Slashdot Mirror


Windows Vista Faces Lawsuits

WindozeSux writes "When tech company Vista discovered the title for the new Windows Operating System version, company founder John Wall was not amused. John Wall may take this to court because he knows of how protective Microsoft is over their trademarks. From the article: 'A Microsoft spokesman said the company chose Vista from a list developed by the Windows team, based on attributes of the new software. Among its primary selling points are new tools for searching and viewing the contents of a PC; communications features; and a lighter desktop appearance with transparent objects.'"

95 of 509 comments (clear)

  1. What about Apple? by brilinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Among its primary selling points are new tools for searching and viewing the contents of a PC; communications features; and a lighter desktop appearance with transparent objects.

    Why did they not just call it "Mac OS X" then? Vista... geesh.

    1. Re:What about Apple? by TheOldFart · · Score: 2, Funny


      Vista? For this crowd, a much more appropriate name for something coming from Redmond would be mallochio.

    2. Re:What about Apple? by fbg111 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or Windows XP ME...

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    3. Re:What about Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why did they not just call it "Mac OS X" then? Vista... geesh.

      They don't want to overpromise.

    4. Re:What about Apple? by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

      They could call it 'Fista' to illustrate (in the most vulgar and sophomoric way) how badly you can get reamed by Microsoft. Ouch!

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  2. BAM! by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Turnabout == fair play.

    </optimistic>

    Does anyone think this will stop Microsoft from pulling similar stunts?

    *earth oscillates from the force of millions of Slashdotters' heads shaking*

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    1. Re:BAM! by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does anyone think this will stop Microsoft from pulling similar stunts?

      Stop them? It'll reinforce the value of pulling the stunt first.

    2. Re:BAM! by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, Vista (the company) was stupid.

      Fortunes can be made by waiting until the product comes out. After it sells in the millions (and millions), THEN you slap them with a lawsuit. This way you can take a cut of their profits from the products already sold, and tell them that your own business is 'irreparably damaged' because of the confusion.

      Why sue BEFORE any money has been made?!? That's just a warning.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    3. Re:BAM! by fvbommel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [...] This way you can take a cut of their profits from the products already sold, and tell them that your own business is 'irreparably damaged' because of the confusion.

      Why sue BEFORE any money has been made?!? That's just a warning.


      I dunno, maybe they fear their business might actually be irreparably damaged? That's not a good thing, you know.

  3. Preemptive strike... by jmcmunn · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Sue for the name, or be sued I guess. Sounds like they have a case for the trademark being theirs as a name, but these cases always seem silly to me. Clearly "Windows Vista" is not the same as "Vista" the software company. It's doubtful anyone is going to confuse them.

    On the other hand, you damn well bet if I happened to own a company by the name of the up-and-coming Windows OS, I would be making sure my name was EVERYWHERE right about the time the new OS came out. Hell, I'd even offer to sell them the name for $500 million or something, make it worth my time.

    1. Re:Preemptive strike... by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly "Windows Vista" is not the same as "Vista" the software company.

      Neighter is Microsoft Windows and Lindows.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    2. Re:Preemptive strike... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly "Windows Vista" is not the same as "Vista" the software company.

      That will be Microsoft's position right up until such time as Windows Vista is large enough to be the dominant name in the industry, and then they'll just turn around and sue him for infringing on their Windows Vista trademark.

    3. Re:Preemptive strike... by jmcmunn · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Yes, but Lindows was created (the idea and name) in order to woo current Windows owners into switching to an OS that sounds similar and is hyped as being easy to use etc...

      Lindows was something created after Windows, and was meant to use the name to draw customers. There is a clear diference here. Vista is an existing company with (as I understand) an entirely different product in a non-competing market.

      (oh, and I have nothing against Lindows at all, it is just not a valid argument IMHO)

    4. Re:Preemptive strike... by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except if "Vista" the software company ever puts out a piece of software and writes in big letters "Vista Flabbledygooker" on the box, it becomes potentially confusing. And it's going to be especially annoying if they have to write in nearly-as-big letters, "Not Windows(TM) Vista compatible" to keep from getting billions of angry letters.

