Slashdot Mirror


Top 20 Geek Novels

Malacca writes "The Guardian's computer editor Jack Schofield has posted a list of the Top 20 Geek Novels in English since 1932. The polling method is unscientific, but it throws up some interesting choices. Definitions of 'Geek Novels' aside, the usual suspects like Neal Stephenson and William Gibson feature, but Terry Pratchett's 'The Colour of Magic' at #9? Neil Gaiman's "American Gods" at #17?" What would you put on that list?

99 of 563 comments (clear)

  1. The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Senjutsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It should be Small Gods, and it should be higher.

    1. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by DoorFrame · · Score: 2

      Small Gods was fantastic.

    2. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by heeeraldo · · Score: 2

      I think it's more that it's the first in the series, because stuff that came afterwards (Small Gods, Hogfather, and Men At Arms come to mind) is, IMO, a lot better.

    3. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Discworld needed to be represented in the list and TCoM was simply the first one in the series. I agree though that it should have been a better Discworld book. I'm not sure which one, but Small Gods is definately in the top 3.

    4. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Small Gods was indeed amazing... though the night watch books tend to be my favourites.

      I'm not at all surprised to see Terry Pratchett on that list. Part of what make his books so enjoyable for me are all the small geeky touches... a magic manual whose name has the acronym MS-DOS (never actually spelled out for you... only noticed it on my second read)... pretty much anything that has to do with Unseen University - most of it rings oh so true for anyone who's ever been at an engineering or science university... All the references to technology, quantum mechanics, evolution, communications (heck, he's practically got an entire networking book in Going Postal)... Our society's technological history (and not only technological, to be fair) can all be found, in the context of a world where magic exists, and IT ALL MAKES SENSE - in its own twisted Discworld fashion.

      Yeah, you could say I'm a Terry Pratchett fan :p

      And my guess is the Colour of Magic is on the list because it's the first of the Discworld series. You can't really put all of them... they wouldn't fit in a top 20 :p

      Ahh, just noticed that the poll is from the UK... it makes a lot more sense now. Discworld is - for some reason - not quite as popular on this side of the pond. So if you haven't read any of the Discworld books, do yourself a favour and pick one up - yes, it's technically fantasy, but it's the funniest and most intelligent fantasy you're ever likely to read.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    5. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by hotzeyboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      While I love all the discworld books, "Going Postal" would definately be the one that I think belongs on this list. It even has a bunch of hackers named the GNU(which is still a recursive acronym), talks about packet space and involves a very low tech spoofing exploit.
      .

    6. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by starwed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll have to agree with one of the other posters: It's true that Small Gods is better. One of my favorite books of all time. But The Color of Magic is way geekier. ^_^

    7. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by bfree · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually the group is the Smoking GNU and GNU alone is a magic "packet header" for control messages (G) which are not logged (N) and are turned around and sent back at the end of the line (U). Of course that's something any good 14 year old girl of a clacks operator who had studied her manuals would know and if you aren't one of them how the hell did you ever find this truly bizarre corner of L-Space ... is that you Hex, Ponder? Oook?

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    8. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course it's a matter of opinion....

      I think Colour of Magic was picked was because it was closer in tone to Hitchhiker's, in is extreme inventiveness and randomness. I agree that the later books are probably better (Small Gods, Reaper Man, Men at Arms, Soul Music, Last Hero), but anything with Rincewind as protagonist will always have a place in my heart....

    9. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now if only the first books could be rewritten by the current Terry Pratchett... oh lord...

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    10. Re:The Colour of Magic is a weird choice... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think my favourite geeky touch was the cryptographical engine whose acronym was E.N.I.G.M.A. (also not spelt out, and also only spotted on the second reading). The geek references have always been there though. In The Colour of Magic (I believe, possible The Light Fantastic) there is a druid talking about people wanting to upgrade to the latest 33 Megalith stone circles - published when a 486 DX 33 was top of the range.

      Another geeky author I can recommend is Jasper Fforde. The Well of Lost Plots, the penultimate book in the series that started with The Well of Lost Plots would appeal to many Slashdot readers (read the earlier ones first though) dealing, as it does, with the topic of DRM. Set in the book world, the world inside fiction, Thusday Next, litterary detective, discovers that the next version of the book OS (an upgrade from the old 8-plot system to a new, improved, 32-plot system with all sorts of extra features) contains a system which prevents a book from being read more than three times. It's full of references to classic literature and more geeky references (a large number of comments about old versions of the book OS, for example, held for old versions of MS DOS). A good read for anyone, and the book to use to explain DRM to your less technically inclined friends.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  2. Show some love for Arthur by Newrad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where the hell is the Arthur C. Clarke?

