Slashdot Mirror


RFID Cookware

HaggiZ writes "Vitacraft are claiming to have what they call RFIQin Robotic Cookware (unfortunate name). It's basically pots and pans that you can place RFID cooking cards in the handle with. The communicate with the induction stove 16 times a second to adjust the cooking when required. Neat idea, although I'm not sure anything I cook needs to have it's temperature reviewed or adjusted every 0.06 of a second." For all the evil uses of RFID that have been floated over the years, it's nice to see that someone is going to finally make it so I stop burning my lunch.

133 comments

  1. This being Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I assumed it was for cooking RFID to kill it. Just like if I saw "RFID Aluminum hat" here, I'd assume it was to block it, not use it to monitor head heat.

    1. Re:This being Slashdot by thaerin · · Score: 1

      I can see Reynold's introducing RFID into their foil line. Then not only could big brother know when and what you're cooking, when made into a hat they can also listen in on your thoughts.

      --
      If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
    2. Re:This being Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like they haven't been doing that for YEARS already...

  2. Wouldn't they... by InstinctVsLogic · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't they... you know, melt?

  3. It's Linge'RFIQin good! by pieterh · · Score: 3, Funny

    One more step to being able to cook a meal without leaving the desk.

    1. Re:It's Linge'RFIQin good! by John.P.Jones · · Score: 2, Funny

      All I need is more negative feedback on my cooking... I get plenty of that already.

  4. Grammar Police to the rescue by __aatskl8715 · · Score: 4, Informative

    For the millionth time, it's = contraction of 'it is'. its=posessive of it.

    1. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      For the millionth time, = is for assignment, == checks for equality.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    2. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear Grammar Police,

      It seems as though you are attempting to write correctly, let me help. Posessive [sic] is spelled possessive.

      Yours truly,

      Clippy

    3. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      It was a statement though, so = is perfectly acceptable. Saying "its" == "it is" makes no sense, since you can't check for any kind of equality between them.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    4. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Not in every language (See ML, Pascal, Lisp, etc.)

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're worrying about spelling when a horrible sentence like this exists: "It's basically pots and pans that you can place RFID cooking cards in the handle with."

      I need some Tylenol.

    6. Re:Grammar Police to the rescue by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      Not to mention "The communicate with the induction stove 16 times a second". The what - kippers?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  5. More money for useless toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What's next, an RFID fork that communicates with your plate to pick up just the right amount of food?

  6. ummm... by heatdeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's nice to see that someone is going to finally make it so I stop burning my lunch.

    Well, no, it'll just help regulate the temperature more accurately. It's still up to you to remember to stop playing doom 3 and go rescue your omlette from becoming a black crunchy lump.

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    1. Re:ummm... by Ethan+Allison · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's still up to you to remember to stop playing doom 3 and go rescue your omlette from becoming a black crunchy lump.

      No, it'll tell when it's done and turn off the heat, right?

    2. Re:ummm... by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No, if the food comes with a cooking-chip then the stove should cook it and turn off the heat when it is done. Other than choosing food which does not say "stir often" you'll just have to keep the volume of your speakers turned down low enough so you can hear the stove beeping when it is done. Making a stovetop stirring robot is left as an exercise for the reader.

      I need an RFID-active oven or a pan on which a pizza can fit. And a pizza chip which knows how to tell the stovetop or the oven how to cook it.

    3. Re:ummm... by Fatal67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the obvious use for this would be int he modern kitchen where you can pull up the recipe and cooking instructions from a LCD in the wall / countertop / whatever. The HKPC (home kitchen PC)(TM) would communicate with the pots and pans and trigger an alert so you know what pot to use. The LCD mounted on the pot handle would display the name of the ingredient and how much you are supposed to put in it.

      The Pot(TM) and The Stove(TM) are in constant communication to control tempatures and times. Since they are in communication with the rest of The Meal(TM) also, they know when to slow it down so that the whole meal finishes at the same time.

      I am not sure this setup would have saved me from the day I had to call my mother and ask her how to use the electric can-opener because my wife was not home. It will allow just about anyone to cook more than your standard ramen noodles and ravioli.

    4. Re:ummm... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... It could tell Doom and then all the monsters could laugh at you when it does burn. (Which would be nothing compared to RFID tags in your laundry and a reader in your washing machine. "Haha! Look he put red in with white again! Die pink boy! *BAP*BAP*BAP*!")

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  7. Microwave... by eosp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wouldn't you melt the chip? It _is_ metal, after all. (I learned the hard way with a Pop-Tart wrapper.)

    1. Re:Microwave... by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      This isn't microwave cookware. It's pots and pans for use on top of the stove. If you RTFS, you'll see that the RFID chip goes in the handle.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    2. Re:Microwave... by eosp · · Score: 1

      It's a joke, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Microwave... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Wrappers don't work in the toaster either.

      All joking aside, this is one appliance that might benefit from that kind of control - however, I find the variation that I get (sometimes light, sometimes dark) far more interesting than if I'd get the same, exact, cookie-cutter result every single time. Perfection is boring.

    4. Re:Microwave... by Havenwar · · Score: 1

      perfection is also tasty.