    5. Re:Preemptive strike... by strider44 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How many people say "Windows XP" as opposed to just "XP"? I'd bet that after "Windows Vista" comes out there won't be a single techie mentioning the name "Vista" in a conversation about computers without connecting it with Windows. I can't see how there *wouldn't* be confusion for the customers or potential customers of Vista.

    6. Re:Preemptive strike... by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      with (as I understand) an entirely different product in a non-competing market.

      Yes, but I don't think that matters that much because both companies produce software products.

      For example, I called my cool new Windows spreadsheet program "SuperLinux", I would not be surprised if Linus Torvolds' attorney served me some papers. Just the fact that the products are both software would be confusing to everyone. (And maybe when the shoe is on the other foot, the slashbots will understand what I'm talking about.)

      Just imagine the sales calls:
      "Hi this is Fred from Vista Software"
      "Un, you mean like Windows Vista??"
      "That's only the 10th time I've heard that today."

      The thing is that a good brandname is worth zillions of dollars. I'm sure MS was fully aware of these guys and just figured they were small-fries that could easily be bought off. (And , I'm sure that Apple though the same way about TigerDirect, The Open Group, Apple Records, etc.)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    7. Re:Preemptive strike... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      these cases always seem silly to me.

      Lawyers make laws.
      Lawyers make laws designed to create business for lawyers.

      Personally, I find these law suits horrible, depressing, and a clear example of corruption of the legal system.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:Preemptive strike... by surprise_audit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But also, if Vista has already trademarked their name, they *have* to defend it, or lose it.

    9. Re:Preemptive strike... by toddbu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ... an entirely different product in a non-competing market

      My understanding is that "a different market" means where there is no confusion on the part of a consumer or that there is no damage to the brand. I think that Vista could easily make the case that their brand will be damaged. Imagine calling a prospective client and introducing yourself as a software company called "Vista". If the prospective client knows about Windows Vista, what will be their reaction? Whether it's positive, neutral, or negative, there's clearly brand confusion. This isn't like Microsoft Windows or Microsoft Money where you're prefixing a common word with the company name to create a new brand. If Vista is a trademarked name for any type of software, I think Microsoft has a long uphill battle.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    10. Re:Preemptive strike... by networkBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      some numbers not quite out my ass:
      ( http://www.finfacts.com/brands.htm )
      CocaCola: $67bn
      Microsoft: $61bn
      IBM: $54bn
      GE: $44bn
      Intel: $34bn
      Disney: $27bn

      so, yeah brands are worth some money. If I was vista I would have waited and made them re-brand their software after the boxes and disks were printed but before they hit the stores ;)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    11. Re:Preemptive strike... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I find your ignorance horrible, depressing, and a clear example of not knowing a goddamn thing about the legal system.

      Congress makes laws, not "lawyers." Though a large percentage of Congressmen/women are/were lawyers, they don't make laws to make lawyers money. They make laws to, in theory, make life function more smoothly. Imagine this scenario: You go into a store to buy some mouthwash. You see a bottle of Scope and a bottle of Scope. Which do you choose? You don't know you say? You can't tell the difference you say? Well that's because in your world there are no laws that protect trademarks and thus any yahoo can throw bleach into a bottle, put "Scope" on it, and everyday schmoes end up gargling with Clorox. In my world, a trademark tells me that the bottle that says Scope is the same stuff I bought yesterday from a reputable company. Laws serve a purpose. You may question them from time to time, but I guarantee they were created by people smarter than you and likely with more forethought.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    12. Re:Preemptive strike... by Ian.Waring · · Score: 2, Informative
      Digital had an extension to their VAX VTX Videotex product in the 1980's called Vista. I remember it well because we got sued for using the name in the UK; it was a trademark here of a software company selling software for the printing/graphic arts industry based in London.

      I'm still amazed that they announced the name without doing a simple search first.

      Ian W.

    13. Re:Preemptive strike... by qurk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm, I may be confusing the issue, and obviously trademarks aren't the same as software liscensing, but couldn't Vista the company defend their trademark yet allow Microsoft the company to use Vista's trademark, with the understanding that Microsoft couldn't claim it as their own to harrass other companies or people? Even if it wasn't a commercial liscense (and they would be fools to not, given the given success of Windows Vista) it would still be cool to preemptivly prevent Microsoft from being dicks, yet again :) I mean Vista is a common English word, but not as common as other english words, like "Word" or "Window". :)

    14. Re:Preemptive strike... by eric76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In some cases, failing to make a timely objection may result in the loss of a winnable case.

