of car radio is that? I need to upgrade my car radio, and I never new that ones with USB ports existed! :) Can it play CDs too?

      I'm thinking of getting a Creative NuVo TX FM 1GB, it would be pretty cool to be able to click it in place for long trips :)

    6. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ahem*. "knew", not "new". My bad.

    7. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      If the computer industry would have kept this technology up to date ... we would have a floppy that is 46 megs

      We had 120mb floppies years ago (google for 'LS120').

      They didn't take off, because at that time CDROM and CDRW were just taking hold and people couldn't see the point.

    8. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only among that segment of the population that only has to deal with computers made in the last 5 years and are only made by manufacturers that include a certain feature set.

      But seeing as how a floppy disk is a heck of a lot cheaper than buying a new computer or USB port for all my friends, I think I'll stick with that.

    9. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But seeing as how a USB key is a heck of a lot cheaper than buying a new computer or a flash drive for all my friends, I think I'll stick with that.

      What's even cheaper is a CF card and a portable reader. 1GB for ~$70. Doesn't quite fit in your pocket as well, but meh.

    10. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by TummyX · · Score: 1


      Most notebooks have USB jacks, but ones with flash readers are pretty rare.


      Eh? All the notebooks I've had in the last 5 years have had SD and/or compact flash slots.

    11. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Unless flash cards have suddenly magically become a heck of a lot larger than your average USB, I fail to see how that response at all relevant.

    12. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by mrsev · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you on crack? You say "out of style faster than the floppy"

      I assume that you are talking about the floppy disc that I have been using since the end of the 80s and still occasionay use.

      By your argument the usb drive will last ONLY 20 years!

    13. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by gargan · · Score: 1

      and many, many more are coming standard with front-mounted USB ports.

      --
      Emory: Uh..we're still..beta testing that.
      Oglethorpe: What you're testing is me and my patience!
    14. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      and we have it in the form of usb flash sticks

      its cheap it works on most fairly recent pcs without extra drivers (win2K and up definately and i think winme too and i'm pretty sure most reasonablly recent linux distros do too)

      why do we need yet another standard when usb handles it so well?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      >> We had 120mb floppies years ago (google for 'LS120').

      And we had "flopticals" (magneto-optical floppies) before that. I think they were around 21 megs and no one bought them either

    16. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      Half the people I work with carry a pen drive. None carry a flash card of any sort.
      The pen drive format is robust and simple. Don't bet on it going away.

    17. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by magarity · · Score: 1

      We had 120mb floppies years ago (google for 'LS120')

      No, sorry, the LS120 was an ATAPI device that could read/write standard floppy disks as well as its own 120MB disks. It wasn't a 120MB floppy disk drive. There's a big difference from a technical standpoint as well as a support standpoint.

    18. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Neither the Powerbook I have at home or the Dell laptop I have at work have flash readers. They both have USB.
      Both were purchased in the last year.
      Both have PCMCIA slots, so I could get a flash reader in there, but that's not the point.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    19. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Lucky you.

      I bought a loaded Inspiron 8200 2 years ago and it had no such slots.

      A friend recently bought 2 other laptops from dell and they have no such slots.

      Dell sucks yea yea...not the point though.

    20. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by fbjon · · Score: 1

      You are apparently buying the wrong laptops entirely or buying them in the wrong country/market. Where I get them, they have one single slot for reading sd, xd, mmc, AND memory sticks. At the very least, a laptop must have an sd slot these days, otherwise it is crippled.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:out of style faster than the floppy by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Which player is that? Very interested.

  7. my experience with Apacer by selderrr · · Score: 4, Informative

    i bought one, and I'm not really happy with it : if you attach the drive at your keychain, you can NOT insert the drive in a USB port without the keys : the litlle cord is FIXED on the drive ! This is very annoying, since I have quite a bunch of keys (10+.. hey, there's a poll suggestion) and the whole mess tends to get tangled between the KVM cables.

    if you buy a drive : make sure you can unplug it from whatever it is attached to. But make sure that the drive itself doesn't unplug too easily : I lost my previous drive cause the click-'n-hold system wore off and it would unplug at the slightest pull

    1. Re:my experience with Apacer by x0dus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would also say stay away from Apacer. I have a 256MB HT202 flash drive, and it has never worked. I constantly get "insert a disk" errors when copying files to it. If you do a Google search you will find many others with the exact same problem. They do have a utility on their website that claims to fix the drive by reformatting it, but I haven't heard a single report from anyone saying it works..

      Bottom line.. Don't buy Apacer flash drives.

    2. Re:my experience with Apacer by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      Me, on the other hand, love my Apacer USB drive for the same reason you don't like it. I don't carry it around at a keychain, so the cap being fixed to the safety cord or whatever they call it doesn't bother me at all. On the contrary, I find it the best feature of the drive. I never need to worry about losing the cap, and I know plenty of folks who have lost theirs.

    3. Re:my experience with Apacer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me love you too!

    4. Re:my experience with Apacer by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you should've got the Apacer AV220, with the Creative MuVo TX-style detachable thumb key.

      Of course, when you say "keychain", I'm thinking carkeys/housekeys. Is that correct?

    5. Re:my experience with Apacer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small carabine hook should take care of that.

    6. Re:my experience with Apacer by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      I agree, Apacer sucks. I once had one, and it suddenly stopped working after 3 months. Not that it ever worked well, I saw plenty of read and write errors during its short life-span.

    7. Re:my experience with Apacer by mrsev · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can recommend using you pockets to store things. They come with the possibility to upgrade to V2.0 pockets with 600% capacity on the new McHammer Deluxe models.

    8. Re:my experience with Apacer by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i keep mine in a part of my wallet (i have two that i keep on my person)

      they can't fall out when they are zipped into an outer part of a wallet ;)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:my experience with Apacer by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      you can NOT insert the drive in a USB port without the keys : the litlle cord is FIXED on the drive !

      They make keychains that seperate into halves. Mount your thumbdrive onto one of those.

    10. Re:my experience with Apacer by Scuff · · Score: 1

      sure, plenty of people losed the covers, but in my experience, the cover isn't very neccassary for these things, unless you're leaving the thing sitting in a pile of dirt, it wont have any effect on the device. Since the only external piece is the connection, even if it gets too dirty, a quick swab with rubbing alchohol and it's just like new.

    11. Re:my experience with Apacer by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      The Lexar JumpDrive attaches to a keychain and slots into a protective rubber "sleeve".

  8. Obligatory by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    They seem to have neglected this flash drive that comes with a free MP3 player.

    1. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All USB MP3 players can function as USB removable drives. The inclusion of MP3 players would have made the article much harder to write, read, and understand.

    2. Re:Obligatory by blueadept1 · · Score: 0

      There is already enough apple in that article. They test them on Macs for god's sake. Oh, yes, and the article is about flash drives, not MP3 players, as the other response stated.

    3. Re:Obligatory by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Except for my !$#@%^ Palm Tungsten.

      What the hell is Palm thinking?

    4. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't criticize Has Blue. He's just doing his job (no doubt).

  9. What a lame comment. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a lame comment.

    '10 days ago' isn't very old. The news is still relevent and interesting.

    The job of the editors isn't to repost news articles as soon as they happen like some RSS newsfeed.

    1. Re:What a lame comment. by rylin · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see the effort of publishing dupes being spent on publishing recent/bleeding-edge news.

  10. Whitelist by tepples · · Score: 1, Troll

    Some of the newer arcade video games accept select brands of USB memory cards. However, they tend to have whitelists such that only pure flash drives, and not hard drives or music players, are recognized.

    1. Re:Whitelist by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Some of the newer arcade video games accept select brands of USB memory cards.

      In order to find out WTF you were talking about, I googled your text... and got zilch. So what did you mean? And how can you identify a USB device in a video game... and why would they do this?

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:Whitelist by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious.

      What is a 'pure flash drive' in comparison to any other USB storage device? What's the advantage in including a small subset of USB storage devices?

      Also, how can they tell the difference?

    3. Re:Whitelist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some of the newer arcade video games accept select brands of USB memory cards. However, they tend to have whitelists such that only pure flash drives, and not hard drives or music players, are recognized.

      Nice jargon troll.

    4. Re:Whitelist by tepples · · Score: 1

      What's the advantage in including a small subset of USB storage devices?

      For one thing, the USB ports on In The Groove don't put out much power, and they don't support hubs either. Otherwise, it's Because Roxor Games Says So(tm). If you want more details please ask on roxorgames.com forums.

      Also, how can they tell the difference?

      In The Groove whitelists USB drives by pattern-matching on the brand name. For instance, if the brand name field contains "Jump" then it's probably a Lexar flash drive.

    5. Re:Whitelist by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

      The game in question is In The Groove. The USB device whitelist is here.

    6. Re:Whitelist by Lshmael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I fail to see how one game became "some of the newer arcade video games."

    7. Re:Whitelist by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you ought to be able to save your high score and position in an arcadde game on a flash drive.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    8. Re:Whitelist by joNDoty · · Score: 1

      Besides In The Groove (see sibling post), Gran Turismo 4 for the PS2 lets you do some pretty cool stuff like save screenshots to a flash drive.
      It also lets you print to an epson USB printer BTW.

    9. Re:Whitelist by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how one game became "some of the newer arcade video games."

      If you ate a single slice of pizza for lunch, would you be wrong in saying you had some pizza for lunch?

    10. Re:Whitelist by Jeff85 · · Score: 1

      Not quite the same, but an old DDR machine in China I've seen allows users to insert PS1 memory cards... which makes me wonder if they just had a Playstation running under the hood. However, the slots were lined up vertically right next to each other, so probably not.

      --
      Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
    11. Re:Whitelist by tepples · · Score: 1

      an old DDR machine in China I've seen allows users to insert PS1 memory cards... which makes me wonder if they just had a Playstation running under the hood.

      A DDR arcade machine with 3rd Mix through Extreme (8th Mix) runs on a hardware platform called "Bemani Digital System 573", which is Konami's "System 573" arcade board plus an audio decoder. "System 573", in turn, is a PS1 with more VRAM. Yes, many official DDR machines have PS1 memory card slots for stats and edit steps.

    12. Re:Whitelist by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      and do what with it exactly, once it's on your flash drive?

      open it in notepad and go,

      Wow man, that WAS great!

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    13. Re:Whitelist by Jeff85 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, ok. I actually have only played on a real DDR machine like two or three times. Maybe I just didn't notice it on the other ones.

      --
      Fetch Text URL - Firefox Extension
    14. Re:Whitelist by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Last time I played a game in an arcade (admittedly a few years ago) I vaguely remember having to start right from the beginning yet again.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    15. Re:Whitelist by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought the original poster said we should be able to save his high score to the key..

      wait--- that is what it says....

      does having your high score enable you to start elsewhere?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  11. Well done, Slashdot!-Panicing geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Article originally posted 10 days ago on Ars. You're really keeping up with the news, eh Zonk?"

    This just in. The world will end tomorrow! React accordingly.

  12. BIOS upgrades? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still, the most important feature is that it's bootable. (And some still aren't)

    Are BIOS upgrades generally available for those older mainboards that have USB ports but no ability to boot from USB storage? For instance, I use a Dell Dimension 4100 computer manufactured in fall of 2000.

    1. Re:BIOS upgrades? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, most newer PCs should have a BIOS option to either boot from USB or "Other Device". Once set, then you just need to change the boot priority order. Make sure that "USB" or "Other Device" is set to boot BEFORE the hard drive.

      If you do not have this option, you might want look into updating your BIOS by getting the latest firmware from Dell. If your PC is customer built, head over to the Motherboard manufacture.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  13. helloooo Alliston/Boston by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    FYI, the photos taken with the flash-drive/camera were right on the Charles River, for the most part. The first building is (I believe) the Biogen building right by Alliston Mass Pike exit. The Trader Joe's happens to be in the same parking lot as (ahem) a Microcenter computer store (gee, wonder where everything was bought..) The red building is right near/behind the Central Square T stop. The last photo looks to be taken right after pulling out of the parking lot of the Microcenter/TJ's.

    I opened that page up accidentally in Safari instead of Firefox, and man, now I remember why I installed Flashblock. Ow. Ow. OW OW OW. 3/4 of the page is flash advertisements!

    1. Re:helloooo Alliston/Boston by maggard · · Score: 1
      first building is (I believe) the Biogen building right by Alliston Mass Pike exit.
      The faux industrial building by the Allston exit of I90 is a Genzyme production facility, not associated with Biogen. All of Biogen's local offices are located around Kendall/Tech Square area (I'm former Biogen IT contractor).

