Slashdot Mirror


Another Amateur Radio Satellite

k4hg writes "Remember the US Naval Academy satellite with the measuring tape antennas? Well, not only is it still alive after nearly four years in orbit (be sure to read the 2001 Slashdot articles to see who was right and wrong about it working at all!), but the latest satellite to come out of the same lab, called PCSat2, was installed Wednesday on the International Space Station. It is bolted to the space station on the P6 truss, but is otherwise independent, only benefiting from the high mass to drag ratio of the ISS to prolong orbital life. The satellite is alive and transmitting on amateur radio frequencies, I could hear it on a marginal elevation in the Florida Keys. When it come in range of a ground station with better coverage, the data will be viewable here in real time. This new system is in addition to the amateur radio station already operational on the ISS. And yes, they used tape measure antennas again, you could see them deploy on Nasa TV!"

140 comments

  1. Heh... by WindozeSux · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not only does this satellite transmit Amateur Radio waves, it measures the stars! :)

    --
    Fallout 3 will suck.
    1. Re:Heh... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the it was built in two weeks with a $100 budget.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    2. Re:Heh... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1

      I bet it doesn't have thrusters either!!

      --
      DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
  2. Ham nerds by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know how "normal" people feel when I start talking about code.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Ham nerds by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the Ham vs Computer vs whatever Nerds chain that's the equivalent of RPGers "greater than" LARPers "greater than" Furries?

    2. Re:Ham nerds by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      I gave up talking about code years back, and the other night I realised why. I spent two or three hours coding a little utility to take strips of 24-bit icons (14 per row, fixed width & height), slice them up and save them out to individually named ICO files in the relevant skins folder. I'd do it manually, but this way I can generate 20 skins with a click of the mouse.

      I tried to explain, briefly, why I was happy it was all working, but it sounded so trivial in 25 words or less and the reaction was... three hours to cut up a bunch of pics?

    3. Re:Ham nerds by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Well, they're right, if you'd just scripted the GIMP it would have taken you minutes.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Ham nerds by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Plus three hours to figure out the scripting ;-) (I'm an old dog... new tricks come hard these days.)

      I'll certainly look into it though. I use the Gimp already, just haven't delved into the script language.

    5. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GIMP needs ages to boot for me, though. So in the long run it wouldn't save me time. Is that different for you?

    6. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't one, it's apples to oranges. You can't connect them along a straight-line scale any more than you can say 3 is greater than 5i.

    7. Re:Ham nerds by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      It starts up quick enough, but I'm used to writing small apps for my needs. (Which then grow into big apps, which then go on my web page for others to use.)

      I've got a big library of routines I put together over the past 4 years or so, which means I'm never starting from scratch. Anyway, when I'm not writing SF I actually enjoy writing freeware - it's a hobby, so I'm allowed to waste time on it for relaxation...

    8. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you'd just scripted the GIMP it would have taken you minutes.
      The GIMP doesn't work in MS-Windows 95 any more. >:-(

      (Why haven't I upgraded?
      1. I refuse to give any more money to Gates & Gang.
      2. The latest versions of MS-Windows don't run on my 1997 hardware.
      I still use the latest version of the GIMP when I run Slackware, and an older version when I run MSW95, but it would be nice to have something that I can use the same way in both OSes.)
    9. Re:Ham nerds by Siggy200 · · Score: 0

      I think you mean Morse code? Not computer coding, right? If so the FCC plans to drop the Morse code requirement for all amateur radio license classes soon. Many other countries have also dropped the code for amateur licenses.

    10. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now I know how "normal" people feel when I start talking about code."

      Programming code or Morse code? Both are fun and I can't understand how people get by that don't know how to do either. It just doesn't seem natural to me.

      I guess I am double geeky.

    11. Re:Ham nerds by mmkkbb · · Score: 3, Funny

      you mean this chart?

      --
      -mkb
    12. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... If so the FCC plans to drop the Morse code requirement for all amateur radio license classes soon. Many other countries have also dropped the code for amateur licenses."

      Just because the FCC plans to drop the morse requirement doesn't mean that people will quit using it. I find it very enjoyable to copy and send.

      At the FDIM QRP convention this year at Dayton, one of the speakers from a German club that makes kit radios said that after Germany dropped the morse requirement he started to see an increase in the number of "no code" hams ordering morse only capable transmitters. He asked each of them to make sure that they realized that the transmitters were CW only and not able to transmit voice. He said that the typical answer was yes, but now that they DON'T HAVE TO learn morse code any more, they actually WANTED TO.
      Interesting. I hope the same thing happens here. One usually learns something better when it's something they want to learn, instead of being forced to.
      73 de w0uhf

    13. Re:Ham nerds by toph42 · · Score: 1

      I thought you gave up talking about code...

    14. Re:Ham nerds by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      That appears to use a different definition of the word "geek" than typically used on Slashdot.

    15. Re:Ham nerds by Thuktun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tried to explain, briefly, why I was happy it was all working, but it sounded so trivial in 25 words or less and the reaction was... three hours to cut up a bunch of pics?

      Geeks like us appreciate not having to do the same thing multiple times, particularly if it's mindless work. You avoided mindless work by creating something which you can reuse later to continue avoiding mindless work. Sounds fine to me!

    16. Re:Ham nerds by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Sure, but this is Slashdot. Code is substitute for conversation here.

    17. Re:Ham nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1997 hardware? Something like a Pentium II 266? Windows 2000 should run just fine on that type of rig.

  3. Price? by Atlantic+Wall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The thing may be cheap to build, but you can not just throw it up there like a kite, it needs a rocket to get it into orbit. the price does not reflect this cost.

    --
    To Hell with the Queen of England!
    1. Re:Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The launch cost only $1.3 billion.

    2. Re:Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're sending a 50,000lb capacity trailer cross country. It's got 49,972 lbs of your crap in it. Your buddy wants to send his parrot cage. There's room and it weighs 8 lbs.

      What's the BFD? The incremental cost is a drop in the rain barrel.

    3. Re:Price? by zardo · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the amateur rocket enthusiasts, heh.

  4. marginal elevation? by fenodyree · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there a type of elevation in the florida Keys _other_ than marginal?

    Marginal elevation: Elevation due to a stick of margarine. The low cholesterol alternative to butteral elevation.

