Slashdot Mirror


Public Domain from Outer Space

Black_by_Pubic_Deman writes "It is a work of art that truly represents the nadir of film making; a movie so bad that it's good. It has been labelled 'The Worst Movie Ever' by the Golden Turkey Awards and is also the winner of two notable Razzies. Ed Wood's classic and every Slashdot reader's favorite movie Plan 9 from Outer Space is now in the Public Domain and available as a free download thanks to the fine folks over at Archive.org."

236 comments

  1. Oops by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    Looks like they weren't ready. Any of the lucky few want to make a bittorrent?

    1. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt they got the film in 5 minutes ;)
      slashdot 4tw

    2. Re:Oops by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      Why not just go out and buy it for $1? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/02/203122 7&tid=97&tid=98 Not like this being $1 cheaper than before is news-worthy.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    3. Re:Oops by rsynnott · · Score: 1

      Yes it certainly is; people are far more inclined to get free stuff than very cheap stuff.

      --
      Me (Blog)
    4. Re:Oops by kesuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why make one, http://isohunt.com/download.php?mode=bt&id=4612267 there already is one ;)

      sadly, it only has one seed and 2 leachers and frankly, it might not be the exact same as the version that was available freely...

    5. Re:Oops by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, and often it's not the money. I'd gladly give $1 to have the movie here and now. But it's the overhead. Register, confirm by email, give details, enter billing information, confirm, etc, etc. Purchasing registration of a program online takes half a hour. Downloading a crack takes 5 minutes. It's not about the price in money, it's about the price in your time and effort the sellers demand.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:Oops by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why make one, http://isohunt.com/download.php?mode=bt&id=4612267 there already is one ;)

      sadly, it only has one seed and 2 leachers and frankly, it might not be the exact same as the version that was available freely...


      No, the truly sad thing is that even though this movie is now in the public domain that isohunt link is probably still illegal due to its source.

      Somebody is going to have to mirror the Archive.org version since they don't claim any copyright on their copy and hope they got it from the original source.

    7. Re:Oops by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it's in the public domain it should't matter where you got it from...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    8. Re:Oops by typical · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I'd like to know is why archive.org, king of bulk data transfer, doesn't automatically provide bittorrents of all of their larger files. It would have to save them some stupidly large amount of money in bandwidth costs.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    9. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    10. Re:Oops by Radix37 · · Score: 4, Informative
      What I'd like to know is why archive.org, king of bulk data transfer, doesn't automatically provide bittorrents of all of their larger files.

      I asked them this very question recently.

      Here's your answer:

      Too cpu intensive unless we dynamically start and stop trackers dynamically for popular shows... Its physically impossible for each of our collections machines to run a tracker and be a seed for all shows that fit into a 1.6tb node....

      For specific shows or new content it could work, and it would work especially well if we ran the trackers on a really high powered node and had the collections machines just be seeds... I would love it.

      --
      Speed Demos Archive - Lots of speed runs!
    11. Re:Oops by arose · · Score: 1

      It might be a touched version that isn't public domain.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    12. Re:Oops by typical · · Score: 1

      Okay, it might require a bit of work on the part of a few P2P hackers -- a request comes in for a non-running tracker item, a lookup is done in a database for the item, and the item is added to the tracker.

      But if there's one thing the open source world is rich in, it's clever P2P hackers...

      Actually, a BitTorrent tracker that could do that would have a hell of a lot of legitimate applications for *other* folks, too. What company *wouldn't* want to stick a "BitTorrent" link next to their "http download" link and knock their bandwidth costs down? Might even be a commercially salable system.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    13. Re:Oops by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Thats why I said sadly. It shouldn't matter, unfortunately it legally does.

    14. Re:Oops by bani · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about the new trackerless torrent protocol though? They wouldnt need to run any tracker at all.

    15. Re:Oops by elronxenu · · Score: 1

      They'd still need to run a seed bittorrent client, else nobody could download it.

    16. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already sort of been done: see http://osprey.ibiblio.org/

    17. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should only need one tracker for the entire archive, and one seeder per node, to handle the entire archive. Both trackers and seeders can handle a virtually unlimited number of files at fixed CPU cost and minimal memory cost if they're designed to do so -- http://osprey.ibiblio.org/ looks promising.

    18. Re:Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Jackson has a version?

    19. Re:Oops by danila · · Score: 1

      For archiving they need to use eDonkey 2000 protocol. In that case they would simply need to calculate the ed2k hash values and link to those (no seed/tracker needed). Kind of like all the ed2k link portals (such as findhash.com). If they want to avoid dead links, they can run checks of the file's popularity and link only if it's already available on the ed2k network. Surely some of the popular files will be shared by some people.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  2. Now... by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

    If only the same were true about the operating system.

    --
    I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    1. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a problem with the current license?

    2. Re:Now... by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Plan 9 OS (which really was named after the film :-) is under an Open Source license. It's a weird one nobody else uses but it is certified Open, AFAIK.

      Not quite Public Domain but good enough for most purposes.

    3. Re:Now... by adam1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It may not be public domain, but it certainly does qualify as the worst operating system ever. :)

    4. Re:Now... by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      Being certified "open" by a bunch of guys doesn't mean it's usable. In this case it means a bunch of people with no real backbones, said that a huge pile of lawyerese was good instead of telling them to just use one of the existing licenses.

      The redistribution restriction alone makes just putting it up on the internet, the way most every open source project is, completely impossible.

      Nope, hardly the level of openness that makes it worth touching.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    5. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "redistribution restriction"? Be more specific.

    6. Re:Now... by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      I had a scan through http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/plan9dist/license.html

      What's the clause you object to? Doesn't it have to be redistributable to be classified as Open by OSI?

    7. Re:Now... by truedfx · · Score: 1

      Lucent Public License 1.0
      Lucent Public License 1.02

      Turns out it used to be a different license - and anyone who obtained it under the original license can redistribute it under that. Assuming that license suits you better, perhaps you could see if you can find anyone who can put it up under that, if you care enough?

    8. Re:Now... by linguae · · Score: 1

      According to what I've read, Plan 9 is a very good OS. It takes Unix's "everything is a file" philosophy to another level. Plan 9 has fixed all of the infrastructural issues with Unix, and uses its own windowing system instead of X. Unfortunately, not many people use Plan 9 as a production OS because of the lack of applications; sure there are text editors and a web browser available, but where are the multimedia and productivity applications? Plus, I don't think we'll ever see Plan 9 on the desktop; its window manager clearly is an extension of the Unix philosophy, and most regular users don't feel like piping and plumbing commands together. I guess most Plan 9 users use another OS (like Linux, Mac OS X, or Windows) for their everyday tasks, and Plan 9 for exploration. Even Rob Pike uses Windows.

    9. Re:Now... by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      By getting the source you have to agree to comply with United States export regulations, a whole whack of garbage that I would rather not become fluent with in order to redistribute the code myself.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    10. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are deluding yourself if you believe that the Plan 9 licence is the reason nobody uses it.

      The real problem with Plan 9 is that it's a pile of experimental early-90s tech that's never appealed to anyone enough to build a business model around.

    11. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Unless Bell Labs moves to Canada, no real way to get around this considering they are distributing crypto stuff.

    12. Re:Now... by Nimrangul · · Score: 1
      Someone disagrees.

      And beyond Inferno, lots of people have long wanted the plan9 C compiler to be MIT licensed so that a solid alternative to gcc could be developed. Theo de Raadt especially has talked about how much he'd love to swap gcc for the p9cc in OpenBSD.

      So although not every ounce of plan9 would necessarily be wanted by someone, there are parts that people would love to have, if only for the license preventing it.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    13. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you can run Windows 2.0-style applications in a IE window! Sign me up.

    14. Re:Now... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried Plan9? (Rhetorical question, don't answer that.) Last time I did so, I gave up because I couldn't figure out how the windowing system worked, and there didn't seem to be any way of dropping to the command line. I remember searching around for a "let's get started with Plan9!" tutorial, but I couldn't find one.

      I mean, there are only three buttons on a mouse. The fact that none of them did anything other than scroll the one text window on screen in weird ways, frustrated the heck out of me. How about some user friendliness to go with the uber-architecture, guys?

      Guys?

      You there?

      Hello?

      Is this thing on? ;-)

    15. Re:Now... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      According to what I've read, Plan 9 is a very good OS. It takes Unix's "everything is a file" philosophy to another level

      I think it's time to go the opposite direction, and have an OS where there aren't any files. Instead, everything is a process. Instead of files, you store data in processes, and you access it via IPC mechanisms. (This is not as inefficient as it sounds, because you could share code pages between most of these processes...the standard "data process" would be used for most things). Directories would then simply be processes that implement naming services to let you find the processes that have the data you want.

      Your disks would be used entirely for swap space (and most processes would be swapped out most of the time).

      Note that if you need to implement special access controls on a "file" in this system, it is simply a matter of having that "file" be a process that implements those controls.

      If a special application needs a different API to access "files", no problem...you can provide processes that implement the API it needs for its "files". It's all user-mode code, and doesn't disturb anything else.

