Slashdot Mirror


Blockbuster's Offensive Against Netflix Flops

bigtallmofo writes "With over four million subscribers, Netflix was an obvious target for rival Blockbuster. In 2005, target them they did. Introducing their own DVD-by-mail service and (for a while) undercutting Netflix's price point, Blockbuster went for the jugular. A year later Netflix shows a market value of $1.5 billion with no debt compared to Blockbuster's $684 million worth with $1.0 billion in debt. Is there still a DVD-by-mail war or has Netflix won?"

302 comments

  1. They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not to bring the whole "throttling" thing into this, but it really seems that the war now is between Netflix and themselves. If they can keep from shooting themselves in the foot again, i.e., lawsuits, etc... Then theoretically, They shouldn't have anything to worry about(considering their market share). I can say from personal experience that they are trying to protect and keep their existing user base, and are quite apologetic when called on it now. I am currently enjoying a a free month + two months at half price after calling them on it. Bottom line is this, they both obviously have deeper personal issues to deal with... I'd say the war is on temporary hold until they can both get their crap together

    --
    Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    1. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DVD-by-mail is neat and will overtake DVD rental at a brick-and-mortar location in the near term. But the DVD-by-mail industry (which consists of mainly Netflix now) is going to have a fight on it's hands when video "rental" over the network takes off. (maybe 2007Q1?)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by iPaige · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Netflix as a corporation has many lawsuits, but their out there with no real basis to start off on anyhow. These plantiffs are suing because the DVD's arent there in "one-day" always. Isn't that the postal services fault? Also because not all the plans were "unlimited rentals", well did ya really think the 7 dollar plan was gonna be the same as the 20 dollar plan? I mean, come on.

    3. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by oGMo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Eh the lawsuit in question is total BS. I was a customer within the window, I received the email, and I decided that the lawsuit was full of crap and I wasn't going to cash in. Seriously, read the claim... anyone who is semi-literate and halfway-intelligent can understand that when Netflix says "unlimited rentals, 3 at a time" it's not the same as "unlimited rentals, send them all at once".

      My guess is the settlement was done because it was really cheap for netflix... upgrade everyone's plan for a month (giving customers a taste of the higher plan and possibly having some switch) vs continuing a pointless lawsuit. Netflix: 1, Lawyers: 0.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    4. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With all do respect, utill you have had this (throttling) happen to you, you're really not qualified to defend them or thier position, and quite frankly are talking out your rear. Dollars to donuts you don't rent enough movies from them to be a victim to this garbage, and that's fine. But to come out and respond like this is just plain Flaimbait. I could go on-and-on about some of the crap I've dealt with from Netflix, suffice to say - it was enough to inspire them to give me $40 worth of complimentary services, just to remain a customer. So before you go and question peoples "intelligence", and "Literacy", get your facts straight.

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
    5. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by SeventyBang · · Score: 1, Troll



      (It's (s/b) aside), you're looking at two different business models, two methods of income from those business models, and two different forms of data to deal with all of this.

      Blockbuster's original market plan (et al as they were Blockbusters original market lan (aside from gobablling everyone else before they could become a threat) was the expectation of a decent percentage of people who ran over the deadline. Think of this as a bar who sells some money from sub- to mediocre-quality food. They aren't in the business for that food (or its quality). They're in the business for alcohol. Once NetFlix showed significant staying power. Blockbuster realized they'd better come with something...fast. And like the software world: why invent when you can copy? (even if you don't have the source) After that, it has become a price war with a couple of twists: Blockbuster has to support brick & mortar stores, including personnel, Flix does't; this impacts a lot of things I won't iterate. Blockbuster permits impetuous|discretionary purposes (stop & rent a movie, stop for a movie, and you're golden.


    6. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone who is semi-literate and halfway-intelligent can understand that when Netflix says "unlimited rentals, 3 at a time" it's not the same as "unlimited rentals, send them all at once".

      Anyone who is semi-literate and has read the complaints can understand that it's not the 3-at-a-time people are having a problem with, it's after you've borrowed and returned "too many" discs, everything you wanted is suddenly out of stock, but only for you. It's the same "unlimited isn't" bullshit you used to get from ISPs back when they were making the transfer from hourly to monthly billing. It would be different if they actually told you what the limits were, but that would put a crimp in their marketing, now wouldn't it?

      (As for this particular case, the plaintiff is whining about the "unlimited" marketing as well as whatever they promise for "one-day" shipping, which is probably entirely out of netflix's control, as another poster had said.)

    7. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I love it when people talk about business models like they're really in a position to understand or compare them let alone explain them.

      The giveaway was, "this impacts a lot of things I won't iterate" which is bullshit artist code for "this impacts a lot of things I can't really understand but you could imagine how they impact things, right?"

    8. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it's their fault for advertising it when they know the postal service doesn't deliver it within a day (I don't believe the postal service guarantees or implies 1 day service.)

      However, despite the nonreality of the 1-day service, I have no problem recommending them. When I used to have their service, I intended to cancel with them before going on a 7 month trip to Europe (mostly because of a lack of anime in their inventory at the time....). Apparently I didn't, when the person keeping my finances in order gave me the CC bills^_^;;;;; - one phone call later, without being put on hold, they gave me my money back in short order without hassle (because there was no account activity) and with still being friendly.

      I think the only thing that might occur within the next ten years is that Netflix's current business model will become obsolete (like Blockbusters) due to bittorrent downloads (and if the studios start offering legal ones).

    9. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      I've been a Netflix subscriber for nearly two years now, and I've never experienced this "throttling" you speak of. I turn movies around typically within 2-3 days of receiving them, and almost always receive the promised one day turn around time. I can have around 30 discs sent and returned in one bill cycle.

    10. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Netflix: 1, Lawyers: 0

      Lawyers 0? Can't say I agree:

      If the Court approves this settlement, Plaintiff's Counsel will ask the Court to award, and Defendant has agreed to pay, up to $2,528,000 in attorney's fees and costs.

    11. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I doubt it... Not unless there's something like allofmp3 for movies that will let you download an unrestricted version at a quality you choose for maybe a dollar or so.

      Really I just don't want to dick with piracy. It's too much hassle for something thats generally low quality, has editing machine timestamps, foriegn language subtitles, or is filmed off a theater screen... Why would I waste hours and hours getting movies that way when I can get 5-10 movies a month for $15 from netflix, with perfect quality and no hassle?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by rfunches · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's their fault for advertising it when they know the postal service doesn't deliver it within a day (I don't believe the postal service guarantees or implies 1 day service.)

      USPS's fastest shipping option is Express Mail, which is overnight to two-day service (depending on the origin and where you're sending it to) with a money-back guarantee. I haven't seen Netflix's advertising but if they note that proximity to a Netflix warehouse is the primary factor in delivery time, then there's no false advertising; I don't expect a package from Nevada to arrive in Northern Virginia after a package from New Jersey or Kentucky (Amazon and several other online sites have warehouses in these states).

    13. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by E8086 · · Score: 1

      The plaintiffs were probably a bunch of people with "lawyer friends" who never bothered to read the sign on the mailbox that said "last pickup 10am/3pm/5pm" and expected to be able to drop their movie in the mailbox around 10pm and have the next one delivered with the next day's mail. While there are limits to "unlimited rentals" they're understandable limits, there is no maximum number you can rent each month, you can rent as many as you can in 30days, the number depends on how fast you watch and return them. It will be a lot more if you watch it the night it arrives and drop it in a mailbox the next morning before 9am on your way to work than if you keep it for a week. The turnover probably relies on the speed and efficency of the local warehouse. I tried Blockbuster and Netflix for 3-4mo each ending in Aug. The address on the return envelope for both was in the same city but Netflix took a day or two longer, If I sent one back Monday with Blockbuster I'd get the next Wed, but Thurs or Fri with Netflix. My schedule has since changed and I've canceled opting to buy or record seasons of TV. Blockbuster has the slight advantage with the two in-store rentals each month, nice if there's a store near by.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    14. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by apflwr · · Score: 1

      These plantiffs are suing because the DVD's arent there in "one-day" always. Isn't that the postal services fault?

      I think the complaint is that their turnaround (receive disk A, send disk B) is often not within one business day as they claim. From my experience (and plenty of anecdotal evidence, here and elsewhere) they seem to deliberately slow down deliveries... Often if I would send three disks back at the same time one or two would be "received" a day before the others, and the replacements would come a day or two or three apart. That's Netflix's fault, not the post office.

    15. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most torrent sites have sections for DVD rips... since they are ripped from store bought DVDs, they have none of the problems you mention. They do take time to download, but you simply queue up 10 things you want, and they download without you having to do anything.

    16. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I've been a Netflix subscriber for nearly two years now, and I've never experienced this "throttling" you speak of.

      The two posts that have actually mentioned this phenomenon so far have both been penned by Chris Bradshaw. Apparently he is the sole target of this dastardly plot.

      When I first subscribed to Netflix I was renting on average one movie per day (3 at a time, returned 2-3 days later). This lasted several months, until I burned through my initial queue, and now I'm down to a more reasonable 10 or so movies per month. Overall I was nowhere close to being a profitable customer initially, and I'm probably borderline now. But I have never experienced anything I'd call "throttling". My movies are received the day after I ship them back and my next movies are shipped out the same day. This happens 100% of the time.

      I live in NYC so that may have something to do with it. My closest service center is in Flushing, within the city limits. And no doubt it's a big one, because it's serving probably hundreds of thousands of customers. Only one time have I ever gotten a DVD from elsewhere in the Netflix system, and that was 2046 - a relatively small foreign film (especially at the time I rented it, when it was one of their region 0 Hong Kong DVD's).

      It wouldn't surprise me if people living in areas that are not as well served have to wait a little longer. Maybe their service center doesn't have the films in stock that they want, and a request has to be relayed to another service center further away. So turnaround takes longer, and the mail takes longer. If a customer doesn't look at the labels on his envelopes, he may never know this. His envelopes may also be labeled for return to his local service center when they actually came from somewhere else.

      But I doubt there's any sort of nefarious plot going on. A lot more people than just one would be complaining about it - there are a lot of long-time, heavy-use Netflix subscribers in here.

    17. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by marcs · · Score: 1

      They do not even ship the same day your return is received anymore. It used to be that way, but I they receive a returned movie on say Monday, they won't ship the next one till Tuesday. At least in my case.

      Quality of service has most certainly decreased.

    18. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand the what the term "throttling" means... If an account is being "throttled", the users rate of comsumption is being regulated by Netflix (slowing turn-arounds). So, if a user is being "throttled" then they are not recieving unlimited rentals are they? Thus it appears that you are the "semi-literate" one in this case.

    19. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      I was getting all my DVDs next day for a long time. Now, I'll put a DVD in the mail on Friday or Saturday, Netflix receives it on Monday, and then they say the next ones will ship on Tuesday, and they are not next day anymore. Not sure if this is due to the Holiday season or what. It will be interesting to see if this contiunes after the new year.

      In all I've had a great experience with Netflixs. I've received a couple of cracked discs, and they are very good about sending out replacements. If they just had a Porno section I'd be set ;-)

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    20. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      They advertise the 1 day verbally (something like "Delivered in 1 business day") as if it's the norm and put a disclaimer asterisk on the screen or something.

      If they said "Could be delivered in as little as a business day" I'd understand as they wouldn't be giving false impressions/high expectations.

      BTW, express starts at something like $11, I think Netflix is going to stick with the non-guaranteed regular postage^_^

    21. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by spacebird · · Score: 1

      The upcoming "Homezone" by SBC and Dish network delivers exactly that, and supposedly much better than "On Demand" does.

      --
      What, me? Never.
    22. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Araxen · · Score: 0

      Porn will be the killer app for Netflix. I'd rather see them start carrying video games(PS2, Xbox, Gamecube, etc...)though. That way I only need to join one provider for all my needs.

    23. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Im in the UK, so I dont have Netflix. What I do have is Lovefilm.com! Pretty much the same as Netflix, rental queue, DVDs in post, keep as long as you want etc.

      Except in the past month theyve added downloadable movies as an extra cost service. Pick what you want from the selection available, pay £1.99 UKP and download it, watch it for up to seven days and then it stops working (WMV based DRM).

      So some are already thinking of the next step.

    24. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Really I just don't want to dick with piracy. It's too much hassle for something thats generally low quality, has editing machine timestamps, foriegn language subtitles, or is filmed off a theater screen" This is were user comments come in. The fools who ignore them are the ones who are upset on the end. Downloading blind off a public tracker; you've gotta be kidding me. "Why would I waste hours and hours getting movies" Hours and hours? My computer was always gonna be there overnight. Now its just turned on, so it works will I sleep. Thats a net gain from computing time I would never normally use. People always seem to be forgetting the fact that piracy, if done right, has no effect on the user, but a large gain in culture (movies/music/anime porn/etc)

    25. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Zip.ca (netflix for canada) has a feature where you go to the website, and let they know you returned a movie. That way, you really can get movie the day after you send it back. You are allowed to have 1 movie "in transit" on top of the 4 you have rented. It's a really nice feature, and I think it lets them keep on top of shipping times. There's rarely a time of more than 2 days when I don't ahve 4 movies, and I don't think I ever have less than 3.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    26. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I use Zip.Ca, and I notice one reason why they weren't sending movies out immediately after I sent it back. The reason was not enough movies in my queue. Whey I only had 40ish movies in my queue. I would often have to wait a day or two for them to send something out. Even though they tell you to keep only like 20 in your queue, it's really best if you have far more, so they always have something to send out. I'm up around 200 right now. I dont' think there's ever a time when they don't send one out right away.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    27. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by helfire57 · · Score: 1

      I've had NetFlix for almost two years now. I can think of about 5 DVDs that have shipped later than the day that they got it and those 5 all went the next day. (I will add that they work on Saturday as well which is helps the "next business day thing."

    28. Re:They each have thier own issues to deal with... by Chris+Bradshaw · · Score: 1
      Netflix does NOT ship out the same day as recieved 100% of the time. To quote, "In determining priority for shipping and inventory allocation, we give priority to those members who receive the fewest DVDs through our service. As a result, those subscribers who receive the most movies may experience that (i) the shipment of their next available DVD occurs at least one business day following return of their previously viewed movie, (ii) delivery takes longer, as the shipments may not be processed from their local distribution center and (iii) they receive movies lower in their queue more often than our other subscribers. Other factors that may affect delivery times, include, but are not limited to, (i) the distance between the distribution center from which your DVD was shipped and your delivery address, (ii) the timing of your placement or adjustment of movies in your queue and (iii) circumstances impacting delivery by the U.S. Postal Service.".

      The above excerpt can be found Here

      You know what's funny? I live 60 miles from thier Global Headquarters, so I don't think that location has much to do with it. You know what's even funnier? If you had bothered to read the rest of this thread, you would have taken notice of how many of the "Heavy-use" Netflix subscribers you mentioned are not only familiar with "Throttling" but they corroborate my claims as well. Instead of spending 10 minutes on your post, spend 10 minutes doing some research on the subject... Heck, the Netflix site is a great place to start, as they now openly admit to the practice.

      --
      Get your Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool Here for FREE! - http://fedora.redhat.com
  2. Netflix... by lasmith05 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Netflix is too entrenched to be taken out by another company. However, I do think faster broadband and downloadable (legal) movies like those available on itunes are going to slowly chip away at netflix.

    --
    www.samuraidreams.com - My Blog
    www.samuraifiles.com - Get Some Videos Here
    1. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 0

      Netflix DVDs don't care about what operating system you're running though.

    2. Re:Netflix... by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      You and a couple other people on the internet are the only ones who really care what operating systems are unsupported.

      (yes, I'm a Linux kernel developer)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Netflix... by lasmith05 · · Score: 1

      Isn't really an issue if you are running windows, apple, set-top box, which is most likely the target audience.

      --
      www.samuraidreams.com - My Blog
      www.samuraifiles.com - Get Some Videos Here
    4. Re:Netflix... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Well, the US is 5% of the population, and perhaps 20% or so of the economy. Most of the potential market is wide open, and cultural and business differences are large enough that it's unclear if there is an advantage to already have a functioning business process elsewhere to start from (or if that even creates a change adversity that is a sum negative).

      I really wonder to what degree it really is possible for any one company to dominate the world market in most culture- or society-related products anymore. What I mean is not that societies are becoming more resistant to outside influences, but that the market - seen as purchasing power or some other similar measure - has grown a lot. Perhaps 30 years ago, if you two or three of the north American, west European and the Japanese markets, you really had market dominance. That is simply not true to the same degree anymore. Becoming a dominant player just is a lot harder today - and perhaps impossible in some areas already.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Netflix... by vlad-o-mirror · · Score: 0

      iFlicks (read iTunes tv shows and movies) will make Netflix ob-so-lete.

