Slashdot Mirror


Wi-Max Deployed in Katrina Disaster Area

Spy Handler writes "In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina's destruction of telecom infrastructure in New Orleans, officials are turning to wireless broadband for use by government workers. Intel, a key backer of WiMax, and Cisco are donating wireless equipment to aid disaster workers. This could be a good opportunity to replace an antiquated system of copper wires with brand-new technology." From the article: "Shakouri and other industry experts contend that the devastation of Hurricane Katrina offers a chance to build the sort of modern network that phone and cable companies have promised for years. Such a network -- whether wireless or fiber-optic -- could deliver movies or medical records at speeds hundreds of times faster than current Internet connections. Telecom executives and analysts, though, aren't so sure it's the right time or place."

49 of 139 comments (clear)

  1. Truth is by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They aren't 'donating' per se -- yes, they're giving it away at no cost, but it's VERY good publicity for them.

    Just think how good it sounds to have two tech companies donating tech to relief efforts. NOw, if only FEMA would get with the times and realize that not everyone uses windows/IE...

    1. Re:Truth is by SlamMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "They aren't 'donating' per se -- yes, they're giving it away at no cost, but it's VERY good publicity for them."

      So, they're donating it.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    2. Re:Truth is by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NOw, if only FEMA would get with the times and realize that not everyone uses windows/IE...
      Believe me- I understand that sentiment. But you have to figure that a lot of people (who had them) lost their computers along with their homes and the rest of their belongings. So I assume FEMA will set up trailers with computers, rooms at shelters with computers, send people to libraries etc. Every library (with the rare exception of a few Macs) has had windows machines. And if you are going to deploy mobile computer labs, why not deploy them with the platform most people are familiar with?
      Complaining about using IE for the relief benefits sounds dort of diingenous and shrill. Sort of like a starving person complaining that the meal they are given "could use a more Paprika."

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:Truth is by redeyeowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What happened in New Orleans is a tragedy and the people there do need help. But let's not forget the people of Florida who have not yet recovered from last year's 4 hurricanes. They need as much help today as they did before Katrina. Don't send all the funds to New Orleans
      Peter Kuhn
      Lakeland Florida
      doublewidetrailer@gmail.com

    4. Re:Truth is by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So it isn't a donation if it gives someone good press? Sorry but that is BS. A donation is a donation, whether it provides good PR or not.

    5. Re:Truth is by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Marketters will be glad to hear this:
      please enjoy this popup donation!

  2. Surely anything helps? by freetipe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may not be exactly "the right time and place", but as long as it isn't diverting skills and resources away from more critical, lifesaving activities, surely it can't hurt to have such things available?

    --
    $10/month: 120GB bw, SSH, CVS, Rails and 10 years' experience!
  3. *Waits* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    *Waits for FEMA to reject this assistance for some BS reason as well.*

    1. Re:*Waits* by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed -- rather than accepting help, it seems as though they're one of those 'we're going to do it our way, or not at all' type of groups.

      Companies: Here's X amount of (free new technology)/(food)/(tp). PLease distribute it and make use of it. FEMA: NO! We're gonna do it our way!!! That's the way the people want it!

    2. Re:*Waits* by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, without defending them too much, it is important to keep in mind that any time you're dealing with a large amount of aid you're also dealing with infrastructure (how and when do the items arrive, where do you store them, how do you prioritize the distribution of funds, who installs and maintains donated technology, is it something that integrates into volunteer efforts without too much training or maintainance overhead to be useful, can the volunteer coordinators fit another thing into the schedule, are there strings attached to the gift, etc.)

      Point being, if the help can't be deployed in a way that makes progress, it's better to turn it away than have it sit on the shelf useless or, worse, have it detract from other aid efforts that are more productive.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    3. Re:*Waits* by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BSE has caused (roughly there may be more and perhaps less , some of the cases can not be artibuted to BSE infected beef)140 cases of variant CJD world wide since 96 . Almost all of those cases were caused infected meat in the late 80's to early 90's(since the meat from those days has gone well past its use by date , and since the regulations have been tightened there is a little to no risk ) . FEMA in their infantile(not a typographical error of infinite) wisdom are making frankly idiotic decisions.

      It honestly wouldn't surprise me if they rejected the Wi-Max deployment as it is a waste of resources.. Resources which are being supplied from an external source and would likely not hurt any other area.
      Wi-Max deployment could help co-ordinate rescue and recovery efforts immensely , also allow people to contact family members more easily.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:*Waits* by Ravatar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's not forget Castro's pledge of 1000+ doctors, they haven't even replied to him yet.

