Slashdot Mirror


Indestructible Super Mug To Save Humanity

prostoalex writes "Next time a ceramic mug falls on the ground, you won't have to buy a new coffee:"A team of undergraduates at the university in Socorro designed a ceramic mug that can fall 15 feet onto concrete pavement and still hold a full cup of java afterward without leaking."" Thank god I can sleep easy at night ;)

300 comments

  1. Bah. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I first read the summary, I thought these kids had designed some new interesting ceramic material that would prove to have many practical applications. After all, that's what the contest is for...

    From TFA:
    Contestants generally try to design mugs out of high-tech materials so they won't break.

    But the New Mexico Tech team used a different tactic...making part of their mug expendable, to save the rest. In short, they cheated.

    Now don't get me wrong...I'm all for thinking outside the box...after all, I'm the one whose egg drop design in high school incorporated a parachute, ensuring my egg could survive a drop from any altitude. I was the clear winner, because I too 'thought outside the box'.

    Did I get a commendation for my cleverness? Did I get a write-up in USA Today?

    No. I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes (although I hear they wrote in that rule the following year).

    These New Mexico Tech students 'thought outside the box', and in doing so, completely subverted the whole point of the competition. Using this strategy, they managed to net second place, and they get a newspaper article for it.

    Again, bah.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Bah. by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      Well, if the underside section could be replaced, then it could have uses.

      But how long for gravity to kick in? Nine feet in the contest, and 15 feet ability, are not useful for my coffee table or desk. If it could correct within 50cm, thus stopping the carpet from getting dirty, then it would be worthy.

    2. Re:Bah. by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Now don't get me wrong...I'm all for thinking outside the box...after all, I'm the one whose egg drop design in high school incorporated a parachute, ensuring my egg could survive a drop from any altitude. I was the clear winner, because I too 'thought outside the box'.

      Did I get a commendation for my cleverness? Did I get a write-up in USA Today?

      No. I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes (although I hear they wrote in that rule the following year).


      Yeah, and I'd be really good at chess if I could just make my horsey jump straight to the king right off the bat. Unfortunately for both of us, the point of the competition isn't to cheat the rules.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:Bah. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately for both of us, the point of the competition isn't to cheat the rules.

      Read again. The rules didn't forbid parachutes.

    4. Re:Bah. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me that you're still sore at Kirk for the whole Kobayashi Maru thing, are you? I mean, he did cheat fair and sqaure. :-P

      I think the reason why the judges liked this entry was because it was a practical engineering solution similar to what you'd see in the real world. While every engineer wishes that a magic material would come along to solve all their problems (and on rare occasions they do get that wish), most of the time an engineer is forced to make the type of tradeoff seen in the coffee cup. I seriously doubt this solution will be accepted more than once, though, so I expect that you're doubly screwed. Sorry.

    5. Re:Bah. by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if no parachutes are forbidden in the rules, why is it 'cheating' ?

      --
      XviD review: 500kbps to 4000kbps

    6. Re:Bah. by Zwets · · Score: 1

      Yeah, contests should promote creative abuses of the rules, like the venerable IOCCC.

      Completely off-topic, just to satisfy my curiosity: what were some of the other entries in that egg contest? I've been looking at the rules, and about the only thing I can think of would be a parachute... what other ways are there to get an egg slowly from 15 feet up to the ground?

      --
      One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. - Will Duran
    7. Re:Bah. by stx23 · · Score: 1

      Neither do the rules of chess.

    8. Re:Bah. by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      But the New Mexico Tech team used a different tactic...making part of their mug expendable, to save the rest. In short, they cheated.

      These New Mexico Tech students 'thought outside the box', and in doing so, completely subverted the whole point of the competition. Using this strategy, they managed to net second place, and they get a newspaper article for it.

      I see. So any idea that maintains the spirit of the competition but violates the rules is cheating, is it? I say 'bah!' to that. As a graduate of this venerable college located in the middle of nowhere in NM, I can say I'm proud that they didn't let a little thing like the rules get in the way. It shows imagination can't be stifled by rigid thinking or a need to create conformity. They developed something that went beyond the limited scope of the arbitrary rules and should be commended for their ingenuity. But coffee isn't what I'd worry about -- they neede to build an indestructible beer stein!

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    9. Re:Bah. by Iamthefallen · · Score: 3, Funny

      True, they don't. But then, a parachute attached to the pieces in chess doesn't make any sense.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    10. Re:Bah. by Holi · · Score: 1

      If he got an F then I am guessing there is some part of this story that he has omitted.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    11. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pawn paratroopers! w00t!

    12. Re:Bah. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes

      The idea in both situations is to design something that can survive the impact -- not avoid the impact, which is what you did,
      They came up with an innovative solution to the problem. You just avoided the problem altogether.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    13. Re:Bah. by SSCGWLB · · Score: 1

      As another Alumni of the 'university in Socorro' which is not a university (New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology), I must concur. Much beer is wasted every day and this must be stopped!!!

    14. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In high school I made one out of about 10 straws that survived a 25 or so foot drop onto cement. If you picture the egg sitting with the fattest part down on a counter, imagine a tall pyramid of 4 straws around that. On the very top of that pyramid there were 4 straws that came out as cross peices to prevent it from falling directly on its side. At the bottom were a few peices of straws that reinforced the pyramid. The egg sat about an inch off the ground in a masking tape cradle. Basically my idea was to use the minimal amount of parts I could to get the egg to land fat side down, because they are very hard to break that way. It worked.

    15. Re:Bah. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      That sir is a brilliant comment.

      BTW, I'll bet you could find a novelty set somewhere that has some (or even all) the pieces with parachutes attached.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    16. Re:Bah. by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Neither do the rules of chess.

      ObYoungOnes:
      Vyv (trying to fix a video recorder): Yeah, but it doesn't say, "ensure the machine isn't full of washing-up liquid"!
      Mike: Well it wouldn't, would it?! I mean, it doesn't say, "ensure you don't chop up your video machine with an axe, put all the bits in a plastic bag and bung em down the lavatory"!
      Vyv (grabs video recorder): Doesn't it? Maybe that's where we're going wrong!

    17. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in other words, you're still crying about an F you got in high school?

      Honestly, who would want to keep a battered mug? Their mug is quite nice and will at least get you through the day- which is all coffee drinkers around the world really care about.

    18. Re:Bah. by firl · · Score: 1

      ya, for my egg drop, they threw us an egg from a distance and we had to catch it. I had a garbage bag, and a huge ammount of shipping bubbles, I didn't lose, but I lost one of the eggs in the abyss known as my garbage bag.

    19. Re:Bah. by Valdoran · · Score: 1

      'cause that's how (most) (high-school) teachers are.

    20. Re:Bah. by Swanktastic · · Score: 1

      What other ways are there to get an egg slowly from 15 feet up to the ground?

      Helium/Hydrogen/Hot Air baloons?

    21. Re:Bah. by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Completely off-topic, just to satisfy my curiosity: what were some of the other entries in that egg contest? I've been looking at the rules, and about the only thing I can think of would be a parachute... what other ways are there to get an egg slowly from 15 feet up to the ground?
      A helicopter design?

      If you turn that downward motion into rotation, you won't end up with an omlette.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    22. Re:Bah. by squidfood · · Score: 1
      a parachute attached to the pieces in chess doesn't make any sense.

      Does it make sense, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. It does not. And so I urge you to acquit the king of this checkmate, because it doesn't make sense.

    23. Re:Bah. by hyfe · · Score: 1
      I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes (although I hear they wrote in that rule the following year).

      The rules you linked clearly used the word 'vehicle'. A parachute is not a vehicle.

      You cheated, got caught and you're whining about it god knows how many years later!

      tihi :)

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    24. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can say I'm proud that they didn't let a little thing like the rules get in the way

      that's the true new mexico spirit, eh?

      i used to liver there, just poking fun... no offence meant

    25. Re:Bah. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If he got an F then I am guessing there is some part of this story that he has omitted.

      The part that he omitted was that teachers are petty pathetic little fucks who don't like being outsmarted by their students. Then again, this is common knowledge so he really didn't need to spell it out. Those who can, do; those who can't, teach.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    26. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now don't get me wrong...I'm all for thinking outside the box...after all, I'm the one whose egg drop design in high school incorporated a parachute, ensuring my egg could survive a drop from any altitude.

      I can't imagine a parachute doing much good in a drop from 15 feet. That's less than 1 second of fall time...

      I used a parachute as well (which didn't hurt my grade at all...), but not to slow it down. The sole purpose was to orient the package so I could focus on padding the bottom more.

      My guess is that either the teacher was stupid or the egg did not actually survive the drop because you banked on the parachute helping when it wouldn't.

      OTOH, I do have to agree that this coffee cup is cheating. I mean what good is a coffee cup that can survive a drop once? You still have to buy a new one, which defeats the whole purpose...

    27. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booster rockets.

    28. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my high school class, we were required to do that same project. However, we had no weight requirements, and could only use toothpicks and a hot glue gun.

    29. Re:Bah. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      A parachute is a vehicle, it's a technology that propells something through the air.
      Most egg drop contests have a no parachute rule, but if his didn't, then he clearly won.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    30. Re:Bah. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Huh. When I did the egg drop, parachutes were allowed, but the scoring was set such that you'd never win the competition with one. The folks who used Nerf footballs did pretty well, but I used a pantyhose egg stuffed with styrofoam packing peanuts, and I won the day.

      Score was inversely proportional to fall time. I never actually threw the egg down, but it survived falls from twice the contest height.

      "thinking outside the box" isn't an end in itself. It's only valuable if you get a valid solution to the problem. (IE within spec and budget)

      Having said that, I wouldn't have failed you, had it been my competition and I had written the spec poorly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    31. Re:Bah. by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the spirit of the competition is to test ingenuity, not try to be the clever shmuck looking for loopholes. There's always one person who does the parachute route (having seen more than one of these competitions). Generally, the failing grade/ wedgies / whatever are enough to discourage the next person.

      You think you're the first egg drop competitor to ever think of a parachute? It's not that clever.

      And it still isn't against the rules, why? Because it's common knowledge that parachutes are gay.

      Only losers use parachutes.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    32. Re:Bah. by Vraylle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, I don't remember acting that way toward my students. I frequently awarded high marks to those that creatively solved problems in such ways (including specifically the egg drop one). Maybe it's your personal experience in school, but don't make a blanket remark like that...especially such a profane one...about any group just because you've had bad experiences with some.

      --
      Mutant Freaks of Nature: "Frighteningly Addictive"
    33. Re:Bah. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      But an engineer's JOB is frequently to solve a problem of limited and arbitrary scope. If you can't do that, you're not a good engineer.

      Yes, there are indeed opportunities for clever lateral thinking, but if you don't solve the problem to the customer's satisfaction, you don't get your money.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    34. Re:Bah. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You cheated, got caught and you're whining about it god knows how many years later!

            C'mon, give him a break. It obviously meant a lot to him!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    35. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes. The egg drop. At my high school there was a long standing tradition of giving the physics teacher nightmares by finding ass-ended ways of making the egg survive the fall off of the gym roof.

      The first year I was up to bad he came up with a pretty clever sliding point scaled based on the general volume of the device. (Which we had to calculate) So, the smaller your enclosure the smaller your handicap. This pretty much discouraged any parachutes or big, fluffy pillows. He'd already disallowed wings or airbrakes of some sort.
      This rule was, I thought, was ripe for abuse.

      On drop day I came with an old pepsi can with its top cut off. Inside was an egg wrapped in rubber bands and neatly suspended in triple strength unflavored gelatin. Smaller than everyone elses by a huge margin, hit the ground with an unimpressive thud.
      Result: First place, liquids and jello banned.

