Slashdot Mirror


World Standards Day 2005

ewg writes "Today, 2005-10-14, is World Standards Day as celebrated by the IEC, ISO, and ITU. The press release emphasizes the benefits of safety standards, but the interoperability is the true prize for information systems. How many sets of country codes and date formats do we need?" From the release: "International Standards accommodate people's desire to live in a safer, more secure world by providing a valuable safety net. 'Standards for a safer world' is the theme of the message signed by the leaders of the three principal international standardization organizations to mark World Standards Day 2005. Standards developed at the international level through IEC, ISO and ITU are available for use at the national and regional levels to meet the needs of society at large, the market and government regulators," the three leaders point out. They see standards as vital in disseminating best practices and new technologies, while avoiding new barriers to trade that national security and safety regulations may create."

187 comments

  1. Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One of my biggest beefs in non-standard behavior (since this article talks about the safety benefits of standards) is highway construction and layout. I could go on about bizarre practices for signage, etc., but I'll just take a couple:

    1. Warning signage: I currently live in Washington state and they have the MOST bizarre ways for warning of construction and other hazards on their highways. I literally have come around a blind curve where a sign says "Flagger Ahead" and I almost hit some construction worker with his "SLOW" sign. Literally not enough warning to slow down without almost slamming on one's brakes.

      Another example was in Bellevue, WA, and I'm not making this up. There was a line of cones angling out from the curb, closing off a lane around construction of a new high-rise. Nestled behind those cones in the "dead zone" of the closed off lane was one of those generator run highway signs that said, "Right Lane Closed Ahead"! Wow! I wished for my digital camera.

      On the other hand, there is the state of Illinois where I also lived for a long time. Their warning practices are amazing. I one time was way north of Peoria driving south on the interstate, and I saw signs warning of "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"! It may seem ludicrous, but I at least had it in my consciousness I would expect delays and construction, obviously with plenty of time. I wouldn't say THAT would have to be the standard, but in WA there seem to be none.

    2. Freeways: notably, the decision to put merging ramps from the left hand side. Again, I'll cite Bellevue WA. They recently redid their I405 and N.E. 4th street interchange and, yep, the northbound merge onto an HOV lane no less now comes in from the left! (It used to come in from the right, go figure.) Until then I'd sort of figured left side ramps were artifacts and had been deemed dangerous and obsolete.

    I could go on, but I wonder how many accidents and deaths could be prevented on our highway systems if there were more sane and consistently applied standards. (And don't even get me started about Europe where they've got ALL of their cars on the wrong side of the road going the wrong way! (kidding))

    1. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only country in Europe where they drive on the "wrong side of the road" is the UK (you know, birthplace of miles, inches, feet, pints, etc...). The rest of us Europeans prefer to drive on the right side of the road.

    2. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by yagu · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm not, I'm posting on slashdot... driving and typing is way too dangerous!

    3. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Seumas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I don't understand is why, in all countries, drivers face each other head-on. If you drive on the right side of the road and left side of the car or right side of the car and left side of the road, when driving toward each other, the drivers are always facing each other - so that in a head-on collision, the most possible damage would be done to the drivers. Why? Wouldn't it be safer to have them drive on the right side of the car and the right side of the road or left side of car and road so that you put the most distance between you? If you hit more or less headon in such a situation, the empty side of one car would collide with the empty side of the other car... right?

    4. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      You have better visibility around a corner from near the center of the road, therefore, you sit as close to the center of the road as possible. That's the reason I always heard, anyway. I guess it was more of an issue in the days of 2-lane windy roads that went up, down, and around hills, back before they started just pulverizing the hills and paving 4+ lanes through the middle.

    5. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah. I guess that does make a lot of sense. :)

    6. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by moogleii · · Score: 1

      Not really.

    7. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"!

      Usually that means that at some point in the next 40 miles you could find some or all of it under construction.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    8. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What I don't understand is why, in all countries, drivers face each other head-on.

      I guess we could try driving from the back seat, facing to the rear, and using little video monitors to steer!

    9. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by jimmydevice · · Score: 0

      Hillsboro Or. ( home to some of Intel's assets ) has the most counterintuitive traffic controls. One is Evergreen parkway, when the left lane ends, you merge right. The other stupidity is traffic signals that totally screw up the expected and learned sequencing. I wonder how many rear-ends have happened in the turn lane as drivers jump off the line expecting the right turn signal.
      Feh!

    10. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Informative
      And my favurite is all those road signs that almost always are written in english with no picture in the US. Most of the time they are OK, but sometimes it's just what the heck do they mean...

      Maybe using pictures on the warning signs is too simple? My favourite is this warning for a quay. The most notably that I have seen is the "Right lane must turn right" and similar small signs often almost too late. I would really like the use of graphical lane information signs like the following: lane information before crossing and lane ending information. Everyone ever using Macintosh has probably encountered this sign indicating "worth to see". (Yes, Apple adopted that sign from a swedish road sign.)

      When it comes to driving on the left side - it's not as bad as it sounds, but roundabouts (rotaries that they sometimes are called) are the worst since you expect traffic from the wrong direction.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    11. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by badfish99 · · Score: 1

      Ah! Another Captain Scarlet fan!

    12. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      I almost hit some construction worker with his "SLOW" sign

      Look into getting the 'personal' variant of this. A certain percentage of drivers slaughter a number of construction workers every year. Be sure you can survive the consequences reasonably whole.

      Wow! I wished for my digital camera.

      Your expectations of construction crews are out of phase with the reality of ex-cons and 'illegal immigrant' day workers that may not have intended to return to the site in the morning. Factor this into your driving.

      Another example was in Bellevue, WA

      ...the state of Illinois ... Their warning practices...

      That's a strange comparison. 'Way north' of Peoria, Illinois (I presume as there are several... Peorii) is a long way from a notoriously small place. I cant quite figure out which city you might have been near at that point because the available maps are ambiguous. Bellevue, Washington however, is a densely populated area. Is it really your expectation that Bellevue post signs on every major thoroughfare for forty miles in every direction for every on-going construction event?

      Until then I'd sort of figured left side ramps were artifacts and had been deemed dangerous and obsolete.

      Road design is a function of cost. Left side exits exist when making the same exit on the right would cost some fraction of a Sagen more. Regardless, you are expected navigate such a path safely. This isn't 'Pave the Earth (tm)' and you don't get to blast around with indifference. If your familiarity with an area is so limited that you don't know the relevant road patterns in the dark without signs, you should be sober, wide awake and terrified.

      I could go on, but I wonder how many accidents and deaths could be prevented...

      Please don't. Instead, hop plane ticket to France, rent a car and go for a spin. If you survive you will likely be reduced to tears so go alone and spare someone the drama. Upon return you will confidently race down any paved road in the US like a native.

