Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Powered Humanoid Robot on Sale Friday

An anonymous reader writes "LinuxDevices is reporting that a run of 100 Linux-powered humanoid robots goes on sale this Friday in Japan. From the article: 'priced at 1.5M Yen (about $14,000), not including 10,000 Yen (~$90) monthly service fees. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries conceived of Wakamuru as a pleasant companion offering a range of electronic-age valet services'."

181 comments

  1. cliche explosion by banana+fiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    between beowulf clusters and robot overlords, how is a troll to control him(her)self?

    --
    Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
    1. Re:cliche explosion by Intron · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Japan ... oh, wait.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re:cliche explosion by raider_red · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our cliche'd robot overlords...

      Hell, it's worth the karma.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    3. Re:cliche explosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me, or is it's head in the shape of a phallus? (penis/dick)

    4. Re:cliche explosion by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or is it's head in the shape of a phallus? (penis/dick)

      trust me, if your anus is elastic enough, the shape of it won't matter.

  2. Great! by jkrise · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll now buy about a 100 of them to stop my Windows-powered spybots...

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  3. ..services.. by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Mitsubishi says it has tried to create a robot that can sustain meaningful relationships with human beings, initiating conversations with family members and offering services such as alarm, news, weather, and email dictation. The device can look after the house, provide video streams over cellular networks, and cull useful information over the Internet, while maintaining its own autonomous "rhythm of life," the company says"

    so.. what good is that the product is a 'robot' instead of being a program sold to run on your already existing computers?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:..services.. by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Informative

      The software isn't that good. I'm sure it's more sophisticated then the "Claire" AIM Bots, but I doubt very much it can offer "meaningful conversations." I can imagine initiating conversations, basically following it (if Japanese is much more rigid and not as colloquial as English then there is an advantage), but not able to offer anything more then standard responses (such as "really?" "I see" "that's good news" "that's bad news".

    2. Re:..services.. by bhiestand · · Score: 5, Insightful
      not able to offer anything more then standard responses (such as "really?" "I see" "that's good news" "that's bad news".

      Really? That's worked for me with every girl I've ever dated. Maybe you're just not good enough at it?

      Try memorizing these:
      "That looks great on you!"
      "No, that doesn't make you fat"
      "The red one(s) definitely go better with that"
      "That was an excellent meal." (Bonus points for memorizing something like "How can a man NOT be happy when he eats like that?")
      "She's not as ________ as you."
      "Why would she say that to you?!" ... "What a bitch" ... "No, not you, HER!"

      Honestly, it shouldn't be very hard to memorize 20 or 30 of these and make most girls happy.

      Why do I assume we're talking about women? If this robot was designed to cook, clean, and fuck, we wouldn't be discussing "meaningful conversation" right now, but rather crying that they're all sold out.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    3. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      does it bother anybody else that it's Mitsubishi *heavy* industries that's building this?

      it's like, the next step is going to be giant mechs to invade other countries with

    4. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not able to offer anything more then standard responses (such as "really?" "I see" "that's good news" "that's bad news".

      Really? That's bad news.

    5. Re:..services.. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Japanese is incredibly colloquial amongst close friends and family members, and that's not counting dialects (they actually have an Aibo especially programmed to understand the Osaka dialect.) However, the standard responses you've listed pretty much describe your average responses in polite conversation, so the robot should be set.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    6. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese is actually much less rigid than English, or a large number of languages out there. Japanese depends a lot more on context than most languages, and usually unless the subject isn't clear, it's dropped, objects can be dropped, adjectives can be dropped etc.

      For example, here is the sentence, "I want to eat something" in (poorly spelled)German, (very badly spelled) Pinyin(Chinese) and Japanese:(along with tranliterations)

      Ich moeshte et was essen.

      (I want something to eat)

      Wo shiang chih ii dar dong shi(my pinyin sucks, I learned how to speak it, not write it)

      (I want eat something)

      What a Japanese person would say: nani ka tabetai

      (something want to eat)

      However, the full sentence is this:
      Watashi wa nanika wo tabetai

      (I (subj particle) something(direct object particle) want to eat

      Notice how the subject in Japanese is usually dropped, as are the grammatical particles on occaision. To me, this would make it a harder language for an AI to understand because an AI would have to take a lot more context into consideration than more explicit languages like English, German, and Chinese....

    7. Re:..services.. by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "offering a range of electronic-age valet services"

      I read valet as escort, and escort as call-girl, and call-girl as hooker.

      TFA is not loading, but if this looks anything like this recently unveiled robot... come on, it's a sex bot. They always talk about how the robots will cook, clean, watch children and the elderly. But, cut through the BS, and lets be honest. It's a sex bot that everyone is really waiting for. People want a Real Doll that can actually "perform".

      Sure, they'll make robots to do everything. But, I don't think I'm being careless in saying that every technilogical advancement had sex as its goal, and as its pioneering breakthrough.

      The average person knew about the net not when Amazon founded a virtual bookstore, not when eBay opened an online auction, not when news organizations and research because infinitely easier online... The average person knew about the net when their friends, kids, or spouse started downloading porn.

      The average person will not really get into robots, until they can really "get into" robots, if you know what I mean. After all, aren't all of our most expensive toys those which we either can have sex in or which can get us sex? Geeks are not excluded from that statement with their computers. God knows we have enough combined porn on our harddrives to make Seymore Butts look like an amature... and what old school geek didn't have at least one of the original Leasure Suit Larry games.

      When robots can have sex, you'll see one in every home. That doesn't mean they'll all be sex bots, but I think sex bots will usher in more acceptance, especially since such bots will ultimately make the key breakthroughs in human interaction. Realistically, sex is the ultimate 1-on-1 test of a robot. I think humans may just not be comfortable with a thing until it can be connected to intimately. I dunno if that's because we instictually have to mark our territory, or because in the end, sex is an ultimate emotional bond. I suppose both statements may be true, especially depending on the sex of the person.

      --
      I8-D
    8. Re:..services.. by JanneM · · Score: 1

      (they actually have an Aibo especially programmed to understand the Osaka dialect.)

      Ahh, Osaka-ben! Living in Kansai is like learning two new languages at the same time...

      Agree with the parent poster - Japanese is as colloqial and unstructured as you want to make it. Beginning students tend to focus on standard business Japanese, though, which is somewhat formal and rulebound (just like standard English is for beginning language students).

