Slashdot Mirror


Poor Man's Kinesis Keyboard: The K'nexis Keyboard

Jon_Aquino writes "For programmers like me with wrist pain (the dreaded Emacs Pinky syndrome), I have made a simple keyboard modification that lets you press the Ctrl, Alt, and Shift keys with your thumbs. Just like those expensive $240 Kinesis keyboards, but made using a $30 K'nex building toy. (K'nex is like Lego but uses rods instead of bricks)."

246 comments

  1. You take a block from the bottom by conteXXt · · Score: 3, Funny

    and put it on top.

    You take a block from the middle and put it on top.

    ooops. Soory. wrong permanently embedded jingle.

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    1. Re:You take a block from the bottom by niteskunk · · Score: 1

      ... Just when I thought that jingle was out of my head forever. :<

  2. erm by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    I can press all three keys with 1 hand, so why do I need some device to do it?

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:erm by teslar · · Score: 1

      you don't because you can use your pinkie to do it.
      but others can't and they need this.
      as you would know if you had rtfa :)

    2. Re:erm by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      because your hands apparently hurt unless you press them with your thumb..

      though.. why not just remap some buttons? and why use a solution that needs you to keep your hands in the air all the time you're using it?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:erm by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Your hands SHOULD be in the air whenever you're typing.

      If you're keeping your palms on your desk (or wrist rest in front of your keyboard) you're asking for problems.

      Whether it's as severe as this is, I dunno... hard to say from the pics.

    4. Re:erm by idonthack · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're keeping your palms on your desk (or wrist rest in front of your keyboard) you're asking for problems.

      Actually, the wrist rest is there so you don't have to exert any effort to keep your hands in the air. (If you don't have one, you have to support the weight of your entire arm. You're not just holding up your wrists.)

      The lowered-wrist position is what is bad for your hands, not the fact that they rest on something... if your wrists are slightly elevated, it doesn't matter if they're touching anything or not.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    5. Re:erm by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      If you're keeping your palms on your desk (or wrist rest in front of your keyboard) you're asking for problems.

      If you suspend your hands in the air, you've got to use muscles to do that - some combination of the shoulder girdle elevators (upper trapezius, leveator scapula) and and elbow flexors (bicepts, brachialis). So you'll get neck, shoulder, or arm pain instead of wrist pain.

      The best solution I've found is the use of SmartGloves along with frequent stretching breaks. (Don't use the gloves all the time, you want to allow those muscles to work and get stretched and strengthened; but when they're tired, they need extra support.)

      Also I'm not a touch typist - I move my hands around a lot, which means slower typing (only about 40 wpm) but possibly less chance of RSI since I'm varing the motion.

      Yes, I only type 40 wpm, but since I don't create text or code that fast, I only feel contrained when I'm typing in text I originally hand-wrote.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:erm by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Jesus it seems like a lot of people have wrist problems while typing. I can type over 80 wpm for half an hour or more without getting even minor pains. It must be the way I have my arms and the desk positioned... I've never had problems typing.

      --
      No existe.
    7. Re:erm by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I've never seen a wrist rest I could rest my wrists on while typing. You'd need 2 or 3 for the proper thickness. If wrist rests are thick enough for you, the only ways I can see that to be is if either your wrists are bent or if your hands are higher than your elbows. Both of these are no-nos.

      Plus the rest would need an indentation to deal with the thumb and part of the palm that follws the thumb.

    8. Re:erm by Genom · · Score: 1

      Nor have I, but I have friends who do.

      The major difference I can see is that I don't tend to stay in any one position for very long. I'll move the keyboard a bit, lean back in my chair, put the keyboard on my knees, etc... My guess is that this prevents any sort of major RSI from taking root. Even though my fingers are still hitting the keys, my arms/neck/back are in a differnet position.

    9. Re:erm by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I can type over 80 wpm for half an hour or more without getting even minor pains.

      Hmm, what sort of job do you have with these 30-minute workdays? :-)

      Certainly, if you take a good break every half-hour your chances of RSI are much lower.

      It must be the way I have my arms and the desk positioned.

      It could be that your hands and arms are better sized and shaped than others for keyboarding - given the highly variable geometry of human bodies plus the pretty standard geometry of computer keyboards, some people will fit better than others. (Shame there isn't a wider variety of keyboard sizes and shapes available.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (If you don't have one, you have to support the weight of your entire arm. You're not just holding up your wrists.)
      Are your arms really so big and weak that they are not able to support their own weight?
    11. Re:erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you suspend your hands in the air, you've got to use muscles to do that - some combination of the shoulder girdle elevators (upper trapezius, leveator scapula) and and elbow flexors (bicepts, brachialis). So you'll get neck, shoulder, or arm pain instead of wrist pain.
      Muscle usage -> pain? Maybe if you are weak and flabby girly man.
  3. Such a sad choice of editor... by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he had simply used vi, none of this would have been necessary.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just jealous of our uber-geek-chic.

    2. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol you can still get pinky syndrome from having to hit : or -[ or all the time too... Although not as bad as alt.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by alexhs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but he's lost for the geek community anyway :
      He's using windows and need that modification just to do ctrl-alt-del, it's written black on white in TFA !

      Posting a story on Slashdot acknowledging to use windows ! What a lame guy ! Hopefully for him not everyone is going to read TFA.

      *** Yeah so there are only seven letters and that I isn't an I, it's just random bars that happen to form a bogus I ***

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those keys are easy to press though. CTRL is far away and hard to press.

    5. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google revoked my ads :( Here [costasandsandra.com]

      That must have been... breach of the ub3r-lameness policy?

    6. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by keesh · · Score: 1

      Escape key? What escape key? Easy fix:

      imap jj

    7. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by doubleshot · · Score: 1

      vi is such a sad choice of editor as well...

      use nano!

      --
      TechColumnist.com -- http://www.techcolumnist.com
      Looking for avid moderators and posters that want to contribute!
    8. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm... FLAME ON!

    9. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      It does seem weird to continue to use an editor that causes you so much pain that you need to modify a keyboard to use it. There are plenty of decent editors which don't require the pain in the ass zillion key strokes of emacs for regular tasks.


      I find JEdit to be a very good editor - graphical, but with plenty of complexity and functionality if you need it. I only know a handful of keystrokes and use the menus for other stuff. Then you've got Eclipse, or GEdit, and whatever the KDE equivalent of GEdit is plus a multitude of others. Then on the command line you've got Joe, Nano, Vim and JED. I love JED, (similar to micro-Emacs) for the quick and dirty stuff.


      Failing that, why not just bind different keys to emacs? Bind stuff to F12 instead. I'm even sure with some hacking you could make the windows key (that most PC keyboards have), or the popup key (that they have too), or Print Screen or something simulate holding all the modifers down at once.

    10. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use nano!

      I think somebody desperately need a lesson in Unixology.

      nano is a reimplementation of pico, which is the text editor included with pine (an internat mail client) for the uninitiated (folks who don't know vi or emacs).

      Translated: there is nothing to be proud of in using nano --- learn vi or emacs, or go back to using windows/macs, softie.

    11. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is this a troll? Because he prefers vi-style keybindings?

      This is an OPINION, not a troll.

    12. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah... ed rules!!! :D

    13. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by atomm1024 · · Score: 1
      You spelled nano wrong. Just what kind of keyboard are you using, that would allow you to make such an odd typo?

      [Insert standard I'm-joking-not-trolling disclaimer here...]

      --
      Signature.
    14. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Individual keys are not that hard on you pinky. It's when you have to hit three or four keys as a single chord that you start getting stress injuries.

      Not that Bill Joy is more ergonomically aware than Richard Stallman. It's just that when he invented Vi, he had to support the cheapo terminals at UC Berkely, which didn't have screen buffers, programmability, or fancy modifier keys. So he simplified the editing model, and forced the user to maintain state information in wetware. Which make vi rather less sophisticated, but a lot easier to keyboard for.

    15. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by AdamPiotrZochowski · · Score: 1

      most people I know press alt with thumb, afterall, its so close to space, and there is two of them, press alt with one hand, the needed key with the other, hence alt-f is right-alt with thumb and f... vice versa, alt-o, left alt with thumb and o...

      also, when it comes to the colon or brackets I have found it simpler to just move my hand a row, press shift with right hand (pinky and the one next to it) and press colon or brackets with indexing or the middle finger.

      I dont know if this is most efficient, propably not, but I have yet to have a problem due to key presses. Now, sitting position, chair, desk, a combination of that gave me bad wrist pains...

      --
      /apz, typying more online than speaking outloud in the real world... ;D

    16. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by doubleshot · · Score: 1

      nano is a reimplementation of pico, which is the text editor included with pine (an internat mail client) for the uninitiated (folks who don't know vi or emacs).

