Slashdot Mirror


MSN Launches Pay-Per-Click Search Ads

San writes "ZDNet is reporting that MSN has launched its first paid-search advertising application. The system will first be launched in Singapore and will be followed by France in September and a pilot run in the United States in October."

108 comments

  1. Um..... by ericdano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um....Why? Isn't this form of ads pretty much dead? I mean, the last time I clicked on a Slashdot ad was.....never!

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Um..... by Osrin · · Score: 1

      ... not dead, no. Pay-per-click pretty much makes up all of Google's revenue stream today.

    2. Re:Um..... by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't this form of ads pretty much dead?

      Netcraft confirms it, pay per click is NOT dead.

      From the page: "Domain Pay-Per-Click Services Growing Rapidly"

      --
      VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    3. Re:Um..... by robdavy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeh, dead..... Google only made like a billion dollars from it last year...

    4. Re:Um..... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      ... not dead, no. Pay-per-click pretty much makes up all of Google's revenue stream today.

      Not only Google's revenue stream, but the vast bulk of quazi-commercial websites out there (e.g. a large number of the sites linked to by Slashdot).

      Google brought advertising to the low-end with Adsense, which is a performance based ad system (e.g. pay per click rather than impression). Prior to Adsense, most low-end sites were trying to recoup hosting fees with affiliate links with sites like Amazon (which led to some whoring conflicts of interest).

    5. Re:Um..... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      Prior to Adsense, most low-end sites were trying to recoup hosting fees with affiliate links with sites like Amazon (which led to some whoring conflicts of interest).

      6 of 1, half a dozen of the other. I don't see any difference. The grandparent was right (about clicking on ads). The last time I clicked on a google ad was ... when I ended up on a highly ranked,link-farm, circle-jerk web site (void of any actual content) and didn't realize it was even an ad.

      I have a legitimate site with google ads, but the clicks aren't there. If you want to see the google cash, you better put on a mini skirt, fishnet stockings, and ask Hemos for tips on dick sucking, because you most definitely are a whore.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Um..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, and also GEORGE BUSH DOESN'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE

      i am not lame i am not lame i am not lame

    7. Re:Um..... by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Funny
      You lazy bugger.

      With out failure when ever there is a microsoft add on slashdot "open in new tab" immediately goes into action, not that I ever read them, I just want to assist microsoft in the sponsoring of my favorite open source leaning web sites.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Um..... by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Naw. If they didn't post duplicates every other day, I might.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    9. Re:Um..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Google did it. Then I guess it's the best and everyone should do it. I didn't realize Google had done it when I said I thought it was dead. Google doing it makes it legit.

  2. Invasion of privacy. by Tontoman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sound like a unpleasant invasion of privacy.
    According to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstech nology/2002210022_microsoftads17.html/news article from the Seattle Times,
    "AdCenter uses information from customers who registered for services such as Hotmail or who tailored the MSN home page to their interests. It supplements that with data purchased from the Experian credit bureau."

    1. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Tontoman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The link seems to lead to a registration page when referrer is Slashdot. Sorry. Here is a link to an interesting blog entry where I originally found the link to the Seattle Times article: http://www.corante.com/mooreslore/archives/2005/03 /17/microsoft_adcenter_ignores_90s_lessons.php/

    2. Re:Invasion of privacy. by oh_bugger · · Score: 4, Interesting
      If you don't want MSN to have your data, don't give MSN your data. Average Joe User may fuel MSN's userbase allowing them to continue this approach to advertising, but for the informed it's very easy to just avoid these kinds of services.

      Everytime I hear that information about myself could and is sold, despite how common this is, frustrates me. it may not be feasible for all but I try to live without attaching myself to many things, such as random subscriptions (check this box to receive mail), credit card(s), intrusive website registrations. Even the link you provided to the seattle times wanted me to register, thank god for bugmenot. Again, it may not be feasible to take every step, but if people were to refuse to allow their information to be used for monetary gain then companies would stop and find another more cost effective way to increase profits at the expense of the little man's personal privacy/rights. [end rant]

      --
      Go home and shave your giant head of smell with your bad self
    3. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For sure. However, here is a better article that explains it alot better.

    4. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The system will first be launched in Singapore

      A good testbed for this.

      Some years ago my company was working on electronic payments, and some of our work involved some Singapore banks. When some of my people objected to the privacy implications of the proposals favored by the Singaporese, one reply was, "You Americans! You're always so concerned about privacy!"