      I have no idea if it would apply in this particular instance.

    15. Re:Preemptive strike... by surprise_audit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The way I understand it, you have to defend against any possible trademark infringement, because letting just one infringement pass means you could lose control of it.

      OK, so if the two parties have wildly different products, there's usually no problem. This is how Apple and Apple Records settled - Apple Records agreed to let Apple use the name, on the condition that Apple wouldn't produce music, and presumably Apple Records wouldn't make computers. I suspect there's some fancy footwork going on to get over any objections over iTunes & iPods...

      Now, with Vista being a software house, and Windows Vista supposedly being actual software (eventually), there's a lot of scope for confusion. Vista's products could be tainted by Microsoft's track record on screwing stuff up. If Vista ever wanted to market a product called Windows Vista, that's definitely a problem...

    16. Re:Preemptive strike... by qurk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they could strike an agreement where they get like a 1% cut on the profits of "Microsoft Windows Vista" and Microsoft gets a 1% cut on the profits of "Vista Windows Vista". :) And everyone is happy!

    17. Re:Preemptive strike... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (oh, and I have nothing against Lindows at all, it is just not a valid argument IMHO)

      Mike Rowe soft ?

    18. Re:Preemptive strike... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First, the law has become so complex and convoluted that a layman has no chance of knowing his rights and obligations without the help of a lawyer.

      Newsflash: Life is complicated. The law reflects an attempt to deal with life. Example: The law starts out simple: no vehicles in the park. What does it mean? No motorized vehicles? No bicycles? If the intent of the law was to protect people in the park, that means bicycles are banned because someone could easily injure someone else using a bicycle. If it is to preserve the grass, bicycles are probably fine, but cars are not. That's all well and good until Dean Kamen comes along and invents the segway. Well, what do we do with the law there. Life is complex and evolves. The law has to be the same. People that think the law can be boiled down to something simple like the ten commandments are naive.

      Second, there are many laws which clearly do not exist to reduce the potential for conflict.

      I'll let the first fly since you make a general statement about the law. This one though is bunk. Since you assert that there are "many laws" that "clearly do not exist" to reduce conflict, I invite you to name some. What laws exists to promote conflict or at the very least, let it remain status quo? As for the courts, well it's the court's job to interpret the laws. There are so,e things that should be left to the court to decide because there isn't an on-point ruling on it. Courts are part of the checks and balances. If they weren't there, Congress could pass any law it wanted.

      I said "in theory" because I am not hopelessly naive and pro-law. But the system is not nearly as corrupt as /.'ers think it is. 99% of the people here get their law from /. which might as well refer to it as "MS-law" because people bash any law-related action on sight. gg, slashbot.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    19. Re:Preemptive strike... by DA_Chef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clearly "Windows Vista" is not the same as "Vista" the software company. It's doubtful anyone is going to confuse them.

      I'm waiting for Buena Vista (distribution, winery, .. social club etc) to join in the claim.

    20. Re:Preemptive strike... by Mikkeles · · Score: 2, Informative
      'Since you assert that there are "many laws" that "clearly do not exist" to reduce conflict, I invite you to name some. What laws exists to promote conflict or at the very least, let it remain status quo?'

      Most 'blue' and prohibitionist laws.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    21. Re:Preemptive strike... by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, many blue laws and prohibitionist laws were written to keep people "moral," thereby reducing any lacivious conduct, i.e., reducing conflict within the town or state. Why they are still on the books is another matter, but it is usually because lawmakers have their hands tied up with more important issues. Next?