    5. Re:*Waits* by mspohr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Just a few facts to intrude on your rant.

      Cuba has a surplus of doctors. In spite of (or because of) a "one party" system, one of the things that Cuba does well is provide good health care for its people. Cuba regularly sends hundreds of doctors abroad (and yes, they speak english). I have encountered them in South Africa and countries in South America.

      Cuba has basic health indicators that are as good as or better than the USA. This includes life expectancy, immunization (better than USA), infant mortality rate (better than USA), maternal mortality rate (better than USA).

      This is a genuine offer of support from Cuba but we know the US will reject it for political reasons.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  4. Solar flares. by jimmypw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its a good thing there arent solar flares disrupting communications at the moment. Oh wait there are.

    My sympathy goes out to the victims.

  5. not the right time or place?? by HyperHyper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>"Telecom executives and analysts, though, aren't so sure it's the right time or place."

    Why is it because of the poverty level and they won't have enough clientele? Or because they will lose all the equipment once the next hurricane hits (man vs nature - my bet is on nature but that's another discussion)

    Personally, I've heard New Orleans is a big convention city and wouldn't that be a good reason to "hook them up" with this technology.

    If the technology is as a good as they are touting, it will draw more people to the area for meetings/conventions would it not?

  6. Huh. by Sheetrock · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Telecom executives and analysts, though, aren't so sure it's the right time or place.

    They had their chance, and handed it to the cable companies by the combined misery of ISDN deployments in the early 90s and DSL deployments in the late 90s. Maybe they can work on correct and complete Caller ID information and shutting down the waves of illegal fax spam until the next communication technology comes around.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  7. Big Fan by Megamote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "The company considered installing wireless broadband in rebuilding, Smith said, but it found that it could recover most of its fiber network. The technologies will be used eventually. "I'm a big fan of WiMax," he said."

    These products operate in the unlicensed 2.4GHz ISM band, or the licensed 2.3 GHz WCS, 2.5/2.6 GHz ITFS/MMDS, and 3.4/3.5 GHz WLL bands. Guess who owns the licensed spectrum - that's right, Bell South....big fan indeed.

  8. Re:Nice move by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its times like this that the big firms should be congradulated. I dont see microsoft doing things like this *whistles*

    OK, so Bill Gates isn't actually Microsoft, per se - but he's personally holding a lot of the stock and cash that has resulted from their growth. I'm sure it pains you to know that he's donated, personally, a fortune to relief and charities. Just one donation (the largest in history) was $5 Billion towards malaria relieft and innoculation of children. The Gates foundation has already donated $1.5 million towards hurricane relief this week (mostly through the red cross).

    As for Microsoft itself, you might want to at least spend a couple of moments reading before you assume they're doing nothing. They have already lined up $9 Million in cash and donations in IT systems to help the local governments impacted by the storm. They're matching their employees' donations - and those people have collectively put up over a million as well. They've deployed three satellite communications busses in Baton Rouge and Mississippi, and are working directly with Intel and Cisco on support of Red Cross operations.

    There are two predictable things, here. One - that since MS routinely does these things, they are doing it now, too - whether or not the press mentions it. And two - that it would of course never get a posting on slashdot, just on principle.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  9. About Time... by Fungus+King · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone I speak to occasionally works in the communications industry, and after Katrina happened he started to chase up his superiors to see what can be done to deploy wireless communications in the disaster area - he made numerous calls to government officials to be told time after time that he was speaking to the *wrong* person - all the while the government were complaining "if only we had communications" - needless to say he's not been in a very good mood lately...

    Better late than never I suppose, but this could have been so much more useful had it been set up earlier...

  10. First suggested right here on Slashdot by blastard · · Score: 4, Informative
    Glad to see they are considering that.

    Here's the "first post" on it right here in slashdot. Of course many simply flamed.

    "Now would be a fantastic opportunity to install a citywide Wi-Fi network. If the ILEC was ever going to do it and get good press for it, now is the time. Could Intel use another test bed for Wi-Max?"

  11. So, when is a good time? by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suppose there never is a good time to install a technology that will cannibalize its bottom line.

    According to TFA, "[BellSouth] expects to spend as much as $600 million to restore service on nearly half its 4.9 million lines in the gulf region and to 24 central offices, where local lines connect to the public phone network."

    That's what, some $240+ per line? Thank god they're using wireless to cut costs in some instances!

    Somehow I can't help but think that the price/performance comparison favours wireless...