      (Disclaimer: a competent French driver is better than a competent US driver. As a US driver I understand this as objective fact. No harm, no foul, mkay?)

      Ok, your turn; key '7' is the Mark XI Slashdot Flamethrower.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    13. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by alekd · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Sweden they actually both drove on the left and sat on the left, but they switched to driving on the right.

      There used to be a joke about this. Changing the side of road to drive on was quite radical so they wanted to do it gradually. Trucks should switch first and cars half a year later...

    14. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's easier to avoid collision when both drivers are near the centre line of the road, and have a better grasp of just where the car ends. Especially in a tight spot this would be useful. If we had drivers on the kerb side of their cars, the frequency of accidental head-on collisions would definitely increase.

    15. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by frehe · · Score: 1

      My favourites among swedish road signs are the "pedofile ahead" signs:

      http://www.vv.se/filer/bilder/vagmarken/1_3/1_3_6_ 1.gif

      http://www.vv.se/filer/bilder/vagmarken/1_4/1_4_12 .gif

      ;-)

    16. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"!
      About 15 years ago, I was driving from Brisbane to Sydney one rainy night. All the way from the NSW border, I kept coming across warning signs saying "Roadworks Ahead - 5km", "Roadworks Ahead - 2km", "Roadworks Ahead - 1km", "Roadworks Ahead" - only to find the "roadworks" was a small pothole that had been filled in the day before.

      Lulled into a false sense of security by this, and driving in the rain at 110kph, I saw a little sign by the side of the road on a blind corner saying "Roadworks Ahead" - and immediately hit a huge patch of lightly-tarred loose road base where they'd dug up an entire 200m stretch of the road from the apex of the corner!

      After almost losing it and swerving to a stop, heart in my mouth, I looked over and saw 2 sets of headlights, both upside down and pointing into the sky. And this grizzled old country local walked up to my car, tapped on the window, and said "don't you city dickheads take any notice of signs!"

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    17. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      I think what usually kills you is the sudden deceleration, so sitting on the other side would not help you

    18. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      The reason goes back to the days of knights on horseback. If you pass on the right, you are in a bad position to attack people. It was therefore a simple matter of 'good form'. At least that's what history lessons tell me, YMMV.

      As for why some countries now pass on the left, I don't have a clue.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    19. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by hazee · · Score: 1

      Here's the version I heard:

      Most people are right-handed, meaning that they'd wear a sword on their left side, so that if they needed it, they could reach across and pull it out of its scabbard (there's no way you can pull a sword out on the same side).

      Therefore, people used to ride on the left, so that if for whatever reason you needed to attack the person coming towards you, you could reach across to your left, yank out your sword, and then swipe at the assailant on your right.

      Therefore, the custom was to ride on the left.

      This all worked swimmingly until Napoleon. Who was left handed. Which is where everything went to hell. Europe switched over to his way of doing things, and later the US copied that too.

      Supposedly.

    20. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      It's for visibility. If you only have two lanes (i.e. one per direction) you quite often have to overtake slower traffic in the oncoming lane of traffic. For this to be succesful, you need to be able to SEE the oncoming lane - if you sat on the same side of the car as you drive on, you'd have no chance of overtaking safely because you'd not be able to see past the slow traffice.

      This is a BIG deal in countries that are sparsely populated like Finland and Sweden, where the road system simply does not have the amount of traffic to warrant more than one lane per direction.

    21. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      No need to jump across the puddle. Just cruise on up to Montreal, QC Canada.
      I've driven across the country and hit most of the major cities. Most cities take some getting used to, but Montreal is just nuts!

    22. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      all those road signs that almost always are written in english with no picture in the US. Most of the time they are OK, but sometimes it's just what the heck do they mean...

      Maybe using pictures on the warning signs is too simple?
      Maybe some of the pictures are difficult to decipher, or are ambiguous, and plain English words aren't (or are less so)?
      For example, from the page to pointed to, what does this sign mean?
      Or this one?
      Or this one?
      And I assume that these two signs have something to do with simple street crossings, but if they are, why are they so elaborate, and multi-colored?
      The simple "+" indicator found on signs in the U.S. is far easier to comprehend.

      Graphic (picture) signs are fine when they're simple and unambiguous (such as the many of the various diamond road signs in the U.S.).
      However, frequently, words are necessary.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    23. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 1

      We have driving school over here in Europe where you learn what these signs mean. Actually, you already learn it in elementary school, but you're only required to know this for your driving license. Once you know the street signs, the information carries really fast and unambiguous.
      As for the questions you asked:
      This means "you have priority at the next crossing"
      This is the generic "Attention!" sign.
      These are distance markers indicating a railroad crossing at 150m, 100m and 50m respectively, if I recall the numbers correctly.
      The other two you pointed two are right next to railway crossings, I don't know why there are different ones.

      Even though I'm not from Sweden I have no problem getting the basic or even the exact meaning of all these signs, see the benefits of standardizing road signs?

    24. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by alexo · · Score: 1


      > On the other hand, there is the state of Illinois where I also lived for a long time.
      > Their warning practices are amazing. I one time was way north of Peoria driving south on
      > the interstate, and I saw signs warning of "Construction Ahead, 40 miles"!


      Speaking of standards, the rest of the world has been metric for quite some time.

    25. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by matfud · · Score: 1
    26. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Command of the English language is supposed to be a precondition for getting a license in most states (except, of course, the Peoples Republic of California).

      Language-centrism aside, getting good/meaningful/intuitive graphics to accurately portray what is meant is not always easy. All too often we end up with a "quick reference guide" that starts to resemble an ideographic dictionary.

    27. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious troll. Move along.

    28. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Therefore, people used to ride on the left, so that if for whatever reason you needed to attack the person coming towards you, you could reach across to your left, yank out your sword, and then swipe at the assailant on your right.

      OTOH if you had an Ox cart (or drove a carriage or whatever) you normally held the reins in your right (because most people are right handed) and the whip in your left. So if you met someone else driving in the other direction it was much easier to move to the right to let him pass (ditto for the other guy).

      In other words in England the aristocrats/soldiers won, in the rest of Europe it was the farmers.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    29. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by eosp · · Score: 1

      You're lucky...you haven't worked in downtown Seattle.

      One road is literally a 1-2-1 way road.  Like this:

      >>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<>>>>>>>
      >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>

      < means go left and > means go right.

    30. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I'd worked overall more than a couple of years in downtown Seattle... Fortunately one time I was on a special project (when I lived in Omaha), so I just lived in a hotel (what used to be the Four Seasons) for six months, and could walk to the office. All of the other times, for the kind of roads you describe, I always took the bus. There just wasn't any other way... lol.