      We'll see what ends up deployed here and in Europe.

    5. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Decker-Mage · · Score: 2
      Interesting blog entry although the author misses the point. The demographic that most advertisers are interested in are not watching television nor are they reading publications. Pure and simple truth which is why we now have /. articles on advertisements in online games!

      Despite all this, I'm very, very glad that I'm totally paranoid and don't allow any information to be transmitted from my computer, or to my computer, except for basice HTML, IP address, date and time, unless I lift restrictions here. Experian credit scores? Sheesh!

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    6. Re:Invasion of privacy. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Indeed. An "advertising application that offers advertisers information on searchers and their search activity, and the frequency at which keywords have been accessed." has little appeal for an informed Joe Consumer.

      I use a combination of hosts file blacklisting, the excellent adblock/flashblock extensions to Firefox and link my cookies file to /dev/null, and that seems to work pretty well for me, in that I see very little advertising that I don't want to. When I use anybody else's computers, I tend to find the experience frustrating.

    7. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "proposals favored by the Singaporese"

      that should be singaporean.

    8. Re:Invasion of privacy. by schestowitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This was predicted long ago in one of Joel's most popular essays. Joel Spolsky used to work in Microsoft and he foresaw the exploitation of cookie and information swap:

      http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog00000000 47.html

      [snip]

      ...One day, Expedia could start offering higher fares to customers who have more than a million dollars in their Investor stock portfolio. There's not really anything technically impossible about this, and it's probably legal, too... ...The scary thing is that if you use Internet Explorer, Microsoft controls your web browser...

      [/snip]

      --
      My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
    9. Re:Invasion of privacy. by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Just like google reads your Gmail and knows what you search for...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    10. Re:Invasion of privacy. by Hosiah · · Score: 1
      it may not be feasible for all but I try to live without attaching myself to many things,

      Heed well, young 'uns, poster speaks Heap Big Wisdom.

  3. On time for once by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 4, Funny

    They announced this in March and said that it would begin testing phase "within six months." For you math whizzes out there, that means they finally released a project on time!

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    1. Re:On time for once by mwilli · · Score: 1

      Whoa, don't get ahead of yourself. It's not out yet!

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
  4. ...And then, they wonder... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Informative
    FTFA:
    According to Eva Balan, MSN's international marketing manager for MSN adCenter, advertisers pay a one-time subscription fee of S$5 (US$3) for MSN Keywords. For each keyword, they bid a minimum of S$0.10 and pay for the number of times search users click on their advertisements, which appear as sponsored links alongside search results. The placement of the links will depend on the bid price, click-through rate as well as the types of user profiles captured by the system.
    ...And then, they wonder why Google is more popular...

    Do marketing executive brains are in the same universe???

    1. Re:...And then, they wonder... by flood6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to be a smartass, but I don't get your point. This is almost exactly how Google and Yahoo/Overture run their PPC programs.

    2. Re:...And then, they wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot... This is how Google works too. Fucking moron.

    3. Re:...And then, they wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's Microsoft. It's Slashdot. Duh.

  5. AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At first glance, this would appear to be a direct copy of Google's AdWords style keyword bidding on search result pages. However, whats more suspicious is how information on search users is being used to target the ads. If they choose to mine the profile data available to them through MSN passport (and this seems to be in line with their intentions, given that age and gender are already available to advertisers), Microsoft could try to exploit people's personal information to gain a targetting advantage over Google (at the expense of user's privacy..)

    1. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by PsychicX · · Score: 1

      Except that passports aren't necessary in order to use the MSN web search, only the usual registration services (web mail, etc). And Google could very well do the exact same thing with gmail accounts. You know what I say? They recognize that google has done a clever thing, and have copied them while throwing their own, innocuous twist on things. That's it. That's what MS has done for 20 years (albeit, not always innocuously).

    2. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know how much of a privacy issue it is if they just look at your data and then say "okay, which of these ads I have would be useful to this person?". It's not like they're selling your information to other parties, they're just using it as a reference.

      If even that still irritates you, Google is doing that far worse with GMail targetting ads based on e-mail content.

      Anyway, if you're THAT concerned about privacy, you wouldn't have given them your information in the first place, hm?

    3. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by spisska · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Google could very well do the exact same thing with gmail accounts.