      Translated: there is nothing to be proud of in using nano --- learn vi or emacs, or go back to using windows/macs, softie.


      a text editor is a text editor, why make it overly complicated by using vi with it's command mode / edit mode whereas nano has easy key combinations to do exactly what vi does without the overly complicated hassle. I know how to use vi / emacs i just prefer not to...

      everyone has their own pref to editors, however because i use nano doesn't mean i should just ditch linux because i don't use vi... get your priorities straight...

      --
      TechColumnist.com -- http://www.techcolumnist.com
      Looking for avid moderators and posters that want to contribute!
    17. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. You still think text editing is editing one character at a time notapad-style. Real text editors let you do so much more than nano/pico can do, it's not even funny.

    18. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, what if you need to type "jj"? Remap it to Esc! ;)

    19. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is this a troll? Because he prefers vi-style keybindings?
      This is an OPINION, not a troll.

      I'm really sorry about that ... I swear I wanted to mod him "+1, Insightful" but I use Emacs to read Slashdot, and I must have played a bum chord somewhere...

    20. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1

      I've got commonly used 3+ key chords rebound to Super+(a single key). Super is the left windows key on my setup. This'll allow me to keep the use of my hands for a few extra years, I hope.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    21. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Transportation is transportation, why make it overly complicated by learning to drive when you can just walk?

      Because it'll save you a lot of time in the (not so) long run, after a minor loss of time learning to do something new. If your editing needs are no more demanding than occasionally editing a .foorc file, use nano, but if you're coding, learn to use a editor. Nano doesn't touch emacs or vi.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    22. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can remap your keybindings, and you can map keys to emulate the "missing" modifier keys (the machines emacs originally ran on had keyboards with Hyper, Alt (not the same as your "alt" key), and Super keys, and you can make something useless like the windows key do their job), and map the overly complex 80's guitar god chords to something simpler using these. I've done so, and probably with a lot less hassle than hooking up an Erector set to my keyboard.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    23. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      That's one approach. Another is to upgrade to a modern editor.

      Of course, that's easier said than done. I've been telling myself for years that Vi (or rather Vim, which has pretty much displaced its prototype) is totally obsolete, since its most important design constraints (must work on a time-sharing system over a 300 bps line connected to a primitive dumb terminal) no longer apply. But all the various editors I've tried seem to not be worth the trouble. Though that might have been an excuse...

      Lately, I've been playing with jEdit which absolutely demolishes every excuse I have for not switching to it. But every time I face the task of retooling my Vim macros and customizations for jEdit, and retooling my aging brain to use jEdit's interaction paradigm, I suffer a total failure of nerve. Help, I'm locked in and I can't get up!

    24. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that old emacs and Vim users have climbed up a steep learning curve, and aren't going to be eager to do that again for a text editor. I can't speak for Vim, but emacs is in many ways obsolete - it's written in a dialect of Lisp that should have gone out with disco, and it lacks the ability to do a lot of GUI eye-candy stuff that can actually display useful information. But it's got tons of stuff written for it, and for those of us who know it, the keybindings are hard-coded into our motor neurons, so there's not likely to be a stampede away from it anytime soon.

      jEdit looks nice, but I'd have to see a very big advantage to want to switch now. And I'd be nervous about the fact that it's essentially one man's open source project (Slava Pestov). If I have to bet on which one is more likely to still be supported in 10 years, I'm betting on emacs.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    25. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on every point. Unfortunately, EMACS and Vi zealots mostly refuse to acknowledge these issues. Which mostly doesn't matter, except that many of them are also OSS zealots, and their efforts to free us all from the Microsoft Monoculture are badly hampered by their inability to grasp the concept of lockin.

    26. Re:Such a sad choice of editor... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      It does seem weird to continue to use an editor that causes you so much pain that you need to modify a keyboard to use it.

      It seems weird to me that he bothered modifying his keyboard at all... my solution for emacs was to swap right alt and right control keys. that way I had alt to the left of the spacebar and control to the right, both easily accessible by my thumbs. It saved me a lot of pain with all the Ctrl+Alt shortcuts...

  4. Just use vi by m50d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, if your tool gives you that serious problems it's time to use another one.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Just use vi by timmyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If he wanted emacs to act like vi, there's nothing stopping him from customizing it that way or using something like viper-mode.

      On the other hand, he's losing some of the greatest benefits of a kinesis keyboard: the keys line up vertically, the right thumb can easily hit the space bar(it's over it) and the enter key, and the left thumb is right over the backspace. For people that enter numbers a lot, there is a foot pedal available that turns the right half of the keyboard into a numeric pad so you can type numbers without your right hand leaving the home row. The more expensive models also support key macros.

      Buying a kinesis keyboard was probably one of the best hardware purchases I've ever made.

    2. Re:Just use vi by metlin · · Score: 1

      Sorry, when someone goes to this great lengths to continue using his favorite editor, it's got to be because it's more to him than just a mere editor.

      If an app gave me a wrist pain, I'd switch in the blink of an eye to another - unless it is so good that I'd go to any lengths to minimize the pain than stop using it.

      So, using another editor is not really an option, finding a way of easing the pain is. Besides, today it's Emacs hurting the pinky, tomorrow it could be vi hurting the fore-finger because of all the ::::::::s.

    3. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no kidding, I mean that was the whole point behind vi's different modes and stuff.

      How to copy a line of text in most editors:
      Cursor over to beginning of line, shift cursor down, CTRL-C.

      I dunno about Emacs, probably something similar or CTRL-something-or-other.

      VI:
      Press Y

      sheesh, get over your fear of vi people! If you spend a lot of time text editing you need to use good tools. Once you start using macros you can't believe all editors don't provide that functionality. Everything goes faster in vi.

    4. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use both personally, vi for quick edits and emacs for the longer ones. If you haven't used emacs you might be surprised at some of the functionality available there, it truly does have everything and the kitchen sink. Copying isn't the trial you think it is either. (Hint: Most modern shells and UNIX GUIs have emacs-alike keybindings.)

      Both editors have their place, and not everything is faster in vi. If you haven't put the same effort into learning emacs that you've put into vi, then you're really not qualified to comment.

    5. Re:Just use vi by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      VI:
      Press Y
      So what do you have to press when you want to type a 'Y'?
    6. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In vi there is command mode and edit mode.

    7. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to use Emacs many moons ago. So long ago that I barely remember how it works other than it's just another editor. I do remember why I like vi better though and that's why I have stuck with it. It's just faster. If you don't think it is then you don't really know vi. If you haven't put the same effort into learning vi that you've put into emacs, then you're really not qualified to comment.

      This can be summed up nicely with a quote from the Emacs Vs Vi Wiki:

      Emacs is easier to learn, but Vi is easier to use.

      Emacs is what neophytes fall in love with because it makes sense quickly. Vi is what people love that take the time to learn it. It's all a matter of what's important to you. Ease of use without much investment, or something more powerful and faster but requiring more up front investment. Different people have different needs. As a programming I spend a lot of time editing source code. Vi kicks the crap out of Emacs in this case.

    8. Re:Just use vi by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      I know. My point is that you're being misleading if you claim the copy line command is just 'Y'. It's not. It's often a switch to command mode and then 'Y'.

    9. Re:Just use vi by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Just a comment: viper-mode sucks.

    10. Re:Just use vi by russellh · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if your tool gives you that serious problems it's time to use another one.


      Yes, clearly by the age of 19 or so, it's far too late to start using a tool like emacs. The body has already developed relatively naturally, whereas deeply unnatural tools like emacs and the violin demand more.

      We should therefore start emacs training at age two.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    11. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Right, but hitting Esc and then y is still easier on your hands than Meta-This Ctrl-That ;)

    12. Re:Just use vi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. Does vi do on-the-fly syntax-checking? No. That alone saves 50% of your time when programming. I use emacs in viper-mode, and it's a thousand times better than vi can possibly be.

      If you haven't learned emacs-lisp, you haven't properly learned emacs. That's your problem. You think you know it, and you spout off nonsense.

    13. Re:Just use vi by TeXMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      >If he wanted emacs to act like vi, there's nothing stopping him from customizing it that way or using something like viper-mode.

      Only an Emacs user who never actually used vim can think that the viper-mode for Emacs comes anywhere close to something usable.

      I had to learn vim because I'm using a laptop, and thus nonalpha keys are clumsy to reach at best. Then I got so used to it I started having hjkldddxxcta things everywhere in other programs :)

      Emacs has an enormous appeal for me (for TeX editing, AUC-TeX & friends is awfully close to Nirvana), but I simply can't use it. I value my hands too much. And no, viper-mode, even in the most vi-ish mode, doesn't cut it.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  5. Lego by funkmeister · · Score: 1

    I think you could probably build the same contraption with lego using the rods, etc. Might be easier to get...I have never heard of K'nex.

