Slashdot Mirror


Dual-core Athlon 64 X2 Laptop Reviewed

Steve from Hexus writes "Dual core finds its way inside a laptop (albeit a not-so-portable DTR) in the form of Rockdirect's Xtreme64. The DTR features an Athlon 64 X2 4800+, two 7200rpm hard drives and a GeForce Go 6800 Ultra GPU. HEXUS.net has a review of the laptop, one of the most powerful we've seen hit the market to date." From the article: "Rather than change a formula that works, Rockdirect has opted to stick with the Clevo D900-based chassis that its other performance-based laptops use. The obvious downsides are bulkiness and weight, with the laptop sitting almost 5cm high and weighing in at 5.7kg. It's a desktop replacement in the truest sense of the words, and with an 8kg travel weight (including charger and supplied carrying case) and relatively poor battery life, it's about as portable as a concrete slab."

173 comments

  1. Tax advantage by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At my workplace we can salary sacrifice laptops but not desktops. This means you pay for the system out of your pre-tax income, which can make a good laptop cheaper than an equivalent desktop system.

    Its a silly rort, but it leads to people buying systems like this one because its portable.

    1. Re:Tax advantage by undeadly · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Its a silly rort, but it leads to people buying systems like this one because its portable.

      It's also most likely sounds like a vacum cleaner due to fans needed to cool components in that constrained space.

    2. Re:Tax advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the library of our university we have "notebook corner" where you get LAN and electricity access. Usually you don't hear any noise from the notebooks when trying to read. But there is one stupid bitch which uses a notebook which could be the predecessor of this thing. when she turns it on your hear it in the whole library. usually people kick her out very fast and then she complains "oh - you're so evil - why don't you like my notebook - blablabla". if she wouldn't look as bulky as her own notebook this would at least be some excuse ...

    3. Re:Tax advantage by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      Ah, the Compaq 8088. Yes, excellent computer.

      I owned one, too. Survived flipping off the table in a small earthquake.

  2. Just Wait by soda160289 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wait until they start throwing server parts in there. Have you ever wanted to host a giant Oracle database ON THE GO?

    1. Re:Just Wait by (startx) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought that's what this laptop was for!

    2. Re:Just Wait by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      Wake up.

      Today's laptops are way beyond Oracle specs for hosting giant DBs.

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    3. Re:Just Wait by JacobO · · Score: 1

      I wonder just what you consider a "giant" database...

      Sure, the laptop will run the software, and it can probably handle a few users with a moderate data size, but I doubt any could handle a truly "giant" database, even just considering storage requirements. Maybe with some externally attached storage... but that's cheating.

  3. It has a parallel port by Saven+Marek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone even seen any parallel port peripherals in the last 10 years?

    And then it skimps on firewire by only giving unpowered slow firewire 400

    1. Re:It has a parallel port by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're just mad because there's no place to plug in your ADB mouse.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:It has a parallel port by pwaring · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any new ones, but up until recently I had a perfectly good HP laser printer that only had a parallel port. It drove me nuts when I couldn't connect it from some new laptops - especially my Powerbook.

    3. Re:It has a parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "lock me in a safe because the license for this software cost more than this laptop" dongles. Newer software is moving to USB style dongles, but not having a parallel port is a deal breaker when dealing with older software.

    4. Re:It has a parallel port by rassie · · Score: 1

      Not doing any embedded development, I presume?

      The Multi-ICE JTAG debugger from ARM is parallel port only. I recently had a colleague who had to buy a port replicator for his laptop just to get a parallel port to use with the Multi-ICE.

    5. Re:It has a parallel port by magarity · · Score: 1

      a perfectly good HP laser printer that only had a parallel port. It drove me nuts when I couldn't connect it from some new laptops
       
      Did these new laptops not have USB or ethernet ports? Plenty of companies, from Belkin to brand X, make USB and ethernet to parallel for printers, scanners, or whatever legacy device you have. These exceptionally handy devices are not at all expensive if you shop around. You save the aggrevation of getting a laptop that isn't the model you want but have to get for its built in parallel port. Or you save the aggrevation of complaining that you can't hook up a parallel printer to a powerbook.

    6. Re:It has a parallel port by pwaring · · Score: 1

      All the laptops had ethernet ports, but strangely enough I was using them to connect to the networks I was on. As for USB->Parallel convertors, the cheapest two I could find were £9.99 and ~£15, both of these required Windows drivers in order to work (or at least they state that in the product description), and when you've only got two USB ports to start with, you don't want to be using one as a parallel port.

    7. Re:It has a parallel port by rwuest · · Score: 1

      Yes:

      Printer
      EPROM programmer
      PROM-ICE (accelerated by using parallel)

      All use parallel port. I won't buy a PC without one (same for serial port - gotta have it)

      Robert

    8. Re:It has a parallel port by irenetheno · · Score: 1

      Grandparent: Did these new laptops not have USB or ethernet ports?
      Parent: All the laptops had ethernet ports, but strangely enough I was using them to connect to the networks I was on

      Cluestick!

      The grandparent was suggesting the use of either a Parallel->USB converter/adapter or a print server. Many routers have also had a parallel port built-in to share a printer over the network.

    9. Re:It has a parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Whine some more for me about how there's no support for Macs! Plenty of Mac parallel convertor support here.

    10. Re:It has a parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Take a look at all of the Bluetooth development kits, for example (www.csr.com). The parallel port is your fail-safe method of talking to a chip and downloading firmware for many embedded applications.

    11. Re:It has a parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It drove me nuts when I couldn't connect it from some new laptops - especially my Powerbook

      Well, you couldn't connect it to an older Powerbook (Macs never had parallel ports), so why should not being able to use a newer Powerbook be a surprise?

    12. Re:It has a parallel port by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      I've never used a parallel port in the nearly 20 years I've been in this industry. Never. Not once. I realize there are printers out there still using them (and dongles and such too probably), but geez, get a USB adapter or something!

      My company recently got me a new IBM T43p laptop, which is excellent on the whole... except for the freakin' parallel port on the back that takes up a HUGE amount of space! To add insult to injury, there's no space for a DVI port (which you have to buy their docking station to get).

      What I don't get is, if there really is such a demand for them, can't someone at least come up with a "mini-parallel" port that isn't the size of a DB25? Then include a small adapter that people can use for it. But holy crap, devoting that much real estate on a laptop to something that most people never use anymore...

    13. Re:It has a parallel port by zardo · · Score: 2, Informative
      The fact that you're 20 years old doesn't mean 20 years in the industry.

      You can't expect anybody to take you seriously. Parallel was the high-speed interface of the past, before USB came along.

      If you'd been in the industry 20 years, you aught to know what a great deal HP printers are. I bought an HP laserjet 4P at the thrift store for $10 a few months back, they have the drum inside the toner cartridge, so a new toner cartridge is essentially a brand new printer, and I can buy them for $25, among the cheapest in the industry. I expect this printer will go on working for another 10 or 20 years, producing fine quality black and white laser prints. Parallel is the only way to connect to it. CUPS setup is a breeze. Sometimes the old hardware is still the best, like the 3com 10/100 network cards, I buy them by the dozen on ebay.

    14. Re:It has a parallel port by CFrankBernard · · Score: 1

      Yep, I had to disconnect the USB and connect via parallel to flash the firmware on an HP2400.

    15. Re:It has a parallel port by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Actually, I *have* been in the industry that long, but you did nail me on exaggerating the situation.

      The reason for my personal lack of encounters with parallel ports: I worked primarily on Macintosh systems prior to the mid-90s... thus all my connections were Appletalk based. (AFAIK no Mac has *ever* come with a parallel port standard, except maybe for the Lisa-based Mac XL)

    16. Re:It has a parallel port by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      I won't buy a PC without one (same for serial port - gotta have it)

      I won't buy a computer without an EISA expansion bus.

    17. Re:It has a parallel port by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Has anyone even seen any parallel port peripherals in the last 10 years?

