Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Chip Makers to Unite

Doctor Memory writes "The Register reports that several Japanese semiconductor manufacturers (Toshiba, Hitachi and Renesas, and possibly NEC and Matsushita) are in talks to create a "semiconductor superpower" to counter rivals in Taiwan, the US and China. The firms are in talks to create a shared foundry, which might set the stage for the creation of a 45-nanometer process well in advance of the competition."

131 comments

  1. The summary neglects to mention the fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That the chip makers will also physically unit to form the mighty robot Chiptron.

    1. Re:The summary neglects to mention the fact by drdewm · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Another nail in the US economy coffin.

    2. Re:The summary neglects to mention the fact by bad+jerkface · · Score: 0, Funny

      I for one welcome our new metallic overlords.

      --
      It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
    3. Re:The summary neglects to mention the fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Name one Japanese chip maker which competes in the same micro-processor manufacturing space as IBM, AMD, or Intel?

    4. Re:The summary neglects to mention the fact by drdewm · · Score: 1

      Toshiba, Hitachi, Renesas and Matsushita

  2. humm by Amouth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have mixed feelings about this.. would be greate for tech but what will happen to the consumer once they kill the competition?

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    1. Re:humm by honeypotslash · · Score: 0

      Seems like that if they are able to put the competition out of business, then the quality of parts would degrade over time as they would stop caring to come out with the next best thing to beat the competition.
      --
      Free PlayStation 3

    2. Re:humm by No2Gates · · Score: 1

      You mean like Microsoft did? And we know what great quality products they put out right????

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    3. Re:humm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, Apple will start using this CPU and once Apple use it no alterantive is needed.

      Apple only uses the best stuff.

    4. Re:humm by sygin · · Score: 1

      Japan's companies have realised that to remain in contention in the new global (eyes towards China and India) economy, they must take a radical approach.

      I was on a lean manufacturing course which teaches what the Japanese componies do to perfect their manufacturing processes. If a small improvement will not suffice you need to implement radical change.

      This is an article describing the radical change in thinking that is now being considered. At times like we have today where the rules have changed very rapidly, you need focused thinking. Look at how china is developing, their version of capitalism seems to be very focused.

      PS: Spelling is VERY hard for me.

      Overheard: Lets hope the ragheads are wrong, that Bush is not a lyer, and Tony is strong.

      --
      Don't make your problems my problems!
    5. Re:humm by Asakusa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First you have to assume that the products we receive now are of high quality. I personally don't use anything NEC branded in my machines. I have used Toshiba and have not found it to be the best. "Made in China/Japan" is already a phrase with a bad connotation (IMHO, I could be wrong). How much worse will it be if they are the only suppliers? The only way to gain profits then is: a) increase prices and b) decrease quality of product.

      --
      The prisoner of hope is sustained and encouraged by his hope, even as he is confined by it.
    6. Re:humm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not 'killing the competition' - they're simply collaborating by going in on shares of a fab. Considering the 20-year run of the siloed fabless / fabricator model is encountering problems, this makes sense in the long run.

    7. Re:humm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one superchip maker: Intel with 31 billion in revenue in 2005. Samsung is next with about half Intel's revenue. Then TI with 1/3. All those Japanese jokers combined would put them about 30% ahead of Samsung but still nowhere near Intel and it certainly wouldn't touch the 60+ billion of the top 5 US companies combined.

      This ignored that fact that most chip makers only compete with 1 or 2 others per market. Intel has only one real competitor in IA microprocessors. Xilinx has only 1 real competitor in SRAM FPGAs. I think the only advantage this path has is increased standards influence.

    8. Re:humm by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Ok, how many in here got a Nec DVD-burner?
      Toshiba makes great TVs and DVD-players.
      Made in China probably stands for something like cheap price, childmade and inhumane labor(my english aren't that great), but Japan? Japanese (and (south) Korean?) products are great aren't they? Good quality, well tested, decent price, modern.

    9. Re:humm by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Made in Japan has always (at least since I was young) meant quality. Makers of lower quality goods here in the UK used to use a Japanese-sounding brand name as it had high quality connotations.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    10. Re:humm by honeypotslash · · Score: 0

      Ive got 2 NEC DVD burners and I couldn't ask for a better quality in a burner. Although I haven't burned too many discs with them, they havn't failed me yet. On the other hand, I have a Sony CD-RW which I have burned hundreds of CD-R's with and reburned CD-RWs so many times I've lost count and it has never failed to burn a single disc.
      --
      Free PlayStation 3

    11. Re:humm by aliquis · · Score: 1

      But then ofcourse Sony is japanese to, don't know of any american whatever burner trademarks but maybe they exist, don't know if the technology in they are american thought ;)

  3. Unite? by Pentultimate+Aeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'll form the head!" -Sorry, couldn't resist.

    1. Re:Unite? by CZA2006 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damnit! They've already got a NEC!

    2. Re:Unite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's what I thought too.. "Japanese Chip Makers to Unite.... INTO A GIANT ROBOT!!!!"

