Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs In Praise of Dropping Out

atlacatl writes "Wired reports on Steve Jobs giving a graduation speech: 'Jobs, 50, said he attended Reed College in Portland, Oregon but dropped out after only eight months because it was too expensive for his working-class family. He said his real education started when he "dropped in" on whatever classes interested him -- including calligraphy.' The irony: that most students were graduating. I wouldn't invite him for a high school graduation. Imagine all the 'hard' work teachers, parents and guidance counselors put into brainwashing every kid that he/she must go to University." (Jobs was speaking to the graduates at Stanford University.)

124 of 1,014 comments (clear)

  1. Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ug... Job's touting dropping out will undoubtedly start a flurry of "ask.slashdot" questions similar to:
    Posted by Michael in an alternate universe
    from the Still-in-the-parents-basement dept.

    hey d00dz, i wanna drop out like Steve Jobs did! i also wanna leet sysadmin job. i aint got no skoolin' or relevant experience. the job has to let me wear my floorscent green hair down to my ass and let me show my 130 tattoos. and don't forget the piercings in my eyebrows, nose, lips, tongue, septum and 2" holes in the ears. and it has to pay $100K a year or i aint geting outta bed and i'm 2 leet to start at the bottom and work my way up because I AM UNIQE!
    The world owes me a living! so what do u /.ers do?
    Thanks, Steve.
    1. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by selfdiscipline · · Score: 5, Informative

      one man's insightful is another's flamebait.
      Personally, think that many people are just resentful of the fact that intelligent people do not need to go to school to get ahead.

      --


      -------
      Incite and flee.
    2. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by adam31 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Remember that this speech was given to students graduating Stanford... not high school. Whether a degree is worthwhile, in the context of the audience, is moot.

      The point of the speech is to encourage students to "ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING". Graduating isn't the top of the mountain, it's base camp. It's not an accomplishment unless they use it to propel themselves. blah blah blah. Potential is for losers.

    3. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by MikeWin10 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed, I do not have a college education and I am considered a senior developer where I work. I happen to work with a few people that ARE jealous of that fact that they spent 4 years getting a computer science degree and I am at a higher level and make more money. My wife is a programmer as well and does not have her degree, and yet she schools co-workers who do have degrees all day.

      Bottom line, just because someone has a degree does not necessarily make them better. Its the "real world" experience that counts the most IMHO.

    4. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by selfdiscipline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, you got modded as troll.
      I must've hit the nail on the head.
      Anyway, I'll probably finish my college degree, but I won't be resentful of you. Envious of you for finding a path to success that avoids college, though.
      I get really irritated when people talk about how valuable college is, because: I'm here, and I'm not seeing it. I guess you could say that "College is what you make of it," but I know that I could be making a lot more of my education if it wasn't for those pesky classes sapping my energy and desire to learn.
      Even for the average Joe, I really don't think college is that valuable. Most people learn things when they can find the information personally revelant, and the material in college is usually taught in such a dry, abstracted way that it's very difficult to find an immediate application in your own life. Also, what you don't use, you forget... and 4 years gives you plenty of time to forget.
      There are so many people that disagree with me about my views that it's hard not to think that I may be mistaken somewhere... but I really haven't heard any good reasons for why college is worth the cost, other than the fact that employers assume that a degree is a prerequisite to a position in their company (And that also may just be a rumor... I think studies have shown experience is more important than education for increasing your chance of getting hired).

      --


      -------
      Incite and flee.
    5. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an absurd and offensive characterization. A huge number of competent people lack the professional qualifications, connections, or luck to escape underemployment. This is particularly true in the software industry today, as opposed to a decade ago.

      The disconnect between professional requirements and competence is a serious social problem. There are certainly incompetents without qualifications, but there are plenty of amply competent (potential) workers without them -- what do you say to those?

      Steve Jobs hardly offers a solution. He entered the business at a time when hundreds of new businesses testified to the potential for entry. Today, the barriers to entry are far too high for the mere ability to produce a superior product to suffice, and it is plain to observe that there are no new entries to speak of. Of course, this is the fate of every market; any serious economy of scale means coalescence to oligopy sooner or later. So, what do you say to today's young Steve Jobs who cannot find his way to a job interview?

    6. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by jonnystiph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ug... Job's touting dropping out will undoubtedly start a flurry of "ask.slashdot" questions similar to:

      Your comment was funny, and well put. However, I am a Linux Sysadmin, with many tattoos (no piercings or long hair however). I can say that Job's had many of the right ideas. I dropped in on many college classes, because I didn't have the money either.

      The result, is a very well rounded education. Also the ability to teach myself skills that are relevant to the work place. The key is really self-drive. If you REALLY want to learn, there is little stopping you. College is great from some. Myself, I honestly prefer a self-teaching method. It really comes down to your choice of learning.

      So yes, there are many people out there that think they can avoid the work of college by dropping out and landing a "leet job", and there are at least a few that care enough to work even harder to teach themselves.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    7. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by TinyManCan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that you are correct about the barriers to entry being too high to start something new.

      There are technologies which have radically changed almost everything about peoples lives in the last 10 years. Do you really think that every product or technology is as good as it can be.

      I don't think that there has ever been a better time to start a new disruptive companies. Startup costs are at an all time low, your ability to communicate to the masses has never been higher.

      Maybe I'm just an optimist.

    8. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by gravteck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whenever I see posts debating the value of a college education on Slashdot, I can't help but shake my head at posts along the lines of "taking pointless classes, wasting my money. etc." When it comes to classes that are mandatory in your major, I can understand the frustration of their seeming irrelevancy. However, it is your choice what college and program you attend, and there's nothing preventing research into the classes and programs before "wasting your money on them." I go to Vanderbilt University, and I chose it based on national ranking, reputation of the Engineering school, financial aid, and grant money for research that the departments receive. I don't go to college just to waste my money in class. I get to meet people from all over the country in the world. I get to avoid the real world for four more years, continue the the experience of being young in an environment of people with similar attitudes. Friendships and memories in college are part of the whole deal (IMO) also. Maybe I'm of a different breed cause I don't consider myself the typical Slashdot geek. I've played sports in college (walk on), partied frequently, had serious relationships in school, but somehow in the middle of that I still love to program and do research. Computers and geekdom aren't inherent in my personality, CS and Mathematics is merely what I study. So before going to college, you should probably decide how your personality is going to react to college life and its benefits. Don't complain about the system when it's you controlling your choices.

    9. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't think that you are correct about the barriers to entry being too high to start something new.
      I meant in that specific market (PC manufacture). Barriers to entry are small in new markets and progressively rise with time. There are of course always new markets, but even the initial barriers to entry are often prohibitive.
      There are technologies which have radically changed almost everything about peoples lives in the last 10 years. Do you really think that every product or technology is as good as it can be.
      Do you really think superior product is sufficient for success? (You must be new here!) Anyway, the nature of modern technique is that any new product can be duplicated by a larger company that will be able to achieve a much higher scale of production, acquire capital, materials, labor, and publicity at a much cheaper price, and afford a far greater up-front loss. There are certainly areas in which a new business is possible, but it requires a lot of luck to find yourself in one.
      I don't think that there has ever been a better time to start a new disruptive companies. Startup costs are at an all time low, your ability to communicate to the masses has never been higher.
      This is of course nonsense by any objective metric. The number of successful businesses being started today is smaller than ever and getting smaller. The best time to start a business was surely at the beginning of the industrial revolution, or any time before that. After industrialization, competence becomes a commodity.
    10. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I went over to the apple web site and did a few random searches for jobs there. Virtually every single one requires a degree although some say "or equavalent experience". Most flat out require a degree.

      If Steve applied for a job at his own company he probably would not even get interviewed.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    11. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You either need college or an extensive apprenticeship. Either is fine. Which one will be faster depends on how good the school is vs. how good the work environment is, but work environments tend to be a *lot* more focused.

      The problem, of course, is finding that magical first job that will hire you without either experience *or* education. Good luck with that. The most useful thing about college is the internships - the best way ever around the first job Catch-22.

      I will say that the code written by people who worked in tech support for years, then QA for years before finally making it into programming tends to be damn good. Nothing like living with the consequences of bad code for many years to build the proper values. A degree does tend to be faster than that path, however.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by damsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, sad that you have to buy a company you started in order to get a job there.

    13. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by weg · · Score: 2, Funny
      If Steve applied for a job at his own company he probably would not even get interviewed.


      Actually they even fired him a few years ago... they only hired him again after he had built up another tremendously successful company ;-) AND he only gets one buck per year, so you see: Dropping out doesn't pay off *g*
      --
      Georg
    14. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I went over to the apple web site and did a few random searches for jobs there.

      Me too; I kept winding up on this page.

    15. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by WiFiBro · · Score: 2, Funny

      Working as a pizza delivery boy is okay because it can be a great socialization experience. Learn to fend for yourself, learn there's no safety net if you screw up, and no one to keep you from screwing up, etc.

    16. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ThePromenader · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can say I sympathise. I am an Architect by degree, but today am working in the Graphic arts and photography fields. Thus, as far as my trades are concerned, I have no schooling at all.

      A while back I was looking for salaried work (instead of the usual freelance - which I've gone back to BTW), and all the ads were for looking for someone "imaginative and independant" but with at least a college degree. I couldn't help but thinking that what they were looking for was a perfect contradiction.