    1. Re:Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am surprised he had to introduce knex to this crwod. i enjoyed them as a kid. thought they were just as good as lego. oh and btw, when did this please type the image crap happen here? a human cant even tell

    2. Re:Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is all this type the image crap people talk about?

    3. Re:Lego by jafomatic · · Score: 1
      I'll second this and add that all the engineers seemed to use these in school; there were HUGE k'nex projects being built on campus at least as long ago as the early 1990's. I don't exactly interrogate people about k'nex, but I think all the geeks I've ever met have at least seen the darned things.

      I have to say I was disappointed in this article. I expected something interesting and less shoddy than double-sided-tape-plus-pencils. This looks like the product of a guy who became very bored.

      --
      ::jafomatic
    4. Re:Lego by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it must affect those who don't log in.

      So as a result, I'm guessing that you're logged in but clicked the "post anonymously" button.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  6. Knex != Lego by PakProtector · · Score: 1

    Knex is more like the old Erector Set toys, not like Legos.

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Knex != Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

    2. Re:Knex != Lego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erector? That sounds like a pr0n movie.

    3. Re:Knex != Lego by Cougem · · Score: 1

      For all those Brits, Erector is the American (and more boringly/dirtily named) version of Meccano, an very cool nuts-and-bolts version of K'nex, which could make some very cool products.

      My Uncle passed me down an actual steam engine, with a mounted boiler with working pistons and all, which could drive the action of a Meccano toy. The smell of meths still reminds me of that.

  7. Pinky on the ctrl? by mrjb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the the 'ball' at the base of my pinky to press the ctrl-key. Leaves the pinky free for all the keys it was intended for: the q, a and z as well as capslock,tab and shift.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Pinky on the ctrl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont use the balls below the pink one for such things.

    2. Re:Pinky on the ctrl? by idonthack · · Score: 1

      *tries it* That works great. Good habit to have. But it's kinda hard to press Ctrl+Z like you say.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    3. Re:Pinky on the ctrl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the ball of your right pinky for the ctrl key.

    4. Re:Pinky on the ctrl? by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      The q and z keys? I thought the right pinky keys (besides a) were the quote and semicolon. ...or are you using some type of weird keyboard layout?

    5. Re:Pinky on the ctrl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes he is, it's called QWERTY, and is made for typing the word "typewriter" without moving your hands.

  8. Obligatory Guinness Quote by kc32 · · Score: 0

    Brilliant! Brilliant!

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. I solved this problem another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by running emacs in vi mode.

    1. Re:I solved this problem another way by mrjb · · Score: 1

      And you use what finger to press ESC?

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:I solved this problem another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's easier and less physically stressful - hitting alt with your pinky or hitting escape with your pinky?

    3. Re:I solved this problem another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is why you have a nose.

    4. Re:I solved this problem another way by Sweetshark · · Score: 1
    5. Re:I solved this problem another way by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1
      And you use what finger to press ESC?

      Left and right pinkies, simulatneously: Ctrl-[

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  11. OMFG ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so incredible, I can't believe anybody would pay for that sweet looking keyboard after seeing this.

    Who would have thought double sided tape and pencils could be used to create an art piece so beautiful and so distinctivly geek ?

    I most definately do not want pencils go across my keyboard just to get some half-assed ergo effect.

    1. Re:OMFG ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God.

      I was beginning to think it was just me who recognised this as the most ridiculous idea ever.

      All touch-typists should now recognize the value in typing with index fingers only.

  12. Kinesis Rocks by healy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a long time (5+ years) user of a Kinesis Keyboard I can tell you that it's the best keyboard I have ever used. It took me about a week to get used to the new layout (I stayed away from root shells) but once I did, I've never looked back. It's the most comfortable keyboard I've ever tried. I own one for home & one for work. Combined with the Evoluent mouse, my hands are much, much happier now.

    --
    "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
    1. Re:Kinesis Rocks by gstovall · · Score: 1

      Amen to the Evolution Mouse. I've been using ITAC MouseTrak trackballs since 1992, and the Evolution since 1997, on both work and home machines.

      I had developed RSI problems, so did the research and switched to the ITAC products (and later the Microsoft Natural keyboard also when it came out). Make a world of difference. The RSI is gone.

    2. Re:Kinesis Rocks by healy · · Score: 1

      Actually the one I am talking about is the "Evoluent" VerticalMouse 2: http://www.kinesis-ergo.com/pd-evoluent.htm

      I bought it about 2 months back & it's really nice.

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
    3. Re:Kinesis Rocks by bmw · · Score: 1

      I just ordered one of these. I'm told they help immensely and I can see why. Try moving your wrist to the position it would be in while gripping one of these and then try the position you would have it in for a normal mouse. The difference in wrist strain is quickly noticeable.

    4. Re:Kinesis Rocks by pioneer · · Score: 1

      unfortunately i also have a kinesis and it rocks and i'll never look back.

    5. Re:Kinesis Rocks by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      I had a Kinesis for several years. It's great for word processing, emails, etc...i.e. any situation where you're just typing regular text. As soon as you get into coding, gaming, etc where unorthodox key combinations are necessary, you start realizing that it's a 101-key QWERTY world. Don't even try to use Emacs productively with the Kinesis. All those CTRL-ALT combos just don't work as effectively.

    6. Re:Kinesis Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't use the Kinseis, but a very similar keyboard, and agree that it's the best design out there. It not only looks cool, but you can go on, and on, and on, and on... and do it real fast. A lot of my friends thought it looked cool, but then tried it and labeled it a gimmick. I realized very soon that all of them had odd typing habbits that were causing problems when using a keyboard like this. You need to use the correct finger-key position in order to use these keyboards, but once you get over it (seriously, 3 days will do it if you already know the keyboard layout by heart) you immediately start picking up speed, and save your wrist and fingers from odd stretches.

      I used mine for 5 years, and it finally broke down. 5 years of 10hour/day usage is apparently pretty intense for most keyboards. Since then, I've unfortunately been issued a laptop at the office, and wanted a bluetooth keyboard for my Mac at home, so I've parted from the Kinesis-style keyboard, but I miss it. Unless you need wireless, or are required to use a laptop keyboard, take a look into the Kinesis. Sure, it's expensive. But it's one hell of an investment that I will never regret. If I knew in advance how great they were, I would have probably shelled out even more.

    7. Re:Kinesis Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Kinesis keyboards at both home and work for coding in Emacs. I switched about five years ago when I first start noticing wrist pain, which I haven't felt since. I have the caps lock key set to "CTRL" and the thumb ctrl key set to "ESC". C-x ` for 'next-error' feels a bit unnatural with this arrangement, so I created a macro triggered by ctrl-'. Works great for me.

    8. Re:Kinesis Rocks by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      That seems like a silly comment to me, but then I'm not an emacs user. Could you give examples of ctrl-alt- combinations that are harder on a Kinesis? The ctrl and alt are right next to each other.

      I'm an Eclipse user and there are a number of alt-shift-x,<key> combinations. I find them quick and easy because I can use my thumb for ctrl-alt and my pinky for shift and my ring finger for x, all without changing the angle of my wrist at all.

      On a classic keyboard I'd have to bend my wrist left in order to do that. (Wrist bending is a good way to exacerbate tendonitis.)

      The whole point of the design of the Kinesis is that you can do anything except function keys without bending your wrists or moving your arms.

    9. Re:Kinesis Rocks by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I've got a Kinesis keyboard. The dvorak version. It's really nice, and quite comfortable, and it doesn't aggravate my tendonitis at all. But there are a few problems...

      -- The symbol keys are annoying, particularly ~.

      -- The function keys suck.

      -- And the kicker: modifier keys get stuck down in firmware. It is unbelievably irritating for a $300 keyboard, whose features have been stable over several years, to have such a big firmware bug.

      Still, it is an amazing keyboard for typing English text, and a pretty good one for coding, too.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  13. Errrr by amulder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I looked at the article, and saw the photo's, but it hardly looks comfortable. Seems to me that you'd get in trouble every time you let your wrists down.

    Seriously... how many of us have good piano skills and always keep our wrists up? Not me, thats what wrist rests are for...

    1. Re:Errrr by 10537 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing -- it doesn't look very sturdy at all, and I can imagine it's going to be very annoying moving the sticks about every time you catch them at a funny angle and detatch them from the keys. I also suspect that -- due to the extra force required to press the keys because of the length of the linkages -- you're going to do a lot more damage to your thumbs than you would have done to your pinkies.

      From the headline I was expecting some sort cool hack, but "I stuck some sticks to it with tape" is lame. Is this really the best /. can come up with these days?

      --
      This sentence no verb.
    2. Re:Errrr by El_Servas · · Score: 1

      Actually no.

      Wrist-rests are for when you are NOT typing.

      You should keep your wrists on the air, not resting while you're typing.
      It may seem unconfortable at first, and many many many people believes this is the natural position for typing, but is not. And oooooohhhhh the pain comes later.