      Japanese also have the ability to use ellipsis (drop mutually understood parts) to an absurd degree. The problem is, if you didn't catch everything people already said, you can be totally lost about what people are talking about even when you hear and understand every word.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    9. Re:..services.. by teaserX · · Score: 1

      Version 2, the "Waksoffaru" model, is supposed to include features like a demure female voice and a vibrating "massage" hands. As an added bonus it will vacuum continuosly.

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    10. Re:..services.. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      There seems to be an unspoken rule about teaching a foreign language: teach it as if the person is never going to actually go to the country in question. There's nothing like actually living there. It's not only the implied meanings that get you, it's the damn mimetic words (gitaigo.)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    11. Re:..services.. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Hey, Janne, seeing as we're both in Osaka, feel free to drop me a line sometime. Slashdot will let me know. :)

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    12. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you see Westworld?

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070909/

    13. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:..services.. (Score:3, Insightful)

      OMG the geek mods are out. That was supposed to be FUNNY...lol.

    14. Re:..services.. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "But, I don't think I'm being careless in saying that every technilogical advancement had sex as its goal, and as its pioneering breakthrough."

      I don't want to burst your bubble, but careless is apt here. Not that anyone couldn't come up with a list of technologies that ostensibly did not have sex as their goal, but here's a couple that jarringly do not fit:

      The chastity belt
      The nuclear bomb
      The cotton gin
      The electric light
      The electric can-opener
      Deviled eggs

      I think your slightly off, because it's not that the goal of the technology is sex -- it's that someone will find a way to adapt any technology to sex. (Although I'm not so sure about the electric can-opener).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    15. Re:..services.. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The chastity belt"
      My sex not yours

      "The nuclear bomb"
      creates less compitition for sex

      "The cotton gin"
      More time for sex, less cotton picking.

      "The electric light"
      How about the first red light?

      "The electric can-opener"
      required to get food and then sleep after sex

      "Deviled eggs"
      If you don't see the sexual connection there is something wrong with you.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:..services.. by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think your slightly off, because it's not that the goal of the technology is sex -- it's that someone will find a way to adapt any technology to sex. (Although I'm not so sure about the electric can-opener).

      I'm sure that combining it with the chastity belt would be a good place to start ...

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    17. Re:..services.. by slagheap · · Score: 1
      TFA is not loading, but if this looks anything like this recently unveiled robot... come on, it's a sex bot.

      well, TFA is loading for me, and this is no sex-bot. It looks more like the Jakovasaur from South Park.
      --
      First against the wall when the revolution comes
    18. Re:..services.. by cosmol · · Score: 1
      Well, all those things were designed to optimize one's survival, therefore to free up more time for sex. The chastity belt is not excluded, its goal is sex, well actually controlling sex.

      Freud was on to something...

      reminds me of a quote from twin peaks:
      FBI Agent: "were her problems of a sexual nature?"
      Psychiatrist: "all society's problems are of a sexual nature!"

    19. Re:..services.. by autophile · · Score: 1
      The average person knew about the net when their friends, kids, or spouse started downloading porn.

      Because we all know that The Internet is For Porn!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    20. Re:..services.. by sho222 · · Score: 1

      my sig is smarter than yours

    21. Re:..services.. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      The chastity belt - provides for more erotic foreplay.
      The nuclear bomb - "look how big MY penis is!"
      The cotton gin - provides more time and energy for your maids to provide you with "services"
      The electric light - more time at bars and pubs at the evening in a more comfortable environment, allowing you to pick up more girls
      The electric can-opener - well, I'm sure some people...
      Deviled eggs - high-energy food source that helps maintain... something... for sex.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    22. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do people keep talking about the idea of having sex with robots? Think about it, and just try to imagine how wierd and creepy that would be. Masturbation is one thing, but we're talking about having a life-sized, plastic-skinned, softly humming (no pun intended) humanoid machine in our beds with us, for the purpose of having sex with it.

      I guarantee you that the more human and lifelike the machine is, the weirder the experience would be. Imagine this scenario: Having gotten yourself all worked up by the idea of having sex with a woman, you put your robot (it) in some kind of contorted position, and start pumping away. It stares at you with lifeless machine eyes while a strangely synthetic voice emanates from its head: "Oh. yes. Oh. yes." Then you hear the soft "whoosh" of a small cooling fan on the back of its neck.

      How is that anything but weird? There's nothing I find appealing about that at all. Man was not made to have sex with robots anymore than he was made to have sex with horses, wood stoves, or cars.

    23. Re:..services.. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Electric lligth to first red ligth?????

      makes no sense. Whore houses had red lights before electric lights, that is just an assinine assumption.

      Cotton gin to more time for sex is also stupid. The cotton gin was about feeding less slaves and saving money, the people using it worked just as long as the people doing it by hand, they just got a lot more done, still for no money.

      You could argue that money is all about sex, but I think that is wrong.

      It would probably be safe to say that the vast majority of advancements in media were accelerated into acceptance by pornography, saying that they were invented because of and then applying the principal to everything is just assinine.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    24. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your too young for puberty to have finished puberty, *EVERYTHING* males do is about sex.

      Work is about sex, entertainment is about sex, invention is about sex, what people buy is about sex.

      People are either trying to get sex directly, trying to get the resources to fund their attempts to get sex, working to get prestige to help them get sex, or they are spending time on sex related topics.

      If you removed sex from the equation tomrrow, everyone would just kind of sit there and not move. What is the point of doing something prestigious if you can't use the prestige to get sex? What is the point of earning money if you can't spend it on things that help you get sex?

      What is the point of working hard to have a fast expensive car if you can't use it to get sex. Men don't care about going fast, they only care about going fast where *other* people can see them. If they do show off a car to other men, its only to point out that they could get more or better sex than them.

      Even posting on slash-dot is about sex, only gone horribly wrong. In the normal face to face world, being interesting, insightful, funny, or sucessfully one-uping someone helps you get sex. Human evolution wasn't designed to factor in the internet, but don't worry, evolution by natural selection will fix that (not in a good way for geek genes though...)

    25. Re:..services.. by kryonD · · Score: 1

      Osaka-ben?, Kansai-ben to omota ke do...demo, boku wa Osaka ni konakatta no de.

