Slashdot Mirror


Add 8GB of Storage to Your Cell Phone

gd writes "MobileTechNews is reporting that a company called US modular has put out a device that taps into your existing mobile phones microSD or Tflash slot to add up to 8GB of storage. The Stik&Stor adds a memory chip to the back side of the battery pack and only costs $199 to add 8GB to your music phone."

138 comments

  1. Key Questions by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Will it REALLY enable you to transport your data to your new cell?

    First of all, will your new cell be compatible?
    Will the DRM in your downloaded ringtones, mp3s, whatnots allow you to run it on another device?
    Will it allow you to transfer to and from it?

    And if all those are answered yes, how long will it take 'til the lawsuits start to spring up?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. I see trouble ahead by mustafap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tied up in DRM, all this memory kicking around is going to cause problems.

    "Where did I put that Elton John Album? On my IPod? No... On my mobile? No... On my works mobile? No... On my PC? No... On my IPAQ? No... oh bugger it, I'll just buy another electronic copy."

    Glad I stuck with LP's

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:I see trouble ahead by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 4, Funny
      I can't refrain from a chuckle imagining you in the morning commute, dragging along your recordplayer and soundsystem, and listening to some good morning tunes.

      I don't see your problem though: Most mobile phones use flashcards for their storage, and until now I have not yet encountered one which was protected against using any of my images/sounds/music/videos.

    2. Re:I see trouble ahead by blueadept1 · · Score: 1

      Tied up in DRM, all this memory kicking around is going to cause problems.

      "Where did I put that Elton John Album? On my IPod? No... On my mobile? No... On my works mobile? No... On my PC? No... On my IPAQ? No... oh bugger it, I'll just buy another electronic copy."

      Glad I stuck with LP's


      "In the garbage?" Yes.
       
      There you go, problem solved. :P

    3. Re:I see trouble ahead by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

      >"In the garbage?" Yes.

      Maybe Elton John was a bad example :o)

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    4. Re:I see trouble ahead by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      And that's what's so difficult to understand: The most prevelant copyright infringemant occurs with songs/artists that most people claim are too [something] to be interesting music... why are people "stealing" stuff they claim is so bad they don't even want to listen to?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:I see trouble ahead by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      why are people "stealing" stuff they claim is so bad they don't even want to listen to?

      Because they are "sampling" it to verify how bad it is. Uh, yeah, that's it. That doesn't explain the people that store hundreds of gigs of audio though. As much as I don't like the copyright cartels, I don't think this is right either. The people that don't like the mainstream stuff can always buy independent music, there's even plenty of good indie music that has tracks available free and legal, so there's really little point in violating the copyright of the companies that don't want to play. Just downloading stuff against the owner's wishes only gives them more ammo in claiming P2P is hurting them.

  3. I wonder when this is going to end by mayesa · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's next? Adding a 3ghz on board graphic's card to play Doom3? Come on! I want a cell phone to make calls!

  4. Lame by grub · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Most people get their cell phones cheap (or free) on various plans because people are CHEAP. they won't want to spend a couple of hundred bucks for extra memory when they likely already have an MP3 player, PDA, etc.

    This thing will fail miserably.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Lame by carn1fex · · Score: 1
      "they won't want to spend a couple of hundred bucks for extra memory when they likely already have an MP3 player, PDA, etc"

      Youre busted son, turn in your Ti-85, and all your caffinated gum. If we ever see your like around /. again we'll hax0r you. Seriously. This turns your (well, apparently My) cell phone into an ipod nano.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    2. Re:Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you have any evidence that 'most people' get their cell phones that way?

      I live in China, and everyone I know here pays the full price for their phones...and, as far as I can tell, they prefer it that way. Furthermore, although some do pay with monthly plans, I think most I know pay by buying a card from high street vendors with a big code on it - they call a number and enter the code.

  5. One word by Billosaur · · Score: 1

    Porn

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:One word by nizo · · Score: 1

      Or in this case, microporn. It seems like viewing porn on a 1" screen would take away most of the fun, since all the naughty bits would only be a few pixels wide. However the sounds might be useful, especially on crowded buses (don't sit next to me with your screaming kids!) or in boring meetings (I am so bored, fire me right now!).

    2. Re:One word by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > You just wait! Perl 6 is coming... Any minute now... should be here soon... really... oh heck...

      What features of Perl 6 are you waiting for? Many are already available for Perl 5 on the CPAN.

      --
      My other car is first.
  6. Microdrives for 4/8GB by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be a bit hesitant to add a microdrive to my cell phone. I'm a fairly careful person, but I tend to keep phones for roughly 2 years (for Verizon's New Every 2 Program), and my phone tends to have fallen at least a handful of times over that period. I've already heard stories of people with Palm LifeDrives which failed from less.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Microdrives for 4/8GB by Mike+Keester · · Score: 1

      I'd be a bit hesitant to add a microdrive to my cell phone.

      I'd be a little hesitant to add a microwave to my cell phone too. I mean, all of that raditation so close to my head, not to mention the added weight....huh? What's that you say?

      um...nevermind.

  7. WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously not by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have one of the listed phones (V635) that takes transflash, and I can play any MP3 in the player, use any MP3 as a ringtone, re-encode any video I want to .3gp format in mplayer and upload it - including full movies. I have re-encoded whole DVDs into 20 MB .3gp files and watched them on my phone while on the bus.

    There is no DRM issue whatsoever. You can plug a transflash card into any SD reader to download or upload whatever the hell you want on it. It's no different than CF or SD or XD or any other memory card, there is no DRM involved.

    The parent poster is pretty ignorant to this technology. Personally I can't wait to get one of these - the highest storage transflash card right now (I am aware of) is only 512 MB. 8GB would rock.

  8. How big ? by karvind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article I couldn't guess the size of the 8GB microdrive. Anyone has any idea ? One from Lacie is rather big to be tagged along with a cellphone.

    1. Re:How big ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFS. "Add 8GB of Storage to Your Cell Phone".
      Still no comprende? The size is 8GB.

    2. Re:How big ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Size ! shape ! form factor ! mass ! volume !

    3. Re:How big ? by Devynn · · Score: 1

      RTFC, he means physical size you doof.

      --
      -Devynn
    4. Re:How big ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're retarded. By definition, a MicroDrive is the same size as a CF Card.

    5. Re:How big ? by DoctorVic · · Score: 1

      The picture might help you. RTFA! It is the little rectangle stuck to the back of the phone with the companies name on it.

  9. JUST CALLS? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Next you want a game console just to play games? Or a TV Set jut for watching TV? Or a stereo just for listening to music? Or a computer just for ... erh, bad example.

    The world's moving towards "multi functional", baby! How else could you sell those NEW and IMPROVED goodies on various items.