    6. Re:Netflix... by geminidomino · · Score: 1


      Unless you run Linux.

    7. Re:Netflix... by Moofie · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe the four of you could, like, start a club or something.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Netflix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps among the blind and functionally retarded. Those of us who like to watch movies on something larger than a 2" screen will continue to watch DVDs.

    9. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1
      You and a couple other people on the internet are the only ones who really care what operating systems are unsupported.



      Right, because no one uses mac.
    10. Re:Netflix... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Oh so legal downloads will work with the hundreds of millions of set top DVD players already in consumers' hands?

    11. Re:Netflix... by mallan · · Score: 1

      iFlicks (read iTunes tv shows and movies) will make Netflix ob-so-lete. Until High Definition becomes the norm. Lots more pixels, lots more download time.

      --
      "Good people drink good beer"
    12. Re:Netflix... by maccw · · Score: 1

      apparently Netflix has this technology already in place. Its caught up in MPAA red tape.

      --
      My karma is getting better everyday.
    13. Re:Netflix... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Relatively speaking, that is correct.

    14. Re:Netflix... by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen mention of the sort, but I quit NetFlix when they patented their business model — http://ir.netflix.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID= 112258. At that point, any dissatisfaction with their service was moot for (as far as I was concerned) competition was illegal.

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    15. Re:Netflix... by hubt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think there will always be a bandwidth problem. There might be enough bandwidth now for downloadable video, but it's definitely a stretch. And as we upgrade the network, we'll just want better content. HD content will required 4x as much bandwidth as we need for regular TV and once you see things in HD, you never go back.

    16. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      Yes. all DVD players ever created contain hidden hard drives and wireless cards, just waiting for someone to hit the switch enabling their hidden features.

    17. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      The millions of non-microsoft users don't count.
      users of false operating systems: please purchase and install the latest version of microsoft windows.
      Users with hardware not supported by microsoft are advised to dispose of their incompatible devices.

    18. Re:Netflix... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Bill, is that you?

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    19. Re:Netflix... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did get your sarcasm the first time. It's just that what, 90% of the market is windows? The wants of that 10% divided into mac and linux are bound to be much lower priority, if one at all.

    20. Re:Netflix... by orasio · · Score: 1

      You don't seem as a marketing expert.
      You don't want to alienate 10% of your target audience.
      You can have a niche product and cater to a 5% of the population, but it's stupid from a marketing perspective to leave out people that you don't need to. Specially when you are targeting large audiences. That top 10% might be all profit, and your might be chopping it off just because you don't want to do some more testing.

    21. Re:Netflix... by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      It's a defensive patent, they're not going after Blockbuster for licensing fees.

    22. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1
      Yes, I did get your sarcasm the first time. It's just that what, 90% of the market is windows? The wants of that 10% divided into mac and linux are bound to be much lower priority, if one at all.


      This is SLASHDOT you moron, home of the digital minority, you're preaching to the wrong crowd about shaving off the smaller group. That would be like going to detroit and telling them that black people only make up 13% or so of the population and because of that are not important.
      Not every software company's market has to reach 90% of the computer users, the millions of mac users create enough revenue for many people to live off of. I am capable of driving to the local mall and finding a store that is aimed at my insignificant system, along with three other stores that carry hardware and/or software for it. I can also purchase distros and documentation on all of the other operating systems I mentioned at said mall.
    23. Re:Netflix... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I know all that. Listen to yourself. You're so indignant it's like I trolled you considering how many words you're wasting.

    24. Re:Netflix... by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      What kind of defense is that? the "I'm so stupid that words spoken to me are wasted" defense?

    25. Re:Netflix... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      The original instigator, OrangeTide, was just trying to get your goat. So was I somewhat. I also think that self-created small minorities should realize just how significant they really are. That would involve going to the minorities and telling them, like on /. Oh, and insulting groups of people who can't change who they are is vastly different from insulting groups of people who can change their OS.

  3. well-positioned for downloadable movies... by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting



    Netflix has already partnered with Tivo, which already has tivo-to-go that works for the video iPod.... potentially they're ready to roll-out downloadable movies...

    Seth

    1. Re:well-positioned for downloadable movies... by lasmith05 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There you go! That's exactly what i'm talking about. :)

      --
      www.samuraidreams.com - My Blog
      www.samuraifiles.com - Get Some Videos Here
    2. Re:well-positioned for downloadable movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix and TiVo? Yeah, there are two companies whose partnership guarantees Netflix' future profitability.

    3. Re:well-positioned for downloadable movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their web site is slower than shitting up-hill. You think they can handle the load incurred by downloadable movies??

  4. The Red Envelope by oGMo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah a number of people might subscribe to Blockbuster's deal. It might suit them fine. But in this case, Netflix has won the mindshare. Blockbuster is the video store on the corner, and well-established at that; but on the internet, Netflix is the common word. The red envelopes are signature. They've won the highly-important mindshare game, and they appear to be winning the business game, too.

    Sure, there are always advantages of one over the other. Blockbuster has instant gratification---I can get the movie I want within minutes. Netflix has wider selection---I can't walk into a BB and find much anime. They also have convenience---I decide on a movie, I can click it and it'll be there tomorrow. And I can procrastinate and watch it when I feel like, returning it when I want. And it's cheaper than the corner store if I watch a lot of movies.

    I can't really speak to BB's online service; they might have similar selection and pricing, but they also have the same disadvantages. And after dealing with Netflix ("oh, the movie never came? here, we'll ship you another free of charge") vs Blockbuster ("oh, you returned the movies in the morning, but we didn't notice til after noon... that's $6 please"), I would definitely rather do business with the former.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:The Red Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice but Blockbuster does not charge for late returns anymore.

    2. Re:The Red Envelope by oGMo · · Score: 1

      Maybe not the online service, but is this the same "no more late fees" that they got sued for, or have they actually changed their ways?

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    3. Re:The Red Envelope by anagama · · Score: 1
      I can't really speak to BB's online service; they might have similar selection and pricing, but they also have the same disadvantages.
      I tried blockbuster for a short time. Their website was ugly and busy compared to Netflix'. But what got me to cancel was the fact a search for Star Trek Voyager showed all seasons except for season 3 or 4 -- can't recall exactly but there was absolutely no way I could find any discs for that season no matter how I tried searching. Either their search engine really sucks, or they forgot to buy a whole season of a tv show. Either way, that was enough. Oh, and they were slow compared to netflix.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:The Red Envelope by toddbu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nice but Blockbuster does not charge for late returns anymore.

      But how much damage did they do to their reputation when they did charge late fees? I will never deal with Blockbuster again because of their policies. I can't trust them to do the right thing. Let's face it - they drove the mom & pop stores out of business but never established themselves as a member of my community. They were stupid not to build loyalty, and eventually they'll go out of business or get snapped up. The only thing is that Netflix could be undermined by the download market when it becomes legal and widespread, so they have to have something more than the "red envelope".

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    5. Re:The Red Envelope by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute. You cancelled your subscription because they wouldn't let you watch Star Trek: Voyager?! You should be getting on your knees and thanking them for sparing you such torture!

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    6. Re:The Red Envelope by dirty · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not entirely true. A number of franchises never participated in the program, and many that did are cancelling it. Basically they need the late fees as an incentive to get people to return videos and games, without them they were having trouble keeping new releases in stock.

      --

      -matt
    7. Re:The Red Envelope by dirty · · Score: 1

      I'd say they did no damage to their reputation by charing late fees before the whole "no more late fees" scam. Every video rental store charges late fees, hell even libraries charge late fees. People simply accept it.

      --

      -matt
    8. Re:The Red Envelope by Parham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just want to point out that while in the US, they are franchised, they aren't in Canada. And as far as I know, Canada doesn't plan on dropping their "no late charges" policy (at least anytime soon). They seem to be grabbing a lot of customers from Rogers Video.

    9. Re:The Red Envelope by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      I knew the American public would be too stupid for the "no late fees" policy. As if you could rent movies and keep them for 3 years at no extra charge. Not like they made it any big secret that it converts to a purchase after a certain amount of time. Nothing new here; some lawyers saw an opportunity to shake Blockbuster down for some money on behalf of some trailer park retards. I hope their happy with their coupons for $1 off next rental and the discontinuation of a great program.

    10. Re:The Red Envelope by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2, Informative

      but, I bailed on BB way back because there late fees were excessive. I checked them out again with there "no late fees" thing (and they are like, 6 blocks from my house). And I switched stores to them. I get a WEEK grace with no late fees, even on a 2 day rental (and video game rentals). And I've actually used the "convert to purchase" a few times on kids/family movies. For instance, I rented Robots, my kids liked it, I read the recipt that it was only $12.99 more to buy it,just kept it and paid the bal. next time I was in. that really is pretty nice.

    11. Re:The Red Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, either they heard your complaint, or you just didn't search well enough - because I just finished watching the entire Voyager series, including seasons 3 and 4.

    12. Re:The Red Envelope by toddbu · · Score: 1
      Every video rental store charges late fees, hell even libraries charge late fees.

      I can live with late fees. What I can't live with is late fees that are charged when the movie isn't late. My local library seems to be able to check in a book the same day I drop it off. The same could not be said of Blockbuster. And then, when you inquired about the timing, you were always referred to a manager who seemed to be out for the day. At least with the mom & pop store, you could talk to mom or pop who were always around and would work with you to settle the issue.

      --
      If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    13. Re:The Red Envelope by DigitalReality · · Score: 0

      Adding to that....

      They got sued for "misinformation." Being an employee with the company at the time of the problem, I witnessed it from the inside. While blockbuster shoved down the throats of many "no more late fees" up front, we as cashiers were told to shove in the fine print at every transaction, or whenever someone called, or to offer brochures whenever. The reason the company got sued over false advertisement was for a few reasons: 1.) the retarded cashiers that exist (in every company) who didn't push it like they were supposed to. 2.) The commercials forgot the fine print. 3.) Franchise stores had the name, but not necessarily the same policies. Since those stores contracted in under different terms, I would suppose (my thought here) that Blockbuster couldn't make them do it.

      There was more ignorance on the customer side than any. It's amazing how many people really thought they could keep it as long as they wanted, even though we still sold new and used DVDs. Even though we still gave them due dates. It's also amazing how many people couldn't get it in their head. The policy is very easy to understand, and has not changed from day one. Keep in mind, the very second that this was explained to me, I understood it. I didn't need to go over ANYTHING a second time. (Then again, I do browse (/.) :).

      -Rent a DVD
      -You have 2 or 7 days with it.
      -Bring it back, and you're cool.
      -Bring it back late, you're cool.
      -Bring it back 8 days late, $1.25+tax ($2 for games, but that always seemed to go to $1.25 at my store). This is called a restocking fee, because at this point, they have to reclaim it as lost merchandise, which only happens at the end of the month. And besides, this was much better than being charged the rental cost over and over again (especially every 2 days with new ones).
      -Keep it, and be charged the current used price of the movie, or if there isn't a used price (too new) be charged the cost of the movie.

      That's not that hard, there were 10 year olds who were explaining it to their parents at the counter.

    14. Re:The Red Envelope by thpdg · · Score: 1

      > The red envelopes are signature.

      Don't forget, that in the very begining, the envelopes were actually yellow.

      Also, when Shrek brand movies come out, they seem to turn green!

      --

      -Patrick

      "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

    15. Re:The Red Envelope by dirty · · Score: 1

      To everyone who replied above...

      I personally have never experienced false late fees from Blockbuster, I just always objected to their practise of undercutting local stores until they drove them out of business and then jacking up their prices once all of the competition was gone. For the video store I worked out (a local crappy one) generally if a customer complained about a late fee it was waived, even when we knew it was justified. Honestly it was easier to waive the fee just to shut them up, it's not like the extra $2 for the store affected any of the employees.

      --

      -matt
    16. Re:The Red Envelope by anagama · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should have made it clear that this was well over a year ago. But it left a negative impression.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:The Red Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't really speak to BB's online service;

      Then perhaps you should shut the fuck up? When did announcing you're ignorant of something then spouting an opinion on it anyway become "insightful." Those of us who have large experience with both are far more qualified to speak to it. It's simple, really. Blockbuster wins, hands down. Same turnaround as Netflix (wtih no throttling), same selection, same customer service (as in mark a movie as damaged and another is sent instantly for free), AND free in store rentals every month as well as other in store deals. As for your bitching about late fees, perhaps you should keep up. They dropped those months ago. You now have a one week grace period beyond the rental period to return a movie.

    18. Re:The Red Envelope by Parham · · Score: 1

      In Canada, keep it more than 30 days past the due date, and it's yours - you can't return it to the store, and the store can't put it back into their inventory.

    19. Re:The Red Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the company got sued over false advertisement was for a few reasons: 1.) the retarded cashiers that exist (in every company) who didn't push it like they were supposed to. 2.) The commercials forgot the fine print.

      Wait a minute. You expect minimum wage cashiers to mention the caveats when the suits who ok'd the ads weren't smart enough to do so themselves?

      Of course, when I saw the first commercial, I understood that it was a lie. Most people did. But remember the dude who collected a bazillion Pepsi points and demanded a Harrier? This is a country that rewards people who spill hot coffee in their laps, for chrissakes. Aren't execs supposed to assume all potential customers are either a) litigious freebee grubbers, or b) morons?

    20. Re:The Red Envelope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blockbuster absolutely does NOT have the same selection as Netflix. If they are anything like the brick and mortar blockbuster stores, then they mostly offer edited version of controversial films e.g. the crappy R-rated abrogated version of "Y Tu Mama Tambien." I'm sorry, but I'm over 30 years old. I don't need Blockbuster deciding that I can't see the unrated version of "372 Le Matin" or "Storytelling." Also, I know for a fact that their selection of foreign films fall far behind what Netflix offers. I have +140 French films in my Netflix queue, most of which Blockbuster's online service doesn't offer at all. Blockbuster's catalog would seem to be geared toward children, and uptight middle Americans. That just doesn't cut it for me.

    21. Re:The Red Envelope by mallan · · Score: 1
      I can't really speak to BB's online service; they might have similar selection and pricing, but they also have the same disadvantages.

      Blockbuster's online service is actually fairly decent - the website/selection/availability isn't quite as good as Netflix, but you get 2 free in-store rentals per month included w/ your online subscription (even if you're at the $9.99 cheapo price point). So, you get all the advantages of the online model, plus the ability to go down to the store twice a month for impulse rentals. I like the flexibility.

      --
      "Good people drink good beer"
    22. Re:The Red Envelope by E8086 · · Score: 1

      "The red envelopes are signature."
      They can also be a nice big red, or yellow&blue, target for anyone who might want to "borrow" some of your movies. I say borrow because it once took two weeks for BBOnline to update the status of two of my rentals, I sent all three back on a Mon morning, Tues one was received and the other two weren't. I contacted support before reporting them returned but not received. Their status remained sent by BB for a few weeks.

      "I can't really speak to BB's online service; they might have similar selection and pricing, but they also have the same disadvantages. And after dealing with Netflix ("oh, the movie never came? here, we'll ship you another free of charge")"

      I've used Netflix and BBOnline and can say the selection is nearly the same and the pricing is the same, a little higher now than when I subscribed a few months ago, now $17.99/mo for 3 at a time, was $14.99. And the policies for lost in the mail/not received by customer/not received by warehouse are the same as far as I could tell. The larger used base seems to be all about the advertising, which one did people think of when choosing a DVD rental by mail service. I've seen far more Netflix commercials than BBOnline commercials.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    23. Re:The Red Envelope by SebNukem · · Score: 1

      BB didn't have Star Strek Whatever so you cancelled your subscription? That's how you thank them from saving your life from the most boring TV show ever made? Each time I accidentaly watch that stuff I want to die after 5 minutes.

    24. Re:The Red Envelope by ryanov · · Score: 1

      The coffee thing is a myth. It was a valid case. The coffee was FAR too hot (no one expects to be hospitalized for spilling coffee on themselves), and internal memos showed they knew this.

    25. Re:The Red Envelope by DigitalReality · · Score: 0

      You expect minimum wage cashiers to mention the caveats when the suits who ok'd the ads weren't smart enough to do so themselves?

      Yes, I did it, and I was getting paid, what at the time was BB's minimum wage.

    26. Re:The Red Envelope by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      The coffee thing is a myth. It was a valid case. The coffee was FAR too hot (no one expects to be hospitalized for spilling coffee on themselves), and internal memos showed they knew this.

      It's not a myth. No purveyor of coffee expects the customers to dump it in their lap. Coffee is made by boiling water. If you boiled a pot of water on the stove and then poured it on your lap, you wouldn't expect to end up in the hospital?