      If the IPC mechanism you use to access data in these "file" processes is one that works over the network, then you automatically get transparent network storage.

      The hard part here would be saving state when you power down. You need to save the state of hundres of thousands of processes. (OK, I suppose making it so your OS can efficiently handle hundreds of thousands of processes might also be a bit of a challenge!)

    16. Re:Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crypto? Can't have honest citizens distributing that. I'm sure telling them they can't do it will stop all those criminals, terrorists and foreign spies from exporting it too. They wouldn't want to do anything illegal, I'm sure.

  3. Maybe there's a Mistake by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Plan 9 From Outer Space is better than half the movies available in the theatres now.

    1. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      You want to see real crud, I recommend Night Train to Mundo Fine, also known as Red Zone Cuba. I could not make heads or tails of the movie, nor did I care. There's a reason it scores 1.7 out of 10 at IMDB...

    2. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plan 9 is not the worst movie. The Hands of "Manos" is by far the worst movie ever made. While Plan 9 is amusing in the sense that its so bad its funny, Manos is so bad its pathetic. There is no humor, there is just pain.

      For example, the director didn't put the credits in so for the first 10 minutes of the movie you are watching a car drive down the road. The camera could only operate for about 30 seconds, so the scenes are constantly spliced, often not coordinated (such the dog bouncing about different places in the car).

      The only redeemable facet is Torgo. Presumably Torg from Sluggy Freelance came from here.

      No, don't go watch it to compare. Don't! You will be like half the cast who killed themselves after making the film.

    3. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its called 'Manos' the Hands of Fate.

      Rated at 1.5 on IMDB. Not bad.

    4. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by heptapod · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, the body count after the filming of Manos: The Hands of Fate is highly exaggerated Obligatory Wikipedia article meant to be a cite. A more reliable article than Wikipedia.

    5. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I saw Fantastic Four yesterday. It was bad, but not nearly as bad as the Hulk. That's because it didn't take itself seriously.

      Now the Hulk, that was worse than Plan 9. That was worse than any movie I have ever seen.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by sgant · · Score: 1

      I liked the Hulk. Thought it was great. And honestly, it's one of those bandwagon jumping things where "everyone says it's bad because everyone says it's bad" type of things.

      It was a great movie. Don't know why people had a problem with it and when asked they really can't give a good reason other than "it sucked" or "he looked green like Shrek". Um...in the comic he was green. Hello?

      Oh well, does anyone really care? I like it and you don't. Who cares.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    7. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by foistboinder · · Score: 1, Funny
      Plan 9 From Outer Space is better than half the movies available in the theatres now.

      It's better than any Michael Bay movie.

      Then I was right. Job has all his children killed, and Michael Bay gets to keep making movies. There isn't a God.
      -- Kyle Broflovski

    8. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Um...in the comic he was green. Hello?

      Hi! Apparently you forgot that he was gray too. A Joe Fixit movie would've been more entertaining.

    9. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm waiting for the torrent version to come out...

    10. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by insulto · · Score: 1

      Amen to that!

    11. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by dpilot · · Score: 1

      But when the Hulk escaped from the secret underground base, he went jumping across the landscape, and ended up in Arches National Park, a few miles from my sister's house in Moab, Utah. When General Ross said, "Make it into a parking lot," he was talking about Fin Canyon, one of the places out there my daughter and I went hiking a few years back.

      But I guess I'm not commenting about the movie, am I. I guess I wasn't terribly disappointed, but I'd heard so much ahead of time, that my expectations were lowered.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    12. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Flounder · · Score: 1
      Sorry, Manos: The Hand of Fate does top them all. Even mistied, it's painful. Un-touched, it'll make your eyeballs bleed.

      And I proudly own an original 16mm print of it.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    13. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      Dude, I liked the Hulk too. Actually, parts of it.

      some people discuss the notion of comic book movies taking themselves too seriously. It's because comic books take themselves seriously. that's the whole point. Comic books are smart and brooding, but with pictures. Some of the smartest fiction I've read came from comic books.

      There was something austere about the film. It was minimalist but very violent. And Nick Nolte was downright creepy in his quiet menace. He was the most terrifying thing in the movie to me, because while it's difficult to imagine a monster like the Hulk really existing, a monster like the man Nolte played in the film can really exist, and I reckon, does actually exist in the world. That's just scary, and I dig it.

      Good flick, that Hulk.

      Fantastic Four sucked.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    14. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The premise is intriguing enough. Since Hollywood's all into remakes these days, it wouldn't be a bad idea to give it a shot once it gets into the public domain. Oh wait, that'll be in another 30 years...

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    15. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by cmacb · · Score: 1

      "Plan 9 From Outer Space is better than half the movies available in the theatres now."

      I don't see how that statment and the statement that it is a really crappy movie are contradictory in any way. :)

      By the way I just downloaded it a few days ago and watched it for the first time. Incredibly bad! A must-have for any serious collector.

    16. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by hawado · · Score: 1

      Try "ZebraMan" for total cheese...

      --
      Feed my eyes...
    17. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by rworne · · Score: 1

      I just can't resist posting this:

      Pearl Harbor from Team America

      I miss you more then Michael Bay missed the mark
      When he made Pearl Harbor
      I miss you more than that movie missed the point
      And that's an awful lot girl
      And now, now you've gone away
      And all I'm trying to say is
      Pearl Harbor sucked, and I miss you

      I need u like Ben Affleck needs acting school
      He was terrible in that film
      I need u like Cuba Gooding needed a bigger part
      He's way better than Ben Affleck
      And now all I can think about is your smile
      and that shitty movie too
      Pearl Harbor sucked and I miss you

      Why does Michael Bay get to keep on making movies?
      I guess Pearl Harbor sucked
      Just a little bit more than I miss you

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    18. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      it's one of those bandwagon jumping things

      Nope, I thought it was a bad movies because it was painful to watch. I went into it thinking "it's going to be cheesy", so I wasn't expecting anything in the way of good acting, good editing, good effects, good production, or anything like that. The story was incoherent, the main character so one dimensional it was impossible to feel for him, the action implausible to the extreme, and the CGI just plain sucked. Nick Nolte was just plain awful in the movie. His inane philosophical spoutings were almost as bad as the Merovingian's in Matrix II.

      But those weren't the worst things. The worst thing was that the movie took itself seriously. It didn't try to be a fun movie, it tried to be "art", and that's what tipped it over the edge into junk.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    19. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I saw Fantastic Four yesterday. It was bad, but not nearly as bad as the Hulk

      there's exactly one relevant question here.

      Do you like the Fantastic Four and Hulk in comic book form?

      I ask the question because, IMO, every comic book movie Marvel has made since X-Men -- Punnisher, Daredevil, Elektra, SpiderMan 1 & 2, X-Men 2, Hulk, and The Fantastic Four -- has struck me as a rather good rendition of the comic books in movie form.

      The comic books that weren't that popular weren't that popular as movies. The comic books that were popular were popular as movies.

      While one might argue that this is a case of fandom propelling sales, I think it's a bit more a case of the movies doing a good job, and their relative popularity and quality being properly proportional to their comic book's relative popularity and quality.

      (Which, btw, is why I heartedtly expect to think that any Avengers movie is going to suck. Because I don't like them in the comic books.)

    20. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Do you like the Fantastic Four and Hulk in comic book form?

      Actually I never got into comic books.Does that mean I have to turn in my geek card?

      Consequently, I'm not judging these movies by how well they match the comic book. If a movie cannot stand on its own, don't bother making it.

      (Which, btw, is why I heartedtly expect to think that any Avengers movie is going to suck. Because I don't like them in the comic books.)

      They did make a movie out of it. Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman, I think. It sucked. I never knew they made it into a comic though.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    21. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Panoramix · · Score: 1
      Sorry, Manos: The Hand of Fate does top them all. Even mistied, it's painful. Un-touched, it'll make your eyeballs bleed.

      Not that I disagree with you last remark, but I side with grandparent here: Red Zone Cuba is in fact worse than Manos, unbelieveable as that may be.

      Manos may have been made by a fertilizer salesman (which shows, plenty), may have been shot out of focus in its entirety, may have the most ridiculous set of characters ever, but at least had some resemblance of a plot. Granted, a dumb plot, an annoying plot, but it's there. Plus, that lady was very good looking, IMO.

      RZC, on the other hand, is technically as bad as Manos, and also completely incoherent. It is just an idiotic sequence of unrelated scenes, ranging from dull to unpleasant, up to frankly insulting.

      Besides, RZC actually stars Coleman Francis, the man, the legend. With Anthony Cardoza to boot. That alone should be dreadful enough, but this is worse than the sum of the parts. For instance, RZC is much, much worse than Skydivers (my opinion again, of course---the IMDb for some weird reason ranks it better!).

    22. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by masdog · · Score: 1

      Hey...I enjoyed Bad Boys and Bad Boys II. They weren't THAT bad.