      -yagu (as AC)

    31. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I'm thankful it isn't that way. If it was, I would have been killed late last year when the driver of the semi I was passing decided that he wanted to be in the same lane I was in, which wedged the right side of my car underneath his back trailer: http://webpages.charter.net/scarletdown/XFers/Geo- 1.JPG

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    32. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Warning! Breasts Ahead
      http://www.bcvr.co.uk/images/roadsigns/WARN006.GIF


      Beware of Flying Boomerangs

      http://www.bcvr.co.uk/images/roadsigns/WARN008.GIF


      Caution. Intoxicated driver yakking on a cell phone up ahead.

      http://www.bcvr.co.uk/images/roadsigns/WARN014.GIF



      Can't think of any smartass interpretations for the other signs.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    33. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Your+Anus · · Score: 1

      Actually, the driver is positioned such that the passengers can get out at the curb instead of the middle of the street. It probably goes back to the horse-and-buggy days, when you wanted to keep you passengers from stepping in the mud (and other stuff) in the middle of the street. This reminds me of the tale about the diameter of the SRB's on the shuttle being determined by the width of a horse's ass, but that's another campfire.

      --

      In the USA, we like stuff watered down, like beer, television, and freedom.
    34. Re:Okay, here's a standard I'd like to see: by Specter · · Score: 1

      The best one I ever saw was while driving into Missouri on I-44 where the flashing highway warning sign read:

      Construction Zone
      Next 14 Miles
      Prepare to Be Annoyed

  2. second or third post? by utnow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ooooooh... I wish I were an oscer myer weiner...

  3. Oops by damiena · · Score: 0

    I think you mean yesterday

    1. Re:Oops by richdun · · Score: 1

      Depends on your time zone...ah the irony.

  4. Riiiiiighht by Qubit · · Score: 5, Funny

    World standards day is today, the 14th. Posted on..

    ...the 15th.

    Maybe we need some new standards?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
    1. Re:Riiiiiighht by parasonic · · Score: 1

      Like a working Industry Standards Organization web server even when a lot of requests are made? ...And I was considering looking up cool stuff like 9660 and 9001 while I saw "iso.org" on the front page :(

    2. Re:Riiiiiighht by diersing · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My reaction to standards day was the same when I learned about National Talk Like a Pirate Day.

      Another game of grab ass.

    3. Re:Riiiiiighht by Seumas · · Score: 1

      It's still the 14th in my timezone. You must be in one of the other 23 timezones.

      Thank god for standards.

    4. Re:Riiiiiighht by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We do have a standard time. It's called UTC, and the article was posted on the 15th in UTC. date -u

      Just because you don't use it -- that doesn't mean there isn't a standard.

    5. Re:Riiiiiighht by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Nobody uses it. When was the last time you booked a flight at 18:00 UTC?

    6. Re:Riiiiiighht by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you were grabbing asses on national talk like a pirate day, I think you completely missed the purpose of national talk like a pirate day.

    7. Re:Riiiiiighht by tommykat · · Score: 1

      You took my words before I could say them.

      --
      Do you have an oblem?
    8. Re:Riiiiiighht by FRiC · · Score: 1

      Probably because you're in the wrong timezone, like me. Whenever I see an article on /. that says Today is xxx day, I know that it was yesterday and I missed it.

    9. Re:Riiiiiighht by unitron · · Score: 1
      " World standards day is today, the 14th. Posted on.. ...the 15th."

      Remember, the IEC, ISO, and ITU were all in on this. No doubt someone proposed this date back in January or February and it took them until today to agree on it.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Riiiiiighht by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Last time he was in London presumably...

      There are some people who live outside of your TZ you know.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  5. Remember... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... all replies in this thread should be in Esperanto!

    1. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... all replies in this thread should be in Lojban!

      Fixed.

    2. Re:Remember... by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      My native language is Klingon, you insensitive clod!

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    3. Re:Remember... by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Bonvolu alsendi la pordiston? Lausajne estas rano en mia bideo!

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  6. How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. er, one for each country.

    The date formats annoy me quite often e.g. 13/4/2005 compared to 4/13/2005. Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing.

    1. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing."

      According to whom? Your arbitrary set of aesthetics? You still cannot tell apart the data formats from your randomly chosen preference.

    2. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      According to whom? Your arbitrary set of aesthetics? You still cannot tell apart the data formats from your randomly chosen preference.

      Why not? YYYY-MM-DD is the international ISO standard (yes, I am aware of what the I and S stand for). YYYY-MM-DD goes from least specific to most specific, so if you sort a set of dates you get them in the right order. Nobody ever uses YYYY-DD-MM. It's the most intuitive choice.

    3. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      "Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing."

      According to whom?

      According to anybody the least bit familiar with numbers? That's generally how they work - the higher magnitude numbers go to the left. Anybody who can count higher than nine is surely familiar with the concept.

      You still cannot tell apart the data formats from your randomly chosen preference.

      Well it doesn't conflict with other practices, unlike DD/MM/YY, MM/DD/YY, etc.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing.

      What's wrong with using "April 13, 2005", "13 Apr 2005", etc.? Very few uses (e.g., sorting) require numerical YYYYMMDD formats. If you're talking about, oh, the terrorist attacks on the US a couple years back, it's stupid to call them the 2001-09-11 attacks. They're the September 11 attacks. If you call them the 11 September 2001 attacks it would probably make sense (although people in the US would be more used to Month Day). But 2001-09-11 imparts a data-ness to it that it doesn't need to have.

    5. Re:How many country codes are needed? by RussP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing."

      Good idea, but let's get it right while we're at it. It should be 2005-04-13, or it will be lexicographically ordered later than, for example, 2005-21-13.

      --
      I watch Brit Hume on Fox News
    6. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Imagine working in a big global corporation where everyone uses their local standard (like in America, using MMDDYY). God, I hate it. I don't care if it's anti-american - this is one american that would give his left nut and a good chunk of the right one to see everyone here learn to use YYYYMMDD.

    7. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      According to anybody the least bit familiar with numbers? That's generally how they work - the higher magnitude numbers go to the left. Anybody who can count higher than nine is surely familiar with the concept.

      It sounds like you spend too much time interacting with machines and not enough time interacting with people.
      What's wrong with the Eurocentric DD Month Year? It fits with how our brains work in relation to time. When someone is telling me a date I don't need to know that it's this year first, then this month, then some day.

      20 October 2005 is better than 2005-10-20 because my brain sees "20th" and I, knowing today's date, can easily decide if the person is talking about today or not, or if the date might be in the future or past. The next bit is the month which tells me if it's the recent past or near future, and the last bit is the year which tells me if it's in the distant future or distant past. A quick glance at "20 October 2005" tells me that the date is soon. "2005 20 10" gives me big concepts to digest first which might not even be necessary, while leaving the most important and specific details for last.

