Slashdot Mirror


V For Vendetta Delayed until March 2006

datemenatalie writes "According to Sci Fi Wire, V for Vendetta, originally slated to open on Nov. 4, has been pushed back to next March. The film stars Natalie Portman and was written by Matrix creators Andy and Larry Wachowski. This delay comes as quite a blow not only to expectant fans, but also to the marketing campaign of the film, as the clever tagline tie-in 'Remember, remember the 5th of November' is decidedly weaker when you attempt to rhyme it with March 17th."

302 comments

  1. Beware the ides of March! by chill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And just pull it back 2 days for release.

      -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Beware the ides of March! by linzeal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Beware the ides of march
      And schedule your gynecologist

    2. Re:Beware the ides of March! by e-duderino · · Score: 1

      I didn't know you had a hand in there too?

    3. Re:Beware the ides of March! by mldkfa · · Score: 1

      How about offering a free glass of green beer at every showing? That would get people there.

    4. Re:Beware the ides of March! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Should you get an ides and nodes specialist?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. Sign me up! by DirtyJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...stars Natalie Portman...
    ...comes as quite a blow...to expectant fans

    Uh... where can I get tickets?

    1. Re:Sign me up! by hobbesx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Save your cash! You can get a blow in the alley behind the Paramount now, and for only five bucks!

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    2. Re:Sign me up! by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 1

      It didn't say fans should expect a blow.

      --
      I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    3. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What can be betta
      than V For Vendetta
      On the 17th of March,
      Natalie Portman and Starch

      Hot grits on a leg --
      don't make slashbots beg
      but fanboys will swoon
      and yell "there's no spoon"

      So you boys gotta wait
      and master teh bait
      then watch V For Vendetta
      So you can shoot your beretta

          -- some Slashbot

    4. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, she looks really ugly in the clips of this movie I have seen. I guess I don't go for the sinead o'connor look.

    5. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      uh, she looks really ugly in the clips of this movie I have seen. I guess I don't go for the sinead o'connor look.

      Sure, hair is one body part one may pay attention to, but on the other hand... ;-)

    6. Re:Sign me up! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Ironic that your username is DirtyJ.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    7. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but how much does it cost to get popcorn to go with it?

    8. Re:Sign me up! by DirtyJ · · Score: 1

      Not so ironic. I've been known to make an off-color joke from time to time... hence the nickname.

    9. Re:Sign me up! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Dear Hollywood:

      Please stop making crappy "literary cinema" out of crappy comic books. Most of us are not twelve years old any more. Please consider going back to making good, original movies instead of ripping off stupid ideas from stupid comic books that nobody outside of some dude's D&D gaming circle in his mom's basement knows about.

      Oh wait, you never really did that in the first place. Okay -well, start doing the original thing for the first time at all, then.

      Seriously - that Sin City is the best you've got is sad. It didn't suck, but it was little more than average. And you wonder why you're "losing" money this year.

    10. Re:Sign me up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's almost the complete opposite of ironic.

    11. Re:Sign me up! by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      V for Vendetta could make for a good movie, in theory. It may not be Superman, but it's not quite limited to some dude's D&D gaming circle. I've seen it in most bookstores where I've looked. They wouldn't stock it if no one would buy it.

      But seriously, Hollywood ran out of new ideas years ago. They remade Flubber. How much more proof do you need that the idea barrel is empty?

  3. Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by HeLLFiRe1151 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My expectations for anything done by them are decidedly weaker anyways.

    --
    I've got 101 mod points and you can't have them!
    1. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Decessus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I liked all three Matrix movies. There was a lot of depth to all of them. I know the second and third one were not as popular, but there was a lot there, it was just a little harder to see.

    2. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      I put that down tot he sequel curse. All the non-sequel movies they've done so far (Bound and The Matrix)have been kickass. Sad news, a 90 ft Natalie Portman with a shaved head would have had me twicthing in my sleep for weeks.

      But As long as Serenity isn't delayed again I'm still flying high.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    3. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      People wanna be spoon fed entertainment. The Matrix wasn't like that so they feel the need to criticise it otherwise they have to admit that they are intellectually lazy. It's like the opposite of the emperor's new clothes.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by gowen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      People wanna be spoon fed entertainment
      No. I like plots that make sense, dialogue that actually sounds like people talk, and I don't like pointless 30 minute action sequences that fail to advance the already threadbare plot. Oh, and a lead actor who can actually act wouldn't go amiss.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Decessus · · Score: 1

      How did the plot not make sense?

    6. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see, you actually have to think to understand the plotline. An education in religious symbolism will also help your appreciation of the film a lot. Do you know that kids in catholic schools study and write essays about The Matrix? It's just that good.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 1

      I don't think that it was harder to see, I think that it was incoherent psychobabble as opposed to interesting and thought provoking philosophical questions.

      The Matrix got it right but the following two tried too hard to get it right and went way over the top and beyond the point of being a nonsensical sampling of way too wide a body of thought. The sequels tried to top the original by using the same old schtick, just in larger quantities. The original had magic and its sequels did not.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    8. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Decessus · · Score: 1

      Yes, knowing religious symbolism definitely does help. I'll admit that when I first saw the second and third movies I didn't care much for them. It wasn't until a little later that I found a new appreciation for them.

    9. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Decessus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. I could be just much easier to please. This is probably on account that I'm just glad someone at least tried to put something a little deeper in the movie they were making. That's more than you can say about a lot of the stuff that gets put out these days.

    10. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like plots that make sense, dialogue that actually sounds like people talk...

      You know, I'm actually quit fond of dialogue that is not at all how people talk - as long ass it's good dialogue. Try watching, say, a film by David Mamet (random example that comes to mind, I'm not endorsing him as the pinnacle of good dialogue). In a lot of his films the things people say are not what a person would ever actually say, but rather the things you wish you'd said 2 days later when you've had tome to think about it. The dialogue isn't realistic, but it is often extrenely sharp and snappy. Heck, try watching a film like Closer (featuring Natalie Portman no less) that's been adapted from a play: people do not talk like that in real life, but damn there's some good sharp dialogue in there.

      Jedidiah.

    11. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the woman that really wrote the Matrix movies just got a big settlement for them stealing it from her? Maybe this push back is to do with the settlement terms?

    12. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      try watching a film like Closer

      I did, and damn was that painful.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    13. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The dialogue isn't realistic, but it is often extrenely sharp and snappy. Heck, try watching a film like Closer (featuring Natalie Portman no less) that's been adapted from a play: people do not talk like that in real life, but damn there's some good sharp dialogue in there.

      Ugh. Terrible example. Closer was a horrifyingly pretentious play inexpertly turned into an even worse movie. The dialogue was painfully stilted, the characters totally unsympathetic, and the interactions were frequently completely nonsensical.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maddox said it best, when criticizing Matrix Reloaded...

          "I know most of you who liked this movie are probably reading this and saying "STUPID MADOX [sic]! YOU JUST DIDN'T GET IT." Oh no, I got it, it's just that once I got it, I didn't want it anymore. There are going to be websites popping up left and right trying to justify this movie, trying to rationalize everything, but there's one thing all these geeks are forgetting: just because a movie makes sense, doesn't mean it's good."

          And of course...

          "I wouldn't have minded this movie so much if I would have remembered to bring my Game Boy Advance to the theater. At least then I could have practiced murdering vampires instead of being patronized by stupid bullshit about "causality." Good job you shrubs, you've managed to surface the underlying philosophy of just about every other movie in existence. Man I hate people."

          The one for Matrix Revolutions was also great. I agree with a lot of things he said; they were just bad movies. There's something very wrong when a movie bores you on every action scene and can't make you care about the dialog-driven ones.

    15. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      The second and third were spoon fed entertainment. Jesus Christ, who didn't see Neo as Jesus Christ? The first wasn't particularly deep, but it hinted at interesting and exciting cinema. The Wachowski Siblings squandered two great opportunities to follow up on the first.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    16. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Stop that right now.

      The case was dismissed - the woman who claims to have written them didn't prove her case, didn't supply the evidence she and her lawyers had to supply, and the case was thrown out because of this.

      It never even went past the initial steps of discovery.

      She's not getting any money out of that, apart from the money she'll score from the publicity for her crappy, crappy novel.

      Please, just google her name in google news. It ain't hard. In fact, I'll take pity on you and provide a link to Snopes on just this matter.

    17. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god! I thought I was the only one here who felt that way.

      It's not that it doesn't it doesn't have tons of philosophical references; it's that they're all pretty damn obvious if you're the least bit acquainted with the philosophies. And the most major one, Christianity, is so obvious I have trouble believing that anyone of sound mind could miss it.

      Of course, when he blindsided me by trying to argue that Signs was, in fact, a deep movie... well, then I knew...

    18. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      No, I actually understood the gnostic Christian themes in the movie, and the Neo-Messiah connections, and the "life is a simulacrum" theory they laid out. What I didn't like was weak and pretentious way the film ended, the way the characters wound up in the end, and the not-so-subtle crucifixion theme in the third movie. In short, the ending wasn't happy enough for me. I could be more specific, but I don't want a spoiler.

    19. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      A war ended.. that wasn't happy enough for you? I guess it is old hat, people don't dance in the street anymore.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    20. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      It made sense, it's just that if you blinked, you would have missed it. (Robots suck, and Neo is the same as he was at the end of the last damn movie. /end Plot) The rest of it was a bunch of pseudophilosophical babble. Not that i'm opposed to long speeches on philosophy in general principle, but i'd prefer it to be nonobvious, non-sophomoric, or at least something I didn't come up with independently before graduating the fifth grade. Also, lone wolf ascendant characters are no longer interesting after they've achieved godhood. Period. No amount of half-assed references to jesus can make them interesting again.

      Also, the action sequences were stolen from dragonball, the english translation of which is generally regarded as the least entertaining piece of literature in the entirety of the language. I only comment about this here because I feel that the action sequences were supposed to, in some way, fill in for the nonexistent plot.

      Ok, that's my bitching for today, back to being completely apathetic regarding pop culture.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    21. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      What makes good essay writing is obvious symbolism that is like being hit over the head with a bat if you have even a middle-school level education. This is the matrix.

      What makes good storytelling is subtle symbolism that you don't notice until later, and then think 'hey, that's kinda neat' instead of 'hey, that's like being hit over the head with a large blunt object'. This is why Star Wars episode 4, 5, and 6 are generally regarded as good storytelling, while 1 and 2 are regarded as almost complete crap and 3 is usually thought of as at best mediocre.

      I did not appreciate the bat-beating i got when watching matrix 2 and 3. At least matrix 1 made a passing attempt at subtlety, and you could connect to the characters before NEO IS A SOPHOMORIC ATTEMPT AT A REDEFINITION OF JESUS IN TERMS OF MODERN SOCIETY flashed across the screen in 50-foot tall neon letters.

      Also, plotline is a different beast altogether from symbolism and literary reference. The plotline of, for instance, matrix 3 is "a guy is a black trenchcoat gets in a lot of fights with evil robots". The symolism is, apparrently: NEO IS A SOPHOMORIC ATTEMPT AT A REDEFINITION OF JESUS IN TERMS OF MODERN SOCIETY, according to the flashing neon letters.

      Finally, I'll also note that catholic schools also have children draw an uninterrupted stream of teddy bears for almost 6 months straight (I spent my first few years in a catholic school). This does not indicate the supreme literary value of the teddy bear (not that the bears don't have a fair amount of literary value, but the fact that a school uses them as a teaching aid does not in any way imply it).

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    22. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      There was just enough story in the Matrix to cover one film. Beyond that, the cracks started to show.

    23. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by mdarksbane · · Score: 1
      dialogue that actually sounds like people talk


      You must loathe shakespeare, then.


      And no, people back then *didn't* talk in blank verse. I think a scene in Black Adder said it best.
      Beshrew me, my lord! - Only stupid actors say "beshrew me"

      For instance, although the Architect and the Oracle's language is nothing like how people actually talk, they're easily the best written characters in the whole movie.

      Or to take another example, Obi Wan Kenobi. Again, nothing like real dialogue, SIGNIFICANTLY better. How you wish every old man you met sounded.

      While I'll agree that the dialogue in the matrix movies isn't great in general (and Revolutions was the worst - Trinity's final scene was some of the worst writing I've ever had to sit through) the scenes that *are* great (anything with the original oracle, the architect, agent smith's rant in the end of the first one) are great precisely because they are poetry, not real speech.

    24. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by gowen · · Score: 1

      Shakespeare wrote plays in poetry. His dialogue was artificial, but brilliant. Dialogue in the Matrix 2&3 is artifical and godawful. It's not really a valid comparison.

      As to Star Wars, the dialogue is largely shit, but no-one (sane) is holding those up as great and meaningful works of philosophy. If they were, I'd take the piss just as much. The initial Star Wars trilogy, like Matrix I, are great escapist entertainment, and can be enjoyed on that level. Shakespeare is great poetry and philosophy, and sometimes entertainment.

      Matrix 2&3 are simply none of the above.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    25. Re:Remember Matrix 2 and 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm actually quit fond of dialogue that is not at all how people talk - as long ass it's good dialogue.