    /*sarcasm*/

    1. Re:marginal elevation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm maybe he's talking about in relation to the equator at the bottom and the north pole as the top.

    2. Re:marginal elevation? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Informative


      More likely elevation as in "horizon at the bottom, zenith at the top." The higher the sat is above the horizon, the longer the pass, the shorter the radio path and the less atmospheric attenuation (for high UHF and above).

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:marginal elevation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is there a type of elevation in the florida Keys _other_ than marginal?"

      Yes, it's called negative-elevation and occurs during hurricane season.

  5. Finally, a practical use for shuttle+iss by grozzie2 · · Score: 1

    A school science experiment in the form of an amateur radio satellite. Shuttle to deliver it, ISS to 'hold it up', finally, the pair of them actually doing something useful....

  6. Stupid Question by toupsie · · Score: 1
    What are these amateur satellites for? I clicked on a link and I saw a bunch of entries like these:

    02:11:26:12 : W3ADO-1]BEACON,SGATE,qAo,N1GAU-15:T#014,066,058,05 8,087,213,11111111,0001,1

    Enlighten me, please...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Stupid Question by k4hg · · Score: 4, Informative
      That is telemetry, which gives the status of the satellite. PCSat2 is a material-science experiment, which monitors 70-odd different solar cells and how they respond to the environment of space. The solar cell performance data is sent via a separate amateur radio system.

      When the checkout is complete and the satellite is opened for general amateur use, it will also relay position between two points on the earth (which is the main function of the first PCSat).

    2. Re:Stupid Question by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      More specifically, that is an APRS packet containing telemetry ... the APRS network primarily operates on 144.390 MHz. It's a tactical network of stations that send and repeat location-aware information. Primarily, amateur radio operators use it for regional mapping of other APRS stations and weather data.

      The original PCSat is an APRS satellite ... ie: it relays APRS packets to a wider area. The ISS has amateur radio equipment on board and it also was an APRS "digipeater". Sometimes the ISS astronauts get on the radio and make voice contacts ... yet another reason to get your own amateur radio license. Now that PCSat2 is installed on the ISS, I believe the ISS equipment will no longer digipeat APRS packets, but I'm not 100% sure on that.

      APRS was invented by Bob Bruninga, WB4APR, the same guy that built PCSat and PCSat2 at the Naval Labratory.

      Mr. Bruninga maintains an APRS page at: http://web.usna.navy.mil/~bruninga/aprs.html. (Most of the actual APRS specification is documented within the APRSdos package.)

      There is a good Linux APRS application called Xastir ... www.xastir.org.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    3. Re:Stupid Question by g4dpz · · Score: 1

      You can see this telemetry converted into sensible numbers on the realtime telemetry page at http://www.pcsat2.info./ This shows the operational characteristics of the PCSAT2 device and some of the basic characteristics of the MISSE5 solar cell experiment.

  7. Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm not a ham but I have a couple of scanners. My question is, how can I eavesdrop on the ISS and/or STS shuttle missions? Some web searching has led to 145.8000 and 146.6550 as the ISS and STS audio downlinks, respectively; however, monitoring them even when ISS is over North America doesn't get me anything.

    Are there other interesting frequencies, or does the ISS/STS have to be "exactly overhead" in order to pick up on their transmissions? I presume that if Houston is able to pick them up, I should be able to, also; but I'm not a radio engineer. I'm in west Tennessee and haven't been able to locate any repeaters of the ISS/STS frequencies anywhere nearby.

    Any help out there?

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    1. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The antenna polarization is probably wrong. Also, a gain antenna like a beam or dish pointed at the ISS or STS would help things even more. And of course, remember to account for the doppler effect.

    2. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Juggle · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ISS is fairly easy to recieve, but due to it's low orbit it has a very small footprint meaning you only get about 7-10 minutes each pass when it will be in range.

      On the upside it's got a higher power transmitter than other Amateur radio sattelites so it's a lot easier to hear. I regularly listen to it with just an HT and stock rubber duck antenna. 145.800 is the frequency of interest but what you hear depends on what they're doing with it.

      Most often it's in packet mode so all you'll hear are bursts of data. They aren't very melodic but they do stand out above the background noise so you can tell you're hearing it. It's 1200 baud packet and with something like a $45 TNC-X hooked to your audio you could decode it fairly easily. The packet transmissions are a combination of APRS for position reporting on the earth and the BBS for sharing messages.

      From time to time it gets put into cross band repeat mode where it listens on 437.800 and then retransmits whatever it hears on 145.800 I made a contact through it in that mode just a few weeks ago using nothing more than a homebuilt "J-pole" I usually use for communications on earth based repeaters. (They're real easy antennas to build, just takes one 1/2" copper tee 1 1/2" elbow and 10' of 1/2" copper pipe, lots of sites on the net with plans for them.) For my uplink I thought I was using a 440mhz Jpole I had build but not yet installed but later found out I was using my directional Yagi I built for listening to weaker satelites - amazingly I had that very directional antenna pointing nowhere near the ISS but was still able to get a signal through it very easily.

      The third mode the ISS radio may be in is just a normal radio with an astronaut on the other end. I've yet to be lucky enough to hear it in that mode :(

      However the radio is also off from time to time since it's not a primary mission of the ISS. It's always off when they're on spacewalks to keep down RF exposure.

      The website www.issfanclub.com is a great place to check and see what the current status is. They have an area where people submit what they've heard recently so you can see what mode it's in. Though for some reason the site isn't responding today.

      Because of the ISS's small footprint just knowing it's over NA isn't usually good enough. You'll need a way to check it's actual current position. On Windows I use a package called Orbitron which is postcardware and works great. amsat.org has links to a bunch of other sat tracking programs as well as a tool for finding passes through their site. Also because the ISS tends to move around more than most sats you need to make sure that your keplerian elements are up to date. Those are what the tracking programs use to determine it's exact position. Most sats are fairly fixed in their orbits but the ISS is adjusted from time to time espically when docking with a shuttle or other supply ship.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    3. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by grumling · · Score: 3, Informative
      You can, but it will require a little playing around with an antenna. It is unlikely you will be able to hear with a standard "rubber duck" antenna. I use one of these, made by Arrow Antennas, for working Ham satellites. Then you need to figure out when the satelite will be in range. For example, AO-51 is in a polar orbit. It makes 2 passes per day. I have heard it with a 1/4 wave dipole on my HT, but not very well. The Arrow works much, much better. A good source of location data is the Heavens-Above web site, but if you really get into satelite listening, you'll want to download a tracking program. I use STS Plus, mostly because it is freeware, but there are many others.

