Slashdot Mirror


Really Remote Internet Access

RexDart writes "The BBC Online has profiled Duane DeFreitas, an adventurer and guide living in Guyana. He's three hours away from the nearest town (in the dry season; three days away when it's raining), yet has full internet access via satellite. His latest project: setting up Skype for phone service, as soon as he can import a microphone and speakers. Yet more proof that the internet is truly everywhere. Mind the jaguar."

182 comments

  1. I wonder... by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you think he is worried about identity theft?

    1. Re:I wonder... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd be more worried about the mind rays getting to me - can you imagine how hard it can be to get a proper supply of hat-making foil out there?

    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If his head gets shrunk will it take less space to store his mind?

    3. Re:I wonder... by floodo1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      theres special foil for hats? drats, ive been using reg tin foil!

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    4. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only internet is everywhere, but idiots too.

    5. Re:I wonder... by http101 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, he's got a leg up on us... women love guys with their own place, their independence, and can pay their bills. Chances are, he cooks and cleans too.

      You know what women say, "I love a man who can cook what he traps!"

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    6. Re:I wonder... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Forget the Jaguars! Just don't hit the Fire Ants with a hammer; It may irritate them!

  2. Mic & Speakers by fembots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    setting up Skype for phone service, as soon as he can import a microphone and speakers

    Is there a software which turns text into audio for Skype, and turns audio from Skype into text? Can the normal text-to-speech software do that for Skype?

    To him it'll be like an IM client, but the other party might enjoy talking/listening instead of typing.

    1. Re:Mic & Speakers by downsize · · Score: 2, Informative

      the audio to text is not there yet. even the best dictation softwares out there are only about 80-90% and leave you to proof the transcript before you give it the thumbs up.
      working for a VoIP company I've tested these products, but they do not claim to be 100%. my step father is a director over at chevron and they have many (200+) that use similar software and it does save them time, but bottom line, I don't think Skype would be able to offer him (or anyone) audio to text anytime soon.

      --
      do you have shinyfeet?
    2. Re:Mic & Speakers by quintiusc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really a good solution. The listening party would have to listen to a computer generated voice which isn't as good as a human voice yet. There's also more lag in a typed conversation so combine that with the satellite lag and I don't think it would work.

    3. Re:Mic & Speakers by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      a computer generated voice which isn't as good as a human voice yet. There's also more lag in a typed conversation
      ... nuk-uh-leah ... wepins ... o' ... massss ... dE-struk-shen ...

      That's one of the great things about voice synthesizers - you can make them do a bad imitation of anyone if you play around with the spelling a bit.

    4. Re:Mic & Speakers by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Anyone here know how to do sampling for digitizers? ;) Surely we have enough samples of Bush, Jr's speech to make something that imitates him.

      *goes to answer the knock at his door*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Mic & Speakers by mahmudaq · · Score: 1

      BBC cudnt get the poor guy a mic n speakers worth less than 10 bucks?! pathetic! :P

    6. Re:Mic & Speakers by paz5 · · Score: 1

      Though using old fashion people to do the text to voice and voice to text.... http://www.relaycall.com/national/relay.html would work for him untill he gets his mic and speakers.

  3. Yanno.... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

    were he really fast, he could use one half of a set of headphones for listening, and the other half as a microphone, if they were small enough. Earbuds work really well for this purpose, he just needs to split a jack and add another stereo jack. A little wire-rigging and he'd be set for less than 5 bucks.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Yanno.... by DaveCar · · Score: 1

      I'd suppose that if basic speakers/microphones were unavailable then a soldering iron and the pick of audio interconnects at Radio Shack are probably out (unless he's McGuyver or something ;)

      And given that he's running a satellite phone I doubt that he's particularly bothered about saving a few bucks.Christ,the only people in the UK who are ever referred to as "adventurer"s are also referred to as "Sir".

    2. Re:Yanno.... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I'd suppose that if basic speakers/microphones were unavailable then a soldering iron and the pick of audio interconnects at Radio Shack are probably out (unless he's McGuyver or something ;)

      For what he said, all you need is a pair of wire cutters, electrical tape, and the headphones. The second audio jack to separate the input from output could be obtained by just buying another set. 2 pairs of those headphones is about $2, and the wirecutters and electrical tape should be cheap, if he doesn't have them already.

      A soldering iron wouldn't be used for this...

    3. Re:Yanno.... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Thank you for clarifying this up. I thought anyone with any absolute minor electronics experience would know exactly what I meant the second I said headphones for a microphone.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Yanno.... by DaveCar · · Score: 1

      Yeah so once you've got the wire cutters, electrical tape and second audio jack from Radio Shack you could have just bought some fricking speakers and a microphone.

      Unless wire cutters, electical tape and audio jacks grow on [whatever type of trees it is that grow wherever the hell this godforsaken place is].

    5. Re:Yanno.... by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why cut the wires at all? If the soundcard can accept a speaker used as a dynamic microphone, then just use the second headphone set as a stereo microphone and there is no cable splicing nor soldering at all.

    6. Re:Yanno.... by Elshar · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with alot of slashdot users. Over-engineering. What ever happened to the 'keep it simple, stupid' mantra we got taught when I was a kid? Has it changed to 'make it complex, smartass!'? :)

  4. Upgrade by tinfoilgrrl · · Score: 5, Funny
    Mind the jaguar.

    Surely he's using Tiger by now.