      10 years ago was the end of 1995. USB did not exist, Firewire did not exist. You would be pretty hard pressed to find a computer or a printer that DID NOT have a parallel port in 1996. The only exception would of been Apple, who were using some propriety connection back then for printers. Until USB became popular (around 1998-1999), there lots of parallel accessories - the Zip drive, some rare external harddrives. Until ethernet, USB, and CD-RWs became ubiquitous on PCs, often the easiest way to move a lot of data between two computers was a direct connection between the parallel ports. And parallel port printers really didn't die out until about 2002-2003. My guess that if you went to Best Buy right now you could find atleast one printer model with a parallel port. Probably several.

      Though I would agree - a parallel port on a 2006 laptop is kind of a waste of space though.

    18. Re:It has a parallel port by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Whereas I've used the parallel port on my last two laptops to talk to various things, including my EPROM burner, some custom hardware I built, a JTAG interface, an Intellivision joystick interface, and (believe it or not) an actual printer! I just got a new laptop that also has a parallel port so I can continue to do those things.

      --Joe

    19. Re:It has a parallel port by Trixter · · Score: 1

      Uh... printers?

      Even if modern printers don't do LPT any more, my postscript printer of 10+ years is still chugging and I'm glad to be able to keep using it for quick preview/markup jobs. For this reason, I'm glad they haven't gone away. (Don't refer me to parallel-to-USB adapters, they're all crap, I've tried three from three different brands.)

    20. Re:It has a parallel port by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      My relatively new IBM T42P (company bought it for me) came with a parallel port and NO firewire ports...

    21. Re:It has a parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...
      You misspelled PCIe :)

      Helpful is my middle name!!!11

    22. Re:It has a parallel port by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      HP actually has a smaller parallel port, but they don't even use it on THEIR PCs, because you'd need a special cable and that would suck. They only put it on printers, and only some of those, even.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:It has a parallel port by magarity · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your fingers replying to that nit; he's unaware of USB hubs, nevermind how to network a print server gadget. I also find it amazing that anyone who has the money for inflated Mac prices complains about a widget costing 10 pounds to hook up a laser printer.

    24. Re:It has a parallel port by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Any specific issues? -- I've purchased a few cheapos and deployed them at various client sites (plus one here at my house) over the years, never had any issues. The one at my house is on a 30' USB cable too.

      The only issue I've run into is that if you move the unit to a new USB port, it causes problems. Luckily I keep it wired to a desktop, or to a specific USB port on my laptop's docking station.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    25. Re:It has a parallel port by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      Oh, that argument makes as much sense as my uncle the Ford mechanic saying he's never came across a V12 engine, just because he's never touched a Ferarri.

    26. Re:It has a parallel port by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      So a parallel port is like a Ferrari V12?

      Umm... whatever.

  4. Twice the machine, twice the posts! by pieterh · · Score: 0

    Yes, if it sounds familiar, that's because this is the machine reviewed here about 2 weeks ago.

    1. Re:Twice the machine, twice the posts! by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      No, actually, it's not.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Twice the machine, twice the posts! by pieterh · · Score: 1

      OK, here's a page with the WidowPC reviewed on 16th December.

      Now, compare this to the photo of the notebook reviewed today.

      No doubt the insides vary. Yay. Two identically-clad notebooks, both with dual-core AMD two 7200 RPM hard drives, minor differences in screen, etc. I hate to be pedantic, but it's just the same story.

    3. Re:Twice the machine, twice the posts! by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Two identically-clad notebooks, both with dual-core AMD

      Bzzt. Yes, there is an AMD on the page you linked, but the review you're talking about was for an Intel P4 based laptop. The other differences are similarly "minor". I hate to be pedantic, but you're dead wrong.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  5. Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In 10 years the Apple zealots will again have rewritten the history and given Apple the spot for first dual core/SMP laptop, just as they always does.

    1. Re:Does it matter? by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

      In 10 years the Apple zealots will again have rewritten the history and given Apple the spot for first dual core/SMP laptop, just as they always does.

      Looks like PC zealots like you have already started

      Apple did dual processor laptops 10 years AGO in 1996.

      Go find another drum to beat.

    2. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dual Processor != Dual Core

    3. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the GP : "first dual core/SMP laptop"

    4. Re:Does it matter? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dual Processor == Dual Core. Really - who the fuck cares about "casing"?

    5. Re:Does it matter? by Megaweapon · · Score: 1

      Actually, Dual Processor == Dual Core. Really - who the fuck cares about "casing"?

      Who cares? Anyone with a fucking clue, that's who. I've got an old dual CPU Pentium motherboard with two 75Mhz chips on them, THEREFORE THEY ARE DUAL CORE JUST AS THE TERM 'DUAL CORE' IS USED TODAY! How about you re-evaluate your perception of reality and get back to us when you aren't a fucking retard.

      --
      I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
    6. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple did dual processor laptops 10 years AGO in

      You forget to mention that the Dual CPU powerbooks (the 5600 models, the only PPC604 ones coincidentally) did not run MacOS at the time, rather ran AIX, IBM's UNIX also used in some of their servers.

      No MacOS = not a Mac.

    7. Re:Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the iPod has two ARM cores in it, so maybe they could claim the first dual-core handheld device :p

    8. Re:Does it matter? by hattig · · Score: 1

      "Apple did dual processor laptops 10 years AGO in 1996."

      The poster didn't say it was a Mac, merely a dual processor laptop.

      Hell, Apple could have sold dual-processor G4 based [17"] Powerbooks for the last couple of years if they cared about their customers to make up the performance difference. At least the G4 is quite low power, and Apple gets them quite cheaply - they should have tried something to jazz up the glacial speed increases of that processor line.

      Anyway I wouldn't call this a laptop, not if it is a desktop replacement. It's a portable all-in-one system. It's probably just as portable as a Shuttle case with handle and separate LCD, but requires less cables. :)

    9. Re:Does it matter? by hattig · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, the system has two cores in it, but the term dual-core really means a single chip with two processor cores on it, connected via something (the cache, the on-chip arbiter or whatever) and then attaching to the rest of the system via a single interface.

      AMD's processors are dual-core as they connect via an on-chip arbiter, the SRQ. They then connect to the rest of the system via a HyperTransport link. AMD's next core revision, the F-Step, will have 4 core connections from the SRQ, allowing for future quad-core processors.

      Intel's current 'dual-core' processors aren't really dual-core as they connect to the FSB independently. Indeed Intel's latest Presler processors have separate dies on the processor packaging. In practice however it doesn't really matter that much, so they get away with calling it 'dual-core' when it is technically SMP on a chip. Yonah will be Intel's first true dual-core processor because the cores are connected at the L2 cache level, which they share.

      So now people defined the number of cores a processor has by the number of cores per socket in the system. In your system you have one core per socket, so the processors are single core, the system is dual-processor. In the reviewed laptop there are two cores in one socket, for the system is single-processor, but the processor is dual-core. Quite simple really.

    10. Re:Does it matter? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 1

      You forget to mention that the Dual CPU powerbooks (the 5600 models, the only PPC604 ones coincidentally) did not run MacOS at the time, rather ran AIX, IBM's UNIX also used in some of their servers.

      Not to mention Powerbook 5600's had woeful battery life as bad as the machine in this article. When new it was rare for users to get the full 1.5 hours quoted with just one hour the norm. Those two 604's ate up more power relative to battery capacity than even the beast in the review here.

      No Macintosh OS and bad battery life. I don't think it counts as a first for apple, do you?

      --
      RST
    11. Re:Does it matter? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Too bad you're implying that a PC company did it first. See here.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    12. Re:Does it matter? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      BTW, there is some benefit to true dual core over independent FSB hookups. Mainly, core-to-core latency can be much lower and core-to-core bandwidth can be much higher.

  6. These specs are indeed impressive... by Phariom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but with a battery life like that of a goldfish, why bother? Seriously save yourself hundreds of dollars and just build a comparable desktop system.

    This isn't exactly the kind of system I would want to lug with me into a coffee shop either--it might break the damn table!