      Google cannot do the same thing, since they do not collect this kind of information when you sign up for gmail. It's been a while since I got my gmail account, but I don't recall having to give them a single piece of information that I didn't want to (as opposed to Hotmail, which requires entries for things like age, gender, physical location, etc.)

      If you took a good look at Hotmail user data (and nothing else) you'd probably be surprised how many 90+ year-old women in Albania are using the service. Google does not have this problem since they never intended any ridiculous implementation like MSN Passport.

    4. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google's GMail just looks at your email message instead and displays targetted ads that way. Somehow I don't consider it to be apples and oranges like you're suggesting...

    5. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by NubKnacker · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong but webmasters don't get paid for simple views right? Only clicks.

    6. Re:AdWords clone, but potential privacy issues? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      It's not like they're selling your information to other parties

      So what happens when an advertiser specifies that they should only have their ads shown to, say, people in a certain age group? While Microsoft isn't selling that information per se, they are still leaking it when you click on the link.

      Anyway, if you're THAT concerned about privacy, you wouldn't have given them your information in the first place, hm?

      Well smart people who don't trust Microsoft wouldn't. But the average person would trust Microsoft with the information and give it to them, not realising that they are also giving that information to anybody who can open an advertising account with Microsoft.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  6. "I will f**ing kill Google !" by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 0

    Ok, so one of the weapons Ballmer intends to use to cut off Google's oxygen supply os a kind of "MSN AdSense".

  7. MSN is herrific! by coffeisgood · · Score: 0

    MSN is just terrible. A while ago, I searched for "asp.net". 3 results and 10 ads. Nothing is better then Google.

  8. Innovation by setag · · Score: 0

    What innovation! Soon everyone will be jumping on the bandwagon.

  9. Coincedence.. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We hear this just after Ballmer vows to destroy Google.... ?

  10. Do you remember? by Robbyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Do you remember when developers actually developed software? It boggles my mind that the borg of all things software would still be patronized given the minimal amount of independent thought that comes out of Redmond, WA people would just get fed up and embrace open source.

    Windows 98... "Look Johnny, long filenames" (Macintosh had been there, done that)

    M$IE7 Beta... "Look Johnny, Tabbed Browsers" (FireFox had been there, done that)

    MSN AdCenter... "Look Johnny, Pay per click advertising" (Google had been there, done that)

    What further amazes me is that anything M$ does is still news. Why are the masses constantly amazed by the fact that M$ does not have to form independent thoughts and simply hijack everyone elses. Why not take that black hole of thought hovering over Redmond and channel it into something useful.

    A Secure Microsoft Product "Look Johnny, A Secure M$ Product...Make a Wish"

    1. Re:Do you remember? by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about long filenames, but Firefox wasn't the first to have tabs, and Google wasn't the first to have pay-per-click advertising.

      Most of Google's products were bought from other companies, just like Microsoft does. Picasa, Hello, Earth, Blogger...

      --
      No existe.
    2. Re:Do you remember? by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It boggles my mind that the borg of all things software would still be patronized given the minimal amount of independent thought that comes out of Redmond, WA people would just get fed up and embrace open source.

      So, when Google copies Yahoo, or Google copies MapQuest - and then makes their versions of things, whether improved or not - they don't deserve the same scorn? Or when a Linux distro goes to a lot of trouble to provide users with an interface shockingly similar to Windows, that's innovation? Not every new service has to be a brand spanking new innovation. Otherwise we wouldn't have multiple car manufacturers, musicians, architectural jobs, or any other overlapping producers.

      What further amazes me is that anything M$ does is still news

      Let's see - millions and millions of users, and a giant new marketplace for ads from both small and large businesses...? It's a shame you don't understand why that might be worth mentioning to an audience that deals, in one way or another, with some of those millions of people all over the world.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Do you remember? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You make a good point about the innovation. However, the masses do not know about OSS, and they don't care. They go to a major retailer and buy there wintel machine. That's what they get and its all they see. They don't research alternative browsers, they don't know about freshmeat or sourceforge. You mention Linux and they are like, what's that?

      The alternatives are making progress however, the iPod has given Apple more visibility to the general public (may drive more mac sales) and Linux is starting to make its way into places like Wal-Mart. Also, look at the number of Firefox downloads. It takes time but I think the mass PC and software market will eventually correct its self and achieve an equilibrium. It will take time though.