    1. Re:Upgrade by Scoria · · Score: 1

      Or, better yet, a PlayStation 2?

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:Upgrade by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Unless he's waiting for the Capybara release.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capybaras are not felines.

    4. Re:Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tiger ? In Afric..er... South America ?

    5. Re:Upgrade by ajlitt · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, he meant to say "beware of leopard"

    6. Re:Upgrade by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      Curses. Beat me to the punch.

    7. Re:Upgrade by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Lynx is far more portable.

  5. Atari? by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

    Mind the old 64bit system?

  6. Adventurer? by Oldest+European · · Score: 1

    Where is the adventure part if you bring all your modern high tech gadgets with you?
    How is that any different from driving your SUV through a safari park?

  7. Hmmm... by rackhamh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Three hours away from the nearest woman.

    I wonder what sites he vists most often?

    1. Re:Hmmm... by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot? Like everybody else here?

    2. Re:Hmmm... by MaroonWarrior71 · · Score: 1

      certainly no webpages with women on them

    3. Re:Hmmm... by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 1, Funny

      The principal one, of course, is that - with very little to do in the evenings apart from drinking rum and listening to the insects - the whole of DeFreitas' family wants to use the internet at once.

      Seems to me he's married :| !!

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot? Like everybody else here?

      You failed to confirm you are a human.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? What does that have to do with the question? :-|

    6. Re:Hmmm... by mahju · · Score: 1

      nope - wrong demographic. He's only 3hours from a woman, not a lifetime

  8. Way down deep in the middle of the Jungle by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Was a web page being slashdotted by ip over bongo!

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Way down deep in the middle of the Jungle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was the PPTP Protocol

  9. Performance of Skype over Sat? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

    How well does this work?
    I have two sites in the Pilbera (North Western Australia) that could make good use of this.

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      The delay caused by satellite transit times will drive you crazy during a telephone conversaion. /Mark

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since skype uses TCP, it'll be even worse than satellite phones... since there need to be ACKs.

      So one high-latency trip to send the packet, and another one for the ACK.

    3. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by epiphani · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I looked at satalite access a few years ago when I was looking at buying a house too far out of town to get broadband.

      Geosynchronous Orbit is at 35,786 Kilometers. It takes light 120ms to get from earth to a geosync satalite. (source).
      Hence, 240ms round trip. Back and forth, you to your provider. Another 240ms to get a responce.

      The only reason I'd consider satalite access would be for bulk downloads. 540ms on an ssh session would quickly drive me insane.

      So add that half second to whatever routing overhead there is involved in skype (I usually see about .3 to .6 of a second delay, talking to people within a few hundred kilometers). I'd say, all in all, pretty crappy experience.

      But its better than nothing I suppose.

      --
      .
    4. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by epiphani · · Score: 2, Informative

      Err, 480ms rather. I cant do math. Damnit, there goes my whole post.

      --
      .
    5. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      Nah, I got it thanks..
      hmm.. It would have to be pretty bad to be worse than sat phone.. those things REALLY suck sometimes plus the cost of them is huge!

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    6. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeh, i was wondering why the post says 'full internet access' and 'satellite' in the same sentence

    7. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      240ms round trip
      Suddenly vi is the perfect tool!

    8. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by seanmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The latency issue is what kept me away from satellite.

      I live about 15 miles outside of Deming, NM - corner of No and Where. My only options were dialup, satellite, and (hallelujah) SWNM.com, a local ISP that uses Alvarion BreezeAccess II hardware to provide wireless access to a decently-sized chunk of the county.

      Most of my work is with clients back east, and satellite latency would have driven me nuts. I found the Alvarion hardware for about 60% less cost than what the ISP charges for it, so I bought it and signed up - so far so good! They advertise the service as 250kbps, but I'm typically running around 400kbps, give or take. Probably a step back for someone used to cable, but I've never had cable internet, so I'm satisfied with it.

    9. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      wow.

      you missed the Gulf war coverage I assume?

      and yes, I agree, more than 500 ms will drive most nose breathing adults insane.

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    10. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I misremember, but I seem to recall that back in the 70s, before they strung fiberoptic almost everwhere, a lot of long-distance phone connections were made by geosync satellite. Delays were only mildly irritating. I think a lot of of developing-world phone systems, which can't afford to string a lot of cable between towns, still rely on geosync satellites.

    11. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works really well. I've used Skype over Immarsat with even better voice quality than the satellite phone itself can provide. With a dedicated data phone you can run Skype as well as other apps (web browser, im) without any problems.

    12. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by Zorton · · Score: 2, Informative

      The distance and latency problem is indeed the main issue. I've only worked with Starband systems so i can't talk for the other providers out there but....

      typically i saw a ping time of about 600-800 ms. Working with ssh over a connection such as this is a bit hard but if you know your keyboard shortcuts you can do alright. You just have to think about what your going to do before hand and not be addicted to the backspace command. Another option is to edit files using emacs or vim's ssh remote access method.

      Starband's 480 line of modems now has the "TCP acceleration" software built in which helps out quite a bit. I suspect what happens is some sort of UDP encapsulation but please don't quote me on that one, i'm not sure of the internals. However, in practice it's quite nice. Once you use their built in http proxy loading a web page acts just like a typical broadband connection. large file-transfers in the downstream direction works very nice as well with speeds of about 100k/sec or so.

