Slashdot Mirror


Domain Name Sold for Millions

Luke PiWalker writes "The infamous and controversial domain Sex.com has officially been sold to Boston-based Escom LLC for a reported $14 million. Sex.com owner Gary Kremen was unavailable for comment, but a source from Kremen's company, Grant Media, told XBiz that sales for the famous domain name will still be handled through Grant Media's San Francisco offices. While other terms of the acquisition remain unknown, XBiz was able to locate information on the deal through a company called InternetRealEstate.com, which shares office space in Boston with Domain Name Acquisition Group (DNAG), a company that was involved in a lawsuit surrounding the Sex.com domain in September."

141 comments

  1. Sex Sells by Joebert · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've heard the saying "Sex Sells" but this is ridiculous.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Sex Sells by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      It needs a rewrite. The modern version is: "Sex.com sells"

    2. Re:Sex Sells by Aeros · · Score: 1

      wow..almost $6 million per letter.

    3. Re:Sex Sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      wow..almost $6 million per letter.

      You must be a product of the public school system. $4.6 million / letter is hardly "almost $6 million".

    4. Re:Sex Sells by Joebert · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about that ?
      That looks more like private school marketing math to me.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  2. $14 million by yobjob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Definitely goes in my great big "wish I thought of it first" list.

    1. Re:$14 million by rosewood · · Score: 1

      When did sex.com get gobbled up originally? There was an article a few years back that talked about the history of the sex.com domain that was rather interesting I thought.

    2. Re:$14 million by RobinH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely goes in my great big "wish I thought of it first" list.

      I just have a feeling that someone would have stolen the domain name, had you registered it originally. I was at a bar years ago in Ottawa, Canada talking to an employee who said that a bar with the same name in New Zealand stole their internet domain name just by sending a letter to the domain registrar asking for the admin contact and details to be changed. There was nothing they could do to get it back.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    3. Re:$14 million by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe that very thing happened here as well, and they sued to get it back.

    4. Re:$14 million by Fiachra06 · · Score: 1

      Along with the paper clip, post-its and Page Rank.

    5. Re:$14 million by joepeg · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is called Domain Hijacking. It is actually a common practice. It even happened to Sex.com

      A guy named Gary Kremen was apparently one of the first cybersquatters in the early 90's when domains were free. A guy named Stephen Cohen then hijacked Sex.com, and Kremens sued him:

      "In November 2000, at the end of a three-year legal battle, a federal judge ruled that Stephen Cohen had stolen the domain by forging a letter from Kremen's company to Network Solutions. Cohen was ordered to return Sex.com to Kremen and pay him $65 million in damages. (Cohen appealed, and in June of this year, the US Supreme Court declined to hear his case.) In the meantime, Cohen had fled the country, so all Kremen got as compensation was this California mansion and a derelict house on the US-Mexico border. Even so, Kremen figured he'd found his winning lottery ticket. Under Cohen, Sex.com had been taking in $500,000 a month selling banner ads to other online porn sites."

      --

      ZEN is a prime number in base-36

    6. Re:$14 million by Jugalator · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It's actually a really interesting history behind Sex.com!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex.com

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:$14 million by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Didn't whitehouse.com sell for $3 million a while ago?

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    8. Re:$14 million by rosewood · · Score: 1

      Wow - talk about unfair moderation. Sorry about that bloke.

  3. Domain name - so 1999 by nordelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are domain names really that valuable anymore? Given recent stories on the way that search engines are leaching value from web resources, doesn't the default action of yer average mom-and-dad browser involve typing a company name into google rather than typing an url into the address bar? Er - first post (both EVAR and on this article). Guess I was just that lucky :-)

    --
    -- "You never mentioned comets before, Mac. This opens up a whole new area of negotiation." - Gordon Urquart
    1. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are forgetting that Google uses domain names as one of the key factors of their search algorithm.

    2. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a trophy domain. Because it's too generic. Think about it, what service can you possibly sell there? I'm being serious. Sex is a highly specific thing with millions of "products", "choices". What would you expect to find at money.com or at drugs.com or at people.com? Nothing but a catch-all umbrella portal for other sites, so why go there and not directly to the specific flavour you're after, which is what a search engine is for anyway. Some poor sucker just paid 13,999,999 dollars too much for nothing useful.