      Obviassly, quit true.

  4. Fuzzy-headed Pr0tman by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Natalie's going to keep the fuzzy look, so she says. Is this any kind of annaversary of Star Trek TMP? Let's mangle memories and metaphors.

    It was the third of september That day I'll always remember, yes I will 'cause that was the day that my daddy died... whoops, wrong lyric!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. Historical signifcance by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Informative

    March 17th also has a little less historical significance for vigilantes trying to overthrow the British government than, say, November 5th.

    Jedidiah.

    1. Re:Historical signifcance by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

      "1845 - The rubber band is invented"
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_17

      YES!

    2. Re:Historical signifcance by The+Dodger · · Score: 1

      March 17th is St Patrick's Day. :-)

    3. Re:Historical signifcance by richdun · · Score: 1

      ...and it is my birthday, so quite frankly I think it has plenty of historical significance. Now all I need is a temporal theorist to explain why that is true (you know, the whole spiel about how even seemingly minor events on a universal scale can have huge consequences if they turned out differently).

  6. New Tag Line by Earl+The+Squirrel · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about:

        Watch, Watch the 17th of March.

    1. Re:New Tag Line by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Watch, Watch the 17th of March.

      Only Jean Luc Picard could pull that off.


      -Colin

    2. Re:New Tag Line by Eightyford · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be from Boston!

    3. Re:New Tag Line by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      I would have said Colorado, since that's where you go to get your Truck Warshed.

      "Warch, Warch, the 17th of March, good buddy"

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    4. Re:New Tag Line by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 0
      Marketing guys might be pretty canny, but I don't think they'll be able to find any date that rhymes well with:

      "Hey don't blame us! It was some reactive studio executive who has an emotional trigger that causes him to pee when he hears 'Plot' in any context."

  7. Bah! by mangledspine · · Score: 1, Funny

    Colour me V for vexed!

  8. The 4th? by corrie · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone remember the 5th of November if it would've opened on the 4th?

    1. Re:The 4th? by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      The evening of the 4th in the USA is the morning of the 5th in Britain.

  9. Clever Tagline by gowen · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not just a tagline. It's a bit of terrorism related doggerel known to every British schoolkid.

    Remember remember the 5th of November
    Gunpowder, treason and plot
    I see no reason
    Why gunpowder treason
    Should ever be forgot.

    The V comic book was great -- this film will suck because the Wachowskis are hacks, living it large off one good film (albeit one with an obvious and portentious, pretentious dialofue carried by its special effects).

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Clever Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "this film will suck because the Wachowskis are hacks, living it large off one good film"

      And there's even been (as-yet unsubstantiated) claims that they stole someone else's treatment when creating that film. That could certainly explain why 2 and 3 seemed so lacking compared to the first movie. See http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/matrix.asp for a good overview of the claim's history.

    2. Re:Clever Tagline by FatRatBastard · · Score: 1

      Actually, Bound was a good flick too (although I'm sure they didn't get very rich off of that film).

    3. Re:Clever Tagline by CardiganKiller · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The Matrix movies worked out because of the ridiculous amount of "creative" options in the general concept of the Matrix. X = "Vampires", "Ghosties with Dreadlocks", "A Little Asian Guy Who Makes Keys" WB1: "Lets put some X in the movie." WB2: "How?" WB1: "Because the machines made X so X could do Y." or X = "Flying", "Stopping Bullets", "Being A Little Spacey" WB1: "Let's let Neo have X ability" WB2: "Why?" WB1: "Because then we can create mini-plot Y around ability X". Basically each movie has some entirely new set of concepts to wow the pants off of you so that they don't have to worry so much about the intracacies of the previous movies. I loved the movies, and I love cheap thrills, and concepts that wow the pants off of me, and the newest FPS [graphics/physics/AI] w/o improved gameplay. I am 22, and a little ADD. If the V comic book contains any intertwined complexities that aren't just based off of circumstance, then I worry that the WBs won't even be able to follow the comic book completely and just wow the pants off of me again. Of course movies generally turn out this way anyways. The Dune books are ridiculous for what I expect and can handle out of entertainment. I think they're the best things since sliced bread but I'll be damned at how many times I have to go back and work out my fact checking, and fact checking within fact checking within fact checking (plots within plots within plots ;)).

    4. Re:Clever Tagline by Decessus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and there are also people who still believe we didn't land on the moon and that the world is flat.

    5. Re:Clever Tagline by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Remember remember the 5th of November
      > Gunpowder, treason and plot
      > I see no reason
      > Why gunpowder treason
      > Should ever be forgot.

      Remember, Remember, the Fifth of November,
      Natalie's turned into rock.
      That's all the reason,
      in Slashdotting season,
      to cover in grits that are hot!

      /I am so sorry...

    6. Re:Clever Tagline by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I re-watched Dark City the other day and I realized that the plot and style of Dark City is a *lot* like The Matrix... only about 10 times better in every way.

      If you enjoyed the Matrix, you owe it to yourself to go see Dark City as soon as you can. It's from the director of The Crow.

    7. Re:Clever Tagline by Formica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you liked Dark City, you might like Metropolis, where many of those ideas came from. A review.

    8. Re:Clever Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea...and dark city owes itself to metropolis. What is wrong with you people

    9. Re:Clever Tagline by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      > The V comic book was great -- this film will suck because the Wachowskis are hacks, living it large off one good film (albeit one
      > with an obvious and portentious, pretentious dialofue carried by its special effects).

      I don't remember many special effects in Bound? It is definately their best film. Jennifer Tilly, Gina Gershon, yumm.

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    10. Re:Clever Tagline by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it was 10 times better in every way, but it certainly had infinitely more Richard O'Brien in it.

      (I was listening to the RHPS soundtrack when I saw your post. Couldn't resist!)

      -Peter

    11. Re:Clever Tagline by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I know, that's one of my favorite movies. I have the really good Kino Video version on DVD. However, both Matrix and Dark City have the "reality isn't real" angle that Metropolis lacks... that's why I didn't mention Metropolis.

    12. Re:Clever Tagline by Formica · · Score: 1

      Good point, but I don't get too many chances to plug Metropolis, so I had to do it!

    13. Re:Clever Tagline by comicnerd · · Score: 1
      ...this film will suck because the Wachowskis are hacks, living it large off one good film (albeit one with an obvious and portentious, pretentious dialofue carried by its special effects).

      Maybe not. The Wachowskis are big comic book fans. In the introduction to their own comic book Doc Frankenstein they wrote:

      "Comics, more than film, give us an appreciation for the different ways that words and pictures can be used to tell a story... The comic book is superior to film in our opinion because of the excessive compromises that must be made every single day on a film set."
      May not change your mind about them or their movies, but I liked what they had to say.
    14. Re:Clever Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Remember, the Fifth of November,
      Natalie's turned into rock.
      That's all the reason,
      in Slashdotting season,
      to pour hot grits over your cock!

    15. Re:Clever Tagline by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I find Dark City to be quite silly and altogether lame. Besides the fact that both have somilar clothes and start with the fact that things aren't as they seem, they don't have much at all in common. While the sequels weren't very good, give me the Matrix over Dark City any day.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    16. Re:Clever Tagline by Lord+Raze · · Score: 1


      The V comic book was great -- this film will suck because the Wachowskis are hacks, living it large off one good film (albeit one with an obvious and portentious, pretentious dialofue carried by its special effects).

      How was "Bound" carried by it's special effects?

      --
      -- "Have you ever seen your own brain?"
    17. Re:Clever Tagline by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      It wasn't. It was carried by its lesbianism.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    18. Re:Clever Tagline by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I have to say, I find Dark City to be quite silly and altogether lame. Besides the fact that both have somilar clothes and start with the fact that things aren't as they seem, they don't have much at all in common.

      Another thing they have in common, Matrix was shot on a lot of the same sets, in Sydney.

    19. Re:Clever Tagline by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      I always like how they have different names in that. Robot or android aren't used.
      It would be interesting, well not for anybody who likes the original, to see a remake. It would probably just have much effects though, similar to The Matrix.
      I did have an odd dream about that movie once. It sounds like it could be from the various movies mentioned in this story.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    20. Re:Clever Tagline by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      I coincidentally watched Dark City on video a couple of weeks before The Matrix was released. I don't remember either of them very well any more, but I do remember thinking, as I was watching it, that the Matrix seemed like a rip-off of Dark City in many ways. It was probably just coincidence in hindsight.

      Of course, as others have also pointed out, Dark City itself was preceeded by Metropolis.

    21. Re:Clever Tagline by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      actually, matrix reused some of the sets from Dark City, see here (scroll down to Cinematics). so there's a reason parts of the film liiks the same, just check out that staircase were Neo sees the deja vu!

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    22. Re:Clever Tagline by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      I'm a fan of Equilibrium, personally. It's about like the Matrix, but the heavy hand with the symbolism bat comes across as funny instead of painfully pretentious, somehow. Also, it had 'gun kata' which reduced me to helpless laughter for over 1/3 of the movie. I had to keep pausing and rewinding so i wouldn't miss parts.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    23. Re:Clever Tagline by jhage · · Score: 1

      I don't remember any special effects in 'Bound'.

      Oh, you mean 'The Matrix'.... Right, never mind.

    24. Re:Clever Tagline by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      The similarites probably aren't coincidental. I believe, in the commentary voice over during the closing credits, it's mentioned that the producer Joel Silver (maybe, could have been someone else) wasn't there to finish up things on Dark City because he left to film "some film called Matrix or something." They both have different feels though and I think the first Matrix movie is better than Dark City, even if the sequels were almost unwatchable.

      Dark City is excellent though, but I recommend new viewers fast forward to the part where you actually see Keifer Sutherland on screen. The voice-over in the beginning is unnecessary and ruins much of the movie in my mind.

    25. Re:Clever Tagline by mink · · Score: 1

      I thought the 13th floor was a good film along the same lines as this discussion.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  10. V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The spokesperson, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, denied that the delay had anything to do with the movie's subject matter or the current political climate.

    I'm not buying it that a movie about terrorism in London just happens to get delayed at this time.

    -Colin

    1. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by gowen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Usually "to accomodate post production" means "while we try and fix the uncomprehensible mess the director has shown us." Given the provenance, that's far more likely (have you tried to watch Matrix Revolutions without laughing?)

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by big+whiffer · · Score: 1

      its like the spokesperson only though he was partially anonymous. why else would he deny the reasons for the delay yet give us other truthful information...?

    3. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not buying it..."

      Just as well. It's not for sale.

    4. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you tried to watch Matrix Revolutions without laughing?

      "Many men have tried."
      "They tried and failed?"
      "They tried and died."

    5. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not buying it that a movie about terrorism in London just happens to get delayed at this time.

      .
      Incidentally, here's what producer Joel Silver had to say about it at the San Diego Comic-Con:

      Question 13: In the post 9/11 sort of climate, where Britain and America seem to be getting closer and closer to the world of this movie, what made you decide to make it now, and how do you think it's going be received?

      Joel Silver: I think it's a really great time for this movie. I mean, it's a controversial film, and we're in a controversial time. There're some really bold and impressive ideas in the original story, which was written in the late 80s, and it's the perfect place for us to show the film now. What happened is that when the boys finished the Matrix movies, they were kind of burnt out, but they had written a script for me for this before they made the Matrix movies. They said that they were very happy with working with James McTeigue, who had been our first assistant director on the Matrix films, and they wanted James to have a shot to direct a picture. They said, "We were thinking about going back, rewriting V -- we'll produce it with you," which I was happy to have them do, "And we'd like James to direct it." And they said, "We think the time is right for it." So that's why we're doing it, and I think it's going to impress a lot of people and make a lot of people think, which I think is important for movies like this today."


      .
      And here's the original comic's artist, David Lloyd's thoughts on the subject:

      "Question 16: David Lloyd, as a creator of the original story, and the rest of you making it, what are your feelings about the London bombing, and also present-day London with video cameras all over the place... which is kind of how the story of V FOR VENDETTA was.

      David Lloyd: Yeah, that's very interesting about the CCTV cameras, because when we did that in the '80s, there weren't that many around. I mean, society has actually become a lot more like the one that we actually painted. The question about London and terrorism, and what's happened there -- I think it's important that we try and understand terrorists. I think there should be lots of movies made about terrorists, and politics generally, and one of the reasons I'm so happy about this film is that it does have a very strong and uncompromising political message, and there aren't many films made like that now. So, in terms of what's happening in London over the last week, I think it's going to be healthy to try and understand what leads a person to terrorism. There's that old cliché, isn't there - one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter - and if we try and understand that, then maybe we might be able to solve the problems that cause terrorism more easily."


    6. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spokesperson, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, denied that the delay had anything to do with the movie's subject matter or the current political climate.

      I'm not buying it that a movie about terrorism in London just happens to get delayed at this time


      I dont really think Londoners and Brits in general would give a fuck. We arent as sensitive as our US cousins. Im sure i read about people being upset about the name LOTR : TTT over a year after 9/11

    7. Re:V is for Vuh-yeah-right. by GozzoMan · · Score: 1

      There's that old cliché, isn't there - one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter - and if we try and understand that, then maybe we might be able to solve the problems that cause terrorism more easily.