    4. Re:Do you remember? by eMartin · · Score: 1

      "Windows 98... "Look Johnny, long filenames" (Macintosh had been there, done that)"

      Although Apple's HFS+ supported 255 character filenames since 1998, the Finder and standard open/save dialogs did NOT until OS X in 2001, and until then, Mac OS only fully supported 31 character filenames.

      Windows has supported 255 character filenames since Windows 95.

      So, while Windows does add lame restrictions on allowed characters and even reserves certain names, it did allow and support longer filenames than Mac OS between 1995 and 2001.

    5. Re:Do you remember? by Infonaut · · Score: 1
      Not every new service has to be a brand spanking new innovation. Otherwise we wouldn't have multiple car manufacturers, musicians, architectural jobs, or any other overlapping producers.

      He's right, of course. You don't have to like Microsoft to understand this. Please, moderators, don't use your power to bash on people whose views don't align with yours. Use them to discourage ad hominem attacks and encourage intelligent discourse. If I had any mod points, I'd give ScentCone a +1 Insightful for what is obviously a well reasoned post.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    6. Re:Do you remember? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Ha ... DOS 3.1 for the Apple ][ (of all things) had 30 character filenames. I got my first Apple around 1978 or so, and got accustomed to using descriptive filenames. When I eventually "upgraded" to an IBM PC I remember being irritated with MS-DOS's 8.3 naming convention. I still am.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Do you remember? by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      Actually, keep in mind that the long filenames under Win9x were extremely ugly hacks grafted on to the FAT filesystem. You could say they supported long filenames, but you're really stretching the meaning of the word "support". NTFS was the first "real" support for long filenames under Windows. In fairness, though, both of these examples ignore the fact that there was long filename support in HPFS back when OS/2 was a MS/IBM joint venture. IIRC (flip a coin), this was available well before Win95.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    8. Re:Do you remember? by Slash.er+FX · · Score: 0

      How do I mod u up?

      --
      discover Charamel, the best firefox theme around. http://members.shaw.ca/lucx/
    9. Re:Do you remember? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had said "shockingly familiar to the Apple Macintosh interface..." I would have modded him a point, but instead, his perspective indicates Microsoft is the inventor of the GUI.

    10. Re:Do you remember? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You need things called "Moderator Points". The only way to get Mod Points is to send a certified cashier's check payable to "bearer" to the Slashdot editors, in the amount of $50 per point desired (maximum of five.) Send it c/o ScrewMaster and I'll make sure that they get it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  11. Invasion of Pirates?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god! We are done for!

  12. Re:post here if you simply do not care by DashEvil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bitch, I just ran out of milk! I blame you and your apathy!

    --
    -If God wanted people to be better than me, he would have made them that way.
  13. Launch countries... by Bob54321 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Is it just me or do the countries chosen for the launch seem kind of strange. I mean France...

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Launch countries... by ToolsDrummer83 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      maybe there's some feeling that France isn't a big fan of Google (referring to the court case Google lost) and MS could step in here? i have no idea, they do seem rather odd picks.

    2. Re:Launch countries... by serutan · · Score: 1

      I read the article but I still don't get what it means to launch something in a particular country if it's on the Web.

    3. Re:Launch countries... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite lines from Pirates of the Caribbean...

      "I take it you've never been to Singapore." -Captain Jack Sparrow.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    4. Re:Launch countries... by werewolf1031 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is it just me or do the countries chosen for the launch seem kind of strange. I mean France...

      Well, if Microsoft are gonna conquer anybody without firing a shot, I can't think of a better place to start...


      Um, was that out loud?

    5. Re:Launch countries... by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      This thread is old, nobody's gonna read this except maybe you (if you are warned at reply). Anyway...

      I think we (as in French people) hate MS as much as the next guy may him be American, Polish or Mexican. And no, we haven't anything against Google, we use Google just like everybody else... It's not because some French charged Google (afaik for "legally" good reasons, may I remind you that each country has its own laws?) that French people aren't big fans of Google.

      I know Slashdotters like France jokes (haha stop I surrender!! so funny :P) and I find them amusing, but, damn, you shouldn't be modded insightful. Where is the insight when you just don't know what you're talking about? I don't have anything against you, but more against the stupid moderator who modded you up.