      I get pretty much exactly the same result every time... charcoal. Hence, I think I might benefit from this. As would most likley restaurants, large familys, and all others who know that the taste is less in the condition of the food and more in the spices added and the ingredients used.

      charcoal goes pretty well with hot peppers.

  8. Wrong target market. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The people who would cook by plugging a card into a pot would not be using a pot in the first place. They'd be using a microwave.

    The people who cook with pots and pans already know how to cook so they won't spend money on this. Gas stoves are much better for cooking anyway.

    Which leaves the only market being people with too much money, a love for new toys and no culinary skills.

    1. Re:Wrong target market. by yobjob · · Score: 1

      I can see this being useful in commercial kitchens, where the chef may be cooking multiple meals concurrently.

    2. Re:Wrong target market. by NoseBag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which leaves the only market being people with too much money, a love for new toys and no culinary skills. ...which explains why it's on /., I guess.

      --
      Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    3. Re:Wrong target market. by jandrese · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can see this being something of a safety feature too, if you have the "greasy food" item in your pan, it won't let the temperature exceed the flashpoint of the oil you're using (minus some for contaimination) and you'll never have an oil fire again.

      I have to admit though, this seems like gadetry overkill for even me, and I'm a hardcore geek.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Wrong target market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Which leaves the only market being people with too much money,
      >>a love for new toys and no culinary skills.

      In other words, a huge commercial success. If it weren't for rich idiots the north american economy wouldn't exist as it does today.

    5. Re:Wrong target market. by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      I agree. The only thing this would be really good for is deep-frying. Which then brings up the question: how does this mechanism improve upon existing designs for automatic deep-fryers? It's probably much more expensive and less durable than the old designs (most of which just use a thermocouple to control a heating element or a gas burner) and doesn't provide any new functionality.

    6. Re:Wrong target market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A chef who can't keep track of multiple orders/dishes/burners won't be a chef for long.

    7. Re:Wrong target market. by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed. Why not just go get some microwave food at the store if you can't cook?

      Somehow, I find this pretty sad. People don't want to learn anything. Cooking is a great skill to learn, and it's fun to learn. 95% of it is following the directions. I suppose having a chip in there makes it easier to surf the net while cooking? (not that surfing in the kitchen is a good idea...)

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    8. Re:Wrong target market. by Dark_MadMax666 · · Score: 1

      Somehow skill of which "95% is following the directions" doesnt look "great" or even "fun" to me :/

    9. Re:Wrong target market. by ericdano · · Score: 1

      That is sad. I'm not saying I'm a cook. But I do know how to cook things, and I have many, many times cooked things following the directions on how to cook them. It's not hard, it just requires following the steps.

      To be a real cook, now, that is really something. I had a girlfriend who was a cook, and it was incredible how she could make things taste better. Simple things, like hamburgers. She'd add some spices to the meat and......yum!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    10. Re:Wrong target market. by illtud · · Score: 1

      The people who would cook by plugging a card into a pot would not be using a pot in the first place. They'd be using a microwave.

      And in the UK we already have microwave ovens that can read the cooking instructions and automagically cook your food as intended by the producer.

    11. Re:Wrong target market. by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      What is this bullshit about Slashdotter having too much money? I'm barely scrapping by...

      (/me waits for "but that's just anecdotal-evidence-spiel)

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    12. Re:Wrong target market. by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. IASWCC(I Am Someone Who Can Cook) Did anyone notice that this monitors the temperature of the *pan* and not the food?

      Will you have to have diffrent recipe cards for each weight and temperature of the food being prepared (frozen, room temp, etc)?

      The pan may be at the correct temperature but that is kinda useless as most cookware conducts heat so well that it is effectively the same temperature as the element anyway, so is this basicaly saying you still have to be there to cook the meal it will just double check your elements setting or translate it for you (i.e. knob on stove is 1-9/10 == 100-400F or something like that). Sounds kind of redundant especially if you are cooking thick pieces of meat where the outside temp is way diffrent then the internal temp.

      So in short your KD is still gonna burn.

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    13. Re:Wrong target market. by espressojim · · Score: 1

      You know, you can't get a stove that puts out BTUs like a professional chef's stove. Induction cooking allows you to achieve those kinds of heat outputs (as it only heats the cookware, not the stove, walls neat the stove, etc) in your own kitchen.

      That's why I want induction cooking - I can't stir fry food in a wok nearly as well as I'd like with my wimpy consumer stove. As for RFID to control temperature - that might be really useful interested in holding food at a certain temperature to cook, like in vaccume cooking (sous vide). In that case, you don't cook food above 175 degrees for many items, and slow cook over time. Normally, you'd need to get thermometers and constantly check the temperature of the water, or get circulating water baths (that are very expensive) to automate the process. I think this would do very nicely.

      I love cooking, and my GF thinks most of my food is better than the resturaunts we go out to eat at. I could see buying this - it's a nice bonus over the induction cooking I'm already lusting after.