    The only practical application of such a portable system (give the cost) that I can think of would be somewhere in the applied sciences "out in the field." However, these specs barely conform to those that many such scientists would require.

    I'll admit this, though: I would love to take this bad boy to a LAN party! Perhaps that's the target market they've been looking for.

    1. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's lighter than my Acer Aspire 1710 (what was I thinking...).

    2. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by isj · · Score: 1
      ..but with a battery life like that of a goldfish

      What's the battery life of a goldfish?
      Inquiring minds want to know.

    3. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the same as their memory -- 6 seconds.

    4. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 0 seconds flat as fish don't have batteries but have these weird flakes where they run on.

    5. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Phariom · · Score: 1

      i.e. You simply look at the battery and it dies.

    6. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by sessamoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What's the battery life of a goldfish?

      Probably about as long as an African swallow can carry a coconut.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    7. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're thinking of how long the European swallow can carry a coconut.

    8. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by droolfool · · Score: 1

      BTW, the few-seconds memory of the Goldfish is a myth that the Mythbusters claimed to have busted.

    9. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I don't see much point in complaining about the size or battery life unless there's some other system that's comparable in performance but with a smaller size. The comparison to a desktop is just silly; this thing is "only" 5cm thick including a screen which, though bad for a laptop, puts in in a whole different class of portability than a desktop. And the width and height are about the same as a 17" Powerbook which, though too big for me, some people seem to like.

    10. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by dodobh · · Score: 2, Informative

      These are "desktop replacements" and sold as "gaming laptops". They aren't meant for your traditional laptop use, but for those people who need lots of computing power, and have less space, this is nice. Think of this as a powerful version of a Mac mini, including monitor and keyboard.

      Some of us have access to electric power while travelling[1], but porting along a desktop is much harder.

      [1] AC power supply in a train. This might not make sense to most Americans who drive or fly.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that depends on the airspeed velocity of the swallow.

    12. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Cromac · · Score: 1
      [1] AC power supply in a train. This might not make sense to most Americans who drive or fly.

      Probably not to most Americans since trains aren't used very much for travel at all, at least not away from the east coast. I don't know how it is in Europe, but train travel in the western US is horribly slow. It may be more relaxing than driving but it will take 2 to 3 times as long, and of course 10x as long as flying. It's also expensive out here, train tickets often cost as much as plane tickets, unless you want the scenery who wants to spend as much and take 10x as long to get where you're going?

    13. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by rapidweather · · Score: 3, Funny

      Goldfish are indeed tough.
        I had a goldfish pond, and the cats used to fish them out, but usually walk away. Hours later, I would put the fish back in the pond, and after a while, it would recover. Big rain storms would wash some of them out, same result and cure.
      Winter brought ice to the pond, I just took a rock and broke the ice every morning, so they could get oxygen from the surface of the water. The cold water did not harm them at all.
      Kind of like a good car battery that starts the car at 5 degrees below zero.
      They ate insects that jumped into the pond during the summer, I did not have to feed them except during winter.
      Put some Water Hyacinths in there, and the goldfish lay their eggs on the roots, and eventually, you have little goldfish swimming around. Those that survived (again, references to battery life), replaced the older fish that died. Goldfish, in their own way, are way tougher than almost any battery. If you decide to raise them, be sure to give them a really big pond, and make it at least 5 feet deep. If you make a concrete pond, let it cure a good long while before adding the fish. Use a half-round concrete drain pipe 12 inch round or so for the bottom, with sloping sides, so you can syphon out the waste material from the resulting trough with a garden hose. Locate the pond out in the open, so they get full sunlight all day long, if possible. You may plant some shrubs on the south and west side if the sun is too strong in the afternoon. Don't put the pond on the north side of a house or fence. If you do all that, you will have some of the goldfish outlive any laptop computer. You don't have to buy goldfish, just wait till a neighborhood kid gets some for free somewhere, and offer to give it a good home. By the way, Goldfish come with their own fishtank screensaver!

    14. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      If I were in college now, rather than 10 years ago, THIS would likely become my "real" system... the one that mostly lived in my dorm room, chained to the desk, tethered to a nice Lexmark buckling-spring keyboard w/trackpoint and second TFT display, and removed only for trips home and to lan parties... augmented by a thin & light ultraportable that I actually carried around to my classes and used at the library and viewed as my "toy" computer, even if it were actually the one I ended up using for 90% of my classwork.

      Of course, that's not a whole lot different from how I lived in college... a laptop as a "real" system was utterly out of the question back then, of course, so I had a fully-loaded desktop system to die for, but I still have fond memories of my old DEC HiNote CT475 (horrifyingly expensive and underpowered, but small enough to fit in a manila envelope) and even my older Compaq Aero (though its 7.5" screen was DEFINITELY too small for comfort by any objective standard and left me cross-eyed more than a few times).

    15. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are tough, take this one for example who survived being caught by a bird and dropped down a chimney into a raging fire http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005600693,00 .html

    16. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's also expensive out here, train tickets often cost as much as plane tickets, unless you want the scenery who wants to spend as much and take 10x as long to get where you're going?

      People who don't want to deal with all the hassle and crap you have to put up with just to get onto a commercial airliner nowadays? Though really, I would just drive.

    17. Re:These specs are indeed impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?? It's a simple question of weight ratios - a 5-ounce bird can not carry a one-pound coconut. Supposing two swallows carried it, though...

  7. Who buys these? by Kijori · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't understand the market for these sort of laptops. At almost 6kg, this is approaching the portability level of my desktop PC, especially since with its battery life of one hour you're still effectively tethered to power supplies anyway. And for this 'privilege' you pay far, far more than you would for an equivalent desktop system. So, where's the market? I can see basically two possibilities: video editors who need a rendering setup that's just about portable, and gamers who want the highest-specced laptop, no matter the price. But since this laptop's gone for the 6800 go - rather than the faster 7800 cards that are being rolled out - and allows no overclocking, the gamer market's going to be pretty limited, at least until it starts shipping with the 7800. And with only 200GB of storage - far less than I use in a day when shooting - the video editing market is limited to those who're willing to carry an additional kilo or two in external drives, or have facilities available; and these people probably just use a desktop anyway.

    I also question the accuracy of Hexus' reporting on the weight front. Either they've got one of the two weight figures wrong (7Kg with charger, 8Kg with charger and bag) or that's a very heavy bag.

    While I'm ranting about the laptop, is there really any need for the heat to be blown out of the bottom? If it's generating 200W of heat, couldn't it get blown out of the sides, rather than the bottom, which is going to be either on a desk or your lap; the former allows little airflow, the latter being a touch hot.

    Anyway, my final point: Does anyone buy these laptops, or are they purely made, like top-of-the-range graphics cards and cars, to be able to boast about having the fastest? Has anyone here ever bought a similiar laptop? Why, if you did?

    1. Re:Who buys these? by TallMatthew · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't understand the market for these sort of laptops. At almost 6kg, this is approaching the portability level of my desktop PC, especially since with its battery life of one hour you're still effectively tethered to power supplies anyway. And for this 'privilege' you pay far, far more than you would for an equivalent desktop system. So, where's the market?

      One assumes it's easier to lug this laptop around than a desktop and a monitor and its specs make it desktop comparable, thus the moniker DTR. Using the same machine at home as you do at work makes life easier, as does taking said machine on the road. If they seldom are used without their umbellical power cords, battery life is a nonissue. This isn't a "work on a plane" laptop, clearly.

      As for why it has to be this beefy, well simply because it can. The majority of machines today are overkill for what people use them for. Video editing requires certain specs, but for most people the limits of a machine never come into question. If you've decided your laptop won't be used that often away from a desk, and you make a purchasing decision based on the most bang for your buck, and if this is being paid for by your employer, then why not get the most powerful one? That's what they're banking on.

    2. Re:Who buys these? by S3D · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the market for these sort of laptops.
      Such laptops are good for contractors dealing with CPU/graphics intensive applications and in need of mobility. I'm doing dome 3d graphics contract job, and product mostly for mid-high end machines,so for me is very important to be able to bring my machine into the office, for installations, configurations, and then problem arise with different hardware - I able to run my laptop side-by side with problematic desktop. Some other users of such systems are students and gamers who are moving around.

