Slashdot Mirror


ATI All-In-Wonder X1800 XL Review

Timmus writes "With the release of the X1800 series last month, it was only a matter of time before ATI announced a new All-In-Wonder card that took advantage of it. Today Firingsquad has a review of the new board, the All-In-Wonder X1800 XL. The card features all the multimedia capabilities of previous AIW cards, giving you TV viewing and recording, timeshifting, and of course gaming. Video capture shots are provided as well."

111 comments

  1. All the info needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Officially, the ALL-IN-WONDER X1800 XL carries an MSRP of $500...

    End of Line

    1. Re:All the info needed by CCFreak2K · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then everything from the previous generation sees a massive price slash. THAT's where the deals are.

      I still wouldn't mind an AIW, though. It'd be like my current card, but with lots of video in video out options.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:All the info needed by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      SRP doesn't mean jack to me, it's a made-up price point to help people think they got a good deal when they pay less than that. "Street price" is the significant number.

    3. Re:All the info needed by menkhaura · · Score: 0, Troll

      I second that. Until then, ATI can go suck one, and I'll stick to nVidia

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    4. Re:All the info needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Also,
      • No linux drivers
      • No linux support for video capture, like all ati cards
      • Non-standard video capture in Windows, so most capture apps won't work with it
      Quack quack, ati.
    5. Re:All the info needed by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 0

      What exactly do you mean by "advertisement"?
      It doesn't look like an ad to me, it actually looks like a list of features. Being top of the line, they're obviously good. If you seem to think that all these still aren't worth the money, then maybe you should say something like "it's good, but it's overpriced." John Dvorak seemed to 'advertise' the Xbox360, talking about how good it was, and how great of a step that was for Microsoft. I'm sure he was paid off big too, as opposed to something rational, say maybe he actually liked it.
      To me, this actually looks like a good card. ATI has Linux support for most of their drivers, and I'm sure you can expect this within the next year or so. On the other hand, I'd be surprised if you used Linux a day in your life.
      Maybe instead of say "this card sucks" you should be constructive and say something along the lines of "this card that I have is better, cheaper and has more features". Mod parent down. Nobody needs to hear from him.

      --
      Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
      "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
    6. Re:All the info needed by PunkFloyd · · Score: 1

      My buddy picked one up last week at CompUSA for $299.

      -pf

    7. Re:All the info needed by sabernet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have an ATI AIW 9600 Pro

      I love it. I suggest more people take a look at this card. It has served me almost 3 years now. It does have Linux support. MythTV even has support for the great video in/out stuff.

      On that note: Go fock yourself.

      On another side note: Do you even -have- linux?

  2. Different direction? by dada21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Higher resolutions at faster refresh rates is great, but I'm wanting video to head in a different direction. I'm sure I'm not alone.

    First, heat efficiency in getting out of control. My MCE runs fairly cool but I needed to fab my own fan brackets. I won't even look at newer video cards if they're running 10 degC hotter. I know more speed generally means more heat but there has to be some techniques to reduce it.

    Coupled with the heat problems we're getting annoyingly loud fans on the card. In my theater I've replaced a vidcard because the fan started acting up. Not good.

    I'd love to see more support for the newer resolutions out there. My backup projector needs a 960x540 resolution which requires buying Powerstrip. My regular projector requires 1280x720. Even the newest cards I've tested ignore these fairly standard resolutions in their drivers.

    I'm not impressed with many on-board video decoders lately. Fuzzy text, artifacts that shoulder occur and (sometimes) color errors.

    I'm happy to see ATI releasing these fast cards at cheap prices but I fear that none of the future needs are being planned for.

    They should also STOP SCREAMING THEIR PRODUCT NAME.

    1. Re:Different direction? by wpiman · · Score: 1

      Can you run this this in various modes? It seems that there should be a high power mode for gaming in which all the switching needs to occur- and a Video mode- which is relatively passive in comparison. That way- when watching movies and when not in use- the card is not very loud.

    2. Re:Different direction? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      In your display properties (desktop-> right click -> properties) go to settings tab and click on the advanced button. Then go to Adapter, and click the list all modes button. You'll generally see a lot more modes there then you will get with the slider bar. I'm not sure what kind of success you'll get with trying the different modes.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Different direction? by iso · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're looking at the high-end All-in-Wonder for an HTPC, you're looking in the wrong place. This is their top-end card that's primarily meant for gaming. It's like complaining that your sports car doesn't get 55 miles per gallon.

      If you want an HTPC All-in-Wonder, you should be looking at something like the All-in-Wonder 2006. It's passively cooled, and has the same tuner bits as the last few All-in-Wonder cards. It works in MCE too.

      As for resolutions, my ATI X700 (gaming PC) and All-in-Wonder 2006 (HTPC) both support 1280x720 (it's a pretty standard resolution). I'm not sure about 960x540, but I bet you could set that as a custom resolution in Catalyst Control Center.

      And for what it's worth, ATI has been calling it an "All-in-Wonder" (not "ALL IN WONDER") for a while now, so it's only this review that's "screaming" the product name, not ATI.

    4. Re:Different direction? by dada21 · · Score: 1

      Definitely tried that, but it doesn't ever list standard HDTV resolutions. I've never even seen standard SDTV resolutions/refresh rates.

