Slashdot Mirror


New 'Mighty Mouse' Formula Found

mystyc writes to tell us that scientists at Johns Hopkins have improved upon their original "mighty mice" discovery. Teamed with the biotech firm MetaMorphix and pharmaceutical company Wyeth, they have found a new agent that interacts with the muscle-limiting protein myostatin that was able to trigger a 60% increase in muscle size after just two weekly injections.

24 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. Gotta love the scroll wheel. by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please move this to the Apple section :P

  2. Investigation... by daddyrief · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congress better look into this. If baseball players can't do this, mice shouldn't be able to either.

    --
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." -Thomas Jefferson
  3. new market? by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So will this only be used for already sick people, or are we going to have to test for it in sports in the next decade?

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
  4. Re:MLB by IdleTime · · Score: 4, Funny

    They can read???

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  5. What happened to the heart? by BerntB · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Increased heart size is dangerous, right? This increase all muscles, so...

    What are the effects on the heart?

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:What happened to the heart? by inputsprocket · · Score: 3, Informative

      It only affects striated muscle. Heart muscle is smooth and so is unaffected.

  6. Give some to the depressed hamsters? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wait, let me patent that idea, first.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
  7. Keeping Score by Nerdposeur · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, for the obligatory recap, we're looking forward to: Mice that are really strong, don't age (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/ 18/2133229&tid=214&tid=14), can regrow damaged limbs (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/ 01/0035245&tid=99&tid=14), and have no fear (http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/ 18/0644240&tid=191&tid=14).

    I, for one, am investing in explosive mousetraps.

    1. Re:Keeping Score by ViX44 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They regenerate, and you want to blow them into pieces? Cut up some starfish while you're at it.

    2. Re:Keeping Score by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

      and the rodents are organising in attack squadrons.

      We're doomed!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:Keeping Score by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't forget about piloting millitary airplanes. Screw better mousetraps -- I need a anti-rat missiles.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  8. Re:MLB by Hey+Pope+Felcher+.+. · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . I am a baseball player and I take persenal ofense at this slur on us. just cause we can run and not fall other and dont wear glas's does not meen we dont have the intelligense to read and learn and become an actif member of the geek crowd.[br][br]Your just another hater. keep reading them books and see how many women you can get buzy with.

  9. Abstract / free full paper link by Frangible · · Score: 5, Informative
    ABSTRACT: Myostatin is a secreted protein that normally functions as a negative regulator of muscle growth. Agents capable of blocking the myostatin signaling pathway could have important applications for treating human muscle degenerative diseases as well as for enhancing livestock production. Here we describe a potent myostatin inhibitor, a soluble form of the activin type IIB receptor (ACVR2B), which can cause dramatic increases in muscle mass (up to 60% in 2 weeks) when injected into wild-type mice. Furthermore, we show that the effect of the soluble receptor is attenuated but not eliminated in Mstn(-/-) mice, suggesting that at least one other ligand in addition to myostatin normally functions to limit muscle growth. Finally, we provide genetic evidence that these ligands signal through both activin type II receptors, ACVR2 and ACVR2B, to regulate muscle growth in vivo.

    Full journal article (PDF)

  10. Athletes... nature's willing guinea pigs. by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are we going to have to test for it in sports in the next decade?

    Decade? I give it months.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  11. normal people by rayde · · Score: 5, Interesting
    so my question is this... if something like this is proven to be safe in humans, allowing large increases in muscle growth, will it ever be available to the public? if not... why not?

    Steroids have long been banned in sports because they can have catastrauphic side-effects, and pro atheletes are often seen as role models. however, if a product came out that could dramatically strengthen humans, without nasty side-effects, for what reason shouldn't the average person be able to go out and in two weeks have significantly larger muscles? should it be regulated? and if so, why?

    there are ethical implications here... the haves vs. the have-nots... those who can afford to increase their muscle mass using the products would perhaps become a superior segment of the human race. imagine a scenario where western countries and their super-citizens gain a distinct physical advantage over the less wealthy countries.

    yet think of the productivity gains that would be possible in manufacturing, construction, or other physically intensive occupations. strengthening your workers could bring huge advantages.

    it's a very interesting issue, i'm sure one that we'll see popping up again in the future.