      Next year (advanced physics class! Woo)

      Came with an egg neatly enclosed in a cube of clear epoxy resin.
      Result: Easy to calculate volume, shattered old record, 1st place- Epoxy banned

    36. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now don't get me wrong...I'm all for thinking outside the box...after all, I'm the one whose egg drop design in high school incorporated a parachute, ensuring my egg could survive a drop from any altitude. I was the clear winner, because I too 'thought outside the box'.

      Ummm, I hate to burst your bubble, but using a parachute for an egg drop contest isn't exactly thinking outside the box. We did egg drop contests in the 6th grade and my entry had a parachute...as did many others. Perhaps you meant it as a tongue-in-cheek comment and I'm humor impaired as it's monday an all, but it doesn't exactly take an Einstein to think "Hey a parachute would help."

      Oh, and none of us got F's for it, because "any means you can devise" was given as the criteria. So your teacher was clearly being an idiot if they didn't mention it as not being allowed but still failed you for it.

    37. Re:Bah. by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      I believe the traditional solution to the egg problem is some sort of energy-absorbing shell- much like what was used in TFA.

    38. Re:Bah. by bugmonkey · · Score: 1

      Those who can't teach, teach Geography.

      Well, that's what I heard anyway...

    39. Re:Bah. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What is "looking for loopholes" for one guy is "thinking out of the box" for the other.

      And even if you (the organizer of the competition) think about it as a loophole, you can't "punish" the player for it, because at the time of the contest it was conformant to the rule. What you can do, however, is change the rules for next year's competition. That's how it is done in a fair contest.

    40. Re:Bah. by cloak42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Obscenity is the crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker."

    41. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some one is rather bitter.

      There are some teachers like that, yes. And IT folk, and programmers, and engineers, and pretty much every other profession. Teachers do not have a monopoly on jerkitude.

    42. Re:Bah. by khallow · · Score: 1
      When I first read the summary, I thought these kids had designed some new interesting ceramic material that would prove to have many practical applications. After all, that's what the contest is for...

      [...]

      But the New Mexico Tech team used a different tactic...making part of their mug expendable, to save the rest. In short, they cheated.

      Good design is more important than good materials. So I think the win was fair.

      Second, go NMT!

    43. Re:Bah. by j_snare · · Score: 1

      I would agree. I remember the same competition at our school, the rules being fairly explicit, still not disallowing parachutes. In fact, it wasn't even an uncommon solution. About 50% of the class used parachutes. Interestingly enough, the parachutes performed fairly poorly, given the high representation.

      Getting an F for original thinking, my foot.

    44. Re:Bah. by Isotopian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I fully agree with you, as I like to do the same type of thing myself. I was just pointing out that this specific example seems to be a bit un sportsmanly. My high school math class held a catapult competition, with the only limit on size being 'table-sized'. Imagine their surprise when we rolled up with a 9 foot roman catapult using 200 feet of bungee cable. My teacher said 'I said small ones!' to which we retorted, "you said table sized, and we like big tables." The following year, there was a specific weight limit in the competition.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    45. Re:Bah. by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Look at the monkey. Look at the silly monkey!

      *Juror's head explodes*

    46. Re:Bah. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Pawn paratroopers!

            "and it's another tense moment here in the world championship as the current - wait, I can't believe it, oh it's a sudden paradrop the the 8th rank and a surprise queening! I think the Russians have taken the title again this year..."

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    47. Re:Bah. by Greatmoose · · Score: 1

      So, was your teacher's goal was to ban any successful solution? Way to stifle creativity, teach. What was his reason for banning those solutions? Especially the pepsi can one (btw, GREAT idea).

      --
      Clearly I forgot to equip my +5 Codpiece of Karma.
    48. Re:Bah. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I did the HS egg-drop competition, too. the "Parachute" technique is the obvious plan, and is about the furthest from "thinking outside the box" you can be.

      also, if you had enough materials for a parachute, your egg-drop contest simply wasn't restrictive enough.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    49. Re:Bah. by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      It's bullshit that you got an F, especially since there were no specific rules prohibiting what you did.

      I lost an egg-drop competition at my work because the vague rules didn't specify a bullseye hit (not only did the egg have to survive but it had to hit a bullseye on the ground when dropped from 50 feet). The winning team had a giant sheet of plastic that basically covered the bullseye, which was considered a hit, despite the egg being 10' from the actual target. My team's egg was an inch away from the bullseye, but because we didn't have any part actually touching the bullseye, we lost.

      We didn't take it too personally though. The following year they were more detailed specifying the rules and we ended up winning (a team of systems and software engineers beat 20 or 30 other teams of aerospace/mechanincal/materials engineers from one of the top defense contractors)

    50. Re:Bah. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      I believe the traditional solution to the egg problem is some sort of energy-absorbing shell- much like what was used in TFA.

      Read the rules he posted -- the competition isn't so much to get an egg to fall w/o breaking (although that is required), but to take as much time as possible in doing so. The longest amount of time in the air wins.

      Unsure how a parachute is "out of the box" thinking though.

      The traditional egg drop contest went the way of the dodo when someone realized that a piece of bread and some creamy peanut butter could beat just about any other design out there. The bread provides a small, lightweight cushion and the peanut butter has rather stunning impact distribution and absorption capabilities.

    51. Re:Bah. by jaylene_slide · · Score: 1


      Brilliant! I nearly choked. Thank you.

      slide

      --
      "Your proactive bipartisan synergy is indemnifying. Good work, carry on."
    52. Re:Bah. by Inzkeeper · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the game Shogi: a japanese chess-like game.
      Captured pieces are now yours and can be dropped anywhere on the board at any time!

    53. Re:Bah. by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      True, they don't. But then, a parachute attached to the pieces in chess doesn't make any sense.

      Obviously you've never played chess using my rules. I think it's quite an improvement on the original game, but I have trouble finding people to play with. I wonder if this might have something to do with my rules for castling, which involves a car battery, jumper cables, live hornets, and kerosene.

    54. Re:Bah. by pla · · Score: 1

      But an engineer's JOB is frequently to solve a problem of limited and arbitrary scope.

      ...Usually with rather spartan financial and temporal limitations as well. Don't leave those out...

      Yet, despite all of the above (or perhaps more accurately, because of them), finding a way to "cheat" usually means the difference between success and failure. And in the real world, your boss won't care if the container lands on its side - Only that his coffee doesn't spill.


      If you can't do that, you're not a good engineer.

      Yes, a good engineed needs to know how to take the slow and methodical traditional approach to a problem. But the difference between a good engineer and a great engineer lies in how well they "cheat". Simple example, silicon lasers... Everyone knows you can't make a laser out of an opaque material, but who says a laser needs to emit in the human-visible spectrum? You might nit-pick about the meaning of the word "light", but an IR laser works just fine in 99% of the applications for which you might consider a laser in the 400-750nm range.

    55. Re:Bah. by avronius · · Score: 1

      While I wouldn't argue whether or not a parachute was a vehicle or not - there's just too much that's available to interpretation - a parachute is NOT a propellant.

      It's purpose is to aid with deceleration (retard your fall), not acceleration.

    56. Re:Bah. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're missing my point. Of course you have to think laterally. But, if you design an "unbreakable" coffee cup that a) breaks and b) doesn't do a very good job of holding coffee, you're not going to get the contract.

      This coffee mug is not clever thinking. This is a failure to understand the problem space. If I were to design this really nifty airplane that didn't actually, you know, fly, it doesn't matter how clever it is.

      Engineers solve problems. This mug is a silly solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    57. Re:Bah. by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Because when 30 students showed up with gelatin filled Pepsi cans the next year, it wouldn't be creative anymore.

    58. Re:Bah. by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      And those that can't teach inspect schools.

    59. Re:Bah. by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Retrorockets?

      Antigravity?

      One or two swallows (European) grasping a bit of string with the egg tied into it?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    60. Re:Bah. by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      I dunno. They used traditional materials, but the lost-foam concept by which they constructed the "sacrificial" ceramic is pretty novel in its own right.

      You got screwed on the parachute thing, though. Here in Florida, you'd be due a long and painful recount.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    61. Re:Bah. by op12 · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience. We had several people use parachutes. But ours had the right combination of a parachute and padding under the egg. The only problem came after we won and decided to try a 3-story drop. The parachute got caught under the egg and that was the end of that egg.

    62. Re:Bah. by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      Kinky!

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    63. Re:Bah. by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      How is that maths? It's tech or physics. Maths doesn't involve physical experiments...

    64. Re:Bah. by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 1
      The point of the contest isn't to produce unbreakable coffee cups; it is to produce engineers that know how to solve engineering problems.

      Arguably, their solution represents a bending of the rules; if that is the case, then this should presumably lead to the rules being modified next year so as to prevent this "abuse."

      But personally, I don't think it represents an "abuse." The students decided to take a different approach as to where they would apply their "high technology." In most cases, the participants tried to create fancier forms of ceramics; these guys applied their problem solving skills to other aspects of the problem, and did so sufficiently well that they got a second place finish with a material that was consciously and by design inferior to the ceramics used by other teams.

      This reminds me of the technology choices made in Vinge's A Fire Upon The Deep. In that book, they had "slow" and "fast" zones, where computers were either virtually useless and stupid, or, in the "High Beyond," potentially god-like in their powers. Ship designs would vary considerably depending on where they were going. The protagonist's ship winds up getting a redesign along the way, where it is designed, by one of the "god-like" Powers, to perform particularly well in the Slow Zones. This winds up involving using low-technologies (short on computing power, and such) with High Beyond "elegance."

      The analogy here should be obvious: our intrepid New Mexicans were using fired clay (a low technology) with a great deal of design thought having gone into how the device was built.

      If it was clear, to the judges, that there was a great deal of design work that went into it, it seems to me that it is not at all unfair that the entry won.

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    65. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vehicle: 1.A device or structure for transporting persons or things; a conveyance: (Dictionary.Com)
      Transport: 1.To carry from one place to another; convey.

      Point A being window in second story of a building.
      Point B being ground below and within general proximity to said building.

      How is it not a vehicle?

    66. Re:Bah. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Yup, absolutely no mathematics involved when calculating the trajectory of a projectile. Except, you know, the calculating part.

      --
      My other car is first.
    67. Re:Bah. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > This mug is a silly solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

      Tell that to the coffee-stained carpet.

      --
      My other car is first.
    68. Re:Bah. by crawly · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I think your missing "Kobayashi Maru" from your sig.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobayashi_Maru/ For those who don't get it.

      --
      GCS/S d-x s+(+): a C++++$ UL+$ P+ L++$ !E--- W++@ N++>$ !o !K-- w++$ !O !M !V PS++>$ PE !Y PGP+ t+ 5++ X++ R tv b
    69. Re:Bah. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Mine was a little TOO restrictive.. Remember the Family guy episode where Peter sends macguyver a paperclip, a rubber band, and a drinking straw to save something or other?

      well we got two sheets of loose leaf paper, a balloon, and four inches of scotch tape in addition to that. I think if i'd had more than 10 minutes to come up with something I could've done it though.

      ok now considering how easy it was for the parachute to get caught under the egg, what does that tell you about skydivers...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    70. Re:Bah. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      This mug does not prevent the coffee from spilling. You also fail to understand the problem space.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    71. Re:Bah. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "it is to produce engineers that know how to solve engineering problems."

      What problem does this solve? If I drop my coffee, I don't really care if the mug can hold another cup of coffee (and oh by the way have jagged stabbythings stick out the bottom), I care if I have to clean up a coffee spill and shards of ceramic everywhere.

      This thing solves zero problems that aren't addressed better by having a metal or plastic coffee mug.

      It's not a matter of abusing the rules, it's a matter of failing to understand the problem space. It doesn't matter how elegant the design is if it doesn't perform better than other alternatives (according to whatever performance metrics you're interested in...price, durability, thermal efficiency, aesthetics, etc.).