    3. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are enough users just typing in the [keyword].com they're looking for to make it profitable. Especially for sex.com.

      If they simply parked it they'd probably be making tens of thousands per day.

      Now if they develop and brand the domain the sky is the limit.

    4. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      You have a definite point, but you also underestimate the power of branding.

      For some businesses, marketing is what gets the word out. Your name/brand is tied to that, making it valuable. Nike isn't a shoe company, it's a branding company. Most people don't go to the store and ask for sneakers, they go in and ask for Nikes.

      The majority of search engine traffic for some of my clients' websites are name searches - "MyCompanyName" or "Smith and Associates." It's part of the online marketing battle. Not just so that people find you when they search for your product, but also so that they associate your name with the product. ("Online books" translates to Amazon, "auction" and Ebay.)

    5. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combination - typing the domain name into google search. Well, my mother does that, imagine her frustration when she couldn't get to a site anymore because there was no google to type the URL into.

      (No, we haven't tried to teach her about bookmarks yet. One thing at a time).

    6. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Compulsion · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's just a trophy domain. Because it's too generic. Think about it, what service can you possibly sell there? I'm being serious. Sex is a highly specific thing with millions of "products", "choices". What would you expect to find at money.com or at drugs.com or at people.com? Nothing but a catch-all umbrella portal for other sites, so why go there and not directly to the specific flavour you're after, which is what a search engine is for anyway. Some poor sucker just paid 13,999,999 dollars too much for nothing useful.

      A Trophy domain is exactly what you want. Pay for click banners, AdSense, and favorable linking practices net you, oh, $500,000 a month. It doesn't necessarily work under the old system, but it's a thriving internet business.

    7. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by omeg · · Score: 1

      The thing is that a concise and unique domain name could add a whole lot of credibility to your site. "That's not just some porn site you're browsing, that's THE sex.com!"

    8. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by auntninn · · Score: 1

      Just typing the name of the company did NOT work so great for me when looking up Dick's (Sporting Goods) from work.

    9. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      But the name of the company IS "Dick's Sporting Goods", not "Dick's". "Dick's sporting goods" and even dick's sporting goods sans quotes both had the correct company at the top of the list.

      You woudn't search for University of North Carolina by googling "University" would you?

      As a joke: lame. As a serious comment: sad.

    10. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by auntninn · · Score: 1

      Not a serious comment. As a joke, lame? Perhaps. As something that really happened (because yes this really DID happen to me)? Everyone around here calls it just plain Dick's. And I didn't google. I typed in the URL, wasn't this thread about typing URLs directly?

    11. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      "You woudn't search for University of North Carolina by googling 'University' would you?"

      The search term you are looking for is "tarhole." :P

      GO DUKE!

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    12. Re:Domain name - so 1999 by baadger · · Score: 1

      Software Exchange. Sex.com, your open source portal!

  4. Today's sexy anagram by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sex.com has officially been sold to Boston-based Escom LLC for a reported $14 million.

    Anagram 'Escom' and you get 'Comes' - now we know why they wanted it so bad.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Today's sexy anagram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought Escom were a now-defunct German PC manufacturer who aquired the Amiga back in the 90's (& hence, The Curse). At a guess, that Escom and this Escom are not related. Or maybe they are. Or maybe they're not...

    2. Re:Today's sexy anagram by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 0

      Anagram 'Escom' and you get 'Comes' - now we know why they wanted it so bad.

      Gary Kremen his pants

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    3. Re:Today's sexy anagram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And merge it with Calvin Klein's CK brand and you can derive COCK SMOKE from it.

  5. expensive sex. by Random_Goblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    $14, million!

    is that the most money paid for sex ever?

    1. Re:expensive sex. by rxmd · · Score: 5, Funny
      $14, million! is that the most money paid for sex ever?
      It's like coitus interruptus for geeks, you pay $14 million for sex and all you get is a domain name.
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    2. Re:expensive sex. by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well...it wouldn't even make the list on the Top 10: Most Expensive Divorce Settlements.

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    3. Re:expensive sex. by paiute · · Score: 1

      $14, million!

      is that the most money paid for sex ever?


      Wait for the Gates v. Gates divorce settlement.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    4. Re:expensive sex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of all the Realdolls he could have bought!