    1. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Doctor+Sbaitso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Somewhere in Sri Lanka, I presume.

      --

      ---
      Hello, Slashdot user. My name is Dr. Sbaitso. I am here to help you.
    2. Re:Show some love for Arthur by PokerAndroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rendezvous with Rama

    3. Re:Show some love for Arthur by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard rumors that you're a pederast. Is that true?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Show some love for Arthur by IngramJames · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget Arthur, and forget Pratchett!

      Are they seriously trying to tell me that "The Complete ZX Spectrum ROM Disassembly" doesn't make the list?

      OK, it's not fiction, but the sheer beauty...

      </uber geek>

      --
      'No rational religion claims "supernatural" exists, that's an atheist slander.' - seen on slashdot.
    5. Re:Show some love for Arthur by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative
      I Have heard rumours that he is a pederast, and moved to Sri Lanka to avoid possible prosecution. Is that true?

      He is fairly open about being gay. He won a court case against the british newspaper which made the pedophilia allegations against him.

  3. First Prime Factorization Post by 2*2*3*75011 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Guardian's computer editor Jack Schofield has posted a list of the Top 2*2*5 Geek Novels in English since 2*2*3*7*23. The polling method is unscientific, but my factorizations are geeky.

    1. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by julesh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's *really* geeky is that your username is a factorization of your uid. The only geekier thing would have been to wait until the next UID was prime. You'd have only had to wait until 900139!

    2. Re:First Prime Factorization Post by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's more useful if you have a slashdot uid that has 2 prime factors.

  4. Enders Game by Catskul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where is "Ender's Game"?

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Enders Game by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tolkien? Jules Verne? (I'm not a devotee, but she has a huge geek following -- Ayn Rand?) That other woman who writes those coma-inducing books the sci-fi buffs drool over, ummm, Ursula LeGuin?

    2. Re:Enders Game by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'd agree. My only commentary on a possibly reason is that enough people who continued to read the series might have regretted it just as much as I did. "Ender's Game" was absolutely amazing. Unfortunately, someone had told me the surprise ending years earlier, and I remembered it before it was revealed in the story. The second book in the series wasn't too bad. However, the third book in the series made me seriously revise my opion of Orson Scott Card as an author. I had absolutely no idea why I was reading the book, and by the end, it streched well beyond any plausible set of physics, where the first in the books had generally stayed within the bounds of standard physics which I appreciated. There were some samll liberties taken, but even those are "reasonable" by SCI-FI standards. I couldn't bring myself to read the rest of them. I think there are seven in the series. It soured my opinion of OSC and of "Ender's Game".

      Kirby

    3. Re:Enders Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      A previous post by Jack Schofield clears up this omission.
      http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/20 05/10/26/what_are_the_top_20_geek_novels_updated.h tml
      I'm in two minds about Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card. It's a brilliant story, no doubt about that. Orson is also geeky enough -- in the 80s, he even worked for a computer magazine to which I contributed. But Ender's Game is a straightforward story with a twist. It doesn't force you to keep rewriting your mental maps, like, say, The Eye in the Pyramid.

      Seems like he defines a great geek novel as one that expands your horizons instead of confirming your expectations and worldview.
      On a related note, here's a list of books that will induce a mindfuck. http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1016251
    4. Re:Enders Game by DrEasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is about "Top 20 Geek Novels in English since 1932", so Jules Verne would be a no-go for at least two reasons by that definition...

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    5. Re:Enders Game by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative


      To quote my wife, who has read them all (ender's game, speaker for the dead, xenocide, children of the mind, ender's shadow, shadow of the hegemon, shadow puppets, as well as Songmaster, the call of earth, and probably more - she reads alot):

      "Orson Scott Card is an author who can't write a sequel to save his life."

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
  5. What?! No J.R.R?!?! by Pastey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comon, a list of the top 20 geek stories and Lord of the Rings isn't on it?! This is a list made about nerds, not BY nerds!

    1. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A guy who writes FIVE seperate languages just for a book is a hardcore geek. I mean he invented Elvish (including Quenya and Sindarin), Dwarvish (Khuzdul), Entish, and Black Speech. He might not have been a technology geek but he was definitly a geek.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by mike2R · · Score: 2, Informative

      More to the point, he invented five languages as a hobby, and then wrote a book to go with them.

      Definately a geek...