      Some time later I was speaking with a client who was looking for someone in his design department, and he was commenting on the schools his candidates were attending and judging them on that. I said to him: "do you want ideas, or conformism"? He looked at me and said "Ideas, of course." To tell you the truth I don't know who he hired but you get the picture.

      The whole educational system needs a workover, but this won't happen until the job market changes. If everyone is looking for independant, free-thinking people who really care about what others want, instead of the usual conformist self-interested self-preserving lemming we are trained to be, schools of course will follow suit and teach us WHY we're learning instead of just promising us that we'll have the world if we follow their orders. Today's educational system is very confusing and discouraging to anyone with ideas of his own.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    17. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Stween · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed, I do not have a college education and I am considered a senior developer where I work. I happen to work with a few people that ARE jealous of that fact that they spent 4 years getting a computer science degree and I am at a higher level and make more money.

      Then the people you work with probably took the degree simply to get a job, and perhaps shouldn't have. Perhaps they were fed bad information before University, that the degree was their best way to go.

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. A degree is primarily for people interested in the subject material. A degree offers experience with a wide variety of technologies and opens the student up to ideas which would just not be seen in industry. If a kid wants money, and just wants to learn what they need to, there's a big bad job industry out there waiting.

      Job-seekers and employers everywhere realise that a good degree from a good institution is worth something, and employers can see it as a good starting point for that employee, but it does not equate to real-world experience. It equates to an ability to learn, and an ability to work, without silly levels of assistance from others. The kids you work with are probably realising this the hard way, after 4 years of being told that the degree would get them places. (It did, it got them their job. They're now realising that they have to work for more than 4 years to progress further.)

    18. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      Steve Jobs and Bill Gates weren't just drop outs who got a free ride because it was easy to get into the "biz". They both suceeded because they were at the time able to work (with very little reward) long, hard hours to produce a product without a customer.
      This same ability exists today. The barriers that exist now are inconsequential compared to those for a computer engineer 30 years ago. For one it is now respected as a notable enterprise beyond simply counting census reports.

      Look at Google. With very little capital, lots of know how and a great deal of luck they created a new phenomenon.

      Competance is always sought out. As the number of applicants increases so does the difficulty in weeding out the quality. As such companies can usually 'filter' garbage applications with somewhat draconian requirements (Such as degree or years of job experience). However few requirements are absolutes, if you provide a killer resume, proof of experience and competance and an ability to set yourself above the rest I don't know of a company that will turn down your application because of some arbitrary HR requirement.

    19. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The whole educational system needs a workover, but this won't happen until the job market changes

      I think you've hit the nail on the head with this statement. The educational system definitely needs to change. To me, the issue is that colleges and universities try to tailor their courses and programs for whatever they perceive as the current needs of the job market. Usually, by the time the students who've enrolled in the latest "fad degree program" graduate, the needs of the job market have changed. Also, when you consider the original purpose of the university (learning for learning's sake - primarily theoretical), it completely defeats the purpose. Nowadays, most kids go to college to learn skills to get a job to make money. When the primary motivation for learning something is money and not an actual interest in the topic, this will likely lead to failure.

      The educational system needs to be split into two separate systems: One for the theoretical type of thinker, and one for the prictical type of thinker. The theory folks can devise the bleeding edge ideas for new technology developments, and the practical folks can implement those ideas.

      IMHO, having a degree is not always necessary. Look at my family:

      • Sister 1: PhD in organic chemistry; university professor; moderately successful; big debts
      • Sister 2: MS in Mathematics; schoolteacher; moderately successful; not as deeply in debt
      • Me: HS diploma; well-paid geek; moderately successful; no debt
      All three of us are happy with what we do. For me to reach the same level of success as my sisters, all I did was have an interest in what I do, read a ton of books, screwed up / fixed many systems/networks/databases (my own, of course), and always asked questions of those who are more knowledgeable than me.
      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    20. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ebuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is an intresting dilemma, but lest we all forget:

      Jobs didn't apply at his own company.

      If you feel that you have the skill to go out and make money, there's basically two routes:

      1. Convince someone else that you are worth what you desire to earn.
      2. Start a company.

      Jobs picked #2. To start a company, you need no credentials, but the list of required skills vary dramatically. You don't need to graduate to start a company, but you need to keep the company alive. Usually keeping the company viable is much more effort than getting a degree.

      Now if you're running a successful company, you want to hire people with degrees. In part because people with companies are already working for themselves. In part because you can't run a company where everyone is seriously about to jump ship to set up their own shop.

    21. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Elranzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I dropped out of College I moved to London, joined a rock band, travelled the World for free, got drunk for free and generally had a great time for about ten years. Then at 34, broke and bored, I realized I'd better get it together FAST. Luckily the internet was just starting to happen so I borrowed some money for a computer and started a business. If it hadn't have been for the internet I really don't know what I'd have done. I was lucky, I managed to brave the rapids, but not everyone can go with the flow and stay ahead of oblivion.

      Is that you, Ronnie James Dio??

    22. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ThePromenader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The world would be a much better place if evryone did their job for the sake of the job and had a good time doing it.

      I'm really beginning to dislike the phrase "make money". Money is work, a purely symbolic representation of a person's labour; With it a person can trade the product of his labour with anyone else's - instead of trading chickens for grain for bricks like we used to.

      People seem to think today that "making money" is something you can do without work - but even if you find a way to, don't forget that money is the result of someone else's.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  2. Sure, a few people drop out because they are smart by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but a lot more drop out because they are stupid.

    --
    Beep beep.
  3. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think Jobs' success is in spite of the fact that he dropped out of college, not because of it.

    He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

    1. Re:Bah by grub · · Score: 4, Funny

      He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

      Worked For Me. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Bah by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

      He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too?? - sure it is a good thing. He is different from you and I am different from him and you are different from me. Is that a bad thing? He needed to know what he needed to know. Maybe if he was a 'normal' person he would have never tried acid in the first place, but would he create Apple? I think not.

    3. Re:Bah by eh2o · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually LSD is a great stimulant(*). Good for unhindered creativity and cultivating an appreciation for the big picture. In other words, "Thinking different".

      In fact, I'm suprised Mac OSX doesn't ship with a sheet of the stuff.

      (* do not try this at home)

    4. Re:Bah by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      see, he stopped dropping acid and ported NeXTStep to beige box 486, and now the Mac's going to Intel. Someone get that man some Mickey Mouse Blotter!

    5. Re:Bah by vwjeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

      Well, that explains the original iMac.

    6. Re:Bah by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > He also dropped acid in
      > his younger days. That a
      > good thing too??

      Let me rephrase this: "He also hired John Sculley in his younger days. That a good thing too??"

    7. Re:Bah by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

      Frankly, we'd all be better off if more people were willing to broaden their mental horizons.

      I'm not saying that acid (or any other drug) makes you smarter or gives you better ideas, but it does let you look at old things in a new way, and it changes your thought process temporarily so that you'll come up with different ideas and connections than you would've otherwise. Especially on subjects like your own life, personality flaws, and future - things that most people are normally too blinded by ego to think about critically.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    8. Re:Bah by rampant+mac · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Well, that explains the original iMac."

      Original? Bondi Blue? Try the Flower Power, man!

      DO NOT EAT THE BROWN iMAC! DO NOT EAT THE BROWN iMAC!

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    9. Re:Bah by martinX · · Score: 4, Funny

      He is different from you and I am different from him and you are different from me.

      Oh wow man I get it! I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.

      goo goo gj00b :-}

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  4. Looks like sound advice.... by zanderredux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...like "do not think that you, freshly-graduated students, are better than everyone else. It takes more than a degree to really stand out."

    Sounds like good advice to me!

  5. Just because Jobs dropped out... by mjpaci · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and it worked for him AND Gates dropped out of Harvard and it worked for him, doesn't mean that it OK for everyone to drop out.

    In general University/College is a GOOD thing. However, some people's paths take them elsewhere.

    --Mike

    1. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be interesting to see the percentages-- though of course it would be difficult to come up with the numbers -- of succesful drop-outs vs. succesful graduates. Having a couple high profile drop-outs gives that option a lot of exposure but tends to ignore the huge number of drop-outs who are actually beginning/continuing a pattern of failure.

      And of course, no one path is for everyone. Not everyone should spend the time getting a degree. But I would wager that many more would benefit from a degree than actually earn one.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by mjpaci · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How do you measure success? Take a look at the NBA...quite a few successful drop out there, wouldn't you say?

      --Mike

    3. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Neither Jobs nor Gates really made any great breakthroughs in science or engineering, either. Gates was a pretty good programmer, and Jobs had a friend who was a pretty clever hacker (i.e., Woz.) Gates had the connections and acumen, and Jobs had charm, a smart friend, and some cunning. Good for business. But frankly, I don't think either of them, or the other college-dropout-tech-millionaires, really go into the "great minds" category. Business success is about work, energy, networking, and leadership, things which are not the exclusive provenance of the university.

    4. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Woz dropped out too. I'd put him into the great minds because he did a hell of a lot more technologically than a lot of grads still can't do.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    5. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by linguae · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Woz went back to Berkeley and got his degree in 1982, while he took a break at Apple. Read more about Wozniak here.