    5. Re:Different direction? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      On NVIDIA Quadro cards if you drill down through the control panel screens you can set fine details of your resolution and refresh rate down to the timing of various parts of the video signal. I've successfully output 1080i from a Quadro using this panel. I believe GeForce cards can do this too, but perhaps with not quite as much fine control or high-refresh performance.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    6. Re:Different direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, heat efficiency in getting out of control. My MCE runs fairly cool but I needed to fab my own fan brackets. I won't even look at newer video cards if they're running 10 degC hotter. I know more speed generally means more heat but there has to be some techniques to reduce it.

      You mentioned also that you use a projector. Doesn't the projector bulb run much hotter, and its fan much louder, than any consumer video card ever has?

    7. Re:Different direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you bought a new vidcard because the fan was failing? Why not just buy a new fan?

    8. Re:Different direction? by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1
      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    9. Re:Different direction? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Since when was 960x540 a standard res? Still, 1280x720 is pretty standard HDTV and should be supported by most new mid-high end cards with new drivers. You would be supprised at the features removed from low end cards, quite a few new sub $100 cards ship without HDTV support, even if they have DVI.

    10. Re:Different direction? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Nope. I don't have the same projector, but mine is literally inaudible unless I mute the audio, and even then it would be masked by even a soft conversation.

      Anything suitable for home theater use, even a repurposed office model like mine, is quite quiet.

      I can't say the same about my GeForce 6600 video card, which screams the second I fire up anything that uses D3D or OpenGL.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    11. Re:Different direction? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure in Linux you can use ModeLines to specify just about any refresh rate and resolution you want. Whether or not your video card an screen will accept them is another story. Is there anyway to do this in windows, possible through the registry, or editing some text file?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:Different direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, thanks... I am only used to the projectors we have at work. Maybe I should consider making a home theater setup one day after all. :-)

    13. Re:Different direction? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      care to share which projector you have?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    14. Re:Different direction? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      InFocus X1 that I bought off of eBay. It's hardware-identical to the ScreenPlay 4800, which is a home theater model, just has a different firmware which balances colors differently. I could flash it with the 4800's firmware, but I'm happy with it the way it is. I'm not picky, so having the largest TV in the dorm is more than enough for me.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  3. Printer Friendly by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Informative

    But without the pictures

    http://firingsquad.com/print_article.asp?current_s ection=Hardware&fs_article_id=1756

    Just thought I'd point out the first thing I wanted to know:

    Just below the ALL-IN-WONDER X1800 XL lies the ALL-IN-WONDER X800 XL (PCI-E) and ALL-IN-WONDER X800 XT (AGP), which both carry a pricetag of $400. For the mainstream market, ATI then provides the ALL-IN-WONDER 2006 (AGP) and ALL-IN-WONDER X600 PRO, both of these boards officially carry an MSRP of $200.

    Not everyone has a PCI-E mobo, and I assume this one isn't AGP

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Printer Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone has a PCI-E mobo...

      You're right, but I do, and my PCI-E mobo is bigger than yours

  4. Coral Cache link by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Coral Cache link by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      You owe me a new shirt!

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
  5. Linux/Myth support? by olddotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So any chance we have Linux support out of the box?

    How can a hardware review be posted on slashdot without a list of compatible open source OS's?

    1. Re:Linux/Myth support? by Soko · · Score: 2, Informative

      ATIs support of linux has been a Myth.

      "No 3D for j00, Mythter!", Hit and Myth, bad in mythical proportions... whatever.

      I personally haven't used an ATI card in years, but anyone who I talk to says linux support is still bad. YMMV.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Linux/Myth support? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing. We always expect it to work with windows but what about Linux?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Linux/Myth support? by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      So any chance we have Linux support out of the box?
      You must be new to Slashdot...
      The proper question is...

      Yes, but does it RUN linux?

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    4. Re:Linux/Myth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing I expected when I clicked on this article was half a billion comments complaining about the Linux drivers. What surprised me is that from some of the stuff posted here, their Windows drivers are just as bad.

      Is there any real reason for anyone to buy this card over a separate NV card and TV tuner, given ATi's consistent incompetency when it comes to the software?

    5. Re:Linux/Myth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there's Linux support.

      Unfortunately, you'll find that you and ATI have wildly differing definitions of "Linux support". If you don't mind your $500 video card performing on par with a $10 one, then ATI's drivers will be perfect for you.

      I guess it's better than staring at a blank monitor, but not by much.

    6. Re:Linux/Myth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think your post was Flaimbait, as it was moderated thus far. You are dead on asking for Linux/Myth support. I also would have LIKED a list of Compatible OSs. As it stands now, what I want to know about this card is still out... and thus the article is useless (to me).

    7. Re:Linux/Myth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hit and Myth was a great series of books.

  6. Not enough X's! by kidcharles · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are only two X's in this product name. I refuse to buy a video card that only has two X's in it's model number. Give it a name like "ATI XXL 81200X XP X-Treme Edition" and I'll consider forking over my money.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    1. Re:Not enough X's! by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      You mean ATI XXL 81200X XP X-Treme Xdition. I won't consider any card that doesn't have the "x" in glowing green.