      If it contained the coffee spill, it'd be great. If it had a clever way of preventing breakage, it'd be great. As it is, it's a bulky one-shot solution that provides a bunch of problems on its own, not the least of which is that it creates a much bigger mess than just plain ol' ceramic coffee mugs.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    72. Re:Bah. by op12 · · Score: 1

      Well, it actually was something like the 6th time we did a drop, so it wasn't really easy to get caught. Also, I would hope the skydivers backpacks launch the parachute upwards, but they could at least roll around and use their hands to move it around. An egg, on the other hand...

    73. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember doing an egg drop in school also.
      I remember thinking the same thing about the parachute, but alas, the rules stated that you could use

      ONLY toothpicks and glue.

      Our solution, built a huge toothpick box and filled it with about 50 bottles worth of elmers glue.
      We dropped our egg in the middle and damnit, it almost worked. Some hairline cracks...

    74. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in MY day, we had an egg drop. And by "egg" I mean an actual, live chicken, and by "drop" I mean attempting to kick it through football uprights from a tee at the twenty-yard line. This exercise was stopped after the first year and replaced by the more traditional drop using real eggs and just dropping it.

      Oh, by the way, it was in the snow, uphill, both ways.

    75. Re:Bah. by stanmann · · Score: 1

      One way to discourage parachutes is a clever application of the size rules.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    76. Re:Bah. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      parachutes work well as the drop distance increases, at lower drops they are unlikely to unfurl correctly in time to save the egg, for example being pushed off a table or tossed out a first story window.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    77. Re:Bah. by turdinthegrowler · · Score: 1

      If the mug costs $3.00 and the Double Latte Venti Grande costs $9.25, I'd say the crumple zone is worth the price.

    78. Re:Bah. by gid · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with thinking outside of the box. I used the parachute idea as well in 6th grade and it worked very well--although I think i got an A. The problem I have with the expendable part of the mug is that it isn't reusable--you drop it once and the bottom of the mug is broken up into piece. Sure it holds liquid, but can you still set it down on desk without fear of it tipping over? And if it drops again, what's going happen to it?

      -- gid

    79. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, but the spirit of the competition is to test ingenuity, not try to be the clever shmuck looking for loopholes.

      The sprit is to test ingenuity but not look for clever loopholes? That's what ingenuity is!

      There's always one person who does the parachute route (having seen more than one of these competitions). Generally, the failing grade/ wedgies / whatever are enough to discourage the next person.

      So, be ingenious and creative, but not too much or you get an F. Sounds like a great way to teach kids that it's not worth it to be creative. They'll just get punished for it. It's better to just be mediocre and not attract attention to yourself

      And it still isn't against the rules, why? Because it's common knowledge that parachutes are gay.

      This is either a troll or you're an immature 13 year old. I don't know why I'm bothering to argue with you.

    80. Re:Bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's why NASA uses them, drag and funny car, and jet car racers use them, and the military uses them. Mmmmhmmm. If the rules didn't say 'no parachutes', I'd have been pretty pissed off when they tried to penalize me for using an optimal solution. In fact, somebody would have been wearing my egg at that point. I recall one such competition that failed to specify a raw egg. At least two competitors hard boiled theirs. I often wondered why nobody tried freezing one assuming it was possible without making the shell crack.

    81. Re:Bah. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "Did I get a commendation for my cleverness? Did I get a write-up in USA Today? No. I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes (although I hear they wrote in that rule the following year)."

      At least you got an early education on the real purpose of school: to punish you for thinking outside the box. That's worth far more than temporary fame.

    82. Re:Bah. by Musc · · Score: 1

      Calculation is not math.
      Math is doing proofs.

      Just because elementary school "math class" omits the proofs doesn't mean that doing calculations
      is math.

      --
      Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
    83. Re:Bah. by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      And those that can't teach, teach PE. (credit goes to Woody Allen on that one... unless he stole it from someone)

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    84. Re:Bah. by instarx · · Score: 1

      Completely off-topic, just to satisfy my curiosity: what were some of the other entries in that egg contest? I've been looking at the rules, and about the only thing I can think of would be a parachute... what other ways are there to get an egg slowly from 15 feet up to the ground?

      - drop it into your pocket and carry it down
      - drop it into a long sock tube that will slow its rate of descent to the ground
      - tie a string to it so when it is dropped it can be lowered to the gtound
      - build a tall device and put it under the drop point so the egg hits your device which lowers it gently to the ground
      - put an upward-blowing vacuumm cleaner hose under the drop point to support the egg in the air (gets around "no touch" rules) and then carry the vacuum cleaner down to the ground ... and the list goes on.

    85. Re:Bah. by instarx · · Score: 1

      The idea in both situations is to design something that can survive the impact -- not avoid the impact, which is what you did,
      They came up with an innovative solution to the problem. You just avoided the problem altogether.


      That's YOUR interpretation, and is the point of original post that just because everyone made an incorrect assumption (that it was an impact-absorbing experiment) does not mean that alternative solutions were not just as valid. The parachute designer didn't avoid the problem - he merely solved it in an unexpected way.

      Besides, the parachute solution really didn't even violate your definition of the experiment. What difference does it make if he controlled the deceleration of the egg in the first meter of the drop rather than in the last few cm like everyone else?

    86. Re:Bah. by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Not if the Wolverines have anything to say about it, comrade!

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    87. Re:Bah. by hyfe · · Score: 1
      "Transporting" is the relevant word.

      A controlled fall is not transportation.

      http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/transportation

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    88. Re:Bah. by tommy_traceroute · · Score: 1
      ... incorporated a parachute, ensuring my egg could survive a drop from any altitude


      Ok Trip, let me get this straight: your parachute ensured egg survival from a drop of, ohhh, say 18 inches? 10 inches?

      That must've been one Hell of a 'chute!

      (Sorry, just woke up in a bad mood this morning. I'm sure your parachute was lovely.)

      --
      o 1 Sig beneath your current threshold
    89. Re:Bah. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      It depends on the precise wordings. There are ways to to describe the problem such that the need to allow the drop is implicit in the problem -- I.e. that the problem is to pack the egg such that it survives the impact of a 10 foot drop. In that case, designing the system to prevent a 10 foot impact would be implicitly wrong.

      On the other hand, "Your egg will be dropped from a height of 10 feet. Design a system such that your egg can survive the drop." could be taken to allow a parachute.
      However: if he was warned, early on, that his parachute system wouldn't be in the spirit of the contest and he insisted that he could do it anyways "because the rules don't explicitly disallow it", then he wold hae turned a physics problem into a law problem and I could see a physics teacher giving him an 'F' for being in the wrong class. -- especially if he was being a prick about it.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    90. Re:Bah. by armb · · Score: 1

      > I was the clear winner, because I too 'thought outside the box'.
      > Did I get a commendation for my cleverness? Did I get a write-up in USA Today?
      > No. I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes

      Reminds me of a similar event, where we had to transport a lump of metal as far as possible using a rubber band powered vehicle. We specifically asked "does the whole vehicle have to go the whole way, or can we have a smaller 'delivery' section". "The whole vehicle has to cross the start line, but you can leave bits behind", we were told.
      Our ramp crawled across the start line, pulled the pin at the top of the ramp as the string wound round the axle, and our roller hit the far wall of the hall, way further than anyone else.
      We got zero marks for originality , because that "wasn't what the judges expected".

      --
      rant
    91. Re:Bah. by j_snare · · Score: 1

      With ours, it was likely also a problem with the requirements, which I should have also mentioned earlier. The requirement was that we could only use certain materials in our construction. If my memory's right (this was 15 or so years ago), we could use paper, straws, and scotch tape. We dropped them about 9 feet as well, certainly not enough for a paper parachute to unfurl properly. People also tried to start with it unfurled as much as possible, but there's only so much you can do.

    92. Re:Bah. by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Maths may involve calculating the trajectory (actually it involves *how* to calculate it rather than the actual calculation, but examples are a useful learning tool), it doesn't involve actually projecting anything - that's physics. Physics is using maths to predict the results of experiments - if you're actually doing an experiment it's physics, maths is abstract.

  2. Just like Toast by Lev13than · · Score: 2, Funny

    A team of undergraduates at the university in Socorro designed a ceramic mug that can fall 15 feet onto concrete pavement and still hold a full cup of java afterward without leaking.

    The secret is to butter the bottom of the mug, thus ensuring that it always lands the right way up.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Just like Toast by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      ...then attach a cat's feet to the buttered side, thus creating a gravitational paradox. (Cat must land on its feet, but the butter must land down.) The result is an antigravity cup that is incapable of falling. Just imagine, a coffee cup that hangs in midair! Just like the Jetsons!

    2. Re:Just like Toast by slowbad · · Score: 1
      and still hold a full cup of java afterward

      I've watched Proctor-Silex redefine a "full cup" over the years from 8 to 6 ounces and now five ounces.
      Get a suitably porous ceramic material, and it can absorb all four ounces (2006 model) as freefall begins.

      --
      Send the prize money to my nonprofit SIG

  3. Am I the only one by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    that is relieved I wont spill my coffee when I regularly drop it from heights of 15 feet?

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    1. Re:Am I the only one by adam.dorsey · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your bubble, man, but it only says hold a cup of coffee afterwards, meaning the coffee cup is still intact to use after "the Eagle has landed".

      Your coffee still goes all over the poor little grandma that was walking under your balcony at exactly the wrong time.

      --
      You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people. - notnAP, #26891325
    2. Re:Am I the only one by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      DAMNIT, well I have no use for this product then

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  4. Requisite by batmanmiles · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new expandable masters.

    1. Re:Requisite by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      In soviet Russia, the coffee would drop you!

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Requisite by Mayhem178 · · Score: 0

      But does it run Linux?

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    3. Re:Requisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux, what's it all about? Is it good or is it whack?

    4. Re:Requisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On TEH SPOKE!!@exclamation-point

  5. Next Project: A Ballmer-Proof Chair by digitaldc · · Score: 1, Funny

    The NewMexTech students are purportedly working on a new indestructable chair.
    It will have the ability to absorb impacts from dropping, kicking or throwing due to sudden fits of rage and violent outbursts of anger.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  6. Who cares about the mug. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Its the damn coffee I am concerned about when I drop it.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Who cares about the mug. by dw09577 · · Score: 1

      you're right, it's probably more expensive.

    2. Re:Who cares about the mug. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly the vodka in the coffee :(

  7. Round Bottoms by beders · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA "It's rounded (at the bottom)"

    That'll sit nicely on a desk...

    1. Re:Round Bottoms by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Weebles wobble, but they don't fall down!

    2. Re:Round Bottoms by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      So does my secretary. And she has a rounded bottom.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    3. Re:Round Bottoms by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      So this is what the cup holder in my Pee Cee is for!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  8. Obligitory futurama quote by tont0r · · Score: 1

    GREAT! change it to be eight feet tall and put lasers on it! We can make a fortune on theintergalactic arms market!

  9. Not if you... by tanverenzo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank god I can sleep easy at night ;) Not if you drink that cup of Java :-P

    1. Re:Not if you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! I've been immune to caffeine for years now - ever since grad school. Coffee has little to no effect on me, aside from the jitters, and the withdrawal headaches.

  10. Pics by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a different article with pictures of the mug

    1. Re:Pics by bbkingadrock · · Score: 1

      and wow are they fugly...

    2. Re:Pics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This should win a design award for most stupid-looking cup of coffee ever. I understand the implications of the contest weren't about looks, but seriously, who would be caught actually walking around drinking out of this thing? I can imagine the quips now:

      "Yeah, it's dorky-looking, but it will survive a 15 foot drop...so there!"

    3. Re:Pics by PietjeJantje · · Score: 1

      Oi aye matey, now there it was! Gimme back my pirate pint of wine and I'll spair ye'll puny lives!

    4. Re:Pics by baKanale · · Score: 1

      Are we sure those are coffee cups and not Grecian urns?
      Maybe we can get John Keats to write "Ode to a Coffee Cup"!