      While I completely agree to Lloyd's point, I wouldn't call the quote a "cliché": it's from Ronald Reagan, about the founding of groups such as the mujahideen in Afghanistan, the Contras in Nicaragua, and Jonas Savimbi's rebel forces in Angola.

  11. New Tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey all you /.'s, hot grits have starch, come and see Natalie this 17th of March!"

    1. Re:New Tagline by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

      You ain't never seen th'
      likes of March 17th

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  12. Hmmmm by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wonder if this has anything to do with assumed emotional stress concerning the films bombings?

    Although - If they are doing this to maintain the integrity of the film, so as to not remove any of those scenes - more power to them.

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Hmmmm by kae_verens · · Score: 1
      Wonder if this has anything to do with assumed emotional stress concerning the films bombings?
      Although - If they are doing this to maintain the integrity of the film, so as to not remove any of those scenes - more power to them.

      whoops... I wonder if it's the fact that I'm Irish, but I misread that as "more powder to them"

    2. Re:Hmmmm by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Not likely. Has britain ever actually managed a month without the IRA blowing something up in a large city? The movie would be delayed forever.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  13. obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Natalie Portman, naked and petrified...
    the Wachowski brothers...

    this geeks head asplode.

  14. No, that's not how it works - here's why... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Informative

    The lead character in V for Vendetta, V, is basically Guy Fawkes, albeit in a contemporary dystopian setting. Now, you may not know it, but Guy Fawkes was one of the conspirators in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament, on November 5th, 1605.

    So, a November 5th release is very appropriate for V for Vendetta, especially as this year is the 400th anniversary of the plot. Releasing the film in March 2006 doesn't have quite the same marketing effect or poignancy.

    I've commented on V for Vendetta in its original comic book form on Slashdot many times. I won't bother to drudge up what I've written elsewhere but I will summarise it all here: V for Vendetta is one of if not the greatest comic ever written, and there is no way that any film adaptation will ever do it justice.

    My advice to anyone who will go to watch the film is read the original first and let that blow you away before you watch whatever butchery the story has to undergo to suit the media of film and the tastes of Hollywood execs.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "V for Vendetta is one of if not the greatest comic ever written, and there is no way that any film adaptation will ever do it justice."

      I would have said the same thing about Sin City two years ago, and I would have been dead wrong.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    2. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by \\ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Frank Miller was 100% involved with the Sin City movie.

      Alan Moore has nothing to do with the V for Vendetta movie (his choice), Fate has been changed to be a shock jock, Evey isn't going to be caught selling herself to start the film, in the film there are a great many people dressed like V all being unhappy with the government together (which is always funny, anarchists being anarchists together). The list of ridiculous changes from the comic to the movie is somewhat long.

      If you have any love for the comic, you'll be most displeased with the movie.

    3. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Logan+Smith · · Score: 1

      Agreed; I was going to say the same. I wouldn't call this "quite a blow... to expectant fans," considering the movie would never do it justice regardless of when it was released; at least, not as the movie plot stands now, with much of its underlying concept stripped out to avoid the idea that the story may be encouraging terrorism.

      --
      Logan Smith
    4. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look at how V for Vendetta is set out. Look at the chapter styling, the poetry, etc. How do you translate those elements to film without losing 90 percent of your audience?

      The answer is you can't do it, so you don't even try to do it, and, consequently, much of the depth of the story is lost. V for Vendetta is perhaps the least superficial comic that you could ever hope to come across, yet film is perhaps our most superficial medium. It is inevitable that much of what makes V for Vendetta such an outstanding piece of work will be lost in translation.

      I'd even go as far as to suggest that certain parts of the story that involve action rather than worlds will be diluted to suit modern sensibilities. Hollywood's primary audience is and always will be US filmgoers, and it's hard to imagine that some aspects of the story (I won't elaborate further, as I wouldn't want to spoil anything for someone who hasn't read it yet) wouldn't be watered down or eliminated totally to fall more in-line with what is and isn't taboo in a society that still hasn't gotten over a 1 second flash of one of Janet Jackson's nipples more than 18 months ago.

      Suffice to say that, somewhere along the line, Alan Moore's beautiful nightmare will be so heavily diluted and edited that it will lose much of its raw power.

      Where you see a potential Sin City, I see a potential (and probable) Judge Dredd: ie, a Hollywood mockery of the original source material.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by rodgerd · · Score: 1

      If you think Sin City is one of the greatest comic books ever written, pass me a pipe of whatever you have.

      And the movie, while very good, is also flawed. In some cases, those flaws are a result of the slavish translation from comic to film.

    6. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Hey, c'mon -- this might be the first blow many potential fans have ever seen. Don't take that away from them. ;)

    7. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by dominion · · Score: 0

      (which is always funny, anarchists being anarchists together)

      Not if you know anything about anarchism.

    8. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I shudder to think of what the Wachowskis' egos will do to this movie. Ever since Matrix Reloaded I can't stomach the thought of seeing any more of their creations. I wonder how many sequels they are planning.

    9. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Logan+Smith · · Score: 1

      Aww, I don't want to be a spoilsport. ^^ I'll say no more!

      --
      Logan Smith
    10. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by andyt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Alan Moore has nothing to do with the V for Vendetta movie (his choice)

      Which, lets face it, is perfectly understandable after the horrible horrible jobs done on his previous works of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen and From Hell.

      I think he's pretty much given up on Hollywood now.

    11. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by pthisis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      yet film is perhaps our most superficial medium

      If you can say this with a straight face then your movie criticism is fairly worthless, IMO. The medium of film is no more superficial than the play, and substantially more complex than radio, photograph, etc. It's true that some real stinkers have been made, but you can walk into the local bookstore and see whole aisles full of superficial, boilerplate romance novels, mysteries, and self-improvement guides.

      Films like High and Low, the Last Flight, Requiem for a Dream, and so on have serious depth to them.

      I'd certainly put dozens of media ahead of film as far as shallowness (perhaps starting with the billboard and the pamphlet--both of which _can_ have some depth but on average rarely do).

      Hell, the sculpture is generally pretty damned shallow; for every Hand of God or Unfinished Slaves, there are hundreds of generic classical-styled garden decorations and huge crappy abstract installation pieces outside of corporate headquarters. Idem painting with all the pseudo-impressionist doctor's lobby pap, cute puppies/kids, etc.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    12. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My list of greatest comic books ever written include (in no particular order):

      -Moore's The Dark Knight Returns and The Watchmen (and of course V)
      -Ellis' Transmetropolitan (and perhaps Preacher by the same writer, though I'd like to see *that* put to film)
      -Spiegelman's Maus
      -Sin City

      Now, I don't know whether you prefer "classic" comic books, but I consider the above comics/series to be the best the industry's offered in the past couple of decades. You got any better ones?

      As for the film being flawed: it's a conversion, so it's not going to be perfect, but it's the closest conversion of a comic to film that I've ever seen, not just in terms of story but style.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    13. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Sarcastic+Assassin · · Score: 1

      Honestly I can't comment on the depth V for Vendetta goes into with the "chapter styling, poetry, etc." However, film is certainly not our most superficial medium. Sure, many people watch films purely for entertainment, and no other real (analytical) value, but just because the majority of the film industry's money is made from those people does not mean that film is "our most superficial medium."

    14. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      That's always been his stance. He takes the cash, absolves himself of it, makes sure they don't tie his name into the marketing, and let's them wander about. However now he's giving all portions of his proceeds to the artists involved in the projects.

    15. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by alfedenzo · · Score: 1

      Preacher's actually by Garth Ennis, not Warren Ellis.

    16. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by dbhankins · · Score: 1

      "The Dark Knight Returns" is Miller, not Moore.

    17. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      You're all completely missing the point! Screw Alan Moore, I want to see Jason Flemyng get a role in this movie, so we can get the Jason Flemyng/shitty Alan Moore film adaptations trifecta!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    18. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hollywood's primary audience is and always will be US filmgoers,

      This is quickly changing. In fact, a good number of films are being designed for moderate American box office success with an aim to get in the black overseas. Put any Tom Cruise film in this category; he's a huge international star, eclipsing his fame domestically. Films like Collateral and American Samurai are examples of how the industry is acknowledging the sheer mass of the international market and catering accordingly.

      That said, I agree with you. For the most part, comic book adaptations suffer greatly because the things that make great graphic novels often translate poorly onscreen. It's two critical things, I think: pacing and imagination. Hollywood doesn't want to lose its core audience. They'd rather seem a little behind the curve than ahead of it; this affirms the supposed intelligence of the audience, so dumbing down is a must as far as they're concerned. The second is imagination: film robs the viewer of the opportunity to imagine the unfolding of events, or for a different take on the turn of events. Unless someone totally nails it (Robert Rodriguez nailed Sin City visually) it becomes something people are dissatisfied with.

      The problem is that you have smart people bringing smart projects to executives who understand how to sell dumb movies. Nine times out of ten, those executives have final cut, and are beholden to big-money investors who expect significant returns.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    19. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      At least this time they didn't steal the idea from someone else and try to pass it off as their own creation. Although it should've been painfully clear from the differences between the first movie and the second two that whoever wrote the first had nothing to do with the two that came after.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "American Splendor" would be at the top of my list. "Real life is pretty complex stuff", as the author says. Personally I find his short story about finding a pair of Stetsons means a lot more to me than anything I've ever read by Moore.

    21. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done moron.
      They wrote all 3 at basically the same time.
      WB just wanted to test the water before doing them all.

      I know the bros personally and know they came up with it themselves. Larry studied philosophy for years before starting on matrix. Most of the themes of matrix or even terminator are all throughout various philosophies. Its not that unreasonable that 2 people would come up with the same ideas.

      If they really should get sued by anyone it'd probably be about 20 philosophers that they grabbed various ideas from.

    22. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did either of them perchance suffer brain damage during the course of writing these films?

    23. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      No, it still is, because he's not talking about that kind of anarchist. He's talking about the kind that link is trying to say isn't real anarchism, even though it has many adherents (or pseudo-adherents).

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    24. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Frank and Alan Moore wrote the comic books, Larry and Andy Wachowski did the movie. What more could you possibly want?

      (it's a joke, people.)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    25. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but obviously the depth of the philosophy is way to deep for you puny mind to handle.

      If you forget about the john gaeta uc(r)ap fight scenes and focus purely on the 3 movies as a whole. If you can really piece the philosophy together, your realise how amazing those films are.

    26. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If they really should get sued by anyone it'd probably be about 20 philosophers that they grabbed various ideas from.

      By which you mean, "Grant Morrison" -- the guy who wrote The Invisibles. You're wrong about the movies being written at the same time. The Wachowski Siblings were planning to release a series of comic books after the first one until WB approached them for more. Indeed, both brothers are college drop outs. So you're wrong on three counts. And since you "know Larry," shouldn't you know that the Siblings are no longer Brothers?

    27. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by mbourgon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My advice to anyone who will go to watch the film is read the original first and let that blow you away

      And my advice is to ignore that advice - see the movie first. Think it's cool. Enjoy, etc, etc. Then read the comic book. If it's truly all that, then you'll be blown away again. Do it the parent's way, and you'll probably be disappointed with the movie.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    28. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      In the words of Andy Dufresne, how can you be so obtuse?

      You misunderstand the point that I was trying to make, and deliberately so, it seems.

      Of all the entertainment media commonly associated with storytelling, film is probably the most superficial, with the possible exception of pop music (if you want to classify that as a storytelling medium too).

      A picture might tell a thousand words, but a film director only has so many such pictures that he can put in the can during a typical film. 24 pictures a second, for two hours or so (two hours being a rough approximation of the length of a typical film nowadays) still leaves a director playing catch up to the novelist who is as free as he likes to be as verbose as he likes about every detail in every scene.

      A character might pause for a second or two on screen before committing an act yet that pause can easily be strung out for pages and pages by even a half-decent author who can use it to describe everything from the character's immediate state of body and mind to his motivations, hopes, dreams and aspirations. An author has every luxury to wax lyrical, a director typically does not, hence my comment about superficiality.

      Take a complex scene from any movie and try to express it in words. Now add ton and expand on that written description. With the written word, that's easily done, right? Now take a complex scene from any book and try to cram everything that a writer's telling you onto the screen. Sure, you might be able to express what a character's thoughts and actions whilst keeping the action on screen at a reasonable pace but could you do that for, say, four characters without losing anything and without being reduced to a crawl? Or would you have to leave some things to the viewers' imaginations?

      And, of course, you can flip back a page or two in a book and re-read it, but you can't do that with a movie being played to a packed theatre. Whereas an author can be excused losing his readers from time to time (because they can go back a few lines and find their way again) a movie director cannot (whatever message needs to be conveyed has to be conveyed in a clear, unambiguous fashion). That's not to say that a book can freely wander meaninglessly about it's subject matter without causing concern or that a film has no room for subtlety, because that's not true in either case, only that time and the opportunity for retrospection are usually on an author's side but rarely on a director's one.

