Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Mechanical Turk

rscoggin writes "Amazon.com has a new program that wants you to 'Complete simple tasks that people do better than computers. And, get paid for it.' (example: 'Is there a pizza parlour in this photograph?'). For each task you complete you get a small payment, usually ranging from a few cents to a little under a dollar. It's named the Amazon Mechanical Turk after a famous hoax from the 19th century. Kill time and get paid in tiny increments to boot!" Similar to Google Answers, there seems to be a reliability ratings system and some incentives.

82 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Great... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great... Another way for /.'ers to waste time at work.
    GOOD JOB AMAZON

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Great... by phase_9 · · Score: 5, Funny

      News just in, people getting paid to look at webpages they're not meant to at work! In unrelated news, slashdot hits drop off...

  2. Micropayment mercenary by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Funny

    This could get addictive.

    1. Re:Micropayment mercenary by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, you gave me an interesting idea.

      "Micropayments" are used a lot of send small payments to 'charitable' organizations--not just bona fide charities, but things like Open Source projects.

      Suppose you could sign up and do this, but have the proceeds sent to charity? Getting 3 cents isn't at all useful for me. If many people sent their 3 cents to a developing country, it would matter.

      I can't navigate the site that well right now (everything's returning errors), so I'm not sure if this is in the works or not. But it'd be a nifty idea.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  3. CAPTCHAs by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean I can get paid for breaking CAPTCHAs?

    --
    Why not fork?
    1. Re:CAPTCHAs by Agelmar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, yes. The whole motivation from this came from the same person who invented the CAPTCHA, and was explained in his thesis defense on Wednesday. Abstract for those who care:

      Subject: Thesis Oral - Luis von Ahn

      November 2, 2005
      Luis von Ahn
      12:00 PM, 3305 Newell-Simon Hall
      Thesis Oral
      Title: Human Computation

      Abstract:

      Tasks like image recognition are trivial for humans, but continue to
      challenge even the most sophisticated computer programs. This thesis
      introduces a paradigm for utilizing human processing power to solve
      problems that computers cannot yet solve. Traditional approaches to
      solving such problems focus on improving software. I advocate a novel
      approach: constructively channel human brainpower using computer games.
      For example, the ESP Game, introduced in this thesis, is an enjoyable
      online game -- many people play over 40 hours a week -- and when people
      play, they help label images on the Web with descriptive keywords. These
      keywords can be used to significantly improve the accuracy of image
      search. People play the game not because they want to help, but because
      they enjoy it.

      I introduce three other examples of games with a purpose: Peekaboom,
      which helps determine the location of objects in images, Phetch, which
      collects paragraph descriptions of arbitrary images to help
      accessibility of the Web, and Verbosity, which collects common-sense
      knowledge. I also show that, in principle, every problem that could be
      solved by a computer, today or in the future, could be solved using
      enjoyable computer games.

      In addition, I introduce CAPTCHAs, automated tests that humans can pass
      but computer programs cannot. CAPTCHAs take advantage of human
      processing power in order to differentiate humans from computers, an
      ability that has important applications in practice.

      The results of this thesis are currently in use by hundreds of Web sites
      and companies around the world, and some of the games presented here
      have been played by over 100,000 people. Practical applications of this
      work include improvements in problems such as: image search,
      adult-content filtering, spam, common-sense reasoning, computer vision,
      accessibility, and security in general.

      Thesis Committee:
      Manuel Blum, Chair
      Takeo Kanade
      Michael Reiter
      Josh Benaloh, Microsoft Research
      Jitendra Malik, University of California, Berkeley

    2. Re:CAPTCHAs by glinden · · Score: 2, Funny
      The whole motivation from this came from the same person who invented the CAPTCHA, and was explained in his thesis defense on Wednesday.
      When you say this thesis was the motivation for Amazon Mechanical Turk, what exactly do you mean? Luis von Ahn isn't at Amazon, is he?
  4. i can see it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    - can you see boobs in the picture ?
    - Is there a donkey in the picture ?
    - Can you see the can of whipped cream ?
    - is there chocolate paint involved..