  4. Concerning chip makers by fionbio · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just got this from my /usr/bin/fortune: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (The Times of London) Dear Sir, I am firmly opposed to the spread of microchips either to the home or to the office. We have more than enough of them foisted upon us in public places. They are a disgusting Americanism, and can only result in the farmers being forced to grow smaller potatoes, which in turn will cause massive unemployment in the already severely depressed agricultural industry. Yours faithfully, Capt. Quinton D'Arcy, J. P. Sevenoaks

    1. Re:Concerning chip makers by fionbio · · Score: 1

      (sorry for bad formatting...)

    2. Re:Concerning chip makers by eosp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm on Slackware you insensitive clod! It's /usr/games/fortune .

    3. Re:Concerning chip makers by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a similar quote:

      When asked about railroads tne Duke of Wellington complained that they would "only encourage the common people to move about needlessly."

    4. Re:Concerning chip makers by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      What a COMPLETE IDIOT... obviously the guy that sent the letter realize that micro-chips are in everything from his radio, car, coffee maker/machine, wrist-watch, his kid's toys, and damn near anything else you can think of...

    5. Re:Concerning chip makers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and YOU obviously didnt realize it was a joke. micro-chips, small potatoes, little fryed snacks? get it yet?

  5. Well by Soporific · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one welcome our new semiconducting overlords!

    ~S

    1. Re:Well by PenGun · · Score: 0

      Karma Whore ... nothing to see here, just /. in all it's glory.

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    2. Re:Well by Soporific · · Score: 1

      This is true, but funny mods don't get Karma I don't believe.

      ~S

  6. I for one welcomeourJapanese chip making overlords by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Hitachi, Toshiba and Renesas today announced that they have initiated a joint study on the feasibility of an independent semiconductor foundry business offering advanced fabrication processes to which each of the companies could outsource fabrication."

    If you create a company to make a product for you, shouldn't it be called insourcing ?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  7. Price Fixing by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So much the eaiser to fix prices if you 'collaborate' your R&D and production.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Price Fixing by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well there is still companies US, Taiwan, and the EU competing with these manufactures. If they "fix" the price too high then companies in these other countries can undercut them.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Price Fixing by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Japan is a signee to GATT. If the other nations see Japan price fixing and/or dumping (they can do both at the same time) the GATT says they can sue them in The World Court for damages and to abolish the anti-competitive action. Of course that takes years, in the meantime the other nations will erect tariffs/subsidies to protect thier own makers of such chips. This is NOT a smart move by the Japanese, sure it's radical but radical the wrong way.

    3. Re:Price Fixing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If and only If they do fix prices. Sharing RD costs and developing a 45nm foundry makes a lot of sense. I doubt that they would ever want to risk price fixing. Even if they did I think it would fail. Now dumping is another story.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Price Fixing by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Antitrust law still applies when companies fix prices during a joint ventures. Warner and some other labels had a joint venture to make a Three Tenors album. They fixed prices and got busted. The FTC later said that all price-fixing with relation to a joint venture will get the per se illegality treatment, which means no excuses. The parties can only set the prices of the new products of their joint ventures, and only when it is necessary to the success of the venture. (Firms cannot dump all their assets to the joint venture and then fix prices, because that's against Section 7 of the Clayton Act regarding mergers tending to lessen competition.) American antitrust law applies to activities in other countries that significantly affect American commerce. While the government may not want to bring an action against American firms, that reticense sure does not apply to foreign firms.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    5. Re:Price Fixing by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      The GATT says that? I thought the GATT was based entirely on reciprocity. I would imagine the WTO would be the one that has other countries going to the World Court.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    6. Re:Price Fixing by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      foundry!=fab.
      The foundry produces the siicon ingot and wafers but does not process them. Owning your own foundry lets you more tightly control the quality of the silicon going into your fabs.
      Going in together on foundry capacity is more of a testing the waters approach before diving into a fab (or 5)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:Price Fixing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when could businesses not do business. Hell, there doing this for competive reasoning. In other words they are trying to sway consumers towards them. It would be very hard to control prices when there is still plenty of choice left in the market.

      Someone never fails to scream bloody murder.

    8. Re:Price Fixing by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      As they have competition elsewhere in Asia, the US and Europe, I don't see how it would make a difference. To do price fixing, they would have to cooperate with every other company in any particular chip industry.

    9. Re:Price Fixing by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      foundry!=fab

      Huh? Sir, are you sure you know what you are talking about? ;-) Yes, your inequality is correct, but in much weaker sense than you assume: since the dawn of modern CMOS (you know, Mead-Convay time, circa 1980) people referred to foundry as an outside place to make your chips.

      Foundries have fabs, Intel also has fabs but (AFAIK) does not provide foundry services; IBM provides, e.g., SiGe foundry services, MOSIS is a foundry, etc.

      Places where you get wafers are just "wafer suppliers", places which make masks are "mask houses"...

      Paul B.

    10. Re:Price Fixing by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      WTO is the parent organization that enforces the GATT is how I recall it. WTO has the power to make nations "conform" to the agreements. Trade is really never based on reciprocity as some countries don't have a lot to offer someone in return for goods. If by reciprocity you mean if you tarriff my stuff X, I'll tarriff your stuff Y that can happen, but the GATT was setup to prevent such "trade wars" and instead have "fair" trade agreements.