    14. Re:Wrong target market. by Lenins_beard · · Score: 1

      Which leaves the only market being people with too much money, a love for new toys and no culinary skills. 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

    15. Re:Wrong target market. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am also in the 'someone who can cook' category, and this device does seem useful to me. The temperature regulation thing seems like a gimmick, but having the ring automatically turn itself off when I remove the pan would be useful, since it's something I forget to do periodically, which shortens the life time of the heating element.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Wrong target market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a gimmick. A lot of food needs to be prepared in boiling water. If the pan knows it is boiling than you don't have to add heat untill it is again under 100C. So this allows you to be more energy efficient.

      It would also help with frying in oil. It should shut off if it gets hotter than 180C as a security feature.

    17. Re:Wrong target market. by colin_young · · Score: 1

      Shameless plug (not that I make any money from it -- wikispaces gets all the revenue from the google ads): In case you didn't see my other post, I've got a wiki up about induction cooking at inductioncooking.wikispaces.org. There is some interesting information there about ordering cooktops from Europe (I'm assuming you are in N.A., so ignore this if you aren't), where you can acquire nicer European models with higher power than the N.A. stuff at far lower prices (even after paying for shipping). Colin

  9. uncoral'd link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. "needs" by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Nothing "needs" this amount of control...Oh, but the flavor!

  11. Taco by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nice to see that someone is going to finally make it so I stop burning my lunch.

    Scary thought for someone named after a food...

    1. Re:Taco by iphayd · · Score: 1

      You actually think Taco refers to Mexican sandwiches?

      Hint, Pronounced "Command her"

    2. Re:Taco by shawb · · Score: 1

      And I thought they were referring to the submitter, haggiz. But then again, most people outside of Scotland might not consider that to be food (nevermind the alternative spelling.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  12. Nice by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice, now the industrial complex will know if I like my eggs baked or boiled.

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    1. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god! you're losing your only privacy still not monitored. We're all going to die!

  13. RFID Is not evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The people trying to use it for nefarious purposes are.

    RFID has some neat applications, most of which will do nothing more than make your day and mine a little easier. It doesn't matter if it's a coffee pot that knows how much sugar, honey or milk you use. Or a little keychain that stores all my information so I don't have to fill out any forms at the hospital, hotel, police station or when I renew my license (that was a three hour wait). If I could do all that by dragging a small keychain over a little platic thing, count me in...

  14. This is part of the RealPlate act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which insures the identity of your cookware and that only legal US plates are used and that taxes are paid. The RealPlate act will insure that your china is not made in China and that only US knifes and forks labor to cut your meat.

  15. Close, but not close enough by Brento · · Score: 3, Funny

    The next thing would be pantry integration. I'd like to pick out a stack of recipe cards, drop them into a pile, and have the system figure out what I need to buy versus what I've already got - especially since it could link with RFID tags of the stuff in my cupboard. Granted, it won't know which items are full and which are empty, so it won't know if I've got enough vegetable oil for the particular recipe, but it can always print out a list of exceptions that I could investigate.

    Then, I need it to integrate with my wine cellar, so it can see whether I've got an appopriately matching wine for each of the recipes.

    And it'd obviously have an internet connection, so it could check prices on each of the ingredients. I could put in my work address and my girlfriend's work address, and it could balance out the list and prices so it could SMS me (or her, depending on the shop) right before I leave work.

    Ha! This is Slashdot! Who am I kidding? I don't have a girlfriend, a wine cellar OR a job! Much less RFID cookware, bwahaha. Now pass me that pizza delivery menu.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Close, but not close enough by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a great idea. Or, rather the converse of that is a great idea.

      Imagine a method of having the fridge, cubboard and stove use RFID to keep an up to date list of what you can make based on what you have. Plus with a "if you had" list.

      It just pulls from a database with ingredients, cooking time and estimated remaining volume and displays it. You wouldn't need to update it more than daily or hourly at most.

      Half the time I end up staring at my full fridge, wondering what I want to eat and end up making some sort of complicated rammen-based thing. Even though the fridge and cubboard have all sorts of common and exotic ingredients at all times. If you have eggs, butter, cheese and just about any other veggie or meat you can make an omelette. But I always forget that.

      A list in front of me would be all it would take to make me spend all my free time cooking. (Which the wife likes, but it's made us both fatties.)

    2. Re:Close, but not close enough by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Why not take the 2 minutes and look for yourself? What happens the day you lose power? Or are hit by a storm that knocks out all your electricity? Are you going to starve to death? Sounds like it....go Darwin! Go!

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:Close, but not close enough by Hymer · · Score: 1

      Ha! This is Slashdot! Who am I kidding? I don't have a girlfriend, a wine cellar OR a job! Much less RFID cookware, bwahaha.
      Dem Übergeek himself has got both a wine cellar, a wife (aka. girlfriend v. 2.0) and a job... why shouldn't you have it too ?

    4. Re:Close, but not close enough by Brento · · Score: 1

      What happens the day you lose power? Or are hit by a storm that knocks out all your electricity? Are you going to starve to death?

      My post was a *joke*, Sherlock. Besides, I live on Miami Beach, two blocks from the ocean's edge. I went through three hurricanes last fall including Katrina, Rita and Wilma, and had no power for a while. I lived. Deal with it.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
  16. I prefer "Grammar Nazi." by Armadni+General · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But seriously, if that's the only mistake you were able to find, you're not fit to call yourself Grammar Anything.