  14. Don't use Emacs by goldenratiophi · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I'm not going to give you a lecture on why Vi is better. But one editor rules them all.

    Ed: your Lord and Master

    1. Re:Don't use Emacs by Husgaard · · Score: 1
      No, I'm not going to give you a lecture on why Vi is better. But one editor rules them all.
      Don't be too loud about it. At least I dare not mention that I use the better editor.

      We are all sinners, but some sins are considered especially bad during a religious flamewar.

      And personally I don't want to be expelled from The Church of Emacs just because of the editor I use, in particular not after having been blessed by St. IGNUcios

    2. Re:Don't use Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ed? Ha! I laugh at Ed! Ed source code in "BF"

    3. Re:Don't use Emacs by ThePacki · · Score: 1

      Well, you could run vi inside the EmacsOS(tm).

    4. Re:Don't use Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But one editor rules them all.

      and in darkness binds them?

  15. Google Image search link by buddahfool · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally a Google image search (with safe search off) link that does not bring up any porn in the results!! Work Safe! YIPPEE!!!

    1. Re:Google Image search link by bowloframen · · Score: 1

      Since we're talking about building toys, search for erector. I dare ya.

  16. Do tell. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    Is there a USB version? Bluetooth? How is it with the Dvorak keyboard layout? I'm interested.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Do tell. by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I bought the Dvorak one (It's actually a QWERTY with Dvorak in subscript), and I've found it difficult to learn Dvorak, but that's probably just me as opposed to the keyboard.
      AFAIK, there is no Bluetooth, but I have it in USB. It has two extra usb ports on the back so I found it quite easy to just plug my mouse into the keyboard.

      I recommend the purchase, and if you're still learning dvorak, buy the dvorak (subscripted one). However, if you want to switch to Kinesis+Dvorak at the same time, it's gonna take quite a bit of adjustment.

  17. HA! by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    A real geek would have built a mechanical keyboard with voice input to eliminate all that nasty keystroking altogether....

    Points for effort, but come on, go all the way, the Rube Goldberg keyboard is the one that I want!!

    1. Re:HA! by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      My dream setup is a million monkeys on a million typewriters.

  18. Suck it up, maybe? by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    Are computer people really becoming the 90 lb weaklings that they're so often made out to be? I remember reading a Slashdot article about a 10lb notebook a few weeks ago, and everybody was screaming about them being "too heavy". And now, it's hard to use a keyboard? You gotta be kidding me. Are all geeks *really* that fat and pasty now? Honestly... I can't imagine a healthy person complaining about it being "hard" to press 3 buttons on a keyboard.

    1. Re:Suck it up, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, troll perhaps ?

      Man it bulds up over time. One day, without there being any pain, it hurts press the keys. It's not bad pain, like falling down a flight of stairs and breaking a leg, but more mental. My brain is screaming to stop pressing that damn button, and it continues into physical pains eventually. One day I just quit my job and got a paper route.

  19. alt with your pinky? by downsize · · Score: 1

    I thought you took care of ALT with your thumb already?
    and where is the windows Key solution '/me ducks' I can't believe he removed it for his shift key :-}
    my solution was even simplier, I just taped my 'pinky' finger to the one next to it (2nd from index) , that way, it puts less stress/stretch on your tendons in your wrists

    --
    do you have shinyfeet?
    1. Re:alt with your pinky? by tehcrazybob · · Score: 1

      I just taped my 'pinky' finger to the one next to it (2nd from index) , that way, it puts less stress/stretch on your tendons in your wrists

      This solution might work fine for people who don't type enough to need a solution in the first place.

      However, if you type enough to have wrist problems, I hope you type properly. My pinky and ring finger are separate entities, each pushing their own set of keys. Combining the two fingers might give them more strength, but it also means you have to relearn how to type with fewer digits.

      Also, it's inconvenient to have to add something to yourself in order to type. If your solution is integrated with your keyboard, it's only there when you are typing and therefore need it. It doesn't take extra time to use and doesn't interfere if you get up to get food or use the restroom.

      --
      Computers need to explode more often.
    2. Re:alt with your pinky? by downsize · · Score: 1

      i type 18 hours a day, and my hands are too big for every keyboard i've tried. I settled on the MS split, which, thus far, has worked out the best.

      the solution of taping my fingers together works as it forces me to move my arms from my shoulder instead of stressing my wrists or reaching with a finger.

      true, I have slowed down to about 50wpm, but as the saying goes 'slow and steady wins the race' :-}

      --
      do you have shinyfeet?
  20. Personally... by DarthVain · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cheaper it is, and fewer options the better.

    I would rather a 10 buck clickity clack than a 100$ wireless, usb, internet, media, programmable, glow in the dark, led indicators, blue tooth, ergonomic, natural, quiet, windows, etc...

    So long as it interpretes typing. I am so sick of the varients. Wireless might be ok in some applications (media center for example), but is half this stuff ever needed or used.

    The last two stupid ones I bought (they were the cheapest I coudl find in a pinch), were a media one and an Internet one.

    They both sucked, half the time you would inadvertantly hit a button while doing something else. Let me tell you hitting the "internet" or "Media Player" button while playing a FPS online will make you curse.

    It is also all the more screwy buttons my cat can walk over and activate. So the next morning I can see several dozen apps started, or the computer put into standby or shutdown.

    Another positive with the cheapo keyboard is the ability to just toss it if you accidently spill crap on it.

    I am really just writing this to see if I get first post... :)

    1. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cheaper it is, and fewer options the better.

      I think i found your solution.

      Portable, clickity-clack, and about ten bucks. Just like you wanted.

    2. Re:Personally... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Uhm... so you've been buying the quality equivalent of $10 keyboards with $90 addons, and you are complain that they arn't better? A product stuffed full of useless features is *not* a sign of quality.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    3. Re:Personally... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      try an old clicky keyboard, or a new one from PCKEYBOARD.COM if my old Dell keyboard i scored dumpster diving (not in a dumpster, a drop off area for trash equipment) ever dies i am getting the black and white customizer.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last two stupid ones I bought (they were the cheapest I coudl find in a pinch), were a media one and an Internet one.

      Hrm, I'm sensing a pattern here with "cheapest" and "piece of crap."

    5. Re:Personally... by martijn-s · · Score: 1

      Maybe you shouldn't be buying a cheap ass Internet keyboard then, but a high quality one. I've been using the MS Internet Keyboard Pro for years and not only does it have the ergonomic split, but also the Internet keys are noticably smaller than the numeric keys and very well-placed. No confusion possible.

  21. More fun ?'s. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    So, compare this to the Microsoft natural. I assume this is better.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:More fun ?'s. by healy · · Score: 1

      The one I use is the Kinesis Classic. Not the split design that is like the MS Natural. My wife uses the MS Natural & I can tolerate it for short periods but the kinesis runs circles around it.

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
    2. Re:More fun ?'s. by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      The MS Natural is a convex keyboard. The Kinesis is a concave keyboard. The concave shape means I can reach any key without moving my wrists. (Changing the angle of your wrists is a good way to exacerbate tendonitis.) Having the arrow keys under your fingers is a huge speed gain if you use them a lot like I do.

  22. It's obvious by fiori · · Score: 3, Funny

    Keyboard manufacturers are VI users...

    1. Re:It's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keyboard manufacturers are VI users...

      That explains why the ESC key is in such a convenient location.

  23. In addition, switch your layout to Dvorak instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Qwerty is a terrible choice, for English speakers. Dvorak is much better, and safer for your wrists. This will not solve the ctrl, etc. but it will preserve your wrists for years to come. Additionally, it is much faster, too.

  24. nice by ate50eggs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wish pages for complicated mods had such detailed instructions with so many pictures. This one I think could have been described in a sentence or two.

    --
    not everything is a science experiment!
    1. Re:nice by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it make them Slashdotted faster too?

  25. The most ghetto mod since... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the creation of "curb feelers".

    What the fuck has /. come to when this is news?

  26. Answers!! by Eunuch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, there is a USB version. The only bluetooth prototype fell in the toilet so it will be awhile before that is available. Dvorak is integrated on all of them.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Answers!! by healy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they also supply a Sun adapter for those who need it. I used to use a PS/2 version on a KVM switchbox with Linux, OS X, Sun & Windows boxes all on it without a hitch.

      On my G5, I use it & remapped a couple of keys to be the Apple keys. It's a snap to do.

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
  27. Your hands are your career by maynard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bought a Kinesis split bowl keyboard five years ago and haven't looked back since. It's still in use, and as sturdy as ever. While the article in question may offer a cheaper alternative, frankly I consider the ~$300 I spent on that keyboard worth every penny. It saved me from countless hours of finger and wrist pain while keeping me on the job when I might have been further injured. $300 is chump change compared to a career. I'd still gladly recommend the Kinesis, especially if you're beginning to feel keyboarding pain after a days work. --M

    1. Re:Your hands are your career by atlauren · · Score: 1

      I heartily agree. I developed tendonitis in college after years of computing geeking and typing undending English papers, and I was then stupid enough to go into IT. After a couple years of that I couldn't type without severe pain. I did my time with wrist braces and Hand-Eze gloves, and it took the Kinesis keyboard to finally end my pain. (Well I could have left computers completely, but let's be realistic here.)