      Of course, having said all that (and, believe me, it's far more than I wanted to say), there are some films with more depth to them than some books. My point was a generalisation of the media, not a specific critique comparing novel x to movie y and then a wild extrapolation from that to suit my own conclusions.

      Coming back to some of your other points, I'm sorry, but I don't consider billboards and pamphlets to be entertainment media capable of story telling, so what relevance do they have in this discussion, even in its broadest sense?

      If you recall, the fraction of a sentence that you decided to pick up on and pick apart was concerned with the translation of the story from comic book to film: trying to pull advertising hoardings into the debate is tangential at best.

      Clearly you took umbrage at my use of the word superficial. Well, by superficial I didn't mean trivial or insignificant, I meant, more often than not, barely touching the surface. I think I've illustrated how films often barely touch the surface in comparison to books, haven't I?

      I stand by what I wrote but I'll expand on it to eliminate some of the pedentry. Film isperhaps our most superficial entertainment medium for storytelling.

      Now, of course, this is where the people who ignored my recognition that this was a generalisation will choose to step in to point out the error of my ways. And that, my friends, is your cue...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    29. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather learn about the paintings of Leonardo da Vinci by first viewing sketchings of them made by an art student and then using your appreciation of that student's efforts, no matter how good or bad, to decide whether or not da Vinci's works are actually worth seeing? Gotcha.

      Sorry, but that really is ridiculous. However good or bad this movie turns out to be, the original comic book will always be a masterpiece. Appreciating the original artist's vision and then judging the interpretations of others is the logical way of doing things.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    30. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A character might pause for a second or two on screen before committing an act yet that pause can easily be strung out for pages and pages by even a half-decent author who can use it to describe everything from the character's immediate state of body and mind to his motivations, hopes, dreams and aspirations

      Of course, you're assuming that an actor cannot convey a huge range of emotion in a brief pause, and that directors never use lingering shots, pans, etc. And that vocal inflection, facial expression, etc do not convey huge subtleties.

      Hell, forget film: take V for Vendetta and write it as a novel without graphic art. It's a different experience, and it's not necessarily a less superficial one no matter how many words you use to describe the visuals, or how many deep emotional asides you insert.

      And, of course, you can flip back a page or two in a book and re-read it, but you can't do that with a movie being played to a packed theatre. Whereas an author can be excused losing his readers from time to time (because they can go back a few lines and find their way again) a movie director cannot (whatever message needs to be conveyed has to be conveyed in a clear, unambiguous fashion)

      Of course, timing is a key advantage of film (or live storytelling) over the written word. A pregnant pause or machine-gun monologue can mean a lot. Suspense can be built more easily, or pacing can be tied to emotion.

      Take a complex scene from any movie and try to express it in words. Now add ton and expand on that written description. With the written word, that's easily done, right?

      Sure. And it will _still_ lack much of the subtle artistry of the original. I mean, yes, obviously, the written word is going to be better at expressing something in words. That's pure tautology, though--words miss meaning. Often. Have you never seen a well-staged play after reading the script? Performances matter. Sets matter. Visuals matter. And they don't merely matter for flashy MTV quick-edit visual reasons, either; they often convey subtleties that are nearly impossible to put into words.

      But even leaving that aside, suppose we cede that the written word is somehow deeper than film, at least in novel format. That's _one_ medium, certainly the longest by word of any common one (epic poetry is all but extinct), and if you're going to equate verbosity with depth then it's clearly your runaway winner.

      So how is film more superficial than a play? Or television? Or radio?

      The typical script is longer (more words) than a short story or a typical poem.

      Hell, how is it more superficial than a comic book? A typical film has more words and more imagery, and if they're used intelligently there's a lot more opportunity for complexity in those images.

      Hollywood may make a lot of crappy films, but last time I was in the local newstand there sure were a lot of Archie comics in there too.

      The film medium is not the problem. Comparing Watchmen, V is for Vendetta, and Sandman to Pearl Harbor, XXX 2, and Deuce Bigalow isn't any more reasonable than comparing Amethyst and Archie to Brazil and Full Metal Jacket.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    31. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by DreamingReal · · Score: 1



      Since you got several of the creator's wrong, you'll forgive me if I take your opinions with a grain of salt. And while those are good titles, if you think those (with the exception of "Maus") are the best offerings of the medium in the last two decades, your knowledge of comics is pretty shallow. Check out Craig Thompson's "Blankets", Chris Ware's "Jimmy Corrigan", Daniel Clowes' "Eightball" serials, Jason Lute's "Jar of Fools", Seth's "It's A Good Life, If You Don't Weaken", or anything done by the late, great Will Eisner for examples of transcendent comics.

      --
      We want some answers and all that we get
      Some kind of shit about a terrorist threat

      - Ministry
    32. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      "While Ms. Stewart was shopping her manuscript around, she also sent it to the Wachowski brothers in response to an ad looking for a science fiction manuscript to create a comic book.

      During the FBI investigation, it was discovered that, in an effort to avoid liability, 30 minutes or more was edited from the original Matrix film. Further witnesses employed at Warner Brothers came forward claiming that the executives and lawyers had full knowledge that the work in question did not belong to the Wachowski brothers as they claimed.

      The witnesses also added that the original work of Ms. Stewart had been seen, and often used during preparation of the motion pictures. During a Sept. 27 court proceeding, United States District Judge Margaret Morrow ruled against several motions made by the defendants in their attempt to get the suits against them dismissed."

      The FBI report said that "there was no doubt" that the Wachowskis stole the idea nearly verbatim from Ms. Martin. Are you going to tell me that the FBI is lying about their conclusions?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    33. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What philosophy are we talking about here? Are we talking about the blatant Christian imagery? Or are we talking about the obvious existential hero stuff? Maybe the random gnosticism stuff?

      What exactly do you think is so deep and profound about these movies?

    34. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      I think he's pretty much given up on Hollywood now.

      funny that... he takes their money though and lets them butcher his work... If he really cared, he would refuse to sell the rights.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    35. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would be far better to watch the "butchery" first then read the comic. That way you can enjoy the film and then enjoy the comic more. Positive and Positive. Why would you want to sit through the movie in a negative state?

    36. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I don't think that it's a matter of more or less superficial, I think most mediums have the potential to deeply detail any given moment in their own way.

      The problem is in adaptations, often times the depth associated with a particular moment is there because of the original medium, and it is often impossible to translate this to any different medium.

      A good director can add complexity where there was none in the book, and can even improve on the original story. IMHO this is why the best adaptations tend to be from mediocre books (Jurassic Park). The director has the ability to expound on the story the author laid the framework for.

      I would even go so far as to say that it is impossible for a director to improve on an excellent book, although a good or mediocre movie may still appeal to the American audience more than the original material (LotR).

    37. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      De gustibus non est disputandum.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    38. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      I agree. A book and a movie based on it are like a polynomial, with the difference that the movie is a little underspecified. Therefore, I find that reading the book first helps with the movie, since the extra data points let make sense of it better. Case in point: LOTR; I would've been totally fucking lost if I hadn't read the paper version first.

      Butchering the analogy further, if the polynomials turn out unequal, the degree of inequality shows how far the adaptation strayed from the book.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    39. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Rude-Boy · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, he doesn't actually have the rights to the work, DC does.

      He still has to get paid when people use it, but he doesn't have control of how it gets used.

      Sounds insane to me too.

    40. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by GozzoMan · · Score: 1


      Moore has been so disappointed by the adaptation of TLOEG and FH that he refused to accept any money for any other film adaptations of his work.

      No control (by "contract" or whatever) and no money (by choice).

    41. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has to be the longest winded FAQ I have ever seen. I'm sure it sais lots of great stuff, but who really has time to read a 100+ page FAQ?

    42. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by jabber01 · · Score: 1

      Now, you may not know it, but Guy Fawkes was one of the conspirators in the Gunpowder Plot to blow up Parliament, on November 5th, 1605.

      So, what you're saying is that the significance of an 11/5 release will be entirely lost on all the non-British.

      --

      The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
      What you do today will cost you a day of your life

    43. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by renderhead · · Score: 1

      At first I read that as "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen From Hell", which sounds like quite the summer blockbuster to me.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    44. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about letting the "sketches" influence your choice of seeing? My point is that if the comic book is as good as you say, there's pretty much no point in seeing the movie - you'll be disappointed. Why set yourself up for that? See the movie? Okay, it's good. Cool. Then you'll enjoy the comic book. Say it's bad. Still, cool. You'll read the comic book and that'll be good.

      Then again, after seeing LXG, I went and bought The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen graphic novel - and was utterly disappointed. While the story was cool, IMHO the art style was awful. Same with the pr0n that he did, the one with Alice in Wonderland and the two others. Interesting premise, but the art. Ugh!

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    45. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      You'll forgive me for laughing when your comment is basically "My opinions are better than yours." I'm glad that you have such a high opinion of yourself, but my opinions are mine, and quite frankly I could care less whether you agree with them or not.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    46. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I almost sprayed Mountain Dew all over my monitor (no, I don't drink it regularly, it just struck me that it might go well with the pizza that I had for lunch, I was somewhat mistaken.)

      It's not often that a post can produce a spit take on me.

      Many moons ago, I took a class in Pascal. Our final project was to write a program that the instructor found interesting and challenging, and he had to approve it. I wrote a fairly simple program that took a file of a couple hundred movie titles, and if the first word of one matched the last word of another, it displayed the results.

      My favorite was and still is "Blood Beach Blanket Bingo."

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    47. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to be fair, try writing a faq about any political theory and it's history as a movement without getting longwinded.

      This faq is pretty good though, in that you can read sectiosn of it without having to read all of it at once.

    48. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm afraid thats just a rumour. They were always going to do comic books to show other aspects of the story, but it was always written to be 3 films.

      One example is in matrix 1, when they're in the interrogation room you pass through a screen. This is the architects room later seen in the sequels.

      I didnt say he completed his course, but he did go for years and still does study philosophy.

      And larry is both and they still consider themselves brothers.

    49. Re:No, that's not how it works - here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You'll forgive me for laughing when your comment is basically "My opinions are better than yours." I'm glad that you have such a high opinion of yourself, but my opinions are mine, and quite frankly I could care less whether you agree with them or not.
      Oh good grief, relax. As the person who started this with "my list of greatest comics ever written", "I consider the above ... the best", and "you got any better ones?", you're hardly in a position here to resort to absolute subjectivity of taste.

      (And, to give the argument something more concrete than just "x is better than y", take Craig Thompson's "Blankets". I find it is an extremely effective description of a very particular, carefully observed example of experiences that, nevertheless, many of us have had. Partly thanks to extraordinarily expressive drawing. For example, watch the panels showing the reaction of Raina's dad when he discovers them sleeping together. Compared to that the characters in V for Vendatta seem flat. Perhaps that's a conscious decision, and perhaps there's a good reason for it, but I don't see it.)

  15. insulting my intelligence by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "We have moved the release date of V For Vendetta to March 17, 2006, to accommodate the movie's post-production schedule."

    Bullshit. Post-production is "scheduled" to the day. It has to be. You don't suddenly go "whups, let's take another 4 or more months".

    The spokesperson, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, denied that the delay had anything to do with the movie's subject matter or the current political climate.

    Are we really as stupid as we look? What the fuck is with an "anonymous spokesperson"? If you can't quote them, don't print the story. Oh wait, it's not a story, it's a clever press release.

    V for Vendetta has come under scrutiny for the coincidence of its subject matter and the recent terrorist bombings in London.

    It has? Could have fooled me. Most everyone in the (US) theaters I've seen the preview have murmered "looks good" etc. Since a few hours after the train bombings, a lot of Londoners were saying "look, could you all get over it? We have." Especially given the typical audience for this film, I doubt any of the said audience will give a crap.

    "It's that horrible word: intellectual. I mean, you have to think about the movie"

    What? They laid out the entire plot in the trailers (or so we're led to believe). Facist, authoritarian government. Agents of whom attempt to rape Portman. "Good" guy rescues/befriends her. He's doing the whole "government is evil, I'm gonna blow it up, yo" and she's doing the "I'll die for you, yo. I am stretched on your grave, I'll lie here forever, yo." The government is all "Your ass is ours, yo."

    What part of that requires any "thought"? The fact that it's blatantly playing off how fascist US/UK government has become?

    Appropriate quote: "Ah, MIND taxing time again, now is it?"

    The whole thing reminds me of Gilbert Godfried's joke at Hugh Heffner's roast, a couple says after the WTC attacks. "I'm kinda concerned, my flight has a layover at the Empire State building". Most everyone laughed. One or two people yelled "too soon, too soon." So he told the Aristocrats joke, and boy did those two people wish they had kept their mouths shut :-)

    1. Re:insulting my intelligence by yui_unifex · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "It's that horrible word: intellectual. I mean, you have to think about the movie"

      What? They laid out the entire plot in the trailers (or so we're led to believe). Facist, authoritarian government. Agents of whom attempt to rape Portman. "Good" guy rescues/befriends her. He's doing the whole "government is evil, I'm gonna blow it up, yo" and she's doing the "I'll die for you, yo. I am stretched on your grave, I'll lie here forever, yo." The government is all "Your ass is ours, yo."