  7. Macrovision by drxenos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always like the ATI TV tuners. Very easy to use. But I've always hated that their software won't record signals that have Macrovision in them. I had bought an ATI a few years ago to copy my VHS tapes to DVD. When one plays that is protect by Macrovision, the record button disables. Luckily it is (was?) only in the software, and their cards work well with all the open source stuff out there (virtualdub).

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  8. Linux drivers? by cybergrue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I want to know is have they released proper Linux drivers that support all the functionallity this time, unlike eith previous AiW cards.

    1. Re:Linux drivers? by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Linux? What's that? Nobody uses Linux because the cards don't work there! Linux can't handle an IOMEM port and an interrupt it's just unfathonable! :-)

      That said I have no clue. I've long since stopped caring about ATI products since they told me my ATI RADEON MOBILITY U1 [listed on their website] graphics chip in my laptop was not an ATI GPU and they wouldn't support it.

      Maybe they'll release the interface specifications and let an OSS developer make a free driver?

      HAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  9. Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by MrRogers2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I've never really understood the AIW's popularity. While maybe it's nice to have it all on one card, when it comes time to upgrade, which comes along depressingly fast for video, you've got to trash a perfectly working tuner. Why not get the video card and a seperate tuner?

    More cost up front? Maybe, but my ATI TV Wonder is still working *years* after its purchase.

    --
    MrRogers(2)
    1. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that this AIW is only $50 more expensive than the base video card, it's easy to see why.

    2. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      A very valid point. I'm sitting with a Nvidia Geforce FX5700 in my machine because I wanted to keep up with the gaming scene a while back but couldn't afford the All-in-wonder that would do the job. Now i have TV tuning capabilities sitting useless in the box the 5700 came in because they were tied to my gaming video card.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by Chr0nik · · Score: 0

      Why not get the video card and a seperate tuner?

      And it's easy to do since ATI makes the separate cards in a different line of products called the "TV Wonder" series. It's easier to pick and choose the features you want your tuner to have as well, for example, some are HDTV capable, others are not. Some have remotes, others do not.

      IMO, it's smarter to get a Radeon, and a tv wonder, than to get the whole thing on one card.

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    4. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by PDXNerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, because this the ATI TV Wonder is mediocre? I'll admit, my TV Wonder is still working too, but the people who buy this card are not looking for upgradeability. If you want to go with an external TV tuner, Hauppage makes a better card. Besides, the target audience for this card is probably not looking for "always the best" video - they want what is the latest with all the other features *plus* 3d-video.

      My ATI All-in-wonder 7500 is still a great card, but the system it's in plays no games other than my snes (and the occasional bout of Enemy Territory). It records TV and kicks ass. TV picture is much better than the TV Wonder. YMMV.

    5. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, not tying up the PCI bus throwing video over it would be one logical reason...

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    6. Re:Depricating a perfictly good tuner... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      All the PCI slots in my machine are full. I love my AIW because it means I don't have to take out one of my other PCI cards if I want a TV tuner in the machine.

  10. But how are the drivers? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I own an ATI All-in-Wonder 9800 pro. It is great, when it is working... It is fast, and all the features work well, but updating the drivers and sofware is a nightmare. I really miss the Nvidia unified drivers that I use on work machines.

    The problem is that there are 3 files that need to be upgraded with every driver change - and while I understand this, the process is annoying. If a new driver comes out for video, and I install it, but neglect to install the other drivers for the card, the DVD viewing software, and the TV software break.

    This, again, is understandable, but the process is annoying. ATI really needs to simplify their driver installation (and hell, having better Linux drivers would be neat too... but that is an aside)

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:But how are the drivers? by drxenos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this problem exists even with their separate cards. I have a Radeon 9700 Pro and a TV Wonder Pro. I've forgotten many times to remember to go get the new DVD decoder, and have the TV option disappear from the media options.

      --


      Anonymous Cowards suck.
    2. Re:But how are the drivers? by tenton · · Score: 1

      They haven't really updated the non-Catalyst stuff in a while. I haven't had any trouble just going to the website and selecting the High Speed (one download), as opposed to grabbing the low speed (three files) ones. The High Speed option is on the same page, and is, in fact, above the low speed options. It's been this way for months and months; perhaps you haven't grabbed an update for a long time?

    3. Re:But how are the drivers? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      However, that one download contains the 3 files - you have to install each in order, and reboot between installs.

      If I just want to download the latest driver for high speed gaming it breaks my other apps.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    4. Re:But how are the drivers? by babyphatman · · Score: 1

      I'm running an AIW X800 (before that i had the AIW 9700) and updating just the display driver has never given me any problems. Here's my process:

      1. Download the "Display Driver, Control Panel*, WDM Driver" integrated package. *the new "Control Centre" is crap and I don't recommend it.
      2. Uninstall the "Control Panel" (no reboot) then uninstall the "Display Drivers" (reboot).
      3. Install the Driver Package and reboot when completed. (for me this package only asks to reboot after installing all three drivers)

      This ONLY works for upgrading your display driver. (ie. moving from CATALYST 5.x to 5.y) Whenever they decide to release a new version Multimedia Centre/DVD Decoder etc. then you have to do the full uninstall, driver cleaner, re-install procedure. Hope this works for you.

      --
      A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals...
    5. Re:But how are the drivers? by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      There are some settings you can only set in the CCC now. It sounds like within 2 years the old one will be gone. Better get used to that slow montrosity.