    11. Re:Price Fixing by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      THere has got to be more to it than just R&D costs. You don't build a foundry to do R&D you build it to make chips. If everyone investor owns equal share of production then they should be able to produce chips for pretty much the same price. And I don't see one firm willing to take a market share hit by pricing higher than the others. So you don't have a formal price fixing but you have it informally. It's a backdoor (Loophole?) . Of course they could each take the technology, build a 45nm fab and cut each others throats, but IIRC that is what this agreement is supposed to AVOID as that is the way they do things now.

    12. Re:Price Fixing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      But this just one country. There are still chip houses in the US, EU, and Asia that will compete with these Japanese companies.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    13. Re:Price Fixing by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      No doubt. BUT the big deal is the possibilty these guys try to run everyone else out of the market by selling at low costs, grabbing market share until everyone else who wants to compete cannot afford to compete. These guys could become a market cartel for these chips, much like OPEC is for oil. I'm not sure the Japanese Gov't would let that happen these days as they are not nearly as much bought and paid for by business as they used to be 20 yrs ago. We just need to keep our eyes open to what is going on so they don't slip one over on us!

    14. Re:Price Fixing by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Fairly sure, yes.

      When I worked at a comm silicon company we were fabless. We always referred to TSMC and UMC as fab houses, not foundries. Similarly when we contracted with IBM for an ASIC design we used the Burlington FAB (as opposed to foundry).

      Now maybe other geos or corporate cultures refer to this differently, but for both companies I've worked for it was foundry, fab && || fab house, mask house, sort, etc.
      One company had ~1200 employees the current one has many times that.
      Cheers,
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    15. Re:Price Fixing by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess it is indeed a case of slight difference in corporate culture/lingo, and maybe time -- I've revealed my timeframe by referring to Mead-Convay's book! ;-)

      Yes, you obvously would "used the Burlington FAB (as opposed to foundry)" -- you as a designer (I assume) need to know where chips will be made and deal with the right "_fab_ people". But your contracts people would, I think, deal with what IBM would refer to as "foundry services department".

      Anyway...

      Paul B.

  8. Competition is Good! by sarlos · · Score: 0

    This is great news for the semiconductor market. Hopefully it will stir the pot up a bit and force more serious innovations to occur.

    --
    Government's view of the economy: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
    1. Re:Competition is Good! by larry_larry · · Score: 1

      Yes innovation is great... The only problem is that larger companies and organizations are slow to innovate. Massive infrastructure and bureaucracy stifle innovation.

    2. Re:Competition is Good! by sarlos · · Score: 1

      That is true, but the proposed facility would help tremendously reduce their production costs. This means more money goes into R&D. Companies in the US, Taiwan, and China will need to find ways to keep a competitive advantage against the Japanese trio.

      --
      Government's view of the economy: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving,regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.
    3. Re:Competition is Good! by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Not knowing anything about chip fab, don't you kind of need big companies in some respects to come up with innovative chips? The cost of R&D and manufacturing newer and better and more innovative chips has to be enormous. I don't think it's something that can be done inside someone's basement. The article mentions they hope to produce a 45 nanometer chip before anyone else, if they do wouldn't that mean that your generalization about The only problem is that larger companies and organizations are slow to innovate. Massive infrastructure and bureaucracy stifle innovation. doesn't apply here.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    4. Re:Competition is Good! by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      Know what else stifles innovation in semiconductor devices? When it costs literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to get your new whiz bang product through the semiconductor manufacturing process. That's a big reason why they want to combine their efforts to reduce cost.

    5. Re:Competition is Good! by larry_larry · · Score: 1

      Yes, bigger is better for economies of scale. By Moore's law everyone will eventually have a 45nm process. First to market with a 45nm process doesn't say innovation to me, unless the yields are excellent and unmatchable by others. My view is that the fabs don't innovate much other than in an industrial manufacturing sense... to risky... leave the physics innovation for the academic institutions. Suppliers of manufacturing and process control equipment (i.e. smaller companies) likely provide a good chunk of the fab innovations.

      For the manufacturing end of things the costs are enormous. A bunch of companies joining together to partner on a fab says that manufacturing isn't what differentiates them from the pack. What really differentiates would be the analog, digital logic and software design that define the chip's design. The methodology for creating chips, verifying and validating functionality is a differentiator too. To me this is where the innovation occurs that has the most impact on society -- at an abstract level that is independent of manufacturing processes.

      Subsystem (aka IP) development can actually be done in someone's basement or garage using a simulator and FPGA for prototyping. From your garage you could theoretically create and prototype an IP subsystem worth hundreds of millions of dollars in licensing revenue. It's the manufacturing process that costs the most and this is one area where you don't want to take big risks.

  9. The Chipmakers will unite by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    The chipmakers will unite into a giant chipmaker who will protect the world from evil and fight many giant monsters.
    --Toho Pictures
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  10. By your powers combined... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I AM CAPTAIN CHIP FAB!!

  11. Ship Has Already Sailed to China by mpapet · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of this stuff is moving to China as fast as humanly possible.

    R&D and (b)leading-edge manufacturing is still in Taiwan, but moving at lightning speed to China ASAP.