      What part of that requires any "thought"? The fact that it's blatantly playing off how fascist US/UK government has become?

      This may be an accurate depiction of the story the movie tells, but it is doing the graphic novel a grave disservice. The plot in the graphic novel -- particularly the part about Evey (Portman) in prison -- is only superficially similar to what you've identified. It deals with concepts such as the pitfalls of contentness, justification of terrorist acts, how the mean fascists are normal people that "are probably nice to their kids".

      So unless the script has been changed significantly (and there's reason to believe that it has; I haven't read the script), the plot was certainly not entirely laid out in the trailers.
    2. Re:insulting my intelligence by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      So unless the script has been changed significantly (and there's reason to believe that it has; I haven't read the script)...

      Given that Alan Moore has read the script and spared little invective when describing it, I think we can presume it has been substantially changed.

      Jedidiah.

    3. Re:insulting my intelligence by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Graphic novel? That would be, like, a comic, right?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    4. Re:insulting my intelligence by yui_unifex · · Score: 1

      Graphic novel? That would be, like, a comic, right?
      Yes.

      define: graphic novel

    5. Re:insulting my intelligence by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It deals with concepts such as the pitfalls of contentness, justification of terrorist acts, how the mean fascists are normal people that "are probably nice to their kids".

      And you would show this in a 2:30 long trailer how exactly?

      To be honest, the scenes I saw recently in a trailer for the movie looked like they could have easily been merely filmed versions of scenes from the novel. However, lacking the context of the entire work, one could easily walk away with a twisted perception about the film.

      Or, as stated later, they might have screwed it all up to make it palatable.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:insulting my intelligence by yui_unifex · · Score: 1
      It deals with concepts such as the pitfalls of contentness, justification of terrorist acts, how the mean fascists are normal people that "are probably nice to their kids".

      And you would show this in a 2:30 long trailer how exactly?

      Uh, you don't. That was my point: You can't accurately draw the conclusion the OP got from the trailer.
    7. Re:insulting my intelligence by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      Sir, you missed explaining one thing. What is the Aristocrats joke?

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    8. Re:insulting my intelligence by Moofie · · Score: 1

      In the same way that a Mini Cooper is like a Hummer H2, yeah.

      What's your point?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:insulting my intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Sir, you missed explaining one thing. What is the Aristocrats joke

      It most recently made the rounds in the form of the following .WMV video from Matt and Trey of South Park fame.

      http://www.somefoolwitha.com/2004/06/09/the-aristo crats-south-park/

      SPOILER WARNING: The Aristocrats - see the documentary, coming soon, to a theater far away from you.

      Experience the joke for yourself, at least once, without reading the Wikipedia article.

    10. Re:insulting my intelligence by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      What is the Aristocrats joke?

      Google. Hit #1.

    11. Re:insulting my intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post-production is "scheduled" to the day. It has to be. You don't suddenly go "whups, let's take another 4 or more months".

      I think they're using a slightly different meaning of post production. While to you it may mean final editting, audio mixing and printing, to the marketting guys it means test audiences thought it sucked so they're going to try to patch it up as best they can.

      Since a few hours after the train bombings, a lot of Londoners were saying "look, could you all get over it? We have

      Personally, I was shocked for some time. I had to wait 3 minutes to boil a kettle, about a minute for the tea to brew, a few seconds to add milk and about 5 minutes to drink it. But I really think the delay has nothing to do with that.

    12. Re:insulting my intelligence by gav_b_g · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Post-production is "scheduled" to the day. It has to be. You don't suddenly go "whups, let's take another 4 or more months".

      Uhh ... are you serious? i've worked on so many movies that have overrun it's more par for the course these days. At any given point in the production, usually as late into post production as possible, some exec will have some bright idea to completely rejig areas of the plot that used to make sense, and post production will inevitably then run up until a few days before release. Or they'll push the date back if they can.

      Anyway, March 17th, as Ireland's national day, is a great 2nd choice as an anti-british government release date!!

    13. Re:insulting my intelligence by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      Generally, it's called a comic if it's meant to be funny somehow. I get the feeling that this particular story wasn't.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    14. Re:insulting my intelligence by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Generally, it's called a comic if it's meant to be funny somehow.
      When I was a kid there were comics like Victor, Warlord & Eagle. They weren't funny. Well, not all the time, and when they were it wasn't always intentional.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    15. Re:insulting my intelligence by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      What's your point?

      That pretentious knobs call them graphic novels and everyone else calls them comics?

      P.S. When are you retaking analogies 101? You really need to.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Month by Exquire · · Score: 1

    You know, nothing rhymes with month.

    1. Re:Month by cianduffy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can think of something... you just have to pronounce it the North Dublin way, and all of a sudden a certain word that I'm not sure if its swear filtered here or not; but certainly is by my employers proxy, rhymes with it...

    2. Re:Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's just silly.

      You can come up with any number of rhymes for month, as long as you aren't afraid of using naming nouns, eg.

      Mister Blunth.
      In the town of Strunth.

      etc. :)
      (I won't even bother to check if there already exists a full rhyme for month, but even excluding that, I'm sure half-rhymes already exist).

    3. Re:Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Month has a rhyme. oneth being one of them..

      see:
      http://rec-puzzles.org/new/sol.pl/language/english /pronunciation/rhyme

    4. Re:Month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a rhymed couplet?

      October is the scariest month,
      when the pumpkins are very orange.

    5. Re:Month by aaza · · Score: 1
      Well, according to Murphy[1], "things equal to nothing else are equal to each other". Extending this, "words that don't have a rhyming word all rhyme with each other".

      Therefore all of the following words rhyme:
      Month
      Orange
      Purple
      Bulb
      Silver

      There may be others, but those are all I can think of right now.

      [1] All things that have no source can be attributed to Murphy. It's one of Murphy's Laws.[1]

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    6. Re:Month by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What the hell is the matter with you? Everybody knows that "nurple" rhymes with "purple". What, did you skip fourth grade or something?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Month by aaza · · Score: 1
      "nurple" appears to be a strictly American word... It didn't really exist where I grew up (which was in a reasonably small town in Australia).

      But the rest of the words still stand.

      Oh, and a note to mods: The parent post is not "Flamebait", nor is it "Troll". Mod it "Funny" if you must mod it at all.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
  17. larry wachowski? by XO · · Score: 4, Informative

    isn't it Linda Wachowski now?

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    1. Re:larry wachowski? by cephyn · · Score: 1

      I saw that movie! wasn't it VI Wachowski though?

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:larry wachowski? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wierd, when the heck did that happen?

      I did a quick google on Larry/Linda to see if this was true, only to have some pretty gross sites popup.

      This is just great as I'm surfing from work....

      I just hope IT doesn't monitor the log that closely...

    3. Re:larry wachowski? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      try looking on Wikipedia

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:larry wachowski? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      I'm confused too, but I think this site may have something to do with it?

      Where's the obligatory explain-the-joke post?

    5. Re:larry wachowski? by XO · · Score: 1

      5 informative? I'd figure a 5 Funny, or a -1 Troll.. sheesh.

      Better stop calling them the Wachowski brothers. We hear "Matrix" co-creator Larry Wachowski is ready for the sex-change operation that will finalize his conversion to a woman named Linda.

      Last May, he wore women's earrings at "The Matrix Reloaded" premiere. At the time, the estranged husband of an alleged Los Angeles dominatrix told newspapers that Wachowski was a client of his wife. The source said he had seen Larry "in her bondage room...lying there in a dress, no panties and a blond wig."

      Several "longtime friends" say Larry - who is in the middle of a divorce with his wife, Thea Bloom - is now ready for the operation, reports the Chicago Sun Times.

      The agent for Larry and his brother and collaborator, Andy Wachowski, did not return calls yesterday

      ---
      from http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/18872 4p-163325c.html

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    6. Re:larry wachowski? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      isn't it Linda Wachowski now?

      No, Linda Wachopski.

  18. Looks like crap anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say the trailer at Batman a couple weeks back. Looks like a bunch of crap to me. Of course, most movies look like crap these days.

    Meh. I'll either be modded down as a troll or ignored. Can't express dissent around here.

  19. will they really do it right? by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's somehow hard to imagine that this will be a faithful version of a story in which the protagonist is essentially a terrorist.

    1. Re:will they really do it right? by Dominic · · Score: 1

      Having terrorist heroes didn't (and still doesn't) stop Star Wars IV - VI being very popular...

  20. The only tagline that's necessary.... by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    Remember, remember, Natalie Portman.

    Rhymes perfectly.

  21. ah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Prepeare for the spin, on march seventeen"

    "Where have you been, on march seventeen?"

    etc

  22. curious... by Spent+Casings · · Score: 0

    I wonder whose script they ripped off this time.

    1. Re:curious... by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 0

      Next time try linking to a site written in English.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    2. Re:curious... by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      I would have accused Terminator and the Matrix files of being ripped off of myths and folklore before I would have said that some obscure author was the basis for the screenplays.

  23. Not Happy, But Not Surprised by Mekkis · · Score: 1

    Not that I'm comparing the Washowski Bros. to George Orwell, but this is equivalent to releasing 1984 in 1985. It's a matter of course that the 'anonymous spokeperson' denied any political implications -- just like people under scrutiny in Washington D.C. resign "to spend more time with their families". It's a bullshit excuse but they can't admit it as such.

    *sigh* I guess we should just be happy the movie's being released at all. However, I wonder how heavily it will have been edited for content?

  24. Only Two Hot Grits Posts So Far by ndansmith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Come on, where is the classic troll? No Hot Grits?!? Sheesh, what has Slashdot come to?

  25. Not a good omen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When movie release get pushed back, that means it's going to suck so badly that the next 70's sitcom remake is expected to murder it at the box office. The trouble with movie trailers now is that they can't edit them well enough to fool people into thinking that the movie is worth the ticket price anymore.

    1. Re:Not a good omen by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      Or that they're expecting another player in a niche genre to eat into their audience.

      I'm not sure what else is opening in that late october to end of November time frame, but there could be other considerations.

      It could also suck

  26. Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by Cerv · · Score: 3, Informative

    V for Vendetta was written by Alan Moore and David Lloyd. The Wachowski siblings adapted it for the screen.

    --
    sig
    1. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by NicklessXed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. That's why it says The film [...] was written by [...]" in the summary... not a word about the graphic novel up there. And as far as I know, Alan Moore didn't/doesn't have sh*t to do with the movie.

    2. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      There's a distinction between writing a film and adapting a screenplay. Hollywood recognises the difference, even at Oscar time if I remember correctly, as does the grandparent poster.

      "Alan Moore didn't/doesn't have sh*t to do with the movie."? Well, apart from writing the original story...

      By that rationale Leonardo da Vinci "didn't/doesn't have sh*t to do with" postcards of the Mona Lisa because, after all, he didn't take the photograph or print them, he was just the original artist...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by NicklessXed · · Score: 1

      Alan Moore wrote the graphic novel the movie is based on, but that doesn't mean he was in any way involved in the writing of the story as it appears in the movie.
      You see, the difference is that your Mona Lisa postcards are basically reproductions of Da Vinci's work. The film is not a reproduction of the graphic novel in that sense, as there will most likely be many differences. So, congratulations, that was the second worst analogy I've read here today.

    4. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Go watch the movie then. Stay until the credits have run completely. See if "Alan Moore didn't/doesn't have sh*t to do with the movie", according to those credits.

      QED.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by NicklessXed · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he'll be mentioned in the credits. You still didn't get what I said, though. He wrote the material the movie is based on, but he isn't involved any further. The actual movie was not written by him. Is that so hard to understand?

    6. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      No, you said "And as far as I know, Alan Moore didn't/doesn't have sh*t to do with the movie", to which I said "Well, apart from writing the original story..."

      Don't try to backtrack what you said. It might not have been what you meant, but it is what you said.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    7. Re:Oh look, an innacurate /. summary. *shock* by NicklessXed · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have anything to do with the movie, because he wasn't actually involved in writing it (the movie). He didn't actually work on it. That is exactly what I said, and it is perfectly true, argue all you want.

  27. Yes, but can November 5th run Mac OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  28. Methinks the lady doth protest... by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    "The [anonymous] spokesperson ... denied that the delay had anything to do with the movie's subject matter or the current political climate."

    "It isn't just a teen slasher movie"

    Certain statements seem to scream that Truth resides in their exact opposite ...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  29. wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    No, you didn't have to think to understand the plotline. You had to be the kind of smarmy pseudo-intellectual assmunch who thinks his views are "challenged" by Gnosticism wrapped up in explosions and gun fights.

    Did you know kids in regular schools study and write essays about Yu-Gi-Oh? It's just that fucking stupid.

    1. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yep. They should put a label on the box.

          Warning: This film contains depth.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that saying, "yep" and restating your assertion does not constitute a cogent argument.