      RSI solutions are very subjective, as each person's RSI is a wee bit different. But the Kinesis keyboard is a lifesaver for me, and I don't use anything else on my desktop computers.

      If it's helpful for anyone, I wrote this review for TidBITS back in 1998:
      http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=05168

    2. Re:Your hands are your career by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I would say it is probably worth it, but I would expect direct USB compatibility out of any keyboard costing more than $15. I am plenty happy with my Microsoft Natural Elite though, and it does have USB compatibility.

    3. Re:Your hands are your career by maynard · · Score: 1

      Well, when I bought mine USB wasn't an issue. I think the newer ones support USB though. And certainly ps/2 to USB converters aren't expensive compared to the keyboard itself. What you're buying with a Kinesis is a specific contoured key layout that no other split keyboard offers. It looks somewhat like shaping the keys to the inside of a brassiere. Though, not having tits, I can't say if strapping it up against my chest would feel like one. Probably not. *cough!* --M

    4. Re:Your hands are your career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Your hands are your career by Mark+Imbriaco · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. I've been using my Kinesis keyboards for about 6 years now and I absolutely love them. I was feeling wrist pain pretty much daily and after switching to the Kinesis I've been pain free. I liked the first one so much I bought a second so I would have to lug it back and forth to the office.

      If mine died I would order another immediately, though they're still holding up fine after all the (ab)use they've seen.

    6. Re:Your hands are your career by Zepalesque · · Score: 1

      Also note that something like this can be considered a tax write-off.

    7. Re:Your hands are your career by killjoe · · Score: 1

      What do you do about the mouse? It seems like the travel from keyboard to mouse would be even longer with that keyboard.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:Your hands are your career by geniusj · · Score: 1

      It definitely is not. Notice it has no separate number pad. Big difference.

      PS: I have one as well.. An old Professional QD.. Still in heavy use :)

    9. Re:Your hands are your career by danberlyoung · · Score: 1

      Knesis does have a USB version. I have been using it for nearly 5 years now and would use none other. It works great on my Mac and any other system with a USB port. Plus it has programmable keys so you can remap the thumb keys to suit yourself.

      As others have said, $300 is *chump change* compared to RSI surgery! No other keyboard even comes close!

    10. Re:Your hands are your career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main thing he's doing to prevent carpel tunnel is using his pinky less, and holding his hands in a 'proper' elevated position. any typing method that over uses a finger beyond the capacity it evolved to do is going to cause pain, eventually crippling.

      The kinesis takes away needing to hold your hand in proper elevation by making the keys sit in a bowl, it also puts some keys by the thumbs, because they aren't used effectively on modern keyboard layouts.

      anyways, most people could avoid pain simply by learning how to hold their hands while typing. for people who need to input a lot of characters to get anything done... a kinesis will increase the amount of character input you can perform prior to reaching a pain threshold. This is why, ultimately a skin embedded computer chip that interfacess to the neural system, and allows data output at the speed of thought is ultimately the tecnology that will someday replace keyboards.

    11. Re:Your hands are your career by wik · · Score: 1

      I had problems using a USB converter on my kinesis classic. The keyboard generally works fine, except for two things: 1) sometimes it forgets that Control is held down and 2) I cannot program macros anymore. Apparently, if you buy the kinesis USB converter (I have a $9 white-box one), the macros do work.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  28. Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by tezza · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Use Sharpkeys
    2. Put a mapping from Caps Lock to Left Control
    3. Use new capslock instead
    4. No more Emacs wanky or whatever you said.

    You won't remember life before this change. And no having to use vi ;)

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    1. Re:Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name this foo.reg:

      [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contr ol\Keyboard Layout]
      "Scancode Map"=hex:00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,02,00,00,00,1d,00 ,3a,00,00,00,00,00

    2. Re:Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that still use the pinky to hit the new Control button? It is less awkward but still the same finger is used just as much.

    3. Re:Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by bender647 · · Score: 1

      I've bound Caps Lock to control on all my Linux, BSD and Win XP machines. But I've noticed that Sun is shipping $30 USB keyboards with their newest Linux machines, with the Control key in the proper place. I haven't tried on with Windows yet, but it should work.

    4. Re:Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by dragonman97 · · Score: 1

      Heh...sorry, I'm a vi user - I don't have any of these problems. Seeing as the Caps Lock key is an utter waste of an otherwise good key, though, I've mapped it to Escape. :)

    5. Re:Once again: Bind CAPSLOCK to Control by AdamPiotrZochowski · · Score: 1

      real people use a low level keyboard rewriter tool from
      http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/ctrl2cap. shtml

      its from sys internals, the best windows hackers out there,
      same people who brought junction with source for win2k+ ntfs,
      reg/file mon, process explorer. On top it comes with source!

      --
      /apz, Avert misunderstanding by calm, poise, and balance.

  29. And you call yourself a geek! by mc+clown · · Score: 0, Troll
    So like any geek would, I decided to make my own Kinesis keyboard.
    Is that a lexmark printer I see in the background...no self respecting geek owns one of those horrible contraptions.
    1. Re:And you call yourself a geek! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that but he's running Windows and has a 15" monitor..

      No self respecting programmer uses a 15" screen unless it's on a laptop. (dual 21" LCD's here; hey it's my job, I want good tools)

    2. Re:And you call yourself a geek! by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I'm pretty sure all of the moving parts inside a Lexmark are K'nex.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  30. emacs or xemacs? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 4, Funny

    hey, he says 'emacs, emacs, emacs is the greatest editor', and then he shows up the display with --- God forbid --- XEmacs.

    Bloody hypocrite.

    1. Re:emacs or xemacs? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Not only that!, he's using XEmacs under Windows, if you say "Emacs is the best text editor", you mean GNU Emacs under the GNU Operating System.
      Besides, Emacs is not the best text editor, it's just the ONLY text editor ;-)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:emacs or xemacs? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      pico >> Emacs

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:emacs or xemacs? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      You can't compare Pico and Emacs, Pico is a SIMPLE, BASIC, text editor, for people with little or no unix experience. Emacs is a customizable, fast text editor, Pico is for simplicity, Emacs is for Performance.

      AND, most important, Pico is proprietary.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    4. Re:emacs or xemacs? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i was not aware that pico was closed, i just installed nano so i don't have to dirty myself when using linux.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:emacs or xemacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are slow console based text editors?
      What the fuck..Performance?
      How many more FPS does emacs get compared to pico?
      Heh.
      Anyways, so people that use simple,basic editors to edit simple, basic config files are not experienced in..THE WAYS OF THE UNIX?

      Yeah, people that use the editor thats simple to use (pico /etc/rc.d/rc.modules )are not experienced, but the ones that use emacs /etc/rc.d/rc.modules are way more l33t because its customizable and has key combos you have to read the man page to learn.

      Unless you're a programmer I don't see the difference in just editing text, how can one be 'faster' than the other?

      Why would you want "performance" with editing /etc/inetd.conf? control + o, saved. Took a second.

      AND, most important,
      I would think people that used NOTEPAD would be inexperienced with unix, not the ones who discuss which console based text editor is the best.

      Christ, get a grip. Everyone knows that echo "im a weenie" > imabigweenie.txt is the fastest.

    6. Re:emacs or xemacs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that's why mandrake has nano but not pico.

    7. Re:emacs or xemacs? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's actually closed, just like pine, they are written by the same people at the University of Washington. It's a big shame that most distributions include them by default, in many cases, it's the only, or one of a very few elements tainting the distribution.

      You seem to actually understand why it's important to use Free Software, so let me point out the use of the word "Linux" in your reply, which is actually misleading, since it doesn't refer to the whole OS (Linux is only the kernel), and, specially, the people involved in the Linux development are not actually interested in freedom, and they use and actually promote the use of proprietary software that runs on their kernel. Let me suggest you use the name GNU/Linux to refer to your OS, you are showing more precisely what OS you use by using that name, and you are showing that you use it because it's FREE AS IN FREEDOM, and not only because it's technically better, by saying GNU you are helping our fight for freedom, and supporting this filosofy.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    8. Re:emacs or xemacs? by gomoX · · Score: 1

      They're not "closed". They just don't match Stallman's definition of "fr4y & 0pen s0rz". You can get the source and patch it as you wish, it just has some additional restrictions for redistribution.