  11. Another review at Bjorn3D by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article summarizes: "Quite simply this is the card I would like to put in my MediaPC".

  12. Linux support? HDTV? by kimvette · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will it run Linux, or will I be just as screwed on it as I've been with the ATI-TV (ISA), AiW 128 Pro, AiW 7500, AiW8500DV? I'm sure it runs great on Windows, which is great and all, only I want to punt Windows from my system and not have a dual-boot configuration.

    Also what is up with offering only analog/NTSC reception on this side of the pond? NTSC broadcasts are supposedly dying soon, so why don't they offer HDTV-capable cards yet? They advertise high-definition output, which is just wonderful, but what's so great about an upsampled NTSC picture?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have never understood the popularity of the AiW cards myself. I am further puzzled as to why this article is posted here. If you want to run Linux and watch high-def, buy an HD-3000 tuner card and the video card of your choice (pick your poison).

    2. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Why AiW cards are popular:

      A) yes, if you do your research, you can probably find a good separate tuner card. If you do a half-assed job, however, you end up slave to MSI's TV@nywhere Master: neat hardware, proprietary design working only with proprietary software (seriously, no F/OSS solution existed as of a year ago when I through the thing into the bin). Said proprietary software was done by intervideo, but someone seems to have left out the phrase "deliver properly tested, stable software" out of the contract. So there's actually hardware out there that doesn't work.

      B) Sorry but, Linux is cool and all, but most home PC platforms are running Windows. You might also notice that Serenity did not have a great box office showing either. Popularity is not necessarily a quality you want to have, particularly on a "news for nerds" site, but running Linux has nothing to do with Popularity. Besides, this is an Open-Source site, not a Linux site. Maybe I don't want to run Linux.

      C) For folks who want to run an HTPC setup, putting a tuner card on the video card makes the hardware simpler.

      D) Why is this article posted here? What, you don't like to read about goofy hardware? This is an aggregator site, and all kinds of stuff gets posted here, regardless of whether you agree with it. Heck, they regularly feature John Dvorak's slashdot-troll pieces. Maybe it's Slashtivism?

      Sure, AiWs have always had space issues, but it's time to get on the HD bandwagon.

    3. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by l33td00d42 · · Score: 1
      NTSC broadcasts are supposedly dying soon, so why don't they offer HDTV-capable cards yet?

      ...and that is why this review was crappy. they kept saying "IT DOES TV! OH JESUS! YOU CAN WATCH TV!" "TV" is a completely ambiguous term these days. they only barely mention at the end, "oh wait. it only does the archaic, crappy kind of TV."--the kind i can get on a $20 used hauppage card.

    4. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      NTSC broadcasts are supposedly dying soon, so why don't they offer HDTV-capable cards yet?

      Yeah, your right. That's a genius idea. They should offer a card that does HTDV. They could call it a HDTV Wonder card.

      The HDTV market is still small. That's probably why they have a card especially for that niche (as of yet) market, rather than add the expense of those components to their more mainstream cards.

    5. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The market is small because there are few HDTV devices. Well, few for less than $1,500.

      There are few sub-$1,500 HDTV devices because the market is small. Well, few PC and few portable devices. It's a catch-22 situation.

      HDTV is not growing because of product availability. Product availability is not growing because HDTV really isn't here yet in full force. Repeat et al, reworded in many different ways, it's still the same darn situation.

      Actually, I can't find ANY portable HDTV receivers - and yes, I've looked. All portables I can find are still analog.

      Oh, and the last time I checked, the HDTV Wonder card is not the subject of this review, and totally ignores the question I asked, which is:

      Why the hell are TV tuner (and related product) manufacturers still actively designing and producing analog-only products?

      Why can I not get an HDTV version of the AiW card (not that I want another ATI product, but that's beside the point)? Reminder (again) for the people who don't read: the HDTV wonder card is not an AiW card. It is a discrete (separate) tuner card.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Linux support? HDTV? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Why can I not get an HDTV version of the AiW card

      For exactly the reasons you already listed. HDTV really isn't here yet in full force. It isn't broadcast everywhere, not everyone has a big TV which takes HDTV input, so why include a reciever for it in all your products?

      Posters in other threads have already complained about the extra expense of the AIW over the regular game cards. Now you want to add in the expense of HDTV tuner and they will really start screaming. Yes, the Catch-22 situation sucks, as it always does, but ATI would be silly to shove an extra expensive tuner into a card that most people wouldn't use or want to pay for. That's why they have the HDTV card now, to let those who want to be early adaptors go ahead and make the move. It makes a nice transition piece into the market.

  13. MythTV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if it is configurable with Linux/MythTV? Thanks in advance.

  14. Why bother: ATI SW is unstable and evil by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's the point of running software to tape shows when the software makes the box crash after 3.5days? When I don't use the ATI SW, it stays up for at least 10days (don't trust it more than that and force a reboot)

    On top of that, some shows that I ask it to tape get deleted at the end of the show for no reason. It's so bad that I have to setup a process to copy the file before the ATI SW deletes it!

    It seems anolog copy protection on Cable TV was working well even 3y+ ago!

    (BTW: It's All-in-one radion)

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:Why bother: ATI SW is unstable and evil by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      I watch TV on my 9600 Radeon AIW every day. I haven't rebooted my machine in almost two months (it doesn't crash). I've never had it delete a show I recorded. Maybe you need to try a different version of the drivers.