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

  4. I think.. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MS deserves to be sued for picking such an un-attractive name for an OS. :P

    Windows 2000? Yeah, that works. XP? Sure. ME? Not great, but it is better than "Vista". How many people are going to actually know what "Vista" means, anyway? I'd put 20 on people thinking that the newest incarnation of Windows is some spanish distribution.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    1. Re:I think.. by courtarro · · Score: 2, Informative
      You underestimate the common public. Like the article states, end users like my grandfather are not interested in techie-sounding letter combinations like XP and CS2. "What does NT stand for?", I've been asked. "Vista" has a positive connotation (sounds like a dryer sheet scent) and I'll bet it sticks in the minds of potential customers simply out of uniqueness. Remember when Windows "95" was one of the first pieces of software named for its year? I remember magazine articles that made fun of it.

      Expect to see more of the "Vista" naming convention in the future.

    2. Re:I think.. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point (both of you who have replied so far); However, I have 2 arguments.

      One, as far as marketing goes, you should always pick something attractive that is going to appeal to your target audience. Microsoft, I'm assuming, is targetting the home user with little desire to learn computing; They want to just do it. My premise could be flawed, but I'm sure MS has something similar in mind if not that. Anyway, "Vista" isn't exactly something I would peg as attractive, or common to the desired userbase. While the meaning is good, I believe that not only should the meaning be fitting, but also the visual and audible flow. For instance, "pulchritudinous" doesn't really look or sound like a word that describes beauty. If I called someone I didn't know pulchritudinous, I would probably get called something else quite the opposite.

      Second, many people think in numerical versions; Rocky comes in numerical order, sports cames usually have a year in the title, and multi-movement musical pieces usually include a number designating which movement it is (certainly not always the case, though). Newer people then have to actually make an effort to figure out which is newer when it comes to Windows versions - It can get pretty tough.

      Not saying I don't think your argument is valid, but I do think there are a few more variables to the marketing equation MS is faced with.

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    3. Re:I think.. by Dragoon412 · · Score: 5, Funny
      How many people are going to actually know what "Vista" means, anyway? I'd put 20 on people thinking that the newest incarnation of Windows is some spanish distribution.

      Well, I know what Vista stands for:

      Viruses
      Instability
      Spyware
      Trojans
      Adware

      Quite frankly, I'm amazed they didn't find a way to work DRM in there. ;)
    4. Re:I think.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, Joe Public is a completely uneducated moron.

    5. Re:I think.. by Eric604 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Y'know, it's not Microsoft's fault for assuming that Joe Public isn't some completely uneducated _moron_ who doesn't know the basic vocabulary of the english language.

      They don't have to assume anything, only stick to the facts. Like usually ms is assuming too much and ignoring the facts.

    6. Re:I think.. by Eric604 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Windows is not a virus, spyware, trojan or adware.
      Actually it stands for: Vista Is Superb Terrific Awesome.

      Next time I want to play boggle

  5. Lets just call it by its true name... by ZiakII · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows XP Service Pack 3

    1. Re:Lets just call it by its true name... by macaulay805 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or Windows NT Service Pack 18 Level 2 Patch 41 with Mac OS X GUI Extensions.

    2. Re:Lets just call it by its true name... by damsa · · Score: 2

      Vista reminds me of the old Dodge. It recommend Windows seXnT. And then the gamer version would be called, Windows Type R, the striped down version will be called Windows Mini, and the pirated versions should be called, Windows Arrrrrggh.

  6. Already have TM by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you forgotten Microsloth applied for TM on the entire dictionary in 1992? http://www.microsoft.com/library/toolbar/3.0/trade marks/en-us.mspx

  7. It confuses me. by espergreen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am still trying to figure out why apple is letting tigerdirect make its operating system. :(

  8. Interesting post, but.... by SwiftWind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The poster's nickname kind of kills the objectivity on this one.

    I still think Microsoft should pay up for their mistake, but when someone with this kind of nickname posts about microsoft, its bound not to sound objective or credible.

  9. The Terminator Kills Your PC by mcmediaman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find the name Vista to be very appropriate. I propose that on every new install, an image of the Terminator pops up, saying "Hasta la vista, baby!!!"

  10. Odd name choice by loomis · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If they called it Windows Garbage, would people still buy it? Yeah, they'd buy it," said David Burd, [. . .] "They've got something like 90 percent penetration in the world of operating systems."

    Uh, wouldn't "Windows Hegemony" have been a better choice?

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:Odd name choice by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always thought that it would be most approriate to name Windows releases after Venereal Diseases.