      But there is one thing that bothers me about all these action movies - the fascination with full auto. The villians are supposed to be elite terrorists, why do they need their guns set to full auto all the time?

    23. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by bsartist · · Score: 1

      They did make a movie out of [the Avengers]. Ralph Fiennes and Uma Thurman, I think.

      Different Avengers. The movie you're talking about was based on the BBC television show. They *did* make a comic adaptation of that, but because there was already an existing Avengers comic it was called "Steed and Mrs. Peel". There was also an American knock-off TV show called "Scarecrow and Mrs. King".

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    24. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1

      It certainly beats Episode I.

    25. Re:Maybe there's a Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about Ishtar?

  4. Darn It by nxtr · · Score: 1

    The Internet Archive got slashdotted. No more downloading the internet for them.

    1. Re:Darn It by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      >> No more downloading the internet for them.

      No sh*t. They come by each of my sites every so often and scrape the whole thing.

      How much frigging disk space does it take to do full backups of the internet?

  5. Glen or Glenda by portforward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was on TV late at night about 15 years ago when I was still a teen. I was wondering what that was until I saw the movie with Depp.

    Still, I don't know if Plan 9 is truly the worst movie ever. I have to agree with the MST3K crew that there are several others even worse, like Manos.

    1. Re:Glen or Glenda by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

      I've never seen Plan 9, but I don't believe it could be worse than The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies!!?

    2. Re:Glen or Glenda by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have to agree with the MST3K crew that there are several others even worse, like Manos.

      The Master would like to have a word with you ;)

      /Torgo

    3. Re:Glen or Glenda by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I've seen both (ain't that something to be proud of!), and I'd have to go with Plan 9, just because it's got the added sadness of first seeing Bela Lugosi in a pathetic performance squeezing one last drop from his Dracula fame, and secondly seeing the stiff who impersonates Lugosi during the second half of the film since Bela died during the filming. The impersonation consists of stalking slowly around the set with a cape drawn across his face.

      And besides, "Incredibly Strange Creatures blah blah blah" at least has a stripper in it. For a teenager watching Grade Z horror flicks, that's worth some points all on its own...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Glen or Glenda by stwrtpj · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I have to agree with the MST3K crew that there are several others even worse, like Manos.

      My wife and I are big fans of MST3K, and we kept hearing how Manos was a classic episode because of how bad the movie was. Well, we were disappointed at the MST3K's performance in this one. We think it was because the movie was TOO bad. There was not enough story in the movie for making jokes. The main problem was that incredibly long travelogue near the start of the movie. There were only so many jokes that could be made about watching someone drive down the road.

      Some better treatments by the MST3K crew:

      • The Thing That Couldn't Die
      • I Was A Teenage Werewolf
      • Prince Of Space
      • Invasion of the Neptune Men

      Maybe those movies were not as intrinsically bad as Manos, but the provided much more joke material.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    5. Re:Glen or Glenda by mikey1134 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you there, "Manos" the Hands of Fate surpasses even a movie like this in the area of "Oh my God the let them film that" bad movies

      --
      <gir voice> I love this sig... </gir voice>
    6. Re:Glen or Glenda by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      "What's it going to do, blink us to death?"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:Glen or Glenda by nyri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if Plan 9 is truly the worst movie ever. I have to agree with the MST3K crew that there are several others even worse, like Manos.

      What I hear is that 'Manos' - The Hand of Faith is scoring below its level because of MST3K. One reviewer in IMDb claims that the MST3K version was hevily edited so the movie appears worse than it is. Is he right? I don't know, and will never find out as I have no intention to watch two different versions of a crappy movie.

      Anyway, the point remains: people should undeline that they are speaking of "MST3K: 'Manos' - The Hand of Faith" not "'Manos' - The Hand of Faith". Thay are two different movies like "Blade Runner" and "Blade Runner - Director's Cut" are two different movies.

    8. Re:Glen or Glenda by mat.h · · Score: 1
      I was wondering what that was until I saw the movie with Depp.

      My first encounter with Plan 9 and Ed Wood was the early-90s adventure game (which is *not* based on the movie's plot).

    9. Re:Glen or Glenda by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      When you compare the original uncut with the version shown on MST3k.. the only scenes cut were of MORE DRIVING. That's it. I love the MST3k episode (one of the few Joel episodes I like). And it's "Fate" not "Faith"

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    10. Re:Glen or Glenda by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Manos is bad. Monster A Go-Go is worse. When the phone rings, a guy off camera is going "RING.. RING"... You have to see it to really understand how bad it is.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    11. Re:Glen or Glenda by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      I read an interview with Joel and Trace where they said there were two reasons they never did Plan 9. The first is that the movie speaks for itself. The second and more pragmatic is that the movie has a lot of fairly delicious narration and the MysTie treatment would have stepped all over it.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
  6. Worst movie ever by mikeanuzis · · Score: 1

    Is "Fantasy Mission Force," an old Jackie Chan film.

    If you're ever in the mood to pull your hair out and you're just looking for a reason, rent this movie.

    1. Re:Worst movie ever by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      I just downloaded the original Fantastic Four, not this years release, but 1994's release just because I had read it was so bad. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109770/ I wonder how it will stack up for worst movie :)

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    2. Re:Worst movie ever by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      I saw the original fantastic four movie you speak of, and it's truly one of those "bad in a good way" movies. Invite your friends, microwave some popcorn, and have a good laugh.

      (and it looks like they spent some money on that movie too, and they never bothere relesing it in the theatres)!

    3. Re:Worst movie ever by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      We have "bad movie night" at the local video store every thursday, and Jackie Chan's Fantasy Mission Force was the feature attraction about a month or so ago.

      I'm at a loss of words in describing it - it has to be seen to be believed. And although it was "bad" in many respects, it was a hoot to watch. A classic "so bad it's good" movie!

    4. Re:Worst movie ever by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

      Bah. Check out the Roller Blade movies (not Roller Ball), such as Roller Blade, Roller Blade Warriors, The Roller Blade Seven, The Legend of the Rollerblade Seven, and Return of the Roller Blade Seven.

      These are truly the worse movies ever. They're movies about post-apocalyptic roller-skating battle nuns. POST-APOCALYPTIC ROLLER-SKATING BATTLE NUNS!!!

      Here's the plot summary of The Roller Blade Warriors from IMDB for example:
      In the future, a warrior nun on roller skates must rescue a seer, who is to be sacrificed by a band of mutants.

      Now, I haven't seen all of these movies, but the ones I've seen have been so attrociously bad as to be incomprehensible. The acting is awful. The dialogue ranges from bizarre to stupid. The cinematography is okay. The plot is nonsense. The characters are also nonsensical. I've seen a lot of bad movies. These are far and away the worst.

      Although, I should note that we haven't yet worked up the guts to watch the other films from the same director, Hell Comes To Frogtown and it's sequels.

      Keith

  7. the plan9 OS by BACbKA · · Score: 1

    is named in the honour of this film, to commemorate how truly bad it was in the opinion of the Bell Labs folks

    --

    VKh

    1. Re:the plan9 OS by kesuki · · Score: 1, Troll

      cmon, plan9 OS sucked, but it wasn't the worst OS ever... *points to windows ME*

    2. Re:the plan9 OS by BACbKA · · Score: 1

      My orig post was not a joke. I read it somewhere in interview with one of the Bell Labs guys. They didn't imply that their OSes sucked, just that the film did. BTW, the successing OS was called Inferno, also in honour of a film the folks disliked a lot :-)

      --

      VKh

    3. Re:the plan9 OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My orig post was not a joke.
      Of course not, but it was a really good 'set up' for my joke. Which was semi-trollish, so I posted sans karma bonus... because I couldn't post anonymously because I had posted only less than 5 minutes ago, and you need to wait 50 minutes/use proxies to do more AC posting because of an excellent crapflooding script writen by a friend of mine who is a very angry dude. angry because slashdot keeps breaking it's karma system worse.. you have to socially engineer your comments to fit the groupthink to get and maintain positive karma.

      And humor can't be edgy, or else all your efforts will be undone ;)

      But to a certain extent slashdot's dysfunctionality is part of what makes it interesting, but the whole 'silence the trolls' movememnt was stupid. the whole problem lies in the karma system... comments can only go to -2 and they can only be read to -1.. which had to be implemented because it was too easy to 'mod' bomb people... and then they decided to let the mod system silence people... by restricting posting privaldges based on karma. while still having numerous modbomb methods left in the code :/ especiallyt he +funny -whatever mod bombing, a large enough group of people, or a well scripted bot, with a human catcher can easilly create an army of 'moderators with points' to mod a single user +20 funny and -20 offtopic, for example.

