Slashdot Mirror


Toronto to Become One Huge Hotspot

8127972 writes "The Toronto Star is reporting that Toronto Hydro is about to announce plans to make all of Toronto Canada a huge wireless hotspot. The project could go live as early as this fall and hopes to bring low cost Internet access to millions of Toronto citizens. In the process it will challenge the Canadian telcos for a share of the $8 billion (CDN) a year wireless market."

283 comments

  1. "Challenge"? by XanC · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's an awfully generous description of what government would be doing. It's the only "challenger" which has men with guns who will force people to pay, whether they use it or not. Pretty big advantage...

    1. Re:"Challenge"? by OzPhIsH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Many people don't use public libraries anymore. Maybe the government should quit funding them. Afterall, the government has guns and forces me to pay, wheter I use it or not...

      --

      "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

    2. Re:"Challenge"? by Pov98 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummmm maybe you need to look before you write - Toronto Hydro is not owned by the Canadian government.... not to mention there are like 10 different telco's in Toronto (ie Rogers, Bell, Telus etc.)

    3. Re:"Challenge"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's included in our taxes, it's either they build things like this or they siphon the money into their own pockets through advertisement scandals and such (because no government which has managed to siphon money out of its' people will willingly give it back). That and I'm all for free wireless (even though I'm a Vancouverite) in Canadian cities, it's simple enough to tap into an open wireless network in Vancouver, but to have one layered into the city infrastructure is just so much sexier.

      Also..Dear Canada, on behalf of Vancouver, I'd like to say, Do me! Do me!

    4. Re:"Challenge"? by brassmoknets · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, Toronto has by far the most popular public library system in North America:

      from: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pag ename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1 139007013815&call_pageid=968350130169&col=96948320 2845

      "Lending out a record 30.4 million books, CDs and videos in 2005 -- a 5 per cent jump from the previous year -- the TPL now boasts a circulation that is a full third larger than its closest continental counterpart, Bryant says. "It's not that we're in the lead by a small margin," Bryant says. "The next busiest library system in the United States (in Queens, New York) is around 19 million items circulated."

    5. Re:"Challenge"? by BewireNomali · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of that too. Maybe public libraries can be retooled. Into after-school programs, say. The "retail locations are there" - retraining librarians to run after school programs shouldn't cost too much. Or you can hire recently retired teachers or other recently retired professionals to help kids with homework and with some mentoring for the older kids.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    6. Re:"Challenge"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      funny, last i checked, bell was the only telco with landlines in toronto. or ontario for that matter.

      rogers -- cable company, primarily ontario, and national cellular provider. rolling out voip service. swapped cable territories with shaw, now rumoured to be buying shaw. one cable company for all!
      telus -- ilec in bc and alberta, national cellular provider by buying out clearnet. rolling out tv service, wireless data service.
      fido -- national cellular provider, now owned by rogers.
      shaw -- cable company, western canada. rolling out voip service.
      bell -- largest telco in canada, ilec in ontario and quebec. national cellular service, national satellite service. rolling out nationwide wireless data service.
      sprint -- clec offering mainly business long distance service. partnered with fido for a home/cellular package.
      at&t -- bought by manitoba telecom, renamed allstream.

      despite the "deregulation" and "competition" introduced several years ago to canadian telecommunications, the only clec to make any use of it is really primus, who offer landline and long distance service, leased from whoever the ilec is in that province.

      and, why can't americans ever get a canadian city location right? it's toronto ontario, not toronto canada. that's like saying chicago usa. how fitting. my confirmation word is gagging.

    7. Re:"Challenge"? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Well, you've made it clear that he sure didn't get his money's worth from your public school education.

    8. Re:"Challenge"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "PHLBTPHLBTPHLBTPHLBT!"

      No, that sounds like an asshole.

    9. Re:"Challenge"? by NeoDragon · · Score: 1

      You forgot about MTS (allstream) (although you mentioned AT&T, but that was bought up by Rogers not MTS) Not that MTS will be around for too much longer, bell has been eyeing it for years since it was made private.

    10. Re:"Challenge"? by talson · · Score: 1

      Toronto Hydro is not owned by the Canadian government

      It's owned by a Canadian municipal government. The Corporation of the City of Toronto is the sole shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation, a holding company with four subsidiaries one of which is Toronto Hydro Telecom Inc.

  2. Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Apostata · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...just kidding - I realise it couldn't spread that far. Now, Etobicoke - *they* have something to cheer about!

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by TubeSteak · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm just wondering when the first American leecher is going to try setting up his own wireless ISP through Canada's network.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Astin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One would hope so, since Etobicoke is part of Toronto.

      Although the article says the downtown core could be covered by fall, one would assume that the service would expand to the rest of the city as they continue to roll it out. Especially since they're excuse for this is that they plan on using it to monitor smart meters.

      --
      - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
    3. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "when the first American leecher is going to try setting up his own wireless ISP through Canada's network."

      American leecher?

      You socialist degenerates have been leeching off America for your peace and security these past 60-odd years.

      'Bout damn time you gave something back to the folks who guaranteed your welfare state.

    4. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Rochester would be hard but you can see the Toronto skyline across the lake starting from around Olcott. An intrepid DX'er may be able to get a connection.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    5. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by firl · · Score: 1

      wish rochester would get it ... would bring life back into the city, almost as good as putting a subway in it! ... oh wait

    6. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Canadian security is only at risk because of all the people we piss off. I don't blame the Canadians for not spending ungodly amounts of their governments money on a giant war machine, it's not their fight, they didn't start it... We did.

    7. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I am going to steal Rochester's fast ferry and use and anchor it about mid way between Toronto and Olcott. We can use it as a Relay and a Geek party barge.

      Not to mention that if you straddle the border you can always claim wrong jurisdiction.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interpol says otherwise on that part. ;)

    9. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that if you straddle the border you can always claim wrong jurisdiction.
      Methinks it is more likely you'll find out firsthand what it means to get prosecuted in two jurisdictions at once.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      Etobicoke=Toronto

      For over a decade!

    11. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Canadians see close proximity to once great country led astray by right-wing extremist, war machine-feeding, paranoid, rights-abusing, law-breaking, war-mongering, neocon dictatorship as a liability, not an asset. If I could move Canada half a world away from you, I'd do it in the blink on an eye. Go fuck yourself.

    12. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      'Bout damn time you gave something back to the folks who guaranteed your welfare state.

      yeah but Britain doesn't ask for much these days.

      (nafta, on the other hand...)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    13. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by ckedge · · Score: 1

      No that's not true. They hate us all. They've just decided to try and kill you first because you're causing the most trouble for them :)

    14. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by The+Spoonman · · Score: 1

      Step 1: get rid of the orangutan

      Step 2: ???

      Step 3: Who cares? The orangutan is gone!

      --
      Which is more painful? Going to work or gouging your eye out with a spoon? Find out!
      http://www.workorspoon.com
    15. Re:Hundreds in Rochester Cheer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if "they" started the problem. Wait isn't this a discussion about WiFi in Toronto?

      I live here, quite like Americans, and "they" whoever they are are always welcome in my country too. Just remember if "they" blow something up in the U.S. it's not because they came through Canada. That was something Fox News came up with. THOSE are Americans I hate.

      Johnny Skidmarks

      Bush

  3. Eh? by abscissa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What $8 bln CDN /yr wireless market? I live in Canada and there aren't any public wireless providers that I've heard of, though Bell/Rogers are planning to develop one. Do they mean like, cell phones? Or selling wireless routers?

    1. Re:Eh? by aspjunkie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rogers and Bell both operate HotSpot services in Canada.. Look for HotSpot stickers on the doors of your local Starbucks or Second Cup - as well as other places. They'll even charge it to your Bell or Rogers mobile phone bill...I think all the big Canadian mobile phone providers are in on the action.. even Telus.

      http://www.shoprogers.com/business/wireless/plans_ services/hotspot.asp

      http://www.bell.ca/shop/en_CA_BC/Sme.Sol.Wireless. Solutions.Hotspots.page

      http://www.telusmobility.com/on/business_solutions /hotspot.shtml

    2. Re:Eh? by Rebel_lord · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, all the wireless companies in Canada: Fido, Bell, Rogers, Telus have been working on developing something called Hotspot ahref=http://www.canadianhotspot.ca/advancedsearch .asprel=url2html-24218http://www.canadianhotspot.c a/advancedsearch.asp>

    3. Re:Eh? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "What $8 bln CDN /yr wireless market? I live in Canada and there aren't any public wireless providers that I've heard of, though Bell/Rogers are planning to develop one. "

      Lack of product != lack of market.

      For example, right now there is a market for ice cream in my office, two of us would like to buy some -- but there is no company selling ice cream in my office building.[1]

      They pretty much conflate the entire Internet provider market in T.O. with the wireless market -- but it's still a guesstimate.

      [1] Except, of course, the leftover ice cream cake from last week's monthly birthday get-together, but that can't be touched until after 5 PM.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes they mean cell phones. You must be the only one in the country who missed those annoying Bell ads during the olympics... what did you think they were talking about when they said Bell's network was faster than Rogers'? Did you see the PCMCIA card those fscking beavers were promoting? Hey, it's 3G wireless access via Bell. Telus and Rogers sell their own versions of the same thing. And yeah, data rates on the telcos networks aren't cheap.

      What really upsets the telcos is that if you've got 802.11 wireless all over a city you might as well carry a wireless SIP phone rather than a traditional GSM/CDMA cell phone. Whether you tie it into an Asterisk PBX or the type of VOIP systems that Vonage, Shaw, etc are touting doesn't really matter as long as you are avoiding the per minute traditional cell rates and their insance long distance. It'd even make City Fido at $50 a month look expensive.

    5. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mean EDGE/EVDO laptop cards that connect to cell networks. City-wide WiFi would threaten the insane prices Bell and Rogers charge for that service.

    6. Re:Eh? by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm admittedly guessing, but I think that figure probably includes a whole lot of wireless technologies, not all of which are available to the average consumer. Yes, it includes cell technologies (GPRS being a completely acceptable -- if not hugely expensive -- way of accessing the Internet) -- cell technologies probably make up the great bulk of that figure. However, there are fee-based WiFi Hotspot providers here in Canada (generally in the larger centres), so they probably get counted too (such providers typically only provide service in specific venues -- for example, Bell AccessZone, which provides WiFi service in the Air Canada Centre, and in VIA Rail first class lounges (and on in first class sections of the Toronto - Montreal corridor trains).

      It may also count satellite-based Internet, and could also possibly include microwave uplinks available to corporations. Without a breakdown it is difficult to know -- it appears to me that they're just throwing out a Really Big Number for investors to chew on. After all, who doesn't want a slice off of a Really Big Pie?

      Yaz.

    7. Re:Eh? by wanchai · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rate Plan

      • Hotspot hour $10
      • Hotspot day $15
      • Hotspot week $25
      • Hotspot month $40
      • Hotspot National Unlimited Subscription $25/mont

      yes, I thought it's free. no, it's not.

    8. Re:Eh? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should take a look at this graph

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Eh? by matt-larose · · Score: 0

      Do some research..

      Does this look like a canadian wireless network thats not Bell/Rogers/Telus ?

      http://www.storm.ca/map_wireless.html

      Yup yup AHUUUUUh

      --
      "Be glad you sailed for a better day, But dont forget there will be hell to pay" - Dave King/Flogging Molly
    10. Re:Eh? by LightningBolt! · · Score: 5, Funny

      What $8 bln CDN /yr wireless market?

