Slashdot Mirror


Duke Nukem Forever Tops Vaporware List

Wired has an annual list of high-profile vaporware projects and the number of games on there is just depressing. Numbers 7, 6, 5, 2, and 1 are all videogame projects. When the Phantom is only #2, you know what has to be number 1. From the article: "Announced in 1997 and promised every year since, this game takes vaporware to new heights. Think about it, in just 13 months this game will have been in one form of development or another for a decade. This project started with a game based on the Quake 2 engine, then in 1999 it moved to the Unreal engine and has been stalled ever since."

133 comments

  1. But But But by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    Duke Nukem is in production?

    Say it ain't so.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:But But But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been playing a pre-beta version of Duke Nukem Forever since late November 2005 and it is fantastic. The graphics blow all other games I've played out of the water. I highly suggest getting on a pre-order list immediately so they don't run out of stock when this game is released this summer.

    2. Re:But But But by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      pre-beta? So that'd make it alpha then :-P

  2. Don't Panic by someguy456 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, it's painfully obvious that DNF will run on Vista running on a Phantom. In fact, these have the same launch day...

    1. Re:Don't Panic by iamjoltman · · Score: 1

      And it'll be on Blu-ray/HD-DVD media. And you'll play it with an AlphaGrip keyboard.

  3. What?? by Ramble · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can't wait to get home so I can play Duke Nukem Forever on my 8-core Phantom while talking to my mates using a VOIP phone and recording HDTV over IPTV on my Media Center machine with a super-fast fiber-to-the-home connection.

    --
    "Oh boy"
    1. Re:What?? by Shadarr · · Score: 1

      VOIP phone? I'd hardly call something that's been out for a year vapourware.

    2. Re:What?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take it easy driving home or you'll crash your flying car into a skyscraper

  4. Ok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ain't so.

  5. In other news... by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Water is wet!

    Although I think calling the new Legend of Zelda "vaporware" is off as its only late by... ooh...3 months.

    1. Re:In other news... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. How much was the first Zelda game on the n64 delayed? I think it was like two years or so. It was quite traumatic for me. At least it gave me a goal those two years.....

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    2. Re:In other news... by Babbster · · Score: 1

      What threw me more was mentioning how it was the most anticipated Zelda game since Ocarina. Despite the anti-cel-shaded/anti-young Link nonsense, Wind Waker had everyone and their mom geeking out over it and, as I recall, had more preorders than any other game before it.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I preordered Wind Waker so I could get Ocarina of Time for Gamecube.

    4. Re:In other news... by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Oh, Lord! That was halarious! Read the parent post and ignore the bottom line (as if it's a sig) and what to you get?

      In other news... (Score:5, Interesting)

      Water is wet!

      I had to laugh out loud at the moderator who labeled it interesting. If I could, I'd meta-mod that (+10 fricken halarious)!

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  6. I'd like to buy it by kmhebert · · Score: 1

    When it comes out.

    --
    Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    1. Re:I'd like to buy it by iggy_mon · · Score: 1

      i swear to god i thought you'd be modded +5 hilarious. the irony is as sweeeet as it subtle!

      made me smile! (the first one today)

      --
      --iggy_mon - www.ananonymouskiller.com - Die Trying -
  7. Yay Wired by GammaKitsune · · Score: 0, Troll

    I love how it's not all on one page, so I can't just skim through the list.

    --
    Gamertag: WyleType
    1. Re:Yay Wired by ferrisb312 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just click the Print view link to get it all on one page: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/1,70143-1.htm l

  8. Duke Nukem Forever is no longer vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think DNF has finally passed The Rapture as the ultimate in non-deliverables. It has achieved such a mythical level of nothingness it has gone from nonbeing to actually existing in the minds of each and every geek. Long live DNF! Well, long enough until it is actually delivered, in which case it can only be a disappointment and will cease to exist.

  9. DNF isn't dead! by Esine · · Score: 2, Informative

    You guys should follow the most excellent 3D Realms forums! George Broussard has provided us .. um.. "a lot" of info about DNF

    It will come soon (as in 10 years), I'm sure! ;)

    -- dbg

    1. Re:DNF isn't dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Duke forums. You will never find a more wretched hive of fanboys and idiots. We must be cautious.

  10. google by szembek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I disagree with the author having the Google beta products in the list. Simply because a product doesn't change from beta to actual release for a while doesn't necessarily make it vaporware. Gmail has been implementing new features and improving ever since it was initially released as a 'beta'. I think I would file it under vaporware, if we kept reading slashdot posts about an upcoming mail service by Google only to never see anything. Also Google tends to use the term 'beta' quite loosely.

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:google by generic-man · · Score: 1

      According to Wired's definition, it's vaporware. From the article:

      Sure, millions of people use these [Google] services every day, but by our definition, they're vaporware: "Any program that's in a never-ending, pre-release, beta-testing stage is considered vaporware, even if it's widely available."

      Any negative comments about a Google service are dismissed with "it's in beta, what do you expect?" on Slashdot. Google releases products when they're ready and they take a long time to become ready.

      I would still consider Duke Nukem Forever to be vaporware if a demo were leaked to peer-to-peer networks, since it's been promised for years and never delivered in a final shipping version.

      (Full disclosure: In the Wired article I was quoted about Google's perpetual beta cycle. Woo hoo! Now I know how pompous blogger who thinks he's a renowned expert on everything because he got one brief quote in an article written by the mainstream media he pretends to hate feels!)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they redefine what they want vaporware to mean whenever it doesn't fit something they want to put on the list, and it's different for each item they consider.

      Then again, this list has no more value than a hand wetting fantasy, so who cares.

    3. Re:google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any proof for that, or are you just annoyed that someone said something less-than-glowing about a Google beta product?

    4. Re:google by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to Wired's definition, it's vaporware.

      The only thing wired's an authoritative source on is how to make a magazine so ugly, gaudy, and unreadable that you lose half your subscribers. The only people who hung onto wired for that long were the ones who wanted to look like a nerd by having it on their coffee table.

      Wired articles tend to be punched up so much in order to be sensational that they lose any validity. They're not about the news, they're about giving them excuses to put pretty pictures and funky type in their magazine.

      No one who is anyone important takes Wired seriously.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:google by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think they redefine what they want vaporware to mean whenever it doesn't fit something they want to put on the list, and it's different for each item they consider.

      Do you have any proof for that, or are you just annoyed that someone said something less-than-glowing about a Google beta product?

