Slashdot Mirror


Banned From WoW For WINE & Programmable Keyboard

An anonymous reader writes "Player gets banned for playing World of Warcraft under WINE and using a Logitech Gaming keyboard. "I am an experienced network engineer for an ISP and I am often running World of Warcraft on Linux through the use of WINE..."" Although the e-mails exchanged are unclear my guess is that the programmable keyboard was more the problem then WINE. Not that you'd ever know that given that Blizzard communicates with their users seemingly almost exclusively with form letters.

109 of 701 comments (clear)

  1. Anonymous? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdot profile

    The keyboard he is using sounds quite cool though :)
    I shall have to look into getting one.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Anonymous? by n00tz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Around Christmas I bought me and my brother both a Logitech G15. They are really nice keyboards, with a lot of versitility. G15forums.com has a lot of different ways to use the display it comes with.

      Unfortunetely, for the keyboard to be effective in WoW, Blizzard is going to have to support it and program some hooks into the game for it to be supported. Even if there was a 3rd party program (or even a UI mod) that would take care of the hooks for WoW it would be against the ToS, and my account would be banned for it.

      As much as I like the game, I have found blizzard themselves to be fairly nazi about what can do what and who can do it. CmdrTaco had an instance with Blizzard Nazism not too long ago.

      --
      I had college once, but I drank some fluids and got a lot of rest and eventually it was cured.
    2. Re:Anonymous? by Juliusz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, cool, but it got him banned. He should have used one of those little, swinging, water-drinking, wooden birds with the funny hats, they're harder to detect.

      --
      A baby seal walks into a club...
      www.sourcio.com
    3. Re:Anonymous? by infernix · · Score: 5, Informative

      I did not submit this anonymously myself; I submitted under my own account a week or two ago. I guess someone else resubmitted it.

      And just a minor remark here to people who claim I was botting. Please, go look up some botting software.

      1) They virtually all need MS .Net framework - in other words, botting software doesnt work on WINE.
      2) Botting software runs around, taps mobs, kills them, loots them and repeats this process. I didnt. I did not loot, move, nor change target. Anyone with a WoW account can run to Thousand Needles, find a Windchaser creature, get a lowest level weapon and hit it indefinately, provided that you are a healing class.

      Anyway, I mentioned this, but I can understand why people who quickly read would miss it.

    4. Re:Anonymous? by thelost · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I sympathize with you man. This kind of treatment is why I gave up WoW. I haven't had to go through that terrible process myself, I just sick of the way people were being treated and cancelled my account, but to see you being blind-sided like that with no warning really makes my blood boil.

      One of the most obvious problems with WoW these days is that there is this massive wall of low level employees (GMs, Billing & accounts etc) who don't have either the authority or time to really look after customers properly. Add to this Blizzards obvious contempt for it's playerbase as easymeat who are pretty much addicts so can be treated like trash and you have a situation where people will frequently get reamed like this with no way to prevent it.

      You will of course get accused of botting by lots of players, but lots of players also happen to be 14 year old children who love to point fingers (not to say every 14 year old is like this, but the culture of WoW has shown to me that while there are exceptions if a player sounds like a 14 year, acts like a 14 year old and talks AOL trash talk then he's caek).

      In the end Blizz and it's employees can pretty much act as they want and this is the most problematic part of it for me. There is no accountability, GMs have been to behave extremely innapropriately in the past, it's impossible to defend yourself from accusations of cheating because Blizz wants to be seen to having a strong anti-cheater policy so if false positives come up then it doesn't really matter. Amoung the thousands of cheaters those innocent will go unheard.

      I suggest that you give up on WoW, and find a MMO that treats it's customers with at least a little common decency. Hmph that might be tricky though.

      --
      Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
    5. Re:Anonymous? by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think your only legitimate statement is that Logitech claims the keyboard is useable for WoW. Other than that, using macros is a definite nono.

      Botting is not defined by "botting software." Its defined by Blizzard. In Eve-online, they don't have a 'bot' ban. They ban you if you are using macros. Maybe Blizzard should upgrade their terminology to make it clearer. If you were a younger person I might accept that you had no idea you would get banned. If you never gamed before I might expect you may think a legalistic position would work. But as a network engineer, and someone that has probably gamed before you should know better. You know there is neither judge nor jury. You know legitimate users get banned all the time. Knowing that you should have known the keyboard would be an issue.

      I hope they let you back in. You seem like an honest person based on how much info you told them. My mom also taught me to tell the truth. The world really doesen't care...

    6. Re:Anonymous? by merreborn · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I think your only legitimate statement is that Logitech claims the keyboard is useable for WoW. Other than that, using macros is a definite nono."

      If you RTFA, he provides a (now defunct) link to a post in the EU forums, with a quote, in which blizzard had stated that using keyboard macro functions is okay.

    7. Re:Anonymous? by Hillie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I kind of agree that what he was DOING with the keyboard would have made me question my actions.. but I had been planning to buy a gaming keyboard so that I could have more keys to program. (i am running out of keys on my current keyboard)

      Now, after reading about his experience I am deathly afraid to buy the keyboard, even if I don't use it for automation purposes.

      Blizzard really needs to draw the line though, because the game itself contains the ability to run macros, and there are perfectly legal addons around that automatically buff you while you move, and also buff your entire party with the repeated press of that button. How is this not a different color of the same automation?

      Blizzard has not banned those tools.

      The banning of the posts on the WOW forums would make me diligent to post this to every gaming forum that I could get my hands on, and try to stop people from playing WoW. But I digress, there will always be thousands of players waiting in the wings to replace those who boycott the game.

      At least CmdrTaco only got forced to change his name. I believe he was a little over-dramatic since it's easy to tell someone "Hey I used to be so and so" and then they recognize you from then on. I think "Taco" might be a cool name. Then he could achieve a rank higher than 'Cmdr' :)

      but seriously, the only thing you can effectively do is either don't play the game, or play it and be really careful about stuff like this, because (like Ebay, Paypal, etc.) Blizzard seems to have a "shoot first and ask questions later" policy and seem to not care about customer service in the least, and just like with Ebay and Paypal, it does not hurt them financially to screw-over consumers once in a while, because they have thousands upon thousands of consumers who have no problem with the service. Ebay didn't even want my money when they banned me (of course because of their lack of caring about taking care of their shit I am no longer banned :) Unfortunately though, Blizzard does take care of their shit.

      --
      - Alex
  2. Favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He should consider it a favor. Now he can go back to living his life.

    1. Re:Favor by cablepokerface · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad you are being modded a troll anonymous coward. Playing WoW extensively I can say you're comment is most insightful.

    2. Re:Favor by imdx80 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Everytime I think I should get round to trying wow et al I see a story like this.

      So i should pay x per month to sit there pressing the same keys over and over while watching a film?
      I can do that for free, and if I unplug my keyboard i can do it roaming!

  3. Getting banned from recreational sites by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just got out of a pink page of death ban myself here at Slashdot. Somehow they mistook my frequent reloading of pages and multiple-thread bouncing as some sort of bot or malicious bandwidth-stealing script. It was neither.

    So I sit out a couple days trying to get the techs behind banned@slashdot.org to notice my emails. Finally, after a long negotiation with these guys and promising that I will turn off all my Firefox extensions when accessing the site, I get let back on.

    And this is what I come back to. A story about someone getting banned.

    1. Re:Getting banned from recreational sites by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suppose it's a bad sign when BadAnalogyGuy beats me to exactly the analogy I was going to make...

    2. Re:Getting banned from recreational sites by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a mediocre irony, not a bad analogy.

