Slashdot Mirror


Updated OQO Model 01+ with USB 2.0 and More RAM

xanthines-R-yummy writes "OQO has announced the availability of the OQO Model 01+. The new model has more RAM and USB 2.0, which were probably the main deficiencies in Model 01." They now start just short of $2k but they still look very yummy.

197 comments

  1. Santa? by Wayne247 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, i need one :)

    1. Re:Santa? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      If you can keep Transmeta alive.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    2. Re:Santa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Transmeta had gone belly-up already? Anyone who's owned a machine with one of their processors fitted will attest to the fact that they're so sluggish as to be practically useless; Centrino is a better bet on every aspect that matters, including power consumption.

      Is this the gadget that used to run WinCE? How many silly products are there in the PDA/TablePC/laptop arena anyhow?

      If you plug a product here that deserves to be rubbished then thats what will happen.

  2. not small enough by hatch815 · · Score: 0, Troll

    keep getting smaller till we dont have to see windows anymore

    1. Re:not small enough by Wayne247 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd rather have a nice Zaurus like the C3000 then.

  3. Besides... by demondawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    being a blatant slashvertisment (I mean, there's not even an article about it, it's just a link to OQO's website), this doesn't really seem all that impressive. Especially in the $2000 range, when for that price I can have a decent desktop PC (with better specs than this thing) AND a decent PDA. Do people in "healthcare and public safety" really need this sort of computing power at their fingertips all the time? And if so, shouldn't there be a better way to give it to them then that horrific looking mini-keyboard? Of course, I'm biased, I suppose.

    1. Re:Besides... by MoralHazard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Especially in the $2000 range, when for that price I can have a decent desktop PC (with better specs than this thing) AND a decent PDA.

      Well, duh! If you buy a desktop and a conventional PDA for $2000, YOU obviously don't need one of these things!

      This seems more like a laptop--portable and fairly full-featured, without making any concessions on the interface or operating system. Sure, it's expensive, but it's brand new and doesn't have any competitors, yet, that I know of. So of course it's going to be pricey. Remember when PDAs first came out? We were paying $300+ for something with 8MB RAM and a black-and-white LCD.

      And for the record, there IS a reason to buy one of these things: carrying a goddamned laptop around gets old, really quick! Unless you shell out for an ultraportable, you're lugging around several extra pounds of gear whenever you need to take it somewhere. But if you only take your PDA, you're sacrificing a lot of functionality, ESPECIALLY the full keyboard. On airplanes, too, using a full-size laptop in coach can be a real bitch.

      Now, granted, I wouldn't buy one of these things with WinXP installed on it, but as soon as someone has it booting Linux... look out, bank balance!

    2. Re:Besides... by BHS_Turf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is not a slashvertisment because it runs a Transmeta CPU. Anything that SlashGod Linus has touched is relevant to everyone that reads Slashdot. The news is that the device has been improved, and makes Linus' work look even better.

    3. Re:Besides... by nine-times · · Score: 1
      being a blatant slashvertisment (I mean, there's not even an article about it, it's just a link to OQO's website), this doesn't really seem all that impressive.

      I think you mean, "It doesn't seem all that practical"? Certainly it's impressive and neat to have a full-blown computer in a tiny package, right? It's just not practical, but cutting-edge devices often aren't.

      So, sure, for most people and in most circumstances, it will be more effective and cost efficient to buy a desktop+PDA combo. For now. Give it a couple years, and who knows.

      I remember when laptops weren't practical.

    4. Re:Besides... by Skye16 · · Score: 0

      >> I remember when laptops weren't practical.

      What were the dinosaurs like?????

      ;]

    5. Re:Besides... by eggoeater · · Score: 1

      They have to market it to specialized industries first because they're the only ones that can justify the expense. In the log run the price will come down and business execs will want these just so the can have the convenience of a laptop without the weight/size. It's semi-uable on a plane, and you just put it in a dock at work or home.

    6. Re:Besides... by demondawn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except this thing doesn't have a full keyboard either; in fact, the keyboard on this thing looks comprable to that on the higher-end PDAs. Which means if you DO want a full keyboard, you'll have to lug that around. For this price, if you really want to shell out $2000 for something superportable, there's the Sony U-line, which is about the same speed, just as portable, and has a real keyboard (if not full-sized, at least a lot more useable than the one on the OQO 01 (did they make that name just so it'd be hard to pronounce?)). This seems more like a laptop--portable and fairly full-featured, without making any concessions on the interface or operating system. Except we are making concessions on the interface. The screen pretty darn small, for laptop-style work, and as I said, that's not a "real" keyboard, in my opinion. And if you're looking for one without an OS pre-installed, I think you're going to have a bit of a wait there.

    7. Re:Besides... by interiot · · Score: 1
      Slashdot stories about iPods link directly to Apple's website. Yet nobody thinks those are slashvertisements.

      What's the difference between a cool link and a slashvertisement?

      It's whether or not people think it's actually cool (eg. the same thing that makes it show up on Digg, and BoingBoing, and Engadget, etc etc). And this device is cool. CmdrTaco says he wants one. I would want one (if I earned $150k+). Apparently you didn't really RTFA, because it is quite cool (engadget has covered it hundreds of times, for instance).

    8. Re:Besides... by WigginX · · Score: 4, Informative

      OQO has been working on linux support.

    9. Re:Besides... by demondawn · · Score: 1

      Cool is entirely in the eye of the beholder. Just because /. says something is "teh awesome" doesn't mean it's the unfiltered word of God.

    10. Re:Besides... by iocat · · Score: 3, Funny

      They smoked at their desks and used really heavy keyboards. And they talked about punch cards all the time. I was all "what was the primordial soup like?"

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    11. Re:Besides... by interiot · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Engadget says it's cool. I say it's cool. Wired thinks it's cool. Digg thinks it's cool.

      I can understand that if you don't think it's cool, that your initial impression might be that this is a Slashvertisement. But I think it's established that it has somewhat wide appeal (not necessarily practical appeal, I don't know how many of these people linking to it are actually forking over the $2000 for one, but they still like to drool). At the very least, it's unlikely that Taco had to receive money to post this.

    12. Re:Besides... by bedroll · · Score: 1
      Slashdot stories about iPods link directly to Apple's website. Yet nobody thinks those are slashvertisements. ... What's the difference between a cool link and a slashvertisement?

      Exactly.

      They linked directly to the website because the press release is there. If they waited until a review is found then linked to that everyone would be harping about how they saw it at xyz site two days ago and links to the press release would get karma whores +5 informative (it probably will anyway).

      Personally, I think the grandparent would've been better served to post some other cliche really quick. Instead of, "It's a slashvertisement!" they posted "but will it run..." or "I for one welcome our new tiny pc overlords." They would've contributed just as much to the topic.

      I would want one (if I earned $150k+).

      Who, with enough disposable income, wouldn't want one of these? It'd completely emasculate the executive next to you who wears his RIM like a badge of honor.

    13. Re:Besides... by hesiod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Do people in "healthcare and public safety" really need this sort of computing power at their fingertips all the time?

      I work in a hospital and yes, they need that power. Clinical Info Software can require a heck of a processor for some things. Also, the 100% availability is a very attractive prospect for bedside documentation, such as being able to point out EXACTLY when medication was given, and having an immediate notification to stop if you are about to administer the wrong drug.

      Of course, at $1900 apiece, PDAs are a much more cost-friendly alternative.

      As for the keyboard, you are exactly right. That thing is hideous. It's like trying to use your 1980s watch calculator for complex statistical analysis.

    14. Re:Besides... by demondawn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I swear, you people are gonna give me foot-in-mouth disease.

    15. Re:Besides... by HardCase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also a doggone shame that they just appointed Joe Daltoso to their board of directors. That guy is the kiss of death to any tech company he touches. Just look at what happened to Micron PC (now MPC) and Interland after he got hold of them. MPC merged with Interland, Interland paid Gores Technology to take the company, which they turned around into a money maker. Interland's stock promptly went into the crapper and has stayed there ever since. Joe's famous last words? "The PC is dead - the future is the pure play Internet company."

      The guy was so inept at Micron Technology that they shuffled him off to the red-headed stepchild (Micron PC). Fortunately, I got out before they laid off half the company!

      -h-

    16. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      does healthcare needs this? quick answer, yes.

      you're out in the field several buildings from your desk, how do you look up the remedy ticket to make sure you're in the right room when your shop has gone paperless? right now you're stuck finding a desktop or opening up a clunky laptop. you can't use a palm sized device because the screen size/resolution can't handle displaying something like a remedy ticket. there are a zillion and one more situations like this.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    17. Re:Besides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is for Mac customers, mainly... they're trying the same price point but with a substantially more advanced product to hit Apple where it hurts.