    2. Re:Why bother: ATI SW is unstable and evil by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      I watch TV on my 9600 Radeon AIW every day. I haven't rebooted my machine in almost two months (it doesn't crash). I've never had it delete a show I recorded. Maybe you need to try a different version of the drivers.

      No, it's you that needs to try different drivers. By the sounds of it you are currently missing out on the full ATI experience. What's the point of even having an AIW if it doesn't make your PC unstable, delete all your movies and set fire to your dog? You may as well have just bought a cheap Hauppauge card.

    3. Re:Why bother: ATI SW is unstable and evil by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      I have tried more recent drivers 2ys ago when they came out with their new "catalyst" drivers. They made the box unusable.
      I'll probably try again but I have no faith in ATI drivers.

      My next TV-tuner card will not be an ATI because I can't use any other less flaky SW with an AIW.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  15. Is ATI Responsible For The Bad 360 Graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something seems to be going terribly wrong at ATI.

    They have been getting creamed by NVidia's stuff this past year. And now with the 360 hitting store shelves everyone who sees the ATI powered graphics is talking about how poor they look and the hideous jaggies.

    Maybe ATI will be able to redeem themselves with the Revolution GPU, but they will have to do something extraordinary to make up for botching the 360 graphics.

    It is depressing to think I will probably end up getting my first non-ATI card to replace my 9800 Pro.

    1. Re:Is ATI Responsible For The Bad 360 Graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if they'd run the game in the right resolution, it wouldn't look jaggy...

      It's like me complaining that my X800 is ass because FEAR looks jaggy when I run it at 640x480.

  16. Why no HDTV and CAbleCard support?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why havent they supported HDTV and CableCard specification?

    There's no reason to get this card considering it will be obsolete in a year or two.

  17. AiW < VGA + TV by courtarro · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the owner of two older AiW cards, I stopped buying AiWs because it just doesn't make fiscal sense to consistently upgrade your TV tuner with your VGA card. The tuner features improve more slowly than gaming cards, and most of the study in this article covers the card's in-game performance, with TV tuning and its quality mentioned as a side note. Personally, I'd rather go with a cutting-edge gaming card for VGA, and a separate tuner for TV, since I won't be forced to part with either if I decide to upgrade the other. Additionally, the tuner chipsets in the AiW often have little 3rd-party support in the drivers, forcing users to use one piece of software to handle TV (ATI's Multimedia Center), often with little support in Linux (I know that MythTV dislikes most of the older AiWs, and I doubt this one will change that). Do yourself a favor and buy a TV Wonder instead (or, of course, a non-ATI product!).

  18. PC to TV by crashcodesdotcom · · Score: 2

    What is the best PC to TV setup?
    Cheapest with mild quaility trade-offs?

    I got a 47" projection (not LCD) TV with HDTV (component) support.
    My pc gots an nVidia 6800 GT (256MB) video card with vga, dvi, and composite output.
    If I output through the composite to my TV, words look really fuzzy and the resolution settings are all funky in general. If I put some media player in full screen mode the picture is generally okay.
    Where do I need to go from here to get a descent PC with TV as monitor solution going?
    I'm considering upgrading my TV in the upcoming year, what features should I look for if I want to use the new TV as a PC monitor?
    And how to get my PC Audio to my TV? Even with connector adaptors the signal doesn't seem compatable.

    Thanks

    1. Re:PC to TV by kesuki · · Score: 1

      any AIW card from the 9800 up will support HDTV output. I don't honesly know if any Nvidia cards support HDTV output, and unless your HDTV supports Progessive scan the words will always look grainy, because windows fonts are all based on being used for progressive scan displays. in fact, it's very hard to make text not look blurry on interlaced video.

      when looking for a TV that can be used as a monitor you always need to check the progressive scan resolution, and usually if the TV has a VGA or dual DVI ports it should be work pretty well with any graphic card.. component video output is not very common on video cards, and composite video is interlaced, which sucks.

    2. Re:PC to TV by rikkards · · Score: 1

      1 word: DVI. HDMI which is the newfangled connector is essentially DVI with Audio (oh and DRM). Since you have a machine that has DVI out you should be ok.
      Matter of fact there isn't a difference (well there is a difference just not a huge one) between the picture through Component and through DVI/HDMI. Now Composite is a different story.

      Well I can't really tell but is that a blessing or a curs (I would say more the former than the latter)

    3. Re:PC to TV by damsa · · Score: 1

      I would get a DLP or LCD projection TV as that has 1280 x 720 resolution native. Most Plasmas in the affordable range do 852x400. Look for a TV with HDMI input. CRTs are the best, but to get sizes in the 40in plus range would be more expensive than getting a projection equivalent.

  19. All-In-Wonder drivers suck by realmolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Everyone knows this. The hardware is nice, but the software package and drivers are HORRIBLE. Yeah, you can get other software to capture video with, but you lose a lot of "proprietary" features of the ATI cards.

    Not to mention ATIs notorious "we'll never release updated drivers for any new operating systems" policy when it comes to their AIW cards. I can almost guarantee that when Windows Vista hits, the TV features of this card won't work on it. Ever.

    Honestly, you're better of picking up one of the Hauppage cards if you really want to have TV features. They're better, better drivers, and widely supported by all kinds of third-party software.