      The fucking article was in Wired. How much more proof do you need? Wired jumped the shark in Article #2, when they failed to bring the percentage of flourescent ink used in the magazine below 50%.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:google by generic-man · · Score: 1

      And the only things Google's good for are serving ads, aggregating your personal information to serve you more ads, and rewriting otherwise-passable native applications in JavaScript. I take Google as seriously as you take Wired nowadays.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:google by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Please provide an example of Wired "redefining what they want vaporware to mean whenever it doesn't fit something they want to put on the list." Please provide an example of Wired using a different definition "for each item they consider." If you're just going to jab at their color scheme and hipster-futurist attitude, that's fine but off-topic.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:google by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > And the only things Google's good for are serving ads,
      > aggregating your personal information to serve you more ads,
      > and rewriting otherwise-passable native applications in
      > JavaScript.

      Actually, I heard they've introduced a search engine. It's supposed to be pretty good, you should try it.

      Chris Mattern

    9. Re:google by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Google is a prime example of Wired redefining vaporware; You can use it! Vaporware is reserved for products that get talked up, but never appear. Just because Google is adding new features periodically and calling it "beta" it doesn't make it vaporware. (It's not beta, either. Then again, it's not anything we've seen before the current age of web applications, so what DO you call it? Beta may not be right, but it sure as fuck ain't Vaporware.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:google by generic-man · · Score: 1

      One commenter on Wired offered the term "betaware" for software that keeps getting revised but is never released. That would put Google in the same camp as ICQ and WINE: just keep fixing bugs and (in the former case) keep piling on more features, but never officially release anything as GA.

      I don't have a problem with people frequently releasing software: as a Linux user it's nice to see bugs addressed when they're fixed and satisfactorily tested. What I do have a problem with is companies hiding behind the "beta" tag. Either a product is released and you can hold the company accountable, or it's in beta and you shouldn't trust it for production work. In my opinion most Google products fall into the latter category for three years or so.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    11. Re:google by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Nah, PageRank was solved and Google Search is just an index to a bunch of link farms and copycat blogs. Reminds me of AltaVista just before AltaVista plunged in popularity and became just another portal site.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    12. Re:google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright, which search engine is so much better then, Mr. TooCoolForGoogle?

    13. Re:google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSN? Hell, it's valid HTML (search results are valid HTML too) so it must be good. Who would use a web site with 280 errors? It's madness.

    14. Re:google by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I disagree with the author having the Google beta products in the list. Simply because a product doesn't change from beta to actual release for a while doesn't necessarily make it vaporware. Gmail has been implementing new features and improving ever since it was initially released as a 'beta'. I think I would file it under vaporware, if we kept reading slashdot posts about an upcoming mail service by Google only to never see anything. Also Google tends to use the term 'beta' quite loosely.

      Some companies or people never uses a product unless it's an official release. For those companies, Google's products being forever in beta make them vaporware.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    15. Re:google by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Sure, millions of people use these [Google] services every day, but by our definition, they're vaporware: "Any program that's in a never-ending, pre-release, beta-testing stage is considered vaporware, even if it's widely available."

      I wonder if this definition would include the many open source projects that take years to reach version 1.0, and whether people would consider it reasonable to count them as "vapourware"?

    16. Re:google by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Please provide an example of Wired "redefining what they want vaporware to mean whenever it doesn't fit something they want to put on the list." Please provide an example of Wired using a different definition "for each item they consider."

      From TFA:

      Several wags nominated our vaporware story itself for an award. Yeah, we know it's late. Apologies for that. But we never promised it in 2005, so it wasn't eligible anyway.

      Likewise, the PowerBook G5 is also ineligible. Apple may have occasionally hinted at it, but it never promised a ship date.


      Did Google promise a non-beta version of their products in 2005? I don't recall that they did - in which case, they are inconsistent in their definitions.

  11. DNF by singularity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just noticed this on the DNF FAQ:

    1.8 - Will DNF be available on DVD?
    This still has not been decided yet, however the chances of this happenning are slim. It is important to note that DVD's are not mainstream yet, at least not in the software industry.


    Now, I almost never do any gaming on my computer, but I definitely think that any machine that is going to run DNF is going to have a DVD drive.

    Amazing that this product has been in development so long that means of distribution have even changed.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:DNF by saskboy · · Score: 1

      To launch Duke Nukem's latest adventure, they're renaming it Duke Nukem: Forever In Limbo!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:DNF by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      That FAQ was probably written back when Duke Nukem Forever was first being hyped. Games had only just started being released on the new 'CD' medium back then.

    3. Re:DNF by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, I almost never do any gaming on my computer, but I definitely think that any machine that is going to run DNF is going to have a DVD drive.

      Are you kidding? At this rate, any computer that is going to run DNF is going to have a direct neural interface and a quantum holography storage device.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:DNF by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insight captain!

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    5. Re:DNF by damsa · · Score: 1

      I don't think so, by the time DNF comes out, mankind would be killed off and the world ends and then the big bang comes along and then civilization starts again when finally DNF is released on a new technology called an Atari cartridge format.

    6. Re:DNF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As though no one's ever come up with that joke before! It's too easy.

    7. Re:DNF by bigbigbison · · Score: 4, Funny

      To be fair, in America, there are still very few PC videogames released on DVD -- and when they are, it is usually as a more expensive "collector's edition" while the regular version is still released on CDs.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    8. Re:DNF by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      It gets better actually. I remember when this game was announced and they mentioned it would take advantage of the new MMX features coming out in the P-166 and P-200 - 4 generations of cpu's later...

      How something can have a product cycle that long is a project managers nightmare - I mean the original specs must have been Windows 95 with at least 16 megs of ram etc. I suspect the game has been cancled, but the site hasn't been updated.

    9. Re:DNF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duke Nukem Forever is already 'in development' for the Atari 2600...

    10. Re:DNF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy jokes make the best ones. Did Not Finish, oh my goodness they just pop out of the woodwork.

  12. For those too lazy to RTFA by ThomS · · Score: 5, Informative

    The list: 10. High-def TiVo and TiVoToGo for Mac 9. AlphaGrip ergonomic keyboard/trackball 8. Blu-ray or HD-DVD discs 7. Team Fortress 2: Brotherhood of Arms 6. Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess 5. StarCraft Ghost 4. Microsoft's Vista and Internet Explorer 7 3. Google -- betas galore 2. Phantom Game Service 1. Duke Nukem Forever

    1. Re:For those too lazy to RTFA by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Of TivoToGo for Mac, one reader said: "We've been getting nothing but nebulous promises out of TiVo for months."