      By your method, addresses would be written:
      United States
      17745, Lock Haven, Pennsylvania
      Lock Haven University
      McEntire Hall
      Room 545
      Jim Smith

      Completely bass ackwards.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    8. Re:How many country codes are needed? by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      Personally I've never seen what was wrong with just using the number of seconds since January 1, 1970.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    9. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 1

      This is actually the way addresses are written in Japan. As far as post sorting goes, it is much simpler, more important things first.

    10. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      What are "April" and "September"? They only have meaning in a limited number of countries. Not only that, you ignore all of the countries that don't use a Latin alphabet.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    11. Re:How many country codes are needed? by xornor · · Score: 1

      I second that... Anyone not using YYYYMMDDhhmmss is retarded!

    12. Re:How many country codes are needed? by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

      - you mean like UK _and_ GB :-)
      ( .. er, one for each country.)
      Yes, and I am well aware that Great Britain and The United Kingdom have different meanings (at least to those in the Northern part of the island of Ireland). I am also not aware of England, Wales, and Scotland having widely used individual country codes.
      My address registered on eBay ends with GB (as I originally registered on the US site). The postage calculator on the UK site does not recognise this as being (essentially) the same as UK and thus postage on my purchases is quite frequently incorrectly calculated.

    13. Re:How many country codes are needed? by xornor · · Score: 1

      Thats a good idea about the addresses, they should order it that way! Now you are thinking properly.

    14. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Z00L00K · · Score: 0

      Actually - nobody is the wrong statement. Sweden and Japan uses the ISO format.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    15. Re:How many country codes are needed? by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Actually, ISO is not an acronym. ISO is a pun based on the latin prefix. Check their website :-)

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    16. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 October 2005 is better than 2005-10-20

      Unfortunately, less than 20% of the world's population uses the english language. On the other hand, Arabic numerals are, according to Wikipedia, "the most common set of symbols used to represent numbers".

    17. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - nobody is the wrong statement. Sweden and Japan uses the ISO format.

      He said that nobody uses YYYY-DD-MM, not YYYY-MM-DD. When the year is on the left, you know that the date is written in ISO format because nobody uses YYYY-DD-MM. When the date is written on the right, the date format could be either MM/DD/YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY, which is confusing, especially if the day is 12 or less.

    18. Re:How many country codes are needed? by truedfx · · Score: 2, Informative

      YYYY-MM-DD is the international ISO standard [...] Nobody ever uses YYYY-DD-MM.

      Actually - nobody is the wrong statement. Sweden and Japan uses the ISO format.

      So who uses YYYY-DD-MM? I think you misread the date format. Either that, or I misread your post :)
    19. Re:How many country codes are needed? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Actually most of the address you wrote is redundant. Once you have the zip there is no reason to have the city, state or the name of the inversity. The address should be written as.

      United States, 17745
      McEntire Hall
      Room 545
      Jim Smith

      Better yet since each country already has a unique phone extention maybe even.

      +1 17745
      McEntire Hall
      Room 545
      Jim Smith

      --
      evil is as evil does
    20. Re:How many country codes are needed? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It is also used in Russia (and, I believe, other ex-USSR countries). It actually makes sense,as it roughly traces the path of your letter as it reaches the addressee, from top to bottom (as you would read it).

    21. Re:How many country codes are needed? by DeafByBeheading · · Score: 1

      And the plus-4 on the zip can probably give you the campus building, so

      +1 17445-1234
      Room 545
      Jim Smith

      or, to make it completely unintelligible to anyone but a postal employee...

      +1 17445-1234 545
      Jim Smith

      --
      Telltale Games: Bone, Sam and Max
    22. Re:How many country codes are needed? by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      address's are nothing to do with numbers, asshat. yyyy-mm-dd is THE ISO date standard, and no matter how much in denial you are your still wrong. maybe you shouldn't open your big mouth about things you have no clue about and you won't look like such a loser next time.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    23. Re:How many country codes are needed? by stesch · · Score: 2, Informative
      The date formats annoy me quite often e.g. 13/4/2005 compared to 4/13/2005. Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing.

      I'd prefer the date format according to ISO 8601 instead of your own format. :-)

    24. Re:How many country codes are needed? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The all-numeric date format with years first sorts out perfectly. When you use English spellings (note: a sizable portion of the world has different names for those months) you lose the automatic sorting.

    25. Re:How many country codes are needed? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Why does it have to be english at all. My phone number is not english why should my address be english.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    26. Re:How many country codes are needed? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      "What's wrong with the Eurocentric DD Month Year? It fits with how our brains work in relation to time. When someone is telling me a date I don't need to know that it's this year first, then this month, then some day."

      When someone is telling you the date, they're not going to say YYYY dash MM dash DD. They'll simply tell you it's the DDth. They're just giving you a reference, not a timestamp.

      "2005 20 10" gives me big concepts to digest first which might not even be necessary, while leaving the most important and specific details for last."

      Your brain isn't supposed to digest the year first (unless it's important). It's supposed to jump to the third field automatically. You're just getting confused now because your brain expects the day to be in the first field. Your argument about the address format proves that you're just blindly sticking to what you know, given that it would be completely logical to write it as what you describe as "bass ackwards".

      I've been using YYYY-MM-DD for everything since I heard of it, and nowadays any other date format causes me to hesitate. I'd even argue that I'm faster with it now, than I was with DD.MM.YY before, because having my computer display YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm in the corner puts everything in the same logical order.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    27. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the alphabetical sorting order. Try to sort files that have date in their names, and you will see: 2005-03-17 and 2003-07-15 will always be sorted in the right sequence, unlike 03-17-2005 and 07-15-2003.

    28. Re:How many country codes are needed? by hazee · · Score: 1

      The trouble with such a short address is that there's no redundancy. Get one digit wrong and the letter's never going to get there. And with automated machines reading addresses in sorting offices, that's bound to happen too often.

      Also, it looks like Canada doesn't have a unique phone code, sharing +1 with the US. I wonder if there are any other countries that share phone codes.

    29. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Ithika · · Score: 1

      That reminds me - why does the "UK Date" style for LaTeX come up with "DD^th MMMM, YYYY"? I've never seen that date format used in an official capacity anywhere in the UK. It's just plain ol' "DD MMMM YYYY". No commas and no ordinals to ugly it up.

    30. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      But the US way, according to their brain-dead date format, addresses should be written :

      Lock Haven University
      United States
      Room 545
      Pennsylvania
      Jim Smith
      McEntire Hall
      17745, Lock Haven

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    31. Re:How many country codes are needed? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      But canada and other countries within the US telephone system also are in country code 1.

      Also some ex-soviet republics still use country code 7 but have separate postal systems.

    32. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please use 2005-4-13 as it is less confusing.

      "2005-04-13".