    3. Re:Who buys these? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      If you look at the most expensive Prostar, Hypersonic-PC, Sager they are a clear cut above in feature and performance compared to what's offered at your local Compusas, Bestbuys. The problem is that the pricing is so out there.

    4. Re:Who buys these? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing that you're not in marketing. They sell well. I have the Sager / Pentium 4 version of the same chassis and love it. I need to do high end photoshop and video editing in several places. And it's much more convenient to flip the screen closed and pop the thing in a backpack then to 1) unplug a shuttle / minitower 2) figure out where to put shuttle / minitower 3) deal with screen 4) deal with cables, rinse/repeat.

      The weight discrepency is likely the power supply. It gives new meaning to the word "brick".

      Little laptops are for wussies.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Who buys these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you really that blind? theres a huge market. I bought a machine similar to this about 2 years ago and it'll still beat any "mobile" laptop in speed.

      the market is for people who want a portable machine, but have power where they go. I can use mine in the car, at home, at work, and most other places since it's usually not that hard to find an outlet. And if theres not, you can still run it for long enough to do alot of things with the battery.

      i'm not sure if they should really be called laptops as much as portable desktops.

    6. Re:Who buys these? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the market for these sort of laptops.

      It would of been great in college. All the power of a good desktop, but still have the ability to grab it and take it home on the weekends, or to a LAN party. I had no desire to take a laptop to class on a daily basis (pen and paper is simplier and easier 99% of the time), so I wouldn't of been hauling it around that much.

      Though in reality, I would of never been able to afford it in college. I got by with my decent but inexpensive AMD desktop computer I put together myself. I ferried data around on a USB stick, CD's, and eventually I got a USB harddrive.

    7. Re:Who buys these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one (a little bit older though) and quite like it, it's nice being able to play system intensive games in the car on long trips (with an adapter) as well as having a powerful computer where ever you end up at. 6kg or whatever it was really isn't THAT heavy when you consider the alternative of a full desktop and monitor.

      Like other people said though, this isn't a machine to carry around all day and randomly stop and do work, it's a desktop that can be moved, easily.

    8. Re:Who buys these? by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but if you get the laptops from where the high-end marker-uppers get them, you can save some money. M-Tech is the direct vendor for Clevo, the company that actually manufactures all of these laptops. The one in this article looks like the D900K. The reviewed laptop costs $4247. The same config from M-tech is $3825. Granted, that's without any kind of software bundle, case, or extras.

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    9. Re:Who buys these? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Does anyone buy these laptops .. ?
      Presumably the same type of people who bought Osbournes and Kaypros 20 years ago. It may not be a real laptop, but it's still more conveniently portable than a typical desktop.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  8. "Portable" renamed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptop is now known as Lapsquish.

    1. Re:"Portable" renamed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they refer to a "Desktop Replacement", were they referring
      to the computer or the slab of wood (or hardened glue/sawdust slurry)
      that forms the top of the desk?

      Seems to be about the same density...

  9. Dual core... by nurhussein · · Score: 5, Funny

    So you can cook both of your balls at once.

    1. Re:Dual core... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stories about balls cooking are highly exaggerated. Only make sure you watch out when you slam down the lid! ;-)

    2. Re:Dual core... by nurhussein · · Score: 4, Funny
      The stories about balls cooking are highly exaggerated. Only make sure you watch out when you slam down the lid! ;-)
      I don't see how it's a problem unless you rest your family jewels on the touchpad.
    3. Re:Dual core... by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 0

      What about those who have only one testicle, you insensitive clod!

      --
      The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
    4. Re:Dual core... by Demerara · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the funniest thing I've read in YEARS!!

      Not the MSNBC story but your concise description of same.

      I went the other way this year and bought a 3.3lb Sony Vaio. I used to have a 9lb Toshiba Satellite which was big and fast and, well, big.

      Now I can play two DVDs and MP3s all night on a single charge and carry it to meetings and use it a hell of a lot more than I did the Tosh.

      My next purchase is a strong and lightweight replacement for my very heavy Targus leather PC bag (9lbs).

      New Year's Resolution (after stop smoking and get more exercise) - get the whole carry-on kit below 12lbs.

      --
      Backward%20compatibility%20is%20over-rated
  10. What an ugly piece of hardware by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I'd never thought I'd actually look at this but since I've got an iBook and worked on several Sony Vaio and IBM ThinkPad Laptops I'd say this is a real downer. It looks like an early nineties 'luggable'. I'm looking forward to the time we've got 3 GHz like performance at Apple/IBM quality levels and 8 hours battery-time for 1000$.
    Until then I'm sticking to my 12" iBook and a little envy of my friends Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook P with 15 hours (!) of battery time. And the size of an OReilly Camelbook.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:What an ugly piece of hardware by IAstudent · · Score: 1

      I just got myself a Thinkpad 380ED, circa 1997. Built like a brick, looks like one too. Hopefully this will make my college friends envious of how I can carry around such a big notebook with a weak processor and nearly geriatric battery. :P

    2. Re:What an ugly piece of hardware by SeanHayward · · Score: 1

      As I was reading the article I was thinking about the 380s as I have a 380Z sitting at home. Great machine, 1024-768 display and the best keyboard, IMHO, ever made for a laptop. Though with only 64 MB of RAM, even XFCE runs slow.

      --
      If I found in my own ranks that a certain number of guys wanted to cut my throat, I'd make sure that I cut their throat.
  11. Compare prices with desktop *plus* UPS by javajosh · · Score: 0

    Think of this as a compact desktop with a built-in UPS. Since it can run for about an hour on batteries that's actually pretty good - most experts recommend a 15 minute UPS, and this device gives you 4 times that. It would actually be quite handy for the gamer going to lots of LAN parties, or the power user who doesn't want to mess with cabling or give lots of desk real estate, or for a (admittedly odd) server. Certainly this isn't a mainstream device, but useful nonetheless.

  12. £2,500? by hoshino · · Score: 1

    I guess you might need this if you spend your day in different rooms inside your luxurious mansion and you want your computer with you all the time to stay connected to WoW and check your various stock prices all the time.

    But carrying this thing outside?

    You would need to hire another butler just for that!

    1. Re:£2,500? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are obviously low income. Paying just under $3000 is not bad for a PERFORMANCE laptop.

    2. Re:£2,500? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      That's £2500, not 2500 or $2500. £2500 is around $4300 at current exchange rates.

  13. Just last week.... by clark625 · · Score: 1

    My printer at home still is connected to a computer via a parallel printer cable. It's my server and it's been running for a few months now. But, that's not what you're asking about, is it?

    Tune to last week: My son got his picture taken with Santa and the professional photographer had a nice digital camera hooked up to a small computer/printer combo box. Pretty cleaver, really. On the back of this box connected to the parallel port, which couldn't have been more than six-months old, was... a key dongle.

    For those who maybe aren't old enough to remember these babies, they are fairly slick little copy-protection keys. They are the hardware solution to software piracy. When the special software starts up, it looks on the port for a key and if it's not there, it bails. And hardware keys are much harder to copy, partly because the good ones destroy themselves if they are tampered with (usually the soldier points or ICs are sensitive to prying).

    While these never really got used for major software products, they are practically everywhere in scientific and research environments where companies spend millions on a software package that only a few hundred of specialized applications exist. If you're charging $5,000+ for software, a hardware key starts sounding pretty good. Heck, when I left the university a year and a half ago, we still had three such applications that had been around for years (even through computer upgrades). I'm certain that these programs are still being used, and it will continue for some time.

    *Sigh* Thanks for the trip down memory lane.

    --
    Long, cute, or funny Sigs are just another form of over compensation, used by geeks, nerdz, etc.
    1. Re:Just last week.... by owlstead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fortunately, most newer software uses USB for dongles. Much better. Fewer compatibility issues, you can easily use multiple dongles at the same time. Just buy a cheap USB hub if you run out of ports. Note that you can rather easily buy USB to parallel/serial thingies. So most of the time there should not be any problems even if the parallel port is left out. All that said, I've got no personal experience with these kind of things (thank god), so if anyone has I'll be glad to know.