      And reader Aaron Ouellette said: "Tap, tap, tap, we're still waiting."


      Stop waiting for TiVoToGo for the Mac. Get Galleon. It brings TiVoToGo functionality to the Mac, Linux, Unix, and Windows, as well as the GoBack ability TiVo doesn't offer and many other features.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:For those too lazy to RTFA by harrkev · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that I have an alphagrip at home -- #9 on the list. It did take a while, but it is here now.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  13. Just thinking about other things by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DNF is only a long standing joke because its of interest to us.
    I'm sure our anticipation of that will be similar to how movie buffs react to news.

    Its taken 18 years to a get a sequel for Indiana Jones.

    DNF has loads of time yet.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Just thinking about other things by AuMatar · · Score: 2

      It did? I seem to remember an Indiana Jones sequel. Two of them, in fact.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Just thinking about other things by damsa · · Score: 1

      He/She meant Indiana Jones Four: The Search for Lucas' Millions.

  14. Duke Nukem needs a DNR by MrPeavs · · Score: 1

    Do Not Resuscitate.

    Duke Nukem had its chance, blew it (multiple times) and has been dragged along like a piece of toilet paper stuck to the button of a shoe.

    1. Re:Duke Nukem needs a DNR by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be so embarassing! Thank god my shoes don't have buttons.

  15. Woah. News. by Kid+Zero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Congratulations to the DNF team. Now we know what they mean by "Forever".

  16. Err by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did the creators of duke nukem ever claim it was coming out that year? Never. Their stance, for at least 6 years now, has been "when it's done." The publishers may have given dates, but they are marketer not game creators.

  17. Free publicity by Threni · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Think about it, in just 13 months this game will have been in one form of
    > development or another for a decade.

    I can't believe there are still people who seriously think this is what's happened. Obviously they've not been working on it for 10 years. They must have decided at some point to work on other things and simply give the impression they were working on it, and have finally (perhaps) decided to release something. Not many companies get to pay nothing to have one of their major project ranges mentioned on a regular basis - good luck to 'em. I've bought several of their games on PSX and PC but I'm hardly hanging on for new games from them (or any other company for that matter). I'm happy to wait for reviews and screenshots of the finished product.

  18. For runners, DNF == Did Not Finish by SurryMt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Could there be a little similarity here?

    1. Re:For runners, DNF == Did Not Finish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a little more then a year this joke will be 10 years old. Mark it in your calendar so you can bring it once more!

  19. WINE by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If products that have been in Beta for forever are classified as vaporware, WINE deserves at least an honorable mention. How long has it been in Alpha now? ;)

    (yes, I know it's often useful nonethess, but...)

    1. Re:WINE by deezilmsu · · Score: 1

      I'd also put DevC++ in the same category as well.

      --
      It's not that I'm asking the big questions, it's that I'm asking lots of small ones.
    2. Re:WINE by wolf369T · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I think WINE is actually in the Beta now, starting from december...

  20. Re your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --
    - (c) 2005 Hank Zimmerman


    ... Amazing that your post has been in development so long that it was copyrighted over a month before it was posted.

  21. The real vaporware by dcapel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is Desktop Linux. Sheesh, it is not the year of the Desktop Linux. It never will be. It will slowly grow, but just 'be' there. Yes, Martin Fink, I'm talking to you.

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:The real vaporware by dcapel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem, there is a not after the but in the previous post :)

      --
      DYWYPI?
    2. Re:The real vaporware by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can have a desktop linux NOW. Fetch a modern commercial distro (http://www.ubuntu.com/>Ubuntu, Mandrake, etc) or any of the free ones and you'll have an excellent desktop with little issues, if any.

          The people that bitch about the "linux desktop" haven't normally ever tried Linux and want something that feels like their WinXP desktop. If you're looking for that, yes, there's nothing like it now and probably won't be for a while. If you want an useable Unix desktop, there's a lot of excellent ones arround.
          You have a wide choice of desktops and window and managers, and there's a lot of excellent software for them. A linux desktop is useable today, and by anyone - i had Ubuntu on a desktop for a while and my mother, who's 'computer-imparied' had zero issues using it. Besides being unable to find the blue E icon ;)

    3. Re:The real vaporware by generic-man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My killer app for Windows is Quicken. I've been using it since version 1, back before Linux's kernel hit 1.0 and before GNUcash development was started. My file is something like 12 MB in size. Whenever the topic of "how do I migrate from Quicken for Windows to GNUcash?" comes up, the solution involves a very tedious and lossy export/import of QIF files, usually with some childish jabs as to why I would ever use such a closed platform.

      I bought a Windows PC specifically to run Quicken after seeing how unbelievably awful Quicken for Mac is: the migration process from Quicken/Windows to Quicken/Mac is nearly as bad as the one from Quicken/Windows to GNUcash.

      Show me a program that can import my whole Quicken for Windows file into a Free Libre Software program format, and I'll go down on you.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:The real vaporware by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Come on, everyone has their killer apps. For some is Quicken, for others Office, for some others Photoshop, etc. The thing is, you can have a working, useable, productive desktop today. In your case, you're migrating OSs, so of course you'll bump into issues - just as if you switched to, say, OSX - but if you want to, it's doable. Now.

          As for Quicken => GNUCash, i'm sorry - i've rarely used either lately :( Quicken has a reputation for "locking-in" their clients though, so i'm sure the migration wouldn't be as easy as it should...

    5. Re:The real vaporware by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can have a basic desktop now: web browsing, e-mail, basic office suite, but the fact that "everyone has their killer apps" is the reason why Windows is and will remain the market leader. I'm not talking about people who stubbornly refuse to try an e-mail program other than Outlook; I'm talking about people who haven't found a suitable finance suite for Linux, doctors who have specialized billing applications, businesses who use Access databases far more than they know they should, and so on. The web as an application platform has only started to erode those platform boundaries, but to redo every business process in a Linux-friendly way costs a lot more than renewing Windows licenses, in many cases. (That's "a lot more" in the short term, of course; any business who can amortize software costs over the long term deserves a round of applause.)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:The real vaporware by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      Desktop Linux is here now. Get over it.

    7. Re:The real vaporware by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't get it, do you? People don't want a choice of window managers, they want something that works. They don't want OpenOffice, which, while an excellent product, is bloated and not fully compatible with Office.