    18. Re:Besides... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Remember when PDAs first came out? We were paying $300+ for something with 8MB RAM and a black-and-white LCD.

      Actually, I do remember when PDAs first came out. I even bought a second-generation Palm Pilot Personal (back when they were still "U.S. Robotics"). US$200, and it only had (has, actually -- I still use it) 512K of RAM. The original Palm Pilots only had 128K IIRC. Don't know where you got an 8MB model, maybe you were a little late to the party?

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    19. Re:Besides... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      8MB would presumably be a IIIxe. I'm still carrying my IIIc, which is also 8MB, but is in color. (256 colors, and a transmissive screen, though, so it washes out in the sun like a '92 laptop.)

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    20. Re:Besides... by aonaran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If linux is your thing try one of
      these

      Not quite as high in specs, but it's less than half the price.
      I have a c860 with a 1 gb SD card and I've not had much desire for a laptop since getting it.
      My main portable use is just e-mail, web and wireless network auditing, so the little c860 with pdaXrom works fine for me.

    21. Re:Besides... by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Not a full keyboard?? Are we looking at the same picture, here?

      http://www.oqo.com/

      Sure looks like a full keyboard to me... wait, checking for all the letters... Yep, pretty goddamn close to what's on my laptop right now.

      And besides, even if you DO need to use an external keyboard (let's say you want to do some coding on the airplane), you can get small, comfortable USB keyboards that fold up smaller than a paperback book. More stuff, true, but still a hell of a lot smaller and lighter than a laptop.

    22. Re:Besides... by dud83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      HTML pages over FTP, the pain! Such raw abuse of standards and protocols.....

    23. Re:Besides... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If we're going to get into one of these kids today arguments, I'd like to point out that I was using a Psion Series 3 back in 1993ish. These were released five years before Palm was even founded and were the third revision of PDA that Psion made (although significantly superior to the Organiser 2). It came with a 4.77MHz NEC V30H (8086 pin-compatible), 256KB of RAM, and a monochrome screen (no grey shades or backlight). It had a graphical multi-tasking OS, a set of basic apps including a compiler, and I even go online with it at one point - although about the only thing I could do was telnet. It had two slots for memory cards which were about twice the size of CF cards, and I paid about the same amount in around 1994 for a 256MB flash card for it (which had to be formatted completely, destroying all data, to reclaim the space from deleted files) for about the same price I bought a 512MB flash card last week.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:Besides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not in the healthcare or safety biz. I'm in the CI design/installation/service biz. I have a mind (and shoulder) numbing amount of tools. One of those tools is a laptop.

      That laptop is used for programming security/biometrics systems, unified remote controls and home automation processors and that is it.

      I just plain don't have the time in my day to dig out the custom hardcase and find a safe place to set up the awkward lappy to use email, access my accounting/CRM, modify a contract, etc.

      If I had one of these, my productivity increases would be worth the expense. I'll be keeping an eye on it and if it turns out that it lacks any fatal flaws, I'll drink the koolaid.

    25. Re:Besides... by feijai · · Score: 1
      Remember when PDAs first came out? We were paying $300+ for something with 8MB RAM and a black-and-white LCD.
      Actually, I do remember when PDAs first came out. I even bought a second-generation Palm Pilot Personal (back when they were still "U.S. Robotics"). US$200...
      Let's turn on the wayback machine properly. The term PDA ("Personal Digital Assistant") was coined by John Scully, CEO of Apple, to describe how the Newton MessagePad was going to fulfill his dream of the Knowledge Navigator. By definition, PDAs first came out when the Newton came out.

      The first Newton MessagePad was $800.

      Also, the first Palm device, the Pilot, was shipped by a company called Palm Computing, Inc., whose CEO was Jeff Hawkins. The company started in 1992 developing software for the GRiDPad, then later for the Newton and also for the Zoomer. Only rather later did they decide to go it on their own, after Apple kept going for more advanced machines rather than smaller, simpler, cheaper ones. At that point they got a $44 million stock infusion from US Robotics to put out the Pilot.

      The Pilot cost $300.

    26. Re:Besides... by feijai · · Score: 1

      And the original MessagePad came with 640K of RAM, only part of which was flash. No Newton ever shipped with more than 4MB flash even in later years.

    27. Re:Besides... by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Now your paying $2000, or 6.67 times that for a device with 8MB of video ram and a teeny color lcd! What progress we make!

    28. Re:Besides... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Not a full keyboard?? Are we looking at the same picture, here?
       
      Apparently not since the OQO website spec sheet specifically states:

      Thumb keyboard with mouse buttons and TrackStik

      So yes, one needs at least one of those roll up keyboards to do any serious amount of typing.

    29. Re:Besides... by Hormonal · · Score: 1
      Does healthcare need this? Quick answer, no.

      Your illustration has nothing to do with healthcare -- that's just the place where you happened to see the situation. It could happen in any largish work environment.

      Furthermore, this is not a problem that requires a full-blown palmtop computer. Viewing a Remedy ticket requires very little in the ways of computing grunt. It does require a larger screen resolution than you're going to find on most handhelds.

      If the users of a ticket system (like Remedy) are going to be out and about, then whoever implements said system needs to take that into account, and choose a system that's more PDA-friendly than Remedy. Perhaps viewability on PDAs was at the end of the requirements list when picking the system. If people need to buy new devices at $2K a pop to use a specific vendor's system (especially because of something as trivial as formatting the system's output), one has to ask why that vendor was chosen.

      An application where this device is truly needed is one where someone has to do computationally-intensive operations on a device that can fit in their hand. I'm not sure that I can think of any examples where this is necessary. If I needed to do truly intensive computation, I'd look to remotely control a box in a closet with lots of grunt, and have the results sent to my PDA-class device. The closest I can think of is something where those comptuations would require or generate large datasets that would be inconvenient to transfer wirelessly.

      This looks to me to be a smaller-than-normal laptop. If you can handle the tradeoff between reduced grunt and not having to carry a laptop bag home every night, then this machine has a place. Its worth lies in convenience.

    30. Re:Besides... by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      and doesn't have any competitors, yet, that I know of.
      What do you mean, "yet"? There are at least 5 slashdotters preparing a post on how to fit the same hardware for one tenth of the price into a pencil case.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    31. Re:Besides... by oever · · Score: 1
      The first line on the linked page:
      These instructions are not officially supported by OQO. Please do not call customer support about any linux-related issues.
      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    32. Re:Besides... by daedalus-prime · · Score: 1
      doesn't have any competitors, yet

      ahref=http://www.flipstartpc.com/rel=url2html-7786 http://www.flipstartpc.com/>

    33. Re:Besides... by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

      I've found that extremely small form factor keyboards are rather difficult to use, even the 10.1" ultraportables are different enough to take some getting used to (and still remain uncomfortable to use afterwards). YMMV but I think 12.1" small form factor (i.e.
        Regardless, it is an interesting evolution of the notebook and I'm certain that at least a subset of notebook/pda users are in need of something along such lines.

    34. Re:Besides... by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Or OSX. That would be sweet.

      -Nano.

    35. Re:Besides... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Well I can beat that. Back in the mid-80s not only did I own a Psion Organiser I; I also worked for Psion programming their Organiser II for their corporate clients.

      Cue Grognard telling us how he used to programme mainframes for the navy by toggling switches on the front of the machine ;-)

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    36. Re:Besides... by torpor · · Score: 1

      I would have been more impressed if, instead of PSION, you said Atari, and you were talking about one of these .. after all, they were the ones to kick off the whole 'personal data assistant' thing, PSION was just a riff off the ol' Atari block in my opinion, admittedly a pretty good one ..

      [and yeah .. i've got a tandy model 100 in storage, thanks very much .. thats more a laptop than a PDA ..]

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    37. Re:Besides... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      No, healthcare right now is working fine on their touchscreen tablets. This is too single-purpose and with a 3 hour battery life won't make it through rounds at a hospital.

      The Toshiba Toughbooks have drawn eyes because they can take abuse. Doctors abuse their computers-- I know. I've seen what happens to their equipment. But Toughbooks, with internal WiFi and a touchscreen PLUS a powerful Pentium-M work very very nicely. You can toss a Toughbook into your briefcase and open it again after dropping the briefcase down some stairs and tossing it under a desk. This thing wouldn't last a week.

    38. Re:Besides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I like this http://www.dynamism.com/sl-c3000/ Sure its less then half the power but its also less then half the price.