      If the woman had injured her mouth from sipping it, she might have had a (non-stupid) case.

    27. Re:The Red Envelope by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So she wound up in the hospital for spilling it in her lap. You think her mouth would be so heat-resistant that it wouldn't also be injured by water of that temperature?

      Of course you boil water to make many things, but you don't serve them at that same temperature. Is this concept really that difficult?

  5. I guess it depends on who is paying... by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for this ad.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:I guess it depends on who is paying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is damn true.

      Slashdot lost it's integrity a long time ago. Now whoever gives Slashdot advertising money gets favorable articles submitted.

      Slashdot used to be a decent site for nerds to discuss technology.

  6. Blockbuster's been in the shitter for a while now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That company has been fucked for at least 7-10 years.. I have seen 3 Blockbusters come and go in my town alone..

    Now, they have gotten rid of 40% of the Blockbusters where I live (Long Island).. so I could only imagine how many more have been, or are in the process, of being shut down..

  7. The Jugular? *snork* by deacon · · Score: 3, Informative
    With what, a floppy rubber claw? Foam rubber teeth?

    I've stress tested both. Netflix was able to push out 9 movies a week for 6 weeks, and then throttled down. Blockbuster managed 4 movies a week, for the less that a month I kept them.

    Now I just borrow what I want from the library system. Reserve online, get it all pulled and sent to a library near where I am during the day. No limit on the number of DVDs I take out.

    Based on my Blockbuster experience, I would not even consider them again.

  8. There's more to it than that by HardCase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Market value and debt don't really tell enough. Earnings and cashflow are bigger tools to gauge the success of the companies. If Blockbuster is making enough money to service the debt (and other obligations), then they're doing fine. If Netflix has enough cash reserves that they don't need debt to keep operating, then they're doing fine. Debt is just a tool that businesses use.

    -h-

    1. Re:There's more to it than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Debt is just a tool that businesses use to keep going...

      I will be glad to send a bill for no services rendered to every company in the world. Say $100.00 each... Not a bad deal if you ask me...

    2. Re:There's more to it than that by wfberg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Market value and debt don't really tell enough. Earnings and cashflow are bigger tools to gauge the success of the companies.

      How about some good old-fashioned "profit"? (And we'll have none of the EBITDA crap either!). A quick look at the charts on Yahoo reveals a $603.30M loss.

      Inexplicably their market cap is also about $600M, with a $1200M debt. Now, I have a debt that's more than my income or savings, sure, but it's a mortgage, so my creditors can sell my house and reclaim the money. If they sold the company in parts, assuming that strip-raiding it adds 25% in value over market cap, that still leaves $450M in bad debt.

      Of course, it might be that all debt is really from one division (say, the DVD posting division) that they're looking to get rid of. But still, things look pretty bleak, seeing as that debt isn't doing anything right now, and their last investment pretty much failed. This kind of company is usually propped up by their creditors to salvage what potential is left.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:There's more to it than that by Precursor · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, debt can have a favorable impact on shareholder wealth by both creating tax shields and leveraging invested capital. The capital structure (the mix between debt and equity) is not a really good way to compare two company's success when one company has a large physical asset base and the other is mainly inventory and service.

      ROI, ROA, EPS, and P/E are all good indicators to dictate which company is more successful. For more information on debt-to-equity and capital structure mixes, see the Modigliani-Miller Theorem Part I & II: With Taxes.

    4. Re:There's more to it than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Blockbuster isn't making enough money to cover their debt. Not even close. If I remember correctly, they lost a fkton of money last year and not due to one time write offs either. If they don't turn things around, they'll be in receivership by this time next year. I think they're doomed, their expansion and growth has been fueled by debt their whole existance. But now they're in a stagnant market and the pipers bill is due.

    5. Re:There's more to it than that by Precursor · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put the final nail into Blockbuster until movie on demand technology is completed and fully implemented. I personally believe that the cable companies will have the last laugh in all of this once people have the full ability to watch any movie at the quick push of a button. This technology is already implemented with services like Adelphia on Demand. Once these packages become more competitive Netflix and Blockbuster may just go the way of the dinosaur unless they move into a new or undeveloped market?

    6. Re:There's more to it than that by maxume · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the market has factored the debt into the market value? Ie, the company is worth approximately $1800M, but they have all that debt, so you can buy it as if it were worth $600M. The real situation is bound to be more complicated, but it seems reasonable that something similar is going on here.

      To compare to your house analogy, when you compute your net worth, you add the value of the house and subtract the amount of the mortgage.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:There's more to it than that by wfberg · · Score: 1

      To compare to your house analogy, when you compute your net worth, you add the value of the house and subtract the amount of the mortgage.

      Ah, but I have positive cash flow. Which means I have some cash to pay off my debts.

      What you're thinking about would be the balance sheet. Im no Chartered Accountant, but it does seem to mention "Net Tangible Assets ($567,700)" (that's a negative number), as well as a ludicrously high amount of goodwill. Now, the goodwill was listed a lot higher in 2002, which looks to me like they're writing it off - probably at the behest of their creditors. That means that in their own eyes, the company's value (or, the parts of the company they bought prior to 2002) is diminishing.

      Their quarterly report is fun reading. Notice how they're paying 7% interest on their debt.

      On the up side, their stock hasn't been this low for ages, and they're estimates for next year show a profit. But.. That may just be wishful thinking. Seeing as how BBI is hardly a company racking up debt to do really innovative investments, you're probably better off investing in a company that is (or one that isn't investing as much as actually turning a profit year-on-year).

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  9. The classic online vs B&M model by wmajik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used Netflix when they first came out, as I thought it was a very novel idea and one worth trying. It worked great until I ran into the same problems that everyone else did - delays with new movies, being pushed into the far reaches of the queue and other inconveniences. I quit Netflix due to their growing pains, but didn't have a ton of animosity toward them. Having been in the business world, I understand that sometimes you can shoot yourself in the foot with success when demand exceeds capacity.

    Recently, I was given a Netflix subscription again and noticed that they've gone through substantial upgrades, added new features and have none of the same queue problems that I exeprienced before. To me, this shows the maturation of the company, because they have the resources now to meet their customer base, given that they are now a very profitable company with the means.

    I don't think Blockbuster is going to go kaput over the issue, because there will always be people who prefer a brick and mortar video store or you'll have an occasion where you can't wait a few days in the mail for a video. For this, Blockbuster is king. However, the cost of running a B&M operation like Blockbuster far surpasses an online only entity like Netflix, where store space, rent, maintenance, employees and the like are no longer issues. This means that Netflixs' margins are simply leaps ahead of what Blockbuster could even hope to achieve in their wildest dreams.

    So can Blockbuster compete with Netflix? I think the answer is on the walls to everyone. I think this is exactly why Blockbuster tossed everything (and the kitchen sink) against Netflix, because they saw the picture and it didn't look pretty.

    Do I think Blockbuster is going to bite the bullet? Not at all. Do I think Netflix will take a giant cut of of their market and force Blockbuster to resign itself to a B&M only operation with limited expansion abilities? Very much so.

    1. Re:The classic online vs B&M model by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the looks of the local Blockbuster here they are at best about 18 to 24 months from going out of business. At least as a movie rental operation. They appear to be reinventing themselves as a game rental outlet. I doubt it will be enough to save them.

      But from what one of the managers said they are about to go out of business. I suspect that Netflix was not the the only reason for Blockbuster to be in decline. I find that buying the DVDs I want to watch is not that bad at the local wholesale club. As such I no longer have a desire to rent DVDs.

      I wonder what store will replace the Blockbuster up the street?

    2. Re:The classic online vs B&M model by lord+sibn · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what store will replace the Blockbuster up the street.

      The declining rentals and used movie purchases will compel the MPAA to whine about further lost sales on account of P2P piracy. See? It drove that Blockbuster Video out of business!

      No matter what replaces that outlet, you know what will be blamed. it is a lose-lose situation, and you already know who wins.

    3. Re:The classic online vs B&M model by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      The MPAA had define a new business model. Let's call it the "Lawsuit funded model". Find a bunch of lawyers that are not good enough to make it in a real law firm an use them to file law suits against the little guys that can not afford to defend themselves. Settle out of court for a reduced amount, so the little guys feel they can survive, and use the money from those settlements to file more law suits. Kind of a self funded pyramid scheme. The more law suits you file the more settlements you get until finally PROFIT!

      They need to face the fact that things change. I don't know the numbers of people going to theaters to see movies, but I would not be surprised to learn that it is decreasing. And piracy is not the major contributing factor. Higher prices on tickets, poor selection of quality movies, even higher prices on refreshments, and inconsiderate people in the theaters (cell phones, lasers, talking, etc.) make it much more relaxing to watch movies at home. The quality of DVDs (to say nothing of those that have HD TVs) make watching movies at home much nicer than putting up with the afformentioned problems in theaters.

      But the movie industry does not want to fix the real problems. They are going after a boogey man that does not really exist instead.

      As a matter of fact they are starting to make DVDs less fun by putting those "DON'T STEAL THIS DVD" message at the start of the DVD. I already bought the damn thing. Let it go! If they get any more annoying I may have to find another entertainment medium. Actually thinking about it this may be the reason many people start downloading pirated versions of movies. hmmmmmmmmm.

  10. Does Netflix have a future? by GabrielF · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Netflix has been very good to me, I bought the stock at about $10 and now its at $27. However, with good video on demand coming soon I have to wonder if NetFlix has a future. I doubt that Netflix could compete with the likes of Apple and Google when it comes to video on demand. I'm very curious to hear whether Slashdotters have abandoned their Netflix accounts in favor of services such as Comcast's OnDemand and would you prefer a download service to NetFlix?

    1. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by blakestah · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's exactly what Netflix is concerned with. They beat Wal-Mart AND Blockbuster in the online market. But the execs at Netflix are concerned with the content-over-broadband market. They view that as their primary threat.

      Rupert Murdoch's DirecTV will begin delivering content from Murdoch's empire, and anything else they can get their hands on, over the DirecTV lines to their DVR, both as trickle download and OnDemand.

      Comcast is working on OnDemand.

      And then there is the Netflix-TiVO-Comcast arrangement, in which TiVO programs the trickle download so Netflix subscribers can rent movies onto their TiVO box. After all, the only better way to rent a movie from Netflix would be to have it available, nearly instantly, on your TiVO box. And that is what is coming. You'll be able to view a few movies from your TiVO box. When you delete them, the next ones will be able to be viewed. TiVO's engineers are using their broadband boxes to download the moves, 6-8 hours each.

      Now, OnDemand can beat that turn-around time, but only with limited content. Netflix can deliver ANY of their content. And, with content protection, the consumer will see ZERO download times (unless you delete 2-3 Netflix movies rapidly, then you will need to wait for the download).

      The Future? Who knows? But OnDemand and trickle download models are emerging, and a lot of money is being spent trying to determine the video equivalent of the iPod.

      So let's not forget them. The new video iPods can store 15 movies. You could download from iTunes store and carry it with you. Neat-o.

    2. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by markh1967 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As the old saying goes 'never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magnetic tapes'. In this case it can be updated to 'never underestimate the bandwidth of a bunch of DVDs in the mail'. Netflix's days are numbered so long as bandwidth continues to increase. They've probably got a good few years yet though until they are overtaken, especially if HD disks become popular; demand for higher quality should give their delivery system better bandwidth than online connection for some time. In the meantime they'll continue to make a lot of money.

      --
      Input error. Replace user and press any key to continue.
    3. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I think downloads are the only thing that will kill Netflix at this point.

      They have options. They can run their own download service. They can brand another (OnDemand featuring Netflix) or sell theirs out (DirecTV Downloads provided by Netflix). But there are still problems with downloading (bandwidth for most people), and watching (sorry, I want to watch on my TV and I don't want to hook up my Mac to it). However, if they set up a download service right (like caching stuff from my queue onto my TiVo for me to watch) I will subscribe.

      For what it's worth, PPV has been around for years and hasn't killed rentals. Something like OnDemand is closer, but I don't think it is there yet.

      And of course I like Netflix, where as Comcast has earned the nickname Comcrap by gutting and killing my local cable company and offering us subpar service under a legalized monopoly. Timewarner is better in my eyes, but still quite down there due to previous experiences.

      They have a brand, loyalty, and trust. They can survive if they play their cards right. They can probably afford to lose a hand or two and still come out ahead.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A few points.

      There was no Netflix-TiVo-Comcast deal.

      There was a Netflix-TiVo deal. There is a TiVo-Comcast deal. The two deals are entirely unrelated.

      Also, the Netflix-TiVo deal is on indefinite hiatus, because they could not get the content owners to cooperate. So until that happens, no deal.

      Other problems: the existing TiVo Series 2 boxes don't support Dobly 5.1 sound and bandwidth limitations prevent full DVD quality video. So given current TiVo hardware limitations, and limitations in bandwidth, the quality of these downloads would have been substandard. Even had the content owners played ball, its questionable if the market for existing TiVo/Netflix users with broadband access is large enough to support the deal and make it profitable.

      This will change as TiVo hardware gets better and can fully support DVD standard audio and video, and as more and more people get broadband (and faster broadband becomes more available).

    5. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      I think there are several years in netflix as well. Bandwith is not here for dvd quality movies yet. Especially when geeks are switching to voip and other things that suck their max bandwith down. As of now, I couldn't support a phone call, my wife playing WoW and downloading a movie at teh same time on my 3mb charter cable modem package.

    6. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I couldn't download on my 1.5 Mb Comcast cable because it never runs near it's full speed.

      This is why the TiVo type device is so critical in it. The TiVo or whatever downloads during off hours (which I guess you could specify). By doing this, it could still get things to you faster than the post office (especially since it could download things you shouldn't be able to watch yet, then "turn them on" when you "return" previous things). Plus, because it it caching it to watch later instead of streaming it straight for watching, it could throttle down to 20KB/s or so it wouldn't interfere with things. In the middle of the night (or whenever) it could throttle up to full speed.

      Then again, there is something to be said for having a physical DVD that I can take with me and my laptop and such instead of having it stuck on my TiVo.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by sam1am · · Score: 1
      especially if HD disks become popular
      This is going to be the big thing; My Comcast-provided on-demand programming is wonderful - for SD content. I've only had a problem with it once (movie broke up and stopped). DVDs aren't immune from issues either.

      But once we start talking HD in some sort of volume, HD-on-demand is probably not going to scale very quickly. Having an early collection of HD discs will convince me to resubscribe to NetFlix (assuming I get an HD DVD player)
    8. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Netflix's days are numbered so long as bandwidth continues to increase.


      I've heard this oft-repeated story that bandwidth is increasing... but I don't see it. In 1995, I started college with ethernet that was at least as fast as my current hip broadband connection.


      Maybe more people have broadband, so the average connection speed is increasing, but it's not decreasing the download time, and it doesn't imply that future bandwidth spells doom for Netflix.


      To be honest, if broadband is the future this really spells doom for the Xbox 360... where discs are the content delivery, and only one console can do HD discs. At some point, losers join hands and MS-Blockbuster strike an alliance.

    9. Re:Does Netflix have a future? by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Netflix's days are numbered so long as bandwidth continues to increase.

      Maybe, but is bandwidth actually increasing?
      For virtually all ISPs, if you transfer a lot of data, you will get bitched at and ISPs will threaten to pull your connection or threaten you with "breach of contract fees" for going over their (usually secret, unmentioned in the TOS or advertising, possibly written down on a webpage 32 clicks in from their homepage) bandwidth limit.

      I'm going to be moving in the next couple of days to a fairly major city in Canada (Kelowna BC). I've looked through all my options and there is not a single ISP that allows for more than 60 gigs combined up/down transfer montly.
      I was a bit pissed when I discovered this.
      (ok, one offers 100 gigs (wow!) under a "premium business account", but it costs $160 a month, and of course, services like fractional T1s, et al are available, although they are stupidly expensive)

      This isn't isolated to the Great White North either - browse around for a bit and Comcast (80ish gigs) and generally all the big ISPs are sending out nasty letters and suspending people's accounts. This would seem to me to be a trend that is becoming common among isps. And in case you were wondering, there are no signs that the limit is increasing, even as speeds are decreasing (i.e. the speeds of cable internet in the last few years)

      What I'm trying to say is that, unless this changes (and I really doubt it will - since someone is going to eventually sue them for false advertising, they are going to lose and as a result, they will publish a limit and enforce it to the letter), there really isn't a market for downloading anything that resembles high quality video because these ISPs want to cripple your connections so they save a few extra pennies on the bandwith bill.