    Buy the new cell, it now has a camera! No, buy this, it has an MP3 player! Buy this console, you can watch videos on it, not only play!

    If you made a cell that just, well, makes calls, how do you want to market that? You can't sell cells that make calls anymore, a cell has to play games you didn't even want to play on your C64 anymore 'cause they looked crappy and the graphics sucked, but hey, IT'S MOBILE NOW! Wow!

    Next PSP generation will be able to make phone calls, I'm sure! And maybe you will even get a keyboard and mouse to the next sequel of the XBox, that would... eh...

    Never mind.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:JUST CALLS? by shawb · · Score: 1

      Next PSP generation will be able to make phone calls, I'm sure!

      I think you mispelled Nokia N-Gage.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:JUST CALLS? by British · · Score: 2, Informative

      Next PSP generation will be able to make phone calls, I'm sure!

      Yes, and the PSP phone will have:

      1. a cost that's twice as much as the other cell phones
      2. Downloadable games, at $29.95 each.
      3. A proprietary memory card slot that won't have readers/writers available for it
      4. A compilcated sync system where you have to give funny names to upload video files, ringtones
      5. firmware upgrades every 2 months to prevent homebrewing
      6. Dial a wrong number? You just bricked your psp-phone.

  10. You're full of it. by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I also already have a toaster and an oven. That doesn't mean there's not a market for toaster ovens.

    People don't want to carry 15 different devices when one can do the job of all good enough. Why is it some /.'ers can't understand that?

    My V635 is a perfectly capable MP3 player and also a very decent phone. Why should I have to carry around a whole other device to listen to a bit of music one in awhile. Simmilarly, the 1.3 MP camera is "good enough" for what I use it for, quick snapshots.

    1. Re:You're full of it. by grub · · Score: 1


      Want to bet a $20 Amazon Gift Certificate? :)
      How do we determine if it's a failure or a hit, though...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:You're full of it. by elmegil · · Score: 1
      My V635 is a perfectly capable MP3 player and also a very decent phone.

      My a950 is a perfectly capable camera (for snapshots) and a decent phone, but I'll be damned if I can figure out why I'd want to pay even more just to be able to use the MP3 player capabilities. No, they don't bundle the cable, no I'm not paying airtime + >$1 per song to download them. It's stupid enough that the phone doesn't include any normal human being type ringtones.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:You're full of it. by Firehed · · Score: 1

      We do understand that. It's that the unified device trys to do everything and fails at all of it, including the original purpose. Specialization has worked since the dawn of life. As for toaster ovens, most people don't have one in addition to a toaster, and in any case they're more convenient (and effecient) for cooking small items like hash brows or reheating a couple slices of pizza or whatever.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:You're full of it. by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      People don't want to carry 15 different devices when one can do the job of all good enough. Why is it some /.'ers can't understand that?

      That is all well and good but the uber device should be a good single device before tackling other tasks (i.e. be a good phone with nice reception, durability, etc. before trying to be an mp3 player). Most, if not all, companies who make toaster ovens and who made toasters and/or ovens probably made sure that the toaster/oven was good quality and worked well before advancing to the next level of difficulty. Maybe you have a decent phone but what about the service with the phone? It's hard to find the perfect combo assuming that piece of heaven even exists yet in the cellular world.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    5. Re:You're full of it. by clonmult · · Score: 1

      Some of these uber devices are actually good at the prime functions.

      I've got an SE W550, colleagues have got K750s, W800s. They all have either good or excellent battery life, excellent signal (doubly so with the W550), usable or good cameras, decent MP3 players, etc. etc.

      The uber devices are here, they're good products.

    6. Re:You're full of it. by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      Good products at probably outrageous prices too but I'm just guessing.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  11. RTFM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFM: Memory Chip != Microdive

    1. Re:RTFM by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
      From TFA you're suggesting he read:

      ...whereas the 4GB and 8GB micro drive versions...

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  12. Nice! by xero9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice! Now I can have 8GB of storage for all my phone numbers! Oh wait, that already fits on my 32k SIM. Nevermind.

    1. Re:Nice! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      Since my phone can contain 1GB, I really enjoy not having to bring along my MP3 player anymore: It's one of the few extras I -really- use on my phone (and one, imo that makes sense).

    2. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PLEASE MOD THIS UP... unless you are a freak who watches CNN on your cell phone

  13. Last Accessory by Ianing · · Score: 0

    Is this anything like that other phone accessory that stuck on to your phone that was on slashdot a while back?

    1. Re:Last Accessory by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      No, but it is like that other accessory that stuck to your phone.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  14. But it adds an ugly 'wart' on your phone by TeeJS · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think it's a great idea in concept, but the bump it adds to your phone would be seriously annoying. I'm very happy with a Treo 650 w/ 4GB SD card. If you're a serious user of data on your phone, why wouldn't you buy one with real expandability built in?

    The picture in the article does not truly represent how big the patch is - a better example is on the mfr's page here

    1. Re:But it adds an ugly 'wart' on your phone by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      If that blue ribbon on the side is the connector cable... you're going to tear it or pinch it or somehow cut that connection.

      Just looking at that picture makes me think that they would have been better off designing a new battery cover & building their memory card into the cover*.

      It would solve a lot of the aesthetic issues and would give you a more durable design. It may or may not still be a bit ugly, but IMHO it would be a much more elegant solution.

      *with the memory card being removable of course

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:But it adds an ugly 'wart' on your phone by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      4GB? WTF? The 650 can only handle the first 2GB on the card unless you've got some janky software hack I haven't heard of.

    3. Re:But it adds an ugly 'wart' on your phone by TeeJS · · Score: 1

      To get 4GB to work, you need a custom ROM that upgrades the file access to fat32. It's also said to double the drive access speed. More info at treocentral.

  15. 8 Gig - Now I can run .... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
    8 Gig - Now I can run ....

    [wait for it...]

    ...

    Windows Vista !!

    Bill Gates will be so pleased.

    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    1. Re:8 Gig - Now I can run .... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0
      8 Gig - Now I can run ....

      [wait for it...] ...

      Windows Vista !!


      This would be heaps funnier if Windows XP didn't come on one CD yet Fedora required 4.
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:8 Gig - Now I can run .... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      If Windows came with the amount of software Fedora does it would be four discs as well. I'm sure Office is at least one CD.

      --
      Why not fork?
    3. Re:8 Gig - Now I can run .... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      Office 2k is about 200 megs. Sorry, I don't have information on anything more recent.

      So what else is taking up all those gigs of space? 4 different browsers? Fifteen different text editors?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:8 Gig - Now I can run .... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Yep, basically. There are plenty of Linux distros that don't have so many apps in the base install. Knoppix for instance is a live cd and an installer and it fits on one cd.