  11. excuse me, you dropped your coffee by ExE122 · · Score: 1

    We're still a long way away from the Futurama tea cup that reassembles itself after it breaks =).

    Its still a neat idea, sort of a "crumple zone" for a coffee mug. What I don't understand is how it still holds liquid after the crash. Are we assuming it lands upright?

    --
    Capitalism: When it uses the carrot, it's called democracy. When it uses the stick, it's called fascism.
    1. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The "crumple zone" is heavier than the mug, so yes, it will always land upright.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Not quite automatic reassembly, but I've already got a mug which would pass the test. Indestructible is an understatement.

      It was made by Hornsea Pottery, and it was given to me around twenty years ago. It has a picture of a monkey on either side. It's a fairly straight-sided white cylinder with perhaps a slight bluish tint to it, and a square-ish handle. It has a very slight chip or imperfection in the rim, which I suspect it probably acquired when that Mars-sized planetoid crashed into the Earth some billions of years ago in the collision which created the Moon.

      It's been dropped on to hard, tiled floors. As a child, I ran with it through a doorway, and it hit the wall surrounding the door - gouging a big chunk of very solid plaster out in the process. (Our house was built from World War 2 bunker surplus materials, and is the second strongest thing known to mankind. Putting a nail into the wall? Good luck.) The mug is truly invincible. I'd investigate further, but I'm concerned for the safety of whatever it might hit - this planet was not built to contend with rigid, Newtonian solids incapable of deformation or damage.

      I hear Hornsea Pottery went bust a few years ago. Not bloody surprised...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    3. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are the uguliest mugs I have ever seen personally, I guess despite their usefullness, which has still to be proven, sounds like a bunch of people who just thought of a good idea but the execution sucked ass... No one would buy that in the real world, can you imagine that mug on your desk, your co workers would be like um, hi nice mug, eh no...

    4. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a mug that won't break either. Mine is made of metal.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by Jeff+Carr · · Score: 1

      Mine won't shatter and is made from a material older than both metal and ceramic... Leather.

      --
      The television will not be revolutionized.
    6. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I think that metal has been around much longer than animals or the earth itself.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by idontgno · · Score: 1
      it will always land upright

      I'd like that guarantee in writing, please. Then I'll "drop" the cup with about an 80-RPM roll-axis tumble and see how well it survives landing on its top edge.

      Oh, that wasn't in the rules? Which means we're going to abolish all the laws of physics which makes it possible to knock a cup off a surface with a anything but an axial rotation?

      It's a toy solution to a toy problem. Let's not oversell it, shall we?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Metal cups make the brew taste funny.

    9. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by zen-theorist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      sadly, metal does not shield human fingers from java heat the same way ceramic does.

    10. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by miceter · · Score: 1

      I prefer "metallic poly-alloy" - "liquid metal".

    11. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      funny, my vacuum bottle would disagree with you on that

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    12. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      What about fiberglass? Or even better, carbon fiber.

    13. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by swalker42 · · Score: 1
      What I don't understand is how it still holds liquid after the crash. Are we assuming it lands upright?
      From reading the article, or at least the secondary article listed in the comments, I don't think there is liquid in the cup to start with. They are required to drop it on it's side. The advantage to this cup is that it is heavier (or more accurately, as one poster put it, denser) at the bottom. This way the cup 'rights' itself on the way down. The cup will, however, still hold liquid when it is filled after the drop.
      --
      You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means
    14. Re:excuse me, you dropped your coffee by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Cool. I didn't know there was such a thing as leather mugs.

      However, they can't hold coffee. Only cold drinks. Sorry, they can't count.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  12. Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like the article says, the issue of dropping a mug to save coffee is entirely in the transfer of kinetic energy to the right places.

    As the mug falls, it gathers velocity towards the ground (thank you, gravity) and upon impact it stops when it meets the resistance of cement. This resistance means that the prior amount of kinetic energy must be absorbed at some point in the mug or absorbed by the concrete (not too feasible).

    I'm going to say that I'm not accounting for everything here ... yes, there's entropy and blah blah blah going on but this is a cut and dried version of what you should focus on.

    The strategy behind their solution is that they used a "crumple point" at the base of the mug. What they refer to as "the bomb" is really just a crushable base that sufficiently absorbs the energy. Therefore, the energy does not transfer to the coffee (which would thus splash it everywhere). This is a lot like the crumple points on modern car frames. My car's frame has points at which, if I run into something, the energy will be absorbed in the event of extreme energy transfer. This stops the energy from transferring to my body and causing me to splash everywhere. Let me tell you, you do not want to splash everywhere; it's quite messy and rather painful. As a car designer, you'd like to know precisely where energy will be transferred to in the event of an accident so you create crumple zones. If a car is in a sufficient collision, often times it will be necessary to have the vehicle "pulled" which means spending a lot of money to have some goof put it in a very expensive machine that pulls on the frame until everything is back to near perfect specs and calibration.

    I, on the other hand, prefer loading it onto a flatbed trailer, attaching a hand winch to both axles and laying underneath it and winching until your friend tells you that the doors can open and they no longer touch the front quarter panels. Alignment? Oh, that's just for rich people and inspectors.

    Now, what I don't like about this mug design is that it seems to be a one shot deal for the mug. Yes, you've saved your coffee but your mug is shot.

    I'm reminded of when I used to work in a restaurant and ceramic plates and glass would occasionally drop by mistake from my hands and the hands of coworkers. Now, as time went on, I noticed that glass objects like drinking glasses would have one bounce. I do not know why but they would have one bounce and then SMASH ... a million pieces. Ceramic plates were just a spider web on impact (quickly absorbing energy) but the glass seemed to almost always get one bounce.

    Knowing this, if I saw an empty glass falling, I knew I had one bounce to try and save it but the bounces weren't always too high. Years of hacky sack training on sipas finally became useful. Now, there is a move I was taught that we called a "lazy man" that involved kicking the foot out but actually using the ankle movement to kick the bag up into the air. There were a few times when a glass dropped and after the first bounced I lazy manned it up and caught it and I was a god for 10 minutes at least in the back of the kitchen. Sure, there were times when it just looked like I was booting a glass into the wall but it was worth it. I always wondered if those saved glasses would ever get another bounce if they dropped again.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by PFI_Optix · · Score: 3, Informative
      Knowing this, if I saw an empty glass falling, I knew I had one bounce to try and save it but the bounces weren't always too high. Years of hacky sack training on sipas finally became useful. Now, there is a move I was taught that we called a "lazy man" that involved kicking the foot out but actually using the ankle movement to kick the bag up into the air. There were a few times when a glass dropped and after the first bounced I lazy manned it up and caught it and I was a god for 10 minutes at least in the back of the kitchen. Sure, there were times when it just looked like I was booting a glass into the wall but it was worth it. I always wondered if those saved glasses would ever get another bounce if they dropped again.

      I'm going to venture a guess here. The bottom of the glass is the heaviest and strongest part, especially on restaurant glasses made for heavy use and frequent washing. It stands to reason that the glass would turn so that the bottom hit the ground first. The bottom strikes the ground unevenly, recoils, and the glass is thrown into a spin. When it strikes the ground again, it's with the much more fragile side of the glass.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The glass is always greener on the other side.

    3. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by wrfelts · · Score: 1

      Often, this would be the case. There is also the case of resonance caused by the initial impact, making the glass act much more like a crystaline solid on second impact than its more liquid state implied by its amorphous solid nature. The power that an object's resonance has over the object can never be taken for granted.

    4. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Additionally, when it strikes ground again, the fragile sides will probably have significant rotational velocity.

      --
      No comment.
    5. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      You can get a lot of hazing without external damage - if you have any clear biros around, put one in your teeth and squeeze gently until you get a "craAACk" noise; there'll be a craze in the plastic, but the surface will remain completely smooth. Since plastic strains during fracture, you get a white stress-area that's highly visible, that looks like a crack - glass breaks very cleanly though, so crazes in glass might be invisible unless you were looking very carefully for them. This is similar to why you can place the pieces of a broken glass back together again and make the line almost invisible. The impression there is that those saved glasses - if dropped again - wouldn't survive (unless combined with the point of your other child post).

      Disclaimer: while this comes from a materials science course, it's been a while since I've gone over it and I don't have the materials to hand to test with, so might be off target.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
    6. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      This resistance means that the prior amount of kinetic energy must be absorbed at some point in the mug

      IANAMEoP (Mech Engr or Physicist), but couldn't the mug be designed to deflect its downward momentum horizontally upon impact (i.e., rolling)? That's usually what stuntmen do when they jump out of windows, is it not?

    7. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. At my restaurant, we don't even try to save the glasses from impact. If one hits the floor and gets a crack, we set it aside for later. At the end of the shift, we line them all up behind the dumpsters and put them out of their misery. I use a CO2 powered Powerline-93 with a laser sight (hey, it gets dark out there). Two of my co-workers use spring-loaded bb guns and trade accuracy for ammo. My old kitchen manager brought in a compound bow, but that was kind of overkill. Ah good times.

    8. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      The bottom of the glass is the heaviest and strongest part, especially on restaurant glasses made for heavy use and frequent washing. It stands to reason that the glass would turn so that the bottom hit the ground first.

      Try this experiment: Take a heavy bowling ball, and a lighter super-ball and drop them off the top of a tall building at the same time. Which one will hit the ground first?

      If you say the bowling ball because it is heavier, you need to go back to high school science classes.

      Weight/mass has NOTHING to do with which end will hit the floor first.

      Now, if you strap buttered toast to a cat, you could generate a condition that would distroy the universe.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    9. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bowling ball will strike first, unless you evacuate all the air around the building for your test. The bowling ball has two things going for it: 1) it's larger, and has greater volume-to-surface ratio. The surface is where the air resistance comes from. 2) It's more dense, so it will reach it's (higher) terminal velocity more quickly as well.

      The world is a lot more complicated than high school physics' s=1/2at^2.

    10. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't know what a 'super-ball' is, if it's anything like a beach ball, then I'll be you anything that the bowling ball will hit first. In fact, let's make it more extreme, let's fill the beach ball with helium. It won't even hit the ground. *You* need to go back to school. We're not on the moon, on Earth, a feather falls slowly. Falling objects are affected by drag, and the positions of the centre of pressure and centre of mass are *very* important It makes the difference between a stable and unstable rocket, for example. Also, get a long stick (a broom stick, for example) and attack a weight on one end, throw it around, see what happens.

    11. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the much more fragile side of the glass

      Instead of relying upon a Thermos vacuum model of a vessel-within-a-vessel,
      someone should have combined with nanotechnology to put a mini-dustbuster vacuum inside.

    12. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      You're missing one crucial detail: your balls aren't connected (pause for chuckles). If you drop an object that is heavier on one side that the other, the heavy side will strike the ground first (assuming the two sides are level when dropped, other forces can of course overpower gravity).

      Two objects will fall at the same rate in a vacuum but an irregular, unbalanced object dropped inside an atmosphere will tend to land on its heavier side.

      But congrats on applying that high school physics education :D

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    13. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by HiThere · · Score: 1

      A superball is rather like a small hand-ball made out of extremely elastic material. It was called a superball because of the number of bounces it would take to come to rest (and as opposed to the prior common "rubber ball").

      Superball is probably a tradename, but I think the trademark on the term has lapsed (and I don't know who the most recent owner was).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you say the bowling ball
      then you would be correct although it may be difficult to measure

      because it is heavier
      then you would be partially correct. A heavier object of the same size and shape will fall faster because the gravitational force will be larger and the air resistance the same so the resultant force will not be proportional to the mass (even though the gravitational force increases in proportion to the mass) and therefore the resultant acceleration will be dependent on the mass.