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    1. Re:So, when is a good time? by gui_tarzan2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      True story - we built a new school building to replace old portables and called Verizon to move the cable over to the new building. It took three "technicians" FOUR hours to pull a 25 pair cable through a 2" conduit 50' and terminate both ends. Then they had the balls to charge us $1400!!!!!

      --
      Have you hugged your penguin today?
    2. Re:So, when is a good time? by danharan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just think that you're lucky: $1400 for 12 billable hours and some material is fairly cheap ;)

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    3. Re:So, when is a good time? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father, some twenty years ago, ran the computer center for a legal division in our State. Anyway, in the State Building where he worked, they were preparing for a new mainframe installation, and had planned to put terminals throughout their floors for all the lawyers and secretaries to use. Well, his division had the money to pay for the cable-pulling and so forth, but the union guys wanted way too much time to do the work. Dad also had a mandated deadline, so that wasn't going to cut it. So he organized all the attorneys and other staff to come in one weekend and pull all the cables themselves. And they did ... with all the wires terminated in a few pipes coming out of the floor in the computer room's wiring closet.

      Well, to make a long story short, one of the union electricians heard about this "illegal" effort. He came in the next day and sawed all the wires off flush with the top of the pipes.

      The only redeeming aspect to the story, from the Union perspective, is that it was another union employee who reported him and got his ass fired.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:So, when is a good time? by RevMike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      $240 per line? well when it takes a union worker an hour to screw back in one set of wires...

      Massive flooding is unlikely to just pull some wires out from under a couple of screws. The wires themselves are the least of the problem. How much switching equipment was underwater long enough that it needs to be replaced? Probably tens of thorusands. How many poles are down? Probably millions. How many cables were severed and need to be spliced? Thousands.

      The $240 a line number is probably an estimate of the entire effort. Some lines will cost only a dollar to restore and others will cost thousands.

  12. Re:Nice move by SlamMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    My kingdom for some mod points.

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  13. Re:Nice move by huangpo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey, I don't like Microsoft either, but the truth is that they have donated resources:

    http://katrinasafe.org/

    and I know personally they have been donating their expertise via conference calls and software licenses for PCs for shelters. And possibly in other ways as well; I've been too busy lately to keep dibs on Microsoft.

    I live in the affected area and I am a volunteer for the Red Cross.

  14. Re:Wi-Max Infrastructure by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Very much so , A hurricane could literally rip up the existing infrastructure causing immeasurable damage over a wide area .(think tens of thousands of broken lines and switch boxes)
    Even if it destroys every Wi-Max antenna in the area it would only take a matter of hours to replace them ,plus it would be a hell of a lot cheaper .(think the man-hours , the cost of the street and cable repairs etc. Vs. the cost of a few servers and a few antennas )

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  15. Re:Nice move by digitalinfinity · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think its also fair to bring to attention a post made by scoble [http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011] on channel9 publishing an internal ms letter [http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=112 438#112438] which lists some of the efforts of employees into the hurricane relief.

  16. wimax? by myukew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think fresh water, food and a place to sleep are way more important. You'd better donate something more usefull

    1. Re:wimax? by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think fresh water, food and a place to sleep are way more important.
      That is a very simplistic way of looking at things and not necessarily correct. Truckloads of ice and fresh water did not get to the right places in recent days due to a lack of communication. Communications infrastructure, electricity and even computers make it a lot easier to organise fresh water, food and a place to sleep.

      We get this sort of simplistic attitude exhibited whenever people mention sending any sort of gadget developed after WWII to impoverished nations, it shouldn't apply there and it shouldn't apply to the southern US - technology that does not appear to be instantly lifesaving does help people live better lives and does save lives.

    2. Re:wimax? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think fresh water, food and a place to sleep are way more important. You'd better donate something more usefull
      Another one of these comments.

      Look, officials have been complaining since day 1 that a big part of the problem is communications:

      As powerful winds uprooted trees, power lines snapped and flood waters poured into homes and businesses, members of the New Orleans Police Department and other emergency responders had little more to communicate with than hand-held radios and cell phones. And communication with outside agencies, officials say, was near impossible.
      ... The radio system "was the only thing working during the storm," Schneider said. But it didn't allow contact with local agencies, he said. The National Guard couldn't get in touch with New Orleans Police Department officers working the city streets.
      The military has been aware of this issue for *decades*, that's why they invented the Internet, which allows all kinds of information to be exchanged using a standard set of protocols. That is the key to allowing different parties, that don't usually communicate, to rapidly and dynamically set up new data exchange pathways during an emergency.