    As I recall:
    Employees cost roughly 1/3 the price of an American worker. Employees in China cost roughly 1/4 the price of a Taiwanese worker.

    Is my recollection still true?

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by Yehooti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems that the cost of living is much greater in Japan than in the USA. They can beat the USA by their manufacturing effeciency. I don't see how Japan can hope to compete with Taiwan and China though, unless they out research Taiwan. If they come up with even sharper, leading-edge manufacturing, maybe.

    2. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true in the electronics industry, but not for semiconductors. You don't need very many employees to run a semiconductor fab, and they can't be taken in from the street. The big expense is equipment and the facilities, and these prices do not vary that much (but they are huge - several billion dollars for a cutting-edge facility). My impression is that one of the biggest factors in where fabs are located is where companies can get the biggest tax cuts and/or government subsidies. BTW, there are cutting-edge fabs in the US, in Europe, in China, in Taiwan, in Singapore and in Japan.

    3. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by RouterSlayer · · Score: 1

      the limited labor working in the plant is still cheaper in China.
      Labor to build the fab is cheaper in China.
      Materials to build the fab are also cheaper.
      Office costs and other costs are also cheaper.

      Everything else being equal, China still wins.

      And China already manufacturers just about everything else.
      Go ahead, pick up a random object in your house/apartment/basement/etc
      see the little sticker? yeah "Made in China"...

      And that goes for electronics and computer goods too. (the majority anyhow)

    4. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by atokata · · Score: 1

      The cost of living in Japan vs. the cost of living in the US is fairly equivalent these days. Even gas is nearly the same, where I live in Colorado.

    5. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

      yeah, but the japanese tend to leave the high end stuff on their home turf because the chinese have a tendency to "borrow" (as in copy exactly and sell under a chinese brand name) whatever is being made on their turf at the time. In automotive manufacturing, the chinese have "developed" a honda passport clone. There are also mercedes C class clones.

      Your LCD panel may be stamped "Made in China" but the electronics running that panel are stamped "Made in Japan".

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    6. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by riptide_dot · · Score: 1

      Most of this stuff is moving to China as fast as humanly possible.

      R&D and (b)leading-edge manufacturing is still in Taiwan, but moving at lightning speed to China ASAP.

      As I recall:
      Employees cost roughly 1/3 the price of an American worker. Employees in China cost roughly 1/4 the price of a Taiwanese worker.

      Is my recollection still true?


      I believe that is the case, but remember that these companies still want to be able to still sell their product to U.S. companies (like the big three auto manufacturers for instance), so having plants inside the U.S. is still in their best interests, as if it's manufactured in the U.S. for use in the U.S., they don't have to pay the high tariffs on the import of them from China/Taiwan/Japan/Vietnam/etc.

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
    7. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like the big three auto manufacturers for instance

      One of the big three 'auto' manufacturers was bought out by a German company years ago, and the other two are facing bankruptcy in the near future.

    8. Re:Ship Has Already Sailed to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To some degree that's true, but the majority cost of a fab isn't necessarily in terms of land or construction, but in terms of equipment. The price of the equipment is pretty independent of where the fab happens to be located.

  12. Rock and a hard place by ChowRiit · · Score: 1

    Either we have small companies with no money for R&D, and few if any industry wide standards, or we have a few big companies which can effectively pricefix and control the market with ease, preventing further companies from joining.

    This seems to be the big dilemma these days, so, honestly, I have no idea if this is a good or a bad thing...

  13. Re:Do Over by mpapet · · Score: 2, Informative

    As I recall:
    Taiwanese employees cost roughly 1/3 the price of an American worker. Employees in China cost roughly 1/4 the price of a Taiwanese worker.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  14. This is a good thing. by gasmonso · · Score: 1

    All this will do is force Taiwan and the US to stay honest and innovate to stay ahead. A side benefit of course will be lower prices for the consumer. Of course this only works because there are other major players. Competition = good.

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
  15. Re:I for one welcomeourJapanese chip making overlo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    has to be a wholly owned company to be called insourcing.

    owned by many = not wholly owned by any.

    so it's outsourcing.

    not that i'm pedantic or anything

  16. Nothing New Here by FSM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not exactly unusual. Japanese have long been doing this. It is called Keiretsu.

    1. Re:Nothing New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Not exactly unusual. Japanese have long been doing this. It is called Keiretsu.


      I'm sorry, but this is not a keiretsu. A keiretsu is marked by mutual company ownership and strong social ties. Unless Hitachi is buying a portion of Toshiba and the top executive is marrying one of the Renesas' executive's daughter and no one is mentioning it, this is just a western style joint venture.

  17. Sounds like an Anime plot by TheBogie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually it's too coherent to be in anime. There are no dwarfs or unicorns.

    1. Re:Sounds like an Anime plot by neko9 · · Score: 1

      ...or persocoms

    2. Re:Sounds like an Anime plot by Dante+Shamest · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Actually it's too coherent to be in anime. There are no dwarfs or unicorns.

      Now that's what I call a non sequitur.