      Oh, and you say "France", I guess you'd find clever if I'd consider "America" as a whole, where everyone is happy about the current administration? Let me tell you : you have ~50% pro Bush ~50% against? Same here with our f*cking Government. You find some court trials to be stupid? So do we, but at least our legal system isn't JUST a weapon to get money and sink competition (at least for now... it's changing unfortunately)

      American fantasies about France are ridiculous. Come here for some time and have a look for yourself, but stop giving a whole population ideas because a citizen did something on his own. Hint for you: French companies are just like American companies, they care for themselves before caring for their country. When Louis Vuiton attacked Google for putting ads of counterfeits products in the very result of the search "Louis Vuiton", it is a COMPANY who attacked Google. Not France.

      As a matter of fact, we love Google, everybody here knows it, everybody uses it, and we don't have the "it's american so it sux" mentality American people think we have.

    6. Re:Launch countries... by ToolsDrummer83 · · Score: 1

      Where is the insight when you just don't know what you're talking about? I don't have anything against you, but more against the stupid moderator who modded you up.

      hey no hard feelings. i don't know what i'm talking about. i was wondering about the choice of countries as the parent post was. i was just putting out there maybe there was an anti-google feeling? i said i didnt know...but yeah. thanks for clearing that up. good to know. (i'm not a France-hater btw)

  14. Expectation of MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious, we shouldn't expect anything creative out of microsoft. Look at what their interns do:
    http://internz.org/Video2005/ByeByeBye%20Internz%2 02005%20v2%20(NTSC).wmv

  15. Doesn't this really sum them up? by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this just epitomize them? Always one step behind!

    --
    "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
  16. so... by Kuku_monroe · · Score: 1

    With this move now Microsoft and Google have almost the same features. But i still hate Microsoft.. Ah!, you analyst didnt see that comin' bill did they?!

    --
    //WR
  17. it's cheaper than 500 MIL to Claria by TehBeer · · Score: 1

    Hey, it could have been worse, the claria deal could have went through, and they could have gotten their spydata that way and unclassified claria from their antispyware app.

    What am I saying, what do I care, I don't use windows. ClamAV can handle the sendmail.

  18. Re:post here if you simply do not care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame MS because I saw Stebe Balmer throwing milk jugs in the vicinity of your house earlier! (as well as chairs, voodoo dolls that look suspiciously like certain Google execs, etc)

  19. Now Yahoo! can sue Microsoft too! by Alascom · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Yahoo! (Overture) holds intellectual property rights to pay-per-click and bidding systems that grant Web sites higher placement in search results.



    Google agreed to issue 2.7 million shares (~$250 million) of Class A common stock to Yahoo, based in Sunnyvale, Calif. In turn, Yahoo dropped its lawsuit against Google and issued a "fully paid, perpetual license" to Overture patents.



    I guess Microsoft thinks its open season on Yahoo! patents now... I hope Microsoft's legal team is ready to open the checkbook as I doubt the two Standford search engines (Yahoo and Google) will allow Microsoft to get in on the action for free!

    1. Re:Now Yahoo! can sue Microsoft too! by rbaf · · Score: 1

      The patent involves bidding for the highest position. If MS doesn't get into the bidding thing, they might escape the Yahoo patent. Would they actually come with something even better? :-)

      It's Stanford, not Standford.

  20. All I know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for the next round of Steve Ballmer vids.

  21. Imitation of Google? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS is scared to death over google.

    My guess is they are trying to take over their market or they will use monopolistic pressures to "cut off Google's air supply". Certainly that scenario is a classic Microsoft tactic.

    Especially after reading yesterday's news about Balmer throwing a chair because someone left to join google. That is just scary.

    1. Re:Imitation of Google? by joelsanda · · Score: 1

      Just what has Microsoft built from scratch? I can't think of a single application they've released that hasn't been a knock-off from something else. Excel, first released for the Mac (!) was VisiCalc. I remember looking at Excel on the Mac - it did less than the $40 Word Processor/ Spreadsheet suite I had for my Commodore 64 in college. Flight Simulator was BAO's before MS bought it. Visio. Seriously - has Microsoft produced anything that hasn't been done before?

      --
      The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    2. Re:Imitation of Google? by toddbu · · Score: 1
      MS is scared to death over google.