      Just clarifying, because "closed" can be misleading.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    9. Re:emacs or xemacs? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      They don't match the definition of Freedom. If something is FREE, i can do whatever i want with it, as long as i keep it free (So other people have the same Freedoms that i have). The license for Pico and Pine doesn't allow modification or redistribution of modified copys, yes, i can suggest modifications, just like i can suggest modifications to Microsoft's products, but it's up to the autors to use them or not, it also has extra limitations that make it NOT FREE.
      Besides, you say it doesn't match Stallman's standards, that's not actually true, RMS created the Free Software movement, and we owe him a lot, but you are not forced to agree with him, or to even listen to what he thinks about some specific piece of software, but what you have to take into account, is that the mayority of Free Software is under the GPL license, if you create software that is under a license that is incompatible with the license of most Free Software, including some mayor pieces of software that are the base of this comunity, then your software is not really Free, regardless of what your license says.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  31. What is this vi you speak of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must know, and I seriously do not have any idea what "vi" is.

  32. nice.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nice to see the editors check what they link to. The wiki article has "well damn nigga" at the end of it... nice to see we keep racist bullshit off the site.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a wiki says can be changed at anytime, even you know this dumbass.

      If you did not like it, sign up, change it and be done with the juvinial complaining.

    2. Re:nice.. by yotto · · Score: 1

      You do know that it's possible to edit wikipedia articles after they're linked to from slashdot?

      Edit the article, remove the offending remark, and you're all set. Well, not really, you may need to do it 30 times or so.

    3. Re:nice.. by idonthack · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have done that... Now it says "omg haxtorr?!?!"

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  33. Help me I accidentally clicked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://cmdrtaco.net/

    and it sucks

  34. Just remap! by CypherXero · · Score: 1

    If you're having THAT much trouble, just remap your keys on your keyboard. Geez. Or, tell Emacs to substitute another key for the control key, or whatever. I'm sure there's better ways to do this, other than taping children's toys to your keyboard.

    Or you can just download Vi :)

  35. Thanks Captain Obvious... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This eliminates the physical pain, but it does add financial pain: $240 US -- double that if you need one for home and one for work."

  36. Sure Sign of a Fanatic by scotch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beware of endorsements from people who say "I've never looked back." There is no surer sign of fanatical devotion to a particular technology than that phrase. You will usually find "I've never looked back" after an anecdote justifying said fanatics use of the technology and especially their decisions to purchase fringe technology for relatively high prices. Ironically, "I've never looked back" is offered to endorse the fanatics chosen poster gadget, yet the phrase, if evaluated honestly, clearly says more about the purchasers fanaticism than it does the quality of the gadget. Indeed, the rational consumer always looks back and re-evaluates purchases, technological trends, long-term quality and alternatives that have come on to the scene; the fanatic, on the other hand, clings to his decions against all evidence and data. Please, if you see or hear "I've never looked back", run away from the source as fast as you can, and do not look back. Thank You.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
    1. Re:Sure Sign of a Fanatic by gstovall · · Score: 1

      In general, I agree with you.

      However, I did do a tremendous amount of testing and comparison between various trackballs before selecting the ITAC Evolution trackball. I went through at least 12 different models (drove both my wife and the Ergo people at work nuts) before I found one that had the right characteristics to resolve my RSI issues.

      Same with the Microsoft Natural. I imagine that is more a personal preference thing, as opposed to the extremely clear ergo benefits of the Evolution mouse, but I went through many different keyboards before stumbling on the Natural (we happened to get a shipment of them at work one year), and because it gives ME comfort that I've never experienced before, I've felt no need to look further.

    2. Re:Sure Sign of a Fanatic by healy · · Score: 1

      OK then Mr Paranoid...I don't work for them or anything like that, I was just trying to offer up a little of my own experience to fellow slashdotters.

      I meant never looked back as in never looked for another solution after I got it. The reason I stopped looking is that I've not needed anything else since. It solved my particular problem. If that makes me a "fanatic", well, whatever...

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
    3. Re:Sure Sign of a Fanatic by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I started using an electronic can opener, and I've never looked back!"

      "I've switch from a 286 to a Xeon, and I've never looked back!"

      "I upgraded to a 19" monitor, and I've never looked back!".

      The "I've never backed phrase" indicates that the new way is better than the old way, and there are no-second thoughts about the decision. How is that fanaticism?

      It doesn't mean that I'm going to use a Xeon forever, or never investigate other options. It just means that the Xeon is better for my needs and I have no cause to switch back.

    4. Re:Sure Sign of a Fanatic by scotch · · Score: 1

      No offense intended, mister serious. I noticed that odd turn of phrase and was going for funny. Failed, I guess.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    5. Re:Sure Sign of a Fanatic by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      "I started using an electronic can opener, and I've never looked back!"

      Actually, electric can openers can be a health hazard (since they're harder to keep clean). Dunno if the other stuff you listed is a health hazard :-)

  37. Takes me back... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Marathon Pinky--the game used control as the run modifier. It never made my wrist hurt, but it made it hard to bend my pinky halfway.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:Takes me back... by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      You do know that you could/can CHANGE the run modefyer to something more useful, like Caps Lock (thus enabling you to run ALWAYS), only problem there is that you needed to remember to shut it off every time you jumped in water... If you still have your old data files (or even if you don't) you can play them again using AlephNull.

  38. Excuse me. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    The poster noted that he has tried the alternatives, including "natural keyboards".

    There is nothing wrong with "not looking back". I haven't looked back one moment since my elective castration.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Excuse me. by HillaryWBush · · Score: 2, Funny

      I moved to Canada after the last elective castration. I haven't looked back either.

  39. I'm a little confused... by mellon · · Score: 1

    ...as to why the author doesn't just swap caps and control like every Emacs power user does. It's no pinky strain at all to hit the caps lock key. This is just part of being a geek - you have to learn how to optimize your keyboard layout, or your hands are doomed.

    For the various vi acolytes who suggested he switch to vi, I would like to point out that switching to vi would be a better option if only the escape key on most modern keyboards weren't so far off the home row that you have to pick up and move to hit it.

    1. Re:I'm a little confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you go on about remapping keys, then complain about placement of another key?

    2. Re:I'm a little confused... by magefile · · Score: 1

      It's only the vi noobs that use esc - anyone who's used vi for long has at least heard of using ^[ instead. And if, as you said, you've remapped capslock and control, it's not a reach at all.

    3. Re:I'm a little confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's only the vi noobs that use esc - anyone who's used vi for long has at least heard of using ^[ instead.

      I'm assuming that "^[" is supposed to represent ctrl+[. In which case I guess I'm the exception. I've been using vi or vim for the last 5 years or so and have never heard of such an odd remapping. Why, as a vim user, would I want to emulate emacs' complicated ways? I don't know what OS you all are running your editors under, but I run mine on FreeBSD, previously various Linux flavors.

      That being said, ever hear of the saying "When in Rome, do as the Romans"? Every *NIX I've used has a UNIX keymap installed by default. Think there might be a reason that UNIXs had their own layout? Swap your keymap with the UNIX one and, among other things, your caps lock and control keys are swapped, as are your grave and escape keys. Viola! No more stretching!

    4. Re:I'm a little confused... by mellon · · Score: 1

      Heh. You raise a good point. However, in my defense, the point is that it's a hell of a lot easier to fix things in software than in hardware. Switching to vi is one way of fixing it in software, but you still have to do key remapping to get the escape key into place, or to get control where it needs to be if you do C-[ instead of ESC.

      If you're going to go to the trouble of remapping your keyboard, and you're already an emacs geek, why not just remap caps lock and control rather than learning a whole new editor?

      Personally, I use vi when I'm in a terminal window, and Emacs when I'm doing a serious hack, and I can't really tell the difference between them most of the time, but there come times when circumstances force me to switch to Emacs, because it's more programmable and extensible, and when I am so forced, I'm glad I'm fluent with it.

    5. Re:I'm a little confused... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      I've been using vim for years, but I've always thought it was a little weird to use your pinky to hit the escape key. You've got to move almost your entire hand to do that anyway, why not just move it all? I use the middle finger of my left hand to hit the escape key and then just move my hand back to the home row. My hands know the position well enough to find it quickly, and the nubs on the F and J keys make it even easier. Similar with backspace; I use the ring finger of my right hand, not my pinky.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    6. Re:I'm a little confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power user? I think not.

      The true blue vi console keyboard cowboy has already taken out the ESC key and replaced it with a foot pedal.

      You'll see them using that footwork to reload ammo! on the huge arcade game "Time Crisis"

    7. Re:I'm a little confused... by magefile · · Score: 1

      First, it's not a remapping - ^[ works on a vanilla install of vi (well, I've only tried it on vim on RH, Debian, OS X, and Knoppix - good enough?). Second, for some of us, grave is still a bit of a stretch - I have small hands, so I have to stretch to reach it, but my right pinky sits at the top of the ; key, putting [ just a twitch away.