      Windows Herpes, Windows Gonorrhea...

      It would seem to more accurately reflect Windows does to your computer.

  11. Don't they know about www.uspto.gov? by Deton8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When my company wants to propose a name a new product, one of the steps is to go to the USPTO to see if somebody in the same industry has a registered trademark on it. If so, we drop the proposed name and go on to the next. Seems elementary to me. We also try to get the .com domain if at all possible. Lastly, we do a google search to see if the name candidate is diluted or already in use as a claimed (but not registered) trademark. Sometimes we find that the name has negative connotations. Anyway, why doesn't MS hire people who do these elementary steps for them? Perhaps they felt that "vista" was too diluted to be a trademark on its own, and/or that using the trademark "Microsoft Vista" is sufficiently distinct from any other use of "vista", but these arguments seem lazy and weak to me. Other than that, it's a pretty good name.

    1. Re:Don't they know about www.uspto.gov? by nathanmace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe because Microsoft doesn't care?

      --
      I'm very responsible, when ever something goes wrong they always say I'm responsible.
    2. Re:Don't they know about www.uspto.gov? by kaan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see your point, and for the rest of the world, I think it applies. But Microsoft doesn't really have a solid track record of doing things the way other entities do. Instead, they've established an undeniable reputation of doing whatever the f*ck they want, no matter what anybody thinks about it. If anybody has a problem with 'em, Microsoft will happily take it to court and drag it out until you can't afford to fight it, or they'll just buy you out up front (everyone has their price, and Microsoft is sure to find out how much).

      I almost feel bad for Microsoft that the name is so important. I mean, they just don't get it - if you make a really good product, your name will not matter. Especially if you make a really good product and most computers on the planet already use it. I mean, look at Apple (not trying to be fanboy here), but how exciting of a name is OS X? Yeah, there are the code names - Tiger, Panther, etc. - but it's just a neutral, numeric name. X is the roman numeral for 10, which followed OS 9, which followed OS 8, which followed System 7, and System 6, etc. People who use Macs and swear by them couldn't care less what the goddamn name is, and Apple knows this. Microsoft, on the other hand, has problably spent millions of dollars on positioning research, market analysis, an army of lawyers to research everything under the sun, etc.

      It's just sad. They so, so, so don't get it.

    3. Re:Don't they know about www.uspto.gov? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how exciting of a name is OS X?

      The brandname is actually MacOS X. Transitioning to a new OS can be very risky (and there's numerous failed attempts in computing history), so Apple obviously wanted to emphisize you were still using MacOS (even though you weren't :). That way the installed base would see it as a "natural upgrade" rather than "a change to something different".

      So, no, it's not like Apple doesn't care about branding (are you fuckng kidding?!?) -- "OS X" was a fairly boring name by design.

      In Microsoft's case, it is not a new OS, so it's better to have a different sounding name to get people's attention. Using a real word makes a distinction from the old 98/ME/NT/XP mumble-jumble.

      Now, if you want terrible branding with no particular logic, try "OS/2" (one of those failed new OSes I alluded to.)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    4. Re:Don't they know about www.uspto.gov? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I post as "Nutscrape", and even I find that joke really, really lame.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  12. MS Team named it? by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Somehow I doubt that the "MS Team" (by this I'm assuming mainly software engineers, etc) would be entrusted with the name for a flagship product. Codename perhaps, but I'll bet that a name as meaningless-yet-initially-resistant-to-punnery (just look at how Apple treated the Longhorn code name) like Vista would be coined by an amalgam of dozens of vacuous marketing executives.

    Though really I'm just surprised they didnt do a google search of the name to see if there's any similar companies or products out there called Vista...

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:MS Team named it? by rathehun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually they did an MSN search - nothing came up.

  13. I don't blame him by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right now, the name can be changed without Microsoft caring too much. If it gets to release time, there is no way in hell Microsoft will change the name. They'll just throw lawyers at him until he gives in. If it doesn't work in the USA, they'll harass him in other countries.

    Right now, he's got a clear advantage. If he makes every move to completely stop their use of the mark 'Vista' (as opposed to licensing it to them or something), then they'll probably change the name sharpish. But if he shows any sign of weakness, they'll just steamroller him into submission.