      An object of the same shape and density but greater size will fall faster because volume increases with the cube of dimensions whilst surface area only increases with the square of dimensions.

      you need to go back to high school science classes.
      NO you need to realise that gravity isn't the only force acting on something dropped on earth despite the assumptions you made in your high school questions.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The bottom of the glass is the heaviest and strongest part, especially on restaurant glasses made for heavy use and frequent washing. It stands to reason that the glass would turn so that the bottom hit the ground first.

      Let me guess, it's because, um, the heavy end falls faster?

    16. Re:Crumple Zones & the Lazy Man Maneuver by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I can't decide if you're implying that I'm stating the obvious, or if you're trying to bait me into a high school physics lesson that doesn't apply here.

      The glass rotates around its center of gravity so that the heavier side is oriented in the direction it is being pulled.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  13. Mmmm, shards by borkus · · Score: 1

    As pointed out in the article, the mug "breaks"...at least part of it does. However, the coffee doesn't spill. I'm not sure how likely I would be to finish my coffee in a mug that has bits of broken ceramic hanging off of it (though some mornings, it's a real possiblity). Beer on the other hand...well, the very idea of split beer...I ... just...can't... talk about it.

    Coffee and beer drinkers aside, I wonder if a design that that could be used to transport hazardous or toxic liquids.

    1. Re:Mmmm, shards by chill · · Score: 1

      However, the coffee doesn't spill.
      Actually, the article says the contest rules required the mug to be dropped on its side. While this mug is self-righting, the starting position would sort of preclude any coffee to begin with. ...I wonder if a design that that could be used to transport hazardous or toxic liquids.
      The design has one function -- to protect from a drop. It does nothing for impacts from any other direction. Smack it hard enough and it would shatter. I doubt that would be very useful for transporting toxic materials.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Mmmm, shards by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      the mug "breaks"...at least part of it does.

            So now we have coffee mugs with "crumple zones". What's next - air bags?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  14. I care more about heat conductivity by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The problem with ceramic mugs is not that they are breakable, it is that you can't have a cup of coffee sit in them more than 10 minutes before it is nearly ice cold.

    Make me a mug that looks like a nice ceramic, but has the termal insulation value of my vaccum sealed travel mug.

    1. Re:I care more about heat conductivity by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That depends on two things:
      • Part of the problem is that they absorb heat. If you pre-heat the mug (rinse it with hot water) your coffee will stay warm longer.
      • Try getting a mug made from shuttle tile material....
      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  15. Yes, but what about the beer? by Mesinjah · · Score: 0

    I usually throw my beer at my TV in a rage. Will this mug hold my beer safely?

    1. Re:Yes, but what about the beer? by juanfgs · · Score: 1

      Who in the world would drink beer from a ceramic Mug??

  16. Time tested coffee mug by Maurader · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think I'll stick my ole reliable Pessimist's Mug to cheer me up in the morning. If I drop it, it was not meant to be.

  17. wow 2 of 20... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they got second out of twenty? who got first?

    1. Re:wow 2 of 20... by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      University of Missouri - Rolla, a fine engineering school.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  18. Extreme by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I have an Extreme Gulp from 7-11.

    It's 9.5 inches tall, 5.5 inches in diameter and practically indestructable. I have no reservations about chucking it 15 feet up into the air.

    It'll hold 52 ounces, but can be modded to hold 38% more.

    In 1967 (The Graduate) the future was plastics.
    Which is the Next Big Thing? Ceramics or nano-stuff?

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  19. Picture by trip11 · · Score: 1

    Here's a picture of the mugs (pre-drop). http://web.abqtrib.com/art/news06/022006_mugs.jpg And yes they do look sort of like a very ugly bomb.

    1. Re:Picture by halltk1983 · · Score: 1

      Could you imagine trying to tip this thing repeatedly through the day? You'd have some nice forearms...

      --
      Watch for Penguins, they eat Apples and throw rocks at Windows.
    2. Re:Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how comfortable they are to use in their pre-drop state.

  20. Concrete feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Concrete feet ? I thought this is an ancient tradition in the Chicago area.

  21. Re:Just when I thought Zonk stories were lame.. by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
    On this one, I think CmdrTaco actually struck the bottom quite vigorously. Fortunatly, the barrel was saved from destruction due to being made out of the ultra-strong ceramic material the contest winners used on their coffee mug.

    Does General Taco know about this? And what of pour Mrs. Taco. I am sure they would be quite disappointed if they knew their son was aspiring to mediocrity.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  22. Space Shuttle by inventor61 · · Score: 1

    Gee. Maybe they could make the new space shuttle tiles out of this stuff?

  23. what I really want to know by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

    who's drinking coffee 15 feet in the air?

    1. Re:what I really want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roofers, thats who.

      My dad was a roofer for 30 years. He fell from 30 feet once, and said the last thing he remembered was his favorite coffe cup hitting the ground before him, he said he was actually worrying if his coffee cup would be ok, as he sped torward earth. He woke up with two broken legs, a concussion, and a few cracked ribs.

      The cofee cup, even though it landed on asphalt pavement, ended up being undamaged. It was one of those nautical cups with the wide base and rubber bottom. It was ceramic, but had plastic and metal parts around the ceramic, not to mention the rubber was a good shock absorber. Anyways, that was back in 1989. So it appears coffee cup technology hasn't really progressed much since then.

    2. Re:what I really want to know by Twisted64 · · Score: 1
      who's drinking coffee 15 feet in the air?

      Answers:
      One 15 foot person
      One 7 foot person, standing on the head of an 8 foot person.
      A 10 foot person who pours the coffee into their mouth at arm's length to cool it on the way down.
      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  24. Not a university :) by pavon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using this strategy, they managed to net second place, and they get a newspaper article for it.

    That is the administrations improved PR in work.

    As a proud alumni, I'd like to point out, just because our adminstration hates it when we do so, that the name is New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and it is not a University :) It is not in the name, and historicaly, the term university, has been reserved for large schools that are divided into multiple colleges. We are a small engineering college and we like it that way. Bigger is not always better - stop trying to ruin the school with your illusions of grandure.

    </rant>

    Sorry for that. Several years ago the administration decided make increasing enrollment it's biggest goal, which came with talks of improving freshmen retention. Tech already accepts almost anyone who applies (a good thing), and about half drop out after before completing their junior year. While a couple classes seemed to be "weeding-out classes", most were reasonably challenging for those willing to learn. So there is naturally concern that standards will drop as a result of the administrations direction.

    The practice of slapping the word Univerity into all the press releases started at the same time, and the two are linked in my mind, hence the rant.

    Anyway, sounds like a fun competition, and best regards to the materials students that designed the project.

    1. Re:Not a university :) by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      historicaly, the term university, has been reserved for large schools that are divided into multiple colleges

      Actually, it's usually used to distinguish the difference between a school that has a post-graduate program from one that doesn't.

      This isn't always true anymore, of course, since some "Colleges" offer both undergraduate and graduate programs.

    2. Re:Not a university :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a proud alumni

      How many are you?

    3. Re:Not a university :) by greginnj · · Score: 1
      As a proud alumni

      ... historicaly, the term university , has been reserved

      ... stop trying to ruin the school with your illusions of grandure.

      Several years ago the administration decided make increasing enrollment it's biggest goal

      ...about half drop out after before completing their junior year.

      So there is naturally concern that standards will drop as a result of the administrations direction.

      Gadzooks! You mean they haven't already done so?

      As for illusions of grandure, dont wurry, frum now on we wont misteak it for a place whear peepul lurn ennything.
      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    4. Re:Not a university :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - grandure wouldn't work - I think I will try to ruin your school with illusions of grandeur instead!

  25. yay! Socorro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to point out that this is really old news.. like a week or two at this point, shame on Slashdot for being so slow - On the other hand, I'm rather happy to see my mother, Dr. Hirschfeld, being quoted in the national news.

    Dr. Hirschfeld has had a long history of having very inovative classes for her engineers... like the Water balloon catapults at Virginia Tech.. that was cool-- of course Slashdot didn't exist then.. but whatever.

    Her real claim to fame is low thermal expansion cermamics -- stuff that doesn't change size with a change in temperature - seemingly simple, but very very important.

    Do you like your porsche ceramic coated headers? and how well they perform? Well.. thank her, too bad Virginia Tech - those bastards, never paid her the money she was due, but then again.. that's another story entirely..

  26. Technology advances by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe we have not got the hydrogen fusion yet. And also some diseases are far from being overcome.
    Also the fossil fuels problem still needs some more efforts.
    For sure mugs technology is getting more and more advanced thanks to all those smart minds!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
  27. Is it stain resistant? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    The big question is: Is it stain resistant. I mean the sort of stain from having a half cup of coffee sit in it for hours at a time, only to be filled up again and repeat for a few months between cleanings. If so, sign me up!

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Is it stain resistant? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      SACRILEGE!!!! That thick stain is the essence of geek coffee flavor!!! I can't tell you how many times I've had to chew out some misguided dogooder for washing my coffee mug.

  28. Boo by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    I just RTFA, and your snarky "butter the bottom" comment is closer to the truth than you'd expect.
    Tech's cup "kind of looks like a bomb," Hirschfeld said. "It's rounded (at the bottom) and the bomb part breaks so the rest can survive."
    ..
    Adding to the difficulty, the contest requires that mugs be dropped on their sides. But the sacrificial bomb -- which weighs more than the mug on top -- and gravity take care of that, Price said.
    They didn't use any fancy ceramics, instead they gamed their design.
    Clever, but not world changing.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  29. Misleading blurb by MORB · · Score: 1

    "Next time a ceramic mug falls on the ground, you won't have to buy a new coffee"

    Here I was hoping that they had found a way to prevent the coffee to be spilled when dropping the mug.

    Dropping a mug 15 meters on concrete is not part of my coffee cup usage patterns anyway.

  30. Twice? by tulmad · · Score: 1

    So what happens if you drop it a second time? You've already broken the part that saves it from the fall (the bomb section). Now that that's gone, you've got nothing protecting the mug from shattering on a second fall.

    --
    "In case of emergency, break glass. Scream. Bleed to death."
    1. Re:Twice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better if they made the bomb section from another material that doesn't break ( plastic or metal ) .

    2. Re:Twice? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, it will only work once. I assumed "Indestructible" meant always and not once. That would have made a very dull first edition Superman comic.

  31. it will never sell by Susceptor · · Score: 0

    who in their right mind would sell a cup that could last? Consumerism is about...well...comsuming, and if stuff stopped breaking you woulden't have much insentive to consume now would you? It's a cool thing, but I doubt it will ever see the light of day.

    --
    Fool me once...shame on you, fool me twice...won't be fooled again (our president)
  32. Re:Next Project: A Ballmer-Proof Chair by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    Dick Cheney is probably going to shoot you if you keep using that "chair throwing" joke.

    I mean, that old guy doesn't even read Slashdot and he's heard it a million times

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  33. In the car by ari_j · · Score: 1

    I doubt that it will do any good in my car, which is the only place I'm likely to drop a cup of coffee.

    1. Re:In the car by Zerbs · · Score: 1

      ...and you've got to have a really big cupholder in your car to hold that thing!

      --
      "22 astronauts were born in Ohio. What is it about your state that makes people want to flee the Earth?" Stephen Colbert
  34. MOD PARENT -1 WHINY KARMA WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what's worse. TMM's pathetic ego or the fact that his karma-whoring post will susseccfully be modded as "Interesting" or "Insightful" by assholes who don't want or know to use their mod points responsibly.

  35. Weighing the Merits by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, it sounds like this mug would probably break if dropped from waist height, since there wouldn't be time for it to right itself. Also, even if it could, it would only work once, since the "Holy Hand Grenade" portion at the bottom would disappear. So this design is, in practice, completely worthless.

    On the other hand, I have to appreciate the creation of a contest entry designed to satisfy the verbatim rules of the contest, as my buddy and I are responsible for at least a page of prohibitions in the Botball rules (although I hear some of the things we did are once again legal), so I can't really say I don't appreciate entries like this.