      Come on, get with your own program or we'll get you banned you for handle fraud. I mean really, what the hell to do you thing we put up with you for anyway?

      KFG

    3. Re:Getting banned from recreational sites by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Karma...getting...low... Need..to..get..back..over...Positive!

    4. Re:Getting banned from recreational sites by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jeezum Crow! I just read my post again and about all I can do is plead no contest and throw myself on my keyboard.

      Not exactly hara kiri, but I'm sure it'll leave some nasty red spots for several seconds.

      KFG

  4. He's better off. by GundamFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It stings to get banned... but realy any MMO is a waste of time, WoW being one of the worst in my opinion.

    if this is Blizzards new attitiude towards it's customers, maybe I can get all of my friends to stop playing WoW and spend some time in the real world interacting with people in person.

    Mod me a troll if you want it won't change the fact that I am siclk of Fantasy MMOs.

    --
    I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
    Mark Twain
    1. Re:He's better off. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      but there's really no such thing as an offline MMORPG is there?

      Yes there is. It's called business.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:He's better off. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good analogy. Business has lots of grinding, low level mobs, and elitist guilds.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:He's better off. by Cat_Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ugh. I just had visions of the IT department getting a raid party together and heading down to payroll.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    4. Re:He's better off. by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ugh. I just had visions of the IT department getting a raid party together and heading down to payroll.
      Or Finance ;)

      Why not both? Then follow it up with a sweep through the executive offices to burn out the heretics?

      The streets shall flow with the blood of the non-believers.
      --
      Who did what now?
  5. Not a Suprise by Herkum01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In any situation which one party has vastly superior authority and little chance of penalized. Don't expect them to act in a reasonable manner.

    1. Re:Not a Suprise by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In any situation which one party has vastly superior authority and little chance of penalized. Don't expect them to act in a reasonable manner.

      I guess it depends upon your definition of reasonable.

      In this case they actively pissed off a customer, terminating the account of a paying subscriber, because they felt that his actions were detrimental to the rest of the community. His actions had nothing to do with Linux, but rather were the result of what appeared to be automated activity (which could have been that a user saw him there stat padding for hours, complained, and then an admin trying conversing with him to find the character just mechanically repeating the same steps). Reading his account, it sounds like he configured a variety of complex activities as macros on his keyboard, and just sat there repeating them ad nauseam for hours while he did other things (fun!), doing this largely automated activity for his own gain. Given that MMMORPGs are somewhat of a zero sum affair, this means that it's at the cost of other players.

      I'm actually amazed that the company acted so responsibly. It would have been easy to just backtrack and forgive and forget, but they forged ahead, making an enemy and losing a customer, to try to maintain the "rules of the land". Good for them.

      I should also say that the individual in question might want to learn why "the right to silence" can be an important trait. He completely indicted himself in his emails ("so I was sitting her occasionally triggering macros while I watched TV...").

    2. Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm actually amazed that the company acted so responsibly. It would have been easy to just backtrack and forgive and forget, but they forged ahead, making an enemy and losing a customer, to try to maintain the "rules of the land". Good for them.

      You have a funny definition of "responsible". If you read TFA, he went through great lengths to attempt to resolve the issue with Blizzard, keeping his emails polite at all times. He pointed out that both Logitech and Blizzard had advertised the keyboard as being good for WoW, and even offered to accept a temporary ban to make up for any accidental infractions.

      Blizzard ignored all his correspondance, and went for a permanent ban, apparently in direct violation of their own terms of service.

      Blizzard was WRONG, and paid no attention to a reasonable customer. I find it perfectly acceptable if he was currently considering either legal or grass roots responses to their gross negligence in the matter. If that is the best they can do for loyal customers who attempted civil resolutions, then they deserve to end up in a media circus of bad press and class action suits.

    3. Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So you're convinced that every person who accidentally triggers a TOS violation should be permanently banned from a service like WoW, even when:

      1. The service claims in forum posts that what he's doing is okay.
      2. The user offers to correct the problem, and even accept a punishment.
      3. The service has a policy that is supposed to require multiple violations to obtain a ban.
      4. The user has no prior history of TOS violations.
      5. The user has spent considerable money on the product.

      If you think that all that combines to make a "responsible decision" on the part of Blizzard, then allow me to be the first to point out that you're a heartless tyrant, and I really do hope this happens to you. Perhaps you'll see things different from the other side.

      I for one, hopes he gets a good lawyer. Given that this is far from the first time I've heard these complaints, a class action suit against Blizzard may just be what's needed to shake things up.

    4. Re:Not a Suprise by sirket · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a question of "they won't take my money." It's a question of "I paid for the right to play a game and I am being denied that right." Blizzard and this person had a contract- he invested his time and money and Blizzard has to provide him with a fun gaming experience. There are certain rules that both sides have to abide by- only from the article it appears that the player stayed within the rules whereas Blizzard broke them (The "multiple violations required for a ban" rule). That is a broken contract and he has every right to sue Blizzard. Will it make a damned bit of difference? probably not but just harrassing Blizzard would be worth it.

      Frankly I would love to see gamers create a union and when a company breaks the rules they simply walk out- when the company loses enough revenue maybe they will stop acting like asses.

      Having said all of this I can't begin to fathom sitting around all day playing these mind numbing games- get some freaking hobbies- take up painting, learn to play the guitar, restore a classic car. You girlfriend (or the ladies) would much rather go for a ride in your classic Mustang than take a virtual ride in a video game.

      -sirket

    5. Re:Not a Suprise by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blizzard ignored all his correspondance, and went for a permanent ban, apparently in direct violation of their own terms of service.

      I wonder what it's like to make so much money you can give a dedicated customer a high handed heave-ho.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Not a Suprise by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's a fun game, but it's just a game, a service provided by Blizzard for a fee.

      (Emphasis mine.)

      There's the part you seem to be missing. He has paid money to be provided with a service. As of right now, he's been singled out for violations to the agreement that he didn't commit, and has been unfairly kicked out of the service he paid for. (Presumably without a refund.) Because of this, he has suffered the loss of virtual property (his characters/accounts) that he has a paid significant amount of time and money to obtain. This just isn't okay, neither in a moral sense, nor in a legal sense.

      You have got to be kidding. "This company refuses to take my money anymore! I'm suing.!" I marvel at the mindset that spurred you to even imagine writing that paragraph.

      I'm dead serious. The legal system is there as a recourse for resolving disputes between parties. He has pursued every avenue available to him in resolving this issue. He has been ignored and treated poorly by the other party at every step of the way. As a result, he has an honest grevience to bring against Blizzard.

      While I'm not one to suggest that he sue for $10,000,000 for "emotional damages" (that's just not right), suing for restoration of his account(s), legal fees to be paid by Blizzard, and a full refund of the amount he has paid to date (to cover the harrassment he has received) is a perfectly acceptable solution. Of course, it's a lot easier to get a lawyer to handle a class action suit for him, so in that case Blizzard would be facing the equivalent of hundreds of these suits at once.

      Even if he didn't take the class-action path, a judge may note several reasonable complaints occurring around the same period and decide to combine them into a single suit himself.

      Firstly, we're of course hearing one side of the story.

      That's about the only insightful thing you've said. Unfortunately, Blizzard refuses to talk about the issue. If they won't even talk to the customer they have a disagreement with, then that customer may have to force them to tell their side in court. Alternatively, he could start a grass-roots mailing campaign or boycott against Blizzard. These are the options he has available.

      Secondly, how about some perspective: This is a game.