      Once you get some idea of when the sat will be overhead, you can start tuning around the transmit frequency. You have to keep the squelch open, and it helps to have a continuous tuning receiver because it is easier to adjust for doppler shift. I wouldn't think the NASA communications between the ISS and ground control is open for the general public (looks like the ground control systems are not easily heard by a scanner anyway), but the HAM stuff is all just narrowband FM. Good luck.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    4. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, we probably could reverse the polarity of the positron emitter array, but the quantum oscillation interference might implode the ship's hull!

    5. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Mozk · · Score: 3, Funny

      very small footprint
      HT and stock rubber duck antenna
      in packet mode
      1200 baud packet
      $45 TNC-X
      APRS for position reporting
      BBS for sharing messages
      homebuilt "J-pole"
      directional Yagi
      RF exposure
      make sure that your keplerian elements are up to date

      Dude, I have no idea what any of that means.

      The bold one's my favorite, though.

      --
      No existe.
    6. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Juggle · · Score: 5, Informative

      Teaching someone how to track and listen to an orbiting spacecraft in a short post is pretty tricky - so yeah I figured some would stumble on a few of the more specialized terms. But I'm willing to keep helping since just a few months ago all of it was gibberish to me as well even though some of the questions lead me to believe I'm just responding to a troll.

      Just for reference when I say spacecraft I'm including unmaned satelites juts to prevent confusion before it starts....

      -very small footprint

      The footprint is the area of the earth visible to the orbiting spacecraft. The higher the spacecraft the more of the surface of the earth that will be line of sight to it at any given time. That dosn't necessarially mean the spacecraft can only see the area in it's footprint, but it does mean only those in the footprint can see (and talk to or recieve transmissions from) the spacecraft. The ISS is the lowest orbit of any spacecraft carrying amateur radio so it's got the smallest footprint. That means the window that you can hear it durring is shorter than any others - but it also means the signal is louder and easier to hear.

      -HT and stock rubber duck antenna

      HT = HandiTalkie. A small low power handheld radio. "Rubber Duck" is a cheap flexible antenna with little or no gain, basically the bare minimum to recieve a radio signal.

      -in packet mode
      -1200 baud packet
      -$45 TNC-X

      Packet is a form of digital communication. 1200 baud is the speed it runs at. A TNC is to radio basically what a modem is to a phone line, it converts audio to digital information and vice versa. The TNC-X is a pic (small microcontroller populary with hobbyists) based TNC that you can assemble yourself for very low cost. It has USB capabilities but relies on the computer it's attached to do to much of the "thinking" for it.

      -APRS for position reporting

      APRS is a a position reporting system. Kind of like the Garmin Rhino only a LOT more powerfull. It uses 1200 baud packet to encode information and transmit over the air where it is picked up by other amateurs.

      -BBS for sharing messages

      Seriously, what the heck are you doing reading slashdot (a BBS!) if you don't know what a BBS is. This is the point where the troll starts to show...

      -homebuilt "J-pole"

      As explained in my first post, it's an antenna you can build yourself. Once again the trollishness is getting pretty bad.

      -directional Yagi

      A Yagi is a certian type of antenna, google is your friend. They're very directional meaning that they transmit a very directed signal and likewise recieve from a limited area. Omni antennas you don't aim, directional you do.

      -RF exposure

      RF = Radio Frequency. Come on, RF exposure has been discussed on /. quite a bit lately with the whole cell phones will fry your eyes and all the Wifi/WiMax/Bluetooth wireless stuff.

      -make sure that your keplerian elements are up to date

      Keplerian elements are descriptions of a spacecrafts orbit. They're used to calculate the position of the spacecraft. Most tracking software have built in utilities to download them on a regular basis to make sure you know where a spacecraft will be.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    7. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Ah I wasn't trying to be a troll. I was at most trying to be mildly humorous for other people like me who don't understand it.

      I know what a BBS is, but I don't quite understand how a satellite would use a BBS for messages. Also, I don't really read into the stories that much, so I didn't really know what RF was.

      Thanks for taking the time to explain things. It makes more sense and I'm actually interested in it now.

      --
      No existe.
    8. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Juggle · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the bit about Packet and what a TNC is helps fill in what a BBS is doing on a satellite.

      Sometimes people forget that radio is usefull for more than just music and voice. You can also send data by encoding it someway.

      Think back to the days of dial-up BBSes, only one user at a time so you do a store and forward type of deal. On radio it's the same. Only one person can use a frequency at a time so you can either have a single conversation or use a BBS to store messages and let multiple people send and recieve in turn.

      So it's kind of like the dial-up BBS days only instead of a modem you use a TNC, instead of a phoneline you use a radio and instead of a computer in some guys basement running the BBS you've got it strapped to a bunch of batteries and solar panels and flying around in space - or in this case strapped to the ISS.

      Frankly though the whole satelite packet thing dosn't do it for me much outside of APRS. If I'm going to bounce something off a chunk of metal and silicone up in the air I want it to be voice.

      Why APRS on sats is interesting to me is a much longer story though and has to do with how APRS works. Basically the big limitation of APRS is range. With Garmin Rhinos that range is 2-5 miles in the best of conditions. With Amateur radio the range at 2m for data can vary from 5 miles to 150 miles depending on a number of things. But usually it's around 5-30 miles or so. That means when you send a position report on APRS it usually goes no further than 30 miles. To reach further hams use something called digipeating which is basically a radio with a good antenna located up high somewhere and with lots of transmitting power. So it can hear weaker stations and then retransmit them from a higher point at higher power letting them reach further. With APRS you usually bounce a signal off 2 of those to get good range. But using a satelite instead of just a tall tower or mountian means your range suddenly goes from 150-200 miles max to several thousand miles in the footprint of the satellite. When you're out in a remote area that can be the difference between being heard and not being heard.