  14. Garmin, too by Forthan+Red · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps Garmin, which makes the Vista GPS, should also sue. After all, that whole "Where do you want to go today?" slogan of MS's could also apply to a GPS.

  15. Years by paul248 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't they just go back to naming it after the release year, and avoid all the legal problems?

    After all, Windows 2017 has a nice ring to it...

  16. Naming tradition by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Funny

    I say Microsoft should continue with the emoticon tradition started with XP and go for like =( or 8| or something...

    1. Re:Naming tradition by Godman · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do you pronounce =(?

      Windows Equals Parentheses

      Doesn't really make sense if you ask me.

      --
      I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    2. Re:Naming tradition by EnsilZah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm...

      That would be pronounced Windows [Sad sounding "Awww"].

    3. Re:Naming tradition by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The operating system-like piece of software formerly known as Windows.

  17. Synonyms for "Vista" by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Funny
    If MS does end up having to change Windows Vista's name, they can choose from a list of synonyms for "Vista" so they'd have names like:
    • Windows Aspect
    • Windows Horizon
    • Windows Panorama
    • Windows Landscape
    ...and my personal favorite:
    • Windows Outlook
  18. Remember Lindows? by PlanetX+00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems that M$ can't keep from trotting on Linux companies. First Lindows get bought off my M$ for the name, but this time they have chosen a name similar to an existing Linux company MontaVista?

    I can see it now "Was that Windows Vista (tm) were were supposed to buy, or MontaVista (www.mvista.com) Linux?" I'm so confused...

    It only gets worse once M$ Windows Vista goes embedded considering MontaVista is the #1 embedded Linux vendor on the planet

    1. Re:Remember Lindows? by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's also a no-brainer that it's asking for a trademark infringement suit

      I wouldn't have said so - Microsoft shouldn't have a trademark on "windows". It's like if Microsoft trademarked the word "server" today, marketed a product called "Microsoft Server", and then, in twenty years time, sued everybody else who uses the word "server" or something that resembles it. Sounds completely bizarre, but it's essentially what Microsoft did with the word "windows".

      Also, IIRC, Microsoft didn't/couldn't trademark "windows" in some places, which is why they sued Lindows in more than one country.

  19. 5 steps to sucess by Snipes420 · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. aquire trademark for a word.
    2. ???
    3. wait for a big company to use the same word.
    4. sue their ass.
    5. profit!!!

    --
    What goes around comes around, kid.
  20. They used MSN Search to look for it... by zaydana · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why all the people saying microsoft should have googled for the name first? Obviosuly, microsoft would have used the msn search. Perhaps that explains why they didn't realize that the name is already taken.

  21. i wanna know by Naikrovek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    what http://vistawindows.com/ is gonna do.

    1. Re:i wanna know by njko · · Score: 2, Funny

      damn cybersquaters

      --
      \n.\n
  22. Finaly a lawsuit I can get behind! by Blacklotuz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was hoping that Vista Windows would sue them, but this is even better. Not that I like these stupid corporate legal battles but anything that may force them to change the name is great in my book!

    Heck, why call it Windows Vista, when Windows Fiesta! sounds even worse?

    1. Re:Finaly a lawsuit I can get behind! by kubrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heck, why call it Windows Vista, when Windows Fiesta! sounds even worse?

      How about "Windows Fiasco!"?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  23. Just what is beyond Windows? by Erris · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Landfill, where malware crippled Microsoft Computers end up. Call it Microsoft Landfill.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  24. Buy Him Out, Boys! by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Clearly "Windows Vista" is not the same as "Vista" the software company. It's doubtful anyone is going to confuse them.

    How often do people drop the term "Windows". I mean, it's called 95, 98, ME, XP, NT, so why do you think it will not be called simply "Vista". Microsoft can't change the name (Well, they could, but it's unlikely because there's a huge marketing machine in place). They could, of course, could drag it through the courts, but that would be unwise PR-wise (Cue up the "Microsoft steamrolls over another small company" propoganda). So they will load up a truckfull of cash and buy the name from the guy.