      My perspective is just fine. A game or not, Blizzard is offering a service in exchange for money. If Blizzard then decides to turn around and unjustly harrass its customers in violation of the contract entered into, it can expect that its customers will seek to reverse the business transaction and/or force Blizzard to uphold its contractual obligations. Not only does this resolve the matter, but it sends a message to the business that the customers do not appreciate being stepped on. Otherwise, what is to prevent the company from further abusing its other customers?

    7. Re:Not a Suprise by mikaelhg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder what it's like to make so much money you can give a dedicated customer a high handed heave-ho.

      You should ask Sony Online Entertainment, they're currently living with the results.

  6. It's the keyboard, stupid. by JasonUCF · · Score: 4, Informative
    They have stated repeatedly that programmable keyboards like the Logitech one violate the EULA for WoW. While the current iteration of hacks -- sending the keyboard the mana/HP, are benign, the possibilty exists for there to be future mods that become harmful to the game or allow for some form of hacking.

    Source:
    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?fn=w ow-interface-customization&t=330798&tmp=1#post3307 98

    1. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is a link in TFA, allegedly to a post on the European forums where a Blizzard rep (I think) says explicitly that programmable keyboards are allowed.

      This is the link, however it's giving me a "service unavailable" message. I'm not sure if that's because I'm not authorized, or because I'm in the US and trying to get to the European forums, or what. If anyone can access it and quote their answer, I'd be very interested.

      Besides, Blizzard employees have stated in a blue post on the EU forums:

      "We have looked into this matter and haven't found reasonable cause to disallow usage of its functions for use in world of Warcraft. We do, however, reserve the right to come back to this statement at a later point, at which we will inform our players."

      The link to this post is http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?FN=wow -general-en&T=705675&P=5
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. by I_Strahd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, I think this has no real tie to Linux is a bit over dramatized. It is the keyboard. If someone tried to contact the player in game and he didn't respond (listed as dnd), yet he was still playing. What are the admins supposed to think?

    3. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. by mazariyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      That thread relates to the use of software to display in-game information (e.g. hps, mana, level, etc.) on the LCD screen of the Logitech G15 keyboard, not the use of the keyboard itself.

    4. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. by makomk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this thread (on the US forums, I think)...

  7. CmdrTaco and his Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Not that you'd ever know that given that Blizzard communicates with their users seemingly almost exclusively with form letters.

    Gotta love the hypocrisy from Taco complaining about unresponsive, noncommunicative companies.

    Anybody else unfortunate enough to email the editors about an issue? Whether it is abusive moderation, story dupe/inaccurate/inflammatory, or posting bans, almost all the editors respond with one-line dismissals or direction to read their outdated FAQ which hasn't been updated in years.

    Taco really has balls so whine about Blizzard, especially the last time he bitched on the front page about his screen name being changed.

    It's really funny when the shoe is on the other foot.

  8. Uhm, no. by Syberghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Banned for violating the rules with his programmable keyboard. They outright told him that; he was interacting with his environment in an unattended manner. That's a violation of the TOS for every MMORPG I've ever read the TOS for, which admittedly isn't many.

    However, it is telling that he knows that bot programs won't work on Wine under Linux; I'm not buying the story that he tested them all subsequently.

    Summation: Cheated. Got caught. Got banned. Whined and told his buddies an "edited" version of the story, so they all rallied behind him. Tough noogies.

    1. Re:Uhm, no. by EddieBurkett · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Banned for violating the rules with his programmable keyboard. They outright told him that; he was interacting with his environment in an unattended manner. That's a violation of the TOS for every MMORPG I've ever read the TOS for, which admittedly isn't many.
      The best part is that the guy wraps himself in the I'm-being-persecuted-for-running-Linux flag, which he knows will raise the ire of many the WoW player. If he was playing the game unattended and got caught, he deserves to be banned, and if he finds fighting low level mobs to raise his skills so boring, maybe he should find another way to spend his time.

      Its been a while since I've played WoW. Can Trolls be Priests?
      --
      The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
    2. Re:Uhm, no. by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My point was that even WITHOUT a fancy keyboard, the game doesn't REQUIRE focus for most at-level missions. The fact that he wasn't focusing entierly on the game killing something 35 levels weaker than him means NOTHING.

      Hell, I used to watch Bullshit! while running all those goddamn Barrens missions

  9. Rights and software? by globalar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think you have any rights related to software you can't completely control yourself. Please, someone correct me if I'm wrong here. That said, my experience with most RPG's is that they involve a lot of repetition (which is why the guy programmed some macros). Apparently this is part of the official, mandatory WoW experience. That would explain why goldfarming (or whatever it's called in the game) is so popular. Someone at Blizzard must have taken econ101 somewhere along the line?

    The fact that Blizzard needs to know if you're sitting at your computer or not is a bit disturbing, however. Like a parent.

  10. all that time leveling lost because of a keyboard? by Neologic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Incidents like this remind me that when you play WoW or other mmorpg's, you don't own your character, despite the often thousand of man-hours people put into them. It seems to me that if there was a similar real-world analogue, the account holder would be able to get some sort of redress to his losses in a court of law, or at least reinstatement. In these virtual worlds, the game company is able to rule by diktat and is able to twist the TOS to suit their needs. Indeed, they can change the TOS at will and if you don't agree to the new terms, then you forfeit your right to your account. Eventually, the legalities of virtual worlds will need to be addressed.

    --

    "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

  11. Definitely the keyboard by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems like it was definitely the programmable keyboard and not WINE that set off their bot detectors.

    Apparently the macros on the keyboard were making him do repeated actions, and somehow this was interpreted by Blizzard as "unattended" operation. (Why they think it was unattended I don't know, TFA doesn't say exactly ... why didn't they just message him when they saw the odd behavior? Or do something else to verify it's a human on the other end?)

    Anyway, a quote from TFA:
    "So it seems that if I use a programmable keyboard I am botting. However I suspect their 3rd party detection software saw a very strange enviroinment in which WoW was running; that combined with the repetitive task of healing myself, switching weapons, and casting Hex of Weakness programmed in my keyboard, I am viewed as a bot."

    So it seems other people using WoW under WINE are safe, you'd just better not get too trigger-happy with the keyboard macros.

    What's really the problem here is that there seems to be a huge disconnect between official Blizzard policy (programmable keyboards are okay, this has been explicitly said by one of their reps in the forums, according to the article) and what the GMs did. And after the guy got banned, they seem to just be just stonewalling him and hoping he'll go away, giving him a lot of "the matter is closed" crap. I have to salute his perserverence, though, in spite of this.

    Rather a disappointing showing from Blizzard.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Definitely the keyboard by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why they think it was unattended I don't know, TFA doesn't say exactly ...

      Yes, TFA says the guy had been watching movies during this because his character was owning the enemies anyway. That counts as unattended gaming and is strictly prohibited in WoW due to unfair advantages it grants the botter.

      Now, how Blizzard pictured this may be up for debate, but Blizzard has in the past been monitored suspicious accounts if the strange behavior goes on over long periods of time and aren't just flukes. That's probably how they can say this, and if pressured could maybe even say for how long he did it.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  12. If it walks like a duck... by Tominva1045 · · Score: 4, Informative



    On this point (botting) the EULA has been clear since the release of the game. If one knows something he is doing could be percieved as botting (at the discretion of the owner of the content) then why tempt fate by using it and then admit to using it?

    They made a judegement call with their corporate reputation as the foundation upon which they stood to defend this principle. That didn't leave them any backing-down room. When you admitted to the programmable keyboard that gave them what they needed to completely defend their position.

    Step 1: ditch programmable keyboard.
    Step 2: obtain new credit card.
    Step 3: Hellooooo Level 1.

    good luck - EULAs can be tough.