  6. what's wrong with this? by aendeuryu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Universities are filled with people who are there just because someone felt they had to go to university. If a speech like this makes them question what it is that's really important about a university education, then that's probably more thought-provoking than half the shit they actually DID have to study at university.

    Granted, it'd be better as an address to freshmen than the graduating class, but there's still nothing wrong with it.

    To anybody who thinks it's stupid for Jobs to play down the importance of a university education, I ask this: what is being done to demonstrate the importance of a university education? Other than talking about the importance of a piece of paper, that is.

  7. Not for everyone by chickanmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I dropped out of college and life still sucks.

    Students might want to consider there own abilities and motivation for success before eagerly taking such advice.

    Life, don't talk to me about life.

  8. Smart Kids by teoryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think people at stanford need 'brainwashed' into thinking that they should get an education.

  9. Good For Him by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know what? Good for him.

    I don't think the point of his speech was that dropping out is cool. It was that hard work and determination are what you need to be successful.

    Say what you want about Jobs, he's a gifted businessman who knows how to sell. He had the right product in the 70's at the absolute best time.

    Your mileage, of course, will vary :).

  10. Congratulations!!! by Schoony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The good news is that you got a world class education at one of the world's most prestigious universities! The bad news is that you have to average $170,000 of total home income over the next 30 years before you can afford a house in the Bay Area! Now, get to work...

  11. Re:Guess what by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Education != College.

    College can provide a wonderful education, if the student is ready for it. I started college when I was 16, but I was too immature even though the "test scores" said otherwise. I needed to grow up, get life experiences. I did these things (though I didn't realize it at the time), and graduated when I was 24.

    Had I gotten through school by the time I was 19, which was the pace I was heading, I would have had a college degree and a job I would have hated. Probably would have been found hanging by a rope by now. Instead, I love what I do, and life only gets better by the day.

    Summary: College is education for those ready to receive it. Same goes for life in general.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  12. Not Feynman. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Richard Feynman is mildly famous for having said that "I love to think and I don't want to screw
    up the machine," electing to go with sensory deprivation instead of drugs to get a hallucinogenic experience going.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Not Feynman. by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Interesting
      " Richard Feynman is mildly famous for having said that "I love to think and I don't want to screw up the machine," electing to go with sensory deprivation instead of drugs to get a hallucinogenic experience going."

      Are you certain that sensory deprevation is safer than LSD? Furthermore, evidence that LSD is damaging to the mind is suspect (There is aboslutely no evidence that it damages the brain). Stories about people who've 'freaked out' on acid or other drugs were most likely already insane or mentally unstable. Remember, *a lot* of people did *a lot* of drugs in the sixties, and you don't see every middle-aged baby boomer in the asylum, do you?

      Unfortunately, because of the war on drugs, it's difficult to get good data on what LSD does. We really don't understand currently how it works on the mind.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Not Feynman. by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From Wikipedia:
      According to James Gleick's biography Genius, Richard Feynman experimented with LSD during his professorship at Caltech. Somewhat embarrassed by his actions, Feynman sidestepped the issue when dictating his anecdotes; consequently, the "Altered States" chapter in Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! only describes marijuana and sensory deprivation experiences.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Not Feynman. by bursch-X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, the atomic bomb is responsible for saving more lives than any other thing in history.

      Great I'll tell this to all the victims of your mindless bombing of two cities with dense population in close succession in Japan. They'll thank me and the US for saving so many lives.

      Or do you think the lack of a World War III is just a coincidence?

      Just because there was no World War III proves that atomic bombs have prevented it? Cool line of reasoning.
      I tell you a secret. The fact that there was no World War III is solely because I am wearing grey socks on weekdays and ones with holes in them on the weekend (ever heard of the magic chaos butterfly? It's actually me and I'm always compensating).

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    4. Re:Not Feynman. by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From what I can tell, it was use The Bomb, or invade Japan. Estimated losses of allied forces invading Japan were gigantic. It was hardly mindless, it was simply a case of Us vs. Them. In that particular point in history, it was them. You don't have 4 years of war and then say, "Hell, we don't need to prove to them that we're capable of leveling their cities, lets just keep killing our troops for a few more years - we'll win eventually." You drop the damn Bomb, twice, to show the other side that you can make them, and they should really consider surrender.

      And the fact is that once The Bomb was about, there were lot of times where major powers would have usually gone to war, but were held back by The Bomb.

      So, for the sacrifice of 110,000 people, countless others got the chance to live.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  13. I wouldn't follow Steve Jobs advice. by figleaf · · Score: 4, Informative

    He cheated his friend and partner Steve Wozniak out of money before the early days of Apple.
    And when Wozniak set up his own company in 1986, Jobs threatened Wozniak's suppliers against doing business with Wozniak.

    Just because Jobs did something in his past doesn't mean that is a good path to follow.

    1. Re:I wouldn't follow Steve Jobs advice. by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's true, Jobs cheated Woz out of some money. Back in the day, before Apple, Woz wrote the first Breakout game. Jobs asked Woz if he could sell it and keep half the money; he took it to Nolan Bushnell and sold it to him for $5000. Jobs then went back to Woz, gave him $350, and said, "There's your half!"

      Many years later, Woz (then rich and famous) was flying on a plane when he picked up a magazine and read the story for the first time; he reportedly wept when he read it.

    2. Re:I wouldn't follow Steve Jobs advice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      He basically says, maybe it happened and maybe it didn't

      Er... no. From the very page that you linked to, he says that it happened (and he didn't like it):

      I was hurt in later years when I heard that Steve was paid more than he'd told me, and I don't think that I hurt easily.

  14. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Larry Ellison (Oracle CEO) gave at Yale University to the Graduating class of 2000. What follows is a transcript of the speech delivered by Ellison at Yale University last month:

    "Graduates of Yale University, I apologize if you have endured this type of prologue before, but I want you to do something for me. Please, take a good look around you. Look at the classmate on your left. Look at the classmate on your right. Now, consider this: five years from now, 10 years from now, even 30 thirty years from now, odds are the person on your left is going to be a loser. The person on your right, meanwhile, will also be a loser. And you, in the middle? What can you expect? Loser. Loserhood. Loser Cum Laude.

    In fact, as I look out before me today, I don't see a thousand hopes for a bright tomorrow. I don't see a thousand future leaders in a thousand industries. I see a thousand losers. You're upset. That's understandable.

    After all, how can I, Lawrence "Larry" Ellison, college dropout, have the audacity to spout such heresy to the graduating class of one of the nation's most prestigious institutions? I'll tell you why. Because I, Lawrence "Larry" Ellison, second richest man on the planet, am a college dropout, and you are not. Because Bill Gates, richest man on the planet-for now anyway-is a college dropout, and you are not. Because Paul Allen, the third richest man on the planet, dropped out of college, and you did not. And for good measure, because Michael Dell, No. 9 on the list and moving up fast, is a college dropout, and you, yet again, are not.

    Hmm ... you're very upset. That's understandable. So let me stroke your egos for a moment by pointing out, quite sincerely, that your diplomas were not attained in vain. Most of you, I imagine, have spent four to five years here, and in many ways what you've learned and endured will serve you well in the years ahead. You've established good work habits. You've established a network of people that will help you down the road. And you've established what will be lifelong relationships with the word "therapy." All that of is good. For in truth, you will need that network. You will need those strong work habits.

    You will need that therapy. You will need them because you didn't drop out, and so you will never be among the richest people in the world. Oh sure, you may, perhaps, work your way up to #10 or #11, like Steve Ballmer. But then,I don't have to tell you who he really works for, do I?

    And for the record, he dropped out of grad school. Bit of a late bloomer.

    Finally, I realize that many of you, and hopefully by now most of you,are wondering, "Is there anything I can do? Is there any hope for me at all?" Actually, no. It's too late. You've absorbed too much, think you know too much. You're not 19 anymore. You have a built-in cap, and I'm not referring to the mortarboards on your heads.

    Hmm ... you're really very upset. That's understandable.

    So perhaps this would be a good time to bring up the silver lining. Not for you, Class of '00. You are a write-off, so I'll let you slink off to your pathetic $200,000-a-year jobs, where your checks will be signed by former classmates who dropped out two years ago.

    Instead, I want to give hope to any underclassmen here today. I say to you, and I can't stress this enough:

    LEAVE. Pack your things and your ideas and don't come back. Drop out. Start up. For I can tell you that a cap and gown will keep you down just as surely as these security guards dragging me off this stage are keeping me dow..."

    (At this point The Oracle CEO was ushered off stage.)

  15. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, your post completely ignores the real issue: That they shouldn't have gone to college in the first place.

    The US has gotten so fixated on sending kids to college that we've lost sight of the reasons why we wanted them there in the first place. As a result, the quality of education has been declining, while the amount of debt our kids pile up before ever starting a job has been rising. And how many of those kids use their college degrees to do amazing things like sell real estate or become plumbers. i.e. What did that degree buy them other than a wad of debt?

    That's not to say that education is a bad thing. But people always get the best bang out of an education when they know they want it. Sending them to school before they know what they want to know only devalues it for everyone. Teach your kids to wait until they're ready. Then they can be sure that they really want to take on a college education.