    5. Re:expensive sex. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, $40M for the Clinton investigation...

    6. Re:expensive sex. by johndierks · · Score: 1

      Anna Nicole Smith was awarded $449,754,134 from her husband's estate. The case is currently before the supreme court. Link

    7. Re:expensive sex. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      is that the most money paid for sex ever?

      Depends what value you place on the legacy of a US President.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. Nice by 42Penguins · · Score: 1

    That must be a nice domain to have! What are the stats for "sex" in Google?

  7. Is it really worth it? by broothal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many of these sites they could get for $14 million

    1. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, how many of these sites they could get for $14 million. Who the hell other than 12 years olds search for "sex" when looking for pornography?

    2. Re:Is it really worth it? by shon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While these domains have nice search result rankings, there is a dependency on Google's ranking algorithm that decreases their value. They could just as easily be blasted to page 5 next month, who knows?

      What you're overlooking is the type-in traffic that "sex.com" gets. You'd be surprised at how many people just type in random URLs into their browser. What's even more interesting is that most of the "search results" at parked domains are handled through Google, Yahoo, and smaller outfits like sedo.com. Having a simple URL like "cellphones.com" can earn you a decent living from just type-in traffic alone. This article at Business 2.0 reveals how these domainers are making a killing from type-in traffic.

      Here are the reportedly top selling domains of 2005.

    3. Re:Is it really worth it? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's amazing the number of people who just type in URLs. But, I think they get a lot of wasted bandwidth because of it. They probably get a lot of traffic from people who don't bring them any revenue. Seriously, I don't know how porn makes any money with the amount of free stuff available.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Is it really worth it? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1
      Is it really worth it?

      Today they will think so. In a few days, when the /. traffic declines, they might reconsider.

    5. Re:Is it really worth it? by shon · · Score: 1

      You and I (well, at least just you :-) know where the good free porn is, but what about people in lesser developed countries or those coming online now? Seems to me that typing in sex.com into your URL bar is less risky to prying eyes and repressive governments. Just delete history/cookies and you're somewhat safe.

      Search engines store way too much information about their users anyway.

    6. Re:Is it really worth it? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I don't know how porn makes any money with the amount of free stuff available.

      The same way most Open Source projects do: consulting fees! Who wouldn't pay Nicole from WeLiveTogether.com to do some "one-on-one consulting"?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:Is it really worth it? by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Which one is Nicole?

      -- Dave

    8. Re:Is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blonde regular with big tits and perfect ass.

    9. Re:Is it really worth it? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      $14 million? Is that all?

      If beer.com sold for $7 million, then sex.com is worth at least $14 million. Sure, more people drink more beer than have sex, but these guys will be selling selling online -- you can't delivery beer through a browser.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    10. Re:Is it really worth it? by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      Hmm... This offers interesting possibilities to college campuses everywhere.

  8. Too easy by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a plethora of jokes to be made at this point... I'll refrain. It's just amazing how much money there is to be made in the domain name game. When you think about it, what is a domain name? On the technical level, it's just something plugged into DNS servers so people don't have to remember IPv4 codes. But on the media side of things, your domain name is an attribute, you're billboard on the information superhighway. And when you think about it, how smart were some people when they registered the more obvious domains back at the start? And now they're reaping the rewards. Sex.com was just too obvious to pass up, and now it's worth $14 million. That's easy money.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Too easy by spectrumCoder · · Score: 1

      Two reasons why it fetched so high a price:

      Most net users think along these lines - the shorter and snappier the domain name, the more it costs to buy. So surfers conclude that sites with short names (and a .com tag) are more likely to be half-decent professional operations than those with long domain names. It's a symbol of prestige.

      They're buying traffic. Thousands of people looking for sex will type in www.sex.com every day (strange but true). They're buying traffic, no advertising required.

    2. Re:Too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real big problem for domain names though is when they open up the domain space to allow more names, then the value of certain names drops significantly.

  9. Business.com went for pretty much the same price.. by gd23ka · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. a few years ago. I wish I had registered shit,com, it wouldn't be worth crap today :-)

  10. Wikipedia article by SecState · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's some background on the domain name here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex.com

  11. just wait by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    as soon as they open up the *.sex domain, i'm buying

    com.sex

    muahahahahaha!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:just wait by cosminn · · Score: 1

      As soon as they're coming with the .xxx domain I'm buying
       
        se.xxx
      :)

    2. Re:just wait by Patik · · Score: 1

      Are you by any chance a Soviet Russian?