      It's not that Microsoft is scared of Google, but rather what Google represents. Microsoft has never quite figured out a business model that they liked for delivering service over the Internet, and they have clung to their shrink-wrapped product mentality. It's why they don't like Linux. It's why they don't like Google. It's why they don't like iTunes. And the problem is that unlike the OS/boxed-product-software business, they can't control the delivery channel. In some ways it reminds me of why politicians hate bloggers. If you can't control it, you can't make insane amounts of money from it.

      What I find interesting about all of this is that unlike the previous businesses that Microsoft has faced, Google is a completely new competitor. They can't just buy their way into it. "Google" is now a verb, as in "I googled the web for the answer". (Old timers will remember this as "grepping" for things.) Can you ever envision a world where someone says, "Yeah, I microsofted for the answer"?

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    3. Re:Imitation of Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you ever envision a world where someone says, "Yeah, I microsofted for the answer"?

      Well, I microsofted my works on many occasions when programs were crashing before I could save, and had to re-type everything. Now I just linux around. No problems. At all.

    4. Re:Imitation of Google? by kihjin · · Score: 1

      Especially after reading yesterday's news about Balmer throwing a chair because someone left to join google. That is just scary.

      I'd die if I saw that on video. Torrent, anyone?

      --
      This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
    5. Re:Imitation of Google? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Not of throwing his chair but if you love to laugh at Balmer check out this.

      Yes, that is really Balmer from a developers tradeshow at Redmond.

    6. Re:Imitation of Google? by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      Yea, because competition == "monopolistic pressures".

  22. Pathetic by klept · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Almost all absurdity of conduct arises from the imitation of those whom we can not resembel"- Dr. Samual Johnson

    1. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, that was on the super-Google homepage QOTD.

    2. Re:Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google misspelled "Samual" and "resembel" too?

      Now we know what that $4B secondary was for - to buy a spell checker.

  23. Here's a question: by paulius_g · · Score: 1

    And why would I want to use it?

    I want real reasons and none of that "better experience" crap. Stuff such as "Better Payouts", "less ads about spyware", "better optimized displaying technique" or any feature that would allow more liberty (Read AdSense's TOS carefully, you'll see what I mean)

    And finnaly, I would want a username that goes by the name of "MSNGuy" to reply to this! .... What? Google has it already!

  24. For this to work by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't someone have to use M$ search?

    My start up page, at home or work, Windows or Linux, is always Google. On Firefox.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:For this to work by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1
      Now, I think that is a very good point. I spend $200 a month on Google ads, and I haven't even bothered to add Overture to the list. My ad budget isn't bottomless, pay per click isn't great, and I focus on the biggest game in town. If I ever expand my search budget it would go like this.

      1. Do Overture at all

      2. More money on google

      3. More money on overture

      4. See two, repeat.

      I don't think I'd ever ad MSN. Who ever searches from there?

    2. Re:For this to work by tempehop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think I'd ever ad MSN. Who ever searches from there? According to http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_500 MSN is hit more than Google. I'd be willing to guess that they have the searchs of the average internet surfer who doesn't have AdBlock and who are probably more likely to click on an Ad than the person running firefox, with google set to their homepage. But Microsoft doesn't even have to do astoundingly well to deal revenue damage to google, since they can take up new customers who really don't care where they get their clicks.

    3. Re:For this to work by toddbu · · Score: 1

      This was exactly our strategy, although we haven't gotten past #3 yet, mainly because Overture isn't delivering our daily limit of clicks. The biggest problem with adding a third player is that it's just another thing to have to deal with. I get calls frequently from people wanting me to list with their suite of sites, and I just tell them that I'm not interested.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    4. Re:For this to work by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Since Alexa is removed by both Ad-Aware and Spybot I wonder how accurate there info really is? The only people who have Alexa on their systems are the ones who take things exactly as M$ gives it to them. Those boxes are mostly zombies now.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    5. Re:For this to work by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      > Since Alexa is removed by both Ad-Aware and Spybot I wonder how accurate there info really is?

      Accuracy has nothing to do with number of users they have. They just report data they get, so the figures (from their sample) are absolutely correct.
      Whether they are representative of the whole Internet, that's another thing, although I can't see why would one consider PageRank info more representative of a site's popularity than Alexa's.

      >The only people who have Alexa on their systems are the ones who take things exactly as M$ gives it to them.

      Nonsense.
      I have Alexa on my A9.com toolbar (Firefox edition) and I know many Web-savy people who have it too.
      I uninstalled Google toolbar from MSIE (which I had used only because of Google toolbar) since it was useless except for the search box which Firefox has built-in.
      Alexa gives me detailed info on Website Internet ranking - more detailed and objective than Page Rank, which Google changes at their whim every few months, can give me.