      Upstream is a different matter. If I understand how the bird is working they use a round robin arraignment for receiving the uplinks from the client ground stations. This means that you have to wait your turn before you can x-mit data up to the bird. Latency kicks in again and upload speeds slow down quite a bit. As of right now i've got a server uploading data files at about 11k/sec. Better than nothing though, and rather cheap and easy to setup.

    13. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Actually, satellite phones use low earth orbit satellites which have a low latency. Satellite internet generally uses "geosynchronous" satellites which must be in a much higher orbit (18,000 miles) and have a much longer latency.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    14. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Hence, 240ms round trip. Back and forth, you to your provider. Another 240ms to get a responce.

      No. The internet is not connection based. You don't have a "connection" (in the IP layer, there are no connections!) with your provider, you only exchange packets.
      Please do not think of the internet as a chain of connections. There are physical connections, sure, but 'Network link' is the proper naming here...

      The provider simply dispatches the packet into another channel and if that and all other hops are fiber-linked, you get 240ms+ x ms where x is what you'd get if you do a ping to the destination host from the satellite provider you use.

      Of course, if your satellite link has a very ugly setup, it may do handshake on link level for every packet transmitted/receive. For example if you have some sort of "phone link" over which you do a ppp connection.
      In this case, you would be right. But I'd try hard to find another ISP then... :-)

    15. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      no the grandparent has it right for a 2 way satalite setup (ie where the satalite is your only link to the isp) ping time is a measure of how long it takes for a packet to get from you to a remote server AND back again.

      its 120ms from you to the satalite
      120ms from the satalite to your isp
      whatever time it takes to get to the destination server and back
      120ms from your isp to the satalite
      120ms from the satalite back to you

      so the MINIMUM ping time you can have to anywhere on a two way geostationary satalite hookup is 480ms

      one way to reduce this is to use a modem for upstream and the satalite purely for downstream. This however means you need a phone line and have very little upstream bandwidth.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      You're damn right, somehow I had the ISP planted at the satellites location... oops :-)

      Well, maybe I can excuse myself with having seen a satellite 280ms ping, but somehow I had ignored the DSL uplink...

    17. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      doesn't using dsl for the upstream kinda defeat the point of satalite internet?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      there are several different sat phone systems arround some (inmarsat for example) use geostationary others (irridium and globalstar for example) use low earth orbit.

      trouble with low earth orbit is you need a huge amount of satalites to do it properly

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    19. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      No I dont think so, it was something like DSL 512kBit downlink and satellite 10Mbit.

    20. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      as you found you can accelerate the web by a HUGE amount if you control both ends of a high latency link. by using a protocol designed for the job.

      tcp connection setup is pretty expensive in terms of round trips so if you keep a persistant connection (either tcp or something propietry) over the high latency link to handle resends etc (on the rare occasion they are needed) possiblly even with forward error correction to reduce resends further then you can reduce the overall delay in getting a page to just about 1 round trip over the link.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:Performance of Skype over Sat? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      540ms on an ssh session would quickly drive me insane.
      No worse than using ssh when you have a lot of torrents running. You type stuff in a local terminal window and paste it into the remote window.
  10. setting up Skype for phone service by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:setting up Skype for phone service by leonmergen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      <Your Dvorak remark here>

      Ha, I can do that too! :)

      <Your Funny comment here>

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:setting up Skype for phone service by dextroz · · Score: 1

      just make sure you use a Dvorak keyboard - it will kill that horrible 480ms lag time by making up for it with exponentialy increased finger-keyboard response.

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    3. Re:setting up Skype for phone service by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      No, no, I think you messed it up; you got modded Insightful.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  11. bi directional satellite? by Local+Loop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought satellite internet was downlink only, with the uplink being provided by a phone modem. What is this guy using that is bi-directional?

    1. Re:bi directional satellite? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

      Got news for ya, For some people in MS, they've got two way satellite net access.. thogh it still sucks, because after you hit 150 megs of bandwidth used, you get capped to 56k speed.

      You just need two boxes hooked up to the satellite to send and receive. The lag's still horrible, though. DirecWay offers it in Como, Mississippi.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    2. Re:bi directional satellite? by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bidirectional satellite connections have been available for consumer use for a little over 3 years now (that I am aware of).

      I use DirecWay. The Fair Access Policy sucks, you only get a measured amount of bandwidth to use per time slot. Mine is 500 meg per 4 hours. The speed of the transmission is nice. Download speeds can get upto 2000bps and upload varies based on how much money you parley. Mine is 120bps (pitifull I know).

      The latency is born from the signal having to leave your satellite dish, upto the geosychronise orbiting satellite, back down to the Network of Operations, out to the Internet, back from the Internet to the NOC, back up to the Geo sat, and finally back down to your satellite dish. All told, the best time for round trip transmission is 0.7 seconds.

      All network traffic handshaking is hampered by this high amount of latency. If whatever protocol requires pretty rapid back & forth to be responsive, then it's pretty much guarenteed it will suck with satellite internet service.

      -FlynnMP3

    3. Re:bi directional satellite? by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      For the record, direcway's main competitor, starband, is also bidirectional through the satellite; no telephone-system connection required.