  25. Re:That name sucks by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Naming is important, but unfortunately that anecdote is untrue.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  26. From JoelOnSoftware by noblethrasher · · Score: 5, Interesting
    For those of you who keep up with Joel Spolsky, here's what he had to say about a very similar matter
    Well, there are a couple of dozen products named Copilot, many with registered trademarks, so our trademark lawyer advised us to use Fog Creek Copilot which would eliminate any possibility of confusion with those other Copilot brand products. The point of trademark laws is that what you're not allowed to do is create any confusion or potential confusion as to the origin of your product, and sticking "Fog Creek" in front guarantees that, but we have to be religious about always using the full name. I didn't really mind, having started my career working on products like Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications for Microsoft Excel, etc. etc. After a few weeks on the Microsoft Excel team if you ever saw the word "Excel" without a "Microsoft" in front of it, it looked nekkid.
  27. Connections with the SCO group by blang · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wall was one of the early inverstors in the Caldera/SCO scam.

    The company also owns some dubious energy company (most likely a tax-writeoff stunt).

    MS knew must have known about Vista, and this might poosibly be a somewhat indirect way of funelling money to further finance the SCO litigation machine.

    If you put on your tinfoil hat, this name is not an accident, but a way to finance SCO without alerting the antitrust watch dogs.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    1. Re:Connections with the SCO group by blang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See Vista reverse merger benefits SCO?

      Also note that Vistas CFO is Bob Bench, formner CEO of SCO.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    2. Re:Connections with the SCO group by blang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From Yahoo board:

      Mark LeMay, the latest beneficial owner of Vista.com, was reportedly involved in a now-bankrupt point-of-sale consulting business. The business was a public stock ASPE.pk (Aspeon aka Aspeon Consulting) renamed from Javelin systems (Nasdaq JVLN) Aspeon has a few recent SEC filings, related to changing bankruptcy directors.

      Aspeon built point-of-sale terminals for McDonalds, and were the first to roll out Window NT retail terminals.

      SCOX provides the OS for McDonalds store terminals, so this new beneficial owner must have deep roots with SCOX.

      The critical missing piece in the VISTA-SCOX story is why SCOX invested millions of dollars to buy promissary notes and stock from John Wall in the Fall 2002, when obstensibly they were shopping for capital for SCOX, and not looking to invest the little capital SCOX had in other ventures.

      When SCOX secured MS and Baystar funding in 2003, the Vista investment was blithely written off with minimal recompense. The asymmetry of this capital exchange makes the deal look very suspicious.

      Source NT story:

      Source NT story

      Source McDonalds story

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  28. Re:That name sucks by TelJanin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stop spreading bullshit

  29. Re:always the copy cat, never the tiger by idlake · · Score: 2, Funny

    "it's bad enough that microsoft takes 5 years to release beta software that's probably going to be 50% capable of mimicing os x."

    Actually, even Windows XP is already 100% capable of "mimicking" Tiger: desktop search, graphical scripting, widgets, RSS, AV chat, etc., it's all there as add-ons, from multiple sources.

    The only thing Apple is doing differently is that they are bundling all this stuff with their OS.

  30. _windows_ by Nikademus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How did someone let them register _windows_ then. Afetr all, it's a common word.

    Word History: The source of our word window is a vivid metaphor. Window comes to us from the Scandinavian invaders and settlers of England in the early Middle Ages. Although we have no record of the exact word they gave us, it was related to Old Norse vindauga, "window," a compound made up of vindr, "wind," and auga, "eye," reflecting the fact that at one time windows contained no glass. The metaphor "wind eye" is of a type beloved by Norse and Old English poets and is called a kenning; other examples include oar-steed for "ship" and whale-road for "sea." Recently we have restored to the 800-year-old word window a touch of its poetic heritage, using it figuratively in such phrases as launch window, weather window, and window of opportunity or vulnerability.

    --
    I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
  31. New OS: Microsoft Wall by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny
    Man - Microsoft can't win. What if they called their new OS "Microsoft Wall" - More solid than Windows.

    You'd still see press saying John Wall was not amused...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  32. Great Publicity for Vista.Com by DavidD_CA · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the threat of a lawsuit from MS is certainly enough to keep one up at night (and personally I don't think they'd try to sue Vista since they held their name first)... this is great publicity for vista.com.