  17. Here's what's really going on: by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1, Informative
    For those of you puzzled by this story, you should be, as it's basically bogus.

    They're talking about inductive heating, which is a bit worrisome: It involves having a kilowatt or so of 13.56 MHz radio frequency energy beamin up at the cooking implement.

    The pot can't be just any pot-- it has to hit a certain electromagnetic sweet spot, as to absorb the radio waves, and not reflect them all over the place.

    this usually implies it has to be made of somewhat resistive and lossy material-- iron is a good choice.

    Unfortunately materials that are resistive electrically are usually resistive, thermally too. So instead of getting a nice even heat, the pan is likely to have hot spots.

    Ergo the pans really could use some sort of sensor to feed back to the stove some info about how the pan is heating. As to not have some cool spots while nearby the pan is melting through.

    So this isnt so much a wonderful added feature, as a partial kludge to compensate for the basic foibles of the whole scheme.

    1. Re:Here's what's really going on: by Avumede · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, cast iron has wonderfully even heating, better than almost anything else out there. However, because of it's poor conductivity, you have to let it sit on the stove for a bit for the temperature to even out.

      One of the best restaurants in the world, The French Laundry, uses induction stoves instead of gas stoves.

    2. Re:Here's what's really going on: by Tenk101 · · Score: 1

      I have an induction hob, its really great, the only downside is the need to buy induction compatible sauce-pans (which are pretty common). Induction hobs have the advantage that they are never hot to the touch, nothing burns onto them. They cook a perfectly even heat moreso than any other type of cooker.

    3. Re:Here's what's really going on: by buckles · · Score: 1

      Induction cooking requires the use of a ferrous cookware. Iron and steel can get hot enough to really sear something. The addition of iron scraped off into the diet is actually a nutritional plus. Stainless steel has always had problems with scorching, even the copper aluminum sandwich kind.


      Copper, glass, aluminum etc are useless for induction schemes. We use copper, steel and aluminum so this technology is out for us. Good pans should be able to cook every meal you eat in your lifetime and then some.


      I think that the poster wanted to point out his relief of a use for RFID that didn't directly benefit big brother. Having an eight burner gas stove in your house is like having an AS/400 server at home to manage your 200 recipes.

    4. Re:Here's what's really going on: by sploxx · · Score: 1
      They're talking about inductive heating, which is a bit worrisome: It involves having a kilowatt or so of 13.56 MHz radio frequency energy beamin up at the cooking implement.

      The pot can't be just any pot-- it has to hit a certain electromagnetic sweet spot, as to absorb the radio waves, and not reflect them all over the place.

      This usually implies it has to be made of somewhat resistive and lossy material-- iron is a good choice.

      No, Although 13.56 MHz is an RF ISM band and used for various purposes (such as RF heating, which completely different to induction heating, as RF heating relies on dielectric losses in the material), it would be foolish to use such a high frequency for an induction stove.

      Such stoves use a magnetic field switching in the 10s to 100s of kHz range, and essentially form one half of a transformer in a SMPS (switch mode power supply). Using radio frequencies simply does not make sense here, as the conversion efficiency is poor and the pots are not 13.56MHz antennas.

      Regarding the material to use for the stove, the stove can be idealized to form such a schematic:

      MAINS-> +--------+-R'->--W . W------+
              | DRIVER | . . . W . W . . .|
              | . . . .| . . . W . W . . .R
              | CIRCUIT| . . . W . W . . .|
      MAINS-> +--------+---->--W . W------+


      where the left (1) is the primary coil in the the stove driven by an appropiate driver circuit with unavoidable internal resistance R'.
      The base of a pot forms the right (2) winding and the material's resistance is R'(idealized).
      The best conversion efficiency of this setup depends (among other things) on the impedance matching for the R/R' values and the coil windings. It also depends on the magnetic properties of the pot (\mu_r - where's slashdots TeX-Mode?).
      (Calculation of coil-resistance relationships left as an exercise to the reader, I'm tired ;)

      Although the oven may be tuned to work with iron pots of certain shape, it could in principle also work with very well conducting silver pots.

      I would not be suprised (although this is pure speculation) if the vendors of induction stoves already have methods integrated into the stove (change of frequencies, different tappings switchable on the primary coil etc.) which will try to find the parameters for maximum efficiency energy transfer.

      ---
      This comment was compressed too much because it contains the drawing above. Argh. Hopefully, this text will reduce the compression ratio as needed. Hey, random bits are incompressible: fdhz49b8xgh32gfh43hxhjgfn32nsjkqgk6901dhvnmahjwuht nvnyu324kgdj
    5. Re:Here's what's really going on: by njh · · Score: 1

      If you read the wikipedia article on induction cooking you'd know that induction cookers mainly rely on magnetic hysteresis heating rather than eddys, and thus you need to use something with a large loop. Conductivity doesn't come into it - you could use suitable non conductive ferrites without significant effect. Also, there is no reason why you couldn't add a copper layer for heat spreading if it is important.