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:8 Gig - Now I can run .... by xenoterracide · · Score: 1

      fedora require's 4!!! now I no why I don't run fedora... Gentoo baby.

  16. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by elmegil · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So I have a question about this whole mess, having recently gotten a TF capable phone. I put a new TF card into my phone, then took it out, put it in the SD adapter, put it in my lifedrive, copied two MP3's to the "music" folder that my phone had created, and put it back into my phone.

    Those were the "any" MP3's you refer to above.

    They aren't seen by my phone. So clearly, your claims of technical ignorance and that "any" phone can play "any" MP3 are far overblown.

    Obviously, there probably needs to be some other additional update to the phone for MP3's, but since Samsung doesn't see fit to include a USB cable with their phone, and Verizon does see fit to neuter the Bluetooth capabilities of all their phones, I'm not in a position to do it "the right way" to find out how to do it "my way".

    Am I bitching about Verizon? Not really. This is a CELLPHONE for me, not an MP3 player, not anything else. And from that perspective, Verizon is the best of my options where I am at. But I was curious, and find it somewhat ironic that they market all the amazing capabilities of these phones when in fact they *aren't* as simple as you want to claim, much less how they market them. Unless of course you *like* paying three times for your music.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  17. hrm by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well a byte will store two digits or one letter. So if we need a 10 digit number that's five bytes, then we'll be generous and leave 35 characters for first and last name. That would give us 40 bytes for each phone # and name... allowing you to store two hundred million phone numbers. Wow, I've gotta run out and get me one of these!

    Sigh. Now if only I had someone to call.

    1. Re:hrm by GiMP · · Score: 1

      To disprove your assumption that 1 byte == 2 digits, I only need to point to 0xFF which is 255, clearly 3 decimal digits.

      However, you are right, a 10 digit phone number would use 5 bytes.. beginner's luck, I suppose.

    2. Re:hrm by MikeWitt · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but phones use one byte per number, and while yes, they could use two, they use one, because it is esaier to deal with, because then they see that 1=a certain tone, 2=..., etc..., whereas you are suggesting that they say, hmm, split 18 into 1 and 8, then deal with it. It is also easier to convert from hex without dealing with two digits, because then they just look at the last digit of the hex, rather than doing math (i.e. : 0x01 0x08 vs. 0x12, the 0x12 is smaller, but would you immediately know that 0x12=18, or that 0x01 and 0x08 = 18) Take a look at the tF card in your phone, you'll see thet if you do a hex dump, there is one byte per character.

    3. Re:hrm by owlstead · · Score: 1

      No, one byte will store 8 bits. With 8 bits you can count up to 255, starting at 0. For a basic telephone number you would need 10000000000 log 10 / 2 log 10 = 10 / log 2 ~ 33,2 bits, or 2 bits more than 4 bytes. Since national telephone numbers start with a 0 you could do with 4 bytes instead of 5. And then you could use frequency detection on the names. Store e's and other more frequently used characters in less bits then others. My guess is that you can easily get up to 300,000,000 telephone numbers. Or one uncompressed, full color, 30 fps, 2 MPixel video of 45 seconds of course :)

    4. Re:hrm by dwater · · Score: 1

      > Since national telephone numbers start with a 0

      Not everywhere they don't. Also, international numbers can also start with a zero - though I personally prefer the format where they start with a '+', then it works in any country [no, I haven't tried them all].

      --
      Max.
  18. not really logical... by theheff · · Score: 1

    It'd be much easier to just use an 8 gig flash drive, not to mention that there are SD cards out now that are half that size. It's not really a question of space, though, for cell phones. It's all about functionality. The two ideas have to work together to make something useful; they are mostly useless, or equatable to today's cell phones, if you have one without the other.

  19. WHY? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that the cell phone market has it all wrong if they are aiming to add massive amounts of storage to a cell phone.

    If I was a supposed industry leader in the cell phone market, I would announce that my phones would NEVER have more then a few megs of storage in them. Here is why!

    Cell phones are ALL ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION and PAY PER USE services. The only reason why you have a camera on your cell phone is so you either pay a monthly service charge to allow x number of pictures/kilobytes to be transmitted for free, OR you pay $.10 - $.20 for each picture sent. Same with text messaging, same with video on a cell phone, same with music on a cell phone. These features are not added to benefit mankind, but to drive up your cell phone bills and make the phone companies more money.

    I.e. the cellphone is a money making device. It makes money from its very existence, you can't use or even have a cell phone without spending money.

    This is unlike mp3 players, PDA's, computers, etc, where you buy the device, it comes with X amount of storage, and you fill the device with hopefully legal content that you can listen or watch at your convenience without paying a dime extra.

    So, when someone decides to turn a cellphone into a ubiquitous multimedia player with ample storage, why should ANY cell phone maker rush to implement these feature? Why should a cellphone company allow the user to store gigabytes of high resolution pictures so they can return home to their PC and download the pictures FOR FREE to their computer. Why should a cellphone company allow people to listen to hours of music or watch hours of video FOR FREE. Why should a cellphone company allow ANY feature to be used for free on a cellphone.

    Instead, the future of cellphone multimedia lies squarely in subscription services. You can stream music from the cellphone network, FOR A PRICE. Stream pictures taken to an online storage facility, FOR A PRICE. Stream video and data services FOR A PRICE. Even for those people that want to buy a song online with a cellphone, buying the music only puts the song into some online storage container that is streamed to your cellphone, for a price of course.

    I can't see cellphone companies embracing technology that effectively ruins their subscription based market. Allowing users to store gigabytes of pictures, music, video, or text might get people to buy the cell phone, but cellular service providers won't want to carry a phone that doesn't force the end user to buy into some subscription or pay-per-use service.

    Unlike digital multimedia players, cell phones are tied to a network. Given sufficient bandwidth, constant "always-on" music and video and data streaming should be possible, if for a price. I think cell companies are going to want to implement these subscription based features rather then slapping 8gb of hard drive into a cellphone so the end user doesn't spend a dime on ring tones, games, music, video, and other subscription services because they can find content on bit torrent or eDonkey.

    In the end, perhaps only PDA based cellphones will get the boost in storage, but I can't see the average cell phone coming with gigabytes of storage, it just doesn't make sense.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    1. Re:WHY? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      So, when someone decides to turn a cellphone into a ubiquitous multimedia player with ample storage, why should ANY cell phone maker rush to implement these feature? Why should a cellphone company allow the user to store gigabytes of high resolution pictures so they can return home to their PC and download the pictures FOR FREE to their computer. Why should a cellphone company allow people to listen to hours of music or watch hours of video FOR FREE. Why should a cellphone company allow ANY feature to be used for free on a cellphone.