    8. Re:I'm a little confused... by thelenm · · Score: 1

      You can hit Ctrl-C for the same effect as ESC. This may be the best kept vi secret ever... it doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. I used Vim for several years and became quite proficient at it before I discovered this.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  40. Try a chording keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    See the twiddler2 chording keyboard:


    www.handeykey.com


    I had the alphabet memorized in an evening. No more wrist pain, and my fingers are much happier. Also, this thing as great firmware making reprogramming virutally any keymap simple.


    Someone did a study comparing chording keyboards to multi-tap (cell phones). They found multi-tap peaked out around 20 words per minute, while the newbie subjects under study were still improving at 40 words per minute on the Twiddler.

    1. Re:Try a chording keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link = dead

    2. Re:Try a chording keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hint: Handy isn't spelled "handey"

  41. Google Cache by MonoNexo · · Score: 1

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:oxaUmtTL9DUJ: c2.com/cgi/wiki%3FEmacsPinky+EmacsPinky&hl=en

    Sense the original link to the definition of Emacs is already down...

  42. Nice link. Thanks! --M /nt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    note xt

  43. Tinker Toys by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    I would say more like Tinker Toys...a lot more.

  44. where is the space bar? by rungood · · Score: 1

    I'm not seeing it. Or am I just blind? :-p

    1. Re:where is the space bar? by jclaer · · Score: 1

      right thumb to the rightmost thumb position
      on my classic. Just right of the Enter key.

  45. EMACS?? Ha! by atomm1024 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Real men use Nano!

    --
    Signature.
    1. Re:EMACS?? Ha! by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      I always thought real men used vi. They have a difficult time with it, but hey, if that's what it takes to be a real man.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:EMACS?? Ha! by spasticus74 · · Score: 1

      Thats right, man! After all - that's what Maddox uses: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=fa q

      --
      "I'd like to think oysters transcend national barriers Adrian"
  46. More painful? by NekoXP · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I can't see how this is ergonomically better than his current keyboard or up
    to par with the $230 one.

    Probably he will end up crippled all for the want of being a cheap-ass. Such is
    the hippy FLOSS way, right?

  47. Not for lefties. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I really don't like how it assumes that one hits the space bar with the right hand. I'm left-handed, and I use the left thumb 99% of the time to hit the space bar. It seems like a nice idea, but it makes too many assumptions.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Not for lefties. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I'm a lefty as well, but I learned to use my right thumb which, as far as I know, is the classic method of typing anyway. How hard is is to smack a huge bar with your right thumb? Not like it requires any kind of precision control.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Not for lefties. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      my keyboard is worn enough to show dimples in most of the keys, and ive worn all the way through the plastic where my fingernails touch A and S (and damn near W and D as well). also, my space bar is cut in half because the keyboard folds up. the right half shows most of the wear, but the left is not in great shape either. id say 20/80 for me, and im a righty who doesnt use 'normal' home row touch typing

  48. Use a foot pedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a foot pedal mapped to ctrl when I'm doing heavy editing in emacs. It was surprisingly easy to adapt to. The only downside - it can get a little squeaky.

  49. Someone mentioned this a few weeks ago by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    one of the problems a lot of people have with key combo's is the control key... that is if you're using a pc keyboard as opposed to a unix keyboard where the control key is located with the caps lock button is..

    I've use pckeyboards everywhere, so i'm stuck with the control key at the bottom left and right hand sides... it's sooo bloody awkward to press alt-cntrl-key .... but with the capslock acting as cntrl it's much easier and damned easy.. and all those bloody emacs key combos make sense now..

    Should've done this 15 years ago, bloody acer keyboard is almost dead.

    1. Re:Someone mentioned this a few weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you get your hemophilia under control.

  50. Windows version by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    Lemme guess: The K'nexis Made For Windows (TM) has delete instead of shift?

  51. Not a good idea by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    CPS will arrise from not moving your hands during repetitive motions. Making it all accessible now without moving is a dumb idea that'll save a few minutes a week but only cause more discomfort in the long run.

    1. Re:Not a good idea by convolvatron · · Score: 1

      thats kind of a silly comment. the kinesis helps alot by chording off of the thumb, alowing the hand to stretch across the palm, which is a much easier motion than stretching out the fingers and trying to chord that way.

      i've been using one for >10 years; they help alot.

  52. Trying Typematrix... by Idle+Hands · · Score: 1

    For those looking to try an easier-on-the-fingers & thumbs keyboard: http://www.typematrix.com/ Dvorak & QWERTY layout. Spacebar and such is moved from the thumb position to the center- separating the hands.

  53. Legos? by Legodude522 · · Score: 0
    --
    Because I have low karma, I need pills.
  54. I own two Kinesis keyboards by Continental+Drift · · Score: 1
    If you type for a living, as most of us here do, you should plunk down money for a great keyboard. The number of programmers who can't even touch-type is astounding. Otherwise you're driving the Indy 500 in a pickup truck.

    More about my keyboards and how I've modified them here: http://wiki.playagaingames.com/tiki-index.php?page =Dvorak+Keyboarding

  55. Congratulations, by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

    It's ugly, it's stupid, and it's not practical. You hit the trifecta.

    --
    word.
  56. Priceless Quote from TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "Here I am doing a Ctrl-Alt-Delete."

    I'm diggin' the log-in play-by-play, dude - thanks.

  57. Cheap Knockoffs of Kinesis? by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    Kinesis probably takes $10 to manufacture, maybe even less. Do you people know of any garage/boat made copycats that are sold for $20? $240 is outrageous.

  58. I disagree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinesis makes a good product but there's not much to like about the company.

    They patented their design almost 15 years ago. That's a smart business move on their part, but it creates the functional equivalent of a monopoly and the company behaves like one, maintaining monopoly profits and resisting even the tiniest amount of innovation

    Re pricing, consder: the price of a Kinesis contoured keyboard has remained virtually constant for 10 years. Displays, mice, RAM, hard drives, etc etc have all fallen in price as costs of production have fallen because there are many sellers selling fungible products. But the price of a Kinesis keyboard never bore any relation to the costs of its production. Ten years ago one could spend $5K on a beast of a PC and $325 on a Kinesis keyboard. Now, or in the near future, you could buy a new PC that's far better than that beast from the past and pay less than $325 for it. But you'll still pay $325 for your kinesis keyboard. The difference is, there's a single seller and a patent that prevents anyone else from selling a fungible product.

    Re innovation, consider: Kinesis didn't offer a USB model until 2002. It's now mid 2005, and they don't offer a wireless model. Monopolies resist innovation because they are under little or no market pressure to innovate. IMHO that's a shoe that fits. It would have been trivial and cheap to put a USB port on a $325 keyboard. But Kensis felt no market pressure, and hence saw no need. Same thing today. No one else can legally sell a wireless contoured keyboard, so Kinesis feels no market pressure and hence sees no need.

    I'd be surprised if Kinesis had more than one full time (working five full days a week) employee. There wouldn't be anything for a second full time employee to do. The company's on autopilot. They have a patent, a product and a price. They've been sitting pat for 10 years and will be sitting pat another 10 years from now.

  59. Easy: you get what you pay for by jbellis · · Score: 1

    The MS Natural is a good keyboard. That is the first thing I would try if you have RSI problems.

    For me, though, the Natural wasn't quite good enough: my tendonitis almost went away, then came back with a vengeance after a few months.

    About four years ago I got a Kinesis (with some nervousness, given the price) and my forearms have thanked me every day since.

    I think some peoples' bodies are just naturally more prone to RSI problems, though, since I've had co-workers 10 years older than I, with absolutely horrible ergonomic style, who have no problems whatsoever. I think most people will be fine with a MS Natural, but if you're not, give the Kinesis a try.

  60. A better hack would be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to use telekinesis. No assembly required!

  61. GOD FIXING THIS IS SO EASY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I DONT KNOW WHAT YOU GUYS HAVE SO MUCH TROUBLE WITH I JUST LEAVE CAPS LOCK ON ALL THE TIME AND IT WORKS FINE FOR ME I ALSO DONT USE PUNCTUATION ANYMORE

    GOD I DO HATE THIS FUCKING FILTER THOUGH IT GIVES ME PROBLEMS SOMETIMES

    Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention. Obnoxious filter circumvention.

  62. There is a better solution by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    I don't know what it is called, but my boss has this keyboard with two "leaves" that fold up vertically - so the keys are on two vertical planes, one for each hand, and your hands are held with the palms vertical, facing one another. You can't see the keyboard, so it takes some getting use to.

    The physiological rationale for this wierd keyboard is that your palms must be vertical; otherwise, the two bones in your forearm are twisted, and this twisting, which occurs with any flat or flatish keyboard, is what leads to problems.
    On the otherhand, in this thread, many power users say they are happy with the flatish kinesis keyboard, so who know.