    33. Re:How many country codes are needed? by SW6 · · Score: 1
      Good idea, but let's get it right while we're at it. It should be 2005-04-13, or it will be lexicographically ordered later than, for example, 2005-21-13.

      What's the name of the 21st month? ;)

    34. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I second that! Every computer system I have used I set it to ISO8601. What makes me mad though is that I have to enter all these settings myself as Windows doesn't have a preset ISO8601 entry (what a shame!). Also, if you write software and stick strictly to ISO8601 parsing dates/times becomes a breeze! I always get mad when I run into a piece of code that utilizes not one, but SIX different date/time formats!

    35. Re:How many country codes are needed? by sydb · · Score: 1

      Because (normal) people don't navigate telephone exchanges, they just dial numbers. Towns and streets are things you move through, and we remember that Castle Street joins Princes Street with George Street and that number 9 is on the junction of Castle Street and George Street, but I have no idea how to get from 0131-669-0783 to 0131-425-6583, and I actually made that last number up because I can't remember the phone number of my previous residence, despite living there for the whole of 2004 and a chunk of 2005. The only reason I can remember the other number is that it was my phone number for around 8 years. People remember names a lot easier than they remember numbers. Or maybe you don't care about ease of fucking use. But maybe you were being ironic, I hope so.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    36. Re:How many country codes are needed? by RussP · · Score: 1

      A better example would have been 2005-11-13.

      --
      I watch Brit Hume on Fox News
    37. Re:How many country codes are needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer "2005 IV 13" (and yes this format has been used for years).

    38. Re:How many country codes are needed? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Most people are perfectly capable of memorising their own phone numbers. They also seem to be quite capable memorizing their cell numbers, the numbers of their friends, children or parents. People are not as dumb as you think they are.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    39. Re:How many country codes are needed? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      My God Oh, that's completely ack basswards! ;-)

      You all need to read `on holy wars and a plea for peace': http://www.csd.uwo.ca/staff/magi/personal/humour/S haggy_Dog/On%20Holy%20Wars%20and%20a%20Plea%20for% 20Peace.html .1+ TMG 95:05:20 61-01-5002 dnuora detsoP
      (wakarimasu ka ^_^).

      And btw, my way of doing things (which of course is "D-YYYY-hh ss:MM:mm") is the only right way :P

    40. Re:How many country codes are needed? by sydb · · Score: 1

      I didn't say people can't memorise phone numbers. I said they are easier to forget than addresses. I am not as dumb as you think I am.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  7. so who doesnt celebrate it? by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    Well apparently the IEEE (International Electronic and Electrical Engineers) dont support it, and yet dont they carry all the standards for data transfer? (802, 1394, etc. Dont forget, 802.1 is for the internet ;P)

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  8. Bureaucracy by redonion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is just more bureaucracy. Why not do your best, instead of keeping to minimum standards? We need a society that tries to exceed, not just get by.

  9. HD Video release of proceedings... by SalsaDot · · Score: 3, Funny

    HD Video release of the proceedings will be made available on both HD-DVD and Blue-ray format discs.

    1. Re:HD Video release of proceedings... by game+kid · · Score: 1

      ...in 1280x720 and 1920x1080 screen sizes, and 25Hz, 30Hz and 60Hz frame rates!

      It's the standard way of doing things, you know.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:HD Video release of proceedings... by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      Along with torrents, DVD, DIVX, VHS, Beta, a flip book, and a sequence of stone carvings... ;-)

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  10. Standards? Bah. by Mister+White · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who needs 'em? We all know things work out better if you just build everything from theoretical or visually pleasing designs.

    --
    "Crime fighters fight crime. Fire fighters fight fire. What do freedom fighters fight?" -George Carlin
  11. 20 minutes late, and a buck short. by Vorondil28 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This would have been cool to know about 16 hours ago. Oh well.

    Seeing as how late the "Dilbert Hiding On Your CPU" story was, 20 minutes late is certainly an improvement. :-P

    --
    This sig rocks the casbah.
  12. Baby Steps by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many sets of country codes and date formats do we need?

    Speaking as someone who has worked on a few large scale, interdepartment information systems, I think a good first step would be to get it down to one per application.

  13. Bring in the End-times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's have a world government... no more of this having to have a visa and all that nonsense. everyone's a citizen everywhere, just as it should be, afterall every human has a right to be anywhere they wish on planet earth right?

    So let's standardize that, and then while were at it, let's standardize the shopping where everyone will have a VeriChip in their hand or forehead (whichever they choose), and this will allow them to buy from any store on the planet. Those who don't have it can't buy anything...

  14. ITU by Bogtha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's worth pointing out that the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is an agency of the United Nations. All the bluster about the EU "taking over" the Internet is actually a move to have the Internet administered in much the same way as the international telephone service.

    Bear that in mind before celebrating World Standards Day today and accusing the EU of being petulant children tomorrow.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:ITU by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      All the bluster about the EU "taking over" the Internet is actually a move to have the Internet administered in much the same way as the international telephone service.

      Oh, good. I though there was something to worry abo&*$(3zz.. NO CARRIER

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  15. Let's not be too hasty here. by elgee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thousands and thousands of programmers are employed trying to display the right time and date in internationally used programs. Make it too easy and those programmers will have to get real jobs.

    1. Re:Let's not be too hasty here. by xornor · · Score: 1

      Can someone explain to me why in gods name would you want to use anything other than YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss

  16. Let's all hear it for the C99 standard! by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh wait, no-one actually implements the full standard because it is completely disconnected from reality and outside the scope of the committee that drafted it.

    Let's all hear it for the C89 standard!

    That's better.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Let's all hear it for the C99 standard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gcc provides compound literals, glibc provides snprintf(). Those two alone are enough to make me not care about C89 compatibility. I also like exact-width integer types, VLAs (which gcc supports enough to be useful, at least), named struct member initialization, no implicit int ... and %zu is neato!

      There is still the bug of gets() existing, but oh well.

    2. Re:Let's all hear it for the C99 standard! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well ... they had to do something, after the original C-4 standard blew up in their faces.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  17. Re:How I celebrate! both hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like the sound of that standard. I mean we can all agree to ASCII pr0n, but both hands?

  18. This is all well and good... by John+Nowak · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but when are they going to standardize on a standards organization?

  19. Re:How I celebrate! by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

    You're still using only two?

  20. Important question by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Does the Day start when it's 12:00 AM GMT, or 00:00 Local Standard Time? Or Daylight Time I guess that would be right now? Does everyone celebrate it within the same 24 hour period, or do some countries get to enjoy the day before others?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Important question by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone should be on Zulu time (which is basically just GMT expressed in 24-hour format). When it's 0600 Zulu, we here in the central US should be asleep and should stay that way until about 1200 at the earliest. Personally, I wake at about 1330. When it's 1330 in the central US, it's 1330 in Britain, Russia, and even on islands on both sides of the IDL. No muss, no fuss. It just happens to be location-dependent whether it's dark or light at any given numeric time of day.