      Because social engineering is so key, a simple AI bot that knows what types of posts get modded up can be written, that scans the article submission, or takes operator input, googles relative links etc, and generates thinkspeak type posts that are +5 informative...

      a clever programmer could easily write a bot that could maintain 100 accounts that only required the attention of one person, in their spare time to maintain an army of mod bombers squadrens, and they could keep tabs on which accounts had mod points etc etc...

      yeah, being able to silence people is gay ;) negative karma users should have just as many posting rights, but the threshold they're viewed at could always be lower...

      anon because this is 1000% offtopic and i have foes that would mod it as such ;)

      -kesuki

  8. ET Go Home by TommydCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps we can place a copy onboard for the next shuttle launch and send that piece back where it came fome. *shudder*

    --
    This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
  9. Already Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should say "But subscriber can beat the rush and slashdot the links early" rather than what they have now.

  10. But how does it compare with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    ...Gayniggers from Outer Space?

    1. Re:But how does it compare with... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      Man...they're always playing that on Slashdot. It's not a good movie, I don't why they keep showing it.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:But how does it compare with... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Who keeps modding these comments down? "Gay Niggers From Outer Space is a REAL MOVIE", and asking which one worse is on-topic. To answer your question: It's bad, but not even as bad as Plan 9 From Outer Space.

      You heard me right, if forced at gunpoint to choose between watching Plan 9 and Gay Niggers, I'd watch Gay Niggers From Outer Space. God help me if it ever comes to that.

  11. The Matrix by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd like to see an MST3K made of The Matrix, which I think is *much* worse than Plan 9, especially given the budget.

    1. Re:The Matrix by magarity · · Score: 3, Funny

      No kidding; especially since Plan 9 had Bela Lugosi and The Matrix had Kenny whats-his-name.

    2. Re:The Matrix by isny · · Score: 1

      The Matrix had Kenny whats-his-name.
      You bastards!!

  12. Never Seen it. by MindNumbingOblivion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Don't plan to.

    Anyways, it couldn't be any worse than Battlefield Earth, could it? Or am I about to have to give up my geek card?

    Now, if it is as bad as you say, there should be an MST3K of it somewhere. THAT I would like to see.

    --
    #define CLUE 0
    1. Re:Never Seen it. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The thing is, that it is unintentionally hilarious, so bad that it's good according to some people.

      An MST3k of it would only be able to pick the obvious jokes.

    2. Re:Never Seen it. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Be careful. If you bash Battlefield Earth, Scientology might sue. They might even sick Tom Cruise on your ass!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:Never Seen it. by Vancouverite · · Score: 4, Informative
      Anyways, it couldn't be any worse than Battlefield Earth, could it?


      Oh dear.

      You have no idea.

      An MST3K of it? They couldn't do it. There was nothing they could do to it to make it (better|worse|funnier|stupider|more appalling). It would be like taking your absolute favorite meal *ever*, then adding caramel to it to "make it taste better".

      Remember - we are talking a movie where Bela Lugosi died, and was replaced by a chiropractor - younger, taller, and blond - as "the Ghoul Man", who played his part crouched down with a cape over his face, so people wouldn't notice.

      And the Octopus battle scene! This was conducted in a public park, at night (because they didn't have a stage, a budget, or a permit) with a *stolen* rubber octopus. Unfortunately, they forgot to take the motor(s) that made the octopus run, so "our hero" had to "battle" the octopus, in a shallow pool of water, under a car's headlights, and move the limbs of the octopus himself. It's really a classic scene.

      As is the scene where the giant zombie knocks over the obviously cardboard tombstone.

      As is the scene where they are "flying" in the "airplane" - the airplane never moves, but they bounce in their chairs to simulate flight.

      As is... well, just about all of the movie, in fact.

      And how can you beat this quote from the movie - "Future events such as these will affect us in the future" - absolutely classic!

      Nope. Sorry. Pass over that geek card, son, and walk away. Just walk away.

      And watch out for those future events.

      --
      We are the Music Makers, and We are the Dreamers of Dreams...
    4. Re:Never Seen it. by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Size of my arse I wouldn't even notice...

    5. Re:Never Seen it. by Wizzmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Battlefield Earth is the worst movie ever.

    6. Re:Never Seen it. by p!ngu · · Score: 1

      It would be like taking your absolute favorite meal *ever*, then adding caramel to it to "make it taste better".

      My favourite meal is caramel, so...

    7. Re:Never Seen it. by MalachiConstant · · Score: 2, Informative
      And the Octopus battle scene! This was conducted in a public park, at night (because they didn't have a stage, a budget, or a permit) with a *stolen* rubber octopus. Unfortunately, they forgot to take the motor(s) that made the octopus run, so "our hero" had to "battle" the octopus, in a shallow pool of water, under a car's headlights, and move the limbs of the octopus himself. It's really a classic scene.

      Actually that scene was from "Bride of the Monster", which was on MST3K. And you forgot the best bit, after he fights the octopus it explodes like an atomic bomb (if you saw the movie "Ed Wood" this is what that guy that owned the meat plant insisted on). That's followed by Harvey B. Dunn's classic line "He tampered in God's domain."

    8. Re:Never Seen it. by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      "Future events such as these will affect us in the future"
      Looks like Ed Wood is alive and kicking as GWB's speech writer. ;D
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    9. Re:Never Seen it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because you've obviously only seen the Johnny Depp movie.

    10. Re:Never Seen it. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Caramel, more like dog shit. At least caramel is edible.

    11. Re:Never Seen it. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      They might even sick Tom Cruise on your ass!

      That's an odd business plan, for them to pay for personal visits from career actors who vomit on you from behind...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:Never Seen it. by Rwilson500 · · Score: 0

      I love how your post was modded up for being "informative".

  13. What a great idea! by Yumi+Saotome · · Score: 3, Funny

    After all, it's future events such as these that affect us in the future!

  14. The worst movie in the world... by BlastM · · Score: 3, Informative

    would have to be Gay Niggers From Outer Space.

    The GNAA put out a torrent of a VHS rip for those curious how bad a movie can be.

    It might have rock-bottom production values and a below-b-grade script, but thinking about it I don't it's any less enjoyable a movie to watch than Spiderman 2 or *other random hollywood movie*.

    It's worth watching just to know what everyone's on about.

    1. Re:The worst movie in the world... by Yumi+Saotome · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah, I think that title goes to Manos: Hands of Fate

      No matter what yardstick you use to measure a bad movie by, this movie will still suck. Not even the "so bad that it's good" excuse can save it.

    2. Re:The worst movie in the world... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after GNAA troll posts, I had to see what it was all about. I watched the movie and it was so horrible I had to stop half way through. It was HORRIBLE. It wasn't even funny!

      I wonder how long you managed to watch it for?

    3. Re:The worst movie in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap... that's... that's... I just watched that... all the way through... it's... umm...

      That movie made me depressed again. I can *never*, *ever* recover that 25 minutes of my life...

    4. Re:The worst movie in the world... by notque · · Score: 1

      Even MST3k doesn't make that a good movie.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    5. Re:The worst movie in the world... by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Yeah, after GNAA troll posts, I had to see what it was all about. I watched the movie and it was so horrible I had to stop half way through. It was HORRIBLE. It wasn't even funny!

      You know, I've seen the GNAA entry requirements on Slashdot for quite a while now, and I had always thought the "watch this movie" one was just a joke. But if it really is that horrible, there may be something else to it.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  15. "Karloff? Sidekick? FUCK YOU!" by wolfpaws · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Karloff did not deserve to smell my shit! That limey cocksucker can rot in Hell for all I care!"

    1. Re:"Karloff? Sidekick? FUCK YOU!" by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Informative

      THIS SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN MODDED FLAMEBAIT. This is a quote from Tim Burton's movie "Ed Wood", a dramatic account of the life of the director of Plan 9 From Outer Space.

      The joke here is that Bela Lugosi (of Dracula fame, and whose last role was in Plan 9) was constantly being asked questions about Boris Karloff (Frankenstein, and a somewhat rival), and it drove the already irritable old man into a angry frenzy. In the movie, he goes from happy to sign an autograph for a fan to nearly knocking the guy's head off.

      It was hilarious.

    2. Re:"Karloff? Sidekick? FUCK YOU!" by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, to my recollection, here's what the actual question was: "what was it like to play Boris Karloff's sidekick in White Zombie?" So you can see why it pissed him off. I laughed out loud, best moment in the film.

  16. Speaking of Ed Wood by e9th · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you haven't seen the move Ed Wood, get it now. Johnny Depp as EW, Martin Landau as Lugosi, Sarah Jessica Parker as Ed's poor girlfriend. It's wonderful.

    Oh, and there's a great scene where EW meets Orson Welles, played by Vincent D'Onofrio, except that Welles' voice is uncannily dubbed by Maurice la Marche (Kif & the Robot Devil in Futurama, The Brain in Pinky & The Brain, etc.)

    1. Re:Speaking of Ed Wood by Rabbi+T.+White · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, Maurice LaMarche has been doing the voice of Orson Welles for a while now - he started doing it on the wonderfully underrated Al Jean and Mike Reiss cartoon, The Critic. Also, the Robot Devil in Futurama is played by Dan Castellaneta. :P

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining, but, then again, so does every cigarette packet.
    2. Re:Speaking of Ed Wood by e9th · · Score: 1
      "Rosebud Frozen Peas: Full of country goodness and green peaness."