    4. Re:bi directional satellite? by dextroz · · Score: 1

      dude... are you sure that is bps and not kbps?

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    5. Re:bi directional satellite? by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

      Ooops. Yes. kbps. It's not THAT bad.

    6. Re:bi directional satellite? by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Few people answered your question already, so I'd like to ask you one:

      How the hack did you manage to have this user name with such an acct number? You friends with CowboyNeal or something?

    7. Re:bi directional satellite? by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      That may be the case for normal people buying off the peg systems, but I have a cousin who is living on the Brunt ice shelf in antarctica, where the current temperature is -27C, several thousand miles from the next base, for 3 years, and we can have a two way video link using MSN messenger. Somehow I don't think they have a land line.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    8. Re:bi directional satellite? by Local+Loop · · Score: 1

      I don't know the distances offhand but it's possible he (or rather they) have a microwave link to somewhere south america.

    9. Re:bi directional satellite? by Local+Loop · · Score: 1

      The user ID was pure chance when I signed up; I can't figure out what you mean about the username.

    10. Re:bi directional satellite? by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Number 5 is kinda looping there as well.

    11. Re:bi directional satellite? by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      OK Halley V is at 75:35'S 26:34W, Cape Horn is 56:30S 68:52W. That makes the distance 1705 miles. Can microwave work over that kind of distance and curvature?

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  12. Um.... yay? by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    You can get internet from the middle of the Pacific. Or anywhere else on the face of the planet for that matter, with a satellite.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Um.... yay? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      You do get some horrible latency, so you can very well forget about SSH, VNC, games or anything remotely real-time for that matter.

    2. Re:Um.... yay? by Graymalkn · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, not all com satelites are geostationary. Internet access at the South Pole is present, but spotty - about 17 hours per day, IIRC.

      --

      *******
      "What good is science if no one gets hurt?!" - Professor Chromedome

    3. Re:Um.... yay? by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Turn the globe up a bit and rotate it just right and you can get it so you can see nothing but blue. Those are the south seas of the Pacific. There's no reason to go there at all unless you're whaling. . .or in the 'Round the World single hand race.

      It's nasty "country" where the wind has thousands of miles of scope to build up waves. Some years ago one of the competitors in the race capsized in those seas. She got an emergency signal out to the orginizers, but with no shipping lanes within a thousand miles or so the only one around to attempt a rescue was one of the other competitors, who, as it happened, was sleeping at the time.

      How did they get in touch with him to alert him to the situation?

      They emailed him.

      KFG

    4. Re:Um.... yay? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Internet access at the South Pole is present, but spotty - about 17 hours per day, IIRC
      Considering that their days and nights can be up to 4 months long, thats REALLY spotty ...
      Antarctic Culture - The Seasons
      At McMurdo, there are about four months of 24-hour daylight (that's "summer"), four months of 24-hour night ("winter"), and two months on either end where the sun is either coming or going.
    5. Re:Um.... yay? by tylernt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are many LEO satellites (notably, Iridium sats in polar orbits and GlobalStar sats in various inclined orbits) that provide internet access for non-equatorial regions.* Granted, speeds are 1200bps to 9600bps and it will be horrendously expensive (around $1.60 per minute last I checked), but it can be done and often is done on oceangoing ships large and small for sending GPS telemetry back home and also so the crew can email their landlubber friends.

      Now, for *broadband* satellite internet, AFIAK you are limited to geostationary satellites around the equator. Bill Gates' Teledesic broadband internet-via-satellite venture, which would have been LEO, fell flat on it's face and I am not aware of any alternatives. I suppose you could buy four or eight Iridum phones (at $1,000 a pop) and gang them together into some kind of Frankenstein dialup-speed connection. I hope you are rich or you'll soon be decalaring bankruptcy!!

      * Granted, GlobalStar does not cover the poles very well. IIRC there is also Inmarsat, but I'm not sure if they do data?

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    6. Re:Um.... yay? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Anywhere one can read that story? Sounds like a good one!

      Hopefully he had an effective wake-up sound set in his email prefs :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    7. Re:Um.... yay? by kfg · · Score: 1

      For some reason I'm drawing an almost complete blank on the web. The race was the 98-99 Around Alone and the official website seems to be dead.

      There's a video documentary of the race available and on the web ad you can find a picture of the capsized boat (the skipper was trapped inside the upsidedown hull at the time. The rescuer, who did not receive the email until he woke up on schedule, had to alert her to his presence by banging on the hull.):

      http://www.paladventurevideos.com/BTTW.htm

      Discovery (or it might have been Nat Graph) did a "magazine" piece on it about 2000 or so.

      Sorry, best I can do at the moment. I'd like to take a crack at the Great Southern Ocean myself someday (or The Bottom of the World as it's sometimes called), but I'll have to wait until my cat dies and my finances come a bit more alive.

      Oh, I'm figuring on doing it in a 20 footer.

      KFG

  13. Remote, that's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Growing up in rural South Carolina back in the early 60's I was 3 hours from the nearest town on a good day and three weeks away after the ice storm.

    Imagine a third grader getting on the school bus at 5AM and not getting home until 6PM. This when Shirley the 10th grader bus driver didn't run the bus into a ditch...