      I think they're referring to all things sold that have no wires. Like pomegranates.

      --
      Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
    11. Re:Eh? by FunFactor100 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, Storm's wireless service is a line of sight service....meaning you have to have a receiver/transmitter on your roof or somewhere that can see their tower.

    12. Re:Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's surprising. I'm an avid latte drinker (at least one a day - no I'm not some kind of snob, it's just yummy), so I visit those places a lot, and I haven't yet seen any mention of a WiFi HotSpot or anything. And I do a fair amount of travelling too (been in hotels for about 20 out of the last 30 days, 3 different hotels and 4 airports too), so I've seen many of them so you'd think I'd have noticed. Either ways every hotel seemingly has free Wifi nowadays (thru i-Hotel or whatever else; funny thing how I got the EXACT same access code for 2 different hotels, different room # and all, 2 weeks apart!)

    13. Re:Eh? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Telus,Bell,Rogers != Toronto Hydro

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    14. Re:Eh? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      I think they're referring to all things sold that have no wires. Like pomegranates. - and I like my grenades to come with wires, so I can setup wired networks, namely booby-traps.

    15. Re:Eh? by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

      I still wonder why they call them booby-traps. It's a trap. Maybe people just wanted to say booby, I guess.

      --
      sent from my slashdot browser.
    16. Re:Eh? by pixolet · · Score: 1

      You idiot, how else will nerds get real boobies? A booby-trap, duh. Although, I don't see the need for blowing up the boobies after they've been caught..

      --
      the practice effect makes things betterer.
    17. Re:Eh? by dryeo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here (Greater Vancouver area) the radio is constantly airing Telus ads about their high speed wireless. Highest speed ever, 5 times faster then Rogers, at least according to the ads

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    18. Re:Eh? by rikkards · · Score: 1

      I think they are talking about over the cell phone. Out here in Ottawa, I have seen Bell ads saying the exact same thing on TV but it was definitely a phone.

    19. Re:Eh? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Well according to their press release http://www.telusmobility.com/about/press_room/rele ases/20051114_EVDO_network.html it is high speed wireless. To quote
      Broadband data speeds
      Wireless High Speed offers clients the broadband data access they've become accustomed to on their desktops, but now they can take that speed on the road. With typical download speeds of 400 to 700 kilobits per second, and possible speeds of more than 2 megabits per second, TELUS Mobility's Wireless High Speed network offers clients the speed they need for powerful mobile computing applications.


      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  4. Not just T. -- yes, challenging by coaxeus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard that Calgary, Alberta is looking at doing the same. Various companies in town have been asked to present proposals, ranging from cellular companies, telcos, isps, and tech firms. One of the latter I'm familiar with has proposed a cisco mesh solution using new aerospace gear. The plan is to use this network for emergency services and the like, at first anyway. Streaming video form security cameras to a squad car at 120mph for example. That = challenging for 802.11.

    --
    My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
  5. You use our cheap connection... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... and we can spy on you easier. Great.

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    1. Re:You use our cheap connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When in TORonto...

    2. Re:You use our cheap connection... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Good point. Shame nobody else will see it, seeing as I've been modded "troll -1" for the first time! Rotfl.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    3. Re:You use our cheap connection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

      It's not a troll, it's the truth.

    4. Re:You use our cheap connection... by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Bah... what do you think this is, the States?

      Canada has a long way to go before it reaches that level of paranoid dictatorship.

  6. Homeless by killmenow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I spent a week in Toronto once. There were seemingly a lot of homeless people sleeping on the sidewalks every night. I'm not sure there is a better social service than making sure they have wireless Internet.

    1. Re:Homeless by OzPhIsH · · Score: 0, Troll

      Since the whole city will be connected, they can just use the wireless network to motitor just which sidewalks the unsightly homeless are sleeping on and then kick them out. Duh.

      --

      "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

    2. Re:Homeless by KarateExplosions · · Score: 1

      If homeless people do not have a wireless connection, then how the heck are they supposed to check on their 401(k) plans? Dialup?

    3. Re:Homeless by smartin · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't have 401(k)'s you insensitive clod. They have RRSP's (hence the reason that they are homeless).

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    4. Re:Homeless by jpardey · · Score: 1

      That would be horrible! Do you know how many images there are to load on some of those financial sites? Torture!

      --
      I have freaks! I did something right...
    5. Re:Homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those homeless people are better get off their ass and get a job, and stop washing my windshield just in 5 minutes after I've got out of the car wash. Miserable bastards.

    6. Re:Homeless by Cruciform · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some of them make a lot more money than most Slashdot readers.

      I've talked to panhandlers that take in over $60 an hour tax free every day.

      The homeless you see sleeping on the street are typically the mentally ill. They have options available to them for shelter but due to their mental condition they end up leaving for one reason or another.

      I bet within 5 years of the wireless system being implemented you'll hear someone in office suggest that we should tag the mentally ill homeless so they can be located and retrieved when they wander from shelters.

    7. Re:Homeless by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Hee hee :-)

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    8. Re:Homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess one week wasn't enough for you to learn that the local government does everything it can to convince those homeless people to go to a shelter where they have access to decent basic services.

      I spent a week in New York city and it looked like a refugee camp full of Mexican people begging in the streets not to mention the misery some poor black people have to withstand over there...

    9. Re:Homeless by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      In Canada, we spend a lot on social programs, compared to most parts of the world. However, there will always be people that fall through the holes. Be it drug addiction, spousal abuse, family issues, mental illness. Its kind of sad, but a lot of homeless ppl are ppl with mental problems.

    10. Re:Homeless by killmenow · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've talked to panhandlers that take in over $60 an hour tax free every day.
      That may be true and all; but, my experience tells me that for every Shaky Lady there are a dozen legitimately homeless people either mentally ill or drug addicted or something along those lines. I'm sick of hearing from people how we're being duped by unscrupulous cheats who just don't want to work and will sit there and scam people out of cash all day. You know what I think: more power to them. If it's such a lucrative career and will earn a person a cool $60/hr tax free every day, the "homeless" problem would be of epidemic proportions as millions of people living on $10/hr "changed careers" so to speak.
      The homeless you see sleeping on the street are typically the mentally ill. They have options available to them for shelter but due to their mental condition they end up leaving for one reason or another.
      I know. I actually spoke to some local Toronto(ans? ites?) and they said the same thing. In fact, I even watched a van with blankets and food stop by to check on several of them a couple times. I was told that's basically what the social services people do for them. They won't stay at the shelters so there's really little more they can do except just check on them, make sure they have food and blankets, etc. It's a fair bit more than what we do for them here in my little city.
      I bet within 5 years of the wireless system being implemented you'll hear someone in office suggest that we should tag the mentally ill homeless so they can be located and retrieved when they wander from shelters.
      I wouldn't be surprised. And in an ironic sort of way, it would fulfill a lot of the mentally ill paranoid delusions about the government trying to spy on them and track their every movement, etc.
    11. Re:Homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there are many homeless in Toronto. A small number choose to remain on the streets while others represent a mix of runaways (abused or otherwise), those with psychological problems, and many that have hit rock bottom for a number of reasons (e.g., alcoholism). You should consider that Canada only has a small number of major metropolitan areas, each acting as a magnet for those at risk in other parts of the country.

      Much of it is inexcusable but it's not a black & white situation. The homelessness situation is only one part of the shameful rates of poverty in the US and Canada.

    12. Re:Homeless by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

      But the homeless need the wireless access so they can download email to their laptops, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
    13. Re:Homeless by LaughingJack · · Score: 1

      [...] you'll hear someone in office suggest that we should tag the mentally ill homeless so they can be located and retrieved when they wander from shelters.

      That's not a bad idea actually... :P
      Just joking ;-)
    14. Re:Homeless by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually spoke to some local Toronto(ans? ites?)

      Torontonians, actually. But most just say "I'm from Trawna". ;-)

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    15. Re:Homeless by sessamoid · · Score: 1
      I bet within 5 years of the wireless system being implemented you'll hear someone in office suggest that we should tag the mentally ill homeless so they can be located and retrieved when they wander from shelters.
      And you'll have justified the reason they wear tinfoil hats, as the paranoid suspicion that the government is implanting tracking devices in their bodies will have come true.
      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    16. Re:Homeless by saforrest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've talked to panhandlers that take in over $60 an hour tax free every day.

      I don't deny this happens — I've seen some cases myself — but I think it's talked about by passerbys like us much more than it really happens.

      My rationale here is essentially that the reward of believing that all (or most) homeless people are scammers is the ability to walk by while ignoring their pleas, without a guilty conscience. That emotional "reward" is so powerful, especially for people that are confronted by homeless people regularly, that I can easily see all kinds of people choosing to believe it regardless of the evidence. Even you provided only one piece of circumstantial evidence.

      There was a guy in London (Ontario) who used to sit on a busy corner in a wheelchair. I got a haircut across the street from this corner once, and the hairdresser said she'd seen the guy walk a block without trouble to a nearby Tim Hortons and get coffee with his earnings.

      I had my suspicions about the guy too, and I don't doubt she was telling the truth. But the outrage in her voice and the exasperated sighs of the fellow customers said there was more going on here than just being pissed off at this guy.

    17. Re:Homeless by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      The people you see on the streets are the ones who fight for the prime locations. I'd say that ups the odds that they're scum. They also stand alone. There's a reason they stand alone.

      I don't give them a penny. I used to, but I regret every cent. People who give to panhandlers are enabling those who should be spending their time putting their lives back together rather than honing their act.

      Even the homeless newspapers are a fraudulent industry preying on the slave wages they can give the homeless.

      I don't have a solution, but giving them money draws more scum to the street to abuse the "legitimate" homeless.

    18. Re:Homeless by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I don't have a solution, but giving them money draws more scum to the street to abuse the "legitimate" homeless.

      The main solution is progressive homeless shelters. The majority of the homeless are not mentally ill, they are people down on their luck. Programs to get them off of addictions, into cheap housing, and into jobs for the most part work. Sure there are scammers and people who will just try to take advantage and mentally ill. They may or may not be helped, but if you want to do good, just donate to a shelter.

    19. Re:Homeless by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I don't deny this happens -- I've seen some cases myself -- but I think it's talked about by passerbys like us much more than it really happens.

      I'm not so sure about this. I met a few homeless people and a number of people who work at the local shelter. I've also seen several people spontaneously have the same idea. Why don't we give the homeless some food. Try it some time. Make up a couple dozen sandwiches and go try to give them to the homeless people you see on the street begging for change. You'll get a few people who take them, a large number of people who refuse them, and a few people who get mad at you and throw things. Since a good number of the people out there ask for money so they can get something to eat, I'd say the results show a lot of dishonesty.

      Now I've been dirt poor in my life. And I can sympathize with guys who are down and out who want a drink. Hell, I've given some guys cash when they asked for it and told me they wanted to buy a bottle of something. I've run into them at the liquor store later when they are buying that bottle. But I don't confuse this with actually helping the problem and I don't think most people who give cash to the homeless should think they are helping.

      The truth is you can do a lot more good by donating some cash to the homeless shelter who can get people clothes, food, a place to sleep, a job, and affordable housing than you will giving it to the homeless directly. Maybe there are some who don't want to deal with the shelters, but most of those are either scammers (as shown above) or the mentally ill, and most of them will still go in when the weather gets really bad. That is my advice.

    20. Re:Homeless by spells · · Score: 1

      That's not what the rest of Canada calls you ;)

    21. Re:Homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fuck you talking about? I'm homeless downtown montreal and I've been looking for a hotspot all winter!