    6. Re:Here's what's really going on: by mykdavies · · Score: 1

      You're in luck - all the Grammar Nazis are busy at the top of this thread!

      --
      The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
  18. Ba-dum-CHING! by khasim · · Score: 1

    Ba-dum-CHING!

  19. RFID??? by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This has nothing to do with RFID really. RFID is just an ID. This is a nice temperature monitoring device. I have see other wireless units for sale but none built into the Pot like this.

    Its a clever idea that I can see being used for testing out cooking techniques. However, using the term RFID is just to hype the produce as it really is not getting that much out of the RFID technology.

    1. Re:RFID??? by jcaldwel · · Score: 1

      Looks like they just used RFID to monitor the type of pan. I guess that could be useful with the differences in conductivity, density, etc of each. My 3-year-old's play kitchen does this sort of thing, already, though. When you place the plastic eggs on it, it crackles, the spaghetti, it bubbles.

      Sounds like some XML-enabled, service-oriented, 4-gl buzzwords being thrown around to me. *g*

  20. But then again... by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A stove that communicates with the pots via RFID has enough micro-electronics inside to contain a clock, maybe a scheduler even! Mom can place the pan there, it'll heat up in time and signal you via WLAN, Bluetooth or SMS, so you know when food is ready! What a pointless waste...

  21. The grand plan by peektwice · · Score: 2, Funny

    1: Come up with crappy inductive heating cookware/stove combo. 2: ??? 3: Make liberal use of the term RFID in marketing hype 4: Post slashvertisement 5: Profit!

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  22. Good for Gourmet Cooks by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even temperatures would benefit gourmet cooks more than inattentive college students trying not to burn their mac and cheese. Precise cooking temperatures without large swings command premium dollars.

    Just check out this for the extremes people will go to for this kind of control.

    1. Re:Good for Gourmet Cooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent mentioned Aga ranges. I really enjoyed the company's 8 minute tour that explains these "legendary" ovens, which use radiant heat to ensure thorough cooking. It's like they used a time machine to bring forward marketers from Victorian-era England to make this commercial. The narrator, an aging woman named Marie that would love to send us home with a plate of scones if she could, sings praises to an oven that's not just a treasured heirloom, but the very center of her home and community. She calls America "The Colonies", compares the oven's styling to a "luxury oceanliner" and a Rolls Royce, speaks lovingly of the Queen, belittles newfangled, modern gadgets like the electric stove, fawns over tea and orange marmalade toast, and even proudly declares that the oven is available in British Racing Green. It's brilliant.

    2. Re:Good for Gourmet Cooks by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      That was exactly what I was thinking. For those not aware...certain foods, particularly french ones, tend to require exact timing and temperatures so as not to ruin it. Pretty much all egg recipes could benefit from this, as could crepes, sauces, and anything else that requires such accuracy.

      Of course...the chefs serious enough to care about those things, such as myself, are typically at a culinary skill level where they do just fine without expensive gadgets. Although the industrial kitchens of restaurants are always looking for a way to prevent ingredient loss and improve efficiency.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Good for Gourmet Cooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding in suggesting that you can control Aga ranges. Aga ranges are anything but controllable. Some good cooks might be able to work around the limitations of an always ON cooktop and oven but it is hardly controllable.

  23. Can power vapourizers? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    Getting one of these chips into a vapourizer would be a neat idea. Hardware hackers with free time should get working. Everybody must get stoned.

  24. Possible advertising slogan? by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

    Now you can fry your RFID chip, literally!

  25. Chocolate (and other candies) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chocolate, candies, and sauces come to mind. Especially chocolate.

    Cocao butter in chocolate melts around 90F. Ideal melting temperature is between 40-45C (104-113F). Above that (45C, 115F), the chocolate scorches.

    For tempering (the shiny coatings), you melt it at around 110F, cool it to 79-80F, and then warm it back to 90F. Automating it is very handy.

    Candies (and related sauces) are very temperature sensitive. Sugar melts at 146C (367F). Just right and you get caramel. Just wrong and you get carbon.

    1. Re:Chocolate (and other candies) by Triple+Click · · Score: 1

      Double boiler. Put chocolate in pot in another pot of boiling water.

  26. Too bad you can't outsource education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's basically pots and pans that you can place RFID cooking cards in the handle with."

    Just what the hell did they teach you in school? Anything?

  27. English by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's basically pots and pans that you can place RFID cooking cards in the handle with.

    ENGLISH, CmdrTaco, ENGLISH! ! !

    I only use one button on my microwave oven, MinutePlus. My mom always wonders how I get it to turn on by pressing one button without typing in the amount of time...

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and what is wrong with german grammar ?

    2. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still live in her basement don't you?

    3. Re:English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit she lives in my basement and fuck you.

    4. Re:English by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      Nothing, but German grammar that was not.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  28. RFID is not evil by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It's is a tool that is used for monitoring and tracking.
    All I want, and a lot of folks I have tlaked to, is laws in place to prevent abuse. Unfortuunatly they are easy to abuse.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Mods on crack again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The above post was moderated down overrated so that the person who did it will not have to face accountability in the meta mod process. its a shame, it was a legitimate expression of opinion and fact.