      FWIW, Ars was started by a bunch of Harvard folks, so the Cambridge/Boston backdrops aren't suprising. All of these are on or within a few block of Memorial Drive, which runs along the Charles River from Harvard to MIT.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    2. Re:helloooo Alliston/Boston by Deffexor · · Score: 1

      Trader Joe's happens to be in the same parking lot as (ahem) a Microcenter computer store (gee, wonder where everything was bought..)

      Actually, I think the only thing I got at Microcenter was the PQI drive (because I couldn't get in touch with anyone at PQI to save my life). Everything else was shipped to me from the manufacturer. But yes, you guys guessed right: Ars Technica was founded by a bunch of Harvard guys, thus the photos of the area.

    3. Re:helloooo Alliston/Boston by desiato · · Score: 0

      Actually, those photos are taken in Cambridge, not Boston/Allston(correct spelling). The red buliding you mention is The Field pub, which is just across Mass Ave from me =)

      Kind of creepy to know that there are Ars guys skulking around my neck of the woods!

      --
      -- Ryan!
    4. Re:helloooo Alliston/Boston by lhpineapple · · Score: 1

      That's Allston, not Alliston.

  14. What's with OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any idea why the OSX test yielded results 5MB/s slower than Windows?

    dom

    1. Re:What's with OS X? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      OSX only runs on Apple hardware. So I would assume the issue is not an OS problem, but that of a hardware issue.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:What's with OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Troll: Windows the shit, Mac the sux...

      Mac Troll: It was designed for Windows, and MS did not write the drivers anyway

      Real answer: Ask the BSD folks

    3. Re:What's with OS X? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "OSX only runs on Apple hardware. So I would assume the issue is not an OS problem, but that of a hardware issue."

      I wouldn't assume that without trying Linux on it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:What's with OS X? by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Yet Apple uses the same standard USB controllers like everyone else in the industry. Maybe its the type of partition which makes it different, plus, most pen drives or formatted for FAT32. OSX and XP can read from that but of course OSX is going to suffer because the OS doesn't run on FAT32.

    5. Re:What's with OS X? by ZackSchil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The same reason firewire is slower on Windows than Mac OS X. I think it has to due with the USB2.0 drivers Apple wrote. For whatever reason (IO streamlining, CPU time, who knows) they made it run a bit slower. The transfer speed to total capacity ratio is high enough that it doesn't really matter though.

    6. Re:What's with OS X? by KillShill · · Score: 1

      it has nothing to do with "running on fat32". its about fat32 r/w support. and obviously apple's sucks comparatively.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    7. Re:What's with OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The reason that the OS X performance is less than the others is the fact that the Mac has to read the foregin file format. The same problem shows up in PC-formatted floppies and hard drives. If you want the best perfromance for a flash drive you need to format it in Mac's HFS file system. I have done so and it screams. As a side note, try a Lexar FireWire compact flash reader and a 1 GB camera card if you want speed and capacity.

    8. Re:What's with OS X? by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      I don't quite remember, but it's something about 20 megs taking 17 minutes or something. I donno. Could be my imagination.

    9. Re:What's with OS X? by gozar · · Score: 1
      Any idea why the OSX test yielded results 5MB/s slower than Windows?

      Could it have something do with that the drives are FAT formatted? I wonder if it would be different if they reformatted them HFS+?

      --
      What, me worry?
    10. Re:What's with OS X? by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Thats what I meant.

  15. The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stick by licamell · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The PQI stick is absolutely amazing. I have one and leave it in the cargo pocket of whatever pants I'm wearing and hardly remember it's there until it's needed. My roomate also has one (he actually got me mine for this past Christmas) and he has put his through the wash twice already and it still works perfectly.

    One thing that's weird in the review is they act so shocked that the I-Stick can be so small and still be so good... but have they ever opened up any other USB thumb drive? Most have what looks like a I-Stick inside them. The case broke off my cruzer titanium (yeah, its titanium, but the part that holds the two halfs together definitely was not!) and I used to carry around the inside piece after that which was about the size of the I-Stick, but of course was not as strong of plastic and couldn't survive like the I-stick has.

    Just my $0.02

  16. PQI 1GB by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    I use it all the time, very unobtrusive and handy, my only worry is that I'll lose it admist a shuffle of papers, or down a crack in a desk. Also, the wallet caddy broke quickly, because I don't take my wallet out of my pocket before I sit down. I think the caddy counts as another one of those afterthoughts.

    I taped one into the PCMCIA slot filler for my laptop, it's kind of a neat place to hide it.

    1. Re:PQI 1GB by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Now that seems like a useful idea. replace the stupid wallet card with a PCMCIA device that holds two, connects them and acts as some sort of hardware RAID.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  17. What we need is one universal standard by John+Seminal · · Score: 1, Interesting
    These flash drives are nice, but problematic. First, on many computers the only USB ports are on the back of the computer. This is a pain to try and stick the usb memory stick in a port behind the computer, when the computer might be pushed up against a wall, or under a table.

    The other problem is they are rather pricey. They are expensive. The cheapest one was $46 bucks. They can get to be over $100 dollars.

    What we need is another jump in floppy disks. Like when it jumped from 720k to 1.44 megs. The #1 file type that I carry around are documents. And some PDF files, some powerpoint presentations can get to be big.

    With all the innovation, we run a risk of having multiple products doing the same thing, and different computers supporting different hardware. For example, I really wished that all computers had a CD-RW. My computer lab has just DVD drives. It does not make sence, it is a lab, who is going to watch movies in a lab? But writing data to a drive is needed.

    The anwser is to keep the #1 standard of the past 20 years. Floppy drives were the standard, every PC had a floppy, you could take your disk and know with 100% certanty you could read the data. There was no problem of "I brought my zip disk... huh? You don't have a zip drive?". Lets work on making a floppy drive take a couple leaps. I expected the past couple years for the 1.44megs to double a few times, to be around 11.52 megs if it doubled 3 times the past 6 years. That size disk would be big enough for most files, and people would not need a usb keychain, zip drive, and 3 other methods of transporting files.

    Plus, am I the only one who thinks USB keychains are flimsy. A friend had the ipod shuttle and I kept thinking the USB part was going to snap off the cheap plastic. It stuck out of the computer, one bad move, one slip or shove into it and it would snap.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Zeebs · · Score: 1

      This was already tried, didn't take too well.
      Zip Drive and Jaz Drive where what came of the effort, at the time I remember media being rather expensive.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    2. Re:What we need is one universal standard by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
      First, on many computers the only USB ports are on the back of the computer.

      Try a USB-A M-F extension cord. Run it around to the front of the machine. Works for me.

      --
      My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    3. Re:What we need is one universal standard by dukeblue219 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you look online you can find a decent 128mb USB drive for $13, and a good 256mb for just over $20.

      Also, are you serious about the floppy drive? Floppy drives are the slowest, most unreliable and generally worst form of storage I have ever used. In the late 90's there were numerous different replacements for the floppy, like Zips, Superdisks (something like that) etc. None of these caught on because nobody had a drive to read it. Now we have a system where 99.5% of all users can read your files from a USB key at far faster speeds than a floppy could offer, but you want to go back to an 11.52mb floppy drive?

      Some USB drives are flimsy, yes, but I remember putting floppy disks in my backpack, and almost every time the damn metal thingy would bend or get yanked off. I feel far more confident about tossing a solid state USB key into a backpack, pocket, cupholder, etc.

      --
      -Ted http://www.freemathhelp.com/
    4. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could take your disk and know with 100% certainty you could read the data.

      Uh, no. Those things are unreliable as hell. I don't have one good floppy in my house, out of hundreds.

    5. Re:What we need is one universal standard by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      This was already tried, didn't take too well. Zip Drive and Jaz Drive where what came of the effort, at the time I remember media being rather expensive.

      I am not talking about a new media that looks like a disk. I am talking about the disk. It is on every PC. That is what we need, something on every PC. The disk drive is the only hardware that has stayed the same for 2 decades on all PC's. We just needed the data capacity to double a few times. It could have happened with the media, and the same hardware would have still worked.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    6. Re:What we need is one universal standard by tepples · · Score: 1

      I am talking about the disk. It is on every PC.

      Then use CD-RW. Virtually every new PC comes with a burner. Besides, floppies aren't even on every commodity x86 PC anymore.

    7. Re:What we need is one universal standard by rideaurocks · · Score: 1

      You're right about the need for a standard, but guess what the most readily available new standard is for medium-to-large data transfer; USB.

      You'd have a tough time to find a computer these day without at least 2 USB 2.0 ports, and having at least that is only a pci card away.

      Floppy disks aren't going to be able to handle increased storage space, which is why there haven't been any developments since the ZIP drive. Face it, a USB flash drive IS the new standard!

    8. Re:What we need is one universal standard by nemattoad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firstly, I have not seen a single new computer in the last year or two without front USB Ports. Also, a USB Hub or a USB extension cable works wonders.

      Secondly, the last thing I'd call one of these devices is expensive. I recall it was about 2 years ago when I bought a 256MB SD Card (cheap one) for $139 canadian which was around $100 US back then. Today you can get a 1GB one for $100 US that is of decent quality and a top of the line 1GB for 100$ US.
      Now, you may be saying WTF, that is expensive! you must be rich. Well, no, I just have an appreciation for the difference between solid state and magnetic or optical storage. Even compared to todays leading comparable storage medium, CD-RWs, they are A) Much faster, B) No software required, C) Virtually indestructable if retardedness is not an issue.

      Finally, I have a Pentium 2 333mhz computer that has USB ports. I think it's safe to say that USB is a standard. As for drivers, if you still run windows 98, using good 'ol floppy drives may not be a bad idea. But if you want to embrace USB mass storage and don't want to upgrade your OS, included win98 drivers will do the trick, but are slightly slow to begin access to the device.

      I must say that having had an M-System DiskOnKey 64MB for the last few years, I have had NOT ONE issue with corrupted files, durability, or speed, even on a win98 system. I can however think of numerous times where having to read/write many times to a floppy has yielded in extremly slow speeds and how easily it is to break them.

      To top it off, a 11.52 MB floppy disk? Why not just write the 0s and 1s down on a piece of paper, it shouldn't be much slower.

      Long live USB Mass Storage Devices! I say this as I am about to head out to buy a verbatim store and go pro 512MB and from my computer which does not have a floppy drive.

    9. Re:What we need is one universal standard by meganthom · · Score: 1

      Two of the three computers I use don't have a floppy drive. If I wanted to read a floppy disk with them, I would need a rather large device. If I want to read information from my flash drive on the computer that only has USB ports in the back, I can buy a handy extension cable.

      I have a 128MB San Disk Cruzer Micro that cost me $25. It's half the size of my friends' flash drives and works just as well.

      While standards are nice, floppy drives are not standard anymore. The disks are too big and too easy to ruin. While USB ports may not always be easy to access, they are practically ubiquitous.

      --
      Live free or die
    10. Re:What we need is one universal standard by LocalFire · · Score: 1

      I can load 128 mb on my thumb drive. I got it for Christmas and have no idea how much it cost, but because my kids gave it to me, it must have been reasonable. I have installed Open Office.org from it and routinely haul things around bigger than 12 mb. If you really want to continue using floppies, you could get a usb floppy drive. They only cost about 50 bucks and seem to work all right.

    11. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      LS120. Replacement floppy drive.. completely backward compatible with 120MB capacity. It died. Nobody bought it.

    12. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I still keep a USB floppy drive around... It's needed sometimes (they're not big and the one I have came with an old laptop).

      eg. I had to install XP on a brand new machine. XP can't install directly on SATA and I didn't want to do my usual trick of having an old 30MB IDE drive as drive C, so I had to use the boot drivers that came on floppy that are for this purpose (The XP installer won't read a CD prior to installation, however it will read USB floppy drives... go figure).

      I wouldn't store anything on floppies any more... we have ethernet these days.

    13. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      None of my PCs have had a disk drive in 5 years. And no Apple computers have had one since 1998.

      Your assumptions are kind of out-of-date.

      Besides, even if your plan WAS used, the floppy drive in today's Dell *still* can't read anything bigger than 1.4 MB... so you'd have to replace the floppy drive, which is a LOT hardware than just plugging something into a USB port.

      If you think USB memory sticks are fragile sticking out of the USB port, just buy a $4 USB extension cord and lay it down on your desk. Isn't that a little bit cheaper and easier than replacing the floppy drive on millions of computers?

    14. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why force yourself to move to a more reliable, faster, cheaper, and all-around better standard when you can pretend you're saving a few cents and put up with losing data every so often?

      Of course, if you really want to get modern space and performance out of a floppy drive, you could always do this. Good luck getting it on a keychain, though.

    15. Re:What we need is one universal standard by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      What we need is another jump in floppy disks. Like when it jumped from 720k to 1.44 megs. The #1 file type that I carry around are documents. And some PDF files, some powerpoint presentations can get to be big.