    Advanced indexing of Pr0n, humanity is moving forward, no doubt.

  5. This could be brilliant. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pepsi pays Amazon 3 cents for product placement. You are shown an image of a Pepsi can. "What kind of soda is this?" "pepsi", you answer. You get paid 2 cents.

    1. Re:This could be brilliant. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that qualifies as a business method. start filing those patent papers quick

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:This could be brilliant. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better would be if there were pictures of people enjoying pepsi with the same question and answer as you gave and then they also had ugly people drinking coke and cringing, etc. with the same question, but new answer, "coke."

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:This could be brilliant. by stienman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even better:

      Question: What kind of pop/soda do you see in this picture:
      First picture shows a party with several attractive men and women and [good soda].

      Second picture shows a senior care hospice and one can of [bad soda] being shared between 5-6 individuals.

      Third picture shows a couple in a fast car along a mountian pass, each holding [good soda].

      Fourth picture shows a prison cafeteria with a badly maintained [bad soda] machine.

      I can't wait for the next election. This kind of "advertising" could be much worse than the kind of adverts we see on TV and in newspapers.

      -Adam

    4. Re:This could be brilliant. by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about this one?

  6. So this is going mainstream now... by Dekortage · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to this earlier Slashdot report, the spam industry has been doing this for awhile with free porn.

    I'm curious to know if Amazon is going to use the cumulative results to try to "train" computers, or if it really is just for the money. The requirements include being over 18, so you can't pimp your kids to click through this stuff for cash (though I'm sure it will happen).

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    1. Re:So this is going mainstream now... by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've revised your business model:

      1. Volunteer at an orphanage in China.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  7. Doesn't pay enough by slavemowgli · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, but it seems that it's not really worth it. Consider the following task, for example:

    Your task is to create a new product description for a product in the Amazon.com Automotive catalogue. The Product Description provides an additional opportunity to tell the customer about the product. This HIT will require some product research to complete. Approval depends on following the instructions and the quality of your submission, determined by a manual review.

    Guess how much you get paid for that. 2 dollars? 3? That wouldn't be unreasonable, I think, considering that you're supposed to write an entire product description from scratch for which additional "research" is required. The actual amount paid is only 65 cents, though.

    Maybe it's just me, but if I check to see how much I need to work in my regular job to make 65 cents, then it does not make any sense to invest more than a few minutes into a task like this, and it seems that it would take more than that to actually complete it. The fact that there's a review required afterwards doesn't exactly make things better, either - if what you did gets rejected, then you've essentially worked for nothing (I wonder if there's anything that keeps amazon from still using your description in this case, too...).

    In other words, the whole thing seems like a good idea in theory, but it won't really take off until they're willing to actually pay you a reasonable amount.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Doesn't pay enough by RandoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just do it AT work. Get paid twice.

    2. Re:Doesn't pay enough by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that this is the type of thing a copywriter at a marketing firm gets big bucks to do, so essentially you are doing their job for free for Amazon.

    3. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not about the money; it's about fucking with Amazon, by giving hilariously incorrect answers.

    4. Re:Doesn't pay enough by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you notice most are "find the best picture" for $0.03. Of course the site rules really slow right now so its not worth your time, but if it ran faster it would be something to do if you could crank through a hundred an hour.

      100 images / hour * $0.03 / image == $3.00 / hour.

      So, you've just busted your ass to crank through one image every 36 seconds for a solid hour, and you have three dollars to show for it. There are definitely parts of the world where that would be a fantastic income, but my home country isn't one of them.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    5. Re:Doesn't pay enough by skiflyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That job would never be worth 65 cents to me, but if I were a mechanic and the additional research could be labelled as my common knowledge, and I was IM'ing with my girlfriend at midnight and she was a slow typer...