      What happens when I buy a multi-function printer? Will I be able to scan photos using it? Will my webcam work?

      If I decide to get into photo editing, will I be able to run Photoshop? When I do my taxes, will TurboTax run? Will I be able to play games?

      Will I be able to buy (mainstream) music and put it on my iPod? Will Mathematica run? What about Maple?

      All of the things above are trivial on two operating systems: Windows and Mac OS X. Currently, Mac OS has less than 5% of the desktop market, and it is far more 'ready' for the desktop than Linux.

      You can meet 80% of the needs of 80% of the people 80% of the time. But in a world where Windows just ins't that expensive, that's just not good enough.

    8. Re:The real vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are so blind that you never will accept the existence of Desktop Linux...
      Desktop Linux has been a fact in something like the last 2 years.
      Your answer to this will be one (or more) of following:
      • You have to recompile your kernel to get support for WiFi
      • You have to recompile your kernel to get support for your webcam
      • You have to edit config files to use the simplest thing
      • There is no driver for my sexy-Windows-only-piece-of-crap-hardware
      • Average John Doe can't use Linux (No, and he can't use Windows either)
      • This (or that) piece of software, wich I think I need, is Windows-only

      --
      Wanted, preferably dead, Bill Gates. People has been executed for less...
    9. Re:The real vaporware by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Maybe i'm lucky, but OO 2.0 imported every single Office document i've throwed at it perfectly. My epson inkjet printer works flawlessly, GIMP fulfils my (basic, admitedly) image editing needs just fine, and even my POS Concord webcam works. You can use your iPod just fine. I haven't tried iTunes on Wine, but i did try Maple and it worked perfectly. So did Orcad, another software package i used quite a lot.

          It is good enough for most people, and that's right now. Of course you'll find a lot of Windows software that won't work correctly on *nix that you might need, but as a whole, it's good enough for a basic desktop. And that's ignoring the shitload of perfectly good *nix software that isn't available on Windows either. Again, you can use Linux as a desktop. Today.

    10. Re:The real vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really... You don't get it. I do not care what people want ! That is their fucking own problem.
      The fact is that they CAN get a replacement for allmost everything.
      Fine. If You don't want to change don't change... but don't tell me that I can't use Linux on the desktop... 'cause I've used it for over a year... and I didn't miss Windows... and I didn't need Windows.

    11. Re:The real vaporware by westlake · · Score: 1
      You can have a desktop linux NOW. Fetch a modern commercial distro or any of the free ones and you'll have an excellent desktop with little issues, if any.

      What you won't have is the 97% of users that have remained loyal to Windows and the Mac. OS Platform Stats (January 2006)

    12. Re:The real vaporware by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      You had Ubuntu and had no problems? I find that hard to believe considering that Ubuntu doesn't even have a compiler on its default install. Even assuming that everything you install can be installed from a package, I still have had to go through some dependency hell when getting things installed on Ubuntu. It was not that bad, and as a programmer with Linux experience nothing I couldn't get through in an hour or so. However, as a real desktop OS, Linux still has room for improvement. If your mom is anything like my mom, she would have given up and cried. And my mom typing apt-get xmms or doing anything similar to it? Forget it. She will either be calling me every time to hold her hand through the process or just not using the computer altogether.

      I like Linux, and its great for me, and I don't really mind the occasional hassle anymore, especially since I pretty much have all the software I need installed and don't have to muck around with things too much, but for most people (and myself included) Windows on the desktop Just Works. I want a piece of software? I download it from the web, doubleclick install.exe and 30 seconds later I have a working program without fail. Spyware is a much smaller problem after using Firefox, and a stupid user is a stupid user on any platform and equally prone to installing happy alligator weather friend or whatever no matter what OS is running (and we are all stupid users sometimes).

    13. Re:The real vaporware by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Well, I can tell you after installing it on 60 lab machines for the CS department at Virginia Tech, Mathematica will run on Linux. Which it should; it's natively a Unix application, and runs on things like Alpha/True64's too.

      It doesn't want to run, however, over cygwin on a windows box. Of course, there's a native Windows install for it, but running over cygwin, it's looking for fonts that no one knows where are. And if you said /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts, you'd be wrong.

      A multifunction printer will probably "print", but scanning with it might be difficult. It still can work, though. Webcams actually have decent support in Linux (in the same way that, for instance, USB ethernet adapters do, or any ethernet adapter for that matter) - most webcams whatever the branding have a very specific and limited chipset in them, so the same drivers work for a wide variety of cameras.

      But, I agree with your point at face value. If you have a Windows boxen plus a Linux boxen, you can rule the universe. But just a linux desktop leaves things to be desired.

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    14. Re:The real vaporware by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I did - i had it for a few months while i was switching to a new computer. I eventually settled for Gentoo, but Ubuntu was quite nice, and, from a non-power user point of view, damn easy to use. Even more so Mandrake, which i ended up reccomending to a friend who wanted to try Linux - it's even better built up, and has things like repartitioning utilities that made the install a breeze.

    15. Re:The real vaporware by cgenman · · Score: 1

      The people that bitch about the "linux desktop" haven't normally ever tried Linux and want something that feels like their WinXP desktop. If you're looking for that, yes, there's nothing like it now and probably won't be for a while. If you want an useable Unix desktop, there's a lot of excellent ones arround.

      The OS that supplants Windows will not need to be "Windows Like" It will need to be vastly superior to Windows, in the same way that DVD's were vastly superior to VHS.

      Linux, sad to say, is not superior in the desktop category. To uninstall things in Linux (real distros, sorry Red Hat), you run "Apt-get update, apt-get remove Package_If_You_Can_Remember_The_Official_Name". To uninstall things in Windows, you go to the control pannel, select it from a list, and watch as the uninstall routine crashes. To uninstall things in OSX, you throw it out. To arrange your files and applications in OSX, you move folders around until you have an aesthetically pleasing organization. To arrange files and applications in Windows, you carefully plan out your structure ahead of time and install applications only to the areas you have designated for those types of utilities. To arrange files and applications in Linux: forget it. You'll just break everything.

      Either way you look at it, 'tis not the year of desktop linux.

    16. Re:The real vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, uv used LiNuX for over a YEAR???!?!? w00000t! you should be a pr0f3s0r! Dr. AC! Teach teh n00bs tu use teh 'putar! Chill out, dude. Nobody's telling you that you can't use Linux. They're saying that some people can't use Linux yet, because the required software isn't there. And it's true. Learning software isn't a hobby most people would like to take up, so they would only want to use Linux when something familiar is there.