      APRS is used extensively by SAR (Search and Rescue) teams as well as emergency response teams for tracking resources out in the field. I use it when out exploring the desert here in southern AZ so friends and family can see where I am and I can easily send a distress signal if something happens to me.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
    10. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      A TNC is completely superfluous.
      It is a technology developed over 20 years ago, at the time the typical radio amateur would have only a terminal or a very simple computer, and computers existed in very many variants so software development on home computers was a nightmare.
      To make packet work, someone developed a small embedded system with modem and firmware running the protocol, and connected it to a serial port of a computer that would only be a terminal.

      However, with the current state of the art you don't need that. A modem can easily be emulated in the PC itself, so you just feed the audio from the receiver to the soundcard of your PC, and in the PC you install software that performs the functions of the modem and the microcontroller originally in the TNC.

      Even in Linux this service is available, as part of the standard kernel.
      No need to spend any money on a TNC, it is outdated technology!
      (would you buy an external 1200 baud telephone modem today?)

    11. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hey, screw you. I was serious.

      And he wasn't. Now why do you want to screw him?

    12. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Siggy200 · · Score: 0

      Have copied ISS using a HT and the rubber ducky very clear. Now to connect some kind of TNC, there is Packet interface built into the HT, just need the TNC and a cable. Also tried a home brew J-Pole made out of 300 Ohm "ribbon" Television cabe, it does help some. Waiting for the PCsat2 to be turned on and try that one also.

    13. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1
      Even in Linux this service is available, as part of the standard kernel.

      Really?! The Linux kernel has a built-in soft modem? I thought it just understood the higher-level packet protocols like AX.25. All I can find is: Device Drivers > Networking Support > Amateur Radio support > Packet Radio protocols > Amateur Radio AX.25 Level 2 protocol . If it's not in the kernel, is there a software TNC/modem package for Linux?

    14. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Siggy200 · · Score: 0

      Most of the time the comms are going through two "TEDRIS" satellites. There are also some ground stations, when you see the "flat" orbital dispaly at Mission control, there are some circles on that map that indicate the ground stations. There are two in the USA, quite a few in "Russia". If the ground stations are communicating they use UHF ~450 MHz. Since 9/11 these frequencies have changed and are no longer published for public release.

    15. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by DotComMarky · · Score: 1

      I believe AX.25 is what you are looking for.

      --
      It's just me.
    16. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 1

      The program that acts as a modem is called soundmodem. Its home is www.baycom.org/~tom/ham/soundmodem. You run audio from your radio's earphone to the computer's line-in, and from the computer's line-out to the radio's mic/line-in. Soundmodem handles converting the data-audio signal conversion.
      The tricky part is getting the computer to actually turn on the mic (push the PTT button) on the radio before transmitting. This requires an interface between the computer's parallel or serial port, and the radio's PTT port.

      I've just learned all of this while playing around with soundmodem during the last few weeks.

    17. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      As ThinkingGuy wrote, that part is called soundmodem. It is also in the standard kernel.
      You need the AX.25 protocol as well.

      When you have enabled the AX.25 protocol and the soundmodem, you can use various user-mode programs to display what you are receiving. In SuSE Linux, which I use, there are packages like ax25-tools and ax25-utils.

    18. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by zardo · · Score: 1

      HT = HandiTalkie. A small low power handheld radio. "Rubber Duck" is a cheap flexible antenna with little or no gain, basically the bare minimum to recieve a radio signal. Handheld Transciever, that's the technical definition.

    19. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By posting treknobabble in response to my serious response about antennas, he was implying that I was full of shit and just using big words that were meaningless in this context.

      So yeah.. he can fuck himself.

    20. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      Here is the CHEAP answer:
      YES

      You should have no trouble hearing the ISS, The Shuttle or any satellites using Ham Radio.

      How to do it

      You need to know when to listen. Yes you can get keps and computer software and learn how to use it, however it's real easy for average Joe to just go to http://www.heavens-above.com/ and look it up. They tell you when and in what direction. ---It's great because you can see the ISS and other orbiting things too.

      These satellites use several frequecies accross several bands. The most common ones you'd be interested in will be in the 2-Meter (145 MHz) and 70 centimeter (437 MHz) bands -as it's easy to get scanners that can pick up those frequencies. Luckily many of the satellites do transmit FM (as opposed to sideband or other mode) which is exactly what a cheap scanner likes.

      You may hear voices! this makes it easy, because the scanner is all you need.

      You may hear packet-splats --- when you hear them the term will make perfect sense.

      Cheap way to decode packet

      You can hook the headphone jack of your scanner into the line in on your computer's sound card! There are many freeware OSS programs to decode it too. Sure, a dedicated Terminal Node Controller (TNC) is nice and even cheap, but free is always better when you're just playing with it to see what it is! info on using your soundcard for packet http://www.soundcardpacket.info/

      You may want to know about other OSCARs out there (Orbital Satellite Carrying Amateur Radio) see: http://www.amsat.org/

      Tips

      Satellites aren't using high power, don't try to listen from your scanner with it's antenna in the basement -it won't work.

      Use an external antenna if possible -It's a scanner not a transmitter, if all else fails, try a hunk of wire

      Doppler shift... yes you heard me DOPPLER SHIFT... these things move fast! the signal may be off by more than 15kHz from where it's supposed to be... As the satellite approches, it will be higher, as it receeds it will be lower. It will be helpful to have a scanner that has a VFO... a way to rotate the dial and keep up with the satellite... otherwise program several channels 5 kHz apart both above and below the expected frequency so you can get to the next one quickly. Th more you can move in frequency to keep up with the satellite the longer you can hear it.

      Downlinks
      ISS: 145.800 MHz
      PCSAT2: 437.975 MHz
      AO-51: 435.300 MHz

      What you hear -if anything- depends on what they are doing at the time. You aren't going to hear astronaut John Phillips, KE5DRY if he's having supper with the shuttle crew, or sleeping, or went home on a soyuz, or doing just about anything else. - Sometimes the satellites are shut off... while they fix it, or they experiment, they are on s-band or under power resrictions... whatever

    21. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1
      [soundmodem] is also in the standard kernel

      It is? I grepped the kernel for soundmodem and only found one reference to it, in a file called hdlcdrv.c. The page for soundmodem suggests that it is a usermode program that integrates with the kernel AX25 stack. I'm confused...