  30. Unintended Markets? by camperslo · · Score: 1

    This is certainly a new twist in dealing with all of those exploding meth labs.

  31. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RFID in pot? The next step in the war on drugs? WHO KNOWS?!

  32. what happens if.... by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    an ambulance drives by and scrambles the signal?

    It'll burn your house down?

    --
    "Officer, you must be drunk."

  33. i don't need the man telling me how to cook! by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    this seems more like a thing for microwaves or ovens for TV dinners. maybe scan the box and insert frozen crap? that may be nice if your internet connected oven could have its characteristics tune the cooking instructions. does this already exist? anyway, it's not for me, i like to actually cook.
    food you cook in a pot or pan does not seem like it would benefit from this. there are so many variables in cooking (like how often you stir it!) that come into play, plus a little variety is what makes cooking have more soul than fast food take-out. think about making cookies for example, some people cook them a little longer to make them crunchy and some like them softer. people that like to cook usually like to have their personal taste and input. good luck to them, but i don't see a big demand in this direction.

  34. slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot. news for nerds, stuff that matters?!
    jeez, frightens me that RFID might make it to the households of all the dontknow-dontcare guys...at least ill be able to check out what my neighbours having for lunch, right?
    but on the other side...finally every nerd can get rid of their mama:
    "food will be ready in approximately 5.76588 minutes! WARNING: still hot! eating right away might lead to 2nd degree burnings. have a nice day, your RFID-kitchen"

  35. Useful: Protection From Teflon by Rob+Carr · · Score: 1, Interesting
    When used on a stove, Teflon can burn. While the fumes can't be good for humans, they are incredibly lethal for pet birds. Most parrot owners cannot use Teflon-coated pans.

    RFID cards that tell the stove to turn off after a certain amount of time would help prevent mistakes with Teflon pans.

    Better would be pans with sensors that monitor the temperature of the pans used. Not only would it be safer, but it would be easier to control temperatures of food being cooked.

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    1. Re:Useful: Protection From Teflon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? RFID chips in Tampons and pads? So women will know when to change them out.

    2. Re:Useful: Protection From Teflon by Rob+Carr · · Score: 1

      If you want to improve safety, changing technology is far more effective than attempting to change human behavior.

      --
      This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  36. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent have surely never used an induction oven, as everything he asserts, inclcuding the frequency of operation, is bogous. Mod down!

  37. Apparently you don't know much about induction by colin_young · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Saying that "gas is better for cooking" is only true if you're talking about traditional electric cooktops. Induction is superior to gas. See http://inductioncooking.wikispaces.com/AboutInduct ion (disclaimer: I maintain that website, although the information is collected from various sources).

    That said, I don't see a lot of use for a pre-programmed cooking routine. It will only work when you can guarantee the consistency of your ingredients (making caramel or deep frying come to mind, but there are already cooktops that can maintain a set temperature +/-5C).

    1. Re:Apparently you don't know much about induction by shawb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To take the thought further, the only place I could see this being really useful is in pre-packaged heat and serve style food. Just embed another chip in the packaging which contains the instructions for heating. Waving the chip by the stove's RFID scanner will program the cooking cycle, with the pots measuring temperature to make sure everything's going right. Stirring would be sort of a problem, unless you incorporated some sort of inductive stirring similar to some chemlab hotplates. Just coat the magnet in some high quality porcelain or something so it washes off easilly.

      There are a couple other uses with fresh ingredients, such as whisking eggs over a flame for a mother sauce and making sure it doesn't get warm enough to scramble, melting chocolate, making custards, controling temperature for a beurre blanc, making custards, etc. But for actually cooking most main courses I'd imagine the good old giant gas burner and a trained set of eyes and ears would go a lot farther (such as gauging temperature by the sizzle when cooking steak, and using the good old fashined poke test to gauge doneness: not using a fork, but simply pressing down with your tongs or even finger and feeling the resistance.)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  38. iron, better than almost anything else by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    With exception of copper.

    Which is what is used in the best french restaurants in France.

    The main problems with copper is the "maintenance" : it's hard to clean, and has to be polished quite often. But it has the best conduction for cooking, with a nice even diffusion.

    Also you cannot as yet use them on induction stoves (as far as I know...I'm not that much a cookware geek)

    Induction is top for a few application : boiling water under 30 seconds, changing temperature of your pan really fast...

    Induction IS top hardware when you have no gas, because your alternative is the bland electrical stove

    But then I learned to cook on a gas stove, and grandma showed me how to cook with copper hardware, so I'm not willing to change until I have to move to a flat with no gas pipe.

    And I'm using "Tefal" Teflon coated iron pans, because I don't want to spend one hour dishwashing every night.

    But I still think copper and gas are the best combination.

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  39. when in doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    choose neither?

    "adjusted every 0.06 of a second"
    it would have beeen either
    - adjusted every 0.06 seconds
    or
    - afjusted evere 16th of a second

    well, nice mix anyway :)

  40. I wonder how this.. by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..will pan out boom tish

    Interesting idea, can it alter temperatures per pot on the stove? so my meat sauce cooks on high then simmers while something else does a controlled slow cook? Nice vendor lock in - you now have to buy pots, pans, skillets AND the stove they belong to.