    6. Re:For this to work by David+Off · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't someone have to use M$ search?

      No, not if it works like Google Adwords. For example someone may search with Yahoo!, go to a page on your site. On your page a piece of Javascript connects to the Adwords server with the page URL. Adwords checks its own database to see what the page is about and serves up appropriate ads based on:

      1. the amount that users are bidding on those keywords
      2. the number of clickthroughs for each ad
      #2 is interesting - it means Google does not necesarily serve the highest bidder but the ads that tend to earn most for Google and the website owner.

      Just an additional comment, Microsoft Algorithmic Search, launched in Beta about a year ago, has been a dismal failure. MS Adwords will probably go the same way.

      ps
      if you buy my book: The ABC of SEO ISBN: 1411622510 all is revealed.

    7. Re:For this to work by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      It's because all the misspelt domains, etc in IE get automatically directed to MSN.

      So every single typo the average joe does is a hit for MSN. But you can't get to google with a misspelling.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  25. You forgot by lheal · · Score: 1

    MS-BASIC... BASIC ported to 8080.
    MS-DOS... CP/M-86 with IBM patches.
    Xenix... Unix ported to 8086
    Windows... Oh, a GUI.
    Windows NT... VMS with a GUI

    The list goes on.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  26. Level the playing field ?? by serutan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Balan noted that the application helps to "level the playing field" for small and medium-sized businesses

    Because nobody knows the "level playing field" concept like Microsoft!

    1. Re:Level the playing field ?? by cwj123 · · Score: 1

      Oh, they understand the concept and the most important part of it, how to avoid it.

    2. Re:Level the playing field ?? by dkf · · Score: 1

      Must be "level playing field" as in "crushed flat underneath the jack-booted heel of Microsoft".

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  27. Ouch! by blooba · · Score: 1
    I happen to work for a much smaller player in the paid-search industry, and I must say that we are doing well so far. Google hasn't gobbled us up yet, but this news about M$ entering our market makes me feel a little worried about my stock options.

    Come to think of it, it could be good for my little company to watch two 600-lb. gorillas duke it out for primacy, while we sneak up from behind and nibble at their market share.

  28. I remember... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    On the first machines I worked with (Burroughs B3700, which went out of production in 1976) the operating system (MCP) only allowed 6-character filenames, upper-case only please. After that, Honeywell's GCOS allowed (IIRC) 64-character filenames, and when I eventually got to play with PC-DOS, it was a bit of a shock to find myself stuck with the 8.3 convention.

    1. Re:I remember... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Good old days and all that. Charles Moore, inventor of Forth, once commented that it would have been called "Fourth" (as in "fourth generation computers") but the system it was developed on only supported five character filenames.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  29. That should read... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    "Clearly you've never been to Singapore." -Captain Jack Sparrow. Mod me down for not checking accuracy.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  30. One of the reasons... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
    I never agreed to the terms of the passport end-user-license-agreement... primarily being their ability to change the terms on you without any notice, and continued use of the service constituted agreement to the new terms...

    all those moaning about how it's an invasion of privacy must note that when they agreed to that .net passport, they waived all rights in perpetuity... they allowed Microsoft & their "partners" to do whatever they want with the data... and it looks like their partners include anyone who pays for an MSN Keyword... and that could be anyone

    I think the EU will have some serious concerns over this as it appears to be a primae facie breach of the Data Protection requirements which all EU contries have signed up to. And last time I looked, Microsoft have offices AND customers in the EU and are subject to them.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  31. What took them so long? by machinegunhand · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates began dreaming of "pay-per-click" the first time he saw a mouse in action.

  32. People said google ads were invasion of privacy by tod_miller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Adsense and their gmail ads. Still only if you have your google cookie set.

    However this microsoft ploy is what one reader 'predicted', if microsoft offer a 'killer' ad program (lets face it, it isn't a sodding technical marvel) with extra data and sod, and then basically give all the money to the people who operate it (read cheap advertising and high payouts) then they will crush google.

    Except they will have to imitate google, and perhaps their arrogance (using credit data) has gone against them.

    I for one don't block adsense frames, because I find it interesting to see who can get ads on certain pages.