      The Criticwas great. But I thought the Futurama episode with the golden fiddle was MlaM.

    3. Re:Speaking of Ed Wood by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      POINT OF PARLIMENTARY PROCEDURE!!!!!

      Maurice La Marche didn't do the voice of the Robot devil. Dan "Homer Simpson" Castellaneta did. La Marche did (according to IMDB): Lrr, Morbo, and Calculon among others.

      la Marche also did Orson Welles on "The Critic"

      and lastly the infamous Orson Welles "frozen peas" spot that inspired La Marche.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  17. classic filmmaking by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    Hilarious film, a classic. It's always nice to be reminded that as long as nobody wants something it might actually make it to the public domain some day.

    If you haven't seen it I definitely recommend "Ed Wood" by Tim Burton. Very funny, talks about this movie a bit.

  18. No way! by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

    The worst movie ever title belongs to 'Zombie vs Ninja' http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094384/

  19. Obligatory IMDB link by Rupy · · Score: 2, Informative
  20. Ouch! by sfled · · Score: 1


    If the person who posted the original article really liked archive.org, they wouldn't have posted the link...

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    1. Re:Ouch! by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It's a sad day when a mention on Slashdot can bring down archive.org, though. I mean... seriously, guys, you consider it your mission to preserve the entire Internet (many times over, in fact), and you can't handle the load generated by the mentioning of a tech website?

      It's pretty sad really.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  21. My candidate for "Worst Movie Ever" has to be... by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

    Seven Ninja Kids. I am not kidding. After watching this film, you'll murder babies.

  22. Loving Crap by fenodyree · · Score: 1

    More and further proof that we all love to see utter crap. At amazon the rating is 4/5 stars, after being reviewed by 188 people.
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/6305 760403/ref=pd_sxp_f/103-5341856-6668652?v=glance&s =dvd

    Perhaps this is the type of success that Hollywood is currently aiming for?

  23. Too Bad by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Too bad that it's actually not watchable. I mean, there's something cool about something so bad it's good, but this movie is so bad that it went straight through bad, PAST so bad it's good, and back into bad again, so bad it's undescribably unpleasant to watch it. I'm talking kicked in the testicles bad. but worse.

    The only movie I have ever seen that I disliked more was a tie between Joel Schumacher's Batman Forever and Batman & Robin. If there was ever a case for copyright extension, keeping those piles of shit out of the public domain IS IT.

    I am NOT kidding. This movie is BAD.

    1. Re:Too Bad by isecore · · Score: 1

      I am NOT kidding. This movie is BAD.

      Obviously you've never watched Manos, The Hands of Fate. That movie makes Plan 9 seem like a brilliant tribute to life.

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    2. Re:Too Bad by jonnystiph · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not seen Roger Corman's "Creature from the Haunted Sea". I was in tears from the mere awfulness of the movie. Not even funny, never wraps around to good cheesy, just awful the whole way through.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  24. Wood rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To truly appreciate Wood's work (his masterpiece, Glen or Glenda is especially worth checking out) one needs to think of it in it's proper context, that is, alongside such work as Un Chien Andalou, L'Age D'Or, and the works of filmmakers like Kenneth Anger, Andy Warhol, John Waters, and the Brothers Quay.

    Mainstream critics and casual moviegoers laugh at what Wood acheived, but the surreal beauty of his films will live on and be appreciated by fans long after rubbish like Cinderella Man and Spielberg's crummy War of the Worlds remake have been forgotten.

    1. Re:Wood rocks! by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The truly sad thing about your post is that I am entirely unable to discern whether or not you are being serious.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  25. This is probably the worst movie ever made! by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like anyone could even know that, Napoleon!

    1. Re:This is probably the worst movie ever made! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a ha ha! Oh gosh that's funny! That's really funny! Do you write your own material? Do you? Because that is so fresh. You know, I've, I've never heard anyone make that joke before. Hmm. You're the first. I've never heard anyone reference, reference that outside the movie before. Because that's what he says in the movie right? Isn't it? And, and yet you've taken that and used it out of context to insult me in this everyday situation. God what a clever, smart boy you must be, to come up with a joke like that all by yourself. That's so fresh too. Any, any Titanic jokes you want to throw at me too as long as we're hitting these phenomena at the height of their popularity. God you're so funny!

    2. Re:This is probably the worst movie ever made! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a ha ha! Oh gosh that's funny! That's really funny! Do you write your own material? Do you? Because that is so fresh. You know, I've, I've never heard anyone make that joke before. Hmm. You're the first. I've never heard anyone reference, reference that outside the tv show before. Because that's what he says in the show right? Isn't it? And, and yet you've taken that and used it out of context to insult him in this everyday situation. God what a clever, smart boy you must be, to come up with a joke like that all by yourself. That's so fresh too. Any, any Simpsons jokes you want to throw at me too as long as we're hitting these phenomena at the height of their popularity. God you're so funny!

    3. Re:This is probably the worst movie ever made! by chickenrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh sure... the last Napoleon reference I made got a -1 Offtopic... Flippin Idiots!

      --
      People say my sig is the best thing about me.
    4. Re:This is probably the worst movie ever made! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recursive flaming! The geek in me is so tempted...

  26. Arrrgh! Goodbye Godspeed... by Stillman · · Score: 1

    So, here I was, happily downloading the last few live recordings of Godspeed You! Black Emperor, when this gets posted to slashdot. I DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE MOVIE, I JUST WANT MY MUSIC BACK!

    Poor Archive.org. :( Well, I really hope you lot all really do want this film, and aren't just leeching it "because it's there".

    --
    Prisoner #655321
  27. Public domain? What's that? by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Informative
    I am surprised to learn that anything has gone into the public domain, as previously expired copyrights were reinstated by the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extention Act of 1998. One Example is Frank Capra's It's A Wonderful Life. This was on everywhere in the holiday season until then, but since is exclusively on NBC. Capra chose not to renew the copyright on that film, so it was his wish that it be public domain. We have all been robbed.

    Here is an interesting tidbit. In its day, that film was considered communist propaganda for making a common man the hero and a banker the villian. Now, the entertainment industry would have us believe that the public domain is a communist plot, and that "intellectual property" (pure vapor) is worth more than tangible things. Well, it's not!

    In the near future people might literally ask, "Public domain? What's that?" and only historians will be able to explain the concept. It will be as extinct as the Dodo Bird.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    1. Re:Public domain? What's that? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      More to the point, HOW did this film make it into the public domain. I thought copyrights were automatically lengthened. I thought that one of our hopes was for legislation to require intervention to keep copyrights active, so things would begin falling intot he public domain, again.

      Of course in Eldred vs Ashcroft, it was asserted (and not rebuked by the court) that Congress even has the ability to remove art from the public domain, and place it back under copyright. Combine this idea with the recent eminent domain decision, and hooooo boy!

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Public domain? What's that? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Public Domain?

      Shakesphere, Mozart, and Sammuel Clemens. (Odd that I know his real name and I can't recall his pen name...)

      Not to mention that "long enough for a newborn child to have great-grandchildren and die" is long enough for a copyright. Expect Disney to lose next time they argue for a copyright extension. Especially since by the time that rolls around, most of the Senate will have grown up with Napster.

    3. Re:Public domain? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shakesphere

      Now that was funny... Kinda WebSphere right?

    4. Re:Public domain? What's that? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      To be pedantic, no expired copyrights were reinstated by the Sonny Bono Copyright Act; only copyrights still in effect were extended. The Uruguay Round Agreements Act is the act that returned many copyrights, foreign only, to newer works that fell out of copyright basically because their creators weren't able to deal with the complex (and foreign) American copyright system at the time.

  28. nah worst movie ever made is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Fantastic Four.

    What a streaming pile of cat shit and an insult to those who grew up with the comics.

    Please Hollywood you don't need the MPAA, it's not like any of your stuff is worth protecting.

    Give up. Stop. Please stop making films. They are FUCKING AWFUL.

  29. wow really creepy by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0

    me and my friend were just talking about that movie earlier today O_O

  30. Re:Shoutz to my budz in the CIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're sorry, your post could not be completed as written. The agency you were attempting to spam, "CIA," could not be reached. Please check to make sure you didn't mean, "NSA," and try posting again.

  31. Editors from Crackville by istartedi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well the site is down. Duh. How predictable was that? But did they post a torrent before they posted the story? NoooooOOO. This is slashdot. Even when they can legitimately post a torrent, something that isn't even hosted on their own servers for cryin' out loud, they don't consider it. They post the story knowing the server will be DoS'd. Oh. I'm soooo impressed at the "slashdot effect". Right. GET OVER YOURSELVES ALREADY. That was cute for about 5 minutes in the go-go 90s when everybody was oh-so-impressed that your little ol hobby website could get that much attention. Guess what? We're half way through the next decade already. Nobody is impressed. They're just annoyed.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Editors from Crackville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am doubly annoyed because my download of Charade with Audrey Hepburn off archive.org was cut off and is now trickling along. Boo! Hiss!