    1. Re:normal people by TheTerrorized · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AFAIK, the FDA does not approve drugs that improve regular people, just drugs that can fix problems already there. Many college students take ritalin to allow them to focus with low side-effects but they still cannot get it without a prescription.

    2. Re:normal people by mangamuscle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need to recheck again your facts. The reason steroids are banned is not because they have side effects, ask your doctor and he will tell you that all medicines (including) drugs have side effects. So why steroids in particular are illegal and (i.e.) viagra is not? 1) The soviets block was using it and winning medals, so it was easier to call it immoral and unfair using steroids. 2) Nixon started the war on drugs, adding steroids to the list was the next natural thing to do, nowadays 'roids are a multi-million dollar a year industry. 3) For a fascist goverment it is better to have fat citizens, athletic citizens have the scary custom of flexing their political muscles against the goverment.

  12. Re:Mighty Mouse Theme by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Mr. Mouse,

    I am writing in regards to your inquiry about compensation for your recent affliction of horrible cancers. I am afraid we must reject any request for compensation. If you will refer back to the release you signed before submitting to our experiments, you will find that you stated that you understood all the risks and possible side effects of the injection and would not hold Johns Hopkins responsible for any adverse effects. In summary, I am sorry about your sickness; and I hope you can see that while this injection will eventually bring about your untimely death, you were able to dispense some mouse justice prior to your illness.

    Sincerely yours,

    G. Figley Whitesides
    Attorney at Law

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  13. No miracle pill here by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well the number one through three issues I can think of is whether or not it increases tendon and ligament strength. I'm pretty sure if all it does is block myostatin that it doesn't do either. If not, then you run the risk of having muscles way too strong for your joints.

    Of course you run this same risk if you leap right into weight lifting with low-rep, heavy-weight work without spending the time to strengthen these joints with high-rep, low-weight work first.

    On the other hand, since this almost certainly does nothing for neuromuscular response, you'll also end up with a lot of large but mostly useless muscle mass that's untappable for you.

    In other words, don't expect this to substitute for working out for anyone who's not trying to stave off the decay of their existing muscles.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  14. The End of Roadkill by dogwelder99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pretty soon, running over rodents on the street will just make them mad enough to chase you down and fight back. Better invest in a Hummer.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. I know it's funny... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I know the title of this article is kind of funny, and there are a lot of funny posts on this thread, however; if you are interested in learning a little more about this, and wish to see a different perspective on the issue (such as practical appliactions, etc...) Check out the following link.

    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6065

    Seeing that the source for the main article is currently ./'d, you should have time to have a gander :-)

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
  17. Wrong by Seoulstriker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heart muscle is also striated. However, the cardiac myocytes are not multi-nucleated and the pattern is more zig-zaggy. Nevertheless, if the cardiac myocytes were not striated, the muscle just wouldn't have enough force to contract and propel blood through the chambers and the peripheral vasculature.

    I'm still waiting on the published research...

    --
    I am defenseless. Use your button. Mod me down with all of your hatred.
  18. Re:No Problemo? by dallasmsl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In response to your posting, bodybuilders have NOT been found to have less myostatin than non-weightlifters. Not ONE scientific report will back up your statement. In fact, in most bodybuilders, myostatin has been working just fine at keeping them from becoming absolutely huge. No bodybuilder just looks at weights and becomes muscular. Unlike these mice, bodybuilders train on a daily basis. These mice gained muscle mass (and muscle cells!) without any additional exercise! As for your inference that the child in Germany will have heart problems, the doctors do NOT know this. In fact, they do know that the parents don't have problems so their warning about the child is unfounded.