      We had 2.88meg drives over 10 years ago. Sony 2.88meg drives were stock on 486 series PS/2s by IBM. They used the same media as standard floppy but held twice as much. But they didn't catch on. Why, no bugger would buy them. Hell even fewer bought 5.25inch 2.44meg drives, and in fact only have seen them used on odd IBM equipment.

      MD (Sony MiniDisc) would have been good but they didn't want to license it for the PC.

      I hate to say it, but CD-R(w) and DVD+/-R(w) are the floppy of this decade. Cheaper than floppy by a long shot, and everyone at least has a CD drive. New systems are hardly ever shipped with a floppy drive anymore, why would they it's not needed.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    16. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      MD (Sony MiniDisc) would have been good but they didn't want to license it for the PC.

      Sony used to do an external MD-based data drive for PCs - but it cost like 500 dollars. Even at the time, for the amount of storage you got, it was ludicrously expensive.

      I sometimes wonder how Sony manage to sell anything.

    17. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Zeebs · · Score: 1

      I may be mistaken because they were before my time, but I think the 740K disks were usable in the 1.44M drives, but not vice versa, or at least not to their full utility.

      --

      Happy Noodle Boy says "F###ing doughnut! Mock me? You fried cyclops!!"
    18. Re:What we need is one universal standard by spectre_240sx · · Score: 1

      Are you aware of the durability problems with floppy disks? Way too often I get people asking me to retrieve data from a toasted disk and most of the time it's completely gone. The sooner floppy disks are gone from this earth, the better.

    19. Re:What we need is one universal standard by johnw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The anwser is to keep the #1 standard of the past 20 years. Floppy drives were the standard, every PC had a floppy, you could take your disk and know with 100% certanty you could read the data.

      Man, what planet have you been living on? Have you tried using floppy discs lately?

      Floppy discs have never given you 100% certainty and these days it's probably more like 20%. I practically never use them and when I do it becomes a long and tedious search to find a disc and drive that actually work. The drives are little more than a token gesture on modern PCs and they're fast disappearing.

      A new standard for floppies would offer none of the benefits which you claim. No existing drive would read them. No existing media would give you this mythical new capacity. It would just be a completely new and incompatible option. It would also be far less convenient to carry around than the modern alternatives.

      Accept it - the floppy is dead. It was useful in its day but it's long since been superseded. The alternatives are just too overwhelmingly better.

      John
    20. Re:What we need is one universal standard by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      XP can't install directly on SATA

      Change your choice of mainboard. Lately an MSI board required XP setup to load SATA drivers from floppy, whereas an Asus emulated IDE and didn't require a driver to be loaded.

    21. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Kesh · · Score: 1

      No, it wouldn't. IBM tried to do this with 2.88 MB floppies and that, well, flopped. People tried again with the LS120s and, again, it didn't take off.

      Why? Because the new discs didn't work in the 1.44 MB drives, and folks didn't want to spring for new hardware. When folks didn't spring for the new drives, that meant you couldn't take your bigger floppies to work or the library and expect to use them.

      I think it's best that the floppy drive is dead. USB ports are ubiquitous, and you can plug whatever you want into them: key drives, Zip drives, hard drives, flash card readers, etc. It's the ultimate in compatible media because whatever you buy, if it uses USB, it will work.

    22. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Correct. Though, it turns out, you could sometimes punch a hole in the side of the low-density disks and format them to be high-density disks. It wasn't always reliable, but it worked with some of them.

      But, yes, once a disk was formatted for high-density (1.44 MB), it would not read in a low-density (720 K) drive.

    23. Re:What we need is one universal standard by radish · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a network? I've never owned one of these things, and I just don't understand why I would. What do people use them for? My music is on my mp3 player, if I want to move a file between locations I use the net, if it's too big for that I burn it on a CD/DVD for $0.10. I realise I'm not the target market but I'm trying to understand who is - college students? Don't they have internet access?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    24. Re:What we need is one universal standard by edwazere · · Score: 1

      Yup, exactly what we do in some of our computer labs where I work, works fine, even when epoxied to the case :-)

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
    25. Re:What we need is one universal standard by TheIndefiniteArticle · · Score: 1

      I have a floppy drive under my desk which I use to scratch my toes while I work at my computer.

    26. Re:What we need is one universal standard by XMyth · · Score: 1

      The last 2 computers I bought (1 dell laptop and 1 compaq desktop) don't have floppy drives.

      USB storage makes sense.

    27. Re:What we need is one universal standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Plus, am I the only one who thinks USB keychains are flimsy."
      Maybe. I havent broken any. You could just pot a PQI stick in fibreglass resin if you are worried.
      The floppy drive needs to take ONE leap, into the trash can.
      USB stick durability varies, but they are far tougher than the wretched floppy.
      The universal standards are CD-RW and USB flash drive.
      If your USB port is in the wrong spot, a cable will fix that.

    28. Re:What we need is one universal standard by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Use driver disks for better reliability. Nearly all my bought disks are toast by now, but I've found some ethernet card driver disks in my drawer (with nice glossy label in colour) that apparently are of better quality.

      Ok, so I don't actually use it, except to build that s-ata driver disk that XP wants, since I'm unable to slipstream the driver into XP, since nLite refuses to work with me. So actually I don't need it, honest! (do not slashdot me with truckloads of old driver disks)

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    29. Re:What we need is one universal standard by evilviper · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with a network?

      Ever tried to edit the presentation you're working on, over the network? On a CD? Just doesn't work.

      For the network, you're going to want to install something like WinSCP to copy the files to/from your remote machine. Almost no machines have it installed when you get there, and even if you can install it on all the machines you use (and re-install it regularly) it's still a hassle to log-in, copy files, edit, log-back-in, copy files back, repeat ad nauseum. It is FAR easier when you plug something in, and your files appear like REGULAR local files.

      Not to mention that networks go out, some machines may be offline, and people don't always want to have their home machine up and running all the time on the odd chance they'll need it.

      I was unlucky enough to have gone to college at a time when floppies were showing their age, and practically useless, but USB drives hadn't come around yet. ZIP was the only option, few computers had drives, and they didn't work great. Most people really didn't want to buy an expensive ZIP drive and disks either.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    30. Re:What we need is one universal standard by nemattoad · · Score: 1

      Emulated IDE does not offer any of the advantages such as NCQ, hotswap and the rest of the fancy that SATA offers. If slipstreaming drivers or spending a minute to hook up a floppy drive outside your case is too much for you, then go back and use regular IDE. Nobody forces anyone to use new technologies when the old stuff is still plentiful, but it seems that way too many people embrace new technologies and then whine when it doesnt work like the old stuff. Suck it up.

  18. i just broke my MuVo NX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i need to get a thumb drive to replace my muvo that i had been using. i was in lab at school where they have the computers on the floor and i plugged it into the front usb port. i managed to kick it with my big feet and broke the damn plug clean off. i was hoping to resolder it back on but the solder points ripped off the pcb.

    1. Re:i just broke my MuVo NX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that to a wireless USB adapter. Just find wherever the solder points lead to and solder there.

  19. Feature not taken into account by ArAgost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like the FA didn't conider the fact that some USB drives simply *don't fit* in some USB ports. I think it's one of the most annoying thing about those little things.

    1. Re:Feature not taken into account by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      On the Comparison Matrix page that ends the article, look at the line for "USB extension cable". Those devices come with a short USB cable that solves the problem of the drive itself being too fat to plug into a crowded USB port.

    2. Re:Feature not taken into account by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      I guess that being a geek I'm supposed to take an usb extension cable with me (and that's ok). But why not just build it so that fits? (rethorical question - no answer expected)

    3. Re:Feature not taken into account by dajak · · Score: 1

      I know what you are talking about.

      My first USB flash drive was an Apacer steno. I also have four TwinMos drives. The four TwinMos drives fit into the 4-port USB hub on my desk together. I need a cable for my camera, mp3 player, and steno.

      If I put the steno into the hub, it will block ALL 4 ports. That's crappy design.

      I use two of the TwinMos drives as disks for a portable, silent, low power, non-moving parts mini-itx server. Most important requirement is they physically fit in the USB ports which are directly on top of eachother.

      I considered the RAID configuration they tried, but I think I will wait until >1GB becomes affordable. Disk space is pretty tight. Two IDE flash drives in RAID configuration could make an awsome swap file for my silent server, but they are pretty expensive too & hard to find.

  20. Bonzai with SD card by bender647 · · Score: 1

    I have one of the Bonzai drives with remove SD card. It is slow, it is bulky. But its nice to be able to pull the memory out of my camera or Sharp Zaurus, plug it into the Bonzai and sync to the PC. It saves battery life on the camera or PDA for sure.

    1. Re:Bonzai with SD card by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have one of these, too. It is a little slow, but the removable and upgradable SD option is great. I recently broke my Bonzai card and will be able to pull out the memory card and stick it into another Bonzai.

    2. Re:Bonzai with SD card by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      I use the Bonzai too. I use it with the large SD card in my Palm. That way I can keep all my portable data in one place and work with it from the Palm, my work laptop or desktop, home desktop, or any other machine I come across.

  21. a drive full of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Definitely a good read for anyone who has recently sat on their USB thumbdrive!

    I think the only thing good for someone who did that would be a first aid kit...

    -SJ53

  22. Looking for SECURE thumbdrives by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For the most part, all of these units are the same with only minor variation in features and performance.

    What I am looking for is a usb thumbdrive/fob/whatever that has strong anti-tamper security features. I'm talking about on the level of FIPS 140 Level 4 which, among other things, means that it probably encrypts all of its contents and if it detects an attempt to physically get at its innards, it erases the data. Note that levels 1 through 3 are all pretty much the same, but level 4 is a big leap up in protection from level 3.

    I need this to store all my drug deal accounts receivables,
    and to keep my wife and her electron tunnelling microscope from finding my pr0n.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:Looking for SECURE thumbdrives by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      First suggestion: Ditch the wife, she'll be a continuous security exploit :P

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:Looking for SECURE thumbdrives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Mandriva drakloop, you need to click about 1 button to make an encrypted file system. It can't get any easier.

    3. Re:Looking for SECURE thumbdrives by gr8dude · · Score: 1
      You need something like Dekart Private Disk, it uses AES-256 encryption, and can be used to encrypt an entire flash disk too. You can read it on any Windows machine without having to install the program itself.
      And, as i was told, they have a Mac-version in mind.

      See this http://www.dekart.com/support/howto/encrypt-flash- drive-cd-dvd/
      and this (for those with a PDA) http://www.dekart.com/support/howto/Howto-palm-sec urity-token-ecrypted-disk/

      I use their software myself. Very small, very fast and very flexible; and they have a very responsive support-team.

      P.S.
      Using NTFS encryption ties you to:

      Windows 2000/XP

      The same computer (if i understand correctly, the info is encrypted with a sting taken from the user's account; i.e. you can decrypt only on the same machine you encrypted it on) + If Windows is re-installed - where will the account-data be taken from? Can anyone explain this?

  23. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    Yes, I got one of these two days ago, on the same day that I got a Cruzer Mini (for work). The PQI I-stick wasn't recognized in Win2k, no matter what I did, wasn't consistently mountable in linux, and kept crashing my WinXP machine. It may have been an anomalously bad little piece of hardware, but that's ridiculous.

  24. Bad charts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Argh! Somebody please instruct these guys on how to build charts. You don't change the line markers between charts! You have to read the legend for each individual chart.

  25. In other words... by camcorder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone is becoming a geek.

  26. SD USB by TummyX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd rather have one of these.

    1. Re:SD USB by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Why would you want one, exactly? Do you have some desire to save you data, then swallow it?

      It's too flimsy for my taste, and I stick to CF and avoid SD anyhow. I'd rather have something 5Xs larger that can survive actually being handled.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:SD USB by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Well small cameras (casio exilim) and pocketpcs/smartphones only support SD with their small form-factor. I'd rather not have to carry around a card reader or spend extra money a USB flash drive to simply not be able to use that storage on my camera if there is a better choice.

    3. Re:SD USB by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I can (slightly) understand phones using SD for size reasons, but why would someone buy a camera that is plenty big, but requires SD which is twice as expensive as CompactFlash?

      Just doesn't make sense to me. Would you care to explain?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  27. New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by RonBurk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've long followed and tried to predict the struggle to replace the floppy as the standard for removable media. Finally, I realized that there will be no standard for removable media -- the standard that matters is the interface for removable media, and that prize goes to USB 2.0.

    Once there was an interface standard that supported the basic "something that looks like a disk drive" concept, the war was essentially over. Who cares if different people choose flash, or miniature disk, or anything else that might come along? So long as they can all plug into that USB port and behave pretty much the same to your host computer's software, there's no reason to mind that a single removable media format is not king.