  18. American chip manufacturers aren't worried . .. by mmell · · Score: 4, Funny
    What, with all the atomic weapons testing happening off the shore of Okinawa every year, Godzilla, Gamora or Mothra will certaily level the Japanese chip makers, leaving Intel and AMD, er, Pinky and the Brain to take over the world!

    What? There's no such thing as Godzilla? Has anybody told Johnny Socko about this?

  19. Lets go Voltron Force! by frankmu · · Score: 1, Funny

    now which company will be the Head?

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:Lets go Voltron Force! by tktk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too bad Sony's not involved...it could be the ass.

    2. Re:Lets go Voltron Force! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      No matter what a bunch of music pirates say and try to do, Sony is and has been a company that produces a superior grade of consumer electronics equipment. Not 'far superior,' just a trademark that can usually be relied on when buying something at a mainstream retailer.

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:Lets go Voltron Force! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25 years ago this was the case, now, Sony is just another brand of low quality, outsourced & rebranded goods - usually with the only innovative feature being some way to restrict your use of it, or some non-standard part that forces you to only get it from Sony.

      I remember back when they actually made good products. The Atari 2600 was still in production. I can appreciate your brand loyalty, but by the time the 90's hit, quality went out the window. Now its just a name, and that is their only real asset. It wont even be that for long, people get tired of getting burned.

  20. As long as... by greysky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, I'm cool with it as long as they aren't teaming up with the Germans...

    1. Re:As long as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so semiconductors + german engineering =.....?

    2. Re:As long as... by aurb · · Score: 1

      so semiconductors + german engineering =.....?
      Porn?

  21. ^_^ by icj · · Score: 0

    All your chips are belong to us.

    1. Re:^_^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's
      All your chip are belong to us!

    2. Re:^_^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say?!

  22. To be "well in advance" they'd better hurry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want to do 45nm "well in advance" of the competition, they'd better hurry. I am in no way associated with Intel, but I think they have 65nm pretty much solved and are already deep in figuring out how to really do 45nm right now.

    1. Re:To be "well in advance" they'd better hurry by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1
      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    2. Re:To be "well in advance" they'd better hurry by Urusai · · Score: 1

      I've already figured out 45nm...just use gamma ray lithography. With some wavelet theory and stuff. I'm pretty sure positrons are involved somehow, as well.

  23. Gee, Didn't SEMATECH Try This In the U.S.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look how successful it was at doing manufacturing research collaboratively starting in the late 80s!

    So successful that it moved away from semiconductor manufacturing process research into fab equipment research!

  24. Nicon by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1

    You can probably add Nicon to that mix as well. Because I don't think they will be using wafer steppers from outside of Japan.

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    1. Re:Nicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nikon is a Mitsubishi company. Mitsubishi is part of the Renesas joint-venture.
      There is another Japanese company that makes wafer steppers: Canon.

    2. Re:Nicon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, I realised that myself after posting.

  25. NOT a Keiretsu by a.different.perspect · · Score: 1

    A Keiretsu is a loose grouping of companies working in disparate fields but keeping the same name. An example would be Mitsubishi or, in the West, Virgin Group. What the article talks about is just a normal business partnership between different companies, not a Keiretsu.

  26. Re:Do Over by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believe me, I do a lot of R&D Testing of products whose manufacture recently was 'shifted' from the US to China. The Chinese who I have encountered (Shenzen region) have zero concept of proactive quality engineering. They will do exactly what they think you told them to do without thinking. Any time there is a problem, they become defensive and opaque, and it becomes very difficult to do anything about the issue.

    My feeling is that this comes from years of socalism and group-think within a very regimented culture.

    --
    resigned
  27. In a reactive move... by geobeck · · Score: 0

    Lays and Fritos are rumored to be merging to develop a new 45nm sodium chloride process.

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  28. Brook's Law by SporkLand · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The firms are in talks to create a shared foundry, which might set the stage for the creation of a 45-nanometer process well in advance of the competition."

    Does Brook's Law:
    "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later"

    not apply in the least bit to semiconductor shrinking?

    That is an actual question, I'm not trying to make a point.

    1. Re:Brook's Law by ThunderBucket · · Score: 1

      Manpower != investment

      --

      "All I do is eat and poop!" -- Bean
    2. Re:Brook's Law by scheme · · Score: 1
      Does Brook's Law: "Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later" not apply in the least bit to semiconductor shrinking?

      Brook's Law doesn't even apply to software all the time. Consider a project with a single person working on writing a full featured OS. Adding another person should reduce the time needed to get the thing done even if it's late.

      Part of the work needed is actually building the fab and getting the physical stuff done. Adding more people would speed things up there up to a point. Besides, a large part of the time lag is getting the funding in place and paying for ongoing expenses. Having more companies involved would help here.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  29. Violates Principles of Free Market by jgardn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the reasons Japan isn't doing so hot is that they can't compete as well as they used to now that their labor wages are so high. I find it amazing that any business leader would think by eliminating all competition in their own country they are going to be more competitive on the world market. Since when has IBM or Sun decided that buying out Intel, AMD, and all the other chip makers is going to make them sell more chips in Asia? No, we in America do precisely the opposite. We stab our own domestic companies in the back unless they can do it for cheaper and better. We would happily see IBM, Sun, Intel, and AMD bite the dust if they bit the dust due to a leaner, more aggressive, and better producer.