    17. Re:The real vaporware by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, you don't get it, it works NOW. My friend, in a management position at Intel corp., recently called me to bitch about Windows. I overnighted him a Fedora Core 4 DVD.

      He called me the next day, ready to try it out, apprehensive as hell. I told him not to sweat it, that he didn't even need me on the line.

      He booted from DVD, "Next-buttoned" everything from then on. It detected his 3D accelerator, his flatscreen monitor, his wireless network, and all of his hardware and dropped him in a nice desktop.

      He plugged in his late-model Brother laser printer. Autodetected upon plugin and away he went, printing.

      He plugged in his USB flash drive to test out access to office files. BOOM, icon appears on desktop. He double-clicks and up pops a file manager window showing his files.

      He double clicks on an MS Word file and it opens in OpenOffice, no problem.

      He plugs in his scanner and asks what program he needs to use to scan. I tell him to start GIMP and use the acquire tool, just like he would in Photoshop. The nice, user-friendly scanner dialog was just like he was used to in windows, and he scans three or four test scans and says "all good!"

      He wants to use his Olympus digital camera. I tell him to go for it, so he plugs it into USB and BOOM, an icon appears on his desktop. He starts copying images off of it.

      He normally copies his images to DVD-RAM, and he's got an external DVD-RAM drive that he made by installing a Panasonic LFD-211 in a USB case. I get a little nervous about this one, but he plugs it in to his USB hub, inserts a 4.7GB disk, and BOOM, there it is on his desktop.

      He drags-drops the files from his digital camera to the DVD-RAM drive, prints out the photo he'd scanned with gimp, and tells me that he has one last need: he's got to install MS Office, Photoshop CS, and FrameMaker.

      FrameMaker and Office, I tell him, are a go. Photoshop CS, not so fast. Does he need the whole suite? No? Then does he have Photoshop 7 onsite? Can he use that? Yes? Then we have a go. I point him to the Codeweavers website and he buys Crossover Office for the price of pizza and soda delivery, well under the cost of similar software for Mac OS.

      After downloading it, he double-clicks on the Crossover Office icon on his desktop. Up pops a window asking for his password, and a moment later, it's installed itself.

      I tell him to insert the Office XP CD and double-click on the "Setup" icon, just like he would in Windows. He does, and a few minutes later, he's got Office XP installed, including completed activation. He quickly does the same for FrameMaker 7 and Photoshop 7.

      He begins to ask "how do I start these," and a moment later cuts himself off with, "oh never mind, they've gone into the start menu in a group called 'Windows Applications'."

      He launches each one to test that it opens, saves, and prints files.

      An hour and forty five minutes after he originally called, we've gone from nothing to a full Fedora desktop, complete with printer, scanner, digital camera, flash drive, DVD-RAM drive, and major Windows applications, and I haven't had to answer a SINGLE QUESTION and have instead been listening to him talk mostly about his family.

      It's two weeks later, and I haven't had a SINGLE CALL from him asking for tech support help. His one comment, sent via e-mail:

      "Man, I can't believe how fast Linux is. Starting about last year I was thinkin' this PC was due for a replacement request, but I guess it was just XP."

      --

      Linux is ready NOW. Five years ago, there were a few unmitigated optimists that refused to admit that Linux wasn't ready yet. Today, there are a few unmitigated cynics that refuse to admit that it became ready sometime in the last 24 months.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    18. Re:The real vaporware by Storm · · Score: 1
      I disagree that Linux on the desktop is vaporware. I have actually been running Linux on my desktop for 11 years. I am a Unix sysadmin, but the user threshold for running Linux on the desktop is dropping every year. Three years ago, my wife and kids switched (about the same time as Code Red stormed the Internet). I think that Linux is actually getting very very close to the point that my mother, who lives 800 miles away could run it.

      The most common comment I get when I say that my family runs it is "yeah, but they have a sysadmin living there." True, but I raise two points. If every windows user had a qualified system admin, a vast majority of the worms and virii out there would be stopped cold, since they tend to prey on the gullible and the uninformed. (I don't want to use ignorant, since it has such negative connotations. Most home computer users are experts in their own fields, but expecting them to be an expert in our field too is too much to ask.)

      The other point I make to living with a sysadmin is that for the most part, my family (none of whom are geeks, I might add) have learned self-reliance. Most of the time, they search for their own answers instead of running to me to figure out where their minimized window went. Could they restore from backups? Probably not...But how many Windows users could? Can they reinstall the OS? Absolutely. Look at some of the installers. One of the guys from the Linux Link Tech Show actually had his 6 year old daughter install Ubuntu. The only thing he helped her with was the "big words." She made all of the decisions. In fact, Linux is getting to the point where it is easier to install than Windows.

      So every year is the Year of the Linux Desktop, its just that the numbers are quietly growing and the demographic is expanding. I guess it depends on your perspective.

      --
      --Storm
    19. Re:The real vaporware by DohnJoe · · Score: 1

      Well, it sure is good to hear that it can work so well, but there is still one thing:

      He said he wanted to replace his pc so I assume it's already a few years old and that explains all the hardware was recognised, but if you try this with a new machine you still have the problem that the latest wireless/usb/sound/etc devices are not yet supported and to get it to work is not exactly easy. It's not like you can just download a driver and install it like under Windows (in theory you could but the drivers simply don't exist yet). So what is still needed is vendor support.

    20. Re:The real vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sorry dude... I didn't understand what they were talking 'bout.
      Linux, OSX, xBSD or any other UNIX are NOT PnP replacements for Windows, they can do anything Windows can and much more... but not as an Windows-4-free replacement.
      Yes I have now used Linux in over a year... as a desktop OS instead of a W2K, in a major financial business... and nobody have noticed, so yes Desktop Linux is here.
      ...and btw. What was familiar in Windows 3.x, Windows 95, Windows 2000 or in Windows XP compared to eachother ? I tell you what: NOTHING !
      --
      My Sparc runs Solaris, my AlphaServer runs Tru64, my R/6000 runs AIX and my PowerBook runs OS X. I don't have any problems running Linux on my ThinkPad.

  22. What about Too Human? Or Mario 128? by mouse_clicker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I love all of Silicon Knights' games, but Too Human has been in development since before The Legacy of Kain: Blood Omen (meaning over 10 years, probably more) and has switched consoles twice. Now, I have no doubt it'll eventually come out and most likely be excellent, but why is Twilight Princess or even DNF on the list and not Too Human?