    Back on the first hand, it seems ridiculous that the second-place team gets a full-page article which only passingly mentions the first place team and doesn't describe the properties of their entry or how high it was able to survive falling from. If I was on the UMR team, I'd be pretty upset right now.

    (And no, I'm not a UMR student/alum)

    --
    I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    1. Re:Weighing the Merits by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

      I'm a UMR alum, and I don't have a problem with this article- sure, UMR may have created new and powerful ceramics, but the article is about how an underdog managed to place second by using normal ceramics and creativity. That's more interesting (and potentially more useful) than saying "UMR created a coffee cup that can survive being tossed out a second story window. For $300, you could have one too!" Besides, the story still mentions that we did the best, even if we didn't think as "outside the box."

      --
      You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    2. Re:Weighing the Merits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a UMR alum and it is certainly disappointing. I was hoping to see an sister article to this one covering UMR's winning design (which would have survived more than 1 drop).

  36. Replace it from the start by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    A substance doesn't need to break to absorb energy. Generally, objects are good at either holding their shape, absorbing energy, or transferring energy, though I may not have the right bases.

    1. Re:Replace it from the start by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      substance doesn't need to break to absorb energy.

      That substance, in this case, is ceramic.

    2. Re:Replace it from the start by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      So, how does that change anything?

  37. A super-mug? by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

    So is it topologically equivalent to a 4-dimensional hyperdoughnut?

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  38. What about the 'IT Crowd' solution? by The-Bus · · Score: 1
    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  39. What about BEER? by gurutc · · Score: 1

    Who cares about coffee?

    --
    Moderation in All Things... Especially Moderation - gurutc
  40. Pardon me... by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1

    But this is retarded.

    Did the kids come up with a new, unbreakable ceramic? No.

    Did they come up with something that can be used more then once? No

    Did they come up with something that would retain its coffee if knocked off a table? No

    When i read the summary I thought: A coffee mug that I can drop whenever, from whereeer, and it'll keep its coffee.

    This article is nothing like the summary makes it sound like. These cups can be used a grand total of one time (after which you need a whole new crumple zone), and would hold coffee if dropped from straight up and down. However, if it landed at a tilt, I'm fairly certain it would spill everything. Who cares about saving the $0.50 worth of cheap coffee if you have to go buy another huge mug to hold it?

    Better solution for those of you who continually drop your coffee. It's called a "Travel Mug", and is already designed NOT to spill upon drop, AND can be reused after said drop!

    Ok, so yes, they solved that little competition. But if I won the "make a coffee mug out of used condoms that won't break if hurled at a freshman's head from 15 feet up" award, is that news?

    1. Re:Pardon me... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Better solution for those of you who continually drop your coffee. It's called a "Travel Mug", and is already designed NOT to spill upon drop, AND can be reused after said drop!
      A better solution for you might be a sippy cup.

      http://images.google.com/images?q=sippy%20cup
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Pardon me... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Do they make sippy cups in Stainless steel? Cool.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  41. Java doesn't leak anyway by RandomPrecision · · Score: 1

    That's the thing with automatic garbage collection.

  42. No rule against nukes either by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    The rules of chess say exactly what moves are allowed. No other moves can be made by either player. There's no rule in chess that says nuclear weapons can't be used, but that lack doesn't mean you can nuke your opponent. (In formal chess matches, I'm sure there are specific rules against assaulting the other players and the judges, but I'm only guessing here)

    Competitions like this normally give a goal, and what's not allowed. Thus, people should be creative in how they accomplish the goal. Rather than disallowing a parachute (which would discourage creativity) the rules could be written to include flight time in a points structure, so that the team that gets the egg to the ground intact and the fastest wins. Alternatively a competion like this could be more chess-like by providing all the teams with the same materials, that way you can't buy your way to a win.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:No rule against nukes either by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Actually, since chess only lists the moves that ARE allowed, they don't need to have an explicit rule against nukes; it's not explicitely allowed thus forebidden.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:No rule against nukes either by vertinox · · Score: 1

      There's no rule in chess that says nuclear weapons can't be used, but that lack doesn't mean you can nuke your opponent.

      Actually, that would be against international law and if you had a nuke I'm sure your opponent would let you win, but I think you'd have more to worry about the team of highly trained anti-terrorist soldiers that kind of like the guys from Rainbow 6.

      What you are thinking of would be like if we played a game of chess and I started playing a boom box really loud with Vanilla Ice while every time it was your turn while a group of naked midgets danced around us.

      I'm sure its not against the rules, but I think it is quite questionable.

      However, thats when have things called "house rules" to append to chess. Seeing you like have your friends throw things at me and I like to play music loudly, we could come to a personal agreement that we won't do those things.

      Then again, we might decide on "house rules" to make the game more fun. Lets say every time we take a chess pecie we get to zap our opponent with an electric taser.

      I think most games and rules are like that. All things are allowed unless specifically denied except for things that would be rude or illegal. I don't see why a parachute would be against the rules seeing it was actually solving the problem.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:No rule against nukes either by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      My 7-year-old cousin just finished an egg-drop competition. As you have suggested, they have a fairly complex scoring algorithm, but it included a number of elements, including:

      -the smaller the number of items/materials in the design, the lower the score (lower is better)

      -the lighter the container, the lower the score

      -the container must come to rest inside a target area, so delivery precision is a key component of the contest.

      My to my cousin's chagrin, she was essentially disqualified when her entry bounced out of the target area. Otherwise, being a small container with only three components, it was a frontrunner.

      All-in-all, it seems like a very well-run contest. You can take a look at the rules and such at the website: http://www.wsfceggdrop.com/

    4. Re:No rule against nukes either by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      What you are thinking of would be like if we played a game of chess and I started playing a boom box really loud with Vanilla Ice while every time it was your turn while a group of naked midgets danced around us.

      I'm sure its not against the rules, but I think it is quite questionable.

      Actually, the FIDE ( Fédération Internationale des Échecs or World Chess Federation) Handbook, does have rules against distractions. It is covered in Chapter 15, Ethics http://www.fide.com/official/handbook.asp?level=A0 115. Chess has been around so long, that the rules have evolved to handle just about anything.

  43. good to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good to the last drop

  44. Ode to a non-breakable mug by HappyUserPerson · · Score: 1

    I once had a cup that won't break
    To make it, engineering it did take
    I made it to be cool,
    But now I feel like a fool
    Because I dropped my cup in a lake!

    Piping hot coffee
    Sealed in a ceramic mug,
    Indestructible

  45. Cat owners rejoice! by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1


    I don't even want to know what the padding under my carpet looks like.

  46. That's just great by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    From the look of those things, you'd have to pre-heat them for about 10 minutes before you poured your coffee into them. That is, of course, if your arms are strong enough to lift the damned things !

  47. Next project improved concrete by baomike · · Score: 1

    The students will next tackle the problem of fomulating a concrete that will withstand the inpact of the improved mug.

  48. Great news!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll need something to drink after my 15 foot fall while waiting for the ambulance to show up.

  49. What about kinetic energy? by zlogic · · Score: 1

    If you drop the cup with coffee, while in mid-air it's basically two objects: the cup and the coffee. When the cup starts landing (and decceleration because of the "bomb" breaking up), it's like if the cup was falling slowly, and the coffee was falling faster, which can be translated to a completely still cup and the falling coffee. Now, if you drop liquid into a cup from some height, it will spill. The slower decceleration only reduces the speed of the coffee relative to the cup.
    Also, what about the cup falling on one side because the bomb breaks up better at that side?
    It would be better if they used a car-suspension scheme: not-too-fast decceleration when landing and slowly returning to normal state with a spring.

  50. Most problems are best avoided. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    NASA does this all the time. Avoiding a problem is often way better than solving it. Prevention vs. Cure.

    Would you rather avoid accidents while driving your car, or survive them? Suriving an accident often involves long term disability. Avoiding the accident in the first place is much better.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I would rather ensure that I was safe in the occurance that I did hit something. You can make all the collision avoidance stuff you want to in your car, but it should still be safe in the instance where that fails. If you could design a car that would stop all injuries to people inside in all crashes at less than 100 MPH then it would probably be better than a car that avoided most crashes, but if it ever got in a crash would leave the passengers dead or severely injured.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The idea in both situations is to design something that can survive the impact when avoiding is no longer an option."

      It may be true that avoiding the fall is the ideal situation, but that still isn't the point. If the idea was to avoid the mug from breaking then the smart thing would be to not enter the competition and leave your coffee mug at home.

    3. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by AgentDib · · Score: 1

      The problem with your line of reasoning is that in this case, the point of the contest was to design a mug that would be resistant to sudden impact forces. The 15 foot drop to the ground is nothing but an easy way to test durability.

      A much more involved (and expensive) way to test ceramics is with an Edge-on Impact Test. http://www.emi.fraunhofer.de/english/Departments/E xperimentalBallistics/DeptPages/Projects/Edge-on_I mpact_01.asp

      You could easily defeat the Edge-on Impact Test with a system that simply moved the test ceramic out of the way of the oncoming projectile. Would that be worth second place too? Probably not, because the solution does not satisfy the goal - that of constructing a durable ceramic.

    4. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by zgornz · · Score: 1

      If you could design a car that would stop all injuries to people inside in all crashes at less than 100 MPH then it would probably be better than a car that avoided most crashes, but if it ever got in a crash would leave the passengers dead or severely injured.

      You do realize that you aren't the only person on the road? If you're getting into accidents all the time but survive every one a-okay, you're still hurting/murdering other people that you hit.

      The real solution is to outlaw cars.

    5. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      If you could design a car that would stop all injuries to people inside in all crashes at less than 100 MPH

            You can't. You don't even have to _hit_ anything to cause an injury. Eventually what you run up against is the deceleration force causing your arterial ligament to split your aorta in two just like a guillotine - the principal cause of death in deceleration trauma (car accidents, plane crashes, etc). Sometimes the aorta will come right off the heart at the level of the coronary arteries, too. See the aorta is fixed to the posterior chest wall, but the heart is relatively mobile. The forces involved usually split the two apart.

            And if you're lucky enough to survive that, your heart slams against your ribs causing myocardial contusion and either a fatal arrythmia or bleeding, ending up with tamponade again. I won't even get into _other_ deceleration injuries involving CNS or intra-abdominal organs.

            The only way to avoid all this would be having _you_ decelerate at a survivable rate when the vehicle decelerates at a greater rate. Unfortunately this would imply needing distance - which is why crumple zones _help_ a bit - but unless you want to be driving a bus-sized vehicle from the back then survivability just won't happen at great speeds.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or make cars out of Nerf.

    7. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by the_tsi · · Score: 1

      ...or just* design all vehicles so we sit with our backs in the direction of travel and see forward with a video screen.

      (* Yes, I hate "just do X..." too.)

    8. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      A simple change of the rules would make this clear. Test the object multiple times.

      This is the test the X-Prize competition used. Repeatability is everything.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    9. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by AgentDib · · Score: 1

      In this case even if the destructible element was easily replaceable for each test it would still invalidate the point of the experiment. Ceramics are seen as a very light solution that are cheap to produce, and with a high resistance they could have many applications in protective sheathings such as light armor.

      Avoiding the initial contact through a destructible cushion, a parachute, or any means really wouldn't help when you are talking about a product like a light chest armor for police capable of stopping rounds that pierce kevlar.

      Furthermore, I doubt the widow of the police officer would appreciate you telling her that you designed the armor on the principle that the best way to solve the problem was for the officer to simply avoid the bullets in the first place.

    10. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Just use whatever they use on star trek / star wars when travelling at faster than light speeds.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    11. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I thought the most common fatality associated with deceleration was your brain coming to a full stop within your skull. I didn't do work on this myself but I seem to remember that your torso can sustain substantially higher g forces than your skull.