    --
    Cogito Ergo Sum
  13. geez that guy's a trooper by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    The way Blizzard replies to the guy's emails, if I had been him, I would have emailed them a large high rez uncompressed photo of my middle finger with the caption "this is the finger I used to press my final macro key in WoW".

  14. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by JasonUCF · · Score: 5, Informative
    OMG! I wanted to get the link in, but I read through the rest of the email:

    At the time of the suspension I was playing WoW on Linux. I was training my weapon skills because I recently turned to level 60. I had programmed the switching of weapons (I use Wardrobe for that) to my programmable keyboard and was fighting a low-level healing mob to upgrade all my weapon skills to 300. As you might very well know, this takes hours, and while I was training my different weapon skills by pressing the macro keys and healing myself every now and then, I watched some movies on my TV, because fighting a level 25 healing mob doesn't require much attention if you're a level 60 priest.
    It's not a matter of WINE, he was fucking botting! He took his programmable keyboard and built macros for fighting mobs and then left it unattendend.

    When you a grinding, if a GM suspects botting they will whisper you looking for you to respond. If you don't respond within a reasonable amount of time you get nailed for botting.

    Yawn..

  15. anyone spot his first mistake? by know1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please do not reply to this email as you will receive an automated response.

    Regards,

    English Game Master Team
    Blizzard Europe

    -----
    and he wonders why he git shitty responses. maybe he should have tried a different email route first I replied them with the following e-mail:

  16. He Had It Coming by Kylow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any dunderhead should realize that automating levelling of skills is and SHOULD BE against the rules of an MMORPG. He got what he deserved. He was also deceptive early in the correspondence, trying to convince them he was only using his macro keyboard to change armor sets. Whether weapon skills are important to a priest or not, he gained levels in those skills with this macroing. This also has very little, if anything, to do with WINE. I think that played no part in the expulsion.

  17. let me get this straight by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, I've never played WoW (nor any other MMORPG). Now, let me get this straight. The entire WINE aspect seems incidental, so we'll ignore that. Otherwise, he set up some macros on his Logitech keyboard to perform some repetitive tasks. He set those in motion, put up a 'Do Not Disturb' message, and then proceeded to go off and do something else (which admittedly was watching the movie on the other monitor). While this is not a bot program, per se, how is this not running a bot? It's unattended automated actions performed repeatedly. To the best of my knowledge, that's what a bot is. In which case, a banning is what you get.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:let me get this straight by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it is. He went AFK. He wasn't there to respond to the GM whisper they do when they think you're botting. You want to split hairs, but both halves are bannable. Blizzard doesn't divide the specification between a bot, a script, a macro, or whatever, they ban all automation.

      This is why the Decursive mod isn't fully automated anymore, and why the macro-delay function was made inaccessible by the UI. Anything that will allow you to perform N functions in less than N keystrokes/clicks hits Blizzard's definition of automation. Entire raids got banned for the use of the old Decursive, and that's even less automation than this guy had set up - all Decursive did was cast one debuff-removal spell over and over until deactivated. His setup could change his weapons, heal, buff, debuff, and initiate autoattack while he watched TV.

  18. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by FireIron · · Score: 3, Funny

    When you a grinding, if a GM suspects botting they will whisper you looking for you to respond. If you don't respond within a reasonable amount of time you get nailed for botting.

    IOW -- "Human fails Turing Test. Film at Eleven."

  19. It was most likely Wine by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Search google for "wow warden client" and read a few things. In a nutshell: Blizzard most likely checked if their watchdog program was running (which should make sure that you only run "good" programs and makes sure that you're a "good" player) and didn't find it in the process list.

    Result: You must've been hacking your way to 60.

    Dunno, as much as I hate cheaters, but some companies go a tad bit far for my taste.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. But that is not the point by geddes · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. He wasn't using the LCD functioning of his programmable keyboard, he was using macros, it is far less clear if that is against the WoW tos, since programmable macro-keys do not involve "intercepting data" being sent from the WoW application.

    2. But you are right, it was the Keyboard that brought this on. He was wathing movies and just casually pressing his macro key every now and then. Since he wasn't paying attention and doing the same thing over and over again, it looked like he was botting. Blizzard may have been right to ban him. Though I tend to think that since they have no clear programmable keyboard policy, they should have warned him.

    3. Nonetheless, after reading his website, I have sympathy for the guy. Blizzard's communication with him really sucked. Getting sent those form letters must have been so frustrating. He asked specific questions to his accuser and they were replied to by generic form letters. He went into great detail explaining what his (somewhat unique) situation was. Even if Blizzard had replied and said "We have no problem with your running Wine, but using those programmable keyboards are against our ToS." Then that would be fine. But Blizzard was vague in their responses, which is unfair, and if they were a government (which they sort of are in this online world) for a developed, democratic, nation, this guy would have the right to at least SEE the evidence against him. It sounds like here somebody reported him as not responding to messages. They should tell him WHEN and WHERE it happened. Explain what showed up in their logs for them to conclude that he was botting.

    The true problem here isn't lack of Wine support or Programmable Keyboards. The problem is that Blizzard makes decisions behind a closed curtain and doesn't tell you what evidence they used to support their decision.

    1. Re:But that is not the point by drzhivago · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you have sympathy? He configured his keyboard to run repeatable tasks, then walked away from the game. In all the MMOGs I've played, that's botting and is an easy and clear way to get suspended or banned.

      Maybe Blizzard could handle it with more tact, but the end result would still be the same. He botted, he got caught, he got banned.

    2. Re:But that is not the point by MayonakaHa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except he didn't configure it to do the macros automatically so he couldn't just walk away. Looking at the article, he was watching TV on his other monitor which is situated right next to the one displaying WoW. He was keeping an eye on his character in WoW to determine when to hit the next macro key while watching TV. Unfortunately it looks like he probably didn't keep an eye on his chat box and missed an IM to check if he was actually there or not. I have to admit, when I was doing some mindless task in an MMO I usually didn't notice the chat box either because I was watching TV or reading a book too. Looks like either he just got caught not paying enough attention to the game and he missed the message, or the admins just saw that he was doing the same thing over and over and the abilities were being used in the same order with the same delay between them and decided to suspend him without checking with a message to the player.

  21. Re:good by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    haven't you ever played an ORPG? Repeatedly pressing a single button tends to be the whole of it.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  22. Why was it WINE or keyboard? by fleck_99_99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From reading the linked explanation, it sounds to me like the playing really WAS essentially unattended. If a GM sent a tell while this guy was watching TV, and he didn't answer, but his character kept performing actions -- well, if it looks like a bot and quacks like a bot...

    --
    seven two six five
    seven four six one seven
    two six four two e
  23. He was cheating.. by saboola · · Score: 2, Informative

    Before you all come down on him with the "OMGFTW He gotz banned for the WINE iN lInux0rz" it had nothing to do with that from TFA. He was using his programmable keyboard to fight a group unattended, which in my book is considered a macro cheat. He should have been banned, and was.

  24. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by Danse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you a grinding, if a GM suspects botting they will whisper you looking for you to respond. If you don't respond within a reasonable amount of time you get nailed for botting.

    Same thing that admins would do back in the BBS days. A friend of mine and I used to write scripts for Telix to grind for us in a couple of MUDs. We ended up having to make the script give some kind of generic reply anytime someone talked to us and then start beeping to notify us that we were being watched. Worked really well. We never got caught.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  25. If the author wants to know... by mmalove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why you got banned:

    "At the time of the ban I had configured my keyboard to switch weapons, cast hex of weakness and renew myself, all with the press of a button."