    That is how unobstrusive it is. I choose what I watch, and sod the advertisers, I would rather a cheap and nasty ad free internet than a cheap and nasty adfull internet (which we have now).

    I will adblock any flash or video ads that encumber my screen, and no visit websites that have 'interval' ign style ads. 'skip this ad'

    'Microsoft' have no class, is a statement being passed around by in the hyperswill - and I think this offering, timely after the whole 'I will bury google' release, will show that despite a mountain of cash, they will not be able to topple google.

    Internet has shown that inertia is enough of a force with people to let even shit sites (ebay) win through. Google have been pushing for this, and probably on day 1 they knew this would happen, and worked out their game plan.

    Microsoft are such lazy uncoordinated bastards, they sit and wait too much, with worked in googles favour.

    They are spending all their time on faux blog sites, shitty 'Microsoft are cute and fun' reaching out to developers and crap. Please develop for our platform only, tie in etc.

    Now most download sites and 'open' downloads are for linux, 3 years ago it was windows software, and someone please bring it to linux, and now it is 'Windows Version - someone managed to get this to compile, it is 3 versions old, but good luck'.

    File in Java (which Microsoft had a game planon how to trash - and failed) and you see where this is going.

    One final point fo rpeople who say Microsoft don't innovate:

    According to Eva Balan, MSN's international marketing manager for MSN adCenter, advertisers pay a one-time subscription fee of S$5 (US$3) for MSN Keywords. For each keyword, they bid a minimum of S$0.10 and pay for the number of times search users click on their advertisements, which appear as sponsored links alongside search results. The placement of the links will depend on the bid price, click-through rate as well as the types of user profiles captured by the system. [why is this bold not italic? I hate reading italic on screen] ...you are right they are not innovative! Grounds for a google counter sue for their advertising style? pteesh.

    To confirm you're not a script,
    please type the word in this image: recast

    random letters - if you are visually impaired, please email us at pater@slashdot.org

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:People said google ads were invasion of privacy by myov · · Score: 1

      On a few sites, I've been forced to block ads. Not because I don't like them, not because the javascript tags add the "interval" ads, but because they horribly slow down the page render! There are times when my browser has the rest of the content but can't render because it's "Waiting for servedby.advertising.com" or some other ad server. Blocking the ads renders the page quickly.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  33. Microsoft mortgage ads? No trademark? by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    http://www.adcmedia.com/

    Devils advocate - traditionally in advertising - noone knows what works, so targetted may work, at the end of the day:

    Someone looking at a gardening site - will they buy into ads selling 'gardening things' or things related to that aricle (it doesn't always work) :: OR is that person has just refinanced his house, o rmaxed out credit cards, or is a gambler or has lots of finance, will they hit ads that target them with refinancing, credit cards, and online gambling.

    It is this crowd of 'financials' that microsoft look to be targetting, and I think that this will lead to people calling microsoft ads 'mortgage ads' or 'gambling ads'.

    I wonder if M$ will succumb to the click-fraud crowd.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  34. Difference is vast by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Look, in the case of MSN they can tie every word of every email they get to the fact that you are male, live in a certain location, and so on and so forth (based on what you tell them in the profile). Furthermore they know something of other sites you frequent, if you use Passport to reach them. So for instance if I have the word "car" in an email I may get an ad for a particular brand of cleaner different than the one I normally purchase at a car-cleaning site I frequent that also uses Passport. I'm sure they are not going this far yet but it's easy enough to rig up they way they have things.

    In the case of Google, they are looking at one email and what it holds. They don't know if I'm human much less male. They don't know I just bought polisher at Joes Auto Shack last week. They just put up a few ads related to cars and consider themselves done.

    An automated service that looks at each email I read and does something imperminent based on a keyword? OK by me.

    A service that can estimate when I'm out of any given fluid based on a vast network of interconnected sites tracking what I buy? Pass the tinfoil please!

    The difference is that Google is collecting statistics in aggragate (400 out of 10k people clicked on this link when "car" was a keyword) whereas Microsoft can keep track at an individual level.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Adblock filter? by Andy_R · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone found one of these adverts yet? I'd like to block them before I ever see one, if possible.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  36. paid ads by emh924a · · Score: 1

    who the hell would pay for ad's i dont even want to see the ones that are on there allready and between the adware and spyware whod want em anyway

  37. Patent? by psymastr · · Score: 1

    Hey, I have a patent on that one!

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com