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    3. Re:What?! No J.R.R?!?! by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A guy who writes FIVE seperate languages just for a book is a hardcore geek. I mean he invented Elvish (including Quenya and Sindarin), Dwarvish (Khuzdul), Entish, and Black Speech. He might not have been a technology geek but he was definitly a geek.

      Yep, a linguist geek. From his biography:

      Even as a young boy, Tolkien loved languages. He invented his own, but his mother viewed them as a waste of his time. "As a child, I was always inventing languages. But that was naughty," Tolkien recalled wryly. "Poor boys must concentrate on getting scholarships. When I was supposed to be studying Latin and Greek, I studied Welsh and English. When I was supposed to be concentrating on English, I took up Finnish."

      Through the door of language Tolkien entered the world of myth. "The seed [of the myth] is linguistic, of course. I'm a linguist and everything is linguistic--that's why I take such pains with names." A language, he believed, could not remain abstract. It must arise within a history and a culture--or, if lacking that, a mythology. Soon he would create for his own languages a most elaborate world indeed.


      How many authors write stories like that? It's almost as if the story was an afterthought created by the linguistics. I.e. the linguistics were so rich that a story grew around them.

      Most authors write like this: Story(as a rough outline) -> Characters(including setting) -> Details(such as language, customs, etc.)

      as opposed to Tolkien who did the opposite:

      Tolkien: Language -> Culture -> Characters -> Story

      Robert E. Howard is the only other fantasy author I can think of who wrote like that, except Howard built his stories (Conan) over a predetermined geography rather than a predermined language. Interestingly, both J.R.R. Tolkein and Robert E. Howard wrote fantasy in the 1930s, and are considered pillars of the genre.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  6. Ringworld... by mikael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought the "Ringworld" series by Larry Niven would have been worth a mention.. whatever happened to the movie that was supposed to be in production?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Ringworld... by aldeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      They re-did the story and called it Halo.

    2. Re:Ringworld... by Blue+Mushroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      aldeng -

      Either you haven't read books in the ringworld series or you haven't played halo. Indeed, both the books and the game feature a giant ring-shaped object in space, the inner surfaces of which contain whole ecosystems. That's about where the similarities end, however. The actual story plots and universes have few if any elements in common. Whoever modded you +4 insightful must have just modded something up that sounded intuitively like it was accurate.

      --

      "Humanity lives and dies by its capabilities of communication, or lack thereof."

  7. What about Tolkien? by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Where the hell is the Arthur C. Clarke?
    That is a good question, but I myself am wondering about the conspicuous absense of John Ronald Reuel Tolkien. Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?
    1. Re:What about Tolkien? by JeremyALogan · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...I myself am wondering about the conspicuous absense of John Ronald Reuel Tolkien. Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?
      I think that counts as the Geek Bible.


      Shamelessly stolen from Chris in the original thread.
    2. Re:What about Tolkien? by patio11 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, after the movies came out Tolkien is now not just a cult hit but genuinely *popular*, and whats the point of listing him if we can't look down our noses at those not in the geek club?

    3. Re:What about Tolkien? by General+Wesc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I consider the Silmarillion that.

    4. Re:What about Tolkien? by asb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?

      Nope. It's way too nerdy.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    5. Re:What about Tolkien? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2
      Well, if the reason why one would expect LotR on the list is the implied (and certainly existing) correlation between geeks and role-players, then I think The Silmarillion should be there even higher. At least from my experience, most serious rp'ers I know like The Silmarillion more. I've personally re-read it 4 times in two different languages, compared to only 2 times for LotR...

      And yes, surprisingly, I have a girlfriend. She had only read it twice, though. ;)

    6. Re:What about Tolkien? by snookums · · Score: 4, Funny
      I've personally re-read it 4 times in two different languages

      It doesn't count unless one of those languages is the original Quenya.


      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    7. Re:What about Tolkien? by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny
      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Anyone who knows the similiar Star Trek quote this is derived from can safely assume right now that he will die a virgin by the way.

    8. Re:What about Tolkien? by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I even have the wife and kid to prove it!

      Ahhhh.. so you mean you're not getting laid *anymore*?

      Burn karma, burn!

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    9. Re:What about Tolkien? by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      You haven't read the Silmarilion until you've read it in the original Elvish.