    1. Re:All-In-Wonder drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the vast majority of XP drivers work perfectly well in Vista. the driver model hasn't significantly changed. i can confirm right now that all current ATI XP drivers work just fine in Vista.

  20. Linux? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Did the older All-In-Wonder cards like 9800 work in Linux for its TV tuner? I never did find one since ATI had bad drivers and no support for the TV tuner for Linux. I am dumping my 9800 AIW soon to get a separate HDTV tuner (air2pc) and going back to NVIDIA side (6800).

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  21. I was ready to buy ATI....but not now by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    I had HORRIBLE experiences with the last round of drivers and quite frankly after 2 rounds of "software" driver problems *civ4, cough cough* I'm ready to hand in my ATI AIW9700.

    Trouble is I've been out of the loop so long and I don't know what a good card is from the "other" manufacturers. All tech-specs and benchmarks aside, anyone have any good recommendations for the $200-$300 video card that will take me into the next 3 years?

    Yeah yeah, I'm lazy and not geeky enough to do the research, consider me an average joe.

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:I was ready to buy ATI....but not now by jsoderba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear the 6800 GS is the best value for money right now. (Just as as fast as the plain 6800, but cheaper.)

      Personally I just bought a 6600GT because 150 euros is all I can afford, and my Radeon 9100 isn't cutting it any more.

  22. Re:AiW VGA + TV by Monkey · · Score: 1

    It makes more sense to buy a separate tuner card if you're any sort of serious gamer. The life cycle of a capture board is much longer than your graphics chipset. Since we're talking ATI here, I would recommend one of the boards based on the Theater 550 chipset which can be had for less than $100. A review and comparison of three of these boards can be found here.
    Personally, I own a Sapphire Theatrix Theatre 550 and I have to say this card is great for ripping home movies from the video camera and I also use it as a PVR with SageTV. What I really like about it is I can upgrade my main video card independently, and it doesn't matter if I decide to go with ATI or Nvidia.

  23. Atari 800 XL by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... insert comment here ...

    1. Re:Atari 800 XL by KylePflug · · Score: 1
      ... insert comment here ...

      No, see, that's your job.
  24. yuck by jigjigga · · Score: 1

    those shots look really really awful. I spent 75 bucks on an old tv tuner from avermedia, and that in conjunction with dscaler has been a great experience. Why on earth would you buy a video card with all of that junk built in? Not only does it cost more for each part (combined as 1 unit), but when you upgrade your video card you lose your capability? It just doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:yuck by damsa · · Score: 1

      People like to put these into tiny cases so they can use it in their living room. Certain cases like shuttles and what not only have 2 sometimes 1 available PCI slot so if you want to use the other slots for other uses then an all in one is handy. If you are a systems builder, getting an all in one is handy too as it keeps down the number of inventory you have to keep. If you like having a lot of tuners so you can record 6 channels at once, and your computer has 5 pci slots, then you can use the all in one to record 6th channel. Also people have lots of money so when they upgrade, they upgrade to another all in one.

      I myself would prefer the seperate solution but for some people, they like the integration.

  25. OpenBSD/Solaris Support? (Was: Re:Linux/Myth supp? by quarkscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So long as ATI refuses to recognize that there are other OSes that consumers use besides MS Windows Latest & Greatest(TM), I shall continue to avoid purchasing their products. NVIDia is barely better, what with their binary drivers which always seem to be one or more kernel releases behind the times.

    I do (really!) hate to have my comments modded to flamebait, but there are actually "OTHER OSes" besides x86 GNU/linux (really, there is!). Without reasonably complete source code drivers available, PPC||MIPS||ARM||other GNU/linux as well as *BSD, Solaris will never stand a chance against the WIntel behemouth.

    Barring the possibility of obtaining source code drivers for the latest video cards (or other geeky kit), rather complete hardware documentation should be made available so that the F/OSS community can "roll their own" drivers. Major vendors appear to be so concerned about providing any insight to their hardware designs to their competition that they are forsaking a growing segment of the consumer market.

    Recent news regarding MS Windows "rootkits" showing up in heavily DRMed product should illuminate the dangers of reliance upon one convicted monopolistic company "owning" a nearly ubiquitous portion of the market. Those companies that band together in support of a single platform risk alienating their consumer market when "extremely bad things" crop up to destroy that market.

    Alternative OSes exist; alternative sources of media/content exist; and alternative hardware exists -- when consumers start voting (in droves) with their cash, the current industry "leaders" will likely be caught by surprise. I suspect that those most surprised will not survive.

  26. awwww, too hard for you to grok? by Thud457 · · Score: 0, Troll
    Why haven't you lazy Open Sores bitches reverse-engineered the architecture and implemented your own goddamned Open Sores drivers?!!! THAT WOULD SHOW THEM! It's not like you care a whit about protecting ATI's trade secrets or anything.

    FREE as in "stick it to TEH MAN!!!"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:awwww, too hard for you to grok? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Why are interface protocols "trade secrets". You bought the fucking hardware. You're saying you don't have a right to use it?

      If your only product value lies in a cryptic undocumented port interface then you really don't have something of value now do you?

      Knowing how to switch video resolution or draw a polygon doesn't amount to knowing how to design a GPU pipeline. I'm sorry but there is no comparison.