    2. Re:Editors from Crackville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some people think cucumbers taste better pickled.

    3. Re:Editors from Crackville by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      Dude, this isn't some guy's backroom server running a site about his k00l tr1kz, this is Archive.org, who, having taken upon themselves the job of hosting such a vast amount of information and media to thousands of people everyday, you would expect to be able to withstand a Slashdotting and not go down like a $2 hooker the way they have.

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  32. Worst movie ever by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Is it any worse than "Inframan"?

  33. Just how did this enter the public domain? by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see everyone claiming this movie is in the public domain, but I don't see any evidence that it really IS. Just how did this copyrighted work become no-longer copyrighted? AFAIK it's not old enough for the copyright to have expired.

    On another note, I don't think this movie truly qualifies as bad. Sure it's crap, but is it bad? I remember an interesting film essay that said for a movie to be truly bad, it had to have a grand concept that was so arrogant or so ham-handedly executed that it turned on itself and became bad. Sort of hard to explain the whole essay in a couple of sentences, but to give you an example of the movies considered truly bad, he used the examples of "Pay It Forward" and "Grand Canyon."

    Now to me, nothing surpasses the horror of what I consider the worst film ever made, by Robert Altman, starring Karen Black, Cher, Sandy Dennis, and Kathy Bates.. that horror is: "Come Back to the Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean." This film even fulfills that essayist's ideas, the concept is "high theatre" (it's a film of a 1-room 1 act broadway play) and it is so stridently, shriekingly feminist that it is like being trapped in a room for two hours with a bunch of suicidal women that just won't shut up.

    1. Re:Just how did this enter the public domain? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070948/

      zardoz is the absolute worst ever.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Just how did this enter the public domain? by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      You watch Plan 9 and wish it had never been made.
      You watch Zardoz and wish you had never seen it.
      You watch "Come Back to the Five and Dime," and you wish you could kill yourself to escape the horror of the memory that will never ever go away.

  34. It probably went public because by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    No one wanted to keep it. I mean really, this *is* Plan 9 we are talking about here.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  35. Why is this public domain? by JoeNotCharles · · Score: 1

    So why is it public domain now? It's nowhere near 70 years or whatever from the creation date.

  36. The worst movie in the world...Average Joe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just think. When that "new and improved" content distribution model plus "technology will set you free" comes of age. You'll have acres of such quality to wade through to find those gems our grandparents use to have to go to a movie theatre to discover. Viva la evolution!

  37. Try their FTP by krazikamikaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm getting good speeds from their FTP.

    1. Re:Try their FTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What are you doing? Shut up... shut up.... Aw DAMMIT! My download just dropped 100kb/s.

  38. Worst movie ever made by mike3k · · Score: 1

    "Manos: the Hands of Fate" Nothing else even comes close. It's truly painful to watch.

    1. Re:Worst movie ever made by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      At least Manos has the excuse that it was made by a bunch of nobodies with no money behind them. But when you put together John Wayne, Pedro Armendariz, Susan Hayward and Agnes Moorehead, put Dick Powell in the director's chair, have Howard Hughes write the checks, and get The Conqueror -- that's BAD.

      rj

    2. Re:Worst movie ever made by Detritus · · Score: 1
      John Wayne's dialog in that movie is priceless. Another John Wayne turkey is Jet Pilot:
      JET-FLAME ACTION! JET-HOT THRILLS! No man can pay the price for what this woman offers!
      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Worst movie ever made by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that was a hummer too, although it had some neat aviation footage. John Wayne's uncomfortable attempts at lascivious banter with Janet Leigh were hysterical. That picture was also bankrolled by Howard Hughes, and IIRC he was so stung by the negative reception that he withdrew them from release and they didn't appear in public again until well after his death.

      Incidentally, another John Wayne aviation picture, The High and the Mighty, is about to make its return to public showing after a hiatus of several decades caused by some IP litigation between the producers and the Duke's estate.

      rj

  39. What a great sig!! by jamrock · · Score: 1
    Mac users against Mac bigots. If you can't take criticism of Apple, add me to your foe list because I hate you already.

    I know this is off-topic, but I've got to thank you for that. As a Mac user and Mac lover, I heartily despise the blind frothing fanatics who give the Mac community a bad name. A long-time acquaintance recently asked me what I thought about Windows XP, and when I told him that I've only ever used a Mac so I couldn't comment about any Microsoft OS, he said, "So you're one of those Mac fanatics, eh?" I was livid. The only thing I'm remotely fanatical about is my family; nothing else, certainly no computer, even comes close.

    It burns my ass that people automatically assume that I'm some sort of zealot because I use a Mac. I've been called a "traitor" and worse in Mac-related forums for daring to criticize Apple, and for making no bones about my dislike for Steve Jobs. Admire him as one of the greatest visionaries in the tech industry? Certainly. Respect him for his unswerving desire to produce great things? Absolutely. Like him? I wouldn't piss in his mouth if his teeth were on fire. This entire Jobs-is-God-and-Apple-is-His-Kingdom shtick is just damned distasteful and immature. For the last time, Apple is a public company like any other, and their CEO needs a thorough psych evaluation. Period. A lot of Mac users need to seriously grow up and rethink their emotional investment in a computing platform, albeit a very good one. My PowerBook is one of my favorite material possessions, but I don't hug it or lick it. That's what my wife is for.

    What was this thread about again? Oh yeah. "Plan 9 From Outer Space." Sorry, never seen it.

  40. Yah I downloaded it by SmartyFartBlast · · Score: 1

    It was pretty bad, but it was no Hangar 18, let me tell you.

    It was fun watching Vampira..meee-owww

    Tor was loads of fun since he doesnt close his mouth the entire time. Gotta love it.

    The acting is bad. The sets are awful.

    I liked it.

  41. You must be new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Unless what middle school Family Life classes taught me was wrong, I think you have to have sex first to have a daughter. And people at /. dont really...

  42. "It's a Wonderful Life" by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Frank Capra's It's A Wonderful Life. This was on everywhere in the holiday season until then, but since is exclusively on NBC. Capra chose not to renew the copyright on that film, so it was his wish that it be public domain.

    As I heard it, the film is still public domain, but the music in it was still under copyright; NBC bought the rights to the music, and is therefore able to control copyright of the film.

    Theoretically, anyone could play it if they replaced the music (or cut the scenes which contain copyrighted music.)

    But you're right - we are all being robbed.

  43. Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Personally I'd choose the gun.

    I'd rather get hit over the head with the gun, which is preferable for obvious reasons to getting shot with it, but when put in those kinds of situations, one doesn't have much choice.

  44. Ed Wood redefines "genius" by Allen+Varney · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone talks about Ed Wood, Jr. being a totally incompetent filmmaker, but that is incorrect. Wood was selectively incompetent, which is far more interesting.

    Genuinely incompetent films are incomprehensible; they're so badly written, filmed, lit, recorded, and edited you can't tell what's supposed to be happening moment to moment. They're dull. Ed Wood's films are interesting because he so weirdly mixes okay technical competence -- in the sense that you can follow the storytelling from scene to scene, because he tells it with acceptable narrative cohesion -- with utterly whacked-out, surreally incompetent plotting. He couches nonsensical ideas in the most portentous yet tone-deaf language. He displays a glorious ignorance of taste -- not "bad taste" in the too-conscious John-Waters sense, but a genuine vacuity of any informed sensibility at all.

    Ed Wood is, in fact, an interesting filmmaker. This is true. If you've ever sat with an audience watching Glen or Glenda?, they stay all the way through, and the final scene has them cheering. Wood disastrously fails to engage his audience on the emotional level he intended, but he nonetheless engages them. A genuine incompetent couldn't do this.

    I think Ed Wood is a telling case study that illuminates what we really mean when we talk about "genius."

    1. Re:Ed Wood redefines "genius" by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, Ed Wood would of made an awesome filmaker nowadays where he could show off his personality more. The repression of the first half of the 20th century in America is inconceivable to someone who did not live it but it drove many artists to commit themselves to projects and ideas that were not wholly there vision to make it through the censors.

    2. Re:Ed Wood redefines "genius" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Ed Wood is a telling case study that illuminates what we really mean when we talk about "genius."

      No, he just made some real crap movies. And people pretend it's cool to like them. Like you do. No more complicated than that.

      Hey, wanna talk about Star Wars or Star Trek next?

    3. Re:Ed Wood redefines "genius" by ccp · · Score: 1

      Everyone talks about Ed Wood, Jr. being a totally incompetent filmmaker, but that is incorrect. Wood was selectively incompetent, which is far more interesting.

      That, and the fact that he just LOVED films and filmmaking, and it showed even through his huge shortcomings as a producer, director, writer, etc.

      May be we should make him the Saint patron of amateurs. Every person who's passionate about something he's not really good at will understand.

      Cheers,

      Carlos Cesar

  45. Just in time! by ChePibe · · Score: 1

    Sweet! It's just in time to compete with Fantastic 4 for the honor of worst movie made!