      Now can I rant for a minute? Every time slashdot reports a communications network is to be set up in a poor country or emergency, somebody complains that communications are superflous in such circumstances. That's insane! Ask yourself - why are cops, soldiers, and emergency responders such heavy users of communications technology? Don't they have better things to do than sit around chatting?

  17. How about finding new homes for Katrina Victims? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are lots of Katrina victims that are going to have to be permanently relocated. FEMA in its continuing bungling of the Katrina disaster seems to be overlooking that.

    The American Voice has a solution that could be used to relocate some of the Katrina victims that are willing to work for what they get. The Katrina victims would be given free farms in the Western U. S. Not a bad idea imo. It gives the victims both a place to live and a way to earn a living. The farms are small family farms rather than big commercial operations. Nothing that would make anybody rich. But enough to have a nice wholesome life.

    The article is Relocating the Victims of the 8/29 2005 Katrina Catastrophe. There are pros and cons to this plan. But at least someone has offered a plan that could work to relocate some of the Katrina victims.

  18. There's always a silver lining..... by smchris · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I guess.

    Yes, I suppose when a major U.S. city is destroyed, that is an excellent time to follow Africa's paradoxically late "lead" and just pass over copper and even fiber in some cases.

    1. Re:There's always a silver lining..... by maelstrom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So far as I can tell, most of the copper and other wiring underground was built to be flooded and probably doesn't require huge repair.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  19. Why? by gexen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would they try and make this infastructure? So it can also be taken down when this shit happens again? I would not invest ANYTHING in any kind of infastructure down there until local and federal officials decide on a course of action for rebuilding the town in such a way that this won't happen again. If they can't do that, it's time to go elsewhere.

    1. Re:Why? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, president Bush made it clear he wants to rebuild a prettier city. Now, cities have upgraded poor neighbourhoods in the past, with the result that the prices skyrocket and poor people get driven out. Once it is a fancy neighbourhood with rich people, national budgets will be easily diverted to build big constructions to divert the water. But right now, it isn't worth the trouble.

      Also, note this:
      > Telecom executives and analysts, though, aren't so sure it's the right time or place.

      What they mean is: "Why should we try to sell fiberoptic network to poor people? They stink!" If they install fiber now, it will be only in the rich neighbourhoods, and it will only underline the factual segregation that is still present today in the USA. This has become painfully clear in the last weeks already, so indeed, it's not the right time nor place.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  20. Wifi over copper? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This could be a good opportunity to replace an antiquated system of copper wires with brand-new technology.


    Well it is a good situation to update the infrastructure (although being one of the poorer areas of the US, I'd doubt they'd go too far due to a lack of major corporate backing). On that note, why would they avoid good old copper or other great technologies? The potential of copper (10-gigabit is the latest 'consumer' technology) is faster, more reliable, and more secure than any WiFi they can throw at it.

    C'mon- WiFi is fun and all to save you running wires to your basement, or giving you e-mail while you check your coffee, but lets be realistic. It's a security issue. It's a reliability issue (interference, signal issues in certain areas, 'jamming'). And the spectrum only has so much room in it. Just run a few wires and call it a day.

    -M
    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:Wifi over copper? by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "although being one of the poorer areas of the US"

      Assuming New Orleans is rebuilt I think its open to debate if it will still be poor after its done. One possibility is all the low income housing gets bulldozed, which is a key motivator in forced evacuations, and it will replaced by yuppie friendly condos and high rises. Most of the poor have been scattered to the wind already and may stay where they landed, since its hard for poor with no cash reserves.

      New Orelans would be an ideal city for yuppies due to its ambiance, food, music, etc. The only obstacle is they needed to get rid of the poor and fix the oppressive crime rate which is something Katrina solved.

      On the flip side its open to debate if anyone will want to develop it or move there with the realization that it will always be vulnerable to flooding without massive and more importantly sustained investment in its levees. reclamation of its wetland buffers, and maybe raising some of the low lying areas (and putting green space in the lowest areas).

      It would be odd to put it mildly to spend hundreds of billions of dollars rebuilding New Orleans, and spend billions on expensive new levees in perpetuity to recreate and preserve slums. The French quarter, garden district and downtown will come out of the rebuild intact but I doubt any of the crime ridden low income areas will be there in the rebuilt New Orlean, other than maybe some token government planned and subsidized low income housing for the maids and gardeners to live in.