    What's left for the USB media revolution is its use in bricks and mortar commerce. In the B&M scene, they are constantly trying to create schemes to get you to carry a device (e.g., smartcards) to let them "touch" your data. The information benefits for the B&M store are clear, and the example of store cards ("10% off if you have your QFC card!") shows that they can offer rewards to induce the information sharing.

    But who wants to carry 15 different magstripe cards for 15 different stores? The answer is in those little USB devices that more and more people have in their pocket. What's needed is an open standard for sharing data on a USB device -- a standard that lets the customer control what the merchant can store on the card, and what information the customer is willing to share with that merchant.

    Consider the following scenario. I walk into a store I've never visited before. They tell me that if I sign up for an "affinity card", I'll get 30% off today's purchase. But now, instead of spending 15 minutes filling out a lengthy form of personal information, I just plug in my disk on key. Up comes a list of personal profiles I've created. I pick the one I'm willing to share with the store, select how much device storage I'm willing to let the store have on my USB device, punch a button, and I'm done!. When I return that store, I can just plug my pocket USB device into their socket to qualify for discounts.

    You can already purchase password database applications designed to run from USB disks. These let you walk up to your Internet cafe machine, plug in your USB disk, and gain access to all your many encrypted passwords for logging into various web sites. There's no reason the same sort of thing can't be extended to "logging in" to B&M stores.

    1. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      And while you're futzing around picking out how to limit what they can get to, they dump the memory of the thing and start parsing.

      Remember, USB only works where there's a host controller. That host has to be trusted. If it's not, your data is screwed.

      A Firewire (IEEE-1394) keychain drive would be much more secure for what you're describing, since the keychain drive would be in a point-to-point communication mode with that untrusted store machine. It wouldn't rely on an untrusted host that might force it to do what you didn't ask it to do. I'm surprised nobody's made a Firewire keychain drive already. It would be a faster and more secure (though a bit less universal) alternative to USB-based drives.

    2. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Up comes a list of personal profiles I've created. I pick the one I'm willing to share with the store, select how much device storage I'm willing to let the store have on my USB device, punch a button, and I'm done!

      Just curious - what colour is the sky in your world?

    3. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Well, color me uninformed. Oops. /me flogs himself with a Google stick.

      It seems there is a Firewire flash drive. Available in 128MB, 256MB, 512MB, 1GB, 2GB, 4GB. FYI, the 128MB one is about $55, the 4GB one is about $650.

    4. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Schlemphfer · · Score: 1
      The first part of your comment about USB winning the war for portable storage by providing a default interface makes enormous sense.

      The second part of your comment also makes enormous sense. However, it suffers from the chicken and egg problem. Until many people carry around a USB keychain drive, this just won't be viable.

      However, most people already carry around a cellphone. And if a cellphone could contain some flash storage, and have an interface any store could read, your idea could catch on quickly. I definitely don't want to carry around a thumb drive all the time, if I'm already carrying a cell phone or an MP3 player. So those devices might be where your idea gains traction. And I agree that it makes great sense. I travel a lot, and it drives me crazy when I'm in a grocery store out of state and I can't take advantage of any specials without signing up for a loyalty card I don't want.

      --
      I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    5. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm... baked beans...

    6. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by shawb · · Score: 1

      How long would your standard USB port last with a device being plugged in every what... 30 seconds?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    7. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But who wants to carry 15 different magstripe cards for 15 different stores? The answer is in those little USB devices that more and more people have in their pocket.

      What a typical geek thing to say. A USB device doesn't fit into my wallet. Where's your "perfect interface" now?

      It needs to be like a credit card to get mass adoption (btw -- you'd be hard pressed to find anyone with a credit card without a chip embedded on it in Europe).

    8. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by Kesh · · Score: 1

      I'd say this is the future. I've heard of a similar system already being put in place in Japan, where folks can simply point their cell phone at a vending machine, pay for their selection right on the screen and get what they wanted. No change, bills or card swiping, just a cell phone.

      Eventually, smart cellphones will likely replace the wallet. Probably not for decades, but when it gets enough entrenched users and secure transaction modes, there will be little reason for plastic cards or paper cash.

    9. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Notice something about the pricing for those devices? They're expensive. FW requires more intelligence at the device end, just because it's a peer-to-peer bus instead of a master-slave relationship. USB has always had a slight edge, in terms of how the end devices need less smarts to work.

      If the devices are simpler, they can (potentially) be smaller, cheaper, and less prone to failures. Granted, the difference in equipment between USB and FW isn't much, but it was something before cheap single-chip device solutions became available.

      I think that mostly, the dearth of FW devices is driven by the understanding that USB is still more common than FW, especially on the previous generation of PC laptops (many of which didn't have FW ports built in). Combined with the cheaper/smaller factors, there's a slight edge in building USB devices over FW.

    10. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Notice something about the pricing for those devices? They're expensive. FW requires more intelligence at the device end"

      And, IIRC, the licensing costs for the manufacturer are significantly higher.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by fermion · · Score: 1
      You miss one point of the affinity card. To get you to go to a particular store. Instead of competing on price and service, affinity cards attempt to make a consumer visit a particular store even if the price, service, or whatever, is inferior. For many consumers it works. They will always shop at a single grocery store. Me, I always shop at one grocery store, but it is the only one without markups for non-members.

      So making it easy for a consumer to be part of serveral programs is not a good thing. True they still make money off selling customer data, but the store will lose sales. Also, there is a possibility that a competitor might get free access to the customer spending patterns.

      I think this was one problem MS passport. It is already too easy for consumers to compare prodcuts and switch vendors on the web. The MS solution would aggravate this, and there was really no reason for any vendor to pay for the privilage.

      As you mentioned, it costs money to get a new customer. A vendor does not want to things that will allow the customer to easily move to a competitor.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by snol · · Score: 1

      Eh? Knowing nothing besides the obvious about either protocol, I can't see how there'd be any such fundamental limitation in USB. It would certainly make USB drives much more complicated and expensive to make them smart enough to know what data they're allowed to share with what device, but why couldn't it be done? I don't know so much about what the host controller's role is but in the worst case you'd have some adapter inside that acts as a host controller for the memory itself and a slave device for the actual external host controller, while filtering what goes between. It wouldn't be easy, and it would need an additional secure protocol to program the permissions in addition to the usual USB drive protocol, but I don't see how it'd be impossible.

    13. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I think that mostly, the dearth of FW devices is driven by the understanding that USB is still more common than FW, especially on the previous generation of PC laptops (many of which didn't have FW ports built in).

      One more problem with laptops is the 4-pin version of Firewire that doesn't supply power. Thus you need a separate power supply for all devices connected to it.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    14. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by wmute · · Score: 1

      They have, its called an iPod :)

    15. Re:New Removable Media Standard Ignores Media by panoplos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having worked with USB Mass Storage Class (MSC) devices, I will have to call you on your bullshit.

      MSC devices utilise a SCSI pass-through protocol, which encapsulates SCSI packets in USB bulk commands. In order to access the flash, the device has to report the storage unit as a LUN, and respond to standard SCSI capacity inquiries.

      Now, the firmware on the uController is at complete liberty to report whatever information it deems necessary to the requesting host. The host cannot arbitrarily "dump the memory" contents of the flash chip, as it is limited the number of sectors that the F/W reports. Attempts to access beyond the reported sector boundary will result in errors.

      Additionally, in many of the top-end removable media devices, the F/W possesses the capability of representing the separate sections of the flash storage on the device as multiple LUNs, each with their own capacity (read: multiple partitions).

      Add this functionality to a secure authentication system (password, fingerprint, etc.), and voila! The user has complete control over what can be accessed on the device by disabling, and effectively hiding, the partition on which they have data that they do not want to expose to the host.

  28. Poorly Written by yakofdeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Previously, most people had no idea what a Flash drive was, but now you can be sure to find most people with even a basic Flash drive in their pocket or purse.

    I thought this article was fairly informative, but their writing sure could use a little work.

    1. Re:Poorly Written by Mondoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But you've got to give them props for dunking one of them in a glass of water...

      --
      /sig
  29. What about CD-RW? by enosys · · Score: 1

    What about CD-RW? Practically every computer can read them and most can write them too. The discs are very cheap and you can find great deals on drives too.

    1. Re:What about CD-RW? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What about CD-RW? Practically every computer can read them and most can write them too. The discs are very cheap and you can find great deals on drives too."

      I used to have CDRW's that were roughly the size of PSP/GameCube discs. They were GREAT for toting drivers etc around to other computers. My job doesn't really have that requirement anymore, but if it did, I'd probably still use them for one simple reason: USB ports tend to be located on the BACK of computers. In a lot of cases, it's easier just to pop the disc in.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:What about CD-RW? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      1. Not all drives can write them, or rewrite them. A USB port is much
      cheaper and more common.

      2. CDRs are not portable. They need a case, and they're huge. They don't fit in your pocket, unless you're 300lbs. Also they scratch easily.

      3. Re-writing on CDRWs is not a trivial task. You can't just treat it as another disk like you can with a USB stick. You can't just mount /mnt/cdrw /dev/hdc and start moving files over. Don't as me why not, it doesn't seem that a lot of thought went into the technology.

    3. Re:What about CD-RW? by coopex · · Score: 0

      The reason that CDs are harder to write to is because of their very nature. Floppy disks and Flashdrives, as far as I recall, have a traditional track/sector file system, while with CDs you have one continuous track, and need all sorts of information to tell the computer what parts of the track go to what file.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
  30. USB drive that accepts xD memory? by Construct+X · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a good sulution? It would be nice to take advantage of the over priced memory I have for my digital camera. Ugh, wish this thing took honest to God CF or SD instead.

    1. Re: USB drive that accepts xD memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Something like this?

  31. impossible combination by ashpool7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that none of them have write-protect AND are bootable? Both of those are pretty high features on any geek list.

    1. Re:impossible combination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Transcend Jetflash 2A from their review last year is still available.

    2. Re:impossible combination by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Am I missing something? I was under the impression that a "bootable" drive was a drive that was formatted to be bootable AND the computer has to support booting from USB.

      As for write protection, I have a Memorex traveldrive that has a write-protect switch, that i never really bothered to use :P

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    3. Re:impossible combination by yfmaster · · Score: 1

      I have a transcend jetfflash ( an older one then the one in the review.) It has a write protect switch on the side, and boots damn small linux.

    4. Re:impossible combination by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      That's what I would have thought, but there's a column for "bootable" in the comparison list and not too many have "Yes" there.

  32. Corsair Flash Voyager by odyrithm · · Score: 1

    Even though they think the rubber is a gimmick I can say no sir it is not! I've been looking for a memory stick for ages that could live on my bike/house/work keychain that sits on my bike through all kinds of shitty weather, looks like this one will withstand all the rain god gives and vibrations a bike pumps out unlike countless wimpy mem sticks in the past. woot! /me runs out to buy one!

    --
    moo
    1. Re:Corsair Flash Voyager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a Corsair 256MB model and it is indeed a very nice flash drive. I was also looking for a durable device since these usb flash drives are quite exposed to rough conditions and the Corsair model fulfilled all promises. I did no benchmarks with it but at least it *feels* very fast. I would recommend it.

  33. Very offtopic by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does anyone know of a flash based device like the Shuffle that handles Ogg?

    1. Re:Very offtopic by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/portable-media/flas h/index.php#nhc-pmp2000-tiny-video-player-040050

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Very offtopic by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Apple simply has to implement a flash ROM update to make any of their iPods support OGG... but they haven't done it yet. I'm still not quite sure why, but they're holding off support for it so far.

    3. Re:Very offtopic by _pi-away · · Score: 1

      The iRiver players are imo much better than any of the ipods, and yes, they support OGG (and WMA for that matter).

      http://www.iriveramerica.com/prod/ultra/

      They even offer a firmware that will let's the drive behave like a normal flash drive that you can just drag and drop files to.

      I recommend the 800 series, very nice.

      --

      "The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
  34. I suppose the warranty by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    is a way of quantifying the durability of these things, but they suffer the same limitations of compact flash cards or memory sticks being as that they're the same thing, no? How many times can we jam it in and rip it out before the connnecter gets all loose and starts shorting things out?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:I suppose the warranty by mrsev · · Score: 1

      I posted a story last year some time about these USB drives as to how reliable they are. I find them very reliable. If you abuse things they will break if you treat them well they will last longer. How long they last with good treatment depends on the quality of the build.

      Just ot summarise the reason that made me post the story a year ago was the fact that I dropped a USB drive into a -80 degree celcius freezer(-112F). I did not find it for 6 months until I chipped it out of a solid block of ice. To this day I am still using the little bugger without any problems. So I guess they CAN be pretty reliable.