    Before that I lived in rural N. Georgia and it was 4 hours to town, much of it on dirt roads.

    I kid you not.

    As for remote internet access, it's been done for years from sailboats via HF radio. A bit slow, but easily weeks from anywhere in good weather.

  14. Slashdot? by coop0030 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he has all this set up just to read Slashdot. I know I would go through the trouble to keep up on nerdy news.

    Sir, could you reply to this from your satellite internet in the bush.

    1. Re:Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon due to rabid net pigmies.

      Sup mate.
      Glad to see SCO hasn't bought out IBM yet
      Well, back to the Jaguars

      ciao

    2. Re:Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've not seen the internet in the bush, but I've sure seen a lot of bush on the internet!

  15. Guyana.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Jungle pr0n!
    All natur4l!
    Hot Guyana locals!
    Guyanagirl!
    Girlanaguy!
    Girlanaguyanagi rl!
    Check out my live feeds at...

    --D. DeFreitas

    1. Re:Guyana.... by dextroz · · Score: 1

      I guess this dude is prolly the guy sending *his* live jungle feeds everytime ya login to JungleRumble.com

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  16. Online banking... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't he open a bank account (replete with credit/debit card) the next time he's in the city?

    By doing this, he could buy things online with ease.

    However, I'm assuming he wants to purchase ahem, 'intangible' products from the web that can only be enjoyed on the computer, like the rest of world. On the other hand, I'm not sure how he'd keep the wife and kids out of the hut long enough to enjoy his new purchase.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Online banking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure he can buy things online easily but the delivery charges will be hell.

    2. Re:Online banking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Buy things online with ease. Not sure about the delivery part of the deal.

    3. Re:Online banking... by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      software? itunes? movies?

      why would his family need to leave for that?

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  17. We need to get him to set up a website by Solr_Flare · · Score: 3, Funny

    So that we can legitimately claim that there is literally no place on earth safe from being slashdotted.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  18. if you were stranded in the middle of nowhere... by MaroonWarrior71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...what one thing would you bring with you? apparently this man chose the wrong answer as a child

  19. Re:if you were stranded in the middle of nowhere.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I'd bring that video of Jenna Jameson posing with that big burger in her mouth...

    And imagine that was something other than a burger... like she eats that crap, anyways.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  20. he better not get too used to it by spirit_fingers · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the rainy season happens and his solar panels become useless it's bye-bye World of Warcraft, hello Pin-the-Leech-on-the-Jaguar!

    1. Re:he better not get too used to it by michrech · · Score: 1

      With this type of connection, it doesn't matter if he has power or not -- he'll lose the satellite connection anyway.

      I had Starband for somewhere around two years. It's better than Direcway in that, at least when I had it, there was no "FAP". I could download all day and all night and never lost any speed.

      I hated not being able to use DialPad (that should date about when I had the hardware) or play Asheron's Call with it, so I eventually switched back to dialup.

      'Course, those in power at Starband that decided to force us into the "WinModem" of the StarBand world (The model 360) from our nice 180's helped me decide to shitcan Starband.

      This type of access has been available for years (mostly in businesses). Why a guy in the middle of nowhere with a satellite connection is "stuff that matters" is beyond me.

      I'm sure there are plenty people in the US on solar power with some sort of satellite internet connection. I say "Big Deal".

      ---
      Read muh journal!

      --
      bork bork bork!
    2. Re:he better not get too used to it by dbIII · · Score: 1
      When the rainy season happens and his solar panels become useless
      Two things: clouds are not completely opaque, and since it is no longer 1960 solar cells can get a reasonable amount of power from less than full, direct bright tropical sunlight.

      However, the wavelengths used don't go through water very well, so you would lose the link in the rain.

  21. Cost? by raoul666 · · Score: 1

    Anybody else curious aobut how much this costs?

    --
    When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    1. Re:Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not sure about his application, but I am currently using a satellite connection from a rig site where we pay $700 per day for the computer systems and satellite access. It works quite well and you can have one web cam going without too much latency. ch latency.

  22. I bet I know who his first call will be to.... by telstar · · Score: 1

    Junis!

    (I still contend that's the funniest Slashdot story ever)

  23. Skype on sat ? good luck by updatelee · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine has the sat internet, the delay is terrible, using voip on sat would be terrible, 3-4 delay at least.

  24. TIred by just_von · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    God I'm tired of hearing crap about the RIAA.

  25. So.. yeah by Sase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If he doesn't have a credit card.. how is he paying for this mysterious satellite?

    Or is he pirating it?

    --
    ------------
    Sase
    "It's the opposite of that."
    1. Re:So.. yeah by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

      Pirating satellite is relatively easy and you'll never get caught if you don't get greedy with bandwidth.

      Spread spectrum over a television transponder, at low bit rate will not raise the noise floor enough to arouse suspicion. If you're feeling particularly paranoid, bit rate can be kept low enough to be completely undetectable.

    2. Re:So.. yeah by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Uhh direct debit?

    3. Re:So.. yeah by kentborg · · Score: 1

      Wow! I thought of that about 5-years ago, thought it was really cool, but didn't have occasion to make any use of the idea. Where did you get it? (And do you have implementation details worked out?)

      -kb, the Kent who doesn't have any need to steal satelite bandwidth, but who thinks it is a really cool idea.