      You're confusing cellphone makers with service providers.

      Samsung / Nokia / Motorola don't make a cent when you send pictures over Verizon / Cingluar / Whoever. But they make lots of money when you buy a new phone directly from them because you want a decent uncrippled phone, and just drop in your provider's SIM card that you got with your POS $0 phone.

      This is how the cell phone market works. Technophiles buy unlocked phones before th eproviders even offer them. Wanna-bees who don't know what a SIM is see the cool phones and ask their providers are going to get them. Market pressure and marketability forces them to get them, but they rape and lock down functionality so people will be encouraged ot use the pay-per-play services. Technophile now wants something better than the average joe, so he upgrades. Rinse, repeat.

    2. Re:WHY? by vertinox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't see cellphone companies embracing technology that effectively ruins their subscription based market. Allowing users to store gigabytes of pictures, music, video, or text might get people to buy the cell phone, but cellular service providers won't want to carry a phone that doesn't force the end user to buy into some subscription or pay-per-use service.

      Last I checked, my manufacture of my cell phone is not the same as my cell phone service provider. Sure, it says SprintPCS on the phone, but it's just painted on by Toshiba.

      Does Toshiba cell phone service? Not to my knowledge. Do they make money me directly when I download ring tones? Not directly. The only money they made is when I paid $50 for the phone and Sprint gave them a rebte cut of about $150 when I signed a two year contract.

      Even T-Mobile and Verizon do not make their phones. You've got Erikson, Nokia, Samsung, Keyocera, and various other companies who make the phones. They make the hard ware and in theory you can get a branded phone to work on another service provider if you get the correct ID car put it in. (not that they are going to give you hell about it and the first 3 sales reps you talk to know nothing about this but they can do it)

      So... Sure the cell phone makers make money by selling cheap ass phones to the providers who in turn give money directly to the manufactures, but the cell phone makers are competing with each other and in order to remain competative they are having to put more features on their phones.

      The providers may not like and ask if they can make it so you have to go through them to get content out of the box, but there are ways of transfering content to and from your cell phone through 3rd party sources.

      In fact, with the introduction of VoIP wifi phones, I'd say we'll stop seeing content lock in as hard core as it is now.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:WHY? by saboola · · Score: 1

      So the cell phone company stores and owns all of my music, photos, video, documents... Sound's like a fantastic idea!

      ..not really

      I know what you are saying, how this makes a lot of business sense, but this trend toward giving the consumer less and less control has to stop.

    4. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not if you buy the right phone, I have the rokr - people that hate it have never really looked at what it can do, Right now I have 150 songs on it - that's right not 100, "one five zero" The 100 song limit is the number of iTunes songs. 4 hours of TV shows and a few dozen pictures of my grandkids. I have custom ring tones for each of my family members and haven't paid for a single one yet, When I use the cam, I just download via USB no cost to me for that ether.

      Maybe you should do a little bit better job of comparison shopping next time you look at phones.

    5. Re:WHY? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      Cell phones are ALL ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION and PAY PER USE services. The only reason why you have a camera on your cell phone is so you either pay a monthly service charge to allow x number of pictures/kilobytes to be transmitted for free, OR you pay $.10 - $.20 for each picture sent. Same with text messaging, same with video on a cell phone, same with music on a cell phone. These features are not added to benefit mankind, but to drive up your cell phone bills and make the phone companies more money.

      You're confusing cell phone makers and content carriers.

      The carriers don't get much from high tech phones (except when they can make you pay through the nose for 3G/EDGE), but the cell phone makers do, and the interrest of the makers ain't always those of the providers. For example: check the latest Nokia phones, they have half a dozen phones (already for sale or soon-to-be) with WIFI (802.11 b, g or i/e/g). WIFI, do you think that's a good thing for access providers? And you can already run Skype on some of their Series60 for god's sake !

      Some people are already planning applications where your phone would use VoIP over EDGE/3G when there is no other option and would automatically switch to WIFI when in range of a hotspot !

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    6. Re:WHY? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      If I was a supposed industry leader in the cell phone market, I would announce that my phones would NEVER have more then a few megs of storage in them. Here is why! Cell phones are ALL ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION and PAY PER USE services.
      And as a customer in the cell phone market (no hypotheticals required), I get sick of paying bills, and will buy a cellphone with some storage space so I can just copy over my music once and for all.

      I have they money, you (as a hypothetical player in the cell phone market) want it. If you won't make what I want, some other company will.

    7. Re:WHY? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Cell phones might be all about subscription and pay per use, but they should be about low latency, high availability bandwidth. High availability in both the geographic and time senses. If a cell phone company took the ?foolish? step of charging a reasonable rate for usage without the shenanigans surrounding contracts and cheap loss leader phones and shit, people would flock to it.

      This is something google gets right by providing pop access for gmail; barriers to exit are barriers to entry. The contract based phone stuff means that the phone companies are limiting their market to people who either don't have a phone or are between contracts. No one else is interested in shopping, and everybody has a bad taste in thier mouth.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cheers from Denmark, (and cartoonists everywhere) I use a cell phone for work, and use pre-paid phone cards... I don't buy subscriptions to anything, prepaid is actually just as good of a deal as subsciption here, if not better because i can pick up and move without worrying about all my money going to waste. If I want a ringtone or video, I get it from some website for less money anyway, if not just plain free.

      As to music players in phones, on the train and metro around here, i would say that more people listen to music on their phones than on seperate mp3 players. almost all the phones I have looked at in stores these last three weeks have minimum 512 storage, and a large (30%ish) have 1-3gb. People live in small places here, and space is always at a premium.
      I myself much prefer to play music, run a schedule, email/sms, and call all from one small device rather than carry 4 things that I have to charge seperately.

    9. Re:WHY? by bitt3n · · Score: 1

      it's lucky that your hypothetical phone company has a complete monopoly so that people can't just walk across the street to a competitor that doesn't sell such horribly crippled phones.

    10. Re:WHY? by ghjm · · Score: 1

      Your post summarizes the thinking of U.S. mobile phone operator CEOs, up to mid 2004. Then Apple came along and sells 4.4 million iPods for $1.3 billion in revenue (Apple fiscal year ending September 2004). Operator CEOs predictably say: $1.3 billion is a lot of money, and we want a share of it next year. So they instruct their product development teams to figure out whatever magic pixie dust iPods have, and put it into their phones.

      The secret, of course, is that the iPod magic pixie dust is the same as the Sony Walkman magic pixie dust 20 years earlier: the ability to listen to music you like, on demand, without undue encumbrances.