      Let me translate... If it were write a product description for the pictured computer parts and you were waiting for your kernel to compile while twiddling your thumbs, why not make 65 cents?

    6. Re:Doesn't pay enough by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      So basically, if it takes you 5 minutes to write a brief product description, and you churn through them all day, you're making $7.80, which is better than minimum wage. Not a good proprosition if you're clueless about auto parts and have to research everything as described, but I don't think that's the intended optimal target for completing the task (although it someone's dumb enough to spend half an hour or more per description for a crappy hourly wage, they're more than welcome). The optimal target to take up that task is someone who already knows a lot about car parts. Chances are if you're an Autozone (auto parts store chain) employee, you could get most of the descriptions done in under 5 minutes with little to no side research, because you already have the domain-specific knowledge. That's the guy who will be drawn to answer that question.

      So the key to making effective money at this scheme is to skip tasks that you don't think you're "better than average" at - kinda like the job marketplace in real life.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    7. Re:Doesn't pay enough by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bad accounts are easy to detect. This system could easily be made quite fraud-proof.

      1. Tie accounts to something valuable, like Amazon accounts with a verified purchase history, to prevent mass signps. Easy.
      2. Randomly check answers by randomly posing the same question to two different accounts. This step is infinitely tuneable; more checks means more fraud resistance at a higher overhead cost. New accounts and accounts with suspicious activity could be checked much more often. Reliable accounts could be checked less and used more for checking others.
      3. The system is self-correcting and self-sustaining; money goes in and quality results come out.
      This is really a brilliant idea; I predict that the first company to use this technology to weed out search result spam and tune their algorithms is the first company to finally provide better search results than Google. The first company to use this technology to improve targeted ad relevance is the first company to provide more relevant ads than AdSense. I believe Google has too much pride in their algorithms to use this "Mechanical Turk" method unless forced to, so it's wide open for Yahoo or MSN or some upstart to come in and take their crown. If so it would be Google's first big misstep.
      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    8. Re:Doesn't pay enough by TheSync · · Score: 3, Informative

      One billion people on planet earth make less than $1 per day. Perhaps you are not the target audience...

    9. Re:Doesn't pay enough by webview · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are definitely parts of the world where that would be a fantastic income, but my home country isn't one of them.

      Yes, and I am sure they all have Amazon.com accounts with credit-cards hooked up to them.

  8. $/hr by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone want to make an estimation of $/hr earned doing this? I'm at work, and don't have the balls to spend 20 minutes earning cash online ;)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:$/hr by yellowbkpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did nine 3-cent HITs in about 5 or 6 minutes, so that's about 3.25/hour. The lag for me was in waiting for the images to download and clicking on the "Accept HIT" button repeatedly.

      There is an API, maybe if someone made a page that just displays the images and sends in the result when you click on the image instead of having to click twice for each HIT, you could go faster and make much more money.

  9. 3 cents for 1 hours work? by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I can give up my day job!

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  10. Sounds interesting but.... by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a bit too paranoid to type my Amazon user name and password into a site that isn't on the main amazon.com domain....I can't find it mentioned anywhere on amazon's main site. Can somebody a little bit less of a wuss tell me if it is legit?

    1. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Dekortage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, mturk.amazon.com redirects you to www.mturk.com... seems to imply something.

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    2. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by stefanb · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm a bit too paranoid to type my Amazon user name and password into a site that isn't on the main amazon.com domain

      The whois info looks a bit dodgy. I would have expected Amazon knew how to properly register domains...

      Registrant:
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States

      Registered through: GoDaddy.com
      Domain Name: MTURK.COM
      Created on: 22-Oct-01
      Expires on: 22-Oct-06
      Last Updated on: 11-Oct-05

      Administrative Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562 Fax --
      Technical Contact:
      Hostmaster, MTAI mechturk1@hotmail.com
      MTAI, Inc.
      P.O. Box 80626
      Seattle, Washington 98108
      United States
      2065794562 Fax --

    3. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by droptone · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amazon has a page on their site about MTurk

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    4. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by bibi-pov · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you try to login, the login page is amazon's genuine page sitting on https://www.amazon.com./ You can verify for yourself but there's nothing phishy here (pun intended). I have to admit the whois record is not very enticing though.