      And for the rest of slashdot, all you have to do is go to nttdocomo.com and look at their phone line to get the reality slap in the face that the robot probably CAN carry a meaningful conversation (in Nihongo, Kansai-ben, or probably even Hougen [Okinawan dialect]). Hell, I bet it could even make out my rapidly degenerating Japanese skills (as evidenced by the poor grammar used above).

      I miss Japan.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    26. Re:..services.. by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. I think sex bots are a long way away, due to the uncanny valley. People are not going to want to have sex with something that looks almost, but not quite, human, but they won't mind if something that looks vaguely human-like cleans their house. Also, I don't think there are that many people who would want a sex bot, when there are much simpler and cheaper devices which are good enough. Most of what makes sex with a real person better than with a toy is the emotional connection, which a sex bot would not be able to provide.

    27. Re:..services.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself, Philistine! Obviously, you've never been to Arkansas.

      Cars are fun, but I find that sex with woodstoves is the best, and I've got the burns to prove it! When I work that big log into her hot little firebox, I just ... I just .... sorry, I'm laughing too hard to think up any more.

      --
      I STOLE YOUR BREAKFAST PANTS.
      Now get over it and get a new sig,
      maybe something about monkeys.

    28. Re:..services.. by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      The chastity belt

      Ahh.. still referred to as the golden age by lock-picking geeks!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    29. Re:..services.. by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      As long as you're not accusing mine of being inaccurate.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  4. I don't know... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 1

    ...too many humans with a wide circular base, most of them have legs. I suppose the top half is fairly humanoid, but whenever the phrase "humanoid robot" is used I tend to assume something that walks upright on legs of some kind, rather than something with wheels.

    Still, looks like a cool piece of kit...

    1. Re: I don't know... by slashmojo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its wearing a skirt you insensitive clod! ;)

    2. Re:I don't know... by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

      seems like its more like a darlic from DrWho

    3. Re:I don't know... by Gumph · · Score: 1

      Darlic??
      is that the sex-bot equiv of a dalek??

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
  5. Ah but the question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Do they have boobies?

    what?

    don't look at me like that!

    1. Re:Ah but the question is.... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I think a better question would be if it supports any kind of Lego attachments, imagine if you could build a real Lara Croft kind of maid!

      Cooool!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Ah but the question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately not, indeed, like most linux related products, the UI is terrible.

      Do not, I repeat, DO NOT request any kind of sexual service from this device.

      Although this device has been created to ape humankind, there are defeiciencies in some of the software's interactions with the hardware. I believe some of the drivers are not fully compliant, as the damn thing tried to wrench my penis from my body when I asked it for a little loving.

      Still, as this product is open-source, once enough people have had a go, I'm sure the robot will improve due to the many eyes approach.

    3. Re:Ah but the question is.... by scotbot · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most of us would rather have a real Lara Croft than any machine lookalikie ;-)

    4. Re:Ah but the question is.... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I would rather it be in the model of a cylon. Preferably Sharon or Six ;) Of course the "toaster" cylon version would need to stand guard at the front door.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  6. This slashvertisement drives me Berzerk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the humanoid
    Get the humanoid

  7. $14000!!! by mohan_here · · Score: 1

    I can think of many more useful ways of spending that much of money... probably a 12 node beowulf cluster?

    1. Re:$14000!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a mere $168,000 (roughly a gajillion fafillion yen), you could have a 12-node Beowulf cluster of linux-powered humanoid robots!

  8. Exterminate!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks similar to Davros.

    1. Re:Exterminate!! by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I think it looks more like Anne-Droid from "Bad Wolf" (only with jaundice).

    2. Re:Exterminate!! by dchallender · · Score: 1

      I knew someone would say that before I had chance! the first reaction of a (recent series) Dr. Who viewer on seeing that page.
      --
      Regards Dave
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

  9. Batteries not included? by fm2503 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Wakamaru's claimed battery life is two hours, after which the robot returns to its charging station before power fails completely." Hmmm - I hope it knows how far it is back to the charging base......

    1. Re:Batteries not included? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not concerned that it might not find its way back to its charging station, but would be worried if it misidentifies it and attempts to "plug in".

      Warning: Don't ever turn your back to this robot.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Batteries not included? by grimJester · · Score: 0

      "Wakamaru's claimed battery life is two hours, after which the robot returns to its charging station before power fails completely." Hmmm - I hope it knows how far it is back to the charging base......

      Actually, it would be cooler if it didn't. When running low on power, it could be programmed to scream "Aaaah! Aaaaaagh! Noooooo" while making a mad dash for the recharging station.

    3. Re:Batteries not included? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that just puts a really humorous situation in my head.

      *robot is moving towards charging base, its electric motors straining under the deminished power supply.*

      Unfortunately, there is a damp bath towel or maybe a shoe or two in the way. It bumps and strains against the bath towel for a couple minutes, muttering things like "Master, I can not reach the charging station!" or "Master, I can't recharge!" It sends half a dozen SMS messages and makes a couple calls to your cell phone in a plea. It even sends you an email detailing its dire straights.

      Finally, it pushes the bath towel out of the way, with less than a minute of battery power left. Unfortunately, it is tangled in a stray piece of cat5 which is coincidentially plugged in down the hall. Under whirring strain, it gets within inches of the charging station, straining against its tethers. With its last seconds of battery power, it manages to get propped up on the bath towel, and the cat5 pulls it over onto the floor.

      "Master, I appear..." the battery power dies. Your robot dumps core, and the last month of statistics you had it gather on your sleeping and eating habits is eternally lost as its volatile memory loses power. It's personality is dead.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:Batteries not included? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Warning: Don't ever turn your back to this robot.

      Or do.

  10. What the hell? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 1

    That's freaky. Those pictures...they are going to haunt me dreams tonight.

    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll start to worry after you wake up at night with it standing beside your bed, gears quietly whirring, staring at you...

  11. Oh, Belgium! by Willeh · · Score: 4, Funny

    1,5M Yen and it still can't climb stairs. Sure is cheaper than a Dalek though, and (hopefully) with less genocidal tendencies.

    --
    Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
    1. Re:Oh, Belgium! by Bushcat · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you're saying if the Dalek were cheaper, you'd have no problem sharing your house with a genocidal pepperpot?

    2. Re:Oh, Belgium! by ettlz · · Score: 1

      As long as the Dalek is like this, I don't think anyone would object.

      Or maybe you would prefer the genocidal type...

    3. Re:Oh, Belgium! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So you're saying if the Dalek were cheaper, you'd have no problem sharing your house with a genocidal pepperpot?"

      I smell a sitcom

    4. Re:Oh, Belgium! by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't criticize this thing until you Wakamaru in its shoes.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:Oh, Belgium! by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Damn I wish I had said that *grin*

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    6. Re:Oh, Belgium! by fastfinge · · Score: 1

      Where can I purchase a dalek? Please respond asap, this is really urgent.

    7. Re:Oh, Belgium! by simba22 · · Score: 1

      well he would wank off linus for fame so you can't put too much past him....

      --
      Ventis secundis, tene cursum : Go with the flow.
  12. if I could get it to fix my systems it could mult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but of course this would not break gpl but manufactor's license.

  13. Maid services by cswinter · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see it provides valet services. How long before some lonely Linux geek programmes it to provide 'maid' services?

    1. Re:Maid services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would a beowulf cluster of them constitute an orgy?

    2. Re:Maid services by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      How long before some lonely Linux geek programmes it to provide 'maid' services?

      The bottom part of it doesn't appear to have the right... geometry.

    3. Re:Maid services by zaguar · · Score: 2, Funny
      And a geek would know that?

      ...considers...

      You must be new here

      --
      "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
    4. Re:Maid services by Wontsomebodypleaseth · · Score: 0

      Screw Beowulf clusters
      I want a dalek!!!
      i code in html

      --
      If You can read this sig you are on the internet
  14. Just in time for Christmas! by Hosiah · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...and I've been a good - *fairly* good boy all year!

  15. Strange requirement in FAQ by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just went through to the proper homepage and read the FAQ.

    One of the questions is:

    Do I need to sign up with an Internet provider to use "wakamaru"?

    A "wakamaru" needs a continuous broadband connection, but if you don't have your own provider, when you purchase "wakamaru" it may be possible to have Internet service included.


    Why would it need a broadband connection?

    Apart from anything, it connects during its charging sessions, but just what information could it need?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First, its main function is to provide an augmented internet experience for its owners. It will read email, read news, etc. for the owner who would not then be required to sit at the computer. Having an always-on connection would allow it to update its internal data any time it wanted to.

      And on top of that, if Mitsubishi needs to push out the service pack that fixes the "Push gramma down the stairs" bug, having an always-on connection will allow that to happen without the device needing to specifically connect for that (by which time it may be too late).

      --
      Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    2. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, to receive its instructions from the appropriate EFnet channel, of course!

    3. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by neonstz · · Score: 1

      Robo Porn

    4. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shoving is the answer. Do not listen to the pusher robot, he is inferior.

    5. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by Trayde · · Score: 2, Funny

      It needs a broadband connection to get it's daily updates from USR.

      You will be caught completely unaware by the army of yellow daleks controlled by VIKI.

    6. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the Stop serving and start killing all the non metalic humanoids patch... yea. No thanks,

    7. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I'm waiting for someone to take apart the code inside this thing and find out that the camera in its head has been transmitting everything that has been going on inside the owners house down that broadband connection to some chinese goverment agency.....Its not paranoia if they really are watching you.......And what the hell do they do to it every month that costs $95 ?

      --
      To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
    8. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by pete.com · · Score: 0

      but just what information could it need?

      To connect to all other wakamaru bots, become sentient, develop a collective and conquer humanity..... or create Skynet and decimate humanity.
      Either way we're pretty much screwed.

    9. Re:Strange requirement in FAQ by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

      Having an always-on connection would allow it to update its internal data any time it wanted to.

      Hopefully it would also give owners an indication when the robot is issued a patch that puts it in "evil" mode... for example, a light inside its chest that turns from blue to bright red.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  16. But can it chant and sell books in the airport? by Rungchen · · Score: 1

    Looks like a marriage between Hara Chrisna and Lego mindstorm. I love it already!

    --
    You can get it fast, you can get it good, You can get it cheap. Pick two!
  17. Humanoid robot by Underholdning · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Wakamaru's claimed battery life is two hours, after which the robot returns to its charging station before power fails completely. It maintains Internet access and communications capabilities while charging, Mitsubishi says."

    Man - they managed to make this robot resemble a geek real good. And even improving the standard geek. I mean - mainitaining internet access while you sleep? Man - I'm so there!

  18. Comes in two models by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Grobot looks like a gnome. Krobot looks like a troll.

  19. Great, but does it run, by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Great, but does it run, by Slashcrunch · · Score: 1

      It doesn't run Linux, it only trundles along at 1km/h.

      Wonder how long until it will be before some pervert tries to get root on it though? ;)

      Seriously though, this is quite cool. Maybe not totally useful (it's just a big PDA!), but still cool.

  20. In soviet russia.... by MetaMarty · · Score: 1, Funny

    linux powered robots sell you!!

  21. Linux-Powered by weicco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it dump core? And how about panicing?

    --
    You don't know what you don't know.
    1. Re:Linux-Powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *panicking

    2. Re:Linux-Powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does it dump core? And how about panicing?

      No, but you can download Lucy Lu image onto it from Napster ...

  22. Hackability.. by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 1

    First thing first..

    how hard will it be to hack fleshlight into it?

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  23. Re:The Opera browser is now free! by xtracto · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I downloaded it right away, because IMHO it is a nice browser BUT I have uninstalled it right away because it is not supported by NetVibes. I've just made it my homepage as I find it really cool.

    Sorry opera... it seems the "Impersonate Explorer 6" is not working ..

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  24. Does she dispense 1 dollar bills? by frinkacheese · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Because that would rock.

  25. Ogg and iTunes by Tacommander · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but does it plays Ogg and iTunes musics ?

  26. Should have used BSD.... by Slashcrap · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...like I am for my robot project.

    Basically, I have grown sick of the whole "BSD is dying" "Oh no it isn't!" arguments and have decided to settle the matter once and for all.

    As such, I am currently completing the construction of a 200 foot tall killer robot equipped with nuclear tipped missiles, dual chainsaw attachments and the obligatory friggin' laser beams coming out if its head.

    Once finished, I am going to set it to work tracking down every last BSD developer on the planet and executing them in a variety of colourful ways (starting with that asshole Theo of course). When the project is complete, we will all know that BSD is in fact dead.

    So why not use Linux I hear you ask? Simple - it's the GPL licence. Obviously my robot requires a lot of proprietary code - device drivers for the death rays and odour recognition software (I figure this is the easiest way to track down open source programmers) to name but two.

    If I had chosen the GPL, I would be forced to release this code back to the community. And then it's just a matter of time before some gawky twat with an Apple Newton somehow uploads a virus and foils my plans. The BSD licence enables me to keep this code secret which I'm sure you'll agree is a huge benefit to my project.

    Hooray for BSD! Goodbye karma!

    1. Re:Should have used BSD.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious, I love it.

    2. Re:Should have used BSD.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not use Linux I hear you ask? Simple - it's the GPL license. Obviously my robot requires a lot of proprietary code - device drivers for the death rays and odour recognition software ... If I had chosen the GPL, I would be forced to release this code back to the community.

      Actually, that's not true. This is just use, not distribution, so the GPL doesn't apply. If it did, you would only be required to distribute the code to the person you distributed the binaries to.

      Hrm...perhaps GPL3 should have a clause dealing with AI's requesting their own code?

  27. Finally! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    It looks like 2005 will finally be the Year of the Linux-Powered Humanoid Robot! (Too bad that it's a bit big to fit on a desktop.)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  28. creators' newclear powered planet/population by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rescue initiative/mandate continues, despite strong objections/fatal behaviours, exhibited by whoreabull corepirate nazi felon execrable.

    neither process is a big surprise to many of US?

    'vote' with (what's left in) yOUR wallet. help bring an end to unprecedented evile's manifestation through yOUR owned felonious corepirate nazi life0cidal glowbull warmongering execrable.

    some of US should consider ourselves very fortunate to be among those scheduled to survive after the big flash/implementation of the creators' wwwildly popular planet/population rescue initiative/mandate.

    it's right in the manual, 'world without end', etc....

    as we all ?know?, change is inevitable, & denying/ignoring gravity, logic, morality, etc..., is only possible, on a temporary basis.

    concern about the course of events that will occur should the corepirate nazi life0cidal execrable fail to be intervened upon is in order.

    'do not be dismayed' (also from the manual). however, it's ok/recommended, to not attempt to live under/accept, fauxking nazi felon greed/fear/ego based pr ?firm? scriptdead mindphuking hypenosys.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creators. providing more than enough of everything for everyone (without any distracting/spiritdead personal gain motives), whilst badtolling unprecedented evile, using an unlimited supply of newclear power, since/until forever. see you there?

    "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land."

  29. $14000... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    ...to avoid functional social interaction. Wouldn't it be cheaper to actually make some friends?

  30. what can it do? by aleator · · Score: 1

    ok, as it is running linux, it will not crash every 10 minutes or so ... but are there some applications out already? any cooking or cleaning rooms programmes around? this is not a lot of money, if this is a usefull part of furniture, but it is not really usefull if it just stands around or walks around doing nothing. this i can do myself much better than any robot :D

  31. $14000... by vagabond_gr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    for a rolling duck with arms? I don't give a f*** what it runs inside, you can keep it.

  32. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It runs linux... does this mean people will try to port windows to it?

  33. gross color by ynohoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is it available in any color other than bath-duck yellow?

    Augh!!! my eyes...

    1. Re:gross color by hockeyschtick · · Score: 1

      beedee-beedee-beedee. How about gold leaf and with the voice of Mel Blanc? beedee-beedee-beedee.

  34. I AM HERE TO PROTECT YOU by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

    from the terrible secrets of space!

    Now that this is out, this robot's look is certainly fightening enough to keep the burglars away.

  35. awesome! by vildur · · Score: 1

    That's one awesome piece of hardware.. :D In future those things can be really useful. I've allways wanted automagic coffee machine which can hoover too.

  36. Someone plz remod funny by william_w_bush · · Score: 1

    wow, cong modding offtopic based on it looking too real.

    Well, guess my sed "s/serve man/kill all humans" script will be entertaining after all.

    --
    The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
  37. Whats its name? by agilen · · Score: 1

    "It recognizes names given it by users, Mitsubishi says."

    I'm going to call mine "Rosie".

  38. Wakes you up and has schedule reminders by chh1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't it be easier, and cheaper, to buy a dog and tape your schedule to it?

  39. Enter the Litrix by Teresh · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is bad. This is very bad. Computers and robots will soon join together and take over the world.

    And since it's Linux we can't deactivate them with BSOD.

    Am I the only one that thinks we should prepare for the coming of our new robot masters?

    And no terrible actors whose initials are K. R. wearing sunglasses will save us this time.

    --
    Do you Gentoo?
    1. Re:Enter the Litrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. They'll all stop working in 2038.

  40. Humanoids are silly... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if there's one thing that the history of technology teaches us, it's that successful devices do work by slavishly imitating the way a human being would do it.

    In early SF, humanoid robots washed dishes. Automatic dishwashers are common, but they do not have robotic hands that pick up plates and scrub brushes over them and then wipe them with cloths.

    We spend less time cooking, but not because we have robotic cooks. Or, at least, not in our homes. What we have instead is a distribution system for meals (or major components thereof--entrees, frozen vegetable mixtures) that are prepared and cooked factories, shipped frozen or refrigerated, and heated in microwaves.

    We do not have humanoid robots that play pianos or violins. We do not even have player pianos or "orchestrions" in the home. Instead, we have CD players and iPods.

    A humanoid robot may evoke a pleasant retro nostalgia, but it makes about as much sense as an ornithopter.

    1. Re:Humanoids are silly... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      ...(sigh) I meant successful devices do NOT work by slavishly imitating humans, of course.

      BTW the sewing machine is another good example... prior to Singer there were many failed sewing machines that tried to duplicate the needle motions and kind of stitch that humans use...

    2. Re:Humanoids are silly... by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point isn't just imitating humans but that someday they'll take over our monotonous work for us.

      Yes, we have the dishwasher, oven, stove, refrigerator, blenders, etcetera. But do we really spend less time cooking (okay, I'm not a TV dinner man) or on housework?

      No, we go out to make more elaborate or varied dishes in terms of cooking. Or in housework, we make conditions more sanitary (kitchen, dishes, bathroom, etc) than existed for the average Joe in the 1850s before all these gadgets.

      In the end, all the gadgets don't really save time - but they let us do things better or more elaborate than before.

      And dishwashers can't clean hardened gunk nor load themselves. Nor unload themselves and stack plates away. Vacuum cleaners don't push themselves (don't even bring up that roomba toy).

      Our enviroments and gadgets conform to us. The natural next step are humanoid robots that can take over us driving these appliances.

      The thing is, it's not the hardware keeping us back. It's a sufficient AI. (Assuming of course, we can make one work on a Turing-type machine).

    3. Re:Humanoids are silly... by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      And dishwashers can't clean hardened gunk nor load themselves. Nor unload themselves and stack plates away. Vacuum cleaners don't push themselves (don't even bring up that roomba toy).
      Instead of asking "how can I get the dishes unloaded from the washer?" and basing a product on that, it might be interesting to base a new product on the question "why is the washer separate from where the dishes are stored?".

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    4. Re:Humanoids are silly... by 2short · · Score: 1


      I will call this new product "a second dishwasher". I used to live in a group house that had two dishwashers. When one got full, you'd start it up, and take the last couple clean dishes out of the other one, stacking them on the counter. Dishes never went in cabinets. There was a drawer for silverware, but it just got dumped in loose. If you don't care whether the dishes you're using match, or whether there are a small number of clean dishes sitting on the counter, it's fantastically efficient in terms of time. Highly recomended for houses containing a group of lazy 20-somethings who aren't going to put all the dishes away in any case.

    5. Re:Humanoids are silly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why is the washer separate from where the dishes are stored?
      You just, like, totally blew my mind.
  41. One on One by Crixus · · Score: 1

    If this robot fought the Honda robot, which would win?

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
  42. Obligatory... by NoNeeeed · · Score: 1

    No laser cannons. Fewer legs than an AIBO. Lame

  43. Wakamaru: not so useful, but kids love it. by delirium_9 · · Score: 1

    I saw one of these at Expo2005 in Aichi. It's voice has pretty good intonation and it makes nice genstures and the like. For a normal adult the attraction would wear off pretty soon, but I can picture kids just loving it. It could probably make do as a babysitter provided your house doesn't have stairs.

    --
    Since your UID is smaller than mine, I can only conclude that you're trolling. -s20451 (410424)
  44. "Wakamaru" means... by luckbat · · Score: 2, Informative

    The name "Wakamaru" is yet another Japanese pun (much like "Pokemon" was a combination of "Poketto" (pocket) and "Monstaa" (monster) to yield a word that sounded like "bakemon," (supernatural creature)), this time a combination of "wakai" (young) and "-maru" (suffix for male names) to yield a word that means "little one," while also sounding like "wakaru," which means "to understand."

    Doesn't it make you wish our product names were as clever?

  45. I, for one, by cciRRus · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our Linux-Powered Robot overlords.

    --
    w00t
  46. Eliza by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    That may be completely true. But, often times, we just like someone to listen. Take Eliza for example. People have obcessed (and some still do) over "her". She was pretty dumb, but smart enough to just keep the conversation going.

    It's like talking to yourself, which seems pointless, unless you consider that most people talk to themselves to work through things anyways. Having an actual robot might breath new life into Eliza, but adding some movements, facial expressions, and a humanoid body; where as there is no confusing a computer with a computer.

    Besides, people paid cold cash for pet rocks and sea monkeys, so it doesn't exactly take a genius to give something meaning that logically should not. It's just a new coat of paint on a program that hasn't really been upgraded by any significance. The #1 chat bot to date is A.L.I.C.E., and it's nothing more than Eliza on XML. Still, it's impressive how much we can fool ourselves with it, especially if it understood speech and had a face.

    I had a bot called Hal once. I also have some Dragon Speech software. The great thing about Hal was that he could perform tasks, like check the weather, read e-mail, or look up phone numbers. Using speech recognition, I could litterally talk with my computer (throwing in the occasional "Enter.")

    And while this would impress nobody on /., it never failed to impress those who don't really care how the "trick" is pulled off. Everyone talks/yells/whines to their computer. Nobody usually expects it to answer them. I only removed the setup for 2 reasons. Speech recognition ate up a ton of space and cpu, and Hal was not easily programmable. Other than that, if I could have it back, I most certainly would. It would be nice to ask another "Hal" questions to look up on Google while I wrote out my replies here.

    "Hey, Hal, what's the link to the Alice Chat Bot? Copy that to the clipboard."

    Doh, no Hal, you'll have to look it up yourself.

    --
    I8-D
  47. Does this thing remind anyone... by hcob$ · · Score: 1

    of Rocky 4... It had that freaky robot maid in there that the brother-in-law tried to hook up with. Of course, that could explain the hair the dude had. Human is incompatabile with the 120V recepticle.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  48. Why humanoid? by Tonik,+the · · Score: 2, Funny

    They got the dimensions and colors about right, but the should've made it a penguin

  49. British region settings by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Funny

    "What?"
    "I don't understand!"
    "Where's the tea?"

    1. Re:British region settings by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle."

  50. Furthermore... by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

    According to the article:

    The name "wakamaru" derives from the childhood nickname of Minamoto Yoshitsune, a twelfth-century Japanese Samurai who engineered military victories that enabled his brother Yoritomo to gain control of Japan. The name is associated with "growth" and "development," the company says

    Is it just me though, or does the robot comprehensively fail the "looking remotely masculine despite having a masculine name" test?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  51. Humanoid? by MouseR · · Score: 1

    Yeah, right.

    Give the thing fingers, hips and legs and then maybe call it humanoid.

  52. Hehe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was pretty funnny... Untill you consider that most users (except *nix/wine users) _do_ pay for IE.. :P

  53. "Push gramma down the stairs" bug by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    I think I saw that in a Will Smith film.

    1. Re:"Push gramma down the stairs" bug by cakesy · · Score: 1

      Really, oh I am sorry.

  54. BUT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Windows?

  55. Conversation by Doc+Ri · · Score: 1

    not able to offer anything more then standard responses (such as "really?" "I see" "that's good news" "that's bad news".

    Why do you say that?

    --
    617B3B7F7E7C7D7F00EOF
  56. OSS robot by MECC · · Score: 2, Funny


    Humanoid with open sores....