      Enter 2005. The mobile phone product introductions all suck, because they have too much DRM, too little storage, and are more expensive (in terms of recurring cost) than the iPod. Music phones go nowhere. Meanwhile, the iPod, which mobile execs probably assumed was a fad product that peaked in 2004, sells 22.5 million units for $4.5 billion in Apple's fiscal 2005.

      What will happen in 2006? Personally I don't think the iPod has peaked yet; I think 2006 figures will be higher than 2005, though not as spectacularly. I don't think any music phones will break the million-unit barrier. Mobile operators will probably give up on the concept of a music phone.

      -Graham

    11. Re:WHY? by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      What will happen in 2006? Personally I don't think the iPod has peaked yet; I think 2006 figures will be higher than 2005, though not as spectacularly. I don't think any music phones will break the million-unit barrier. Mobile operators will probably give up on the concept of a music phone.

      Have you looked at some of the phones that are coming out from Sony-Ericsson or Nokia? Those that don't come will 4 Gb internal memory, all come with some removable memory. I have an easier time filling up my Nokia N70 with music than my Ipod (Nokia N70 has a MMC, so I can put into my machine and Linux discovers it as a USB storage device).

      I don't think the lower end Ipods (nano, mini) will survive.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    12. Re:WHY? by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      Because phone makers != network providers

    13. Re:WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Cell phones are ALL ABOUT SUBSCRIPTION and PAY PER USE services.

      What you say may be true where you are, but it isn't everywhere. China is a fairly large cell phone market, and it is perfectly possible to have and use a cell phone without a subscription. I'd go so far to say (ie, I have no evidence to back it up) that most cell phone owners in China don't have a subscription at all, instead charging their phones with cards that can be bought off the street.

    14. Re:WHY? by glitch23 · · Score: 0

      So... Sure the cell phone makers make money by selling cheap ass phones to the providers who in turn give money directly to the manufactures, but the cell phone makers are competing with each other and in order to remain competative they are having to put more features on their phones.

      They skipped right past being competitive by building more towers and increasing call quality. Where I live I can choose between CellularOne (which I have now), Sprint, US Cellular, nTelos, and I think that's about it. No one else has service here (North Central WV along I79). It would have been nice to have more choice of service, and phones (especially since you are stuck with one of the provider's phones unless you can get it unlocked and taken to another provider).

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  20. Is this the future ? by ravee · · Score: 1

    I can't stop wondering where this is going to take us. In the near future, all of us will be carrying all our data right inside our pockets. Will PCs be reduced to a dumb terminal instead of the computer it is now? Only time will tell.

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
    1. Re:Is this the future ? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Dumb terminals? Given that you can stick more and more powerful chips in smaller and smaller devices - with less electrical consumption, it would seem the opposite. Right now, a very good many computing devices are so small that the largest impediment is the *input* - trying to type into the things.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  21. Well blame your provider, not the phone. by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    I can guarentee you if you bought it stock or from a 3rd party you'd have the cable and software to transfer whatever the hell you want.

    And my phone (and all the ones this thing is for) has a removeable transflash card I can just plug in my PC. Also my phone came with the cable - and I can set it so that when I plug it into the PC it shows up as a USB flash drive.

    1. Re:Well blame your provider, not the phone. by elmegil · · Score: 1
      I can set it so that when I plug it into the PC it shows up as a USB flash drive.

      Yeah. That's how I transferred the MP3's from the lifedrive into the transflash card. I would have used my PC except my PC doesn't currently have an SD slot. As for the software, yeah, I have a copy of Media Player 10 too. Hello? The MP3's weren't recognized by the phone, and I don't think Verizon was sitting there saying "nope, we didn't authorize these".

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    2. Re:Well blame your provider, not the phone. by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Check if they are VBR, my phone won't play VBR MP3s.

      Also try re-naming them to something somple, like File.mp3, see if they show then. There may be filesystem limitations.

      Also make sure they're in the right folder.

    3. Re:Well blame your provider, not the phone. by spxero · · Score: 1

      "...I don't think Verizon..."

      And here we reach the root of the issue. j/k
      I have this argument with my fiance all the time: she is on Verizon and has a great connection all of the time. I am on Cingular and have a great connection most of the time. She is not able to download her own pictures from the phone without going through Verizon or voiding the warranty to use a USB cable and "hack" into it(it's not really hacking or cracking, but just using a different piece of software to analyze all the phone's files and replace them). I, however, can upload/download whatever songs, pictures, videos, etc. between my phone, computer, or other phone by using IR, Bluetooth, or the MemoryStick.

      Oh, and the .mp3 had to be renamed .mid before it was put on the Verizon phone(an LG7000 I think), and the songs.txt file or something of the like had to be deleted for the phone to recreate that file and recognize the new song files.

  22. Backwards by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The utility of having this much space on your phone isn't just storing MP3s, videos, and whatnot. The real potential is in what this means you can create.

    I'd like to have my phone be a constant or voice activated recorder. I have my phone on me at all times, it has a microphone, why not have it provide me a 'cockpit voice recorder' of sorts for life? No more guessing exactly what my wife told me to do, or having to write down phone numbers.

    Generation 1, your phone just records MP3s of life as it happens to you. If anything interesting happens during the day, you save the file on your computer.

    Generation 2, it meta overlays GPS data and is automatically stored as part of your 'diary'. You store it in an encrypted location so it can't be used against you unless you choose to release it, and you have a perfect alibi showing what you said and where you were.

    Generation 3, combine voice processing to index everything spoken around you into a searchable form, recognize phone numbers, voices, etc, and create a full digital assistant. At some point around here, it can also store a digital video feed from any cameras you or your personal equipment might have that's synchronized with everything.

    Generation 4, it hunts down Sarah Conner.

    Everytime someone puts a bunch of storage into something, someone else says "what's the use?" And human nature being what it is, some other asshole decides to invent something cool to use that storage/capabillity for just so they can give the finger to the first person.

    1. Re:Backwards by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny
      No more guessing exactly what my wife told me to do...

      Oh man I so badly want one of these now. Now I will have PROOF that she didn't ask me to take out the trash two hours ago.

      Sadly she will now have proof of all the stupid crap that I have blurted out , and can now nag me about it without even saying anything by playing it over and over.

    2. Re:Backwards by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Or just backup IMDB to your phone and OWN the Kevin Bacon arguments

    3. Re:Backwards by masklinn · · Score: 1

      I'd like to have my phone be a constant or voice activated recorder.

      Not constant (it doesn't have the memory for that), probably not voice activated (unless you meant 'activated via a voice command'), but my cell already does voice recording.

      My mp3 player does voice-activated recording though.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    4. Re:Backwards by syukton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At 96kbit/sec, 8gb (67,108,864 kbits) would net you about 699,051 seconds of recording.

      That's eight days of recorded audio.