    There exists a global cooldown of one second between most gameplay affecting actions in WoW, most certainly for casting these two spells hex of weakness and renew.

    Therefore the only way you could have cast both with one button, is if the keyboard is interjecting a wait period, and issueing a keystroke to the game that you are not pressing after this wait period. Now in this case, that keystroke may only be a second after you pushed the button. But the issue is that you have, at this point, just barely crossed the line into botting. It has to be drawn somewhere, and to me this is where it makes the most sense: If you allow the keyboard to issue commands while you are not interacting with the hardware in anyway, you are botting.

    Not saying this to be an ass, just to let you know what most likely Blizzard took issue with.

    --
    You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
  26. Ridiculous. by xutopia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with Wine or Linux. If he had been using the keyboard and macros but been able to respond when asked a question it wouldn't have been a problem. The problem is this guy was not at his computer for all intent and purpose and leveling his character's skill through automation. He was close to his computer but not on it while leveling his skills. Bannable.

  27. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by Splab · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So you are actually required to 1. Be able to read english, 2. Give a crap about some random guy messaging you?

    God damn I'm glad I'm not playing WoW any longer.

  28. CmdrTaco Vs. Blizzard by binkzz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To me, it seems Mr Taco is still peeved that Blizzard made him change his invalid nickname, and is using this story and abusing slashdot to try and shed some more negative light on WoW.

    Unfortunately, none of the major MMORPGS offer any form of reasonable communication to their users, and if you decide to disregard the ToS (by installing macros and playing the game unattended or using bad nicknames), you're likely to get stung sooner or later.

    Which is why I don't play MMORPGS anymore, because they can undo all your hundreds of man hours without warning or compensation for reasons that are just or not and there'll be nothing you can do about it, until someone starts an MMORPG player's union.

    --
    'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  29. Very Mature by Kristopher+Johnson · · Score: 3, Funny

    At the bottom of the article:

    P.S.: I'm no kid. I'm 24.

    Priceless.

  30. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by kcurtis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A GM will specifically identify himself/herself as a GM -- not just any random player name. This guy was botting, and I for one cheer his being nuked. He cheated.

    The game has has a built-in macro system that does not permit you to do multiple battle actions at once (you can swap multiple items, and perform multiples of other non-combat actions) because casting multiple spells/performing multiple combat skills all with the press of a single button is botting. This guy bypassed the in-game restricions with a hardware/software combination. The rules exists for a reason, and he broke them.

    Funny thing is that if he had just been paying attention to the window he would have been fine.

    And your comment about English is just flamebait (not that the rest is not).

  31. And I think all FPSs are a Wate of Time by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's called a gamesupposed to be a waste of time. If it wasn't a waste of time then it would be called "work" or "chores", because other than work, chores, eating, and sleeping, everything you do in life is a "waste of time", since it's only purpose is to entertain you.

    To each his own, I don't care if you don't like MMORPGs, but you don't have to try to belittle those who do.

    1. Re:And I think all FPSs are a Wate of Time by Silverstrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the GP was striking at the biggest problem with MMOs -- their seemingly nicotinesque additiveness. To be perfectly honest, I never started playing MMOs. Although, that's not to say I haven't toyed around with a friend's account just to see what the game looks and plays like. Now, from that experiance, they looks like a perfectly legitimate and high quality video game experiance.

      However, there is something about them that triggers the addiction mechanism is some people. Now, I'm aware that all video games, as well as TV, are addictive. In most cases those, other genres of games tend to be significantly less addictive than MMO.

      I'd argue that the "proof is in the pudding", so to speak: when I can get those friends of mine who practically live in their MMO of choice out into the "real world", I often feel like the non-smoker at a table of smokers when all the chatter about thier guild/weapon/whizz-bang-spell-of-the-day starts.

  32. Player TOS by Bonewalker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You know, the real irony here is that while Blizzard won't allow players to 'bot' their way through the game, the only responses you get from them are bots. Standard form letters that are automatically activated when you contact them.

    There should be a Player TOS that the company agrees to before selling their games. It would read like so:

    17. In the event you, the player, are ever in need of technical assistance, customer support, account maintenance, or in the event you are banned from the game and your account closed, you have the right to expect that a human Blizzard employee will examine your situation and respond without the use of bots, form letters, or automated responses to make certain that your situation is fully resolved. Furthermore, while the resolution may not always be to your liking, the details will be explained in full using simple, standard language showing the logic we used to make our decisions. Once we have made every effort to explain our decisions, if you still feel that Blizzard has errored in some way, you will have one appeal effort to escalate your situation. This will mean that a team of three Blizzard employees will examine your case in full, reaching a decision. You will only be notified that either Blizzard's previous decision has been upheld, or that there is sufficient evidence to reverse the previous Blizzard decision.

    1. Re:Player TOS by cmburns69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, until people stop buying games, there will be almost no incentive for companies to add this. Remember, we all like Blizzard for being "for gamers by gamers", but the reality is that they revolve around the almighty buck.

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  33. What's this botter's problem?? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... "while I was training my different weapon skills by pressing the macro keys and healing myself every now and then, I watched some movies on my TV, because fighting a level 25 healing mob doesn't require much attention if you're a level 60 priest. "

    That is the key problem in what he did. If he used macros while watching TV, I can only guess at how long these repeated actions went on.

    This isn't about Linux, not about WINE, not even about programmable Logitech keyboards! This is about: watching TV while letting your computer play the game. And... "playing" the game unattended is most certainly against most MMO agreements, and usually equalled with botting, much like Blizzard indeed told him.

    I can only guess at why the Blizzard Boards once told him that it was OK to use keyboards with basic programmability, but a guess was that Blizzard didn't mean it was OK to fucking abuse them to play WoW while watching TV. Yeah, maybe that's why.

    If it in his eyes "doesn't require much attention" or not is completely irrelevant, and an "excuse" stupid enough to just worsen his case. It's the very same excuse used by "true" botters. Blizzard has most likely monitored his account over some period of time and seen, "hey, this guy is doing identical actions all over". The follow up reply from Blizzard shows they were listening to his complaints and clarified the problem once again.

    He then went on saying:

    "I have also apoligised in advance if using a programmable keyboard violates the TOS - but your TOS does not say anything about using such keyboards."

    No, but a TOS doesn't detail every individual piece of hardware or software disallowed either. That would be impossible. Instead, they try to explain what's allowed or not. Not that Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboards are disallowed when used to exploit game mechanics. Whether Logitech says they're OK or not is also irrelevant as they don't have a say in the WOW ToS anyway.

    And I'm sure they are right too that using their keyboard is allowed, but do Logitech say "using our keyboards to 'play' WoW with during TV watching is in agreement with Blizzard ToS"?

    So that's flaw number two in his argument, after trying to excuse himself with "but *I* thought it was OK to play the game in an unattended way, because ... my level 60 char is so powerful anyway!"

    Come on, just because he's using WINE and this stupid keyboard doesn't excuse his actions.

    "However I suspect their 3rd party detection software saw a very strange enviroinment in which WoW was running"

    Nah, that's just him trying to find ways of blaming his behavior on Linux and WINE.

    "that combined with the repetitive task of healing myself, switching weapons, and casting Hex of Weakness programmed in my keyboard"

    Yes! That's why though! You know, stuff botters write Windows software to do Does it really matter that much how you do it? This guy need to understand what botting implies (= tools to enable game play automation) and that botting isn't allowed.

    "Now to the advantage gained. What exactly did I gain? All I did is train my weapon skills. I did not gain any gold, did not gain any experience at level 60, no honor, not even any loot whatsoever."