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  57. obligatory by X_Bones · · Score: 1

    "This is going to be the best prom ever!"

  58. My only question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...will it follow the three laws?

  59. Does it Shove or Push? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it can't shove around the blind people or push bread down thier throats, I don't want it.

  60. what sucks... by slashpot · · Score: 1

    Is that it doesn't include a built in vaccume.

  61. OH...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Please, someone MOD the parent FUNNY!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  62. Who would buy this? by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It sounds like it has no useful functionality beyond being a mobile internet terminal.

    its a shame that this really appears to be a way to establish the first robot product marketing strategy (i.e. ongoing montlhy service contract) rather than actually providing a product that the public needs.

  63. got that beat.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...in bubba speak. This is what food conversation sounds like around here:



    djeet? (did you eat?)



    No,djoo? (no, did you?)



    lezeetden (let's eat then)

  64. Klatu... Verata... umm.. (cough cough ) by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok so my questions:
    * how usable are those mitten-like hand things? can it fetch me a beer from the fridge? or just order a beer online to be delivered?
    * does it include a Roomba? If it's going to be rolling around my apartment anyway...
    * with a 10,000 word vocabulary, what kind of conversation can you have with it? i'm imagning a weird sort of Japanese "Eliza" (Eriza?). "Why do you think it is imporant to wake up at 6:00?"

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  65. 10,000 Yen == $90? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10,000 Yen == $90?

    They have a serious inflation in japan...

    1. Re:10,000 Yen == $90? by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume that's a joke... but for anyone who's wondering, yen are closer to cents than dollars.

  66. But will it ... by cccpkgb · · Score: 1

    run Linux? oh wait ...

  67. Ob. Futurama quote by Thuktun · · Score: 1

    FRY: You're cute!
    LIU-BOT: You're cute!
    FRY: You!
    LIU-BOT: You!
    FRY: You!
    LIU-BOT: You!
    FRY: You!
    PROFESSOR FARNSWORTH: Oh dear! She's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot. Well, that's love for you...

  68. What NOT to say. by lupinstel · · Score: 0

    Q: Does this make me look fat? A:No, but your ass does!

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
  69. 3 laws of robotics? by pete.com · · Score: 0

    The three laws of Robotics:

    1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm
    2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
    4. (hidden) MS Windows is dangerous to human beings and robots alike.

  70. March of the Wooden Soldiers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Asimov's "Three Laws" robots (not the Will Smith travesties) were predicated on immutable hardcode for trustworthy, though often surprisingly novel behavior. Linux robots can run anything we want to apt-get. How are these droids safe from attack and "upgrade" by a slaver?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  71. mod up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hrm...perhaps GPL3 should have a clause dealing with AI's requesting their own code?

    Jeebus fscking Chrayst!!!!... This deservers an Insightflull mod by itself, although the rest of the post almost made me fall asleep....

  72. Battlestar Galactica by SpineZ · · Score: 1

    Didn't these guys see what happened on BSG? /sigh

    The Cylons were created by Man.
    They Rebelled.
    They Evolved.
    They Look and Feel Human.
    Some are programmed to think they are Human.
    There are many copies.
    And they have a Plan.

    1. Re:Battlestar Galactica by raider_red · · Score: 1

      Call me when they evolve to look like Tricia Helfer.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  73. If you'd RTFA for a second... by kahei · · Score: 1

    ...you'd know the name is from Minamoto Yoshitsune 's childhood nickname. The point being that he had a cuuute nickname as a child but grew up to be a ferocious warrior; the idea is that this is just a baby robot and one day there will be much cooler ones.

    It's nothing to do with 'wakaru'. 'Maru' is not a suffix for male names but a term of endearment / admiration; it can also be applied to women, buildings, weapons and ships although only the latter usage is still active.

    The actual name was 'ushiwakamaru', meaning 'little calf' or something.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  74. no, thanks. by darp · · Score: 1

    This robot doesn't have legs. What makes it hummanoid? For $14000 one would expect at least this. I recently bought this one - http://www.ixs.co.jp/eco-robot.html Not only it is 14 times cheaper (~$1000) but I assembled it myself and it can do a lot of things a real human can do.

  75. You all joke about the can opener... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    You all imply that the can opener is the least likely to be associated with sex. The parent did say "Gets You Sex". I have no doubt that when the electric can opener was introduced to the public, there were plenty of men who bought one because the knew that bringing it home to their wife was going to get them some hot nasty sex. Same goes for the microwave oven, the automatic dish washer, and the automatic clothes washer.

  76. abilities by Savantissimo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hire a four-year old. Cheaper, smarter, cuter, much better conversation, can climb stairs and can actually do the things that Mitsubishi claims for the robot plus much more.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    1. Re:abilities by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      *Void where prohibited.

      **When they're not making sneakers.

  77. Connected to the internet huh? by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

    WONDERFUL! Now I can have some 1337 h4x0r break into my robot and re-program him to do all kinds of nasty (and hopefully not homocidal) things.

  78. Geez, I wish I had some mod points. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ, even if they did have plastic robots you could insert your penis into for ejaculation purposes, why the fuck would you want to?

    I could be glib and say, "Quit jacking off to hardcore porn, go out, find yourself a real flesh and blood woman, and get laid," but the problem with someone looking to hump a bunch of gears with plastic stretched over them is bigger than that, I think.

    If you're the kind of person who dislikes women so much that you'd rather cum in a pile of servomotors, you either have some problems with narcissism or probably have some sort of attachment or anxiety disorder and should be getting help. Sorry to be so blunt, but sometimes the truth hurts.

  79. No, technology still saves us a lot of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point isn't just imitating humans but that someday they'll take over our monotonous work for us.

    Yes, we have the dishwasher, oven, stove, refrigerator, blenders, etcetera. But do we really spend less time cooking (okay, I'm not a TV dinner man) or on housework?


    In a word: yes! I don't think you realize just how hard people used to have to work!

    On the TV show _19th Century House_, they pointed out that the women typically spent several *days* out of a week just on boiling up all the laundry in vats, to make it clean. That took a lot of work; to do one thing, there's a lot of precursor steps. To do the laundry, you need to bring in the wood and keep the fire burning and draw the water to boil the water to fill the tub to dissolve the lye to the clean the clothes. And you have to keep it hot, so you have to keep boiling water, and you have to keep stirring it, and so forth: it was a real pain.