    2. Re:Just last week.... by MioTheGreat · · Score: 1

      "While these never really got used for major software products" 3D Studio Max/Viz both used them. And didn't AutoCAD use them too?

    3. Re:Just last week.... by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Pro Tools as well uses a USB key.

    4. Re:Just last week.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Don't remind me.. I was at a company that used these for years - eventually they abandoned them after they realized that over 80% of support questions were due to dongles. eg. Large customer pays $50,000 for a contract for the software (yes it cost that much) - boss wants to run it on his laptop, laptop has no parallel port. Support call at 9pm, irate customer and contract is jepoardised.

      The smaller things caused headaches.. the dongles had a high failure rate and blanks were expensive and had to be bought in batches of 100 or more. Many, many customers had printers attached to their machines and were more than slightly pissed off that they had to remove them to run the software.

      It was such a breath of fresh air to get rid of them... we had the afternoon off and got drunk when the decision was announced.

    5. Re:Just last week.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      alldata still uses parallel port dongles for security for their automotive repair database which comes on DVDs. They're really bad about getting 'em to you, too. They use HASP keys.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Swinging testicle. by mcrbids · · Score: 0

    I have trouble imagining this so-called laptop being anything other than a gimmick to assuage a sensitive ego that just wants to claim "biggest, baddest", without any particular attention paid to issues of practicality or usability.

    It's too big/heavy to be particularly portable, it gets uncomfortably warm in normal use, it burns lots of power, so battery life is worthless.

    Trying to jam a high-end Desktop into a laptop has resulted in a system not well suited to replace a desktop or a laptop particularly well.

    For a desktop replacement, get one of the newer Mobile AMDs or maybe a Pentium M. I have the latter, and even though 2 years old, it still does a respectable job playing games, and working as a good, solid, developer's workstation. Plus, it's quite light, decent battery life, (I type this on battery) stylish appearance, and I sit with it in my lap all day without getting very uncomfortable.

    Figure out what you really want to do, and get the right tool for that. Sheesh!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Swinging testicle. by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      I have trouble imagining this so-called laptop being anything other than a gimmick to assuage a sensitive ego that just wants to claim "biggest, baddest", without any particular attention paid to issues of practicality or usability.

      Keeping in mind that I agree with you so far as the laptop is concerned...

      A couple years back I picked up a highly impracticle car. It was a Toyota MR-2... a 2 seated mid engined double-trunked (both worthless) pocket rocket.

      Man how I loved that car, it was so fast....turbocharged.....so agile....not terribly fuel efficient, and not at all practical. Fun fun fun.

      Sometimes it really is about being specifically impracticle...the benefits you get from such a machine are equally impracticle. But, man, the price premium and practicality bombs you suffer can be quite worth it.
       

    2. Re:Swinging testicle. by gatzke · · Score: 1


      I have one of those moster HP laptops. I get maybe an hour on battery. Big screen, full size keyboard with separate keypad, giant screen, regular desktop processor. Over 10 lbs and huge.

      The think is so big as to almost not open correctly in coach on planes. Good thing the bat only lasts 45 minutes. If you can find a plug in the airport it is awesome to work with.

      Get a bigger bag and hit the gym you little /. nerds, bigger is better. This new thing is awesome.

    3. Re:Swinging testicle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much about carrying the weight, but that lighter laptops are more comfortable and a battery life under 1h is not very useful and the fans are noisy. IMO it would be better just to have a powerful desktop, and a portable and preferably quiet laptop with a good battery life.

    4. Re:Swinging testicle. by gatzke · · Score: 1


      I have big fat fingers so I like having the full sized keyboard. I just wish they would make a laptop with full depth keys, not just full width. The extra depth makes a difference, but I learned to type on a manual typewriter back in the day. Maybe newer kids don't mind key travel so much.

  15. Printer Friendly page by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Hi Steve from Hexus,

    Could you point out the printer friendly link on the page on your site you linked to? Some of us would rather just load a long document to read than read one that's been artificially split up just to increase ad revenue.

    Thanks

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:Printer Friendly page by unts · · Score: 1

      Hi poopdeville,

      To view the printer friendly version you need to be logged in, which requires that you sign up (for free) to MyHEXUS (top right of every page there's a link). The pages aren't broken down purely for ad revenue. Stupidly long pages are... stupid, plus it makes locating a particular part of an article easier, and breaks it down so you don't get bored - which can happen if you trawl through one long page.

      As for ads, it's amusing that people complain about them, especially when Slashdot has ads too. Of course, on Slashdot you can subscribe to get rid of the adverts, but that costs money. Funny that... it seems websites rely on adverts to pay bills!

      Regards,
      Unts (more commonly known these days as Steve from HEXUS)

    2. Re:Printer Friendly page by poopdeville · · Score: 1
      Hi Steve,

      Thanks for replying. I must disagree with your comments regarding "stupidly long pages." All the functionality of multiple pages can be emulated with fragment URI's. At the same time, using fragment URI's makes searching an article much simpler, since you don't have to wait and load pages between searches. Try searching for "OBJECT element" in the URL I gave you, and imagine how big a pain the same search would be if the document was split up. You could easily even have a mini-TOC like the one at the bottom of the pages between the bigger sections, if you wanted.

      Regarding advertising: I don't care one way or the other as long as it doesn't disrupt my flow of reading. Splitting pages up does that, hence the complaint. Privoxy can't do anything against it, either.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  16. over 4000 dollars by lostngone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow an people say PowerBooks cost a lot.

  17. Duplicate Slashvertisements? by SuperDuG · · Score: 1
    Initial Slashvertisement here

    Forgive me for wondering, but if you feel the need to post how thinkgeek, newsforge, etc are all owned by your parent company in every story that comes from those (and the rest) of the sites. Then why don't you mention that this company may not be paying you, but did give you something to inspire you to talk about them so well on a website?

    I guess I'm just lost here ... you want full disclosure, most of the time?

    This thing is not a monster laptop, it's a portable all in one desktop that has a builtin ups (battery). It's not that cool (the price tag which you fail to mention this time around, is pretty high). All I ask is that if you want full disclosure, then practice what you preach...

    Queue the flaimbait, off topic, redundant, etc mods.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Duplicate Slashvertisements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why don't you mention that this company may not be paying you, but did give you something to inspire you to talk about them so well on a website?

      Because the company that is in the link you posted is not AFAIK the same company in the article today. They have different names at least.

      Because Zonk is not CmdrTaco and you can't expect a /. editor to remember what another /. editor posted four weeks ago; they have trouble remembering what other editors posted on the same day.

  18. Laptop? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    If it weighs 5.7kgs, I won't be too excited about carrying it on my lap. A good DTR should be a trade-off between size and performance. And what about the power consumption? Dual-core + GeForce 6800 would generate a lot of heat. Anyway, the overall package is good but I'll buy one when the weight comes down.

  19. Reason to buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought one because I am in iraq, and a desktop makes no sense for me. I dont need it to be truly "portable" i just need something equivalent to a desktop that i can move if i need to easily.

    But this seems to be a bit behind since http://www.sagernotebook.com/ already has the exact same DTR in the same Clevo 900 chasis that has the 7800GTX mobile ver.

  20. That's no laptop... by KirkH · · Score: 1

    ...it's a space station!

  21. This is not a laptop, at best... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    at best it's a Notebook. For some of the differences, see an earlier post of mine: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=14205 8&cid=11906247

    However, I even find 'notebook' arguable. If the difference between a notebook and a desktop machine is a built-in display, keyboard and pointing device - then sure, it's a notebook.
    If the difference is that a notebook is meant to be able to be relocated with sufficent ease that it can be frequently done- i.e. between home, work, off-site locations - then I would say this isn't even a notebook; just a desktop machine with built-in display, keyboard and pointing device. I can't imagine anybody wanting to lug this beast around even if it would be just twice a day, 5 days a week.