    What Japan should look at instead of conglomeration is lowering the cost of entrepeneuring, and encouraging young people to start companies. Rather than forcing on the youth the ideal of getting into a good college so you can get hired by a good company, they should push on the youth the concept of rebelling against conventional wisdom and inventing new businesses and technology to slay the dragons. This would keep the existing companies competetive because they would have to compete just to keep their domestic revenue. Instead, they are forming a cartel of sorts that will discourage innovation and competition, and the Japanese people are looking the other way. They don't have a culture of entrepeneurship, and they haven't worked to create one. Now they will get screwed by higher prices and crappier products thanks to an unrestricted monopoly. (Phase 2 of the plan, if it isn't obvious, is tariffs or restrictions on imported electronics.)

    Maybe the US system of education is doing well for our country precisely because it is so incredibly broken compared to Japan's. People have a much better chance of succeeding economically by entrepeneurship than education and employment in our country. That's why your local independent plumber and painter are making more money than you are and they haven't even seen the inside of a college campus. And the net result is that people in our country know that the only way to be truly fabulously wealthy is to quit your job and go form your own company.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Violates Principles of Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you play too many video games!

    2. Re:Violates Principles of Free Market by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 0

      my understanding of hte us economy is that ~ 40% of workers (the lower two quintiles on the income distribution scale) have seen virtually no real increase in income in 20+ years

      therefore, by any reasonable definition, the us economy does not work well, and has not worked well for 20 years, and most of what we call working well is a small number of people getting rich

      so much for the free market

    3. Re:Violates Principles of Free Market by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I would think if uniting means they'll make better processors than the American ones then they've got a chance.

    4. Re:Violates Principles of Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it amazing that any business leader would think by eliminating all competition in their own country they are going to be more competitive on the world market.

      Maybe they think that those resources spent trying to undercut the competence would be better used building better fabrication plants.

      We stab our own domestic companies in the back unless they can do it for cheaper and better. We would happily see IBM, Sun, Intel, and AMD bite the dust if they bit the dust due to a leaner, more aggressive, and better producer.

      Let me point out that, more often than not, this aproach produces cheaper products, not better ones. As an analogy, starved workers do not produce high quality goods.

      Instead, they are forming a cartel of sorts that will discourage innovation and competition, and the Japanese people are looking the other way.

      Japanese have been doing this for ages, and to date it hasn't prevented innovation, has it?

      Japanese people are looking the way they have always been. They like to work for big companies.

    5. Re:Violates Principles of Free Market by matfud · · Score: 1

      The cost of next gen fabrication plants is so high that most of these companies cannot risk building one on thier own. Even intel would be remarkably weary of the risk. So if they get together they can share the cost of construction and development and share the risk. Nobody is sure how good the yields are for .45 nm in volume production environments as there are no volume production facilities for the technology at the moment. Building the foundary is very very very expensive. It will take time and research to produce acceptable yields (most likely a year or two after opening if ever) but if they are first then they stand to make a huge amount of money (as they will probably patent important/crucial techniques). They will likely use the foundary to make chips for anyone who is willing to pay for the 0.45 nm process (AMD for example does not own current generation foundaries (let alone have enough money to build .45 nm foundaries)

  30. Hardly by jgardn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is hardly a nail in our coffin. The US knows that monopolies are bad because they become lazy and charge high prices for crap. If anything, this will ruin the semiconducter economy in Japan as they become equated with bloated prices and shoddy work.

    How would you feel if you heard that all the top semiconductor companies in the US were going to merge? Wouldn't your next reaction be something about monopolies and anti-trust? Wouldn't you expect to see higher prices for shoddier work? That's exactly what's going to happen in Japan. I assume the next step is to start using the Japanese government to enforce favorable trade controls to keep the conglomerate alive.

    It's competition that keeps U.S. companies honest. If they can't compete, they go out of business, to be replaced by companies that can compete. In Japan (and to a large extend, Korea) mama government will start passing out welfare checks when national corporation X stops being profitable. (We'll see if China is going to behave the same. All predictions say "yes".)

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mama government will start passing out welfare checks when national corporation X stops being profitable.

      What, a group of private companies get together and decide to start a joint venture corporation, and suddenly we're talking about "mama government"? Where does government enter the picture beyond inventing the corporate fiction?

      Aside from that, it's not a monopoly until after it has crushed its competitors in the US and Taiwan. Then and only then can it start sucking.

    2. Re:Hardly by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      You make one significant error in your logic.

      People in the US are generally lazy, people in Japan are generally extremely productive. Its not a matter of race, but culture. Americans are just brought up differently from the Japanese, who have the strongest work ethic of anywhere afaik, and have a totally different attitude to buisness.

    3. Re:Hardly by drdewm · · Score: 1

      "It's competition that keeps U.S. companies honest." Wow... just wow.

    4. Re:Hardly by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      If they can't compete, they go out of business, to be replaced by companies that can compete.

      OK, so these aren't companies in the strictest sense, but... have you recently looked at how much money is spent on subsidising cotton farmers in the USA, for example? If not, please do, and then try to come back and say that the USA aren't subsidising anyone with a straight face. I predict you won't be able to.