    *ducks*

    1. Re:Just in time! by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fantastic 4 is out? Shit! I havn't even seen Fantastic 1 yet!

      *also ducks*

  46. Time for a big budget remake! by yndrd · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best news of all is that this script--pure Hollywood gold--is now available for Michael Bay or the Wachowski brothers to work their magic.

    Tom Cruise as Jeff Trent! Jennifer Lopez as Paula Trent! William Shatner as Inspector Dan Clay!

    Money in the bank, I tell you. Ka-ching!

    1. Re:Time for a big budget remake! by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well... Bay and modern hollywood could make the movie only worse... face it the dialogs probably would be worse than in the original, everything which would make the movie funny would be taken out and replaced by CGI and explosions, and the acting would not be better either.

  47. What were the first eight plans? by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

    Now that it's public domain will there be a set of prequels?

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
  48. The worst is "The Skydivers"? by ipapusha · · Score: 1

    Nothing beats The Skydivers, according to IMDB's bottom 100. The biggest loser, though, is 'Manos' the Hands of Fate. If you notice, only a few actors in that Manos played in other films.

    1. Re:The worst is "The Skydivers"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you notice, only a few actors in that Manos played in other films.

      That's because the rest of them committed suicide shortly after the movie was released.

      (No, seriously. I'm not joking.)

  49. MOD parent up! by TapeCutter · · Score: 0

    Gayniggers from Outer Space is a horrible movie but definitely not at troll.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  50. We need a new CC score for IAWL by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Theoretically, anyone could play it if they replaced the music (or cut the scenes which contain copyrighted music.)

    How hard would it be to remove the music from the sound track of It's a Wonderful Life and leave the dialogue and foley? Then you could have a Creative Commons contest for best film score, much as one of the old movie channels (TCM? AMC?) is having for silent films.

  51. Topic ?!? by Ben+Struferga · · Score: 1

    Darn, when i read the headline, i was hoping for Extragalactic Storage Space.
    This could have been a fine and secure place for my m&vie backups.. (Ohh my god, its full of stars)

    as a recently joined slashdot pro, i didnt even read the comments, so mod me redundant if thats the case

  52. Unrenewed copyrights by tepples · · Score: 1

    Just how did this copyrighted work become no-longer copyrighted? AFAIK it's not old enough for the copyright to have expired.

    Copyright owners of works first published in the United States before 1964 had to pay a maintenance fee in the 28th year in order to reap the full 56^H^H75^H^H95 years of exclusivity, or they'd lose their U.S. copyright. (The fee was abolished in 1992.) Patents still have a similar maintenance fee, due in the fourth, eighth, and twelfth year after grant.

    but to give you an example of the movies considered truly bad, he used the examples of "Pay It Forward" and "Grand Canyon."

    Pay It Forward did not suck.

    nothing surpasses the horror of what I consider the worst film ever made, by Robert Altman, starring Karen Black, Cher

    Any movie starring Sonny Bono or Cher sucks, except perhaps the original Troll. That movie sucks in a fun-to-laugh-at-it way.

    1. Re:Unrenewed copyrights by dfl · · Score: 1
      Copyright owners of works first published in the United States before 1964 had to pay a maintenance fee in the 28th year...

      Check the copyright office database. The film was registered in 1958, renewed in 1986. It is under copyright for 95 years.

    2. Re:Unrenewed copyrights by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      Any movie starring Sonny Bono or Cher sucks

      Silkwood? Mask? Moonstruck? I didn't care for the latter, but it didn't suck.

  53. There is worse by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Pendragon Picture's version of "War of the Worlds"

    It's worse than plan 9...much, much worse.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  54. DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1

    No. Really. Its worse than bad. We are talking beachball aliens and collander/cheese grater space equipmnet. Directed by John Carpenter and Written by the author of R. Scott's "Alien"

    I think its even worse than boogie nights... which to this day I am furious I will never get those hours of my life back.

    But if you've seen it you will agree - Dark Star. Worst. Movie. Ever.

    1. Re:DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You couldn't be more wrong. Dark Star is fantastic. It does help to be stoned, but it's not absolutely necessary.

      As for Boogie Nights, naked Heather Graham automatically elevates it above the 50th percentile.

    2. Re:DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Bomb 20 makes it all worthwhile.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    3. Re:DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by Confessed+Geek · · Score: 1

      Ok Naked Heather Graham is worth a LOT a WHOLE lot... I would watch 2 hours of that :) but it wasn't worht 2 hours of boogie nights for a few seconds of HG.

    4. Re:DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how comic-book guy would put it, but: No. Way.

      Yeah, the beachball was pretty silly, but the conversation with Bomb 20 was great.

      To truly compare with Plan 9, a movie has to have *no* redeeming qualities other than its lack of redeeming qualities, which, of course, equates to some humor value.

    5. Re:DarkStar is the Worst movie of all time by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      No no no, you are confusing "made without enough money" with "bad".

      The beachball alien is allegedly very influential on sci-fi in the movies; O'Bannon was, so legend goes, so upset and frustrated with how incredibly crap it looked that he decided to write a script about an alien that would scare the pants off you.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  55. Re:Arrrgh! Goodbye Godspeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, I really hope you lot all really do want this film, and aren't just leeching it "because it's there".

    You must be new here.

  56. IMDB value for both film by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Gay Nigger from outer space : 6.0/10 (1,104 votes)
    Plan 9 from outer space :3.5/10 (7,854 votes

    So it seems the world at large agrees with you, still I wonder how both of those film could get more than 0.5/10...Oh, well, there is something for all taste.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  57. Bittorrent Download by ppcvidz.com · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have made the MPEG2 1.78 GB version of this file available via bittorrent. You can download the torrent from the following locations:

    http://www.bogaa.org/details/185874
    http://www.bitenova.org/index.php?idx=details&id=6 86368294eb5b9226a60534a442b497351c8b7c5
    http://www.torrentspy.com/directory.asp?mode=torre ntdetails&id=356075
    http://www.mininova.org/tor/73675

    I distribute the MPEG2 files from Archive.org via http://torrents.pdmdb.org/ but can bet that Slashdot would kill my webserver too. Hopefully it can at least handle the tracker.

    1. Re:Bittorrent Download by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Nice!! Thanks for doing it.

  58. How? by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unfortunately, archive.org seems to be slashdotted at the moment, so I can't figure out what I really want to know -- How is it that this film is now in the public domain? Are there people that keep track of this sort of thing?

    1. Re:How? by dfl · · Score: 3, Informative
      The copyright has NOT expired. According to the copyright office's searchable database the picture was registered in 1958 and renewed in 1986, so it is covered by copyright for a 95-year term. It is scheduled to go into the public domain around 2053!

      BUT archive.org does allow copyright holders to make a dedication to the public by a creative commons license. After archive.org recovers, check the details, and if there is a "creative commons license" link, click on it.

    2. Re:How? by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 1

      The Internet Archive page finally loaded for me, but says it's public domain...

    3. Re:How? by dfl · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, what is says it "Creative Commons License: Public Domain" Click on the link and you see a copy of a license, written by creative commons. This is meant to enforce a waiver of all the rights granted by copyright; presumably archive.org has a signed copy from the copyright holder. Just to confuse you, this license is called "public domain" here, but it is really "public domain dedication." For the purpose of federal law, the film is NOT in the public domain.

      In short, this film does not have an expired copyright; archive.org has obtained a general waiver of enforcement (and if they are lucky, they've obtained it from the true copyright holder).

      Ask a question about a crazy legal regime...

  59. Oops-"./"-.torrent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It would have to save them some stupidly large amount of money in bandwidth costs."

    Maybe slashdot should come in .torrent form.

  60. Try "Starship Troopers 2" Re:Worst movie ever by TED+Vinson · · Score: 1
    Starship Troopers 2. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0367093/

    Watched this a couple of weeks ago. My eyes stopped bleeding yesterday.

    Not an old, putrid carcas like "Plan 9" or some others cited; more like fresh roadkill, still steaming on the road side...

  61. What makes for a Mac bigot by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It burns my ass that people automatically assume that I'm some sort of zealot because I use a Mac.

    I have to say that I try to be even handed, but I know I swing more than towards Mac advocacy (just suggesting it once if someone asks me about PC's, not the constant chatter kind).

    However what makes me a Mac advocate is not owning and using a Mac, but having to use a Windows box every day at work (developer). I tell you now that using both every day is the quickest path towards Mac support of the frothing kind.

    Also, I have to say that the metaphor you used is both confusing and a bit icky:

    Absolutely. Like him? I wouldn't piss in his mouth if his teeth were on fire.

    The confusing part for me comes in that if you didn't like someone, it seems to me yoou'd be happy to piss in thier mouth and perhaps even happier if that mouth were on fire. So in a wierd way it makes it seem like you sort of like him - no offense.