    3. Re:just wait by tacolicker · · Score: 0

      where's the humor? did you mean cum.sex? you're a fucking douche.

    4. Re:just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lucky you, i've got a feeling i'm gonna get no.sex

  12. Sex is twice as important as Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex.com sold for twice the price of Business.com (to Sky Dayton's eCompanies Venture Capital fund = 100% owned).

    Coincidence? I think not!

  13. Its all because of the idiots.. by JeepingNET · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The funny thing is it totally makes sense for it to cost that amount... Think of how many 14 year old males and idiot computer users must type in sex.com. A part of business not many people like to admit but really does sell is selling to idiots. The sex industry is a billion dollar industry and while most of it is very legit the people making the big money is the damn reseller sites that don't even host their own adult content. They just link to others so by owning a site like sex.com you could make millions a year. Someone made reference however to how Google and others are now really changing the way URLs work and I have to agree. While sex.com is still a great buy I think the idiot who type in sex.com in their URL window will also be the type to put stupid stuff in Google and get back the same results. Now this is where google and other can are are helping. Back in the day you searched anything in a search engine and half the sites where either mislabeled or porn. I really do not find this much anymore and even if you type in sex you get 95% of the site returned to be heath sites. I applaud Google for this and while I'm not one for censorship or hiding porn I think this move is one for the good. As I had people making money off the dumb (or jealous..)

    1. Re:Its all because of the idiots.. by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      You have to realize that most of the people who pay for porn are the vast, unwashed, naive people. You and I know how much free porn there is out there, whether torrents of DVD rips or whatever else. The people who pay for it are... AOL users, for example.

      Search engine traffic is great for conversion ratios in the online porn industry. But sex.com isn't even in the first 100 results when I google the word sex. For it to be worth that, it's gotta be the type-ins. That, and the simple notoreity factor.

    2. Re:Its all because of the idiots.. by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

      While you make a good point, how much profit are you going to make from 14 yr old males online? They usually don't have credit cards.

      --
      Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    3. Re:Its all because of the idiots.. by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

      The advertisers to whom you sell space don't know if the viewers are 14 or 40.

      --
      Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  14. Sex.com -- a sex superstore! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Look at the front page! They have everything! Oh, wait. Except for links to other sites, there's just a page asking for your e-mail address with a statement that by giving them your address you're asking them to send you lots of e-mail.

    Guess they've got to pay for that domain name somehow.

  15. At Last! by zmollusc · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope they get their site up and running ASAP. I am desperate to find a supplier of those Viagra pills.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:At Last! by mk_is_here · · Score: 0

      You don't need to wait. Apply a hotmail a/c, and you will get a lot of information how to acquire those.

  16. Alexa Rank...3,560 by xoip · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For what it's worth, the Alexa ranking for Sex.com is 3,560.
    If this is a benchmark, think of the value of any top ranked site like Business.com

    1. Re:Alexa Rank...3,560 by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Why can't I never get into that alexa page??? I only get a connection timed out error :-/

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Alexa Rank...3,560 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spybot Search & Destroy and various other anti-spyware programs block the site silently. The reason why is to avoid having bad cookies set that will track you all over the net and ultimately add your stats to Alexa too.

    3. Re:Alexa Rank...3,560 by SCVirus · · Score: 0

      Thats most likely based somewhat more on content then random enterings.

  17. No link? by SamSim · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...And there's no link to sex.com in the story? Good grief.

  18. February issue of Playboy by mzs · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is an long article about sex.com in the current February issue of Playboy. I have not finished it yet, but it so far it is well written and interesting. There is also an interview with Al Franken that is more insightful than humorous. So pick-up the issue or check playboy.com, sometimes they have portions of articles there with no charge.

    1. Re:February issue of Playboy by ladyKae · · Score: 0

      theres words in playboy....!?!?!

      --

      Smile, it confuses people

    2. Re:February issue of Playboy by blankoboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something got you distracted so that you cannot finish the article? =)

    3. Re:February issue of Playboy by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Obviously your SO knows your /. id.