  22. TONS of people do [long] by DarkTempes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let me think. Acer I do believe sells a comparable laptop using the same chasis. They don't appear to be hurting buisness wise.

    Alienware sells a comparable laptop using the same chasis + a custom lid. They definitely arn't hurting buisness wise.

    I in fact bought one such laptop, mostly because I had the spare money and could, but also because I travel between two cities alot (my hometown and where I go to college).

    I don't like unplugging all my desktop stuff (and I prefer leaving my desktops always on) and having to lug it back it forth. I'm also a geek and a gamer. I want to be able to play battlefield 2 perfectly wherever I am before bed.

    I also have a couple of friends who have bought such laptops because that's what they wanted: they wanted a more slim/portable machine that was also as powerful as most desktops.

    I don't use such a laptop for long battery life. Nor does anyone else I know. But the battery is still useful! Ever try moving your desktop from your living room to your bedroom then back 5 times fast? Or using your desktop from the sofa while watching TV? Yeah.

    Also, my laptop in that chasis isn't that heavy and i'm quite a small person, so that's really no big deal. Sure I wouldn't want to carry it around all day, but it's NOT that kind of laptop.

    Lastly, the bottom ventilation I find to be pretty important. Putting these laptops on a flat hard surface (read: no cloth!) greatly reduces heat and strain on the fans. There is a very small air path underneath it that is amazingly important. I also find I CAN put it on a cloth surface without serious heat problems if i put a cold/heat (you know, one of those gel packs, it need not be cold though) right underneath the graphics card area.

    Having room for two hard drives with a SATA/raid controller, two optical drives, and four SODIMM (read: RAM) slots in my beast is just a nice plus too.

    Oh yeah (sorry for the rambling, it's early). There ARE some serious downsides to this specific chasis that seems so popular. First it's plain ugly and the component layout is near retarded (most ports on mine plug in...upside down!). It just screams cheap high production taiwanese product. Most importantly, and something I find many laptops lack, is a good power connecter. There have been multiple reported problems both on the motherboard and adapter plug itself from most vendors who use this chasis (so it appears they mostly use the same power adapter too). Also the fans working with most of the heat are right by the power connection. Well this baby will put out some pretty hot air. Hot enough that it probably does some serious damage to your sperm count. Combine that with plastic cable and wire and possible laptop movement moving the wire around more to get a situation asking for the cable to die a slow and painful death.

    With better thought and design put into the product, I could see such laptops being used alot more frequently. As it is I doubt many owners of one will buy another anytime soon and not just because of the large price tag. If you pay alot of money for a product, you expect everything to be near perfect (read: like a mac) and I have yet to see a laptop using this chasis be just that.

    1. Re:TONS of people do [long] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chassis, you dumb fuck

  23. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it ship with a crappy OS like Microsoft Windows, and the 32bit version at that?

    1. Re:WTF? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      "Why does it ship with a crappy OS like Microsoft Windows, and the 32bit version at that?

      So you can download and burn Linux.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, has anyone actually installed Linux on one of these?
      (I'm particularly interested in one with an X2 4800+ with 2GB of mem).

      If so, what distro and what problems were encountered?

      Any prayer of having the info posted on http://www.linux-laptop.net/
      so that we can have an idea of what to expect?

      TIA!

      (I think someone posted a comment here about AGP or somesuch, but I
      can't seem to find it easily, so please bear with me - given the price
      of one of these beasts, I'm trying to be prudent before unzipping my
      fly and actually ordering one of these things.)

  24. Parallel port???? by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck waste space for a parallel port on a "portable" computer? The three people who would use it could just buy a parallel to USB converter. And the same could be said of the serial port, seriously ...

    1. Re:Parallel port???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find a Serial port pretty useful. At work we need to constantly connect to routers, and the laptop that the manager bought us doesn't have one. Long story short: we have a stupid 15 meters serial cable.

      although this laptop is a monster. even I wouldn't want one.

    2. Re:Parallel port???? by richpulp · · Score: 1

      ..unless a tech engineer on site at a customer needed to prove to them that the hp drivers are _not_ required for the customer's ageing hp 660c when plugged into the desktop running a copy of xp their neighbor installed for them from a limewire d/l... seriously tho, there may be occasions when backward compatibility is a must, viz trying to get essential backup data off an elderly Ditto drive.

  25. Jeebus! Look at all those fans! by ettlz · · Score: 1

    My HP zx5000 has two smaller fans in it and they need dusting after about 10 months' hard use. And 200W?! This thing could wind up needing the air-duster kiss of life every three weeks.

  26. If you're a video editing mobile ninja, yeah ok. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    This unit has a purpose albeit a narrow one such as someone who has to lug around their own video multimedia editing-mastering studio with them. I mean people wondered what the massive Apple notebook with a screen larger than most people can easily fold out was good for, but it's good for something.

  27. so light! by cout · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dunno what y'all are talkin' about sayin' 5kg-8kg ain't portable.  That's like half the weight of my ol' Kaypro II.  Mus' be some weakling Yankee thing.

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    x\ * \             / * /x
    x   \ * \       / * /   x
    x      \ * \ / * /      x
    x         | * |         x
    x      / * / \ * \      x
    x   / * /       \ * \   x
    x/ * /             \ * \x
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    The South shall rise again!

    1. Re:so light! by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      I'm a little worried to use this as a replacement for my Amstrad PPC. Yes, I want something portable, but not so small and light I could lose it down the back of the couch!

  28. Dual core AMD != 3.66ghz P4 by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    What are you smoking?

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    1. Re:Dual core AMD != 3.66ghz P4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WidowPC comes with exactly the same dualcore AMD chips. Looks pretty much identical too. I'd say its the same machine, badged under different names.

  29. Rockdirect by vorok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else think the company's name is just a little too fitting?

  30. You are a fool. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    At my workplace we can salary sacrifice laptops but not desktops. This means you pay for the system out of your pre-tax income, which can make a good laptop cheaper than an equivalent desktop system.

    You're spending your own hard-earned money so that the owners of your company will become wealthier?

    Please tell me that you have a substantial shareholder position in this enterprise.

    If not, then repeat the following 500 times a day: "I am not a slave, I am not a slave, I am not a slave."

    1. Re:You are a fool. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why? This is common, and saves a lot of money on larger purchases. The company does not benefit - it's an employee perk.

      In the past I've saved thousands this way.

    2. Re:You are a fool. by thisislee · · Score: 1

      The guy above said it but maybe no explicitly.... If you buy a 2k laptop with your own money for work, you get to take a 2k deduction on your tax return. Deductions come off of your income before tax is applied. So if you made 40k and bought a 2k laptop, you only have to pay tax on 38k of your income. You pay 2k for the laptop but end up not having to pay like 400 dollars that you would have paid on your taxes otherwise

    3. Re:You are a fool. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      You also don't pay tax (VAT in this country) on the laptop because technically the company purchased it, so you win at both ends.

    4. Re:You are a fool. by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, *you* are a fool - or at least ignorant of the scheme the OP is talking about.

      The laptop is his, bought through a scheme which means that he effectively gets it cheaper than retail by the rate he pays income tax at. Thus if he pays income tax at 25%, he gets a £2000 laptop for £1500.

      The idea is that the company benefits because having a PC at home helps to increase the PC-literateness of its employees, and the government benefits because having a (more) PC-literate population potentially gives the economy a boost as more people move into (currently) higher-paid "knowledge economy" jobs. The guy's benefit is obvious - he gets a cheaper laptop.

    5. Re:You are a fool. by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      The laptop is his, bought through a scheme which means that he effectively gets it cheaper than retail by the rate he pays income tax at.

      Unless you're a tax lawyer and can cite specific court cases that make such a think legal, I suspect you're very wrong.

      The company is buying the laptop with pre-tax dollars, and they own it. If they're turning around and give the laptop to the employees and no-one is paying any taxes on the transaction, someone is going to go to prison.