      From that point, it's a hop-skip-jump to making everyone have the same date, thus eliminating the 24-hour jump over the IDL, along with stupid fights about which country gets to be the first one to start a new year. (Remember the whiny-bitch islands that wanted to be first ones into the new milennium? Yeah. That. Prevent retards by force if necessary. But usually changing the rules out from under them works fine.) So basically, when the clock rolls around to 0000, the date rolls over to the next day. Again, no muss, no fuss, just a simple numeric counter for easy measurement of events in their proper order.

    2. Re:Important question by saskboy · · Score: 1

      " Everyone should be on Zulu time "

      Yeah, but then those darn Zuluians get to have New Years first, you just can't win.

      I think once we have colonies of people on the Moon and Mars, we'll switch to Zulu time or something derivative of that to avoid confusion when talking with people who aren't on earth.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Important question by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      Everyone should be on Zulu time (which is basically just GMT expressed in 24-hour format). [...] From that point, it's a hop-skip-jump to making everyone have the same date
      Everyone should be using UTC, which automatically puts everyone at the same date in the first place, thus eliminating the necessity of your various ambulatory mechanations.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    4. Re:Important question by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work too well if you use a sun dial. Time is local. It needs to relate to the position of the sun at your location. However, UTC should be located at the International Date Line.

      --
      What?
  21. Ah, those good old ISO standards by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 4, Funny

    True story.

    I had a customer that was very intent on becoming certified to the ISO-14000 standard, the "environmental" standard. Part of this includes writing 3 page procedures on how people should throw their aluminum cans in the recycle bin. Of course, one must track the 7 revisions to the document to comply with the standards.

    Anyway, they had a big push for this. They implemented training for everyone, wrote policies and procedures for just about every action (such as recycling cans), and so on and so forth. To motivate the troops and show off their pride, they had dozens and dozens of signs made up that they placed all around the plant, talking about ISO 140001.

    Yes, you read it correctly.

    A few weeks after they put the signs up, I pointed out the error. I wondered if ISO-140001 was an order of magnitude better than ISO-14001.

    On my next visit, they had painted over one of the zeros so that they were now promoting ISO-1400 1. I guess that's revision one of the 1400 standard.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  22. In my country ... by elronxenu · · Score: 1

    In my country, International Standards Day occurs next week.

  23. Great..... by Burz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now why am I staring at friggin Windows-only cable modems in the retail ads?

    I have friends who heard that Linux might actually be compatible with the Internet!!!

  24. What I'm hoping for... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...is the day when ISO 8879 can be downloaded for free. Granted, OpenSP kicks ass at much of it, but I'd still like to read the standard without paying ~$224, and if Goldfarb is the one in the way of that, he's gonna get smacked soon.

    (Or did I miss a PDF somewhere this side of eMule? I've seen none there of 8879 yet...)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  25. For IEC, ISO, and ITU by AthenianGadfly · · Score: 2, Funny

    While IEC, ISO, and ITU celebrate today, ANSI, IEEE, and ETSI - among others - are ramping up preparations for what they contend to be the correct day for the festivities, a yet-to-be-determined date in December.

  26. The cool thing about standards... by xilix · · Score: 1

    Is that there's so many to choose from.

  27. That was a tad late by teslatug · · Score: 2, Funny

    Posted on Fri Oct 14, '05 11:20 PM, quickly we have 40 minutes to celebrate.

    1. Re:That was a tad late by akeyes · · Score: 1

      ...or, on the east coast, saturday morning at 12:20 am Oct 15...wait, that isn't the same 'today' as listed in the article.

  28. Re: (International) Standards by odibil · · Score: 1

    Let's just use metric (SI) units from today on!

  29. Metric system sucks by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time to include a standard rant about the Metric System. 10 is an ugly base for measurements. 12 or 60 would make a better base because they are nicely divisable by more simple integers. However, we would probably need to use a base 12 or base 60 counting system to take advantage of it. The Intelligent Designer should have given us 6 fingers on each hand.

    1. Re:Metric system sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...to go from metres to millimetres I multply by 1000. To convert grams to kilograms I divide by a 1000. To go from feet to inchs I multiply by, what is it, 12? To from tons to pounds, it is....hang on let me get my conversion sheet.

      If base 10 is too hard, I bet you're still wondering why Santa stopped delivering presents after you moved out of home.

    2. Re:Metric system sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main reason the metric system was not adopted in the US was one word " Convert". We couldn't figure out how many meters in a quart or how far our car would go on a kilo of petrol (what ever that is) :>( yes I do know)

    3. Re:Metric system sucks by a.d.trick · · Score: 2, Funny

      I propose using base 8 from now on. This would have many advatages, particularly with helping people work with hexadecimal and other computer related numbers. To facilitate this move I propose we cut off every person's index finger. That way people will get used to counting to 8.

    4. Re:Metric system sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments /boy_with_12_fingers_and_13_toes/ - heh --Still, think I'd rather stick to my four fingers and one thumbs or five digits per hand.

  30. Invoice by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Please remit CHF 93,00 to ISO for each person that will be celebrating World Standards Day.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Invoice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaargh... this is one of the things that I find most annoying.... most of the official standards documents cost a significant amount of money to purchase. Sure, sometimes you can find draft copies on the net that are just as good, but it really irritates me that something that is supposed to be open and promoted for widespread use costs so much (particularly if you need to purchase many such documents to ensure that your program implements the standards correctly...) ...at least free copies in .pdf format should be made available.

  31. My favorite standard.... by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

    ....is sub-standard.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  32. Common Criteria and DO-178B by jimmydevice · · Score: 0

    If these asshat enterprises would follow a little procedure and not operate like a cowboy coding basement we would have semi-secure systems that don't require a tuesday patch session. It's not just doing the paperwork, It means that the code you write DOES SOMETHING that is in the spec, and you can show that from the design document. Coverage analysis really shows dead code and crap that was added as an afterthought. Testing shows that the thing you wrote does what the spec said it would. Revision control keeps a rope around the whole project. Gebus people, It's 2005 not 1980!

  33. Regional Differences by Alea · · Score: 1

    I understand folks in Redmond celebrate this on the 17th instead...

  34. --Please note-- by mcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oct. 14 is World Standards Day except in the United States, where it is observed on October 17

  35. Woohoo! by Goonie · · Score: 1
    This rates right up there with International Sanitation Day, World Election Monitoring Day, and Legal Precedent Appreciation Week in the excitement stakes.