  35. Heh ... by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    Definitely a good read for anyone who has recently sat on their USB thumbdrive!

    Shouldn't that be called a "Bumdrive" now?

    In all seriousness, though, I've been trying to find reviews on the Creative Labs MuVo TX FM 1GB. I'm very interested in getting one, but I want to hear if anyone's encountered issues with it. Tom's Hardware had a glowing review of the MuVo TX (non-FM), and their only gripe seemed to be the lack of an FM radio.

    Anyone here own one? Seen a review? Heck, *written* a review? Link me please :)

    1. Re:Heh ... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      I have the 512MB version c/w FM reception. I haven't used it much yet.

      It comes with a belt clippy, semi-transparent rubber holder that is a bit difficult to fit/hold the device into. The sliding door that covers the battery compartment has a flimsy clasp that often refuses to "snap" closed, so the door is often loose. I still haven't figured out how to turn the thing off, so it drains the battery dead if the power button is accidentally pushed. The manual claims that you have to push and hold the power button for a few seconds to turn the device off, but that does not work with the one I bought. I open the battery compartment and remove the cell to shut it down.

    2. Re:Heh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own the 512 mb version, and I have to say, it works just fine as a usb drive.. and if I remember correctly, you could boot from it. The mp3 player is also very good. The FM could use a little boost in signal reception, but if you live in a big(ger) city you should be fine. The only thing I have to point out is that I used it almost non-stop from christmas through mid-january and the headphone jack got so worn out that only one of the metal peices inside ever touches the headphones, resulting in sound in only one side. I have given up using it as an mp3 player, but I still use it an awful lot for a flash drive.

  36. USB drive destruction is hard by dascandy · · Score: 1

    > anyone who has recently sat on their USB thumbdrive!
    Does plugging it into the back of your laptop and then dropping your laptop on the floor back-end first count too?

    The USB plug was ripped off. Being soldered back on it physically worked, but was at a 70 degree angle to normal position, so it wasn't portable anymore.

    my poor usb stick... *sob*

    1. Re:USB drive destruction is hard by edwazere · · Score: 1

      Er, why didn't you solder it back straight?

      I work in IT department in a school and we've fixed quite a few that have had the connector bent or snapped.

      I love the damn things, and hate floppy disks with a passion, it's all I can do not to say "well, it's your own fucking fault you lost the only copy of your A Level coursework that you've been working on for months because you saved it onto that floppy disk that's now in the shape of a banana!"

      Hmm... that turned into a bit of a rant there...

      --
      -- You ain't seen me, right?
  37. Write cycle limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That article didn't discuss my main concern about USB Flash drives - longevity. Flash memory used to be quite limited in the number of write cycles per block. What is the limit on these modern devices? One hundred thousand, one million, or what? And which devices (if any) have the write-leveling that you sometimes hear about, and is it built into the USB drive?

    1. Re:Write cycle limits by Kesh · · Score: 2

      I'd say the problem right now is in testing such large drives. There's so much storage space, it may be difficult to tell when the drive is having trouble with a particular block, especially if the MTBF is larger than it used to be.

  38. Sandisk by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Washed and dried in my pants pocket and didn't lose any data or have any problems. Can't get any better than that.

    1. Re:Sandisk by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Heh, I think that should be a standard benchmark for media longevity :)

    2. Re:Sandisk by mrsev · · Score: 1

      Yes .... that would be a good standard. They could advertise "Rated 5 stars on the boilwash with bleach and two rubber bricks test....over 30 cycles with perfect data storage"

    3. Re:Sandisk by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      "Tide with Bleach gives it the highest rating - KICK ASS!" :)

  39. MOD DOWN... not insightful, it's incorrect by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The iPod shuffle 1 GB is more expensive then every 1 GB drive reviewed.

    1. Re:MOD DOWN... not insightful, it's incorrect by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      But the iPod shuffle is also capable of playing mp3s. It's cheaper to buy an iPod Shuffle then to buy a 1 Gig flash drive and a portable music player. If you're going to buy both, you might as well buy a shuffle.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:MOD DOWN... not insightful, it's incorrect by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      But the grandparent wasn't talking about buying both. What if you don't want an MP3 player or already have one? He said straight out that the iPod 1 gig was cheaper than the 1 gig flash drives reviewed. That's just flat out wrong.

    3. Re:MOD DOWN... not insightful, it's incorrect by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The iPod shuffle 1 GB is more expensive then every 1 GB drive reviewed."

      More useful, though. I have limited use for a 1 gig stick. A few more bucks and I get a music player... well in some cases that can turn the tide.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:MOD DOWN... not insightful, it's incorrect by tabrnaker · · Score: 1
      Only if you're a fashion whore and don't care about wasting your money.

      Or you can buy a decent 1gig mp3 player with lcd for 2/3 the price of the shuffle.

  40. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by MisterLawyer · · Score: 1

    I have had one (512MB USB 2.0) for about 6 months now. No problems whatsoever. The driver built into XP work seamlessly. Mac OS X 10.3.x also recognizes it out of the box. I don't know about 2K, but in 98 I just downloaded the driver from the website, installed, and it worked flawlessly. Never had a problem. The credit card size plastic carrying case is a great way to transport it, too.

    I have been recommending it to others and have yet to hear a complaint.

  41. Wha? by switcha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTFA:
    Previously, most people had no idea what a Flash drive was, but now you can be sure to find most people with even a basic Flash drive in their pocket or purse.

    Really?

    As long we're operating on anecdote, in my office of about two dozen folks, two have a Flash drive. If you add iPods in the mix (as a easy file transport device) we go to five people. I wouldn't say most people quite yet.

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  42. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I picked up a PQI stick a month ago, and the 1GB has been working perfectly for me... It works on my Linux desktop (Ubuntu), our windows machine, and every Windows machine at work I've tried it on. The only problem I've had with it thus far is that it doesn't work in the Apple USB keyboard. Apparently it wants more power than the keyboard is willing to transmit. But it still works just fine plugged into the back of a g4 or the front panel on a g5 workstation.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  43. Standards are easier said than done by fm6 · · Score: 1
    First, on many computers the only USB ports are on the back of the computer. This is a pain to try and stick the usb memory stick in a port behind the computer, when the computer might be pushed up against a wall, or under a table.
    So you spend $30 on a USB hub that goes on top of the computer or on your desktop. Perhaps a USB port on the front of your machine is more convenient, but the fact some systems don't have them is hardly a major crisis.
    What we need is another jump in floppy disks.
    There have been jumps. I used to own an IBM laptop with a 2.4 MB floppy, and I've read about floppy drives with a capacity as high as 10 MB. Manufacturers just never got around to setting a new standard to replace the current 1.4 MB floppies. Which is hardly suprising -- they're in a low margin business, and there wasn't that much pressure to improve "sneakernet" technology.

    If you can think of a way to persuade Dell, HP, and IBM (excuse me, I meant Lenovo) to ignore economics and add high-capacity floppies to all their systems, you're a lot smarter than I am.

    The anwser is to keep the #1 standard of the past 20 years. Floppy drives were the standard, every PC had a floppy, you could take your disk and know with 100% certanty you could read the data.
    Perhaps I misremember, but I seem to recall that 3-1/2-inch 1.2MB floppies have only been universal for the last ten years or so. Before that, a lot of people still used the older 5-1/4 inch floppies, which came in various formats and capacities, not entirely cross compatible. For example, pre-AT systems had 360K floppies that could be used, but not formatted, in the 1.2 MB drives that were standard in AT-compatibles. I remember seeing systems with three floppy drives, for people who needed to share disks with AT, pre-AT, and laptop users. Which still didn't solve the problems of sharing disks with Mac users (Apple had a proprietary floppy format) or with older laptops with low-capacity 3-1/2-inch drives.

    So much for floppy nostalgia.

    1. Re:Standards are easier said than done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you spend $30 on a USB hub that goes on top of the computer or on your desktop.

      I think the parent poster's point was that he carries files around often, and the machine he's provided to use sometimes/often doesn't have an easily accessable USB port. For example, showing a PPT presentation at a client's office.

    2. Re:Standards are easier said than done by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I misremember, but I seem to recall that 3-1/2-inch 1.2MB floppies have only been universal for the last ten years or so.

      Perhaps. I tossed almost all of my 3.5" floppies (which are 1.44MB) about 7 years ago. I've had boxes full since around 1989.

  44. faulty reasoning by Schlemphfer · · Score: 1
    There is already enough apple in that article.

    What a dumb thing to say. The question is whether a shuffle deserved a spot in the review, not whether some arbitrary quota of Apple commentary had been reached within the review. The fact is that Apple makes a computer that deserved benchmarks, and they also make a thumb-drive that deserved review.

    I read the review and I felt some temptation to go out and buy one of these drives, particularly since my current thumb drive uses USB 1.1 and is three years old. When I read the grandparent post suggesting a Shuffle, I had a Homer Simpson D'oh! moment. Like, how could I have forgotten how much cooler it would be to pay $45 more, and receive all the great features of a Shuffle?

    So I totally agree with the grandparent post. A Shuffle really deserved to be included in this review. Do the Shuffles perform comparably to the other drives mentioned when it comes to transferring files? I have no idea, since it wasn't in the review. I wish I knew.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:faulty reasoning by blueadept1 · · Score: 0

      The quote you have chosen from my comment was meant as a sarcastic reason to why the shuffle should not be included. That is why I followed it with my [i]actual[/i] reasoning to why the shuffle was not included.

      The fact of the matter is, they are reviewing devices with the primary purpose of being used as a thumb drive. If they were to include music players as well, they would have had to test dozens of other flash-based mp3 players, as they all generally can be used as thumb drives.

      Perhaps you could make your comments constructive in emailing the article author to review flash-based mp3 players with the same benchmarks.

    2. Re:faulty reasoning by Deffexor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seeing as I was the one who wrote the review, I seriously considered including the Shuffle, but then I realized that if I included it, I would have gotten a ton of people accusing me of playing favorites to Apple and asking where all the other Flash-based MP3 players were at the same time. Including all the flash-based players along with the Shuffle would have made this article obscenely long and unmanageable.

      Needless to say, I have an iPod shuffle in hand along with a bunch of other flash-based digital audio players. I should have a review coming soon featuring as many of these flash-based players as I can get my hands on (some of which can act as a flash drive, too.)

      Hope this makes sense.

    3. Re:faulty reasoning by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      I considered replacing my USB flash drive with an iPod shuffle when they first came out. A couple months before I bought a Iomega 1GB drive that I chose based on the flash drive roundup Ars Technica did last year. The 1GB Shuffle is just about the same physical size, has the same storage capacity, and is only about $20 more than the resale value of my drive (which I got a good rebate on originally, so I wouldn't even be losing money by selling it again). The deal breaker for me was the need to charge the Shuffle. I need a USB drive that will always be available, not one that will go dead if I don't remember to take it out of my bag and charge it every so often.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  45. Mod his post "Luddite" by jfb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Luddite.

  46. iPod shuffle=no display by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Even at 512M, there will be so many songs on your device that a display is very useful. Why buy the iPod shuffle if, for about the same amount of money, you can get an MP3 player with a display?

    The iPod shuffle is a low-cost Chinese-made MP3 player masquerading as a brand-name item and fashion statement, just because Apple is selling it.

    1. Re:iPod shuffle=no display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod shuffle is a low-cost Chinese-made MP3 player masquerading as a brand-name item and fashion statement, just because Apple is selling it.

      Ouch!! The truth hurts!

  47. Why are some NOT bootable? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand that older PCs don't boot from USB - so no surprise there. But why are some of the the USB sticks bootable and some not? Aren't they all implementing the same standards, and just adding their features on top (like crypto drivers or whatever)?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  48. not very good by idlake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The iPod shuffle is a pretty lousy MP3 player and a pretty lousy USB storage device: it has no display and it keeps music and data files in separate areas.

    You can get lots of USB MP3 players that let you play MP3 files from the file system and that have a display.

    1. Re:not very good by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      The iPod shuffle is a pretty lousy MP3 player and a pretty lousy USB storage device: it has no display and it keeps music and data files in separate areas.

      You can get lots of USB MP3 players that let you play MP3 files from the file system and that have a display.


      So, what are you complaining about? Go buy something else. My wife has a Shuffle and it's fabulous. I hope to get one, too. No wires. It integrates with the nearly 7,000 songs I have in iTunes. And I consider separate areas for music and data to be a benefit, not a liability.

      No one's forcing you to buy it. So what are you bitching about?

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    2. Re:not very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Hey, no one is forcing you to read that guys post. So what are you bitching about?

    3. Re:not very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be the dumbest post I've ever seen. I'm just going to respond to it crassly because clearly the parent is so full of fanboyism he doesn't deserve to be treated with respect.