      That's like knowing the x86 ISA means you know how to duplicate an Athlon.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  27. That used to bug me, too ... but by jabberwock · · Score: 1
    about two years ago I finally came up with a hardware configuration that lets me have it all, I think.

    ("All" meaning, everything *I* want and need.)

    I run dual monitors on my main PC with an nVidia card ... and I run my old AIW 8500 on my No. 2 PC, plugged into the second input on one monitor. So the tuner is the flick of a switch away, on one monitor. And I'm running all the ATI drivers/apps one box removed from anything they might screw up ... like real and sound editing apps.

    Will I ever upgrade the AIW card? Maybe for HDTV. Someday.

  28. But was this written by ATI? by DotDotSlasher · · Score: 2, Informative

    This "review" seems to have been written by a marketing firm, not a reviewer.

    I helped a friend get his AIW X-600 going. What a pain.

    After several tries, the driver checker never did like the video driver that was installed -- it was always out of date.

    The software for viewing DVDs, watching TV, capturing video -- all different interfaces. For a casual guy to want to control it -- very hard to use. Tiny little buttons with cryptic symbols. I tried lots of keyboard shortcuts to get the menus to disappear (I think F2 worked for one).

    You can time-shift, yes -- if you tell it that's what you want to do. And you don't mind fighting the interface to try to move around in time (he didn't have a remote). And you can't move around in time while a normal recording is working.

    Everything on his machine was lightning fast -- except for launching ATI's apps and waiting for video to come along.

    Video capture didn't work in other virtualdub nor Windows Movie Maker.

    There were flickering problems in the resulting video. Sound/video synchronization became a problem over time.

    But, he could copy his video tapes to the hard drive, and then onto a DVD (way more complicated than it needed to be). He could watch TV, set up the programming guide (which didn't install by default -- we had to go look for it through the install DVDs).

    It has the checkmarks of a TIVO, but not the ease of use and clean interface of a TIVO.

  29. Re:AiW VGA + TV by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Ditto to that. I got the AIW 7500 (Was only $200 I think so nowhere near as insane as this one). "It seemed like a good idea at the time"......... I regretted it after a while. AIW's are traditionally pretty crippled for games even in comparison to there numerical equivilants that aren't AiW (As is seen in a review of the newest one that I have seen, probably the one in the article). It was really a pain in the ass when I realized it wasn't cutting it, and had to get another TV tuner in addition to a new Vid card.... "I don't have enough slots" gives some people reason to go with an AiW, but you could get a decent new mobo in most cases for $100 with plenty more slots if that's a problem, and that would probably be more cost effectve in the long run.... And what if you've got all 5 slots filled? I don't know how your filling all those, but a good mobo would probalby take the place of a lot of cards additional functions....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  30. Guaranteed chipset by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    I've owned the original AIW Radeon card, and it was OK for its time. Of course with DirectX 8 and 9 games, it would never work. So time came a couple years ago when TRON 2.0 was out plus Doom3 was around the corner and I needed an upgrade.

    At that time, the 9800 was pretty well regarded. But, there was about 18 different versions of that chipset in various vidcards. Many of the (online) vendors had misleading specs or prices, a lot of cards were lesser 9800 XL cards but without mentioning the 'XL' part. After Christmas there was a nice price drop on the AIW9800 (which uses the superior 9800 'Pro' chipset) which made it competitive with a bunch of the non-TV cards. I was happy, and got a guaranteed part.

    ATI only releases one AIW model per chipset, so you at least know exactly what you are getting in the box. That's how it worked with me, and I was very happy to knowingly get a 9800Pro for use with Doom3 and other newer games.

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  31. My TV Wonder only supports Win9x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those bastards stopped supporting it (external).

    1. Re:My TV Wonder only supports Win9x by Markos · · Score: 1

      These TV Wonder USB drivers for XP. Maybe you overlooked this? I assume by external you mean usb...

      https://support.ati.com/ics/support/KBAnswer.asp?q uestionID=1167

  32. Re:OpenBSD/Solaris Support? (Was: Re:Linux/Myth su by courtarro · · Score: 1
    "Alternative OSes exist; alternative sources of media/content exist; and alternative hardware exists -- when consumers start voting (in droves) with their cash, the current industry "leaders" will likely be caught by surprise. I suspect that those most surprised will not survive."

    Unfortunately, "alternative hardware" in the high-end VGA world only barely exists, and not with any serious contention. There are really only two players, and the older parties that used to be alternatives (such as Matrox and Voodoo) have either been destroyed or have been relegated to niche positions. There's also the self-sustaining cycle of Linux's (or insert other OSS OS here) reputation (true or not) as a poor desktop OS, supported significantly by the very driver issues you bring up, which hurt gaming the most. ATI and nVidia probably see Linux as a server OS (which needs only a very simple VGA card, if at all), or a niche desktop OS, which is supported by the fact that people don't seem to play games on them as much. Thus, the cycle is apparent.

    As things are now, the open-source driver community manages to provide limited support for most 3D cards after a little while on the market, effectively beating or at least matching the latest hardware from outside the nVidia/ATI camp. Thus, no one really has any incentive to make purchases from any other company, other than philosophical ideals. I don't really see an opportunity for OSS consumers to make a big dent in the current duopoly; it's like voting for a 3rd party in American presidential politics: "Go ahead, throw away your vote".

  33. anybody look at those simpsons snapshots? by TimeSpeak · · Score: 1

    I thought they looked horrible (fuzzy, blurry, between frames)...... I took better ones on my old ATI phillips TV Wonder card....

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
  34. At least the A/V isn't disasterous like the 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the AIW 2006 model the A/V dongle all hangs off a fat stiff cable and plugs into a mini-din. No latching, no screwdowns, and difficult to orient correctly. Drops out when an ant passes by. Turns your all-in-wonder into a some-in-wonder for those of us that don't enjoy rooting around the back of your computer all the time. It appears from the illustrations that at least they didn't sabotage this product in the same way and it has screwdowns for everything.

  35. how is that post FLAMEBAIT? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    How does asking about linux support for a new piece of hardware become flamebait?

    Someone please, PLEASE explain this to me.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  36. is it as bad as the AIW 9700pro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! I wonder if this one has the great features of my AIW 9700 pro? Right now it is sitting in my drawer, useless, since it finally gave up the ghost after weird snow on the screen for a month or two. Before that it ran great in my Shuttle box (so long as the case was open and I had a massive room fan pointed right at it). I mean... Morrowind was great so long as I turned off all the shading...resolution... And the TV tuner software... Ugggh. I am never wasting my time with this company's garbage again....

  37. ati - the great disappointment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will never buy any ATI product again. The cause - bad linux support of AIW128 (16MB). TV tuner worked only with RedHat9 and Gatos driver but not with Fedora. 3D crashed with Quake3Demo: when I launched the game, first time all was OK, but when I exited the game and launched it later again, my computer crashed so, that only Reset button did help. Now I have Nvidia6200 and Leadtek WinFast2000 TV tuner - both of them have nice linux support.

  38. Huh... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Whys everyone bitching. I'm watching adult swim on my second monitor (off my PCI 9200) from my AIW 9800Pro right now. Never had any problems with it, other than the ocasional instability when i've got the TV on and have too many browser tabs open.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  39. oh soo wrong... by Markos · · Score: 1

    uhmm, no...

    Point 1: The AIW's TV capture is not better, they are the same, at least they were the last time I looked into these things. Owning both a AIW 7000 and a TV Wonder PCI, I've seen the both myself.

    Point 2: Hauppauge makes a better card, this is true, as it includes hardware mpeg support. But this isnt about the Hauppauge, this is about the AIW vrs the TV Wonder.

    Point 3: Ever try getting a AIW to work in Linux? Good luck, go over to the Gatos page and see the pain that AIW's are in linux. The TV wonder and the Hauppauge cards are a breeze to setup, insert the driver module and you're good to go.

    So basicly you are paying for a capture card that will be useless when you upgrade your video card, as opposed to buying a tuner card separately and it lasting as long as you own your computer. My tuner has gone from a orignal pentium board all the way to my barton.

    There is no good reason to get an AIW unless you can't afford to spare an extra pci slot.

    I can't believe posts like this get modded up... no offense :)

    Mod me as a troll, but whatever, the truth must be told!

  40. Heat dissipation by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I might add something to this:

    Heat is bad for the card, yes. Bad for the inside of the case yes. Adding fans controls is yes... but you must factor many other things.

    a) Where does the heat come from: Electricity, generally being wasted, and therefore upping your power bill

    b) Where does the heat go: In the summer my main machine if left on overnight would noticable raise the temperature in the room. Over a few days it would become sweltering. Getting the heat out of the case doesn't always get rid of the overall problems of heat.

    Personally, I'd like to see cards rated for heat emissions along with FPS etc. How about "average temperature after a game of Quake IV?" Fan noise would be another nice thing to factor in.

  41. Re:OpenBSD/Solaris Support? (Was: Re:Linux/Myth su by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Alternative OSes exist; alternative sources of media/content exist; and alternative hardware exists -- when consumers start voting (in droves) with their cash, the current industry "leaders" will likely be caught by surprise. I suspect that those most surprised will not survive.

    I know I'm a bit late on this discussion but the fact is that consumers are not going to "start voting (in droves) with their cash" for a long time to come. There is obviously a reason you feel the need to point out alternative OSs as alternative OSs on a "tech hip" site such as slashdot; their numbers (as in users) are small. Once these become more of a market (as Linux has) they will be taken more seriously.

    This Linux revolution I have heard about has taken years and years longer than the average Linux enthusiast foreseen back when RedHat went IPO. Back then they acted like it was a given that Linux would overtake a reasonable marketshare and most of them predicted it would have happened overnight and years before this posting was made. Is Linux an OS hardware manufacturers should consider? Sure. But we're hell and away from the Golden Dawn on Linux that was (and still is) raved about. I was told back then that by now Bill Gates would be washing your windshield with a beat up Starbucks cup in his hand begging for change at a busy intersection in Seattle.

    This isn't to say alternative OSs don't have a place and that Microsoft shouldn't have less of a place then they do today but how many of these OSs are going to go the way of BeOS? How much longer will it be before I can goto Best Buy and buy a box with Linux pre-installed and ready to go?

    In time we will see more Linux installs made available from more vendors but we are doubtlessly years from the point where we can buy a box off the shelf and have Linux preinstalled instead of having to wait for the Geek Squad (Good Lord!) to bumble thru and install only to find it was done with the competency of a six year old.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.