      Of course, the ISPs could bring in their own systems, while crippling the internet access to prevent competitors from, well, competing, but aside from Comcast's attempt, every company who has tried to do an on-demand type movie service that included more than 100 titles at a time has failed miserably - even Comcast isn't doing too hot with their on-demand service - and this doesn't just go back a few years, but to the 80s and 90s when people were experimenting with movies over a telephone line (i.e. dsl).

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  11. Plan 'D' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Blockbuster should try a second billion dollar deal with Enron's Broadband division.

  12. Netflix...DVD's on wheels. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "However, I do think faster broadband and downloadable (legal) movies like those available on itunes are going to slowly chip away at netflix."

    Tell me if this saying doesn't ring a bell with you.

    "A car full of DVDs, has a greater bandwith than any wire."

    Parallel car versus serial wire.

    1. Re:Netflix...DVD's on wheels. by Nugget · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But I don't want to watch a car full of DVDs tonight -- I just want to watch one movie, and haven't decided which one yet.

      It's not a bandwidth issue, it's a flexibility issue.

    2. Re:Netflix...DVD's on wheels. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The bandwidth of the "truck o' DVDs" is great, but the latency sucks. If you go by the number of movies I actually want to watch (1 or 2 per week at most), then the download model works far better, as I can have my movies much quicker. Doesn't matter if UPS could have had 100 of them to my door by the time 2 downloaded. Those 2 that I wanted were here long before the UPS guy would have been.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  13. And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines here by Stubtify · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Blockbuster's 2 free rentals a month are sweet; I used to use them for video game rentals (which are now $7 each at my local store).

    That said, with all of the comments on which service is better I'd like to weigh in on a few specific points:

    First, each service does a good job of what you want it to. Keep a large quantity of movies queued up and they show up in the order you want and you've always got something to watch. Look into who has a better catalog of what you like to watch and stick with them.

    Second, each service FAILS when you use it to the limits. I've heard people saying they average 18-23 movies a month with netflix/blockbuster. 18-23 movies!!@?? That's WAY below a dollar a movie, and don't forget shipping back and forth (at least $.60). The idea here isn't to scam the company into a loss on you, the idea is to use a service and have a reasonable good time using it.

    Now, I'm all for fairness in advertising (i.e.: unlimited should mean unlimited) but don't complain when you only get 15 movies in one month, for $17. And ESPICIALLY don't complain to me when I know that the majority of the people who are doing this crazy 8 movies a week thing are simply burning every movie right when it comes and then shipping it back the next morning. It is all but impossible to watch three movies a night three nights a week. That is SURELY not what these services were meant to be. You're raising my rates, and it's totally illegal as well.

  14. Re:old news by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Than why not spend you time at Digg?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  15. The "Video-on-Demand" argument... by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 3, Insightful
    For those of you who think that $videoBymail vendors will suffer when Video-on-Demand hits the market, think again. You need to remember that quite a few folks out there that are building up impressive home video libraries thanks to services like Netflix and Blockbuster.

    Couple unlimited rentals with the ability to download the jacket to any movie ever made... Well I'm sure you get the point.

    --
    I'm not fat, just big boned...
    1. Re:The "Video-on-Demand" argument... by ydrol · · Score: 1
      For those of you who think that $videoBymail vendors will suffer when Video-on-Demand hits the market, think again. You need to remember that quite a few folks out there that are building up impressive home video libraries thanks to services like Netflix and Blockbuster.

      I think those folks actually hurt their business model. The company pay postage both ways and these folks usually have a fast turnaround and max films out. They prefer people to sign up and do little - much like the majority of gym memberships.

    2. Re:The "Video-on-Demand" argument... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the problem with OnDemand will still be a pitifully small library.

      Somebody let me know when "OnDemand" means "Exactly What I want To Watch, Not Pay Per View's Seven Movies With More Variable Showtimes"

  16. tried both. blockbuster's UI *sucks* by mgoodman · · Score: 1

    started with netflix for obvious reasons. switched to blockbuster because the allure of getting a couple free in-store rentals each month was tempting (there is a blockbuster a few blocks from me in DC). also, blockbuster seems to have more titles available than netflix.

    however, the simplicity and robustness of the user interface from netflix is extremely superior to blockbuster. ratings are much better. watching trailers and reading reviews is easier.

    also, there are more categories in netflix. i like to watch lots of foreign films, and blockbuster doesnt break them apart like netflix breaks them into different subcategories -- japanese, chinese, etc.

    overall, the little details really enhance my experience, so ive chosen netflix.

    --
    01100111 01100101 01110100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110100 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00101110
  17. they aren't stupid by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    The Netflix executives aren't stupid--you can bet that they have contingency plans for getting into the downloadable content market. Whether they can pull it off is another question.

    iTunes may have a lead in this area, but Apple also has big hurdles to overcome to make a good business out of this; a lot of 320x240 downloads isn't going to cut it.

    1. Re:they aren't stupid by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's better. Knowing I have 2 blockbusters in my town or 50 mailboxes. All I know is I would prefer the unlimited downloadable movies model over any alternative.

  18. It should also be noted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very valid point, they're also hiring a "video encoding engineer". Of course it should also be noted that most people who choose to watch movies want to watch a movie on their big screen tv plugged into their (insert level of surround sound) system. Yes, a few of us have working HTPCs (a few of us just use XBMC, but that's another story). However downloading a movie, and watching it in an arbitrary (compressed) file format (with or without special features, menus, etc.) requires a select group of people. That coupled with the current state of broadband technology in the US (withstanding the few places that actually have FIOS), I don't think there's enough of a market to make a dent one way or another in netflix's market domination. The only thing that could significantly cut into Netflix's market is the customer service level / shipping speed at netflix, and this only effects users who have already been subscribed to the service for an extended amount of time (e.g new members get new releases much quicker then old members. While there might be a long wait for Brothers grimm in my account, a friend who just joined can add it now (or could friday). It's annoying, but one has to admit it helps win over customers ;-) ).

  19. OnDemand still has a long way to go. by shineyboy · · Score: 1

    I've used On Demand with Comcast, Time Warner and Cox in three different states over the last two years. They're all still plagued with problems like the movie randomly stopping partway through, the service going down, the boxtop set resetting randomly, limited or no ability to quickly navigate through a movie, etc.

    Aside from the technical problems, I dislike On Demand because the selection sucks and is rarely updated, and all the interfaces they've designed for the different systems are slow and buggy.

    NetFlix, on the other hand, sends me DVDs I can use however I want, it's one flat rate for as many movies as I can watch at a time, and I can return them whenever I like. :)

    1. Re:OnDemand still has a long way to go. by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      I feel OnDemand and Netflix reach different types of viewers. For me, OnDemand satisfies the impulse buyer. I'm sitting at home bored and decide I want to watch a movie. Quick browsing and instant gratification. No driving, No waiting. Movies are priced to compete to compete against a single rental. Selection is limited. With Netflix, you have to pick what you're going to watch days before you actually get to watch it. If your mood or wants change, tough luck. Though you end up with a much lower cost per movie if you watch a lot and a much bigger selection.
      For awhile, I used Blockbuster's Instore Unlimited (It might have changed since I last used it.) It was close by and convenient for me. Plus I could go there, pick 3 movies from a large selection, go home, watch two, return and get another two. 5 movies a night. When I was dead broke and on vacation, I watched 20 movies in 4 days since I couldn't afford to actually do anything.

      There's plenty of room for different movie rental places as long as they're not trying to reach the exact same customers.

  20. Blockbuster may have a chance... by supabeast! · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blockbuster still has one ace up its sleeve - porn. Most of the mom-and-pop shops that survived Blockbusters intense expansion did so by renting and selling hard-core porn. That option is certainly a tough one for Blockbuster, as many franchise owners will object, but for the corporate locations it may be the only option to keep them open.

    Of course, this wouldn't kill Netflix - it would just turn Blockbuster into the world's largest chain of sex shops. But being a chain of sex shops is a better option than going bankrupt.

    1. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      You're looking for http://www.sugardvd.com/

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    2. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by Jetson · · Score: 3, Funny
      Blockbuster still has one ace up its sleeve - porn.

      They'd have to change their name to Nutbuster...

      Seriously, though, I haven't been inside a Blockbuster since the "No More Late Fees" fiasco.

    3. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blockbuster still has one ace up its sleeve - porn.

      BB doesn't do porn - they have a 'family friendly' reputation, so no Jenna Jameson for you. Meanwhile, Greencine does.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't netflix just open up their porn-rental service (netf--ks, perhaps?) I would think that the model of not going into a brick store would specifically appeal to the the porn consumer...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    5. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by Chemical · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Greencine, another DVD-by-mail service has porn in addition to everything else. Hasn't helped them capture the market.

    6. Re:Blockbuster may have a chance... by robgamble · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the huge number of junk titles that have littered the shelves in Blockbuster lately? It seems like 1 in 3 movies are some B-rate or sex flick, my favorite box cover is "Femalien 2"... it's just tooo funny.

      But seriously, no one's renting Atomic Dog. Are these titles on the shelf to create the illusion that this store carries a lot of titles? How bored do you have to be to rent Bleeders, anyway?

      --
      No sig for you!
  21. Both have strengths and weaknesses by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
    I have a Blockbuster account. The killer feature with Blockbuster Online is the two free store rentals each month. We queue up all the obscure titles in the online queue (ever seen "Children of Heaven" from Iran, or "Primer"?), and get popular stuff at the store.

    The thing that tempts me to switch to Netflix is their bigger selection (while both collections are growing, Netflix consistenly has about 10000 more). They have lots of BBC titles (including BBC Shakespeare performances on DVD) that Blockbuster just doesn't have.

    I am tempted to sign up for both on the $10/month plan. That would get me 2 DVDs at a time (one from each), plus 2 in store rentals from BlockBuster for $20/month. But then, the $15/month I spend now is already a luxury.

    The thing that irritates me about Blockbuster is that their DVD event email is screwed up. They forge custhelp.com as the MAIL FROM, despite repeated complaints from me and from custhelp.com (according to the custhelp.com postmaster). Since custhelp.com publishes an SPF record, I have to list Blockbuster.com as a "forwarder" so that the event mail isn't rejected.

    I haven't actually tried Netflix yet, but I'm sure they have something messed up also.

    1. Re:Both have strengths and weaknesses by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      I've had a NetFlix acct for quite some time. I tried BB for a month, to see how it compared, and switch if it was better. Even with the 2 free/month, NetFlix was a better value. Faster, bigger selection, better UI.
      At one point, I had occasion to send back 3 each on the same day. Netflix had a new one to me before BB had registered receiving two of them.

      I dropped BB after the intial month.

    2. Re:Both have strengths and weaknesses by goat0-9a-zA-Z_.+!*'( · · Score: 1

      I used both and BB was far better (for me). the closest netflix hub is 3 hours away, and it was taking 3-4 days for them to get movies and ship the next out, then they switched me to another hub 7 hours away, eventho atlanta hub is about 5 hours, so it was taking almost 10 days for me to get a new movie once i mailed the old one off. BB closest hub is Atlanta and it takes them 2 days to get me a movie and they ship the it out the day they get it anyway i had a queue of 100 or so movies when i left netflix, BB had all of them except maybe 3, and in the last few months they have been added alot of small market discs ymmv

    3. Re:Both have strengths and weaknesses by aacool · · Score: 1

      Thanks - I just added "Children of Heaven" to my Netflix queue.

      I've used Netflix for years now, and can't do without, especially the wide selection. The further comfort I have with online commerce (Amazon Prime, eBay,etc.) makes me prefer well-run online options
      I am, however a miniscule part of the huge non-online customer base of Blockbuster. It's surprising they could make a loss with such a comfortable, non-technical population

    4. Re:Both have strengths and weaknesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't actually tried Netflix yet, but I'm sure they have something messed up also.

      So you're The Amazing Kreskin or something? I mean like, if you're not, how the fuck can you make the statement that you're "sure"? Or is it that you have no clue what the word actually means?

    5. Re:Both have strengths and weaknesses by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1
      It means that in my 30 years experience as a customer of thousands of companies, I have yet to encounter one that did everything perfectly. The only one that came close was Motorola Computer Systems - which won all kinds of public awards for their amazingly close to zero defects quality on both products and service, so it wasn't just me. But Motorola shut that division down because it wasn't profitable enough. Sigh.

      So it was just a bit of weary cynicism leaking into my fingers. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

  22. Re:They each have their own issues to deal with... by BigFoot48 · · Score: 0

    I viewed the Netflix settlement as moral dilemma. I typically despise class-action lawsuits as I view them as an extortion by attorneys gaming the systems and plantiffs hoping for an easy payday, but I also try to minimize my living expenses so as to expand my standard of living. In the end I took the moral high-ground and declined the settlement. Another blow against "The Man."

  23. I switched to Blockbuster by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 2, Informative
    I switched from Netflix to Blockbuster's mail service last year and haven't yet felt the need to switch. I'm still on the original $14.95 pricing plan for three movies out at a time. Yes, Blockbuster's UI is inferior, the selection might not be as vast, and it might take an extra day or two to receive a flick over Netflix, but the real deal are the coupons.

    Blockbuster gives two in store coupons every month good for a game or movie rental. With their game rentals hovering in the $8 range, it pretty much pays for itself every month. Blockbuster also credits the value of the coupon against the 'keep it' price for any video or game rented at the store. Good deal (for me at least).

    1. Re:I switched to Blockbuster by BobSutan · · Score: 1

      But is the coupon a real incentive to stay if the prices are outlandish to begin with? $8 per game rental is a bit excessive to say the least, especially in light of other online offerings like Gamefly. Point being, if you rely on the BB's coupons for your subscription to be worth it, then you've really missed the point.

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    2. Re:I switched to Blockbuster by anaradad · · Score: 1

      ...but the real deal are the coupons.

      Blockbuster gives two in store coupons every month good for a game or movie rental.


      Not much of a deal at their prices. Definitely not a deal for me, since I don't even know where the nearest Blockbuster is located and I haven't been in one in 3+ years.

    3. Re:I switched to Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the coupons are only good at corporate owned stores. The francises can choose to take them or not. I know this as the francises for my area doesn't take them. The not late fees thing has been a major hit to francises and corporate as far as the stores are concerned. The francises that don't do the no late fees are doing ok, the ones that hoped on the bandwagon are being sold and bought out by other francises.

  24. People are used to renting movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So price is going to make or break video on demand. If I can download a movie and 'own' it from Apple for $5 it will work. If it's $10, well ... I can get several movies from Blockbuster for that in the time it'll take to download that one movie with most cable/dsl lines. Bandwidth may be hindering p2p for the MPAA more than the RIAA right now, but when they finally do decide to enter the online market, it's going to be working against them. They need (a) a solution ready to deploy, and (b) to push for more bandwidth from ISPs. Since they aren't doing (b) then they probably haven't got (a) yet. That's pathetic considering how long they've been watching the RIAA fight because they didn't have (a) ready in time either. My guess is they'll just lobby congress to keep video on demand on PVRs and then hope the internet will just go away.

  25. Blockbuster is evil by jrmiller84 · · Score: 1

    This is definately a personal quarrel I have with BB, but I feel it is a valid one. I've worked for two different divisions of Blockbuster (at an actual store and now at the corp. office of a subsidiary of thiers) for four years total and I'd use Netflix any day. BB is an extremely deceptive company. "Don't pay attention to the man behind the curtain" is how they like to present their motives to employees and customers when we know we're gonna get railed ( No Late Fees? Please... who didnt see that it was a load of BS? ). Sucks that I'm in college or I'd leave in a heartbeat. Needless to say I won't work for any part of their company after I graduate. Don't be surprised if their online initiative falls through completely. I don't think they're ready for it in the least. I know they're throwing a lot of money at it, but it seems like they're rushing to catch up to the market and that's never a good thing.

    --
    I will forever be a student.
    1. Re:Blockbuster is evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things may have changed, but once I rented Sex and Lucia from Blockbuster, went on IMDB, and was puzzled by what most of the comments were talking about. I then rented it from Netflix and saw the rest of the movie. Never went back to Blockbuster.

    2. Re:Blockbuster is evil by cspring007 · · Score: 1

      I worked for blockbuster for about two weeks. I quit because my manager gave me a ton of crap over suggestive selling.. "i see that you are renting "Crappy Movie A". You know, you can pre order "Crappy Move A part 2" for only 23.99 and get it when it comes out next month. I absolutly hated that. Also, they want you to be "HIGH WELCOME TO BLOCKEBUSTER" when somone walks through the door. Then there are the crappy promotional ads that run all freaking day long. And they close at midnight, which means i get off work at like 1:30. Boyhowdy i am glad i went to college and dont have to work at a blockbuster. who is evil. Not to mention the intensive brain washing seminars they make you sit through when you start.
      grrr.
      Viacom owns everything.