    4. Re:February issue of Playboy by Meniconi,Nando · · Score: 1

      Why is this moderated as Funny? The article is very well researched, which is quite a rarity given the subject matter and the state of investigative journalism. You should really read it, but it is not (yet?) available online.

    5. Re:February issue of Playboy by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1

      Buy Playboy for an article? Are you nuts? You DO know that there are pictures of naked ladies in there, do you?

  19. what about the miss-spellings? by mustafap · · Score: 1

    I would have thought that the miss-spelt domain names of heavily used sites would be more valuable. But then, who miss-spells sex?

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:what about the miss-spellings? by THE+ROCK · · Score: 1

      When you're only typing with one hand its easy to make mistakes.

    2. Re:what about the miss-spellings? by veeoh · · Score: 1

      its easy to spell it wrong when typing one handed....

    3. Re:what about the miss-spellings? by ggambett · · Score: 1

      It's "sehks", dummy.

    4. Re:what about the miss-spellings? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Good think most people are right handed and S, E, and X are all next to each other on the left side of the (QWERTY) keyboard. Talk about good planning (although I'm hesitant to think of ways that might be useful with a typewriter).

  20. Re:Business.com went for pretty much the same pric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it was $7,500,000. This is almost twice as much.

  21. Misspellings can be fought on trademark grounds by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    It's not hard to get a misspelling domain like yaho.com or googel.com on trademark grounds. Generic words are where most of the big money is spent on domains these days. Check out DN Journal to get a peek of what publicly announced domain sales are like these days. Plenty of 5-figures sales for the more generic terms.

  22. Wow. I wonder how much for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    sax.com, six.com, and sux.com? Oh, what the hell -- even syx.com? Somebody must be able to do something interesting with that one too. I expect Sox.com must be owned by Major League Baseball or the Red Sox. Hmmm...

    Sax.com is owned by a D. Miller in Malibu, California
    Six.com is owned by some company (Xedoc Holding) in Luxembourg
    sux.com is owned by ^!@#$@#$23! Damn. Almost spewed my drink over the computer monitor! ... Are you ready? Okay. The "Sydney UniX Club" of Sydney, Australia. That's ... rather unexpected :-)
    syx.com is owned by "Syx E Business Solutions" in Norway

    Strangely enough, sox.com isn't owned by the Boston Red Sox, as I would have expected. It is owned by a "William Boston" in Washington. That name is a weird coincidence, though.

  23. The headline should've been: by yellowstuff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sex.com changes hands.

  24. fuck.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years ago, I did a whois on fuck.com and it was on some sort of "reserved" list (by request of an authority figure I believe [icann?]). Now I just whois'd it and it seems to belong to some guy in Croatia named Damir. Strange...

    nmap shows smtp (filtered), http, and http-proxy (port 8080) on it now. Also, shit.com seems to be almost the exact same site, and both are hosted alongside ns1.hitfarm.com and ns2.hitfarm.com. Different ips though, and shit.com wouldn't yield to an nmap scan.

    1. Re:fuck.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if you've uncovered a way to transfer slush money to some of "our" "friends" in Yugoslavia...

  25. What's so great? by LukePieStalker · · Score: 1
    This is too '90's for words. I remember when the term "cybersquatting" was coined, and domains like "furniture.com" and "syndicatednews.com" were making millions for their housewife or cab driver owners.

    Really, though, what's the advantage of these generic names? Do you buy your books at books.com? I usually get mine at a place called Amazon. Do people (who actually pay for it) download their music from music.com, or iTunes? If, as another post pointed out, the importance of a domain is not in its use for browser navigation, but in the billboard/TV/magazine copy in which it appears, isn't it better to be unique and memorable?

    1. Re:What's so great? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because newbies will just type 'sex' into the address bar; the browser will convert it to sex.com.

  26. *.xxx by Joebert · · Score: 0

    I can't help but wonder.
    If the *.xxx domains ever come to life, what happens to sex.com ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  27. pr0n.xxx by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm still suprised when the porn sites resist the .xxx domain. It seems to me it would put an end to the whining and moaning. Parents could just block *.xxx, and the porn companies could get on with their business and lay off a few of their legal staff. People could set up *.xxx only search engines. There's a world of possibilities here.

    1. Re:pr0n.xxx by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      Not neccesarily. The porn industry thrives on not just those that know they want adult content, but those that accidentally happen upon it. [insert joke here]. I think that the porn industry is just as guilty as the tobacco industry of desire to infiltrate peoples' homes and expose them to erotic material--this means those under the age of 18. I have no beef with the .xxx domain being created, but I doubt that there will be this mass abondonment of .com, .net, etc. domain names to claim the newly created territory, simply for the reasons you just stated.

      No marketer in their right mind would close off a path from a lucrative market. In order for their machine to continue working, they have to get new customers of adult content.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    2. Re:pr0n.xxx by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      I dunno... if people find a porn site accidently, are they someone who would normally seek it? Do the accidental porn tourists generally click away quickly? I'm not convinced of the value added there without some actual research data.

    3. Re:pr0n.xxx by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful


      That solution will neither help people find porn nor stop the christians from whining about it. The problem isn't about segregating porn, but determinig what porn is. Are 18th century impressionist nudes porn? What about Playboy? Is graphical information about vaginal yeast infections porn? If we set up a system where all "porn" goes in the .xxx domain, then someone has to decide what is and is not required to go there. That "someone" is likely to be a Republican so that means all sex education material and anything relating to birth control or LGBT issues will be classified as porn and forced into the ghetto.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    4. Re:pr0n.xxx by E++99 · · Score: 1
      That "someone" is likely to be a Republican so that means all sex education material and anything relating to birth control or LGBT issues will be classified as porn and forced into the ghetto.
      Yeah, cuz Republicans, are like, stupid and stuff.
    5. Re:pr0n.xxx by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      You heard it here first.

    6. Re:pr0n.xxx by binarybum · · Score: 1

      your example hints on another reason why .xxx is a terrible idea. With blocking software in place it's likely that that our future, the youth of the world, will grow up yanking it to "graphical information about vaginal yeast infections." Call me Freudian if you will, but such specimens will not likely exhibit prime mental health in their later years.

      --
      ôó
    7. Re:pr0n.xxx by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      With blocking software in place it's likely that that our future, the youth of the world, will grow up yanking it to "graphical information about vaginal yeast infections."

      Could that be any worse than yanking to images of women who've had so much plastic surgery that they only vaguely resemble human beings? Hard to say.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    8. Re:pr0n.xxx by sfjoe · · Score: 1



      No, just repressed.
      Just because someone is conservative doesn't necessarily make them stupid. Stupid people, however, are nearly always conservative due to their limited abilities to envision change.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    9. Re:pr0n.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me it would put an end to the whining and moaning.

      Why would they want that? That's their biggest revenue source!

    10. Re:pr0n.xxx by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That "someone" is likely to be a Republican so that means all sex education material and anything relating to birth control or LGBT issues will be classified as porn and forced into the ghetto.

      You've hit the nail on the head exactly.

      What's porn and what isn't porn is a completely subjective call subject to the social mores of a particular culture or subculture. So no matter where the line is drawn, you're going to get effusive self-righteous elists like this weighing in on all sides of the issue insisting they're right and everybody else is an idiot.

      Thought experiment - do you thing anything is porn? OK, name one... Somebody thinks that's not porn. Any policy grounded in the theory "my opinion is right and everybody else can go shove it" is destined for ruin (though not before enriching several laywers).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:pr0n.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Stupid people, however, are nearly always conservative due to their limited abilities to envision change.

      You're joking, right? The conservative versus liberal meaning desire for change is a useless dictionary definition. There's issues where the cons want change and there's issues where the libs want the change. It's a meaningless way to define the differences and a crutch for those with no real arguments.

      For example, all the liberals here in California are resisting any and all reform (change) despite that fact that business as usual is going to destroy this state's economy and drive everyone with even a modicom of productivity away.

      And go look at who really makes up the bulk of voters for liberals- people too broken or stupid to even live their lives without constant nannying and handouts from the State.

      No, stupid people vote mindless for both Parties. It's the mindlessness that makes them stupid.

    12. Re:pr0n.xxx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. who's mom are you?

    13. Re:pr0n.xxx by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      You're joking, right? The conservative versus liberal meaning desire for change is a useless dictionary definition.

      If by "useless" you mean "spot on", then yes. Generally, fiscal conservatives want to roll back taxes and regulation while religious conservatives want to roll back restrictions on the separation of church and state.

      For example, all the liberals here in California are resisting any and all reform (change) despite that fact that business as usual is going to destroy this state's economy and drive everyone with even a modicom of productivity away.

      Ahnold? Is that you?

      And go look at who really makes up the bulk of voters for liberals- people too broken or stupid to even live their lives without constant nannying and handouts from the State.

      Right, that would explain why the bluest state pay the most in taxes and the reddest states use the most in taxes. And why blue states have the best divorce rates and red states the worst. The funny part is, after all the GOP babbling about banning gay marriage to "protect the institution of marriage", the state with the best divorce rate is Massachusetts, the first to legalize gay marriage.

      Oh, and don't forget the electoral IQ map from 2004.

  28. Internet Real Estate Legislation by BrockH01 · · Score: 0
    It was interesting to read the following:
    XBiz was able to locate information on the deal through a company called InternetRealEstate.com

    I work for a bank here in the United States that offers traditional residential mortgages and commercial mortgages (warehouses and such). There is a ton of regulation that the government makes us comply with in regards to privacy, discrimination, etc.
    My question is this: Does anyone out there have any experience with government regulations in regards to the selling of internet 'real estate'? Is this simply an ICANN regulated issue? I don't know if the two areas are similar at all, just kind of curious this morning :)
    --
    To shreds you say...
  29. Playfullyclever at it Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the submitters website:

    "Yeah I'm starting up our slashvertising again, this time using the most playfully clever name ever created. It disguises me as one of the Slashbots so I can easily destroy them from the inside! More to come soon!"

  30. In 1995 by n6kuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised it took that long....

    Registrant:
    Escom, LLC
    ATTN: SEX.COM
    c/o Network Solutions
    P.O. Box 447
    Herndon, VA. 20172-0447

          Domain Name: SEX.COM

          Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
                Escom, LLC d54ma69r6ze@networksolutionsprivateregistration.co m
                ATTN: SEX.COM
                c/o Network Solutions
                P.O. Box 447
                Herndon, VA 20172-0447
                570-708-8780

          Record expires on 30-Nov-2015.
          Record created on 18-Oct-1995.
          Database last updated on 19-Jan-2006 10:45:31 EST.

          Domain servers in listed order:

          NS5.SEX.COM 198.87.233.72
          NS6.SEX.COM 64.244.252.131

    This listing is a Network Solutions Private Registration. Mail
    correspondence to this address must be sent via USPS Express Mail(TM) or
    USPS Certified Mail(R); all other mail will not be processed. Be sure to
    include the registrant's domain name in the address.

    --
    If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  31. safe search by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    even if you type in sex you get 95% of the site returned to be heath sites.

    I think the reason you're seeing those results is that your google preferences have 'safe search' enabled. That's one mechanism they've implemented to achieve the effect you're describing.

    Seth

  32. 19x.net by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    I had 19x.net and I couldn't even get $50 for it. Feh.

    --
    This space available.
  33. Link is NSFW by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on, even Fark lets you know when a link is NSFW. Please put some kind of indicator there. I didn't notice the naked pictures until I finished reading the article.

    Oh wait, there are two things wrong with that statement:

    1. I read the article.
    2. I read the article instead of looking at naked ladies.

    1. Re:Link is NSFW by banaanimies · · Score: 1

      sex.com NSFW? Bet you didn't see that one coming.

    2. Re:Link is NSFW by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

      Haven't learned how to read the submission yet, eh? The link is to XBiz, not sex.com, eagle eye.

  34. Research... by neveragain4181 · · Score: 1

    I just spent the afternoon researching this one. If TCP packets have a color, I think it's pink.

    The odd things that strike me about this deal is that people have been 'Googlelized', in that the new Domain name registery is effectively the search engines. You just type what you are looking for into Google(!), even grandma does it (nice image eh?).

    What with also the impending .xxx thing meaning a devaluation of the sexy xyz.com's value, then this just makes it seem like a 'bragging rights' buy. Bad business.

    Mind you, if you just spent 14 big ones on a domain name then you're probably hung like a mouse, and could do with all the help you can get...

    NA

  35. 44 domains sold for $100K or more last year by miller60 · · Score: 1
    While this deal is the biggest ever, there are plenty of top-dollar domain sales taking place these days. Check out the top sales of 2005 over at Domain Name Journal and you'll find that at least 44 domains sold for more than $100,000 last year, including a blog domain (blogster.com) and even a typo (voyuer.com).

    The list of highest all-time domain sales is also interesting reading.

  36. Geez, money maker, what? by BrknSoul · · Score: 1

    Check out the wikipedia page from TFA. This Gary Kremen made around $65m from S M Cohen for fraud and another $20m from verisign for improperly transferring the domain. and now he's just got another $14m from Escom LLC. Not to mention all the revenue from the site itself.. this is one rich puppy...

  37. Re:Domain names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can the second post be redundant?

  38. Sex Sells by firpecmox · · Score: 1

    wow what to do with 14 million dollars.
    1. retire and never have to lift a finger again.
    2. pay someone to do my job.
    3. buy a nice car that is even nice enough for a geek to pick up chicks.
    4. or buy one single small domain

    i think that was a smart buy. i mean who would rather never have to work again so you can stay home all day on your computer, when they could buy a domain name. hmmmm.

  39. NERD.COM, FOLK.COM coming up by humankind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the wake of the disaster of Hurricane Katrina, my company has decided to put a few old-school domains we've had up for sale. It will be interesting to see what we can get. We registered these domains in 1995 and never intended to sell them as property themselves, but we need resources now to rebuild our networks and business after the destruction of New Orleans.

    Among others, we're trying to determine what kind of price we might get for domains like: NERD.COM, FOLK.COM, IBL.COM, PROMARKETING.COM, and a few others.

    Ironically, I submitted an "Ask Slashdot" story on this issue with more details yesterday that was rejected. It is boggling the prices these domains are going for now. We sold WISDOM.COM for $475k around 2000 and at the time that was one of the top three highest cash sales of a domain name. Now it looks like nothing.

    So, if anyone thinks they can help us with the sale of some of these domains, there's a form on the site. The company who brokered the last sale we did walked away with $47,000 in commission. Can NERD or FOLK go for six figures?

    1. Re:NERD.COM, FOLK.COM coming up by humankind · · Score: 1

      Someone modded this off-topic? Obviously someone re-modded it up. It's disappointing to see this kind of weird moderation.

    2. Re:NERD.COM, FOLK.COM coming up by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      It's disappointing to see people spam on Slashdot. If I had mod points I would spend them all on you right now.

    3. Re:NERD.COM, FOLK.COM coming up by humankind · · Score: 1

      This isn't spamming. It's directly related to the topic. Every day you have people asking the Slashdot community for assistance regarding things that cost or make them money. You can't look in any story where there aren't posts like this. Get over it.

  40. I know Kremen's attorney by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Kremen's attorney, Timoth Dillon, is opposing me in a case I have against a porn spammer. The sex.com case (Kremen v. Cohen) established that a domain name is property, or at least in California. But, Tim has tracked down some of his money and Cohen is currently sitting in jail claiming that he "doesn't have the money to buy toilet paper to wipe his ass."

    Remember:

    Harry Mudd: Norman, I always lie.
    Norman: Yes, Harry Mudd always lie.
    Harry Mudd: I am lying to you now.
    Norman: If you are lying to me now, and you always lie, then you must be telling the truth, but you always lie....

  41. Re:Domain names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How can the second post be redundant?

    everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read that.

  42. Unavailable, huh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex.com owner Gary Kremen was unavailable for comment...

    Likely 'cause he was rolling around in his big tub of money!

    TFOAE

  43. NSFW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may sell, but it doesn't keep jobs. What's the likelyhood of getting that xbiz link tagged with a quick [nsfw] or something?

  44. Five bucks says NetSol bungles the transfer. by capilot · · Score: 1

    Like the last time. Or Races.com.

  45. The infamous and controversial domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first I heard of it...

  46. What I learned in college... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh... don't ever eat out the morning after... Have you ever peeled apart a day old dried up and crusted grilled cheese sandwhich with just a tad bit of mayo? :-(

  47. It could if... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    It could if it's like the posts under one of his other user names. (Luke PiWalker) He just plagiarizes other people's posts. He has had articles published by Slashdot that I've found elsewhere on the internet as well. He's just a plagiarizing karma whore. (As NeutronCowboy puts it.)

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!