      I could be way off base but I seem to remember that cranial decelerations were survivable up to ~50g, and torso decelerations survivable up to ~150g.

      If the parent or anyone else is familiar with the field please speak up, the graphic description has piqued my interest...

    12. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      I could be way off base but I seem to remember that cranial decelerations were survivable up to ~50g, and torso decelerations survivable up to ~150g.

      I don't have the exact g-force numbers, but I do know that I've seen patients come out of high speed accidents relatively neurologically intact, but still manage to partially tear the aorta. Those that openly tear their aortas don't live more than a few seconds after impact. It's kinda hard to get volunteers to do a study on this... The brain can take a pretty fair bit of contusing before it kills you.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    13. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      was your brain coming to a full stop within your skull.

            Nope. I'm not a forensic pathologist, but I am a physician. #1 cause of immediate or 1st hour traumatic death due to deceleration - cardiac tamponade due to aortic laceration. Feel free to look it up.

            Central nervous system (CNS) injury (brain/spine) is what you will probably die of if you don't bleed to death right away. You will bleed to death from rupturing a major vessel in the thorax, or rupturing an intra-abdominal organ (liver >50% of the time, then spleen, then kidneys). Then you have your pelvic fractures that can kill you pretty quick, and breaking both your femurs can also lead you along the path to hemorragic shock and death.

            Unless you're on a motorcycle and hit your head against a solid object, or are unlucky enough to be crushed or decapitated in the trauma mechanism, CNS injury causing death is way way down the list because 1) you cannot bleed enough inside the skull to go into shock and 2) it's usually not the bleeding that kills you, it's all the inflammation and crap that happens AFTERWARDS that does you in. That means it takes TIME.

            Now I can't comment on the physics and exact g-forces and all, but my position is based on the actual cause of death statistics from any morgue. If you want a fun place to visit I think http://www.trauma.org/ still exists ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    14. Re:Most problems are best avoided. by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Holy Motion Sickness BATMAN!!!

  51. Huh? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    "Next time a ceramic mug falls on the ground, you won't have to buy a new coffee: ..."

    so what you're saying is, this new mug is spill-proof?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  52. Sleep well at night... by KevinColyer · · Score: 1

    Not with all that extra java you wont!

  53. Re:Next Project: A Ballmer-Proof Chair by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Dick Cheney is probably going to shoot you if you keep using that "chair throwing" joke.

    I wish he would shoot me, then I could come back and apologize to him and his family for all the problems I had caused.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  54. What about first place? by sulam · · Score: 1

    So, why don't we hear about the folks who won first place? How much do you want to bet that they used some super high tech ceramic that simply doesn't break when dropped from 9'? Of course, that wouldn't be nearly as 'interesting' as that other monstrosity...

  55. They didn't win.... by grqb · · Score: 1

    The New Mexico Tech team didn't even win, they came in 2nd. University of Missouri-Rolla won.

    1. Re:They didn't win.... by MdotCpDeltaT · · Score: 1

      Why read how the 2nd place finishers did?

      Here's the article that should have been posted (from the winners) and with pictures and tactics.

      http://news.umr.edu/news/2006/mugdrop06.html

      Rolla came in 2nd in 2005 and 1st in '06.

  56. bah by wwmedia · · Score: 1

    bah, JAVA is "so ninetees"

  57. Am I the only one who took physics? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    I keep reading these comments about how the bottom is "heavier" than the top, so it'll fall faster. The secret is that it is denser, so it's less affected by air resistance than the top, thus leading to its, well, leading position during the fall.

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
    1. Re:Am I the only one who took physics? by onedotzero · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but it's hardly likely to retain any great amount of liquid after a fall. If that were the case, we'd all be using plastic cups with heavy bases.

      The point was, the mug was still functional after the fall. You could go and make another coffee. Just be more careful this time... :)

      --
      onedotzero
      thedigitalfeed.co.uk

    2. Re:Am I the only one who took physics? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Actually, it isn't denser

      If you RTFA, you'd know why.

      If you want to get pedantic about it, the breakaway section masses more than the mug.

      Happy now?

      P.S. I don't recall anyone saying anything about 'falling faster'

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Am I the only one who took physics? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Part of my definition of "functional coffee cup" specifies that it doesn't have jaggedy stabby bits pointing out from the bottom.

      This seems like a really silly solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  58. Excellent article quote by karmaflux · · Score: 1

    Coming in second was a meaningful experience for the team and something they'd like to do again, Burr said.

    Aim high, brave souls.

    Aim high.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  59. Java by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    and still hold a full cup of java afterward without leaking

    So they use a garbage collector?

  60. 15 foot drop by VeryHotTopic · · Score: 1

    Phew! At last, someone has the sense to make a ceramic mug that can withstand a 15 foot fall. (I can't tell you how many times I've dropped my coffee mug from 15 feet!)

  61. Is nobody curious... by zkosky · · Score: 1

    about the mug that won first place?

  62. Funny... ironic even.... by zubinjdalal · · Score: 1

    ... "indestructible super mug" that "... save[s] humanity" "... kind of looks like a bomb".

  63. I'm shocked by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    Really, the only way I could see dropping my precious precious sweet wonderful precious coffee would be if someone chopped off the hand that was holding it. Seriously.

  64. Glass can be "bruised" by Medievalist · · Score: 1
    Knowing this, if I saw an empty glass falling, I knew I had one bounce to try and save it but the bounces weren't always too high. [...] I always wondered if those saved glasses would ever get another bounce if they dropped again.
    No, they get one bounce each. According to my spouse and close friends in the chemistry trade, glassware bruises on the first shock and shatters on the second (unless the force is so extreme that it gets pulverized in one shot or so trivial that it is completely unharmed). My own kitchen experience bears this out.

    I'll bet that if you have a really good ear (I don't) you can tell if the glass got bruised from the sound it makes. If you're breaking up cast iron (real cast iron, which many of you youngsters have never seen) with a 16lb hammer you just flail away at it with an earsplitting BONG BONG BONG BONG until it finally goes thud. Then you just barely smack it and it shatters - don't hit it full force after the thud or it's likely to go off like a grenade! This seems like a similar phenomena to me.

    Throw away bruised glassware. It can be incredibly fragile and might shatter from the slightest shock.
    1. Re:Glass can be "bruised" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're breaking up cast iron (real cast iron, which many of you youngsters have never seen) with a 16lb hammer you just flail away at it with an earsplitting BONG BONG BONG BONG until it finally goes thud.

      Seriously, why in the fuck are you breaking up cast iron? Why not just melt it?

  65. Re:In Soviet Russia... They use a pencil. by vertinox · · Score: 1

    These New Mexico Tech students 'thought outside the box', and in doing so, completely subverted the whole point of the competition. Using this strategy, they managed to net second place, and they get a newspaper article for it.

    And no I wasn't going to do the cliche, but remember the story about the millions NASA pumped into making the ballpoint pen that could be used in zero gravity, but the Soviets saved time and money by using a pencil. (Even though I remember reading a snopes article)

    But the lesson is the same. In the real world, you goal is to accomplish tasks and it doesn't matter how sometimes.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  66. So what are you replacing? by el_womble · · Score: 1

    Cost of mug to Starbucks: $0.50
    Cost of coffee to Starbucks: $0.20
    Price of coffee at Starbucks: $2.50
    Cost of bad customer service: Priceless

    Any coffee shop worth its salt should replace a broken cup of coffee... within reason. Of course they are under no obligation to, but it's got to be cheaper than investing in bomb shaped, ceramic nightmares from hell.

    This is an intreresting academic exercise... right up there with "Who can design a vessel that can save an egg dropped from 200 feet?". That gem has kept school kids ammused for decades.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  67. One word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. Re:childhood trauma by Medievalist · · Score: 1
    I got an F, despite there being no rules whatsoever prohibiting parachutes (although I hear they wrote in that rule the following year).
    But you're not bitter!
  69. Link to an article about the winning design by CiQuat · · Score: 1
  70. Umm...but I still need a new one after dropping it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I drop that bomb, the bottom shatters and ... yes, my coffee's still inside, I can still drink it, but after dropping it once, the bottom part is probably not doing too well a job at holding it upright.

    So I can either place that sorta-kinda designer piece I got then (hey, it's a one-of-a-kind after dropping, none will look the same way when they hit the floor!) and carefully balance it so it stays upright, or I can go out and do what I do now already after dropping my coffee:

    I go out and buy a new cup.

    What's saved is the cleaning up part. And that's done by someone else anyway...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  71. Re:In Soviet Russia... They use a pencil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  72. Indestructible French cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mug considered to be indestructible when using a crumple zone? Well then you could consider any car used in French to be an indestructible super car too considering they don't consider the outside of the car either.

  73. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've held an inconsequential grudge so long, we're making you an honorary woman, with a free upgrade to "married" too!

  74. How many thousands did this cost? by eltonito · · Score: 1
    It warms my heart knowing that tuition and tax dollars were probably wasted on such a project. Given the lab time, materials, class time and travel this had to have costed thousands.

    Target has Lexan, "virtually unbreakable" coffee mugs with near spill-proof lids for $9. Of course, they don't look like a mug with a pineapple glued to the bottom, but they do fit into a car's cupholder.

    1. Re:How many thousands did this cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. Get over it. The lab time in an art studio that's running is essentially free. The cost of some clay, slip and a sponge? A lot less than $9. I mean, do you have any idea how much clay costs?! Get a clue - $0.2/lb! Travel costs aren't cheap, okay, but, realistically, it's in the noise for a University, people travel to conferences all the time.

      But the opportunity to have your students show off to a national audience, get articles in the local papers, national media, and a national engineer society magazine? *Priceless*.

      Engineering societies do projects like this all the time to inspire students and provide opportunities to do something different, to apply the knowledge learned in class or to force the student to see the knowledge they have gained in a different light. I've always appreciated seeing a project like this on a new-hires resume, as I trust that they've seen something more than the inside of a textbook.

      More power to them. If my tax dollars go to funding the application of engineering principles at a university, bravo.

    2. Re:How many thousands did this cost? by eltonito · · Score: 1
      So this is what college level engineering is like? I saw, and retained, the concept they employeed from a Mr. Wizard experiment I saw on Nickelodeon when I was 12. Their design was far from ground-breaking on functional or artistic level. The thing looks terrible, isn't remotely functional for imbibing liquid at ones desk and it doesn't push the design/engineering/ceramics envelope.

      Sure, in the end they got a lot of press on it, but it's still a complete waste of time and money. A group of college students placed second by emulating a junior-high physics experiment.

  75. How do you drink from a cup that can't spill by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Instead of broken cups we would now have broken toes and cracked pavement...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  76. Re:Umm...but I still need a new one after dropping by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    What's saved is the cleaning up part

    Weeeel, yes. Technically, in that the coffee is not on the floor and won't need to be given 5 seconds of attention with a wet rag. The pointy shards of shattered ceramic, now, they're every-fucking-where. And a lot harder to deal with.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  77. You're thinking too far inside the slashbox by hellfire · · Score: 1

    In an effort to be negative, you're too far inside the slashbox mode of thinking. Grab a blurb from the article, take an angle and get crabby. That or you are just bitter :)

    I think you have a right to be bitter. Per the rules you posted, you should not have gotten an F. Now, if during your class the spirit of the class was to deal with materials or polymers or impact resistance then your parachute idea would have been against the spirit of the contest. Egg dropping contests are common in engineering and science classes, and kids have been subverting them for years, but each class has a slightly different reason for introducing the subject. Sometimes, it's just to see if the kids are clever enough to think "outside the box."

    And perhaps that's the point here. Get a bunch of engineering students to think about a project and see which ones think creatively. Why design a $10,000 coffee mug when a $10 design could work just fine?

    That being said, I think you were ripped off and I think these kids were given a gift. Egg dropping contests are notoriously run by grumpy people tired of kids who "subvert spirit of the rules" which is incredibly stupid if you just use the project as a grading exercise. It then becomes "how well did you follow the rules?" not "how creative are you?"