    22. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Apparently it has been removed in 2.6
      In 2.4 it was part of the standard source but of course it usually was not enabled in .config.
      Maybe they considered the audience too small...

      But anyway, it is available for Linux.

      In my own system I use a HDLC interface card that is driven by drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c and has external hardware modems, this was a solution popular between the TNC and the softwaremodem era. This driver is still in the 2.6 kernel, together with some others.
      It scales a bit better because it is usually impractical to have many soundcards in one system.

      Using these cards a typical 386 PC from those days could drive 12 modems at speeds between 1200 and 9600 bps, and this setup was used in connecting nodes (routers) in the amateur packet radio network.

      The network has mostly died, because its users have moved on to the Internet (which was not available to the general public when this network was first built, back in the mid eighties). Now, packet radio is more an individual-station affair again, with applications like satellite/iss contacts, APRS (broadcasting GPS-determined position and other info), etc.

    23. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      Thanks to everyone who responded! I've been using heavens-above to forecast Iridium flares for some time now, so I'm aware of their ISS tracking. What I didn't know is how close satellites such as ISS had to be in order to pick up their transmissions.

      I presume that since the shuttle is currently docked to the ISS, its passes overhead are concurrent with ISS. There is no pass listed over my area until 8 August, so I imagine that I should keep my scanner tuned to the local po-po trunk until then... ;)

      Thanks again to all who replied, in particular, juggle and grumling. Very informative, and I appreciate it greatly.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    24. Re:Q: How can we listen to ISS/Shuttle comms? by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1
      The network has mostly died...

      It's really a shame, because (/me just can't force himself to write "in this post 9/11 era")... well, because it is good to have a long-range, backup data network that can be driven by battery-powered portable devices and can route emergency position information across the nation (with VHF-HF digipeaters). It would be cool if packet had evolved into a parallel Internet, and hams could basically use the Internet (albeit at 9600 baud) anywhere near a digipeater.

  8. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So directly murdering someone "comes close" to what Bush does? I'd love to know what you think he did that was that bad.

  9. YAARS by aalu.paneer · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that "Yet Another Amateur Radio Satellite"?
    Did someone miss a chance to add "Yet" to derive a "Yet Another Names Starting With Yet"

    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  10. /.ed... by lilricky · · Score: 1

    Yes the satellite is still operational, too bad the website isn't :)

  11. Yeah... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    As I understand it, real science on the ISS won't begin the Columbus Science Laboratory is added (if it's added), and, really, not until they can have six crew there on a permanent basis.

    But, frankly, it seems the history of science in LEO is pretty poor. Aside from using LEO as a convenient spot to look down upon the Earth or up at the stars, that is...

    Can any Slashdotters make a convincing case that science on the ISS is a vaguely good use of funds? In the sense of "the scientific payoff is likely worth it in the first place", not "well, we've spent $100 billion now, we may as well spend the remaining $10 billion".

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Yeah... by fbjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has the useful purpose of being a place to go and stay. Getting up to LEO requires a lot of thrust and equipment, but take note of this highly recommended article: A rocket a day keeps the high costs away. If you can haul up large amounts of stuff, for a cheap price to LEO and the ISS, then everything else has already been solved, practically. I see the ISS as a solution to a problem that will come eventually.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Yeah... by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Freefall research. Lots of processes give totally unexpected results without gravity. Some of them can be simulated in ballistic flight, but it lasts at most a few minutes. You can't examine gravity-less growth of plants, formation of crystals, diffusion of liquids and all kinds of processes that simply take time. Things that depend on gravity start often to behave in completely unexpected ways when the gravity is not present. We often have no idea what kind of profit would that give us, but it's like exploring unknown land - you have a good chance of finding something valuable, even if you don't know up front what would that be.
      Long-term freefall is impossible to simulate on Earth and that's one essential condition of research, but there are others that help a lot. Dirt cheap cryo temperatures. (think superconductors - just put the CPU outdoors and in a shadow :) Dirt cheap vaccuum of good quality (think removing dust/particles/contaminations from ultra-high precision manufacturing, just a great cleanroom "outdoors"). Global travel - several hours to get above any latitude, for free (think orbital observation). Unfiltered cosmic rays. (Bad for humans, but research could greatly benefit, finding particles that simply don't filter through the atmosphere. Also, lots of solar power). No clouds, air, lights, vibrations - all that is needed for good astronomy.

      There's a lot of profits from this location. Now, whether they are utilised or not is a different matter...

      Just a theoretical idea: Orbital microchip factory. Partially purified resources brought from Earth. Then final purification on the orbit. Waste in large packages mapped as "known space junk" put on a decaying orbit to burn in the atmosphere a few years later. Storage: Open space, possibly shielded from the sun by a big "sail". Purification: No worries about gravity mixing the fluids in transport, possiblity to hang charged pieces of material "levitating" without being touched (=contaminated) by any handling devices, no air/dust contamination (easy to purify the vaccuum by charging and then dragging away all the particles entering the area), then all the processes without any medium to transfer any kinds of vibrations, get optical beams out of focus, no forces on lenses that could change their shape, cheap to achieve dynamic liquid lenses for advanced optics etc. The devices manufactured could be of way higher quality than on Earth. Orders of magnitude in miniaturisation, less manufacturing errors, perfect manufacturing conditions really cheap. Just transport, supply, servicing would cost. And of course intruder risk: Space junk, micrometeorites. But these would be just a calculated risk. Facilities could be located sparsely enough that damage to one would not break any other - the line would just switch to a redundant backup and the broken facility would be replaced with next transport. And a single lander filled with a million of 30 Watt 20GHz 256-core CPUs would quite likely be enough to finance the whole investment.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, humans in space is a waste of money. Look at the benefit/cost ration of robotic missions compared to the same for manned missions.

      Putting humans into space is nothing more than a pissing contest, pure and simple.

    4. Re:Yeah... by homebru · · Score: 1

      Orbital microchip factory.

      Short pause to remember that when we started into space, one of the possible commercial exploitations that was mentioned was an orbital vacuum-tube factory.

      Anyone priced a 6146 lately?