      The Ipod Shuffle is shit. I don't know what kind of D-A convertors they're using(Apple doesn't seem to list their parts for it; I wonder why? Probably because they're notable trash), but they don't seem to be doing a good job. Listening to uncompressed 44.1khz 16bit waves on it sounds like listening to, I'm not joking, 22.05khz 8bit waves. Its mp3 decoding is even more disappointing. You know Lame offers mp3 decoding for free. Why didn't they just implement that? Nope, that had to be jackasses just for the sake of it and use their own decoders. Did they look at some numbers and say "hey, these decoders are the best for bit-accuracy!" but then forget to actually listen to what they sound like? A number doesn't tell you how well it will sound Apple: maybe try using your ears once in a while. But it's never been about making a high quality device, its been about making a device that arranges the signs in such a way so that it goes down with cafe hipsters.

      I like how Apple lists the frequency response for the Shuffle and it's headphones on their literature as just "20Hz to 20,000Hz" Oh wow, amazing. Now what the fuck is it supposed to mean? Yeah, I got this mic preamp with 1Hz to 100000Hz response. Oh, but it does drop 20db per 10Hz after 2000Hz, and 35db drop per 10Hz below 100Hz -- but can you believe that frequency response!!!?!?!?! I guess Apple's learned how to sell products like Microsoft: pretty much lie.

      And I like how they outright refuse to list total harmonic dissonance for neither the player or the headphones. Probably because the player has about 5% THD and the headphones somewhere around there too.

      But all in all, the Ipod shuffle is a great device. It realy goes with my pair of Euro jeans. Those dark blue ones with the clever fading and wearing around the knees and the butt, and the faint green undertones. It's gloss finish matches my horn-rims too.

  49. Regarding the iPod shuffle... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

    RTFC! (the "C" is for Comments, or rather Ars' discussion section for this article)

    Comment by Deffexor (Ars Audio/Visual Moderator):
    The problem with including the iPod Shuffle in the review was that we then would have had to include a bunch of other USB based Audio players in the review. Then to make matters worse, we would have had to benchmark/test the audio players, etc. This article is already 12 pages and I wasn't going to push it beyond that...

    The good news is that I'm planning a portable audio player (flash based) round-up for May and will include the iShuffle.

  50. Stealing Mobile Phones is passe also by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mobile phones used to be expensive and interesting, as well as useful for drug dealers who wanted to call Colombia for free, so they'd get stolen, especially if you left them visible in your car. But these days, at least in the US, nobody bothers them any more. Cell phones are cheap enough to make that you tend to get them free when you sign up for an overpriced cellular plan, or kids who can't afford that can get prepaid phones in the 7-11, so there's essentially no resale market except for the good ones (where you can also buy extremely cheap long-distance phone cards.) Perhaps the fact that the US is mostly not GSM affects that as well - you usually need to register the phone itself with the cellular company, so it's traceable, as opposed to simply popping your SIM card into a better phone. Since the crime has stopped paying, it's just not worth the trouble.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Stealing Mobile Phones is passe also by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The US is getting more GSM; Cingular bought AT&T just as AT&T was going GSM. Together, they're the big kid, and T-Mobile has been coming up as well - using their network :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Basically a good review, but... by fm6 · · Score: 1
    • If they're going to focus on USB2, why include a single 1.1 drive? The fact that it has a very bad built-in camera seems a poor excuse to waste space on it.
    • Although Corsair does claim that the Flash Voyager is water resistant (nobody claims "waterproof" anymore), the reviewer didn't consult the product literature. He just saw the rubber case and said, "Hey, let's see what happens if I drop it in a glass of water!" Not very bright.
    • Its pretty sad that none of the file management software reviewed appears to have Windows Shell integration. Or perhaps some do, and the reviewer didn't notice.
    • I've never heard a USB drive referred to as a "memory stick". The term usually refers to a kind of memory card.
    • The review of the SimpleTech Bonzai Upgradeable fails to note the most obvious flaw in the product -- a USB drive with removeable media doesn't make a lot economic sense. The USB interface isn't so expensive that you have any real savings in separating it from the media. But then, I made the mistake of buying an Iomega Peerless, so I'm in no position to sneer.
    1. Re:Basically a good review, but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A USB drive with removable media makes good sense if you have other devices that take that kind of media. You can then use them for usb storage, or use the thing as a card reader.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Basically a good review, but... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You have a point. But a combination drive/card reader strikes me as one of those gadgets that combines two jobs but does neither of them really well. On the one hand, the speed of your USB drive is limited by the access time of the removable card. On the other hand, a combined gadget is much less convenient than a dedicated card reader -- and convenience is the only reason to buy a card reader, since all the gadgets that use the cards also have USB or Firewire ports.

    3. Re:Basically a good review, but... by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

      The Bonzai is the world's smallest SD card reader. That's it's best use.

  52. Flash Firewire is still as slow as the flash chip by oe1kenobi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firewire is faster than USB 2.0 for hard drives, but flash-based devices have significantly slower access speeds than hard drives, so the speed of Firewire wouldn't be a factor.

    --
    -Richard L. Owens
  53. Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/better by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder why the Iomega Micro Mini drives were not included in the review. If you include the PQI's somewhat necessary enclosure, the Iomega model is smaller than the PQI and a better form factor (can't lose the Iomega's swivel cover). As far as I know this is the smallest drive on the market right now, and they're priced to move. Still I'm looking forward to more models that use the low profile USB jack like the PQI.

  54. write protection switch by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I noticed that newer drives are not including the write protection switch. Can anyone explain why that was ever useful? I'd figure that people would be more prone to accidently write protect their drive and not know why it doesn't work.

    1. Re:write protection switch by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use my drive mostly to carry around anti spyware and antivirus software, so it tends to get a lot on quite unsafe machines, and even if the times when malware was mostly reproducing itself onto executables is past, you can't be too safe.
      So my usb keyring is write protected most of the time.

    2. Re:write protection switch by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Yes, some folks travel and may need to put their thumbdrive into an unknown (and possibley hostile) machine. 1) Write protecting your drive prevents any nasty bugs from crawling from the foreign machine onto their thumbdrive (which you will later be inserting back into their own machine). 2) One more step in preventing accidental erasure of files

  55. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 1

    Just another endorsement...
    I've done the exact same thing to my I-Stick and had it come through the wash and the dryer with no problems.

  56. Flash Reader on a USB Cable by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Flash readers on USB cables used to cost $29; I assume they're down to $10-15 now. They're a bit bigger than USB sticks, but if you're mostly using them at home or work, they're fine, and you can easily upgrade them as memory prices come down.

    Back when they first came out, I got one for my digital camera, because it was much easier than haggling with the drivers that talk to the camera itself, and the flash cards in the good camera were removable. So when I was thinking about buying a USB stick, I realized that I had the cable, and I had a bunch of flash around from the camera, so why bother. And now I've got an iPod Shuffle, which works well as a flash drive as well as playing music. (Haven't gotten around to installing Knoppix on it yet :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Flash Reader on a USB Cable by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      One could also buy a Flash based MP3 player for little more than what a pure reader would cost. If you make sure that the reader acts as a detachable hard drive you get both a Flash reader and portable music. Some MP3 players are pretty small, too - my first one was merely 7/5/1.5 cm big.

      The MP3 player-as-a-Flash-reader might have a downside, though: Some players have a standard mini-USB jack, which is fine and makes buying extra cables (if you don't want to constantly plug/unplug your main cable from your main PC) easy. OTOH, my current player has a strange nonstandard jack, which makes buying additional cables much harder.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  57. Backup Reliability by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1
    I sent an email to Lexar inquiring about the feasability of using a USB flash drive as a backup device for our information at work. Previously we were copying to CD-RW's every night, but you can only copy to those so many times before they can't be copied anymore. I had the bright idea to just plug a Jump Drive in permanently, set up a .bat file that xcopy's all the folders I need every night to the jump drive. I never got any response from Lexar about this.

    Anyone have any insight as to the good/bad idea-ness of this?

    --

    kurzweil_freak

    5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

    Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    1. Re:Backup Reliability by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if this applies specifically to USB Flash drives, but I've heard that flash media in general can only handle so many writes before they lose reliability and crap out.

      Of course, I have no idea what will happen in the practical sense, plus I doubt it would be any worse than using CD-RWs over again.

      So I'm sure YMMV.

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:Backup Reliability by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was wondering. Can anyone verify or provide more info?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    3. Re:Backup Reliability by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Well, according to these folks in this 2003 report, you can get a maximum of 10,000 - 100,000 write/erase cycles out of them. That's with more errors creeping in as you get near that limit.

      At one backup per night, that's 27 to 270 years of nightly backups. I think you are probably safe if you swap to a new memory stick every decade ;). Your bound to need to increase the size of the memory stick by then anyhow, so it doesn't seem like an issue.

      I wouldn't trust it as my only backup for sure, but it sounds like it would be ok to use as one more step.

    4. Re:Backup Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would depend on how often the directories and block allocation tables are written. Even if the 'data sectors' get only one write per backup cycle, these other sectors may be written far more often, depending on caching strategies.

    5. Re:Backup Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Portable Thunderbird project site, there was a mention that Thunderbird's adaptive junkmail filter can use "1,000 to 3,000 I/O writes just for marking a message as junk", making it a bad function to enable for flash media.
      A lifetime of 10k to 100k write cycles seems like a lot, until one has a good way of determining just how many write/erase cycles go into some forms of data access.

    6. Re:Backup Reliability by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a crappily written app. The thread originator was talking about doing backups, which should not re-write so many times as that crappware.

  58. Return of the Disk-Based Virus! by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that most people are on the net and send email around instead of bothering with floppies, we'd finally gotten rid of the floppy-based virus as a relevant threat. But USB sticks are starting to bring it back. It's not as serious a problem as it used to be, since most people have anti-virus software, and most people move more bits around by email even if they have USB sticks, but it's non-zero, and it'll get worse as virus writers rediscover the opportunities. Good Times Ahead!

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Return of the Disk-Based Virus! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      boot viruses are a posisble problem on flash sticks though they would have to learn to infect them.

      file infecting viruses can go anywhere thier files do flooppy email flash-stick whatever makes no difference

      HOWEVER the arms race on the internet regarding viruses has meant that virus scanners are on update schedules that frankly don't give traditional viruses much of a chance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  59. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so far ive gotten a mouse to work in the usb-keyboard, so dont be surprised when usb-sticks, etc dont work.

  60. Size Matters by wolfdvh · · Score: 1
    Since the standard USB form factor puts 2 ports so close together, I was surprised more wasn't said about the difficulty of inserting many drives when the other port(s) are in use. This sometimes causes one to have to use a USB extension cord or wedge it in next to the other connector adding mechanical stress.

    Fortunatly, there are some thin ones. I randomly bought one (Fry's loss leader) that happened to be thin (PNY) and came to appriciate how much less hassle it was to use. You really could put two side by side for that raid-0 stripe, or just fit into an open port without having to jam it.

  61. Encrypt Filesystems Instead by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sure, you could do that, but it's simpler to use encrypted filesystem drivers on your PC's operating system so you never store unencrypted data. I don't know how cooperative most USB sticks are about using NTFS instead of FAT, but there are other approaches as well. And if you need to carry around software to do it, you can usually keep it unencrypted on the drive...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Encrypt Filesystems Instead by springbox · · Score: 1

      On a windows xp-like machine: format e: convert e: /fs:ntfs /x

    2. Re:Encrypt Filesystems Instead by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I can still see the appeal of building security into the thumbdrive though. Any software or drivers required are just bound to cause problems when you want to access with a different OS, or if you don't have permission to install software on the machine in question, or if you try to install the encryption software and it bombs out with some obscure error.

      What I don't see though is how security on the drive would work; wouldn't it need a keypad or something?

    3. Re:Encrypt Filesystems Instead by billstewart · · Score: 1
      The problem is that you then need to trust the thumbdrive maker to have done a decent job of cryptography, and you also run into the risk that it'll require some non-portable operating system support. There _are_ drives that do AES encryption on all or part of their filesystems, but they need an interface to the host OS to hand them a key - if they're not open source, you can't evaluate whether to trust their key handling, and they often limit the operating systems that can use that feature (e.g. only Windows XP, or Win and Mac, but maybe not Linux and probably not OpenBSD), and it sometimes interferes with them being bootable.

      There have been USB drives that had fingerprint readers on them, again with no way to examine the source code and evaluate the quality or reliability. You could try to jam some other user interface onto them (e.g. very small keypad), but it'd be tough ergonomically.

      I'm not just ranting about open source because of GNU/Linux prejudice - it's a much more critical issue for cryptographers, because not only do most amateurs design bad encryption algorithms (like the GSM phones or some parts of PPTP), it's often difficult to handle the crypto protocols adequately, especially password management and all the different kinds of data padding you need to do, and even things like PGP have had multiple critical mistakes (as have *far* too many people who've used RC4, such as the amateurs designing WEP and other parts of PPTP.) If you can't see the source code and design documentation, it's guaranteed that you can't trust it. If you *can* see the source code, then it still depends on how smart the people reviewing it are, and what they miss, but you've got *some* chance.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  62. USB drive on keychain solution by Mikito · · Score: 1

    I put my flash drive on one ring and my keys on another ring. Both rings are on a small version of those devices used in rock climbing (I forget the name) where one side is spring loaded and opens under pressure.

    With this setup, it's easy to separate the flash drive from the keys and plug it into a computer.

    I sure do wish I could remember the name of that device. It has a vaguely triangular shape.

    --
    Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    1. Re:USB drive on keychain solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those devices used in rock climbing (I forget the name)

      That device you're looking for is a "carabiner". (Though I may have spelt that wrong...)

      Typically, the miniature ones people use for keychains are not load-bearing and should not be used for any sort of belaying. I had one break once (fortunately not while rock-climbing, though). Now, it's real bad-ass if you keep your keys on one of the big, thick load-bearing ones that can hold your entire body up if you happen to be hanging from a rope. :)

    2. Re:USB drive on keychain solution by Mikito · · Score: 1

      A carabiner! Thanks for the name!

      The one I use even has the warning "NOT FOR CLIMBING" molded on the surface.

      Another advantage in using a carabiner as a keychain is that you can keep your car key on yet another ring. That way, when you go have your car serviced, you don't have to risk getting your house keys duplicated behind your back. Or your flash drive.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    3. Re:USB drive on keychain solution by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      That#ll be your Carabina then... You don't need a memory, google IS your memory...

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  63. mmm non powered hubs suck for bus powered devices by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    are always going to have that problem with any higher load device on a non-powered hub

    i dunno what the power consumption of a typical flash stick is but i'm willing to bet its more than 100ma. With usb you are allowed to draw 100ma without asking and can request more up to a max of 500ma but a bus powered hub can never allocate you more than 400ma (as it can only request 500ma from the upstream hub or computer) even in theory and i think most won't allow more than the miniumum 100ma.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  64. whats so interesting about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    okay, so you've been to microcenter in boston. do we need to know your life's story?

  65. SanDisk 512 MB by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if the SanDisk 512 MB is bootable? This review says no, yet other reviews say yes.

  66. Cross platform speed by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    Curious fact to see that in windows, read speed peaked at 22MB/s while on mac it was 17MB/s

    Mozilla is faster on windows that on linux too. On most stuff i see, windows drivers are always more optimized. Anyone has different examples?

  67. so much for ArsTechnica being independent by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Actually, I think the only thing I got at Microcenter was the PQI drive (because I couldn't get in touch with anyone at PQI to save my life).

    Wait- wasn't some slashdot reader lecturing me recently about how ArsTechnica guys "buy all their stuff" so they're impartial?

    So much for that, you're just like the rest. Samples samples samples. Whee.

  68. GMail replaced my flash drive by CatGrep · · Score: 1

    The era of the flash drive may be short lived.

    I bought a USB Flash drive (512MB) last summer and carried around with me everywhere (school, work, home) to transfer files. Of course I was always worried about losing it or having it break in some sort of unfortunately accident.

    Now I just use GMail to make my files available everywhere. No worries about losing it. No worries that it'll break (well, I suppose a big quake in CA might do that...) and 2GB of storage.

    1. Re:GMail replaced my flash drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you need to put them on a keychain.

    2. Re:GMail replaced my flash drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine when you've got an Internet connection. I generally use my shiny new keydrive (x-mas giftie) only for transferring files between two hosts that have USB but aren't connected to the same network. I keep my home system connected to the Internet, but if I'm going to do a presentation or something, I can't always rely on being able to transfer those files that last foot without the keydrive. Or at least, not as conveniently.

    3. Re:GMail replaced my flash drive by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      To me it's more convienient (sp? /. needs a spell check) to use a usb drive than gmail when I have to deal with presentations that use audio/video or consist of more than one file. Though my Sony micro vault of two years recently died on me so I've been stuck using gmail and my webspace on the school's ftp server.

  69. I didn't see any tests using a washing machine by cecil36 · · Score: 1

    One time I accidentally left my 256MB Memorex USB drive in my pants pocket prior to washing them in a load of clothes. I find my drive still in the pocket of the same pants as I took them out of the dryer. To my surprise, the drive still worked, and I was glad it did since I had a lot of crucial data on it.

    1. Re:I didn't see any tests using a washing machine by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      To my surprise, the drive still worked, and I was glad it did since I had a lot of crucial data on it

      It's not that surprising it still works. Electronic devices are usually pretty tolerant of getting wet, as long as you dry them out before trying to use them.

      The risks basically are that something that is disolved in the water and is conductive will be left behind as the device drys, causing shorts when you use it, and that the mechanical actions of the washer will damage the device, and that parts of the device might be sensitive to heat.

      So, as long as your detergent doesn't leave conductive gunk behind, you are likely to be safe.

      One of the IT guys at work tells me that he routinely cleans electronic components (cards, keyboards, etc) by putting them in the dishwasher. With some trepidation, I gave that a try on a remote control that I wanted to clean, and it mostly worked. Some segments on the LCD display didn't survive, and some areas of the LCD are cloudy. I suspect that this was from the heat, not the water itself, because it is similar to the damage I've seen on cheap calculators that I've carried around in my pocket over hot summers.

  70. Missing the one I own by springbox · · Score: 1

    I have a USB 2.0 Attache device from PNY. I also have their USB 1.1 version, which ends up having some significant differences. Their latest revision uses cheap plastic with a somewhat fugly color scheme. The plastic is so thin that when the drive's LED turns on the light bleeds through. It works just fine and I've had the older version for about a year now, but I do have to say that I'm disappointed in the direction that has been taken (durable casing, tasteful design -> cheap casing, not as pleasing to look at.) The one thing they DID get right in the USB 2 version is they included a hole at the bottom of the device that is large enough to put it onto a standard key chain. The original had to be threaded first.

  71. features by Massif · · Score: 1

    Is booting from a USB device motherboard dependent? I searched through the boot order of my BIOS but I can't seem to find USB on there. I think the next step in the progression of portable storage is the ability to transfer from one drive to another without a computer. Maybe even wirelessly! A small lcd browser window that displays file names, maybe a few buttons for sending and receiving. You just point it at someone else and send them a file. Of course, they would need batteries and Wifi. I guess it would start to resemble an MP3 player more than a thumbdrive. I'm still hopeful though.

    1. Re:features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your motherboard's BIOS would have to support booting from a USB device if you wanted to boot the system from one of these.

  72. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My iStick works great on all OSs, even on Linux (Xandros). Maybe you got a bad stick and should return it.

  73. Make Sony Hi-MD the standard by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    The Sony Hi-HD is a new mini-disk format that can hold up to 1GB of data and music. But the real bonus is that hardware manufactures could use the same form factor that the floppy drives use in PC chassis and replace them with a Hi-HD drive. Also, the mini disks are small and enclosed in their own little caddy like a floppydisk is.

    The specs in PDF format can be downloaded here

    http://www.minidisc.org/keep/Sony_Hi-MD_Spec.pdf

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Make Sony Hi-MD the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you don't mind waiting 20 minutes to write a 300M file! LOL! Oh, and about your sig, why not raise the LCD? What's wrong with that?

    2. Re:Make Sony Hi-MD the standard by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Total off topic

      LCD depends on national ecconomic growth. So unless the nations entire populous become prosperous, it wont change.

      In a capitolistic society, you have the individual ability to reap the benifits of your labor.

      In communism, everyone gets the same service and goods regardless of how hard or little you work. Because of lack of personal incentive to work hard in a communistic country, very little if anyone does work hard. So, the nation as a whole because poor. At this point, the only way to force people to work hard in communism is through a totalalitarian government/regime.

      Prime Examples are former USSR, China, and N. Korea. Though interesting to note that China is becomming more and more capitolisitic and hence an awsome growth in GDP. But...only because those in CCP know that it will fund the totalalitarian government with more resources.

      So now you know why you can never raise the LCD in communism.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  74. is it me or the graphs hard to read? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    i'm trying to read the graphs of benchmark tests they ran, but it's so confusing to understand which line belongs to which flash drive. they use only 3 colors (why? who knows) and alternate the rest with thick/thin and solid/big dots/small dots. just makes it so confusing to really see who is better in that area.

  75. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why are the called thumb drives?
    I the UK, they're generally called "pen drives" (prolly cuz a lot of them have a pen clip on them for putting in your shirt pocket) or just "usb memory sticks" or simpley "usb drives"

    I'm trying to figure out why they would be called "thumb drives" but it's not coming to me...

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  76. Apacer HT203 all the way... by alexburke · · Score: 1

    Super fast little unit. I bought the 4GB model a few months ago for like US$450, and it's been worth its weight in gold. I carry installers for antispyware and free antivirus software on it, as well as a bootable image of BartPE (which unfortunately, by the way, takes forever for the ISO to load into the RAMdisk set up by the Win2K3 SP1 NT loader, no matter how fast your flash disk is... any way around this on boxes that give a BSOD without the ISO trick?).

    However, do not *ever* open the "disk" it presents to the OS in something like WinHex then tell WinHex to write 00h to all user-accessible sectors as a way of securely cleaning it up before repartitioning, reformatting, and reloading stuff onto it. The wiping seems to irrevocably fuck the unit beyond repair, by apparently blowing away some config sector of flash or something. (Apacer's fixing utility doesn't seem to work properly on the 4GB model, not even after they emailed me a different version.) I recall in some USB-flash-disk-controller-IC datasheet (probably not the same one Apacer uses, but they're all probably pretty similar in this regard) I read that the controller itself requires a few sectors of flash for housekeeping, sizing, configuration, etc. One of the things you (the manufacturer) could set was the number of LBA sectors it would report to the host machine. I suspect Apacer set this number a little too high and included part or all of the keepout region the controller requires as being reported and exposed to the host OS, causing this issue.

    I went through two units before I figured out exactly what was doing it -- but to Apacer's credit, they exchanged it both times at no charge (I paid shipping both ways, which in a padded envelope with a tracking number cost me US$3.85 each way).

    The Apacer HT202 and HT203 units are beautifully-designed. I didn't want one where I could ever lose the cap, because if you know me, you know the cap would be gone in a week. The thin rubber-coated stranded steel cable is a very secure attachment point, and makes sure that cap goes absolutely nowhere you don't want it to.

    I don't have the balls to try washing it in my pants pocket, though, since it's NOT sealed. I wish Apacer would pot them with RTV silicone or something which would also give them more shock resistance, not unlike the SanDisk Extreme CompactFlash cards. I don't know how they avoid the silicone releasing acetic acid when it's curing, though -- wouldn't this be bad for the metal traces, pins, joints, discrete components, USB connector shell, etc?

    In short, before even reading the review, the HT203 (and Apacer's support) get my one-point-seven-thumbs-up stamp of approval!

    1. Re:Apacer HT203 all the way... by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1
      I don't know how they avoid the silicone releasing acetic acid when it's curing, though ...

      There is a non-vinegar cured silicone for electronic work.

  77. Not entirely happy with it by jeti · · Score: 1

    I got a Micro Mini 64. It's small and stylish.
    But the chain broke soon after I bought it,
    and it doesn't reliably stay closed.

    That's why I currently don't carry it with my
    keys as I planned.

  78. They missed the most important review by btarval · · Score: 1
    I was looking for a new Swiss Army Knife the other day, and discovered that they now make them with USB drives, believe it or not.

    Here's one.

    I don't see how you can seriously have a real review for geeks without including this baby, no disrespect intended towards the folks at Ars.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  79. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one of these. The design, I agree, is pretty good, but the software that came with it was crap. I installed it and partitioned the drive for 3 partitions (one secure). Every time after that the drive was plugged in, it blue-screend my computer. That was in XP.

    When I uninstalled the software, the blue-screen problem stopped, but I could no longer access the secure partition. I tried to repartition the drive, but that required installing the software again, and as soon as it was installed and recognized the drive...yup, blue-screen.

    I finally had to find the software from the original manufacturer (my drive was labeled a "GE" product, and its their drivers that were bad). Since then, it hasn't been problem, but I'm not running a secure partition, either.

    Does anyone have experiance using one company's software on another's drive? The Lexar's software, where the secure partition doesn't require installing anything to access, sounds nice, but can I put it on a I-Stick?

  80. Primary storage by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 1

    Best part of these is the morons at work that save their important data to them instead of to the network, and then lose them. It's always fun to be able to tell them they're screwed and not have to help them.

  81. plurals by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

    no, but you would be wrong to say that you had some pizzas

    --
    copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
  82. Re:Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/bette by British · · Score: 1

    I wonder why the Iomega Micro Mini drives were not included in the review.

    Because due to the Click of Death, we don't talk about Iomega anymore. Nor do we send them Christmas cards. We do invite Belkin and others though for drinks.

  83. Introducing: The wallet disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The floppy worked well as a standard for many years. And it has never really been replaced. The CD-RW was never a replacement. USB flash drives are getting closer, but they are unecessarily bulky.

    What is called for is a new standard form factor. I want a storage medium to bring with me along with my credit cards, in my wallet. It should hold at least 50-100 MB, with the possibility of increasing down the road. It should not have to be (much) thicker than a credit card; physical size, not storage is the key point.

    A USB flash drive is something you have to remember to bring along with you when you think you're gonna need it. This thing (let us call it the wallet disk) I would always have available in my wallet, wherever I go. That would be nice.

  84. It seems to not have been mentioned.... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    But what fatass can break a flash drive just by sitting on it? I would venture to say I could safely jump on mine a few times.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
    1. Re:It seems to not have been mentioned.... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing.

      I bet two or three people could sit on mine at once at it wouldn't break. I'd be more afraid of kicking it while it was plugged in or bumping with my knee or something of that nature.

      --
      The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  85. Linux Support by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 1

    Would have been nice to see this reviewed on one of the more popular distros. I've got an (admittedley aged) 64Mb usb stick, a 'Disgo' model from a few years back when they cost £80 or so for the size I have. Problem I have is intermittent recognition with FC3 and others. Bit of a pain in the proverbial...

  86. ObSeinfeld by sharkey · · Score: 1

    *having "fallen" and "landed" on my USB drive* -- One in a million shot, doc!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  87. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Calroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unlike probably everyone else here, I've had my PQI Intelligent Stick for quite a long time - almost 3 years now (it's the purple USB 1.1 model, 128MB).

    In my opinion, the form factor is brilliant, and being able to keep it in your wallet is indispensable. It will literally always be near you, you don't ever think about it, unlike having to pick up and check the charge on your mobile phone, MP3 player, etc.

    However, due to having it with you all the time, and its small form factor, I reckon it's more suscepible to knocks, hits, etc., which cause data errors. (Although mine has never been through the wash - it stays in my wallet.) I got around these errors the cheap and easy way: by making multiple copies of important files on the disk.

    So, all you folks who have a shiny new I-Stick, treat it carefully and it'll stay good for a long time.

  88. Better done in software than hardware. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    The only way the device itself transparently could encrypt/decrypt contents would be with some kind of password/key interface on the device itself. This would make the device somewhat biggish to support the PIN/password entry area. Also you'd have to add a few more chips to the device to support the cryptographic functions which could definitely change the footprint and power requirements... unless some chip vendor thinks it'd be neat to add those features to the next set of flashUSB single-chip solutions.

    But if the protection is software based than you don't need to worry about tampering (since the data on the fob is useless otherwise). Existing chipsets would suffice.

    Windows EFS is the answer, really. It uses 3DES or AES and it's easy to manage. You get it for free with 2000 and XP Pro... so... why not use it?

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Better done in software than hardware. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The only way the device itself transparently could encrypt/decrypt contents would be with some kind of password/key interface on the device itself.

      I disagree, it could accept the password as data from the host - with nice software for windows boxen or a simple "echo password > /dev/dsk/c0t0d1" dealio under unix or other similar OSes.

      Also you'd have to add a few more chips to the device to support the cryptographic functions which could definitely change the footprint and power requirements.

      Yes, it would need more chipage, but the additions should be small enough to be trivially supported by USB.

      But if the protection is software based than you don't need to worry about tampering (since the data on the fob is useless otherwise).

      Despite my joking about pr0n and such (and the multiple nurbs who modded my post a troll, wtf?) I really am looking for such a device with physical tamper-proofing, on the order of level 4 because even AES-256 alone isn't really sufficient.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Better done in software than hardware. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1


      I disagree, it could accept the password as data from the host ...


      I smacked myself in the head after I posted realizing that you could easily use some OOB key exchange to do the same job.

      Also, what does the physical protection offer you that the encryption doesn't? It doesn't make it any less difficult to get the encrypted data off the flash.

      The only thing I could think is to prevent someone from installing something in the device that intercepts the plaintext travelling in/out of the device via the USB interface. But if they could do that unnoticed, they could also install logging into your end-user computer.

      --
      THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  89. Re:Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/bette by elemental23 · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself. Belkin's building adware into their routers' firmware is far worse than the technical shortcomings Iomega has had in the past.

    I have a 1GB Iomega flash drive (not the micro) and am pretty satisfied with it. It's got a lifetime warranty and any data that exists on it also exists on my laptop, so hardware failure isn't that big a problem for me. It's pretty unlikely anyway, as these things don't have any moving parts, so there's no chance of "click of death"-type problems.

    --
    I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  90. Unknowing user problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work as a technician in a small computer shop and we've had a number of customers who've had problems with the drives, simply because they don't know they need to tell Windows to stop the device before pulling it out, which often destroys the formatting.

  91. Firewire doesn't fix anything. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    In either case, the device would have to be aware of the data contained within to know whether or not to accept/deny a request.

    Equipped with said smarts, a USB-based device could "correctly" respond to anything asked of it by the host controller, but only returning 0s or garbage if it wants to not share some specific data.

    The type of connection between the host and device is immaterial.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  92. And you can even buy them at Best Buy (!) by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1


    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  93. I want my money back by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    Verbatim Store 'n' Go,

    sucks so bad that it should be called the

    Verbatim Whore 'n' Blow

  94. Re: the 1000s of IOs per marking. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    It's not that the app is written crappily.
    Understand that when you mark a message as junk mail, you have to update the database which stores the word occurence frequencies for spam and ham. If a message contains 1000 unique tokens (including server names, non-standard headers), then you're going to need to potentially update the database file in 1000 different places.

    Presumably this database file is memory mapped, so really it's up to the OS to cache and batch up these frequent writes.

    What's really needed is a way to mark a file with a special attribute that says: this file gets updated a lot, don't flush the buffer cache so damn often.

    A way to do that could solve a lot of problems that many different applications have when doing stuff to a file on flash media.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  95. Hell of a lot faster than the network. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    I work in a large building where practically every PC is on the corporate LAN, but we use USB flash drives all the time. Why? Because it's quicker and cleaner to plug in the drive I carry around, than to establish a network connection back to my office PC. No need to search the domains (yeah, it's an XP network), enter my user name and password (you have heard of security, right?), and browse to a folder where I might want to dump the file. Then when I get back to my desk, I have to remember exactly where that was in all my folders.
    Even ignoring all the security/browsing/storing tedium, writing data to a USB 2.0 drive is simply faster than sending it over the network.
    And every now and then, you hit a machine that either isn't on the network, or for who-knows-what stupid Windows reason, won't let you connect back to your own PC.
    USB drives have been one of the biggest productivity enhancers to hit our office. Needless to say (I will anyway), they've also made floppies extinct.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  96. NOT Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PQI do a "Cool Drive" that has a write protect switch and is bootable. I know because I had one.

  97. Re:Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/bette by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    Between the Click-o'-death, Jaz WORN drives (Write Once Read Never), a handful of short-lived proprietary formats, and an unhealthy denial that any of the above ever happened, you couldn't pay me to store my important data on anything made by Iomega. They're like the Yugo of storage devices, and the Chicago Cubs of backup media (except that people like the Cubs).

    On the other hand, their products work great as entropy sources for hardware PRNG acceleration.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  98. SanDisk Cruzer mini by yasuo.hiroshi · · Score: 1

    I sometime ago bought a SanDisk Cruzer mini, which has served me quite well. It's performance has been great and I have has no trouble with it what so ever. I carry it everywhere I go and can attest to the fact that it is quite durable. So durable in fact I had oneday forgot to check my pockets before I washed my clothes and it had went through the wash and dry cycles before I noticed the next day when I went to put on a pair of pants that I had just washed, that I had found my missing USB drive. I pluged it back and all the data on it was still there and it still works fine

    If only MS could make products this realiable

    1. Re:SanDisk Cruzer mini by Compumyst · · Score: 1

      True - San Disk mini's will actually last through a run of the laundry - it happened to me as well. However, make absolutely sure that it doesn't happen again, as I did run it through twice, and it didn't last very long after the second run.

      --
      What's done's in the past, forever shall last.
      Work is work; life is life; fair is not!
  99. Re:Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/bette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    On the other hand, their products work great as entropy sources for hardware PRNG acceleration.

    Sure, it worked great for me until I got this in my data stream:

    1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click*
  100. Re:Iomega Micro Mini drives are even smaller/bette by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    YOu dont get it!

    You have to count the spaces between the *CLICKS* to get your data! It was an innovative way of hiding data in plain sight!

    --
  101. Talk about a useless "hardware" FS test by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Looks to me they were testing benchmarks on FS speeds on a medium (which happens to be flash).

    I wounder what would happen if you were to actually write sequential raw data to these devices? Would'nt that give no FS skew?

    And talking about FAT (file acclocation table- MS partition formats), wasnt it recently said that it is a killer of Flash memory due to continously poking the same parts of data (the 2 tables)? If anything, Id consider NOT using fat if you can avoid it, due to that fact. Perhaps a freer FS would be advised (like ISO9660? )

    --
    1. Re:Talk about a useless "hardware" FS test by pslam · · Score: 1
      Looks to me they were testing benchmarks on FS speeds on a medium (which happens to be flash).

      I wounder what would happen if you were to actually write sequential raw data to these devices? Would'nt that give no FS skew?

      Considering 99.9% of people would only ever be using a flash drive with FAT32 on it, I think the benchmarks are quite appropriate.

      FAT32 happens to be quite a terrible format for flash usage, and the FAT tables take quite a bit of rewrites. The block erase size on type 2 flash (common these days) is 128KB, which means the entire FAT table is contained in 1 block! That gets erased and rewritten each time the FAT table is updated. Most of these drives have really cheap CPUs running the show and can't do any kind of intelligent rewrite strategy, other than bad block remapping.

      If you write 128MB to a 128MB flash drive, the FAT table gets block erased 2048 times (assuming the usual windows 128 sector write size). Do that 100 times and you'll grow a bad block, which gets remapped. Do it 1000 times and simple schemes without wear levelling run out of spare blocks.

      By the way, ISO9660 isn't at all suitable for a random access writable filesystem.

  102. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by entrigant · · Score: 1

    Hint: it has something to do with their size...

  103. Wow, it's small! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  104. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1
    Have you ever heard of a little guy called Tom Thumb, or a gal called Thumbelina. In older English, the word Thumb often referred to diminutive size, especially when it was on the same order of size as a human thumb.

    Not only is the device approximately the size of a thumb, but the next time you insert it into the USB port, look carefuly at your hand. What part of you hand is the most prominently used. (Don't answer this all of you poor victims of threshing machine accidents.) Some even have a kind of depression in them for a particular digit.

    Incidentally, many "strange" phrases that the English believe to be American or sometimes Australian in origin, actually are British. It's just that we still use them, whereas they fell out of use in England itself. That's not true of them all of course, just some.

    Now I'm going to get mean! I can't believe you actually couldn't figure this out, unless perhaps you're not a native speaker of either English or American ;). I'm reminded of the SNL sketch of "Celebrity Jeopardy", where Will Ferrel asks the Minnie Driver character, "Are you English, or retarded?"

  105. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1
    (Although mine has never been through the wash - it stays in my wallet.)

    Well my USB drive has been through the wash a couple times, and putting it my wallet wouldn't really help. You see, my wallet has made it through the wash a couple times on it's own. Once I forgot to take it out of my swimsuit pocket before jumping in the atlantic.

  106. Re:The Washing Machine Test - PQI Intelligent Stic by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

    lol it was late. Understand now... that terminology is just not common here in the UK at all, I've heard them called many things but not a thumb drive!

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  107. Wow! by R32EEK · · Score: 1

    Very nice resource, I'm probably going to bookmark this. 3 Flash drives!

  108. Re:mmm non powered hubs suck for bus powered devic by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

    I really don't care about what the specs call for, I just want to be able to use my thumb drive without getting on hands and knees. Yes, the thumb drive uses something close to the 2.0 max. If Apple, the designers of their hardware, can't figure out a way to send more power to their keyboard to allow for such devices, then it seems like they've got a lot of talent for nothing.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  109. Flash Drives by lbanting · · Score: 1

    Or if you put your thumb drive in the wash. Mine quite working after the second time in the wash. Ironicaly I think it was the drier that did it in.