      Nobody alive in the world has ever read the Silmarillion in the original Elvish. JRRT read it in the Red Book of Westmarch, where it was included as Bilbo's Translations from the Elvish; this would have been written in Westron, the common language of the countries of northwestern Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age. He translated the Red Book into the English with which we are familiar, and later published Bilbo's diary There and Back Again and Frodo's The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King as fiction because nobody would take all this elf stuff seriously otherwise. The Translations from the Elvish seemed to have posed more difficulty in translation to English and in editing, though Christopher has done a pretty decent job in cleaning up the conflicting versions to give us the Silmarillion we know today.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    10. Re:What about Tolkien? by CheechBG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem, not quite. It's Christopher Plummer, and the original quote goes something like this...

      "You have not heard Shakespeare until you have read it in the original Klingon!"

      Guess who's coming to dinner...

    11. Re:What about Tolkien? by LocoMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The real trick would be to read it in old entish... though it would probably take a few months of non stop reading just to finish the first page.. :)

    12. Re:What about Tolkien? by WiFiBro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Aha, but the film did not answer such questions as: WHAT is Tom Bombadil http://tolkien.slimy.com/essays/Bombadil.html#Summ ary, and WE can feel really smug knowing what REALLY happened to Aragorn.

      -
      Tired he is, thirsty he is, and he guides them and he searches for paths, and they say sneak sneak.

    13. Re:What about Tolkien? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      The real trick would be to read it in old entish...

      Interesting. If I remember correctly, the first words of the book were There was Eru. Now, Fangorn tells us that in Old Entish any name is actually in itself the story of what it names. He himself, as perhaps the oldest living thing in Middle-earth (AFAIK only Bombadil, the Maiar and maybe Cirdan are of the same kind of age) has a truly spectacular name that would take days to read in full.

      Now, given Entish naming conventions, what would the name of Eru Iluvatar be like? It seems to me that the Entish name of Eru would in fact be a complete history of Creation, including the entire Silmarillion, because the whole thing is part of Iluvatar's story. It would, then, certainly take several weeks just to read the first page - but you'd be finished after word number three.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  8. Re:Hitchiker's guide to the galaxy series for sure by Catskul · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA... its freeking #1 on the list.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  9. SurveyMonkey by daigu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You would have thought The Guardian could have sprung for the $19.95/month to get a thousand responses a month for a few months. Posting anything about 100 responses is weak. Anyone a subscriber to Surveymoney (or similar) and willing to post a more realistic survey?

    1. Re:SurveyMonkey by Jerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, with the way online communities band together to stuff the results of polls like this, I'd kind of prefer something small like that. Despite the smaller sample size, it's probably a more fair one than you could get if you just threw it open for extended periods of time.

      Throw it out on the Internet and you're liable to "discover" that the Serenity novelization is the #1 geek book of all time.

      Reality and easy math (like "normal distributions") don't meet up all that often. A smaller, but more random, sample can be much better.

      (We're looking at "small but biased" vs "large but really biased", so I really do mean that "more" as a comparitive statement, not an absolute claim of validity of the original sample, so if you needed this parenthetical note, why not read more carefully? Also note the word "can".... it's not the same as "absolutely will".)

  10. Bruce Sterling by mr.henry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wah, no Bruce Sterling? But he has a powerbook and writes for Wired! Surely this is enough to be in the pantheon of geek writers! I am shocked and apalled.

  11. Before there were geeks by Quirk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    E. Abbot's Flatland

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Before there were geeks by Jivecat · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA: since 1932. Hence, no Verne either.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
  12. s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Heinlein's The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress is a much better book than Stranger in a Strange Land. (Heinlein himself thought so.) He started working on Stranger back in the 40's, and didn't publish it for a long time --- partly because he thought the world wasn't ready for it, and partly because he wasn't sure how to execute it successfully. It's a less mature work that really doesn't show him at the peak of his powers. He succumbs to the temptation to have Jubal Harshaw act as the authorial mouthpiece all the time, and both the minor characters and the major ones are flat and unbelievable.

    The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress is in some ways a recap of the same idea: replace the human raised on Mars who doesn't understand normal humans with a newly sentient computer who doesn't understand normal humans. Although both are satires, Mistress is the more effective one, IMO, because it concentrates on satirizing one thing (republican government) rather than everything all at once. (And don't make the mistake of missing the satire in Mistress, as many people do. Life in the original penal colony as portrayed as a kind of anarchist utopia, whereas the revolution screws everything up by creating the evils of government.)