  41. ESPECIALLY unfortunate name in German... by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...since the German verb "ficken", which is homophonous to "FIQin" means "to fuck" and the prefix "er-", though not normally used with this verb, usually designates a successful completion of the action indicated by the stem. Not a clever choice of letters.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
    1. Re:ESPECIALLY unfortunate name in German... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homo what? Are you saying this is gay cookware?

  42. rfid cooking by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 0

    bad idia , i am a chef . I like to ajust the flame never used the new induction stove so no apinion i like gas

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
    1. Re:rfid cooking by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      If you can't cook equally well on an electric stove, a gas grill, or a wood fire, you are no chef.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  43. RFID Wont Help Your Lunch by quantax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If CmdrTaco wants to stop burning his lunch, he will stop making the same mistake nearly everyone else does when burning stuff: they forget that its cooking in the first place. Whenever you are burning something, I'd say roughly about 95% of the time it can be attributed to the fact that you forgot it was cooking in the first place or were otherwise engaged elsewhere (playing a video game, doing a seperate cooking step, etc) and you missed your time cue to remove the food from the heat source. So what you really arent fancy RFID device, what you need are some decent kitchen timers, nothing fancy, just something that is loud and will let you know when its time is up. Now, if the RFID device could somehow detect that the food was burning and the subsequently turn off the heat source, that might be useful, though any hardcore cook would not likely ever use any of these type of devices beyond perhaps a digital meat thermometer. The market is definitely tech-toy lovers and people who can't cook (note, these two catagories may possibly be mutually inclusive).

    --
    "What can a thoughtful man hope for mankind on Earth, given the experience of the past million years? Nothing." -Bokonon
  44. Smart cooking by illtud · · Score: 1

    ...sorry to followup my own post. More on 'smart cooking' here, including PDF codes you can download for various recipies, print out & swipe at your smart oven for 'perfect cooking'.

    I despair sometimes.

  45. Figure it out already by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1, Informative
    HaggiZ writes "Vitacraft are claiming to have what they call RFIQin Robotic Cookware (unfortunate name). It's basically pots and pans that you can place RFID cooking cards in the handle with.

    Hey HaggiZ, "RFIQ" != "RFID". Seriously, there are a lot of people out there calling anything small that passively or with minimal self-powering communicates via RF radiation (i.e. radio waves) "RFID". RFID is a specific thing. It's basically a small, cheap device that echoes back a unique ID number for tracking purposes. Calling this RFID is as fucking stupid as calling everything with 2 wheels and a motor a "scooter". Get a fucking clue, people.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:Figure it out already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling this RFID is as stupid as calling everything with 2 wheels and a motor a "scooter".
       
      Bzzzt Wrong. If you do a little research it *is* RFID. The stove/pans read 16 special recipie cards and adjust the temperature to suit the recipie.
       
      Look at http://ubiks.net/local/blog/jmt/archives3/004713.h tml for a better write-up.

  46. OK, call me a retard, but Cookware? Pots and Pans? by layer3switch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Doesn't sound like "just" pots and pans to me. Sounds more like Entire Oven Appliance and Cookware unless that RFID pots and pans come with machanical robtic arm with RFID reciever to turn my gas stove knob to turn down the heat.

    Besides that, how many times do we ever "cook" lunch?

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  47. Better idea: build one for a microwave oven by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A more useful idea would be a wireless temperature probe that worked in, and with, a microwave oven. Then, when you're cooking something thick, like a chicken breast, the oven could sense interior temperature. Traditional ovens have had this since the 1950s, but microwave ovens usually have not.

    There would certainly be no problem powering the thing; there's plenty of RF power in there. Interference could be overcome by programming the oven to shut off for a few milliseconds every second, during which period the probe would send a temp reading.

    1. Re:Better idea: build one for a microwave oven by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I've seen microwave ovens with temp probes. I could be wrong though. I have usually just bought whatever $100 microwave whenever I moved. Never had one fail, and never used any feature of one except "put on high, enter the time, press start". Not even sure I've ever cleaned one.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Better idea: build one for a microwave oven by Animats · · Score: 1

      Recently I've been going to a deli that has chicken pieces (Ninan Ranch, so it's worth it) in the cold case. You pick one, and they microwave it. The bigger pieces come out underdone in the center; a fixed setting isn't working for them.

  48. When I stir-fry, temperature is not very critical by 5plicer · · Score: 1

    +/- 50 degrees isn't going to ruin your dinner. What IS critical is stirring technique. I doubt I'd get much use out of RFID cookware.

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
  49. Not for me by petantik+f00l · · Score: 1

    It would be quite useless. I am always aware about the temp of my food cooking, either on the XBox 360 PSU (also useful as a foot warmer in bed) and on my overclocked intel (great for pot noodle) using the motherboard temperature sensors ;)

    I actually think it could be feasible to harness all that wasted heat from electronic equipment to cook food

    http://petantik.blogsome.com/ - A Lucid Look at Reality
    http://www.xanga.com/petantik - The Golden Nugget

    1. Re:Not for me by urbaer · · Score: 1

      I actually think it could be feasible to harness all that wasted heat from electronic equipment to cook food
      Nah... it makes it taste funny...