      I went to Catholic school, and we wrote about the original Star Wars trilogy. Does that mean you think it's also one of the great achievements of modern literature?

      The second and third Matrix movies are a muddled collection of references to various philosophies and archetypes, along with some big special effects. Of course, that's great for people who like to look through the movie and pick out bits and go, "Oh, they're alluding to X here! How fantastic!" But overall, there's very little of consequence that is actually said by the movie.

      These movies are no deeper than philosophy 101. That may be better than 90% of movies out there, but don't claim it's some deep, important thing that they're getting across. They're just action movies with tidbits for aspiring philosophers to masturbate to.

    3. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt you ever even did philosophy 101. The Matrix trilogy is about purposeful self sacrafice for a greater purpose. It's an attempt to present an alternative to today's self absorbed youth. As for Star Wars, you won't find a more formularic hero's journey. As such, it is the perfect thing to study if you want to learn the structure of a hero's journey tale. The Matrix trilogy is the perfect thing to study if you want to learn about creation stories of various cultures. Why your Catholic school saw the value of teaching you the hero's journey probably has less to do with it being a Catholic school than those schools which study The Matrix in religious education classes. I don't know if it is different in the US, but my friends who went to Catholic school tell me that they are openly taught all the popular religions and, these days, tolerance is encouraged. Frankly I'd love to see more of that and if a popular film can aid in that process, all the better.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:wow! it's that good? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the Matrix that i saw was about one person being singled out to receive special powers, be singled out just for who he was, defy all the rules, and naturally outshine people who worked hard to train themselves to do things. that all seems like hero worshipping to me, and not exactly a humble journey that would align itself with Catholic teaching. maybe Catholics just like Ray-Bans and trenchcoats

    5. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1
      the Matrix that i saw was about one person being singled out to receive special powers, be singled out just for who he was

      Wow, I can't imagine what religious significance there could possibly be in this.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Okay, now explain exactly how purposeful self-sacrifice is so deep like you keep asserting. Is it deep for these Catholic school kids? One of the basic tenets of their religion is incredibly deep?

      Yep, the Matrix has fuck-tons of Christian imagery, just like lots of other Western literature. At the end they lay it on so thick it's almost funny (Neo is crucified; <Keanu>whoa</Keanu>). Did you think Signs was a really deep movie, as well?

      You can also view it as a case for existentialism. "... an existence without meaning or purpose. ... It's pointless to keep on fighting. ... Why do you persist?" "Because I choose to."

      And if we take the opinions of the writers of the Wikipedia, The Merovingian can be seen to allude all sorts of stuff, like Satan and Hades. Is he the personification of part of Tomas Hobbes' philosophy? Is The Matrix essentially the allegory of the Cave? Who knows?

      How about our hero's journey from Star Wars? Some excerpts:
      • The Call to Adventure -- "Neo, I will show you the Matrix."
      • Refusal of the Call -- "Oracle, I am not The One. Then Morpheus got captured and I died. Now I am the one."
      • Supernatural Aid -- "Neo, go find the keymaker."
      • The Crossing of the First Threshold -- Take your pick. How about The Merovingian?
      • Atonement with the Father -- "I am the architect. ... Concordently ... vis-à-vis ... ergo ..."
      • Apotheosis -- "Something's different. I can feel the sentinels."
      • Refusal of the Return -- "Oh shit; I'm trapped in the Trainman dimension."
      • Rescue from Without -- As the Wiki says, "Let's go kick the Merovingian's ass so he lets Neo go."
      • Crossing of the Return Threshold -- The Wiki says, "Neo again confronts Smith."
      • Freedom to Live -- Neo can now confront and destroy Smith, thereby saving humanity

      Well, it looks like The Matrix can be cast as a pretty formulaic hero's journey as well.

      So, can you please explain how this stuff is deep? Or does "deep" mean, "I can apply what I learned in my high school literature/philosophy course?" Is Harry Potter deep?
    7. Re:wow! it's that good? by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a Catholic or even more generally Christian significance. People do want to be sppon fed entertainment. A friend of mine actually had the nerve to say that they needed more fighting in the second and third movies. And the worst part is that a College Professor I know who is a good friend of mine also disliked the second and third movies because of the philosophy. Until we watched the special features together, he did not understand the second or third movies. Perhaps due to my math ("your life is the sum of the remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the matrix..." - this actually makes sense :-D) or perhaps the religion (I am a Lutheran) or perhaps just the philosophy (choice, causality, transcendentalism, metaphysics) really appealed to me, probably the most in the second movie but throughout the entire series. The problems I had with the Matrix series were the unexplained stuff, like how Neo could "see" the machines outside of the Matrix or how he randomly "jacked in" in that trainman part. But that's technocrap. I can even forgive the stuff about the use of humans for power. Morpheus does say "combined with a form of fusion." Very interesting, because some companies are pursuing the use of solar power combined with fuel cells to generate power in the future. I think the Wachowski brothers are artistic geniuses, and their movies were great. I actually have new depth and understanding of what I believe, and what others believe. I have a deeper understanding of being human. It has caused me to be not afraid of change. I am a more powerful and more self-controlled person because of the movies. Not much, apart from my Religious beliefs, can claim that.

    8. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, WTF, are you trying to suggest that Signs wasn't deep? Are you insane? How about Phenomenon, was that deep enough for you? If not, would you care to name any film that you consider to have depth?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1
      how Neo could "see" the machines outside of the Matrix

      Wireless.

      But that's technocrap.

      Exactly.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    10. Re:wow! it's that good? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the Catholic story of Jesus takes pains to point out that even though he's the son of God he has to work his way through life in the same manner as everyone else. The story of the Matrix is the story of someone to whom everything comes easy, someone whose natural talent lets him skip most of the hard work and drudgery that everyone else has to do to get good at manipulating the Matrix. he's surrounded by people whose only purpose is to help him get better, rather than by people that he can teach to raise themselves.

      that seems like the opposite to me, with the only link being that both characters are singled out for extra suffering rather than living the good life like one my expect given their background.

    11. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      and then he discovers that he isn't all powerful, that he's just a pawn and that the only way to free humanity is to sacrafice himself.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah man, signs was weak. Go see Primer, recent movie with some serious depth.

    13. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Signs was deep? "God has a reason for everything!" That's the kind of insight you can only get from a random suburban mother. Did you have to think to get that from the movie? I thought they laid it on thick enough that you'd have to be brain-dead to miss it. For what it's worth, The Matrix is much more thought provoking than Signs was.

      Phenomenon? They took the 10%-of-the-brain myth and ran with it. Ultimately it's a feel-good movie about John Travolta going from nobody to somebody, finding the girl of his dreams, and dying a happy man. Oh, an maybe the pains of being different/intelligent, though I'm pretty sure, for example, Flowers for Algernon does the latter better, and isn't quite as sappy (though it's been a while since I read it).

      If you want something that's thought provoking, how about looking at something that doesn't have an immediate explanation? How about something like Donnie Darko (unless you've read The Philosophy of Time Travel), or Lost Highway (as far as I know, there's no explanation that fully accounts for everything)? There you can actually have a discussion about what is going on in the movie, and how that fits into whatever philosophy you want to project onto the movie. At least when you have to struggle to figure out what's going on in those movies, it's by design, rather than because of some poor explanation that the Wachowski brothers pulled out of their rears. "Oh... well... Neo has wireless, now, so he can communicate with the source."

      Or if you want to get really out there we can watch some Soviet Montage, where the plot can be almost incidental, and the real point of the movie is using imagery, graphical elements and editing to get a point across.

      The Matrix has tons of stuff in it if you want to discuss allusion to various philosophy and other literature, especially Christianity. Unfortunately, I think the latter two movies in the series are pretty mediocre as far as writing and story goes, so I'd argue that there are much better stories you could use if you actually want to do that. Of course, you might not be able to find all the philosophies you want to talk about in one place like you can with The Matrix, because the Wachowskis went out of their way to cram as many philosophical references as they could into their story.

      But, I'm sorry, I don't find it intriguing to pick apart a movie and figure out what philosophy from hundreds or thousands of years ago most accurately describes it. I had 6+ years in school to do that kind of thing. If I want to read a story about existentialism, I'll read Camus. If I want a Christ figure, I'll read about 50% of good western literature. Et cetera.

      You want purposeful self-sacrifice? How about Bruce Willis in Armageddon? Arnold in Terminator 2/3? Are those deep movies too? Almost any movie has implications other than a literal reading of the plot. That doesn't mean they're exceptionally deep or thought provoking. Just because the Matrix purposely crams a bunch of references in doesn't mean that it has anything particularly profound, new, or interesting to say, although the mysticism does make for decent fantasy, and the Dragonball Z-esque battle at the end was rather entertaining.

    14. Re:wow! it's that good? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we can agree on Donnie Darko.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    15. Re:wow! it's that good? by poopdeville · · Score: 1
      The Seventh Seal. Wild Strawberries. Metropolis. The Grand Illusion. The Rules of the Game. Society of the Spectacle. Un Chien Andalou, Scenes from a Marriage, Aguirre: The Wrath of God, Little Dieter Needs to Fly, Cobra Verda, Heart of Glass, Fitzcarraldo, Chinese Roulette.

      Why do I suspect that IHBT?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    16. Re:wow! it's that good? by gowen · · Score: 1
      your life is the sum of the remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the matrix..." - this actually makes sense :-D
      Actually, that's a brilliant example of something that sounds like it's deep... and can superficially convince someone that it's meaningful, but isn't. Why's it inherent to the Matrix? What's the equation? What does the equation describe? Why is it unbalanced? What does "remainder" mean in this context?

      People read all sorts into the Merovingian and the trainman, but in terms of the development of the plot, they're ciphers. They don't have characters to speak of, there's no personality. They talk in nonsense riddles and aphorisms, particularly of the pseudo-intellectual type that appeal to teenagers. (The fact that teenagers can bolster they're intellectual superiority complex at the same time doesn't do any harm). These characters (and I use the term loosely) fake depth but ultimately they serve no purpose but to get us to the next overlong fight sequence, and to point our heroes into the direction of the next cliche spouting one-dimensional plot device. Never has the phrase "Deus Ex Machina" been more appropriate.

      Sure, they're archetypes -- and the W's show they at least have some understanding of the major archtypes of fiction -- but they're so monstrosly lazily used. The reason there's so much being read into Matrix 2&3 is not because it's deep, but because it's shallow. Well constructed, thoughtful fiction, doesn't admit 700 different -- and frequently contradictory -- interpretations.

      It's an horrendous mish mash of received wisdom, half understood ideas (which are never explored in any depth), superficial symbolism and pseudo intellectual guff.

      And the action sequences simply aren't that great.

      "The Matrix", on the other hand, was simple, coherent and groundbreaking.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    17. Re:wow! it's that good? by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you are measuring depth in terms of the web of literary reference, and some of us are measuring depth in terms of the web of meaning created by the tale itself, i.e. the quality of the story. The the former context, sure, signs was deep. In the latter, sorry, no go. Not that (to give credit where it's due) the movie wasn't entertaining-- i actually have a weakness for simplistic movies with a clean moral, and the guts to just ignore glaring logical inconsistencies in the setting. But deep? Not really, the director in this case has never really produced anything 'deep'.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    18. Re:wow! it's that good? by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1
      They don't have characters to speak of, there's no personality.

      They're Programs!!! That's the point. The only real programs with personality were the Oracle and Smith. If you read into the movie a little, the Merovingian was very important. Remember the scene when they walk off of the elevator to visit the Merovingian for the first time? What does the floor number read? 101. Persephone actually tells Neo that the Merovingian was like him. Of course we don't know if that means he kissed like Neo or if he was like Neo. And he is very important with the whole cause and effect thing. That's the philosophy part for you. The Merovingian is convinced, or perhaps he wishes to believe that there is no such thing as choice; causality is the only constant according to him. Also, the Merovingian is the eventuality of power. "What do men with power want? More power."

      The Trainman also is important, not for who he is, but for where he is. In that "area between the real world and the Matrix" he calls himself God (i.e. "Down here, I'm God!"). Neo went to Hell (shock!). Again, I couldn't understand why Christians would be influenced to study this. Many small characters are very important.

      Why's it inherent to the Matrix? What's the equation? What does the equation describe? Why is it unbalanced? What does "remainder" mean in this context?

      OK. Inherent to the Matrix? Because the Matrix is preselected to be the One. The Equation? The equation is a summation (sigma) of the remainders of some sort of function that approaches infinity. What it describes? Many possibilities. Most likely an irrational number. Why it's unbalanced? Because one can never really determine the value of an irrational number. You get closer and closer, but never find the actual value. The "remainder"? This means that the "unbalanced" parts are added together to generate the "remainder" which is assigned to Neo. He is meant to make everything whole. Some people have suggested that pi is the number being determined. It is derived by increasing the number of sides of a polygon, measuring the difference between the distance to the center of a side and to a vertex, until you get very close to a circle (or you get to a few decimal points). Computers use this equation to test speed. The architect is a very mathematical character. He is the "opposite" or "negative" of the Oracle. She is into the microdetails of the Matrix. The Architect is about the macrodetails of the Matrix. She finds a system that works based on "the One," but he wants a system that works mathematically, no individuals to bring it down and no one lost due to unbelief.