    6. Re:You are a fool. by fiendy · · Score: 1

      The laptop is his, bought through a scheme which means that he effectively gets it cheaper than retail by the rate he pays income tax at.

      The company is buying the laptop with pre-tax dollars, and they own it. If they're turning around and give the laptop to the employees and no-one is paying any taxes on the transaction, someone is going to go to prison.


      Its akin to an employee loan.

      1) Company agrees to purchase computer on behalf of an employee which may or may not get used for employment purposes.
      2) Company agrees to repayment using pre-tax deductions from pay.

      Things to note: The company pays sales tax on the computer when it is purchased (no one is getting out of the tax on that part of the transaction.
      The employee finds it easier to finance, with more favourable terms than he could get for a loan - or upfront lump-sum payment to purchase the computer.

      The employer (likely) ends up with a happier employee and one who has increased his/her technical ability and probably improves their trainability in the process.

    7. Re:You are a fool. by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Company agrees to repayment using pre-tax deductions from pay.

      Despite that this is insanely unethical, I'll grant that the politicians of many countries have probably made it legal. But again, unless someone is citing specific court cases where this was found acceptable, I'm going to guess that in most places people doing this are risking prison.

      (Of course, I'm not saying that avoiding taxes is unethical. I'm saying that tax laws that create such blatantly unfair and uneven tax burdens are unethical.)

    8. Re:You are a fool. by mixmasterjake · · Score: 1

      In the case where companies do this, they're really just passing along a tax break to their employees as a perk. The company still pays the tax in one way or another. They either pay taxes on the re-sale of the computer to the employee, or they have $2,000 less wage expenses to report. (I suspect the latter)

      I'm sure corporations have various legal ways of reporting the purchase so that they get a little kick-back themselves. Where the employee would have paid $500 tax, the corporation might pay $350 tax, for example. So the company gets to look like a nicer guy than they really are. Corporate tax laws are a maze of constantly changing regulations & loopholes.

      --
      TODO: come up with a clever sig
    9. Re:You are a fool. by fiendy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The city where I live has offered this perquisite to its employees (my uncle being one of them). Granted its not a provincial or federal government, but I don't believe that doing so is illegal in any way. For reference, I am Canadian.

    10. Re:You are a fool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're spending your own hard-earned money so that the owners of your company will become wealthier?

      I'd like to clarify MichaelSmith's post. Firstly, you'll notice that his URL shows that he's probably Australian.

      Secondly, the laptop is his, not his company. Completely for his personal use. The rort comes from paying less income tax to the Australian federal government at his marginal tax rate. He can leave the company and keep the laptop. He can tell the company to piss-off if they want to put work-related materials on the laptop. He can keep it home 365 days a year. His company involvement is merely that their financial systems is capable of offering this perk (a special case of fringe benefits). Indeed, it might be possible for MichaelSmith to claim this perk regardless of his employer's wishes (though he'll get the refund up to a year later).

      The catch is that you can only do this once a year. You can also do it once a year for PDA/mobile phones. And if I could be bothered, I could actually make money by buying a laptop, using it for a year, then selling it second-hand. You could probably also sell it immediately after buying, but while you'll probably get away with it, is probably illegal.

      Now, there's another provision in the Australian federal taxation system which allows MichaelSmith to depreciate or deduce if the laptop is also used for business/work-purposes. And it might even be possible to claim both of it on top of each other. But I'm not a financial specialist, so ask someone who knows.

    11. Re:You are a fool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it all depends on where you live, and what tax system you have to tolerate...

      Seems to me, from reading various replies to this general discussion, that we have
      readers/posters from the USA, Canada, and the UK at the very least, and likely several
      other countries as well.

      And if that weren't complicated enough, there are a lot of US states that have state
      income taxes, with many variations as to what's deductible or not, either explicitly
      (by dint of state law) or implicitly ("enter the amount you paid to the IRS on your
      Form 1040 here, multiply by n percent and remit to us"). And, on top of that, the actual
      effect of the deductibility of the laptop's price might be affected by whether the
      taxpayer took the standard deduction or itemized... And so on and so forth.

      So, I think the term "your mileage may vary" is particularly pertinent here, and I
      think it's appropriate to start the New Year on a more tolerant and pleasant tone.

      Just be grateful to be in the position to even consider acquiring one legally, be it
      through a job, or because you have other resources available.

  31. touchpad only? by magarity · · Score: 1

    At that price, and supposedly with "all the best components" and all it has built into that hugemongous case is a touchpad. There's more than enough space to have a combination of touchpad and trackpoint. Heck, you could even have a trackball on it too. If even Dell can put a combination of both on some of their bigger models then this beast can certainly offer a choice.

  32. why does it have to be so ugly? by javiercr · · Score: 0

    Does being ugly make it any faster?

  33. Great Systems by Hop-Frog · · Score: 1

    These Clevo systems are rebadged by a bunch of different companies: Sager, Alienware, Hypersonic, Prostar ... These are great systems if you need the power and mobility.

    I have a Sager 9860 (same casing as this). I take it to client sites every day. It's heavy, but not too much for just walking from the parking lot. And it has a lot of power. I typically run an application server and a database while I'm working, in addition to my IDE, various office apps and music player. If you need the performance, it's worth it.

    Of course, if you don't, don't buy it. It's always interesting how so many people assume that they understand the needs of everyone else.

  34. Yes actually by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    Yes actually, We almost daily, do a large application demo with a series of laptops showing a real network environment. Often this is done with VMWare and one laptop as well, showing various user-level views. We indeed do it on todays modern laptops but started once on a P133 and P233 laptop.

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  35. XP Home? And what's "Bullguard"? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    Shipping with Microsoft Windows XP Home as standard, Rockdirect adds in Microsoft Works 8, Roxio's Easy Media Creator 7, Bullguard Anti-Virus
    I would have thought Pro edition, or maybe this "Linux" thing I've heard about. Obviously this is aimed at the PC gamers, but why use XP Home? Also, I'm not familiar with the Bullguard product. Anyone have any experience with it?
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  36. You Get Used to the Weight by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    I have an Acer Aspire 1712 laptop that weighs in at 15 pounds without the power brick (and it is about the size and weight of a real brick), and I can tell you that, while you won't want to carry it with you everywhere you go, it's manageable. You get your exercise, at least. You want to make sure you have a strong bag to carry it in, of course (no place to shave pennies). I opted to buy a second power supply, so I can keep one in my home office, and carry the other in the back of the car when I have to travel.

    As a software contractor, I need the power of a full-blown desktop combined with portability.

    The battery life on these things is about an hour, but you're only going to use one of these monsters sitting at a desk, near a wall outlet. The battery serves as a battery backup in case the power fluctuates (valuable when traveling to an older building.

    Why have a parallel port? Well, I have a good bit of hardware around the house (printers and scanners mostly, even an old Zip drive) that I still use on occasion that only works with a parallel port. It's not dead yet, Jim.

    Finally, most of these monsters use desktop parts, which makes upgrading things like memory, CPU and harddrive very nice. For example, my laptop has a 250 Gig drive in it, and I'd like to try one of those 400 Gig drives. There's no such thing as too much disk space.

    You have to live with noise with a machine like this. Turn it on, and it sounds like a jet taking off (mine certainly does). The plus side of this is the sort of white-noise effect it supplies if you're working in a noisy environment. You actually get used to the sound after a while, and miss it working on a quieter machine.

    Just because a machine like this is big, heavy, and has a short battery life doesn't mean it's worthless or a waste of money. I mean, which would you rather haul back and forth to the office: a desktop machine, keyboard and 17-inch monitor, or one of these things? Oh, they're also great for LAN parties.

    Of course, after about a year and a half carrying this thing around, my right arm is twice the size of my left. Wanna arm wrestle?

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  37. I prefeer a Tadpole Bullfrog Dual Processor by pupeno · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tadpole Bullfrog Dual Processor http://www.tadpolecomputer.com/html/products/mobil e/bullfrog-dual/:

    - Dual 1.2 GHz UltraSPARC® IIIi processors
    - Up to 16GB DRAM
    - Large 17.1" SXGA TFT LCD Display
    - Full Length, 66 MHz, 64 -bit PCI Expansion Slot
    - Dual 2.5" High Performance Disk Drives
    - Integrated DVD/CD-RW Drive

    I'd change the operating system for a GPL one though.