    Don't get me wrong, I am fully aware of the importance of standards, but by their nature they are extremely boring things.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  36. Electrical standards by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    As at least some people around the world has noted there are a multitude of electrical standards, plugs sockets voltages and so on floating around.

    Now I have actually figured out that in the country where there are a multitude of responsibility write-offs (read USA) the electrical plugs are still "unsafe at any handling" (compare with Unsafe at any speed) I have since figured out that the Underwriters Laboratories isn't doing a good enough job when they are checking the safety of our household utilities. A most notably thing is the electrical plug for 220V 30/50A applinces where you actually can grab around the plug and come in contact with both the live pins at the same time when inserting/removing the plug. This can be prevented by a design that protects the user from coming into contact with the pins while inserting the plug. This picture shows the outlet in a well that actually serves two purposes - protecting the userd during insert/removal and also catching any mechanical sideway stresses that can break the pins inside the connector.

    I have also noted that NEMA is not doing a very good job either since the amount of different electrical plug pinnings that are present is more confusing than helping. Too many pin configurations for the same electrical rating is not very good.

    The issue that I would like to point out is that even if there is an international standard that standard isn't followed and adopted as superseding the national standards.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:Electrical standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A most notably thing is the electrical plug for 220V 30/50A applinces where you actually can grab around the plug and come in contact with both the live pins at the same time when inserting/removing the plug.

      This can be prevented by paying attention to what you are doing.

  37. If they cared standards would be free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they cared standards would be free. Instead you have to pay to get a copy of the standard. It is just another way to make a buck.

  38. This isn't off-topic by Burz · · Score: 1

    Do the mods recognize when someone is complaining about a lack of standards?

  39. From the Plan 9 fortunes file... by CondeZer0 · · Score: 1
    % grep [Ss]tandard /sys/games/lib/fortunes
    Multilevel standards are like onions. They're smelly and make you cry a lot. -Ron Natalie
    That's the nice thing about standards -- there's so many to choose from. -trb
    This is a full standard Kernighan & Ritchie C compiler.
    We don't need a standard; Kernighan & Ritchie completely defines the language.
    Is there no room for competition in the standards industry? -R. Hardin
    X is a temporary standard, like FORTRAN. - Andries van Dam
    Happiness is just gymnastics--and I hate programs that read standard output. -Boyd
    Oh! It's one of those programs that reads standard output. - boyd
    Geez, you'd think standards were a continental disease or something. - Brian Reid
    No UNIX system on the market supports more standards than DEC OSF/1.
    Standards is an area that is constantly changing. -Carl Cargill (ed. ACM StandardView)
    If there was [sic] a single standard for the English language it would not be necessary to support redundant spellings. - OSF1 ls(1) man page
    First off, I'd suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards, and NOT read it. Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture. - Linus Torvalds
    gcc -Isomenonstandardplace -Dverylongoption -Wpleasedontcomplainaboutmyprogramiknowhatimdoing ilikethingstobeclearsoigivemyfileslongnames.c
    /us r/include/c++/3.2/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2 : warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the <X> header for the <X.h> header for C++ includes, or <sstream> instead of the deprecated header <strstream.h>. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated.
    We lead by following standards. - sape
    Standards can be useful, but they can also make your life miserable; Rob Pike wrote a great paper which among other things, explains how standards can make research and innovation difficult: Systems Software Research is Irrelevant
    --
    "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
  40. Defiance by deke_kun · · Score: 1

    In an act of defiance, the US is holding their standards day in 3mths, 8 days, 4 hours and 22 minutes. Also they are referring to it as Standards for Freedom day. There will be no mention of the metric system, and people will come from _miles_ around to visit events that are dozens of feet across in size.

    1. Re:Defiance by Mutatis+Mutandis · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it was not until 1958 that there was an international agreement on how long a feet is. Before that, American, British and Canadian measurements were slightly different, just to make life more difficult for the engineers.

      As for "no mention" being made of the metric system, even in the USA this would be very difficult when talking about standards, because the inch is defined as 24.5 millimeter, and the pound is defined as 0.45359237 kilogram.

    2. Re:Defiance by sxpert · · Score: 1

      the inch is actually defined as 25.4 mm

  41. What's going on??? by anonymous+leprechaun · · Score: 1

    I've only read the word metric four times in this thread! (as of 03:45 EST)

  42. Surprising by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    It's surprising that the US has not chosen to celebrate World Standards Day on the 12th or something instead.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  43. translation error. by quest(answer)ion · · Score: 1

    thwarted by alta vista.

    grabbing "booty," not asses.

    --
    /. is what happens when geeks talk. get used to it.
  44. Standard day for World Standards Day? by smeg · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, Friday, October 14 was World Standards Day. Or, at least, it was World Standards Day in *some* countries. However, in America, the celebrations were held on October 11th. In Finland, World Standards Day was marked on October 13th. Italy planned a separate conference on standards for October 18th.
    - Shakib Otaqui

  45. please use 2005-04-13 by J_Omega · · Score: 1

    use 2005-04-13, and NOT 2005-4-13. That placeholder zero is useful so that files sort chronologically.

    thank you.

  46. Wait. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that 2005-10-14... or 10-14-2005? or 14-10-2005? or 14OCT2005?

  47. Well actually... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    However, we would probably need to use a base 12 or base 60 counting system to take advantage of it. The Intelligent Designer should have given us 6 fingers on each hand

    Well actually, I read about this in the Universal History of Numbers. Counting in 12 and 60 is quite easy for people if you use your thumb to count each of the 3 segments of the other 4 fingers. If you use the 5 fingers of your other hand to keep track of each group of 12 - tada, you have 60. They theorize this is why the Babylonians used base 60, and we have 360 degrees in a circle, etc.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  48. Will the event be sponsored by... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    Microsoft?

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  49. What !!!??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today is not 2005-10-14!
    At least not in the arabic calendar!

  50. Definition by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 0

    Masterbaiting
    v.
    1. To perform an act of luring ones superior or owner into an unforeseen situation.
    2. Angling at a professional level.

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  51. I would propose an even more weird system .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Well, in one system for coordinating traffic I made up, the slow lanes would be in the middle to reduce the speed between cars in opposing lanes. I guess that system would only work in highways through the desert.

    Now back to the question on which side of the car to sit, for the British custom of steering on the right side, it is often said this is so that drivers of carriages could attack each other better with the sword.

    I suppose steering on the left then must be better for knightly jousting with the lance

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  52. The Best Thing About Standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that there are so many to choose from!

  53. It's amazing, isn't it? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Isn't it amazing that these three organizations were able to agree on today as the day to celebrate International Standards Day?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  54. For the sake of irony... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    ...I'm going to celebrate World Standards Day today (15 October) instead.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:For the sake of irony... by rathehun · · Score: 1

      ...I'm going to celebrate World Standards Day today (15 October) instead.

      --

      http://microsoft.toddverbeek.com

      I'm not surprised.

  55. No respect for standard HTML ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The W3C Validator Finds seventeen errors in the press release page, including a missing Document Type Declaration.

  56. decimal time, anyone? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    While we're on the subject of time, how about this 60 minutes per hour, 24 hours per day garbage? Lot of people love to bash the US for not switching to metric, especially after some, such as Britain, went thru the pain of switching from shillings and farthings and such to a decimal coinage system, but everyone is still using this obsolete Babylonian time system. What's with that? 100 seconds per minute, 100 minutes per hour, 10 hours per day!

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:decimal time, anyone? by SD_92104 · · Score: 1
      [...] 10 hours per day!
      Well, working 8 hours a day would really suck then!
  57. iso.org - page is not Valid (no Doctype found)! by nsasch · · Score: 1

    Failed validation, 40 errors So here's a standards site, that doesn't follow standards. If I were blind, I'm sure I would be unable to read the page, or color-blind, or any other disability would make it difficult to read.

    --
    Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
  58. World Standards Day by springbox · · Score: 1

    Ha. I guess Microsoft wasn't invited. ;)

  59. Which timezone was that in? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Was it my standard or theirs?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  60. ISO date by Zouden · · Score: 1

    It's ISO 8601:
    ISO 8601 specifies calendar dates like this: YYYY-MM-DD.
    The great thing about ISO date is that folders with names like this get correctly sorted alphabetically. Useful for archiving digital camera photos, etc.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:ISO date by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It's the only reason I use it.

  61. Re: (International) Standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always think the same. The United States, being a large consumer market, keep dragging their feet regarding standards (I know, I know, the metric system was made official in 19.., blah, blah...). But it is not enforced! What good is a law when everybody choose to disrespect it?

    And products are sold in ounces... and height measured in feet... paper size in inches... and miles per gallon... WTF?

    Also, there's always that stupid argument that base 12, or 60 is better, because you can easily divide by 2 and 3. But money follows base 10.

    Of course money is of secondary importance, huh? Who would argue about money division? (these are ironies).

  62. Why the emphasis on safety? Why not simplicity? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

    Standards for a safer world? I like standards for making life easier. Good standards promote understanding, communication, and efficiency through simplicity. Safety is merely a secondary benefit, though danger seems to be the driving force behind the creation of many standards. Can't people see the world any other way except through the prism of what is safe and what isn't? What is it, 9/11? Is it that the people promoting this standards day think that stressing safety is the best way to get attention and govt funding? When it's not a joke, it's distortion to refer to any old problem as a "danger". I'm glad that, for instance, milk bottles and cartons are a few standard sizes so that they're easier to store, but if they weren't, it'd hardly be dangerous. Could do with even fewer sizes, as in (in the US) change quarts to liters and perhaps make them the same shapes as soda bottles, but the present situation isn't too bad.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  63. You don't convert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is hard thing to do, a mind mapping.

    Instead you learn how much a liter (or litre) is and forget about gallons, quarts, pints and other bs.

    1. Re:You don't convert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      | begin sarcasm | Yes I Know | end sarcasm |

  64. Barriers to Market Entry by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, "standards" can be as much of a problem as a benefit. Many companies will view an industry standard as a method to obstruct competitors. If Company A can get their document format adopted as the "standard," they've got a built-in head start on everyone else who has to rework any existing products they have in the pipe to be "standards compliant."

    My former employer designated me a their rep to the ANSI T1 standards body back in the mid-90's when SONET was the hot thing. I entered with youthful ignorance and enthusiasm, but exited as a complete cynic. I've never seen so much posturing and pandering with respect to corporate positions. Some folks had strong corporate agendas (i.e. MCI,) while others (HP) tended to have a more open viewpoint.

    Regardless of the politics involved, there always seem to be corporate positions that hide just beneath the surface of industry standards. Instead of being the wild west frontier, introducing a standard says you must "be at least this tall to play in this market." Oh, and you have to pay the extortion fee to the standards body in order to get the specs. The PICMG is a good example. A so-called "open" body, you're welcome to participate. Oh, but you need to pay the annual fee to join the group first. Oh, and expect to shell out a couple hundred bucks for copies of the documents.

    The PICMG is only one example. They're open enough to let non-members purchase the standards. The ITU has similar non-member document purchase options, but participation in the committees is substantially more restricted. The SD-Card cartel is much more closed. So don't think that standards creation benefits you first. That's just a convenient symptom. Companies establish standards as defensive barriers. If Company X thinks it's too expensive to enter Market A because the standards compliance is so draconian, then the standards have done their job for the membership. The fact that consumers get $10 ethernet cards out of the deal is completely coincidental.

  65. Berkeley: home of the 3/4-way stop by LeDopore · · Score: 0

    Speaking of non-standard signage, my home town of Berkeley, CA takes the cake. Here we have 3 out of 4 way stops, indicated by two lines of 1.5" text under the stop sign saying, for example, "Traffic on your right does not stop." God help you if you don't speak English!

    --
    Expected time to finish is 1 hour and 60 minutes.
  66. and world standards day on the 16th for china, by swschrad · · Score: 1

    the 19th for ms windows, world standards hour 3:27 in cleveland, etc.

    it's 5-o'clock somewhere, and they have a different standard there for happy hour than we do.

    this message is patented in the US and the Azores, copyrighted in Italy, open-source in Belgium and Norway, and pirated everywhere else.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  67. Metric by '75! by jhhl · · Score: 1

    The united states should be on the metric system by 1985 a the latest!
    http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/misc/usmetric/m etric.htm

    --
    -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  68. obrigatory quote by nazsco · · Score: 1

    > "Today, 2005-10-14, is World Standards Day as celebrated by the IEC, ISO, and ITU."

    That's what I like about standards ...There are some many to choose from!

  69. yay for standards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The great thing about standards is that there's so many versions of them. 8^)

  70. Gis' a job by blippy · · Score: 1
    'Standards for a safer world' is the theme of the message signed by the leaders of the three principal international standardization organizations to mark World Standards Day 2005.

    Could anyone imagine a more boring and tedious event such as this?

    They see standards as vital in disseminating [...] new technologies"

    You've lost me. How does having standards improve the dissemination of new technology? Can't we just look at the internet, or look at the world around us with our eyes open.

    I get the impression that these guys seem to think that the world would run more efficiently if only we had a lot more paperwork.

  71. ISO/IEC made irrelevant by gouging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is intended to be an open standard, why keep on charging outrageous prices just for looking at them, even for obsolete standards? Last time I checked, I don't need to pay to watch ANY of the W3C standards! Besides, how much does it cost to host these technical paper anyway, when everyone offering free web access? If ISO want people to take its standards seriously, it should stop ripping people off with these outrageous fees.