    3. Re:Blockbuster is evil by jrmiller84 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I remember those seminars. They put us through them when they rolled out the mind numbing 9 (or however many) step process. Basically it amounted to employees not interacting with customers and asking the same questions in the same order every time. If you ask me, that's horrible customer service. I'd rather have the employee casually talk to me than sound like a robot. Blast them...

      --
      I will forever be a student.
  26. Go Netflix go!! by RedR · · Score: 1

    All hail Netflix!!! I've tried both, and by far Netflix is king!! They are responsive, they address shipping problems/questions, they do not count it against you when the CD is lost in the mail or the wrong CD sent. Over all the CD's are clean and free from straches or problems. So go Netflix!! Enjoy, RedR

  27. Death to Blockbuster by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I used to like them. For movies, they can't hold a candle to Netflix's selection, etc in their brick and mortar stores. I don't know about their online service, but Netflix is great (there is a distribution center within about 40 miles of me so my turnaround is very fast).

    But I don't like blockbuster. We'll ignore all the scratched discs and such that the stores would give me (almost no problems in that way from Netflix). I recieved 2 broken discs from BB in about 3 years of renting, compared to 1 in 2 years at Netflix. And if you consider how you get the discs, that doesn't look too good.

    But what are their prices now? I'll ignore the "2 day rental" scam they run on popular movies. They used to be $4 for everything. Now they are like $6 for a movie and $8 for a game. EIGHT DOLLARS TO RENT A GAME. I also enjoy how they sell anything you keep out too long to you. That is how their no late fees program works. You can reverse the charge within 30 days and pay a restocking fee, but the fact they don't advertise this fact in that no late fees campaign ticks me off.

    Mostly it is the price raises that they keep doing. If it wasn't for video games (I don't get enough time to play them to make Gamefly worth my while otherwise I would HAPPILY subscribe) I wouldn't go near the place.

    So, from my point of view, here is what happened:

    • I left BB because their service/selection was terrible
    • I joined Netflix
    • I found I LOVED Netflix
    • BB Gets mad they are no longer the big-cahoona in town
    • So they make a competing service and expect people (who all seem to hate them as much as me) to switch from a company they love (Netflix) or no mail rentals to BB's mail rental service
    • People either laugh at them or ignore them
    • Netflix proffits.

    Never tried BB's program. Never thought of it. I'm surprised it lasted this long. Is Wal*Mart still doing this, no, they sold out to Netflix didn't they?

    That's right, WAL*MART FAILED. Surely BB could do it where WAL*MART couldn't.

    I've only talked to 2 people who tried BB's program. They both (former and current Netflix subscribers who tried it because of the price) said the selection was worse, the availability was worse, the turnaround was worse. Only the price was better.

    And at $2 a month (wasn't that the difference?) no one cared. Netflix later dropped their rates in response anyway, IIRC.

    Time to die BB. You're like Radio Shack and Toys R Us. You are not even a shadow of your former self. You're a dead man walking. You can try to switch industries (like RS did) and stay as a bit of a joke (and with their GameRush crud, this looks like their plan), or slowly wither and die (like Toys R Us is doing).

    Long live Netflix. They (along with TiVo) have completely changed the way I watch TV. They have a great price for the service, and only continue to impress me.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Death to Blockbuster by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Just as well, Blockbuster as a corporation was pretty bad.

      They required expensive hair-based drug tests that could detect previous drug use for 3 months back. Even one joint in the last 3 months. Such hair tests were also more likely to false positive on african hair than caucasian.

      While that's within their rights to choose who they want to employ, I think it's a pretty shitty practice to invade the private life of your employees like that. I have always boycotted Blockbuster since I found out about this practice.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Death to Blockbuster by egburr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can tell you have had some pretty bad experiences with Blockbuster, but ...
      That is how their no late fees program works. You can reverse the charge within 30 days and pay a restocking fee, but the fact they don't advertise this fact in that no late fees campaign ticks me off."
      The very first time I heard about the "no late fees" my first thought was "there has to be a catch". Bo on their website and in their stores, every ad or pamphlet I picked up had fine print describing exactly what would happen and when. I never thought any of it was misleading. "No late fees" is completely accurate. You will not be charged a late fee, but if you keep it more than a week past due, then by the rental agreement they asume you intend to purchase it (I don't have a receipt with me, but I am pretty sure it clearly states the purchase price and date that will occur).

      I always used to have trouble getting my wife to get movies she rents back on time, incurring horrendous late fees; now I am able to take care of returning them on the weekends without worrying about it. I have never yet fallen into the purchase/return scenario, because I understand that there is a return deadline, that it isn't a brick and mortar version of NetFlix.

      Blockbuster made no attempt to hide what would happen. They may not have made a great effort to call attention to the part that wasn't the main focus of the deal, but it was always available for anyone who took 30 seconds to look. Are that many people really too lazy or illiterate to spend 30 seconds reading the fine print on a deal that sounds too good to be true?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Death to Blockbuster by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, it was in the fine print as always. I just find disgusting that their solution to late fees is to just sell you the movie instead of charing you.

      I have kept a movie too long and had to "sell it back" and pay the $1.25 restocking fee (or whatever it was). If that part didn't exist, I would be thoroughly sick. My family is terrible about returning things on time also (but, that was how they made almost all their money). Even if you waited too long to "sell it back" (30 days after they "sold it to you"), you can then sell it back like you can sell used tapes to them. You'll get some of your money and end up losing only $3-5 (they are also fair, charing you $8 for that old movie instead of the $20 a "new movie" costs).

      But they advertised it like it was Netflix: no late fees ever (yeah, a little asterisk but still). The campaign got pulled because some Attorney Generals threatened to sue the for misleading advertising.

      My point was more that their "solution" was just as bad, they went about it in a way that wasn't fully honest ("no late fees if you bring it back within a week of the due date, otherwise you bought it" in readable type on the commercials would have been fine). They are the largest video rental company (as far as I know) and I just see them as having lost all focus on the customer.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Death to Blockbuster by mallan · · Score: 1
      I've only talked to 2 people who tried BB's program. They both (former and current Netflix subscribers who tried it because of the price) said the selection was worse, the availability was worse, the turnaround was worse. Only the price was better.

      All true (although I've had good turnaround). Also, the website isn't as nice and the condition of the DVDs is generally worse. However, getting two free in-store rentals per month makes it worth it for me. For $9.99 a month I get unlimited one-at-a-time through the mail (two day total turn around time) plus two impulse in-store rentals every month.

      For the budget-conscious and/or more casual movie renter, Blockbuster Online is pretty good.

      --
      "Good people drink good beer"
    5. Re:Death to Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The plural of "Attorney General" is "Attorneys General".

    6. Re:Death to Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, funny you should mention Toys R Us (though I don't quite get Radio Shack). I think they only understand their industry a fraction more than Kay Bee Toys, who is also very close to bankruptcy for the same reasons on a more intensive scale. Christ, it's like a presidential election here, voting for toy stores over Walmart based on how much I hate Walmart instead of either's quality of service :(

      At any rate, Blockbuster is the reason I only buy video games and movies now. We used to have a wonderful little rental shop here that was run by a nice guy who had 2 others in the neighboring towns. When Blockbuster succeeded in killing his business, their rates doubled and selection halved. You can probably trace it down to the same week Jack closed shop.

      Now, a renting a game is 4x higher ($8) and renting a movie is 5x ($6) more.

      In the same time period, I went from paying $80 for Super Street Fighter 2 to $50 for the next big GameCube release. As careful (experience, research, kiosks, etc) as I've become in my purchases, it's just not economically viable to rent for 1/5 the purchase price. Arguably, Contra had an order of magnitude more replay value, but it wasn't the only game I rent dozens of times before eventually buying.

      Also it used to bother me that games I wanted to rent were only available for a matter of months. The idea of a back catalogue completely escapes many brick and mortar outlets. Oddly enough, I've never seen most of the games available for purchase used, so it's anyone's guess what black hole they were consigned to.

      Lack of back catalogue and diversity, along with the fragility of media, turned me off to movie rental as well. Target or Walmart on any given day has more anime. A real movie store like Suncoast has access to 100 times what my BB's had in the last decade. And you mean I can buy an average movie for just 2-3 times what it costs to rent now? And it probably won't have several hundred scratches (unless it's a WB release)?

      Like many others, I was subject to the magical late fees on multiple occasions. They really are arbitrary, to the point that at mine, the case is often so weak, merely disputing the charges can get them cancelled. It's the principle of the thing, though, combined with a real disinterest in providing the service I want at a fair price, that's driven me away.

      So long Blockbuster!

      However, I do disagree with people touting OnDemand as the inevitable solution. Until it becomes more than the 6-7 movies of Pay Per View with variable show times, it can't. And the media industry's idiotic/insane DRM attitudes won't let it happen. They view a satisfied customer with exactly what they wanted like Superman views an oil tanker full of Kryptonite.

    7. Re:Death to Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such hair tests were also more likely to false positive on african hair than caucasian.
      Really? I'd like to see some studies that back this up. If you mean the test itself, that sounds like complete bullshit. If you mean the results were manipulated to fit a pre-conceived notion that blacks smoke more weed, then perhaps you are right. Funnily enough, all the black dudes I know smoke weed all the time. Come to think of it, so do all the whities I know, they just can't claim racism when they get caught.

    8. Re:Death to Blockbuster by egburr · · Score: 1

      The $1.25 restocking fee for keeping it over a week past the due date is worse than the former $5 late fee for keeping it one minute past the due date?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  28. PeerFlix by gellenburg · · Score: 1

    What could give both of them a run for their money is PeerFlix.

    See: http://www.ellenburg.org/content/view/17/26/

    1. Re:PeerFlix by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      This is just one of those dot com bubble idead being trotted out again.

      Remember Swapit.com?
      No?

      Neither does anyone else. They had the same business model.

      --
      This space available.
    2. Re:PeerFlix by ogewo · · Score: 1

      PeerFlix costs 99 cents per DVD plus shipping. The example in your link put shipping at $1.20. At $2 per DVD, plus one of your own, this service will only beat netflix/BB if you are only watching 5-7 dvds per month. That keeps it under $15/mo, approximately the Netflix/BB fee.

    3. Re:PeerFlix by gellenburg · · Score: 1

      But the single biggest difference between PeerFlix and NetFlix/ BB is that with PeerFlix, ownership of the DVD is transferred to you upon receipt.

      With NetFlix, if I rent "The Untouchables," and then decide to lend the copy I receive to a friend, that's one less DVD I'm allowed to get until that copy of The Untouchables is then returned back to NetFlix.

      I'm not buying The Untouchables, I'm merely leasing it.

      With PeerFlix, I can do whatever the hell I want with it.

  29. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because then he'd/she'd miss out on the chance to be a dick, which is oh-so- satisfying to the under 16 crowd.

  30. Holy Un-"Settlement" Batman! by raehl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I need to become a lawyer. This lawsuit rocks!

    - Sue a company for something they didn't really do wrong in the first place
    - Negotiate a "Settlement" that's really a marketing campaign for that company
    - Pocket massive legal fees!

    Did anyone read this settlement? If you sign up for it, you get a free month of a one-level upgrade of Netflix service. Then, and here's the cool part for netflix...

    After that month, THEY CONTINUE TO BILL YOU AT THE HIGHER PACKAGE PRICE!

    What kind of "penalty" is that? Trade a couple rentals to get your customers to upgrade packages? That's cheap advertising is what that is!

    1. Re:Holy Un-"Settlement" Batman! by Cherita+Chen · · Score: 0

      LMAO, You people are too much... Read the whole thing, and not just the excerpt. You are taking it out of context, and really look silly while doing so. Netflix settled for one reason, they got caught "Throttling" users who had a high turn around time. "Throttling", by it's definition, deems "Unlimited Rentals" false advertising at best.

      --
      I'm not fat, just big boned...
    2. Re:Holy Un-"Settlement" Batman! by aacool · · Score: 1

      I wrote a blogpost about the Netflix settlement, where I named the law firm. A few weeks back I got a vaguely worded threat from the lawfirm - left as a HaloScan comment - with a number to call, etc.

      I spoke to a pro bono lawyer who handles stuff for another website I run, and she advised it was fluff, but recommended I take the name of the firm down, as apparently the BIG firm was using a SMALL firm as a front in the lawsuit, and thereby could claim misrepresentation, lost business, etc.

      'Nuff said - the firm name is gone.

    3. Re:Holy Un-"Settlement" Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sue a company for something they didn't really do wrong in the first place"
      Actually Netflix CTO "proudly" said in a tech interview (years back in 2003 I think, it was in /. at the time) how they where lowering the shipping priorities of "many shipping" clients. I guessed it since my first few monts at 20-25 movies a month went down at 5 or 6 after my 3 years of "Good customer".
      As much as I understood the sound business decesion; I was costing them a lot on mail, custemers like my where easy to keep; while the '2 rentals a month' made them an incredible profit margin; I was PO'd at their advertising claims.

      "Negotiate a "Settlement" that's really a marketing campaign for that company"
      The settlement is about getting 1 movie! (1 upgrade for one month).

      I did found the sedttlement laughauble. I waited for the service to get back to 'acceptable levels' for about a year. Actually, it's the Interview that confirmed my doubts and convinced me it would never get back. I cancelled.

      I consider that in my year of "hopping" I missed at least 15 to 20 movies a month! So if the settlement would be for 200-250 movies I would be happy, now I have a feeling that a lawer and it's client (another lawer I bet) where just happy to get anything for payday and a better resume.

    4. Re:Holy Un-"Settlement" Batman! by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      So? Just sign up for one level lower than you want.

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
  31. Poor baby by pediddle · · Score: 1

    Captain Janeway is playing the world's smallest violin just for you.

  32. Netflix...DVD's on wheels-VOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *deep breath*

    Do people intentionally miss the point around here?

    Seriously, while the proliforation of broadband will erode the "content via UPS" model. It still will only be a small competition for the simple reason that much more can be pushed to the consumer via the latter, rather than the former (another reason video stores are still in business). Plus it lends itself to parallellism better. Also just in case everyone here is suffering memory loss. VOD (video on demand) via cable bombed dramatically.

    1. Re:Netflix...DVD's on wheels-VOD by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I use it a couple of times a week. Not sure what bombed means.

    2. Re:Netflix...DVD's on wheels-VOD by Nugget · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Man, you score +1 for attitude, but you're still brutally wrong when it comes to actually having a valid point.

      For the vast majority of consumers, no video rental mechanism is bandwidth-throttled. Consumers don't want an entire station wagon full of movies delivered every night, so the higher bandwidth potential of USPS-delivered movies versus downloaded movies is not relevant to them.

      The pacific ocean has a lot more water than lake michigan, but you can't fill up a bucket faster in the ocean than in the lake.

      I also think that you'd have a tough time demonstrating that b&m video stores are still in business because they offer the ability to rent more movies at once. b&m video stores thrive because they provide lower latency than the alternatives -- you can walk in without having already decided what movie you want to watch that night. With netflix or other USPS-delivered rental options you have to decide days in advance what you plan to watch.

      A download model will combine the best of both worlds -- allowing low latency flexibility of choice along with the convenience of not having to leave the house.

      Good show on the attitude, though. I'm sure in some circles that can be an effective alternative to having a well-reasoned position.

  33. Re:The Jugular? *snork* by Spokehedz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only problem I have with the library is that the DVD's are usually scratched... which means that I have to watch them on my computer. Which is not my 52" TV with surround sound. So I usually end up copying the movie, burning it to a DVD, and watching it on my TV... Which unfortunately breaks so many laws, it's a shame.

    Well... There is geexbox... but I really want my remote control...

  34. In Canada, we have Zip.ca by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Zip.ca is the big online DVD rental outfit here in Canada and I've been with them about 4 months now. I haven't rented a single movie from BB in that time, as I am slowly working through every older movie that I wish to see via Zip. It's been great so far, they provide a lot of obscure titles. The few times I've tried for new releases, I find that it takes forever to get them... this is where BB has them easily beat! With BB, you can usually walk into the store the day a movie it's released and rent it. With Zip (and possibly with NetFlix?) you wait weeks for a new release. So, after I get through watching about the 120 or so movies left on my list from Zip, I might cancel them and go back to BB for the new releases. We'll see.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:In Canada, we have Zip.ca by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      With Zip (and possibly with NetFlix?) you wait weeks for a new release.

      I've noticed that I can usually get a new release one or two days before the release date through Netflix; as long as you added it to your queue before the release date. It seems that the "saved" titles put you up higher on some priority list when they actually start mailing them out.