      Also, the idea that there are no monopolies in the USA is so far out there that I'm not really sure whether your entire post isn't actually meant to be sarcastic/funny. I'm pretty sure we can all think of at least *one* monopoly that has a pretty firm grip on *one* industry at least...

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  31. Save your money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to hire Mothra to destroy the competition?

  32. Future Innovation in US or Chinese domination? by Analogworm · · Score: 1
    This could be good because getting to cheaper fabrication means allowing more fabless design houses in the US. Perhaps this could slow the gravitational shift of engineering to Asia. Fabless chip houses can be small units funded only by a few million dollars.

    on the other hand...

    By decreasing the importance of TSMC and UMC, that decreases Taiwan's economic power, allowing China to more easily establish military/political control of the island. Currently, most US presidents honor the economic power of TSMC and UMC and not the alliance from WWII days.

    Cheers!

  33. Re:Do Over by NewmanBlur · · Score: 1

    There's no doubt about the lower wages, but I think the difference is negated in other ways.

    This is an anecdotal example, but Canon moved it's high-end manufacturing back to Japan after attempting to set up in Malaysia. Malaysian wages were lower, but employee turnover was significantly higher than what it was in Japan. This led to increased training expenses, and lower productivity over the long term.

    My impression is the the lower-cost countries can be a great way to save money on manufacturing relatively simple items with well-established production techniques, but for newer technologies and R&D, a more highly skilled workforce is necessary.

    --
    Per ardua ad astra.
  34. Think bigger! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0
    The firms are in talks to create a shared foundry, which might set the stage for the creation of a 45-nanometer process well in advance of the competition.

    Think bigger still. Why not one world-wide corporation to develop 45nm, 32nm, and whatever-comes-next-after-that-nm processes that are made available to everyone on an equal basis? Better than money spent (wasted) on parallel development and patent fights.

    Then you can start competing on the value of your circuit designs.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Think bigger! by mce · · Score: 1
      Corporation: no. But consortium: yep, it's coming, because development costs for 45 and beyond are so horrendous that nobody can/wants afford them on his own anymore.

      Things will start with a few consortia (of which this Japanese one is an example) because governments still want to push their local economies (esp. the Japanese one does so very much), but over time even those few consortia will either merge or die.

      The thing that is really going to surprise a few people (though not the insiders), is that the key research developments will eventually be performed in "neutral" countries that do not have a major local chip making industry. Why, you ask? Because of the "neutrality", of course! This is starting to happen already (check out IMEC), and the Japanese "recent" moves towards a "national" consortium will only enhance it by giving the others an incentive to put aside their differences.

      Note, though, that this is not the first time that the Japanese industry and government have tried to setup a counterweight for Silicon Valley and Taiwan. All their previous attempts ended up as failures. But the costs of 45nm and beyond allow them to have another go at it.

  35. Honest?!? Thats a load of crap by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1
    It's competition that keeps U.S. companies honest.

    Aparently you've missed the recent headlines about the ex-Qwest executive's wire fraud charges and the current state of the Enron fraud case. U.S. companies are dishonest slime, just like companies everywhere else. There's a reason why the term "business ethics" gets used as a classic oxymoron - they have none!

    In fact, it seems like competition makes companies less honest. Competition seems to get the credit quite often for IBM covertly outsourcing jobs to India and Nikie paying pennies a day for child slave labor in Indonesia. Competition is an excuse to behave like sliime, not a force to keep companies "honest".

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  36. Re:Do Over by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    In North Korea, workers are a tenth of the price of a Chinese worker, and that's to *buy*. None of this capitalist renting nonsense.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  37. Re:Do Over by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1


    My impression is the the lower-cost countries can be a great way to save money on manufacturing relatively simple items with well-established production techniques, but for newer technologies and R&D, a more highly skilled workforce is necessary.


    Yes quite, like us for instance. I often remind my clients of this, a good lecture often makes them forget what they came to ask me to do too.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  38. I think the word the submitter was casting about by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    for is "Cartel". What we're going to have here is the RIAA of the semiconductor industry. Call it the CMAN - Chip Maker's Association of Nippon.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  39. Untrue by denjin · · Score: 1

    Have you ever lived and worked in Japan?

    Japanese do not work harder than Americans. Yes, if you work there you spend more time in the office, but more time doesn't equal productivity. When I was working there, you were expected to stay until like 800pm at night, and then we usually went out drinking. But, the number of smoke breaks and meetings and things during the day certainly didn't equate to more work done. Lots of meetings here, too, but overall I think the work done is the same.

  40. Not true at all, mod down by denjin · · Score: 1

    +5? Does anyone here actually know Japanese? Two others posted before me, so they deserve the mod points.

    But, a keiretsu is quite a bit different (see Mitsubishi or other companies for an example). This seems like a much less cohesive venture, and a single one at that. They are just discussing a 'shared foundry' as TFA states. This is nothing like Mitsubishi or the Virgin Group.

    Granted, I suppose it is possible for it to eventually turn into a keiretsu, but I don't think so. These are MUCH larger, independent companies, than the groups that formed the modern-day keiretsu of Japan.