      Relatedly: 86,400 seconds in a day * 96kbit/sec = 8,294,400 kbits per day, or 0.988769531 gigabytes per day.

      Definitely within the realm of feasibility.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    5. Re:Backwards by autophile · · Score: 1
      Generation 2, it meta overlays GPS data and is automatically stored as part of your 'diary'. You store it in an encrypted location so it can't be used against you unless you choose to release it, and you have a perfect alibi showing what you said and where you were.

      The argument about a "documented life" revolves around trust of the encryption mechanism and keys, and trust of the authorities allowed to use those keys. But the latter is an oxymoron for most as long as those authorities are human.

      That's why I say judges, politicians, and cops should all be robots! Otherwise we'll never be able to store information about ourselves!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    6. Re:Backwards by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      why not add video on top of that? most cell phones are already camera phones and newer ones have capability of recording video. have it set in your chest pocket and record where ever you are and what you're doing.

  23. Vaporware Indicator: Falsified images by Garridan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look at the shadows & bright spots on the "memory chip" and the cell phone. They don't line up.

    If this thing is real, why'd they have to photoshop an image of it?

  24. Looks Fragile by youngerpants · · Score: 2, Insightful
    OK, I actually quite like this idea. I've had my P900 for a few years now as I cant really see the point of giving up a phone that does everything for me (phone, browser, email, ssh ferchristsakes). A boost in storage for MP3's sounds like a great idea.


    However, just look at the flimsy ribbon connecting it, imagine the poor quality adhesive that will rip the bugger off when my phone is in the same pocket as my keys. Nah, I'll wait until they get it out of prototype phase.

  25. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by brunes69 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They aren't seen by my phone. So clearly, your claims of technical ignorance and that "any" phone can play "any" MP3 are far overblown.

    Are they VBR MP3s? If so can your phone handle those?

    Are they using extended filename syour phone can't reconize?

    Do you have your primary memory device even set to your TF card?

    There's a plethora of reasons these may not show up, none of which have to do with DRM. If you're talking about the a950, I can assure you it can play MP3s fine. You're doing something incorrect.

  26. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by everphilski · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't know about Samsung phones, but Motorola phones have transfer cables that are easy to come by... $10 or so on froogle. http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=samsung+transf er+cable&btnG=Search+Froogle (16.99 for the first result ... I don't know what model you have ) thats how I moved stuff onto my v265. I'm a Verizon customer too. Good cell phone forums for this kind of thing are www.howardsforum.com (may be misspelt, google it, I don't look up this kind of thing at work).

  27. Radical! by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    A memory card in a memory slot!

  28. Re:42 words by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

    What kind of LOSER would want to watch porn on an inch-and-a-half screen? Other than, of course, those majestic shitheads who proclaim loudly and consistently that they love porn and then expect me to be impressed because they're rebelling against societal acceptability.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  29. Better another equipment by catdogven · · Score: 0

    I think for that kind of money you could buy an Ipod or another mp3 player

    --
    It's never too late to stop doing something wrong, or to start doing something right.
  30. Re:42 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should not forget that that "inch-and-a-half" is everything some people have ;P

  31. how much usable, how reliable by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This reminds of the old MS DOS 3.1 days, when we could use all sorts of tricks to upgrade to more memory, but wheather wwe could use it at a particular time was dependent upon the phase of the moon, the distribution of the electrons, or whatever. One would have all the formats, all the drivers, and hope for the best.

    It seems that this might be the same case. First, the connection seems a bit fragile. Second, the current specificatins for some motoralo phone already include a memeory slot, but the maximum memory is listed at 256MB even though the current maximum memory module is 512K. This indicates that phones may have a less than GB limit, perhpas they do not include 32 bit addressing.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:how much usable, how reliable by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, FLASHBACK, I clearly remember the dark days of DOS memory managers. I was working support at the time, and I remember one of the first questions to ask was what memory manager they were using and how many drivers were loaded into low mem. What a f-ing nightmare. I was so happy when NT came out because that BS was finally going to go away forever. Now, I can just imagine mem mgrs coming full circle and coming back for a visit ... on cell phones. I guess the form factor will always limit the expandability so they *should* never be as widely used there, but I wouldn't be too surprised to see it in some form.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  32. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When looking at the list of available audo files, hit menu and select the TF Card as the primary memory device. You should now see your audio files on the card.

    by default, it's reading your phones memory, not the TF card.

  33. already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What's next? Adding a 3ghz on board graphic's card to play Doom3?

    yep
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/ 13/212249

    hope you are still enjoying your black & white TV

  34. What I would like to have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like mountain biking, hiking and inline skating. The following is a single device that I would like to see hit the market,

    1) A cell phone with a local phone directory loaded into memory.

    2) A GPS unit with detailed local maps.

    3) A music player that holds at least a thousand songs.

    4) A few movies to watch while camping or resting along the trail.

    5) A built in camera that takes at least 500 quality photos with little compression.

    6) A 12-hour battery life no matter what purpose I am using the phone for.

    I think 8GB's is a good start but not nearly enough.

  35. Re:42 words by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

    At the risk of feeding a troll...

    What kind of LOSER would want to watch porn on an inch-and-a-half screen? Other than, of course, those majestic shitheads who proclaim loudly and consistently that they love porn and then expect me to be impressed because they're rebelling against societal acceptability.

    Not me, because I don't have a phone. But I know plenty of so-called "majestic shitheads" who like nothing more than seeing porn on their phones, and spend lots of money downloading it and/or sending it on to others. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean there is no market for it.

    As far as telcos are concerned, the more data you have, the more likely you are to send/recieve data through them, the more money they get. Same goes for third-party companies that make movies, ringtones and all the other crap that people put on their phones nowadays.

    Take the internet as an analogy - porn and piracy have been two of the dominant driving forces behind it to date. Obligatory geek reference As storage capacity increases it's hardly surprising that traffic in these increases too, and where there's traffic there's usually an opportunity for money. Why should phones be any different?

  36. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The post to which you were replying was asking about your next cell phone, not your current one. There's no way you can guarantee what kind of DRM your next cell phone will have, or for that matter what file formats it will support. I happen to own a phone that takes transflash but doesn't play MP3s, only WMAs. Apparently MP3s were supported in an earlier version of the firmware, but it was taken out specifically in order to force users to adopt WMA format. Was this a good decision by the marketing team that made this phone? I don't know, I may have to return this phone, and avoid them in the future. But as far as I can tell, they're all equally evil, just in different ways. Will I be able to rewrite the phone's microcode to play MP3s? Probably not. Will I transcode MP3s into WMAs in order to listen to them? If I decide to keep the phone, I have to. Maybe I chose a bad phone. But maybe Microsoft will offer all the cell phone manufacturers a billion dollars apiece to drop support for non-MS formats, and in two years there will be no more cell phones that play MP3s. For better or worse, hardware manufacturers have already demonstrated that they are more interested in telling the consumer what to do than in doing what the consumer wants.