    For that matter, why is Zelda on the list but not Mario 128? Mario 128 has been promised to us since, what was it, Spaceworld 2000? I could be mistaken, but regardless, it's been a while and we have seen no demoes, videos, or even screenshots, and it's switched development from the Gamecube to the Revolution. How is Twilight Princess being delayed 4 or 5 months but still having videos, screens, and demoes galore count as vaporware, but Mario 128 not? Odd...

    -Moses

    1. Re:What about Too Human? Or Mario 128? by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 1

      Um, wasn't "Mario 128" called Super Mario Sunshine?

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    2. Re:What about Too Human? Or Mario 128? by tepples · · Score: 1

      For that matter, why is Zelda on the list but not Mario 128?

      For one thing, Zelda: TP was promoted last year, but Super Mario 128 wasn't. In fact, Nintendo's Super Mario 128 is already released, as it was rejiggered into mission 22 of Super Smash Bros. Melee.

  23. Note that... by Sunrun · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ..you'll probably never see an Apple product on the list.

    ;)

    [ducks]

    --
    "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -- Voltaire
  24. Yes, thank you. -- team fortress 2 by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The original team fortress (not the original, original quake one, but halflife one) was my first serious team based game and i have many great memories playing it.
    but this whole hl2, but no tf2 experience has left me pretty raw towards valve. heck I was even willing to go along with their steam delivery, hoping that they'd deliver tf2 one of these days, but they've been dragging their feet too long..
    in the mean time we've had the wonderful and free Wolfenstein: ET released, and the upcoming quake wars: ET, which should be the best game ever made...

    i'm glad someone has the courage to tell valve that they've dropped the ball on this one.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Yes, thank you. -- team fortress 2 by vodkamattvt · · Score: 1

      From everything I read about TF2 when people were still under the impression it was coming out, it was very similar to a WW2 online shooter and Battlefield 2 .. which if they released a product like that now it would be pretty much white noise. I think Valve's best shot at TF2 is to go to the TF roots and just make it a really fun game with some innovation, balance and diversity in classes. For the love of god just dont copy BF2, I want old school TF.

    2. Re:Yes, thank you. -- team fortress 2 by Ponzicar · · Score: 1

      The new features of TF2 sounded awesome and unique when it was first announced, the problem is that every one of them have already been used in every team based online shooter released since then.

    3. Re:Yes, thank you. -- team fortress 2 by robnauta · · Score: 1

      What's Team Fortress 2 about anyway ? I guess a soldier-based shooter, where you fight each other in squads lead by a squad leader, while the whole team is commander by the commander. Oh wait, Battlefield 2 has totally armageddoned the need for this game. It has deleted the reason for this game to even exist. Maybe if they improve TF2 by allowing you to ride various vehicles, or fly planes ? No sorry, BF2 has that as well.

  25. Duke Nukem tops vaporware list Forever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  26. HD-TiVo by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article:(The cable-card) high-definition TiVo (was) announced at CES 2005, probably will be re-announced at CES 2006.

    Actually, it was announced at CES 2004 for release in the first half of 2006. It's not even late yet.

  27. It's a joke, kids... by loftwyr · · Score: 1

    There's never going to be a Duke Nuk'em Forever. It's a joke. They'll keep that up forever until people get tired of it and realize that they've been had.

    The studio has other products that they focus on and they're going to be the ones forever. DKF is dead, really it is, but every time someone says it's dead, someone goes to the site and checks the forums where George Broussard has posted "It's not dead" for the nth time.

    Give it up people, laugh at George Broussard's joke and move on with life....

    1. Re:It's a joke, kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be a joke. I heard they even have S. Morgenstern the famed and talented author of the Princess Bride signed on and writting the storyline!!!!!!!!

  28. uh... ultimate dupe? by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    DNF vaporware of the year?

    I thought they would stop nominating it after a life time award... I mean, dead horse and all that

  29. Duke Nukem Forever by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and ever and ever and ever...

    (Sorry, couldn't resist.)



  30. from the faq: "* 1.3 - Who is publishing DNF?
    Take 2 Interactive Software is publishing DNF. Prior to this, it was announced in a press release that the Gathering of Developers has acquired publishing rights to Duke Nukem Forever. Prior to that, their publisher was Infogrames (now known as Atari), who bought out GT Interactive as well as the DNF rights. Even before that, GT Interactive had bought the rights from FormGen."

    Take 2 interactive... Finiancial woes... DNF Release date
    2048 (they've made a NEW unix like time() system, they just need to wait for the old one to run out...)

  31. TiVo recommendations? (Offtopic) by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of TiVo, I'm thinking about buying one but I don't know what to get. Some of my buddies were able to do some neat things hacking into their TiVos, and I'd like the ability to save off selected shows or movies without building a MythTV box (too much effort). Which TiVo should I buy, and what Windows/Linux/FreeBSD apps should I grab? Are there non-TiVo firmware images I should download and install on my TiVo? Can I just go out and buy a TiVo brand new and use it without having to mod it? Or, even better, is there a web site out there that explains everything? I googled for "tivo recommendations" and "which tivo to buy", but they didn't turn up anything interesting. It looks like the Series 2 DVR does everything I want except for burning stuff to DVD, but if I can just FTP the files off or something that'd be good enough for me.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    1. Re:TiVo recommendations? (Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of your questions are best answered in the forums at tivocommunity.com, but expect to do a little searching. In short, though, Series2 units are less hackable than older models but you can download the programs from a series2 unit via an HTTPS link, after upgrading to firmware 7.1 or later. (To watch them on non-Windows platforms, you may need to convert them to regular MPEG files and use something like VLC, though.)

    2. Re:TiVo recommendations? (Offtopic) by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Pretty much any TiVo will be upgradable. I have a 5XXX TiVo, and I upgraded mine. You want to get a modern one (don't get an older or used one), because the later ones sport a later kernel that supports drives bigger than 120GB (or if you put a 140 in, it'll only see 137GB, or whatever that limit was). Mine has 160GB in it, and I can record 180ish hours at full quality. With compression, I can fit about 4x that, but the compression they use is pretty bad on anything other than "High". Especially if you already have grainy cable.