  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. Re:I for one welcomeourJapanese chip making overlo by Bill+Wong · · Score: 2, Informative

    No... That's not quite right either.
    Joint Ventures are typically formed for this kind of strategic alliance.
    Joint Ventures are typically owned by the parties involved, so, it's not exactly outsourcing...

  43. Call them... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    ToHiRe

    Or...

    ToHiReNeMa...

    Butt, I am sure the US-based chip makers will not only have a CHIP on their SHOULDER, they'll have a new... (ToHiR)-eNeMa... Or, a Pentuple Eneme

    (image word: triple...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  44. It would have been simpler.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to just have a link to the goatse guy

    and interestingly enough the security word was "mouthful"

  45. So let's go back to farming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the competition couldnt compete .. too bad for them. So now people can't make money because fools think corporations are out to get them. Well let's do some economic analysis.

    Company A makes really cool product (like say as popular as iPod).'
    Company B, C, D cant acheive volumes and reduce production cost
    Companies B, C, and D go out of business.
    VAlues of shares in Company A rise.
    Owners of company A get mad rich.
    Revenue growth rate of Company A slows
    Company A reduces prices to gain even more customers from peopole who couldnt afford product and from different countries etc.
    Shareholders pull money out of company because stock is not rising fast enough.
    Shareholders fund (via Venture Capital firms) FUND NEW BUSINESSES.
    Shareholders spend money on luxury homes, feraris .. CREATING JOBS.
    Miserly shareholders put money in bank accounts. Capital within banks used to give out loans to those who start businesses. Banks try to get more customers by giving loans to people of higher risk and at lower rates. Banks give out $10 in lonas for every $1 in assets. These loans are used by people to start businesses (construction?) and build homes. Others such as teenagers in their mom's basement use a bank loan money TO START A BUSINESS THAT OUTCLASSES COMPANY A's PRODUCT.

    As long as there are people who are allowed to work, our quality of life can be improved. Every human can make a contribution to improving global quality of life, simply by providing legitimate services to others .. until people start saying they need no more services .. no more homes .. no more vacations .. no more jewellery .. no more medicine. Who's rich and can say "I don't need anything else"?

    Government should not prevent people from implementing ideas by setting up barriers to people who are not stealing (definition of stealing = taking something that isn't yours). If a company acheives a monopoly without forceful means, so be it.

  46. +5 Hysterical by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    It's competition that keeps U.S. companies honest.

    You should be in showbusiness, hahahahahahaha.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  47. Is this really news? by tcoady · · Score: 1
  48. This was expected. by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

    The cost of FAB has been growing and will grow all the time. At same time production capacity of a FAB has gone up even faster.
    DEC died because its management though they couldn't afford the increasing cost of fab in long run.
    IBM:s semiconductor business makes losses, just because its TOO SMALL.
    [In IBM:s case the profits come from consulting for systems build from the components that semiconductor business unit makes.]
    Its all about capability of filling the minimum unit size with products, that bring the cash. Also its about putting all their research for entire group to utilize.
    There is plenty of reasons why they want all their semiconductor research to be utilized. And if this move bring them a process generation ahead of competition, then their margins could go sky high. [By halving the per chip costs.]

    Intel seems to be only one capable of staying in business completely alone.

    --
    Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
  49. I, for one, by amoeba47 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new 45 nanometer overlords.
    All your 45nm base belong to us!!! mwah ha haa

  50. Considering todays story by aliquis · · Score: 1

    DVD Writer RoundUp this becomes even more fun when you read the conclusion:
    "Of all the units we tested for this article, two models had the best overall performance: the NEC ND-3540A and the Toshiba SDR-5472."

  51. Where are these companies today? by jgardn · · Score: 1

    Where is Enron today? GONE! The second--yes, the very second--word got out that they were dishonest, their stock prices tanked and people began leaving. Here today, gone tomorrow. These sick kids that thought they could play a joke on the market are learning really fast that we don't take this kind of crap. Where are they now? Having nightmares of serving long sentences for fraud. Do you think they will ever see their salaries and stock options again? Do you think they will ever get a job working within 3 miles of a account book? Heck no.

    Yes, Enron was dishonest. But they are gone now. That's what happens: The market corrects for them.

    This is very different than the business culture in Asia. If a company does poorly, or is caught in some scandal, the government bails them out. Not so here, except for rare exceptions.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  52. Good point by jgardn · · Score: 1

    You have an excellent point.

    I do have a friend in the hardware business. He says that because the cost of building a fab plant are skyrocketing, that the fab plants are becoming independent. His own company makes a deal with a fab plant that has the right setup for their particular chip. They send off the design, get 5 or 6 back, and test them. Then when they are satisfied, they put an order up for several million of them.

    This is the way of the future. The fab plants will be an entirely separate business, charging money to fab stuff for various companies.

    Now, if Japan decided to consolidate all their fab plants into a single interest, with no competition, that would be bad. It's precisely because the competition we're facing in Taiwan and China that people are using those fabbers from time to time (cheaper, but not better). It's sad to see it go overseas, but it is way too expensive to run one here in the US nowadays.

    BTW, you need very highly educated people to run a fab plant. These are no sweatshops, nor can they ever be.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.