    5. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they're about $20 a pop. http://www.thetubestore.com/shuguang6146.html

    6. Re:Yeah... by junkcannibal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I want Intel's toxic waste or even "known space junk" raining down over my house. Good idea. Most of it might burn up in the atmosphere, but is that really any better, i.e. isn't burning toxic waste still toxic waste?

    7. Re:Yeah... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Well, except great most of it is non-toxic. Toxic stuff could be launched into the Sun if you prefer.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    8. Re:Yeah... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      You can't examine gravity-less growth of plants, formation of crystals, diffusion of liquids and all kinds of processes that simply take time.

      "Gravity-less" is not correct. Even "microgravity" is a misnomer. "Micro-acceleration" would be a better term.

    9. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, thats a much better solution, and at this point we're both off topic.

  12. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by capnal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    WTF does this have to do with satellites???

  13. In case of slashdot... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny
    In case the site gets slashdotted, here's a copy of the recent activity:
    00:08:54:51 : PC2XXB]APRS,RS0ISS-3*,qAO,KB8ZGL-5:!3900.00N/07630 .00W0Testing
    00:08:56:20 : PC2XXB]APRS,RS0ISS-3*,qAO,KB8ZGL-5:]testing
    02:03:26:43 : PCSAT2]APRLTM,SGATE,qAO,KC9XG:{T# IGNORE ALogger A side test packet
    02:03:26:43 : KC9XG]APRS,PCSAT2*,qAC,KC9XG:] IGNORE ALogger A side test digi packet
    02:03:26:44 : PCSAT2]APRLTM,SGATE,qAO,KC9XG:T# IGNORE ALogger A side test packet
    1. Re:In case of slashdot... by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Have you ever looked at the wire protocol of IRC?
      It's actually fairly similar to this.

    2. Re:In case of slashdot... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      In case that wasn't a rhetorical question, yes, I have.

    3. Re:In case of slashdot... by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Great, so what you were seeing is the raw protocol data.
      For examples of what gets done with it see
      aprsworld, an open source site and database of APRS location-based service data generated by and for hams.
      You can see google map overlays, ACME.com topo map overlays, tracking data, historical events, and also other services such as weather reports from individual weather stations.

    4. Re:In case of slashdot... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a bunch of low-tech do-it-yourself stuff that I'm not even allowed to play with because of stupid government rules.

    5. Re:In case of slashdot... by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Well, it's an international limited resource with a minimal competence and rules examination you have to pass first. The tests are online at QRZ.com (click on practice exam) and you can have your license in a few weeks. It's actually fairly similar to certification exams for IT professionals, for MS developers, or DBAs.

      As for low tech, far from it. I just finished building a PIC-based microprocessor controled module for my radio; it's actually quite similar to the kind of experimentation that people do now with home robotics, only when radio signals instead of stepper motors.

      So, go check out QRZ.com for the Technician (no morse code required) test, looka t Arrow Antennas for a $75 antenna, and you can get a $150 hand-held radio or two and start sending data and voice directly through satellites and the ISS. I think that hardly qualifies as low-tech either.

    6. Re:In case of slashdot... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Well, it's an international limited resource

      So are sidewalks, but I don't need a license to walk down the street. So is the internet, and where do you think the internet would be today if you had to take a test and get a license to use it?

      It's actually fairly similar to certification exams for IT professionals, for MS developers, or DBAs.

      Except that you aren't required by law to take those exams in order to be an IT professional, MS developer, or DBA.

      As for low tech, far from it. I just finished building a PIC-based microprocessor controled module for my radio; it's actually quite similar to the kind of experimentation that people do now with home robotics, only when radio signals instead of stepper motors.

      It's still low tech compared to commercial products, and that's what I was talking about.

    7. Re:In case of slashdot... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      So, go check out QRZ.com for the Technician (no morse code required) test

      Alright, how high do I have to score? I got a 60% on the practice test, and that apparently wasn't high enough.

      Then, assuming I read up on a few things, and can get a passing score, all I have to do is go to one of the places listed at http://www.arrl.org/arrlvec/examsearch.phtml?State =FL , give them $14, and take the test? I guess that isn't too bad. Not sure how useful it'll be, though, especially since I live in an apartment and can't access the roof.

    8. Re:In case of slashdot... by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's great news!
      You can try hamtestonline.com as well, which has a study guide (free for the first 15% of the questions or so) and see if that fills in the gaps.

      You don't need roof access to get to a satellite, you can do it from outside.
      Send me mail please if you want to go further and I can hook you up with people to help.

      (That goes for anyone.)

  14. The antennas ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those were made from measuring tapes, right?

  15. Antenna Picture by anagama · · Score: 3, Informative
    I didn't see any pictures of this infamous antenna, but some googling brought me to this picture. Seems as though this idea has been in circulation for quite some time! Funniest line:

    We were allowed ten pounds total-payload weight, including antenna and batteries and enclosure. We wanted to transmit on 20 MHz, the same frequency as the Sputniks, so we needed a long antenna, on the order of 3.75 meters, to get the best possible efficiency. It had to be confined to the Lockheed-supplied box during launch, and to erect itself upon signal after orbital injection. The Air Force suggested a design for a pin-puller, an explosively activated latch which could release a spool, upon which the antenna could be rolled during the launch phase. The antenna itself was a steel tape, with a lengthwise crimp to give it some stiffness. We just walked down to the neighborhood hardware store and bought a carpenter's tape measure. (When an Air Force engineer asked why our antenna had inch marks, I told him it was to measure the mean-free path in the ionosphere.)
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:Antenna Picture by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      It is actually a very good idea!
      Why? Because it is so simple. It can hardly fail.
      Try it yourself with a 50cm (20 inch) piece, you will see it always rightens itself no matter how you hit it.
      Under wightless conditions, any length reasonable for an antenna will behave the same, and still can be packed in a small space.

      Compare that to an automatically extending car antenna. It is complicated, uses a lot of current, and can get stuck anytime.

    2. Re:Antenna Picture by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Only except it can't roll itself back... You'd expect that from a car antenna.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Antenna Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tape measure has also been used in space as a release mechanism. The Clementine spacecraft had one of its instrument covers opened by using a hardware store tape measure (that had been properly cleaned, degreased, etc. for flight).