      I wish you please do not attack view points which you do not understand, because this probably means you have not analyzed them. It is not taken for face value. You simply said that Mero and Trainman were "ciphers" with absolutely no reasoning whatsoever. And the fact that there are so many interpretations enhances the Matrix's artistic quality. That is a very postmodernist ideal, to just have an artistic form without explaining a DAMN BIT of it. We see it in literature, artwork, architecture, and film.

    19. Re:wow! it's that good? by gowen · · Score: 1
      The equation is a summation (sigma) of the remainders of some sort of function that approaches infinity. What it describes? Many possibilities. Most likely an irrational number. Why it's unbalanced? Because one can never really determine the value of an irrational number.
      Nothing you've written there has any meaning. Why is Neo like an irrational number? Why are irrational numbers important in this context? That's not philosophical, it's just enigmatic.
      That is a very postmodernist ideal, to just have an artistic form without explaining a DAMN BIT of it.
      It's also a total cop-out.
      And the fact that there are so many interpretations enhances the Matrix's artistic quality
      No it doesn't. It just denies (and nullifies) any interesting artistic statement the W's wanted to make.

      I appreciate that there's a school of thought that says otherwise, but IMHO, an artistic work is only as interesting as the ideas put into it by it's creator. Otherwise, it's about as worthwhile an intellectual pursuit as looking for familiar shapes in the formations of clouds. Anyone can randomly scatter unconnected imagery, unless there's a coherent thought process behind it, what's the damn point?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    20. Re:wow! it's that good? by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      Fair questions. Pi is likely the number the machines are trying to reach. For purely philosophical reasons, the circle represents something that is complete. Neo is the chunk of the circle that can't be filled in, the "remainder" if you will. The Architect would like a system that worked with 100% of all of the people in the Matrix. Unfortunately, such a solution did not exist, so the concept of the one was created. The function is a subroutine inside the code in the Machine Mainframe that determines the One. Neo isn't really being expressed as an irrational number. Humanity is being cast as irrational, because of the concept of choice. With every choice that everyone in the Matrix makes, the Matrix gets increasingly convoluted. Also, Neo being the remainder of this is symbolic in that he is the completion of a cycle. Remember that he is the 5th One. The One "reloads" the Matrix (by "reinserting the prime program"). He completes the circle. This is even more significant because of his both Christ-like attributes. Christ says that he is "the Alpha and Omega" (beginning and end). I hope that maybe now you can have a better understanding of the movie because of this analysis of but one line in the movie.

    21. Re:wow! it's that good? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Unsubtle religious symbolism is no substitute for a plot, dialogue, characters or acting.

      Perhaps you'd enjoy a film which consisted of 5 minutes of a fat man having a big sweaty shit, and then 2 hours of cardboard characters philosophising about the shit, along with religious symbolism about how the shit represents some ancient religious text or something. All the fans could meet up at Starbucks and talk about it over $8 cups of coffee.

    22. Re:wow! it's that good? by gowen · · Score: 1
      I hope that maybe now you can have a better understanding of the movie because of this analysis of but one line in the movie.
      I certainly have a better understanding of your understanding of the movie. Is that close enough. My understanding of the actual movie as mutable, protean pseudo-babble, so densely abstrusely packed with arbitrary symbolism as to be completely meaningless (and yet capable of being interpreted in a million ways by anyone with enough free time) has actually been strengthened.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    23. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because W brothers didn't make the first one, they stole it. The second and third ones only resemble the first because they use some of the same actors. They might as well changed the name.

    24. Re:wow! it's that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll try to explain:

      Machines work in mathematical ways, like with equations. Each equation gives out one and only one answer. So the machines created a perfect world for humans to live in there. But humans didn't cope with it, it was too perfect.

      So the machines added the element of choice to the humans. When humans have choice, they disrupt the equations, because they had this new completely unpredictable element to them. Unpredicted by any equation. These disruptions created by choice start to fuck the equations and growing like a snow-ball up to a point where the system is completely unpredictable and unmanageable. So the machines decided to concentrate all of those unpredictabilities into one individual, Neo or The One, whose jobs is to keep all of those unpredictabilities out of the system and onto himself until the time comes for him to join his code back to the system and everything is reseted and made whole again.

      kay...?

    25. Re:wow! it's that good? by gowen · · Score: 1

      No. Not 'kay. Because it's all claptrap... The world designed and controlled by computers is a lovely Maguffin -- a cute conceit around which the first film is based. But as soon as you start to examine it in any detail it starts to fall apart, essentially because it was never designed to be an internally coherent design, it was a set-up around which to build a groovy chop-socky movie. As has been noted, it's tricky to build a world that doesn't fall apart two days later.

      All this talk of remainders, and irrational numbers and choice... they're Midichlorians. In Star Wars 4,5,6 we don't care how The Force works -- we suspend our disbelief because we're happy to go along for the ride.

      After that the mythos becomes more important than the movie, and more and more exposition is used trying to explain the backgound. And, because the background has not been built from the ground up (and why should it it's just a MacGuffin) that's not possible.

      So what your left with is a film that's neither an enjoyable romp (because it takes itself far too seriously, and indulges in endless portentous, unlistenable dialogue) or a coherent philosophical work (because it's "philosophy" -- such as it is -- has been built from the top down, and lacks any sort of coherent foundation). The W's were unsatisfied with simply making a good film, but the so-called philosophical theory has been tacked on later, and the combination is, inevitably, an ugly mess.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    26. Re:wow! it's that good? by mink · · Score: 1

      Have you seen "Abre los ojos" (Open your eyes)?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  30. Affects my portfolio by Aeron65432 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interestingly enough, this news has tanked the stock of V for Vendetta on the popular movie stock exchange, HSX

    In the last two days, the stock has dropped from 70 to 50, with no bottom in sight. Sadly, I'm invested 50,000 shares in it, so it's hurt me/the market quite a bit.

    For those of you who wonder why it hurts the stock, V for Vendetta first was scheduled for November, which is a good month for movies. March is typically much weaker. Secondly, people don't want to hold onto it for 7 months as opposed to 3.

  31. "Remember...5th of November" by Simonetta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    An astute observation about the origins of the movie's tag line. The actual quote "...Remember, Remember, the fifth of November" is from an obscure song by John Lennon called Remember.
        This song is one of the centerpieces of Lennon's Plastic Ono Band album released in late 1970. Lennon and his wife, Yoko Ono, had just completed an extended session of Primal Scream therapy under Dr. Arthur Janov which cured him of heroin addiction and post-Beatle-breakup depression.
          The album is simple, beautiful, and haunting. This song is just John (on piano) and Ringo (on drums) with lots of echo.
          Lennon was at that time the world's biggest rock star and could get away with releasing an album for the sole reason of exorcising deeply personal demons. The record sold poorly, However, his next recording, Imagine, was an instant worldwide success and is still played on rock radio stations worldwide. This song Imagine led directly to Lennon's murder by a young man who had spent three weeks prior to the murder in a fundamentalist Christian commune/retreat in North Carolina. In a manner that preshadowed the Salman Rushdie affair in the late 1980s, the fundamentalists believed that Lennon needed to be assassinated because he had released a hit record with the lyrics "Imagine there's no heaven..." and other contra-religious expressions. When the young assassin showed up at the commune with a fanatical obsession with Lennon and end-of-the-world fantasies, it was a straight-forward task to convince him that Lennon's death would hasten the second coming. They cult-brainwashed him for three weeks, procured for him a powerful handgun, trained him on it, bought him a ticket to NYC, and set him off.
        Ten days later, Lennon was dead.

    1. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by One+Louder · · Score: 5, Informative
      The actual quote "...Remember, Remember, the fifth of November" is from an obscure song by John Lennon called Remember.
      So, in summary, you're giving John Lennon credit for a nursery rhyme that's been around for nearly 400 years.

      The full text of the original poem, which dates to 1606, one year after the Gunpowder Plot, and was initially delivered as a church sermon is:

      Remember, remember the fifth of November
      Gunpowder, treason and plot.
      I see no reason why gunpowder, treason
      Should ever be forgot

    2. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure John Lennon had *something* to do with popularizing it for the current generation of SUV driving self-centered captitalists.

      Most of them were stoned during their 17th century literature classes back in '70.

    3. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, there's a bit more to the poem than that. No, I hadn't heard of the rest either.

    4. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      No, in Britain the nursery rhyme is still remembered. Guy Fawkes Day is a national holiday, celebrated much like the 4th of July in the United States. Sorry, but John Lennon had nothing to do with this tagline. The movie is based on the Guy Fawkes incident, thus it makes since to use the song everyone remembers in connection with Guy Fawkes Day to advertise it.

    5. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had the rhyme (sourced like you said) in our English books in my school (I'm a Finn), some five years back. Explained all about burning an effigy guy fawkes..

    6. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by databeast · · Score: 3, Funny

      you're a damn good Lennon fan, and a really shitty researcher.

      Lennon has got jack shit to do with V, Alan Moore, or Guy Fawkes however.

    7. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The 5th of November is like Juky 4th in that at night people let off fireworks, or go to a public display of pyrotechnics. However it is not a 'holiday' in the sense that people have the day off work or school.

    8. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by StarTux · · Score: 1

      Thanks for bringing this to attention of those who may not have known this, especially those ex-colonies...

    9. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An astute observation about the origins of the movie's tag line. The actual quote "...Remember, Remember, the fifth of November" is from an obscure song by John Lennon called Remember.

      You're American, aren't you?

    10. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Noember 5th is preceded by about two months of fireworks being let off until the small hours of the morning...

    11. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just like the punks these days quoting Tupac like he was some sort of genius when in fact he was just stealing lines from the "big book of quotes"

    12. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Just wow. "makes since"?

      Sense.

    13. Re:"Remember...5th of November" by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      i remember this from euro-history class. i always thought it was a rather sloppy rhyme though, the syllables don't match up. maybe it sounded better 400 years ago

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  32. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best Natalie Portman rhyme this week.

  33. An interesting claim by jd · · Score: 1
    However, she didn't show up to the court case (always a bad mistake) and the case was thrown out. True, she'd just sacked all her lawyers, but if she'd shown up AND presented sufficient evidence of having a claim, she'd have had time to find others. The one thing the US is not short of is lawyers.


    Oh, I can certainly believe that derivation occured - that happens all the time - however the claim itself is questionable. (I'd both read and written plenty of short stories along similar lines by the early 1980s, and the earliest cyberspace novel was written by H.G.Wells)


    I think it would have been fair for the parties to have settled for some MODERATE amount, on the basis that some ideas probably were borrowed, with the condition that she then formally accepted that any such borrowings were incidental and accidental with no malice in principle or fact.


    My suspicion is that both parties got greedy - a billion is a lot of money - and nothing short of absolute victory (as opposed to mutual recognition) being acceptable. This is no surprise to me - the US is about competition, not cooperation, so all-out victory IS going to matter more than truth or even common decency.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:An interesting claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find interesting is that she also was claiming ot have come up with the idea for the Terminator films. Which is interesting, as it's already been revealed that someone else came up with the idea for The Terminator.

  34. Somehow... by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I don't think that a holiday that is not celebrated in the United States (IE Guy Fawkes Day) is going to make any difference as far as the majority of V For Vendetta's potential take. What I think might be going on with this film, however, is Warner Bros. losing their collective nerve over a movie that has as its hero a person whose actions can be interpreted as being "terrorist."

    The only time Guy Fawkes Day has figured in a work of art aimed at an American audience is in the "Depth Takes A Holiday" episode of the MTV animated series "Daria." Guy Fawkes Day is portrayed as a surly British punk rocker who looks like Sid Vicious and sings like Johnny Rotten. Since British obscenities barely register in American English, he gets to swear like a British sailor. Of course, when the show aired on English MTV it had to be edited something fierce. Note to the Brits: you didn't miss much. One of the least enjoyable "Daria" episodes, one of the two from the series that almost sent it hurling over the shark tank. Almost doesn't count, though.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  35. No so parallel... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA: "V for Vendetta ... is set in an alternate universe in which the United Kingdom has a fascistic government"

    In this universe Tony Blair has banned protesting within 1000m of the Houses of Parliament, he is trying to introduce trials without jury for many crimes, he now strongly influences what the BBC broadcasts, he is trying to ban criticism of any religion and he is forcing a mandatory ID card scheme on the public and that isn't a facist government??!?

    1. Re:No so parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Belmarsh; indefinite detention of people without trial when insufficient evidence exists to get a conviction.

      Just like their fascist friends in the good ol' USA.

    2. Re:No so parallel... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      What are the terms of this protest ban? I was there last Saturday and saw protesters that looked to be a whole lot less than 1 km away.

    3. Re:No so parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every good lapdog wants to be like his master.

    4. Re:No so parallel... by isorox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ban was brought in to get rid of the protester in your picture, who's been there for over 4 years (June 2001). It failed miserably, a judicial review a few days earlier found that, due to a technicality, Mr Haw was exempt from the new law.