      The Hindsdale How-To is the definitive faq, including tools, for the tivo hacker. Basically, you're just doing a dd if=/old/disk of=/new/big/disk && some-command-to-expand new file system to fill /new/big/disk.
      http://www.newreleasesvideo.com/hinsdale-how-to/in dex9.html

      Keep in mind: As far as I know, Tivo doesn't really care if you hack your tivo, but you instantly forego any possiblity of warranty or tech support.

      Pulling programs off the tivo is easy. Most tivos support a wide variety of USB-Ethernet adapters via their USB ports. Hook your tivo up to your home network and get a copy of Tivo2Go from Tivo.com. It will allow you to pull files from the Tivo, but keep in mind, 1.) you're going to have to google for the tool which strips the TiVo DRM out, 2.) the files are HUGE, so you're going to want to divx for storage, and 3.) if you distribute the files, there's no way of knowing if they have any information which can be traced back to you, or your tivo subscription number, etc etc.

      Hope that helps. I love my tivo. I messed with a Windows Media Center PC when I worked at a system builder / consultant shop, and I never got it to do what I wanted. The TiVo "Just Works(tm)". It's a breath of fresh air.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:TiVo recommendations? (Offtopic) by horatio · · Score: 1

      I'll second this recommendation. I've had a series2 for about 3 years now and have been extremely happy with it. Out of the box it works just fine. No need to hack it if you don't want to. It is easy enough that your grandma could figure it out - which may seem like the TiVo isn't for the hardcore geek. The simplicity is the beauty of the whole thing. I spend most of my day dealing with computers - windoze, linux, clients, servers, code, the list goes on - something always needs fixed or updated or reinstalled. I don't want to fight with my fracking television too.

      The only "hack" I've applied is the 30-second skip. And that is just S-P-S-30-S on the remote (Do it while an already recorded show is playing - tends to work better there.) Has to be done after power failures and reboots, but those don't happen very often. A bunch of major software updates later TiVo has left that "feature" in, albeit disabled by default. I think someone else mentioned tivocommunity. A great resource. Figured out how to upgrade my 40GB to 80GB there - was a piece of cake (I still have the 40GB drive intact just in case the drive I put in there blows up.) The only hacking advice I would add is that if you hack your TiVo badly, you'll bork the OS and it won't be able to pull service updates, or worse - guide data.

      Like zerocool^ said, you can grab Tivo2Go from tivo's website free (I think someone wrote a java clone) and download as much as you want to your PC. Nvidia has a codec you can buy for like 20$ (not sure why T2go doesn't come with one) that lets you burn DVDs with the application of your choice. I think there is Sonic something or other which is a burning app and a codec in one package. IIRC it is made by Roxio, so I stayed away from it. I won't tell you what to do, but I would suggest not P2P'ng the files as a matter of principle. The MPAA and RIAA are enough of a pain in the ass. They don't need any more excuses to go after things like TiVo, and it discourages content providers from partnering with DVR makers if they feel they're just getting ripped off.

      Downsides: get a newer one - and hope it has USB2 or built-in ethernet. Transferring a show to or from the PC (I think USB1 is my issue) takes a long time - about 85-90% of the show's length. If you decide to get a wireless adapter, triple check to make sure it is the right one. One letter difference in the adapter's model and it is useless. Over three years, the TiVo unit has gotten progressively slower to respond - a lot of people have complained about this and it seems to be due to the 7.x software updates. No idea what, if anything, TiVo is doing about it. It is annoying sometimes, but not unbearable.

      Upsides of TiVo: TivoCentral: schedule programs remotely without putting a hole in your firewall. It definitely "just works" - which is why I have avoided MythTV, WindowsMC, etc - no need - my TiVo makes me happy. Now if only finding a g/f were this easy ... talk about vaporware, geez.

      --
      There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.
    4. Re:TiVo recommendations? (Offtopic) by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      Thanks, both of your, for your advice. I'm off to look at Series 2 DVRs. P2P-ing recorded shows was never my intent, however it would be nice to watch Battlestar Galactica or other shows on my laptop when I travel.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  32. Weak, as usual by Godai · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Every year they hash in a bunch of weak entries.

    Personally, I don't consider something vapourware that's delayed from the end of the year in question to first quarter of the following. Maybe I'm picky, but I prefer my vapourware to be talking in years, not months. But every year, they pick at least one or two. Zelda being delayed 3 months does not, I think, get it the 'vapourware' sticker.

    And c'mon, Google? That's a real strech. All the things they mention you can use just fine. By other people's definition, they're finished, but Google's fussy. That's not 'vapourware'. Geez, they must have been seriously hard up for ideas or something.

    Starcraft: Ghost is more on the nose, though not in Duke Nuke Em's league. The Phantom is aptly named. Complaining about Blu-Ray or HD-DVD seems a touch premature I think, given how long it takes hardware standards to formalize, but at least there's a little substance there. TF2 has been in the works forever.

    Vista, well, it's been delayed a couple of years so I guess it qualifies, even if it's one of those things that's guranteed to come out, in a way like nothing else on that list, even if does take another three years.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
    1. Re:Weak, as usual by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't think Starcraft: Ghost should be in there either. Sure, it's been in development for a long time, but Blizzard are renowned for taking a long time to develop games, and it shows through in their track record. Good games take time to develop, companies like Rockstar North and Blizzard who take their time in development produce the highest quality games (eg GTA series, Starcraft/Warcraft/Diablo etc).

      I'd rather they took their time to get things right, rather than the EA model of "ready or not it must ship on date x" and releasing disappointing games.

    2. Re:Weak, as usual by jonadab · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Vista, well, it's been delayed a couple of years so I guess it qualifies, even if it's
      > one of those things that's guranteed to come out, in a way like nothing else on that
      > list, even if does take another three years.

      I'd count Longhorn/Vista as vaporware. It was going to come out in 2003 (or was it 2002?). The original projected release date for *Blackcomb* (the release that was going to be after Longhorn) passed in late 2004. It's now early 2006. However, it's not the total quantity of delay time that really makes Longhorn vapor; it's the continual repeated pushing-back in small increments: Every spring, it's coming out later this year. Every summer, it's coming out in time for Christmas. Every Christmas, it's coming out next year. Mmm Hmm. Sure it is. Now they're saying 2006 Q3. Since they've now shown an actual factual beta to a significant number of people outside the company, I project it will now only get pushed back 1-2 more times, and release in 2007.

      > even if it's one of those things that's guranteed to come out, in a way like nothing
      > else on that list even if does take another three years.