    39. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      we broke a tough book in a weak with regular use, which involves lots of dropping considering it's size.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    40. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      So a health care indrustry should spend millions of dollars in new software, training, and hardware to switch to a package that will let employee's use a $1k unit to gain access instead of a $2k unit? do you also bitch about the cost of your health care? i bet you do.

      i don't care what pda or system you buy. if you need to see anything more then one or two lines a pda's display isn't going to cut it. the oqo is not cut out for doing large sums of heavy computation. i suggest you buy one and try it out before you knock it.

      doctor's refuse to use tablet laptops because of their size, and those who use them drop them.
      doctor's refuse to use pda's because they can't read anything useful on them.
      doctor's bring in the milk money.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    41. Re:Besides... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      The Psion Organiser predates even that, going back to 1984. This has a single line LCD display and a keyboard where the letters appeared in order. The Psion machines the GP refers to are direct decendents. Actually, modern smart and semi-smart phones run an OS with some technologies that come from that - OPL, the scripting language of Symbian, stands for "Organiser Programming Language" and was present in the very first Psions.

      So, nah, the Atari Portfolio wasn't the first by a long shot. Psion was one of the original entrants in the portable computer market, with Sharp and Casio producing minature battery operated machines (I, personally, had a Casio device in 1987, I can't recall the name, I *think* it was PB80 - update, Holy Googled History Lessons Batman, here it is - it had a touch sensitive keyboard, single line 10 character LCD display, and was programmable in BASIC though it had about 500 bytes of RAM free for BASIC programming.)

      While the Portfolio had a similar form factor to some of the later Psion machines, it's worth pointing out that they more decend from some mini-(non-PC)-notebooks Psion made than from external-to-Psion influences. The adding of a GUI is exclusively Psion's work, no GUI was on the Portfolio which ran DOS.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    42. Re:Besides... by torpor · · Score: 1

      i also had a PB80, and i wouldn't really put it in the PDA category .. more 'programmable calculator', which may or may not be close enough, actually, to a 'real PDA' descendant.

      But the Portfolio -did- have a GUI: it ran GEOS..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    43. Re:Besides... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      No, I wouldn't either, I was just trying to give a sense of the history. The fact is that the Series 3s and 5s that Psion produced do follow a clear line back to the original Psion Organiser, with the clam-shell design being essentially based upon Psions attempts to make a "notebook" version. Psion was one of three major innovators in the area.

      I don't know if GEOS ran on the Portfolio, but I'm 90% convinced it didn't come with it. I assume GEM would have worked on the Portfolio too, as that had pretty low hardware requirements too.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Besides... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      They do have integrated handles for a reason, you know. And that OQO thing, considering its size, would get dropped more-- think of all the times you drop your cell phone, PDA, MP3 player, etc. Not healthy for that thing.

      And the Curoso (spelling?) processors are slow as hell. They can't handle voice-recognition (they barely handle Windows XP) and a 850MHz model I played with couldn't play a H.264 movie without stuttering. Voice recognition is something that more doctors are doing and these won't be able to handle it based off of my experiences. Do they even have a mic-in?

    45. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      the oqo has a nice clip case and we haven't dropped any of our gen-1 models yet. a lot of people don't realize how often our environment requires us to balance anything of a laptops size either barely on a counter or a knee or a similar small surface.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    46. Re:Besides... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      And the speed issue? It wouldn't replace a laptop in that department, and for $2000 it isn't worth it to only have it to look up information in a database. There are cheaper ways of doing it.

    47. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      what speed issue? there is no speed issue. if you had bothered to follow the rest of the comment train you would also see that there isn't a cheaper way to view what the oqo can provide. however your tough book is perfect, besides the fact that it costs more, is heavier, and larger.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    48. Re:Besides... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      I realize there isn't a way to provide what the OQO can, but the price is probably debatable. We don't really know how much they cost to manufacture, design, market, etc. And the speed issue is an issue because if you had bothered to read, the Crusoe processor is not comparable clock-for-clock to an AMD. They suck. Voice recognition software has issues because it cannot run itself, the OS, and the program to place the text into, at the same time.

      Being heavier and larger isn't always a bad thing. More heft can provide a more solid feel, a more secure grip. It isn't a bad thing all the time. And most Toughbooks are about ~$1700 for the semi-rugged to ~$4000 for the fully rugged versions for 3x the power, 50% more battery life, larger screen, more RAM, etc.

    49. Re:Besides... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      again, if you had bothered to read the entire thread you would know that we have used both tough books and are currently using gen1 oqo's.

      when you can muster up some sort of ability to go back and see what has been tried and failed and come up with a GOOD suggestion then do so.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  4. Any Details On Battery Life? by Tha_Big_Guy23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to TFA, it's 4.9x3.4x.9 inches, which as far as I can tell doesn't leave a whole lot of room for batteries. Considering that it's running a 1Ghz processor, and a fairly sizeable full color display for a portable, that has to be draining on the battery. I mean, it looks exceptionally cool, but I don't think I'd want one if I had to recharge it every hour.

    --
    If you're looking here for something insightful or thought provoking, you're probably looking in the wrong place.
    1. Re:Any Details On Battery Life? by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      According to TFA

      TFA? What FA? This was an advertisement directed at OQO's website!

    2. Re:Any Details On Battery Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:Any Details On Battery Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geeze thats horrible. It probably lasts 1.5 hrs or less when browsing with wifi on. I would expect to be able to use a mobile device for more than 90 minutes before sitting down and plugging in.

    4. Re:Any Details On Battery Life? by magarity · · Score: 1

      doesn't leave a whole lot of room for batteries
       
      The battery isn't inside the thing; it's the back of it. Look at the closeup pics of the side angle view on the OQO site. See the line up and down along the back? That's the seam for the battery module.

    5. Re:Any Details On Battery Life? by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Good news: you won't be recharging it every hour.
      Bad news: you'll probably never get the full advertised 3 hours out of it, and end up recharging or swapping batteries every 1.5 to 2 hours.

      I speculate this is the approximate average battery range for the Model 01+ because that is about what I get with my Model 01 that I purchased last year, and not very much has changed that I would expect to affect battery drain.
      I usually use my Oqo for wireless web browsing (when I don't feel like lugging the laptop around) or some minor coding (gcc, text editor, etc) and iTunes. I don't run Office or too many major apps, so if you're a heavy user you might notice a bit shorter battery life.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  5. Great, I've got to have one! by Roofus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now, what the hell is an OQO? The writeup was a litle* lacking

    * little = completely missing any and all relevant information. didn't want to waste time doing a real writeup, eh?

    1. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      That's because it's a Slashdot advertisement. If they bothered to say "The new OQO model (insert what it's a model OF here)", nobody would go to the place's website and Slashdot couldn't justify whatever prices they're charging for the advertising. :)

    2. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      what the hell is an OQO?
      It's an ascii art elephant head, duh.
    3. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by interiot · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's something that's been widely covered in the tech press, so it's reasonable to assume that people know what it's basically about. But here's a quick summary:
      • QWERTY keyboard
      • touch screen
      • runs a full version of Windows XP
      • 20GB hard drive
      • 256MB DDR RAM
      • 1GHz processor
      • built-in Bluetooth and WiFi
      • 3D-accelerated 1280 x 1024 VGA video output
      • very small size (4.9 x 3.4 x .9-inches), about the size of an iPod or PDA (scroll down for pictures)
    4. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Despite being so widely covered, I have never heard of it.

      Would it have been that hard to call it an "Itty Bitty Computer" in the writeup, instead of linking to a slashdotted site and assuming that everybody knows all about it?

    5. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OQO Unveils the model 01+ Pocketable Windows XP Computer

      rtfa

    6. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      I guess Google must have been down if there was no way, other than bitching about it here, for you to know what an OQO was.

    7. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's been around for a while. I haven't seen much about it recently, but I recall El Reg calling it vapourware a couple of years back. Seems like some of the vapour condensed, so maybe there's hope for LongTooth, or Vista, or whatever they're calling it this week.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I know whenever I read a headline and don't immediately know everything about the topic I rush off to Google. I would never dream of _reading the rest of the story_ for that kind of insight, because that wouldn't make any sense.

    9. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      But the whole point of the article is that those AREN'T the specs anymore.  Updates are:

      Better touch screen (not mentioned how so)
      30 GB HD
      512MB RAM standard
      USB 2.0 and Firewire
      Universal Power Supply (AC, Airline and Car)

    10. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Would it have been that hard to call it an "Itty Bitty Computer" in the writeup, instead of linking to a slashdotted site and assuming that everybody knows all about it?

      And how many additional ad impression would that have generated?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by fm6 · · Score: 1
      It's something that's been widely covered [google.com] in the tech press, so it's reasonable to assume that people know what it's basically about.
      Wrong. Lots of people have never heard of it.

      An important part of good writing or editing is to figure out what kind of background facts your readers might need. It's hard to do well, and I could forgive the Slashdot editors if they slipped up now and then. But lately they don't even try.

      And don't say "RTFA!". The purpose of the Slashdot summary is to help me decide if I want to RTFA. If that weren't true, all Slashdot stories would consist of the same text: "Read this, it's interesting".

    12. Re:Great, I've got to have one! by interiot · · Score: 1
      I mean, I'm happy to post more information and get more moderation points, but doing this feels like cheating, because the information is well-known by a sizable chunk of Slashdotters, any one of whom could have posted the info.

      --~~~~

  6. Nice but... by BattleRat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about you guys, but I am curious to know if its been hacked to run Linux (pick your distro)...

    1. Re:Nice but... by Wayne247 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You must be new to this interweb thing.

      Rule #1: Chances are, liunx or bsd will run on [insert name]
      Rule #2: Chances are, google will find information regarding rule #1.

      Like here, 2nd google result.

    2. Re:Nice but... by thisfred · · Score: 4, Informative

      First question that I asked too. The answer is on their site under support:

      question

      Can the OQO model 01 run Linux?
                  answer

      The OQO model 01 is a standard x86 PC and can run Linux. However, you will have to install and support it on your own.

      OQO does not currently have any plans to offer a Linux-based product, nor does it provide technical support for a model 01 running Linux. ...

      One recent reviewer has installed Linux, and you might find his writeup (10/13/04) helpful: http://www.handtops.com/show/news/55

      Another handtops.com poster has published a through "tutorial" of a Linux install: http://www.handtops.com/forum/752/0//OQO_Linux_Ins tallation__amp_Configurati.html# ...

      --
      "I Just Want You To Hurt Like I Do" - Randy Newman
    3. Re:Nice but... by computerdude33 · · Score: 1

      Read by a Mac person:

      I don't know about you guys, but I am curious to know if its been hacked to run OS X (pick your version)...

      --
      computerdude33's stuff: My blog of wonder.
  7. Video by mysqlrocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is the only computer you need.

    I was wondering how this works if you need more than the 800x480 resolution built-in monitor. However, I checked the specs and you can get video out of up to 1280x1024 VGA. It would be nice if it had DVI out.

  8. a really cute laptop by oever · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For quite a bit less you can get a real laptop like the Dell Latitude X1. This one is also very small and light but has a real keyboard. This machine is _smaller_ than A4, weighs only 1.1 kg and runs linux very well.

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    1. Re:a really cute laptop by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Informative

      "For quite a bit less you can get a real laptop like the Dell Latitude X1. This one is also very small and light but has a real keyboard."

      If you're looking at the OQO, it's not because today's laptops are sufficient. You can actually hold that thing in your hands instead of balancing it precariously on your lap.

      I'm not an OQO fanboy or anything, but the main reason I have a TabletPC right now is that I can't stand using a laptop unfolded on my lap. With a TabletPC, you can actually use it while standing up and walking around. (This is great if you're taking inventory, for example...) This thing is not only more portable than a TPC, but it's obviously more typist friendly.

      Lots of you may be shaking your head due to sticker shock or whatever, but this thing would be a god send to a lot of business professionals that need mobility. Heck, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if the company I last worked for bought two of these.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:a really cute laptop by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Er, a Dell is a real laptop?

    3. Re:a really cute laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      I would hope it's smaller than A4. A laptop larger than that would be awfully hard to transport, unless it came with an engine...

      </american>

    4. Re:a really cute laptop by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that require legible handwriting? I'm barely capable of that sitting down - much less while standing up.

    5. Re:a really cute laptop by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Last night I was precariously standing on a chair with an iBook hooked to a Cisco switch, balancing the iBook with one hand and typing with the other. Don't even ask what I did when I needed a cross-over cable that wasn't in my pocket..

      An OQO would have been incredibly handy, but $1700 for a serial console is steep, especially if you have to factor in the cost of adminning Windows on it. Maybe when they support linux wholeheartedly so I'm not stuck with any half-supported hardware.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  9. Pretty cool by EggyToast · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Now that it has more RAM and storage space, it really is a pretty sweet pocket computer. I especially like that it has both USB and Firewire, as a nod that it can function quite well as a portable device and a full computer in its own right. Very attractive for anyone looking for an ultra-portable laptop that's not totally gimped.

    Of course, the downside is that it's kind of pricey. But, given what else is out there, it seems to sit nicely among its peers -- it costs more, but it seems to offer a lot more as well.

    I have a small portable video device, an Archos 420, and while I got it pretty much just for the portable video and photo abilities, I do know it would be nice to hop on the internet for various reasons without having to stow my laptop -- after all, that's why I got the small portable video thing in the first place.

    Something like this that not only can play video, but also surf the web and do pretty much anything a decent computer can do is great for portability. But kudos to the company for an ultra-small, high-functionality computer that doesn't skimp.

    1. Re:Pretty cool by emandres · · Score: 1

      Unless you're going to rip any DVD that you might want to watch to it's relatively small hard drive, it really can't play movies. Sure, you could get a USB DVD player, but that defeats the purpose of the small form factor. In fact, it seems like for a lot of applications with the OQO you would need an external disk drive (like installing programs for instance).

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
    2. Re:Pretty cool by EggyToast · · Score: 1
      Well, the advantage of having it be a full operating system rather than an embedded OS is that it's relatively simple to set up some transcoding software to shrink down movies.

      As I said in my post, I've got an AV420 which has a 20 gig drive and plays divx, xvid, and other formats. I can easily fit about 15 or more movies on the thing -- more if I really want to shrink 'em down. The screen is small enough that I can live with the lesser quality, which means that smaller file sizes are actually something to shoot for.

      So no, I don't think you could store your full movie library on the thing, but I do think it'd be quite easy to keep a store of 10 movies that you really like, some TV shows, and swap with what you have on your main computer as the need arises.

      Similarly, most people tend to install programs once, and are at home for it. After I've got a computer ready to go, I tend to install very few programs, especially from CD, and as the OQO has wireless built into it, you can just download patches or anything else as the need arises.

      It's not a desktop killer, mind, and I'm not saying that this would be someone's only computer. But as a portable device, its functionality kicks the pants off the competition because it is a full computer. I can transfer video from a friend's computer to my AV420, or copy photos to it from a memory stick for photo backup or viewing. But that's the end of it -- I can't actually DO anything with the stuff on there once it's there. That's true for most devices. Usually you need a laptop. And this is, essentially, a laptop so small that it competes with the portable device market.

      So I apologize if I wasn't clear with my movie statement -- for someone looking for a device to take movies as files around, and who isn't afraid to spend some time transcoding stuff, this really would be sweet for video. Especially since, as you're preparing for a trip in, say, a month, you could just load up the files on the device and transcode on it while using your full computer for your regular affairs. It won't be super fast but it'll get the job done, say, a movie every day or so.

  10. Obligitory question by robyannetta · · Score: 1, Funny
    Does it run Linux?

    "Soon"

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:Obligitory question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  11. Oh yes. by emplynx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I likey likey. Please buy for me! That's even smaller than my TC1100. In fact, WAY smaller

    --
    -Tim
  12. The original version did have shortcomings. by jbarr · · Score: 5, Informative

    A colleague of mine purchased an OQO to test in our work environment, and though it worked well overall, the MAJOR shortcoming was its VERY limited WiFi range. We could not hit access points with the OQO that we could easily hit with several PalmOS and PocketPC PDAs. This was a real deal killer, because of its limited range.

    Also, while its all-in-one cable was nice for travel purposes (minimizing what you have to carry) it was cumbersome on the desktop. We would have rather seen a nice docking station/cradle instead of the kludgy "friction-hold" stand/all-on-one cable combination.

    It is certainly a stunning and elegant device, but it still needs some improvements here and there.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:The original version did have shortcomings. by WigginX · · Score: 5, Informative

      OQO fixed the wifi range issue, and is allowing anyone who purchased a unit with poor performance to return it for upgrade at no cost. Excellent customer service.

      The cable is still terrible, though.

    2. Re:The original version did have shortcomings. by ilmdba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sorry actually they didn't. i have a late numbered OQO (with the supposed wifi fix) and both the range and the reliability of the wifi is horrid.

  13. Does It Run Linux? (tm) by oGMo · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, seriously. I've commented to them and asked a number of times whether it supports Linux; and until it does, I will stick with my Zaurus. (Actually I only have a C860, no 4GB microdrive or whatever, but I don't come close to needing more than the gigs of SD I have.)

    Linux is not just a gee whiz thing in the palm. Having all your full-blown apps in your palm is far, far more useful than any stripped-down PDA apps could be. Firefox? Check. Thunderbird? Check. GIMP? Check. Nethack? Doom? ScummVM? Vim? Emacs? GCC? Perl? Python? Ruby? Checkcheckcheckcheck...

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Yes, standard x86 machines run Linux.