  26. Adventurer? Bah! by sturat · · Score: 1

    Real adventurers of the past never had broadband internet. Imagine if Edmund Hilary had this technology... it's summit day, and tension is high at base camp, when an email arrives: "D00ds, Everest is 0wn3d!"

    Self-proclaimed adventurers are generally publicity-seeking wankers in my opinion. As others have pointed out, you could use this technology virtually anywhere on the planet. So the guy has a "pet" jaguar - big deal!

    1. Re:Adventurer? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like: the jaguar has a meal that he's waiting to eat at some undisclosed time in the future

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. these are the days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of lazers in the jungle somewhere

  29. As a former guyanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as soon as he can import a microphone and speakers

    Just like to note Guyana has hotdogs, cheetos, televisions, and mobile phones.

    1. Re:As a former guyanese by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just like to note Guyana has hotdogs, cheetos, televisions, and mobile phones.

      So, it really is a god-forsaken place after all.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  30. I like how the story mentions carnivorous jaguars. by windowpain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because the carnivorous jaguars are much worse than the vegetarian jaguars, believe me!

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  31. Mind the Jaguar? by edwardd · · Score: 1

    Atari stopped making that game system a long time ago....

    Oh, wait... Now I get it

  32. Mind the Jaguar, Panther, Tiger... by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

    > Mind the jaguar

    I guess that means Macs are everywhere too. Albeit old ones. I guess it takes a while for them to get the latest release in the jungle...

  33. Inmarsat BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    The days of being amazed by remote connectivity are over. For several years it has been feasible to setup VSAT powered by generator or solar. You can get up and running for less than $5,000 and a couple of hundred dollars / month.

    The Regional-BGAN has been operational for a couple of years, but has been very expensive and a max speed of 144kbps and a foot print that only covers middle east, europe and northern africa. $700 up front and $10 / mb.

    In the next couple of months, Inmarsat will be bringing their new I-4 satellite online to be used with BGANs. This will provide speeds of almost 500kbps (depending on how you like to calculate your overhead) in a unit the size of a laptop. Coverage initially extends from Europe to southern africa and central australia.

    By the end of '06 the network will be almost global - including the amazon.

    Just for the record, I've done Skype and other VoIP over the RBGAN. It works ok with a similar delay to any other satellite phone. But the cost is still quite high due to the cost / mb.

  34. I cam by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    His latest project: setting up Skype for phone service, as soon as he can import a microphone and speakers.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:I cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that sig's waaaay too nerdy - even for Slashdot!

  35. So. by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    What's MS?

    1. Re:So. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mississippi

      Re-read the last line of parent post.

    2. Re:So. by Khyber · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't tell me you don't even know State abbreviations? Which school did you go to/country are you from?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:So. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that the parent is one of the 6 billion people who use the state code FN.

    4. Re:So. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we aren't all americans dickhead

  36. Three hours from the nearest town? by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    And I thought I had it bad when I couldn't get broadband living ten minutes away...

    --
    R.Mo
  37. I can't live without UPS delivery by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    (Dunno what key I hit before, but it was obviously the wrong one) As I was quoting:

    His latest project: setting up Skype for phone service, as soon as he can import a microphone and speakers.

    Maybe someday package delivery services will accept longitude and latitude (now often called "GPS coordinates") as a delivery address, and if it's not practical to drive a truck there, have an airplane do a "drop shipment" with a parachute. Would a hard drive survive such a shipment?

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:I can't live without UPS delivery by CellBlock · · Score: 1

      It can't be any worse than a regular UPS shipment.

  38. Let me know when Martian IP addresses work by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Latency from the Red Planet is gonna be hell.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  39. How much does it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Ecuador, I live 15 minutes from the nearest city, but there are only two options available: modem access which is 3 dollars a minute when the phone expenses are included or satellite which is more than 300 dollars a month. I have guessed that I could probably get a satellite internet connection in the US and bring the dish here, but that would be a lot of work.

    So, in Guyana is satellite internet in the middle of nowhere somehow miraculously economically feasible?

  40. Another good article... by kevcol · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...in IEEE's magazine Spectrum..

    Bill Woodcock of Packet House travelling the world and setting up Internet connections in remote locations.

  41. Re:I like how the story mentions carnivorous jagua by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno, if it's a choice between being eaten and listening to the vegan jaguar proselytize about the evils of eating meat, I might go for being eaten.

  42. Wow... by xENoLocO · · Score: 1

    and I thought *I* went to extreme lengths to prevent neighbors from stealing my wifi...

    --
    "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
  43. sfdgsdfgf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ) ( \ X 8====D gfdgf dfgsg df gsgd fdg sfdg sdfg sdfg sdfg sdf gsdfg sfdg sfdg sg sdfg sgsdf gds

  44. Also.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mind the jaguar.

    Oh and, beware of the leopard.

  45. VSAT, bitchez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say no more. Also, ignore the idiot postings re: this has been around for 3 years, etc.

  46. IP over Ham by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard you can do IP over shortwave radio (i.e. Ham Radio), would this be a reliable/ reasonable option in this case?

    In what cases does that sort of system work? Is it high bandwidth ?

    I'm hoping for some knowledgable Ham slashdotter here.