      --
      this is my sig
  35. One thing I noticed... by sigzero · · Score: 0

    Blockbuster seems to get new movies and some special tv-2-dvd things quicker.

  36. Having tried both.... by StarTux · · Score: 1

    Tried both at the same time awhile ago and noticed that Netflix just served you better. Had faster turn-around times, Netflix did pretty much most of the time actually send you your top 3. Blockbuster would jump around more, which was kind of annoying. Also with BlockBuster I felt that they did not see, sure about this model (hope that makes sense, it was awhile ago and the specifics allude me, maybe it was just an impression they left).

    StarTux

  37. Netflix is a red herring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blockbuster has probably only ever regarded Netflix as a minor pest. You all are seriously misjudging the size of Netflix's business by looking at market value. Blockbuster is doomed and bleeding money, but still pulls in 10x Netflix's revenue. Only three or four years ago, Blockbuster was still collecting a billion dollars in late fees per quarter or something like that.

    No, Blockbuster's latest moves -- mail rentals, changing late fees, rental subscriptions -- have all been lame attempts to fend off a monster called Comcast. This is the same monster that will always keep Netflix a fringe player.

    You have to essentially watch 4 movies or more per month to make Netflix a better deal than Pay Per View (PPV). Generally speaking, Netflix is for people who know what they want to watch in advance and watch a ton of movies. That's not most of the public. Most people realize they are going to be bored that day and see what's on. They want instant gradification.

    How many of you subscribe to netflix and then let the movies sit for a long time without watching them? Most people I know with Netflix do that, then are basically paying $18 a month for watching less movies than they could watch on PPV for less money.

    Face it, Netflix is a fringe player for obscure DVDs and movie junkies. Blockbuster was wasting their time trying to do it. Comcast rules the entertainment market, everyone should be extremely scared of them. Movie studios, theater owners, Blockbuster, Netflix, and those dudes on the streets of NYC selling Kramer-like recordings of movies. Comcast is poised to pwn them.

    1. Re:Netflix is a red herring by corpsiclex · · Score: 1

      You forgot about families. My family of four shares a Netflix account. I don't watch every movie that comes by, but someone does. The throttles are a bit of a hassle for this type of usage, but all in all it's working quite well for us.

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
    2. Re:Netflix is a red herring by sunspot42 · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to wonder in Comcast isn't the one that's doomed, along with all of the other cable operators. Apple's iTunes video thing has been astoundingly successful. They have very little product, but have managed to shift millions of copies of low-resolution video files in spite of that fact. Clearly, there's plenty of demand for video on demand and on the go.

      If their library continues to expand, and begins to include more first-run network series in addition to older syndicated material and perhaps films, they could begin to make a serious dent in the number of cable subscribers. iTunes works well over DSL, which most homes can get for $15 or so a month more than they're already paying for phone service. That's a hell of a lot cheaper than basic cable and a DVR in most markets, and iTunes may soon offer access to premium channel content from the likes of HBO for the same $1.99 an episode.

      Granted, iTunes content will still cost $2 a pop, but if you aren't a complete couch potato you could download a couple dozen shows a month and still spend less than it costs for cable - let alone cable with premium content - in many markets. And if the networks get smart and offer season packages for $24 or something, they could cut out the cable middleman entirely. Apple gets a very small piece of the iTunes revenue cut compared to the amount of ad time cable operators consume for themselves. And by going around the cable companies, the networks and other content producers would have a much better chance of marketing their shows to customers who might actually be interested in them. Customers will very quickly grow accustomed to watching their shows where and when they want to. Broadcast will die a rapid death.

      If Apple is able to sign deals with ESPN and CBS (which now controls the old libraries of ABC, NBC and CBS, thanks to the various acquisitions Viacom made over the years), the cable companies should get very nervous. Some kind of gadget that makes it easy to get iTunes video from a PC or Mac to a TV is also bound hit the market in the next few months, putting additional pressure on broadcast cable and even their PPV model. If the phone companies wake up and realize iTunes offers them a golden opportunity to kick their largest competitors in the nuts, they may also begin offering customers $20 a month in free iTunes downloads.

      Comcast may outlast Blockbuster, but by how long?

  38. I don't understand... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    What kind of 'throttling' were they doing? I know at one point, I was watching at least on movie every day. I had 90 movies rented in 90 days. The turn around from my mailbox out to my mail box in was 2-3 days.

  39. Netflix by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've stopped buying DVDs because I don't want to re-buy once HD DVDs become available - Netflix is a terrific alternative to building your own video collection.

    I have had some annoyances with Netflix though - damaged (out right broken or cracked DVDs) are about 15% of what I recieve, and sometimes I have to wait several days to get a movie from across the country. But all in all it is super convenient compared to the alternatives, and very inexpensive for what you get.

    I suspect that Netflix is in a great position now because it would cost a heck of a lot of money to start up a competitive service.

    1. Re:Netflix by metamatic · · Score: 1
      I've stopped buying DVDs because I don't want to re-buy once HD DVDs become available

      I don't want to re-buy when HD-DVDs become available either. That's why I'm still buying DVDs.

      That is, when HD-DVDs become available they will be so crippled with DRM I won't want to buy them. DVD is quite good enough with a good upconverter, so...

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Netflix by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      DVD is quite good enough with a good upconverter, so...

      I've seen BluRay content on a Qualia 006. DVD isn't good enough.

    3. Re:Netflix by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, maybe for the 0.01% of people with a $10K HDTV, DVD is insufficient.

      However, on my regular HDTV a good DVD looks stunning. I won't be upgrading until there's at least a region-free Bluray/HD-DVD player available, plus a boatload of content.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  40. One Case Study by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    We use Nexflix. Never even considered Blockbuster as an option. YMMV.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. Blockbuster Online vs. Blockbuster by Corvaith · · Score: 1

    While it's not a perfect service, I've generally been okay with Blockbuster Online. And I can say for sure that if the movie doesn't show up in a timely manner, you can have them ship another. It's automatic. They don't complain, try to talk you out of it, or make insinuations about your character, they just ship the next movie. If you end up with an extra, you just ship it back. Due to the flaky nature of the mail, I think this is necessary for any business working this way, even if it may sometimes be expensive. My first three selections from Blockbuster Online never showed up--but I got an extra month out of it, new copies shipped, and generally everything since then has been okay.

    It's really fairly decent service. I can't compare to Netflix because I'm not a Netflix customer, but I think it's worth the money.

  42. Hollywood Video by akac · · Score: 2, Informative

    We stopped using both Netflix and Blockbuster. BB because of its insane fees and costs, and Netflix just because renting a movie for us is an impulse action. Instead we use Hollywood Video. Its cheap. Quality. And I can find nothing that BB does better.

    1. Re:Hollywood Video by KanSer · · Score: 1

      You're officially whipped if you use the Royal We and you're not the Queen...

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  43. Th problem is... by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that BB has a reputation for fake late fees. I know what finally made me stop renting from them years ago was that they would charge late fees on movies that were returned on time. This combined with their editing of movies, and the fact that it was clear they were trying to trick their customers by offering 3 'night' rentals, and counting both the rental and return nights as full nights, just made me give up on them. When they started their 'no late fees' scam, I didn't even bother to look into them. Apparently that was the right move.

    1. Re:Th problem is... by apparently · · Score: 3, Informative
      This combined with their editing of movies

      They don't, nor have they ever, edited movies.

    2. Re:Th problem is... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I know what finally made me stop renting from them years ago was that they would charge late fees on movies that were returned on time

      Obviously this depends upon the store in question - how quickly they process returns, how honest the franchisee is, if you're returning a minute before the due time, and so on. I have never, ever, ever been charged an incorrect late fee (after patronizing 5 different Blockbusters). Of course I'm honest about when I'm late, too.

      I'm not a huge fan of Blockbuster, but I certainly don't think an enormously awkward DVD-by-mail solution is going to be where we'll go. The biggest threat to Blockbuster is video-on-demand - I can currently, any time of the day, on a moment's notice rent from about a thousand standard and high definition movies on demand. There still are some improvements to be made (e.g. pausing and such is a tad time delayed -- unless I set it to record on the PVR and start watching 10 minutes later when it's basically buffered), but it most certainly is the future.

  44. Wikipedia - Modigliani-Miller Theorem by dave1g · · Score: 1

    Checked it out... sounds like this is one of those theoretical, idealistic type of things, if everything else is perfect about the world then debt vs equity doesnt matter.....

    But since everything is not perfect, this only sort of applies.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modigliani-Miller_The ory

    1. Re:Wikipedia - Modigliani-Miller Theorem by Precursor · · Score: 1

      No, you missed the point. In a world without taxes debt and equity mix does not matter because the individual investor can create or destory leverage. In this case, our world *has* taxes, which introduces tax shields that have a positive net present value.

      Hence the reference to MM Prop I&II with taxes ;)

      No idealistic BS here, these are proven.

  45. My killer tip for netflix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find the distibution center closest to you, track where your movies are returned to and which gets back soonest. Then copy the address and print a label for it. stick it over the shipping address on the netflix, cross out the shipping lines on the bottom.

    From my experience, my movies get there at least a day earlier, sometimes 2-3 days depending on how far across the country they want to ship it.

  46. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't expect people to take advantage of a service to the point of its collapse, then you are not anticipating human nature. For every business method ever created, there have been people who have attempted to scam it. I understand that the people's complaints are rediculous--too few movies/month-- but what do you expect. There are some who will take more than their share, and some who will use the service like it is designed, thats how the game works. If you can come up with a good idea for netflix to stop this, apply for a job.

  47. I would never use Blockbuster by beforewisdom · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blockbuster edits the movies they rent.

    If a movie has scenes that are offensive to the ownership of Blockbuster ( usually sex, they don't seem to have a problem with violence, go figure ) Blockbuster reserves the right to edit that scene out of the movies they rent.

    While they will admit to it if asked directly, they will not advertise it in their stores.

    Apparently telling the truth (fairly representing their products) values of Blockbuster's owners.

    1. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking idiot, how did you get modded informative? Blockbuster EDITS DVDs? Think about that. You're suggesting they edit, remaster and remanufacture original looking DVDs complete with disc art. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Not to mention I can go down to Blockbuster and rent the unrated version of any mainstream movie, including Boogie Nights. So your "theory", if your dribbling can even be called that, is provably false.

    2. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by beforewisdom · · Score: 1
      Blockbuster edits the movies they rent. If a movie has scenes that are offensive to the ownership of Blockbuster ( usually sex, they don't seem to have a problem with violence, go figure ) Blockbuster reserves the right to edit that scene out of the movies they rent. While they will admit to it if asked directly, they will not advertise it in their stores. Apparently telling the truth (fairly representing their products) values of Blockbuster's owners.
      The post above was marked down as "troll".

      Well, first off it is a matter of fact. Feel free to contact blockbuster at your leisure.

      A troll is someone who posts in a forum that they have no interest in other than to provoke inflammatory responses for their amusement.

      My post is on topic, being about blockbuster in a thread about blockbuster. My posting history is available to all slashdotters. It shows an interest in IT and a very good kamma rating.

      All that is shown for the member who marked my post as troll is a lack of education as to what "troll" means and a narrow mind.

      It is kind of ironic with all of the threads about censorship on slashdot that someone who is here enough to get the power of moderation would mark an on topic post about censorship as being "troll".

    3. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The post above was marked down as "troll".

      Because it IS a troll. Either that or you're too stupid and lazy to to the most basic of fact checking. Either way it's not worth anyone's time to read and should be modded into oblivion.P> Well, first off it is a matter of fact. Feel free to contact blockbuster at your leisure.

      Ok. I did.

      Question
      Does BLOCKBUSTER edit its movies?
      Answer
      No, BLOCKBUSTER does not edit the content of its films. We offer all movies for rental or sale the way we receive them from the studios.

      They answer the same question worded slightly differently as well, here.

      Question
      Does BLOCKBUSTER censor its movies?
      Answer
      We do not edit or otherwise alter movies ourselves. We leave the methodology as to how ratings are applied specifically and completely to the studios involved. We are retailers and not members of the MPAA (Motion Picture Association of America), so we take no position on individual scenes or the overall artistic merits of a film. We are not in the content business. We are in the business of exceeding the expectations of our members and customers, and thus our goal is to offer the widest possible selection within our broad parameters of our "no NC-17 or X" standards.

      Blockbuster has always tried to provide our customers with a variety of choices while maintaining our family orientation. As you know, we will not carry "X" rated or "NC-17" rated films. However, there are unrated film titles we feel may contain content unsuitable for children, and we designate these titles with a "YRV" designation, for "Youth Restricted Viewing". Although not pornographic, only members older than 17 are allowed to select these films.

      This is the part that will prove you a troll. Someone legitimately making a mistake would admit that and apologize. A troll would simply think of a job well done and move on.
    4. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by Newtlink · · Score: 0

      Blockbuster did have films edited.. i'm not sure if they do it now, but just a couple of years ago they would have edited films..

      Blockbuster would determine what is offensive, and the movie companies would actually do the editing *for* Blockbuster.. Blockbuster specified the edits..

      when Independence Day w/Will Smith came out, it was funny.. there were obvious segments that were re-dubbed for content.. "shoot" for "shit", etc.. of course, this was nearly 10 years ago..

      --
      i hate microsoft.
    5. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      How does someone with such poor reading comprehension manage to operate a computer?

      I said *I* called them as well as my friends called them and they admitted it.
      These were VHS tapes, but if you know anything about IT at all it is possible to edit DVDs as well, especially if you are a big corporation that can have special relationships with producers.

    6. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      Cough! Cough! Cough!

      Okay, I am at least half wrong, they have updated their policies to lie about it if asked:

      http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2005/08/netflix_vs_b loc.html

      http://www.hackingnetflix.com/2005/10/variety_bloc kbu.html

      http://atheism.about.com/b/a/059230.htm

    7. Re:I would never use Blockbuster by ogewo · · Score: 1

      Those two forum links just one or two users posting that blockbuster censors and the about.com link just says they won't stock NC-17 titles. One forum comment even says:

      "Except, I have received at least three different censored movies, they had bleeps in place of the audio through out an R rated movie. I've only had Netflix for about 2 months and most of them were near the begining. I came quite close to cancelling the subscription for this reason. Could these be disks that belonged to Walmart's online renting service that Netflix bought?"

      That comment relates to censorship from a netflix rented movie, but it is still a reasonable explanation for how something like that could happen, if that ever happened at all.

      Otherwise most user comments on that forum said that BB/Netflix censoring was completely false. I think you got that idea because people described both services as censoring, but really meant that their policy is to not stock NC-17 movies or certain unrated/directors cuts period. Only one user said BB actually had custom edited versions, and claimed it was in the days of previous managment, likely before DVDs.

  48. Why? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Why do people think that OnDemand will kill Netflix. Cable/Sat companies can't seem to get the price on pay-per-view down to a price that matches Netflix, and that is one stream for everybody. How does making each stream independent for each person reduce the cost to make it comparable to Netflix?

  49. Re:The Jugular? *snork* by anaradad · · Score: 1

    Now I just borrow what I want from the library system. Reserve online, get it all pulled and sent to a library near where I am during the day. No limit on the number of DVDs I take out.

    Unfortunately, my library system has only one building and a small collection. Relying on the library for movies might work in a big city, but not in the rest of the world.

  50. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by AgNO3 · · Score: 2

    Hello its slashdot. Its the people Kurt Cobain was writing about when he wrote Smells Like Teen Spirit. The want everything for free except for the stuff they do, then they want paid for that. So much for my Karma.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  51. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by jp10558 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but 18-23 movies isn't even one movie a night. And there are at least some users (like my DAD) who are retired, and like to have something to do during the day when everyone else is at work/school/out whatever. The 5 out a month barely supplies enough to keep him in stuff to watch unless he gets the TV series discs which have ~5hrs of content, so 2-3 days per disk rather than one for movies.

    And for many rural people (who seem to be a large market segment) we don't get much over TV, and the quality is random - sometimes quite snowy. Also, like many others I prefer no commercials, so I like to watch DVDs of a show vs broadcast. And watching one TV episode a night can eat up the slack (I mean, with several people in a household - you might need 2 discs at a time, due to different tastes and more than one TV/DVD player in a house).

    So the idea that 18-23 DVDs a month is for piracy is certainly not necessarily the case, especially for a household of 4. Now if you are a single guy with a full time job, and you're doing that you either have no life beyond work and DVDs, or you are pirating them as fast as you can.

    But there are many reasons you could turn around 18-23 DVDs in a month as listed above. Especially if one family member (if not all) are somewhat TV addicted(not unusual in the US).