    No one heard of them, and now millions of people might accidentially come across their website or read about them in regards to this potential lawsuit.

    Besides, they don't appear to be a software company -- from the looks of their website, they do website hosting and design, ecommerce.

    --
    -David
  33. Grassroots Astroturf: by bobdotorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Step 1: go to http://vista.com/page/5rr/About_Us.html
    Step 2: click on the mailto: bizdev@vista.com
    Step 3: ask where the link is to download Windows Vista
    Step 4: Profit for Vista, as they'll have prime evidence of market confusion

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  34. Microsoft Vista... by Minced · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the only OS you can jump off of.

  35. How about Microsoft Panorama? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny
    Or just give it a fucking number already. Apple uses silly kitty names, but underneath it is a number. 10.4 or something.

    Or enforce some truth in advertising laws.

    Make them call it Microsoft Bloated Buggy Pile Of Evil And Mind Crushing Pig Shit That Makes Baby Jesus Cry

    Sorry. Had to get that off my chest. Just mod me down. Thank you and good night.

    1. Re:How about Microsoft Panorama? by Reverend528 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Or just give it a fucking number already.

      Last time MS used numbers, they ended up thoroughly confusing their customers. Up until windows 3.X, everything seemed fine, but then they released windows 95, which is more than 91 better than the 3.X series. Except no one was quite sure where those 91 versions fit in.

      windows 98 was clearly 3 better than windows 95, but then they decided to put out windows 2000. Although it was better, I think that everyone agrees that it certainly isn't 1900+ better than windows 98.

      Things will be better if they stick to unconfusing names and letter combinations.

  36. john wall's in it just for the money by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    i found an interesting article on john wall and vista and his product:
    http://www.threenorth.com/sco/john_wall.html

    23 April 2005

    It seems that John Wall is selling Vista.com. Well, sort of selling it


    after reading that, i don't feel sorry for this john wall guy at all.

    many of you may be microsoft bashers, and maybe rightfully so. but to be illogical and say john wall deserves this payment just because you dislike microsoft is just wrong.

    if microsoft was wrong, i'd say they are. but this case is pretty clear that vista does not deserve a single penny.

  37. Microsoft Vista SCO connection by Error27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vista and SCO are connected somehow because SCO has given over a million dollars to Vista through various deals. It doesn't seem that SCO got anything in return.

    Now Microsoft and Vista are connected. It's a weird coincidence.

    Stats_for_all talks about the Vista SCO connection on the yahoo SCOX board.

    It seems that there are a lot of puzzling things about Vista as a company.

  38. Vista... by EEBaum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... because, whether you like it or not, you're likely to say, "Wow, look at that."

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  39. Go trendy, Bill by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Funny
    They should get really trendy and name it "Windows: Teh Shiznit."

    And a slogan with that cloyingly trendy "so" thrown in.

    "You are so going to love this version!"

    "Where do you so want to go today?"

    "You so won't see the blue screen anymore."

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  40. Re:How about Curtains? by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Funny


    They should call it "Quits".

    ^=====^

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  41. Re:makes sense to me by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny
    I bet there'll be a bunch of posts like "vista sucks" (i'm sure the slashdot community will be alot more creative in it's insults ie>"windoze").

    Yes: Hasta la Vista, Windows

  42. wxWindows by burbilog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember wxWindows, excellent library (better than QT IMHO)? It existed for a very long time, but Microsoft recently forced them to rename to wxWidgets.

  43. Free marketing? by unoengborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could it be that Microsoft is well aware of the name conflict, and selects a temporary name they know would get this kind of attention.

    That way they get lots of free press telling the world that they are about to release a new OS, and at the same time they try to wash out common nicknames names like Longwait, and NoHorn from peoples minds.

    When the OS is released it will be named to something completely different.

    --
    God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
  44. Another Vista software product circa 1995 - Today by CaperNZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    I happen to work for a software company with Vista in the name... 'Vista Entertainment Solutions' and our product is marketed as 'Vista'. It has been since 1995.

    http://www.vista.co.nz/

    I'm not sure as to the extent this will affect us.