    A parachute is highly practical, while this design is not at all practical for actually drinking coffee. Then again, I have no idea if any of the other submissions were practical either. And the blurb you pulled from the article, that could just be some throwaway line the reporter slapped down. We have no real idea what other designs there were and if there were any other type of creative designs that were just as wacky and impractical.

    In other words, I'm now confident you are just bitter ;) Let me get you a cup of coffee so you can relax.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  78. Never mind the stiches you'll need.... by bodland · · Score: 1

    After you slice the crap out of your mouth drinking from a chipped cermic cup.

  79. Uhmm.. Forgetting Galileo's little experiment? by pjkundert · · Score: 1
    Adding to the difficulty, the contest requires that mugs be dropped on their sides. But the sacrificial bomb -- which weighs more than the mug on top -- and gravity take care of that, Price said.

    Hmm. Unfortunately, they've mastered crumple zones at the expense of understanding basic laws of physics...

    That would be "aerodynamics", not "gravity", that might help the mug to align its top side above the "heavier" sacrificial bomb side. After all, I think that Galileo confirmed that the heavier cannonball doesn't fall faster than the light one, at the Tower of Pisa.

    --
    -- -pjk Perry Kundert perry@kundert.ca http://kundert.2y.net
  80. Call Indiana Jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those mugs look like the Holy Grail.

  81. Maurice Moss is the world's happiest IT guy by ZoomieDood · · Score: 1

    He doesn't have to make two cups of tea each time.

  82. Tommee Tippee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For most cases where a beverage may be dropped by accident, people use Tommee Tippee mugs. Reading the subject I wondered if that was what had been designed, and in fact whether the Tommee Tippee mug is a better solution anyway.

    The cardboard things with the plastic lids with small spout you get from coffee takeways are a similar principle, but not as robust. Then again, they aren't associated with small children or elderly patients either.

  83. Second place? by CyberSlugGump · · Score: 1


    The article features the second-place winners, so what does the first-place design look like?

  84. Re:Next Project: A Ballmer-Proof Chair by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    Dick Cheney is probably going to shoot you if you keep using that "chair throwing" joke.

    I wish he would shoot me, then I could come back and apologize to him and his family for all the problems I had caused.


    He only did that because of some political ass kissing and under-the-table palm greasing.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  85. Try pass that mug through airport security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it is interesting shaped mug but try to explain that your cup of joe is just a unbreakable mug to any security person at the airport or any other transportation system with security which is about all now. I assume they will cavity search you also while they are at it ;)

  86. Nobody likes a smartass. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    I've seen a lot of these competitions, and taken part in a couple.
    In most cases, the organizers of the competition have a management, not engineering mindset.
    These folks typically do NOT like the unexpected, especially in contests they're organizing.

    If you participate in these competitions, you learn some really important things about engineering:
    As an engineer, you must listen to your Client and determine:

    What the Client he says he wants.

    What the Client really wants.

    What the Client needs.

    What the Client is willing and able to pay for.

    What you actually (can) deliver.


    Typically, at the start, no two of the above are the same. You have to make all of them equal and convince the Client it was his idea the whole time. You can do this before quoting the job, or you can do it via change orders after the job has begun.

    But skipping directly from "What they say they want" to "What you actually deliver" does not get you paid. It's a shortcut that just pisses off the Client. And if you're really stupid, it embarrasses the Client.

    If the above sounds unfair, it's not. This is the way it is. Get used to it.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  87. phew by kickedfortrolling · · Score: 1

    with that solved, we can start addressing minor quibbles, like a cancer and avian flu

    --
    --AlexC
    Just because I dont agree with climate change doesnt make me a troll
  88. Eggdrop Parachute? Why not? by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    Clever? Outside-of-the-box? I thought it was the obvious solution! The rules even seem to encourage such approaches, saying (in the "standard rules") that the vehicle which gets the egg down slowest wins (I rather like the other version - fastest descent time wins. Seems much more interesting challenge), and the vehicle which is the lightest wins in a tie. The only bit that seems like it could make things difficult for the use of parachutes is the requirement that it wind up in the landing zone, where a parachute might drift off course.

    The nature of the problem is such that a parachute is a good choice. The structure of the rules and judging guidelines is such that a parachute is a good choice. And it's an obvious choice, it being a thing that was invented for the specific purpose of limiting the falling speed of objects in the atmosphere.

    So yeah, I don't really get why using a parachute to solve that problem is bad. It solves the problem as stated, within the rules as stated, and has a very good chance of scoring very well using the scoring criteria as stated. If the organizers specifically want complicated solutions they need to set up the rules to favor that.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  89. Have one already by Necron69 · · Score: 1

    Give me a break.

    I still have a nice, big mug that I bought in 1987 as a freshman in college. Its made out of this wonderful, space-age material called 'plastic'.

    Amazing stuff.

    - Necron69

  90. Tech is a university. by Saanvik · · Score: 1
    Tech is a university as it offers undergraduate, post-graduate degrees, and has research facilities. That's the definition of a university.

    If you look at the press release from Tech, and not the USA Today article, they never mention university, so your rant is a bit off base.

    Oh, and BTW, I went to Tech, too. I still like to call it School of Mines, though, as it was one of the land grant colleges from back in the 1890's. Freshmen retention has always been a big issue for Tech because most classes were decreasing by 30-40% between their freshmen and sophmore year. In my time there, they were fine with that decrease if it was due to students being unable to maintain the required course load, but they were doing studies to make sure it wasn't due to other problems.

  91. half of a fact by harvey_peterson · · Score: 0

    I'd like to hear the rest of the story:

    Who won? What was their design like?

  92. Use stainless steel by devfsadm · · Score: 0

    My mug is Stainless steel why bother with ceramic. I can drop it from anywhere. And if I feel ambitious I can beat people with it. It can also break ceramic cups. Yes, I know it a ceramic cup contest but, why bother with ceramic.
    I thought that undergraduate students at this "University" would be working on more meaningfull experiments.
    Seems like this experiment belongs in High School. Reminds me of the high school egg drop contest.
    First place was multiple ceramic cups with a very thick base.
    Diffrent cups were dropped by each member until they broke. Each member had one drop.
    I think that is called blind luck. And in a scientific comunity this test can not be reproduced.
    Second place was a crumple zone thing.
    Sure works well but, it is not practical and adds at least 50% if not more material.
    Any forward thinking here? I don't think so.

    First place:
    http://news.umr.edu/news/2006/mugdrop06.html
    second place:
    http://infohost.nmt.edu/mainpage/news/2006/15feb01 .html

  93. BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, I could make a coffee mug out of Zytel or similar and you'd be able to drop that sucker out of an airplane. I fail to see how, in the grand scheme of things, this is such a big deal.

    It's not like they even came up with some sort of more resilient ceramic for this or anything even remotely useful for anything beyond some sort of intelectual masturbation over a dish dropping contest.

    Big fucking deal.

  94. Re:In Soviet Russia... They use a pencil. by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    The pencil story is false, but based on fact. Basically, NASA (and the Russians) used pencils for a while, but didn't like have pencil dust or broken leads floating around the capsules. Some guy came up with the design on his own and started selling them to NASA and they worked. The Russians started using them too.

  95. Paradox? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    Thank god I can sleep easy at night ;)

    But doesn't increased availability of coffee make it harder to sleep?

  96. Disappointing by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    My first skim over the article was sadly misleading. I thought they'd developed a mug that you could drop from 2 stories up, full of coffee, and have it land and still have the coffee in it, no leaks.

    Then I find out this is just a college-kid version of "The Egg Drop". Sigh.

    Hey, I have a mug that I can drop from a few stories up, too. It's a plastic Timmies cup, still in the box with the protective styrofoam. Wow, I'm an engineering student now!

    Hmm, I /thought/ I felt my IQ drop a few points...

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  97. Useless and Misleading by Ranger · · Score: 1

    After finding a pic and reading up on it, I discovered the mug can only be dropped once not repeatedly like the blurb implied. It's more like a crash helmet. Crash once it protects your head and you throw it away. So it gets dropped once you can drink out of the mug. Drop it again and no more mug. Also misleading is that it can hold the coffee when you drop it. It looks more like SpongeBob's pineapple home than a coffee mug.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  98. Enhancement number one by Wayspooled · · Score: 1

    Make one that won't spill when it falls 15 feet.

  99. Last year's winner... by Insert_clever_name_h · · Score: 1

    ...which survived being dropped from 5 floors up (from the pool deck of the Baltimore Waterfront Hilton, in case anyone cares): http://kriven.mse.uiuc.edu/recent/geopolymers/ACER S%20GP%20mug%20dropping/mug2005.htm And this one won the year before, with a 50-ft drop onto concrete: http://kriven.mse.uiuc.edu/recent/geopolymers/ACER S%20GP%20mug%20dropping/mug2004.htm Note: neither of these had "sacrificial layers" or anything like that - they were a room-temperature cured aluminosilicate ceramic ("geopolymer") with carbon fibre reinforcing, made by the "traditional powerhouse" (TFA's words, not mine) Illinois team.

  100. Erm... by offaxis · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Adding to the difficulty, the contest requires that mugs be dropped on their sides. But the sacrificial bomb -- which weighs more than the mug on top -- and gravity take care of that, Price said.
    Heavy things fall just as fast as light things, thankyou very much. :) (Add some air resistance into that mix and everybody's happy!)
  101. karma whoring... la la la by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    s/explodes/a splode/

  102. Steelite. by sudog · · Score: 1

    I have some ceramic mugs and plates right now that can survive a 15 ft. fall to a hardwood floor. It's the only reason I still have them after 12 years.

  103. Oblig. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

    What, held under the dorsal guiding feather?

  104. What was the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the point was to produce a mug that could be dropped multiple times, was practical , attractive, and so expensive that no one in there right mind would ever purchase it then no they didn't "win". If it was to win the contest then they came damn close with a 50 cent solution. I don't think people realize that the real problem to be solved was how to "win" the contest not to produce a practical mug. A practical mug would be plastic or metal not ceramic.

  105. Common Practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We learned about these tactics in my classes in engineering.

    Typically in aircraft, bridges, etc. A weak point will be designed into the object. This way, the engineers can control the failure, and make it break the way they want. Cars even use the same idea with crumple zones.

    It also makes the circumstances of a failure more predictable: Without a designed weak point there may be a less significant weakness due to a manufacturing flaw. With the designed flaw, it's possible to know precisely when the part must be replaced to ensure safety.

    The neat thing about their design is that it could be modified to attach to existing mugs and protect them. You just have to replace the "bomb" on the rare occasion you drop the mug.

  106. Why to smash instead of melt by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Melting requires more equipment.

    The most common reason to smash up cast iron (that I know of) is to salvage lead from large diameter cast iron bell & spigot plumbing. You can get 2 to 5 pounds of lead per joint from old sewer lines with no tools other than a heavy hammer (or big rock, if you are patient enough). This can be a significant source of income for some people.

    Incidentally, an expert with a torch can melt a steel stud out of a cast iron engine block without damaging the threads in the block. It's an impressive trick - you need skills to pull it off!

  107. Knife to a Gun Fight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah all you want, but these guys came up with some very creative ideas. They basically brought a clever but low-tech structural engineering solution and stone-age materials to a materials science competition, and whooped ass. This proves that materials aren't always as important as one might think. The materials people who got beat should be thinking about changing their majors right about now.

    The idea of using a sponge coated in clay slip (very wet, pourable clay), which sponge then burns off in the firing leaving an intricate web of very thin, sponge-shaped ceramic - that's f'ing brilliant.

  108. It's been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "Correlle." :-/

    The story I heard was that when they first invented Correlle a guy took a mug (sans handle) to the top of the building (over 3 stories) and tossed the mug into the parking lot. It bounced. Repeatedly.