    --
    Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  52. It's only a matter of time... by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Before any DVD you want will be either available on demand over the Internet, or available for immediate burn at your local blockbuster (or kiosk). A Coke Machine sized vending machine could easily store hundreds of DVDs and have a high speed connection to the Internet to download more of them as needed. Why not order a pizza and have a DVD of your choice delivered w/ it? Netflix idea fits a niche right now, but I don't think it's viable over the next 5-10 years.

    1. Re:It's only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago a new video store/pizza shop opened up in my hometown. It started as a clever idea (buy a pizza and rent a video) but then the practical issue came up: if people are getting videos delivered, they'll expect the delivery guy to also pick up the video when it's due.

      It closed after a six months or so. In defense of the idea, the business was also plagued by other problems such as frequently changing menus and daily specials, inconsistent business hours, and they apparently never paid any bills including rent or food supplies.

      Complete lack of business sense aside, the delivery/pick up issue does remain. The only way I could think of getting around that would be the DivX model (limited play discs), but we all remember how quickly that tanked (and I believe the DivX people actually paid their bills).

      I think the idea will return with high bandwidth streams, but it's probably going to be a while. Oh... pizza franchises can work out deals with local cable companies and give customers discounts on Pay Per View channels. Sweet.

      -Chris

    2. Re:It's only a matter of time... by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      You could be right about the pizza-place-return issue... good insight really, but I think the idea of Blockbuster expanding their in store inventory to the equal all of the available DVDs is more likely and a workable business model (assuming licensing can be worked out). And if you can replace a store w/ a kiosk then you can make movie/media rentals available at any retail establishment.

  53. blockbuster sucks.. by Newtlink · · Score: 0

    i have a netflix account, and i like it.. the majority of the time i get movies in a single day.. it's unusual for me to get a movie in more than 2 days.. i stopped going to blockbuster after being charged late fees for no reason on movies that were returned the next day.. foolishly, i paid a series of late fees on movies that were not late to keep the membership.. and blockbuster makes it very hard for the customer to dispute late fees and get a refund, or credit.. hollywood video is less like that, but still there are problems with returns in the drop off boxes outside most hollywood video stores.. some stores in my area leave the videos in the box until the next morning, and late fees happen from that..

    in short - i'm sick of late fees, dealing with smartassed employees, shitty selections, and literally getting ripped off at the register..

    i have *never* had a problem with Netflix.. yeah, some movies come in 2 days or so, but so what.. in fact, i've had one DVD that was broken in the mail.. they said send it back and they would send the same one out.. it was an overnight transaction.. i've recently had 3 DVDs go missing in the mail on return.. i reported it, and my next selections were sent out the next day..

    for 20 bucks a month for 3 at a time, i'm very happy..

    i seriously doubt that i will ever go back to renting from a store.. although, i do find the DVD kiosks nice to rent from when we want more movies for a specific event or holiday..

    i hate blockbuster..

    --
    i hate microsoft.
  54. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by Moofie · · Score: 1, Informative

    "You're raising my rates,"

    Wah.

    " and it's totally illegal as well"

    What? Blockbuster doesn't decide what is and is not against the law.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  55. The war is over by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    Netflix won, Blockbuster got their butts whooped. If you haven't tried Netflix, you should. It rocks.

    No, I don't work there, own stock in them or have any vested interested. I'm just a happy customer that loves a good service.

    1. Re:The war is over by chateau_x · · Score: 1

      my problem is, the wife doesn't get the whole "queue" thing that you really have to have down to take advantage of NETFLIX. i would rather do 'FLIX, but the problem is, she doesn't update our queue and ends up going to B'BUSTER anyway ... therefore 2x's charges per month :-/

    2. Re:The war is over by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      What does Netflix do so much better? A blanket "netflix roxors" statement is about useless without some meat to back it up. I haven't tried Netflix because I've been perfectly happy with Blockbuster since I signed up.

      • Selection: I consider myself a fairly "mainstream" movie watcher so I have no problem with Blockbuster's selection.
      • Service: Blockbuster has great turnaround on delivery of new movies to my mailbox and I have never had an issue with lost movies.
      • Price: The price is the same last I checked.
      • Extras: Blockbuster gives me 2 coupons for video/game rental coupons every month to use at my local Blockbuster store.

      I love the 2 free movies/game coupons each month so I think I made the right choice.

    3. Re:The war is over by curtlewis · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster used to have specially edited versions of movies made (and probably still does) when new VHS movies came out. Cuss words edited out, etc. They were deciding what your morality should be.

      I doubt they can have that flexibility with DVDs (but maybe they can), but I will never give a dime to a company that tries to decide what MY morals SHOULD be.

      NetFlix is easy and convient. Working the queue is similar to using TiVo. I just keep adding stuff that looks interesting and I bump stuff to the top if I feel like watching it soon.

      The only major difference between NetFlix and going INTO Blockbuster is the spontaneous rental - where you didn't think you'd want to watch that until you saw it. Kinda like spontaneous shopping at the grocery store, but most women don't shop for food that way, why shop for movies that way? The queue isn't set in stone.

      The best part is, I don't HAVE to go to the video store... it comes to ME.

    4. Re:The war is over by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the versions of the movies I am watching are the same as the ones you are. Maybe they offer special "edited" versions of the movies but I don't think they default to them. I said the same thing about Wal-Mart when I received a censored CD as a gift and tried to return it - how dare you censor my music for me.

      The Blockbuster queue is very similar to the Netflix one by the way you described it. I can add a movie to any slot I like and bump the priorities if need be. The online interface is pretty simple.

      I don't have to go to BLockbuster either, I get the same at home service that you get with Netflix. As an addition to their service, however, I get 2 coupons each month for an in-store rental of a movie/game. It's kinda nice to have, that's all.

      I think both online services are similar, if not identical. Just so happens that when I was shopping around, Blockbuster WAS cheaper. I haven't had any bad service yet, so there's no reason for me to switch.

  56. FYI... by dirty · · Score: 1

    Et al. is short for "et alia," which means "and others." "Blockbuster's original market plan (and others as they were Blockbusters original market [p]lan" really doesn't make sense.

    --

    -matt
    1. Re:FYI... by velocipenguin · · Score: 0

      Neither does the rest of the post. The whole thing's pretty incoherent.

      (I still haven't figured out what "(It's (s/b) aside)" means.)

      --

      Move 'sig'. For great justice!
    2. Re:FYI... by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      Glad to know I wasn't the only one stumbling through that post.

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
  57. PeerFlix not viable by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I looked at PeerFlix briefly, but it had a LOT of issues. I can't remember what they were but either cost or wierd terms or something drove me far, far away when I looked at it... pretty sure it was the cost. You seemed to have points that bought things and it took a lot of points to get things that were not "Pooch & Turner" level movies. There seemed to be a lot of overead fees for a company that got people to mail things to each other.

    It's a cool idea but I don't think PeerFlix is going to be the company that makes it popular.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  58. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by ottffssent · · Score: 1

    The lawsuit wasn't taking issue with not being able to get tons of movies. The lawsuit was objecting to Netflix increasing its turnaround time for specific customers based on high usage. If Netflix is working flat out to get people their movies, there's no problem. Once they start deliberately slowing their service down, they're in breach of contract (or false advertising, or however you want to phrase it).

    I'll bet Netflix is still making money on the people getting 20 movies a month. I assume they prioritize order fulfillment so infrequent users get the best service - keep the people happiest who're giving you the most profit. In that case, the heavy users are getting "excess" manpower and warehouse space, so the only price Netflix needs to beat is the postage costs. I think you're spot on at $0.60 round trip with presorted bulk mail discounts with the post office. The break-even point in that case is actually 30 movies a month with the $18 plan. As long as Netflix can efficiently prioritize their orders, they can probably make a profit on even extreme corner cases. They just have to make sure those users are getting DVDs which would otherwise be unrented, packed by people who would otherwise be chatting with their coworkers.

  59. I've tried both by pajor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried both Netflix and Blockbuster online rentals. I had netflix for a long time and quit them when they raised their prices from 14.95. Later on I signed up with blockbuster because they were cheaper. Blockbuster raised their prices too, but they were slick about it and gave me a free used dvd coupon with it. I stick with blockbuster because I find their selection to be perfectly adequate (I've never had trouble renting something I wanted, maybe I'm just incredibly mainstream), and because I find the two free instore rentals indispensible. It's nice as a movie junkie to have a big queue of movies coming to watch stuff, but sometimes you need a movie for a date or something and having two free in store rentals is awesome. I use them every month. Also you can get video games with them.

    I think if blockbuster leveraged it's brick and mortar more, they'd cut into netflix's market share quite a bit.

    --
    Gnuyen
  60. Its not called "Net"-flix for nothing... by doormat · · Score: 1

    Netflix would already be doing DVDs online if it weren't for the fucking movie industry's bass-ackwards views on digital technology. The deal with TiVo is basically out - Netflix cant negotiate a reasonable deal with the movie industry to allow people to rent DVDs online and have them downloaded to a TiVo box. There is nothing we can do about it until the movie industry either gets investigated by congress (the only real way to make an industry move nowadays) or someone with much closer ties (like what Apple did with ABC/Disney) makes it happen.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  61. Out of spite by networkzombie · · Score: 1

    I respond to integrity. BB has never had any. The have always overcharged and when they needed to, they lied (false advertising). Netflicks at least tried to offer a service worth the money. BB would charge you more than the product is worth if they could and they did! If people would remember how companies lied and cheated, they wouldn't lie and cheat so much to begin with. Please don't use BB. Companies should be a little competitive even without competition. We should boycott more often. Am I a communist? What we need is for BB to die, Netflicks to open better B&M stores and an alternative to Netflicks to offer a download service. No, not iTunes.

  62. What Blockbuster should do. by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had a discussion with a friend sometime ago and I had some suggestions on what Blockbuster could do to have save more money and make customers more happier.

    Offer customers both the option of sending it back by mail or returning it back to a local store. That's an advantage of having a local store in almost every city which Netflix doesn't. Of course, if convenience is your thing, you're still allowed to drop it in your mailbox and have the postal service ship it back. But by offering both return methods, both parties will benefit from the user returning to the store. The user's queue will be emptied by the following day (instead of waiting ~3 days for the mail to be delivered and scanned), therefore that means more movies per month. Blockbuster saves money by shipping all the dvds back to the central office together, saving on shipping.

    Another feature they can offer customers is the option to allow the subscriber to have 1 dvd out from the local store at any given time. They can even subtract that 1 dvd from the # of dvds they can have out at a time. They can even restrict it to 3+ months old movies, where if the subscriber wants to watch newer movies, they'll have to go through the online store. I mean, every Blockbuster has a bunch of movies that hardly ever circulate much. There's really no point in letting them sit there to collect dust. By allowing users to have access to the local store, this will make them happier and actually give those old dvds some worth in the store. Sometimes you might want to watch a movie that night, but neither netflix or blockbuster would fix that. If the 1 dvd out at a time is too much, you can restrict it to x dvds from local store / month.

    Just my 2 cents.

  63. Blockbuster's many mistakes by metamatic · · Score: 1
    They were stupid not to build loyalty, and eventually they'll go out of business or get snapped up.

    Oh, it was worse than that. Long after there were DVD players in all the stores and every movie company had released movies on DVD, Blockbuster still didn't offer DVD rentals at all. I kept going in and checking every month or two. They were literally the last video store in my city to offer DVD rentals.

    I tried Netflix because Blockbuster were simply uninterested in renting DVDs to me. I stayed with Netflix for the selection and the convenience. Once Blockbuster lost me as a customer, they would have had to do something really spectacular to win me back.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  64. Never mind the profit, feel the revenue? by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Blockbuster is doomed and bleeding money, but still pulls in 10x Netflix's revenue.

    Let's see... A billion dollars of revenue and big losses, or a tenth of the revenue and millions in profit...

    Netflix is for people who know what they want to watch in advance and watch a ton of movies.

    Or people who want to watch their movies uncensored. Or people who care about video quality, and don't want to pay out the ass for HD. Or people who actually like the extra material found on DVDs. Or people who feel they already pay too damn much money to the cable company, who keep jacking up their fees every quarter, unlike Netflix.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Never mind the profit, feel the revenue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Let's see... A billion dollars of revenue and big losses,
      > or a tenth of the revenue and millions in profit...

      The point is that the original poster was only judging the size of the two companies based on market value, not looking at the financials. Netflix has a long way to go before they're remotely as popular as Blockbuster, though they are profitable currently and Blockbuster is not. Income's important to measure the quality of business last quarter, but irrelevant when measuring the size of a business (again last quarter, since all data of this kind is purely historical).

      > Or people who want to watch their movies uncensored.
      > Or people who care about video quality.... Or people
      > who actually like the extra material found on DVDs.

      Yes, exactly. A fringe element of movie watchers.

      > Or people who feel they already pay too damn much money
      > to the cable company, who keep jacking up their fees every
      > quarter, unlike Netflix.

      Amen to that. Though Netflix can never provide more than a fraction of the entertainment in a month that a cable company can -- especially when combined with a cable modem.

    2. Re:Never mind the profit, feel the revenue? by pixelite · · Score: 1
      Or people who feel they already pay too damn much money to the cable company, who keep jacking up their fees every quarter, unlike Netflix.
      I actually work for a cable company and we have not raised our rates in the two years I have works for them. Actually, they have lowered their rates for limited basic which is targeted at the elderly on fixed incomes and people who just want a clear picture of the locals.
      --
      >>Sig under construction
    3. Re:Never mind the profit, feel the revenue? by Nethead · · Score: 1
      That may be but I did cancel my cable and subscribed to Netflix. I find myself reading more and have a much more relaxed and quiet home to come to at the end of the day. The only problem is that now, with the lack of ads, I'm not quite sure what I need to buy anymore.

      Even before I had Netflix I had stopped using the BB a few blocks away in favor of a mom&pop a few miles away.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  65. Use common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVDShrink is your friend. Along with 10 cent blank DVD's, you're golden.

    Hopefully, I don't have to draw pictures here...

  66. Netflix has won - until Amazon decides to kill 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Netflix has certainly blown Blockbuster out of the water. The question is when Amazon decides to appear on the US market. They currently seem to try things out in Europe. Once they learned all their lessons there they will probably go after Netflix. If I worked at Netflix, I would be afraid. Amazon has huge customer base they could use to roll over Netflix. They also have the whole distribution game down better than anyone else. We'll see ...

  67. Pretty expensive though... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "As such I no longer have a desire to rent DVDs"

    I can appreciate that, but buying DVD's even at Costco is about $14-16 a pop. That's still pretty expensive; that's about $60/month to watch 4 movies. It might be cheaper to pay for HBO/Max/Showtime and get a couple dozen movies for about $25/month.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Pretty expensive though... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      True the cost of buying the DVD is higher. However I now have a copy I can watch anytime I want and I don't have to worry about late charges. Not that late charges are an issue with Netflix. And there are some months when there are no movies released that I want to watch so I have no costs at those times. I have found that mythtv allows me to catch many movies on regular channels that I normally would not be able to watch.

      And buying the DVD is generally cheaper than going to a movie theater if you get a coke and popcorn.

  68. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack, meet ass.

  69. liberal hippy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be a liberal here, but does anyone see anything wrong with lending a company 1 billion dollars to start a dvd rental by mail venture even though one already exists? How come I have no health insurance, but a company got 1 BILLION dollars to rent dv-fuck**g-d's???? Am I the only person on this planet that sees something very wrong with this?? Its literally an insult that this country can't find enough money to give free health care but when someone needs to rent a dvd through the mail, well suddenly people come up with over a billion dollars! A BILLION DOLLARS!!! FOR DVD RENTALS?!?!?! AND THERE IS A COMPANY ALREADY DOING IT!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Re:liberal hippy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Because it's not the investor's fault that you have no health care. They saw a market space with one dominant and thought a competitor could do well.

      Stop wasting time posting to Slashdot and do something about your own situation, loser.

    2. Re:liberal hippy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      youre an idiot. Im not saying its their fault. Im saying their priorities are mixed up. A country that feels its more important to send dvd's by mail, then it is to make sure its own citizens are healthy is a country with priorities problems. For a "religious" country you guys don't even care enough about your fellow citizens to pay a few more dollars a year in taxes for socialized health care.

  70. No way! by Supurcell · · Score: 1

    Porn over the internet? There's no market for that!

    1. Re:No way! by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      Bwaaa!

      You're right - there's no market for porn at all. Now, there IS a market for V1@gr..a, but that's another story.

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    2. Re:No way! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      some people are so silly they even think *free* porn over the internet is possible.

  71. Arrggh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate mismatched parenthesis.

  72. It's called On Demand by Brigadier · · Score: 1


    Well, It's available now. It's called On Demand. I haven't been to blockbuster since discovering it.