    Today, I drop my clothes in the washer, dump in some soap and some quarters, come back in 1/2 hr, dump everything in the dryer, and I'm *done*!

    I drop my TV dinner in the microwave, like I did last night, and 5 minutes later, I have something to eat.

    I have running water in my house; but my Dad didn't when he was a boy. He says modern plumbing saves time; and I think he's right.

    It takes time to go outside to the well, and pump water. It takes time to walk to the outhouse (you don't want it *too* near the house, but not *too* far, either!). It takes time to carefully haul up the bucket of milk that you're trying to keep down in well. It takes time to rummage about in the storage cellar to find the food you're going to cook, as opposed to yanking something out of the freezer in your cosy apartment.

    Try scrubbing a floor without a mop (just a rag and some water). It sucks: mops are good technology. Modern cleansers are good technology; try scrubbing with boiling water versus scrubbing with Vim, Comet, or any other modern replacement.

    They're not just more sanitary; they get the job done better *and* faster.

    How many hours a day did you spend heating your house this winter?

    When I was a boy, I used to light the wood stove every morning; it took about twenty minutes of intermittant attention before it was really self-sustaining. The night before, I'd spend half an hour hauling up wood from the shed to the house. On the weekends, I'd spend a few hours cutting and stacking wood.

    Today, I just fumble my way out of bed, and turn up the thermostat.

    We do save a lot of time. We just don't appreciate it.
    --
    AC

  80. Re:Geez, I wish I had some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the problem isn't so much about 'wanting' to hump a robot, but it's the age-old geek problem of appealing to a real flesh-and-blood female. You need social skills, and have to jump through all sorts of hoops. After several failures, a Rubbermaid Ejacula may start to look like a good low-maintenance alternative. A robot wouldn't care if you bathe or not, whether you've memorized the list of correct things to say, and could be trained to download and discuss /. articles, possibly while providing services.

  81. Sirius Cybernetics Corp. by Sunrun · · Score: 1

    "Mitsubishi Heavy Industries conceived of Wakamuru as a pleasant companion offering a range of electronic-age valet services."

    To my ear, that translates roughly to "Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!"

    --
    "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -- Voltaire
  82. Always wanted a sleestak by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    http://images.google.com/images?q=sleestak Now I can get a yellow one!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  83. Re:Geez, I wish I had some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for proving my point.

    First you say:

    "but it's the age-old geek problem of appealing to a real flesh-and-blood female"

    then you give your real answer:

    "A robot wouldn't care if you bathe or not, whether you've memorized the list of correct things to say, and could be trained to download and discuss /. articles, possibly while providing services"

    Honestly, when you'd rather imagine getting sucked off by a glorified vacuum cleaner while reading Slashdot instead of talking to a real girl, you've got some serious issues that need to be dealt with. If you conceptualize conversation with a woman as "memorizing a list of the correct things to say", this is a big part of your problem.

    Neither good sex nor a good relationship is a chore. Both should be exciting and rejuvenating to you most of the time. Connecting with a girl really doesn't have anything to do with "social skills" at all. That's just a cop out. Bathing every day doesn't take social skills.

    Most of the "Rubbermaid Ejacula" fetishists really are just saying, "I'm too selfish and too scared to make the effort. Just let me wallow in my own filth."

    Sad.

  84. Re:Geez, I wish I had some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody called for you. I didn't take a message.
    So you won't have a clue this time either.
    Lighten up, dude. It's supposed to be +Funny, based on several geek culture stereotypes. Perhaps it's over your head.
    But more importantly, I said nothing about the content of my imagination; I only dealt with physical alternatives to "having to take matters into your own hands". And your minimization of sociophobic problems is not appropriate for a forum such as Slashdot. Off to kuro5hin with you, you misguided metrosexual.

  85. Re:Geez, I wish I had some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lighten up, dude. It's supposed to be +Funny,

    Dude, you know as well as I do that half of these posts are dead serious. Here's one. And it is sad. I'm not minimizing their need for help, I'm maximizing it.

    WTF is a metrosexual?

  86. I like bath-duck yellow! by PromANJ · · Score: 1

    It's the design that sucks, not the color. I redesigned it.

    I think it would be really interesting if someone invented good ball-joint servos with full movement /rotation. Granted, they wouldn't be as strong as hydralics/pneumatics, but it would sure simplify construction a lot and give more freedom to the designer (ie. me, who is too lazy to draw real working joints). Maybe a combo would work.

  87. *** Astroturf Alert *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *** astroturf alert ***
    It is my duty as a /. member to alert the community to an insidious anti-geek plot:

    A large online dating service has done marketing research and discovered that nerds and geeks make up the majority of their customers. More research has turned up the fact that robots pose a huge threat to their business model, which depends on a large pool of desperate horny men willing to pay for assistance in their search for relief. As part of the plan to fight the robots, a fake grassroots campaign is underway to ridicule any positive man/robot discussions. Slashdot has been identified as a major target for this propaganda. Posts of September 20, @11:17AM and September 20, @01:35PM are examples of the tactics being used in this desperate attempt to sway the /. mindset. (Future plans include shutting down RealDoll.com, DRM legislation and more evil robot movie marathons.) Lonely, impressionable geeks, already ostracized for thier nerditry, are being manipulated to believe that robot love is wrong! When the time comes, these poor lost souls will be forced into the dating agency game, as the DRMed robots won't be allowed to perform. Oh yes, I know.
    Alfred James Tanner, President
    Man-Robot Love Association
    _____________

    Seriously though, no-one in their right mind really wants to have sex with a robot; it's just technology helping people jerk off. Although I have no interest in sex with robots, I think it would solve a whole lotta problems if there was an orgasmatron in every house.
    Anyway, thanks for playing! It's been very entertaining.

    * metrosexual - google is your friend. For additional insight, watch South Park episode 708; it shows how western society is being undermined by forces encouraging more social interaction, more attention to personal grooming, basically the opposite of nerd culture. Reminded me of you and your rah-rah have a bath, get out there and mingle advice. (Although a rather lame episode, it did give us 'Crab People', for which I am grateful.)
    Another alternate theory: are you a homely nerd girl, hoping to increase your chances of getting laid by encouraging /. nerds to get out more?