    Anyway, for (I think) a balanced view of Jobs (good and bad) the book iCon is worth a read if nothing else for the interesting background on Pixar and NeXT that a lot of people probably do not know well (I didn't and I used NeXT stations in school). I still think Jobs was quite petty to ban it even if parts do not cast him in a favorable light at all.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  62. ed wood and other oldies by dobesov · · Score: 2, Interesting

    not really appropriate to this discussion... but... at the same time it is... i love old movies and i love archive.org, but there is something very lacking in the world today... i grayscale video codec! what's the deal?

    1. Re:ed wood and other oldies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many codecs do have special modes for encoding grayscale video, DivX for example...

    2. Re:ed wood and other oldies by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone need a grayscale video codec? Codecs usually seperate out the chromatic and greyscale information and encode the chromatic at lower resolution already, and a unchanging chromatic layer should be encodable in a minimal number of bits anyway.

  63. Torrent by oscartheduck · · Score: 1, Informative
    --
    How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
  64. Congrats!!! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've managed to get a GNAA post modded +1 informative!

    I tip my hat to you sir.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  65. Best line by mpn14tech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I watched this from Netflix a few months back.

    I think my favorite line was:
    "Why are we attcking you? Because you're a bunch of idiots!"

  66. Michael Medved is a sleeze by K8Fan · · Score: 1

    The reason everyone cites this as "the worst movie ever made" is because movie critic (to be generous) Michael Medved has promoted it as such. He and his brother owned a print, and made a lot of money from it's undeserved reputation as such. Anyone who has seen "Manos: The Hands of Fate" knows that "Plan 9 From Outer Space" is "Citizn Kane" by comparison.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    1. Re:Michael Medved is a sleeze by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      I can't recall the title, but the worst movie I ever saw was this, very, very, very bad martial arts movie. It was actually two different movies spliced together at random. Movie one was a very bad "American ninja" movie with actors who could not, act, could not fight, and wore head bands that actually said "ninja" on them in English. No dialog at all. They pranced about in bright orange and black ninja costumes and occasionally performed very bad martial arts moves. The other movie was some unnamed Hong Kong kungfu flick set in the 1700's. Period costumes, in Chinese, no subtitles. Now image these two movies split up into 5 minute pieces, thrown up into the air, then spliced together at random. I watched it to the end, fascinated by the shear ineptitude of it.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    2. Re:Michael Medved is a sleeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's undeserved reputation

      "its".

  67. Not the worst, not by a long shot... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > It has been labelled 'The Worst Movie Ever' by the Golden Turkey Awards

    Clearly, the Golden Turkey Awards have never reviewed The Creeping Terror, the movie with acting that makes William "Excessive Dramatic Pause" Shattner seem stunningly on-the-ball by comparison, Jim Carey sophisticated, and Home Shopping Club announcers believable; special effects that would boggle your mind with their badness if you had to watch an eighth-grade class drama project that used them; camerawork that makes the Blair Witch Project look both conventional and brilliant; a plot more simplistic than Scooby Doo, more hackneyed than I Love Lucy, and yet more convoluted than The Fifth Element; shallower and worse character development than an Olson Twins movie, combining more stereotypes than the Smurfs with more smarmy preachyness than the Brady Bunch; writing so bad, SNL skit-writers would roll over in their graves; scenery that combines humdrum with unrealistic; lighting that manages to be too light to be dramatic and too dark to clearly show all the action, sometimes in the same scene; a sound track that would make Hanna Barbara cringe; a more transparently non-existent budget than anything ever done by Monty Python; all the humor and hilarity of televised professional bowling tournaments, combined with all the deep emotion of RFC 2616; and more. If there is anything else in the history of B-movie cinematography that even *approaches* the fantastically execrable, horrifically abominable, catastrophically horrendous piece of flotsam that is The Creeping Terror, I am sure I would not believe it even if I were to see it. I would be *deeply* surprised to discover another movie bad enough that it would deserve to be called "much better than The Creeping Terror"; any other B-movie I have seen would be insulted by such a comparison. If they made C-movies, D-movies, and F-movies, The Creeping Terror would make them *all* look like blockbusters. The *ONLY* thing I can say in its favor is that the sequel they tried to leave it open for was, thankfully, apparently never made.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re:Not the worst, not by a long shot... by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...combined with all the deep emotion of RFC 2616

      You've obviously never read the "Clockless Origin Server Operation" section of RFC 2616.

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  68. FF: Extortion by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1
    (and it looks like they spent some money on that movie too, and they never bothere relesing it in the theatres)!

    Apparently it was only made so the studio could cash in on having the movie rights - it was never meant to be released. From IMDB:

    One of the reasons behind the making of the film on such short notice was that Chris Columbus was set to make a big budget version of the comic, but had to wait for the option to expire. The producers rushed this film into production knowing it would never get released, as the makers of the big budget version wouldn't want a cheaper version out there before them. The plan worked, and the film was bought for many times the cost of the option and production, just so that it would never see the light of day. Ultimately, a big-budget version would be released in 2005.

    So, essentially extortion: buy out our shitty movie, or we'll release it and taint your future movie.
    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  69. Wish I could find other public domain works... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    For example I have not yet found an online collection of Winsor McKay's Little Nemo in Slumberland. Maybe we could start a site of torrents for public domain films and comics. (I think Gutenberg has literature covered)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  70. Plan 9 is not the worst movie. by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    This is.

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  71. Public Domain in what countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Public Domain in Australia? Australia recently extended copyright to life + 70 I think, for a relatively un-free free trade deal with US, but I'm not sure if it was retrospective.

  72. Bono didn't get all old movies by freeweed · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bono didn't cover everything, not by a long shot.

    For instance, the original Night of the Living Dead (1968) has never been under copyright. Never, because back then, you had to put a copyright notice on your film or it was automatically in the public domain. NOTLD became a wild success, and sadly the original creators never saw much money from it.

    No copyright law, extension or otherwise, has since fixed this problem. George Romero talks about this on pretty much every DVD commentary he's done.

    It's maddening that something like NOTLD never made its creators any money, and yet Disney still rakes in billions from movies it made 70 years ago.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Bono didn't get all old movies by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      It seems to be a general scheme in life that the small ones constantly get screwed, while the big ones get away with everything even stealing goods from the general public.

  73. Re:Shoutz to my budz in the CIA... by Armadni+General · · Score: 1

    Mod Parent Up

  74. Plan 9 from outer space is not the worst movie eve by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    It is one of the worst movies ever which is actually good, the movie is cult and probably one of the most interesting movies ever film historywise, because it shows the last materials ever shot with Bela Lugosi. If you want to see the worst movie ever made, which actually not even is good, then have a look at Gay Niggers from Outer Space, that one ranks the absolute low in my ranking.

  75. Re:Fantasy mission force: WATCH IT STONED. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will not be disappointed!

  76. Ah, but has anyone seen... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    ...Throg, the Movie? Makes Plan 9 look like a Paul Verhoeven flick.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  77. my worst movie experience by njet · · Score: 1

    This is the worst movie I've seen
    http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0106642/

    now i can even watch Plan 9 and find it interesting....

  78. Bela Lugosi didn't die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod, he just became unavailable.

    But seriouslloyd, he actually left this mortal coil
    over a year before Plan 9 was made, but Ed Wood
    had footage he'd shot of Bela he repurposed
    synergistically for the film. Read Nightmare
    of Ecstasy for the full story, you stupid, stupid
    humans!

  79. SSSLLLLOOOOWWWW by martin_lovick · · Score: 1

    archive.org may be a great idea.....but its crippled by bandwidth..... on a 2Mb line I expect more than 30kb/sec...... great idea guys ...but if your gonna put the news like that on slashdot.....get your bandwidth sorted FIRST

  80. Saving state by statusbar · · Score: 1

    If your disks are used for swap space, all that is needed is to commit the memory of all the processes to the swap space before powering down.

    --jeff++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  81. No reasons given to think it actually did by bakunin · · Score: 3, Informative

    What seems to happen here is that a person uploads a movie to Archive claiming that it's public domain and Archive does whatever research they do and decide whether to distribute it.

    Another post points out that the Copyright Office database says Plan 9 was registered in 1958 and renewed in 1986, so the reasonable assumption would be that it's still covered unless the owner places it in Public Domain.

    Archive's page for the movie says the uploader's site is at www.k-otic.com, a site which is basically an uploader's blog which does claim to have uploaded it.

    The person who uploaded it doesn't seem to really do any research on movies' copyright status before uploading; (s)he says in a post about another upload that:

    "the problem is that there is no really reliable source list/search engine on the internet where you can go and find out
    but the people at the internet archive check all uploads and when they say it`s ok ... it`s ok"
    This does not really lead me to believe that the uploader contacted whoever owns the rights to Plan 9 and arranged for the film to be placed in the public domain. ;-)

    Summary: there's no reason to believe Plan 9 actually is Public Domain, since the first person to make the claim (the uploader) admits that (s)he has no way to be sure about the status of the movies (s)he uploads and Archive gives no evidence to support the claim except the uploader's original assertion.

    -robin

  82. NOT in public domain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Archive.org has either been duped, or is complicit in the copyright infringement. It's still covered by copyright, and was uploaded through some fool blog who is NOT the copyright owner.