      The law (amongst other things) bans all protests within 1km (about 2/3 of a mile) of parliament, unless you get permission from the police. Like in North Korea, you can apply to the police to have a march celebrating your leader and they'll probably allow it, although they don't have to.

    5. Re:No so parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Intriguing.

      A quick check shows France and Italy utterly lack trials by jury, have state boradcasters that are significantly influenced by the government of the day, laws against criticism of religions, and mandatory national ID cards.

      No wonder Tony Blair is a Europhile, then. He wants to bring Britain fully into the European Union (of Fascistic States).

    6. Re:No so parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're wrong on so many levels.

      Blair pandered to various Muslim groups including Muslim Council of Britain to outlaw criticism of religion ... putting PC ahead of everything.

      For those accused of terrorism, you know, plotting to blow up commuters and such, ordinary people like you, he wants trials to be able to use (in closed court session) secret intelligence, such as wiretapping someone's IM messages to Jihad Central back in Waziristan Province Pakistan.

      That's sensible. Let the perfect be the enemy of the good (any developer knows what I mean) and you will create a situation where the solution will sort itself out ... horribly. Unchecked Jihadis blowing people up left and right ... and the counter-reaction of ethnic purges. So yeah, go ahead and create a Balkans 2.0 out of PC idiocy or political immaturity. Meanwhile, here on Planet Earth imperfect compromises mean Average Joe Brit doesn't get blown to bits in London or Birmingham, and Leeds and London Mosques don't get burnt to the ground with people in them either.

      One way or another the British people will stop terrorism.

      Moore's book has almost no bearing on current reality; as a prognosticator he's stuck in the 1980's which was the end of the Cold War. He's been unable to view since then a modern world that doesn't have as it's backdrop Atomic-armed superpowers staring down at each other; as opposed to various extremist jihadis with no government but adherence to a sixth century religion.

    7. Re:No so parallel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Last I checked, indefinite detention of persons captured by military forces in a war zone until such time as combat has ended is SOP for all states, fascistic or not, while the fighting is ongoing. Leaving aside questions of the "War on Terror" in general, isn't there still fighting going on in Afghanistan and Iraq?

      I mean, that has to be your claim, since the Padilla detention case was decided in Padilla's favor, after all, which is the only other possible claim of (attempted) indefinite detention without trial in the U.S. in recent memory. I mean, sure, if you wanted to bring up FDR's detentions, you could, but that's somewhat old news.

      Now, France, France has indefinite detention of terror suspects without charge or trial today. And has for decades. Yet, for some reason, they don't manage to get called the creators of a modern-day Gulag.

      Perhaps, rather than trying to be just like the USA, Mr. Blair is merely trying to bring Britain's treatment of terror suspects into harmony with European Union standards?

  36. Point proven. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    After all, there is no spoon.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  37. fix it in post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a guy that does editing and compositing in post-production, i was astounded that the film could be finished between june (when i heard they were still shooting) and november. Special effects work does tend to be elastic about time, and editing much more so - Adaptation, as a recent example, took over a year to edit after principal photography had finished.

    So i'm not surprised at all that the post will take longer than they had hoped.

  38. Why wait? by plaxion · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It will probably still be available on P2P networks by November 5th ;)

  39. ps - the Wachowskis didn't 'create the Matrix.' by kulakovich · · Score: 0, Troll


    They were sued, and lost bigtime.

    /public service announcement.

    kulakovich

    1. Re:ps - the Wachowskis didn't 'create the Matrix.' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, not quite

  40. Re:decency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, basically the three most recent film adaptations of comics? Yeah. Ok. Have you ever read a comic?

  41. MArch Marketing Campaign Solution by syntap · · Score: 1

    This delay comes as quite a blow not only to expectant fans, but also to the marketing campaign of the film, as the clever tagline tie-in 'Remember, remember the 5th of November' is decidedly weaker when you attempt to rhyme it with March 17th."

    Well... "if they used Beware the Ides of March" with an onimous fadeout to black they would get everyone to the theater and in their seats only two days early.

    1. Re:MArch Marketing Campaign Solution by databeast · · Score: 1

      exceptthat has absolutely nothing to do with the film's plot.

      RTFA

    2. Re:MArch Marketing Campaign Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't V for Vendetta about overthrowing the government?

      The ruler of Rome was assassinated on the Ides of March, leading the way for Augustus to take power.

  42. Oh, the one hit wonders are writing it by doublem · · Score: 1

    The twits behind Matrix 2 and Matrix 3 are writing the screenplay?

    Damn, I never saw a movie go from "Intersting" to "Avoid at all costs" so damn fast. I'd almost rather watch another Star Wars from Lucas.

    Almost.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  43. Depth Takes a Holiday by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

    Actually, I rather enjoyed that episode.
    It may not have been a great episode, but it was just so surreal I couldn't help but love it.

  44. I said it LAST time and ill say it again.. V is by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1
  45. Nov. 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember November Fifth because it's my birthday, there goes a fun movie to go see.

  46. Quios Custodes by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


    I think he's pretty much given up on Hollywood now.

    Which I guess doesn't help a Watchmen movie get made, dammit. But really, it would suck too. There's just no way it could be done.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:Quios Custodes by Fuzzle · · Score: 1

      It doesn't hurt it at all, since he has no rights to the work. DC promised him to give him and Dave Gibbons the rights once it went out of print. It's never, ever, gone out of print, and probably never will.

    2. Re:Quios Custodes by Cerv · · Score: 1

      A Watchmen film (set in the present day) was in preproduction for god knows how long, but stalled earlier this year. It could still happen, and Moore can't do anything about it unless he buys the rights but I doubt he can afford that, or even would on principle.

      --
      sig
    3. Re:Quios Custodes by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Best way to do Watchmen would be a mini-series on SciFi. You can't fit a 12 part series into two hours of screen time, you need the multi-episodic format, which also gives you good cliffhangers. Financing it would be a bitch, but this is one movie where I don't think I would mind the extensive use of CGI.

      CGI used to enhance a good story: good.
      CGI used to prop up a weak story: bad.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  47. He was going to have a sex change. by Abutambani · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that he was going to undergo a sex change. I'm not sure if he ever did though.

  48. Moore's dialogue was better. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I think Moore's dialogue in some spots was definitely better. From the trailer, Portman's dialogue seems to be:

    Evey: [bumping into Agent] I'm sorry.
    Finger Agent: Not yet, you're not.

    The original dialogue from the comic (or at least what I have from memory) was

    Evey: I'll do whatever you want, just don't kill me.
    Finger Agent: No, you don't get it. We're going to do whatever we want... and then we're going to kill you.

    Definitely spookier.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Moore's dialogue was better. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's a bewtter line, but perhaps it's too prosey. Too wany words. It's good to read, but if there's a lot of dialogue like that in a film, it gets too long winded and unrealistic. People just don't talk like that.

  49. best comment ever by slithytove · · Score: 1

    That was the best comment I've read on slashdot in a looong time:) Thanks!:)

  50. Originally slated to open on Nov. 4??? by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    originally slated to open on Nov. 4 ... 'Remember, remember the 5th of November' Uh... am I missing something here?

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Originally slated to open on Nov. 4??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Read the 100s of posts above about Guy Fawkes Day, November 5.

    2. Re:Originally slated to open on Nov. 4??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his point probably had more to do with the slogan having November 5th in it, but being released on the 4th. That would probably make people think it was coming out on the 5th, would it not?

  51. Harry Potter by jfengel · · Score: 1

    The big genre film around that time is the next Harry Potter movie. But that's not the reason. The reason is almost certainly that the film sucks.

    March is a terrible time to release movies, at least according to Hollywood wisdom; people are huddled at home rather than watching movies. March is a good time to dump big movies that didn't turn out well.

    1. Re:Harry Potter by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      March is a terrible time to release movies, at least according to Hollywood wisdom

      I never understood this. I don't care for movies in the summer (there's better stuff to do) and I'm way to busy around Christmas time to ever get to a movie. Fall and Spring are the times I'm most in the mood to watch a movie, yet few good ones come out then (well, it seems like bad movies may not be seasonal these days). Although the first Matrix was a March/April movie and that did pretty well.

  52. Watch... Watch... by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 1

    New tagline, "It, you will watch; It, you will watch; on the 17th on March". Reportedly, Yoda was seen snooping around the marketing division of the studio when the new slogan was created.

    --
    Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
    1. Re:Watch... Watch... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 1

      For the record, that doesn't rhyme.

      Maybe they could tie it in with the soda adds? "Buy a coke, or you'll parch, on the 17th of March." Hm... yeah, still not very good. Too many syllables in "seventeen".

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  53. shooting is also scheduled to the day by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Yet it at times runs over.

    Just because something is all scheduled out doesn't mean it can't run over schedule.

    Ask Terry Gilliam.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  54. Natalie Portman can't act... by 8086ed · · Score: 1

    but I'd pay to watch her if she... somehow couldn't speak.

  55. This film has disaster written all over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite simply, it's stuck in the 1980s. Moore's comic was good for it's time, but doesn't really work (neither does Watchmen) outside the atmosphere of the 1980's. No Cold War, no Reagan, Thatcher, and various geriatric Soviet rulers. No endless series of ruthless governments stretching out to the horizon to oppress the people as far as the imagination can take you.

    Instead, most governments, from Bush to Putin's to China's ... seem inept and incapable of finding their rears in the dark with a flashlight and a map. "Freedom Fighters" bring images of Beslan, or 9/11, or London, or some new atrocity just waiting to happen.

    Simply put the Portman character is a terrorist, and that's about as popular as Kevin Bacon playing a child molester in the Woodsman after the BTK killer sentencing.

    This film is a dud. Probably only Oliver Stoned 9/11 Movie will stink more and lose more money.

    Nobody WANTS controversy or stuff like that. With $3.00 gas and war and impending terror, we just want simple entertainment, comedies to make us feel better or good guys winning. The nineties are over, controversy just tells people the movie isn't entertaining and they look for the DVD of the Wedding Crashers or Four Brothers (which is a remake basically of the John Wayne movie "Sons of Katie Elder").

    Fun comedies and hip-hop updates of Westerns seem to be what people want. Here's a thought ... why not give the audience what they want?

  56. Not crucifixion actually by theSpartan · · Score: 1

    I believed the ending, when Neo is taken away, actually represented the "great vessel" of Mayahana Buddhists. Of course I see where that part has a crucified feel to it, as did the "birth" scene to me in the first movie (when they pick Neo up from the sewers with a "claw" and his silhouette again appears crucified).

    --
    ...used to be a library...now it's just a mind-cemetary
  57. March 17th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well March 17th is St.Patricks day - what new dlogans could they come up with for that one?

  58. No reptiles in V? by halleluja · · Score: 1
    Darn.

    I was expecting a revival of the cult (pulp) V series of the 80s (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(TV_series)/)..

    I'm not waiting for the other V so there's no delay

  59. For those who'd like to know more about the comic by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

    Scott Tipton has done an excellent write up of it in his Comics 101 article series at Movie Poop Shoot. Its a bit spoiler laden though, so read with caution if you're planning on reading the graphic novel for yourself.

    Movie Poop Shoot- Comics 101: V for Vendetta

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  60. SuperFANboy? by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    ...Not that you're bitter or anything.

  61. New marketing campaign. by Beer+Moon · · Score: 1

    Beware! Beware the Ides of March Plus Two!!

  62. off-topic? by solomonrex · · Score: 1

    But can we discuss this without getting modded to hell?

    "all being unhappy with the government together (which is always funny, anarchists being anarchists together). "

    Can we discuss anarchism? Were those awful G8 protestors really anarchists? How do they think this works? We have a global economy with roughly 3 bil people organized economically and politically, and it's going to be overthrown by some young guys who won't even work together? Isn't an anarchy movement an oxymoron?

    Does everyone read, 'V for Vendetta' and then curse Bush as fascist and stop voting, using credit cards, buying manufactured stuff? Can someone younger than me explain this? I'm like 30 and took political science, and this has never made sense to me.

  63. Remember, Remember... by xanderwilson · · Score: 1

    the Seventeenth of March.

    Huh.

  64. You have made ... by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    You've made a powerful enemy this day.

    I shall not soon forget the injustice done to me and mine.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  65. V for Vendetta Push Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that V for Vendetta has been pushed back is due to the Star Wars DVD coming out around November 1st. George Lucas feels that it is not good publicity for the Queen in his movie to have a neo nazi haircut. Therefore the people involved in V for Vendetta have graciously pushed it back till the Star Wars DVD sales will die down.

  66. Sin City by PCM2 · · Score: 1
    I would have said the same thing about Sin City two years ago, and I would have been dead wrong.
    I'm glad to hear that you've gained wisdom as you've gotten older.

    In all seriousness, the first Sin City comic was entertaining as a one-off, but since then it's all been the same silly pre-adolescent formula. I found the movie boring and a little embarrassing to watch, given how much it pandered to the cravings of 14-year-old boys to the omission of pretty much all else.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!