Web 3.0
SpunOne writes "Apparently Jeffrey Zeldman is as sick of Web 2.0 as many of us have become. In his latest article, titled "Web 3.0," he really sticks it to the Web 2.0 fan boys, and dispels a lot of the hype generated by our young new friends. It's easy to grow apathetic when a new idea gains so much traction so quickly, but his points are clear and accurate, and deserve consideration."
Web 4.0 will kick his Web 3.0's ass. He needs to get with the times.
Just In Case I make My websites with Web 8.0. This should keep me good for at least 2 or 3 more months.
Evolution or ID?
. . .but here is an indisputable rebuttal.
http://www.parm.net/web2.0/
Come on people, we're all sick of buzzwords, but you can't deny the reality of Web 2.0!
Igi
more often than not, big teams have slowly and expensively labored to produce overly complex web applications whose usability was near nil on behalf of clients with at best vague goals.
We need to immediately have a meeting to discuss reducing complexity, increasing usability and clarifying our goals.
He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
This will beam web content right into your brain! Then.. to enable the DRM, a thug will come to your location and give you a hit or two upside the head with a sledge hammer.
:(
Only problem I am having is getting people to access Web XP a second time
I was surfing the web 2.0 on my Commodore 64
Everyone knows that it won't reallty be usable until it hits Web 3.1.
This guy's the limit!
Slashdot should jump the bandwagon and incorporate Web 4.0
(its just like Web 2.0 but duped)
liqbase
Web 3.0 is for Fedora fan-boys. Debian users will continue with Web 1.0 (or rather 1.1), which has the same interface as 1.0 but all of the security fixes of 2.0 backported.
"WWW:The Next Generation"... Aren't you a bit ahead of yourself there?
WWW : The Markup Protocol
WWW 2.0 The Wrath of Kazaa
WWW 3 The Search for Social Networks
WWW 4 The VRML Homepage
WWW 5 The Final Flickr
WWW 6 The Undocumented Context
then we get to WWW:TNG
I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
I have replaced you with a shell script. You are no longer needed.
However, I have just replaced myself with two shell scripts: the one above and one taking my venture-lent millions and IPO'ing. Further, I have a patent to the business method of replacing employees with shell scripts and will IPO it to make millions. Then I'll write a shell script -- most likely in a different language, Ruby, Haskell, PHP, perhaps -- to do the same as a Web 2.0 thing before reinventing myself for Web 3.0 (there exists a business method patent for reinventing the same business methods again and again, but it's being contested by religions and crime syndicates).
P.S. Word to the wise about Web 3.0: it won't be stable until 3.1 and then 3.11 will bring real connectivity to the Web...
We clearly need 2.0 2.0. It's just like 2.0 1.0, but it's totally interactive ans dynamic and socially collaborative with Ruby tags all over the place. It also has rounded corners.
USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
Since when has not being a multi-millionaire been a bad thing?
You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
Why can I not have moderation points at a time like this to help others see the genius in your statements?
... "Fuck Paul Graham with a red hot fork".
Although, I would have stated your post more like
I think your way is a bit more diplomatic though.
ahem... but it turns out that the real use is...
Web 1.0 is about allowing individuals to create and share porn.
Web 2.0 is about allowing groups to create and share porn.
Web 3.0 is about allowing societies to create and share porn.
Or more succintly, since the above distinctions seem pretty meaningless (in both my and your versions), web = porn (or ideas, or whatever you think really happens on the web).
William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
Web 1.0 is about gathering underpants.
Web 2.0 is a whole bunch of question marks, and
Web 3.0 is about rolling in cash.
This could not be more obvious.
Mike Hoye
Isn't XML the CSV of Y2K?
tone
tone
Watch it, you! I'm working on replacing you with a blooming shell script too! All those buzzwords and you don't really know what you're talking about. Web 3.11 for Workgroups isn't best-of-breed i-enterprise synergy, it's long-view market leader innovation for maximised return on investment across a multi-disciplinary workflow of uncompromising fruity goodness. Please don't undersell the vision, man. And, man, am I buzzed about that vision. Woo!
Web 1.0: The Flash Menace
Web 2.0: Attack of the AJAX
Web 3.0: Revenge of the Blog
Web 4.0: A New Dope
Web 5.0: The E-commerce Strikes Back
Web 6.0: Return of the Geek
Despatch war rocket AJAX to bring back his webserver.
-- The Heineken Uncertainty Principle: You can never be sure how many bears you had last night.