    1. Re:IP over Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes you can. It's not particularly reliable, as it's affected greatly by the state of the ionosphere. B/w stinks, as it's about 2400bits/sec over shortwave.

      Jacques Richer (n1zzh)

    2. Re:IP over Ham by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I've read articles about Packet radio talking about getting 9600bps and higher.

      www.packetradio.com

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:IP over Ham by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting article that I read a few years back about an HF radio network in place in West Africa:

      http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/6299

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    4. Re:IP over Ham by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at HF frequencies. That would be at higher frequencies which are more line of sight and hence useless for long range operation from the ground.

      802.11g is really just packet radio and it's 54 Mbps but it's at 2.4 GHz where using a few MHz of bandwidth is acceptable.

    5. Re:IP over Ham by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      You can also do ham radio over IP too!
      http://www.irlp.net/

      But for remote linking, a sat ISP is probably much better than HAM because HAM is regarded as a common medium. As a result, you have to "play nicely", and can't transmit questionable material over the airwaves. Lastly, in the US anyway...i don't know about operation procedures in foreign lands, but you can't conduct business transactions (like sell stuff) over HAM radio. You can however call for a tow truck if you're stranded in the middle of nowhere tho.

      73s
      KG6JOP

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    6. Re:IP over Ham by ag4vr · · Score: 1
      The FCC specifies limitations on bandwidth for amateur radio frequencies (see sections 97.305 and 97.307).

      In general, you're limted to 300 baud below the 10m band, 1200 baud in the 10m band, 19.6K baud in the 6m and 2m bands and 56K baud in the 1.25m and 70cm bands.

      Most packet radio activity I've heard of has been in the 2m and 70cm bands (there may possibly be some 6m activity, but I can't say for sure). These are VHF bands, so they aren't shortwave, strictly speaking.

      So the short answer is: No, it's not high-bandwidth, but it's better than no-bandwidth. :)

      YMMV outside the US, since these are US rules.

  47. sat access in the amazon by bobsalt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My brother has been using sat for internet 3 hours from nearest paved road for last year or so. It works great! I took a grandstream budget-tone(preconfigured to connect to my asterisk server) with me last summer when I went down there to visit. It blew them away when I called time and temperature at a local bank and the audio was crystal clear. They laughed at me when I tried to call my wife and all she heard was strange noises-lol Oddly enough we could hear her fine. Very weird to hear a perfectly clear voice that far out in the middle of no where. The radio phone going to a little town 80km away sounds ok, but you can tell its over a radio.

    My brother has started using skype and its bearable. You almost have to say over at the end of each sentence.

    I set up a wrt54g running http://www.openwrt.org/ and it acts as a little ap there for them. The really cool thing is, I left it running openvpn, so when ever they fire up the generator it will connect up to my server. I thought using putty over a dial up was bad, this is around 800ms-1000ms, still very cool to be able to ssh into a router in the middle of the amazon. Ya, I know I'm a nerd....

    the only bummer about the sat service is you have to use a windows pc for the connector. It has some client software that runs to connect it..

    here's their website if anyone know someone that needs internet in south america for $65 a month

    http://www.gilat.com/

  48. come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get out of the jungle if you want to play on the internet. next thing your going to be charging goofy americans to pay you to take trips with you because they can now access the internet. shameless. head back to the states girly man or britain or whatever place you come from. btw, i do work abroad in trying situations and like the reprieve.

  49. Pee Wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did Pee Wee become a reporter for the BBC?

  50. Apparently, nobody really cares by iammaxus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When all 4 of the 5-rated comments (That's with a +1 modifier for insightful and interesting) are "Funny" and are just making fun of the content of the article, you can tell no one really cares. Wow, he uses satellite internet, and what do you know, satellite internet actually does what its supposed to by working outside of places where you can get other types of access. He uses Skype, that's also amazing.

  51. In need or everywhere internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to have an internet connection everywhere, in a small unit (ie. no huge dishes), what is available?

  52. Ummm by Nailer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    has full internet access via satellite. His latest project: setting up Skype for phone service

    Combining a high latency connection with an app that demands low latency? Good luck.

    1. Re:Ummm by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      I have a bi-di sat connection and use Skype all the time. Strangely enough (or perhaps not) my international calls have low-enough latency to speak normally, especially after hours, but calling friend Nick who lives three blocks away is terrible - we've had to resort to using radio protocol. "Yes I can hear you - over." "OK over" Annoying but still usable :)

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  53. I Don't Think Angelina Jolie Has Internet by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    when she's in Cambodia with her Cambodian adopted son, Maddox. She said they don't have electricity (except flashlights and maybe an emergency generator). You can't get to her place there except by helicopter, especially in the rainy season when the roads wash out.

    Also, she has to watch the kid in case of tigers, supposedly.

    I don't think Brad's been up there...:-)

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  54. Yawn. by decrocher · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live on Niuatoputapu, Tonga. 1-3 months to the next town (whenever the boat comes). I often have to clean the sparkplug in my generator before booting.

    My net connection is 14.4 dialup that cuts out every five minutes... long enough to load Slashdot and POP email.

  55. jaguars by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Jaguars, actually, are New World only. No jaguars in Africa - lions, perhaps.

  56. $50-60? Why it is so expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would pay up to $30. Two questions

    1) Why it is so expensive? ($50). Star Wars 3 will be ten bucks, it cost a fortune to make it and a lot of time (over 3 years).