    --
    Pupeno
    1. Re:I prefeer a Tadpole Bullfrog Dual Processor by Wrathernaut · · Score: 1

      I have had the "joy" of working on one of those, the system itself was great, but the software we had on top of it was terrible. Lowest bidder *sigh*.

    2. Re:I prefeer a Tadpole Bullfrog Dual Processor by pupeno · · Score: 1

      Awesome, there are people with those computers out there, it give hope! :)
      By software you mean the pre-loaded OS or other software that was custom made ?

      --
      Pupeno
  38. Re:XP Home? And what's "Bullguard"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall correctly, XP Home isn't SMP capable either. What gives? Does SP2 unlock that capability?

  39. Young whipper snappers, you complain about 8kg? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Complaining about 8kg? Bah Humbug. After taking the first compaq portable with me on a trip, my right arm was longer than the left arm -- from carrying it -- it it felt heaver than 28 lbs (12.5kg) it was rated. That was with a 9 inche screen and no battery.

    You young whippersnappers have it so easy.

  40. Complaining about only 8 kg? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but my preferred "laptop" is around 50 kg and I certainly don't complain when she's on my lap.

    1. Re:Complaining about only 8 kg? by llamaxing · · Score: 1

      true, but can she fit in your carry-on?

    2. Re:Complaining about only 8 kg? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I bet she cost you more than £2,500. too...

  41. Re:XP Home? And what's "Bullguard"? by jsight · · Score: 1

    From what I recall, XP Home with SP2 treats multiple cores as one CPU for the purpose of licensing.

  42. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but is it clocked at 6.8GHz?

  43. No, YOU are a fool. by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No, *you* are a fool - or at least ignorant of the scheme the OP is talking about.

    At the risk of sounding like [God forbid] a Marxist, if you can't see what the business owners and their paid lackeys in the legislatures have done here, then you are a fool.

    They [the business owners and the politicians] have written the tax laws so that they can fool you into believing that the laptop you purchased is for your own benefit.

    It is NOT for your benefit. It is for the benefit of the business owners, so that instead of demanding from you a 5 X 8 = 40 hour work week, they can now [at least theoretically] hold you accountable for a 7 X 24 = 168 hour work week.

    Would you feel the same way if the tax credit were for a pager that could be used to wake you up in the middle of the night, or, better yet, a second phone line to your home, replete with a bright red telephone, labelled "HOTLINE", strategically located on the nightstand immediately opposite the pillow on your bed?

    You know, the older I get, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that, if given the opportunity, the vast, overwhelming majority of humans will gladly, of their own free will, chose slavery over freedom.

    PS: And I am getting damned tired of having these sorts of comments modded down as flamebait. You people need to wake up and smell the coffee.

    PPS: Now that I've glanced back over your comment [and no, I wouldn't dream of wasting the time required to read it in its entirety], it's pretty clear that you hail from the general vicinity of Great Britain, which means that you're almost certainly part of the problem, and attempting any sort of civil discourse with you is an utter and complete waste of my time.

    1. Re:No, YOU are a fool. by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, the older I get, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that, if given the opportunity, the vast, overwhelming majority of humans will gladly, of their own free will, chose slavery over freedom.

      You must still be very young. Because the older I get, the more I'm coming to the conclusion that the vast overwhelming majority of humans have already gladly, of their own free will, chosen slavery over freedom. This includes you, and it certainly includes me.

    2. Re:No, YOU are a fool. by rm69990 · · Score: 1

      wtf? My aunt got a laptop through a similar program in Canada and she plays games on it at home. Because she handles sensitive data, she can't work on it at home, and uses a regular desktop at work, and yet she still got the laptop witha tax deduction. I'm starting to get sick of all this conspiracy theory bullshit on Slashdot. Please repeat after me 500 times a day "Everyone isn't out to get me. Everyone isn't out to get me. Everyone isn't out to get me. Everyone isn't out to get me."

  44. I'll wait for the Toughbook version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...add another couple of kgs to make it ruggedized, anodized, and packing even more heat to get me sterilized.

    Or the Brazil-type mod where each fan gets its own flexible slinky-like cooling duct worming their way out from under the chassis.

    One can dream....

  45. They get hot, very hot, then they lock up. by dsmatthews · · Score: 1

    :-( I hope this version of Clevo's DTR can stay cool enough to work in a warm enviroment. If you don't have aircon. then you may see the GPU start to loose the plot then the CPU will HALT. Those fans suck in a heap of dust and crud too, so over time cooling gets much worse. Other than that they are great, unless you are a wimp and can't lift the thing. ;-)

  46. Re:XP Home? And what's "Bullguard"? by dgkulzer · · Score: 1

    I use XP Home on my AMD 3800 X2 based computer. XP Home works just fine with a dual core processor, however, XP Home does not support computers with two seperate processors and Pro does. This is something that has caused alot of confusion on web forums that I visit.

  47. Clevo D470K experience by heroine · · Score: 1

    First of all, most laptops are Clevos. The high end Clevos are the best of the best high performance laptops, but expect all the usual defects you live with in modern gadgets.

    Don't be suprised if the ethernet fails after 6 months and you have to use ethernet over 1394, the keyboard drops a lot of keypresses, and the touch pad is over sensitive due to the high heat.

    Other than that, it's held up better than the Dells and Sonys due to its size. Of course, there is no Linux support on this chipset for AGP, power management, DV over 1394 and there never will be. That's part of the cost of bleeding edge.

  48. Not quite conrete slab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Concrete slab comes in at 2400kg/cubic meter. So a 8kg concrete slab is roughly 3cm by 33cm by 33cm, that is hardly a concrete slab.

  49. Metric by BackwardHatClub · · Score: 1

    I have to admit I have no grasp on how big or small this laptop is because this headline was apparently written in Europe. -Not nerdy enough to know both metric and english.

    1. Re:Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the quick conversion for you:

      8 kg is about 17 pounds, or 23 Thumbalangan stones.

  50. That's odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is news? Sager has had this up for at least a week now and they have all the features this 'will have by mid-January' already listed.

    http://www.sagernotebook.com/pages/notebooks/produ ct2.cfm?ProductType=9750&SubType=V

  51. Solution: Lose 8 Kg of fat by TheOrquithVagrant · · Score: 1

    C'mon, you pizza-munching, jolt-guzzling lardass geeks, you know it's true. Trading 8 Kgs of useless fat for 8 Kgs of uberleet dual-core portable for your daily lugging-around weight can be nothing but good!

    Oh, and Happy New Year, everyone! :)

  52. Re: Paralel port for Dongles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some server and other expensive apps still use Paralel port dongles for protection. But one can always get a USB-to-Paralel converter.

  53. Re:Just Wait - for the next major natural disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>>Have you ever wanted to host a giant Oracle database ON THE GO?

    Perhaps, it would be better to ask if you ever NEEDED to host a giant database (Oracle or other vendor) ON THE GO? "ON THE GO" might actually mean "from an emergency shelter powered by a generator (or other emergency power source)".

    I'm an amateur radio operator who's somewhat involved with emergency communications at the local level, but who wasn't deployed for the hurricanes that we had here in the southern USA this past summer. I can easily envision future scenarios where diaster officials (well, at least those who are properly trained and competent and willing to do the job diligently) could (ideally) make good use of a high-end system like this to temporarily replace critical information infrastructure when high-speed access to the Internet isn't possible. Imagine a hospital's records database (at least partially, or perhaps fully for just those patients currently admitted and/or recently discharged) backed up on a laptop. Imagine a 911 call center (or other emergency service[s]) data backed up onto one of these, ready to run (with a small network of other, smaller laptops) from wherever it's needed. The possiblities, IMNSHO, are enormous.

    YES, I know this beast eats a lot of power, but when all else fails (literally)...