  37. Aye, strange. by kaleco · · Score: 1

    My suspicions are aroused by the fact that they're starting off on 8GB. To demonstrate that it is an effective storage technique, I'd expect them to come out with a more profitable-per-byte lower capacity model, such as a $120 4GB one, possibly even less.

    --
    Prosperity is only an instrument to be used, not a deity to be worshipped. Calvin Coolidge
    1. Re:Aye, strange. by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It's hard for me to tell if the shadows are lining up or not (the bright spots do seem to line up, although the picture does have that photoshopped look to it).

      However, the pages lists a 1, 2, and 4GB model and respective price points.

      The only other question I have is: What would I use that space for? I/O on those phones is dog slow (USB1) and the ROKR in particular is limited to 100 songs anyway. The camera certainly isn't the issue--even with a full load of songs you can take over 1,000 pictures with the camera without filling up the memory.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Aye, strange. by dwater · · Score: 1

      re: 100 song limit on ROKR

      I can't help but wonder if there is a limit on the length of a song. Is it possible, for example, to have a whole disk as a single 'song'? That's the only way to listen to some music; Pink Floyd, for example[IMO], and lots of classical music. One of the annoying things about the iPod is the gaps it puts between songs....

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Aye, strange. by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      No one forces you to use the USB interface on the phone. You can remove the card and use a card reader. Also, the ROKR is not limited to 100 songs, the iTunes player on it is. Any other java mp3 player (and there are several for ROKR) will take any number of songs you can fit on the card (which tops currently at 1GB).

  38. Re:42 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you expecting me to be impressed by your conformity?

  39. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by iainl · · Score: 1

    I don't know about your Motorola, but my U6 PEBL, and for that matter, the V3 RAZR a bunch of friends have, uses the same standardized mini-USB2 cable that came with my digital camera. And even if it hadn't done, the phone came with another I can leave at work.

    So Motorola are pretty good at that sort of thing at the moment. Which is nice, because I've got Katamari tunes for ringtones.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  40. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by Apocalyps3 · · Score: 1

    Agreed, I have a Samsung D600 and am always transfering music/movies to my TF cards for it, and often watch South Park/Futurama on the bus. Which was all ripped from DVD to .3gp using the provided software that came with the phone.

    I can see problems occuring in the future but for now I don't know much they can do.

    I have 2 x 512mb TF cards, I know there is a 1gb comming out early march, but I'd love to have a full 8gb that would be awesome, not just for media but as a file store for work or software.

    Also with some programming maybe a linux distro?

  41. Your name wouldn't be Ed Whitacre now would it? by beeblebrox · · Score: 1
    Your questions remind me of his attitude :-)
    Why should a cellphone company allow the user to store gigabytes of high resolution pictures so they can return home to their PC and download the pictures FOR FREE to their computer. Why should a cellphone company allow people to listen to hours of music or watch hours of video FOR FREE. Why should a cellphone company allow ANY feature to be used for free on a cellphone.
    And we give a flying fuck about the phone company because...?

    My phone allows me to do all of the above and more, including switching to another provider's SIM and a very smooth way to use calling cards to get around the extortionate international rates available on pay-as-you-go SIMs in Europe.

  42. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

    a 10 second search on several sites and a SEEM edit and you can enable obex on your verizon phones.

    My e815 is now an e815m and plays anything I want it too, within reason. Mp3's video, etc.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  43. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by nbritton · · Score: 1

    Yep. I have a Nokia 6236i from Verizon, they DRM'd the crap out of it but if you can find a copy of Nokia's Diego (v3.xx) program and buy a DKU-2 cable on eBay ($5) you can reset everything back to the defaults. Now I can upload my own MP3 ringtones, screensavers, and backgrounds, download pics from the phone to the pc, run any java J2ME apps / games I want, and get on the internet for free (uses regular minutes, free nights & weekends).

    http://www.howardforums.com/
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=6236i+%2B site%3Ahowardforums.com&btnG=Search

  44. 8 GB? Why not 200! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the iPod nano 200 gb upgrade could be applied with some tweaking!

  45. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Yeah, my digital camera uses a mini-USB transfer cable. Motorola uses a universal transfer cable for all of its phones (Going back for 4+ years at least ...) The cable I have is USB and the cool thing is you can recharge the battery via the USB port too. Also works as a data cable if you want to use your cell phone as a modem. (Verizon nights and weekends FTW) Best $10 I ever spent :P

  46. OMG ANOTHER VERIZON CUSTOMER!! by carn1fex · · Score: 1

    Yes actually only verizon screws you in the ass with all these fees that you mention above. I have nextel/t-mobile and I dont pay a dime for any of the pay services that you have mentioned. What you say makes verizon alot of money right now in a near monopolistic environment but market forces are squashing all of that (thank god).

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Only $199? by chesterjosiah · · Score: 0

    That's why things are so expensive in the US. People are willing to spend way too much money for things like this. I'm almost mad from reading the word "only" in that sentence. When people decide that they're only willing to spend what the technology is actually worth, prices for all sorts of technology will drop. $80/month for a cell phone? $199 for 8gb? Ridiculous. . . .

  49. better mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a even better idea, what happened to...oh I don't know this funy thing about enhancing say...usability? Oh my gosh what a concept? Enhance the UI's of my existing Cellphone? I don't particulalry care if it can play MP3's that's a bonus, I'd much rather see tweaks backported to the existing software. I do care that my PDA doesn't have an exchange policy. I do care that, unlike my computer, I can't get sofware upgrades--for free. Or along the same line at christmas (why not) a free upgrade to a 'improved' model? How about enahnced rugedness? Enhanced readamility of PDF's? Hell my old visor wich was seriously KFA on at least that front could, even my OLD palm can read PDF's no sweat, new palm that costs 4x as much? nope no dice thats a 30$ purchase.

  50. ... on my Moto 810... by renehollan · · Score: 1
    Oh sure, I can enter my contacts, and use voice recognition with a Bluetooth earbud to say "call home", but can I ask it to "say time"?

    No.....

    I have to grab the damn thing off my belt clip and look at it.

    Damn idiots.

    (And while it might be a clever hack to add a time service phone number called "time", that's a horribly inefficient waste of bandwidth just to avoid having to grab the phone).

    --
    You could've hired me.
  51. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an Motorola A1000...BUT you need to remove the cover to swap the battery which I do every 2 or 3 days.

    This product doesn't look like it would last long with constant twisting of the connecting ribbon.