    2. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by oGMo · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in whether all the hardware has drivers. This is the big problem with anything portable: laptops are, for the most part, "standard x86 machines", and most of them boot linux... but a lot of them have unsupported peripherals. The Zaurus, on the other hand, has fully-supported everything.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    3. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it matters which brand or flavor of OS you're running, or what "crucial" apps you may think you need on this. The fact is that with such a tiny keyboard you aren't going to be doing much command line hackery anyways. This is much more a "use it with the pen" affair than writing perl scripts with your thumbs.

    4. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by oGMo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Eh, the Zaurus has a fairly small "thumb" keyboard and I've done plenty of hacking, irc, etc. on it. The size of the keyboard doesn't really matter as much as the quality. No, it's not something you're going to be spending a lot of time on, but when you're in a cramped airplane seat and your 17" laptop won't even open (or sitting on the bus, or standing in line, or whatever), it's nice to have something to whip out a few lines of code on (or run ethereal on, or nmap, or nethack, or firefox, or whatever).

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    5. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    6. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Demand the ability to run TOPS-10 under an emulator too! If the zarius can run TOPS-10, then they should be able to run it on this.

      PS: I'm still waiting for my RSTS watch.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    8. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I think they define this kind of behavior as "addiction" or "obsessive"... try looking out the window instead.

    9. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by 0xdeaddead · · Score: 1

      use simh! You can run tops on just about anything! ... even windows.

    11. Re:Does It Run Linux? (tm) by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It maybe but, as clearly defined by the URL, the company doesn't.

      When they do, maybe I'll start using them as an alternative to an embedded platform. It sure would be nice.

      But until then, one can't conceive of plowing $100,000 into hardware for a project for something that's 'unsupported'.

      I wonder if their agreements with Microsoft force their position here.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  14. Already slashdotted. by KerberosKing · · Score: 1

    That is something I expect when we are linked to some guys linux box on his home broadband. For a company that I have not seen a lot of retail physical shelf-space dedicated to, you would think they would have a decent server and net connection. As others have said, for the cost, I would rather have a laptop.

  15. Insightful? NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For quite a bit less you can get a real laptop like the Dell Latitude X1. This one is also very small and light but has a real keyboard.

    Err, duh. If one wants a "real" laptop, then one would buy a "real" laptop. This is obviously for those who are more sensitive to size and portability than $$ or outright power. If you aren't willing to make that tradeoff, fine, this obviously isn't for you.

  16. RAM?? by bugbeak · · Score: 1

    I want 6GB!!

    1. Re:RAM?? by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pshaw.

      640K ought to be enough for anybody.

  17. Re:Insightful? NOT! by geomon · · Score: 1

    Err, duh. If one wants a "real" laptop, then one would buy a "real" laptop.

    Right, but I don't think that is why the mods put it up to +5 "Insightful".

    This is obviously for those who are more sensitive to size and portability than $$ or outright power.

    Sure, but why make a tradeoff if the features do not justify the ~$2K pricetag? The only advantage this unit has over a PDA costing a quarter of the price is the screen size.

    For me, VGA resolution on a 4 inch screen does not justify $1.5 in additional cost.

    If you aren't willing to make that tradeoff, fine, this obviously isn't for you.

    Judging from the comments posted so far, it appears that it isn't for many people.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  18. RTFWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is not just a gee whiz thing in the palm. Having all your full-blown apps in your palm is far, far more useful than any stripped-down PDA apps could be. Firefox? Check. Thunderbird? Check. GIMP? Check. Nethack? Doom? ScummVM? Vim? Emacs? GCC? Perl? Python? Ruby? Checkcheckcheckcheck...

    You obviously haven't clicked through to the site. This is not some WinCE POS, it runs full blown XP. So does it run the most popular office suite on the planet, check. Firefox? check. thunderbird? check. gimp? check. Nethack? Doom? ScummVM? Vim? Emacs? GCC? Perl? Python? Ruby? Apps that 90% of the population gives a crap about? CHECK. Checkcheckcheckcheck...

    1. Re:RTFWS by oGMo · · Score: 1
      You obviously haven't clicked through to the site. This is not some WinCE POS, it runs full blown XP. So does it run the most popular office suite on the planet, check.

      You misunderstand. I've known about the OQO and the fact it runs XP since it was first announced. I don't want XP.

      Also, with even only 512MB of RAM on the latest model, with XP chewing through a lot of that, I'm not going to be running a whole lot. And I'm going to be paying for "the most popular office suite on the planet". And the others are going to require cygwin or other ugly hacks, not integrate well with the system. I could make XP into a pseudo-unix, or I could just run Linux.

      Apps that 90% of the population gives a crap about? CHECK.

      In this case, 90% of the population is irrelevant. I'm talking about what I (and probably most of the other people reading, this being slashdot) are probably interested in. XP isn't it.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  19. Not to troll, but ... by SilicaiMan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... what would the average slashdotter need such a machine for?
    (This is a serious question. I'm curious to know)

    Now, don't misunderstand me. Those machines look amazing, and I would love to get my hands on one. But, apart from the initial 5-minute infatuation, I think I would simply place it in a drawer, where I would eventually forget that it ever existed. But, maybe that's just me.

    1. Re:Not to troll, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you're frequently misplacing $2000 stacks of money in various drawers around your house, um..like invite me over and stuff!

      AC

    2. Re:Not to troll, but ... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I guess I could only see it as a very, easy mobile laptop. Right now my laptop is pretty light, but I'm still wary of taking it everywhere. This would accomplish things too annoying to do on PDAs. I really only see this being a killer app if wireless were available everywhere. Then it'd be useful for browsing on the web while taking public transportation.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    3. Re:Not to troll, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... what would the average slashdotter need such a machine for?

      I think that's the problem that many here on /. have with this device, it's NOT for the average /. reader. It's a niche product, that will mainly attract those with very specific needs. It could be very useful as a tool to deliver vertical apps more simply (e.g. medical, military, etc). It's not meant to replace laptops.

    4. Re:Not to troll, but ... by exi1ed0ne · · Score: 1

      Think Doctor in a Hospital with electronic medical records. Such a small device would be a perfect fit in such an environment. as for Slashdotters using it - well, geekfactor is kinda high. . . :)

      --
      Pessimists.net - as if life wasn't depressing enough.
    5. Re:Not to troll, but ... by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      I would love to have it for the train ride in to school every morning. A laptop is impractical. I don't have a palm, which would work well also. Then again if I'm not spending a couple hundred on a palm I won't be going to get one of these anyway.

    6. Re:Not to troll, but ... by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1
      ... what would the average slashdotter need such a machine for?

      I think that's the problem that many here on /. have with this device, it's NOT for the average /. reader. It's a niche product, that will mainly attract those with very specific needs. It could be very useful as a tool to deliver vertical apps more simply (e.g. medical, military, etc). It's not meant to replace laptops.

      I feel you are correct, it is not meant to be a one-size-fits-all kind of tool. The limitations/advantages of using such a form factor for this level of computing guarantee that it won't suit everyone's needs. And setting the price point where it is, helps to assure those who are going to purchase one think twice first to be sure it will meet their needs.
      However, being an average /.'er with a bit of extra money on my hands, I went and bought one last year for the 'cool' factor anyway.
      The portability is very nice, while startup time, battery life and heat output are a bit uncomfortable but bearable. I use mine primarily when I go on vacation. While I do have to pack the power supply, spare battery, and bluetooth keyboard/mouse (for those vacation coding urges), it's still a smaller and lighter bundle than a fullsize laptop. Otherwise I use it for when I feel like doing some light websurfing from the couch.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
    7. Re:Not to troll, but ... by NMBob · · Score: 1

      Your (U.S.) tax dollars bought one. One of the things we are doing is installing 400 semi-permanent seismic recording stations in the western US over the next couple of years. Once they are all in we will "roll" them slowly eastward over a period of 8 years or so. Each station will be installed for 18-24 months. They are using one of these (an original model) to configure, monitor, and troubleshoot the digitizers at the stations. I guess it is working out OK. The project is the Transportable Array "branch" of USArray, which is a "part" of EarthScope.

  20. stupid Slashcode Subject requirement by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Memory was the primary thing stopping me from getting one of these. It seems like 512MB of RAM is the magic number for good performance in modern operating systems.

    Now I just hope I can buy one.

    --

    +++ATH0
  21. Why is this on slashdot ? by javaxman · · Score: 0, Troll
    Seriously. Why is this um, "story" here? I mean, it's a cute gadget and all... but it's not terribly thrilling or new or newsworthy.

    Is it the smallest, most powerful, does it run Linux? Not really? It's the price of a really nice laptop? Why is the link here again? What's good about it? I'm serious. There is no indication, just some gushy praise and a link to the company website.

    It just leaves the more skeptical and seasoned Slashdot reader wondering who paid who for this Slashvertisement to be here. I'm not sure what's more lame, this or the Xbox ad earlier this morning... it's hard to say, since at least there was an 'article' ( and by that I mean IGN advertisement ) attached to that one...

    I guess I'll have to actually get work done instead of read Slashdot today...

  22. WTF is an OQO? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to click on a advertisement, so could someone give me the cliff notes version?

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:WTF is an OQO? by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      it's a Windows XP computer that can fit in a pocket. (though you'll want to turn it off before you try that or you'll set your pants on fire.)

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  23. OQO missed the curve by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to remember OQO showing prototypes of (back then) incredibily small PCs four or five years ago. It seems that their products have taken too long to materialize, and in the mean time the rest of the industry has really started to catch up with them. In the end, I believe their target market is too small; most folks will be happy purchasing a Dell that's 25% larger but less than 50% of the price -- and all the time, the trend of miniaturization across the entire segment marches onward. OQO will become a small footnote in the history of laptops -- a great idea, but too long on the drawing board and not to market soon enough.

    1. Re:OQO missed the curve by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " In the end, I believe their target market is too small; most folks will be happy purchasing a Dell that's 25% larger but less than 50% of the price"

      I'm not as optimistic. There's a rather strong niche they could chase after. Those executives with a little too much spending power who are sick of lugging their laptop around the country. You have to understand that it's not just physical size, form factor makes a big difference in the use of these machines. It is very difficult, for example, to use a laptop on a plane. This seems like it'd be easier. (Although I should reserve judgement until I've used one...)

      Anyway, there is a potentially lucrative market here. Unfortunately, these guys are doing a terrible job of marketing. I seriously doubt most IT dudes know about this device, let alone the executives who 'need' them.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:OQO missed the curve by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      As someone in technical presales who spends a lot of time travelling with sales execs, I would have agreed with you two years ago -- except now they use Blackberries. I very rarely, if ever, see a sales exec with a fired-up laptop onsite at a prospect -- they leave the mundane stuff like presentations and product demos to us presales folks.

  24. Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 4, Informative

    I demo'd one of their 01 models a few months back and signed a nice NDA that prevented me from discussing this newer Model 01. What's missed in the announcement is that the older, original 01's also got a free wifi antenna upgrade and from 802.11b to 802.11b/g. This change was emailed out about 2 or 3 months ago when OQO Ebay'd a charity OQO, but this means that the 01+ now has the extra RAM & disk storage, plus USB 2.0, but *also* an upgraded radio. Many, many people had complained about poor, directional issues with the original 802.11b radio/antenna.

    Engadget also covered this and mentioned the Model 02 that they hope to see soon. My NDA bars me from discussing this, but since Engadget spilled the beans, let's just say that I was told there'd be an "upgraded Model 01" before the end of the year and a newer Model 02 out before the end of quarter 2 next year. The Model 02 should have some significant updates including *possibly* having a different CPU instead of the Transmeta among other things. Considering the Model 01+ actually happened, I can only hope the Model 02 will be forthcoming as well.

    I for one didn't get the Model 01 simply because I steer clear of the first generation of new devices like this. The unit I demo'd confirmed why I didn't buy one. The upgraded 01+ looks appealing, but I'll probably hold out for the Model 02 sometime next year. But once I get it, I'll be a happy man... I'll have a Treo 650 (Palm-based, not a Winblows version) in one pocket and my OQO in the other. :)

    http://blog.mobileoptimized.com/
    http://mobileoptimized.com/

    1. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your facts are way wrong. OQO never gave an option of 802.11G both the 01 and the 01+ only have 802.11b.

      As for you and your NDA. I'm sure this was for a 01 and not the 01+ the 01+ testers was a very short list.

    2. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Um, I kinda get the novelty of your site being all squeezed together for mobile viewing and all, but could you at least have a second stylesheet so that those of us with full screen browsers can actually read it? I hit the page and in three seconds was turned off from ever trying to get any real information from it.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was told there'd be an "upgraded Model 01" before the end of the year and a newer Model 02 out before the end of quarter 2 next year.


      No there won't. You just Osborne'd them. (Sudden sales freeze as everyone waits for the nu'n'improved version.)

    4. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I mis-read the older emails from OQO. Perhaps they only upgraded the radio/antenna. I thought they said it went from 802.11b to 802.11b/g, though. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Perhaps the b/g was in the future. My NDA wasn't for testing anything new. It was signed before they presented me with their product roadmap as we were looking for a corporate purchase. I was told about the updated Model 01 and that there would be another device to follow a few months later. The unit I demo'd was an original Model 01. They were trying to sell us existing Model 01's and offer free upgrades to the yet to than be released Model 01+ and offered excellent discounts for upgrades to a future Model 02. The original Model 01 we tested had such poor radio performance that we gave up on OQO for the time being and decided to wait for a second generation device.

    5. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be the first time I did something that turned someone off. :)

      The site wasn't built to look good in a full browser. Its not xhtml or anything else. In fact, it doesn't use any CSS at all. It was built to render quickly and well on mobile devices, not desktops. Perhaps I'll update it in the future, however I'll need to learn a lot more about web programming before I do and for now I have plenty of other stuff to do. Your opinions are duly noted.

    6. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Nope... not me. Engadget's comment(s)

      http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000847060621/

      Before mine were, and I simply restated what Engadget said... that they've been looking forward to this and they're looking forward to yet another device. I'm looking forward to one to. Details, however, neither Engadget nor myself gave...

    7. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      From: http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000847060621/

      Quote:

      "OQO announced a long overdue update to their Model 01 ultrapersonal computer earlier today. As its name suggests, the new model 01+ isn't the Model 02 we've been waiting for (that's due out next year we hear) , but it is a solid upgrade and comes with 512MB of RAM, a 30GB hard drive, USB 2.0, a 1GHz processor, an internal speaker, and a 5-inch, 800 x 480 LCD screen. The Model 01+ we've been playing with definitely feels like a significant improvement over the original -- for starters, it's much snappier and just feels easier to use -- but it almost makes you wish they'd been able to release the 01 with these specs in the first place (we'll cut them slack since it was a first-gen product and just be happy that they got it right this time)."

      So take this and some other news and do the math. Transmeta is officially out of the CPU market. OQO uses Transmetas. Where does that leave OQO? Well, the thought is that they might have some reserves... perhaps they bought up some of Transmetas final stock... but for a future device (as Engadget alluded to), they would be wise to switch to a CPU that will be around for a bit of the future... what that is is anyone's guess, but it would make sense to build their next device, if there is one, on a different CPU. I don't think they're in any jeopardy of being Osborned, anymore than Palm is regarding the 650 if people plan to wait 3 or 4 months for the 700.

    8. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would ditch the annoying backgrounds.

    9. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Cyn · · Score: 1

      Re: the palm treo 650 / 700 - interesting comparison...

      oqo: switching from transmeta processors to (intel / amd)
      treo: switching from palm OS to windows (pocket pc / mobile / whatever it is)

      personally, I'm thinking I might grab an unbranded 650 once they're fairly cheap. Palm OS was always quite nice, and the treo seems like a good product - just need to look into build quality - and whether there are any contenders with similar / better products if/when I go to buy.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    10. Re:Finally... my NDA doesn't have to stop me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an 01 I purchased a few months ago, that took me almost 3 months to receive all of the accessories. Now they come out with the 01+ and tell me that I am able to get a $200 rebate on a new purchase since I'm an existing customer!

      FU$K that! I should have waited for the 512M, but I waited 3+ years since I first heard of the box.

      I am very happy with my OQO, however to treat existing customers who put up with their company creation like crap, with no upgrade plan then I think I'll just stick with crapy dell computers, at least they know how to treat customers!

  25. For that price... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can get a Sony Vaio TX with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, a 60 gig drive, and a real keyboard that weighs 2.75 pounds. No, it won't fit in my pocket, but it will fit in anything I carry around. It also has the two holy grails of /. It will run Linux, and it is liquid cooled. :-)

    No, I don't own one, and I don't work for Sony.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  26. What "hack?" by StarKruzr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a standard x86 PC with a Wacom tablet built in. There are no magic wismos here.

    --

    +++ATH0
  27. safari?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    watch the video carefully...

    that web browser it safari in os x.

    they just photoshopped it in!

    1. Re:safari?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you look very carefully/closely almost all of the apps they show running in that video are running on OS X or with an OS X skin. Seems kinda strange but I guess OS X apps are more photogenic than their windows counterparts.

  28. Re:Insightful? NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only advantage this unit has over a PDA costing a quarter of the price is the screen size.