  16. he doesn't seem to advocate dropping out... by admactanium · · Score: 3, Interesting
    in and of itself. but the point he makes is valid. in my field, a degree isn't really that useful and prospective employers rarely care if you've completed college at all. i know many successful people who have no college degree (myself included).

    college degrees, especially these days, are a guarantee of nothing other than having a piece of paper. for many people and many fields the real learning is accomplished by doing rather than absorbing theory.

    i dropped out, and luckily i have done very well for myself. but if asked by younger people who are still in the system, i certainly wouldn't RECOMMEND people leave school unless they already had a very clear plan of their future.

    the educational system is geared towards very specific professions at the exclusion of many viable, valuable professions that don't require their teaching. i don't believe it's done out of any malice but rather just a lack of information.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. I'll agree with what Steve says by log0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never finished college and it has yet to hurt me professionally, financially or emotionally (partly I didn't have the money, mostly I didn't really find it useful for my goals to bother coming up w/ the money - and I went to a good 4 year east coast school with an extremely good comp sci program).

    If you're talented, smart, and *most importantly* not lazy, not having a degree doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. With those assets you're more than capable of working around and moving beyond the confines of the traditional 'system' most people end up dealing in (IMO, because they aren't talented enough, smart enough or lack the work ethic to do anything to change things).

    Degrees are nice and they do make joining the higher class system (white collar?) easier, but IMO, a lot of people also use degrees as a crutch for rationalizing avoiding the need to do anything meaningful.

    If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster. Persuing a degree may even be a distraction from you obtaining your purpose and potential.

    $.02

    1. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster. Persuing a degree may even be a distraction from you obtaining your purpose and potential.

      Try doing real, novel science without a Ph.D. Sure, you can go into IT or even software engineering without a degree, but there's tons of interesting stuff that you simply won't be able to comprehend without years of school.

      I mean, have you seen the cool toys physicists get to play with these days?! ;-)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster.

      Um.. the same could be said if you are good-looking, born with rich parents and get along with everyone.

      The point I think is that most people are not talented enough, smart enough, enjoy hardword enough, good-looking enough, have parents who are rich enough or get along with enough people and so need all the help they can get, including that university degree.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by Triones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PhD is not about taking classes!
      It's just about research only.

      But anyway, in most colleges, you need to pay for the classes if you're not a regular student already.

      I agree that almost all stuffs can be learned without taking classes... except those new research that is not even written yet.
      Well, theoretically, these days you can just download the conference/journal papers too.

      But the grandparent post said "doing real, novel science". So it's not about 'learning', it's about creating new stuffs for others to learn.
      A PhD is awarded when you accomplish that. You won't get the degree even if you take _every_ single class, and learn _everything_ in the field.

  19. Speak for yourself. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Insightful

    High school was like that for me. Going to college---even state school---was like night and day. Suddenly, the kids who sullenly made it a pain in the ass to be there vanished. I got to learn from people who were really and truly competent; I had the time to take courses that just seemed cool at the time, that probably wouldn't be useful in any future job, but I took them because I wanted to learn about something.

    Yes, there were a few fools and charlatans teaching, but I dealt with it; I got to work with some of the cleverest, brightest folks I know.

    For me---who'd never known there were other geeks out there---it was a transformative experience.

    Clearly, your mileage may vary. But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it. Blaming The Man for not hacking it in school is pretty damn weak.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Speak for yourself. by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Clearly, your mileage may vary. But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it. Blaming The Man for not hacking it in school is pretty damn weak.
      Tell that to Galois. Frankly, students who are impressed by today's schools are unexceptionally unimpressive. I've met teachers less competent than me, and teachers more competent than me, but neither has been able to teach me anything I couldn't better learn on my own, or anyway outside the school system. School offers the advantage of regular evaluation, without which motivation can be difficult, but so far as education the approach is obviously wrong. And the motivation problems are largely an artifact of the schooling system: nobody is learning what he really wants to learn.

      To learn a subject requires a combination of practice, which of course schooling cannot provide, and progressive and complete in-take of knowledge, which it provides poorly at best. More concretely: if you want to learn how to program, you hack until you find it easy, and you study whatever you need to know until you have a deep and lasting understanding of it. The very organization of schooling precludes this: you study a subject until the end of a semester, then you stop. Generally the "subject" is a collection so large as to preclude a deep understanding of any part within the time provided, and such is never necessary to receive the highest grade. It's simply insane.

      But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it
      Don't forget that what you put in to school is also proportional to the opportunity you lose in other endeavors, such as learning to program or to write poetry.

      School precludes any serious intellectual endeavor, simply through its dictates over time. This is progressively less true until one achieves tenure, but it is true enough for men like Einstein to find more opportunity to do physics in a patent office than a university. This sad state of affairs is not limited to Germany or to the past.

      The real tragedy, though, is when men like G. H. Hardy conform to the dictates of the system in their ignorant youth, and lose much of their intellectual prime in the process. Hardy is no exception: he is one example of an entire generation of British mathematicians who wasted their minds mastering a poorly-designed standardized test. This specific problem has been acknowledged and addressed, but surely not in fact remedied. It exists in all university schooling today, in admissions, in grading, and in graduation requirements.

      A solution is not to be found in platitudes about getting out what you put in.

  20. Re:school sucks by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Bullshit. Go to a research university, find a professor you like, and start doing interesting stuff. I'm just at a public university, but the classes are pretty good, and the work I do on the side helps me learn huge amounts of stuff about my field.

    You'll get out as much as you put in. If all you ever do is take engineering classes and do the required minimum work, you'll have wasted a great opportunity.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
  21. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by grub · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Trolling is a art,
  22. Re:Reminds me of a satire article about Ellison by nandu_prahlad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry Dude,

    That larry ellison speech has been proven to be a fake

  23. What a dick! by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Telling people to do that is like telling little kids to drop out of school to become NBA stars... for 99.99% of people, college is a good thing. He got lucky, and suggests more kids do it? Is he gonna bail all their asses out when 99% of them are working in a fucking fast food restaurant for the rest of their miserable lives? What a shortsighted, obnoxious, dick.

  24. Universities are in trouble by Inverted+Pilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bravo to Jobs for speaking the truth. Universities, American ones anyway, are largely a waste of time. They're commercial enterprises above all, and for that reason they inflate grades to keep students in place and corrupt research in order to attract grants.

    I took a four-year degree from a reputable American school and thought it largely a waste of time. I had some worthwhile experiences, but the good parts could have fit into two or three semesters. It was basically a rip-off, and everything I do professionally today is the result of self-education and experience.

    When my daughter grows up, I will propose to her that she read and travel (rigorously) instead of taking a formal degree.

  25. OP Misinterprets the Speech by TPIRman · · Score: 4, Informative

    To recap, more accurately: Steve said that he dropped out of college because it was too expensive, and it was the best thing that happened to him. He said that his "real education" didn't start until he took up classes again with a greater appreciation for their value in his life. He took calligraphy classes when peers were telling him that calligraphy had no relevance to career, but he gained a greater appreciation for elegance in ordinary things (sound familiar?). Etc.

    This is not an anti-education message. In fact, it is a message strongly in favor of a liberal-arts education. In Steve's original college career, he was going through the motions -- going to college because that was the thing to do. When he started learning again, he was doing it out of a personal desire to learn, and with more genuine motivations. And he was taking classes to improve himself and his outlook, not just to get nuts-and-bolts information that would advance his career. Steve's saying that you have to invest yourself in learning and appreciate its value where you might not expect it.

    Those of you who are oversimplifying this into a "street smarts" vs. "book smarts" thing have watched too much of The Apprentice. This was a speech about the personal value of learning and the importance of an open mind and broad perspective.

  26. As Mark Twain once said... by Timbotronic · · Score: 2
    "I never let schooling interfere with my education"

    btw, anyone else here feel the urge to slap those students dressed as iPods?

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  27. Yes... by Arcanix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you really want to think "out of the box" there is no better way than tripping. At some point, you will realize you have become the box, and that's when the real learning begins...

  28. I dropped out... by ktakki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I left music school after 5 semesters to go full time with a band. It wasn't uncommon there, since the freshman class numbered 1500 and there were usually about 150 to 200 graduates, mostly music education majors who needed the sheepskin.

    Two years later, I was driving a cab. I did that until I saved enough money to build a small recording studio, which I ran while playing in another band and doing live sound on the side. By the mid-'90s, I had a gig as a 3D animator and graphic artist, skills that had previously been hobbies for me. That led to a partnership in a media services company that also did software development. We sold out before the bubble burst.

    Right now, I'm vice president of a company that does system administration on a contract basis. Small company in a small market, but profitable nonetheless.

    Not having a degree pretty much precludes working for a large corporation, but I've never wanted to work for a big company. I do regret not getting a liberal arts education, and it's something I'd like to pursue soon, even though I'm in my forties. I'm looking to retire in about five years anyway, so I'll have the time.

    To make it without a degree, it helps to be in a field that doesn't require one (like the arts), to be willing to do menial jobs now and then (like driving and dispatching taxis), and to be able to teach yourself the skills you need (technical, entrepreneurial, etc.). I can't stress the last one enough: without the support of a company behind you, sending you to training seminars and paying your way, you have to be your own teacher.

    k.

    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
  29. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by mekkab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excellent post, however jbplou's response is quite telling; an undergraduate degreee is the "high school diploma" of our parents generation; its used by corporations to judge your pay. In that sense, having a BA in basketweaving is a profound step above not having a degree at all in terms of salary.

    Considering my BS was in EE can you guess what got me my first job out of college? Thats right; some perl coding I did in a part time job while in school! My knowledge of semiconductors has completely atrophied. However, I've gone on to get my MS in CS and the A's came with only a bit of hard work because I was motivated.

    That being said, I did learn something of great import while in undergrad. After getting mediocre grades throughout I somehow matured a little bit and taught myself how to learn. This was the most important thing I got out of undergrad. I understand that this anecdotal, but if that is the only lesson some one learns after 4 years of higher education than its worth all the debt they took on.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  30. Re:Guess what by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know your financial situation. However, I can tell you that I did work my way through school. That was part of the problem when I was 16... working 40 hours and going to school sucks bad.

    Eventually, I earned enough that I could afford 25 hours per week with a lighter schedule.

    If you really want to go to school, you can. I didn't realize what was out there for folks in the way of grants and stuff... probably good, or I'd be more in debt :)

    Why don't you share what you think you want to do with your life, and mayble we can figure out a way to get you in school...

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  31. A year of college will do wonders for most people by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...whether they are prepared for it or not.

    College isn't just about the degree and the career. College is about a way of critically evaluating the world around you.

    Of course, you get out of it what you put into it, but I'm willing to bet that most everyone who dropped out of college after the first year will wish, within the following ten years, that they had stuck with it.

  32. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're that weak, it wasn't meant to be.

    (/me went to college three years after high school. You'd be suprised how motivating a shit job at minimum wage is.)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  33. Re:school sucks by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >but what are you supposed to do for the 12-16+ years of school before you're allowed to really get into what interests you.

    Get into stuff that interests you?

    Seriously, you can't pick up a book and read? You can't do things on your own? Does the only thing that interests you at age 12 involve pressing buttons on multi-million dollar toys and then reading the a series of numbers on a print out?

    Who exactly are you waiting for to give you permission to do what you want to do?

    Stop waiting to be spoon-fed.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  34. Here's the basic flaw in his speech. by khasim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He is a success story. He made a lot of money and is world famous.

    Looking back on his life, there will be certain items that he deems to be "important".

    Looking back on anyone's life will also yield certain "important" choices or events or whatever. Those are items that shaped your life.

    But that does not mean that someone else can imitate those choices and get a similar life. As you noted, some drop out because they're smart, but more drop out because they aren't. It isn't the dropping out.

    And I don't believe that Steve's "experience" with cheap college life and calligraphy would mean much if not for a certain Steve Wozniak.

  35. Re:90% of Jobs's success by unother · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about this.

    Woz was the engineer that designed and built the Apple II, true. But Steve provided the vision, style, and intuitive grasp of the need for the personal computer. That framework was how Apple grew into a great company. I'm not certain that Woz would've done this alone--I imagine there were plenty of hand-designed computers of that day and age which are rotting away forgotten somewhere, yet are scions of exemplary engineering.

    I would say that Woz was probably much luckier to know Steve than the other way around. Without Steve, Woz would have been just another engineer--a talented and remarkable one, yes; but Steve managed to bring a world-altering vision to the table.

    That is much rarer than great engineering skills.

  36. proportional fonts: not-so-subtle revisionism? by toby · · Score: 4, Informative
    According to one audience member quoted on Macintouch, Jobs "wondered aloud if computers today would have proportional fonts had he not sat in on that calligraphy course".

    If the late Jef Raskin had anything to do with it, they would; he recalls lobbying for versatile bitmapped displays and not hard-wired fixed width character generators, against Jobs and Wozniak.

    Sadly Jef is no longer with us to defend the account, but he left a detailed history, The Mac and Me:

    In my 1967 thesis, "The Quick Draw Graphics System," I took issue with the display architecture then in vogue. ... There were only a few CRT terminals at the Penn State computer center, and these could display only letters and symbols, usually in green or white on a black background. Hamstrung by specialized electronics -- in particular a circuit called a "character generator" -- that permitted no other use, they could not display graphics. One display at the center could draw thin, spidery lines on its large screen. With it you could do drawings that now seem crude, annotated by child-like stick-figure lettering.

    In this milieu my thesis was radical in suggesting that computer displays should be graphics- rather than character-based. I argued that, by considering characters as just a particular kind of graphics, we could produce whatever fonts we wished, and mix text and drawings with the same freedom as on the drawn or printed page.

    [Later, at Apple...]

    The other Steve, Steve Jobs, was a delight to talk to about less technical aspects of computers. His enthusiasm and business orientation were exciting. They were just starting on the design of the Apple II, and I tried to convince them that they should employ bit-mapped graphics and not have a character generator, but Woz thought that software couldn't handle the character generation task fast enough and Steve Jobs didn't understand why I thought it so important.

    I had a different vision of what a microcomputer should be like, and PARC's programmers and my own work had convinced me that software could do the job. I tried to convince Woz by working out the code to put bit-mapped characters on the screen and calculating timings by counting cycles, but the Steves were not open to the idea.

    The concepts I espoused were far from the mainstream of computer design and for all their mold-breaking thinking, Steve and Steve were very strongly conditioned by the minicomputers they had seen.

    Later in the essay, Raskin notes that Jobs was eventually persuaded to green-light the Apple II's "high res" mode. Only Steve himself knows if an enthusiasm for calligraphy influenced the decision... but even had he not, proportional fonts were already being designed into the expensive research workstations of the day, where the hardware budget was orders of magnitude greater than an Apple II's.
    --
    you had me at #!
  37. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by OSXCPA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I left college after 2 years because I was bored to tears. Joined the Marines. Went back to college 6 years later *highly* motivated and enjoyed the heck out of learning - took CS classes for fun. My fellow undergrads, mostly straight from High School, hated their classes and hated me - I was the jerk who didn't listen to them whine about how hard their schedules were, or how much different classes sucked. My experience - most of them were too immature to appreciate the opportunity they had, and they had insufficient life experience to know that they should feel passionate about anything at all, let alone learning. Long story short - if you are burning up to go to school, go. If you aren't, be honest with yourself and do 'something else' until you figure out what you want to study. Don't let $ keep you back either - I worked my way through school. It is possible, but difficult - and I wouldn't have it any other way. Whatever you do, light your own ass on fire to get something worthwhile done - no one will teach you that. Hard work is it's own best reward.

  38. Arrogance of Good Looks by reporter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As usual, Steve Jobs is arrogant about his capabilities. Perhaps, Jobs should also discuss his fortunate endowments that other people do not possess.

    I am referring to physical good looks. The "Economist", a while back, reported on a study which indicated that height is important and seems to be correlated with financial success. So, too is good looks.

    A good example is Pamela Anderson. She has little acting talent, but she managed to latch onto television role after television role.

    Contrast her with Meryl Streep. Streep is less attractive but worked very hard to achieve what she accomplished.

    Jobs, like Pamela Anderson, is blessed with good looks and a winning personality. Most of us have probably worked with people with such physical endowments. People with them have a much easier time in life than people without them.

    Not surprisingly, the average height of a CEO is above the average American height. So is Jobs' height. Before he tells people how they should mimic him, he should first ask the people around him to forgive him for his arrogance.

    1. Re:Arrogance of Good Looks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bill Gates must have become the richest man on earth because he's hottt. Ballmer too. Certainly being good looking helps you in the work place. Handsome people make more (on average) than homely people, so says a couple of surveys. It's built into our genes, unfortunately... this love of beauty and wanting to associate ourselves with it. But don't believe for an instant that being good looking means you are successful. There's plenty of strung-out washed-up porn stars whose shoes I never wanted to wear. Looks fade, and you wouldn't want to be the prom queen who put on 100 lbs and works at Wal-Mart.

      So don't look at Jobs and see the Arrogance of Good Looks. Look at yourself and consider the arrogance of thinking Jobs only made it because of good looks.

  39. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That being said, I did learn something of great import while in undergrad. After getting mediocre grades throughout I somehow matured a little bit and taught myself how to learn. This was the most important thing I got out of undergrad.

    The part about this that I find so frustrating is that it's such an expensive lesson for kids. I was a home schooler myself, and my mother constantly emphasized that what we learned was less important than learning *how* to learn. While I'm sure that many would take that to mean that she didn't teach us, nothing could be farther from the truth. Rather, I *wanted* to learn many subjects because I had practical uses for them outside of the classroom.

    Do you have any idea how cool it is to look at a Trig book and think, "Oh, the raycasting engines I can make with this baby..." :-)

  40. Why then does Apple *require* degrees for IT jobs? by mildness · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Being an IT Professional that "dropped out" like Jobs and Wozniak, it has always pissed me off that Apple requires "A BS in Computer Science"

    Hypocritical fuktoads

    Bill

    --
    bamph
  41. This is the problem with success stories by nysus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For every success story you hear, the other 99,999 are never told. For every genius who dropped out of school to become CEO of an multi-national corporation, there are thousands of other geniuses who wound up broke and unhappy.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

    1. Re:This is the problem with success stories by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Funny

      Name one.

      --
      Arbitrary sig
  42. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by jrcamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact is that most people will have to go to college to obtain a successful career. I would imagine that the dropouts who become billionaires would average out to be a statistical fluke.

    We live in a different world today than 100 years ago when the elite sent their sons and daughters off to college. Back then, those going to college didn't have to make a living. They already had all the money they needed. They went for pure academic reasons. Your argument is that these circumstances still apply today. They don't.

    Today you have a wide middle class instead of just the poor and the rich. Today regular people can go to college. Today regular people can gain successful careers from an otherwise poor upbringing. But today most people must go to college to obtain the standard of living desired.

    Sure kids should also want to learn new things and expand their mind. It is still an academic institution, after all. But you cannot discount the fact that the reason parents push their children into going to college is that they need it to survive. And, perhaps, to make sure they don't live in their basement for the rest of their natural born lives. Of yesteryear it may have been normal for children to live their whole lives in the ye ole log cabin.

    Things change.

  43. Success = Creativity + Ambition + Hard Work by vinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've thought long and hard about this since graduating from college. I've seen a lot of people do some extraordinary things. The person who runs the division I work in (with about 15,000 people) never went to college, and I'm not sure he graduated from high school. He does happen to be a genius and I suspect he would have went to college if it wasn't for the fact he was successful by the age of 18.

    If I interviewed two people for a job I'd always choose the one who had ambition, creativity and a great work ethic. College degrees and intelligence would be secondary. There is a place for that, but with good leadership you can get an ambitious person to do amazing things.

    The other factor that counts is common sense. Understanding the requirements of a job and relating to customers is very important. In a sense, everyone works for customers - our bosses are customers of sorts.

    For anyone still in school, don't get wrapped up in your GPA but don't drop out of college either.

    --
    ----- obSig
  44. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by drawfour · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forbes would disagree with you:

    1. William Gates III
    2. Warren Buffett
    3. Lakshmi Mittal
    4. Carlos Slim Helu
    5. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud
    6. Ingvar Kamprad
    7. Paul Allen
    8. Karl Albrecht
    9. Lawrence Ellison
    10. S Robson Walton

  45. College is not for everybody by Pingsmoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many people told me in high school that a college degree is the road to success in life, and I have no doubt that it is. But after going to college for five years I have found that my friends who went straight into the workforce or learned a trade at a community college are now the ones who own houses, cars, and generally have much more money than I do.

    On the other hand, my degree allows me to pursue the same quality of life they enjoy, but at a job which will be intellectually challenging and personally rewarding. I just have to wait a bit longer for the tangible benefits.

    That said, I don't think it's appropriate to drop out of high school. College, sure, if you find something else you want to do. But for pete's sake, you really should have a high school diploma.

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
  46. Steve rocks. But... by KrisCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    When the likes of Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were making wakes, the PC industry was still a baby and there were enough chances for everyone. Can a college drop-out still become a Steve Jobs in today's world? I bet you got to really really good at what you do to get that kind of opportunities.

  47. In other words by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Steve was trying to say that success comes from taking risks.

  48. Not Really... by Comatose51 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People who succeed inspite of dropping out of school are those who maybe never really needed formalized learning in the first place. There have always been individuals who learn better on their own and will succeed in the same manner. They're incredibly intelligent but to top it off they're also incredibly self motivated. Those are few and far in between. What people often forget to mention is that in addition to their talents, these people are also very intense people. I've met a few of these people before. They weren't at the same level as Gates and Jobs but a Ph.D. when you're 22 or publishing a major conference paper before you graduated are impressive nonetheless. Most people like to offset their talent by claiming or portraying these people as somehow socially inept or otherwise very weak in other aspects. That was never the case for those who I knew. What I did noticed that they were really into what they did and never wasted anytime. They knew what they wanted and they went after it with a drive that will tire out most people. But they're very rare.

    I've known a lot of very intelligent people but not all of them had the drive or the passion. Unfortunately, many children growing up, especially the intelligent ones, forget the other ingredient needed and assumes their natural talent will bring them success. They neglect school and somehow expect their talents to just kick in and solve all their problems when they need it. Memorization shouldn't be the only part of education but knowing things in advance will save you a lot of time from having to solve them again, probably in a worse way. So, for the rest of us, schooling and formal education are useful. There's no doubt that Jobs is an incredible person, very rare among people. His path to success will no doubt be different and inaccessible to the majority of students.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  49. Different Paths for Different People by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's quite a hoopla about Steve's comments. I don't really see it as a "drop out, college is useless" comment that everyone (even the headline) makes it out to be.

    More importantly, we need to look deeper into what he said and why he said it. For some people, college probably is a waste of time. If he had stayed in college (pressure from family, etc), maybe Apple never would have come to be. Maybe he would have lost all motivation or thinking differently and would have graduated with his degree and got a job as an accountant or programmer somewhere. For Steve, his personality conflicted with the structured ways of university learning. For others, it could be the kiss of death to not get that college degree. Some people need need the schooling to mature a bit. I'm glad he dropped out, scraped for food, and was willing to do whatever it took to survive and to take his "beleaguered company" back.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  50. Actually Jobs said more than dropping out by hmiatn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was there at the stanford stadium. I found his speech serious and very insightful. People just picks the ironic part of his speech. His main advice is to follow the passion. I talked about his speech here .

  51. In Defense of College by finiteSet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am sure others could put together a better argument, but as someone who has really enjoyed my college education I'll throw out some ideas.

    People who might benefit by going to a university:

    1) Anyone who doesn't know what they want to do:
    Before I started college I had never heard of Linguistics. Because there were no other courses available, I took a Linguistics course my first quarter, and immediately loved it. I'll be graduating with bachelors in both Linguistics and Computer Science soon. Without going to a university (one large enough to offer Linguistics, at that), it would have been very difficult to stumble upon that passion. This broader background will help me to do the natural language processing research I am (now) interested in. Similarly, backgrounds in many fields (e.g. Biology, Physics, Geology, ...) complement a CS degree nicely. Getting such a diverse education is harder at a worksite.

    2) People who like variety:
    Depending on who you work for, the variety of the type of work you do will vary. By design, the courseload in a undergraduate CS program is varied, including architecture, ethics, algorithms, automata theory, and of course, programming. I've programmed in Scheme, Prolog, C, C++, C# over the past four years on projects including a networked filesystem, a unix shell, a raytracer, a scheme interpreter, and device device drivers in NetBSD and WinXP. All of these projects were great fun.

    3) People who like to challenge themselves:
    Anywhere you go, smart people will be able to find ways to challenge themselves. At a university, you have the advantage of a knowledgeable faculty who have plenty of pet projects they'd love to let you loose on. I've also found it very easy to get faculty to supervise research projects of my choosing. It's a great environment for getting a lot done, if you are self-motivated and hardworking. And there is something "pure" and refreshing about doing work without commercial motives - many great projects were birthed and/or nurtured in an academic environment.

    I was reluctant to go to college, under the same opinion that if you are smart enough, you don't need it (plus I was just lazy). However, I've found that the university environment is ideal for smart people: lots of challenges, lots of variety. Anyone with the intelligence, curiousity and passion to succeed on ther own would thrive in a good program. Sure, college is expensive. But, again, if you are that intelligent and motivated, you can get scholarships, assistantships, and grants.

    I am extremely grateful that I decided to go to college, it has been a great experience and worth every cent.

    --
    If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
    1. Re:In Defense of College by Xiaran · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why are there no apprenticeships, like in the middle ages? Why can't you apprentice yourself to a microbiologist when you get out of highschool (or even before!), and help them with their research as they teach you the necessities of their job?

      OK... senior developer here. Have degrees in Electronics/Comms Engineering and Computer Science. Over ten years experience. Looking for a 'prentice. Preferably young, female, blonde, open minded and impressionable.

  52. Steve Jobs' experience was unique.. by Christ0ph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it was a different time..

    Actually, my experience was a lot like yours.. I was doing well until around two years ago, but I'm struggling again now..

    I don't think my experience is that atypical.. The powers that be are getting their revenge on those Internet geeks for screwing up their plans for global domination..

    Seriously. The Internet changed everything, and they want to make us pay..

    In the 70s (and I met Steve then, when I was in high school, and he was selling his computer kit to 'telephone enthusiasts') and like us, he was in the right place at the right time.. with the right product...

    But its all changed..

    These days, millions of Americans who are forced to drop out of (or who never attend) college because of money find it really hard to get decent jobs (read - jobs with health insurance and retirement benefits) nomatter how skilled they are...

    The US is now more economically stratified than western european countries, including the uk, canada and australia/new zealand

    we need open source education.. some kind of accredited open internet university for people who cant afford the rich kids colleges.. or who don't want to go into debt for 20 years ...

    Why cant the open source community get behind an open source college?

    Its an idea whose time has come..

    1. Re:Steve Jobs' experience was unique.. by Inspector+Lopez · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why cant the open source community get behind an open source college?

      It's a fair question. And here are some answers.
      • http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity is precisely such a thing. It is young, and parts of it that I have seen are quite lame, but the intent is good, and the structure is there. The content requires ... effort.
      • accreditation would be an issue. If you think that's silly, then contemplate what lack of accreditation or safety standards would mean for air travel.
      • Quite a few universities have stepped up to the "online degree" watering hole, and they have discovered that:
        • it is relatively easy to put up crappy content that no one will buy, and which will sully the University's good name.
        • it is remarkably expensive to put up quality content which is actually worthy buying; the cost rivals or exceeds bricks & mortar conventional courses.
        • there is usually very little incentive for regular faculty to participate in online course delivery, unless the enrollment is very high (why? because it is a lot of extra work). So, if you're looking for that extra special course in kinetic theory of plasmas with application to incoherent scatter, well, don't hold your breath.
        • Likewise, universities have "entrepreneurial" units to go develop stuff for online course delivery. This inevitably begets warfare with the Department that "owns" the course. Example: my university offered a "certificate program" of four courses in electrical engineering. This is just dandy, until the Electrical Engineering Department discovered (by accident) that someone else was offering their courses. The "entrepreneurial" unit hadn't quite bothered to check with the home Department...
      • To expand upon a topic in the previous list, the authoring tools for WWW-based content delivery are ... extremely poor, at least in relation to what you're trying to do. In a classroom, there is opportunity for detailed and remarkably complex interaction with a functioning expert system (the professor) as well as the other students. Just try to capture that functionality in some 'bot. Along those lines, see the recent James Fallows article explaining just how poor modern search engines are in answering questions. Google is wonderful! But it's also remarkably primitive compared to what we'd like to be able to do.
      • If you have ever wondered why there are so few really good WWW-based demos available, consider this: A really good, effective demonstration takes a minute or two to show to the class. However, it can easily take 12 hours of development time to prepare a quality demo that will be used one time, and fill 1 minute of lecture. It doesn't take long to realize that that development time is unjustifiable. (At my own university, there is the very real danger that the computer projection equipment will simply be out of order. There is no satisfaction in wasting 5 minutes of lecture time to show a 1 minute demo).
      • ... and for all you l33t h4korz or however you spell it, there is more to a college education than learning how to program good (as Derek Zoolander might have put it.) The economic forces which create a faculty work force continue to develop a faculty which, however haphazardly, values breadth and experience and (yes) literature and history in addition to being able to log on and hack.

        A college degree is not a commodity (yet); it is not like 87 octane gasoline dispensed at the pump. The college degree represents a period of time in which you study a lot of useless things in the hope that some of them will surprise you by being interesting; that the depressing or boring things will at least teach you how to wade through depressing or boring material for the rest of your life. It is a period of time when people stop being te
    2. Re:Steve Jobs' experience was unique.. by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be new here.

      Here at /., we leave informative, well-thought-out discussion at the door.

      Now, what do you think of Apple's move to Intel. Four words or less, one of them must include the word "zealot".

    3. Re:Steve Jobs' experience was unique.. by cecille · · Score: 2, Informative

      funny you should mention this - just a little while ago (a year or so maybe? can't remember) MIT started up a program called open courseware. It's NOT an open degree...they won't give you one, there aren't tests profs etc, but it DOES open up their course materials to anyone who wants them. And while access to open course material certainly isn't going to solve the problem of lack of accessibility for real degrees, it's definately an interesting program, and a step in the right direction. Plus, it's a fantastic resourse, and some of the courses they have opened area REALLY interesting...I've learned a lot off this site.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
  53. RTFA by tonydiesel · · Score: 2, Informative

    or better yet, get a copy of the speech...

    As someone who was actually there to hear it - he didn't say everyone should drop out of college. Far from it - instead, he said it was exactly what HE needed at the time. He didn't do it because he was being an irresponsible dick, he did it because his tuition costs were overwhelming his parents' resources and he didn't want to do that to them.

    He wasn't attempting to invalidate the degrees of the people he was speaking to - instead he was using a very personal story to explain the idea that people should go through life with confidence rather than be afraid of what can happen...

    I've seen four or five commencement speeches over the last few years and in all honesty, this one was the best by far. It was heartfelt, had important things to say and alternated between being funny and quite touching. Jobs obviously put a lot of thought into the speech and really took it seriously.

  54. The real lesson... by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real lesson should be that you don't need a college degree to be successful ..... but it helps. Stories like this spur people on to believe things like "School is for suckers, I'm going to go make it on my own". For every Steve Jobs, there's a million people who end up working menial jobs at a pathetic salary because they didn't persue their education. Getting an education and getting a good job isn't going to make you a millionare, but more likely than not it'll keep you from being destitue.

    College degrees today are quickly becoming what high school degrees were 40 years ago. Advancement in your job is linked to how much education you've gotten. Whether you know more or not is irrelevant, but having degrees count. I have a friend who is a Lt in the Air Force. He's been telling me how a masters degree is quickly becoming a requirement in order to advance into the higher ranks in his department (He's not in R&D or a repair unit or anything like that either). Another example, a few years back another friend of mine was working a summer job for the county doing road maintainence (AKA, scooping up roadkill). Since he wasn't a total screwball like the other full-timers, he got along well with his supervisor. They were discussing my friend's future at some point. My friend wanted to (and did) go to music school, but the supervisor said that if he wanted, after graduation from college, he could recommend him for a supervisor's job working for the county. When my friend asked how a degree in Music Education would be useful working for the county, the supervisor said the degree itself didn't matter, just that you had it. His own degree was in agracultural sciences. So for most mainstream people, a college degree is the best course of action. Maybe you don't have to go into your major's field, but overall you'll be better of having it.

  55. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by zerus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because a few people had the right drive and knowledge at the right time doesn't mean everyone can do it. In the real world, a college degree means either getting a job or not getting a job. You can't be a licensed professional in most fields without a degree. If you want to be an engineer, you can have all the insight and experience in the world, but no licensing board will administer the FE and PE exams without a college degree, that's a fact. Sure it might be possible to become a quick millionaire if you do an internet startup. You could think of something that no one's thought of before, or make a significant improvement on an existing idea, but that's rare. Taking chances isn't bad, but take chances that make sense. Just dropping out of school and selling software online might make you a few bucks, but come on, take a reality check. "Oh but Bill Gates did it and he's the richest man in the world!" Yeah, but look at all the other people who dropped out of school and failed. With a degree at the very worst you'll make probably $35k+ if you chose to study something worthwhile. That degree in Russian lit., yeah, probably not so much. I went to school, grad school too, I'll be a millionaire well before I'm 40 because I chose a profession that pays pretty decently. So will I be a loser because I went to college? Sure will, but I'll be a loser with a Porsche, big house, and a trophy wife. Life sure sucks for me with my Ph.D on the wall.

  56. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by roastedMnM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The issue of working your way through college is confused greatly when the type of college in question is ommitted. In state colleges, or at least in the ones near my home town and the ones near my college,



    In private colleges or the Ivy league types (not just those colleges but colleges of that type) a 'work my way through' attitude will result in taking part time classes for years (and years and years and years)

  57. drop out, tune in, turn on by scotty777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I took the advice- given by a Harvard prof: tim leary.

    I moved to Europe, traveled the world for almost 10 years, and then went back to school. Got a 4.0 for several years, taking tough courses about subjects that I really wanted to understand. Then bailed out again and got a job in computing- and have done that ever since.

    A few years ago I got my own consulting gig at $120 per hour, and made 1/4 mil per year for the first time in my life.

    I think Jobs and I agree on these points: success comes to those who are smart and motivated. Jobs and I are motivated by love of what we do. We knew enough to find out what we love, and had the courage to follow our hearts: all the way to success and good money. Notice: those are not the same. The money came because I was lucky enough to enjoy a field that is in demand. Success also comes to self-fulfilled but poor artists.

    You want money? Go to college, get degrees, get well paid work.

    You want success? Find out what you love, do it well, and wholeheartedly

    drop out, tune in, turn on...

  58. My personal story by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As someone who dropped out of college last fall to start my own company like Steve did, this makes me really happy that he said that. That being said, it was also totally a douchebag thing to do. Not exactly out of character for Steve though. For those who don't know, around half of Apple's engineers don't have college degrees in engineering.

    Honestly, Steve is my hero, and this is why. The guy didn't have a product, great technical understand, business skills, personal or social skills. And if he was a visionary, then what was his vision? No, Steve Jobs made his money as a philosopher. He had the philosophy that every computer should be simple enough for the average human to use, and it should be beautiful. Of all the things Steve has fucked up over the years, this one philosophy has remained, and he has carried Apple on this alone.

  59. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by Aaron+England · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know what you mean. In fact, I'm in the exact same situation. I left college cause I wasn't motivated. But since joining the military I've found a new motivation to excel in everything I do. Also since joining the military I've become very impatient with people who tell me about their "hard times." So I'm looking forward getting back into school once I'm out, and I'm looking forward to kicking ass.

  60. Higher ed isn't the only measure by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I sometimes worry that we rely too much on higher ed achievement to judge people in the job market. When I was in college, I saw an overwhelming number of kids there who were only there going through the motions because it's what mom and dad wanted them to do. I saw lots of working toward a good grade, but little in terms of real hunger of knowledge and exporations of creativity and critical thinking. I think the more we rely on university degrees as the measure by which we open doors for people, the more we're going to hurt as a society. I mean, it's valid of course, but it's not the be-all end-all. I see so many jobs with the educational requirements and I wonder how many brilliant drop-outs were rejecting as a society for that.

    It's known that geniuses, by their nature, simply do not fit in. I wonder how someone like Einstein would do in today's invironment.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  61. Hm, perhaps you meant ... by Petrushka · · Score: 2

    ... intelligent people do not need to go to school to get ahead.

    Hm, perhaps what you actually meant to say is this:

    People who are intelligent, incredibly well-motivated, charismatic, and very very lucky, sometimes under some circumstances do not need to go to school to get ahead.

  62. Transcript of Jobs' commencement speech by trudyscousin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thank you. I'm honored to be with you today for your commencement from one of the finest universities in the world. Truth be told, I never graduated from college and this is the closest I've ever gotten to a college graduation.