    Then there is the hazardous BENDING the ribbon would be subjected through just to get to the outside of the case.

    I think I'll just wait for the 1GB (transflash now called) MicroSD card to come out.

  52. xobile.com (great service!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    xobile.com meets this need right now! I don't work for them, etc., but uhm, a "friend" of mine told me about it... yeah, that's it: a "friend..." and their quality is pretty decent on my "friend's" Motorola v360's screen...

  53. New A950's only recognize WMA by ZxCv · · Score: 1

    I just bought an A950, picking it over other phones mainly for its music capabilities.

    Since the Verizon outlet I bought it at was inside a Circuit City, I picked up a 256MB microSD card and a USB SD card reader for $20 a piece so I could have my music on the phone.

    However, after formatting the card as FAT32 and inserting it into the phone so its directory structure was created and then filling it up with my MP3s, I was annoyed to see the phone's "MP3 Maestro" didnt recognize a single of my songs. After lots of screwing around with CBR/VBR and filenames, and then a good solid hour of research, I discovered the problem: apparently, in mid-January, Verizon started using a new firmware in these phones that only recognizes WMA files. If you use the USB cable they sell you and WM10 to transfer songs, WM10 silently converts your files into WMA files before transferring them to the phone. So, one quick run through dbPowerAmp and all the songs I wanted were in WMA format, on my mSD card, and (mostly) playing happily with "MP3 Maestro".

    Now, my A950 plays my music off of my mSD card without the need to buy Verizon's hideously overpriced $30 USB cable.

    Of course, if you didn't buy your phone directly from Verizon, or if you've had since before January, then I don't know... :-) I just know that, as retarded as it is for this phone's "MP3 Maestro" to only play WMA files, I'm just happy I got it to work in the end.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  54. Re:Vaporware Indicator: Falsified images by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    I was going to point that out. Actualy, I am pretty sure that is just a real live sticker :P

  55. I have Motorola A1000 by timelady · · Score: 1

    Terrific. I have it syncing under Linux. TF card (with SD card adapter) just mounts nicely. A1000 is Symbian OS, so I added an Ebook reader, GPS program, and MP3 program. Oh and some nice file management tools:) The ONLY issue is the limit on the TF capacity. 8gb would mean my dream all in one device is not so limited, and no ipods for me. Thats exactly what I wanted!!!

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
    1. Re:I have Motorola A1000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointers to a web page about getting the A1000 to sync with Linux would be appreciated.

      I have one too. It plays MP3s well, has GPS built in and works as a fairly good PDA.

      8Gb would be very nice _IF_ the phone will address it (It should do, after all the device is SD) and the dongle might be useful IF it fits _inside_ my battery cover (otherwise that ribbon is a disaster waiting to happen....)

  56. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    I have a Imate sp3 which takes minisd which should be compatible with micro sd. I wonder if this will work with my phone as well.

    My Imate sp3 runs the Microsoft Smartphone OS, it too can play mp3and 3gp, plus mpeg, wmv movie files, with no DRM, I've watched movies on it on budget airlines with no onboard entertainment (with the phone in flight mode of course). The thing I love about the Imate sp3 is that its quite small... almost the same size as my nokia 6100.

    I too currently have a 512Meg MiniSD, I've been searching for quite some time to find something larger than 512M... Getting 8Gig would blow me away.

  57. Actually a great idea! - The global phone book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, I think you've hit on a great idea, a global - built in - phone book.

    Forget calling information, when you could store all the white pages of all major US cities,
    and even add in the yellow page ads to display on the little color screen...

    Great Idea!

  58. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by elmegil · · Score: 1

    Sure I can enable it. If I want my brand new phone's warranty to be completely void.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  59. It needed to be said. by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

    But does it run Linux?

  60. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

    I have had my phone in for service since doing my SEEM edit. Verizon, for the most part, could not care less. As long as your water indicator sticker is okay, that is really all they look for.

    If you are paranoid, back up your unedited SEEM first, and if you need service, restore to that point before taking it in.

    Now, before you say it... if you can boot it, odds are you can restore it. If you can't boot it, they are not going to either when you take it in.

    I have returned edited phones under warranty 3x (company "phone go-to guy") I have never had a problem.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  61. Re:WTF? Do you own one of these phones? Obviously by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    If it's a Motorola, you have to delete /a/audio/TempTones.db and /a/audio/MyTones.db and restart your phone. Beware this scrambles your ringer selections, and if something is unusable you get kicked out of the settings screen. (choose a valid file in multimedia and "set as ring tone")

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  62. Re:Vaporware Indicator: Falsified images by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's what I couldn't put my finger on. It looks totally flat.

  63. Yay for trademarks by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Would you buy a product from a company too retarded to spell Stick and Store?

    OK, so they do it because it's easier to get a trademark on "Stik&Stor". But it's a disturbing trend. Handi Paks, Intel's unpronouncable "VIIV"... every new product or technology has to have a stupid name now. In Nero, they don't say "we put in a buffer so you don't get underruns", they say "UlraBuffer!!!!!!!!!!!" How times have changed.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  64. But I need an 8g SD card by Tangential · · Score: 1

    Damn. You'd think they could package something up for us treo users too.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But then I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain
  65. [OT] Yes I know it's OT... your sig by hummassa · · Score: 1

    pugs is here.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  66. Motorola not in the Cable and Wire business by chickenandporn · · Score: 1

    Exactly... For Chinese New Year, I took an A1200 to Hainan, a tropical province, and connected both cameras and my mobile phone to my laptop (gf wanted to check MSN) with the same cable (not at once mind you, but made for simpler packing). The phone charges from USB, too.

    If I lose my cable, I don't need to order one, I go to the little shop on the corner, and they have one. I guess Motorola realized it's not in the Cables and Wires business.

    Crazier still is that the Airport Extreme AP has a USB port, and will talk the more basic protocols, so I don't have a charger: I just have a standard USB cable from the A.E. AP. I have to make sure the phone is in Modem or USB Storage mode, since A.E. AP has no USB-Net compatibility. USB-Net through the A.E. AP would rock for transferring MP3s! (and sexy photos of afore-mentioned gf)

    The A1200 has only a 10MB userfs, so a Tflash is quite necessary.

    MacOSX doesn't like the factory-format of the TFlash, and A1200 doesn't like the format of a Mac-formatted TFlash (via USB-disk), but letting the A1200 reformat the TFlash makes a perfectly functional filesystem.

  67. 1994 - $800 for 16meg ram. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Dude, in 1994 it cost me $800 for 16meg ram. 4x4meg.

    $800 those days, was 2.5weeks work, today thats more than $3000.

    I would never spend $3000 today for even a whole pc or laptop.

    OK

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.