    5. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by Hedgethorn · · Score: 3, Informative
    6. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by renelicious · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you click login it redirects you to the actual amazon.com domain to sign in. So when you type in your username and password you actually send that to amazon.com (of course I am assuming that there is no spoofing and other crazy things going on since the whole things seems fairly legitiamte).

      --
      "Luke, I am your node.parent();"
    7. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by trib3003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Agreed: whois looks pretty odd. Amazon slashdotted ? Jep, another odd point.

      But in case this is some kind of phishing, they at least manipulated some reverse
      records too :)

      traceroute to www.mturk.com (207.171.166.182), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
      [...]
      11 amazon-above.mpr1.iad5.us.mfnx.net.175.185.208.in- addr.arpa (208.185.175.66) 96.801 ms 97.656 ms 97.633 ms
      12 72.21.201.27 97.109 ms 97.347 ms 98.164 ms
      13 166-182.amazon.com (207.171.166.182) 98.107 ms 97.069 ms 97.510 ms

    8. Re:Sounds interesting but.... by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last hop is Amazon owned IP space they might have been looking to hide the whois on the domain.

      whois 207.171.166.182
      [Querying whois.arin.net]
      [whois.arin.net]

      OrgName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      OrgID: AMAZON-4
      Address: 605 5th Ave S
      City: SEATTLE
      StateProv: WA
      PostalCode: 98104
      Country: US

      NetRange: 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255
      CIDR: 207.171.160.0/19
      NetName: AMAZON-01
      NetHandle: NET-207-171-160-0-1
      Parent: NET-207-0-0-0-0
      NetType: Direct Assignment
      NameServer: NS-1.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-2.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: NS-3.AMAZON.COM
      NameServer: AUTH00.NS.UU.NET
      Comment:
      RegDate: 1999-09-23
      Updated: 2002-03-19

      RTechHandle: AC6-ORG-ARIN
      RTechName: Amazon.com, Inc.
      RTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      RTechEmail: NOC@amazon.com

      OrgTechHandle: ROLEA19-ARIN
      OrgTechName: Role Account
      OrgTechPhone: +1-206-266-2187
      OrgTechEmail: noc@amazon.com

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  11. How long until some sick slashdotter posts the ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    following HIT: "Is there a goat in that picture?"

  12. The Future of Surveillance by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Crime in your neighborhood?

    Get a webcam...

    1. Re:The Future of Surveillance by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a good idea. I would actually pay for that.

      Lets say I've got a herd of cows in a remote location. I setup a few webcams. I put tracking anklets on the cows. If a tracker shows a cow leaving the fenceline, or malfunctions, or is tampered with, the webcams come on. Some random person on the internet gets the task of "count the cows, identify any people". In fact, two people get that task, for redundancy. They can pan and zoom and get a bonus for finding trouble. The whole thing could be run by a security company. If there's somebody stealing my cows, the security company can call the cops.

      That would be worth a reasonable monthly fee.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  13. Contracting work worth big bucks by Silverhammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After a quick review of the available tasks, I must say this looks like a huge scam. Most of the tasks are marketing oriented (e.g. copywriting, photo manipulation), for which experienced contractors get paid $30 to $50 per hour.

    Only 75 cents to research and write a complete automotive product description? Are they kidding? Sure, they say I can copy the description from the manufacturer's Web site, but my time is still worth more than that. Besides, I think it's the responsibility of the manufacturer to make sure their Amazon listing is correct. That's how they do it on IMDB.

    I can only hope the program will make more sense as they add more requesters and more tasks.

    1. Re:Contracting work worth big bucks by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, don't do it.

      Most of the ones I saw were trivial tasks. Even the auto description was edit the auto description until it was human readable. Since they are trivial, people get bored doing them. The common solution has been to over-pay someone to do them, and have the pay offset their boredom. This interface provides a new idea: let people do them until they get bored, and pay them by the piece.

      If your time is truly worth more, don't do them. But there are people who will find it an interesting diversion for a few minutes, and they get paid a bit for it. All in all, not a bad extension of the free market.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
  14. Good idea but for work required it should pay more by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are asking you to rewrite product descriptions and will pay you 60 cents?
    Not only will the work most likely be shoddy, but it seems like they are trying to replace someone else's job by using this cheap online service.
    Yes, for some it may provide rewards but if you calculate the amount of time spent on each item VS. the payment reward (usually a few pennies) it is just not worth someone's free time.
    Why don't they just hire a staff of people to work on these 'HITS'?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  15. Willing to compete with the Indians? by nysus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm interested to know if those living overseas can participate. If so, they would drive down the labor costs so much that only truly desperate Americans would participate in this piecework scheme.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  16. Profit? by DevolvingSpud · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since this is all web-services driven, it seems to me you could create an interesting cycle with a simple program:

    1) Use the API to find a HIT, and sign up to complete it.
    2) Create a new HIT that basically asks someone to complete the first HIT,
          only for $0.01 less than the original HIT was offering.
    3) Do this for every existing HIT.
    4) Profit?

    --
    Keep your friends close.
    Keep your enemies in a little jar on your desk.
  17. What is your time worth? by shoolz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rather than think about how much you could make per hour on this, think about how much your time is worth. Are you worth $65,000 per year? Maybe you're worth more or you value your time more? In any case, at $65,000 per year, you make about $0.52 per minute.

    So to accomplish the 3 cent task and make your time worth it, you should spend no more than about 2 and a half seconds from the second you begin to the second you finish and get approval.

    On some of the higher paying ones, oh, say $0.40 for writing a full product review, you could devote almost a full minute!

    1. Re:What is your time worth? by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Are you worth $65,000 per year? Maybe you're worth more or you value your time more? In any case, at $65,000 per year, you make about $0.52 per minute.

      Well, Google says $65000 per year = $0.123586182 per minute.

      For people "worth" $65,000/year there are three cases:
      1. You are on salary at a day-job ($65,000 / year, irrespective of what you're doing as long as you don't get fired - commute, come in one saturday to meet a deadline, read slashdot instead of working, slip out early, come in late, or come in early, work a little late, etc.) In this case when you're off work you're still making the $0.12 per minute, assuming you're not currently doing something that makes you lose your job or that must be considered part of your next job (to pay off later when you get a higher salary doing something different). When you decide (off work) at seven PM to close your other windows and do this shit for an hour, it's like trading an hour of your time for the appropriate-sized bill appearing on your floor. There's no loss, you're already "being paid" your annual salary. Plus maybe it's fun.
      2. You are employed by the hour (the number of hours you actually put in is what comes to $65,000 / year, with the assumption you could take more hours if you wanted 'em. If you couldn't take more hours it's the same as case 1.). In this case we shouldn't just divide your minutely earning for the whole year, we should say that you make money when you're on the clock, and no money when you're off the clock. The question is, if your on-the-clock job is worth more than this shit, then why would you take an hour of this shit instead of just clocking one more hour? If you consider this shit work and not just relaxation or something, you probably wouldn't. You'd just put in one more hour at work.
      3. You are unemployed. In this case your profession could very well be worth $65,000 / year, but you might not be seeing any of this because you are currently unemployed. Maybe you spend 8 hrs a day interviewing or job-searching (sometimes to include learning something, getting a certificate, etc). In this scenario I think someone is in the same case as 1 (salaried) if they have enough savings (or can take on enough debt) to reach their next job [let's say the signing bonus pays you back these invested days/weeks -- no matter how many hours you actually spent doing them] , and case 2 (hourly) if they don't have enough savings to reach their next job -- except that the hourly wage should be considered slightly negative (you spend something during your job hunt, but don't actually make anything).

        Why would someone invest work in a negative hourly wage? Because they don't know that they don't have enough savings / can't take on enough debt to reach their next job on that investment!


      I think this is a nice way of showing the different cases someone could be in who is "worth $65,000/yr" (interestingly I think the first case works for a completely passive income too, like if you live off of interest. You're still salaried, you just never have to come in to work "in order not to get fired". If you invest time, however, in making sure you get that interest, then that's what coming into work consists of. (Or think of absentee landlords, who must "come into work" for their salary only very rarely if at all.)

      I can very well imagine someone is "worth 65,000/yr" whose "job" consists of reading the Wall Street Journal in the morning and making sure they don't have to head for the hills (the $65,000 is from the interest on "very safe" bonds). The rest of their day is as in case 1.

      Also, please think about case 3, because I could be wrong and maybe there is a better way to analyze this one.
  18. Do A9's Dirty Work For Them by MaceyHW · · Score: 2, Informative

    Acutally, all the tasks that I saw involved processing data for A9's block-level search and "tour". Seems like a clever, cheap way to organize the insane amount of data they have mapped for this project.

  19. Philip K. Dick by baxissimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reminds me of the Philip K. Dick novel in which the main character thinks he lives an ordinary life, and who solves the daily puzzle in the newspaper every day for cheap entertainment. In reality, though, the whole town he lives in is a front, and the fun puzzles he's solving in the newspaper are actually cleverly disguised military strategy problems of some sort.

    Quick -- someone patent that storyline and sue Amazon for infringement!

    1. Re:Philip K. Dick by layzee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Time out of Joint

    2. Re:Philip K. Dick by drudd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you should have charged $0.03 for that information.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
  20. Japanese manuals? by Crouty · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow, I can't wait to unleash my grammar nazi skills on the automated translations of japanese manuals of electronic devices!

    Keep them coming, Amazon!

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  21. Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Guys, let me tell.

    It's registered through Godaddy.com, one of the companies spammers/phishers love to use.

    It has hotmail contact addresses in whois. Impossible for a company like Amazon

    No clue of such thing on official Amazon press room
    http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060 &p=irol-news

    So if it looks like,acts like,runs like (amazon gigantic server farm slashdotted?) a regular phishing site, it is. Even if it made to Slashdot. I'd say pull the story until Amazon comes up with an explanation. Before any harm done.

    It could be even a more "elite" hack including subdomain/DNS hacking. I am a spamcop mail customer and I see amazing things everyday.

    In risk of looking very funny if it is not anything above, happily posting it.

    1. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Number13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Either the phishers already have access to my account information under Amazon (including mailing address and the unique fake name I gave Amazon), or it's actually connected to Amazon's database.

    2. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Dynamoo · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's hosted on 207.171.166.182 which is part of Amazon's netblock of 207.171.160.0 - 207.171.191.255.

      Anyhow, I tried it. It recognised me and new my address. It's Amazon alright.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    3. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Doppleganger · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you are a software developer and would like to learn more about using Amazon Mechanical Turk APIs, click here."

      The link ultimately goes to:
      http://www.amazon.com/gp/browse.html/104-7108086-1 879910?node=15879911

      Which has links back to www.mturk.com

      Looks legitimate, unless someone has really managed to pull one over on Amazon (and if so, why put it on its own domain?)

    4. Re:Highly suspectful site. Do NOT give any detail by Vallimar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems to be listed quite prominently and thoroughly at aws.amazon.com.
      I don't know what the deal is with the dodgy looking registration but
      that doesn't all look like part of a phishing site to me.

  22. As McEnroe said, "You can not be serious"... by DataCannibal · · Score: 2, Funny

    or as we used to say in the UK, "Pull the other one, it's get bells on"

    Or as I say today, "40 cents for a product description!?!?! Fuck off!"

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  23. Agent Smith, is that you? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny
    I hope you all can see where this is going:

    • 2005: Amazon introduces Mechanical Turk program. Thousands of underpaid geeks sign up and start clicking mindlessly.
    • 2010: Home catheterization and feeding tube kit eliminates need to leave workstation. Productivity skyrockets.
    • 2015: Direct neural interface improves response times one million-fold.
    • 2020: The Matrix

    Don't say I didn't warn you.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  24. Sweatshop of the future? by YoFadosa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are the 3rd world drones that will do this pulling themselves up by their bootstraps into the information age or is this some kind of futuristic Dickensian sweatshop where piecemeal work is paid at three cents a click?

  25. automating this by mboedick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For the image ones, couldn't you create 5 bots each with a different account and each one picks a different image and one picks None of these? One of them would be approved and you'd get paid, right?

    Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?

    1. Re:automating this by Wonda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Also if they are having humans approve your image selection before you get paid, isn't that as much effort as you making your original choice?"

      Not if they just send the same to 5 people, and pick the most popular result as correct, massive use of bots could give them some nasty surprises if they do that though!

  26. Elbonia by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, that is probably a whole month's average income for someone in Elbonia...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  27. Netcraft confirms it, am I stupid or amazon.com? by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I hurried a bit but I felt as I had to.

    http://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=http:/ /mturk.com

    It is indeed in Amazon netblock but registering it through godaddy.com with a hotmail address... Gee, I wish I could show like 40 phishing mails I received with the same pattern.

    Sadly there are many victims of phishing sites, and they get slashdotted because the database software can't handle that many requests.

    I have never seen such a unserious whois from a big company like amazon. There are many registrars REJECTING hotmail.com contact addresses even!

  28. I think I get it... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... basically it's just like a sneaker factory in Vietnam, but with a cool-sounding name.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  29. How to avoid paying out: by wampus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make the site dog ass slow so you can ID 3 photos in 10 minutes. I'm up to 9 cents! I guess I should get back to coding, since thats what the OTHER people are paying me to do right now...

  30. Re:Lousy payscale. by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Internet Cafe's are popular in many countries, although if you're paying by the hour to use a PC, that would really eat into your proffit margin.

  31. Spammers and pornographers are always first by ttul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Always look to spammers and pornographers to solve the world's most challenging computational puzzles before anyone else.

  32. Re:What about federal labor laws? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contract work is not subject to minimum wage laws because it is not paid on an hourly basis. If you as a contractor feel that the pay is not substantial, you have the right not to sign.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  33. We slashdotted Amazon? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Complete simple tasks that people do better than computers.

    I wonder if serving web pages counts as such a task. Because their computers sure are doing a crappy job of it at the moment.

  34. Slahdot should use this.. by objekt · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..they could ask us questions like "Is this a dupe?"

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  35. Employee or Lab Rat. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While this Amazon thing might be a genuine attempt to farm out real work to people for chump-change, with the site Slashdotted, I can only sit here and wonder. . .

    It reminds me of a little semi-scam some company had going in my town a few years back. . .

    "You are invited to participate in a screen test of a new television series!"

    People would go down and be a test-audience for a television pilot, and then fill out a questionnaire at the end. People, loving their TV culture, were tickled pink to be asked to do this. --Heck, they were even paid something like $15 for their participation!

    So, a buddy of mine went to see what it was all about. . .

    Basically, some marketing research firm had acquired the rights to an old pilot which never made it to air. They played this for people, and also played a bunch of adverts during the commercial breaks. The questionnaire asked a few boring questions about the pilot, but it also asked a curiously high number of questions about the ad spots. Stuff like, "Which of the two detergent packages in the ad did you find more appealing? The Blue or the Red?"

    --Obviously the whole contrivance was designed to test market, uh, marketing.

    Either way, by friend was amazed that nobody else seemed to catch on, took his fifteen bucks, and left shaking his head.


    -FL

  36. Legit site. Ignore idiots. by ubernostrum · · Score: 2, Informative

    To verify the legitimacy of the site, manually type "amazon.com" into your browser's location bar, and hover over the "See all 32 Product Categories" tab. When it pops up the list, click "Web Services" and read the first item listed on that page, which is a press release announcing Amazon Mechanical Turk.

    For extra points, do this only a machine which has been booted from a liveCD with DNS utilities and hosts file that you have personally audited.

    Or just, you know, look at the fact that the Turk will, by default, display the name and address you've given to Amazon as your contact info, and conclude that yeah, it's an Amazon property.

    1. Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots. by uofitorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re:Legit site. Ignore idiots.

      Since when does a little bit of healthy skepticism make one an idiot?

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
  37. A new kid-powered architecture! by Resseguie · · Score: 3, Funny
    Would that qualify as a beowolf cluster of children?

    Or maybe this would require a new "Grid Kid" architecture with an advanced resource broker to farm out the questions based on difficulty and school grade level.

  38. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is good to know that we humans are still not obsolete, even though we have been relegated to the menial jobs...

    It looks like you're trying to post to Slashdot!

    Do you want to:

    a) make the grammatical correction above;
    b) go back to flipping hamburgers; or
    c) commence robot-smashing?

    -Clippy

  39. It depends by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're scoffing because you're already employed at a job that pays better, then you're doing what you should. Somebody already values your labor more presumably because you are more productive doing that job rather than identifying items in pictures. I work plenty of hours and am well compensated for it. My remaining time is very valuable to me. Perhaps one should not scoff, but politely say "No, thanks." The job one might scoff at today might be the job that saves your ass tomorrow.

    On the other hand, if you're not working, underemployed, or paid really low, scoffing is probably not the right thing to do, and instead of moping about having no job, you should get busy and start looking for pizza places in pictures, and if they're close, maybe see if they have a job. When I'm not employed and work is hard to come by, I'll pump gas, work a car wash, flip burgers, sweep floors, empty trash, deliver pizza, whatever it takes. It might not be enough to live on, but it's closer to livable than making nothing.

  40. Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Amazon+Mturk+Team · · Score: 5, Informative

    We're grateful to have been Slashdotted! Our beta site, mturk.amazon.com, is experiencing the Slashdot effect. You can still read about Amazon Mechanical Turk and its web services APIs at www.amazon.com/webservices. Also, send a blank email to aws@amazon.com if you want us to email you when page load times recover. The Amazon Mechanical Turk Team

    1. Re:Message from Amazon Mechanical Turk Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work at Amazon.com too.

      Put it this way, we didn't expect for it to become so popular so quickly. I'm sure enough boxes were allocated for the expected initial load, but then someone submitted it to Slashdot.org.

      It's hard for anyone to take the load... :)

      The Amazon.com mainsite could probably handle it, but Turk just rolled out, and we didn't expect the sudden hammering it recieved.

  41. Collaborative Human Interpreter (CHI) by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was an interesting article a while back about a Collaborative Human Interpreter (CHI).

    The idea is to harness this kind of thing to develop software for the global brain.

  42. CHI, a Collaborative Human Interpreter by j_philipp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the Mechanical Turk service. It's just like my CHI proposal from half a year ago made real.
    http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2005-03-25-n43 .html

    While most of the comments here seem to focus on the Worker side of this (those getting paid for answering simple questions), there's also the Requester side -- programmers tapping into the power of "fake" (but working!) AI. (Ladies and gentleman, we present you the global brain... it can think for you if you micro-pay!) I think we can implement many new programs/ websites in completely new ways, and there may even be fresh commercial niche programs coming out of this. Maybe in 50 years, we'll include AMT (or similar services) into our software as naturally as we now include, say, SQL.

    I wish the site was working better at the moment (even before it has been Slashdotted, it was behaving strangely), and I wish it wouldn't ask me for a US bank account (being from Germany, that kinda hinders me from working with it).