    This argument is beyond comprehension for me. He gained trained skills! That's what he gained. Gee.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  34. not so odd by kcurtis · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears a game master (GM) approached him in-game and he did not respond -- he was watching a movie and pressing the keyboard buttons without watching the screen.

    Put yourself in the GM's position. A character repeatedly performs the same action hundreds of times. When sent messages (tells/whispers) the character does not respond. There is no other reasonable explanation than that the character is automated. Sure, weird situations like this particular one can occur, but is there really any way for Blizzard to see that it was not a bot? The guy pressed one button that caused his character to perform repeated tasks while the player was not watching the game. That is botting. The fact that the player pressed one button every few minutes does not mitigate the rule breaking.

  35. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by phulshof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you RTFA you'll see that he was at his keyboard, but his eyes were more focused on the TV next to his monitor than on his monitor, since the chance of a level 60 priest dying against a level 20-30 mob are next to 0. Just not giving it 100% attention should not be a reason for an immediate and permanent ban.

  36. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by Arathrael · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's not a matter of WINE, he was fucking botting! He took his programmable keyboard and built macros for fighting mobs and then left it unattendend.

    As I understand it, he didn't actually leave it unattended. On the contrary, he couldn't leave it unattended, he still had to be sitting there pressing the programmed keys. He just wasn't paying attention while he was doing that. You can argue not paying attention is equivalent to leaving it unattended, but a simple macro on a programmable keyboard that you can't leave unattended does not make a bot, let along a fucking one.

    Anyway, the real culprit here is the game design. If Blizzard want their players to worship at the altar of the great Time Sink, then they can expect them to use things like this to make it less mind-numbingly tedious.
  37. WINE is not an unbottable environment by egarland · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A macro keyboard is a descent defense but realistically I doubt it would be hard to programmatically inject keystrokes to a program running under WINE and there would be no way for that program to detect that they weren't coming from hardware. Sending the right keystrokes in the right order can do some basically useful stuff and Blizzard would consider this botting. A clever way to get around the warden and bot but not undetectable.

    The problem with Blizzard's stance on this issue is that they have created a game with some mindless repetitive tasks that beg to be automated. Realistically, they beg to be eliminated entirely since a computer program assigning you fake, easily automated, mundane repetitive tasks isn't good for anyone. Most of WoW is not this way, however. Most of it's parts are interesting and immersive and those are the parts people find fun. Nobody is going to bot their way through an 5+ person instance run (well, almost nobody.)

    Blizzard has drawn a hard line on botting but the problem with any line is there are gray areas and the mundane easily automated tasks (like grinding up a weapon skill at L60) that are so wildly easy to automate as to be trivial. Sitting in one place pushing button 1.. 2.. 3.. 1.. 2.. 3.. 1.. 2.. 3.. gets old after about 1000 repetitions. It would even be easy to create a macro keyboard that would fully automate this activity beginning to end. It wouldn't in any realistic way be "botting" but Blizzard would probably ban you.

    Blizzard needs to fix WoW. Pull the mundane easily automated crap out. I'm level 60 and never used a crossbow, don't make shoot 100,000 arrows at rats in the tram to level the damn skill.. it's mundane, repetitive, and I don't want to do it. Ramp that skill up much much faster to the point where it's maybe a little weak but I can use it in regular combat and you eliminate the mundane easily automated task issue. They should also allow you to assign one of your characters to a task and log out and have the game essentially fake the thing for a while (fishing, farming mobs, etc). That short circuits a lot of the desire for botting and allows them to control the negative aspects of it (the characters "botting" could appear differently or not at all in-game.)

    As a society we should consider making it illegal to ban the automation of easily automated mundane tasks. Do we really want humans to be forced to sit at a keyboard hitting the same 3 keys in the same order for hours and hours? Blizzards stance on this simply shouldn't be allowed. If Blizzard notices a player standing in the same place doing the same thing for hours the thought on their side shouldn't be "Ban this guy!" it should be "How do we eliminate the desire for automating this task?"

    --
    set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
  38. Fasterfox? by numbski · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've noticed that Fasterfox's default setting is to be horribly abusive about page loading. I'm far more thorough about reading through settings than most people, and I toned it down from "Turbo Charged" to "Optimized".

    I'm hoping this isn't a trend, because Fasterfox really does make a HUGE pageloading difference. :(

    Perhaps if I run a squid proxy on my network it would help too? There's only 3 machines here, my desktop, may laptop, and my wife's desktop.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Fasterfox? by a.d.trick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      According to the HTTP specs your allowed to make two requests at a time to a particular server. Fasterfox ignores this, so don't be suprised it you get treated as a little abusive bot -- your acting like one.

    2. Re:Fasterfox? by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fasterfox and programs like it that prefetch are a bitch on smaller sites. There's nothing like a program fetching every damn link on a page at once to throw off reporting and monitoring. (And yes I know about the X-moz: prefetch header. In fact at work I send 'Forbidden' responses via Apache when that header comes across and filter them to another log file. No point in sucking down CPU for dynamic pages that won't be used.) At least Fasterfox is one of the more behaved ones and supposedly obeys robots.txt. So maybe I just have a problem with the nasties out there. If it was up to me, evil programs like it would burn in hell, or at least be forced to obey robots.txt all the time.

  39. Re:This is commonplace for Blizzard by imdx80 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it just me but:

    "Oh, I was furious. I went out and bought the Starcraft battle chest again for a new key."

    sounds kind of wrong?

  40. What I get out of this story by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I am not a WoW player.

    My take-away from this is that some people are simply addicted. If the game can be so boring, that, at times, a player watches movies while playing, what kind of entertainment is that? Sounds like classic addiction - small rewards at random times("wins" of enjoyment, I presume)keep you coming back despite the overall "loss" tedium, time-wasted, monthly fee.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  41. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by krypt0s · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not botting.

    As a matter of fact, the behavior he described can be easily replicated on a standard keyboard using WoW's built-in API. It is a simple matter to write a macro that will watch your health, heal you if if drops below a certain threshold, switch weapons based on any of a number of circumstances... etc. Bind that macro to a key, and just press the key over and over. Perfectly legit.

    He didn't say he was away from the keyboard, he simply said he was watching tv while grinding out weapon skill. If all you have to do is press one button... that seems entirely plausible. He's not gaining any extra information or abilities from the programmable keyboard, so I don't see the sense in this banning.

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  42. Why? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not like your civil rights are being violated, it's a game, a peice of entertainment. If you don't like the terms, stop giving them money and go play another. There are LOTS of great games out there. Lately I've been playing very little WoW because I have three new games I want to play, and I've got a list of about 6 more I want to try that I probably won't get to. I't snot like I'd be happy if Blizzard terminated my account, but I wouldn't be all broken up over it, I'd find another game to play (actually, I'd just play more of the other games I already have).

    We don't need any fucking regulation over some game. What Blizzar dsays, goes, it's their world. If you find their rules and dynamics are fun, wonderful, pay them to be able to play. If you find them unfun or unfair, tell them to pack sand and give your money to someone else.

  43. A Mr. Godwin on the line for you by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    As much as I like the game, I have found blizzard themselves to be fairly nazi about what can do what and who can do it. CmdrTaco had an instance with Blizzard Nazism not too long ago. [slashdot.org]

    Oh please. Lets get some perspective. Blizzard told CmdrTaco to change a name he had been using for awhile because it violated the game rules. That's it. Blizzard has yet to start rounding up and gassing Slashdot editors.

    "I can't use my nickname! It's like Auschqitz in here!"

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:A Mr. Godwin on the line for you by bongoras · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's it. Blizzard has yet to start rounding up and gassing Slashdot editors.

      too bad.