    Actually I thought the biggest advantage was the fact that it ran full up XP. It could, in theory, act as a desktop replacement if needed. At the very least, it plays in a mixed (desktops, oqo, laptops, wifi/lan) environment MUCH simpler than even a CE based device. Plus there is the benefit for developers of vertical apps that they don't have to code special versions of their apps for CE (and be limited by CE as well).

    Now is it worth the extra cost over a nice little laptop? Depends. My bro-in-law is a cardiologist and carries an oqo in his pocket. Can't do that even with the smallest laptops. He can run Windoze software specific to his field directly on the oqo. Extremely valuable to him where even CE is not an alternative (can't run the software) let alone anything Linux or Palm based. For him it's worth it. This is OBVIOUSLY not a mass market device. It's for those who have dismissed PDA's as being "interesting" but underpowered and with a sparse selection of software.

    So again, how was the parent posters comment in the slightest "insightful"? He merely points out the obvious, this is a niche product and alternatives exist for those that don't meet it's customer profile.

  29. Need optical quantum PDAs! by scovetta · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear the Model 01++ will feature that neat 6.8 Ghz optical-quantum technology. They probably won't be able to fit a terabyte of ram, but I'm hoping for at least 512 GB.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  30. Whaaaa? by Danzigism · · Score: 0
    I rather see Toshiba develop more Librettos!!

    now THOSE were cool.. i mean i like this and all, but i wouldn't dare pay more than $1000 for something I could break so easily.. its just not practical.. although it looks pretty damn cool.. seems like the libretto had much more support .. i could only imagine what it would be like today if they still developed them..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  31. quit complaining. by TenLow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you're all complaining about this, that, and the other, but you're missing the most important part: It's cool and you cant afford one. Thats why you are blasting it. Nobody needs a computer. Nobody needs a PDA. Nobody needs a fullsize anything. You need food, water, and shelter. Anything else is a luxury, and this is just one of the many things on the list of james bond like gadgets that you want, but wont admit because you've spent your money on the food, water, and shelter.

  32. Is there a middle-of-the-road? by nobodyman · · Score: 1

    It seems there is no decent middle-of-the-road. You either have something like the OQO, or you have some piece of junk that desperately tries to be a mac mini and utterly fails because it tries to include legacy cruft(I haven't used the serial/parallel/joystick port in 5 years... why do they insist on including them? Would it kill your business to tell the remaining .5% of dot-matrix printer owners to piss off!?)

    Are there any PC makers that are a good system with the form factor of the Mac Mini? I'd love to have a brick-sized PC that I could easily move from a dock at work to a dock at home. I'm not talking about a mobo or case manufacturer, but a complete system.

    1. Re:Is there a middle-of-the-road? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still do use legacy devices, and plenty of other people do -- in fact there's a huge market for that. Very few are the people who always keep all their computer hardware up-to-date, specially in the corporation world -- changing everything every six months is just unreasonable, expensive and most of the time plain annoying.

      Where I work we have a five-year turnover cycle for the machines, and know what? I even know places where this goes up to 8/10 years, like administrations, schools... And I'm only talking about the desktop side here, if you have a look at the mainframes things are way, way "worse"...

    2. Re:Is there a middle-of-the-road? by ikea5 · · Score: 1

      Shuttle XPCs?

    3. Re:Is there a middle-of-the-road? by Fishbone · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, there is something:

      http://www.cappuccinopc.com/

      That site will at least get you pointed in the right direction. I personally own a Cappuccino series PC (P3, 1Ghz), and I can tell you from experience that they're not bad little machines. The only gripe I might have is that the cooling fan can get a little loud and obnoxious at points. (However, I wlll say that I purchased mine about two years ago, so the cooling solution may have improved since.) It's a fantastic little machine that I not only use to ferry my desktop between work and home, but I also use it to drive my car PC system.

  33. Re:Insightful? NOT! by ghukov · · Score: 0

    I agree. I would rather carry a laptop bag than be seen carrying a man-purse to carry this thing around. I get along fine with my treo 650 for the things I always need available, like secure shell, email alerts, etc.

    --
    ...because Plutonians are teh suck
  34. Re:Insightful? NOT! by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > For me, VGA resolution on a 4 inch screen does not justify $1.5 in additional cost.

    I think a buck-fiddy is a GREAT price for a 4" VGA screen! Did you mean $1.5k?

  35. Mini Laptop by Sundroid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The basic idea behind OQO is to fill the gap between laptop and PDA. MS came out with tablet pc, but the jury is still out on that one. I personally would like to see something like a "Mini Laptop" that has the following essential features:

    #1 Rectangular landscape screen about 4" x 8" in size, with a keyboard about the same size so the Mini Laptop can be snapped shut into a compact case no bigger than a 6" x 9" 300-page hardcover book.
    #2 Runs full Windows, or Apple, or Linux operation system.
    #3 Priced under $1,000.

    Then perhaps I'll consider buying one.

  36. Re:Insightful? NOT! by geomon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I would say that $1.5 is a terrific price! What was I complaining about?

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  37. OQO or Sony.... by Kenja · · Score: 1

    I have to say I like palmtop/ultra small notebooks. I have ever since the old IBM 486 systems. However, what realy does this system offer over the Sony VGN-U750P?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  38. Linux will run on it... by cobrajs · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are like me, the first thing you did is to check and see if Linux runs on it...

    Linux Devices Review
    Tuxmobil list of successful installs
    and
    Handtops guide to installing Debian

    Note:
    It is also possible to make it a dual boot (of course!), just in case you actually wanted XP.

  39. largest iPod made: by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I have the largest iPod made, a 2G 20GB (thick one).

    It is 4.01"x2.43"x0.875".

    The total volume of the largest iPod made is 8.525 cubic inches.

    The total volume of the OQO is 15 cubic inches.

    So the OQO is about twice the size of the largest iPod made, let alone the average one.

    So, the OQO is about the size of an iPod if a Ford F150 is about the size of a Civic.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  40. $2K for What? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant
    They now start just short of $2k but they still look very yummy.

    Twice the price of a very usable laptop otherwise, and with a keyboard I can barely type on.

    Pass.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. Booting Linux by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    It's a standard computer, just with teensy hardware. It'll even boot from a USB device, like a CD ROM, for example.

    Still, *covet*

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  42. Battery life was the problem, still is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The biggest drawback to the the 01 model was battery life. It only runs for 3 hours, about what a standard laptop does. What is so great about a device that is finally small enough to carry around and use all day when YOU CAN'T CARRY IT AROUND AND USE IT ALL DAY!!!??? When it dies with an hour to go before lunch and you have to leave it on your desk charging over lunchtime, then it dies again before you even start the commute home, what the heck good is that?

    1. Re:Battery life was the problem, still is by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      If you need to use it like that then you'll probably be dissapointed with other things like the small screen and lousy keyboard. For people who actually benefit from a device like this 3 hours may well be enough and the keyboard and screen won't be drawbacks. I think the crappy processor is the biggest problem.

  43. Re:Insightful? NOT! by geomon · · Score: 1

    For him it's worth it. This is OBVIOUSLY not a mass market device. It's for those who have dismissed PDA's as being "interesting" but underpowered and with a sparse selection of software.

    I agree with everything you have written here, but I was commenting on how the GP got to +5 "Interesting" (with a few personal oberservations along the way). The mod system on this forum sucks, but it works better than most other forums, so what can you do? ;)

    So again, how was the parent posters comment in the slightest "insightful"? He merely points out the obvious, this is a niche product and alternatives exist for those that don't meet it's customer profile.

    Which goes back to your point about mass market devices: the average /. poster is a mass market device consumer. Any comment from one of the members is mirrored back to them by the tribe. You or I could find a use for this device (although I would have a difficult time justifying $2K for it), but the vast majority of consumers, as reflected in the /. crowd, want a general-purpose device that has tons of bells and whistles.

    I not only concede that your bro-in-law could benefit from this device, but I can think of a whole host of people who need to have a scaled down, but robust, micro-microcomptuer in the field with them to perform their work. Surveyors, civil engineers, and geoscientists could also use this device. The only problem is that once you start moving into that group of professionals, computing power requirements do start to impact the price-for-performance metric. If you are talking about logging data from an instrument in the field, or taking field notes to record observations, then a PDA works great - I use one all the time. But to move into the realm of a hand-held PC, I would need to either get more robust performance for the price tag (nearly 4X a PDA), or get a laptop.

    For people who can connect easily (via Bluetooth or other WiFi) to external storage or computing centers, like physicians in a hospitial or clinic, this device could be extremely useful.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  44. Mobile Phone as Home Computer? by tf98 · · Score: 1

    If only this had a built in phone. Even if it was just VoIP software.

    Perhaps Philip Greenspun's vision of the mobile phone computer is getting closer.