  16. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know people, I'm usually not one to say anything good about a Democrat, but you have to admire Kennedy as being the first Senator to post on Slashdot.

  17. ATV by leighklotz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been watching the shuttle mission on the K6BEN amateur TV repeater near San Jose, which is on 421.25Mhz, the same as cable (not broadcast) channel 57, through my VCR and with a Yagi I made from a magazine article. The NASA Ames Amateur Radio Club is providing the feed with a 1.2GHz uplink to the repeater. They also have shuttle audio on two meters, and I can receive that with my VX-2R HT.

    1. Re:ATV by Siggy200 · · Score: 0

      Neat! Somehow NASA TV link to Comcast's cable in St Paul, MN was broken all the way through the EVA on Wednesday. It came back on just as the two space walkers were closing the hatch at the end of the space walk , how convenient, NOT! But Comcast's Internet was on and was able to watch NASA TV with the Real Audio link, not as good as "real TV", but better than nothing. NASA TV is off again this morning on Comcast TV cable, have a nice test pattern though :-(

  18. An indefinite assisted orbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only benefiting from the high mass to drag ratio of the ISS to prolong orbital life.

    Err.. and the fact that visiting cargo ships occasionally give the ISS orbit a boost.

    If they keep doing that every couple of years, the ISS orbit will never have a chance to critically decay and will be up there forever.

  19. The good thing about a HAM transmisison by LupeSpywalper · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's supposedly no SPAM.

    1. Re:The good thing about a HAM transmisison by Siggy200 · · Score: 0

      Now that K1MAN is off the air, HI!

    2. Re:The good thing about a HAM transmisison by celerityfm · · Score: 1

      Hah hah that was pretty good :)

      Obviously because I am posting I have no mod points, but someone should hook it up :)

      --
      ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  20. Measuring Tape as an Antenna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is not realy new, as it was first used on the AMSAT P3-B (aka OSCAR-10) spacecraft. Because there was not enough room inside the SPELDA adaptor, the 2m (145 MHz)antennas were folded. Once the S/C was separated, they automatically deployed.. Measuring tape was the easiest and cheapest to use, and it worked perfect..

  21. Here's an actual link (with images) by eples · · Score: 2, Informative

    PCSat2 .Info page (with images)

    You can kind of see it mounted on the ISS.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  22. What Type of Tape Measure by jolyonr · · Score: 1

    Is it Imperial or Metric?

    Because I'm in Europe, and need to know if I'll be able to listen in.

    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:What Type of Tape Measure by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Just try frequency 2.54 times higher or lower and it should work fine.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:What Type of Tape Measure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imperial I guess, from this;

      (When an Air Force engineer asked why our antenna had inch marks, I told him it was to measure the mean-free path in the ionosphere.)

  23. Re:hitching a ride is free you dorkwad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the payload adds extra mass you fucking imbecile - extra mass means extra fuel.

  24. But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Not to pan amateur radio (I wish I had my license) but why the excitement about hearing a signal from a couple hundred miles away? If that guy in Key West had a chat with another amateur in, say, Pensacola, that would be routine.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by Goody · · Score: 1

      Not to pan amateur radio (I wish I had my license) but why the excitement about hearing a signal from a couple hundred miles away? If that guy in Key West had a chat with another amateur in, say, Pensacola, that would be routine.

      It's not all about distance in Amateur Radio. In this instance you're talking with a box in space and that's exciting for many. I have a commercial $2K HF radio, but I get more kicks out of operating a $300 kit radio and little flea-powered circuits I design and build.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    2. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using a BBS that circles the earth every 91 minutes sounds pretty exciting to me.

    3. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by maird · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get your license, it requires very little effort or cost and the toys it lets you use can be pretty cool. There's lots of variety to amateur radio so I guess you go with whatever floats your boat. There are people doing EME (reflecting signals off the moon). Hearing a signal that has travelled almost half million miles may sound more impressive than a hundred miles. There are others that bounce signals off the ionisation trails of meteors. I was at a local amateur radio emergency services meeting earlier this week and we were broadcasting a TV signal from a camcorder. I have more prosaic interests: mainly HF but doing the public service stuff is also pretty good - you get great vantage points for events.

    4. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by reallocate · · Score: 1

      I'm in an apartment and really don't want to hassle with jury-rigged antennas and going to QRP to cut back on annoying the neighbors. If I had room for a decent antenna, I'd have my license.

      (I've looked at some of those so-called "invisible" and other antennas marketed at apartment and condo dwellers, but I'm pretty skeptical. There's never any discussion of their abilities on the receive side of an exchange. Just how good at reception can a few feet of wire hidden on a balcony really be?)

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    5. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      So, do you want to do HF or VHF?

      HF, yup, you're kinda stuck with larger antennas. I have seen some pretty nifty setups where the antenna is dangled out of a high window, and it's rolled up after the transmission is done. If conditions are right, you can talk pretty far with a pretty minimal setup.

      If you want to do VHF (or UHF) the antennas are a little smaller AND there's a pretty good chance that there's a repeater near by.

      That's one of the neat things of radio - getting by with what you have. Any twit can plunk down a load of cash on a kilowatt amp, big radio, and obnoxious antenna - but it takes a resourceful individual to do with limited resources and conditions.

      Oh - one last thing - go to a ham club meeting. I'll bet dollars to donuts that you can find someone who would be obsessively helpful in getting you set up.

    6. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by maird · · Score: 1

      In prioncipal, a bigger wire isn't necessarilly a better antenna. A tuned wire is the best antenna. A 2m radio probably doesn't work as well with a 50 foot antenna as it would with a 3 foot antenna. I have a little 2m/70cm handheld radio with a truly pathetic rubber-duckie antenna. I can sit in my basement and get out with only 5W (QRP anyway) to the entire valley I live in (maybe 80x40 miles) because I can reach a repeater, even from the basement. From the ground floor I get out with a perfect signal to even more of the local repeaters. There is a UHF IRLP repeater in the valley next to the one I live in. It's hooked up to an international net of VHF/UHF repeaters using VoIP. I regularly hear contacts from major US cities with Canada, the UK and Australia. You probably have many repeaters (including an IRLP or other networked one) in your area. You can check for repeater lists in your area using Google. Most of the operators I hear are using 5W handhelds. At that level you are unlikely to cause harmful interference to your neighbours but it usually isn't hard to resolve such issues anyway. Your home probably has many apertures that are large enough to permit VHF/UHF to pass with relatively little attenuation. If you really wanted a gain antenna you could get a pre-built one for a handheld that is nothing more than a tuned vertical whip (you could also build one with piano wire). Or, you could build a simple higher gain antenna. Since the discussion started with measuring tapes, a friend built a 2m Yagi from PVC pipe and a measuring tape. He gets out great to repeaters neither he or I can reach with our supplied antennas. The thing is lightweight and small enough that you could just rest it on a table and point it to what you wanted to reach. I built a half wave dipole from stripped coax and it's about three feet tall (best aligned vertically). Attach it to a three foot stick and you could rest it against a wall whenever you wanted to use it. Your circumstances should not prevent you from enjoying amateur radio with the same level of functionality as most of the people you'll contact.