    1. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by trurl7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I must respectfully comment on a few of your claims. While I agree with you that Moon is a Harsh Mistress is a wonderful book, I find that your comments about it being "better" than Stranger in a Strange Land, and that Stranger is "a less mature work" to be a little bit...let's say highbrow. First - what are your qualifications in judging one work "less mature" than another? Second, you say Heinlein "succumbs" to the authorial mouthpiece temptation. Whether it is something that one "succumbs" to is, I feel, debatable, but let's consider this from a different angle:

      If Jubal is an "authorial mouthpiece", and this is bad, then please elaborate on the roles of Lazarus Long in Time Enough For Love (and almost any other novel he's in), Lt. Col Dubois in Starship Troopers, Prof. De La Paz in Moon is a Harsh Mistress, The Boss in Friday, the main character's friend (can't remember his name, he eventually becomes a major) in Revolt in 2100. The list goes on. In almost every serious book that Heinlein wrote (and many of the less-serious, pure fun ones), there is an older/mentor type character that is, effectively, the author's voice. Sometimes this function is distributed (consider Number of the Beast - which almost explicitly switches the authorial mouthpiece), it is sometimes absent initially, but then comes out at the end (e.g. Job: A Comedy of Justice, with the Devil being the mouthpiece). If you feel the "authorial mouthpiece" is a failing, I wonder how you regard the rest of Heinlein's work. And I emphasize - Prof. De La Paz is yet another "mouthpiece".

      Finally, I believe your thesis is confused. MIAHM is primarily a political work - it examines the moral and practical questions of political and ruling structures. SIASL is primarily a work on individual morality - one's relationship to oneself, his surroundings, and humanity in general. Likewise, Time Enough For Love examines aspects of morality in love and sexuality, and Starship Troopers examines an individual's responsibility to his country. I feel that they can not be compared in terms of which is a "better" book. I can acknowledge that we can discuss how polished, complete, or "mature" if you will, a work is. And in some sense, I do agree that Stranger is a bit rougher than Moon is a Harsh Mistress. But I hope you will agree that in discussing the works of such a great master, we should exhibit a bit more circumspection in our speech, rather than postulating blithely that A is a "much better book" than B.

    2. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There should have been Starship Troopers - ok the movie adaptation was crap, but the book was so much better.

      --
      See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    3. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by michael_cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Especially since this is "geek novels". SIASL is a geek fantasy -- grow muscles by thinking them, beautiful women falling over themselves to have sex with you -- where TMIAHM's leading character is, well, a grown-up geek. I would be reluctant to lose either of my real arms but there have certainly been times when jobs would have been easier if I could just pop on the old "number three arm". Besides, the ending of SIASL was obvious and no one really dies. Two of the central characters don't make it in TMIAHM, a much more grown-up treatment.

    4. Re:s/Stranger /Moon Is a Harsh Mistress/ by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re Jubal, you are pigeon-holeing his argument a bit. He doesn't say that there are no authorial mouthpieces in the other books, he says that Jubal is too loud and that this is to the detriment of the other characters, a point I would have to agree with.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  13. Summary of Comments by NilObject · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let me save us all a great deal of time and summarize the oncoming flood of comments:

    My literary preferences are better than yours!
    1. Re:Summary of Comments by screwballicus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My literary preferences are better than yours!

      Actually, I'd argue this is the last place on earth (or elsewhere in the universe) you'd expect to find arguments precisely to that effect.

      The thing is, many of the great works in this so-called geek canon aren't chiefly admired for their literary qualities at all. If there's anything that serves as the basis for self-important pretentiousness in geek reading preference, it's a bias favouring substance over form and ideas over aesthetics. The theoretical or philosophical over the literary or poetical, if it has to be one or the other.

      There's many an Asimov fan who while holding up 'hard sci-fi' as the true geek literature, will quite readily admit that Asimov isn't a great fiction writer, considered amongst the elite of great fiction writers in general. He's a great thinker who conceived his ideas in fiction writing, not a great fiction writer who happened upon some interesting observations while he went about the business of crafting masterful narrative and perfecting the storytelling art.

      There is of course in stark contrast to this 'hard sci-fi' preference a large demographic who proudly declare their love for imaginative fantasy written mostly for the sake of telling a story and immersing the reader in an impossible universe of the author's conception. But so far in history, this has been a preference declared in defiance of respectable preference more often than in celebration of it, despite the tremendously widespread popularity of fantasy writing in general.

  14. chronicles of narnia by Odocoileus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where many young geeks got their start.

    --
    ...
  15. Rant by viksit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Usual rant about Tolkien and Clarke. But are we seeing only Sci Fi type novels here? I thought a lot of people would've loved stuff like Robert Heinlein, and Philip K. Dick's books. The moon is a harsh mistress, and Riverworld are amazing books.. And who in the world voted AGAINST the king of cyberpunk - Neuromancer?!

    --
    If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...oh, wait a minute - he already does.
  16. "I, Robot" not a novel by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I, Robot" was not a novel. It was a collection of short stories.

    1. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by hobbitofthenorth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was thinking the same thing. The movie is actually closer to "Caves Of Steel" by Asimov. (i.e. murder, detective, robot etc. etc. etc.)

    2. Re:"I, Robot" not a novel by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Informative
      I, Robot, is the title of the collection of short stories that included the novella "I, Robot" which is long enough to qualify as a novel.

      Actually, there was no story named "I, Robot" in "I, Robot". The stories in "I, Robot" were:

      • Robbie
      • Runaround
      • Reason
      • Catch that Rabbit
      • Liar!
      • Little Lost Robot
      • Escape!
      • Evidence
      • The Evitable Conflict

      There is a story named "I, Robot", but it is not an Asimov story. It was written by Eando Binder and published in 1939.

  17. top 20 is a little vague by hobbitofthenorth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish people would be more specific in asking for the best "geek" novels. Is it really fair to compare early, groundbreaking cyberpunk like SnowCrash with fantasy genre stuff like LOTR? Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of both, but how can you expect them to end up on the same list?

  18. "books by rating" at iblist by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not quite the same thing, but iblist maintains a list of top books by rating. Geeks are disproportionally represented in their user base, so this is a not entirely unlike a "favorite geek books" list.

  19. Start Neal Stephenson by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just started Cryptonomicon recently and was persuaded to do so after reading this Wikipedia article. It's incredible. Bruce Schneier invented a crypto system based on playing cards for the novel. It's this depth that I find so fascinating with Stephenson. It may be fiction but there's a great deal of fact/truth underneath.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Start Neal Stephenson by Mathinker · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Bruce Schneier invented a crypto system based on playing cards for the novel."

      Ah, yes, Solitaire. Not that I really believe you're going to use it, but FYI, it's broken.

      It's not by chance, either. Paul Crowley, the guy who broke Solitaire, also tried to invent a strong manual encryption algorithm and failed.

      Not that I'm in the league of those guys, but I've been working on the problem myself and it's not easy.

  20. What?! A geek list with no Tolkien? by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 2, Funny

    One root to rule them,
    One grep to find them,
    One cron to bring them all,
    And in the subnet bind them.

  21. Brunner's Shockwave Rider by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Brunner's Shockwave Rider should be there, as should be the Adolescence of P-1.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Brunner's Shockwave Rider by TRS80NT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, and even more deserving, IMO, "Stand on Zanzibar" and "The Sheep Look Up" even as both come true a little bit each day.
      What are terrorists if not muckers?


      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
  22. Roger Zelazny by farker+haiku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Amber Chronicles. That is all. If you haven't read it, do so.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
  23. No Umberto Eco?? by jedZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Foccault's pendulum should definitely be in any top 10 list worth the name

  24. Not bad as top 10 lists go... by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read 8 of the first 10 but only two of 11 - 20. Since I've been reading S.F. for 25 years I find that a little odd.

    What would I add? Off the top of my head:

    1. Utopia - Thomas More
    2. News From Nowhere - William Morris
    3. Startide Rising - David Brin
    4. A Fire Upon the Deep - Vernor Vinge
    5. Ender's Game - Orson Scott Card
    6. Little Fuzzy - H. Beam Piper
    7. The Dispossessed - Ursula K. Leguin
    8. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress - Robert A. Heinlein
    9. Ringworld - Larry Niven
    10. To Your Scattered Bodies Go - Philip Jose Farmer
    11. Inherit the Stars - James P. Hogan
    And what about Tolkien? Can't have a geek list without a Hobbit or an Elf getting in the way!
    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  25. Good Omens by ZahrGnosis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm glad someone mentioned "Good Omens". For anyone who has heard of Neil Gaiman OR Terry Pratchett and hasn't read this book: you're really missing something. It happens that my favorite author for a while was Pratchett, and a good friend of mine was into Gaiman... we recommended the book to each other with serendipitous timing, and it's been a favorite ever since. Highly recommended.

  26. Catcher in the Rye by frankmu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    given this is Slashdot, i am surprised that this wasn't mentioned yet. of course my tin-foil hat is at the cleaners right now. better go now.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  27. What about "The Adolescence of P-1" by P1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Great 70's book on a computer program taking over. Worth a read.

  28. No Grey Lensman? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    With no Grey Lensman, this was obviously compiled by mostly young geeks! :-)

    Also, while Heinlein clearly had non-geeky characters, others pretty clearly were geeks by almost any definition -- Andrew Libby was the most obvious, but when Lazarus Long meets Andrew (in Methusalah's Children) and they start talking about Lazarus' modifications to Andrew's design for a ship's computer ("Integrator" IIRC) it becomes pretty clear that Lazarus is at least a part-time geek as well (then again, live long enough and you'll do almost everything at least part of the time). It is sad that one of the greatest science fiction writers of all time is represented only by one he openly stated was one of his worst (IIRC, in one of his later books, he has one of his characters comment on it saying something like "it's sad how far some authors stoop when they're desparate for money" (anybody remember that, or is my memory playing tricks on me?)

    Then again, any list that has science fiction but no Frederik Pohl, Stanislaw Lem, David Weber, Niven/Pournelle or Theodore Sturgeon clearly has some pretty large holes, to say the least (and that's still far from an exhaustive list...)

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

    --
    The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    1. Re:No Grey Lensman? by DoctorFrog · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (IIRC, in one of his later books, he has one of his characters comment on it saying something like "it's sad how far some authors stoop when they're desparate for money" (anybody remember that, or is my memory playing tricks on me?)


      Your memory's fine. The scene takes place in _The Number Of The Beast-_, when the four protagonists are comparing their favorite books. Two of the four voted for _Stranger In A Strange Land_, and one of the other two makes the comment about Heinlein only writing it for the money.

  29. 1984 and H2G2, but no Sirens of Titan? by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


    I think they polled a not-so-well read segment of the geek population. Anyone who loved 1984 and H2G2 (which made spots 2 and 1 on the list) should have also read Vonnegut's The Sirens of Titan. It fills the space inbetween those two seemingly disconnected books we love so much; in many ways it is the literary bridge from 1984 to H2G2, and one of the greatest works of modern fiction on its own. A fan of either (or both) would see the connections readily, and appreciate it, and it certainly belongs in that list with them.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  30. Missing: Egan, Stross, Sterling by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Two notable absences are Greg Egan's Permutation City (among others) and Charles Stross' The Atrocity Archive and the stories in Accelerando (among others), and Bruce Sterling's Holy Fire and Distraction (among others). All are hardcore Geek works of real brilliance. Permutation City in particular was published about the same time as Snow Crash, and is both a better and more important novel.

    http://home.austin.rr.com/lperson/lame.html

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  31. Hyperion... by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. by Dan Simmons. As with Dune, Enders Game (also missing), etc, the rest of the serie could not be as good as the 1st book, but still, is one of the best sci-fi books i had read so far.

  32. The Shockwave Rider. by arcade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm quite disappointed that so few people have read 'The Shockwave Rider'. It's understandable as the book is a tad difficult to get (at least it was difficult when I got hold of it.. it hadn't been in print for 10-15 years or so).

    It's a great book. It's given us so much terminology.

    Take it as a recommendation.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  33. Why Stephenson is great by typical · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stephenson is great because he writes about technology in a way that doesn't shatter the illusion for anyone who knows anything about technology. Unfortunately, most writers do this, because they don't know beans about technology. Stephenson is an ex-hacker (though since he is now in the business of propagating memes, and he described this in his first book as "neurolinguistic hacking", maybe he still considers himself a hacker).

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  34. Not only is it unscientific... by bob+whoops · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe the list would be better if more than 132 people had voted. Hell, it looks like there are more comments on that page than people who voted.

  35. Zelazny by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Creatures Of Light And Darkness" by Roger Zelazny. A science fiction so strange it takes a second reading to realize it even *is* a science fiction.

    I don't know if it rates as a geek novel, but I like it.

  36. Re:What's with this "geek" stuff? by erinacht · · Score: 3, Informative

    Boffin

    "The word appeared during World War II, where it was applied with some affection to the people who invented radar, early digital computers, the atomic bomb, and other technologies that gave the Allies an advantage over the Axis during the war."
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boffin

    I've always prefered and will continue to use Boffin. It's a good word that encapsulates all the good of geek and nerd, is a bit more academic. It also has none of the baggage, except perhaps for absent mindedness.

    --
    Colm

  37. Altered Carbon - Richard Morgan by bloodredsun · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Probably the best book, sci-fi or not, I've read over the last couple of years. It's probably too new to get into many peoples top lists and as the author is British he hasn't had the exposure that he could have across the states.

    Smart, funny, sexy, violent and with one of the greatest heros around, this book deserves to be on that list.

    He's since written 2 more Kovac novels (and another non-Kovac book that I think was an adaptation of an old short story). They are excellent but Altered Carbon stands out as a truely excellent story

  38. 20 Geek Books ... ok then by lorelorn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm going to jump right in and put my list down before looking at anyone else's comments - I assume I won't be alone here.

    • 1. Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson (geeks in time! not to be missed)
    • 2. Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson (it's good, and frankly, a samurai sword wielding computer hacker named Hiro Protagonist is what many here aspire to be)
    • 3. Ilium by Dan Simmons (good stuff. Greek gods and that... in space!!! and time)
    • 4. The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan (ooo, non-fiction. something like this needs to act as our Bible if we are to seriously combat the pseudo-religious waffle that is stifling science and learning these days
    • 5. Watchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons (the graphic novel that started it all)
    • 6. The Forever War by Joe Haldeman (probably the best example of welding the science into science fiction and still telling a great story)
    • 7. A Game of Thrones by George RR Martin. (unlike most fantasy novels, this one is actaully good. Better than that, it's great!)
    • 8. Longitude by Dava Sobel (a great read about those geeks of the past who attempted to solve one of the greatest problems of their day - and bitched and fought with one another instead of working together to get the job done)
    • 9. Good Omens by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman (what if the antichrist were a geek wunderkind?)
    • 10. A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson (kind of like a geek primer really. How we got to where we are)
    • 11. Perdido Street Station by China Mieville (what, steampunk pseudo-Victorian sci-fi? Mieville described it as 'the new wierd' but then disowned the title. I like mine better anyway.
    • 12. The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli (when geeks get to tell the people in charge how to behave, it tends to come out a bit like this)
    • 13. Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut (geeks destroy the world, normal -ie chain-smoking, girl-fucking- guy looks on, nonplussed
    • 14. Y The Last Man by Brian K Vaughan (what if the last man alive were a skinny geek?)
    • 15. Evolution by Stephen Baxter (ok, now this one takes the long view)
    • 16. The Illiad by Homer (because you should)
    • 17. The Lord of the Rings by JRR Tolkien (see notes on 16)
    • 18. American Gods by Neil Gaiman (UK residents may prefer to substitute Neverwhere here, this is perfectly acceptable)
    • 19. Douglas Adams (whichever of his books you want)
    • 20. Slashdot ("hey that's not a book!" - I know but you need to throw the home crowd a bone)
  39. The Forever War by GeekDork · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Forever War by Joe Haldeman is a must-read, IMO. It raises some points about war that hold true even on today's tiny scale (who started it? why is it still going on? what the hell are we fighting for?)

    --

    Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

    1. Re:The Forever War by squarooticus · · Score: 2, Informative

      SPOILERS.

      Most of the book was fine, but the end was ridiculous. I mean, an interstellar war starting due to a "misunderstanding"? Please.

      --
      [ home ]
  40. Schofield clearly an Illuminatus by willmorton · · Score: 2, Funny
    (From TFA)

    19. The Illuminatus! Trilogy -- Robert Shea & Robert Anton Wilson 23%
  41. LSpace by rjstanford · · Score: 2, Informative

    And if you like pTerry, but you're pretty sure you're not getting all of the jokes (or, better yet, if you actually think you are), you have to check out LSpace (ie: Library Space) and read the annotations. Woefully out of date, they're worth spending a couple of hours on in no uncertain terms.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  42. The Godless whorde. by rs79 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "is the Lord of the Rings not geeky enough?"

    Fuck no. First, the sheer length of the tome is enough to prevent almost anybody from reading it. Second, it's a *fairy story*, the sort of thing 9 year old girls obsess on. Geek books have science, spies or aliens in them.

    Besides, the correlation between "geek" and "bible" seems to be awfully low from my observations.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  43. Vinge! by Khelder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that Vinge should be represented, but I'd favor A Deepenss in the Sky over A Fire Upon the Deep. I thought the pacing in Fire was a bit slow at times, but Deepness was better in that respect. I also thought Focus was really interesting and the society around it really well done.

  44. Re:Verne and 1932 by b100dian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read Jules Verne, and it was clearly after 1932. He would be _this_ Verne, Jules?
    http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/verne.htm : It says "1828-1905"

    Clearly the man (JVerne) had the brains to fool somebody that the books are written in the FUTURE.

    --
    gtkaml.org
  45. Re:1984 is not a geek novel by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently you read it in school. Please reread (especially "The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism", which is the author talking directly to us) and learn more than the schools want you to know.

  46. scifi v. fantasy by Shirlockc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Checking the list and it seems almost all the books are more scifi than fantasy. Tolkein, Narnia are fantasies so maybe that's why they didn't make the list.