      If New Orleans gets rebuilt it will be a "model" city. One has to wonder if, in the process, it will lose all its ambiance and charm.

      --
      @de_machina
  21. Mesh infrastructure by Marcus+Green · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It looks like some folks have started using Mesh infrastructure (that Linux based stuff from http://locustworld.net/ which will use low cost/obsolete hardware. See
    http://www.the-bains.us/

  22. LOL by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    *NOT* The place, and probably not the time.

    Doesn't anyone realize that Mississippi and Louisiana are one of the two poorest states in the country? Who excactly would a next gen internet and cable be marketed to? There is also income data here and here. Let's not put our next gen tech. in an area that can't support it economically.

  23. Re:Wi-Max Infrastructure by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Informative

    When a tropical cyclone (like a hurricane but spins clockwise) hit and distroyed Darwin, NT on Christmas day 1974, all of the copper was ripped up, but the microwave telephone link remained operational. I'm not sure if this is really the same thing, since those microwave stations are a hell of a lot bigger than anything to do with wimax, but wireless does tend to survive huge natural disasters fairly well.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  24. Re:How about finding new homes for Katrina Victims by NeoBeans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree that relocation is going to be necessary for many of the victims of Katrina... and providing them the option to take over a free farm is a nice idea. It's not a bad idea, as long as it is not forced upon folks.

  25. In other News... by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Expensive WiMax equipment was stolen from the near lawless city of New Orleans.

  26. Maybe people should RTFA by voss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of blindly trashing the telephone companies. Maybe we should remember their priority and mandate is to get basic telephone service back up for THEIR customers.

    Grandma betty and Aunt Sue dont need a fancy wireless internet connection they need a phone line back up so they can call their other family and tell them they not dead.

    quoting the article

      "The best thing for us economically and the quickest thing from a customer service view is, if the lines are just down, put them back up," he said.

    (DUH!)

    "The company considered installing wireless broadband in rebuilding, Smith said, but it found that it could recover most of its fiber network. The technologies will be used eventually. "I'm a big fan of WiMax," he said."

    (Clue for the clueless: Fiber is still better than wireless)

    Bellsouth is a BIG company they think strategically not tactically. The most economical thing for them right now is simply restore their phone lines and their fiber networks. when they roll something out they do it en mass. They will be deploying 25mpbs service to all their customers within 3 years to provide both tv, phone service, and DSL over the same line.

    As someone who made it through Hurricane Frances and Jean last year, Im glad bellsouth is on the job. I never lost my DSL service even though I lost my cable for 12 days and many of my neighbors lost power for 2 weeks.

  27. Now there's an ironic turn by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First they brought you "broadcast".

    Then they put your broadcast stations on your "cable".

    Now they want to put your cable on a broadcast channel, including the original broadcast stations, but not on their original broadcast channels... ...although it occurs to me that satellite broadcast has been doing this for decades...

  28. The right time, the right place? by grikdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe once in a while the hidden hand of Adam Smith draws back a bloody stump, and the socialists -- in the name of altruism, justice, mercy and common sense -- win one. Right on! Community broadband forever! Just because it's possible to act like a dog in a manger, doesn't mean it's right to act like a dog in a manger.

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  29. Crossed fingers... by HoodCrowd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am sitting on a street in Hattiesburg, MS looking at downed cable and telephone wires, no one is hanging them up. I would like to see them do it. 25-65 megs with television and telephone with advanced services would be smart. It would help my small linux company. I am in a third world of communications down here. My dsl stayed steady minus the DNS losing power for two days, but will go down soon as my phone lines are crushed. They are clustered before all apartment entrances down the street and are being constanly smashed by SUVs.

  30. Another useless bit of nonsense trumpted on /. by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wireless Internet! Yay!

    Oh, we forgot... Most of the communications infrastructure comprising the critical backhauls that carry all the traffic of the wireless endpoints have been disrupted. Entire phone company central offices are under water in some places or were. Co-location facilities have been disrupted or destroyed outright. Aerial fiber and copper have been severed all over the place.

    Oh, we also forgot that people are in need of drinking water and food to eat and medical supplies to deal with everyday things that they can't deal with everyday and so those issues are mounting. Women need sanitary female supplies. Babies need diapers. Pets need food. There's a lack of electricity all over the place and fetid stinking contaminated water and mud.

    Their computers have been waterlogged, their laptops blown to the next state, their PDAs lost someplace in the muck, but we have high speed wireless Internet being deployed. Yay!

    (INSERT ROLLING EYES EMOTICON HERE)

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)