  63. overkill by ashot · · Score: 1

    A much easier (software) modification I've made is to remap capslock to control.

    --
    -ashot
  64. One word Summary: by cybermint · · Score: 1

    Ghetto.

    1. Re:One word Summary: by pebs · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me too it. I was getting ready to post "most ghetto keyboard mod evar"..

      --
      #!/
  65. Mental mapping and software mapping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't figure out if you're joking. Sure, you need to switch thumbs, but you also have to learn how to use each thumb to hit enter, backspace, delete, home, end, pageup, pagedown. ctrl, command, and option. The punctuation keys are also shuffled.

    With that much changing, the question of preserving which thumb you traditionally use to space is ludicrous. This is not a left handed/right handed issue.

    However, if you really couldn't handle learning that one key after you've become used to hitting enter with your thumb, you can use the hardware remapping to switch the spacebar and backspace keys permanently. The kinesis keycaps are designed for this sort of thing. It comes with a tool to pop them off so you can move them to reflect the way your keyboard is mapped.

  66. In true vi fashion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know: I just do it!

  67. ouch... by pennyher0 · · Score: 1

    Reading this thread is making my wrists hurt like a mofo. gah.

    STOP TALKING ABOUT WRIST PAIN!

    I suppose I could just command+w this window and move on to reading something that won't give me sympathy pains.

  68. IT'S WORTH THE $$ by chadseld · · Score: 1

    How much to you spend on a monitor? How much do you spend on RAM, HD's, Video Cards? Why is $30 the limit people will spend on a keyboard? Especially when you have wrist pain and your job requires you to type all day long? Anyway, I just want to give credit to the Kinesis keyboard. I bought a used Kinesis keyboard a few years ago when typing all day was getting really painful. I could work (programmer) for about 20min before having to take a break. The Kinesis lets me go all day. So, I take every chance I can to spread the good news that this keybord kicks RSI in the balls.

  69. xmodmap by xenotrout · · Score: 1

    I used to do something like this with xmodmap. I shifted the keyboard up a row (numbers and punctuation above numbers was accessed by modeshift), used the space bar for control, c for modeshift, v for backspace/delete, b for alt, n for space and m for shift. I basically stopped because I had a dual-boot setup with windows and couldn't do the same remapping. Although I'm a touch-typist, the misplaced letters threw me off. I know this option isn't available for the author of the article, being a windows user, but it was a nice keyboard layout.
    Having an apple keyboard (thrift store, $5) helped. All key caps of the same size are exactly the same shape--tilt is controlled by the backplane of the keyboard itself.

  70. Wow by malfunctionus · · Score: 0

    That is just about the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

  71. What a stupid post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Far out, /. seems to be running for the "Our site is in the running for stupid posts" award.

  72. patents... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    So what if Kinesis has a patent? No one else has felt the need or desire to license that technology from Kinesis. Most keyboard producers and keyboard users have felt that normal keyboards and Microsoft Natural style keyboards are "good enough". Kinesis keyboards remain a niche product. But it's not a monopoly since there are alternatives that are good enough for most people.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:patents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.maltron.com/

      Here is an alternative that's actually more expensive, and I think has been around much longer.

  73. EMACS vs VI by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

    Emacs vs. Vi arguments are pointless
    Notepad is best
    (/ducks)

  74. Dude by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

    That explanation of what K'nex are at the end was totally unnecessary and even insulting. (you insensitive clod!) What kind of self-respecting /.er doesn't know what K'nex are!!!

    --
    I am Spartacus
  75. Kinesis works for me, 11 years now by jclaer · · Score: 1

    Kinesis works for me, 11 years now. Details at

    http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/jon/sorehand.html

    I use vim.

  76. pinkies by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    I don't think I stretch my pinkies much for hitting ctrl. I mean, I use them a little in Firefox (ctrl+tab, ctrl+shift+tab, ctrl+w, ctrl+t), but for my own key mappings for Fluxbox, and even for word-processing things like ctrl+a, I end up moving my whole hand and using my middle and ring fingers.

    As a side note (which everyone else is saying), Vi uses the : for much of what Emacs uses ctrl for. : is immediately to the right of the right pinky, just slightly easier to hit than enter.

    One more thing: I do finger-stretching exercises all the time, crack my knuckles and such, I use the Dvorak layout, and I rarely have any wrist of hand pain. This is to be expected; I'm 18. But then, I do get horrendous cramps when I try to write. With a pen.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  77. Good for them by MushMouth · · Score: 1

    That is the point of patents, they get a monopoly for inventing something novel and investing in it. In a few years their patent will expire and microsoft, logitech, imation, etc can build the kinesis style keyboard and sell them for only $100.

    As far as I'm concerned whoever invented this keyboard deserves to profit from it to enrich themselves or just feed their family, they invented something truly novel (I am a kinesis user, although my company paid for the keyboard, which is cheap compared to my medical insurance.)

  78. Ah, from the days of AutoCAD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be an AutoCAD professional, and their command-line syntax interpreted a space as and "enter".

    L (spacebar)
    (click)
    (click) ...
    (spacebar) (to finish command)

    BOY that was the way to whip off commands by using both thumbs as enter keys. When my pinky started to get sore hitting "enter" on a particulary stiff keyboard, I investigated adding a second spacebar under the 1st to be my "enter".

    I didn't have the electronics skills then that I do now, but I'm sure glad to see that somebody else also recognizes the surprising (!) utility of these opposable thumbs...

  79. xkeycaps --> emacs friendly keyboard layout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xkeycaps allows to remap keys easily, so you can get a Lisp friendly layout.

  80. Is K'Nex different from the very old Tinkertoy? by CactusCritter · · Score: 1

    Nothing to add to the Subject question. Inquiring mind wonders.

    1. Re:Is K'Nex different from the very old Tinkertoy? by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not *that* different:

      * Parts stay together better. With TT, the wood pieces did not always fit well - some not at all, others wouldn't stay together. Eventually, with wear, they got to where they would not stay together.

      * Parts snap together consistently, making joined pieces always have the same length. Very important for complex structures. With TT, the length varies by how far you have to push the rod in to make it hold.

      * A greater variety of pieces such as flexible pieces - my son has built and made variations on a working roller coaster that is quite cool, but the rails have to be flexible, of course.

      Our kids did have TT's, and they are nice, but K'Nex are better, IMHO.

      Mark

  81. CapsLock and Ctrl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swapping these isn't the answer. The real problem is the uselessly huge spacebar that takes up all that room at the bottom of most keyboards.

    I've remapped my iBook to swap Command and Control keys (and changed the little Enter key on the bottom right to an alt). Now the keys are, moving from the centre outwards, Ctrl, Meta, Alt (in emacs speak). Typing C-x-f (= right-thumb, left-ring, left-index) suddenly makes sense.

    Now I need an external keyboard without an obnoxiously large space-bar...

  82. Obligatory Soviet rejoinder by jigyasubalak · · Score: 0

    In soviet russia, vi users are keyboard manufacturers :)

    --
    The best planning can be done after the project completes.
  83. Fingerworks? by dsmitchell1 · · Score: 1

    I know it's actually more expensive than the Kinexis keyboard (which I have never heard of), but does anyone else use a keyboard from Fingerworks? It acts a lot like a mechanical keyboard, but requires no force and allows for gesture support on the keyboard which is light-years beyond those pitiful mouse gestures supported by a few applications.

  84. Just move the ctrl key to a sensible location by jonadab · · Score: 1

    My ctrl key is on a home position (specifically, where QWERTY puts the semicolon (so my semicolon is where QWERTY puts left bracket and brace (which I've moved to where the Windows/Meta keys usually are (and relocated those to the function-key row (yes, I know a little lisp (why do you ask?)))))). My shift key is also on a home position (where QWERTY puts A (so I put A where QWERTY puts K, and K where QWERTY puts left shift (there is also a ctrl key in the usual place, for those situations where my fingers aren't on the home positions))). My pinkies don't hurt any more.

    I'm using an Avant Stellar, but I think any remappable keyboard could do this stuff, and it _might_ even be achievable softwarily, in much the same way as people change their input methods to Dvorak or whatever.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  85. what?!? by skatephat420 · · Score: 1

    This has to be the worst mod I have ever seen! I would be so annoyed by this that I would end up ripping off the K'nex sticks and start stabbing my computer with them.

  86. It's not just the thumbs.. by Tom+Rini · · Score: 1

    I've been using my Kinesis for 7 years now (on the nose, even) and I must say it's more than just the thumbs for 3 keys that make it so helpful. It's also bs/del, space/enter and the pits. I can't say enough about it being pitted.

    And it's well worth the money. I've only had one problem, esc/F-keys are on a separate, and as of when mine was made, slightly more flimsy connection. But after I broke the escape key (vim user), and got tired of using a remapped capslock, I got mine fixed, for a reasonable price, and haven't looked back.