    2. Re:A Mr. Godwin on the line for you by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Informative
      Blizzard told CmdrTaco to change a name he had been using for awhile because it violated the game rules.

      Except it didn't.
      From Taco's post...
      First of all, the reason that my account is in violation is that my name contains a title prefix. It took dozens of inquiries to get that explained. 'Cmdr' is the problem. I'm told that since the game has an internal honor system with titles, my name is not allowed. Never mind the fact that 'Cmdr' is not one of their titles. Never mind that countless other titles abound in the game: Mr, Sir, Sensei.
      The name change isn't the issue as much as the completely random and inconsistent enforcement of rules (that may or may not be rules) by nameless, faceless people who live behind a wall of form letters, canned answers, and "we don't have to explain ourselves to you, citizen!" attitudes.
  44. Zero Sum? by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have read some research on MMORPGs that suggests that there is an endless supply of creatures to slay and mobs to fight (i.e. Blizzard keeps the economy running through infusions of resources). If that is true, then I don't think the game qualifies as a zero sum system.

  45. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by Kirth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not a matter of WINE, he was fucking botting! He took his programmable keyboard and built macros for fighting mobs and then left it unattendend.

    So why is this a fucking problem? Computers are made for automation of repetitive tasks. If a bot can play the game, you've done something terribly wrong in game-design.

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  46. Different Motive for the Ban? by Millard+Fillmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it possible that Blizzard banned him not because his activities were violating the Terms of Service per se, but rather because he had the audacity to engage in another form of entertainment whilst he was playing the game? Blizzard was losing critical mindshare to some movie studio or television producer. Their customer might even have seen an advertisement for a rival video-game company - while he was ostensibly using their service. The horror!

  47. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by pneumatus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, performing more than one spell on the click of a macro is not possible - The global cooldown between spells will always stop this from happening and there is no 'pause' function in macro or LUA scripting available to wait between spell casts so any spell after the first cast will fail because "Another action is in progress"

    From TFA:
    At the time of the ban I had configured my keyboard to switch weapons, cast hex of weakness and renew myself, all with the press of a button.
    This is not possible to achieve using macros or LUA addons because it is, as many other people have said, botting. If the macro required 3 key presses (1 per action) then it could have been achieved with an in-game macro. I'm afraid the guy is SOL.
    --
    Just don't create a file called -rf. :-) -- Larry Wall
  48. Getting Kicked Off Of WoW $15 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Funny

    Getting kicked off of Wow for using a bot keyboard $15

    Complaining about it uselessly $0

    Posting it to Slashdot so everyone can see how high your 14M3 factor is ... PRICELESS!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  49. Petition WoW for Linux by fithmo · · Score: 2, Informative

    WoW already has great OpenGL support, it shouldn't be that hard for a company like Blizzard to port WoW to Linux.

    There's already an online petition to get WoW ported to Linux claiming 23725 signatures (at the time of my posting this).

    Sign it here.
    (disclaimer: I'm not connected with the creaters/pwners of the site in any way what-so-ever, I just really want this to happen.)

    You don't need to own or currently play World of Warcraft to sign; you just have to support the idea of it being ported to Linux. Please support this. This would make an incredibly strong argument for Linux as a viable gaming platform.

  50. Keyboards by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have one of those Logitec G15 keyboards, as well as a Belkin Nostromo N52 (Which I no longer use). I am very concerned that Blizzard considers them a bannable offense. Only, they apparently don't. But they do. But...

    Blizzard is infamous for refusing to give details about exactly WHAT you did wrong when they ban you. As you can see in the emails. "We looked, you're guilty." "of what?" "Being banned." "For?" "Being guilty". "Of?" "Being Banned." "Well, can you review it?" "Ok. You're still guilty." "Of what??" "Of Being Banned." "For..."

    They're unfortunately just asking for a lawsuit in this matter, but... I guess 6 million customers paying $15 a month makes one feel they can get away with anything.

    I suggest you call their headquarters directly. They will tell you to email them instead. Refuse. Be a huge pain in the ass, and don't accept being told to go away. They *are* accountable for disabling your account. Fortunately you are in Europe where their EULA holds MUCH less weight than in the US -- they can't write away your consumer rights, so fight for them!

  51. You were still botting by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It just is a matter of degree. In your view you were not botting as you define it to a scope which your event does not qualify.

    Look, if your not paying attention to the game go do something else. If it is that boring to do what you were doing then why bother? If it is for improvment within the game should you not focus your attention on it.

    Unattended play, botting, macroing. Call it whatever you will.

    If you want a game which will allow you to bot, supposedly only attended, then go play Asheron's Call. Turbine themselves approved of combat automation to the horror of the entire industry.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:You were still botting by tyresyas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh really? Macroing is botting? Is that why programmable macros are a part of the game? He still had to control his character. If anything beyond him hitting that MoB had entered the situation, he would have had to intervene. The extensible UI of WoW lets you automate a TON of tasks. Additionally, the fact that his situation is outside the scope of their TOS definition of botting is a critical distinction. With the extensibility of the game, a clear-cut definition as to what qualifies as botting is very important. If his doesn't meet it, he shouldn't be charged with botting.

      And tell me, holier than thou WoW player, have you never watched a movie while playing? Because in MC I have definitely done nothing but mash frostbolt when the hall trash gets pulled to my group while I sit and watch a movie.

      Blizzard was entirely out of line this time.

    2. Re:You were still botting by Alcilbiades · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I clearly don't think the fellow deserved a ban here. However, I know exactly why he did. Undoubtedly someone ran across him and filed a petition. Then a good GM sent the guy a tell while he was watching his movie leaving his character "unattended" and just pressed buttons. That is really all it takes. If a GM sends you a message in game and you are not responding yet are still taking action in the game you will get the boot. I have reported botters before farming rep in AV. And to be honest if I was a lvl 28 in thousandneedles and some guy appeared to be afk while fighting I would probably report it.

      Its shitty but you have to pay attention to the game at least enough to respond to Bliz tells.

  52. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by VisiX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason it was "mind-numbingly tedious" is because it was unnecessary. He was spamming attack commands to level up weapon skills of weapons he doesn't use. He could easily level up weapon skills against mobs that drop gold and items instead, but he chose to go the automated bot route. I have leveled up weapon skills numerous times without being identified as a bot, because I was actually playing the game and not just pressing buttons with my right hand while I watched a movie.

    I think permaban is a little extreme with no warning, but he was definetly using automated processes to fight mobs. You can blame this on the fact that "the game is boring", but I would argue that it is simply his chosen way to play that made it boring.

  53. How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The game itself allows you to create macros in game through the /m command and then in game you can assign a key to the macro button you just created. Maybe I'm being overly simple here, but to me that would mean that Blizzard does in fact not only allow macros but also assists the player in setting them up?

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? by kscguru · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In other words ... Blizzard allows macros that don't fundamentally alter the game experience. This user used outside equipment (keyboard) to set up macros that do fundamentally alter the gaming experience - allow him to run automated attacks, from what I can read here - and Blizzard banned him for it.

      I don't see this as any more novel than someone getting banned for inserting a graphics driver wallhack. He's violating the spirit of the game (no automated character improvements; you must invest your own time) while trying to weasel around the letter of the rules. Blizzard is vague precisely so that they can ban smartasses like this guy!

      (All that said, I think Blizzard would be better served inventing some other "punishment" for this. Like, if your character spends 20 minutes attacking a critter it shouldn't be able to kill and it looks like you are a bot, some big SLOW nasty spawns and kills you. If you weren't a bot, you could outrun the nasty... but dumbass bot users die. And maybe take an experience penalty too.)