    22. Re:Homeless by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a song by Lazy Boy, Underwear Goes Inside the Pants:

      We're in one of the richest countries in the world,
      but the minimum wage is lower than it was thirty five years ago.

      There are homeless people everywhere.

      This homeless guy asked me for money the other day.
      I was about to give it to him and then I thought he was going to use it on drugs or alcohol.

      And then I thought, that's what I'm going to use it on.
      Why am I judging this poor bastard.

      People love to judge homeless guys. Like if you give them money they're just going to waste it.
      Well, he lives in a box, what do you want him to do? Save it up and buy a wall unit?
      Take a little run to the store for a throw rug and a CD rack? He's homeless.

      I walked behind this guy the other day.
      A homeless guy asked him for money.
      He looks right at the homeless guy and says why don't you go get a job you bum.

      People always say that to homeless guys like it is so easy.
      This homeless guy was wearing his underwear outside his pants.

      Outside his pants.

      I'm guessing his resume isn't all up to date.
      I'm predicting some problems during the interview process.
      I'm pretty sure even McDonalds has a "underwear goes inside the pants" policy.
      Not that they enforce it really strictly, but technically I'm sure it is on the books.

    23. Re:Homeless by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Your obviously not from around here eh?

      IAMFTO

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    24. Re:Homeless by iwsnet · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what all of these cities expect by offering free Internet access. Is everyone going to walk around with laptops all day and sit in the park? What do people do online anyway besides e-mail and surf the Web? Why not offer city residents free phone service as well?

    25. Re:Homeless by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the guys that stand at Wellington and Commissioners (by the childrens hospital)?

      There's usually one guy that stands at the lights with a sign, and doesn't approach people. The sign says "Homeless, Hungry" etc.

      The thing is, it will be one kid for a couple of weeks, then another guy takes over, then a couple of weeks later it's another guy. Then the first kid is back again.

      I don't know whether they're taking vacations, or have some sort of union thing going, but it's really piqued my curiousity.

    26. Re:Homeless by WoodieR · · Score: 1
      The homeless here in Toronto, is a whopping $250 Million make work project and sinkhole of taxpayers dollars, to support the loonie left fringe twits who seemingly believe that they know better what to do with my money than I do. Incompetent and communistic bent politicians have put in place these programs for these SELF-Interest groups - let's call them what they are, not special interest - SELF-Interest and self-serving groups (at MY expense) ...

      These useless lumps on the sidewalk are there by CHOICE. there is a small percentage of them with actual mental issues, and as such they should be removed from the street and institutionalised for their own safety. The remaining 90 + % are there by CHOICE ... they emjoy not being disciplined or even resposnible for themselves. They have three hot meals or more delivered to them on the street, they have clean clothing and bedding delivered to them on the street, they receive their welfare cheques, as well as over $200 per DAY in handouts from the bleeding heart public ... the worst thing you can tell them is to get a job, or heaven forbid go to one of the shelters - more ten's of millions of MY money wasted ... and the continueing destruction of our tourist trade and business here in downtown ... I mean what does it take for me to be able to walk the streets in comfort and safety without the constant harrassment and molestation for my money ... I don't have to put up with this brand of intimidation ... telling them to go to a shelter gets the response " what! but they have rules there, man " I worked with and dealt with them from 1988 on ... I DO know what I'm talking about ...

      --
      Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  7. Who isn't? by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 1

    Maybe it would be more efficient to say who is not going to be one giant hotspot.

  8. CN tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess the CN tower kind of out does the linksys router +3dB antenna...

    1. Re:CN tower by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:CN tower by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      The parent probably meant it in jest, but I'll go ahead and analyse it seriously anyway.

      To get good WiFi, you need three things:
      - Line of sight (going through walls will work in a house, but not around buildings)
      - Plenty of signal power
      - Low interference

      As one of the tallest free-standing structures in the world, the CN tower has great line of sight to a huge area of Toronto, even in areas of downtown where there are plenty of tall buildings. Heck, even the entire U of T campus (dead in the middle of downtown) can see the tower... (incidentally it makes a very good "south" indicator if you ever get lost there.) So far we're 1 for 1

      Signal power, OTOH, would be problematic. IIRC, 802.11 works in the ISM bands, so there are FCC limits on how much power you can pump into the signal (not to mention practical limits in terms of laptop battery power for generating replies.) I've worked with 802.11 links up to about 20 km, but you need special equipment with expensive amplifiers and huge directional antennas, because your signal ends up something like -70 to -90 dBm. We're down 1 for 2.

      The real killer, however, is interference. So much TV and other stuff gets transmitted off the CN Tower that I wouldn't be surprised if the noise-floor is higher than most ISM band-signals. In theory the frequency bands are isolated from each other, but in reality any sufficiently amplified signal will have a bell-curve-like frequency distribution. There's also the fact that Toronto probably has so many wireless networks, that trying to jam in yet another one will cause major overlapping problems. I don't see much future left in the ISM band. 1 out of 3.

      Of course, I gotta confess that I too thought "Cool! CN Tower!" upon reading the article header.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    3. Re:CN tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FCC? Are you mad? Canada hasn't given up its sovereignty yet. It's the CRTC that controls the airwaves north of the border, if I'm not mistaken.

    4. Re:CN tower by iTristan · · Score: 1

      I hear there's a competition starting to see who can hack Mac OS X Intel to run on the CN Tower

  9. ...oh. by XanC · · Score: 1

    I guess I assumed this was a municipal project. Never mind!

  10. VOIP by XMilkProject · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I could walk around town using my voip phone instead of a cell phone? Maybe just my PDA with a VOIP client? GoogleTalk for all local calls!? w00t!

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    1. Re:VOIP by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I'll keep an eye on what PDAs with 802.11 are going for at the cheepy discount places. Being able to plant one just about anywhere (with a power source of some kind), and have it be able to connect back home is a nifty solution looking for problems to solve. Car alarms?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:VOIP by coaxeus · · Score: 1

      One thing that I think is available now from at least Cisco is a phone that runs on 802.11 voip when your in the office, and as soon as you walk out the door it switches over to cdma/gsm/whatever. Requires a special sever and configuration at the local office and ties into the mobility provider somehow, but the end result is pretty neat.

      --
      My name is coaxeus, and I approve this message. In fact, I think it is awesome.
    3. Re:VOIP by Niebieski · · Score: 3, Informative


      So I could walk around town using my voip phone instead of a cell phone? Maybe just my PDA with a VOIP client? GoogleTalk for all local calls!? w00t!

      Well, you could walk around between calls, because last I checked 802.11 soft handoffs did not exist. You could implement it in the hardware, but it'll still be hard handoffs.

    4. Re:VOIP by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      Thats a really good point. I didn't realize that but after some googling it appears its true.

      Any good solutions for this?

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  11. One question by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1
    He said Canada's largest municipal electrical utility, which last year purchased Toronto's street light system for $60 million, will likely install the necessary wireless transmitters and receivers atop every fourth or fifth lamp post as a way to blanket the city with coverage"

    I've got no knowledge in wireless networking, but to me this statement says that the wireless signal distance is no greater than the distance between five lamp posts; and that, given this, those areas without lamp posts (unpopulated areas) will not receive any coverage? Am I understanding this correctly?

    In any event, it would be a luxury to visit Toronto and have wireless in populated areas.

    --

    For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    1. Re:One question by kebes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      those areas without lamp posts (unpopulated areas) will not receive any coverage

      You'd be hard-pressed to find a place in Toronto that is not within 20m of a lamp post. Seriously, take a quick look. Even if this initiative is meant to include the "greater toronto area" (i.e. the city and its suburbs), every home will still be close enough to a lamp post. So there may be a few parks in the suburbs where you can't get WiFi at the centre of the park... but that's about it.

      Of course, this is all assuming that they actually put a WiFi station or repeater in 1/5 of all lamp posts. Toronto is huge and frankly I can't imagine how expensive it will be to add all that hardware. Some manufacturer is about to get a sweet contract, that's for sure.

    2. Re:One question by TBone · · Score: 1

      Something like WiMax would address the "every streetlamp" problem. In fact, combine WiMax with BPL and any given electric company could conceivable have an instant grid.

      --

      This space for rent. Call 1-800-STEAK4U

    3. Re:One question by codegen · · Score: 1

      Actually 1/2 the distance between 5 lamposts, since you will use
      the closest of the two.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    4. Re:One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High Park probably won't have coverage (at least in the middle). We're ok with that. There should be some 'wireless free' haven.

    5. Re:One question by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      It is huge, but they have to read these meters somehow. It seems like a large initial cost, but don't think those people walking around read the meters for free. This could actually work out to a big costs savings

    6. Re:One question by WoodieR · · Score: 1

      so basically a ¼ mile ? between nodes ? that's very reasonable ... and where in the heart of a large metropolitan area do you expect to find an area without poles? twit.

      --
      Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  12. guns? by szembek · · Score: 1

    I didn't know they had guns in Canada...

    --
    nothing
    1. Re:guns? by bombadillo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I didn't know they had guns in Canada...

      You obviously did not see "Bowling for Columbine". Canada has more guns than people. The movie asked why the U.S. is more violent than Canada. The issue could not be simply be guns as Canada has more guns than people. The movie briefly explored Canadian lifestyle , media content , etc...

    2. Re:guns? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I didn't know they had guns in Canada...

      How did you envision Canadians in the northern areas dealing with polar bears then? Tasers?

    3. Re:guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, maybe the US could benefit from the CRTC's '65% Canadian content' rule, or whatever percentage it is...

    4. Re:guns? by kebes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Bowling for Columbine" tried to make a point like that, but is it valid?

      I'm not convined that there are "more guns than people in Canada." The population of Canada is 32 million. The number of guns is difficult to determine, but is in the range of 7 to 11 million (corroborated here, and numbers of 7-16 million are used in some official canadian government rhetoric). That's alot of guns... but not more guns that people. It's 0.28 guns per person, on average.

      The population of the US is about 295 million. The number of guns in the US (also hard to estimate) is, according to one estimatem, around 200 million (corroborated here, although that includes estimates of undeclared guns; a different site indicates at least 60 million declared guns). That's 0.68 guns per person, on average.

      Those stats are debatable, of course. Estimating such things is hard. I also fully acknowledge that the websites I pointed to are not especially trustworthy sources (some are about gun-control, hence they will typically use the biggest stat for number of guns to make their point). However, the take-home message is that, indeed, there are lots of guns both in Canada and in the United States, yet the number of gun-related deaths (per person) in the US seems worse than in Canada. This is the point that "Bowling for Columbine" was trying to make... however it is a great exagerration to say that there are "more guns than people" in Canada.

    5. Re:guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're lying with stats.

      You give the low-ball estimate as the Canadian percentage and the high-ball estimate as the American percentage. Tracking just declared guns, you get 7/32 for Canada and 60/250 for the US. These are similar percentages.

    6. Re:guns? by kebes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, the 7 million canadian guns figure is total estimate (the declared # is lower, but I don't know what it is). So you have to compare registered-to-registered, or compare total-estimate to total-estimate (I did the latter). This page indicates 0.25 guns per capita in Canada and 0.82 guns per capita in the US (one would hope they used fair and equivalent numbers to come up with those figures... but who knows).

      But that wasn't my point anyway. The number of guns per capita in Canada and the US may very well be exactly the same. That would not suprise me much at all. If anyone has links to hard stats, I'd be interested in reading them. However, in all cases the number of guns per capita (from what I can see) is less than 1.000, and that was my point. To suggest that there are "more guns than people" is sensationalist.

      I went to pains to point out that the numbers I quote are subject to varying interpretations. Please double check them yourself. In any case, my post was not a gun-control rant... it was a "I dislike sensationalist statements" rant... nothing more.

    7. Re:guns? by quakeroatz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey! We're violent too! Have you even seen a Toronto newspaper lately?

      Urban gangs, bitter about failing math in middle school, are trying deparately make thier mark in statistics by raising our violent crime rate!

    8. Re:guns? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd like to see a survey of just hand-guns as opposed to all guns including hunting rifles. I bet the U.S. rate is way higher. And very few people are murdered with rifles compared to hand-guns.

    9. Re:guns? by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't know if I really buy that...or the people with the guns are all out in the boondocks. I've lived here all my life (in both British Columbia and a few parts of southern Ontario), and I've seen what, 2 or 3 guns (police officer handguns excluded). When my friends and I saw that as we were watching, we all just looked at each other and shrugged. And if those stats are true, they're certainly hunting rifles, not handguns.

    10. Re:guns? by loqi · · Score: 1

      Well, FWIW, I've lived in America all my life (in both Washington and a few parts of northern California), and I've seen what, 0 guns (police officer handguns excluded). Doesn't mean there aren't guns to go around, just means I'm not seeing them.

      And if those stats are true, they're certainly hunting rifles, not handguns.

      That is, I believe, the point that Bowling is ultimately trying to make.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    11. Re:guns? by ScottyH · · Score: 1

      My comment was not on the United States. I can only speak for small part of Canada that I live in. :)

    12. Re:guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except our gun crime rate is higher than the USA.. I'm all for fuzzy feeling movies, but it's simply not true.

    13. Re:guns? by Golthur · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used to live in rural Manitoba (the boondocks), and nearly everyone had multiple hunting rifles, and the occasional shotgun - so I can pretty much confirm that (a) it's probably true, (b) it's people in the boonies, and (c) they're hunting rifles for animals, not hunting pistols for people.

      Not me, though, although I did target shooting every once in a while.

      --
      Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.
    14. Re:guns? by sglines · · Score: 1

      It's true that Canada has more guns than people but the people live so far apart that the guns can't reach any human target. I'd hate to be a deer in Canada though.

  13. Pisses me off. by Yo+Grark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the same company that went to the regulators and begged to have a "debt repayment" charge added to every consumer regardless if you were part of the original debt problem. Imagine being able to charge customers for your incompetance and making it clear you were doing so!

    You may think that having Toronto as one huge hotspot, and I might even think it was cool too if these weren't true:

    1. It's illegal to go off the grid.
    2. I'm paying for Toronto Hydro's "debt" which consisted of millions of dollars in self-appointed executive bonuses, even when they had severly unbalanced budgets.
    3. Toronto Hydro has blocked a lot of "green" ideas, every step of the way. Including subsidies to alleviate power problems.
    4. We pay almost almost 10.00 per kw solar power/panel to make sure it's not a viable option.
    5. Powering your house by Wind Power is illegal through "sound governance bilaws" even though the noise is quieter than an air conditioner.
    6. They artificially "Froze" prices because of public pressure only to raise prices overall to MORE than it would have cost in the first place.

    End Rant. Sorry, but it seems like a really cool thing, but like every other cool thing, this will come on the backs of those consumers who have no other choice but to allow them to spend money frivilously.

    Yes I have options to go to "brokers", yes I have options to go "all gas", but when I investigated thouse routes, believe it or not, Toronto Hydro was the lesser of all evils.

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Pisses me off. by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      1. It's illegal to go off the grid.

      Several years ago, the Country Club Clint Eastwood owns decided to go off the grid with solar power. They sued him. He won, but it was only for eighteen months. It's been a few years, but IIRC, the terms were that they had to meet before someone wearing a black bathrobe to decide what would happen in the next eighteen months.

      I'm guessing by now that club is completely off of the grid as no one (except peabrains) want to be seen on tv as fighting something like this.

      Once home fuel cell systems are set up, I always thought it would be interesting to create minigrids in neighborhoods such that you could minimize the number of cell systems, but more importantly, if one goes offline, you'd have backup via the minigrid. I suppose you could remain connected too the grid and sell your excess and if you lose power you'd have to suck up a little juice in the meantime.


    2. Re:Pisses me off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it's not the same company that had a "debt repayment" charge added to every consumer's bill. That was Ontario Hydro.

    3. Re:Pisses me off. by Qwavel · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You are right, but that doesn't make this project a bad thing for the city. It just means that we must watch and question this company like any other.

    4. Re:Pisses me off. by Azarael · · Score: 2, Informative
      5. Powering your house by Wind Power is illegal through "sound governance bilaws" even though the noise is quieter than an air conditioner.

      I'm not sure where you mean, but it isn't illegal to have a wind generator north of the city. If I remember correctly, the ontario gov't was even offering a subsidy for people wanting to put one up. Now, if you tried putting one up in a subdivision, then I can see a problem as no one wants to have a 40 ft tower casting a shadow over their backyard.
    5. Re:Pisses me off. by FunFactor100 · · Score: 1

      How about 1m wide windmills on everyone's roof? It can't look any worse than expressvu dishes. Sure, it won't provide all the power we need...but it'd sure help reduce what each consumer buys from the hydro co. Are those illegal too?

    6. Re:Pisses me off. by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now, if you tried putting one up in a subdivision, then I can see a problem as no one wants to have a 40 ft tower casting a shadow over their backyard.
      There are a few condos within Toronto that have a wind based generation on the roof.

      Not to mention Toronto Hydro is a member of WindShare -- the company that plunked a 1MW wind turbine about 5km from the downtown core.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    7. Re:Pisses me off. by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1
      Wait!

      You mean there's a part of Ontario that isn't Toronto?

    8. Re:Pisses me off. by seann · · Score: 1

      I love seeing that pinwheel everytime I go to T.O.

      They should have more of those in Niagara.

      To generate the lost wind the hotels block out.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    9. Re:Pisses me off. by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      No I'm talking about a small 3-ft one on my house. I live in a "wind tunnel" and want to take advantage. And as for being north of the city, you probably won't get a hotspot so the point is moot isn't it?

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    10. Re:Pisses me off. by Azarael · · Score: 1

      If your generator is that small, I don't see why there would be a problem. We don't have a hotspot per se, but it doesn't matter because Look Communications already has 3Mbit wireless internet services for a lot of southern ontario, including my parent's farm out in the middle of nowhere.

  14. Canada by 42Penguins · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Toronto to Become One Huge Hotspot"
    Oh, one big "hotspot," so that's what they call them these days!
    Such an odd people, those Canucks...

    Disclaimer: I kid! I kid! Living within 100 miles of the border, I've learned to appreciate the exchange rate and advantages of Canadian currency in vending machines. GO CANADIAN WOMEN HOCKEY!

  15. I for one Welcome our new Wireless Overlords by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    and look forward to discussing Curling, Beer, and Hockey with them.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  16. Mod Parent: Realistic by Apostata · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is sooo not off-topic.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:Mod Parent: Realistic by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, it is off-topic, but it's also so very, very true.

      *wipes tear from eye* Another year without the Cup...

      --
      Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
    2. Re:Mod Parent: Realistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. You misspelled "decade."

    3. Re:Mod Parent: Realistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh we know Leafs suck.. but I think it'll be amusing when Hasek pulls his groin in the playoff run and that clown Alfredson's line gets shut down by good defence and Sens go another year as being the best team that didn't win the Stanley Cup. It doesn't have to be the Leafs that eliminate the Sens you know...

  17. There goes LAN security! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a corporate security guy working in Toronto, I'm not happy to read that Comrade Miller is going to make life that much more difficult for me. Thanks to this initiative, there will be a wireless network running (our building is right downtown) that users can switch to whenever they feel like accessing something that our content filters reject!

    1. Re:There goes LAN security! by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Thanks to this initiative, there will be a wireless network running (our building is right downtown) that users can switch to whenever they feel like accessing something that our content filters reject!

      The service isn't going to be free, so it will take more than a whim for someone to switch to the public network.

      However, it sounds like what you need is a tool which can lock down which wirreless networks your users can connect to. Of course, you could always get the necessary paint and window overlays to create a faraday cage to prevent acccess to the public wireless network (killing everyones cell phones within the office at the same time, of course).

      Yaz.

    2. Re:There goes LAN security! by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      You mean like Monster.com or other job sites? ;)

    3. Re:There goes LAN security! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As a corporate security guy working in Toronto, I'm not happy to read that Comrade Miller is going to make life that much more difficult for me. Thanks to this initiative, there will be a wireless network running (our building is right downtown) that users can switch to whenever they feel like accessing something that our content filters reject!

      Quite right! Employees might also occasionally talk to their families and friends on company phones. They may be engaging in such scurrilous activities as looking out the window in their offices (assuming you don't have them all penned up in cubicles) at non-management-approved activities on the street. Why, they might even be using their brains to think about something not approved under company policy! My God, this must be stopped!

      Fuckin' waaah. Deal with it, Agent Smith.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:There goes LAN security! by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      You should have built your office in a Faraday Cage, fool! And they all laughed at me when I did it years ago! MUHAHAHAHAHA! I guess the market for firewalls is going to go way up because of this. Clever solution providers will get rich in Toronto.

    5. Re:There goes LAN security! by MrJynxx · · Score: 1

      lol.. are you joking or haven't fully thought this one through?

      I work downtown Toronto as well, and I'm not afraid of this one bit. Why? Because we don't even have wireless NICs in any of our equipment! Don't you know wireless is horrible for security? If you can't get rid of the wireless cards why not limit their access via a proxy server? And if your afraid of the users removing the proxy information, then switching to the unprotected wifi link then you can set a policy on the domain to lock that ability down.

      Sure they can change it in the registry, but if that were the case i'm sure they've already broken your web security.

      MrJynx

    6. Re:There goes LAN security! by leoxx · · Score: 1
      Ok, Herr AC. You guys in the IT department have no idea what goes on when you are not looking anyway.


      PS: Go Mayor Miller! I'll be voting for you!

    7. Re:There goes LAN security! by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1
      Assuming you have a managed Windows XP/Active Directory environment and an internal WLAN already in place, the solution is surprisingly easy.

      If you set up group policy to automatically connect clients to your WLAN, Windows will not allow them to disconnect as long the SSID is visible, and therefore, they can't connect to any other WLAN. When your SSID is not visible, Windows will happily connect to whatever else it can find. It works well for us.

      We had the same problem when some of our users discovered they could bypass our content filtering by jumping on the "guest" WLAN we provided for visitors and consultants.

    8. Re:There goes LAN security! by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Look kids; an anti-communist censor! Ooooh.

  18. Here's another example... by 70Bang · · Score: 3, Interesting



    Dvorak mentioned something in one of his columns sometime last year. Philadelphia was going to create a huge hotspot until the big boys got wind of what was going on. How did they deal with it? PAC -> State Legislature -> PAC -> Governor.

    Bing Bang Boom.

    Any towns or cities wishing to create a hotspot has to make it known publicly and give the commercial entities some time to decide what they want to do; i.e. right of first refusal, with a fourteen month window.

    This is OTTOMH, but it's very close to what was reported.

    I'm waiting to see how long it takes before VOIP are put into a similar position to where they cannot economically compete and will have to sell out to standard telcos. Or, standard telcos are provided some extra benefits in order to compete. I would view the 911 issue was one of the first arrows out of the quiver. Certain exceptions aside, nearly all monopolies were the result of gov't intervention "in the olden days" - ensuring they had enough of a market to remain competitive. These people are like Microsoft: they don't want to play second fiddle to anyone under any condition.

    We're going to have to deal with something similar here in Indiana. Legislation has passed permitting telcos to compete head-to-head with cable systems. The issue was never raised, as most stats are not. 95% of the households in the US with access to cable have no choice regarding which cable provider. The cable lobbies said the telcos would only go after affluent markets (well, duh!) for better features and for some reason, that's not fair. The telcos said in competitive markets, cable prices easily dropped 25%. "Why would you want to pay 25% more for what you're already getting?" Boffins will observe a 25% discount is not the same thing as a 25% increase over the 25% discount. The telcos also promised "everyone who chooses the telco option plus those who subscribe to cable when that's the only [ground] option will have lower prices". That's a heck of a guarantee. I'd love to challenge them on a panel and ask them, "If that's not the case within five years, are you willing to pull out? If not, then why did you make that promise?"


    1. Re:Here's another example... by markdowling · · Score: 1

      expect plenty of telco types at the next Ontario Liberal fundraiser - just like the copyrighters who were backing former Fed Lib MP Sarmite Bulte.

  19. Go Canada by jshackles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is just one more reason I need to move to Canada. As if I needed a reason.

    1. Re:Go Canada by Cheapy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Admit it: You're going for the curling.

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    2. Re:Go Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be a bit more specific: for the chicks who play curling. Some of them are so hot they don't even need to broom to melt the ice.

    3. Re:Go Canada by Niebieski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Admit it: You've never had a Canadian Beer.

    4. Re:Go Canada by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    5. Re:Go Canada by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Here's another reason to move to Canada.

      Take off, eh?

      --
      Huh?
  20. Toronto's off-net millions by NickCanuck · · Score: 1

    The author noted that the project will bring low-cost internet to millions in Toronto. Toronto has about 2.5 million people. In 2000 (latest year I could find statistics), over 60% had internet access. I would think that number would have increased substantially in the last five years. Even in the poorest 5% of homes, 10% had internet access in 2000. That's likely grown as well. Frankly, if you don't have net access in Toronto, it's probably because you don't want it. Toronto Hydro's initiative might be great for mobile computing, and could spawn some new applications, but to think that Toronto has millions of people who are starved for net access is laughable.

    1. Re:Toronto's off-net millions by mofomojo · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't starved for net access, this is just cheaper and greater competition for the current telcos.

      If I can get cheap, if not free, hi-speed wi-fi in Toronto, then the telcos are in major trouble. It's about competition, see.

  21. Excellent. by respyre · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a great idea.

    1. Move to Toronto
    2. Fire up packet sniffer of choice
    3. Sniff a few million packets full of sensitive personal and financial data
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

    1. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I do at a local coffee shop in Seattle on 15th Ave :) I can't believe the things I can grab. Banks/credit/SSI# passwords, email etc....It's fun. and NO i don't profit from it but one could.

    2. Re:Excellent. by m50d · · Score: 1

      As if you can't do that on the normal internet. How about: 1. Use SSL when sending sensitive information 2. Profit.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Excellent. by rtaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sniff a few million packets full of ... financial data
      But it will be in Canadian currency. That's no good.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    4. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what they do in your country, but in mine, you can't connect to a financial account without using HTTPS. So you sniffed 1GB of well-encrypted packets. What do you do now?

    5. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ??? == Get shot by gang bangers

    6. Re:Excellent. by thefirelane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sniff a few million packets full of ... financial data
      But it will be in Canadian currency. That's no good.


      Yeah, you'll have to sniff 1.13419964 million packets.

    7. Re:Excellent. by dBLiSS · · Score: 1

      The best part is, the way the Canadian dollar is going, we'll be making the same joke about the American dollar.

      --

      The Good Life
    8. Re:Excellent. by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Oddly, the Brits and Euros apparently don't joke much about the lowly American dollar even though they have every right to.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    9. Re:Excellent. by Prune · · Score: 1

      There's a significant downside to having a rising currency, if you are an exporter.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    10. Re:Excellent. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Hahah. You know the American Dollar is in the tank eh? That the Canadian dollar last week finished at a 15 year high eh?

      I'll bet the Canadian dollar is at par in less than 24 months. Wanna take that bet?

    11. Re:Excellent. by WoodieR · · Score: 1

      in a couple more years, it'll be just like the olden days, when the Canadian dollar was worth more than the Yankee Buck ... it's almost back on a par right now ...

      --
      Question Authority before IT questions You ...
  22. How many cities? by slagheap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These types of stories pop up on Slashdot once in a while... "City X to implement citywide wireless". I was just wondering what other cities have announced such plans. Which ones actually have working systems today?

    Slagheap
    --
    First against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:How many cities? by daniel422 · · Score: 1

      I think this is becoming increasingly poular, with at least some part of the downtown area of cities being covered. I live in Riverside, California (by no means a huge metropolitan mecca) and they've had the whole downtown area blanketed for a couple years now (less than a square mile of space, I'd say). I know several other cities in the area that have constructed similar open-networks in their downtown business/government districts.

    2. Re:How many cities? by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Corpus Christi, TX, is rolling out one:

      http://www.cctexas.com/wifi/

      I'm not sure how complete the coverage is, as I haven't found a map. My father reports seeing the access points at various places around the city, but he doesn't have a WiFi card to access it (yet).

    3. Re:How many cities? by Niebieski · · Score: 1


      Well, Montreal has "Ile sans fil" (Wireless island", which an informal organization that lists a lot of the unsecured wireless hotspots in Montreal, but it's totally informal (albeit pretty well organized)

  23. Signal strength by Arandir · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But will the hotspot be strong enough to reach Detroit?

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    1. Re:Signal strength by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But will the hotspot be strong enough to reach Detroit?

      You must be joking, right?

      Maybe if the City of Windsor had decided to do this, your question would make sense, since they're across the river from each other.

      Toronto is at least 3 hours drive away from Detroit -- and this is at 100kph/65mph -- you know, the entire length of Lake Eerie. Your laptop could never hope to broadcast back anything over those distances; the FCC would see to that.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Signal strength by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      But will the hotspot be strong enough to reach Detroit?

      Detroit to Toronto is 393 Km, so I seriously doubt it. Perhaps you were thinking of Windsor?

    3. Re:Signal strength by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he wasn't. What's with the geography curriculum these days... :P

    4. Re:Signal strength by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I was joking! Sheesh, you Slashdotters have no sense of humour.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    5. Re:Signal strength by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I was joking! Sheesh, you Slashdotters have no sense of humour.

      Sorry, Canadian reflex, eh. =)

      You'd be amazed at how many people show up asking for an afternoon drive to take them from Vancouver to Toronto. I've had to explain the sheer size of Canada to people on more than one occasion.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Signal strength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even more funny is people who come to Prince Edward Island via ferry, leaving their cars on the main land, and think that they are going to walk around it in a day.

    7. Re:Signal strength by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Toronto is at least 3 hours drive away from Detroit -- and this is at 100kph/65mph -- you know, the entire length of Lake Eerie.

      You'd have to be going a lot faster than 100km/h to make Toronto to Detroit in 3 hours. Depending on where you start in Toronto, it's easily two hours to London and another two hours to Windsor.

    8. Re:Signal strength by NickCanuck · · Score: 1

      The 401 is clearly marked with posts every 2 km. Toronto's exits start about 340. So, if you're doing the very normal 120 km/h (standard cruising speed outside of Toronto), Toronto-Detroit in 3 hours is doable, assuming your butt and bladder can stand it.

  24. Hmm...decisions, decisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What should we, Ontario Hydro - a Crown corporation, do with our money? Invest it into a project that looks like it could generate a lot of revenue, or should we give it all away to shelter homeless people?

    Definitely homeless people!

    Okay, done that. Time to get back to our wifi project! What, people living under the poverty line? Check! Abused children? Check! 5000 other interest groups? CHECK!

    Wow, 500 years later, after taking care of all those poor people, we can finally move onto our wifi project? Wait, what do you mean, taxes were supposed to take care of those projects instead of the corporation's money? Damn! I wish somebody told us about this first!

    Guess what bud, not every organization's priority out there is to first shelter homeless people. Should we also put all road improvement projects on the hold too until all homeless people are off the streets?

  25. We have this in Sunnyvale, California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    MetroFi is just completing the rollout of citywide free wireless service for
    Sunnyvale, California. Here in the heart of Silicon Valley. There are no
    commercial wireless offerings that I know of, so there is no loss to the
    ISP industry.

    Also here in Silicon Valley, dsl is slow ( phone wires are old everywhere)
    cable is the only real option and there are no plans for FIOS here either.

    So I say to the greedy ISP's:

              Suck It!

    1. Re:We have this in Sunnyvale, California by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      Wait, wasn't Sunnyvale destroyed in the final episode of Buffy?

      Wow, they sure rebuilt that fast.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  26. Read the book... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Oh, Toronto is a hot spot. The PanChinese lands an asteriod on the city in Scardown by Elizabeth Bear.

  27. Wow Just think Leaf fans... by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 0

    ... Now you can just pop on the WiFi network to see how badly your team is losing at any given moment! Go Sens!

    --
    I Like Pie...
    1. Re:Wow Just think Leaf fans... by epp_b · · Score: 1

      LOL! Seriously, that quite amusing.

    2. Re:Wow Just think Leaf fans... by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I needed to get my daily dig in about hockey :)

      --
      I Like Pie...
    3. Re:Wow Just think Leaf fans... by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Right, go Sens! That is 'till they get to the playoffs and choke against the Leafs again.

      Yeah, I know the Leafs probably won't make the playoffs this year. Which will make it all the more amazing when the Sens somehow manage to lose to them.

    4. Re:Wow Just think Leaf fans... by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 0

      Touché, but they get past the Sens only to lose to whoever is next (generally Philly) :D

      They've gotta rebuild! Mail the season in! :D

      --
      I Like Pie...
  28. Debt charge not Toronto hydro's by markdowling · · Score: 2, Informative

    Think you mean Ontario Hydro - not Toronto Hydro. TH merely bills you.

    FAQ here

  29. CDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... will challenge the Canadian telcos for a share of the $8 billion (CDN) a year wireless market."

    So Canadian telcos will lose about 7 bucks and a nickel in US dollar.

    1. Re:CDN by udowish · · Score: 1

      I am SOOOO tired of the currency joke, I think you should take a look in the mirror, the US greenback is falling so hard I call it the American Pesco and have you noticed the TSX trading volumes are LARGER than the DOW...hum I wonder where the real monitary heavyweights will be in a decade??

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  30. Where in Canada to you live? by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ...Dog River Saskatchewan?

    I've found wireless network service in the following places:

    * Rogers, Bell and Telus all offer hotspot service in addition to their cellphone service. I hooked up at a truck stop in Regina.

    * West Edmonton Mall in Edmonton provides hotspot service. Some small town high schools connected to Supernet in Alberta have wireless access.

    * Hotspots are provided by either telcos or Airport Authorities at international airports across Canada. I've seen service in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Saskatoon, Regina, Toronto and Montreal airports myself so I think it's a standard thing everywhere now.

    * In Alberta, there is a company called "community networks" that provides high-speed internet to farms and villages all over ther province.

    Sounds like a pretty large wireless market to me...

    1. Re:Where in Canada to you live? by max99ted · · Score: 1
      Telecom Ottawa (owned by Ottawa Hydro) has hotspots in the downtown core and the Nepean Sportsplex in the West end. Pay-per-hour type service. I've used it on occasion as a backup for net access.

      http://www.telecomottawa.com/wireless/service.htm

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

  31. NO NO NO: READ GRANDPARENT POST. by OzPhIsH · · Score: 1

    This quip about government funded libraries was NOT meant to be taken as a serious proposition as most people seem to be taking it. The parent I original responded to implied that a government funded city wide wireless network was unfair to the competition because a government with guns forced you to pay for it even if you don't use it. I don't agree and used the example of taking away funding for public libraries to illustrate my point that such reasoning is, well, unreasonable. So lets all read a little more before jumping to conclusions, mmmmkay?

    --

    "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

    1. Re:NO NO NO: READ GRANDPARENT POST. by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you gotta explain it, it just ain't funny no more. ;)

    2. Re:NO NO NO: READ GRANDPARENT POST. by OzPhIsH · · Score: 1

      I didn't really intend to get a laugh out of it originally.

      --

      "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

  32. There are already a lot of "HotSpot Cities" by mynickwastaken · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I live in a small village in Germany. Some weeks before I did a test.
    I've passed all main roads with my PDA and a WiFi scanner. From around 200 hotspots (mainly home users), ~150 were were Open (no WEP or other encryption) and free to use.

    1. Re:There are already a lot of "HotSpot Cities" by udowish · · Score: 1

      In Calgary, it is hard to find a spot that DOESN'T have a WIFI available. Almost anywhere in the towntown core you can get an IP. Even in my own house, I can detect three wireless networks not including my own, and only one other one has any WEP enabled.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  33. SSI Micro Yellowknife by addbo · · Score: 1

    Well in Yellowknife we have a wireless WiMax network provided by SSI Micro.

    http://www.ssimicro.com/article20040324.php

    I know... not WiFi... but it is wireless, and it does blanket the whole city.

  34. Join the club! by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like NB Power (New Brunswick Power). The executives goof up a deal to buy Orimulsion from Venezuela, costing the company 100 billion dollars. And what happens? The executives get huge bonuses and severence pay, the company/province is billions in debt, and the consumers are expected to pay for it, to the tune of a 13.6% rate hike!

    I believe in publicly run monopolies on services like power and water, but I also believe that the people in charge should be held accountable for their actions, and not be appointed there as paybacks to political favours.

    1. Re:Join the club! by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      Care to back up that number? I looked and could only find stories about the costs ranging around TWO Billion. That's a far cry from a HUNDRED Billion.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    2. Re:Join the club! by PuddyT · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't you know you are not allowed to talk about Orimulsion anymore, Hay said so. He told us to stop whining and suck it up and pay more, likely b/c he needs more money to build up his eventual severance. And besides, the rate hike isn't b/c of the Orimulsion deal it's because we resedentials customers haven't been paying our fair share.

    3. Re:Join the club! by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I guess it was 100 million / year, 2 billion total.

      That makes it OK right, after all, it's pocket change!

    4. Re:Join the club! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's far better to lie in order to gain support. 156% of all people do it anyway, and the ends justify the means.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  35. citywide LAN? by necro2607 · · Score: 1

    Curious.. does it operate as one huge-ass LAN? Could you play a network game with your buddy across the city, using this wireless network?

    That's about the most key point that I'd be interested in seeing in a citywide wireless network...

  36. Fredericton, NB by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Fredericton has had nearly city-wide WiFi for going on 3 years now.

    AFAIK we were the first city in NA to impliment it.

    NO registration required (though you must agree to the EULA at sign on), and the city actually makes money from the ancillary services the municipal network provides to companies. A win-win in my book.

    1. Re:Fredericton, NB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      though you must agree to the EULA at sign on

      What if you aren't using the wifi network for HTTP? UDP audio streaming? VoIP? IRC? SSH? Do they expect every network-aware device to have a screen, web browser, and a person actively sitting there at the keyboard?

    2. Re:Fredericton, NB by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      All I know is, until you click 'I Agree' in the EULA that opens when you fire up your browser, all your connections are null-routed, or firewalled, or something. Because nothing works. After you agree, the connection will work for 24 hours, at which point you need to re-agree, I think. At least that's how it seems.

      It's a simple middle ground between rwquiring them collecting all kinds of identifiable info, and letting everyone run free on the network. It gives them some CYA protection in case they get sued if someone is running a warez/mp3 server on the network I suppose - they may not know the person, but they know the tower they are on and the MAC address, so they could in theory use the cops and a signal meter to trace em down.

    3. Re:Fredericton, NB by leoxx · · Score: 1

      For a free service, that is imminently reasonable. I hope Toronto does something similar. You guys on the east coast ROCK.

    4. Re:Fredericton, NB by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Fredericton's city-wide WiFi was a fantastic boon when I lived there in 2003/2004. It got to the point where I was never without internet access - everywhere I went, there was wireless. Whether I was at home, at a friend's place (any friend), downtown in a favourite cafe or restaurant, or even sitting on the grass by the river watching the ducks, I could always check my e-mail.

      Some people look at this and say 'You're outside, you should be enjoying nature, why bring your work with you and just go online?' My rebuttal is usually 'I have to do work and study online anyway, so I may as well be somewhere pleasant and relaxing as well.

      Especially now that I have a lighter-weight, easier-to-carry laptop (PB12" vs. Inspiron 5150), I miss that. Montreal, as great as it is, is a lot harder to find good (free) wireless. Oh well.

  37. Yellowknife? by addbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yellowknife is considered a city because it's a capital ... though we only have like ~20,000 people... a company called SSI Micro has basically blanketed the city with WiFi...

    http://www.ssimicro.com/

    Yay we're on the bleeding edge North of 60!

    1. Re:Yellowknife? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not WiFi.

      Although I see you just mentioned that.

      Too bad you can't just walk around with your laptop to get a connection.

  38. Friend of a friend went "homeless" for a weekend by mindaktiviti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember a friend of mine once told me how one of his friends got stuck in downtown Toronto (lives in a suburb called Brampton) so he ends up pan handling for some change to get home.

    Turns out the money's so good he ends up staying an extra day and comes home with like $150! He was a teenager back and it's a lot of money for a teenager even by today's standards.

  39. SOLUTION: anti-wireless wallpaper by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1
    Stealth wallpaper keeps company secrets safe

    Getting purchasing to buy it is a different story on the other hand.

  40. Beautiful garbage by billcopc · · Score: 1

    One wonders why the nation's capital, our beloved ugly-ass tourist purgatory OTTAWA, never gets these cool things. Hell, I can't even get decent 100mbit, I have to source it from Toronto.

    Government here is stunting progress, because it offers a thick cushion of bureaucracy and drives the sharper minds away to.. you guessed it.. Toronto.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Beautiful garbage by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for having different bus routes for every day of the week and phase of the moon.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  41. CDN to USD conversion by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2, Informative

    8 billion CAD at today's conversion (March 6th, 2006) is: 0.877586

    So 8 billion x 0.877586 is: $7,020,688,000 USD just over 7 billion.

    So they're going after a 7 billion USD market. :)

  42. Just like Jupiter! by Marsmensch · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait... that was a RED spot...

    --
    Slashdot: news from nerds.
  43. Toronto Public Library by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, what the heck else do you expect people to do there in the winter?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  44. Re:Have you been to Detroit? by vertinox · · Score: 2

    Well, I spent a week in Toronto once. There were seemingly a lot of homeless people sleeping on the sidewalks every night. I'm not sure there is a better social service than making sure they have wireless Internet.

    Seriously, Toronto is a Utopia compared to the homeless problem in Detroit. All cities have homeless people... And no amount of social services can solve the problem. Some cities need more social services though.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  45. What you need to understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that $8 bln CDN is equivalent to about five bucks USD.

  46. Re: Mentally Ill by aspillai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not sure where you got that idea from. "Typically" implies majority. The truth is a number of homeless about equal to the mentally ill do not like shelters because they are afraid of them. (I say this from having worked at CMHA.)

    Shelters aren't hotel rooms. You have 20 - 30 packed into a room (within fire limits) and you rarely get a secure locker to put your belongings in. Also, in the cases where you do, it isn't a valet. No one is there to make sure you aren't persuaded to open your locker.

    The available options are quite poor. I'm not saying they need Royal York treatment here. But a better option with some high guarantees of safety will see a number going to shelters during the cold winter months. It is a measure of a society's progress when you see how cities treat their most vulnerable. Toronto does a horrible job and too many people think, 'If they just try, they'll be fine.' It is a serious problem with difficult but attainable solutions - if we want it.

  47. The mighty loon by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    Jeez, where have you been these last few years. The loonie's worth about .88 cents American. Thus $8 Can ~ $7 U.S.

    1. Re:The mighty loon by udowish · · Score: 1

      It's okay, the yankee's are having a difficult time accepting the fact that the American Pesco doen't hold much weight anymore. They will get used to it in a year or two when the REAL dollar is worth more than that silly yankee buck

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  48. Toronto gang violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toronto has become a very dangerous place in parts. Gang shootings are commonplace. Many within the city blame blacks from Detroit smuggling weapons in.

  49. Asteroid! by davidc · · Score: 1

    Whoa, when I read that headline, I thought someone had discovered an earth-impacting asteroid... Now I find it's just some boring old WiFi setup which will become congested in short order.

    At least an asteroid would melt the winter snows. Wait, perhaps all that RF energy will do the same.

  50. Big Brother gets WiFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How is a true statement a troll?

    In Pittsburgh, PA the government has been busy tossing old women into the streets and taking their homes,
    all because granny can't pay for the tripled taxes and new stadiums.

    The sheriff has been busy taking more homes away from
    families in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 than back when the steel mills closed.

    Explain to this 5 year old boy why armed men chasing his family out of his home is 'Just a Troll'.

    He lived through it.

    1. Re:Big Brother gets WiFi by EugeneK · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a slippery slope. One day they are building a wireless network, the next minute armed men are chasing 5 year olds. That's why everything the government does is automatically bad.

    2. Re:Big Brother gets WiFi by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 1

      (I am considering that you did not intend to be ironic) And how are corporations better?

    3. Re:Big Brother gets WiFi by EugeneK · · Score: 0

      Yep, I was being ironic.

  51. Bull by ylikone · · Score: 2, Insightful
    >>I've talked to panhandlers that take in over $60 an hour tax free every day. Bull. Shit.

    If this were really the case, we'd see a LOT MORE people out there begging rather than working at their crappy $10/hour jobs.

    You are just spreading the conservative lies that the poor on the streets are lazy scammers. They are mentally ill. Not smart. Not rich.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the smart ones go near an airport and ask money for returning"home". If they're black or dressed like an arab, I'm pretty sure they'll get more than 60$ an hour.

    2. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I overheard (with my very own ears; this is not a "friend of a friend" tale) a local panhandler here in Toronto bragging to a friend that she pulled in over $150 on Boxing day.

      So why do other people stick way $10/hr jobs instead? A sense of pride. I know I'd rather work for $10/hr than beg.

    3. Re:Bull by ylikone · · Score: 1

      Sure, some beggars *might* get a big load once in a while. You think bringing in that much is sustainable on a daily basis? You are deluded.

      --
      Meh.
  52. In other news... Lakehead University is advising.. by ylikone · · Score: 1

    ...its students to stay clear of Southern Ontario because of dangerous wireless waves which will invade the brain and cause cancer.

    --
    Meh.
  53. NOT by ylikone · · Score: 1

    I live in Kitchener, which is only about 100 km out of Toronto toward Detriot and I really don't think we'll be able to get it here.

    --
    Meh.
  54. Re:Friend of a friend went "homeless" for a weeken by archen · · Score: 1

    That's a lot of money for most people in canada when you consider that's tax free. I also think how much you take home depends on what type of homeless person you are. If you're a scummy annoying person you probably don't make as much as the "seems okay" sort of person. If you play decent music you might make more too. Think the bag pipers outside the Eaton center were making a lot of money. Then again I'm not sure they were even homeless, but they looked sort of "displaced" .

    I always leave some American money just to let them know "we're watching" =P

  55. Hotspot? by xRelisH · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it's in Canada, wouldn't it be called... err... a ColdSpot?

    1. Re:Hotspot? by bughunter · · Score: 1

      With the threat of suitcase nukes growing more plausible on a daily basis, making a city one huge "hotspot" may become easier - even in Canadian climates.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    2. Re:Hotspot? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      If it's in Canada, wouldn't it be called... err... a ColdSpot?

      *sigh* such stereotypes against Canada. Why pick on them? They don't say much, all tucked away, down there...

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    3. Re:Hotspot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I wish. Have you ever been to Toronto in summer? It is not unknown to hit 35C (95F), on top of soupy humidity.

  56. My government is retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because of bilingualism. In order to work for the Federal Government, you have to be bilingual. This eliminates the 90% of Canadians who don't speak French. (Harper's victory meant that for the first time in FORTY YEARS we finally had a Prime Minister who wasn't from Quebec. (Joe, John and Kim notwithstanding.)) Thus, my government ends up hamstringing itself, eliminating 90% of the population from participation in the civil service. It's completely retarded.

    1. Re:My government is retarded by d.corri · · Score: 1

      "Of the 32.2 million citizens of Canada, 17.5 million are native English speakers, 7.7 million are native French-speakers and 5.2 million are native speakers of neither of Canada's two official languages." Source
      7.7 million plus a few million who learned it as a second language...
      90% of the population? Not really.

    2. Re:My government is retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that unilingualism isn't an impediment to civil service (though it is to being Prime Minister). Most civil service jobs don't require bilingualism and others will hire a unilingual as long as he'll go for language training. Sounds tough? Nope - my brother joined the ministry of FA and they sent him on an 8mnth training course in Ottawa and paid him 75% of his salary. He said the only ppl who dropped out of the training course were the ones who took other jobs.

  57. Low cost my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low cost wireless access only 10 cents a minute!!*(&@*(!! WOW

    I'll beleive it when I see it when its run by one of the greediest fucked up companies in canada, the electrical companies , these places shit money and burn it, and then just charge the poor suckers who have no choice double rates for 'delivery' and whatever the fuck charges.

    I don't expect it to be anything that anyone not making 80k+/year will be tempted to use, or those that are already using cell phone wireless and paying out the nose for it, it will be cheaper than cell phones, but waaaaay more expensive than say you at home connection...

    P.S. FREE HOTSPOT = GOOD

    overcharged fucked up shitty crap high prices HOTSPOT = BAD BAD BAD BAD as now they can fight any 'free' hotspots and say your 'stealing' from them.

  58. Squeegee Kids- Do the Math ; wanting to be helped by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    There's actually money to be made based on the perception that there's not. A friend who lived near me was in his early 20's and started squeegeeing in Toronto (before it was banned). It was enough (and more fun) than his lovely job at a law office.

    I'm not saying all, or even most, people are doing well for themselves, because by golly, I'd hope many would find help. There are facilities available to people- we have shelters with lots of room all over Toronto, and yet people stay on the street- be it due to pride, information, or more. Police go around during 'cold spells' and bring them in. Many of those on the street don't want to be helped, or they'd seek the help offered to them.

    Now- squeegeeing:
    4 washers (can rotate with helper for a break)
    1 helper (gets water, supplies, food, etc)
      ** assuming an equal cut for everyone

    Timing of light: 45 seconds, 0.75 minutes
    Cars serviced per light per side: 4 (2 people)
    Cars serviced total: 8 (4 people)
    Average revenue per car: $1.50
    Average revenue per light: $12.00
    Light changes per hour: 80

    Revenue per hour: $960
    Hours per day: 8
    Revenue per day: $7,680
    Equal cut per person: $1,536
    Days per week working: 6
    Per person, per week: $9,216
    weeks worked per year: 50 (2 weeks vacation)
    per person, per year: $460,800
    TAX FREE

    Expenses:
    5 buckets, public bathroom for water (maybe arrangement with local business to supply), squeegee, bag for money- lets say $250/yr

    That's some pretty good profit- $460,000+ * 5 people = $2.3Million

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  59. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then go apply for your canadian visa...

  60. Follow the Money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What better way to get your kickbacks then make everyone compete for the equipment supply, network management contract.

    Hell...I'd be looking to making a backroom non-compete deal with Ted Rogers or Mike Sabia to kill the plan before it goes too far.

  61. email management by HyperionCan · · Score: 1

    We use Exchange/Outlook with a simple policy that helps us manage message storage issues. Exchange servers automatically delete messages aged past 60 days. If a user wishes to retain the message past this, they can configure auto archiving in Outlook to archive messages past 45 days. This retains a local copy of the message on a users computer, thus forcing them to self manage. Our mail admin supports about 5000 users on Exchage/Outlook and this policy has never been considered obtrusive or in any way limiting productivity.

  62. Provinces do exist! by Literaphile · · Score: 1

    is about to announce plans to make all of Toronto Canada Contrary to popular (i.e. American) belief, Canada is not ONE BIG PROVINCE! Toronto is on ONTARIO, which is in Canada. Sheesh. How about we start saying "Seattle, USA" or "Salt Lake City, America"?

    1. Re:Provinces do exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is not ONE BIG PROVINCE! Toronto is on ONTARIO, which is in Canada

      Toronto is SOOO big that it is enough to say 'Toronto, Canada' whereas that small city New York has to be clarified as New York, New York.

    2. Re:Provinces do exist! by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Why? The rest of the world doesn't care what state things are in. I have yet to hear anyone describe a US city with the state name, with the exception of American commentators at the Winter Olympics.

  63. This results in a benefit to rural communities too by CFD339 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...at least that is my prediction.

    Two converging factors are going to be a big positive net for rural communities. At the same time Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and Singular are all rolling out high speed connectivity through EVDO (or similar) offerings, big cities are breaking into the hotspot world, and other carriers are planning rollouts via powerlines and other schemes -- some really unusual ones like airships floating around and so on.

    While its true that none of these are starting in rural communities and working IN toward the cities, a side effect of the increased competition in cities is that is is (or I think it is) putting more and more pressure on the cell carriers to roll their services out to the countryside much sooner and at much lower cost than previously planned.

    They (the cell carriers) are quickly going to find that their "market differentiator" is going to once again be the ubuiquity of their service compared to the city wifi clouds. If your market strength is ubiquity, you'll spend more money making sure you cover more remote places. Hence, soon we'll have at least dsl comperable speeds available on EVDO cards in much more rural locations.

    Sure, I know Verizon Wireless has "plans" to cover their whole digital area with EVDO. Let me tell you that it is a SLOW plan from the perspective of those of us who live in the sticks.

    FWIW, I have an EVDO card in my laptop for when I travel, and find it HUGELY useful at airports, park benches, and even hotel rooms in most major cities now. Its about comperable to DSL -- maybe a little higher latency. Upload speed is much reduced compared to download speed of course. They don't want people uploading content or streaming media -- they want you buying videos.

    Still, its often more reliable and faster than a hotel network. Just not at home. At home, its about dialup speed until they get EVDO turned on out here.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  64. I am looking forward to this... by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    Living in Toronto, I can't wait. I have always thought that Toronto lacked the kind of nightlife and thrills that say a Miami beach has... I am looking forward to people driving down the street in hot custom cars, the girlies walking around in sexy outfits... the glamour and nightlife. It is great that the people in the majors office have finally come to their senses and realized that we need to make this city HOT! Hell yeah.

    Oh wait, they are talking about wireless internet, aren't they? Come on guys, I can just steal that from my neighbor!

  65. This post belongs to another story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about corporate emails.

  66. Re:Have you been to Detroit? by RexRhino · · Score: 1

    Having lived in both Detroit and Tornto, I can tell you the homeless problem in Detroit isn't as bad as Toronto.

    The last census count of homeless in Detroit was 1,300... with advocacy groups saying the population is closer to 10,000. Toronto, according to it's last homeless report card had 3,300 - 34,000. (counting homeless is hard, that is why there is the huge range in numbers). But the comparison is consistant no matter how it is estimated: 1,300 low estimate for detroit, 3,300 low estimate for Toronto. 10,000 high estimate for Detroit, 34,000 high estimate for Toronto.

    And it makes sense when you look at housing costs. Housing in Detroit is cheap, housing in Toronto is expensive. My best friend purchased a house in Detroit for $100,000 that would cost $1,000,000 in a comparable neighborhood in Toronto (and no, the neighborhood isn't crime ridden, it actually has a crime rate comparible to where I live in Toronto), and that same house went for closer to $10,000 just a couple years ago - my friend just happen to buy in a housing boom. You can rent a decent enough place to live in Detroit for $150 monthly, where as good luck finding anything without cockroaches and mice for less than $800 in Toronto. So it makes a lot of sense that the homeless rate would be higher in Toronto.

    You should probably check into things before you jump on with the typical Detroit hatred.

    But to the point of the topic, neither Detroit, nor Toronto should be spending a cent on municiple wi-fi. Detroit isn't planning to do that I know of, but Toronto has too many yuppies who will be giddy to use their powerbook in the park to resist.

  67. Toronto hydro? by Monkier · · Score: 1

    is that anything like BC bud?

  68. Re:Have you been to Detroit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But to the point of the topic, neither Detroit, nor Toronto should be spending a cent on municiple wi-fi. Detroit isn't planning to do that I know of, but Toronto has too many yuppies who will be giddy to use their powerbook in the park to resist.

    Apart from the fact that this is Toronto Hydro, a separate corporation, deploying this as a revenue generating plan, your understanding of economics is terrible. So Toronto should fall behind in technology and infrastructure...to help the homeless. Well I guess they'd better boost that budget, because there's going to be a lot more homeless then.

  69. Ah, a WIRELESS hotspot by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

    I was already thinking this sounded like the plot of a bad catastrophe movie. Phew.

  70. More than people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are even more Canadians than people!

  71. Re:Friend of a friend went "homeless" for a weeken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your friend is such a goddamn slimebag!

    I sometimes help people claiming they can't get home (some promise to send a check once they get home but yeah, right) trusting their assertion they actually don't have any cash and it'll be used for the intended purposes.

    This punk collects (begs) beyond his actual need for what to get home just to fritter it away on one more day vacation and whatever goodies he can get once he gets home.

    What a lying sack of sh....... Taking advantage of people like that. Fucker.

  72. Re: Mentally Ill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not that i'm homeless, but i have done various volunteer work and have been in some areas that have a lot of homeless (vancouver, bc)but it's offensive to just blanket statement that they are typically mentally ill or it's their choice. sometimes unfortunate circumstances hit people. met a lawyer that was homeless, had drinking problem, wife left, drank more, caused him to lose job, drank more at home, no income, drank more, lost house, drank more, homeless within the year it all started. just remember when you are toasty warm at home, circumstances could see you eating hot dogs out of the garbage, anyone of us. even our most successful leaders, look at Sadam, he was loved by the US, top of the world with more US cash then he knew what to do with, not so good now.
    just sayin, were often not that far of as we'd like to think we were.

  73. Toronto+WiFi isolation= More Depressing City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toronto is hideous, people are not that friendly, if you add WiFi to the mix you'll end up with a more segregated and less participative community or maybe I'm wrong and this whole experiment will minimize Torontians apathy.

  74. Plenty of that kind of choice already by markdowling · · Score: 1

    I work in a downtown tower and every time we fire up a new wireless notebook two unsecured networks are visible. TH will only be joining the club.

  75. Re: Mentally Ill by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

    So in other words, you're saying that this guy lost control of his life and did what he could to escape from reality, rather than dealing with it head on. I'm sorry, but I have ZERO sympathy for someone like that. It's not like he didn't have the means to put himself on the right track. He had every opportunity and ability to do something about his situation. My wife and I have *almost* been homeless, and we both suffer from clinical depression so sometimes it's *really* hard to do what it takes to move forward with our lives. But we *still* had enough self-control and critical thinking skills to do whatever it took to get back on track. We had to take our pride and roll it in the mud, but we made it out again and we're finally starting to do well again. I used to have much more sympathy for homeless people. Then I worked in a gas station for a year, and I got to deal with these people on a regular basis. They are filthy creatures who only care about fleecing you out of whatever they can get their hands on to satisfy their craving for their chosen toxin. They are woefully dishonest, and I will never give them any kind of support again. There are lots of services available to assist the homeless. Job services, housing services... They just need to use them. These people are on the street because they either want to be, or simply arn't interested in taking control of their lives. Either way, if they can't be bothered to try, I can't be bothered to help.

  76. My city already has one by Dashcolon · · Score: 0
    fredericton, new brunswick, canada

    http://fred-ezone.ca/

    it's not city-wide, yet, but i believe that is their goal.

    --
    Trout's epitaph: Life is no way to treat an animal.
  77. Yikes. Toronto is already a messed up town. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I live in a small town which has comparatively little EM pollution, and I visited Toronto last summer and stayed a couple of weeks at the top of a 30-story high rise in the downtown core.

    There were several weird nights where the energy changes were very noticeable, but one night in particular was extra-noteworthy.

    I was in the living room around 8:00 in the PM, and the ambient energy started doing something very weird. You could feel it through your whole body, making your breathing quick and your head buzz. I was trying to get a grip on it when my girlfriend came into the room and demanded to know what kind of place I'd brought her to; she's energy sensitive to levels far beyond my own and when stuff like that starts, she flinches. It kept up for hours.

    We tried to sleep, but it was impossible. I tried rasing an energy bubble around myself as per my limited chi-training, and I think that might have helped a bit, but not enough to make any real difference. After an hour of feeling shitty, I got the bright idea of escaping to ground level to see if it was any better down there. Nope. Then we went underground to the pool in the basement.

    Whew. Instant relief! --You could feel the buzz reduce dramatically in intensity the moment we stepped out of the elevator. It was like being able to breathe again, a weight lifted. . , all of that. It was still there, but so far reduced that you could ignore it.

    We spent the next couple of hours in the pool and the gym, and we had the whole facility to ourselves. It was really nice.

    The moment we went back upstairs, though, wham! Right back into the middle of it. Ugh. It's hard to describe to people who have never spent time doing any energy awareness work, but it was like that feeling you get when you're leaning in close fiddling with the cable connection behind an active television. You don't know what it is exactly, but you can definitely feel something. Only this was stronger and vibrating; it seemed to put a pressure on your brain, in around the temples and eyes, and all through your heart and chest area. It's hard to describe, but it was quite unsettling.

    We didn't sleep much, and felt very trapped; like trying to escape physical pain. Then around 6:00 AM, it shut off, and the ambient energy shit of the city dropped back to its normal state, (not that there really is one; while I was in town, it changed flavors several times, and also did so region to region. The nicest area was East of the Don Valley. It's like they let things be on that side of the city).

    Anyway, at around 6:00 AM, when that really shitty buzz stopped, it was a major relief. I let out a deep breath and fell asleep for a couple of hours before the jack-hammers started up. (Construction crews doing work in the street.)

    Toronto would be a reasonably nice town without all the weird shit being done to it. I can't stand that place. It's not healthy. I don't know anybody living there who isn't experiencing some kind of fucked up health or stress problem.


    -FL

  78. Re:Yikes. Toronto is already a messed up town. by Lukey+Boy · · Score: 1

    Dude, the Dark Ages called - they want their "science" back.

  79. It's a sign of Municipal Maturity by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 1

    Big cities don't even need the *country* name. Fashion houses and publishers have for years just listed the city: Paris - New York - London - Tokyo. It's nice to see Toronto join that list over the past few years.

    (And yes, of course there is more than one place named 'Toroto' just as there is more than one Boston, London, or Paris).

  80. Dude. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Dude, the Dark Ages called - they want their "science" back.

    Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you're smart.

    Having to point this out should serve as an illustration. You might try doing some research, (other than watching TeeVee), before you let the gas out of your mouth. You'll be better respected and drool less. Win, win.

    btw, SNL called; they said you can keep their lame joke and thanked you for not crediting them.


    -FL

    1. Re:Dude. . . by robinw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you're smart.

      Carl Sagan said it best himself: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

      I'm one of millions of residents of Toronto, and I've lived here for almost a decade. Never have I experienced, nor heard of anyone experiencing energy fields that made sleeping unbearable. I also know many other residents who don't have physical and stress problems.

      You're asking a lot of people if you expect them to assume that you have some extra-sensory abilities to feel energy waves (and make energy bubbles). As far as I know there isn't a single scientific study that supports those findings. If there is, I'm sure you could make some money off of James Randi.

      Instead of throwing around terms like ignorant, how about throwing out some evidence? And when I say evidence, I mean studies involving many people in controlled conditions, not just some odd feeling you got.

    2. Re:Dude. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Carl Sagan said it best himself: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

      What's wrong with just plain old, 'evidence'? Why does it have to be 'extraordinary'? And what exactly counts as, 'extraordinary', --in terms of either claim or evidence? Who is it that decides? No, really. This is important to think about. Using such terms suggests that there is a pre-existing bias in the so-called scientist. A fact either is or is not, there is no coloration. Therefore, a critical mind should never slip into such emotional waters, and the fact that they often do points out a problem.

      I'm one of millions of residents of Toronto, and I've lived here for almost a decade. Never have I experienced, nor heard of anyone experiencing energy fields that made sleeping unbearable. I also know many other residents who don't have physical and stress problems.

      I lived there for more than twenty years before moving away, and I was not aware of energy until very late into those years when I began to focus on it and practice meditation, etc. Awareness grows from that point onward. Energy fields which affect populations are not supposed to be detectable, (or believed possible), by the average person. They lose their effectiveness otherwise. So I am not surprised at all that you can't sense them directly. But regardless of what you may think or believe is normal, everybody is very much affected.

      You're asking a lot of people if you expect them to assume that you have some extra-sensory abilities to feel energy waves (and make energy bubbles). As far as I know there isn't a single scientific study that supports those findings. If there is, I'm sure you could make some money off of James Randi.

      There is plenty of evidence, but you're not going to see it publicized. Scientific findings, like any other publication effort, takes marketing savvy, money and influence. And when it does find its way into the public sphere, it is ignored because it is not 'extraordinariy' enough, or whatever. But it's all there if you want to look for yourself, or better yet by far, go exploring yourself and perform your own experiments. Life is meant to be experienced.

      We all have these abilities. Energy is what you are made of, and you certainly have the faculties to detect what it is doing around you. It comes integrated with the human package. Whether one chooses to develop these faculties or not is up to each individual. When I write about my experiences in Toronto, I'm just sharing; those who know what I'm talking about or who are on the cusp of awareness might be able to benefit from my sharing, those who can't, won't. It would be no different than if I were to describe my time walking through a park. If you had blocked your ability to see trees or the color green, then I'm sure you'd spit and fume similarly. But I'm not asking people to assume that I have extra-sensory abilities because I don't care what people believe. I know what is, what I see, what I've experienced, and that's fine with me. Your ignorance is YOUR problem. Not mine.

      And anybody who brings up James Randi in serious discussion is quite lost. The man is a delusional ass. Think: Randi is a professional stage performer. This means he has a giant ego and seeks public approval above most other things. --He has his entire career and reputation and massive ego staked on his claims that 'magic' doesn't exist; on the accuracy of his so-called sceptic opinions. He cannot afford to have anybody call his bullshit and win his pretend prize because it would make him look like a fool, and there is nothing a man with a giant ego is more terrified of. --Other than, perhaps, his physical world view being unmade.

      Do some research into how Randi runs his affairs, read the accounts and the levels of emotion and unreason and arrogance the man displays. He is openly rude and rants like a child in his letters to people; there is not a serious scientific fiber in his being.

  81. Re:Friend of a friend went "homeless" for a weeken by j-beda · · Score: 1

    I rarely have cash to spare, but have offered to use my plastic to buy someone gas, food, or a bus ticket - and suprise suprise, have been turned down.

  82. I have another personal story by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    Well actually he wasn't my friend (he was a friend of a friend's), and if anyone I know pulled that kind of shit I'd let them know it's just not cool.

    I was once suckered in giving like $5 on my way out of a club (King & John area). The way the guy did it was, he was actually dressed decent, wearing a leather jacket and he told me this story where he lost his wallet and didn't have money for gas...so I ended up giving him $5, and only afterwards my girlfriend was like "Why the hell did you give him that money?" Being a little naive I should have seen through the scam, but at the same time she should have helped me by telling him to fuck off. I'm glad she didn't though because now I *never* give money to homeless people. There are two types of homeless: Mentally disturbed/challenged, and lazy...and I'm sure 0.1% good honest people that just had really bad luck, but they're a rarity.

  83. And Here's The New Guy on the Block by wintermute1974 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the list, but you forgot one!

    Here's the Toronto Hydro Telecom website, so you can go see for yourself.

    If you download the coverage map, you can see that the zone is going to stretch between Spadina (east) and Yonge Street (west), and from Bloor Street (north) to Lake Ontario (south).

  84. Trust of Food by leoPetr · · Score: 1

    Since a good number of the people out there ask for money so they can get something to eat, I'd say the results show a lot of dishonesty.

    So, if a complete stranger proffers you a sandwich, will you eat it? Homeless people get beaten and worse every so often, so I wouldn't put it past people to put poison and razor blades into such sandwiches. If you want to make an objective study, offer to buy a meal at a nearby restaurant.

    --
    My other body is also not wearing any.
    1. Re:Trust of Food by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      So, if a complete stranger proffers you a sandwich, will you eat it? Homeless people get beaten and worse every so often, so I wouldn't put it past people to put poison and razor blades into such sandwiches. If you want to make an objective study, offer to buy a meal at a nearby restaurant.

      First, homeless people in this area do not get beaten regularly, there are too many police around. Second, restaurant food is expensive, it is much easier to show them the food is good by eating some of a sandwich yourself. This does not matter, since most don't really want food. The local shelter and local soup kitchens supply food. Most want money for booze, drugs, or because this is how they make their living. More than half of the beggars (from the last study I saw) are not homeless, and most of the homeless don't beg. Many even have jobs, but just can't afford housing. Some have chosen to live in tents as a lifestyle choice (a lot of hippies around here).

      Basically it is my opinion that a large number of the beggars are being dishonest, and it is usually a better practice to donate to the local shelter than to give them money.