    2) If purchased from Amazon it is even more expensive ($60) Why? I dont want to use crappy PayPal, I get all my DVDs from Amazon,they are usually cheaper than in other places, why in this case it is more expensive ?

  57. Obligatory Futurama quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:
    "Jacksonville Zoo, in Florida, which is sending a cage for the jaguar"

    "Good news everyone! I've made those government mandated updates you've all been suing me about."

    "You made repairs to the dark matter reaqctor"

    "And you got a cage for the lion"

  58. nothing new in this by bonezed · · Score: 1

    now, what would be news is if it was fast, low latency and cheap

    --
    ---- Put Sig here:
  59. Three hours from the nearest town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn man thats almost suburbia. get out where its really remote and try claming this, where I grew up 4hrs got you to your neighbour, the next town was still a way from there.

  60. That's not remote... by meosborne · · Score: 1

    I worked for several years on Johnston Atoll, which is located about 820 miles SW of Hawaii. The atoll consists of four tiny islands: North, East, Sand, and Johnston. Johnston Island (the largest) is 2 miles long x .5 miles wide and 7ft above sea level.

    There is nothing but water for 500 miles in every direction and even then the closest land is an another uninhabited rock. The closest civilization is Hawaii (820 miles), a 2.5 hour journey by jet.

    This guy has it easy. :-)

  61. Remote remote Internet access by Dissectional · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently finished a trek to the Mount Everest Base Camp in Nepal. Prior to entering the more remote areas ( towards Tengboche, out of Nache for those that care ) there was a sattelite Internet provider operating. It worked out to be around $10 Australian dollars for ten minutes. What was funny is that I did this whilist the rest of the country was under a declared state of emergency due to the maoist problems, whereupon the king severed all telecommunications in the country. Obviously, the sattelite feeds couldn't be tampered with in this way ( they literally used side cutters to chop data lines in the towns and Kathmandu ) - so while everyone else was cut off from the world, myself and a mate were able to send e-mails to friends back home - dispite the fact that we were half way up a mountain.

  62. What about power? by birge · · Score: 1

    If it's really that remote, how the hell does he get power? Does he have a solar powered PC? That would be pretty cool. Surfing the net off the grid has a certain cache, if you ask me.

    1. Re:What about power? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      He made a generator out of bamboo and coconut shells.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  63. Wireless rocks here by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Costs about the same as cable and i get 3Mb down/1Mb up and my own fixed IP.

    Best of all i'm supporting a local company and their tech support people are actually TECHNICAL - something that's lost on comcast.

  64. Imagine..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A shitty Southern California desert town teeming
    with gangbangers, skinheads, and other such
    characters.

    No computer stores or even so much as a Radio
    Shack nearby

    TV signals blocked by mountains

    Can't even get dialup anymore cause vandals keep
    ripping down the lines.

    What would you do?

  65. OT Gmail accounts available by jshriver · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have 49 gmail offers available..let me know if you need one.. jshriver@gmail.com

  66. big hairy deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have DirectPc for my RV and I get DSL speeds anywhere I go and if I paid for the $6000.00 tracking dome I could have it driving down the road.

    $59.99 a month for the service. so what again is so SPECTACULAR about this?

    the guy could have spent less and gotten more by buying a OTS solution and service.

    Why is everyone all oooh and ahhh over some backwards tribe getting internet access the hard way instead of the dolt buying a hardware/service combination that is far cheaper, faster and easier?

  67. Mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent post is funny...maybe, but informative? Is there anyone who doesn't know about the months long days and nights at the poles? By the way, 2+2=4. Please mod this +5, Informative.

  68. NOT TRUE ! by dargaud · · Score: 1
    Yet more proof that the internet is truly everywhere
    Well, well, well... I'm writing this from the center of the Antarctic Plateau, where the winter night is now permanent and the temperature drops to below -80C... And I can tell you that the internet connection sucks. We connect 2-3 times a day to transfer email, and web connection is only available during those 20 or so minutes. The DNS timeout is 2 seconds while the ping on the DNS is on average 5 seconds... (if anyone knows how to change that 1st value on a windows box, let me know through my site contact address).

    So, no, Internet access is not ubiquitous yet. Read my blog for more info (some actually relevant to this thread).

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  69. Re:Mods on crack - not really by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Informative
    Modding something funny doesn't increase karma; but any subsequent downmods decrease karma.

    So, if you get 5 * +1 Funny and 5 -1 Troll, you lose 5 points, even though, logically, you should come out even. Get too many Funny mods and you can actually get banned ...

    So what mods are doing to compensate for the defective slashmath is modding funny stuff as informative instead ...

  70. The jaguar? by Mercano · · Score: 1

    Mind the jaguar.

    Forget the jaguar, beware of the leopard/p

    --
    #include <signature.h>
  71. mod down parent down for misinformation by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    firstly have you never heared of a TCP window? TCP is NOT a send and wait protocol it sends a number of packets before getting a response and that number is dynamically adjusted based on the senders previous experiance with the connection (though admittedly changes did have to be made to tcp to properly allow for long fat networks like satalite).

    secondly there was an analysis paper on sypes behaviour recently and it appears to only use TCP when it can't get through using UDP.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register