    7. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by jdigriz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because it's a VHF satellite, and on the Earth, VHF communications are limited to line of sight, and a couple of hundred miles is considered DX (a long-distance communication) for VHF, usually only possible with a) tropospheric ducting (weird form of radio propagation where temperature inversions bend radio waves) 2) bouncing the signal off a meteor trail (woo, ionization!) or 3) using a satellite... or a really tall directional antenna which can peek over the curvature of the Earth. What you're thinking of of routine conversations between Pensacola and Kew West are HF communications which operate at a different frequency and get around the line-of-sight problem by bouncing off ionized layers of atmosphere, specifially the ionosphere, which VHF signals go right through. So.. different communications band, different technical challenge, plus... it's SPACE! If you can talk to this satellite, you can also talk to the astronauts aboard the ISS who are quite often hams themselves http://www.arrl.org/ARISS/arissfaq.html

    8. Re:But It's Only A Couple Hundred Miles by reallocate · · Score: 1

      Thanks. It'd be HF for me. VHF has never gotten me excited.

      When my father was a kid, in the American midwest, he was into SWL'ing. He used a Hallicrafters that was about as big as two microwaves; a big, heavy, solid metal box. His antenna was a longwire that ran down the street on the top of telephone poles for three blocks -- about 1000 feet. His interest was MW, and he had QSL's from 10-watt MW stations in the middle-of-nowhere Australia and others in that ballpark. Kinda difficult to repeat now, I suspect.

      So, all his stories spoiled me, I guess. That 1000 foot longwire would be nice.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  25. Radio Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amateur Radio satellite? Is that like Sirius or XM only not-for-profit?

  26. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope he doesn't try to "liberate" me with a a 1000lb bomb dropped by an F/A-18.

  27. tape antennas by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The very first amateur radio satelite, OSCAR-I used tape antennas back in 1961. The antennas were made out of steel measuring tapes because they could be folded back against the satelite during launch and would spring into position as the satelite separated from the rocket. The tapes are 1/4 wavelength long, which at 2 meters (145 mhz) is about 19" long. Most satelites operate at higher frequencies, though the amateur 10 meter band at 28mhz is also available for satelite use. You do the math to see how long those antennas would be....(75/frequency in mhz = length in meters for a 1/4 wave antenna)

  28. Re:hitching a ride is free you dorkwad by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...extra mass means extra fuel.

    I know replying to an AC is useless, but the assertion that extra mass means extra fuel isn't always true.

    Many of the early small Amateur Satellites were launched for free as the ballast of larger commercial sats. Commercial launchers must add ballast to their payloads if the main payload's CG is not over its center. As long as the Amateur sat is space-rated and the right shape, size, and weight as the needed ballast, why not launch it instead of inert ballast that will just re-enter?

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  29. Not yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll have to wait for the dupe.

    I think I hear it approaching now...

  30. Microstrip antennas by TheSync · · Score: 1

    When we designed the SPARTAN Packet Radio Experiment, we designed and used a microstrip antenna (aka patch antenna) for VHF communications. It makes a lot more sense for a space payload to use patch antennas rather than anything that sticks out of the side of the spacecraft.

    Here is a good wideband VHF/UHF microstrip antenna example.

  31. JPole Source by HenryWirz · · Score: 1

    If you need a JPole here's the place to get one

  32. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by seramar · · Score: 1

    Must have something to do with "amatuer satellite governments."

    --
    australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
  33. Re:"When it come in range of a ground station"? by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1

    mod parent down.

    User links to a site that does malicious things to the browser(Firefox)

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  34. Now I see. by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    02:03:26:43 : KC9XG]APRS,PCSAT2*,qAC,KC9XG:] IGNORE ALogger A side test digi packet
    02:03:26:44 : PCSAT2]APRLTM,SGATE,qAO,KC9XG:T# IGNORE ALogger A side test packet
    ???
    Profit!

  35. yeah by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    actually theres a really large trash heap you can get some elevation on.

    they have an interesting way of getting rid of trash here. they compress it and pile it up and then throw dirt over the top of it. it creates these MASSIVE pretty green hills as the natural tendency of any field or pile of dirt is to sprout grass.

    my coworker here refers to the big one in south of miami in cutler ridge as 'mount trashmore'

  36. Only A Couple Hundred Miles...Straight Up by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    The fact that it's a couple hundred miles up is what makes it different. Sure, getting a signal from Pensacola to Key West wouldn't be a big deal today, because you can retransmit the signal via repeaters located up and down the peninsula. (Or use HF, which is a completely different technical challenge, but is pretty well understood.)

    Imagine trying to get a signal from Key West to a point equally far away, but without any repeaters or being able to use longer frequencies for the HF advantage -- that's more like what space communications are like. It's a whole new ball game.

    Furthermore, there's just something different when it comes to being in space at all. Even if there weren't the technical challenges involved, it would still be interesting to do, because it's just fascinating to be directly involved with something that's orbiting the earth. I understand that might not ring everyone's bells exactly, but for some of us it's a pretty attractive draw.

    Asking 'what's the big deal, it's only a few hundred miles' is kind of like asking someone who's going on a submarine down to the Titanic: 'what's the big deal, it's only three miles...'

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  37. Re:The Death of Mary Jo by Capt.+Caneyebus · · Score: 1

    you are a meathead

    --
    -- Yes, I work for the government, and yes I am watching you.