    Today I want to tell you three stories from my life. That's it. No big deal. Just three stories. The first story is about connecting the dots.

    I dropped out of Reed College after the first six months but then stayed around as a drop-in for another eighteen months or so before I really quit. So why did I drop out? It started before I was born. My biological mother was a young, unwed graduate student, and she decided to put me up for adoption. She felt very strongly that I should be adopted by college graduates, so everything was all set for me to be adopted at birth by a lawyer and his wife, except that when I popped out, they decided at the last minute that they really wanted a girl. So my parents, who were on a waiting list, got a call in the middle of the night asking, "We've got an unexpected baby boy. Do you want him?" They said, "Of course." My biological mother found out later that my mother had never graduated from college and that my father had never graduated from high school. She refused to sign the final adoption papers. She only relented a few months later when my parents promised that I would go to college.

    This was the start in my life. And seventeen years later, I did go to college, but I naïvely chose a college that was almost as expensive as Stanford, and all of my working-class parents' savings were being spent on my college tuition. After six months, I couldn't see the value in it. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life, and no idea of how college was going to help me figure it out, and here I was, spending all the money my parents had saved their entire life. So I decided to drop out and trust that it would all work out OK. It was pretty scary at the time, but looking back, it was one of the best decisions I ever made. The minute I dropped out, I could stop taking the required classes that didn't interest me and begin dropping in on the ones that looked far more interesting.

    It wasn't all romantic. I didn't have a dorm room, so I slept on the floor in friends' rooms. I returned Coke bottles for the five-cent deposits to buy food with, and I would walk the seven miles across town every Sunday night to get one good meal a week at the Hare Krishna temple. I loved it. And much of what I stumbled into by following my curiosity and intuition turned out to be priceless later on. Let me give you one example.

    Reed College at that time offered perhaps the best calligraphy instruction in the country. Throughout the campus every poster, every label on every drawer was beautifully hand-calligraphed. Because I had dropped out and didn't have to take the normal classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do this. I learned about serif and sans-serif typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter combinations, about what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can't capture, and I found it fascinating.

    None of this had even a hope of any practical application in my life. But ten years later when we were designing the first Macintosh computer, it all came back to me, and we designed it all into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography. If I had never dropped in on that single course in college, the Mac would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced fonts, and since Windows just copied the Mac, it's likely that no personal computer would have them.

    If I had never dropped out, I would have never dropped in on that calligraphy class and personals computers might not have the wonderful typography that they do.

    Of course it was impossible to connect the dots looking forward when I was in college, but it was very, very clear looking backwards 10 years later. Again, you can't connect th

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  63. Reality Check... by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Funny
    He told the graduates that few friends could see the value of learning calligraphy at the time but that painstaking attention to detail -- including mastering different "fonts" -- was what set Macintosh apart from its competitors.

    "If I had never dropped out I might never have dropped in on that calligraphy," Jobs said.

    Jobs also recounted founding Apple in his parent's basement and his tough times after being forced out of the company he founded when he was only 30.

    All is well. I am right on track to greatness.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  64. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by dietz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, I'm in the same boat now. I dropped out of high school, fucked around for a while, worked in the computer industry, and eventually decided I wanted to take a few classes again. Once I went back (when I was ready), I realized how interesting school can be.

    Now I'm a math major and hope to go on to get a PhD... not because I want to "do something" with my degree (I like programming, so I'll just keep doing that) but because leaning is fun.

    Dropping out was really a great thing for me, really. I had fun and crazy times rather than sitting in school wishing I was having fun and crazy times. Now I'm older (and know how to manage the somewhat-less-crazy fun around a schedule better) and can be in school and enjoy it.

  65. Education not the be all and end all by HuguesT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know why Jobs said what he did, but I don't think it was derogatory or anything.

    Most likely he was talking to a large bunch of smart and educated young people and telling them that today was the first day of the rest of their life, i.e. getting an expensive education is not the end. Some people do not have the same level of education as they do, yet can be successful and smart too. Doubtlessly in the audience there were people who graduated because their parents had money.

    At a college like Standford with the degree also comes the network of peers. It would be a mistake to think that because suddently they are part of a high-level clique they are more intelligent and deserving than others. They still have to go to work and achieve something on their own to deserve any significant accolade.

    In Europe we have some prestigious schools too. At one of them the president was a military man, and always made some speech at graduation. He was fond of telling his graduating students that (1) there are stupid people everywhere and (2) the more educated they are, the more dangerous they are.

    My own university president was fond of quoting movies. There is a classic French movie called "a taxi for Tobruk", a war movie with great dialog, where a couple of people are in a jeep who breaks down in the desert. The two people are a grunt and an officer. The officer decides to stay near the jeep and wait, while the grunt decides to walk and find help. The officer tells him he'll soon die, but the grunt replies "un con qui marche va toujours plus loin qu'un intellectuel assis".

    An idiot who walks always goes further than a seated intellectual.

    Perhaps this is not very different from the Jobs attitude.

    Cheers.

  66. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by rpozz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look on job sites. Almost every decent vacancy requires a degree, some with a minimum of a 2:1.

    A lot of people on here seem to think they are 'above' getting a degree, that they're too smart for that and after school they can just stroll into a job because of their enormous intelligence. That only works for a very, very small number of people.

    A degree shows that you at least have a basic understanding of the subject, and have spent a lot of money, time and effort in the subject area of your choice. Who in their right mind would employ some kid into a reponsible job who had just finished school, had no proof that he knew shit, and had the arrogance to think he didn't need a degree?

  67. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by dmolavi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A degree also shows that you have a commitment to the field in which you're pursuing. After all, you don't spend 4+ years studying something that you're not really interested in doing. When the option was presented to me to earn my master's degree in Electrical engineering after I finished undergraduate work, I jumped at it. And I'm glad I did; it's bumped me ahead of the pack (and those l33t kiddies) when it comes to getting a job and subsequent promotions. As someone who regularly interviews people for positions at my company, I don't just blindly say "Whoa, PhD...he's the man!". A degree, or multiple degrees, are only part of the picture of a job candidate. Oftentimes, if one candidate comes in with a BS with some co-op or intern experience, and another with an MS and no experience, the BS candidate will be chosen, as the "on the job" learning they acquired is often as valuable, if not more so, than the additional degree.

  68. Re:Why then does Apple *require* degrees for IT jo by MrWa · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Being an IT Professional that "dropped out" like Jobs and Wozniak, it has always pissed me off that Apple requires "A BS in Computer Science"

    They never say that dropping out of college will help you get a job - ever notice that these highly successful college dropouts started their own company and didn't go to work for someone else? There's a lesson in there for you.

  69. Sometimes it's the right option.. by Nijika · · Score: 2, Interesting
    SOMETIMES. It works out really well for people who are clearly not "making it" in mainstream education. Worked great for me. In contrast, staying in school worked great for others.

    It's a lot tougher to guage wether it's the right decision when you're making it though. When I first dropped out of high school I thought I was moving into a long term career in fast food. In hindsight I saved myself about $20k and gained 4+ years of work experience on my friends.

    Since I'm also moving into self-employment the glass ceiling that would face me if I was in a corporate environment with no paperwork is not an issue.

    For those of you who are at a crossroads; When you're making this choice, remember, either way you're actually blessed with good fortune, and making either choice isn't the end of the road, by far.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  70. My son won't go to college by jocknerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've already decided that my 2 year old son won't go to college. Instead, he's going to be a 1st round draft pick in baseball. So instead of studying every night and doing homework, I'm going to have him in the backyard throwing a baseball. I'll do his homework.

    His twin sister will go to college though. She's going to become a lawyer because he's going to need a really good agent.

  71. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
    There's no need for the "a".

    We don't say "I'm going to eat a breakfast", or "I'm going to have a sex", or "I'm going to troll a slashdot".

    If you name the university, then ok "I got to to Harvard".

    And we certainly don't say "I got to to Harvard" unless we have a speech impediment ... or are trying to adapt to the Gentoo Keyboard ...

  72. Dropout's success built on others by Kontinuum · · Score: 2

    Steve Jobs (and Bill Gates) may be wildly successful people, and perhaps to some degree the fact that they were "unhindered" by a conventional college degree may contribute to this.

    On the other hand, I'd like to know how many thousand or million-PhD-hours were spent on developing the technology that goes into every Apple computer (Intel chip, MS product, etc). Yes, I know, "Apple did not invent x, y, or z, blah blah blah". But at some point, someone who went to university and graduate school and a postdoc, etc had to make the major breakthroughs in semiconductors, display technology, storage technology, networking technology, computer theory, etc that makes any of this possible.

    I don't believe Steve Jobs was implying that people should not go to universities or that he has no use for people with conventional educations ... and reading through the rest of his speech, I thought it was very very insightful. But, I think there is a tremendous arrogance in the people who are saying this, as it ignores the contributions of everyone else who's hard work and education contribute to making your job so darn easy.

    As a disclaimer, I went to a "name-brand" type of university, and grad school, and did a postdoc (not in CS, though). I learned a tremendous amount in all my work there, even in the literature and history classes that are completely irrelevant to my day-to-day life. That being said, I suppose my imagination is so completely squashed by my conventional education that you shouldn't be surprised that I have a pro-university bias ...