    2. Re:Not for me by petantik+f00l · · Score: 1

      We will only feed it to foreigners, who will thinks that it is a local specialty

  50. This does look like a waste of money by phpsocialclub · · Score: 1

    The best thing you can do is purchase some solid stainless steel cookware (like Allclad) and get one piece of non-stick for cooking eggs.

    With this compu-cookware, what happens when you want to finish a dish in the oven?

    I would like to see how long this stuff last at 450 degrees.

    All this technology will never replace stirring, thermometer, and following directions.

    Good stainless steel pans will last longer than you do and will be always reliable.

    People will buy the stupidist stuff to "help" them cook, when they should just read a book and practice.

    Maybe read cooks illustrated, http://www.cooksillustrated.com/ the best way to learn to cook.

    1. Re:This does look like a waste of money by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Large operations will benefit. When you've got to feed hundereds of people in one shot, and need it all cooked consistently... every little bit helps.

      I'd agree that its not all that useful at home, but large restaurants, cafeterias, military mess halls... could really benefit from the added consistency such devices can give.

  51. yeah, right by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    This looks like it works best only if you want one single temperature, instead of a range, while cooking something. If I start something on low, then turn it up when I add something, but only want it to boil for a second, or whatever, I would have to keep swapping out cards, or bypass this, right?

  52. Mod parent down by Onikuma · · Score: 1

    How did this get modded informative?

    I know, this is Slashdot, but didn't anyone look at the linked page? You know, the one that starts with "Each Vita Craft pan handle is embedded with an RFID computer chip..."

  53. Tinfoil hats on!!!! by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Now the (NSA/FBI/CIA/Insert favorite American spook agency here) is going to know what you're eating and how hot it is so they don't burn themselves when they come in your house through the kitchen windows. Or they will know what exactly they have to poison in your local grocery store to kill you specifically.

    Or your (neighbours/parents/mother-in-law) can come in and ask if they can join you for your famous meatloaf without even asking them!

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Tinfoil hats on!!!! by Winlin · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous...I would say more but the NSA just called to tell me my crabcakes are burning.

  54. Getting started with RFID by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Ok, so I really wanted to create an RFID product, since it seems like such a useful thing, but I have no idea where to get started with manufacturers or suppliers. Can anybody recommend some resources? What I've basically planned to do (and will use this post as prior art if necessary) is create a home tracking system for things in your house that you can sync up to a cellphone or a computer and basically locate things instantaneously.

    Can anybody offer suggestions?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  55. Remote cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    temperature reviewed or adjusted every 0.06 of a second

    I've waited for such precision. I have the requisite sub-30ms pings between work and home.
    No more wondering if I forgot to turn off the pan of hard boiled eggs that I left out for lunch.

    My alternative, of course, is the realtime monitoring of the local fire department.

  56. Here is a good example of how this works by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    This operates at 171KHz, not 13.56 MHz. Personally, I would not be too worried about all this. In addition, it is fast and efficient. As far as a kilowatt of power, well, back in the late 60's, my father bought a Litton Microwave Oven (one of the first for consumers). A number of ppl swore that we would lose our eyes, would explode from being heated inside out, or would have funny looking kids. They lost.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Here is a good example of how this works by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the correction in frequency.

      The difference between this and a microwave oven is the microwaves are confined (99.98% of them) to inside the oven cavity.

      In a stove, the RF energy isnt confined by anything tangible. The confinement depends on magnetic fields dropping off as the third power of the distance.

      I just thought it was funny how companies can spin this as a super new feature, when others might see it as a kludge to overcome some inherent probs.

  57. LSD!!! by killa62 · · Score: 1

    YES!! I can finally brew my LSD without expensive bunsen burners

    WOOT FOR TECH!!!

  58. From a geek who cooks by Loundry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I visited the website, and I think this is marketing. The most important measurement of temperature in cooking food is the internal temperature of high-mass items such as steaks. The temperature reading which is important is the innermost part of the thickest steak in the pan. How is an RFID tag in the pan going to measure that? Answer: it isn't. Only a thermocouple probe can cut that job, which is why I have two different thermocouples in my kitchen that I use almost every time I cook.

    Another part of the website reads: "Prohibits use of wrong pans with incompatible recipes." Excuse you, Vita Craft Corporation, but I don't need you to tell me how to use my own pans. Sometimes I cook on the outside of my cast iron skillets.

    I think this has nothing to do with improving the way that humans prepare food and everything to do with using a new technology to sell more cookware. If you want to become a better cook, then, by god, invest the money in some good cookware, take some cooking classes with people you like, watch some good tv shows, and, by all means, don't be afraid to try things and have fun doing it. If anything, it's an excuse to become more social. If you invite 6 people over, then you're going to be inspired to try and make something that impresses and feeds your loved ones.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  59. Re:iron, better than almost anything else by seifried · · Score: 1

    With the exception of gold. Julia Childs used a gold frying pan briefly on her TV show. Of course this is a little bit pricey for most people.