      --

      A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    2. Re:How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? by XenoRyet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      From his writeup, he wasn't using an attack macro, he was using the button to switch equipment. Functionality that is included in legitimate add-ons, and I think supported thru the in-game macros.

      As I gather, he was just using the game's built-in, normal auto-attack feature. While in combat characters will do their plain vanilla attacks at a regular rate for as long as the combat lasts. He was just doing that to an enemy that could heal, and thus would never die to that sort of attack. He didn't alter game mechanics in any way as far as I can tell.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    3. Re:How is Using Macro's Not Allowed? by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Logitech and its not some super secret weapon that allows you to do all these things that you couldn't normally do. Really the best part of it for WoW is that the keyboard has extra keys so you can assign more buttons. You can create macros in game and assign them to a key on a normal keyboard. This is no different and is allowed via WoWs user interface. It isn't against their EULA to assign keys (even a macro to swap weapons) to a keyboard. If this person is telling the truth then he did nothing against their EULA.

      --
      News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  54. Against the EULA by kindbud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EULA is now an enforcerable contract with a fanatical following on Slashdot. Who'd a thunk it?

    I wonder if that will carry over to the next thread about the next change in Microsoft's license terms.

    Has anyone ever established that an EULA is a valid contract in any state?

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  55. hmm... how about mono for .NET by Creepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not sure if mono and WINE are compatible, but mono does provide some .NET functionality on Linux. I have no experience with using it myself, however.

    Where the heck is their support from, anyhow? It looks like 2 Indians and a Russian responded to your e-mails, at least giving a casual glance at the names. It's entirely possible that you're getting outsourced support and they may not be able to do anything directly for you.

  56. Re:Typical SlashDot Mob Blames the Victim by Jack9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe the number of assholes on this thread who are so quick to blame the poor guy who got a permanent ban for no logical cause.

    You don't play WoW. WoW players know that GMs message ppl to detect if they are botting. No response is conviction. Your character gets teleported to GM island and the account gets a ban. After the 3rd ban (increasing duration), yur permbanned. Plz stop talking.

    Ask yourself, why he bothers to mention WINE, Linux, or fails to mention what happened before the letters. This guy is not a victim and he deserves what he got. He made a nice attempt at PR tho.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  57. everybody's forgotten his dnd message by Noishe · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "I had put myself on /DND with the note that I was watching movies and was not paying much attention to the game, which i muted because of the movies I was watching"
    Now afaik, the Blizzard GM's will whisper you if they think you are a bot. And what does dnd do? blocks all whispers and instead sends an automated reply telling them that he is watching movies.

    So someone reports him as botting, gm checks it out, gm get's automated reply saying he's not at the computer while the character continues to attack a mob, he get's banned, end of story.

    Regardless of what he was actually doing, he told a blizzard gm through his dnd message, that he was away from is machine, aka that he was botting.

    Never mind the fact that whether or not he is violating a specific rule of the tos or not, he is clearly violating the spirit in which that rule was made.
  58. Says a lot about WoW... by mattgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If players feel compelled to bot their way through tedium, then it says a lot more about the gameplay (or lack thereof) within WoW than it does about the players. Although, admittedly, they should be a lot more picky about what they choose to waste their time with. (I'm become bored quickly, so MMOs are about as fun as watching paint dry on the wall.) Anyway I don't see anything wrong with hitting macro keys every now and then. At least he's doing *something*, and not just having it run full auto without having to watch.

  59. Credit Card == Bludgeon. by Viv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Carefully examine your case. Consider the TOS and AUP.

    Then, if you really honestly think you have a case, use your credit card's chargeback ability as a bludgeon. If you really think you have a case that you can make, then they'll start talking back if you can convince the credit card company to take your side.

    (Keep in mind that by selling you the software, they *offered* to provide you with continuing service at a certain price. Because RPGs are a character building exercise for some people, that "future service" promise may be considered critical to the original purchase -- a sort of contract if you will. Furthermore, they did not give you a reasonable opportunity for dialog to resolve this issue independant of the credit card company {something the CC company wants} because they communicated with you almost exclusively through the form letters, failing to provide you with any meaningful communication.)

    I don't know how well it will hold up, but getting the credit card company on your side is critical for you. You know how Blizzard can tell you to stuff it, do what it wants, and start ignoring you? Yeah, the credit card company can and will do the same thing to Blizzard -- if you can get them on your side. You're going to have to come up with justification (maybe like mine above) that holds water for charging back to day one. Mine may not hold up, so consider it carefully. But, you can expect someone at Blizzard will start talking if you can convince the credit card company that $200 worth of chargeback is justified.

    Assuming you do get the CC company on your side, even if Blizzard doesn't give you what you want... well, you've got your $200 back ;)

    (You may have to threaten to cancel the card to get what you want, btw. :) It helps if you do high volume on it. I do about $20k/yr on my credit card {paying off as I go}, and they do not play around with me.)

    1. Re:Credit Card == Bludgeon. by honkycat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two comments about this.

      1) Be very careful about issuing a CC chargeback on questionable grounds as it opens the possibility of your committing fraud if your interpretation of what you've been wrongly charged for doesn't turn out to be legally correct. Personally (IANAL), I think you'd be justified if they charged you for the period during which you were banned, but I think it'd be a real stretch to say that you have any legitimate claim for payments for service you already fully received.

      2) If you decide to chargeback, you may not be able to do so for anything you've already paid off. I've done chargebacks to a couple of different cards with different banks and they both advise not to pay a balance that you dispute as you may waive your right to dispute it later. If you do formally dispute a charge in writing, they won't charge interest on that balance.

  60. It was a combination of factors. by NoMercy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading his lists, it seems it's most likley a combination of things, the repeated equal-spaced timed events from the keyboard, in combination with the lack of responsiveness while he was watching movies and yet continuing to preform actions, and the suspicious program list, probably all contributed to them writing him off as a bot.

    Personally I think it's also a fault with the way WoW works, if you can can gain skills by doing trivial tasks repeatidly, the system is broken.. You learn a damn sight more about anything by pushing at the limits of what you can do, the game should reflect that.

    Gold farming's harder to overcome, but coding the game to encourage skill farming?!?!

  61. Macros Allowed by kilox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So Blizzard allows you to script your own Macros through the console, but if you Macro through a keyboard that is botting? Okay then.

  62. Re:It's the keyboard, stupid. - And he was BOTTING by Arathrael · · Score: 2, Insightful
    However what this guy did was a very clearcut case of botting and he deserves what he got.
    Not only was it not a clearcut case of it, it wasn't even botting at all. Botting requires a bot. No bot was involved. Q.E.D. You do know what a bot is don't you?

    And again, it's not as simple as "don't like their rules, don't play". In order to know whether you like the rules, you have to read them and understand them as intended by those who will be enforcing them. That's not simple, particularly when the rules are often dependent on terms not defined, withheld conditions, or not even listed anywhere. And even if someone doesn't like the rules, why exactly shouldn't they play? They may still feel the merits of the game outweighs the rules they don't like.

    But perhaps an actual example would help - since you think it's so simple, could you find the exact rule broken in this case and post it here? :-)
  63. Well, one idea... by Corngood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, educate me on how exactly you design the game 'properly' so that some external hardware device cannot mimic human keyboard commands?

    Maybe make a game that actually requires brain activity to succeed? We're not talking about a chess playing super computer here, or some cutting edge artificial intelligence. This game is exploitable by simple keyboard macros, which shows that it is far too simplistic. It rewards repetitive behaviour, and as a result, suffers from this sort of exploitation.