    1. Re:It's called On Demand by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Nobody has turned a profit on it yet. Nor is it really competing with traditional channels. I think the market needs a good 18 months to mature. Plus Comcast is well known for it's inability to execute even it's basic services consistantly.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  73. Connections by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    Netflix has James Burke's Connections (II & III), Blockbuster does not.

    'nuff said.

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
    1. Re:Connections by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      You just made my christmas. I had no idea connections was on DVD!

    2. Re:Connections by faedle · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. Since they were next in my queue, you've just guaranteed that I probably won't get them next now.

    3. Re:Connections by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Huh. Apparently, my ordering DVDs from amazon impacts your netflix queue?

      Who knew?

  74. Dear everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Please note that $1.5 billion equity value is less than $684 million equity value and $1 billion debt value. Therefore, the value of Blockbuster is $1.7 billion, in fact, larger than NetFlix. Furthermore, since Blockbuster is more leveraged, if both firms pursue the same strategy in the same industry, you should expect a higher return from Blockbuster stock, as its assets would have the same risk, and Blockbuster would be 'levered up' versus NetFlix.

    That being said, Blockbuster is no NetFlix.

    1. Re:Dear everybody by ipour · · Score: 1

      OK folks - this whole response is a good explanation as to why we had a dot com bust in 2001. While bookkeeping 101 says "Assets - liabilities = net worth or equity," the joker in the deck is market capitalization of public corporations. The writer of the referenced article seems to have confused the two. Market capitalization is not equity, but only a portion of the equity represented by outstanding shares of stock. (Market Cap = # of Outstanding Shares of Stock x Price per Share). This number can and does change daily. Since Blockbuster is trading at a measly $3.54 v. Netflix $27.73, it stands to reason that Netflix market capitalization is likely to be significantly higher. Sure Netflix has no debt, but with only $140 million in revenue, versus Blockbuster's $1.3 BILLION in revenue for the last three months, it is not in a position to borrow either.

      The market cap here is a leading indicator that is looking at what is happening to the video rental business, namely it is imploding. So far, the market is looking at the fact that the box stores have not responded well to upstart ideas like Netflix, hence the higher share price of Netflix. Having said that, Netflix is not as huge and well established, and could easily be outflanked by newer technologies, like broadband (both wired and wireless) that have potential of bringing those same movies to the viewer instantly. Netflix knows this, and so has not leveraged itself. Blockbuster had no choice - they needed to leverage in order to continue to receive product and just stay in business. Getting into a fight with Carl Icahn obviously has not hapled matters, and the company is adrfit at this point. They have drastically cut expenses from a year ago, per their last quarterly.

      So if you seriously think you are going to make a killing on Blockbuster stock, I have a bridge in Brooklyn you might be interested in.

  75. Returning to the actual question... by FredThompson · · Score: 1

    "Is there still a DVD-by-mail war or has Netflix won?"

    That's a dumb question. What major market for any product has only one supplier (besides government)? There's room for both and more. Must be a slow day at Slashdot to put this up front...

    1. Re:Returning to the actual question... by Celsius+233 · · Score: 1

      Well, it IS Christmas...

      --
      Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice, Denham's Dandy Dental Dentrifice, Denham's Dentrifice Dentrifice Dentrifice.
  76. War? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have we fallen so far that we must describe any competition as a "war"?

    I'm trying to figure out what this has in common with war, and I'm not coming up with much. Well, there are two sides. Except some wars have more than two sides. So it's more like a football match.

  77. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by cliffy2000 · · Score: 0

    timeshifting is illegal? *cough*fair use*cough*

  78. Truth in advertising by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...well did ya really think the 7 dollar plan was gonna be the same as the 20 dollar plan? I mean, come on.

    It's called fraud when you sell one thing and deliver another.

    Had Netflix sent a letter out to their customers saying "We have to cap the number of DVDs you can rent on plan Y to X per month. If you want to see more than X DVDs then we have these upgrades available," the suit wouldn't have had any basis. However, Netflix advertised they offered "unlimited rentals" on their least expensive service when, in fact, they didn't.

    Your post implies you think that honesty in day to day business is too much to ask for. It'll be too bad if that becomes a common sentiment.

    1. Re:Truth in advertising by dswensen · · Score: 1

      How delightfully judgmental. However, if you actually look at the fine print on their commercials, you'll see they disclaim the true nature of their plans extensively.

      Which is not to say they're not doing a little shuck-and-jive, but A) that's nothing new in advertising, and hardly unique to Netflix, and B) it just pays to be an informed consumer and check out the plans before signing up. Of course, some would rather remain in ignorance and sue, but that's the American way.

    2. Re:Truth in advertising by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
      How delightfully judgmental. However, if you actually look at the fine print on their commercials,

      What fine print? Read their webpage.

      Get the Details
      With Netflix you can rent as many DVDs as you want from the comfort of your home and have them delivered to your door in about 1 business day! There are no late fees and no due dates, and shipping is free both ways. Plans start at $9.99 plus any applicable tax. With our most popular plan, 3 at-a-time (Unlimited), you can rent as many DVDs as you want for just $17.99 a month plus any applicable tax. You keep a revolving library of up to 3 DVDs at a time and can exchange them for new available DVDs as often as you like. There are no additional charges. Click here to learn about other available plans.
      That's the language they're using in December/2005. To actually see that language, purge any Netflix cookies you might have before you click otherwise the link may redirect you to their main page. In 1999, when I signed up, there wasn't a "1 business day" qualifier. There's no small print in that offer other than the tax reference and there wasn't in 1999. The "click here to learn about other available plans" link just gives you pricing info on different numbers of disks and refers to the capped service. The capped service is a new addition since 99.

      You're right about litigation being the American way. At its best, it provides a mechanism for people to rectify fraudulent business practices when the government chooses to ignore them. At its worse, it's a get-rich-quick scheme.

    3. Re:Truth in advertising by dswensen · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how any of this makes your point. Nowhere does this claim that unlimited rentals are available on the cheapest plan. It very specifically says "with our most popular plan."

  79. yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are barnes & noble or borders out of business because of amazon ?

    do people not buy software at best buy because you can get it cheaper online?

    bricks and mortar obviously brings things to the table that web sites can't really match. hence there will always be a place for it.

  80. Debt is not necessarily bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I couldn't help but to notice how people here seem to think that debt is something bad. I think somebody already pointed to the Modigliani-Miller theorem, but here is a brief introduction for dummies:

    Firm market value = Market value of equity + Market value of debt

    In case of Blockbuster: $684M + $1000M = $1684M

    In case of netflix: $1500M + 0 = $1500M

    So the market values seem about equal. Now, of course making a loss is not good, but that has more to do with the operation than the capital structure choice.

    The modigliani miller theorem is of course a simplification and in reality debt can have both negative and positive impacts. On the positive side interest payments on debt are tax deductible while equity dividends are not, so by having debt, tax savings can be made. Also debt can help discipline management and prevent them from diverting too much of the cashflows on perks for instance. On the negative side, in case of risks of bankruptcy, the debt can create incentive problems. Depending on the situation the firm may end up not making profitable investments or make unprofitable investments because of the effects of the debt.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_finance

    1. Re:Debt is not necessarily bad by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Some debt isn't bad but that much debt would make me pass on investing with them, and in the end that's all that accounting really means; do I want to invest with this company. What's their acid test ratio, their statement of cash flows, thier PE ratio, their current debt ratio, and their long term debt ratio. Anyone have a quarterly report for BB on hand?

  81. was there ever really a war? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blockbuster was at a disadvantage from the get go. I bet a large percentage of Netflix's first customers were disgruntled Blockbuster customers, so they didn't have a chance of getting those people back. I'll not be unhappy to see Blockbuster close up shop. Netflix et al will get the mass market and the Mom and Pop Brick and Mortars will cover the specialty market and everone (mostly) will be happy and (mostly) un-ripped off.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  82. blah by araczynski · · Score: 0

    i don't rent dvd's anymore, whether offline or online, all the movies that get released are pretty much crap these days, it takes almost a miracle to even get us to waste money on a theater.

    --
    sigs suck
  83. Deal for nothing. Investigation's free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is nothing we can do about it until the movie industry either gets investigated by congress (the only real way to make an industry move nowadays) or someone with much closer ties (like what Apple did with ABC/Disney) makes it happen."

    Investigated for what? The content producer doesn't have to make a deal with anyone they don't want to. Just like you don't have to work for anyone you don't want to. And a company can hire whomever they want.

    It's called free will. But I'll remember to sic congress on you, next time you turn down a job offer.

    1. Re:Deal for nothing. Investigation's free. by doormat · · Score: 1

      So? What did the cable tv industry do? The cable industry had some Congressional hearings and the words "a la carte" dangled over their head, and all of a sudden they move on the issue - enough to keep them out of trouble.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  84. late fees by maccw · · Score: 1

    Didnt Netflix force BB to change its late fee policy? Didn't they start their online service after Netflix? Seems BB is follower not the leader. I couldn't stand the ridiculous late fee's that BB charged. It was not a user friendly policy. Their selection has always been the worst. Unless you thrive on mainstream and mainstream alone. Netflix service is the best video rental experience by far.

    --
    My karma is getting better everyday.
  85. price switching by S3phir0th · · Score: 1

    Recently Blockbuster upped its prices. Inflation is a normal part of life but customers(including myself) were not informed of the increase. I noticed on my bill that it was high and had to call Blockbuster thinking it was a mistake. Im sure whatever contract i signed made it legal not to tell me but imo that is bad business practices. If they had told me before billing me the increased amount most likely i would have stayed with them; i had no thoughts of dropping the service before.

  86. I used both, and Blockbuster is a lot better by EricX2 · · Score: 1

    The price is the same, as far as I can tell the selection is just as good, and the shipping (in my case) is better. It costs $17.99 to get 3 discs from Netflix, but I get 2 coupons a month which I can print and take into the local blockbuster and rent any movies or video games for free, which is very convenient for me. They also give me other coupons such as buy one get one free for used dvds, or a free used dvd. Those coupons can add up to more than the $17.99 fee. When I used netflix they said on 5 occasions that they never received the disc, then when we said we were going to cancel they magically found them and tried to get us to stay with them... which we didn't. I have never had any problems with missing discs since I switched to blockbuster.

    So, I'm not sure what Netflix could be doing that was better than that... anyone care to enlighten me?

    1. Re:I used both, and Blockbuster is a lot better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as far as I can tell the selection is just as good You gotta be kidding right? Or are you a BB shill?

  87. Re:And I really wanted to stay on the sidelines he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hope you're joking... timeshifting a DVD?

  88. Re:Yeah, fuck BlockBuster by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    I had a day without Netflix a few months ago, so I went to BB (hadn't been there in almost a year). I rented Wild Orchid (my wife was out of town), hoping to see some almost softcore action. My wife gets home and a week later I get a notice saying the movie hadn't been returned. I went to the store and the guy says "Yeah it's in. That happens all the time. Computer error you know." So not only did my wife find out, I made wasted gas on a trip into town.

    Bastards.

    Oh yeah, Netflix needs to work on the weekends.

  89. In other news by nocomment · · Score: 1

    oh, wait, there is no other news, it's christmas.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  90. Deliberate delays: Yes. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    That's my experience, too.

  91. Netflix woes by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 1

    Netflix slows down turnaround times after they verify you're a "secured" customer. Sure they tell you that they have the right to do so, but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do to a loyal customer. Netflix and Blockbuster both can go screw themselves.

  92. Maybe the New York Netflix operates differently. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I thought your comment is interesting.

    This was not: "The two posts that have actually mentioned this phenomenon so far have both been penned by Chris Bradshaw. Apparently he is the sole target of this dastardly plot. " You are trying to shut off the entire discussion by attacking one messenger?

    Maybe the New York Netflix operates differently. The Salem Netflix, that serves Portland, Oregon, definitely does some funny business, in my experience. But Netflix is, for us, still far better than what is in second place. The Blockbusters here are staffed by often difficult, bored people. And who wants to drive to look over a few DVDs when Netflix has a huge list?

  93. No, you RTFA. by raehl · · Score: 1

    I read THE TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT. I wasn't really concerned with whether or not Netflix actually committed the infraction anyway, the point was that, even if they were, Netflix didn't get any sort of penalty out of it, what they did get was a discounted marketing campaign - so Netflix won, the lawyer won, and the customer was screwed.

  94. Don't Fprget GreenCine by technohippy · · Score: 1

    GreenCine is a CA based DVD by mail compnay that specializes in independant films, sci-fi and anime.

    http://www.greencine.com/

    Their customer servcie is terrific. Their turn around times may be longer if you live on the East Coast because they have no warehouse here.

    I have been using them for over a year and I am very happy with the service.

    There are alternatives.

  95. Does Blockbuster buy the edited version? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Sure, BB doesn't edit movies. But, do they buy the edited version?

  96. How to detect netflix throttling. by slashkitty · · Score: 1
    I'll second this. Throttling is very common. I have experienced it. My friends have experienced it. I'm sure others aren't smart enough to figure it out, or just don't care.

    For two months I got DVD shipped the same day they were returned. The third month, it took an extra day for every movie. EVERY movie.

    You can track your netflix history here: http://www.netflix.com/RentalActivity?lnkctr=yadb_ viewallshippeddvds>.

    Look at the day you returned movies.. then look at the day the next one ships. The next movie should ship the same day they receive a movie. If it ships the next day a lot, you're being throttled.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    1. Re:How to detect netflix throttling. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      I've had to wait a couple of times to have movies shipped, usually they ended up coming from a non-local shipping facility (there's one in Duluth, which is just north of Atlanta, which is my locality), but never more than one business day, and only a handful of times.

  97. They both will lose by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Both Blockbuster AND Netflix will ultimately lose - to on-demand cable, which doesnt require you to have to return anything, even as far as dropping something in a mailbox.

  98. Whoo hoo fighting for the little guy!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah well who cares?
    I pirate all my shit anyway. It is the right thing to do.

    Join the fight against big business and watch a pirated DVD today!

  99. I still won't give Netflix my money. by Caspian · · Score: 1

    Netflix was responsible for a huge plague of pop-under ads advertising their service. Regardless of whether your (or my) ad-blocking software (or browser) blocked them, they still tried these dirty tricks, and I wouldn't doubt that a large part of their popularity is due to these sneaky advertising methods. (Of course, a large part is also due to word of mouth, but still.)

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  100. Sure... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    ...and in many cases you can resell the DVD's and recoup some of your cost.

    I have a bunch of DVDs that I've purchased, so I'm running out of space. So right now, I'm just subscribing to a bunch of premium channels for entertainment and throw in the occasional purchase.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Sure... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Excellent point about being able to sell off old DVDs to offset costs. I'm in the mode now of reducing my cable bill costs. So I dumped the premium channels, they seemed to run the same old movies over and over again, rarely did they have anything new on that I wanted to watch. The extra cost each month was not worth it. I suspect I would find it the same with a Netflix account after the first couple of months.

      BTW: I just called Brighthouse and they gave me a year long promotion that covers standard digital cable and the cable access for under $40 a month. Really surprised me. I just had to call them up and ask. Last year I saved about $15 a month with the promotion they put me on. When that ran out this year I called them up and got a really good promotion. Saves me about $50 a month!

  101. Start tracking them! by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    I've taken to writing on my wall calendar when I receive and send a DVD, and they HAVE gone down in frequency in the last couple months. The parent poster is quite right about things being received and a delay in getting things replaced. Every great thing gets taken over by greedy corporate dickwads who ruin it...

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  102. Blockbuster has(had) monopoly intentions. by member57 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Blockbuster undercut many Mom & Pop, and small chain video stores back in the early ninties. After putting them out of business they jacked their rental fees right back up, sometimes more than previous said businesses. I will NOT do business with Cockbuster at all. I like to see them getting their asses handed to them, serves them right!

    --
    If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.
    The UN - The largest "political" cause of death.
    1. Re:Blockbuster has(had) monopoly intentions. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If Kerry was the answer, it must have been a stupid question.

      It certainly was a stupid question. "George W. Bush" was the question, and you can see how stupid that was...

  103. Block Buster Online Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have block busters online service and so far they have been pretty good about issuse that i have had w/ them. Wrong dvd in the package or the dvd never came but said it was shipped and they will send out the right one just buy logging on your acount and telling them that they shipped something wrong and they will send it out w/o having to resend the wrong disk back. There are also some added benifits to blockbuster, i now the selection at the store sucks most of the time but u do get 2 free store rentals a month w/ the online service and u get other discounts, ive already gotten two coupons for free (used) movies. Im not trying to say that blockbuster is better but this is the experiance i have had w/ them. No experiance w/ netflix though.