    Link: http://philip.greenspun.com/business/mobile-phone- as-home-computer) Discussed on Sunday - http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/ 25/1445212

    --
    Warning: This post may contain nuts!
  45. Sketching by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

    I'd drop $3000 on such a thing if I had it available. This thing has a Wacom pressure sensitive stylus, it's comparable in size to a CD player, and it is powerful enough to decently run Photoshop, or better in this case, Alias Sketchbook.

    It's a real pain in the rear having to carry around a watercolour or marker set for colour sketching. Heavy, clunky, and a bit of a special effort. This I could get used to just having with me all the time. Clip it on my belt and go. The fact that it's a solid, if not amazing, laptop is just a bonus.

  46. The OQO is agonizingly close to wicked cool... by jht · · Score: 1

    You can almost tell that ex-Apple folks designed it. Granted, they've addressed the most glaring design flaws (by increasing RAM and adding USB 2.0), but the deal-killer is still the battery life. Unless they can come up with better battery performance (I think it needs 5-6 hours) at a lower pricepoint, OQO isn't going too much farther, I suspect.

    And yeah, a Linux/OpenOffice version of this would be pretty slick. It'd cut their licensing costs, too.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  47. Useless except for.... by helix_r · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    The oqo is simply too small to be useful. The only real market is Cx0's who want to run powerpoint presentations on a nifty little gadget. They might as well bundle it with a snazzy magnesium-cased projector.

    1. Re:Useless except for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, How about those applications where a complete small, power efficient PC is just what is needed for prototype applications that need to be turned around quickly?

      There really are no acceptable substitutes, trust me I've looked

  48. Imagine... by Skatters · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of... sorry.

  49. Re:Insightful? NOT! by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

    I use a Palm(One) LifeDrive and am very happy with it. I think people are too quick to dismis any PDA that doesn't have a cell phont built in.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  50. Mod parent up (yes, it does support linux) by rustman · · Score: 1

    The OQO has very good linux support (albeit officially unsupported), available from their FTP site. I recall seeing the lead developer's email address posted as well, for bug reporting and such.

  51. Dangit by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

    And I've not even had my Model 01 for a month. Granted, they didn't up the 802.11 chip to support 802.11g, and they haven't had a magical increase in battery life. They also didn't change the digitizer, which I find to be too unweildy to use, ever.

    --
    09
  52. Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should buy 3 and write a small program that makes persistant inane postings to slashdot, run the slashbot on the third one and get rid of you.

    1. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They should buy 3 and write a small program that makes persistant inane postings to slashdot, run the slashbot on the third one and get rid of you."

      They should buy you a copy of Word and only allow you to post when the green squigglies are gone.

  53. What is a remedy ticket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am 63 years old and I have never heard of it.

  54. I've been Eying an OQO for a while...need Verizon by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I've looked at this and basically esclaimed it's almost everything I want. In fact, if they added two features I would drop the $2,000 for it.

    1) Offer a version with a 100gig drive

    2) Offer it with a CDMA phone module for Verizon incorporated in it so that I can use it to browse on Verizon's broadband cell service.

    And you have a deal...as I would feel at that point that I have true mobility and adequate storage.

  55. Re:I've been Eying an OQO for a while...need Veriz by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Other pluses

    3. Compact Flash/Micro-drive port...so I can read files off my digital camera's memory card.

    4. A built in camera to go with the mic, and allow for video and audio transmissions.

  56. Re:Insightful? NOT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with everything you have written here, but I was commenting on how the GP got to +5 "Interesting" (with a few personal oberservations along the way). The mod system on this forum sucks, but it works better than most other forums, so what can you do? ;)

    Ooops, in that case, it was I who missed your point. Mea culpa.

  57. Too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are too late. The HTC http://www.htc.com.tw/news/index.html mobile phone / pda thing will really fit in your pocket and be less than haf the price and... well be bought by lots of people now all major networks (gsm) will be selling their badged subsidised versions in October.

  58. Yeah....but does it run Debian by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    Someone has to say it.

  59. Somebody please bring back the TRS100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, remember that sweet lil fing?
    I miss Tandy :(

  60. Remedy tickets??? What are they???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no entry about remedy tickets in wikipedia. Lots of results in Google but I did not find any explanation about WHAT THEY ARE, only how to submit, retrieve, etc.

    What is a REMEDY TICKET? It is a law enforcement thing, medical thing, Internet thing or what?

  61. Transmeta is SLOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My officemate has one and its annoyingly SLOW. It chokes when playing Xvid standard definition video and **pauses** for seconds when simply switch apps. My impression is that the "1 Ghz" processor is the Transmeta crusoe. BTW Transmeta has stopped making processors! Sept 2005 PC World: "Former Intel competitor Transmeta has reorganized its business around licensing a technology that actively raises and lowers the threshold voltage"

    No wonder the Transmeta crusoe died. I just wish it had died faster.

  62. JasJar comparison to oqo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found
    this thingie here (jasjar) when this article got me interested in these type of products.

      I have to say, I have two beefs with most PDA/Phone thingies. One is the lack of 802.11 wireless support. The whole "YOU MUST BUY OUR DATA PACKAGE" is getting tiresome. And the fact that there is very little sim card support. Why can I not have two phones and just transfer my sim card between them when I want to change?

      But these seem to be getting closer.

  63. Yes but... (v2.0) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run OS X?

  64. Re:I've been Eying an OQO for a while...need Veriz by glitch0 · · Score: 1

    You could easily do #2 if you had a Verizon phone that'll work as a bluetooth modem.

    --
    -Glitch "We all know Linux is great...it does infinite loops in 5 seconds." - Linus Torvalds
  65. Re:Yeah....but does it run Windows by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Yeah....but does it run Windows

    Just had to ask...

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  66. individual directorsdon't have THAT much influence by jbellis · · Score: 1

    unless he's the chairman or a large stockholder as well as a board member, blaming one for a company's demise is totally bogus.

  67. OQO by ultrapcs · · Score: 1

    Nice surprise OQO !!! We all waited for OQO 02 but the new OQO 01 is certainly a PLUS :) . Here is a web site that has more info about these Handtop PCs : http://www.minipcs.com/

  68. Sadly too much for me by AsmordeanX · · Score: 1

    It is exactly what I want in a portable computer but I couldn't justify spending $2000 on it. $1000 would probably having me check for change in the couch.

    $750 and there would be no question about me buying one.

  69. Compaq TC1100 by sshore · · Score: 1
    Very similar specs to the Compaq TC1100. Similar price as well, once you add the keyboard, which can snap on and make it stand more like a regular laptop.

    I like the idea of a removeable keyboard for a tablet. It just adds weight that you don't use very often.

    Incidentally, the discontinued Compaq TC1000 used a Transmeta Crusoe processor as well. Wonder why they switched..

  70. Pointless technology by jcross · · Score: 1

    For $2000? You get a really tiny screen, a really tiny keyboard, and a laptop's battery life. Why not just get a larger tablet based PC? Here's one I've played with that had about the same specs as OQO and is a really small, and usable, form factor. For about the same price you get the same features but a more useful size. No you can't hook it to your belt. But really people, anything bigger than a cell phone on your belt and you look like a real goober. Given that it comes installed with Windows XP Tablet Edition, and has no Linux support to be found, I don't know that this crowd is going to accept something like this.

  71. ^^^ arrogant parent post ^^^ by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    The GP is certainly right to bitch. Some of us don't have too much time on our hands and we certainly don't want to waste what little we have by Googling FOR SOMETHING THAT MIGHT NOT EVEN INTEREST US.

    There. I've used up my time-waste allocation for today on this reply.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  72. Just Ordered A Couple by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    We just ordered a couple of these for work to test out.

    We are stuck in a bad position with PDA's (PPC and Zaurus).

    The problem is we have a mobile workforce that needs a handheld form factor, with fairly complex (in house built) applications. Tablets are too big. The device has to have the option of "being holstered" to allow for the workforce to do more tradional gets your hands dirty type of work between data collection sessions

    The PPC memory base is about 64 meg split between storage and memory. Fairly complex database driven applications can eat through that memory in no time especially if the particular user base has more than one application that they need to switch back and forth from.

    The OQO seems tempting, because there would be no more need to "port" the parent applications to the PPC or Zaurus. And there would be no more need for the "feature" and asthetic tradeoffs that you have when you port to a device with 320x240 display and 32 megs of memory.

    Sure battery life is a concern -- but when our user base can plug into a car charger betweeen work sites, it should be minimal. (The battery life of a PPC with the backlight on and constant usage is not exactlly anything to write about anyway....)

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  73. Show me by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    the active pressure-sensitive touchscreen on the Latitude X1, and I'll agree with you :)

    --

    +++ATH0
  74. Use RT not Remedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe instead of Remedy you should use something like Request Tracker - it's web-based, clean interface, and completely open.