      That's another vapor-ish thing about Longhorn/Vista: the ever-changing feature list. *Something* is guaranteed to eventually come out, and Microsoft will *call* it Vista, but if you look at what Longhorn was going to be, in terms of promised features... well, that's another thing. Some of that stuff may *never* come out.

      For instance, they've changed the whole *concept* of WinFS, at least twice. Originally it was going to be a filesystem built on top of a database (kinda like BeFS, only on steroids), that would eliminate the whole concept of hierarchical file storage in favor of a database/metadata paradigm for organizing data. Fortunately, they thought better of that, so then they said well, it's going to be an extra symantic _layer_, on top of a more traditional filesystem, so that while the traditional hierarchical storage will be there under the hood, the user won't ever see that, and you'll have the database and the metadata paradigm on the surface instead. That too has now not been heard in the last year or so. At this point I think what's left of WinFS is little more than a specialized indexer.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:Weak, as usual by Godai · · Score: 1

      I didn't feel good qualifying Vista, it's mostly that no matter how sure you are of any of the other entries, Vista is more sure of coming out. Some things are simply inevitable: death, taxes & a new version of Windows. Still, given it's checkered past and changing feature set, you're right, it's pretty much a sterling example of vapourware.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  33. Particle Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When he's underwater does he get wet? Or does the water get him instead?

    1. Re:Particle Man... by U1timateZer0 · · Score: 0

      Nobody knows. . . Particle Man.

      --
      Unplug all controller for great reset!!
  34. Forever Tops? by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    Now, wasn't Duke Nukem released in 1991? So, it can't be forever top vaporware unless you can't find it in your local 7-11 anymore.

  35. In Capitalist America... by misleb · · Score: 1

    Duke Nukem plays you... forever.

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
  36. Well... by vga_init · · Score: 1

    If it's been this long and they haven't cancelled it yet, they might just see it through to release. In which case I will be there to link to my post and say "I told you so," and all those people who claimed that it would never be released are going to turn over in their graves (as most of them will be dead by then).

  37. Wired needs to know what vaporware means! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betas are not vaporware.... nor are any products that DO exist. (IE> IE 7)

    vaporware ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vpr-wâr)
    n.
    New software that has been announced or marketed but has not been produced.

    vaporware /vay'pr-weir/ (UK "vapourware") Products announced
    far in advance of any release (which may or may not actually
    take place). The term came from Atari users and was later
    applied by Infoworld to Microsoft's continuous lying about
    Microsoft Windows.

    See also brochureware.

    Once the product IS released, it is no longer vaporware. Get a damn clue!

  38. Hardware support is a problem for switchers by tepples · · Score: 1

    The people that bitch about the "linux desktop" haven't normally ever tried Linux

    Or they have tried Linux and have had hardware whose driver successfully installed on Windows fail to install on Linux. I tried Mandrakelinux 9.1 when it came out and it found my ATI Radeon 9000 video card (but failed to start X), found my Canon S520 inkjet printer (but printed everything at 60% size because it misdetected my 600 dpi printer as a 360 dpi printer), and completely failed to find my Microtek Scanmaker 4850 flatbed scanner (which is still listed as unsupported in SANE).

    "You should have consulted the hardware compatibility list before you bought the hardware." Even before I knew that I wanted to switch to Linux? Even for hardware received as a gift?

  39. Bullshit by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

    I installed linux (ubuntu), and after 1 hour of trying to get my wireless trying to work (unsucessfully), and two hours of trying to figure things out and arrange things to my liking (unsucessfully) I am going to say linux is NOT ready for the desktop.

    Ie, for anything in windows, you either right click or go to the control panel, and if you can't figure it out from there you have a really odd problem. I've only used a mac a few times, but whenever I try out my friends OS X laptop, everything seems intuitive and I never really have a problem getting things the way I like them. Linux is the exact opposite of this. I shouldn't have to search forums or read a dummy manual just to basic things for a desktop. I shouldn't have to spend hours searching for things or configuring things. The only distro I've heard that is nearly ready is linspire, but it's nearly the same freaking price as windows.

    And if you look for the support contracts for any of the major distros, it is in the 100s of $s just for granny to make a phone call. IIRC, on windows basic support is free (at least, it was the last time I called). Source: $250 for a phone call for Ubuntu support. And no, grandma isn't going to use IRC.
    http://www.ubuntu.com/support/supportoptions/paids upport

    1. Re:Bullshit by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Correction: linspire is cheaper online (~50-60) than what I remember seeing it for at Frys.

  40. Futurama by yoprst · · Score: 1

    It would make a great episode in Futurama. Think of it, the idea that DNF is not released by the year 3k is very plausible...

  41. Amiga by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0

    At least people are still waiting for this to come out after all these years.
    It broke my heart when the next gen Amiga stopped making the list...

  42. lame by inexion · · Score: 1

    they put DNF at #1 but dont even mention Fallout 3?!
    bah!
    they are both 'in production' I guess....oh well - some day =/

  43. Wipes tear. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Beautiful.

    Oh, that's so sweet. Wish I had mod-points.


    -FL

  44. Project Xanadu by Betabug · · Score: 1

    How could there ever be a mention of the word "vaporware" without mentioning Project Xanadu . For some people that is the ultimate vaporware: How about being delayed since the 1960's?

  45. As always... by Gleng · · Score: 1

    My top vapourware vote goes to Elite IV. I doubt that it will ever see the light of day, despite how many rumours and articles I read about it.

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  46. Larry 4 by MiliusXP · · Score: 1

    I still waiting for Leisure Suit Larry 4

  47. Another forgotten item by the+chao+goes+mu · · Score: 1

    The next realease of enlightenment deserves a spot of honor somewhere on the list. It seems to share DNF's release date of "when it's ready", though it has only been 3 years, not nearly 9.

    --
    Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs.
  48. ho ho ho, flamebait? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone who works for Wired had some mod points...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  49. Desktop Linux by Britz · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu is here, and is desktop ready, with all free software!

  50. Its never coming by myfantasyromanc · · Score: 0

    It isn't coming and why does anybody still care?

    --
    I am giving away 2000 premium accounts on my new dating website myfantasyromance.com check it out!
  51. Another one for the list by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Another vapourware product, probably not well-known to the crew at Wired, but important for us slashdotters:

    Ogg Vorbis bitrate peeling.

    Remember how it was going to revolutionise portable audio? Download/rip your music once and peel bits for whatever your application - keep the original for your home theatre and peel lots of bits for your iRiver.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife